{"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.14288\/1.0343142":{"https:\/\/open.library.ubc.ca\/terms#identifierAIP":[{"value":"fad4d74a-bcaa-403c-9d0d-f19ffe4c1aea","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/dataProvider":[{"value":"CONTENTdm","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/alternative":[{"value":"DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/isReferencedBy":[{"value":"http:\/\/resolve.library.ubc.ca\/cgi-bin\/catsearch?bid=1198198","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/isPartOf":[{"value":"Sessional Papers of the Province of British Columbia","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/creator":[{"value":"British Columbia. Legislative Assembly","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/issued":[{"value":"2017","type":"literal","lang":"en"},{"value":"[1952]","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/aggregatedCHO":[{"value":"https:\/\/open.library.ubc.ca\/collections\/bcsessional\/items\/1.0343142\/source.json","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/elements\/1.1\/format":[{"value":"application\/pdf","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2009\/08\/skos-reference\/skos.html#note":[{"value":" PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA\nDepartment of Trade\nand Industry\nREPORT\nFor the Year Ended December 31st\n1951\nVICTORIA, B.C.\nPrinted by Don McDiarmid, Printer to the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty\n1952  To His Honour Clarence Wallace, C.B.E.,\nLieutenant-Governor of the Province of British Columbia.\nMay it please Your Honour:\nI beg to submit herewith the Report of the Department of Trade and Industry for\nthe year ended December 31st, 1951.\nALEXANDER DOUGLAS TURNBULL,\nMinister of Trade and Industry.\nOffice of the Minister,\nDepartment of Trade and Industry,\nVictoria, British Columbia. Honourable Alexander Douglas Turnbull,\nMinister of Trade and Industry, Victoria, B.C.\nSir,\u2014I have the honour to submit herewith the Report of the Department of Trade\nand Industry for the year ended December 31st, 1951.\nI have the honour to be,\nSir,\nYour obedient servant,\nEDWIN G. ROWEBOTTOM,\nDeputy Minister of Trade and Industry. Report of the Department of Trade and Industry\nFor the Year Ended December 31st, 1951\nThe year covered by this Report could be termed outstanding in many ways, particularly in the direction of industrial development. During 1951 construction commenced\non the largest single undertaking in the history of British Columbia\u2014the development\nof power in the Tweedsmuir Park area for eventual production of aluminium at Kitimat.\nAlthough this project dwarfs others by comparison, it should not be forgotten that the\nsum total of other developments either under way or under consideration comes close to\nequalling the reported over-all cost of the aluminium development. Construction\ncontracts awarded during 1951 amount to an estimated $385,000,000, compared to\n$81,240,000 in 1950.\nOne of the chief features of this progress is the fact that areas outside the accepted\nindustrial centres are being opened up in the course of primary-resource extraction and\npower-development. A natural sequence will be the growth of manufacturing and service\nindustries in new locations throughout the Province.\nSignificant progress was made during the year by all agencies concerned with the\npromotion of British Columbia manufactures, in the home market and in the export\nmarket. Our products are becoming increasingly better known throughout the world,\nand any return to normal trading must result in increase in the variety and volume of our\nexports. Already the stimulus of production for defence is evident, and this factor will\nhave a telling effect in the months to come.\nBritish Columbia has received an unprecedented amount of favourable publicity\nduring the past year in Canadian, United Kingdom, and foreign publications. These\nunsolicited testimonials reporting developments here have been a welcome addition to\nthe Department's regular schedule of industrial and travel advertising in nationally\nrecognized magazines and newspapers. Many inquiries have been received as a direct\nresult.\nOil discovery occupied the spotlight in the closing months of the year, and while\nmuch remains to be accomplished in this direction, it appears certain that another\nvaluable asset has been added to our list of natural resources. Much credit is due to\nthose companies whose foresight and initiative made this development possible.\nFollowing in this Departmental Report is a full account of the activities of the Office\nof Trade Commissioner, the Bureau of Economics and Statistics, the Regional Development Division, and the British Columbia Government Travel Bureau.\nSPECIAL ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT\nInterdepartmental Industrial Advisory Committee\nThis Committee meets at the call of the Chair to consider industrial problems which\naffect various departments of the Government service.    The Committee has been\nextremely helpful in furthering industrial development throughout the Province.\nThe following is the personnel of this Committee:\u2014\nE. G. Rowebottom, Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry (Chairman).\nI. V. Fisher, Deputy Minister of Finance (Vice-Chairman).\nE. S. Jones, Deputy Minister, Public Works Department.\nDr. J. F. Walker, Deputy Minister of Mines.\n5 Q 6 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nJ. T. Gawthrop, Director, Regional Development Division, Department of\nTrade and Industry.\nC. Hopper, Assistant Deputy Minister of Lands.\nR. Bowering, Public Health Engineer, Branch of Public Health.\nDr. C. D. Orchard, Deputy Minister of Forests.\nG. Melrose, Deputy Minister of Lands.\nW. H. Robertson, Deputy Minister of Agriculture.\nR. S. O'Meara, Trade Commissioner, Department of Trade and Industry.\nT. L. Sturgess, Administrative Assistant, Department of Trade and Industry.\nG. T. Hatcher, Director, Bureau of Economics and Statistics, Department of\nTrade and Industry.\nDr. H. Sargent, Chief, Mineralogical Branch, Department of Mines.\nG. Alexander, Deputy Minister of Fisheries.\nCol. F. T. Fairey, Deputy Minister of Education.\nBRITISH COLUMBIA RESEARCH COUNCIL\nUnder the chairmanship of the Minister of Trade and Industry the Research Council\nheld monthly meetings at which were considered many scientific problems of vital interest\nto the Province.\nIndustrial advancement is contingent upon scientific research, and it is very gratifying to the directors of the Council that industry is taking advantage of the services which\nthe Council provides.\nThe Council was organized in order to perform the following functions:\u2014\n(1) To co-ordinate the work of existing and prospective research units within\nthe Province of British Columbia:\n(2) To initiate and undertake research work in any field of particular interest\nto the Province; to apply the results of research toward the development\nof new products, the improvement of industrial processes, and the establishment of new industries based on the resources of the Province:\n(3) To assist in the development of the technical status of the industries in\nthe Province of British Columbia through a fuller utilization of scientific\nmethods and industrial research:\n(4) To provide fellowships, scholarships, bursaries, and rewards, and pecuniary and other aids, in order to facilitate and encourage original scientific\nand industrial research:\n(5) To provide for the publication of the results of the research work and to\nenter into such arrangements as may be necessary with regard to patents\narising out of the work done by or for the Council.\nDuring 1951 the board of management consisted of the following personnel:\u2014\nChairman\u2014Hon. Leslie H. Eyres, Minister of Railways, Trade and Industry,\nand Fisheries of the Province of British Columbia.\nProvincial Government\u2014\nG. P. Melrose, Deputy Minister of Lands.\nDr. J. F. Walker, Deputy Minister of Mines.\nE. G. Rowebottom, Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry.\nDominion Government\u2014\nC. E. Webb, District Engineer, Water Resources Division, Department of\nResources and Development, Vancouver, B.C.\nDr. R. E. Foerster, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C.\nNational Research Council\u2014Dr. G. M. Shrum, University of British Columbia. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 7\nUniversity of British Columbia\u2014\nDr. W. A. Clemens, professor and head of Department of Zoology.\nProfessor A. H. Finlay, Department of Civil Engineering.\nDr. G. F. Laird, Department of Agronomy.\nIndustry\u2014\nG. A. Barrat, British Columbia Fruit Board.\nS.  J. Hammitt, manager,  Morrison Steel & Wire Company Limited\nVancouver, B.C.\nPrentice  Bloedel, vice-chairman,  Bloedel,  Stewart & Welch Limited,\nVancouver, B.C.\nH. R. MacMillan, chairman, H. R. MacMillan Company Limited, Vancouver, B.C.\nJames Eckman, Canadian Fishing Company Limited, Vancouver, B.C.\nM. M. O'Brien, managing director, Bralorne Mines Limited, Vancouver,\nB.C.\nLabour\u2014H. Neelands, secretary, Typographical Union, Vancouver, B.C.\nEx officio\u2014R. S. O'Meara, Trade Commissioner, Department of Trade and\nIndustry.\nTo provide improved facilities required by the great demand for services, the\nCouncil started construction in the spring of 1951 on the first unit of its permanent\nlaboratories; the new building will be ready for occupancy early in 1952.   While plans\nfor a future expansion of the new building called for the inclusion of pilot-plant facilities,\nthe existing huts are being retained for the present to provide the needed space for all\nlarger-scale experimental work.   The new building will provide for much more efficient\nhandling of the majority of the Council's activities and, in addition, a safe home for\na large part of the valuable laboratory equipment acquired in the years since the Council's\nformation.\nCombined with its better facilities is the ever-increasing background of experience\nof the Council staff, which is a growing asset to the Province and one in which industry\ncan well place its confidence.\nINDUSTRIAL ADVERTISING\nThe Department continued to advertise the opportunities for new industrial enterprise in the Province. This advertising stressed the natural resources of the Province\nand their relation to secondary production.\nThe advertisements were placed in the following selected publications in Canada\nand United States: Fortune, Newsweek, Time, U.S. News & World Report, Nation's\nBusiness, Business Week, Time (Canadian), Canadian Business, Industrial Canada,\nSaturday Night, and Financial Post.\nThe results of this campaign have been most gratifying, and from the inquiries\nreceived, it is evident that world-wide attention was drawn to the advantages of British\nColumbia.\nCO-OPERATIVE CONTACTS\nThe Department has consistently co-operated with the British Columbia Boards of\nTrade, Chambers of Commerce, and the British Columbia Division of the Canadian\nManufacturers' Association, and the assistance which these organizations have so\nwillingly and cheerfully provided is appreciated.\nNEW INDUSTRIES AND PRODUCTS\nThe past year has brought additions to British Columbia's fast-growing list of\nmanufactured products, and if inquiries dealt with by the Department are any indication, Q 8 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nthe very satisfactory rate of increase will be continued. Mention has been made in\nprevious Reports of the general trend toward full utilization of waste material from\nprimary and even secondary production. Of interest in this connection is the production\nof boiler compound from cedar waste. Experiments with this new material have proved\nsatisfactory, and it would appear that a use has been found for a by-product formerly\nburned as waste.\nFirst-class ladies' nylon hosiery is now being produced at Victoria for the first time\nin British Columbia. Dry-ice production is another item of interest. This product may\nquite possibly find an important market in the United States. Domestic and commercial\nlock-sets are now being produced in quantity, with a good market locally and in Eastern\nCanada. This plant started operation in 1951 on a partial manufacture and assembly\nbasis, but volume of sales has occasioned plans for full manufacture.\nAn interesting development is the plans of a large plumbing-fixture firm to establish\na manufacturing plant in this Province. Of outstanding interest is the coming into\nproduction of the high alpha pulp-mill at Port Edward near Prince Rupert. High alpha\npulp is the raw material for rayons, plastics, cellophane, and explosives.\nLesser items, but nevertheless important from a production point of view, are\nnovelty lamp-bases, hammers, saws, television equipment, figurines, chemicals, sportswear, construction equipment, pottery, and lingerie. All these items point to an ever-\nwidening circle of diversified production\u2014a diversity that will stand the Province in good\nstead if there should be some recession from the high peaks attained in the past few years.\nThere is continuing interest in basic steel production from British Columbia iron\nores, particularly in view of shipments of this commodity to foreign smelters. A steel-\nmill producing some forms of structural steel would be a great asset to the Province-wide\nexpansion programme.\nDuring trips to Eastern Canada contacts were made by Departmental officials with\nfirms interested in establishing branch plants in British Columbia.\nINDUSTRIAL AND TRADE REPRESENTATIVE, BRITISH\nCOLUMBIA HOUSE, LONDON\nThe work at the London office of the Department of Trade and Industry at British\nColumbia House maintained a high level of activity for the same reasons as pertained\nin the previous year.   These factors are as follows:\u2014\n(1) The interest in the Province as a sphere for industrial enterprise;\n(2) The continuing urge of those engaged in trade and industry to transfer\ntheir present activities to other parts of the Commonwealth;\n(3) The increase in purchases of British Columbia products by British\nministries and departments, and those firms who have been authorized\nto conclude private trading agreements;\n(4) The continuing trade and business emigration inquiries from Continental\ncountries.\nBusiness Emigration\nMany inquiries were received from prospective emigrants who wish to become\nestablished in business or industry in British Columbia.\nThese inquiries were, in almost every case, made by people of substantial means\nwith a wealth of trading experience or industrial skill and mainly of the managerial type.\nThe regulations regarding the transfer of sterling to Canada were slightly relaxed\nin May, 1951, where they affected individual monetary transfers. This helped to a small\ndegree in easing the problems of the business emigrant where the emigration of his family\nwas a factor. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 9\nThe British Treasury has recently been sympathetic toward the transfer of more\nsubstantial blocks of sterling for the actual setting-up of branch plants or new businesses.\nIn the latter part of 1951 some applicants had already received authority for transfers\nof this kind, and it is expected that more such authorizations will follow.\nBritish Columbia-United Kingdom Trade\nThe flow of British goods to Canada was somewhat retarded in the first half of 1951\ndue to the shortage of raw materials created by defence commitments and the uncertainties of the political situation in Britain. However, the London office maintained\na constant search for British goods that have sales possibilities in Western Canada.\nUp to the end of November, 1951r sixty-eight agency offers were forwarded to Victoria\nfor inclusion in the Trade and Industry Bulletin which is issued each month.\nThe year 1951 showed a substantial increase in the number of British firms who\nhave included British Columbia in their itinerary when making sales surveys of Canada.\nDuring the year a number of representatives of British Columbia firms visited the\nUnited Kingdom and the Continent. Introductions were arranged to manufacturers,\nsupply-houses, ministries, etc., to facilitate quick delivery of the supply of raw materials\nto British manufacturers, so that British Columbia orders could be executed.\nThe Dollar Convention held at Eastbourne in March, 1951, laid the basis for an\nincrease in purchases for British Columbia food products and manufacture by British\nministries and by private traders. Purchases of British Columbia lumber were considerably higher than for 1950. Selected private traders in the United Kingdom were\npermitted this year to purchase British Columbia apples direct. Indications are that\nthere will be an increase in purchases of metals.\nTrade Fairs and Exhibitions\nThe Festival of Britain was responsible for a large increase in visitors from the\nProvince to London during 1951. Many of these visitors also availed themselves of the\nopportunity of attending trade fairs and exhibitions in other parts of the country. Tickets\nwere provided and introductions arranged for such visitors.\nThe Industrial and Trade Representative in London attended all exhibitions and\ntrade fairs which had a bearing on British Columbia trade or requirements. These\nexhibitions included agriculture, machinery, engineering, food, housing, machine tools,\ntextiles and clothing, public works, industrial management, etc.\nNew Industries and Branch Factories\nThe number of inquiries from manufacturers who are interested in British Columbia\nas a location for a branch plant or the prospects for licence manufacture agreements\nunderlines the fact that the West Coast of Canada is favourably regarded as a sphere for\nsecondary industry.\nApplicants of this kind are generally manufacturers of consumer goods which have\nproved to be readily saleable in Great Britain and the Dominions, but who find that\nscarcity of raw materials and other restrictions prevent an output sufficient to supply the\nneeds of agents in Canada and other export markets; hence their desire to locate\nsomewhere in the Commonwealth, and the reports of the rapid growth of British\nColumbia lead them to consider the Province as an excellent sphere for this expansion.\nAlthough the British Treasury is showing a more lenient attitude toward applications\nfor transfers of capital to establish branch factories in Canada, the amounts authorized\nare still not sufficient to finance the building of factory premises. If building space could\nbe offered to these British firms at low rentals along the same lines as the industrial\nestates now operating so successfully in Britain and at the Slough Trading Estate recently Q 10 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nestablished in Ajax, Ont, it is felt that a good number of smaller factories could be\nestablished throughout the Province. These factories should be assets to the adjacent\ncommunity, ensure year-round payrolls, and, as they are mostly the secondary-industry\ntype, fill in the gaps of the economy of British Columbia.\nStill the most feasible method for British firms to gain access to the Western\nCanadian market is to conclude licence manufacture agreements with already-established\nBritish Columbia firms. Details of such proposals were forwarded throughout the year\nto Victoria for inclusion in the Trade and Industry Bulletin.\nInquiries from Continental firms\u2014mainly from Holland and Switzerland\u2014continue\nto be received. These moves to expand their sphere of interest is prompted by the\nuncertain European situation and because the post-war shortage of practically all\nmanufactured goods led to a remarkable degree of prosperity and the building-up of\ncapital reserves, especially in Holland, Belgium, Western Germany, and Switzerland.\nDetails of such inquiries were forwarded throughout the year to Victoria.\nLiaison with Other Canadian Institutions in United Kingdom\nVery close contact was maintained with Canada House, Provincial offices, branches\nof Canadian banks, and Canadian business institutions. Especially through contacts\nwith banks, the emigration of business or professional men is facilitated. Branches of\nCanadian banks in the United Kingdom are specializing in affording facilities for\nindustrial and trading moves into Canada.\nVisit to the Province\nThe Industrial and Trade Representative from London visited British Columbia\nduring June and July, 1951. The visit was largely taken up with a group of prospective\nBritish investors; the arrangements for this survey were made in the United Kingdom\nprior to his departure. The visit enabled him to refresh his contacts with Government\ndepartments and business organizations throughout the Lower Mainland, Vancouver\nIsland, and the Okanagan Valley.\nINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FUND\nStatement of Loans Outstanding at December 31st, 1951\nPrincipal Interest\nB.C. Livestock Exchange Limited  $3,000.00 $101.71 DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 11\nOFFICE OF TRADE COMMISSIONER\nPRIME OBJECTIVES\nThe office has helped in a co-ordinated effort of detailed planning, as follows:\u2014\n(1) For new industrial establishment:\n(2) For plant extensions:\n(3) For overseas and domestic market surveys:\n(4) For practical application of research results:\n(5) For adequate regional participation  in prime  defence  contracts  and\ndefence sub-contracts:\n(6) In selected phases of public relations.\nDetails under some of these headings are contained elsewhere in the Report.\nAll the work was carried out in co-operation with other Provincial departments in\nBritish Columbia, Dominion Government departments, and departments of other Provincial Governments throughout Canada, and commercial organizations in the Province.\nThe objectives are definitely related to the functions of the Department's Regional\nDevelopment Division, and to background statistics and marketing data which are\navailable through the Department's Bureau of Economics and Statistics.\nLIAISON WITH DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND COMMERCE\nSome of the liaison work with Ottawa is cleared through the office of the Western\nRepresentative of the Dominion Department of Trade and Commerce (Foreign Trade\nService) in Vancouver. Other contacts are effected direct. The Vancouver office uses\nthe Office of Trade Commissioner, Victoria, as a central contact to ensure the closest\nco-operation with Provincial units, and with Commercial Counsellors, Commercial\nSecretaries, and Trade Commissioners overseas.\nOTHER OTTAWA CONTACTS\nReference should also be made to other contacts, as follows:\u2014\n(1) Industrial Development Bank:\n(2) Export Credits Insurance Corporation:\n(3) Canadian Standards Association:\n(4) National Research Council and Federal departments concerned with\nindustrial research:\n(5) Purchasing Agents of foreign Governments:\n(6) Purchasing structure of the Department of Defence Production:\n(7) Defence Planning Staff.\nNATIONAL PREPAREDNESS PROGRAMME\nContract Awards\nThe Trade Commissioner continued close liaison with the Canadian Commercial\nCorporation in the matter of defence contract awards, to protect the interests of British\nColumbia suppliers.\nThe Canadian Commercial Corporation, now a purchasing unit of the Department\nof Defence Production, maintains direct contact with the Trade Commissioner's Office,\nand general policy of contract awards is discussed and cleared through a small committee,\nwith headquarters in Vancouver and recognized at Ottawa. The Provincial Trade\nCommissioner is a member of this committee. Effective contact at Ottawa is maintained\nwith the Director, Small Industries Division, Department of Defence Production. Q 12 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nInformation Available\nThe following types of information are now immediately available at Victoria or\ncan be secured on short notice, in co-operation with the committee in Vancouver:\u2014\n(1) Prime contracts awarded through the purchasing structure of the Defence\nProduction Department over given periods, where value exceeds $10,000\nand listings of \" letters of intent\" for larger purchases and allocations:\n(2) Smaller contract awards, foodstuffs, etc., cleared through the district\noffices of the Canadian Commercial Corporation, which offices are now\nknown as liaison offices of the Department of Defence Production\u2014one\nin Vancouver and one for the Island in Victoria:\n(3) Information for Canadian sub-contractors on United States procurement\nin Canada:\n(4) Lists of prime contractors who may have sub-contract work available:\n(5) Equipment, facilities, etc., in selected plant locations, especially for\nsmaller industries or for proven idle facilities in larger plants:\n(6) Selected \"invitations to tender\"\u2014not published:\n(7) Confidential \" contract demands \" by Department of National Defence:\n(8) Information on priorities affected by the controlled-materials plan in the\nUnited States:\n(9) Information on priorities, controls, etc., for materials supply from\nCanadian sources:\n(10) Samples for inspection by prospective contractors. The most practical\nway of handling sample displays was under regional consideration at the\nclose of the year:\n(11) Charts, etc., covering the set-up of the new Department of Defence Production and the Associated Crown Company, Department of Defence\nConstruction:\n(12) A listing of personnel and staff changes in the Department of Defence\nProduction.\nRepresentations\nThe Office of Trade Commissioner and the Department of Trade and Industry have\nstressed the following points as far as British Columbia is concerned:\u2014\n(a) Equitable basis of quotations, to allow prices f.o.b. places of delivery\nwhere possible:\n(b) Allocations to split larger volume purchases so that local deliveries can\nbe handled by local production, where practicable:\n(c) Procurement of sub-contracting supplies, especially for the ship-building\nindustry and ship-repairs, from local sources.\nPrice differential has been a deterrent factor.\nThe Trade Commissioner's Office subscribed to an over-all interprovincial brief\npresented to Ottawa by the Trade and Industry Council.\nAllied to the efforts in connection with war contracts is the work of the Trade Commissioner's Office in assistance to firms to secure equitable allocations of controlled\nmaterials for normal operations when the plant is not participating in war contracts.\nINTERPROVINCIAL CO-OPERATION\nThe Trade Commissioner represents the Province of British Columbia through the\nDepartment of Trade and Industry on the Provincial Governments Trade and Industry\nCouncil, which was created at the Montebello meeting in September, 1950, following an\norganization meeting at Lindsay, Ont., September, 1949. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 13\nA successful meeting of the Council was held at Banff, September 17th to 20th,\n1951, when the British Columbia position was reported under a number of headings.\nChief interprovincial items on the agenda included the following:\u2014\n(1) Future organization of the Provincial Governments Trade and Industry\nCouncil:\n(2) Impact of the defence programme on the National economy:\n(3) Canadian International Trade Fair:\n(4) Special co-ordinated industrial surveys:\n(5) Co-operation with chartered banks and with industrial departments of\nthe railways.\nAlberta, as host Province, extended many courtesies and full co-operation.\nThe Trade Commissioner presented a summary report of industrial progress in\nBritish Columbia, which is included as appendix in the published proceedings.\nEXPORT SURVEYS\nA main function of the Office continues to be assistance to industry groups and\nindividual firms in connection with their export problems.\nWhile the charting of our export trade during 1951 shows an all-time high for value\ntotal, producers and manufacturers are still facing a number of difficulties, with particular\nreference to the dollar situation and resultant curb on exports to the sterling area.\nThe Office of Trade Commissioner during the year made a survey by special letter\nto a selected list of some 200 manufacturers. From this a table of exportable commodities is being compiled, and assistance and advice have been given in a number of cases\nwhere problems have been presented.\nINTERNATIONAL TRADE FAIR\nCommittee Organization\nThe Trade Commissioner again served during 1951 as co-convener of the Fair\ncommittee in charge of all British Columbia arrangements for the Canadian International\nTrade Fair. This included survey and action for exhibitor, buyer and visitor participation, and for special phases of publicity and public relations connected with the Fair.\nReference is made elsewhere in this Report to the Department of Trade and Industry's\nDepartmental exhibit.\nPlans for 1952 were well under way at the close of the year.\nThe Department of Trade and Industry had already agreed to active participation,\nand the appointment of a field representative working with the local committee ensures\na cross-section survey of exhibitor and buyer prospects in the Province.\nThe Department, through the committee, has received the active co-operation of\ntrade groups, Canadian Manufacturers' Association, and Boards of Trade. The administrator of the Fair from Toronto headquarters paid two visits to the Province during the\nyear.\nDepartmental Exhibit\nFor the second year the Department of Trade and Industry entered an exhibit at\nthe Trade Fair held at Toronto, May 28th to June 8th, 1951. The exhibit is constructed\nwith British Columbia plywoods and is a pictorial and statistical presentation of this\nProvince's industries and progress. It commanded marked attention and compared\nfavourably with other Provincial exhibits. Hundreds of inquiries were received for\ninformation on all aspects of our economy. Many inquiries concerned settlement, travel,\nand employment, while many valuable contacts were made for branch-plant, office, or\nwarehouse establishment. Sources of supply for British Columbia products were provided in many cases. Q 14\nBRITISH COLUMBIA\nH\ntt.\no\nS\nx\nM    \u00ab\nW    I.\n>. m\nX \u00b0\n\u00a7\"\u00b0\nS S\nW.2\n> 3\nH 2\n< c\nDE\nPAR\nTME\nNT 0\nF TI\nIADE\n: AN]\n_) INI\nDUST\nRY\n640\n600\n\/\n560\n\/\n\/\n520\nCUMULATIVE MONTHLY EXPORTS\nPassing Through British Columbia Customs Ports\n1946.   1947.   1948.   1949.   1950.   19511\n480\n440\n\/\/\n\/\n\/\/\n400\n\/\n160\n\/ \/\n\/\nV<1\n\/\n280\n\/\n'\/\n\/\n\/\n\/\n?40\n\/\n\/\/\n\/\/\n. \/\nZOO\n160\n\/\n\/V\n80\n^\/\n40\n1951\n1949\n 19*7\nI9EO\n10A6\n[948\n0\nJAN.\n' 19S! Figures Subjei\nJULY       AUG.\nSEPT.        OCT.        NOV. DEC.\nsh Columbia Bureau of Economics and Statistic). 650\n600\n550\n500\n450\n400\ni     350\no\nQ\no\n-\no\n3     300\n250\n200\n150\n100\n50\n0\n19\nDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY                                  Q 15\nBRITISH COLUMBIA\nEXPORTS\nPassing Through British  Columbia Customs Ports\n1930-1951\nj\n0                   1932                1934                 1936                1938                 1940                1942                 1944                 1946                 1948                 1950    19\n9.1 Figures Subject to Revision                                                                                                                  Y E ARS\n51 Q 16 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nThirty-eight countries were represented by almost 3,000 exhibits, occupying a total\nof 159,429 square feet. The total attendance was 79,889, made up by 35,364 business\nregistrations and 44,525 public admissions.\nThe Department organized a group of British Columbia business-men who visited\nthe Fair as a body. The British Columbia exhibit was headquarters for this delegation,\nand direct results were obtained in business contacts with exhibitors. This delegation,\nheaded by the Deputy Minister, was suitably received and entertained by the Province\nof Ontario and the Trade Fair administration.\nINDUSTRIAL RESEARCH\nThe Trade Commissioner has continued to serve ex officio on the board of management of the British Columbia Research Council. He has assisted through the year in\nadvisory capacity on industrial panels. The Office continues to act as a clearing-house\nfor application of research results, and assists in acquainting industry with improved and\nenlarged facilities offered by the Council.\nINDUSTRIAL DESIGN\nThe Trade Commissioner is Chairman of the British Columbia Industrial Design\nCommittee. Membership of the Committee includes representation from the Department of Trade and Industry, Department of Education, University of British Columbia,\nCanadian Manufacturers' Association, Vancouver Board of Trade, Vancouver School of\nArt, British Columbia Research Council, and the Dominion Department of Trade and\nCommerce.\nThe Committee has co-operated with the National Industrial Design Committee in\nlocal planning, and was directly responsible for a successful industrial-design exhibition at\nWoodward Stores in Vancouver during February. It has assisted in publicity and public\nrelations, to encourage appreciation of industrial design and its importance as a factor\nin production and marketing of British Columbia products.\nIn co-operation with the Department of Education and the Vancouver School Board,\nthe Committee organized a successful series of vocational classes during 1951, and a\nspecial committee is laying plans for similar courses next year.\nThe Committee has started to build up reference libraries on industrial design.\nIt has assisted in local planning for two national design competitions sponsored by\nindustry.\nDirect financial assistance was secured from the National Gallery, Ottawa, with\nsmaller contributions from British Columbia sources. Mr. R. D. Cameron has continued\nas executive secretary of the Committee. Two members of the Provincial Committee are\nmembers of the National Committee.\nHANDICRAFT PRODUCTION\nA revised edition of the Directory of Handicraft Producers and Products was published in 1951. As in 1950, this Directory listed producers in British Columbia known\nto be interested in finding a market and in a position to supply reasonable demands.\nDistribution of the Directory was made to retail and wholesale firms as a guide for any\nhandicraft items they might wish to purchase. Additional distribution was made in\nEastern Canada and the United States. Through the co-operation of a Vancouver supply-\nhouse, the opportunity was taken to distribute an invitation to many handicraft workers\nto send in particulars of production for listing in next year's Directory.\nContact was maintained by correspondence with Eastern Canadian Provinces, some\nof which have extensive educational programmes for handicraft development. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 17\nUNITED KINGDOM SURVEYS\nThe work of the Industrial and Trade Representative at British Columbia House\nis covered in the general section of this Annual Report.\nHe reports to the Office of Trade Commissioner direct in a number of phases of his\nwork. In particular, the Trade Commissioner and the Administrative Assistant have\ncleared the Representative's work under headings of Branch-plant Establishment, Investment Surveys, Special Industrial Surveys, Agency Inquiries, Itineraries, and Introductions.\nTRADE AND INDUSTRY BULLETIN\nThis Bulletin, listing trade inquiries, licence manufacture opportunities, and news of\ngeneral commercial interest, has been published for the past two years. It has been the\nmeans of establishing contact between foreign firms and British Columbia importers and\nmanufacturers. Many of the trade inquiries reach us through our Industrial and Trade\nRepresentative at British Columbia House, London, while the majority of licence manufacture opportunities are supplied by the Industrial Development Division, Department\nof Trade and Commerce, Ottawa.\nPUBLIC RELATIONS AND COMMITTEE WORK\nCo-operation\nThe year has been marked by a series of occasions on which the Trade Commissioner\nrepresented the Department, including the special trip arranged in June for the dedication\nof the cellulose plant in the Prince Rupert area.\nThe Trade Commissioner has attended a number of national and local conventions\nand meetings, and has continued the effective basis of co-operation with foreign consulates and with the Trade Commissioners of Commonwealth countries. Once again\nspecial reference must be made to the happy basis of co-operation with the United Kingdom Trade Commissioner Service and with the offices of the Australian Government\nTrade Commissioner at Vancouver and Ottawa.\nItineraries and Committees\nThe Office of Trade Commissioner has been responsible for itinerary and other\narrangements for business visitors from Eastern Canada and overseas, and visiting trade\nmissions and special industrial-survey parties. It has worked in direct co-operation with\nthe Foreign Trade Service Office in Vancouver for the arrangements in British Columbia\nfor visiting Trade Commissioners and officials from Ottawa.\nThe Trade Commissioner is a member of several standing committees of the Vancouver Board of Trade, and the Office has continued financial assistance to the Transportation Bureau of the Board of Trade to help it serve the smaller Boards of Trade in\nother parts of the Province in a very constructive programme. Q 18 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nREPORT OF THE BUREAU OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS\nBefore proceeding to review the work accomplished by the Bureau of Economics\nand Statistics during 1951, it may be useful to explain that the Bureau is, as its name\nimplies, a fact-finding and advisory body. It has two primary functions: the first is to\nprovide economic counsel and, when necessary, to conduct investigations into economic\nquestions affecting the Province; the second function is to collect and compile economic\nstatistics of interest to the Province.\nIn order to carry out these objectives, the Bureau is divided into the following\ndivisions: Economic research, market research, statistical, and mechanical tabulating.\nTo ensure technical proficiency, the Bureau has endeavoured to follow the policy of\nbuilding up a small corps of professionally trained persons who could be relied upon to\nperform a variety of difficult economic analyses. It has also been the policy to make\nthe services of the technical personnel continuously available to all other departments of\nthe Government.\nSince other Governmental agencies are also concerned with the collection of statistics, a series of working agreements designed to prevent overlapping or duplication has\nbeen arranged in recent years between this Bureau and the Dominion Bureau of Statistics,\nOttawa, as well as with the Provincial Departments of Mines, Labour, Provincial Secretary, and Health and Welfare. During 1951 the essential statistical services performed\nfor the other Provincial departments, as well as for the Department of Trade and Industry,\nwere maintained. Before proceeding with a description of the services performed by the\nvarious divisions during the year, a brief review of business activity in British Columbia\nis presented.\nREVIEW OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY IN BRITISH COLUMBIA\nIt would appear from preliminary statistical returns that business activity in British\nColumbia during 1951 continued upward after reaching new highs in 1950. The basic\nindustries will probably show moderate dollar-value gains over 1950 figures. In addition,\nthe dollar value of production in the manufacturing industries will probably run slightly\nahead of 1950 statistics. It should be mentioned that price increases have again contributed to most of the gains shown. There has been considerable activity in the heavy-\nconstruction industry, with work progressing on many large contracts, such as the\naluminium plant, pulp-mills, schools, public buildings, and public utilities.\nIncomplete returns indicate that the net value of production of primary and\nsecondary industries amounted to some $1,023,000,000* in 1950, as compared with\n$869,201,000f in 1949 and $891,709,000f in 1948.\n* Preliminary estimate.\nt Dominion Bureau of Statistics. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY\nQ 19\nin\nOn\no\nCN\n00\n<\nLU\n>\"\nu\nCD\no\nz\no\nr-\nU\n=>\nQ\nO\n&\nQ-\n<\nQ_\n_D\n1-\n_1\nZ>\nU\n<\n<\n>\n**w\u00bb\u00ab*,*!i:\"\n\"\u2022^i\"\nI      :\n(\u00ab#\"\nrf '>*\n^^\n'i\n\"^>J\n%\u00ab\u00bb\nA.\n\\\nI\u2014\u201e\u2014\ni\ni\n1\n5\n  i\nJf\nM\n\/\n\\\n\\\nTjEfi  *\n| yMf>\n\u00ab,#           ;\n1\n1\n1 77.1.1*\np***\nV\ni     ^ i\n1       \u00a7\nCN\nr-.\n\u25a0<*\nCN\nIT)\ncn\ncn\nn\ncn    (\/l\n\u2014    D_\n<\ntil\nin  >\nco\no\nro\nro\ncn\nm\ncn\no\nvo\no\nm\no\no\nCM\no\no\no\no\no\no\no\no\no\nc_>\nCN\n00\nl\\\n^o\nm\n^t\nCO\n<N\nsyviioa do SNomiw Q 20\nBRITISH COLUMBIA\ntr>\nOn\nO\nH\no\nCN\nCN\n00\n<\nUU\n>\nV\nori\nZ\no\nh-\nu\nD\nQ\nO\nCt_\na.\na:\nLU\nI\nOO\nUL\no\nLU\n_l\n<\n>\nf   I         HP   ;    '\nS\nZ1\n*    |\ni 'Ii\n:ik '\u25a0\u25a0    ,\n7:\n| || 7\n\u00ab\n|\n\"\u25a0                  ii       %\n!Ni^^i\u00a3|j||\nIttA %\n,;|77:1II:;\n^-^J.:|:\n-c   .\nj\u00a7i 1\n\u25a0 \"\u25a0*\u2014\"*%\u00a3\u00a3**\u201e\nv   .\n-\n*\n;f\n\\\n#\nV\n...v.^'\"'*'::     ...\nj\n_,\n\u00a3^fcSK8&&\ngSUCS\n*\n\\ \u25a0\u25a0\nu:;s.\"\u201e::j-;-r^\n\\\n-\n%ts\u00bb^\ni\n\\\n\\\nB\n.7;\u00a77:;: If\nI\nSi\n\u00a3_J\nf\n\\\n1\nv\nJ\n| \\\n1    \\\nI\nii    \u00a7j\u00a7\n**                  ^.:;\ni|\n|:\nL        1\n1\ni^W\n\u25a0 \u25a0     \u25a0\u25a0;\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\nI^T\nin\ncn\nCO\nCN\ncn\ncn\ncn\ncn\n\u00a3__\nin <\nn   lxj\n\u00b0>  >-\nm\nCN\nCM\nCN\nCM\nO\ntn\nCM\no\nCM\nCN\no\no\nO\no\nO\no\no\no\no\no\nOn\n00\nN\nNO\nm\n^r\nCO\nCN\nsavnoa do snoitiiw DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY\nQ 21\nswnoa do SNomiw Q 22\nBRITISH COLUMBIA\nm\nOn\nO\nI-\no\nCN\nOn\nCO\nCL\n<\nLU\n>\u25a0\nU\nca\nZ\nO\nh-\nu\n_D\nQ\nO\nOL\nCl.\nz\n5\nLL.\no\n2\n&:!.:&&:.\nX^\n\"\u25a0'r^&3r\ny,a\/f7\n\/*$*%&\u25a0\n^L\n^\nQ*:\n'\u2022\u2022\u202211\n|^\n,\n4\n. ,.\/s;..:;:ws'...\t\n\u25a0\n^SisS^\n\" \\\n,\/'M;7-                        \u25a0 \u25a0       >:-p\nSM^.    ft        1 s]\nm\n%\u00bb.,, \u25a0 -.   ji-i*\n\\\nPI             N      .\n.     \u00ab\ni.\u21225t.\n\\\n\\Ma \u00a3.:\u25a0 h&tmm.Z-\n\u25a0S                *\nWsf|\nSJt^\n17'tl\n\u2014^y-\n*N\n^H\u2122W\u00ab^1_[\n^\nJm\nin\nCN\no\nV)\n__.\nm <\nro UJ\non  >\nro\nCn\n1-v\nCM\nCN\nin\nCN\no\nro\nCM\nOn\nCM\no\nCO\no\nNO\no\no\no\n00\no\nNO\no\nCM\nsyvnoa do SNomiw DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY\nQ 23\nsavmoa do snoitiiw Q 24\nBRITISH COLUMBIA\nECONOMIC        INDICATORS       IN        BRITISH       COLUMBIA\nEMPLOYMENT\na\na\n2\n2 '20\nz\n60\n111=\n-  100\n1940 1942\n1944        1946\nYEARS\n1948        1950\n1\nBANK DEBITS\n0\n9\n?,\n1\n0\nINTERNAL TRADE\n1200\nRETAIL TRADE\n1000\ncn\nOS\n<\n\u2022i  800\n0\na\nfc 600\nw\nZ\n2 400\nS 200\n0\n0.\nc_ 300\nl-l\nBQ\n2\nP\n2 200\n1940 1942        1944 1946        1948 1950\nYEARS\nWHOLESALE SALES\n\/\nS\n1935-1939 =\n10C\n1940        1942        1944       1946\nYEARS\n1948 1950\n1942        1944 1946       1948       1950\nYEARS\n6.0\nCONSUMPT\nON OF ELECTP\nICAL POWER\na 4.5\ni\nu.\nO 3.0\n2\nO\nJ\n*'\u25a0>\n0\n1940 1942\n1944 1946\nYEARS\n12.0\n10.5\n1948        1950\nSALES OF LIFE INSURANCE\n1940 1942\n9.0\nZ.\nJ\nS  3.0\n1944 1946\nYEARS\n1948        1950\nFREIGHT LOADED\n1940 1942\n1944 1946        1948        1950\nYEARS\n1951 Figures Subject to Revision DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY\nQ 25\nECONOMIC       INDICATORS       IN       BRITISH       COLUMBIA\n250\n225\n200\n175\n150\n125\n100\n75\n50\n25\nRETAIL PRICES\nPRICES\n(INDEX NOS.)\n193\n-19\n9 =\n00\n250\nWHOLESALE PRICES\n225\n200\n175\n150\n125\n100\n1935-1939 =\n100\n75\n50\n?5\n0\n1939   1941    1943   1945   1947   1949\n1951\n1939 1941 1943 1945 1947 1949\nCONSTRUCTION\n(in Millions of Dollars)\n500\n450\n400\n350\n300\n250\n200\n150\n100\n50\nVALUE\nOF\nCONTRACTS AWARDED\n\u25a0\n___i ^\t\nVALUE\nOF\nBUILDING PERMITS\n90\n80\n70\n60\nsn\n\/\n40\n\/\n30\n?n\n10\n0\n*\n1939 1941 1943\n1945 1947\nYEARS\n1949 1951\n1939 1941        1943\n1945 1947\nYEARS\n1949 1951\n1938--58 Municipalities Reporting\n1940-1946--204 Municipalities Reporting\n1947-1951--507 Municipalities Reporting\n1951 Figures Subject to Revision Q 26\nBRITISH COLUMBIA\nTable 1.\u2014Economic Activity in British Columbia, 1949 and 1950,\nwith Preliminary Estimates for 1951\nUnit or\nBase\nPeriod\n1951\nPreliminary\nEstimates8\n1950\n1949\nMining\u2014\nTotal value of production1..\nGold production1\t\nSilver production1 \t\nCopper production1\t\nLead production1\t\nZinc production1 \t\nCoal production1. \t\nForestry\u2014\nTotal value of production2..\nTimber scaled2\t\nPaper production2 \t\nFisheries\u2014\nTotal value of production6..\nPack of canned salmon3\t\nAgriculture\u2014\nTotal value of production1..\nApples\u2014\nTotal shipments4 \t\nDomestic shipments4\u2014\nExport shipments4-\t\nExternal trade\u2014\nExport of canned salmon5..\nExport of planks and boards, Douglas fir5..\nExport of red-cedar shingles5\t\nInternal trade\u2014\nIndex of wholesale sales5  \t\nTotal retail sales5. _ \t\nDepartment stores .\nFood-stores\t\nGasoline consumed6 .\nRailway freight loaded in British Columbian-\nConsumption of electric power5 \t\nSales of life insurance5   \t\nConstruction\u2014\nContracts awarded5\u2014.- _ _\t\nBuilding permits issued   _.\t\nFinance\u2014Bank debits   -\t\nTourist trade\u2014\nAutomobile entries on sixty-day permits5 _\nEmployment\u20145\nAll employment   - \t\nManufacturing    _ \t\nIron and steel products _\nLumber products\t\nPulp and paper __\t\nTextile products \t\nOther manufacturing \t\nMining  \t\nLogging\nConstruction .\t\nCommunication -\nTransportation -\nServices \t\nTrade\t\nSalaries and wages7\u2014\nMB.M.\nTons\nCases\nBoxes\nBoxes\nBoxes\nCwt.\nMFt.\nSq.\n1935\u201439=100\n000$\n000$\n000$\nGallons\nTons\n000 Kwh.\n000$\n000$\n000$\n000$\nNumber\n1926=100\n1926 = 100\n1926=100\n1926=100\n1926=100\n1926 = 100\n1926=100\n1926 = 100\n1926=100\n1926=100\n1926=100\n1926=100\n1926=100\n1926=100\n$\n165,000,000\n525,000,000\n4,420,000\n90,000,000\n1,955,475\n155,000,000\n401.0\n1,130,000\n120,000\n223,000\n172,000,000\n11,840,000\n4,220,000\n136,000\n400,000\n85,000\n10,250,000\n250,000\n210.0\n750,000,000\n148,155,060\n11,404,270\n7,666,151\n9,889,458\n44,391,530\n48,882,765\n10,025,626\n468,371,142\n4,560,080\n477,628\n68,821,358\n1,482,560\n136,690,400\n7,051,622\n3,179,228\n3,872,394\n322,062\n1,146,805\n2,881,584\n351.3\n1,050,054\n113,273\n194,389\n155,363,848\n10,834,135\n3,960,698\n124,280\n81,200\n86,644\n8,446,567\n221,642\n202.0\n219.5\n233.4\n203.8\n212.8\n257.0\n233.5\n121.9\n174.6\n182.5\n229.5\n156.7\n229.0\n276.7\n695,000,000\n133,012,968\n10,911,780\n5,669,769\n10,956,550\n41,645,726\n36,604,700\n12,462,424\n331,589,549\n4,049,682\n462,282\n56,456,260\n1,433,723\n139,960,563\n6,742,203\n3,046,298\n3,695,905\n414,259\n824,097\n2,121,636\n332.1\n940,030\n108,860\n186,640\n142,365,704\n10,394,827\n3,601,317\n110,976\n79,429\n89,293\n7,540,592\n214,805\n200.4\n213.9\n239.5\n190.0\n219.7\n241.8\n228.8\n113.3\n165.0\n195.2\n213.9\n158.2\n243.3\n278.1\n671,980,815\n1 British Columbia Department of Mines.\n2 British Columbia Department of Lands and Forests, Forest Service.\n3 British Columbia Department of Fisheries.\n4 British Columbia Department of Agriculture.\n5 Dominion Bureau of Statistics.\n6 British Columbia Department of Finance.\n7 Bureau of Economics and Statistics, Labour Division.\n8 Subject to Revision. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 27\nECONOMIC RESEARCH DIVISION\nOne of the major functions of this Division is providing economic counsel to the\nGovernment. In line with this objective, numerous projects and reports have been\ncompleted during the past year for various departments. In particular, considerable\nassistance was given to the following branches of the Government (involving in some\ncases loan of staff): Regional Development Division, Department of Finance, Attorney-\nGeneral's Department, and the Department of Labour.\nIn addition to work done for Government departments, hundreds of requests of an\neconomic and statistical nature have been received from private individuals, corporations,\nnewspapers and business publications, and Boards of Trade. These requests covered\na wide range of topics, too numerous to detail individually. In some cases these inquiries\ncall for the provision of statistical information readily available from our files and library.\nIn other cases they require lengthy tabulations and a considerable amount of research.\nThe helpful co-operation of the staff of the Provincial Library and other departments of\nthe Government is worthy of mention in this regard.\nAs a means of providing statistical information indicating economic activity and\ntrends in the Provincial economy, this Division publishes the Monthly Bulletin. This\npublication is circulated to various Government departments, as well as to libraries and\nnewspapers throughout the Province. It is also sent, upon request, to financial institutions and business and industrial firms.\nIn conjunction with the above publication, The Summary of Business Activity is\nassembled each year. It presents annual statistics on production and trade within the\nProvince for the years 1920 to the latest available estimates and provides a historical\nrecord of economic development within the Province.\nSpecial Surveys\nWage-rate Surveys\nEarly this year, at the request of the Civil Service Commission, this Division conducted a survey of current wage rates and working conditions to determine the extent to\nwhich terms of employment vary within the Province. The survey covered selected\noccupations in sixteen major British Columbia centres. Questionnaires were sent to the\nmunicipalities and a sample of business and industrial firms. Information pertaining to\nhospital employees was obtained from the British Columbia Hospital Insurance Service.\nThe returns of the Vancouver Board of Trade Clerical Salary Survey were again\ncompiled by this Division. This survey provides a most useful source of information\nregarding clerical wage rates in the Greater Vancouver area.\nDuring the past year, arrangements were completed with the Department of Labour\nto provide us with the latest collective-bargaining agreements. From these we obtain\ncurrent union wage rates and information on working conditions. The information compiled in this regard is used by many departments.\nComparative Analysis of Provincial Government Expenditures\nAgain this year a short study was carried out comparing on a functional basis the\nexpenditures of the Canadian Provinces. As a means of improving the research in this\nfield, exploratory work was undertaken by two graduate students working during the\nsummer months. Their work will no doubt prove valuable in refining and extending\nour research in the field of Governmental expenditures.\nAs in previous years, this Division has compiled for the Labour Relations Board\na directory of trade unions and other employee associations showing their membership\nand affiliation. An analysis of the distribution of trade-union membership by industrial\ncategories and other significant characteristics of union membership is also provided. Q 28 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nSTATISTICAL DIVISION\nThis Division is responsible for the collection, compilation, analyses interpretation,\nand publication of statistical information. Also, it is the duty of this Division to assist\nother departments in the compilation of statistical information and to establish uniform\nstatistical methods throughout the service. In addition, this Division co-operates with\nother statistical bureaux in the elimination of duplication and answers inquiries relating\nto statistical data.   Following is a brief outline of the statistics compiled in this Division.\nExternal Trade of British Columbia\nThe agreement between this Bureau and the External Trade Branch, Dominion\nBureau of Statistics, consummated in the fall of 1938, has continued in force. Under\nthis agreement the Bureau receives monthly a duplicate set of punch-cards showing in\ndetail the importation and exportation of every commodity normally listed in the Federal\ntrade reports which has been recorded at customs ports located in this Province. While\nthese records do not distinguish the exported merchandise originating in British Columbia\nnor the imports destined for consumption in this Province from the other goods passing\nthrough these customs ports, the records do provide the basis for a very comprehensive\nannual report on the foreign trade of British Columbia.\nPreliminary statements showing the external trade through British Columbia customs\nports covering commodities with an aggregate value of $50,000 and over are now\npublished annually. Until June, 1950, detailed monthly statements were also published.\nFor reasons of economy, this publication has now been condensed and combined with\nan abbreviated form of another discontinued publication, Business Activity, to form the\nmajor components of the Bureau's Monthly Bulletin.\nThe discontinuance of fairly detailed monthly published external-trade figures has\nresulted in increased requests for import and export information, which has been supplied\nto all inquirers. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY\nQ 29\ns\n\"S3\n2\na,\n\u25a0S\n\u25a0S\ns\n-3\n\"o\nO\n\"C\n.2\ne\na\no\n\u00b0^\n^^\nJBt\ntq >\nr-_      \"3\n\"5 a\n\u00ab\u00bb   ,\nI\"?\n-, Os\n2 \u00a7\nON*\n\u2022t. -s:\n\u00b0   fc\no\no\n\u25a0*-_\na\n\u2022I\n3\n-a\noo Os cs o\ncs o\nco r^ vc\nt-\noscS'tcScncsrHTho\no\n00\\\u00ab\u00abr\"iHTfm^\nNO\no\nCMnntMrnmoUi\n>o\ntn\nOscsONOTfr-ii-.rorH\nr^\nOs\nOp-ji-i>-H'-hOC-00O\nTI\ncn cn      OrHmNrnm\nCS\nTh m      io      io      cs\n\u00ab\u25a0             CS\nmr-cncs\u00a9NoooThcn\nVO\nrimsorNinoooi'*\nt:\nq \u25a0* c\u00ab t* io \u00a9^ o ^ no\no\non\nO*r>*(nvo io\" ri en no' no\"\n\u2022*t\nTfOsNDr-ooioiOT-Hw-j\n>*\nas\nso oo      CA oo r-> as cn OS\nso Os       en       O CS io (N\n(S\nCS  CN          NO          NO          CS  rH\ncs\n\u00ab\u25a0               rn\ncn\nIO\"OOOOIO*ONOOONO\nOs\nr-cooomoaNcn\u00a90\\\nm\nTj-oo^ioooenosco\u00a9\nCS\nCO\nNOONriOTrr-CSr-QN\n*f\nTh\nNooosor~mrHtj\\oO\n4\nON\noo no      t-rHsor-ocs\nrH\ntj-no      r-rnr-r-csoN\nr-\n(S CS         t-         \u25a0*         CS rH\ncs\n&9-                  rH\nen\nNoooovt-fNencncnoo\nOs\ncsNooNCSOoor-r\u2014oo\nen\nt\u2014 i-.r-NOOrHrn\u00a9t\u2014\nr-\nt-\nONrHCONOfnOOfriOTt\no\"\n\u25a0n-\nONrHI\/-)CSTh\u00a9ThCSr-\nCO\nOV\nTh CS         i-H _> NO rH m t-\nV\nio rn      co      io en rn rn\nOs\ncs m      co      -<fr      (S\n\u00ab\u25a0                 rH\n<fr\n\\D ^O ^t t f* ONiCit\n00\nrHr-ONNOrHNOONOOP-\nr^\novThcsNOThNOONNor-\n00\nvO\nm m \u25a0* Tf in oo v. ON m\n\u25a0\u00abt\nTh\nThT_-ThTh<OOIO,'*NO\nOs\nCS  rH  .-H  NO          00  CS OS_ Th\nr*\nr-T io      <o      Then no ts\nio*\n\u00abH  CS          O          CS          r(H\no\nW\"                 rH\ncs\nrHoor-ONrnmmfnTh\n,H\nt\u2014r-mvocSooONCOTj-\n00\no-^r-r-TfTj-iooNcs\nt-\n<o\nCOrHrONpCSOvlOCOCO\ncSrHcsor^osNcoo'-t\n3\n-tf\nON\n\u2022^J-rHcScncSrHroNDO\nNO\nOs Th        Os        f- CS f- Th\n\u00ab*\nrH   fs|            CO            rH            1-4  en\no\nV*\ncs\nrocsosr-t-r-,o\\orH\nCO\nONcso>oi>rHr~ooo\ncn\ncnmcscSThONONCScn\nTh\nooo\\cniomTh\u00a9csoo\nNO\nT>\n\u00abT rH        i-h Os CO ON en Os\nCO\nas\noo o      Tf      r- on m oo\ncs O       rn       CS CS rH in\nOs\nrH CS         l-         rH         \u00ab-i ^t\nt~-\n\u00ab\u25a0\n(A-\nr-NommNOOsNDcSrH\nm\ncsooooior-io\u00bborH^H\nNO\n\u00bborHO\\cocncnrHOoio\nt*\nen\nOcncsooosioooooos\nNO\"\ntj-\nIO 00        ^tNOH'Jifl\nNO  ON          IO          NO  00  Th  SO\nON\nON\nr-\nio oo      cn      O cs Os oo\nOs\nt\u00ab- rH          SO          CS                   O\nOs\nNOcntNcscSrioo-s-r-\n\u00bbo\nlOrHV^OOIOcnrHOOOS\nON\nOCOHMTthrlOlO\nIO\nCJ\nCnrHr-^'-HoCrH   \u00a9   CO   CO\nTh\n\u00bboeSrH\u00a9cOCSThCSOO\nNO\nOn\nooo     t-h th r- t\u2014 \u00bbo oo\no\nIO   rH            Cn            Tf   rH   Tj  ON\n&9-CS         t>         CS                OO\ncs\ncs\n&9-\nr-ONNOioioONoocs\no\nIOrHOSOsOCSr-OrH\n00\n\u2022*ONCnNOCOt-0O7-HNO\nocnosOooososcsio\no\nTf\nlOTfOsr-ioor-moo\nNO\nOn\ncs\"^-      oscsr-ONom\nCO\nNO ON         ON         IO rH \u25a0<t\nr-\nvs-rH      r-      cs\nm\nOn r- \u25a0* NO\nW-.  Q  O  rH\nio o\\ \u25a0>* r-\ntH\nOs io r- oo\n\u00a9\nno cs m o\nrn r-t in cn\n\u00bbo\np\nr- Os rn en\noo so no r-\nON\nTh\n\u00a9 o no m\nOS  Tf  NO  rH\nen\nOn\nto r^     o^\nm o so m\nr-\nio\" cn     o\"\nCO   rH   -rj\"\ncn\nWn        r-\ncs\ncs\nCQ\na\nu\nu\na\ncd\nSo\no \u2022O\nwi\nX\n:\nT\nC\nc\nS O t.\nCk\n3\no\n1-1\n0\nT\na\nX\nc\n\u2022c\nc\nPa\nd prod\nand pr\nroduct\ns\t\nv\nc\nS\n&\nC   3   t?   w\n5*2 at5^\n\"\u25a0St. 3\nIh\na\n*3\niral and fai\nfishery pre\naxtiles, and\nood produ\nits produc\nous metals\nallic miner\nIs and allie\naeous prod\no\ns\ns\no\n0\nO\nH\nculti\nand\nes, t\nand\n-ferr\n-met\nnica\n:ella:\n<\n1-\nc\nc\n5\nc\nc\n2\n_2 \u2022=\nto\n\"3\n-Cl\ng\n3\no\nU\n-c\n!>_\nV.\n\u00ab3\ns\n\"a\nS\nS\nS\n&_\ne\no\nU\n<*>\n^\n!~.\na\ne\ns\no\no\nCJ\nrt\n3\n? S\nS\n\u2022\u00a3?\"5\nSO\nJ3\nfc, |?\n\"S \"w\n\u00a71\nt*H\no\n' *\\S\n1 s\nIh\n-\u00ab   E_\n3\nCA\na\n^5 s\n.\u25a0S \"o\no\ncq '-i\n0)\n'   <U  Ci\n>S-  lr\\\nJ-\ns s\n5 >\ni o\n3\n\u2022B,^\nO\n\"9    f\nE\ns\no jj\nO\n6.-5\nrt\n\"S   5\nU\nCONOTf-rHcnrHNDcnOO\nOTF-ri-COTj--rJ-OCSt^O\n-OCOrtOsOOTtrHCTslOCn\nm\nm cs cs on o cs ^F\n>o Os\ncsio^-M-NOr-oom\n00\nIO\nm\n\u00ab\u2022\nP\nio r^ io no\nio\nON'^J-'rJ-NOOvNDIOCOOsr-\nNO\nOO\nIO  CO  rH\nr- co ^ so\nt-\noo cn m\nNO \u25a0* CS Os NC\ntn\nrH\nIO \u00ab-H rt\nrH\nv|j in rf co Tt oo io^ ^t io r*\noCcoooocsrHpSTj-ioao\"\nxj-rnNONDTl-t-cnaNioos\nNoiocsiONOrHmcst-r-\nco\" io\" -*t cn\" cn rn' as as no\" On\"\nen rn      m      tj-\n^HCOOONDcnm-rJ-NONOr-\nr-ONiooocoo\u00ab-H^H(STj-\noooosioosoor-cosoio\nrHI^Oo'lOTTNOTt-rJ-'rtNO\nTj-cosocoQ(smr-Ocn\n00^ On^ t> iO_ \u00a9 l> rf Tf rH Ov\nio\" cn\" cn no\" so\" no oo\" no\" no io\"\nmoscSNO\u00a9m\u00a9Tj-io\u00a9\nOsiocn^oscnr-r-isoos\nio Os^ \u00a9^ oo^ t> vo^ rn Ob t*- m^\noomOssocSNor- oo'r-'m\nN0rH\u00a9'rJ-00IO\u00a9cn\u00a900\nN \"* \"-^ cs \u00a9__ r-_ Os^ 0\\ Th os^\nr-^ cn cn\" co Th Th\" Th cs\" tj-\" oT\nisor-io\u00a9csoscnONio\n)Cn(S*OThrHt-\u00a9ON(S\nliooocnThmmiocoio\n\" rn\" tn  rn\" rn\" o\" r-t m\" rn\" cn\n3\u00a9Thr-coosfnThos\u00a9\n)\u00a9coio\u00a9cn\u00a9Ir-NOio\n\" cn\" rn\" io* cn\" \u00a9 tj-\" no\" cn\" as\nt\u2014 oo\nON ON\n0O SO\nloOriThmovOco\nco-rj-mrH^HrnNONo\nOS  IO  Th  NO  t~^cn  rH  (N_\nriocSrHr-Tooo\"ThNo\n)\u2014\"U-lThCS(SrH\u00a9CO\njoorHrnoNNomThrh\n\" r-T so cs\" cs\" Th\" t- cn\" oo\"\nTh oo en as as on \u00bb\ncs no no \u00a9 no r- v\nNO  NO  rH 00 CS  NO  '\n>o i> rn oo\" no oo\"\nm oo cs no cs rn\n\"i. ^ '\"i \u00b0\u00b0_ \u00b0\\ ^\n\u00bbo\" rn\" M oC i-h\" OO'\nNO rH\n\u00a9 CS\nIO *o\nh so m\n1 cs r-\n\"\"- \u00b0\u00b0- \"^\nl> 00\n\u00a9 Os\nO NO\ncn m\ncn no\ntj^cs^\n<s\"cs\"\nNOior-OsenOsNONO\nCSrH\u00a9OsNOr-\u00a9OV\nIO Os^CS CS IO CS NO cs\nNOoCvOIOThSOOOOO\nf- \u00a9SONOCSCOSOIO\nr- Th a^'r-' e^Ov Os \u00a9\nh r-*n cncncncs\"oo\nCS rH rH\nNOThrH(SmNOrHOV\u00a90O\nosovrHoocsrHrncocor-\n\"l ^t *~t 'I \"^ \u00b0i \u00b01 \u00b0i ^ c~~-\ncooNmioNot\u2014 Thmmr\u2014\ncsmThr-Osr-Noior-io\nCOOsOThCOOscnONNOt\u2014\n\u00ab\u25a0\nOOCSrHlnSOIOIOCOmNO\nOscomrHt-rHrnr-csio\nr^Os^r-ioooON_Th\u00a9cs\u00a9\n\u00a9r- t-^r^r-\"ov\"NOThThoC\n>\u2014imvOmOONmNDm\u00a9\n^NOO^CSNDCOCON^\u00a9-^\n(NcnrHincsiocscs cn Th\n\u00ab9\nB   Z\nOJ\nfl a 8.\nSs-a\n^&\u00a7\nE I'i\n.a s o\na \u00a7 &\n\u2022O ^3 T3\nC H O\n\u00ab   __  P\nft?^\n0 w c\nIH     C      C\nrv C\n2SS\n\"* O rt J\n\u2022a h r\nOC3       2\nrt \u00bb_r\n?1   rt\nW   4)   c -\u2122 H\nrt <y C  g  u\nC  0 fl  <u \u00ab\no o Oj:\u00ab Q 30 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nTables 2 and 3 give a brief insight into British Columbia's foreign trade for the\neleven-year period 1940 to 1950. The peak year for exports was 1950, there being\na slight drop in 1949 over 1948. Imports more than doubled since 1945. Preliminary\nfigures for the first six months of 1951 indicate substantial increases in both exports\nand imports.\nTable 4.\u2014Eleven Leading Exports of British Columbia, 1950\nValue\nRank Commodity ($000,000)\n1. Planks and boards, Douglas fir  83.9\n2. Planks and boards, hemlock  37.2\n3. Newsprint   34.3\n4. Lead in pigs, refined -  32.2\n5. Shingles, red cedar  32.1\n6. Planks and boards, cedar  28.7\n7. Cattle   11.8\n8. Zinc spelter  10.1\n9. Ammonium sulphate  8.6\n10. Copper, fine in ore     8.4\n11. Nitrogen fertilizer     8.4\nThe above table indicates the importance of our lumber, mine, and smelter products,\npulp and paper, and live stock.\nBritish Columbia products, exported through all Canadian ports, went to one\nhundred countries in 1950; however, two of these, the United States and the United\nKingdom, bought over 85 per cent of these exports. The shift in our trading pattern\nwith these two nations is brought out by the fact that the United States received 57 per\ncent and the United Kingdom 19 per cent of British Columbia's exports in 1949.\nFurther, ten countries took over 95 per cent of all our exports. These leading customers\nare set out as follows:\u2014\nTable 5.\u2014The Ten Leading Countries to Whom British Columbia\nExported in 1950\nPercentage\nRank Country Value of Total\n1. United States  $325,079,517 78.8\n2. United Kingdom  34,036,217 8.3\n3. Australia   6,752,297 1.6\n4. Hawaii   6,619,748 1.6\n5. Union of South Africa  5,003,097 1.2\n6. Belgium  4,745,390 1.2\n7. Japan   4,153,150 1.0\n8. India   2,024,330 0.5\n9. Panama  1,911,711 0.5\n10. Hong Kong  1,839,742 0.4\nAll other countries       20,310,408 4.9\nTotal, all countries  $412,475,607 100.0\nA continental breakdown of British Columbia exports shows North and Central\nAmerica and the West Indies bought 80 per cent, Europe 10 per cent, Oceania 4 per cent,\nAsia 3 per cent, Africa 2 per cent, and South America 1 per cent. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 31\nTable 6.\u2014Eleven Leading Imports from Foreign Countries for Consumption in\nBritish Columbia, 1950\nValue\nRank Commodity ($000,000)\n1. Crude petroleum, for refining....  21.7\n2. Automobiles, passenger (under $1,200)...  15.8\n3. Sugar, raw, imported direct  12.3\n4. Coffee, green, imported direct  10.7\n5. Ores of metals, n.o.p     8.8\n6. Gasoline, under .8236 specific gravity     5.3\n7. Diesel fuel     4.9\n8. Copra, not prepared     4.8\n9. Logging machinery and parts     4.4\n10. Traction engines, gasoline     4.2\n11. Heavy fuel-oils, Nos. 4, 5, and 6     4.1\nThe presence of four petroleum products among our eleven leading imports (continuing the 1949 trend) suggests that cheap water transportation is still making it possible\nfor California oil-producers to retain the major portion of the British Columbia market\nfor these items.\nAlthough British Columbia imported from eighty-eight countries in 1950, three-\nquarters originated in Britain and America. Accompanying the changing 1950 export\npicture was an increase in our United Kingdom imports, which were 15 per cent of the\nProvince's total imports in 1949, and a decline in imports from the United States, which\nrepresented 65 per cent of the total in 1949. The top ten countries listed below provided\n90 per cent of all imports.\nTable 7.\u2014Ten Leading Countries from Whom British Columbia Imported in 1950\nPercentage\nRank Country Value of Total\n1. United States   $139,755,005 56.7\n2. United Kingdom  44,248,255 18.0\n3. Fiji   10,151,981 4.1\n4. Brazil   5,761,315 2.3\n5. Philippines   5,029,524 2.0\n6. India   4,420,632 1.8\n7. Peru   3,625,554 1.5\n8. Colombia   2,997,255 1.2\n9. Australia   2,590,430 1.1\n10. Japan   2,456,089 1.0\nAll other countries       25,308,922 10.3\nTotal, all countries  $246,344,962 100.0\nA breakdown of our imports by continents reveals that in 1950 North America\nsupplied us with over 59 per cent, Europe 20 per cent, South America 7 per cent, Asia\n7 per cent, Oceania 6 per cent, and Africa under 1 per cent.\nThe gap between our total imports and exports widened slightly in 1950, compared\nwith 1949; in that year imports were 64.8 per cent of exports, but in 1950 were only\n59.7 per cent, although the balance was still closer than in 1939, when the ratio was\naround 50 per cent.\nTransportation and Freight Rates\nIn February of 1951 the Royal Commission on Transportation submitted its report\nto the Dominion Government.    Some of its recommendations have been placed before Q 32 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nthat Parliament for enactment, the most important of which is Bill 377. The implications\nof this Bill are of extreme importance to British Columbia shippers inasmuch as it effects\ntheir transcontinental and terminal rates. Consequently, as much time as could be spared\nhas been devoted to a study of the situation.\nThe Canadian Railway Association's equalization proposals submitted to the Board\nof Transport Commissioner's general freight-rates investigation, August 15th, 1951,\nhave also been given consideration, and studies have been made which will assist the\nlegal counsel in presenting the Provincial case before that Board. Other services rendered in this field include the preparation of material for the Province's case in opposing\nthe application of the Railway Association for increases in freight rates.\nIn line with the Bureau's policy of assisting industrialists where economic research\nis required, the services of the Research Division have been made available to a group\nof Victoria manufacturers and business-men who are attempting to have reinstated the\nformer parity in Victoria-Vancouver terminal rates. There has also been reference made\nto the Bureau's library of freight-rate tariffs for prospective industries with locational\nproblems, etc. In this regard it should be mentioned that the library of over 100 tariffs\nhas proven adequate in dealing with most of the rate problems arising in Western Canada\nand is available to any interested party. The senior staff man of the Statistical Division\nwas in Ottawa in November and December acting as adviser to British Columbia's legal\ncounsel in the equalization and the freight-rate increase cases.\nCo-operative Statistical Agreements\nThe co-operative statistical agreements with the Dominion Bureau of Statistics and\nother Federal offices increased during 1951. The fields of co-operation and the dates of\nthe original agreements are as follows: (1) Mining Statistics, 1926 (2) External-trade\nStatistics, 1938; (3) Cost-of-food Statistics, 1939; (4) Provincial Government Payroll\nStatistics, 1949; (5) Forecast of Capital and Repair and Maintenance Expenditures for\nProvincial, Municipal and Other Local Authorities, 1950; (6) Census of Construction\nStatistics\u2014Building Permits, 1951.\nThe Cost of Living\nIn 1952 the Dominion Bureau of Statistics will publish a new series of index numbers\nmeasuring changes in price. Theretofore, this measurement of price changes has been\ncalled, simply, the \" Cost-of-living Index.\"\nTo clarify its function and to eliminate the ever-present erroneous idea of measuring\nstandard of living, the new series will be titled the \" Consumer Price Index.\" This Consumer Price Index will remain in character and general purpose the same as the old\nseries, but will be the product of extensive basic revisions conforming with post-war\nexpenditure patterns. Such revisions are necessary to keep the measurement of price\nchanges adequate enough to cover present-day habits in commodity buying. Previous\nseries have been published relating to base periods, 1900, 1913, 1926, and, as at present,\n1935-39.   A new base period will be adopted to replace the latter interval.\nCommodity buying or expenditure patterns are being determined for the new series\nthrough tabulation of the information provided by 3,100 representative families contacted\nthroughout urban Canada in 1948 and 1949 concerning the kinds and quantities of goods\nand services which they purchased. The type and amount of commodities bought in this\ntwelve-month period will delineate appropriate items and weights to be included in the\nnew index.\nOn the fourth day of each month the Dominion Bureau of Statistics releases the\npresent Cost-of-living Index, and these figures are immediately relayed to a mailing-list\nof 140 individuals and organizations by the Bureau of Economics and Statistics. \u2022SP\n\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0'   \u25a0 \u25a0\u25a0      \u25a0\u25a0\u25a0'\u25a0\u201e\u25a0\nDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY\nQ 33\nThis Bureau still computes quarterly a Cost-of-food Index utilizing British Columbia\nprices, but has ceased to publish the report in which this information is contained. This\nseries is also undergoing basic change and will be published in revised form in 1952.\nTable 8.\u2014Dominion Bureau of Statistics Index Numbers of the Cost of Living\nin Canada, by Years 1913\u201451 and by Months in 1951\nAdjusted\nto Base\n100.0 for\nAugust,\n1939\nOn Base of Average Prices 1935-39=\n100\nDate\nTotal\nFood\nRent\nLight\nand\nFuel\nClothing\nHome\nFurnishings and\nServices\nMiscellaneous\n1913 \t\n79.1\n1\n79.7\n88.3\n74.3\n76.9\n88.0\n70.3\n1914  \t\n79.4\n80.0\n91.9\n72.1\n75.4\n88.9\n70.3\n1915  \t\n81.0\n81.6\n92.7\n69.9\n73.8\n96.8\n70.9\n1916   \t\n87.6\n88.3\n103.3\n70.6\n75.4\n110.8\n74.5\n1917 \t\n103.7\n104.5\n133.3\n75.8\n83.8\n130.3\n81.5\n1918 \t\n117.4\n118.3\n152.8\n80.2\n92.2\n152.3\n91.4\n1919 \t\n129.0\n130.0\n163.3\n87.6\n100.7\n175.1\n101.2\n1920                      \t\n149.3\n150.5\n188.1\n100.2\n119.9\n213.1\n110.3\n1921 \t\n131.5\n132.5\n143.9\n109.2\n127.6\n123.4\n112.5\n1922  _ _\t\n120.3\n121.3\n121.9\n113.7\n122.2\n147.0\n112.5\n1923  \t\n120.7\n121.7\n122.8\n116.6\n122.2\n145.1\n111.7\n1924  \t\n118.6\n119.5\n120.9\n117.4\n119.2\n141.7\n109.6\n1925  ._\t\n119.6\n120.6\n126.3\n117.4\n116.8\n141.3\n107.5\n1926\n120.8\n121.8\n133.3\n115.9\n116.8\n139.1\n106.1\n1927  \t\n118.9\n119.9\n130.8\n114.5\n114.4\n135.6\n105.1\n1928 \t\n119.5\n120.5\n131.5\n117.3\n113.2\n135.5\n104.8\n1929     \t\n120.7\n121.7\n134.7\n119.7\n112.6\n134.8\n105.0\n1930      \t\n119.8\n120.8\n131.5\n122.7\n111.8\n130.6\n105.4\n1931... .   \t\n108.2\n109.1\n103.1\n119.4\n110.0\n114.3\n103.3\n1932 \t\n98.2\n99.0\n85.7\n109.7\n106.8\n100.6\n100.4\n1933\t\n93.7\n94.4\n84.9\n98.6\n102.5\n93.3\n98.2\n1934       ...    ...\t\n94.8\n95.6\n92.7\n93.2\n102.1\n97.1\n97.8\n1935\t\n95.4\n96.2\n94.6\n94.0\n100.9\n97.6\n95.4\n98.7\n1936\n97.3\n98.1\n97.8\n96.1\n101.5\n99.3\n97.2\n99.1\n1937 \t\n100.4\n101.2\n103.2\n99.7\n98.9\n101.4\n101.5\n100.1\n1938                               .\n101.4\n102.2\n103.8\n103.1\n97.7\n100.9\n102.4\n101.2\n1939\t\n100.7\n101.5\n100.6\n103.8\n101.2\n100.7\n101.4\n101.4\n1940 \t\n104.8\n105.6\n105.6\n106.3\n107.1\n109.2\n107.2\n102.3\n1941.  \t\n110.8\n111.7\n116.1\n109.4\n110.3\n116.1\n113.8\n105.1\n1942   .        \t\n116.1\n117.0\n127.2\n111.3\n112.8\n120.0\n117.9\n107.1\n1943.\t\n117.5\n118.4\n130.7\n111.5\n112.9\n120.5\n118.0\n108.0\n1944   \t\n118.0\n118.9\n131.3\n111.9\n110.6\n121.5\n118.4\n108.9\n1945..      ..\n118.6\n119.5\n133.0\n112.1\n107.0\n122.1\n119.0\n109.4\n1946.. \t\n122.6\n123.6\n140.4\n112.7\n107.4\n126.3\n124.5\n112.6\n1947   \t\n134.4\n135.5\n159.6\n116.7\n115.9\n143.9\n141.6\n117.0\n1948  \t\n153.8\n155.0\n195.5\n120.7\n124.8\n174.4\n162.6\n123.4\n1949         \t\n159.6\n160.8\n203.0\n123.0\n131.1\n183.1\n167.6\n128.8\n1950\n165.2\n166.5\n211.0\n132.9\n138.3\n182.3\n169.2\n132.6\n1951\u2014\nJanuary. \t\n171.1\n172.5\n220.2\n136.4\n141.5\n187.1\n179.8\n135.8\nFebruary \t\n173.8\n175.2\n224.4\n136.4\n141.7\n192.4\n185.1\n137.0\n178.3\n180.4\n179.7\n181.8\n233.9\n238.4\n137.6\n137.6\n146.5\n146.7\n196.3\n198.8\n188.6\n190.7\n137.8\n138.8\n180.6\n182.6\n182.0\n184.1\n235.4\n239.8\n137.6\n139.8\n146.2\n146.2\n201.5\n202.5\n194.9\n197.1\n140.7\nJune \u2014 .  \t\n141.0\nJuly\n186.1\n187.4\n188.3\n188.9\n189.7\n187.6\n188.9\n189.8\n190.4\n191.2\n249.7\n251.4\n251.1\n249.7\n250.2\n139.8\n139.8\n142.7\n142.7\n144.8\n147.2\n148.2\n149.5\n150.2\n150.8\n202.9\n204.6\n206.9\n213.8\n214.6\n197.4\n199.0\n199.1\n200.1\n199.9\n142.2\n143.7\n144.0\n144.3\nNovember -    \t\n144.9\nDecember    \t\n189.6\n191.1\n249.3\n144.8\n150.8\n215.5\n200.6\n144.9 Q 34\nBRITISH COLUMBIA\nTable 9.\u2014Food Indexes for Canada and British Columbia\nThe Dominion Bureau of Statistics food-group index adjusted to the base 1936=100\nand the Bureau of Economics and Statistics British Columbia cost-of-food index also on\na base of 1936=100 are given below.\nMonth\nCanada1\nBritish\nColumbia\nMonth\nCanada1\nBritish\nColumbia\n1939\u2014\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember...\nDecember...\n1940\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\t\nMarch\u2014\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\nJuly\t\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember-\nDecember\u2014\n1941\u2014\nJanuary..\t\nFebruary\u2014\nMarcti\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\nJuly.\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember-\nDecember.-.\n1942\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\u2014\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\nJuly-\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember...\nDecember...\n1943\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\u2014\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay..\nJune..\nJuly...\nAugust.\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember.\nDecember...\n1944\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\u2014\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\nJuly\t\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nFirst of\nMonth\n101.53\n101.64\n108.69\n111.15\n111.55\n106.85\n106.85\n107.16\n107.16\n106.75\n106.13\n107.67\n107.78\n107.77\n108.49\n111.15\n111.55\n112.17\n111.25\n111.45\n112.58\n112.17\n115.03\n119.22\n124.03\n126.07\n125.97\n128.22\n126.58\n125.05\n125.87\n126.48\n126.48\n127.10\n129.04\n133.23\n132.53\n131.39\n132.72\n135.38\n135.79\n130.16\n129.55\n130.57\n131.60\n132.82\n133.84\n134.76\n136.20\n136.50\n135.90\n136.09\n135.69\n134.46\n133.84\n134.05\n134.46\n134.66\n134.05\n134.97\n134.46\n134.15\n133.74\nFifteenth\nof Month\n94.48\n103.90\n104.38\n104.74\n101.51\n100.43\n100.97\n101.22\n102.53\n101.77\n101.51\n103.47\n103.84\n103.33\n104.92\n106.30\n107.39\n107.03\n108.93\n109.02\n111.42\n111.81\n116.09\n117.07\n120.55\n121.10\n121.24\n123.93\n121.57\n120.99\n122.55\n123.71\n125.12\n128.39\n134.63\n134.19\n135.46\n132.45\n132.05\n128.28\n128.42\n128.06\n1944\u2014Continued\nNovember\t\nDecember.\t\n1945\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\t\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\nJuly\t\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember...\nDecember...\n1946\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\t\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\nJuly-\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember-\nDecember\u2014\n1947\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\t\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\nJuly\t\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember-\nDecember...\n1948\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\t\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\nJuly\t\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember _\nDecember\u2014\n1949\u2014\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\t\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay.\t\nJune\t\nJuly\t\nAugust\t\nSeptember-\nOctober\t\nNovember ...\nDecember\t\nFirst of\nMonth\n134.56\n133.23\n133.13\n133.54\n133.95\n133.95\n134.66\n136.40\n138.65\n139.26\n137.22\n136.30\n137.01\n137.32\n135.79\n135.48\n136.09\n138.14\n140.80\n145.30\n147.44\n147.96\n146.42\n149.80\n149.90\n144.69\n148.77\n150.31\n152.04\n155.01\n158.38\n161.25\n163.39\n164.21\n169.02\n175.15\n177.51\n182.72\n186.30\n190.29\n190.08\n191.00\n195.50\n198.26\n205.83\n207.16\n208.49\n210.02\n209.30\n206.54\n206.75\n204.91\n203.58\n202.97\n203.99\n207.46\n211.86\n213.91\n211.66\n209.61\n207.87\n206.44\nFifteenth\nof Month\n127.95\n128.82\n129.33\n130.96\n130.17\n127.87\n134.98\n138.43\n144.64\n152.43\n159.38\n166.07\n182.36\n189.10\n198.97\n207.38\n209.12\n205.57\n208.61\n209.77\n205.82\n1 Adjusted to base 1936=100. __ ..\nTable 9.\u2014Food Indexes for Canada and British Columbia\u2014Continued\nMonth\nCanada1\nBritish\nColumbia\nMonth\nCanada1\nBritish\nColumbia\nFirst of\nFifteenth\nFirst of\nFifteenth\n1950\u2014\nMonth\nof Month\n1951\u2014\nMonth\nof Month\n203.89\n225.15\nFebruary.    \t\n205.83\n208.59\n209.10\n204.88\n229.45\n239.16\n243.76\n227.11\n209.20\n208.18\n240.70\n235.63\n213.70\n219.12\nJune...\t\nJuly        \t\n245.19\n255.32\nJuly   .\n221.57\n219.02 s\n257.06      |      247.53\nSeptember   \t\n223.72\n225.05\n223.52\n216.12\nSeptember \t\n256.75      |       \t\n255.32      |\n255.82      |      251.16\nNovember ,\t\nNovember\t\n223.72\nDecember\t\n254.91              \t\n1 Adjusted to base 1936=100.\n2 Revised.\nTable 10.\u2014Index Numbers of the Cost of Living at Vancouver, B.C., by Years 1940-51\nand by Months in 1951\n(Base: August, 1939=100.)\nHome\nDate\nTotal\nFood\nRent\nFuel\nClothing\nFurnishings and\nServices\nMiscellaneous\n1940 ..     -\n103.7\n109.1\n114.2\n105.9\n117.0\n128.8\n99.6\n99.8\n100.6\n108.8\n109.5\n111.5\n108.8\n114.8\n119.2\n104.3\n109.5\n112.9\n100.4\n103.4\n105.2\n1941\t\n1942       \t\n1943      \t\n117.3\n134.8\n102.0\n111.3\n121.6\n114.1\n107.8\n1944 \t\n117.9\n133.5\n103.4\n114.2\n123.6\n115.7\n108.7\n1945     \t\n119.2\n136.0\n104.8\n114.2\n125.5\n115.7\n108.8\n1946   \u2014  \t\n123.0\n142.2\n106.2\n116.1\n128.9\n122.1\n111.1\n1947.. \t\n134.9\n161.9\n109.4\n128.6\n146.6\n137.0\n115.8\n1948     \t\n155.6\n198.7\n112.1\n135.1\n182.5\n157.4\n126.2\n1949  \t\n162.0\n208.7\n113.9\n139.5\n192.7\n161.3\n131.3\n1950  \t\n1951\u2014\nJanuary     \t\n167.8\n218.2\n122.7\n141.0\n191.0\n163.7\n135.8\n172.6\n225.7\n125.4\n142.6\n195.2\n173.2\n137.7\nFebruary\t\n175.8\n230.6\n125.4\n145.7\n201.1\n178.6\n139.2\n179 2\n236.6\n127.4\n145.7\n206.4\n181.2\n140.1\n182 6\n244.6\n127.4\n145.7\n208.9\n183.6\n142.0\n240.0\n162.1\n187.8\n143.7\n185 3\n245.5\n129 4\n162.1\n210 8\n189.9\n143.7\nJuly \t\n188.8\n255.5\n129.4\n162.6\n211.6\n190.0\n144.8\nAugust \t\n189.8\n255.2\n129.4\n162.6\n215.7\n192.1\n146.5\n190.2\n252.7\n130.8\n166.6\n220.0\n192.2\n146.5\n190 0\n250.9\n130 8\n167.2\n224.5\n193.0\n146 5\n192 0\n255 5\n131 9\n167.2\n226.7\n193.1\n146.8\n192.8\n257.7\n131.9\n169.2\n227.2\n192.9\n146.7\nSource:   Canada, Dominion Bureau of Statistics, \" Prices and Price Indexes.\"\nMining Statistics\nThis section collects and compiles mining production statistics with the exception of\ncoal, and same are made available to the Provincial Department of Mines, the Dominion\nBureau of Statistics, and to the Bureau of Economics and Statistics.   The information,\nwhen collected, is made available for general use in a form which preserves the confiden\ntial aspects of individual company's or operator's returns when it is requested.   Mining\nstatistics in detail will be found in the Annual Report of the Minister of Mines.   Many\nspecial compilations dealing with data not readily available were provided to other\ndepartments and outside agencies.   Contact is maintained at all times with the officials\nof the Department of Mil\nies, const.\nlting with\nand pro1\n\/iding mu\n:h data fc\n)r specia:\nbulletins Q 36 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nissued by that Department. This Division also maintains up-to-date records on mining\nstatistics, which are kept in the Central Records Branch of the Department of Mines.\nThese records represent years of research and compilation by the Mining Division, and\nare considered to be an integral part of a most comprehensive Departmental source of\ninformation on the production from every British Columbia mine reported to have\nshipped ore for treatment at a smelter or refinery.\nThe Division continues to provide the mineral production value on a census-division\nbasis (see Chart 1), and Table 11 shows the production for the years 1947, 1948, 1949,\nand 1950 on the several regions involved. In order to provide a handy reference, the\nessential mineral production statistics as originally published in the Department of Mines\nAnnual Report are given in Table 12. A brief recapitulation of mineral production\nfigures discloses that the value in 1950 was $148,155,060, which is greater than any\nprevious year except 1948, for which the value was $152,524,752. The product of\ngreatest value in 1950 was zinc, valued at $48,882,765, followed by lead at $44,391,530,\nlode gold at $10,805,553, and an additional value of $598,717 for placer gold. Copper\nproduction had a value of $9,889,458. Miscellaneous metals, minerals, and materials\nhad a total value of $5,689,271, and structural materials had a value of $10,205,989.\nCoal, with a production of 1,542,404 tons, was valued at $10,025,626.\nThe average number employed in all branches of the mining industry in 1950 was\n16,612. Some of the larger expenditures in the industry were for salaries and wages,\n$42,738,035; fuel and electricity, $6,775,998; process supplies, $17,500,663; freight\nand treatment on ores, etc., $22,113,431; Dominion taxes, $14,877,802; Provincial\ntaxes, $3,442,932; municipal and other taxes, $540,620; workmen's compensation, silicosis, unemployment insurance, and other levies, $1,670,252. Dividends paid amounted\nto $34,399,330. -\nDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND\nINDUSTRY\nQ 37\nio\u00a9^t^OONOrncocMON^WTf\u00a9oor--r.NO\u00a9Osrn\u00a9\u00bboOoo'H.NOrncS\u00a9Os       i-h i-h Os. i-h    t* cN 00 0\noo\u00a9cM^r^ioio\u00abornONNO>OTrr~>o>oi>,,*cSfnmo\u00a9NOco\u00a9cscsiocsosQo       <N so cn r-\nIO   IO  NO  NO\nlocM-ot^ccocsii^-oior^^r^^iOTfONior-ioONor-t^rnt-H^tNOooc^ooos       toriHoi\nCN l> Os_\u00a9\ne3\no\u00aboosooTtoo(NioONOoONNooNNOsooNTtMiO'-Hr--rt'Ti-csr--,^-cs>oN\u00a3!ooioio      \u00a9r-Noov\nT-TTf ri >o\nocor)Osi-H-HQo\u00a9\u00a9mNo\\0'-Hi-Hiooooor~'^tON'-J-fn\u00a9coooioNC(NOsNoio\u00a9       som\u00a9oo\nCN (N i-H U-)\n0\nrun in ininO^mwHO^sO^^oin^o^iw xo son ^ ^ loosioco^roooiTiftrsi      cn \u25a0<-* oo so\nCN io^ \u00a9^ i-h^\nH\noo<\u00a3cS<\u00a3^ininx^oooscoo\\^eOy*^&^sooooo<ot^&inooo\\<0      in so *$ in\ncn cn cn 00\"\ni-h <-< r-i                                 ^h       Tt-soTh^cnTfmTj-       i-h ,-h i-h                 rn\ni-H m m i-T\ncn ** cn 00\n>n\u00a9Nor-oo\u00a9fNoo\n10 'H; \u00a9 cn\nco \u00bbo no r-\nNOooNocsriTj-i>cn\nt- r- 0 ^t\n\u00a9\nOO Os^ IO Os^\n1\n00 t\\ cn no \u00bb 00^ \u00a9^ on_\nlO^IO^\u00a9  IO\n1-1\nof \u00a9\" 00 \u00a9\"\n|\nsOhoh On\" F- 00\" \u00a9\"\noC\u00a9\"r-^cn\n6\nZ\nrlMHpi\n^mwooHH'tTt\nNO Os -*t 10\nt\u00ab-\n'\nifl-           Hrt\nOCNT}-00\u00a9O'5frrten^tO\\0\ncNooct-^ftcooocn\n1     ! \u25a0\u25a0* ON \u00bb-h NO                               1\ncn i-H r- Tt\n\u00a9NOT)-io\u00a9r-No<Nr-\u00a9cs\u00a9\ncn^cn^tcnmNOrH\n1    IihhMo\nIO TT o\\ \u00a9\nOn\n\u00a9lOlOCMNOCM\u00a9r-NO^HOOU-)\nOO-etOOOONIOOOTf-\n:    i 00 00 no r-\n00 t^ r-^ r^_\n\u25a0\"-fCNooOcn\u00a9*-<cncNNOcNON\nnON'oo-^-cscn-^\"*\n! ^ Tf c^ NO\nO no\" cn 00\nO\nr-nNooNcNCNCNi-Hio'tr-eN\nO  \u2022*  Tt  t-          l-H           <*\nj i-H io \"O cn\nr- 0 t\u2014 00\n\u00a3\nw-cni-Hcnclcn'^-ON            \u00a9on\ncn th       -0                 tt\nNO ON l> CN\ni-h\" i-T ri 10\n1     !                                                   :\nt\u00ab-\nto\nONCsi(SO<oio\\ONOONt-NOMr-\n!io\"^-oo\u00a9ONONrsioosoooNThcncorsi       nhudh\n0 t- O IO\nONMONSDHCOMrlCNrtH\n!\u00a9vococS'-iTt\u00a9NOT-H\u00a9r~ir.ONcnsooo      rtHcn**\ncn r- cn so\nC\n00\nt-ONioNOoooooooNCor)(N\nirtf\"*H      cNONsoi-HOsONNoini>osio      r- en no so\n\u00a9^ 0 r~ cn\n\u20222\nsocnmooioiooomcst-ONtt\n\u00a9rn\u00a9      \u00a9tnooovocni-HNoeni-HON      \u00abo \u00a9 no 10\nNO  00\" \u00a9  it\"\n0\naiOHTtHO\\t-in      co r-H\nr-ONTf       cnoN-^-'^j-sor^oot\u2014csooNo      NlH\nno r- cn io\n,\u00a3.\nZ\nw-n cnn n\u00ab>t>n             CSr~\nCN                *H *t                                      HW vl\n>o 00 no cn\ns\n\u00ab\"-\"\ni-h t-T ci cn\n!\n1.1.11\n:      tj- 0 os tH        !        1\n\u25a0^   \u00a9  OS   l-H\nl>>\n1\ncn 10 10 n\ncniov-.cn\ns\nt--\ncn cn t^- 10\ncn cn r- 10\n<T 10 in cn\nt\" 10 \"o\" cn\n0\ncn 00 00 On\ncn 00 00 on\n1J\nz\n!\n1\n&^         <o\nM-            10\nu\n1\nOsNcoinOO'tmf-Omint-\nNO\n\u00a9 \u25a0*\n0\\\u00a9oooocn<-Hi-HTt'*j-       T-Hf-r^io\nIO  CO NO  -<fr\n\u25a0^\u25a0vomooior-or-ONQOfnosoo\n*-H   IO\nas^HTtTj-r-inm       Os\u00a9om\nosoio^ON\u00a9r-ON      \u00a9r-or-\nr- 10 >o 00\n\"SO\nr~ioONcsNoior-Oii-Hoot\u2014mr-\nNO\nl-H   ^   NO   OO\ns\nTfcNcnenOsooo\\enioON\u00a9cNcN\nOOHt-MinvOTf       ionooo^h\n<N cn \u00a9 cn\no\n0\n&}\u25a0                micrJXHHfScs\nrHrHW        sD m\u00abfN        Mt cot^\nno \u00a9 r-- i-h\nz\nOn *^ i-h cN\ncs cn cn       10 10 \u00abo \u00bbo\n10 en \u00a9t cn\nt>\ns\ncT en Tt \u2022<*\n9\ncn tfir, m\n\"13\n0\nior-Os\u00a9iovoo\\>nt^enoocnr-,*0.cnr-    lioio                 \u00a9\u00a9t-^rHi-Hcnen\u00bb\u00abH      \\o n Ovx*\ncn r- os no\nTfommmw^HmTtroh no on cn on 00\nNO \u00a9\n0s0NcnN0\u00a9O0s\u00a9      '^j-'-Hcnoo\n10 On NO ON\nS*.\nm\nc. cS c?i m o^o\\ o \u00abn h oo^h tt m N x^\u00abt \u00ab\nOs^-Tj-OONIOT-HSO          rHOMfllfl\nNO to Tl\" On\ntt<\ntfl\"           \u00a9\" \u00a9\" cn\" cn io <o\" r~ \u25a0* 10\" -*\" no\" *** r-T\n\u00a9\nO.OrtiHTHHNM       OsCScno\nNDOSfNCNTl-rl'iHO       iocntr-o\n\u2022*  OO  V.  Tf\n0\nootScnt-i-H                 co i-h os m\nNO\nso 00 Tf so\n<u\nz\n\u2022****-.\nTTNOONONCScnT-irN                         i-H\ncn ,tf cn cn\ncscNcncNcn,Tioio\nno r- as co\nen       r<i^if)0\\OOHHa,OQOff\\Hm't^HmMt-Tth\nlONOCSTt        OOiOCTsNC\ni-H  H;  If,   oo\n,<3\ncn\nr-oicncn^Hio,TrooNcsiocsrt'-H>oionr~oooNONNO\n]en\u00a9\u00a9o       -rf en so cc\n00 10 1-1 cn\n\u25a0*\nNO\n<Ni-H\u00a9'*cn\u00a9cn*0'-HNO,^'-H'-HioioNOcntNcncocNNO\nliotNONcn      \u00a9\u25a0^\u25a0\u25a0*d-\u00a9\n\u00b0\\ \u00b0i \u00b0\\ *\nW-\n~Q\ni-H      r*ONosi-Hoo^r\u00a9Ti-Nor^ONioasrt<omr-'r--ONOo\nli-HTj-NCJIO           CS\u00a9CS'-h\nri cn\" co on\"\ns\nd\nlO\u00a9lO'-HrJ'TtN0r-O0NtScNTfTtC--OO000NrH\nicncnt^io      r*'-,r-i<o\nr- cn cn cn\nZ\nen -f en m                      -t <-t 10 Tt                 ih^ r-xt 00\n:oos\u00a9on      m n \u00ab ^\n10 On ON O\ns\ncn cn cn cn                                 1-1 cn\niMNcfiCN\nNO I> 00 O\n\u00ab\u25a0                  l-H\nOHrfo\\OOH;imtQoinrliHHmMO^HO',*inHXtiri'^0\\,OcOHinH       \u25a0*-!- ^ i-h no\nNO 00 IO IO\nCM\u00a9cnNOCNt^SOlOONlOrnTtNCilONOTj-NO'-iNO>-HO\\'-HrlCSON>OOOONSOOOOONO          lO^t-OONO\nso 00 cn so\n-e\nro\nMn rl t in \\D r- ^ m \"i c^h \\o N't n 00 0 ^\"* ^ h n O h h to 0 *o in w o^      n io_ cn 0\nTt i-h 10^ cn\n^m ts'rn \u00a9\" \u00a9\" os\" cn\" 0* no\" ^t ft\" -t\" so th o* 0\" Tt o\\ r-\" no\" -^-\" 0\" 00\" \u00a9\" as rt gC so\" \u00a9\" rf -<t\"      10\" \u00a9\" 10\" \u00a9\"\n\u25a0a\nno\" 10\" CN On\"\n0'\ncnr^cs\u00bboc\u00abt^ioTfONc^\u00a9iosor^QO^r^r^iocnNor--NO(NON(N\u00a9rjr--o\\rt      cn \u00bbo t-~ t-\nom^fo\nz\nMfNHHinsOMhrf)(JiHO\\                                                                    r.r.r.HHM'^M           HflHH\ncn \u00abo cn 10\nc\n\u00bb-< cn cn n                   ^j-ior-io\nr- \u00a9 i-h os\n\u00ab3\n\u00bbHrt\n0\nlO^IOlOOONDNOOOCnrHTj-lOt^O^OO^tONt-^cnONt-\nooiocn-^t      i-*t^\u00bb-i\u00a9\n\u25a0* n on on\ni-HiOi-Ht\u2014c-~o\\moon-\u00a9<Nr-TrcSinr-MooOi-HOoi-ncMrt\n*n \"v es \"s1      o.iooNt\u2014\nro i-h so 00\nM\nH       ^(nc^O^cnNO^HrH^sorncSNOt^ONONt^rnrni-H^io\n(TiNDi-hO        NO t\u00bbrl t\nOS   l-H   l-H   m\n<D\nw               r-T th 0 so no\" no \u25a0* 00 \u00a9\" 00\" on 00 \u25a0<* no on\" \u00a9\" no cs io r-^\n\u00a9oo^fcJ     ior-oN0\nT-<   l-H   rH   \u00a9\nS\n6\n\u25a03,^XHhOO\\mN(Oif.NH>oosNMcfihr-\nr\u2014i-Ht\u201400      \"-\"OstNio\nSDOiHrt\nCO  \u00a9mN\u00a33  i^-\nz\nmt^\\OcnrHtn^io_>^^^rnsot^^tiCNCSooii>\ni-H CN CN (N        Oj^ \"SG^ m SO\ni-T cs\" T-T ri cn so\"\n^H  (N  r-T ,-T\n\u2022<*\" i> 00\" ri\n^\n\u00ab\u25a0            ^H\ncn t-h 00 10\n1\nM^ftCOO                     rH CN \u00a9 ^t\nr-tncNNO'<*'-HNO\u00a9\u00a90,<*\u00a9iO''d-cnco       ONrJ-^Os\n1\nr*o\\ cn oo-^\n\u00bb-t-  OO  ON  NO\nOMTiMooNDioootcniHTtTtTtr-^D'T       r-osooo\nr- \u00a9 cn -0\nr- re 00 no *h\nNO \u25a0<-?  IO Tj-\nma\\TjHO\\sOt\u00bbttHMr.f~vot'r){si      nt osvd\ncn c- as rt\n*--.\n^rH\nr- cn \u00a9 00\ncnio\u00a9NocN'-oofncsio\u00a9-^-r-Nor-No      t-~oocs\\o\nCN i-h i-h vo\n>-H\n0\nz\nmoOHin\nCN 00 On so\nr-csmascN*-Hiocni-Hm\u00bbo(N!-HNO\u00a9\u00bbo       cnooi-hcs\nHHmos'fJ,T*o\\mco>o(\u00bbrt      men       rtcnen\u00a9\ni-h r- On ON\ncn cn \u00a9 i-h\n_^J\ncn cn cn cn\n.-HONONOooooocoior-ooNo                           cScScScn\ni-h i-h 1* en\n2\n^t-ocn-d-iNmcncn\n00 i-h co On\nte- i-h\ns\nH\nt^oo(^or^oooN\u00a9i^oooN\u00a9r^ooON\u00a9r~ooosOr>oooN\u00a9r--QOOs\u00a9t--oooN\u00a9      r- co os \u00a9\nf- CO On \u00a9\nd\n^^^in^^^in't^,*ir.^-'t'*in,<f't^in^^'tinTli,!l-'*inTj-^-^in       t!- rr ft 10\n\u2022<*   Tf   ^   IO\nOsOsOnOnONOnonOnOnOsOsOsOnOnOnONOnOnOsOnOnOsOnONOnOsOsOnOnOsOsOs        On On Os On\nOn Os On On\n\u25a03\nV\nta\nIh\nQ\nrt\n0\nd               0 \u00a3\n\u00a7\n\u2022C               P \u00ab\ns\n0\n0\nt-\nii                            \u00bbH                         2\nS            0 2              0\nu                u\n\u2014              8 h               H\nrt                   *C\nrt                  C\nft                  1\n1-.                  rt tj\nt_j\nS                 =!  C\n2            2=\nt\n9-                  TJ                    *\n___.U_.rt._S-S\n0                    0                   X.                    O                    \u00a3                    H                    c\n0            0            55            U            el            N            0\n13                 B Q 38 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nTable 12.\u2014British Columbia Mine Production, 1949 and 1950\nQuantity,\n1949\nQuantity,\n1950\nValue,\n1949\nValue,\n1950\nMetallics\nAntimony.\nBismuth\u2014..\nCadmium...\nCopper\nGold, lode ....\nGold, placer\nIndium \t\nIron ore\t\nLead\t\nPlatinum\t\nSilver\t\nTin .\t\n.lb.\n...fine, oz.\n. crude, oz.\n. lb.\n.lb.\nTungsten concentrates.\nZinc \t\n.lb.\nTotals.\nFuel\nCoal (2,000 lb.).\nNON-METALLICS\nFluxes\u2014limestone, quartz\t\n tons\nSulphur               \t\n tons\nTotals _\nClay Products and Other Structural Materials\nBrick-\nCommon \t\nFace, paving\nClay Products\nsewer brick..\nFirebricks, blocks\t\n..No.\n..No.\nClays  \t\nStructural tile\u2014hollow blocks\t\nDrail tile, sewer-pipe, flue-linings.\nPottery\u2014glazed or unglazed\t\nOther clay products\t\nTotals\t\nOther Structural Materials\nCement\t\nLime and limestone .\nSand and gravel\t\nStone \t\nRubble, riprap, crushed rock.\nTotals\t\nTotal value.\n54,856,808\n288,396\n17,886\n263,580,549\n7,636,053\n276,324,451\n42,212,133\n283,983\n19,134\n307,122,803\n9,507,225\n324,263,778\n61,020\n210,972\n1,364,170\n10,956,550\n10,382,256\n529,524\n1,550\n27,579\n41,645,726\n7,468\n5,669,769\n633,047\n36,604,700\n108,094,331\n1,917,296\n1,542,404\n12,462,424\n108,531\n5,941\n144,325\n7,886\n160,435\n143,343\n19,783\n213,773\n79,661\n616,490\n23,301\n517\n1,546,798\n2,500,323\n3,220,000\n509,560\n3,910,500\n1,974,380\n95,075\n24,793\n135,391\n22,339\n145,512\n265,098\n5,176\n9,676\n703,060\n179,400\n2,287\n1,112,272\n221,454\n26,758\n1.164,049\n3,029,425\n1,295,087\n3,967,132\n44,345\n916,841\n9,252,830\n133,012,968\n216,229\n369,138\n1,535,274\n9,889,458\n10,805,553\n598,717\n12,132\n44,391,530\n9,239\n7,666,151\n828,259\n281,1601\n48,882,765\n125,485,605\n10,025,626\n22,925\n268,411\n104,590\n620,108\n1,421,806\n2,437,840\n103,840\n54,503\n254,262\n32,264\n191,016\n428,418\n5,860\n11,335\n1,081,498\n3,088,296\n1,133,776\n3,723,487\n188,675\n990,257\n9,124,491\n148,155,060\n1 Tungsten: 1950 sale of products accumulated before 1949.\nLabour Statistics\nUnder the terms of a continued interdepartmental arrangement the Labour Section\nof the Bureau of Economics and Statistics was again responsible for the collection and\ncompilation of the annual labour statistics for the Provincial Department of Labour.\nA summarization of the 1950 data resulting from this survey is published under the\nheading of \" Statistics of Trades and Industries \" in the Annual Report of the Department\nof Labour for that year. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY\nQ 39\nAs a valuable source of information relative to labour and its problems, the Labour\nSection continues to prove of assistance to the Bureau in the handling of the many\ninquiries and requests for labour information received from industry and business. In\naddition to the routine preparation of Department of Labour statistics, the work of the\nSection also includes such special assignments as the completion of current reports and\nTable 13.\u2014British Columbia Industrial Payrolls by Statistical Areas for the\nComparative Years 1946 to 1950\nRegional Area\nTotal Payrolls (Salaries and Wages)\n1946\n1947\n1948\n1949\n1950\nNo. 1\n$8,792,650\n15,409,997\n11,047,243\n158,098,206\n52,609,451\n4,477,339\n10,680,963\n4,132,464\n5,592,647\n1,279,858\n835,686\n$13,089,910\n20,065,572\n15,407,310\n196,814,172\n73,305,625\n7,068,034\n14,091,695\n7,287,683\n8,260,298\n8,385,552\n2,421,303\n$13,731,856\n23,578,250\n16,857,531\n245,729,208\n85,360,435\n6,070,725\n15,593,568\n8,009,315\n7,170,882\n1,557,047\n2,731,389\n$14,196,272\n25,465,483\n17,162,800\n268,168,929\n69,824,047\n6,709,107\n13,991,506\n7,109,097\n7,793,375\n2,586,330\n1,156,849\n$14 730,880\nNo. 2  \t\nNo. 3 _ \t\n28,152,569\n17,986,918\nNo. 4   _ \t\nNo. 5               \t\nNo. 6 \t\nNo. 7 _  \t\nNo. 8          \t\n276,660,854\n87,321,304\n7,793,958\n17,053,224\n11,492,745\nNo. 9  \t\nNo. 10\n9,749,718\n1,352,763\n2,139,119\nTotals \t\n$272,956,504\n$366,197,154\n$426,390,206\n$434,163,795\n$474,434,052\nChart 1.\u2014Census Divisions Q 40 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nstatistical tables for various business interests, banking institutions, Boards of Trade, and\nother Governmental departments.\nPeriodic surveys of occupational wage rates in various industries enable the Bureau\nto keep pace with the demand for information as to rates currently in effect, and a file is\nmaintained to include the latest information obtainable dealing with union agreements,\nwage-scales, and conditions of work. With the co-operation and assistance of the inspection staff of the Department of Labour in this work, much valuable data has been obtained\nand placed on record, to be made available to the proper authorities as required.\nRegional development throughout the Province as reflected in the industrial payroll\nis presented in the attached Table 13 showing the comparative annual totals attributable\nto each of the ten census divisions (see Chart 1) for the years 1946 to 1950. The totals\nare of necessity restricted to an industrial coverage only, and as such must not be considered as representing the extent of all salaries and wages paid in British Columbia. The\ncomparative yearly record, however, serves as an indication of gradual changes which\noccur in the concentration of the labour force in each section of the Province.\nHealth and Welfare\nIn October, 1949, arrangements were completed with the Department of Health and\nWelfare to transfer to the Bureau of Economics and Statistics the compilation of monthly\nstatistics covering the disbursement of Social Allowance and the maintenance of records\nfor all phases of Social Assistance.\nDuring the year 1950 the many intricate factors covering Social Assistance were\nco-ordinated and the above Section established within the Bureau to maintain close\nliaison with the Comptroller of Expenditure, Department of Health and Welfare, through\nwhose office the major portion of the work of this Section is channelled.\nBecause of new Dominion-Provincial agreements covering social problems and\nespecially those applying to Old-age Pensions, the year 1951 has been one of intense\nactivity for this Section, for, in addition to the compilation of monthly statistics and the\nmaintenance of records, a detailed analysis of Old-age Pension numbers and costs with\nprojections to 1956 covering age-groups 65 to 69 years and 70 years and over has been\ncompleted.\nTo obtain accurate figures on which to base these estimates and projections, it was\nnecessary to record all Social Allowance cases on punched cards and establish machine\nrecords. It is expected that these machine records will be maintained in the future after\nthe transfer of cases within the 65-69-year group from Social Allowance to Old-age\nPension has ben completed.\nAll ancillary services, such as hospital services, medicals, drugs, cost-of-living bonus,\netc., were also analysed and included in reports submitted.\nThis Section is also charged with the collection, assembly, and dispatch of monthly\nstatistical reports for the Dominion Bureau of Statistics covering the issuance of building\npermits by 100 municipalities and regulated areas within the Province, also the submission of monthly reports on employment and payroll statistics for Provincial Government\nemployees.\nThe steady rise in the Cost-of-living Index was reflected in an increased allowance\nto Social Allowance cases. This increase necessitated a revision of monthly statistical\nforms and methods of compilation in order to accurately reflect Provincial and municipal\ncosts.\nCivil Defence\nThe Research Statistician in charge of this Division was a member of the first Civil\nDefence Instructors' Course held in Victoria, August 6th to 24th, and, it is anticipated,\nwill take an active part in the organization and training of Civil Defence personnel within\nthe Provincial Civil Service. '\nDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 41\nTourist Trade\nThe tourist movement to British Columbia has continued the general upward trend\nof the post-war years to an all-time record in 1950.\nFor convenience in statistical analysis, these tourists have been divided into the\nfollowing four categories, of which the first and second are of major importance because\nthis travel across the International Border is in greatest volume and lends itself to\nthorough research: (1) From the United States in automobiles; (2) from the United\nStates by rail, steamer, and air; (3) via ocean ports; (4) interprovincial, via trains,\nhighways, and air.\nThe reciprocal tourist trade between Canada and United States is undoubtedly\ngreater than that between any other two countries in the world, with a substantial net\nincome accruing to Canada. In order to accurately measure the magnitude of this\nimportant source of revenue, the Dominion Bureau of Statistics has systematcially collected data and periodically published its reports in its brochure, currently called \" Travel\nbetween Canada and Other Countries.\" By consulting the following revenue figures, we\nfind that a fairly consistent rise is evident for Canada as a whole to a peak in 1948, with\na slight reversal in trend for 1949 and 1950.\nExpenditures Expenditures\nYear in Canada Year in Canada\n1941  $107,000,000 1946 $216,100,000\n1942   79,000,000 1947  241,100,000\n1943   87,000,000 1948  267,400,000\n1944  116,600,000 1949  267,100,000\n1945  163,300,000 1950  259,700,000!\n1 Subject to revision.\nExtensive programmes of highway construction and greatly increased and improved\ntourist accommodation have done much to speed up the growth of tourist travel in British\nColumbia to a point where it has become one of the Province's great \" service \" industries.\nAvailable figures take into account only those tourists entering British Columbia\nfrom the United States but take no cognizance whatever of the influx by interprovincial\nmovement, which has never been measured by the Dominion Bureau of Statistics because\nthe money they spend on tour has been earned in Canada and does not admit of ready\nevaluation. However, this source of revenue is important to the individual Provinces and\nBritish Columbia in particular. .\nPreliminary estimates of the number of tourists entering British Columbia from the\nUnited States, based on statistics for the first few months of the year, seem to indicate\nthat the total for 1951 will exceed that of 1950 (see Table 14).\nChart 2 shows the distribution of American tourists visiting this Province in red\nfigures as compared with those visiting Canada in black figures, by State of origin. Q 42\nBRITISH COLUMBIA\nu\n<a\n>\nt.)\na\niS\nH\np\nIs.\nO\ni-<\no\no\nrQ\n&_\ng\n3\nK\n<L>\ncd\no\n\"\u00ab\n\u00ab\nits.\no\n3\ne\nCl\nCO\nO\n-t->\n4-1\n&a\n0\ni>\nCu\n^)\n>.\ni-i\n\u2022>s*\n,3\nc\n^\nO\n\u00ab\nP\n>.\nn\n3\n,s\nO\na\no\no\n\u20222\n\u20223\nS\njs\no\nO\n-s;\n5^\n-a\nJO\no\n3\nJO\n3\nd\no\nI\no\nCS\nJO\no\nS\no\n-4--\n3\n<\na\n^\nt-\nNC\nin cn oo \u00a9 no m m\n\"*v \"-i. '\"I \u00b0i **\u00a3 \u00b0i ^\nOs\nt-^ CN no r-^ oo\" cn oo\nO in i-h oo on cn tN\ni-h cn\nDNO taoom\n\u00a9\nMt a t~--H ooO\nr- no on oo r- o \u25a0*\nOn\nm y-\u00bb O t- V\") On r-\nOn fN fH tJ- On cn tN\n(N\nHlOCOOOOhH\nOn\ntN O en r- oo On no\n\u25a0*t\n(S   OO   Ifl   ^)   H   H   *\nOs\nO \"* 00 rH rf oC r-~\nOn \u00bbh       in m Cl tN\nfN                   fH\n\u25a0\u25a0* cN On r- oo in NO\nOO\ncn t\u2014 oo t\u2014 oo in \u00a9\n*r\ncn m on o en cn \u00a9\nON\nOn *h r- rf tN t\u2014 in\nco On       Nttcjff.cS\nl-H                           l-H\nNO NO in On i-h 00 CN\nr-\nm i\u2014 r- i-h nd on tN\n\u25a0<t\ncn tN i-i m i-h no m\non\nr- \"n no on tN co tN\nr- \u00a9       ri- ^ cn tN\nCN                      l-H\nno in no no cn o cn\nNO\nr- on en i-h en no i-h\n\u25a0*fr\nr- m oo no \"\u2022*\u25a0 r- m\nON\nOn 00 in no f- On nO\nm r-        movTrn\nl-H                      i-H\ntN NO 00 r* On O -*t\nooa\\oo^to\ni*\ni\u2014 in tN On On r* cn\nON\ni-h r- in O no --< tN\nto      no t- m i-h\nl-H                       l-H\nt- o r- ^f >n no on\n\u00ab*\nOn 00 On nO CN cn m\n<*\ni-h tN no oo cn in \u00a9\nON\ni-h i-h rn f- cn cn r~\ncn in       no t\u2014 tN\n^\ntr~ rt co en tN tN ON\nen\nTf tN \"-*  tN 00 \u00a9 \u00a9\nrt\nm r- i-h m O tN cn\nON\nr- oo -^t i-h i-h .-. no\ntN cn       r- cn tN\n1-1\nffihc^OHinh\nCN\nfN t r- NO On Tf ^h\n\u25a0^\nCN On i-h m \u00a9 ^f \u00abtf\nON\nno m m no no oo rt\ncn in       m r- i-h\noo oo oo no en i-h no\nOn Tf r- in O O oo\n\u2022*f\ntN o tj- e~~ o r\u2014 m\nOn\noo (N m r- oo no no\nin Os       CN tN th\n\"\nI\njS\no\n.c\naj\n>\nIh\nV\n\u00a3\no\n-a\n\u00a7\n\u00ab\nB\nCJ\n1\n3\no\nrfl\n8 u\ns\nH\no\nS E\n?1\nrt -t-1\nv}  rt\nu\na u\n1\noj 43\nD.\nc\n\u2022^ \u00ab\n\u2014 :\u2014\n>>\nIh   C\nV\nCl\nc > \u00ab o\n& Z. a \u00a3\nu  H  \u00b0  1\nR \u00ab %* d\nH\nlis\ni-\nIE\n>\ntraffic\npermit\neller's\nmercia\nJnumbt\n(numb\nnumbe\nraffle (\n'mobile\n) Non-\n) Trav\n)  Com\ntraffic\ntraffic\nraffic (\nplane t\n^n o o a.\n<            ding) <\nid U > >\n\u2022H\nl-H\no\n0\nS 2\nIB\no ^_\noj rt\n\u2022Eh\n0 -\nJO \u2022\n*_i  \u00bb\nC3  U\n'w Sn\n\u00bbq '\nDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY\nQ 43 Q 44 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nMARKET RESEARCH DIVISION\nThis Division is responsible for market research studies, industrial and location\nsurveys, the collection of market statistics, and statistics relating to new industries, new\nplants, and additions to existing plants.\nThis Division assisted in the preparation of two publications during the year,\nnamely: Industry and Markets in the Okanagan, Similkameen, and Kettle Valleys and\nthe Regional Industrial Index of British Columbia, 1951 edition. In addition, work is\nprogressing prior to publication of the 1950-51 edition of the British Columbia Trade\nIndex.\nAlso many miscellaneous requests pertaining to market statistics were answered.\nPreliminary work has been done relating to a market survey of the Greater New Westminster area and also for the establishment of annual surveys of operating results of\nvarious retail businesses.\nMECHANICAL TABULATION DIVISION\nDuring 1951 the Mechanical Tabulation Division continued to provide tabulating\nservice for several Government departments.\nThe following list sets forth the diversified nature of the work carried out:\u2014\nDepartment of Attorney-General\u2014Motor Accident Statistical Reports.\nDepartment of Education\u2014\nStatistical Report of Pupils and Teachers.\nTeachers' Records.\nDepartment of Finance\u2014Furniture Inventory.\nDepartment of Health and Welfare\u2014\nCost of Drugs Survey.\nSocial Allowance Statistics.\nDepartment of Labour\u2014Annual Statistical Report.\nDepartment of Lands and Forests\u2014\nForest Inventory.\nGazetteer Files.\nDepartment of Provincial Secretary\u2014\nCivil Service Personnel Statistics.\nKing's Printer Job-cost Records.\nDepartment of Trade and Industry\u2014\nLabour Statistics.\nTrade Statistics.\nTrade Index File.\nSpecial Surveys.\nBritish Columbia Liquor Control Board\u2014\nWarehouse Audit Control.\nStore Audit Control.\nLicensee Beer Records.\nPayroll.\nPrice Lists.\nInterdiction Lists.\nThe organization of the Mechanical Tabulation Division was changed during the\nyear and is now divided into three main sections handling the tabulating section of the\nwork. One is reserved for statistical and research applications, another deals exclusively\nwith the work of the British Columbia Liquor Control Board, and the third section is\nconcerned directly with new projects and procedures. In this manner it is possible to\nmaintain established routines while still providing service to new tabulating projects. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 45\nThe personnel establishment of the Division is composed of a supervisor, three\nsenior machine operators, eight machine operators, a senior key-punch operator and eight\nkey-punch operators, a senior clerk-stenographer, and two clerks. Two members of the\nstaff of the British Columbia Liquor Control Board are attached to the Division, acting\nin an advisory capacity.\nThe Division is equipped with a complete set of tabulating-machines, including\nalphabetic tabulators, sorters, reproducing gang-punches, an end printing document\npunch, a collator, an interpreter, and an automatic multiplying punch, as well as alphabetic key-punches and verifiers.\nIt is anticipated that with the present equipment and level of staff efficiency the\nexisting projects can be augmented and the service extended to other Government departments not at present using mechanical tabulating methods.\nMention should also be made of the fact that the Mechanical Tabulation Division of\nthis Bureau co-operated with the Dominion Bureau of Statistics in the processing of the\n1951 Census.\nPUBLICATIONS\nMonthly Bulletin\nThis publication has been continued, with an ever-increasing demand from businessmen, universities, and libraries. It contains a statistical summary of business indicators\nrelating to British Columbia's economy.\nExternal Trade\nMonthly statistics relating to external trade are contained in the Monthly Bulletin.\nA statement of external trade through British Columbia customs ports and covering commodities with an aggregate value of $50,000 and over is published annually.\nBritish Columbia Trade Index\nWork is progressing on a new edition of this publication, which will be released in\n1952.\nBritish Columbia Facts and Statistics\nThis publication was first issued in 1948; the fourth edition was released early in\n1951. A second printing of the 1951 edition was required to meet the demand for this\npublication. This publication provides general facts and statistics relating to British\nColumbia under the following headings: Population, education, government, banking,\ntransportation, communication, retail sales, agriculture, fisheries, forestry, mining, manufacturing, tourist, and economic activity. Q 46 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nREPORT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION\nIndustrial development projected in British Columbia and under way at the close of\n1951, embracing new industry in all regions of the Province, reached the impressive total\nof approximately one billion dollars. Of this sum, over $350,000,000 of new construction has commenced during the year under review, the largest annual figure recorded in\nthe Province's industrial history. '\nIndustrial expansion on a scale of this magnitude has focused widespread attention\non British Columbia, which has resulted in a surge of industrial inquiries from all parts\nof the world. It has been the continuous concern of the Department, through the\nRegional Development Division, to keep abreast of the rapidly changing industrial scene\nby taking effective measures to record our industrial growth and to provide factual\ninformation on the pattern of resources, industrial facilities, and services available in each\ncommunity.\nIndustry location is becoming more and more highly competitive and complex and\nis governed by well-defined basic location factors. Regional areas seeking to keep in the\nforefront of industrial expansion must take cognizance of these factors and provide\nup-to-date information, which can only be portrayed by comprehensive area surveys,\nmapping, and analyses. Industry to-day looks to official channels for this information\nand service, and to keep pace with these demands the Division launched during the year\nthe first of a series of area surveys, at the same time initiating the second phase of its\nprogramme of regional development in the Province.\nFIELD OFFICES\nThe augmented industrial expansion in the Province during the year has resulted in\ngreatly increased activity being reported from the field offices of the Division, which have\nbeen called upon to handle a large volume of inquiries and to render a wide diversity of\nassistance to industry. The field offices have continued to grow in importance and value\nin co-ordinating and furthering industrial inquiries within the Provincial service and\nvarious branches of Government.\nThe regional offices of the Division are located as follows:\u2014\nNelson: Region 1\u2014East Kootenay; Region 2\u2014West Kootenay.\nKelowna:   Region 3\u2014Okanagan;   Region 6\u2014Kamloops and South Central\nBritish Columbia.\nPrince  George:   Region  8\u2014Central British Columbia;   Region  9\u2014North\nCoastal Area (Prince Rupert and Queen Charlottes); Region 10\u2014Peace\nRiver.\nVictoria:   Region 4\u2014Lower Mainland;  Region 5\u2014Vancouver Island and\nGulf Islands.\nFIELD SURVEYS\nNelson Office\u2014Region One (East Kootenay) and Region Two\n(West Kootenay)\nIndustrial development in the Kootenays during the year continued to gain\nmomentum. Announcement of a $75,000,000 pulp and paper mill at Castlegar only\nslightly overshadowed the $62,500,000 expansion programme announced by Consolidated Mining and Smelting Company of Canada. Both developments will have far-\nreaching effects on the mining and forest industries in the region. Despite shut-down of\nthe forests due to fires, the sawlog scale for the district is expected to increase approximately 10,000 M B.M. over last year.\nMining activity in the area continues to show healthy growth, with a number of new\nmines being brought into production during the current year and total mining production\nin the area increasing approximately 15 per cent over 1950 production. ^^^mm\nDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 47\nA number of executive meetings of the Regional Advisory Committee were held\nduring the year. The Committee continued its efforts toward exploring the possibility\nof increasing tourist travel by the development of parks, camp-sites, and vistas in the\nKootenay regions. A report was prepared for the visit of the Vancouver Board of Trade\nTransportation and Communications Bureau on industrial development in Regions One\nand Two for the past three-year period.\nSpecific Assistance to Industry\nThe Nelson field-service office has reported the following assistance to industry\nduring the current year.\nHop-growing.\u2014The establishment of a substantial hop-yard in the Creston area was\nreported in 1950, and our field office has continued to assist this industry in obtaining\ninformation concerning available labour, frost data, and location of materials for this\noperation.\nManufacture of Ceramics.\u2014Furnished data and information through Federal channels at Ottawa regarding the proposed establishment of a small ceramics industry in the\nNelson district.\nManufacture of Pencils.\u2014Information and data supplied through the Technical\nInformation Service of the National Research Council regarding the establishment of a\npencil-factory utilizing local cedar.\nLino-cut Pictures.\u2014This industry was established in late 1950 and additional information was obtained relating to the procurement of picture-frames.\nCranberries.\u2014Data and information supplied to a party interested in cranberry-\ngrowing in the Creston district.\nManufacture of Charcoal.\u2014Information supplied regarding the establishment of a\nsmall charcoal plant.\nPeppermint.\u2014Arrangements made for an experimental plot of 2 acres on the\nCreston flats, and information supplied to determine feasibility of establishing a peppermint industry.\nDrive-in Theatre.\u2014Information obtained from trade for proposed drive-in theatre\nfor the Trail-Rossland area.\nField Surveys in Course of Completion\n(a) A survey was conducted to determine the probable additional labour-supply\nrequired by the recent industrial expansion in the region.\n(b) A report was completed for the International Columbia River Joint Engineering\nCommittee following a two-year survey of industrial relocation on the British Columbia\nside of the Border and related to the proposed hydro-development in Washington and\nMontana.\n(c) Survey continued on industrial potentialities of the region in co-operation with\nthe Associated Boards of Eastern British Columbia.\nOur field office maintained close liaison with other Departmental officials in the\nregion and with other field offices in contact work as between the respective regional areas.\nConduct of several parties throughout the territory was arranged, including the Colombo\nPlan party mentioned elsewhere in this report, the United Kingdom Trade Commissioner,\nand the Trade Representative of the Department from British Columbia House, London,\nEngland, who visited the area during the summer months. Our field official attended\nhearings of the International Joint Commission on the proposed dam at Libby, Mont.,\nand the Waneta Dam south of Trail.\nPROVINCIAL LIBRARY\nVICTORIA, B. C. Q 48 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nKelowna Office\u2014Region Three (Okanagan)\nThe Regional Advisory Committee has continued its surveys during the year covering\nthe third phase of an over-all study of the region related to park areas and camp-sites.\nThirty camp-sites were investigated and recommended, and twelve additional sites are\nawaiting further inspection. The Committee has implemented its report on park areas\nin the southern portion of the region in the Oliver-Osoyoos district.\nThe Committee has co-operated actively with the Okanagan Agriculture Club on a\nspecial study initiated by the club on diversified agriculture. Studies have also been made\non increasing the output of small fruits and vegetables in the fruit-growing areas of the\nregion. A brief on the power situation relating to industry is in course of preparation and\nwill be completed early next year, and the Advisory Committee proposes to give early\nconsideration to certain phases of public health in the region as related to the tourist\nindustry.\nAdditional matters considered by the Committee during the year were furtherance\nof the Grandview Flats irrigation project, soil conservation, Black Mountain new ditch\nproject, berry culture, regulations pertaining to eating establishments, acquisition of\nIndian reserve property at Kaleden for establishment of a fruit-demonstration booth, etc.\nIrrigation Survey. \u2014 The brochure entitled \" Facts about Irrigation and Irrigable\nLands in the Tree Fruits Area of the Okanagan and Similkameen Valleys,\" published by\nthe Division in 1950, has been in continuous demand. The annual irrigation survey\nconducted by our field office has added considerable data, covering forty-four improvement districts. This year a further survey of the Kettle Valley River area has been undertaken and 143 individual water-licence holders contacted. As time and staff limitations\nallow, the irrigable areas under survey will be extended to Region Six. Data secured\nunder this heading is of vital importance to the study of power requirements, sources of\nwater, estimate of pumping costs, etc., for the important agriculture industry in this region.\nTrade Waste.\u2014Our field office has actively co-operated with other departments in\nbringing together sections of industry in the chief centres of the region to study problems\nrelated to trade waste and the utilization of waste materials surplus to the fruit-processing\nindustry. Good progress has been made toward a solution of cannery problems under\nthis heading. A meeting of all interested concerns will be called early in 1952 to consider\nplans of a leading organic-fertilizer company which is contemplating entering this field.\nSpecific Assistance to Industry\nThe volume of industry inquiries through the Kelowna office during the year has\nmaintained a high level, and basic and secondary industry assisted under a wide diversity\nof headings.   A cross-section follows.\nFine Pulp from Apple Prunings.\u2014A number of meetings were held with Eastern\ninterests and investigations undertaken leading to the installation of a pilot plant for the\nmanufacture of fine pulp used in cigarette-paper making.\nPasteurization Plants. \u2014 Various data assembled and meetings held with dairy\nindustry and Dairy Inspection Branch. A plant has now been installed at Grand Forks,\nand further plants contemplated at Princeton and elsewhere.\nBrick-making.\u2014Efforts were made to revive this industry in the Falkland district.\nBoat-building.\u2014Assistance in solving material-supply problems to this industry have\nbeen continued and sources of yellow cedar located.\nBurners for Stoves.\u2014Investigation of export difficulties made for a firm manufacturing this article.\nGrape-growing.\u2014Manufacturing and market data secured for a grape-grower. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 49\nCold Storage.\u2014Contacts were made with the meat-packing trade regarding offseason use of fruit cold storages.\nCeramic Industry.\u2014Samples of clay from the Giscombe deposit were forwarded to\nLuxembourg for testing, and negotiations continued with a large European china-manufacturer contemplating locating in British Columbia-\nCanneries.\u2014Possibilities of new plants at Revelstoke and Westbank were discussed\nwith representatives of a large canning industry. Discussions were also held regarding a\ncommunity cannery in the southern part of the region.\nZircon Deposit.\u2014Information supplied to interests in Armstrong.\nOur field office continued to maintain close relations with all the Boards of Trade\nthroughout the region and, during the period of activity of the Division since 1947, has\nbuilt up a very satisfactory relationship with these agencies. Several monthly and\nquarterly sessions were attended by our field representative and assistance given many\nlocal Boards under a variety of industrial headings, and particularly in connection with\nthe compilation of individual brochures in some localities, and providing Departmental\nmailing-lists for distribution.\nWork on the economic survey of the region, dealt with elsewhere in this report,\nentailed considerable time and effort of our field office in this region in arranging contacts with, and canvassing of, industrial and business concerns throughout the region,\nand the assembling of a vast quantity of material for the market survey of the area.\nContacts with industrial firms concerned in defence contracts were made, and information\ncirculated to appropriate firms on \"Nine Helpful Hints re Defence Contracts.\"\nMany distinguished persons visited the Okanagan region during the course of the\nyear, including the High Commissioner for Australia, His Excellency the Ambassador\nfor the Free State, and several groups of industrialists and engineers. Appropriate industrial tours of the region were arranged by our field office.\nRegion Four (Lower Mainland), Region Five (Vancouver Island and Gulf\nIslands), and Region Seven (Central Coast)\nDuring 1951 industrial activity in Regions Four, Five, and Seven centred principally\non the tremendous expansion of the pulp, paper, and forestry industries. Highlighting\nthis development was the $16,000,000 expansion programme of the pulp industry at\nNanaimo, the allocation of $6,000,000 for modernization of the dissolving sulphite mill\nat Port Alice, and the expected completion by early 1952 of the $40,000,000 newsprint-\nmill at Duncan Bay near Campbell River. Added to this activity were the $12,000,000\nmodernization plan of the pulp and paper plant at Powell River and $5,000,000 expansion of the pulp-mill at Port Mellon. During the year, construction of a $2,000,000\nplywood-factory in Victoria was commenced, which will employ approximately 225 men.\nIn Port Alberni, plans were revealed for construction of $1,500,000 plywood plant.\nA new $1,500,000 Swedish gang-saw unit, one of the most modern in British Columbia,\nalso commenced operation in Port Alberni. The economy of the coastal regions was\nfurther stimulated by the proposed expansion of the hydro-electric plant at Campbell\nRiver, the $2,000,000 expansion project of the cement plant at Bamberton on Vancouver\nIsland, and by an extensive industrial building programme in the metropolitan areas of\nVancouver, Victoria, and New Westminster.\nBusiness Inquiries\nDuring the year an increase in the number of inquiries directed to this office was\nnoted.   Some of the inquiries handled are listed hereunder:\u2014\n(1) An Eastern manufacturer of waxed-paper containers requested information on availability of paper-board in British Columbia.   This company Q 50 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nis interested in establishing a plant on the Pacific Coast, but plans are\ntemporarily held in abeyance due to the current shortage of bleached\nsulphite.\n(2) Request for information on the possibilities of establishing a woollen-sock\nindustry in Victoria. Complete information on markets, supply of wool,\nand manufacturing methods were supplied.\n(3) Inquiry concerning possibilities of obtaining special grade Western red\ncedar for construction of racing-shells. Various business firms interviewed, and the interested firm was placed in touch with a source of this\nmaterial.\n(4) Inquiry from an Eastern manufacturer requiring a supply of special paint\nand varnish to finish manufacture darticles. Contacts of paint-manufacturers arranged, and necessary information forwarded.\n(5) Inquiry from United States interests wishing information to establish in\nBritish Columbia in the lumber business. Inquiry referred to appropriate\nforestry officials, and other special contacts arranged.\n(6) Inquiry from a United States citizen wishing to establish a business in the\nYale district. Complete details on the entire district and also on Hope\nwere sent forward.\nItineraries were arranged and data supplied to several business executives and\nindustrialists visiting the coastal regions during the year. A group of industrialists from\nEngland, interested in Vancouver Island and Mainland centres, was furnished with\ncomprehensive reports on the localities in question, and business contacts and personally\nconducted tours of the areas arranged.\nRegion Six (Kamloops and South Central British Columbia)\n(under Kelowna Office)\nThe Industries Committee continued its study of several matters of concern to the\nregion already outlined in the Annual Report for 1950. The Committee is maintaining\na close interest in the activities of the Fraser River Basin Board as applied to the upper\nreaches of the Fraser, with particular reference to a survey of the Clearwater watershed\nand a power route to the Nicola District.\nThe Committee has again stressed the importance of a survey being undertaken on\nRegion Six of irrigable lands as a prelude to an over-all expansion of the agriculture\nindustry in the region.\nThe Committee has had under review during the year the subject of country killing\nand central meat-inspection depots, and recommendations have been referred to the\nappropriate authority for consideration. Recommendations have also gone forward\nfrom the Committee on the desirability of establishing a plan of restaurant rating and\ninspection. Close liaison has continued with officials of the P.F.R.A. administration and\nDominion and Provincial agriculturalists in the region, and valuable assistance has been\ngiven to the Committee and our field office from these sources. Our field representative\nduring the year has made regular visits to this region, dealing with a substantial increase\nof inquiries and personal interviews.\nRegion Eight (Central British Columbia), Region Nine (North Coastal Area,\nPrince Rupert, and Queen Charlotte), and Region Ten (Peace River)\nGeneral\nThe entire development and activity in Regions Eight and Nine have been stimulated\nby the Alcan Development. All centres in these areas are showing marked growth as a\nresult. Hotels and auto courts have enjoyed capacity business and have not depended\non the tourist traffic in the past year.\n! DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 51\nTransportation facilities in the region have been greatly improved during the year.\nThe Canadian National Railways has increased passenger service on the Jasper\u2014Prince\nRupert line to a daily (except Sunday) service. Freight service has been increased as\nrequired, affecting all railway points, and employment of railway-workers is high. Central\nB.C. Airways has inaugurated a daily return service from Prince George to Terrace, and\nthere is now a bus service from Prince George to Burns Lake, as well as increased freight\ntrucking services. All of these are largely the result of increased travel and shipping\noriginating from the aluminium development.\nA detailed inspection trip was made during the summer of the Alcan project activities at Burns Lake and south, and the Nechako Dam site, 67 miles south-west of Vanderhoof. Officials of the Alcan project have welcomed the interest and co-operation of\nthe Department in this vast industrial undertaking.\nMany new settlers have come to these areas, not only labourers and workers on the\nvarious construction projects, but others seeking to establish themselves in a new and\ngrowing district.\nThis has resulted in increased retail business at all points but has emphasized an\nacute housing shortage over the entire region.\nPrince George and District\nIn the Prince George district, logging conditions continued good during the past\nyear, and prices, while experiencing some recession, are still satisfactory. This condition\nis reflected in the growth of the city and surrounding district. Many fine new homes are\nunder construction, and retail sales remain at a high level.\nMunicipal improvements continue, and cement sidewalks have been installed on\nmost of the down-town streets, and all roads between Third Avenue and Seventh Avenue\nare now paved, between Vancouver and George Streets. This has greatly improved the\nappearance of the city.\nThe school population continues to show marked increase. New rooms were provided this year at Central and Connaught Schools, and three rooms connected with the\nhigh-school dormitory are in use as elementary-school accommodation. Connaught\nSchool recently burned to the ground, throwing 230 children on to the already crowded\nfacilities of King George V, and necessitating a shift system being put into effect for\nGrades III to VI, inclusive. A new school of twelve rooms to replace the seven-roomed\nschool destroyed is planned.\nVanderhoof district has shown great activity. Property values have increased considerably, and retail business has boomed. The contractor on the Nechako Dam project\nhas built prefabricated houses for some of its employees, but the housing shortage is\nstill acute.\nThere are some sixty mills in operation in the district, and prices have been good\nand work steady in the camps and mills.\nConstruction in the village, while showing an increase, has not kept pace with the\nneeds of the community.\nBurns Lake\nBurns Lake is booming; a road has been built from the Francois Lake Road to the\neastern end of Tahtsa Lake, and supplies are barged to the western end of the lake, where\nthe Alcan tunnel operations are going on, and all supplies and equipment are taken in\nover this road.   Contractors for the project have established headquarters here.\nLumbering and logging operations in this district continue at a high level of production. Farming, while not producing the financial return of the lumber industry, is\nforging ahead and may take precedence over lumber and logging as the population\nincreases and agricultural markets develop. Q 52 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nSmithers-Telkwa\nAt Telkwa the local coal mine has stepped up its capacity to 150 tons per day,\nsupplying the cellulose operation on the coast.\nIn the Smithers district several new mining operations are being opened up, and some\nolder developments are showing signs of life, indicating that great interest is still being\nshown in the mining possibilities of this area.\nTerrace-Hazelton\nTerrace is enjoying a great measure of prosperity as the headquarters of logging\noperations for the cellulose plant at Port Edward. Terrace is situated some 42 miles from\nKitimat, the townsite of the Alcan project, and a road will be built connecting the two\npoints in the near future. Railway surveys between Kitimat and Terrace are now under\nway, and a connection will be made to the townsite of Kitimat, scene of the Alcan\nundertaking.\nReal-estate values in Terrace have doubled, and a settlement scheme under way\nabout a mile from the village is opening up very well. Land is being sold in acre lots, and\nhomes are under construction.\nDue to a considerable increase in population in the area, agriculture activity is\nincreasing. A number of small farms are starting up, with the expectation that farm\nproduce can now be sold advantageously, due to proximity of the Alcan operation. Some\nfarm produce is disposed of in Prince Rupert, but there is not sufficient market for\nthe quantities which could be grown, as the land and climate conditions are ideal for small\nmixed farms.\nEfforts have been made by our field office to interest suitable persons in the Lake\nLakelse hot springs. The lake is 12 miles south of the Village of Terrace, on the road\nto Kitimat, and it is ideally suited for a luxury hotel.\nPrince Rupert\nThe city is taking steps to improve its facilities for industry by undertaking a survey\nof possible industrial sites. This action follows discussions with city authorities by our\nfield official during the year. Certain advantages will most certainly accrue to this\nnorthern port through the current large-scale industrial programme taking place at its\ndoor. A gradual increase in population may be expected, and it is anticipated the already\nacute housing shortage will become aggravated unless steps are taken to provide housing\nfor industrial workers. After many idle years, the 1,250,000-bushel-capacity grain-\nstorage elevator is again in operation, and vigorous efforts are being made by local\nagencies to ensure permanency of operation by handling a portion of Western Canada's\ngrain-crop through the port. Our field representative was on hand at the official opening\nof the cellulose plant, which highlighted the year's industrial activity in this area, and was\nattended by a large number of leading industrialists-   The plant is now in full operation.\nDawson Creek and Fort St. John\nThe district has shown little activity for two years past, and population of the area\nhas decreased. With recent oil-developments the picture will now change very rapidly.\nThe reported oil-strike at Peace River Crossing recently has prompted a tremendous flurry\nof lease-buying, and practically the entire country surrounding the well-site has been\nblanketed. Several oil companies have indicated intention to test out their holdings, and\nan all-out drilling campaign seems imminent for this district. Gas is now being piped into\nDawson Creek from Alberta, cutting fuel costs to 25 per cent, and a full servicing of the\narea is to be completed in 1952.   Opening of the Hart Highway is awaited anxiously by DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 53\nresidents of the district, but tourist accommodation is required both along the highway and\nin the Peace River to provide for the traffic expected to travel this new route.\nCariboo\nSeveral centres in the Cariboo have experienced steady growth and increased\nindustrial activity during the year under review. This is especially applicable to Quesnel,\nwhere the logging and lumbering industry is showing rapid expansion. Numerous planer-\nmills are active, employing up to 500 men, and the plywood plant with 200 employees.\nCattle-raising both here and in the Williams Lake district, nevertheless, still plays an\nimportant part in the district's economy, and cattle sales reached a high figure during\n1951. Drilling for oil has been added to the district's activities, and power-development\non a major scale and linking up of transportation and rail facilities will transform the\nindustrial picture in this section of the Province within the next few years.\nNEW INDUSTRIES\nThe substantial volume of large-scale industrial construction commenced during the\nyear under review and referred to earlier in this report has been supplemented by\nnumerous smaller industries reported by our field offices in all regions of the Province.\nA partial list is appended:\u2014\nRegion One (East Kootenay)\nCranbrook: (a) Lumber-conditioning kiln; (b) sawmill; (c) auto courts; (ca)\nautomatic electric-welding plant.\nFernie: (d) Oil-drilling in Flathead area; (e) sixty new houses under construction\nfor coal company; (\/) hotel and beer-parlor (enlargement).\nGolden:   (g) Sawmill operation employing thirty-five men;  (h) auto court.\nKimberley: (i) Fertilizer plant costing $9,000,000, employing 150 men; (\/) 150-\nton mill, estimated cost $300,000; (k) 50-ton base-metal mill, estimated cost $150,000;\n(\/) power-line construction, Riondel to Kimberley concentrator.\nWindermere: (m) Auto court and hotel; (n) new Federal aquacourt at Radium,\n$1,000,000.\nRegion Two (West Kootenay)\nCastlegar: (a) Pulp and paper mill, $75,000,000 (projected, construction to start\nin 1952);   (b) automatic telephone exchange, estimated cost $110,000.\nCreston: (c) Auto court; (d) power-line, Kootenay Bay to Creston, costing\n$375,000  (e) concrete-block factory, employing five men.\nKaslo: (\/) Construction of Riondel townsite and 500-ton mill estimated at\n$3,000,000; (g) 100-ton base-metal mill, estimated cost $150,000; (h) 150-ton lead-\nzinc mill, estimated cost $200,000;  (i) dry-ice pilot plant established.\nNakusp: (\/) Sawmill; (k) Whatshan power project commenced operation 1951;\n(\/) several logging and pole operations-\nNelson: (m) Mine-development and mill-construction estimated at $2,750,000;\n(n) tungsten mine and townsite and 350-ton mill, estimated cOst $1,000,000; (o) mine\nand 50-ton mill, estimated cost $50,000; (p) bus depot, $37,000; (q) mining and\nequipment company; (r) janitors' supplies manufacturing plants; (s) power-line project\nto Kimberley, estimated cost $2,850,000.\nRossland-Trail: (0 Hydro-electric power plant and dam (Waneta) on Pend\nd'Oreille River, estimated cost $30,000,000; (u) modernization of lead-smelter,\n$12,000,000; (v) zinc-plant enlargement, $3,200,000; (w) newspaper-plant enlargement, $75,000. Q 54 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nRevelstoke: (a:) Sawmill; (y) 60-ton mill, estimated cost $100,000; 150-ton mill,\npower plant, mine buildings, projected, cost estimated at $2,000,000.\nRegion Three (Okanagan)\nGrand Forks:   (a) Dairy, Keremeos;  (b) box-lumber manufacturing.\nKelowna:    (c)   Specialty  house;    (d)   cabinet-shop;    (e)   grocery  warehouse\n(expansion)..\nOsoyoos:   (\/) Machine-shop.\nPenticton:   (g) Bakery;  (h) sawmill;  (i) cannery (expansion).\nPrinceton:   (\/') Frozen-food plant;   (k) lumber plant;   (\/) brewery (expansion).\nVernon:   (m) Lumber company;  (n) ice-cream plant.\nRegion Six (Kamloops and South Central British Columbia)\nAshcroft: (a) Ten new lumber plants; (b) feed and seed supply-house; (c) cannery (expansion).\nClinton:   (d) Shoe and saddlery shop;  (c) bakery.\nKamloops: (\/) Sash-and door-manufacturing plant; (g) roofing plant; (h) frozen-\nfood plant;  (\/) seed plant.\nMerritt:   (\/') Sawmill, Lytton; (k) sawmill.\nLillooet:   (\/) Hop-yard;   (m) electric shop;   (n) two sawmills.\nSalmon Arm:   (o) Planing-mill;  (p) sawmill;  (q) co-operative dairy (expansion).\nRegion Four (Lower Mainland)\nBurnaby:   (a) Glazed-fruit factory;  (ft) coffee-milling plant.\nChilliwack: (c) $397,000 departmental store (under construction); (d) Yarrow\nfruit- and vegetable-processing plant.\nMilner:   (e) Factory manufacturing neon signs and baked enamel signs.\nMission City:   (\/) Furniture-factory.\nNew Westminster: (g) Factory manufacturing aluminium precision instruments\n(proposed);  (\/.) carbide-tipped saws plant;   (\/) sash and frames factory.\nPort Coquitlam:   (\/) 15-acre factory-site cleared.\nSteveston: (k) Boat-building plant-\nSurrey: (\/) Factory manufacturing prefabricated houses, farm buildings, etc.;\n(m) bumperettes and bulldozer-blades plant.\nVancouver: (n) Lock manufacturing and assembly plant; (o) printing-supply\nmanufacturing; (p) tire-recapping plant; (q) hammer-manufacturing plant; (r) bleach\nand soap factory;  (s) umbrella plant.\nRegion Five (Vancouver Island)\nCourtenay:   (a) Fish-plug factory.\nCrofton:   (b) Oyster-packaging plant.\nTofino:   (c) Crab-meat packing company.\nVictoria: (d) Nylon-hosiery factory; (<?) veneer plant, $300,000; (\/) office equipment and furniture plant; (g) artificial-ice company plant; (h) plywood plant, estimated\ncost $2,000,000.\nRegion Eight (Central British Columbia) and Region Nine\n(North Coastal Area)\nPrince George: (a) Eight-unit motel; (b) propane-gas storage plant; (c) first unit\nof large dairying operation, $200,000; (d) variety store; (e) hotel expansion, $15,000;\n(\/) hardware warehouse;  (g) equipment warehouse. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 55\nQuesnel:   (h) Plywood-plant expansion.\nBurns Lake: (\/) Hotel expansion; (\/') equipment yard and warehouses (Alcan\nproject);   (k) airways floats;   (\/) mechanical garage.\nSmithers and Hazleton:   (m) Several new mining operations.\nTerrace:   (n) Four new mining operations opened in 1950.\nRegion Ten (Peace River)\nDawson Creek:  Natural-gas installation and distribution.\nECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL SURVEY OF REGIONAL AREAS\nThe report of the Division's activities during 1950 made reference to the decision\nto undertake certain economic and industrial surveys by regional areas as a follow-up\nto the analysis and cataloguing of industrial facilities and resources of the Province as\noutlined in the Regional Industrial Index. The first of this series of area analyses was\ncommenced in Region Three (Okanagan) in October, 1950, and completed during the\nyear under review. Extensive market surveys were carried out in co-operation with the\nBoards of Trade and other agencies in the various centres of the region, whose help\nand assistance proved of considerable value to the success of the survey. The survey\nembraced an intimate study of industrial-location factors, the manufacturing industries\nof the region and their markets. A wealth of data was also assembled on employment,\nwages, and production; income and purchasing power; labour-supply; transportation\nand power. This material, gathered from all centres in the region, was forwarded through\nour field office to Victoria for analysis by a special staff assigned to the survey and assisted\nby the Department's Bureau of Economics and Statistics, and later compiled in an\neconomic-survey report and published under the heading \" Industry and Markets in the\nOkanagan, Similkameen, and Kettle Valleys\u2014Region Three.\" Following wide distribution of the report, most favourable comment has been received from all branches of\nindustry and business concerns across Canada, urging further studies of this kind be\nmade in other regional areas. Extension of these regional surveys will be given early\nconsideration as time and staff permit.\nINDUSTRIAL MAPPING OF REGIONAL CENTRES\nIn the Annual Report, reference was made last year to the completion of the composite industrial map of the Lower Mainland and maps covering the three Okanagan\ncentres of Vernon, Kelowna, and Penticton. This series of maps was especially designed\nto define existing and potential industrial areas in the larger cities of the Province, with\ninformation outlining the acreages available for light and heavy industry, rail terminals,\nhighway routing, and other data. Publication of these industrial maps has filled a gap\nin certain essential information, concerning the larger cities, of special value to industry,\njudging by the numerous requests received for the maps from all sections of industry and\nbusiness following their initial distribution. Further distribution of the Lower Mainland\nmap will be made by inclusion of this map in the next issue of the Industrial Index.\nA key industrial map of the Lower Fraser Valley, covering the area from the eastern\nboundary of Greater Vancouver to Hope, is now under preparation by the draughting\noffice of the Division, to be published in conjunction with the report of the industrial\nsurvey of communities in the Lower Fraser Valley carried out by the Division during the\ncurrent year.\nREGIONAL INDUSTRIAL INDEX\nOver several months of the year our field offices have been engaged in a revision of\nall data pertaining to the seventy-nine districts covered by the Index.   A revised edition Q 56 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nof the Index (1951-52), with factual and statistical information relating to the industrial\nfacilities and natural resources of the Province broken down by all seventy-nine district\nareas, will be published toward the end of 1951.\nThe demand for this publication has been steadily increasing over the past two\nyears, many business firms ordering several copies for branch establishments, and the\nsupply of the 1950 edition of the Index has long been exhausted. A large number of\nadvance requests for the revised edition have been received, with a particularly heavy\ndemand from Eastern Canada, indicating a national interest in the current industrial\nprogress of British Columbia. A considerably augmented printing of the next edition\nwill therefore be necessary. The revised edition will incorporate several new features\nand will contain a series of industrial maps of several of our larger cities, which should\nprove a valuable guide for industry to many of our industrial areas. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 57\nREPORT OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT TRAVEL BUREAU\nGENERAL\nThe British Columbia Government Travel Bureau reports another record year in\nrecreational travel to and through the Province in 1951. Twelve per cent more vehicles\nentered Canada through British Columbia Border points than in 1950, accenting a trend\nwhich has been constant since 1948. In 1951, 247,712 traveller's vehicle permits were\nissued to visitors staying forty-eight hours or more, compared with 221,642 in the\nprevious record year of 1950.\nIn addition to the foregoing, some 110,000 car entries were made under the non-\npermit class; 242,000 persons who might be classed as tourists made direct entry into\nthe Province by rail, steamship, bus, or air, and approximately the same number destined\nfor British Columbia vacation areas entered Canada through customs ports in other\nProvinces, crossing the Alberta Boundary by private or public carrier.\nThus, with an average of three persons admitted with each car, British Columbia\nplayed host in 1951 to close to 1,500,000 visitors, and, basing estimates on figures\ndetermined through several official surveys, it is very conservatively held that British\nColumbia's tourist industry benefited the Province to the following extent:\u2014\nThose entering on traveller's vehicle permits spent an\nestimated  $28,640,000\nVisitors arriving direct by public carrier     20,817,000\nVisitors arriving indirectly, domestic and interprovincial tourists     13,542,000\nTotal tourist expenditures (estimated)  $62,999,000\nWhile tourist traffic in British Columbia showed an increase of approximately 12\nper cent over 1950, this increase is not reflected in the estimated dollar return (1950,\n$60,000,000). The visitor industry is a natural barometer of the continental economy,\nand the average visitor, having less to spend than in previous years, was more rate-\nconscious and more conservative in his purchases. There was a marked increase in\nthe number of inquiries with respect to camping. Generally, however, tourist accommodation in the larger urban centres or on main through-travel routes enjoyed an\nexcellent year.\nThat British Columbia is able to review the tourist-year with a degree of satisfaction\nmay be attributed in large measure to the continuity of its advertising and the cumulative\neffect behind the current campaigns. A great deal is also due to appreciation by the\nAutomobile Clubs and oil-company direction bureaux of the improved highways and\naccommodations, to which considerable publicity has been given. It is also interesting\nto note that while only modest gains were made in the first five months of the year, April\nfalling off very slightly, the June returns on the traveller's vehicle permits showed a traffic\nimprovement of 32 per cent over 1950. At this time the full impact of the national and\nregional advertising would be felt.\nThe local tourist or information bureaux throughout the Province and the Canadian\nCustoms offices at Border points, where the Bureau maintains folder-racks, were again\nvery co-operative in the programme designed to encourage longer stop-overs and increased\nmileage within the Province. Up-to-date road reports were furnished all tourist contact\npoints, and the Bureau's travel extension work was only limited by the quantity of\nregional folders and other directional aid available.\nOnce again the Bureau carried on a modest campaign to encourage British Columbians to see their own Province first, and there was every indication through the resort\nareas that this programme has proven successful to a noticeable degree.   Special seasonal Q 58 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nft\nevents which were promoted at home and abroad by local interests at Chilliwack, Mission,\nNew Westminster, Revelstoke, Nelson, Vernon, Kelowna, and Penticton, and to which\nthe Bureau was able to extend helpful co-operation, were also given considerable advance\npublicity, which encouraged attendance from a wide circle.\nThe tremendous increase in the industrial population of the Western States has\nwidened British Columbia's market among those who enjoy vacations with pay. Most of\nour resort areas are able to cater to this new business, and the steady increase in traffic\nover the past few years is due in no small degree to the population increases of the west-\ncoast States. This market, however, has been appreciated by other tourist areas, and of\nthe more than $35,000,000 spent in community, travel, and transportation advertising in\nthe United States annually, a very large amount must be considered directly competitive\nwith British Columbia in this particular field.\nIn the main, British Columbia's resorts and tourist accommodations have been\nflexible enough to adjust themselves to the changes in vacation trends and the requirements imposed by competitive areas, but in anticipation of any future levelling off in\ntourist traffic, and in view of the increasing intensity of our competition, the Bureau\nproposes to encourage, with all facilities at its disposal, the development of a different\nCanadian atmosphere, the restoration and preservation or marking of historic sites, the\ndevelopment of Canadian cuisine, and local features and attractions which may be\nblended into a composite but distinct appeal.\nWhile fishing is a strong attraction to the Province, the improved highways and other\nfactors have made this a less important consideration over all, and there is a growing\nawareness through the tourist industry in British Columbia that \" romance \" coupled with\nfull resort amenities must be furnished if the full potential of the industry is to be realized.\nThe romance of the Cariboo country, for instance, is considered ripe for appreciation and\ncapitalization. In other words, that era has passed when catering to the tourist meant\nmerely providing bed and board for people who were content to enjoy the scenery or do\na little fishing along the way. More accent must now be placed on the aesthetic, cultural,\nand historic features, which can be used to give distinctive colour to our promotions and\nsatisfaction to the visitor who, with his colour-camera and notebook, seeks the odd,\nindigenous, and different in his vacation travels.\nWith its limited budget, the Bureau does not propose to embark upon any ambitious\nprogramme, but to encourage the appreciation of this facet of tourist-development among\nlocal organizations, whose consciousness of it will go a long way toward the further\ndevelopment of a distinctive British Columbia atmosphere and appeal.\nADVERTISING\nAs in 1950, the 1951 advertising was influenced by the fact that the majority of\nAmerican tourists now visit Canada for touring and sightseeing. This is very definitely\nindicated by a survey of tourist travel which revealed that the American tourist comes to\nCanada to do the following: Fishing, 17 per cent; hunting, 5 per cent; cruising and\nsailing, 3 per cent; resort relaxation, 13 per cent; touring and sightseeing, 51 per cent;\nand city-visits, 11 per cent.\nThe campaign laid some emphasis on the totem theme, which was used to a limited\nextent last year to emphasize the different or foreign features which are of importance to\ntourist-and-sightseeing visitors, and also to establish a symbol. This supplemented the\ninvitation \" Visit Beautiful British Columbia.\"\nThe schedule of magazine and newspapers was developed after a careful analysis\nwas made of all data available. It included both small-space advertisements in leading\nUnited States magazines and a regular newspaper appropriation for the Western States.\nApproximately 84 per cent of United States visitors to Canada are classed as short\nterm (stay was less than three days), but the total travel expenditures in Canada of this DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 59\ngroup is only 19 per cent of the total. The long-term group (16 per cent of the total)\naccounts for 81 per cent of all expenditures.\nThe majority of short-term visitors (especially week-end tourists) are from the\nState of Washington. For this reason a special regional campaign directed to Washington\ndailies promoted short holiday trips to British Columbia at times when most people were\nthinking of taking a short trip\u2014before Memorial Day, before the Fourth of July, before\nLabour Day, and before Thanksgiving. In other States such as Oregon, California,\nTexas, etc., daily newspapers were selected in the larger centres. This advertising at the\ncommunity level supplemented that placed in high-circulation magazines. It was designed\nto reach the lucrative long-term vacation group. Here again copy themes were appropriately designed to appeal to this particular potential.\nAltogether some forty-eight newspapers were used with a total circulation of\n5,892,000, and a total of 22,460,000 impressions was purchased. Sixteen national\nmagazines with a gross circulation of 16,000,000 were used to give a total of 33,950,000\nimpressions. Thus a total of over 56,000,000 impressions was secured, the newspaper\ncopy running from April through to July, with the bulk of the magazine impressions being\nmade in the April, May, and June issues.\nIn addition to the foregoing, the stream-lined painted bulletins which had been\nstrategically placed under contract, in the vicinity of Seattle, Portland, Tacoma, Grants\nPass, and Spokane, were repainted with fresh design and the message \" Visit Alluring\nBritish Columbia  miles north! \" Gross traffic count past these boards approximates 11,680,000.\nA winter advertising campaign was conducted through the Prairie Provinces and\nEastern Canada as in previous years and following a similar pattern. Inquiry returns\nfrom this promotion were quite as high as in 1950 despite economic factors which, it\nwas expected, would lessen the interest in British Columbia as a haven for winter\nmonths. Here again it is felt that the continuity of our advertising has had a cumulative\neffect, as the interest shown was out of proportion to the small amount invested.\nDuring the height of the season, inquiries in response to advertising averaged 325\nper day, with the highest day's mail reaching 731. The Bureau endeavoured to respond\nto each letter within twenty-four hours of receipt, and in all cases answers were made\nwithin forty-eight hours, additional help being acquired for this purpose and all efforts\nof the entire staff being devoted to this end.\nThe preparation and ordering of general advertising, including special editions, are\n.also undertaken by the Bureau, which further acts as a clearing-house for all Government\nadvertising, checking advertising invoices for all departments.\nRADIO\nFor the purpose of encouraging British Columbians to spend their own vacations to\na greater extent within the Province, a series of thirty-two spot announcements was begun\nearly in the season and concluded with every indication that this was a contributing factor\nto an increase in domestic travel. Stations used were CHWK, CJDC, CKOV, CKLN,\nCJAV, CKOK, CFJC, CKNW, CKPG, CFPR, CJAT, CJOR, CKMO, CKWX, CJIB,\nCJVI, CKOA, CKDA, and CHUB.\nIn addition to carrying the scheduled spot announcements, most of the stations gave\nsupplementary ones without billing, and all of them supported the programme with\nannouncements and features of their own which complemented the basic message.\nSponsors of the commercial programmes were also encouraged to adopt the theme where\npractical, and the measure of co-operation from radio-station management generally\ndeserves a very special mention in this report. Q 60 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nLITERATURE\nLast year more than half a million pieces of informative and promotional literature\nwere distributed through various channels into the hands of potential and actual visitors.\nSome thirty standard folder publications were revised, in addition to a number of miscellaneous pieces, such as road reports, hotel listings, and calendars of events, which were\nrun off from time to time as required. The standard publications cover general informative\nliterature, regional promotional pieces, maps, and two pieces of particular interest to\nsettlers.\nNew publications included one featuring the \" Okanagan-Fraser Canyon Loop.\"\n\" Vancouver Island \" was revised and appeared in an improved format. While quantities\nordered were as generous as the budget would allow, supplies again fell short of demands,\nwhich were particularly heavy. Automobile Clubs and other directional bureaux in the\nUnited States made an unprecedented demand for regional and general literature on\nBritish Columbia, and there were heavily increased requests for supplies from Border\npoints and Travel Bureaux in the Interior, where Chambers of Commerce and other\ninterests support the Government Travel Bureau in its efforts to encourage extra days\nand extra mileage within the Province.\nWhile the Bureau has concentrated on the production of practical rather than\nprestige pieces, \" British Columbia, Canada,\" a booklet which discusses all phases of\nBritish Columbia's life and economy, has been revised in context and format to serve the\nmultiple purposes of encouraging industrial development and investment, settlement, and\ntourism, as well as being a generally informative publication with universal interest.\nWith the co-operation of the Department of Public Works, the Bureau was able to\nproduce a series of current road reports in map form, which had an acceptance beyond\nanticipation. These reports carried detours and surface conditions in a secondary colour\nover a base map. Automobile Clubs throughout Canada and the United States made very\neffective use of them. Travel counsellors in every State requested additional copies of\neach issue, and every oil company received supplies which enabled them to keep their\nservice-stations informed. The reports were issued at intervals, usually bi-weekly, during\nthe tourist season commencing May 21st. The King's Printer afforded forty-eight-hour\nservice on this production, with the result that all reports were timely when they reached\ntheir ultimate destination.\nApart from a small folder on the Cassiar region, no new literature is contemplated\nfor 1952, but all current material will be revised as required and every effort made to\nintroduce colour into those pieces which are competitive.\nPHOTOGRAPHIC BRANCH\nTwo new 16-mm. colour-sound films were added to the film library during the year;\n\" Vancouver Island,\" a revision of an old original, and \" Peachtime in the Valley,\" featuring the Hope-Princeton Highway and Penticton. Both of these were produced by the\nChief Photographer. In addition, four films were readied for editing\u2014\" West by Nor'-\nWest,\" covering the west coast of Vancouver Island, \" Peace River and Alaska Highway,\"\n\"B.C.'s Potato Industry,\" and the \"Inside Passage,\" highlighting the Mainland coast\nfrom Vancouver to Ketchikan.\nA 16-mm. special film was taken of the election of the Primate of the Church of\nEngland in Canada; another film was taken of the visit of Princess Elizabeth and the\nDuke of Edinburgh to Victoria and Nanaimo; and work was almost completed on a film\nfeaturing British Columbia's basic and secondary industries.\nApproximately 172,000 people viewed the Bureau's films in 1951 through audiences\ndistributed as follows: British Columbia, 90,000; other Provinces, 2,000; United States,\n40,000; and United Kingdom, 40,000. \u25a0\u25a0\u25a0^^\nDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 61\nThe office of the Agent-General in London screened twenty-two films to a total of\n435 showings at British Columbia House, Tourist Bureaux, clubs and schools, and at\nprivate showings for commercial firms and other interests.\nThe still-photograph production totalled 55,900 prints. Of these, 9,700 were forwarded to writers, publishers, advertising agents, and others for publicity and illustrative\npurposes. The balance represents prints made for stock purposes and a large volume for\nother departments, notably Archives, Public Works, Health, and Agriculture.\nThis work for other departments also accounted for a large proportion of the 3,900\nnegatives which were also processed. Those negatives which were exposed in the Department's own interest cover practically every industrial, scenic, and recreational interest,\nand have added to a very comprehensive library of many thousands of pictures depicting\nall phases Of life in the Province.\nFIELD WORK\nThe Assistant Commissioner made a two-month contact trip in the spring of the\nyear through the States of Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, and Nevada. This\nannual trip enables a personal contact to be maintained with numerous travel counsellors\nand others actively engaged in the industry. Of the wide variety of offices called on,\nparticular attention was given to the Automobile Clubs, touring departments of oil\ncompanies, transportation companies, Travel Bureaux, and Chambers of Commerce.\nIn addition to the foregoing, considerable time was spent with staffs of Canadian and\nBritish consulates and other groups, all of whom, during the course of their duties,\nrequire up-to-date knowledge of travel conditions and facilities in our Province. Arrangements were made with most of the large daily newspapers for the publishing of articles\nand pictures on British Columbia's vacationing features. The principal tourist directional organizations, Automobile Clubs and oil companies noticeably, were especially\ninterested in particulars on highway conditions and accommodations available.\nExhibits at the travel and vacation shows in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle\nwere sponsored by the Canadian Government Travel Bureau. The Assistant Commissioner attended these shows, assisting the personnel accompanying the exhibits in answering the heavy volume of inquiries on British Columbia. Approximately half a million\npersons paid admission to the three shows.\nIn the early summer further work was carried out in Washington State by calling\non travel counsellors of Automobile Clubs and travel agencies. The large amount of\ndetailed travel information required on British Columbia in this area was supplied and\nbrought up to date at that time.\nInformation centres, travel agents, customs ports, and interprovincial border-\ncrossing points within the Province and Alberta were called upon, with the British\nColumbia points receiving a number of visits.\nWith the continual increase in the Province's tourist traffic, particularly on the\nhighways, information centres are increasingly popular, and the communities supplying\nthis facility received excellent returns. The Assistant Commissioner was able to correlate\nmany of the valuable services rendered on a community level and also advise with respect\nto pertinent matters affecting the travel industry on Provincial and international levels.\nMeetings with the Auto Courts and Resorts Association and other local and\nProvincial groups connected with the tourist industry proved most beneficial.\nThe field work of the British Columbia Government Travel Bureau, coupled with\nthe interest, understanding, co-operation, and assistance of the many local Chambers of\nCommerce, Boards of Trade, and service clubs, plus that of the larger Province-wide\norganizations, such as British Columbia Automobile Club and the Auto Courts and\nResorts Association of British Columbia, have been large factors in producing a new\nrecord year in vacation travel. Q 62 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nCO-OPERATIVE ACTIVITIES\nOperating as it does almost entirely on a Provincial level, the Travel Bureau must\nrely a great deal on local and regional organizations, international agencies of various\nkinds, and other official bodies to extend its interest to the potential and actual visitors.\nIt is with pleasure and gratification, therefore, that recognition is given in this report\nto the many individuals and organizations without whose full co-operation British\nColumbia's annual investment in tourist promotion would not make such handsome\nreturns. In one field, particular reference should be made to the intelligent interest in\nBritish Columbia shown by the officers and staff of the Automobile Club of Southern\nCalifornia, the National Automobile Club, and the California State Automobile Association. The Oregon and Washington State Automobile Associations also co-operated with\nthe Bureau to the fullest possible extent. They all were very careful to see that the information passed on to their members and patrons was accurate and detailed, and it is felt\nthat much of the gain in motor traffic previously reported is due to the appreciation of\nour highway system by the associations mentioned.\nThe British Columbia Automobile Association also co-operated very closely with\nthe Bureau, and its secretary-manager, H. F. Bird, found many occasions to discuss\nmutual problems with the Commissioner and to offer timely counsel.\nWhile its general promotions are designed to encourage visitors to the Province, the\nTravel Bureau is also definitely interested in what happens to them when they get here,\nin seeing that they are properly advised and treated, and in encouraging longer stays and\nextra mileage. In this interest the support and co-operation of local and regional organizations have been invaluable. As they have developed in number and size over the past\nfew years, so have they broadened their own fields of activity and their measure of cooperation with one another and with the Government Travel Bureau, thus making a great\ncontribution to the advancement of tourism throughout the Province. In this connection\nthe Victoria and Island Publicity Bureau and its staff, under the direction of George I.\nWarren, and the Vancouver Tourist Association personnel, under M. McCormick, warrant particular recognition for an interest in the tourist trade which is Province-wide, and\nfor a tourist service extending far beyond their local or regional concerns.\nThe visitor industry has gained such recognition and appreciation that virtually every\nBoard of Trade and Chamber of Commerce in the Province is now equipped to give\ntourist advice, and it is difficult to single out any for special mention. At centres close\nto the Border entry points and at main highway junctions, such as New Westminster,\nPenticton, Osoyoos, Kamloops, Chilliwack, Kimberley, Revelstoke, Nanaimo, and Courtenay, the local interests have done a great job and rendered useful and effective service\nto many thousands of visitors. The same holds true for a score of other centres whose\nco-operation with the Bureau has enabled it to round out a more comprehensive programme of promotion and service.\nAt all Border points the Canadian Customs and Immigration Officers have also\nworked as closely with the Bureau as their duties will permit, and their co-operation and\nappreciation of the value of the visitor industry have also contributed in no small way to\nits development.\nThrough its Provincial and regional officers the British Columbia Auto Courts and\nResorts Association has extended much assistance to the Bureau, and the relationship\nbetween the Bureau and this representative body is a source of keen gratification. Any\nproblems arising were met with a mutual desire to serve the tourist industry best, and\nDr. A. H. Bayne, president, and his officers devoted considerable time and effort to\nmatters concerning the business as a whole.\nWhile British Columbia maintains but a token membership in the Evergreen Playground Association, the Department has had a voice in the advertising placed by the DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 63\nassociation which features the Pacific Northwest.   As in the past, every courtesy and\nconsideration has been extended by the officers of the association.\nWith the Canadian Government Travel Bureau, a continuous exchange of corres-\ndence is maintained, and British Columbia's interest in Canada-wide promotions originating in Ottawa has been well protected. Statistical material and large quantities of\nliterature dealing with immigration and customs matters and the National Parks have\nbeen made readily available, and through conference and correspondence, many basic\nproblems affecting Canadian and Provincial tourist traffic have been brought to successful\nconclusions.\nThe Canadian Consul-General and his staff in San Francisco and the Canadian Trade\nCommissioner in Los Angeles have at all times placed the facilities and resources of their\noffices at the disposal of the Bureau. Calls upon their services were frequent, but in every\ncase the response was prompt and whole-hearted-\nThe tourist industry has many and constantly varying problems and complexities.\nIt deals, more than any other, with personalities and human relations. It is, therefore,\na source of keen gratification to the officers of the Bureau that its relationship with all\nthose associated in the development of the industry has been maintained at a high\nco-operative level.\nTOURIST COUNCIL\nThe annual meeting of the advisory body, held in February under the chairmanship\nof the Deputy Minister, discussed a heavy agenda and was productive of many constructive suggestions and recommendations. The current situation in the tourist industry\nwas reviewed by the Chairman, the advertising programme for 1951 approved, and\ngeneral policy considered at length.\nMajor recommendations arising out of the meeting dealt with road-signs, proposed\namendments to the Tourist Camp Act, park utilization, and the establishment of tourist\ninformation bureaux or reception centres under Government auspices.\nThe Bureau was able to implement all recommendations of the Council except the\nlatter, which was also supported from time to time by resolutions and letters from Boards\nof Trade and other organizations. However, expansion of service through reception\ncentres, which has proven profitable to other Provinces and States of the Union, has\nbeen deferred by budget considerations in view of the capital investment required.\nDuring the meeting regional problems were discussed, but regional members of the\nCouncil had co-operated with the Travel Bureau throughout the year when any problems\nwere given immediate attention, and the Council was able to devote the major part of\nthe session to matters of Provincial scope.\nThe personnel of the Council was as follows:\u2014\nFull Membership.\u2014James T. Hunter, Kamloops Board of Trade; George I.\nWarren, Victoria and Island Publicity Bureau; Howard Faulkner, Kelowna Board of Trade; C. D. Orchard, Deputy Minister of Forests;\nF. R. Butler, Commissioner, British Columbia Game Commission; J. V.\nFisher, Deputy Minister of Finance; E. G. Rowebottom, Deputy Minister\nof Trade and Industry; Superintendent G. H. Archer, Royal Canadian\nMounted Police; Ernest Evans, Commissioner, Government Travel\nBureau; Neil McCallum, Assistant Chief Engineer, Department of Public\nWorks; P. E. Robertson, Prince George Board of Trade; T. D. Rosling,\npresident, Nelson Board of Trade; Dr. C. H. Worthington, Vancouver\nTourist Association.\nAssociate Members.\u2014Earle Dickey, Revelstoke Board of Trade, Revelstoke;\nJ. Pound, Auto Courts and Resorts Association, Vancouver; J. S. Brown,\nBurns Lake Board of Trade, Burns Lake; E. Ely, British Columbia Hotels Q 64 BRITISH COLUMBIA\nAssociation, Vancouver; D. F. Shaw, Chilliwack; Les Young, manager,\nOdeon Theatres, New Westminster; Ralph Williamson, Dawson Creek\nTerminal Company, Dawson Creek; H. Kraupner, Prince Rupert Chamber of Commerce, Prince Rupert; W. H. Wilson, Associated Boards of\nTrade of East and West Kootenay, Cranbrook; Dr. A. H. Bayne, Williams Lake and District Board of Trade, Williams Lake.\nTHE CANADIAN TOURIST ASSOCIATION\nThe Bureau supported the Sixth Tourist Service Educational Week campaign sponsored by the Canadian Tourist Association in May, and a large amount of editorial\nmaterial contributed by the press emphasized the value of the tourist trade to the\nProvince and did much to awaken a greater public tourist consciousness.\nAt the annual meeting of the association in September, which was attended by the\nHonourable Robert H. Winters, Minister of Resources and Development, particular\nemphasis was laid on interprovincial travel and its development, and also on matters\nconcerning the actual catering to visitors. A number of resolutions were passed which,\nwhen acted upon, will have the effect of keeping the Canadian tourist dollar at home\nand of encouraging longer stays in Canadian vacation areas.\n\" TOURIST ACCOMMODATION REGULATION ACT \"\nAt the last regular session of the Legislative Assembly the \" Tourist Camp Regulation Act\" was amended to cover all accommodations catering to the tourist other than\nthose regulated by the \" Government Liquor Act \" or operated by welfare or charitable\norganizations. The original Act, applying only to tourist camps or premises equipped\nwith cabins, was considered discriminating in that competitive establishments were not\ninspected under the same regulations. The revised Act and regulations are designed to\nassure clean and sanitary standards in all types of tourist accommodation.\nFull implementation of the regulations has not yet been achieved, but it is hoped that\nby the end of 1952 a greater percentage of accommodation will be inspected and\napproved. A major obstacle to the complete coverage under the regulations is the fact\nthat certain cities issue rooming- or lodging-house licences to premises catering to tourists.\nWhile the municipalities are responsible for the enforcement of the Tourist Accommodation Regulations, to recognize a large number of rooming-houses as transient accommodation would be to admit tacitly that commercial enterprises were being conducted in\nrestricted zones. In some cases the situation can be relieved only by amending the\nzoning by-laws.\nThe Bureau's interest in the Act is the protection of the tourist in respect to sanitation, etc., the maintenance of reasonable standards, and the encouragement of improved\nstandards. It is felt, however, that the minimum requirements should be met throughout\nthe tourist industry, and every effort will be made to see that all premises posting a\n\" tourist \" shingle are approved by civic inspectors or inspectors appointed under the Act.\nAppointment in October of a Tourist Accommodation Inspector has not relieved\nthe Assistant Commissioner of responsibility in this connection but has assured a continuity of the work throughout the year and a quicker response to requests for classification and for inspections prior to licensing.\nDuring the calendar year over 65 per cent of premises licensed Or registered were\ninspected once or more by officers from the Bureau or by district sanitarians. It is\nhoped that in 1952 and thereafter all premises catering to the tourist will benefit from\nan annual inspection. In some instances it has been found necessary for the Inspectors\nto check premises' more than once during the season, but standards have generally\nimproved to the point where only two licences or registrations were suspended for any\nperiod in 1951. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY Q 65\nAt present 1,196 tourist accommodations are licensed or registered under the Act-\nIn addition, some eighty-four permits covering new construction are outstanding. Of\nthese premises, 27 per cent rate four stars, 23 per cent three stars, 17 per cent two stars,\n15 per cent one star, and 18 per cent, while approved, do not qualify for a star rating.\nReinspections during the year improved the rating of twenty-one premises and lowered\nthe standing of four, the majority of accommodations maintaining standards with their\nstar ratings unchanged.\nThe turn-over in tourist accommodation is perhaps greater than in any other business. In one wide resort area all but two auto courts and resorts changed hands at\nleast once in one eight-month period, and over 70 per cent of premises listed have had\nat least one new owner in the past two years.\nAs very few of the new operators have had any previous experience in the business,\nthe work of the Inspectors in the educational field and in the maintenance of standards\nis continuous throughout the year.    However, notwithstanding adjustments which many\noperators had to make, complaints from the travelling public were very few and, on the\nother hand, many complimentary letters were received by the Bureau on the standards\nachieved.\nSETTLEMENT\nSettlement inquiries were handled by the Bureau in unprecedented volume in 1951\nand ranged in interest from homesteading through practically every trade and profession.\nAbout a third of the inquiries were from the Prairies and Eastern Canada, and a high\npercentage of these were addressed by new Canadians who had first settled elsewhere\nand wished to pioneer in a country which, they thought, would offer greater opportunities.\nIt was quite obvious from the inquiries originating in the East that the advantages\nof British Columbia's social legislation have been discussed in wide circles. Schools,\nhospital insurance, and old-age pensions featured many letters, but a large proportion\nwere from skilled tradesmen who could contribute a great deal to the development of\nBritish Columbia. From Africa, India, and South America a steady flow of inquiries\ncame from the executive and professional fields. Most of the applicants are younger\nmen who wish to establish themselves in an Anglo-Saxon community with economic\nstability, but there is also a great interest among those who are approaching retirement.\nInquiries from Britain reflect the interest of agricultural workers, unskilled and\nyoung skilled tradesmen. Many ask about any available scheme of passage assistance.\nThe difficulties associated with the transfer of sterling discourage many potential settlers\nfrom the British Isles.\nThe Canadian Immigration Branch is actively interested in settlement work of all\nkinds and, once the prospective settler from overseas has been satisfied in respect of\nmatters which are purely Provincial in scope, is able to render complete service. Thus\nthe Bureau has more and more confined its interest to furnishing such facts and figures\nas might be requested, the Immigration Branch doing any finalizing. The Bureau is not\nalways appraised of ultimate settlement action on the part of prospective immigrants to\nthe Province. In a large number of cases, however, both in connection with inquiries\noriginating in Canada and abroad, a chain of correspondence is carried on which indicates\npositive action on the part of the inquirer.\nIn the furtherance of settlement interests of all kinds, the Bureau has been pleased\nto co-operate with the Canadian Immigration Department, the National Employment\nService, and the Colonization Departments of the Canadian National and Canadian\nPacific Railways. In England the office of the Agent-General for British Columbia has\nsupported our work in this field, as has the London office of the Canadian Department of\nLabour- The Bureau has also been advised by the Department of Agriculture and the\nDepartment of Lands and Forests in Victoria, and all agencies mentioned have cooperated to the end that the prospective settler has been given all information and all\nassistance authoritatively and speedily. VICTORIA, B.C.\nPrinted by Don McDiarmid, Printer to the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty\n1952\n1,220-1151-2059  ","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/hasType":[{"value":"Legislative proceedings","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/identifier":[{"value":"J110.L5 S7","type":"literal","lang":"en"},{"value":"1952_V02_05_Q1_Q66","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/isShownAt":[{"value":"10.14288\/1.0343142","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/language":[{"value":"English","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/provider":[{"value":"Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/publisher":[{"value":"Victoria, BC : Government Printer","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/rights":[{"value":"Images provided for research and reference use only. For permission to publish, copy or otherwise distribute these images please contact the Legislative Library of British Columbia","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/source":[{"value":"Original Format: Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. Library. Sessional Papers of the Province of British Columbia","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/title":[{"value":"PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Department of Trade and Industry REPORT For the Year Ended December 31st 1951","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/type":[{"value":"Text","type":"literal","lang":"en"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/description":[{"value":"","type":"literal","lang":"en"}]}}