{"@context":{"@language":"en","AggregatedSourceRepository":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/dataProvider","CatalogueRecord":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/isReferencedBy","Collection":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/isPartOf","DateAvailable":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/issued","DateIssued":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/issued","Description":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/description","DigitalResourceOriginalRecord":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/aggregatedCHO","FileFormat":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/elements\/1.1\/format","FullText":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2009\/08\/skos-reference\/skos.html#note","Genre":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/hasType","GeographicLocation":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/spatial","Identifier":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/identifier","IsShownAt":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/isShownAt","Language":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/language","Provider":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/provider","Publisher":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/publisher","Rights":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/rights","SortDate":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/date","Source":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/source","Subject":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/subject","Title":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/title","Type":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/type","Translation":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/description"},"AggregatedSourceRepository":[{"@value":"CONTENTdm","@language":"en"}],"CatalogueRecord":[{"@value":"http:\/\/resolve.library.ubc.ca\/cgi-bin\/catsearch?bid=1211252","@language":"en"}],"Collection":[{"@value":"University Publications","@language":"en"}],"DateAvailable":[{"@value":"2015-08-11","@language":"en"}],"DateIssued":[{"@value":"1967-11-17","@language":"en"}],"Description":[{"@value":"Misprinted volume, should be L.","@language":"en"}],"DigitalResourceOriginalRecord":[{"@value":"https:\/\/open.library.ubc.ca\/collections\/Ubysseynews\/items\/1.0125755\/source.json","@language":"en"}],"FileFormat":[{"@value":"application\/pdf","@language":"en"}],"FullText":[{"@value":" AN OFFERING of love and\npeace in the form of a bouquet of white chrysanthemums is accepted from\nscience vice-president John\nTaylor by arts prez Stan Per-\n?, sky. iPrteisentation made during The Blues mjer-bliange\ndance in Brock Thursday,\n\\bif 9 uigTl t exclamation; of\n'beautiful, beautiful' from\nPersky. And the band played\nJ'an :-r despite cfr\u00a5s-commerce\nmix-up about who had the\nright to the hall at the time.\nArts got it. Only a few weeks\nago Buchanan was the site\nof a bitter feud between arts\nand science men.\n\u2014 lawrenc* woodd photo\nThe sun\nsets\nTHE UBYSSEY\nover the\nprovince\n>l. XLIX, No. 25\nVANCOUVER, B.C., FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1967\n224-3916\nWrappers keep rolling\nbut talks at standstill\nGarbage wrappers for Vancouver-wives and mothers\nwere placed in greater jeopardy Thursday.\nThe Sun and Province, owned by Pacific Press, rolled\noff the presses as three craft unions in a contract dispute\nwith the company met with government mediator Roy\nMacDonald.\nThe three unions and the Vancouver-New Westminster\nNewspaper Guild served 48-hour strike notice to Pacific\nPress Monday.\nBut late Thursday afternoon it was learned negotiations between the three craft unions and the mediator had\ncome to a standstill. The thre% are the International Typographical Union, the Mailers' Union, and the Stereotypers'\nUnion.\nA spokesman for the typographers' union said the\ncraft unions were offered a raise of 13. per cent over\ntwt\u00bb years.\nThe increase works out to 25 cents an hour each year.\nThe spokesman said the increase was less than what\nwas earlier offered to the Guild.\nAll three unions rejected the offer.\n\"The doors are open for discussion, but we are not\noptimistic about the situation,\" said the spokesman Thursday.\nThe unions were expected to hold a caucus to discuss\nand plan stategy.\nA B.C. Federation of Labor official described the\nPacific Press offer a \"take it or leave it proposition\".\nEd Benson, general manager of Pacific Press, could\nnot be reached for comment.\nMeanwhile, Bill McLeman, secretary of the guild,\nsaid: \"We have heard nothing since negotiations with the\nmediator were suspended Wednesday.\"\nThe guild Wednesday rejected a contract offer from\nPacific Press.\n\"We are in a sort of limbo until we find out what\nis happening with the craft unions,\" McLeman said.\nThe guild agreed to take no action until the results\nof the craft unions' talks were made public.\nAt Pacific Press, insiders say there is little question\nmanagement and non-guild workers can turn out a readable\npaper.\nThe key to continued paper production in the event\nof a strike is distribution.\nIf there is a strike, the Teamsters Union \u2014 whose\ndrivers distribute the papers \u2014 will not cross the picket\nifhes.\nEd Zimmerman, business agent for the Teamsters, said,\n\"We definitely will not deliver papers for a struck firm.\"\n\"Our policy is, we'll go to it, but we won't go through\nit,\" he said.\nSenators rumble\nover master plan\nDiscontent at a master plan for campus development has rumbled in UBC's senate.\nAt a special meeting Wednesday senators\nwere shown slides of the plan by an official\nof the San Francisco firm Wurster, Bernari and\nEmmons.\nThe plan was drawn up at the request of\nformer UBC president John\nMacdonald.\nSenator Anthony Scott,\nhead of the UBC economics\ndepartment, said there was not\nsufficient consultation with the\nfaculty while the plan was being prepared.\n(Acting UBC president Walter Gage said Thursday a meeting was held a year ago in the\nauditorium to acquaint the senate and faculty with the plan.)\nSenator C. A. McDowell, dean of the UBC\nchemistry department, said the university ought\nto be more of an academic community.\n\"In the past, campus plans haven't always\ntaken this into consideration,\" he said. \"It seems\nto me this still hasn't been completely corrected.\"\nSenators also said they were unhappy about\nthe location of a proposed administration build-\nSCOTT\ning. This, they said, would not be central enough\nat its proposed location adjacent to the Student\nUnion Building.\nThe plan calls for the academic core of the\nuniversity to fall north of Agronomy Road,\nand between Marine Drive, east and west malls.\nAll traffic except busses and emergency\nvehicles would be banned for the core.\nThe plan also proposed a greater use of trees\nand shrubs to give the campus a colorful garden\natmosphere.\nHenry Elder, director of the UBC architectural school, said in an interview Thursday\nuniversity planning directly reflects the administration education policy.\n\"I think of this campus as a pepper pot.\nYou pick up the pot, shake it and the pieces\nfall where they may.\n\"In its present state UBC is a lonely university.\n\"There is nothing on campus which encourages students to meet and talk.\n\"Each day they merely drift in and out of\na number of independent buildings with little\nsense of belonging to a group effort.\"\nUBC is like Vancouver, he said. \"They are\nboth situated in beautiful surroundings. Inside,\nthis is the mess men have made.\"\nDrop charges, McGill told\nMONTREAL (CUP) \u2014 McGill students council demanded Wednesday the administration drop charges against three\nmembers of the McGill Daily\nstaff.\nThe three, Peter Allnutt,\neditor-in-chief; Pierre Fournier,\neditor of the supplement Flux,\nand John Fekete, in whose\ncolumn the controversial article from the Realist was republished Nov. 3, are all charg-\nwith \"participating in the publication on campus of an article which contravenes stand\nards acceptable by and in this\nuniversity.\"\nThursday, as the three were\nappearing before the senate\ncommittee on student discipline, Peter Smith, council\npresident, delivered the message to principal H. Rocke\nRobertson.\nWednesday, a student judicial committee cleared Allnutt\nof charges of \"bad faith\", although they found him irresponsible, negligent, and unreasonable in printing the art\nicle, which was a fictitious\nversion of events after President Kennedy's death.\nIn the article, Lyndon Johnson was depicted as sexually\nassaulting president Kennedy's\ncorpse.\nA council motion to accept\nthe report was tabled at the\nsame council meeting. At the\ntime of tabling an amendment\nto fire the editor was on the\nfloor.\nThe senate committee was\nadjourned late Thursday evening until next week. Page 2\nTHE U BYSSEY\nFriday, November 17, 19<\nw-\n\"- n&mmm>mmm$t*o Kurt Hilger after Alfred Hitchcock told him\nAssociate .... Al Birnie, Kirsten Emmott about the Phyfatalphynx.\nsaninr -,\u00bb M_\u201ei,.w\u201e A live editor from the University\nf,n*r Pat Hrushowy of vicoria roasted blorg8 Mark De_\nSports Mike Jessen Coursey, Luanne Armstrong, Judy\nWin Charlotte Hair* Young and Joseph Cotton played\n\"\u2022\u2022\u2022 Fr,d\" \u25a0\"\"* B,B\u00bb mNo0oney-could see what was in the\nAss't. City Boni Lee darkroom, but what sounded like\nthe cackles of I_awrence Woodd, Bob\nPlaying banjos, kazoos and bag- Prown, George Hollo and Chris\npipes; Paul Knox, Lin Tse-Hsu, Blake were audible. John Twigg,\nMike Finlay, Fred Cawsey, Hew Bob Banno. Bjorn Simonsen and\nGwynne and Steve Jackson prac- Pio Uran broke 187 typewriters in\ntised martial music. Wearing a star, the jock shop. Come, come. At noon,\nNorman \"Pistol\" Gidney was a mar- to the editorial blorg meeting.\n\u00a9he\nUn ^ THEIBPROVINCE fr s\\r^2\nDH_na\n'And the only papers left will be The Georgia Straight and The Ubyssey YV\nThank God for fresh\nflakes of phoney snow\nBy STUART GRAY\nOne of the most amazing\naspects of living in a sane city\nlike Vancouver occurs about\nthis time each year.\nQuite simply, Christmas decorations.\nWith memories of summer\nmisting in the background,\nfall, with its banal rain and\nnauseating crisp air, threatens\nthe happy existence of each of\nus.\nThere is, however, an extremely fortunate change in\nthe metabolism of local burghers as soon as they sniff the\nwet leaves and wrap the first\nscarves around their double\nchins.\nTECHNICOLOR\nThe result is evident to the\nmost casual observer of urban\nphenomena.\nThank God for the technicolor Christmas lights, the\nfresh flakes of artificial snow,\nand the fireproof wreaths of\ngreen boughs that grace store\ncorners.\nWanderers who see them immediately surge with a renewal\nof love and forgiveness of\nothers, warm with the thoughts\nof parties and gifts to come,\nand start humming Jingle\nBells.\nThe colored lights and bright\ntinsel have practical value as\nwell. When fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters, masters and servants see them, a\ntiny pin begins pricking their\nconscience.\nSo they save. Not just enough\nto purchase trivial last minute\npacifiers, but enough to lavish\nthe huge sums vital to the\nsmooth maintenance of every\ntrue relationship.\nThe resulting joy spreads to\nother groups, like a pool of\nmolasses, delicious and sweet.\nHappiness becomes universal.\nOne can imagine Jesus, his\nface beaming, sprinting around\ndepartment stores and laughing joyfully at the sparkling\nfoil and twinkling lights.\nNot only that, but the money\npumped into department, spec\nialty, gift and drug stores,\nbuoys the economy. With\nprofits made from large sales\nvolumes, entrepreneurs wisely\nbuy new decorations, even\nmore colorful and gay, which\nwill have even greater beneficial value next year.\nDEVOTION\nAnticipation the decorations\ninstill in prospective gift-\nrecipients and party-goers has\nan additional value. It leads to\na renewal of religious devotion,\nthe true reason for the decorations in the first place.\nBy the time Christmas Day\narrives, the believers are so\nhigh on candlelight, fruitcake,\nribbons and egg nog that their\nfervor of worship skyrockets.\nChurches become packed\nwith rosy-cheeked, joyful lov-\ners-of-life, and prayers assail\nheaven with astounding\nabundance.\nWhich brings me to a humble suggestion, which to anyone who appreciates the wonders of Christmas decorations\nis probably old hat anyway.\nWhy leave decorations as\nlate as the beginning of November? The best time to begin\nputting them up is at the start\nof September.\nPeople would get more gifts,\nstores would make more\nmoney, everyone would be\nhappier, and new churches\nwould have to be built to hold\na new movement to religion.\nBig mouth\nEditor, The Ubyssey:\nIt is clear that UBC has got\na new president who talks too\nmuch. I don't back away from\nany of the opinions I expressed\nin my interview with you\n{Ubyssey, Nov. 9), but I wish\nI could back away from some\nof the \"ands\", \"buts\" and\nplain non-sequiturs. The tape-\nrecorder is a merciless critic.\nAnd I think (bottom of page\n7) that I said \"a bow at a\nventure!\" Many thanks for\nmaking so much out of so\nlittle.\nF. KENNETH HARE\nLondon, Eng.\nAdoption\nEditor, The Ubyssey:\nThe adoption department\ndoes not turn down 90 per\ncent of the people who apply.\nQuite to the contrary, they accept the vast majority. There\nis no set income below which\na person will not be considered if they are willing and\nable to offer a child a home.\nThe only financial requirements that are really stressed\nare good medical coverage and\nadequate insurance.\nPerhaps adopting parents are\n\"middle class\" in that they\nfeel that a home and family\nare important, but it is self-\nevident that these are the kind\nof people who would be interested in adoption. Moreover,\nthere are many adopting parents who could be termed unconventional in either their\nideas, their life style, or their\nreligion. Adopting parents are\naccepted not because they fit\ninto some preconceived mold\nbut because they are felt to be\nthe kind of people who can\noffer emotional security and\nwarmth to a child.\nThe suggestion that more\nprivate adoptions should be\narranged worries us. More\nthen once we have visited\ngirls in hospital after their\nbabies are born who had arranged private adoptions that\nfell through at the last moment. Both these girls and\ntheir babies are left with no\nplan for the future and this\nkind of delay is detrimental to\nboth mother and child.\n12 SOCIAL WORKERS\nVancouver pt\nNOVEMBER 17, 1967\nON THE COVER:\nAn oh-so-very mezzo-socio-\npsychedelic graphic zonk-\nout by Fidler Saba Studios.\nBrother can you spare a\njoint?\nfried chick:\njudy bing\nboiled ham:\nStephen scobie\nsirloin steaks.\nbert hill\nground round:\nandrew horvat\nsausage rolls:\nfidler saba studios\nThis week in Page Friday a long-standing debate\nis continued between pacifist and militant activists\non the tactics of protest.\nScott Lawrance is on Pf\n3 discussing different ways\nof non-violent protest while\nBert Hill on Pf 6 argues\nthat violence is a part of\nhuman nature.\nWe hope this dialogue is\na two way street which will\nbe kept open, despite the\nbitterness of many pacifists\nwho organized the demonstrations against the Dow\nChemical Company recruiting employees on campus\nduring the past week. The\norganizers felt that the activists should not have gone\nahead on their own with\nmethods the majority had\ndecided against \u2014 the method of physically blocking\nthe path of people wishing\nto be interviewed by Dow\nrepresentatives.\nBut why does everybody\nhave to protest the same\nway? We are protesting a\nwar machine so efficient,\nso mechanical that it takes\na demonstration to remind\nthe participants (in this\ncase Dow Chemicals) of\ntheir participation.\n. The machine also takes\nin an input of young men\nand produces an output of\ndensensitized soldiers capable of unbelievabe brutalities and of mindlessly\nobeying orders and conforming to army regulations.\nA peace movement which\ndemands machine-like conformity in the methods and\nbeliefs of its members will\nbecome the machine it pro-\nprotests against.\n\u2014J.B,\nm\n* *__.*-\ni&.\n-<:3?V\nREVIEWS\nBy STEPHEN SCOBIE\nFirst, a simple statement: Arthur Penn's\nBonnie and Clyde is the greatest film ever made\nin the U.S.A., and one of the best ever made,\nanywhere.\nTo say why, is more difficult. There is a\ncertain aesthetic pleasure in seeing anything\ndone supremely well, but Bonnie and Clyde is\nmuch more than that. It is intellectually fascinating and emotionally cathartic.\nAt its centre is violence, the daily fact of\nAmerican life. The \"message\" \u2014 that violence\nbreeds violence and is its own destruction \u2014 is\nalmost cliche: but its realization, in the overwhelming climax of the film, is anything but.\nIt is the most fully articulated expression of\nthe theme since the Jacobean drama.\nBut the paradox which gives to Bonnie and\nClyde its unique force is, that at the centre of\nthis bloodily violent film are two characters\nwho are, essentially, innocent. The whole burden of guilt is borne by the \"preacher's\ndaughter,\" Blanche, a silly twittering woman,\nin whom the communal blood-guilt finds a victim to expiate its sins. The scene is bleached in\npenitential white: the fact that it is also a betrayal is a further paradox.\nNo-one can doubt the depth of the forces\nunleashed, though they break to the surface\nonly in the final scene, and then cataclysmically.\nBut Bonnie and Clyde themselves, as characters,\nare separate, and innocent.\nTheir innocence is born in the humor of the\nfirst half of the film. But as Penn subtly shades\nthe humor off, their innocence emerges as a\npositive quality. The dividing point is the extraordinarily beautiful scene with Bonnie's\nmother. The metaphor is their sexual innocence\nwith again the twist that their sexual innocence\nis never more beautiful than at the point where\nthey lose it.\nThey remain untouched by evil, and by guilt:\nnot through any deficiency in moral sense, they\nsimply don't feel guilty. They live in a lovely\nrural Paradise and Bonnie's last act is to eat\nan apple and feed it to Clyde.\nThey are even, to some exent, socially justified, as their dealings with the poor farmers\nshow. They become folk-heroes; their innocence\nis partly that of legend. They are conscious of\ntheir own legend, and help create it. Bonnie\nherself writes their ballad.\nAnd we in turn are aware that the legend is\nbeing recreated in film, and these are really\nWarren Beatty and Faye Dunnaway. As Clyde\nsays to Bonnie first time they meet: \"I'll bet\nyou're a movie star.\"\nSo that in the end even their own death is\nseparate from them. It exists, as a historical\nnecessity in an ethos of violence: but there is\nno idea of justice or injustice in it, to be applied\nto the characters.\nThe movie achieves the classic separation\nof the doer and the deed: taut in doing so transcends life itself, which cannot. Bonnie and Clyde\nare caught in this tragic discrepancy, so that\neven the last verse of their own ballad leaves\nthem unaware that \"it's death for Bonnie and\nClyde.\"\nAnd the viewer too is caught in this discrepancy. The very violence of their deaths\nmay reflect back, make him think that no doubt\ntheir victims died no less horribly. Which is\nrelevant on one level, but not on the level of\nhis pity (and\/or love) for Bonnie and Clyde\nthemselves: hence the agony of the viewer as\nthe last flashed close-ups are shattered into\ndeath.\nThis discrepancy strikes at the very roots of\nguilt and innocence, and of violence. Whether\non a social or a personal level, it is the basis of\nall great tragedy. And with all its beauty and\ntenderness, humor, lyricism, and violence, that\nis what Bonnie and Clyde finally is: one of the\nfinest expressions ever put on film of the unutterable tragedy of being human.\n\u2666 \u2666 \u2666\nBy KEITH FRASER\nAccording to the newspaper caption promoting Bonnie and Clyde, fifteen 'leading critics'\nagree that they have witnessed \"possibly the best\nfilm of the year\". Such unanimous, rubber-stamp\napproval would certainly indicate that this particular film has something more to offer than\nsay, The Dirty Dozen or The St. Valentine's Day\nMassacre, two more of this year's bonanza.\nPossibly it does, for I have seen neither of\nthe last films; Bonnie and Clyde is technically\nrefined, and entertaining cinema. Therefore, it is\nalmost a paradox to resent the manner in which\nthe movie has been presented, or to question its\nvalidity.\nIn a recent issue of Take One, a Canadian\nfilm magazine, Arthur Penn defends the comic\ntenor of his latest movie in curious fashion:\n\"There is no question about it: the character of\nhumour in violence is an immediate and constant\ncorrelative.\" American society, he believes, is a\nviolent one, \"So why not make films about it.\"\nOne might reasonably question Penn's insights, and his justification for rendering them\nartistic. Nowhere in his film does humour share\nan integral part of the repetitious killing (it is additional); nor is there anywhere suggested why\nit is desirable to make such films, unless it is to\nfulfill one's vicarious sadism. Penn writes: \"I\ndon't like to fight, but I am intrigued by watching people fight and seeing it happen.\"\nThe interjection of often clever humour has\nraised this movie from an otherwise grade B\nfilm by turning a tired plot into something original. The characters are likeable because of their\ncomic idiosyncrasies; we are not appalled by their\ncrimes because we identify with them.\nThe comic filter, however, merely glosses\nover what we are to react to; so far as it is intended to correlate with violence, rather than\ndominate, this humour is a sham. What ultimately results is a twisting of our allegiance and\nan unintentional idealization of violence. When\nBonnie and Clyde are rivetted with machine-gun\nholes, when they are captured in slow motion\nreacting to the one death they merited above all\nothers, we are shown an idealized death \u2014 one\nschool boys (should they be permitted to see the\nmovie) would love to enact. The movie, like this\ndeath scene, is artistic, but I doubt somehow it is\nart.\nPenn states that the play today is unable to\nmove in on highly personal level and assault the\nfundamental values of its audience the way a\nmovie is able to. It is the inability of movies like\nhis, however, to assault our basic values, that\nturn many of us to the stage for a more truthful\nexperience. Indeed, the play may fail, but it is\nnot for lack of personal involvement; the empathy established between a stage actor and his\naudience is every bit as immediate as that between the screen and viewer. The stage may\ncheat, but it does so without catchy theme music\nand slow motion reality that is in the end false.\nIt seems a shame, when anti-violence films\nare beginning to take hold (eg. How I Won the\nWar), that a movie which offers violence as a\ntheme that fails to repel us even a little, should\nso catch the fancy of the public, and possibly initiate a string of future imitations. Perhaps, if\ndistorted reality is all one of the 'best' movies\nof the year can offer, we would do well to dispense with this kind of entertainment, and subject to an overdose of the ultimate reality \u2014 the\ntragedy of nuclear war \u2014 as documented in The\nWar Game.\nFlaming\ncensors\nBy STEPHEN SCOBIE \u2022\nDespite his aversion to Bri]\nitte Bardot's bottom, B.C. fill\ncensor Ray MacDonald is not i\nall bad, as censors go. Vai\ncouver film societies and fest\nvals have always found Inmost co-operative and helpfu\nBut in the last few week\ncertain anomalies in the sy\ntern have become obvious, an\nhave drawn adverse commen\nfrom a distinguished dowi\ntown columnist. \u25a0'\u25a0\\\nThere is the question of th\n\"University license\" used 1\ngive showings of both Hig\nand The Chelsea Girls on UB\ncampus after they had bee\nbanned in the province.\nThat the university is\n\"closed audience\" is a leg.\nfiction. Film sock-ties, whic\narc also closed audiences; ar\nnot allowed to -Imw banne\nfilms. What is th< differonc\nbetween a \"socirty\"* with 18\n000 members and a $500 merr\nbership fee, and one 'with 50'\nmembers and a $10 fee?\nNor is there any truth in th\nargument that students ar\nmore \"mature\". It is absurcy\nsuppose that a high school |||\nbecomes \"mature\" the momen\nhe enters UBC, and ceases i\nbe \"mature\" the moment h\ngraduates.\nThere is tho further anomal;\nthat The Chelsea. Girls wa\ngiven two public'showings a\nthe Film Festival. The Festiva\nhas long had an ammgemen\nwith the censor, whereby the\ndo not need to show their\nin advance: but if a film if\nready banned (as was the\nwith High), the Festiva\nnot show it.\nIf the Festival hftd not a\nready shown the film, it seem\nunlikely that tha censor woul\nhave allowed Chelsea Girl\nany kind of showing at all.\nAnd yet further: on Wednes\nday night the Vancouver Ar\nOallery showed to a \"closed'\naudience (i.e. series mem|ei\nship available to the gesifa\npublic) the most infamous? o\nall American undergroan<\nfilms, Jack Smith's Hamuli\nCreatures. This film was no\nshown to the censor ahead o\ntime; but it was openly ad\nvertised for weeks beforehand\nand the censor made no a1\ntempt to block the showing.\nOn a purely objective level\nthe amount of human anatom;\nand the degree of sexual per\nversion directly shown, Flam\ning Creatures is infinitely mon\n\"obscene\" than The Chelsei\nGirls. It has been seized an<\nbanned just about anywhere\nyou care to mention; the dis\n(Continued on pf 3)\n contents\t\nfilm P* *\npoetry P* s\noutside in P\u00bb 3\nletter pf 3\ntheatre pf *\nsymphony pf *\nmusique pf '\nbooks p* 5\nviolence pf 6\nVietnam pf 7\nhorticulture pf 8\nTHE UBYSSEY\nFriday, November 17, 196\". THE NIGGERS, THE CONG\nWe step cautiously\nin apprehension of booby traps \u25a0\nout for a stroll merely\nin a suburban park.\nour nerves are worn thin\nby the ring of our telephones;\nwe insure our windows,\nthough far from the ghetto.\nconsidering the defense budget,\nhow can we fear invasions?\nconsidering the housing laws,\nshall we really ever return\nto find our wife with black child ?\nno twenty-dollar-an-hour\nsessions on the couch\nwill curb these fantasies;\nthough we reason and evade,\nour pure minds have judged us.\n-by ROY STARRS\nIEM WINTER TIME BLUES\u2014\nThoughts to this point, at this point, concerning diverse\nsments affecting myself and them around me. First, re Dow\nlemicals and other various organizations existing in whole\nin part on profits of war.\nNo, Dow is not our only target. Coming this week and next\n. \u25a0 the Canadian National Defense Research Board (to recruit\n:ople for work in more effective warfare, i.e., germ, chemical,\nychological) and Boeing of Seattle (who makes aircraft and\n\u2022craft parts used in Vietnam.) Other industries involved in\nar industries are Canadair, Vickers, Cyanamid of Canada, de-\nivilland, Hand Chemical, Hawker-Siddley, Jarry Hydraulics,\nvy Industries, Litton Systems, United Aircraft, and of course,\ne of the most blatant offenders, Canadian Industries Limited,\n10 will foe on campus Nov. 29, 30.\nThe campus left (and also right) should decide now, in\nscific terms, an analysis of their position regarding on-campus\n;erviews. Should they be allowed to be continued? Why, or,\nly not? And appropriately, what sort of action should be taken\nlen these companies come to Canada?\nI suggest that since the interviewers function for us as\n;rely symbols of the war, we should offer merely symbols\nresistance. Thus, the sit-down which was originally planned\nas going to obstruct no-one. IJowever, a group of people who\nsh to create wars wherever they go, decided to play god and\nshed to obstruct people. Okay, so they have that right, but\nthink that the action was unjustified both morally and tacti-\nlly. Let me propose a meaningful action, however, in which\nlo favor obstruction.\nI have in mind a sit-down protest at the Comox air force\nse, one of the Canadian sites of American nuclear weapons,\nmething that is in many ways closer to me than Vietnam\nd especially Vietnam symbolized by Dow. I propose that\nlen we have established stronger personal and communal\nlationships in the protest movement we start planning a\notest that would attempt to halt operation of the base for at\nist a week, if possible.\nIt's near exam time. Why do you write exams? Did you\nalize they're all a big shuck, to gear you for the people-eat-\nople world of science and business? Ask youself why you\nally should write exams. If you can think of an answer, you\n3 very lucky. However, if you can not, ask the administration\nly. Most professors, at least the more liberal ones (hmmm,\nah, even radical), will tell you that they see no point in\n;ams but they've \"gotta give the registrar a mark\". For whose\nnefit are you here anyhow? Yours, or the administration's\nence, corporations after your soul)?\nThe Dow thing has raised an important point. We're out\nTe now being moulded for jobs. In varying degrees we are\neparing ourselves for various locations. When deciding what\nd where that job is going to be, take into consideration your\nlole self, your mind body and soul, and the selves of others,\nother words, you might be wise to refuse those jobs which\nstfoy your mind and soul and those of others.\nFinally, all the beautiful people who protested, and the\n:autiful engineers who watched with interest, hello. Protesters,\nnot discouraged by what looked like factional splits. This is\nusion, as long as the energy is directed in the same direction,\n3 manifestations need not concern us. You can take that on\ny level you want. I don't care. All I care is that people stop\nrhting for a while. Everyone take a rest. Mfe too.\n\"The wild goose gradually draws near the cloud's heights.\nIts feathers can be used for the sacred dance.\nGood fortune.\" \u2014I. Ching\n\u2014\u2014\u2014 letter-\nPornography not\nfor corrupted\nEditor, Page Friday:\nMr. Scobie's perturbation\nover High seemed to be a bit\nexcessive. What he doesn't\nrealize is that High wasn't\nmade for serious students of\nthe cinema who have had their\nperceptions corrupted in speech\nand movement classes; it was\nmade for the ordinary moviegoer who has a simple, direct\nappreciation of pornography.\nI don't intend to defend the\nfilm thematically. Scobie is\nright; it is reactionary and\nthere is no excuse for that.\nEven if it does accurately depict the pathology of the youth\nsubculture, which is never\nreally defined, (it is certainly\nnot the hippies), it neglects to\npoint to any of the societal\ncauses for the deviancy and\nfinds itself condemning the\nsymptoms rather than the\ncauses. At best, the film is a\npiece of misguided social criticism and I prefer to view it as\nentertainment rather than as\ncultural commentary.\nIf you've never seen a Larry\nKent production, you've probably never seen a movie made\nGENT WITH the flash tie is\nLarry Kent, director of High,\nshown on UBC campus last\nweek. Lanny Beckman, writer\nof this letter, was leading\nactor in Kenfs movie.\nfor less than $150,000. What\nmost people, and especially\ncritics it seems, do not realize\nis the virtual impossibility of\nmaking even a half-way decent\nlow-budget, feature length\nfilm. Ninety per cent of such\nfilms never get finished and it\nis Kent's most singular talent\nto be able to put 90 minutes\nof usable film on the screen\nfor the absolutely insignificant\nsum of $10,000 (the initial\nbudget for High). That means\nmaking compromises at every\nstep along the way.\nMost movies are shot in a\nstudio where it is possible\nto control the entire sound environment or else the sound is\npost-synched in a studio. Obviously we could afford neither of these luxuries. So even\ninterior scenes were accompanied by the rhythmic sounds\nof the passing traffic.\nThe camera alone used in\nHigh cost $10,000, which\nmeant that we had to rent\nsecond-rate equipment by the\nmonth at $60 per day. That\nmeans that any day you don't\nshoot sets you back $60.\nOne night we were shooting\na scene in an apartment. We\nhad blocked it for that particular apartment and it worked very well within that setting. We plugged in the four\nnecessary spot lights and the\nfuse blew so we went to the\njanitor who reluctantly replaced the fuse. Then we tried\nusing only 3 lights which already involved a major compromise. Again the fuse blew\nand again we went to the janitor who by this time had had\nenough. \"Get dressed and get\nout!\" he shouted, which meant\neither that we had to blow $60\nalong with the fuses or that\nwe had to start looking for a\nless suitable location at midnight.\nAnother major problem was\nthat most of the actors had\ncolds throughout most of the\nfilm.\nAlthough many of his points\nare well taken, Scobie might\nhave mollified his criticism by\ntaking some of these difficulties into account. Certainly his\nleast valid point is that Gabor\nlooks anything like me. I\nmean, I just don't see the resemblance.\nLANNY BECKMAN\nSlacks Narrowed\nSuits Altered and\nRepaired\nUNITED TAILORS\n549 Granville St.\nMore\ncensors\ncontinued from pf 2\ntributors require anyone showing it to guarantee the cost of\nthe print against possible police\nconfiscation.\nFlaming Creatures is also\n(in my opinion) a far better\nfilm than The Chelsea Girls,\na work of great beauty and\nstrange, amoral truth. But\nthese are not the grounds on\nwhich the censor allowed its\nshowing: he hasn't seen it. So\non what grounds was the showing allowed? At UBC, the\nFestival of Contemporary Arts\nhas in the past regretfully decided that it could not risk\nbringing this film in.\nThe only way to eliminate\nthese anomalies is to eliminate\ncensorship itself; and that is\nobviously desirable. But in the\ninterim, we could at least dispense with the absurdity of the\n\"university license\" system,\nand at the same time make\nsome attempt to clarify the\nconcept of a \"closed\" audience, so that societies devoted\nto the appreciation of film art\nmay be able to show such\nbeautiful films as Flaming\nCreatures without worrying\nabout what the censor will say\nthis week, as opposed to last\nweek.\nbagatelle\ncontemporary jewellery\nby willy van yperen\nceramics\nby thomas kakinuma\n4410 W lOltl, Vancouver Id. 1344413\n\"OLYMPIA'\nPIZZA\nSPAGHETTI\nHOUSE\n2599 W. Broadway\nDINING ROOM\nTake Out\nService\nBUY 3 PIZZAS\nGET 1 FREE\nWilier*\nfi vety \/oepufat cMeiee uk&\nfodayfr yeuttg j&utiej.\n(fiMuxtdJutfoz 1 if eat,.\nI -fe& <_2_\u00ab*>__^K i\/\u00ab\u00ab _^A__^ I\nI &>au*d# jfoeoueU jbt as. e. I\nI J_S_\u00ab4-B*_a~>\u00ab'-_ie-^\u00bb\u00ab^\/ I\nIHiltm\n\u2022VANCOUVER\n\u25a0 655 GRANVILLE ST., 6836651\n\u25a0H7 W.HA4TINGS ST.. 682-3801\n\u2022NEW WESTMINSTER\n\u2022622 COLUMBIA ST.. 5Z&-377I\niday, November 17, 1967\nTHE U BYSSEY ODTSSET GALLERY\n4368 W 10th Ave.\n\"WHEN UNICORN AND I WERE ONE\"\nOPEN 3 P.M.-7 P.M.\nI\nA Career In\nCHARTERED ACCOUNTANCY\nA representative of\nARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.\nan International 'Firm of Public Accountants, will\nbe recruiting on November 2 7 and 28 for Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto and Montreal.\nContact your Placement Office\nfor an appointment.\nPOLKA\nPARTY\nTONIGHT AT\nINTERNATIONAL HOUSE\n8:30 P.M. - 1 A.M.\u2014All for $1.00\nLIVE GERMAN BAND\nYOUR PRESCRIPTION . . .\n. . . For Glasses\nfor that smart look in glasses .. .\nlook to\nP%esclibtioH Optical\nStudent Discount Given\nWE HAVE AN OFFICE NEAR YOU\nt GRADUATING 4\nSTUDENTS\nThank You For Your Co-Operation\nFOR THOSE WHO DID NOT HAVE\nTHEIR GRAD PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN\nIN THE MOBILE UNIT ON CAMPUS\nOUR STUDIO FACILITIES WILL BE\nAVAILABLE AT 2580 BURRARD AT\n10th. FOR AN APPOINTMENT\nPHONE 736-0261 - HOURS FOR\nSHOOTING 3 P.M. TO 5:00 P.M. -\nMONDAY, WEDNESDAY, AND\nFRIDAY.\nThis Service is Covered by Your Grad Fee\nCAMPBELL STUDIOS LTD.\n10th & BURRARD 736-0261\ntheatre -\nBOOTLESS LAUGHTER\nBy KEITH FRASER\nLast May I pawned my desert\nboots and sat without shoes in\nthe balcony to see a Broadway\nproduction called, strangely\nenough, Barefoot in ihe Park.\nFortunately this comedy kept\nmy side sore, and my mind\naway from those ten toes mashed earlier by a late arrival and\nher date.\nDespite its apparent superficiality, Neil Simon's play received an edge and shine from\nthe New York performers, who\nrendered it entertaining\nenough to be recently released\nas a movie.\nThere is at the Arts Club\npresently, another Neil Simon\ncomedy, The Odd Couple. It is\nalso superficial, and concerns\nmarriage; or more precisely,\ndivorce. The play involves\nFelix (Ted Stidder), being\nsued for divorce, and Harry\nSanders as Oscar, whose weekly poker game dissolves because of his new boarder's\nnagging and fastidious housekeeping. The divorced Oscar\nhas now another partner, the\nreminiscing Felix, whom he\nsoon discovers 'a walking soap-\nopera.' When Oscar invites two\nwomen down for cocktails and\ndinner Felix spoils the party\nwith his infectious sobs. It is\nHARRY SANDERS and Ted Stiller are an odd couple.\nnot until the third act that the\npredicament is resolved:\nThere are some funny lines\nin the play but audience appreciation I found rather slow.\nObviously the local production\nlacks the snap-pop timing of\nthe similar Simon's comedy in\nNew York. Understandably,\nthe resources of the Arts Club\nwarrant only an adequate set;\nand the intimate audience-stage\nsituation places an additional\nonus upon the actors. However, there is little excuse for\n-symphony\ninconsistent direction, thouj\nthe play itself lacks signif icai\ncomment upon either life i\neven divorce.\nThe Brooklyn accent of ce\ntain actors, for instance,\nspotty and sometimes lost du\ning an unduly long perfo\nmance.\nOverall, The Odd Couple\npleasantly amusing but not,\nsuspect, as ticklishy playful j\nit might have been, given\ncrisper exchange between a\ntors, and a barefoot audience\nIN THE HOPE THAT\u2014B_AH,6_AH,--THIS ARTICLE WILL\n\u00a9 INSPIRE\u2014 BLAH, KIM- A NHW SCHOOL\u2014 BLAH 8_AH\n) \u00a9 CRITICISM-6LAH-A L4 rtcLUHM\/,Se6rH0V\/EN,-;i>TEA\/te\n-etArt-cjALAW- FUSMETe\u2014enreKoR\u2014 slahze-\n\"-by ANDREW Hor\\_a_t\n\u25a0A..&..\nWords are too clumsy to express wholehearted praise. And wholehearted praise is what\nboth Ashkenazy and the Vancouver Symphony\ndeserve for their concert last Sunday at the\nQueen Liz.\nWords are very helpful indeed to say that\nVladimir Ashkenazy, Russian piano, virtuoso\nstudied at the Kiev Conservatory for some ten\nyears, that he won many contests including a\nTschaikowsky Prize which hei shared with John\nOgdon, British pianist, that he is tired of contests, and that he lives in London.\nBut when it comes to his performance of\nBeethoven's Emperor Concerto, colors, textures,\ngraphic forms seem more appropriate than linear\nwords.\nIf indeed the medium is the message, then\nthere is a better medium than words to express\nthe emotions that music arouses.\nIf the piano was the instrument of the painter\ninstead of the musician, perhaps the symphony\nmight look like this. Apologies for this column\nmust go out to Marshall McLuhan, Gutenberg,\nand little Miss Bing Jutka.\nBeethoven's Emperor Concerto and Gustav\nHoist's Planets are depicted around. After seeing\nthis you should be dissatisfied enough to go and\nhear the Vancouver Symphony itself.\nfljii \u2022s'V.CrYc* -'iX\nTHE U BYSSEY\nFriday, November .7, 196 *\u2022*\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014niiisi(juc \u2014<\u2014\u2014-\nLanguage no barrier\nfor swinging French\nBy ALEXANDRA VOLKOFF\nIt's surprising how much spirit UBC students\ncan produce, even when they're not too sure\nwhat's going on.\nThis was evident Tuesday noon in Brock hall\nwhen Festival Canada on tour presented Les\nChansonniers.\nThis group of four young French-Canadians,\nsinging exclusively in French, managed to produce a lot of enthusiasm despite the language\nbarrier and the dim lights.\nHow did they manage this, especially on a\nrainy day?\nMaybe it was the way they enjoyed themselves on stage, singing with a rapport that was\ncontagious.\nOr maybe it was Louise Forestier and the\nway she brought in lovely motion to portray\nher words.\nMaybe it was Claude Gauthier, who looked\nlike a member of Hell's Angels, but when he\nsang, his eyes were so gentle that they were\nout of place in his dominating size.\nMaybe it was their accompaniment which\nincluded a lively piano, a bass guitar, and drums\nwith the occasional bell or tambourine.\nMaybe it was Miss Forestier's attempt to\nexplain her songs in English before she began,\nsuch as her beginning to \"Puisque American.\"\n\"If you look on a map with Canada up and\nthe United States down, Montreal is only one\nand a half inches up the United States.\"\nBy SEYMOUR MAYNE\nMaybe it was the subjects of the songs that\nranged from love to war.\nWhatever it was, it caused good feeling on\nboth sides, and produced what Lise Cousineau,\nthe female half of Les Alexandrins, described\nas \"the biggest over-all reaction we have received in 16 universities.\"\nIt's good to know that singers such as these\ncan fill Brock hall, even when admission price\nis 30 cents.\nAN IDIOT JOY by Eli Man-\ndel, published by M. G. Hurtig,\n$4.50.\nEli Mandel, with the publication of his fourth collection of\npoems by the energetic Edmonton bookseller and publisher, Mel Hurtig, commands\nthat skill and vision which\nmake him one of the few important poets now writing in\nthe country. What is necessary\nis to explore the depths of his\nwriting; what do they really\nhold in store? Conclusions are\nalways difficult to come by *\nwhen one tries to move into\nsuch a centre.\nMandel, in his poems, is almost always addressing someone . . . the reader? Often, the\nvoice addresses itself (for whom\nelse can one otherwise break\ninto speech?) \u2014 this voice's\ncounterpart in the other unspoken silent presence. The\nvoice seems to be possessed,\nand seeks to possess \u2014 the\npoems, sequences of such possessions: possessions of the\nJOHN BEECHER, American\npoet, will give a reading of\nhis work in Bu. 106 at noon\non Monday November 20th.\nAdmission is free.\nvoice to its own sound, its own\nstyle of articulation, its own\nkind of logic testing validities.\nThe voice takes on the world\nof objects, statements, ambiguities, the alternatives to metaphors that contain violence,\nhopelessness or the universal\nimpotence of will today.\nYet what is this madness,\nthis possession or possessing at\nits source, is it sprung from\nreal pain? Is the speaking an\nattempt to translate personal\nchaos or betrayal within the\nreaches of language? The day\nto day anguishes or the defeats\nof living are never named,\nrarely particularized \u2014 then if\nthere are few particulars in\nthese poems, do Mandel's\nhyperboles bespeak a mind\nobsessed with the unmeaning\ncurious world outside the self?\nHas Mandel only opened up a\nvista for poetic composition, a\nway of exaggerating so as to\nget far from his close confusions? Often there is no other\npresence in his poems but his\nmind climbing and slipping on\nthe rungs of ambiguity, metaphor, mirages of images. And\nthe insistent noises of the\nbreaking of rungs rip into the\nflesh of the persona, the \"I\",\nthe first person. The violence\ndoes not extend further than\nthe disruption indicated in the\nelements of language; the\nfundamental disturbances, the\ndeep violations hinted at in his\npoems are contained, ultimate\nly, in the ambiguities, finally\nonly in the mind.\nYet why pose these questions? It is my own uneasiness\nabout the bottom here, the\nroots of this man's words. The\npoems, limbos of disturbances,\nsometimes read like hyperbolic programs for a kind of\nguerilla action. But this use of\nmetaphor I also distrust. These\nextensions of a will in words\nis the mask of an impotence\nwhich is a recognizable theme\nin poetry today; it is almost\na \"poetic\" stance. Poets can\nset up any proposition of power in their words. To pretend,\nto invent, to call up violence\nis a manner of speaking, a\npoetic rhetoric of times.\nEven if the poet's traditional\nrole (as the argument goes) is\nnot to put us down or direct\nus, then aren't the poet's appeals, his address to power,\nfinally rhetorical and evasive?\nThis poet is searching for an\nauthenticity; but it seems the\nruptures of his personal world\nare too close for him to expose the nightmare within him\nright at its real heart; I\nwonder if that is why he resorts to the protections of\nmetaphor. And if there is\nblood, put yourself close\nenough for the doubting Thomas' to be stained also into\ntrance. And the speech of this\npoet \u2014 he is still struggling\nwith what has to be spoken\nand what should be spoken.\nNo one denies him (except\nhimself), and this drama of\ndenying locks him within himself. The following \"Poem\" is\nreally written to himself:\nYou would have me deny my\nmurderous thoughts.\nIt is metaphor I distrust.\nWho doesn't? Where's the\nvoice that is beyond such distrust?\n-V\\fc*rtN&Xk-HI-FI\nEXCLUSIVE FOR SCOTT, MclNTOSH AND KLH\n. . . Prestige Brands Hi-Fi Components\nTurntables: Garrard, Thorens, Lenco, Elac-Miracord, Sony Dual \u2014\nAmplifiers, Tuners: Scott Mcintosh, Bogen, Quad, Dynakit, Sony,\nMarantz, Eico, E-V, Trio, Beomaster \u2014 Tone Arms, Cartridges:\nShure, Ortofon, S.M.E., Empire\u2014Tape Recorders: Recorders: Am-\npex, Becord, Sony, Tandberg \u2014 Speakers: Wharfedale, Lansing,\nGoodmans, Electrovoice, KLH-AR.\nPhones:\nDrop In , \u25a0 -\u25a0\nor send for Freeman s Hi-Fidelirv MU s-9058\nree Brochures ,B\u00ab,n\u00bbn \u00bb \u25a0\u25a0\u25a0 riuwuiy MU 3.0725\n671 Howe Street, Vancouver, B.C.\nFree\nHawker Siddeley Canada Ltd.\nINTERVIEW DATES\nDECEMBER 6 AND 7\nfor students graduating in:\nSCIENCE\nBUSINESS\nENGINEERING\nWe are a diversified industrial complex. Our products\nrange from primary steel to sophisticated steel\nfabrications; from miniaturized instrumentation to\nrapid transit systems and railway rolling stock;\nfrom experimental and applied gas turbines to\nheavy duty timberland equipment.\nIf diversity, responsibility, and opportunity to advance upon proven ability interest you . . . talk to\nyour Placement Officer, read our material and\nMAKE AN APPOINTMENT.\nHAVE FUN\nBE IN FASHION TOO\nWITH\nGlenayr\n:y\nS645\/690\n0Ms\nWalk into fashion in this exciting new machine-washable\nEnglish Botany full-fashioned\nraglan shoulder pullover . . .\nwith dome fastenings at neck\nfront, roll collar, new Continental band and cuffs.\nTo complete the pretty picture,\nteam it with this pure wool\nworsted skirt, woven from\nsuperfine English Botany. It is\nfully-lined, dry-cleanable. and\ndyed-to-perfectly-match\nall bright new Kitten sweater\ncolours.\nPURE VIRGIN WOM.\nLook for the\nWoolmark on the label\nWithout this label \u00a3 ffijiit*. ^ il i\u00bb \"\u00abt a genuine KITTEN\nFriday, November 17, 1967\nTHE UBYSSEY By BERT HILL\nHow important is violence\nas a force in understanding\nman and his society? Many\npeople have considered violence as a positive element not\njust a tactic in struggling for\na new society. A recent report\nsuggests that violence expressed through wars and war\nspending is integral to the\nmaintenance of stability in\nAmerican society.\nGeorge Sorel, a revolutionary French syndicalist praised\nviolence by the working class.\nHe believed that the ethic of\nthe revolutionary spirit would\nbring about social change.\nThis spirit was much more important than beautiful Utopian pictures of a future socialist society in bringing the\nworkers to action. He believed\nthat the bourgeoisie was a\ncowardly class that would\nonly cave in before the superior ethics of the working class\nViolence is the common\ndenominator of society\n6ix\nas expressed through their violence.\nENSLAVED\nFrantz Fanon has argued\nthat violence is the only therapy that will free the African\nblacks of their colonkil mentality. This violence is necf-\nsary if these people are t\"\nassert their full humanity :iinl\nnot remain mentally enslaved\nFanon's book Wrelched of the\nEarth has received so mu<-li\nattention by militant Negroes\nin North America that Martin\nLuther King felt it nepessary to\ndebate with thf idi-as of this\nNegro psychoanalyst in his\nmost recent book.\nKing argues that the Negro\nmust not use violence in his\nstruggle for this is the major\nshort coming of the white man.\nThis is absurd since the history of Negro tribal wars is\nas long as white men's 'civilized' nation-state wars.\nProbably the mo.st relevant\nexample of the importance of\nviolence to western society can\nbi* found in '\"The Special\nStudy Group In their Report\nfrom the Mountain \"\nSTABILITY\nThe study wa* purportedl>\ncommissioned l>\\ ,-i U S cabinet minister to look into tin-\nkind ul society that would\nexiit if total peac und disarmament prevailed in tho\nworld.\nThe study came to the conclusion that if praco were to\nprevail society would require\nmuch more than a simple\nswords Into plowshares conversion. The sociely would\nhave to devise a substitute ior\nwar as a means of maintaining the economic, psycholog-\nCATERING TO\nU.B.C. STUDENTS\nWe have a fine selection\nof inexpensive Gifts \u2014 Watches,\nRings, Necklaces, Diamond Rings\nKnown for 43 Years as a Specialist\nin Diamond's and Watches\nppttef'j\nJEWELLERS LTD.\n695 Granville at Georgia\n^i^^^r^^irzd^r^^l^lr^^^^^^^^^^i^irr^\n0\nfl\n1\nE\n0\nB\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\nwonderful\nreception\nthat's what\nyou'll get\nfrom that\n\"extra\nspecial\ngirl\"\n\"Solitaire\"\nfrom $100\nConvenient Budget Term*\nBalance in 12 month*\n10% Down\nwhen you give her a\nFINE DIAMOND\nfrom\nLIMITED\nGranvlHt et Pender Since 1*04\nREGISTERED JEWELLER, AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY\ni=ir=ir==ir==ir=ii==ir=if=ir=ir==ir==iP==ir=in=ip=ir=ir=ir=ir=ir=n=n=ir\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\nB\nB\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\nCOLIN WILSON\n- ANTI-FREUDIAN\nEXISTENTIALIST\nBRITISH WRITER & CRITIC\n(1) NOV. 17 - FRI. - NOON - BROCK LOUNGE\n'Nature of Sexual Impulse\n(2) NOV. 17 - FRI. - 8 P.M. - HEBB THEATRE\nLECTURE DISCUSSION\n\"BEYOND THE OUTSIDER\"\n(The Philosophy of the Future)\n(3) NOV. 18 - SAT. - 9:30 A.M. - BU. 106\nDIALOGUE BETWEEN COLIN WILSON AND\nCRITIC KINGSLEY WIDMER ON\n\"The Critic Against Culture\"\nModerator Dr. Stephen Black, Dept. of Eng., S.F.U.\nSPECIAL EVENTS\nADMISSION:\n(1). 35 cents\n(2). Students $1.25 \u2014 Others $2.50\n(3). Students $2.00 \u2014 Others $4.00\nAdmission which includes (2) and (3)\nStudents $2.50 \u2014 Others $5.00.\nical, political, sociological, ecological, cultural, and scientific\nbasiijOjgjOjtety. And the study\ndilHT\"lfrHrik such a substitute\n'\u25a0xisted.\nCircumstances of the report's\nM-lease through a private pub-\nlixher by an anonymous mem-\nlic-r of the study group would\nl:\n^THE SKI BUM Definitely contending Birds\nBy BJORN SIMONSEN\n'^Shoulders straight to the fall line! Hip to the hill, throw the\nhip out! Look up and ahead !\"\nA local ski school in action ? No. It's what's happening every\nTuesday and Thursday evening in the apparatus gym where the\nThunderbird ski team goes through its grueling training program\nof pre-season exercises.\nCoach Al Fisher is back this year after being absent all last\nseason when a senior member of the team took over coaching\nduties.\nThe exercises emphasize good physical conditioning as a prerequisite to the rigors of racing. This includes \u2022 the usual sprint along the\nboulevard to the gates and (back, followed by\nan intense hour of continuous exercise.\nAfter this, Fisher runs through a series of\nexercises designed to simulate conditions during\nan actual race. Thus everybody may take a low\ncrouching \"eggshell\" posiiton and on signal,\nsuddenly explode up as if hitting a bump at 60\nmph in the downhill. SIMONSEN\nAlthough these sessions are attended by about 60 skiers,\nonly about 20 actually try out for the team. Of these Fisher\nselects 12 to 15 to make up the men's team. The girls' team trains\nwit hthe mens, but are managed by women athletics).\nThe selection of the team is based on performance during\nthe annual Rossland Ski Week which all prospective members\nattend.\nThe ski week is held each Christmas and is open to UBC\nstudents. It offers good skiing and lots of fun in a package deal\nat very low cost. Ski instruction is given by team members.\nAs usual, the ski team is plagued toy lack of financial assistance. Their allotted budget (approximately $1,900) is spent on\nequipment and travel expenses to the major tournaments with\nother universities such as Alberta, Idaho, Montana and Oregon.\nThe team also enters most of the local tournaments in B.C.\nTo subsidize their budget, the team must present ski movies and\nrun tours such as the Rossland trip in order to pay training\nexpenses.\nThe team needs support in their varied program of downhill\nracing, jumping and cross country events.\nMembers such as Gary Turner, Bob Calladine and Klwood\nPesket rank with the best- skiers in the world and are scheduled\nto race with the world's best in the Du Maurier International at\nRossland next year.\nBraves take 8th scalp\nThe UBC ice hockey Braves continued their mastery over\nthe Vancouver Hornets Wednesday as they defeated them 2-1\nfor their eighth straight win.\nIt was the second time that the Braves had edged the\nHornets. Last time the score was 3-2.\nDwayne Biagioni and Frank Lanzarotta were the goal scorers\nfor the Braves. Jack Beech played an outstanding game at his\nforward spot.\nDon Cram, UBC's goalfe, was particularly brilliant as he\nkept the Hornets from scoring with his many fine saves.\nSPECIAL SKI PACKAGE\n(Only to University students)\n-\u00a3- Handmade European Skis \u25a0\n\u2014Interlocking Steel Edges\n\u2014Kofix Base\n-Tip & Tail Protection\n\u2014Top Plastic Edge\n\u20141 year guarantee against any\nbreakage\nir Step-in Safety Binding\nIt Stainless Steel Poles with Pistol Grip\nit Italian Double Lace Leather Boots\nIt's yours for only\n1.95\n\/nark\n$79.\nThis special ski package offer is only good\ntill December 16th\u2014So Hurry.\nFound at\nVARSITY SKI SHOP\nIvor Williams Sporting Goods\n4510 W. 10th \u2014 Phone 224-6414\n(Just 2 Blocks outside the Gates)\nice with defending champs\nBy BRIAN RATTRAY\nThis weekend the ice hockey version of the\nThunderbirds carry the colors to Saskatoon for\na pair of games against the green and white\nof the University of Saskatchewan Huskies.\nFriday night's game will kick off the 67-68\nWestern Intercollegiate Hockey League season\nfor both UBC and U of S.\nSaskatchewan, defending champions, will\nhave to be favored over last year's third place\nBirds.\nIn the two games the Birds played at Saskatoon last season the scores were 4-3 and 5-3,\nboth in favor of the home club.\nWhen coach Bob Hindmarch started this year\nwithout Al McLean, last year's league scoring\nleader, and such defensive stalwarts as Doug\nPurdy, Len Bousquet, Shelly Atwell and current Huskie coach Dave Chambers, he envisioned a year akin to football coach Frank Gnup's.\nBut the results of last weekend's games\nagainst Notre Dame show that this season should\nat least be as successful as last year's \u2014 so\nSaskatchewan could be tested.\nHindmarch expects a close race in the WICHL\nwith Calgary being the dark horse. So as any\nfollower of close races knows, injuries and\nbreaks will play a big part in deciding this\nseason's league champion.\nICE CHIPS\nApparently the best part of the plane trips\nto Glen \"Cowboy\" Richards is the landing as\nthe parachute and survival kit he carries get a\nmight uncomfortable.\nThe stairs leading from the ice to the changing rooms at Saskatoon's ancient Rutherford\nrink present a real problem to a few of the\nBirds who even avoid a pub if it has a stair\nor two.\nGrocers shopping for hoop victory\nBy BOB BANNO\nImagine 6'9\" Billy-Joe Price from New\nMexico State jumping against 6'1\" Ian Dixon\nfrom North Vancouver.\nThat will be the scene when IGA Grocers,\none of the strongest basketball teams ever\nassembled in Canada tangle with UBC Thunderbirds tonight and tomorrow night at War\nMemorial Gym.\nGrocers' roster reads like a real rogues'\ngallery to Thunderbird coach Peter Mullins.\n\"They're a formidable outfit,\" he said.\nBesides former Southwest conference all-star\nPrice, Grocers' coach Mel Brown has starry Dave\nWay, 6'7\" Al Birtles, 6'6\" Neil Williscroft, peppery guard Gene Rizak and Ed Suderman in his\nline-up.\nGrocers recently joined the powerful Seattle\nAmerican Athletic Union league and compete\nagainst the likes of Tacoma Cheney Studs and\nSeattle CAYA.\nBirds, still smarting from their loss to UBC\nGrads two weeks ago, hope for strong performances from Dixon, Neil Murray and guard Phil\nLangley.\n\"We'll be much better than we were against\nGrads,\" said Mullins. \"We're much better organized now.\"\nGrads came from behind to down Simon\nFraser University Clansmen 73-70 last Friday.\nBoth games start at 8:30 p.m.\nUBC's junior varsity club will play a preliminary each night at 6:30 p.m.\n& B S0UND|\nRECORD SALE\nWIDE SELECTION AT LOWEST PRICES IN B.C.\n\"**\u00bb*\u2022**\"*\n'*#\u00a3$&\n,^m\n\u25a0*&\nwsk\nTO\\\nHOUjnMOB\n>