{"AggregatedSourceRepository":[{"label":"Aggregated Source Repository","value":"CONTENTdm","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/dataProvider","classmap":"ore:Aggregation","property":"edm:dataProvider"},"iri":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/dataProvider","explain":"A Europeana Data Model Property; The name or identifier of the organization who contributes data indirectly to an aggregation service (e.g. Europeana)"}],"Collection":[{"label":"Collection","value":"University Publications","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/isPartOf","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:isPartOf"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/isPartOf","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included."}],"DateAvailable":[{"label":"Date Available","value":"2015-07-10","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/issued","classmap":"edm:WebResource","property":"dcterms:issued"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/issued","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; Date of formal issuance (e.g., publication) of the resource."}],"DateCreated":[{"label":"Date Created","value":"1987-05-20","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/created","classmap":"oc:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:created"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/created","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; Date of creation of the resource."}],"DigitalResourceOriginalRecord":[{"label":"Digital Resource Original Record","value":"https:\/\/open.library.ubc.ca\/collections\/senmin\/items\/1.0115441\/source.json","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/aggregatedCHO","classmap":"ore:Aggregation","property":"edm:aggregatedCHO"},"iri":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/aggregatedCHO","explain":"A Europeana Data Model Property; The identifier of the source object, e.g. the Mona Lisa itself. This could be a full linked open date URI or an internal identifier"}],"FileFormat":[{"label":"File Format","value":"application\/pdf","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/elements\/1.1\/format","classmap":"edm:WebResource","property":"dc:format"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/elements\/1.1\/format","explain":"A Dublin Core Elements Property; The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource.; Examples of dimensions include size and duration. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary such as the list of Internet Media Types [MIME]."}],"FullText":[{"label":"Full Text","value":" 8979.\nMay 20, 1987\nThe Ninth Regular Meeting of the Senate of The University of British\nColumbia for the Session 1986-87 was held on Wednesday, May 20, 1987 at 8.00\np.m. in Room 102, George F. Curtis Building.\nPresent: President D. W. Strangway (Chairman), Dr. F. S. Abbott, Dr.\nE. G. Auld, Dr. T. M. Ballard, Dean G. S. Beagrie, Rev. P. C Burns, Mr.\nG. D. Burnyeat, Acting Dean S. Cherry, Dr. T. S. Cook, Ms. L. M. Copeland,\nMs. H. E. Cowan, Dr. J. D. Dennison, Dr. D. Donaldson, Dr. G. W. Eaton, Dr.\nJ. A. S. Evans, Dr. C V. Finnegan, Mrs. E. D. Fulton, Dr. J. Gaskell, Dr.\nJ. H. V. Gilbert, Dr. A. G. Hannam, Dr. M. A. Hickling, Dr. K. J. Holsti,\nMrs. D. Jones, Dean R. W. Kennedy, Dr. J. P. Kimmins, Mr. J. Kulich, Dr.\nL. M. Lavkulich, Dr. D. S. Lirenman, Dean P. A. Lusztig, Mrs. A. Macdonald,\nMr. G. Mark, Mr. J. M. McConville, Mr. D. Mclnnes, Mr. M. G. McMillan, Dean\nJ. H. McNeill, Dean R. C. Miller, Jr., Dr. A. G. Mitchell, Professor D.\nPavlich, Mr. S. R. Pearce, Mr. A. J. Pearson, Mrs. G. E. Plant, Dr. D. F.\nRobitaille, Dean N. Sheehan, Dr. L. de Sobrino, Dr. R. A. Spencer, Dr. J. K.\nStager, Ms. B. Steffensen, Mr. M. Sugimoto, Mr. G. Taylor, Dr. P. R.\nTennant, Dr. R. C Thompson, Dean W. A. Webber, Dean R. M. Will, Dr. D. LL.\nWilliams, Mr. J. A. Williamson, Dr. M. D. Willman, Dr. J. L. Wisenthal, Miss\nN. E. Woo, Mr. R. A. Yaworsky.\nMessages of regret for their inability to attend were received from\nChancellor W. R. Wyman, Vice-President D. R. Birch, Dean P. T. Burns, Mr. M.\nFahy, Dr. M. A. Goldberg, Dr. H. J. Matheson, Dean A. Meisen, Dean J. F.\nRichards, Mr. J. Ringwald, Dr. G. G. E. Scudder, Mr. R. A. Speers, Dr. R.\nStewart, Dr. J. Vanderstoep, Dr. L. S. Weiler.\nSenate membership\nThe Chairman welcomed to Senate Dean Nancy Sheehan of the Faculty of\nEducation. Dean Sheehan replaces Acting Dean T. D. McKie.\nMinutes of previous meeting\nDr. Tennant   ) That the minutes of the Eighth regular\nDr. Gilbert   ) meeting of Senate for the Session 1986-87,\nhaving been circulated, be taken as read\nand adopted. 8980.\nMay 20, 1987\nMinutes of previous meeting  (continued)\nSenate agreed to Dr. Wisenthal's suggestion that the following\ncorrections be made to the first paragraph of the report of the Admissions\nCommittee on 1987\/88 Enrolment Quotas and Controls, page 8974:\nThat the first line be amended to read:  \"Dr. Finnegan informed Senate\nthat the Faculty of Arts had reviewed...\"\nThat the word \"therefore\" in the fifth line be deleted.\nThat  the  word  \"qualified\"  be  inserted  before  \"students\"  in  the\npenultimate line of the last sentence.\nThe motion was put and carried.\nChairman's remarks and related questions\nDr. Strangway drew Senate's attention to the material circulated at the\nmeeting concerning the President's Task Force to Review the Office of the\nRegistrar. He stated that the review will take place during the summer and\nthat the review committee will be instructed to submit its recommendations\nby September 1, 1987. Dr. Strangway further stated that while the basic\ncomposition of the review committee had been laid out, the individual\nmembership of the committee had not yet been struck and that he would\nwelcome any comments or recommendations from senators with respect to the\nmembership.\nIn referring to the Presidential Advisory Committee on the selection of\na Registrar, Dr. Strangway said that the procedures established by the Board\nof Governors and approved by Senate in May 1979 will be followed. He stated\nthat a notice will be sent out calling for nominations to be submitted no\nlater than June 30, 1987 for three members of Senate, including one student,\nto serve on the committee. A mail ballot will then take place, with the\nexpectation that the membership of the committee will be established by the\nend of August. 8981.\nMay 20, 1987\nChairman's remarks and related questions  (continued)\nDr. Strangway reminded Senate that a major fund-raising campaign was\nbeing organized. He informed Senate that a case statement was being\nprepared for use in a market survey to take place in September, and that an\nadvisory committee would be monitoring procedures with respect to the market\nsurvey. A draft of the case statement will be circulated, during the\nsummer, for information and comment.\nDr. Strangway informed Senate that a final draft of a report on the role\nof the universities in the economic development of British Columbia had been\nprepared by the three universities, and stated that this would be circulated\nfor comment after further discussions with the Presidents of the other two\nuniversities.\nIn conclusion, Dr. Strangway announced that the three universities were\nplanning the appointment of a person to act in such matters as arranging\nmeetings of Presidents, Vice-Presidents or other groups and to help develop\na system for the presentation of information to the government. It was\nhoped that this appointment would make the coordination among the three\nuniversities more substantive than in the past. The person appointed will\nreport to the three Presidents.\nIn response to a query, Dr. Strangway confirmed that three of the seven\nmembers of the Presidential Advisory Committee on the selection of a\nRegistrar would be elected by Senate, and that one of the three members\nwould be a student.\nDean Beagrie extended congratulations to Dr. Strangway on his approach\nto the management and governance of the University. He also drew attention\nto Dr. Strangway's efforts and influence in bringing to the attention of the\ngovernment, matters of importance to all three universities. 8982.\nMay 20, 1987\nChairman's remarks and related questions (continued)\nIn response to a further query, Dr. Strangway informed Senate that the\nMission Statement was now in its second draft and that it would be widely\ncirculated for further comments. Relevant parts would be brought to Senate\nin the fall for formal action.\nCorrespondence\nThe Secretary read to Senate a letter received from Miss Katherine\nAndrew expressing appreciation for the tribute paid to her late father\nMr. G. C. Andrew.\nCandidates for Degrees\nLists of candidates for degrees, as approved by the various Faculties\nand Schools, were made available for inspection by Senate members prior to\nthe meeting.\nDr. Finnegan ) That the candidates for degrees and diplomas,\nDr. Tennant ) as approved by the Faculties and Schools, be\ngranted the degree or diploma for which they\nwere recommended, and that the Registrar, in\nconsultation with the Deans and the Chairman\nof Senate, make any necessary adjustments.\nIt was noted that the name of Olav Naas had been removed from the list\nof candidates for the B.A.Sc. degree approved by the Faculty of Applied\nScience. An amendment was moved to add the name of Mr. Naas to the list.\nIt was explained that Mr. Naas, a deaf student, had had some difficulty with\nthe English Composition Test. The Faculty had, however, recommended\nMr. Naas for the degree.\nIt was pointed out that it was within the Faculty's purview to recommend\nMr. Naas for the degree and therefore an amendment was not necessary.\nThe motion to approve the list of candidates for degrees, including\nMr. Naas, was put and carried. 8983.\nMay 20, 1987\nScholarships and Awards\nA list of scholarships, medals and prizes awarded to students in the\ngraduating classes was circulated for information.\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAcademic Building Needs\nDr. Stager, Chairman of the Committee, presented the following report:\n\"The report is to inform Senate about the status of the UCBC Five Year\nCapital Building Plan, the Library expansion, and the changing\ncircumstances that influence priorities for new space and how they are\ndetermined.\n1. UBC Building projects submitted to UCBC in June 1982\ni) Table I lists the proposed buildings submitted in response to a\nrequest to establish a 5-year plan of capital building. As of 1983,\nthe priorities assigned by the University are given along with UCBC's\nselection for inclusion in the 5 year plan including proposed dates\nfor action - the SABN priorities are also included.\nTable I\nU.B.C. Building Projects proposed to UCBC and the Ministry - 1983 status\nUBC Priority $M (1982)  in UCBC plan  SABN priority\n1. Chemistry\/Physics\n2. Campus Services (Phys.Pint)\n3. Laurel II (VGH)\n4. Clinical Medicine\n5. Pulp and Paper Centre\n6. Agriculture\/Forestry Phase I\n7. Dentistry\/Research\n8. Engineering (Chemical)\n9. Engineering II a.\n10. Engineering II b.\n11. Biochemistry\n12. Physiology\n13. Geophysics\/Astronomy\n14. Animal Care II\n15. Engineering III\n16. Life Sciences\n17. Agriculture\/Forestry II\n18. Library\n19. Fine Art Gallery\n20. Botanical Garden Centre\n21. Studio Resources - Arts\n22. Agriculture Field Bldgs.\n23. Recital-Convention Hall\n24. Laurel I  completion\n25. physical Education\/Recreation\n26. Recreation and Athletics\n*Some Ministry funds  released for\n13.3\n84\/85*\n6.1\n84\/85*\n2.7\n84\/85*\n4.6\n84\/85*\n5.6\ncompleted\n16.7\n84\/85\n4.3\n84\/85\n18.2\n85\/8 6\n9.0\n86\/87\n9.0\n86\/8 7\n2.0\n86\/87\n2.3\n86\/87\n5.0\n86\/87\n3.8\n86\/87\n9.0\n87\/88\n13.4\n88\/8 9\n15.6\n-\n53.5\n-\n2.7\n-\n5.6\n-\n8.4\n-\n3.1\n-\n7.8\n-\n2.7\n-\n?\n_\n?\n-\nplanning\npurposes.\n6\n7\n8\nspecial\n10? 8984.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAcademic Building Needs  (continued)\nii) At the time of submission, approval in principle had been given by\nUCBC for items 1, 2, and 3.\niii) During the interval since 1982, the Ministry permitted planning\nfunds to be released for projects 1, 2, 3, and 4, and provided the\nfunds for completion of 5, the Pulp and Paper Centre.\niv) Now that UCBC has been disbanded, and there is a new government,\nthe status of the 5 year plan is unknown.\nv) Recent negotiations with the Ministry have reconfirmed the support\nfor the Chemistry\/Physics building (now $16m) and the Campus\nServices (Physical Plant) building (now $9m) with the release of\nfunds expected imminently.\n2. Library Expansion\ni) Following the latest resolution by Senate in April 1985, asking\nthat the President give a very high priority to new library space\nin the University's plans for capital fund raising, and further,\nurging the President to give this need high priority for private\nfund raising to be joined with government participation (Senate\nminutes p.8389, 8390), the Board of Governors on July 4, 1985,\ndesignated the Old Bookstore site for the expansion of the Library\nand recognized the project as a high priority for fund raising.\nii) In February 1987, the President appointed an Advisory Committee to\nreview Library needs and develop plans for the Old Bookstore site\nto include the David Lam Management Research Library and other\nelements of the Library system. The plans being prepared will not\nbe the same as those submitted to UCBC in 1982.\niii) Both the Senate resolution and the Board minutes cite the urgency\nof the Library need and the Senate particularly mentioned private\nsources of funds in co-operation with government.\niv) it is expected that the Library Expansion will be a top priority\nas a pilot project for public fund raising via the strategies\nbeing generated by the Presidential Advisory Committee on\nDevelopment Policy and the work of the Development Office.\nIncluded in this planning will be opportunity for government\nparticipation.\n3. Observations and  Changes\ni) The 1982 list of building projects contains many proposals which\nwere not brought to the attention of the SABN Committee. While\nsome are not academic buildings per se, many have implications for\nacademic programs and the space for those programs.  Indeed three 8985.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAcademic Building Needs\n3.   Observations and Changes  (continued)\nprojects, Engineering Expansion II and III, and the Life Sciences\nExpansion are directly academic. The implication of interleafing\nprojects with those recommended by the SABN Committee is to extend\nthe time horizon and diminish the prospects for meeting\nestablished SABN priorities.\nii) With almost no action by the Ministry on building requests as we\nnear the end of the 5 year plan period, there are many changes in\nthe Campus circumstances that were not considered in the priority\nsetting by the SABN Committee and by the President's Office.\nThese include:\n- changes in academic programs - deletions and additions\n- programs of excellence initiatives\n- other major research\/grant initiatives\n- the completion of new buildings which might house some academic\nfunctions\n- the prospect of non-university space being released for\nUniversity use\n- space reorganization proposals by co-operating academic units\niii) The administrative machinery for dealing with physical space -\nboth present and projected - has become more intricate.\na) President's Office\nThe President has established a President's Advisory Committee on\nSpace Allocation\nAssociated with this Committee is support for gathering and\nanalyzing appropriate space information, including inventory,\nfunctional classification, quality, etc., and planning standards\nfor functional allocation and entitlement.\nThe Committee assigns new space or building initiatives to\nsub-committees. The Library Space Planning Committee is an\nexample.\nMinistry capital maintenance or improvement of existing space is\nto be allocated by the Advisory Committee on Space Allocation from\nsubmissions through Deans of Faculties or Directors of other\nservice units.\nb) Senate\nThe Senate Committee on Academic Building Needs is charged with\nreviewing all Capital Building proposals involving academic space. 8986.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAcademic Building Needs (continued)\nSummary\nThe Committee, and Senate, will see that events have overtaken and\npossibly altered SABN priorities approved in 1983.  Also new committees\nhave  been established,  and  the  routes for  advice and  decisions\nexpanded.  The Committee recommends:\n1. That the roles of the SABN Committee and the President's Advisory\nCommittee on Space Allocation be considered jointly by the Chairmen\nof both committees, and that Senate receive a report against which it\nmay determine the future responsibilities of the SABN Committee.\n2. Following any redefinition of the SABN Committee mandate, the\nexisting priorities for new buildings should be reassessed.\"\nDr. Stager    ) That recommendations 1 and 2 of the\nDr. Auld     ) Report of the Senate Committee on\nAcademic Building Needs be approved.\nDean Will reminded Senate that in 1985 he had requested information on\nthe fate of the 1982 report of the Committee on Academic Building Needs\ncontaining the academic building priorities approved by Senate. In\nresponse to that request a report was circulated to Senate in September\n1985, containing information similar to that in Table I of the 1987 report.\nDean Will stated that in comparing the 1982 list with the list before\nSenate tonight, there seemed to be a number of large sized projects that\nhad been interleafed. He felt that any list that had been on the shelf\nfor five years needed re-thinking, but that it was pointless to do so\nunless Senate had some assurance that all and not just some clearly\nacademic buildings were going to be vetted and approved by the committee.\nHe further stated that while he recognized that non-academic facilities\nfor the University as a whole might have to be superimposed on the\npriorities approved by Senate, it was a different matter when the list 8987.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAcademic Building Needs  (continued)\ncontained academic buildings that had been parachuted in, totally\ndisrupting those priorities approved by Senate. There was no point in\nhaving a Senate committee if there was some other committee, or persons,\nas indicated in the report, changing the priorities approved by Senate.\nOn a point of clarification, Mr. Mclnnes stated that the Library had not\nbeen given a ranking because it was a special project, and that the 53.5\nmillion dollars quoted was irrelevant since it had involved total\nreconstruction of the main library whereas a much more modest project was\nnow being considered.\nThe motion was put and carried.\nAdmissions Committee\nSchool of Music - 1987\/88 Enrolment Quotas\nDr. Finnegan reported that the Committee had accepted a revision to\nthe enrolment quotas for the School of Music, as follows:\nFirst Year 56\nSecond Year 25\nThird Year  25\nMajor and Honours Programs in Economics - enrolment controls\nThe Committee had considered the following proposal on admission to\nthe Major and Honours Programs in Economics:\n\"Admission to the Major and Honours Programs\nAdmission to the Major and Honours program in Economics is not\nautomatic. To be admitted students must submit a formal\napplication. Because there are a limited number of places some\nstudents who satisfy the minimum prerequisites may not be admitted.\nCurrently selection for admission is by merit based on the overall 8988.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAdmissions Committee\nMajor and Honours Programs in Economics - enrolment controls  (continued)\nstanding in 24 units of credit applicable to the B.A. program. These\nunits must include English 100, Economics 100, and Mathematics 140\nand 141 (or equivalents). Non-majors who are eligible to take\nEconomics 490 may be admitted to the fourth year of the program if\nplaces become available. Students who are considering a Major or\nHonours program in Economics are strongly encouraged to seek advice\non their program from Department Advisers on completion of their\nfirst year.\nApplication\nA written application for admission to the Major and Honours program\nshould be received by July 15 prior to registering for the third year\nto ensure that the student will be considered for admission. The\nletter of application must be accompanied by official transcripts of\nthe student's record from every post-secondary educational\ninstitution that he or she has attended.\"\nIt was stated in the report that the Committee supported the basic\nphilosophy of the Faculty of Arts and the Department of Economics to\nmaintain the content and quality of the Economics program by instituting\nenrolment controls as outlined in the attached document. However, the\nCommittee had identified potential problems in the effective\nimplementation of the procedures and processes necessary to accomplish\nenrolment quotas at the department level and, as a result, the Committee\nintends to monitor the process, as outlined by the Faculty and\nDepartment, through the summer of 1987 and report to Senate in the Fall\nof 1987.\nObjections were raised to the implementation of the enrolment\nrestrictions this year. It was felt that students had not been given\nadequate notice. 8989.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAdmissions Committee\nMajor and Honours Programs in Economics - enrolment controls (continued)\nSenate was informed that a statement advising students of the\nproposed controls, together with instructions to contact the Department\nof Economics by mid-July, would be included with each transcript. It\nwas also noted that announcements had already been made by the\nDepartment's instructors in second year courses.\nBudget Committee\nIn the absence of the Chairman of the Committee, Dr. Holsti presented\nthe following report which had been circulated for information:\n\"Budget Planning\nEarly in 1986 the Committee discussed four major components of the\nbudget planning process at the University, namely\n(i)  the need for a three-year funding plan;\n(ii)  the need to recognize increasing costs in the base operating\nbudget;\n(iii) the need for an adequate base operating funding;  and\n(iv) models for \"add-on\" funding.\nThe University submitted a position paper to the Universities Council\nconcerning suggested changes to the funding formula used to distribute\nthe Government grant to the three B.C. Universities. The Committee\nemphasized a need to stress the pre-eminent role of research at UBC.\nBudget Submissions\nFollowing the 1986-04-09 issuance of the Ministry's guidelines for\nsubmission of proposals to the Fund for Excellence in Education\nproposals, the three Universities agreed to cooperate in making a joint\nproposal concerning the stabilization of base operating budgets.\nStabilizing the Base Operating Budget (Joint Universities Proposal)\nThis joint University proposal was discussed by the Budget Committee and\ncontained the following main components.\n(i)  Merit driven salary increases for faculty\nExtensive comparative data were provided on average salaries at other\nCanadian Universities, and salary profiles at UBC.  These data were 8990.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nBudget Committee\nStabilizing the Base Operating Budget (Joint Universities Proposal)\n(continued)\nsubmitted to the Ministry by the three Universities on April 30, 1986.\nThe 1986\/87 and the 1987\/88 submissions for \"merit driven salary\nincreases\" were as follows:\n1986\/87    1987\/88     1988\/8 9     1989\/90\n1986\/87 request     5%        6% 7%\n1987\/88 request 8.5%        8.5%        8.5%\nAt its meeting on September 10, 1986, the Committee welcomed the\nannouncement from the Board of Governors Employee Relations Committee,\nconcerning competitive faculty salaries, having noted previously that\nthe percentage increase described above would not be sufficient for this.\n(ii) Faculty adjustments and Faculty renewal\nThis item included funds for handling Early Termination Agreements, and\nEarly Retirements at 2.5%, 2.0% and 1.5% over 3 years, plus a request\nfor Bridge Funding for Outstanding New Appointments at 1.0%, 1.5% and\n2.0% over 3 years. The 1987\/88 request extended the 3.5 percent request\nto 1989\/90.\n(iii) Market-driven Non-faculty Salaries\nWith a 25% turn-over in clerical\/secretarial staff, the need is to pay\ncompetitive salaries. At more senior levels the salary was 12% behind\nmarket competition. The request was for 2.3%, 2.3% and 3.0% over the 3\nyears. The 1987\/88 request called for 3.5% plus 2% for special\nadjustments for clerical and for Administrative & Professional staff.\n(iv)  Non-wage Inflation\nThe request was for 4% to account for the effects of inflation, with the\nLibrary being treated separately with a request of 8% each year: the\n1987\/88 submission requested 5% and 8% respectively. Insurance costs\nhave increased dramatically and a 4% increase was requested. The\nCommittee noted that UBC does not have any earthquake coverage.\n(v) Research and Graduate Studies\nThe three universities' proposal identified three areas for additional\nsustained provincial funding, namely\n(a) support of individuals with excellent records for research\n(b) provision of equipment both for research and the training of\ngraduate students, and\n(c) scholarship support for the best graduate students. 8991.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nBudget Committee\n(v) Research and Graduate Studies  (continued)\nThese requests totalled $15.6 million above the base budget over the\nthree years, with the proposed split being UBC 65%, SFU 18% and U.Vic\n17%. Similar requests were incorporated in the 1987\/88 operating budget\nsubmission from the three universities.\n2. UBC Request for Stabilizing the Base Operating Budget\nThe UBC proposal was discussed by the Committee and contained the\nfollowing parts:\n(i)  Excellence in Computing\n(a) Computing Capacity Upgrade\n(b) Telephone Service Strategic Upgrade\n(c) A high-speed data communications facility\n(d) Centralized administrative applications\n(ii) UBC Library: a unique provincial resource\n(iii) Hospital Space and New Space costs\n(iv) Reducing ebergy costs\n(v)   Increased productivity and efficiency in administration units\n3. Centre of Excellence Proposals\nTwo entire meetings of the Committee were spent on this item. Concern\nwas expressed over the relationship between the various Centre of\nExcellence proposals, the priorities of academic units, and previous\nretrenchment discussions.\nThe Committee was worried about the long-term funding of any Centres.\nIt was pointed out that if they are built on current excellence and\nstrength, ongoing support is more likely than if they were d_e novo\ndevelopments with no guarantee of sustaining themselves.\nThe University eventually submitted an extensive list of proposals, with\nBiotechnology at the top of the list.\nOperating Budget Guidelines\nIn the 1986\/8 7 Operating Budget, it was noted that UCBC had decided not\nto depart from the traditional split among the three BC Universities.\nThere was a $1.0 million reduction from the 1985-86 grant to UBC.\nIn a discussion of the 1986\/87 Operating Budget and the short-fall on\nfaculty salaries, the Conmittee noted that an equal percentage reduction\nin the salary budget across Faculties was not consistent with advice\nprovided by the Committee, although it noted that these were on top of\nvery differential retrenchments already determined for that year. 8992.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nBudget Committee  (continued)\nBudget Development Procedures\nIn February 1987, the Committee started a consideration of new budget\ndevelopment procedures. The aim is to obtain information on the budget\nfrom the bottom up. Deans of Faculties and Heads of administrative\nunits have been asked to present operating budget proposals together\nwith a brief assessment of strategic plans and priorities for the unit.\nTwo meetings have been held to review the units reporting to the Vice\nPresident Adminstration and Finance. Further meetings will be held to\nreview the units reporting to the other Vice Presidents.\nFund Raising Campaign\nThe Committee has reviewed the preliminary plans for the UBC Fund\nRaising Campaign. Suggestions have been made with respect to packaging.\"\nIn response to a query it was stated that the Committee reacted with\ndistress when it learned that the University was unable to pay the Faculty\nsalary increases awarded.\nCurriculum Committee (see Appendix 'B')\nDr. Thompson presented the report on curriculum proposals submitted by\nthe Faculties of Agricultural Sciences, Applied Science, Arts, Education,\nForestry, Graduate Studies, Medicine, and Science.\nThe Committee recommended approval, subject to the following:\nAgricultural Sciences - Note 8, Computer Science 101 should read\nComputer Science 111\nUnder Courses offered by other Department and Faculties insert Chemistry\nbefore Commerce.\nFish Aquaculture Option - in order to reduce possible confusion with\nother programs being developed in the area of aquaculture, delete the\nword \"Aquaculture\".  This will now read \"Fish Option\".\nApplied Science - ELEC 456 - add to the description:\n\"Prerequisite: MATH\/STAT 205 or STAT 251. Credit will be given for\nonly one of CPSC 417 and ELEC 456.  (3-0-l;0-0-0)\" 8993.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nCurriculum Committee (continued)\nPHYS 250 - the following change in description was omitted from the\nsubmission:\nPHYS 250 (2) Introduction to Modern Physics - Wave particle duality of\nmatter, special relativity processes in atomic, nuclear and solid state\nand introduction to quantum mechanical measurement devices and\ntechniques.  Prerequisite:  Physics 151   (0-0-0; 3-3-1)\nProgram change 4th Year - (listed in Appendix 'B')\nEducation - change prerequisite for ARTE 303 and 305 from ARTE 100 and\n201 to Fine Arts 181 and 3 units of Art History.\nDr. Thompson  )  That the proposals of the Faculties of\nDr. Hoisti    )  Agricultural Sciences, Applied Science,\nArts, Education, Forestry, Graduate Studies,\nMedicine, and Science be approved, subject\nto the provisos noted.\nAttention was drawn to the reference to Geography 214 in the description\nof Forestry 205. It was pointed out that in the submission from the\nFaculty of Science the number had been changed to 204.\nThe motion put and carried.\nDr. Thompson paid tribute to those who had worked with him on the Senate\nCurriculum Committee over the past three years.\nOn behalf of Senate the Chairman expressed thanks and appreciation for\nthe work done by Dr. Thompson as chairman of the Senate Curriculum\nCommittee.\nNominating Committee\nDr. Tennant, Chairman of the Committee, presented the following report\nnominating persons to fill vacancies on Senate Committees: 8994.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nNominating Committee  (continued)\nAcademic Building Needs\nMr. D. M. Mustard   - replacing Miss A. M. Daszkowski\nMr. A. J. Pearson   - replacing Mr. T. J. Savage\nAdmissions\nMr. J. Snell       - replacing Miss A. M. Daszkowski\nMs. B. Steffensen   - replacing Mr. G. Taylor\nAgenda\nMr.  G.   Mark - replacing Mr.  K.   D.   Hancock\nMs.  B.   Steffensen        -  replacing Mr.  G.  Olivotto\nAppeals on Academic Standing\nMr.  G.  Taylor -  replacing Ms.  P. M.  Arthur\nMr. J. A. Williamson - continuing member\nMr.  R.  A.  Yaworsky      - continuing member\nBudget\nMr. G. Loeb        - replacing Mr. G. Olivotto\nMr. R. A. Yaworsky  - continuing member\nContinuing Education\nMr. R. G. Bush     - replacing Ms. M. Branson\nCurriculum\nMs. H. E. Cowan - continuing member\nMr. D. M. Mustard - continuing member\nMr. K. H. Stewart   - replacing Miss M. M. Reid\nExtracurricular Activities\nMr. M. Fahy - replacing Mr. L. N. Ennis\nMr. G. Mark        - replacing Miss M. Parikh\nLiaison with Post-Secondary Institutions\nMr. R. A. Speers    - replacing Ms. P. M. Arthur\nStudent Appeals on Academic Discipline\nMr. R. G. Bush      - replacing Ms. C. Davidson\nMr. J. P. Ringwald  - continuing member\nMr. R. A. Speers    - replacing Miss T. L. Green\nDr. J. H. V. Gilbert - replacing Dean R. C Miller Reports of Committees of Senate\nNominating Committee  (continued)\nStudent Awards\nMr. A. J. Pearson   - replacing Mr. D. M. Mustard\nMr. S. Vukusic      - replacing Miss M. M. Reid\nTributes\nMr. M. Fahy        - replacing Mr. T. J. Savage\nUniversity Library\nMr. B. Dumka       - replacing Ms. H. E. Cowan\nMr. J. Ringwald     - continuing member\nMr. J. A. Williamson - replacing Mr. K. D. Hancock\nAd hoc Committee on Standards in English\nMs. H. E. Cowan    - replacing Ms. M. Branson\nMr. G. Loeb        - replacing Ms. M. Parikh\nAd hoc Committee on Elections\nMr. J. Snell       - replacing Mr. L. N. Ennis\nDr. Tennant   )  That the recommendations of the\nMr. Pearson   )  Nominating Committee be approved.\nCommittee on Student Awards\n8995.\nMay 20, 1987\nCarried\nDr. Williams  )  That the new awards (listed in Appendix 'A')\nDr. Gilbert   ) be accepted subject to the approval of the\nBoard of Governors and that letters of\nthanks be sent to the donors.\nDr. Williams drew attention to the Data General (Canada) inc.\nScholarship, and noted that the statement should read \"...The award will\nbe made on the recommendation of the Faculty of Graduate Studies in\nconsultation with the Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration...\".\nThe motion was put and carried. 8996.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate (continued)\nTributes Committee\nMemorial Minutes\nThe following memorial statements had been prepared in accordance\nwith the custom of Senate in recognition by the University and Senate of\nthe late Sperrin Noah Fulton chant and the late Kenneth Gordon Young.\nIN MEMORIAM\nSPERRIN NOAH FULTON CHANT (1896 - 1987)\nWith the passing of Sperrin Chant, this university has lost one of the\nlast of its great builders of the post war years. Not only was Dean\nChant a powerful force in the creation of solutions to the university's\ncritical problem of growth and change, he also served as a tireless\nspokesman for higher education in the wider community and was regarded\nas an educational leader of unrivaled stature.\nSperrin Chant was born in St. Thomas, Ontario in 1896. After serving in\nthe Canadian Expeditionery Force from 1916-1918, he enrolled at the\nUniversity of Toronto where he completed his B.A. and M.A. with an\noutstanding academic record.\nDean Chant joined the teaching faculty of his alma mater as a Professor\nof Psychology between 1922 and 1945. Again his career was interrupted\nby service in World War II with the Royal Canadian Air Force from 1941\nto 1944.\nIn 1945 he was appointed Head of Psychology and Philosophy and three\nyears later as Dean of Arts and Science at this university.\nHis involvement in the Senate covered sixteen years.\nIt is quite impossible to adequately recognize the enormous contribution\nwhich he made to the academic development of this university. He played\na major role in the preparation of the Macdonald Report, a creative\nendeavour which changed forever the face of higher education in this\nprovince. In 1960, Dean Chant completed the onerous task of chairing\nthe Royal Commission on Education. Although not without controversy,\nthe Report was exhaustive, critical and constructive. It became a\nblueprint for public education and defined an organizational structure\nwhich has endured to this day.\nHis retirement as Dean in 1964 simply brought new challenges and further\nresponsibilities. Dean Chant played a leading role in the development\nof post-secondary education in British Columbia by chairing the Academic 8997.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nTributes Committee\nMemorial Minutes  (continued)\nBoard. It was largely a consequence of his diplomatic and planning\nskills that articulation within the system developed rationally and\nefficiently.\nSperrin Chant was noted for his wisdom and sound judgment. His counsel\nwas sought, not only by some of the most influential figures in Canada,\nbut by a host of individuals with problems of lesser magnitude. To all\nwho sought his advice he gave the same courteous attention - inevitably\ntempered with respect and consideration.\nSperrin Chant served his country for over seventy years - as a\ndistinguished scholar, a soldier, and a dedicated public servant,\nwhenever and wherever his help was needed. Through his long and\nproductive life he never failed to provide a unique quality of service\nwhich characterized his entire career.\nTo his surviving family the Senate of this university extends its\ndeepest sympathy.\nDr. Dennison  ) That the memorial statement for\nDean Will     ) Sperrin Noah Fulton Chant be\nspread on the minutes of Senate\nand that a copy be sent to the\nrelatives of the deceased.\nCarried\nIN MEMORIAM\nKENNETH GORDON YOUNG (1938-1987)\nNo organization as complex as The University of British Columbia could\noperate efficiently without the assistance of a loyal and dedicated\nsupport staff. In this regard, Ken Young provided the leadership so\nvital to the success of the academic enterprise. Directly or\nindirectly, he touched the lives of every student of this University,\nfrom the time of application to the day of graduation. He offered his\nservices cheerfully, conscientiously, and often well beyond the normal\ncall of duty.\nKenneth Young was born in Edmonton in 1938. He earned degrees in Arts\nand Commerce from the University of Alberta and, after serving as\nassistant registrar at the University of Calgary, accepted a similar\nposition in this institution in 1965. In 1980 he succeeded Jack Parnall\nas Registrar. 8998.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nTributes Committee\nMemorial Minutes (continued)\nDuring his time in office, Ken Young became an essential source of\ninformation in all of those policies and procedures which sustain\nacademe.\nIt may be said of his diplomatic skills that no matter how complex the\nissue nor how tangled the procedures, Ken Young always found a way.\nNo member of the academic community knew more faculty, more support\nstaff, or more students than he. In each case his interest was sincere\nand unreserved. He served on innumerable committees, often providing\nthe continuity necessary to complete the task before them. He displayed\na similar level of dedication in the wide community as a member of the\nBoard of St. Paul's Hospital Foundation from 1985 to 1987.\nKen Young was a loyal servant of this University. He followed in the\ntradition of outstanding registrars whose contributions are so often\nassumed and so rarely recognized.\nIt is appropriate that the Senate, a body to which he devoted so much of\nhis patient energy, should record its appreciation of Kenneth Young in\nthe minutes of this meeting.\nTo his surviving family the Senate of The University of British Columbia\nextends its deepest sympathy.\nDr. Dennison  )  That the memorial statement for\nDean Webber   )  Kenneth Gordon Young be spread on\nthe minutes of Senate and that a\ncopy be sent to the relatives of\nthe deceased.\nCarried\nAd hoc Committee on Emeritus Status for non-Faculty\nThe original report of the Committee had been tabled at the April 26,\n1986 meeting of Senate; the intention being that the report would be\nlifted from the table after obtaining appropriate advice on the use of the\nwords \"...who have been appointed to the position by the Board of\nGovernors...\" in recommendation 1. of that report. 8999.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Emeritus Status for non-Faculty (continued)\nMr. McConville, Chairman of the Committee, presented the following\namended report:\n\"Pursuant to a resolution of Senate at its meeting on March 20, 1985 an\nad hoc committee was appointed with terms of reference \"to review the\nappropriateness of granting emeritus status to senior professional members\nof the University community who are not faculty. The Committee should, if\nnecessary include amended terms of reference for the Senate Tributes\nCommittee\".\nIn order to ascertain the practice elsewhere in Canada the Registrar, on\nbehalf of the Committee, enquired of 12 universities across Canada as to\nthe policies in effect relating to emeritus status for non-faculty. Of\nthe twelve, eight universities have no provision for non-faculty emeritus\nappointments while three provide for emeritus status for non-faculty such\nas chief librarian, administrative officers such as vice-presidents,\nregistrars, university secretaries. One university makes provision for\nemeritus status for \"Academic (Non-Teaching) Faculty\" which includes such\npositions as Director University Counselling Services, Director Academic\nComputing Services, Nursing Director (University Health Service).\nIn approaching the question of how far emeritus status should be granted\nat U.B.C. to retired non-Faculty members of the University community, the\nCommittee started with the realization that U.B.C. grants emeritus status\nvirtually automatically to all retiring members of the University who fall\ninto defined categories. These categories presently include all full time\nteaching faculty who retire at the rank of Senior Instructor or higher at\nthe age of 65, or on early retirement after at least 10 years of service.\nClinical appointees who have served at a significant level for at least 15\nyears are also eligible, upon recommendation of the Dean of Medicine.\nIt was beyond the Committee's terms of reference to reconsider this basic\npolicy. Therefore the question, as the Committee saw it, is whether the\nrationale behind the basic policy that we now follow should apply with\nequal force to non-Faculty, or certain groups of non-Faculty.\nThat rationale, in the Committee's view, is that emeritus status at U.B.C.\nis not seen primarily as a mark of exceptional academic distinction.\nRather, it seems to be regarded as a tribute to the service that a\nretiring employee has given as part of the academic enterprise of the\nUniversity. It is taken for granted that in their teaching or scholarship\nor both, the teaching faculty have made a major contribution to the\nacademic enterprise. The question is whether certain other groups make a\ncontribution to teaching or scholarship that is similarly integral to the\nacademic enterprise. 9000.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Emeritus Status for non-Faculty (continued)\nThe Committee considered that the professional librarian's role is well\nestablished and essential to the academic activity of the University.\nConsequently, professional librarians should be included in the positions\neligible for emeritus status on a similar basis as are faculty.\nThe Committee also concluded that other persons functioning in a similar\nrole in a modern multi-discipline university should be eligible for\nemeritus status. It also concluded that an appropriate test of\nnon-faculty who should be eligible for emeritus status would be whether or\nnot the person had been appointed to his or her position by the Board of\nGovernors. The Committee was advised that non-faculty so appointed are\nnow librarians, the directors and programme directors of the Centre for\nContinuing Education as well as University officers.\nAccordingly the Committee makes the following recommendations:\n1. That on retirement full-time librarians, directors and programme\ndirectors of the Centre for Continuing Education and University\nofficers who have served for 10 consecutive years prior to retirement\nbe eligible for emeritus status.\n2. That Senate grant emeritus status to such persons who are eligible\nunder the preceding paragraph and are nominated by the President of\nthe University, the University Librarian, or the Director, Centre for\nContinuing Education, as appropriate.\n3. That the terms of reference of the Tributes Committee be amended to\ninclude the above recommendations.\nThe Committee did not consider it necessary to review the well established\npractice of this University of granting emeritus status to retired\nChancellors, Presidents, Deans and Registrars.\"\nMr. McConville ) That the report of the Committee be\nMr. Burnyeat  ) adopted and that the Committee be\ndischarged.\nDr. Dennison pointed out that the recommendations were not consistent\nwith the current policy for faculty.  He reminded Senate that there are\ntwo categories of retirees:  those who reach 65, the normal retirement\nage, for which emeritus status is granted automatically, and those who\ntake early retirement.  The policy established by Senate for those taking\nearly retirement states that early retirees will be eligible for emeritus\nstatus with a minimum of 10 years service and a minimum of seventy\n\"points\", in a combination of age and years of service. 9001.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Emeritus Status for non-Faculty (continued)\nIn amendment:\nDr. Dennison\nDr. Tennant\n)  That the recommendations be amended\n) to read:\n1. That at normal retirement age, 65, full-time\nlibrarians, directors and programme directors of\nthe Centre for Continuing Education and University\nofficers be eligible for emeritus status.\n2. That on early retirement such persons who have\nserved at least 10 consecutive years prior to\nretirement and for whom the sum of their age and\nyears of service total at least 70 points be\neligible for emeritus status.\n3. That Senate grant emeritus status to such\npersons who are eligible under the preceding\nparagraph and are nominated by the President of the\nUniversity, the University Librarian, or the\nDirector, Centre for Continuing Education, as\nappropriate.\n4. That the terms of reference of the Tributes\nCommittee be amended to include the above\nrecommendations.\nCarried\nDuring further discussion it was suggested that the reference to\nUniversity officers in recommendation 1. was too vague and that the\npositions of those in that category should be clearly listed.\nAmendment to the amendment\nDr. Wisenthal )  That the amendment to the recommendations\nDr. Stager    ) be amended to read:\n1. That at normal retirement age, 65, full-time\nlibrarians, directors and programme directors of\nthe Centre for Continuing Education be eligible for\nemeritus status. 9002.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Emeritus Status for non-Faculty\nAmendment to the amendment (continued)\n2. That on early retirement such persons who have\nserved at least 10 consecutive years prior to\nretirement and for whom the sum of their age and\nyears of service total at least 70 points be\neligible for emeritus status.\n3. That emeritus status be recommended for such\npersons who are eligible under the preceding\nparagraph and are nominated by the President of the\nUniversity, the University Librarian, or the\nDirector, Centre for Continuing Education, as\nappropriate.\n4. That Presidents, Deans and Registrars who are in\noffice at the normal retirement age of 65, be\neligible for emeritus status.\n5. That the terms of reference of the Tributes\nCommittee be amended to include the above\nrecommendations.\nIt was explained that Chancellors are automatically recommended for\nemeritus status at the conclusion of their term.\nThe amendment to the amendment was put and car ried.\nIn response to a query concerning a number of librarians who had opted\nto take a partial work load instead of early retirement, it was confirmed\nthat they would be considered eligible for emeritus status.\nThe motion, as amended, was put and carried.\nAd hoc Committee on Grades and Grading Practices\nDr. Robitaille, Chairman of the Committee, presented the following\nreport which had been circulated:\n\"This committee was set up following the April 1985 meeting of Senate\nwith a mandate to \"investigate alternatives to the present grading\nsystem.\"  The committee has considered the two reports of the Senate ad 9003.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Grades and Grading Practices\nhoc Committee on Courses that were presented to Senate in March and May\nof 1984, a report to Senate in March 1985 concerning conversion to a\ndecimal grade-reporting system, and a petition on the matter of\ndeadlines for withdrawals that was presented to Senate in March 1985.\nIn addition, the Committee studied the grading systems presently in use\nat a number of Canadian universities and a paper describing the results\nof a major survey of grading systems utilized in post-secondary\ninstitutions in Canada and the United States.\nThe Committee on Courses, in the first of its two reports, presented\nthree recommendations to Senate.\n1. That the two week nominal drop-add time be lengthened to three weeks\nin the case of two term courses.\n2. That the \"N\" grade be abolished. Students not writing a final\nexamination or otherwise not completing the requirements of a course\nin which they remain registered should, where circumstances do not\nwarrant deferred standing, be given a grade of \"F\".\n3. That the Senate ad hoc Committee on Courses be charged with the\nresponsibility of soliciting the views of the Faculties on the\ninclusion of numerical averages on students' transcripts and making\nrecommendations to Senate on this matter.\nAll three recommendations were adopted at the March 21, 1984 meeting of\nSenate.\nThe second report of the Committee contained three further\nrecommendations.\n4. That sessional averages (for each Winter Session) and cumulative\naverages (for all courses taken at UBC) be included on students'\ntranscripts, and that these averages be based on unit-weighted marks\nof all courses attempted, except courses for which no marks are\nnormally given..\n5. That a single cumulative average should cover all of a student's\nundergraduate studies at UBC, and that a new cumulative average be\nbegun when a student enters a graduate Faculty.\n6. That numerical marks be given to all students registered in a course,\nwhether or not a final examination had been written, and that the\n\"DNW\" mark should not be used.\n\"These were referred to the Faculties for discussion in the fall of\n1984. Responses indicated a generally high level of agreement with the\nthree recommendations although some concern was expressed about the\nvalue or validity of a cumulative average, and the possible impact of\nsuch averages on a student's record. 9004.\nMay  20,   1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Grades and Grading Practices     (continued)\nAt the October 1984 meeting of Senate, the following recommendation from\nthe Faculty of Arts was considered and referred to the Faculties for\ndiscussion.\n7.   That UBC adopt a decimal system for   reporting  grades in all courses.\nAt its March 1986 meeting, Senate considered the initial version of the\npresent committee's report and referred it to the Faculties for\nconsideration. By now, virtually all of the Faculties have examined\nthat report and have made recommendations to the committee. On the\nbasis of those recommendations, the committee has revised several of the\npoints contained in its previous report. The committee now wishes to\npresent to Senate the following revised proposal for a grading scheme at\nUBC.\nThe following is a description of the characteristics of the grading\nsystem which the committee proposes be adopted at UBC.\n1. Grades for all courses, regardless of unit value, will be based on a\npercentage system. The minimum and maximum grades for all courses\nwill be 0 and  100,   respectively.\n2. The system of unit values will be changed to correspond more closely\nto a semester hours or credit system. Under the new system, a 1.5\nunit course will become a 3-credit course; a 3.0 unit course, a\n6-credit course;     and so on.\n3. Transcripts will include a numerical and a letter grade for each\ncourse, along with the number of credits awarded for the course. The\nfollowing  categories will be used:\nPercent Letter-Grade\n90-10 0 A+\n85-89 A\n8 0-84 A-\n76-79 B+\n72-75 B\n68-71 B-\n6 4-67 C+\n60-63 C\n55-59 C-\n50-54 D\n0-49 F\n4. \"Degree averages, calculated on the basis of percentage grades, will\nbe reported when a program leading to a degree, diploma, or\ncertificate has been successfully completed. The details of which\ncourses to include in calculating degree averages are to be decided\nby each Faculty. 9005.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Grades and Grading Practices  (continued)\n5. Degree standings, expressed as Class I, II, or Pass, will continue to\nbe used by those Faculties wishing to do so..\n6. In addition to the  letter grades listed above,  the following\nstandings may also appear on the transcript:\nEX - exempt. (Excluded from calculation of all averages) This\nstanding is to be used for required courses from which a student is\nexcused (e.g. because an equivalent course was taken elsewhere)\nJ - \"adjudicated pass\" in that credit is granted and the course need\nnot be repeated although it may not normally qualify as a\nprerequisite for further work. (The grade assigned by the instructor\nshould be used in calculation of averages.)\nP - requirements of subject completed satisfactorily, no quality\ngrade assigned, credit granted where applicable. (Excluded from\ncalculation of all averages.)\nS - supplemental privilege granted.\nSupplementals are not permitted in the Faculty of Graduate Studies.\nSD - standing deferred.  (Excluded from calculation of all averages.)\nT - thesis in progress, graduating essay not submitted, course\ncontinuing.\nFor undergraduate courses: A standing of \"T\" may be used only in\nconnection with graduating essays and similar courses approved by the\nFaculty, or directed studies projects at the 400-level approved by\nthe Dean of the Faculty in which the student is enrolled. A standing\nof \"T\" must be replaced by a percentage grade and a letter grade\nwithin one calendar year of the end of the term in which the student\nwas first registered in the course; otherwise it will be changed to\nan \"F\".\nFor courses in the Faculty of Graduate Studies: A standing of \"T\"\nshould be restricted to reporting thesis in progress, graduating\nessay in progress, and to courses in which a requirement is expected\nto be submitted after the normal cut-off date for the submission of\ngrades but before the end of the academic year. in the case of\nSpring and Summer courses the deadline would be the end of the Fall\nterm.\nW - withdrawal.  (See paragraphs 8-10)\nAUD - audit 9006.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Grades and Grading Practices (continued)\nAEG - aegrotat standing, indicating that the student is granted\ncredit although unable to complete because of illness. A letter\ngrade should also be recorded, and that grade will be converted to a\nminimum percentage grade for that category for the calculation of\naverages.\n7. There is no provision for a grade of \"Incomplete,\" and a grade, or a\nstanding where no grade is awarded, must be submitted for each\nstudent registered in each course.\n8. If a student withdraws from a course within the first two weeks of a\ncourse in one term, or within the first three weeks of a course\noffered over two terms, no record of the registration will appear on\nthe transcript.\nStudents may withdraw from courses in which they are registered at\nany time up to the end of the sixth week of class for courses which\nare offered in a single term, and of the twelfth week for courses\nwhich span two terms. Withdrawals will be noted on the transcript by\na standing of \"W\". Such standings will not be included in computing\naverages. Fee refunds for withdrawals will be calculated on a\npro-rata basis.\nAuditors may withdraw without prejudice at any time; in the case of\nwithdrawal, the record of registration will be removed from the\ntranscript.\n9. Students may withdraw from courses outside the limits described in\nparagraph 10 only with the permission of the Dean of the Faculty in\nwhich they are registered. in such cases, the instructor should be\ninformed. Such withdrawals will be recorded as \"W\" on the student's\ntranscript.\n10. Faculties may, at their discretion, limit the number of \"W\" standings\npermitted to a student. Any withdrawals in excess of that limit that\nwould normally produce a standing of \"W\" will result in assignment of\nan \"F\" for the course or courses involved. Normally, a student may\nnot withdraw from a course more than once.\nThe Committee recommends:\ni)  that the new grading system be approved\nii)  that the revised grading system be implemented at the same time as\nthe new Student Information System\niii) that the ad hoc Committee on Grades and Grading Practices be\ndischarged. \" 9007.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Grades and Grading Practices  (continued)\nIn speaking briefly to the report, Dr. Robitaille explained that the\nfirst version of the report had been presented to Senate in March 1986 and\nhad then been referred to the various Faculties for consideration and\nresponse; the responses to be considered by the Committee prior to\nreporting back to Senate. The reactions from the various Faculties had\nindicated overall support for the recommendations. In revising the report\nthe Committee decided to do away entirely with the grade-point scheme so\nthat the proposed grading scheme calls for a percent score and\ncorresponding letter grades. in recommendation 3. the number of letter\ngrade categories has been increased; several standings have been added to\npoint number 6, and a few of the ones that were there have been revised.\nIn conclusion, Dr. Robitaille informed Senate that if the report were\napproved points 6 to 10 could be implemented as of September 1988 but that\nthe actual introduction of the percent and letter grade system would have\nto await the introduction of the new student information system scheduled\nfor 1990-91.\nDr. Robitaille )  That the report be adopted, and that the\nDean Will     ) ad hoc Committee on Grades and Grading\nPractices be discharged.\nDean Webber stated that he did not see any advantage to incorporating\nletter grades since the letter grade proposal did not add any information\nin terms of informing students about their performance or in informing\nother interested parties about the performance of the student.  He also\nstated that the proposal would pose problems in the Faculty of Medicine\nsince many courses offered require a 60% pass mark, therefore a C-, which\nappears to be a passing grade, would not be a pass in those courses\nrequiring 60%. 9008.\nMay 20, 1987\nReports of Committees of Senate\nAd hoc Committee on Grades and Grading Practices  (continued)\nIn amendment:\nDean Webber   ) That the letter grades be deleted\nDr. Sobrino   )\nDr. Robitaille stated that it was important for other institutions to\nunderstand the UBC grading system and to be able to interpret what UBC\ngrades mean;  particularly since in most Canadian universities \"A\" is a\nletter for a grade of 80 where in many U.S. universities the grade would\nhave to be over 90 to qualify for an \"A\". Dr. Robitaille also pointed out\nthat when the report was referred to the Faculties this particular point\nabout percent and letter grades was favoured by a 9-1 margin.\nThe amendment was lost.\nIn amendment:\nDr. Cherry    )  That the \"W\" notation be introduced in\nDr. Gilbert   )  the 1987-88 Academic Year.\nCarried\nIt was suggested that item 10. should be brought to the attention of the\nSenate Committee on Student Awards with respect to the effect the\nimplementation of this practice would have in that students could be\ntaking advantage of student loans when they were no longer full-time\nstudents.\nThe motion, as amended, was put and carried.\nFaculty of Dentistry\nFaculty Membership\nThe following proposal to amend the Faculty Membership guidelines had\nbeen circulated: 9009.\nMay 20, 1987\nFaculty of Dentistry\nFaculty Membership (continued)\n\"Under the heading, Voting Members:\n(f)  (ii) amended to read: (additional statement underlined)\n\"Instructors (I and II), Assistant Professors,\nAssociate Professors and Professors who, in the\nopinion of the Faculty, provide a significant\namount of teaching to students registered in the\nFaculty, and whose salaries for such teaching are\ncharged to the Faculty budget.\"\nA redefinition is necessary to cover those members of\nfaculty who are on a reduced workload.\n(g)  Student representatives with voting privileges - _7\n- amended to read:\n\"D.U.S. President, Vice-President and Academic\nRepresentative, plus one academic representative from\neach of the four dental classes.\"\nThe reduction from 9 to 7 student representatives and the\ndeletion of the last statement, \"and one from each of the two\ndental  hygiene  classes  .  .  .\",  are  the  result of the\ndiscontinuance of the Dental Hygiene program.\"\nDean Beagrie  ) That the amendment to the Faculty\nDr. Donaldson  )  of Dentistry Faculty Membership\nGuidelines be approved.\nCar ri ed\nReport from Vancouver School of Theology\nThe annual report to Senate from the Vancouver School of Theology had\nbeen circulated for information. On behalf of the Vancouver School of\nTheology, Dr. Anderson expressed thanks and appreciation to the Senate\nrepresentatives on the Vancouver School of Theology Senate, Dr. D. R. Birch\nand Dr. A. J. Elder. 9010.\nMay 20, 1987\nOther business\nSenate Members\nDr. Strangway expressed thanks and appreciation to those members\nattending their last meeting. He noted that Dr. Finnegan had been a\nmember of Senate for fifteen years and that Mrs. E. D. Fulton had been a\nmember for nine years.\nActing Registrar\nDean Beagrie asked Senate to join him in expressing thanks and\nappreciation to Mr. Alan McMillan for the work done as Acting Registrar\nduring the last eight months.\nReport of the Tributes Committee  (in camera)\nHonorary Degree\nDr. Dennison reminded Senate that a special ceremony will be held in the\nfall at which the new Chancellor will be installed and, at the same time,\nthe retiring Chancellor, Robert Wyman, will receive an honorary degree.\nHe stated that in response to many letters of nomination, the Tributes\nCommittee recommended that Mr. Rick Hansen, a graduate of this University,\nand an inspiration to all Canadians be granted an honorary degree.\nDr. Dennison  ) That Mr. Rick Hansen be granted an\nDean Webber   ) honorary degree.\nCar ri ed\nThe meeting adjourned at 10.20 p.m\nThe  next  regular   meeting  of   Senate will  be  held  on Wednesday,  September\n16,   1987.\nSecretary\nConfirmed,\nChairman 9011.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'A'\nNew awards recommended to Senate\nCancer Control Agency of B.C. Dr. Lucille Ellison Prize - in recognition of\nDr. Lucille Ellison's long service to the Cancer Control Agency of British\nColumbia and her devoted care of many patients with breast cancer, an award\nhas been established to provide a book prize for a resident in Radiation\nOncology. The prize, in the amount of approximately $75, will be awarded\nannually to the resident delivering the best presentation at the annual\nResidents Day of the Division of Radiation Oncology, in the Department of\nSurgery.  (Available 1986\/87 Winter Session)\nData General (Canada) Inc. Scholarship - A scholarship in the amount of\n$1,000 has been offered by Data General (Canada) Inc. The award will be\nmade on the recommendation of the Faculty of Graduate Studies in\nconsultation with the Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration to a\nstudent entering the second year of the M.B.A. program. Preference will be\ngiven to a candidate with an interest in computers as related to business.\nThe candidate's leadership, character, and participation in extra-curricular\nactivities will also be considered. The award will be offered for a 3-year\nperiod commencing in 1987\/88.\nRick Hansen Special Needs Bursary - In recognition of Rick Hansen's\noutstanding accomplishments, one or more bursaries to a total of $1,500 will\nbe offered. Funds for these awards were raised at the Celebrity Alumni\nConcert and Auction held at UBC in March, 1987. The awards will be\navailable for students who have special needs brought about by some physical\ndisability.  (Available 1986\/87 Winter Session) 9012.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTIES OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, ARTS, AND SCIENCE\nB.Sc. Program in Nutritional Sciences - Agricultural Sciences\nFollowing the initiative of the School of Family and Nutritional Sciences,\nand extensive consultation with the Faculty of Science and the Faculty of\nAgricultural Sciences, a proposal has been made to offer a B.Sc. degree\nprogram in Nutritional Sciences in the Faculty of Science.\nProposed Calendar Entry for the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences\n(p. 43, col. 2, following Agricultural Mechanics entry)\n\"The program in Nutritional Sciences is specifically intended for those\nstudents interested in basic nutritional sciences, who desire\npreparation for graduate study and research in Nutrition, and for\nstudents who plan to proceed to an area of Agricultural or Health\nSciences in which a background in nutrition would be of value. All\nstudents take required courses in both animal (comparative) and human\nnutrition, but each student may select additional courses to emphasize\none area or the other. Students registered in this program must\nsatisfy all requirements, including Admission requirements, of the\nFaculty of Science, as described on pages 000-000 of the calendar.\"\nThe  following  new  course  and\nimplementation of the new program:\ncourse  changes  are  needed  for\nNew\nChanges\nAdd NOTE:\nANSC 425 (1.5) Comparative Nutrition\nANSC 321 - change description and corequisite\nANSC 322 - change credit restriction\nANSC 323 - change prerequisite and credit restriction\np. 2 39, col. 2, below the heading Animal Science\n\u2666Courses which have Science credit are preceded by an asterisk.\n(Place an * before Animal Science 321, 322, 323, 425).\nRequirements for the B.Sc. Degree:\nMajor\nFirst Year Second Year\nBIOL 101 or 102\nCHEM 110 or 120\nENGL 10 0\nMATH 100, 101 (120, 121)\nPHYS 110, 115, or 120\nTotal:\n3.0\nBIOL 200 and 201\n3.0\nCHEM 230 (or 203)\n3.0\nMICB 200\n3.0\nArts Elective1\n3.0\nScience Elective1\n15.0\nTotal\n3.0\n3.0\n3.0\n3.0\n3.0\n15.0 Fourth Year\nANSC 323 or\n1.5\nHUNU 3 092\n3.0\nANSC 425\n1.5\nBIOL 334 and 336\n3.0\nArts Elective\n3.0\nScience Elective\n3.0\nElectives1\n1.\n5\n1.\n5\n3.\n0\n3.\n0\n1.\n5\n4.\n5\n9013.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTIES OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, ARTS, AND SCIENCE\nB.Sc. Program in Nutritional Sciences - Agricultural Sciences (continued)\nRequirements for the B.Sc. Degree:\nMajor\nThird Year\nANSC 321 or\nFOOD 3 012\nBIOC 301 and 302\nBIOL 300\nHUNU 305 and 307\nZOOL 303\nElectives1\nTotal   15.0 Total      15.0\n1 Electives must be chosen in consultation with advisor.  Students\nare cautioned to take due regard to prerequisites.\n2 Students must take either Sequence A: Animal Science 321 and 323;\nor Sequence B: Food Science 301 and Human Nutrition 309.\nRecommended Science Electives\nBiochemistry 402 (1.5), 403 (1.5)\nBiology 302 (1.5, 330 (1.5)\nChemistry 205 (3), 311 (2), 313 (3), 335 (3), 421 (1)\nComputer Science 111 (1.5), 114 (1.5), 116 (1.5), 118 (1.5)\nMathematics 200 (1.5), 221 (1.5)\nMedical Genetics 410 (1.5), 420 (1.5)\nMicrobiology 302 (1.5), 307 (1.5), 308 (1.5)\nPharmacology 390 (3)\nPhysiology 422 (1.5), 423 (1.5), 424 (1.5), 426 (1.5)\nStatistics 205 (1.5)\nZoology 307 (1.5), 323 (1.5), 405 (1.5), 408 (1.5), 428 (1.5), 431 (1.5)\nNutritional Science Electives\nHuman Nutrition 303 (1.5), 403 (1.5), 407 (3), 409 (1.5), 411 (1.5), 419\n(1.5), 467 (1.5\/3)\nAnimal Science 412 (1.5), 420 (1.5)\nFood Science 302 (1.5), 402 (1.5), 418 (1.5)\n(Note: with the exception of Human Nutrition 409, none of the Nutritional\nSciences electives may be used to satisfy the Faculty of Science\nrequirement of 21 units of Arts and Science courses, including 15 units of\nScience, numbered 300 and above). 9014.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTIES OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, ARTS, AND SCIENCE  (continued)\nB.Sc. Program in Nutritional Sciences - Arts\nDIVISION OF HUMAN NUTRITION\nNutritional Sciences Program - B.Sc.\n\"The program in Nutritional Sciences is specifically intended for those\nstudents interested in basic nutritional sciences, who desire preparation\nfor graduate study and research in Nutrition, and for students who plan to\nproceed to an area of Agricultural or Health Sciences in which a\nbackground in nutrition would be of value. All students take required\ncourses in both animal (comparative) and human nutrition, but each student\nmay select additional courses to emphasize one area or the other.\nStudents registered in this program must satisfy all requirements,\nincluding Admission requirements, of the Faculty of Science, as described\non pages 000-000 of the calendar.\"\nBefore registering for each of the Second, Third and Fourth years of this\nprogram, every student must obtain formal program approval from an adviser\nin either the School of Family and Nutritional Sciences or the Faculty of\nAgricultural Sciences.\nRequirements for the B.Sc. Degree: - Same as requirements listed under\nthe Faculty of Agricultural Sciences\nB.Sc. Program in Nutritional Sciences - Science\nCalendar entry for Faculty of Science:\nThe program in Nutritional Sciences is specifically intended for those\nstudents interested in basic nutritional sciences, who desire preparation\nfor graduate study and research in Nutrition, and for students who plan to\nproceed to an area of Agricultural or Health Sciences in which a\nbackground in nutrition would be of value. All students take required\ncourses in both animal (comparative) and human nutrition, but each student\nmay select additional courses to emphasize one area or the other.\nBefore registering for each of the Second, Third and Fourth years of the\nprogram, every student must obtain formal program approval from an advisor\nin either the School of Family and Nutritional Sciences or the Faculty of\nAgricultural Sciences.\nRequirements for the B.Sc. Degree: - Same as requirements listed under\nthe Faculty of Agricultural Sciences 9015.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals (continued)\nFACULTY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES\nRangeland Resources (p. 39, col. 2, 1986-87 Calendar)\n\"Students planning to complete study programs in the Departments of Animal\nScience or Plant Science may focus their studies on rangeland resources by\ncompleting a common core of 19.5 units and an additional 15 units chosen\nto meet the requirements of one of the departments. Common core courses:\nAgricultural Economics 258, Animal Science 258, 421, Biology 321,\nEconomics 370, Physics 110 or 115 or 120, Plant Science 259, 304, 320,\n404, 405, Soil Science 200. The additional 16.5 units are itemized in the\ndepartmental programs which follow. Interested students should consult\nthe appropriate Head or the Dean prior to the beginning of second year for\ndetails.\nDescriptions of individual courses appear alphabetically by department or\nfaculty in the Section, Courses of Instruction.\"\nAgricultural Economics\nDeletion of Program - Rangeland Resources Option\nDiscontinuance of the Rangeland Resources Option in the Department of\nAgricultural Economics involves the following Calendar revisions:\np. 40, col. 1 and 2:  Delete heading \"Rangeland Resources\" and ensuing\nprogram listings for second, third and fourth years.\np. 40, col. 1 change preamble (final three paragraphs) to\n\"Students have considerable flexibility in choosing courses to meet their\nown interests. Two broad fields of study in the B.Sc. (Agr.) program are\navailable: applied economics and management. Areas of specialization\ninclude the following: general agricultural economics, agribusiness, farm\nmanagement, international trade and rural development, agricultural\nmarketing and trade, and resource management.\nThe general agricultural economics option is academically oriented and is\nof interest to those thinking of a career in research or government\npositions. The agribusiness and farm management options are suggested for\nthose whose interests lie in the practical and business area of the food\nsystem. The marketing, international trade and rural development options\nare concerned with the national and international marketplaces and\nproblems faced by developing economies.\nRequirements for the Bachelor's degree are noted below and for information\nconcerning the Masters and Doctorate degrees, the Faculty of Graduate\nStudies section of the calendar should be consulted.\" 9016.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES  (continued)\nAnimal Science\nFish Option\nNew courses   ANSC 480 (1.5) Intensive Fish Production\nANSC 482 (1.5) Fish Breeding in Aquaculture\nChange       ANSC 481 - change number and prerequisite (was 412)\nRevision in Program Notes (p. 41, col. 2, 1986-87 Calendar)\n(Note 1 - revised)\n(Note 8 - added)\n1. ... For the Rangeland Resources option these electives must include\nSoil science 200, Plant Science 259, and Agricultural Economics 258.\nFor the Fish option, these electives must include Agricultural\nEconomics 201 or 258 and Food Science 258 or 259.\n8. Recommended electives include Bio-Resource Engineering 285 and\nComputer Science 111 or 114.\nCourses offered by other Departments and Faculties\nWhen choosing electives students should consider courses offered by the\nfollowing Faculties and Departments: Agricultural Economics,\nBiochemistry, Biology, Botany, Chemistry, Commerce, Computer Science,\nEconomics, Food Science, Forestry, Geography, Mathematics,\nMicrobiology, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Zoology.\nChange preamble (p. 41, col. 1)\nAnimal Science\nThe former Departments of Animal and Poultry Science have been\ndiscontinued and their programs transferred to the new Department of\nAnimal Science.\nThe Department has teaching and research facilities for study in\nnutrition, physiology, genetics, production management, behaviour,\nembryology, fish, and wildlife management. Laboratories are located in\nthe main Agricultural Sciences Building (H.R. MacMillan Building).\nAncillary facilities are available for teaching and research involving\navian species (layer, broiler, breeder, quail and pigeon), beef cattle,\ndairy, fish, sheep, swine and wild mammals. Field research areas are\navailable also for studies of livestock and wildlife productivity. 9017.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES\nAnimal Science  (continued)\nThe Department offers opportunities for study leading to Doctoral, Master's\nand Bachelor's degrees. For information on the Ph.D. and M.Sc. degree\nrequirements and courses see the Graduate Studies section of the calendar.\nRequirements for the B.Sc. (Agr.) degree: Students enrolled in the B.Sc.\n(Agr.) program in Animal Science can pursue several areas of special\ninterest (e.g. genetics and breeding, nutrition, physiology, animal and\npoultry production, fish, wildlife management, and embryology).\nRequirements for the different programs are shown below:\nProposed Program Requirements for Fish Option\nCourse Requirements for the B.Sc. (Agr.)\nAgricultural Sciences 100 0 Agricultural Sciences\nAgricultural Sciences 110 1.5       electives (Note 1) 4.5\nBiology 101 or 102 3 Agricultural Sciences 213   1.5\nChemistry 103 or 110 or 120 3 Animal Science 258 1.5\nEconomics 100 3 Chemistry 230 3\nMathematics 100 (or 140) 1.5 English 100 3\nMathematics 101 (or 141) 1.5 Electives (Notes 2 and 6)   3\nPhysics 110 or 115 or 120 3 \t\n16.5 16.5\nThird and Fourth Years\nAgricultural Sciences 300    1\nAgricultural Sciences 410    1.5\nAnimal Science 322 1.5\nAnimal Science 423 1\nAnimal Science 498 or 499    1.5 or 3\n(Note 7)\nPlant Science 321 (or equiv.) 1.5\nProgram requirements and\nelectives (see below)     27 or 25.5\n35\nRequirements and Electives for:\nLivestock Option Poultry Option\nAnimal  Science  310 Animal  Science  307 1.5\n(or  equivalent) 1.5 Animal Science 310 1.5\nAnimal Science 313 (Note 5)       1.5 Animal Science 324 1.5\nAnimal Science 320 3 Animal Science 415 1.5\nAnimal Science 321 1.5 Animal Science  419 1.5\nAnimal Science 440 (Note 5)       1.5 Electives\nAnimal Science 450 (Note 5)       1.5 (Notes 2,3,4 and 6)\nAnimal Science 460 (Note 5)       1.5\nElectives\n(Notes 2,3,4 and 6)     15 or  13-1\/2 19.5 or  18\n27 or  25-1\/2 27 or   25.5 9018.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\n3\n1\n5\n1.\n5\n1\n5\n1.\n5\n1\n5\n1.\n5\n1\n5\n1.\n5\n1.\n5\n10-\n-1\/2\nor   9\nFish Option\nAnimal Science 313\n1.5\nAnimal Science 320\n3\nAnimal Science 480\n1.5\nAnimal Science 481\n1.5\nAnimal Science 482\n1.5\nBiology 321\n1.5\nBio-Resource Eng.   306\n1.5\nBio-Resource Eng.  '\n185\n1.5\nZoology 415\n3\nElectives\n(Notes  2,3,4,6  and\n8)\n10\n-1\/2 or   9\n27\nor\n25-1\/2\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES\nAnimal Science     (continued)\nRangeland Resources Option\nAnimal Science 320\nAnimal Science 321\nAnimal Science 4 40\nBiology 321\nEconomics  370\nPlant Science 304\nPlant  Science 4 01\nPlant Science 404\nPlant Science 405\nSoil Science 315 or 416\nElectives\n27  or  25-1\/2\nBio-Resource Engineering\nChange BIOE  306 -  change  title,   description and  hours\nSoil  Science\nChange SOIL 204 - change number     (was 214)\nDelete Program:\nDiscontinuance of the Rangeland Resource option in the department involves\nthe following calendar revisions:\nChange Explanatory Notes (p. 43, col. 1,):\ndelete Notes 4 and 9, and renumber accordingly;\nmodifiy Note  3 by deleting  last  sentence  (reference to Rangeland\nresources option).\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nChanges\nAPSC 151 - change title and description\nAPSC 110, 210, 310, 410 - change title and description\nBio-Resource Engineering\nChanges       BIOE 306 - change title, description, hours 9019.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nBio-Resource Engineering  (continued)\nFor the following courses - the addition or change of prerequisites or\ncorequisites as indicated  (effective September, 1987):\nBIOE 456\nBIOE 464\nBIOE 471\nBIOE 472\nBIOE 480\nBIOE 481\nadd prerequisite BIOE 366 and 376\nadd prerequisite BIOE 361, CIVL 215\nadd prerequisite BIOE 285\nadd prerequisite BIOE 285, 471\nadd prerequisite BIOE 376\nadd prerequisite BIOE 480\nChemical Engineering\nChanges\nCHEM 352 - change units (to 1.5), hours\nCHEM 406 - change prerequisites\nFor the following courses - the addition or change of prerequisites or\ncorequisites as indicated:\nCHML\n242\nCHML\n251\nCHML\n3 41\nCHML\n345\nCHML\n346\nCHML\n351\nCHML\n353\nCHML\n356\nCHML\n357\nCHML\n358\nCHML\n3 59\nCHML\n362\nCHML\n363\nCHML\n442\nCHML\n4 54\nCHML\n4 55\nCHML\n457\nCHML\n464\nCHML\n470\nCHEM\n471\nCHML\n472\nCHML\n473\nCHML\n475\nCHML\n476\nCHML\n477\nadd corequisite MATH 254\nadd corequisite CHML 353\nadd corequisite CHML 353\nadd prerequisite CHML 2 41\nadd prerequisite PHYS 175;\nadd prerequisite CHML 241\nadd prerequisite CHEM 251, PHYS 152\nadd prerequisite CHML 345\nadd prerequisite CHML 251\nadd prerequisite CHML 242, 251\nadd prerequisite MATH 255\nadd prerequisite CHEM 251\nadd prerequisite CHML 345\nadd prerequisite CHML 242\nadd prerequisite CHML 251, 261;\nadd prerequisite CHML 251, 261;\nadd prerequisite CHML 341, 351\nadd prerequisite CHML 341, 346, 351, 353, 356, 359;\nadd corequisite CHML 358\nadd prerequisite CHML 252, 351\nadd prerequisite CHEM 250, 260;  CHML 341, 359\nadd prerequisite CHML 362, 363;  add corequisite CHML 442\nadd corequisite 3rd year Chem. Eng. or permission of\ninstructor\nadd corequisite 3rd year Chem. Eng. or Mech. Eng. or\npermission of instructor\nadd corequisite 4th year Chem. Eng. or permission of\ninstructor\nadd corequisite CHML 353\nadd prerequisite CHML 356 or permission of instructor\nadd prerequisite CHML 3 41 or permission of instructor\nadd prerequisite CHML 252, 241 or permission of instructor 9020.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nChemical Engineering  (continued)\nCHML 478 - add: same as METL 464\nCHML 479 - add prerequisite 3rd year Chem. Eng. or permission of\ninstructor\nCHML 491 - add prerequisite CHML 362, 363\nCHML 492 - add prerequisite CHML 491\nCHML 4 98 - add prerequisite 4th year Chem. Eng. or permission of\ninstructor\nProgram change  (effective September 1987)\n3rd year Chemical Engineering - unit load decreased from 22.5 to 22.\nCivil Engineering\nChanges       CIVL 445, 446 - combined into one course under the number\nCIVL 445 (1.5) with change in title and description\nFor the following courses - the addition or change of prerequisites or\ncorequisites as indicated  (effective September, 1987):\nCIVL 215 - replace 1st year Physics and Calculus by:\nPHYS 170, MATH 154\nCIVL 220 - add prerequisite CIVL 230, CHEM 150\nCIVL 225 - replace prerequisite CPSC 114 by CPSC 151\nCIVL 301 - drop prerequisite MATH 251 (CIVL 225 retained);\nadd corequisite STAT 251\nCIVL 310 - drop prerequisite CIVL 231, add CIVL 215, 230;\ndrop corequisite MATH 257 (GEOL 150 retained)\nCIVL 315 - drop prerequisite statements concerning mathematics and\ncomputing ability;  add corequisite MATH 257\nCIVL 316 - replace prerequisite CIVL 315 by CIVL 215, MATH 255\nCIVL 330 - replace prerequisite CIVL 220 by CIVL 230\nCIVL 3 31 - replace prerequisite CIVL 3 20, 3 30 by CIVL 2 31\nCIVL 336 - add prerequisite CIVL 235\nCIVL 340 - replace prerequisite CIVL 300 by CIVL 310; change\nSTAT 251 from prerequisite to corequisite\nCIVL 405 - add prerequisite CIVL 205\nCIVL 407 - add prerequisite CIVL 205, CHEM 150\nCIVL 411 - replace prerequisite CIVL 410 by CIVL 311\nCIVL 413 - change CIVL 311 from prerequisite to corequisite\nCIVL 415 - replace prerequisite STAT 251 by CIVL 315 (CIVL 316 retained)\nCIVL 417 - replace prerequisites CIVL 232, 316, STAT 251 by\nCIVL 215 (MATH 257 retained)\nCIVL 418 - drop prerequisite STAT 251 (CIVL 316 retained)\nCIVL 4 30 - replace prerequisite CIVL 3 31 by CIVL 231 9021.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nCivil Engineering  (continued)\nCIVL 433 - add prerequisite CIVL 430\nCIVL 434 - add prerequisite CIVL 331, 430\nCIVL 435 - add prerequisite CIVL 332\nCIVL 436 - add prerequisite CIVL 235\nCIVL 439 - replace prerequisites CIVL 250, MATH 251 by:\nCIVL 235, STAT 251\nCIVL 441 - drop prerequisite STAT 251\nCIVL 454 - add prerequisite CIVL 235\nCIVL 4 80 - add prerequisite 4th year standing\nCIVL 493 - add prerequisite 4th year standing\nProgram change (effective September 1987)\n4th year Civil Engineering - all students will now take CIVL 445\nwhereas formerly they would have taken either CIVL 445 or CIVL 446.\nThere is no change in unit load.\nElectrical Engineering\nNew       ELEC 450 (1.5) Economic Analysis of Engineering Projects\nChange     ELEC 456 - change description, prerequisite, hours\nDeletions  ELEC 364, 451\nProgram change (effective September 1987)\nThe following statement is to be inserted preceding the Electrical\nEngineering curriculum tables in the Calendar:\n4. Electrical Engineering\nIn addition to the regular Electrical Engineering program, there are two\noptions, Honours Mathematics and Computer Engineering, as indicated\nbelow. For both options and the regular Electrical Engineering program,\nELEC 450 must be completed in either the third or fourth year.\nRegular Electrical Engineering Program\nSECOND YEAR\nComputer Engineering Option\nProgram change (effective September 1987)\nThird Year\nELEC 254 (1.5)\nELEC 313 (1.5) 9022.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nElectrical Engineering  (continued)\nELEC 356 (1.5)\nELEC 359 (1.5)\nELEC 362 (1)\nELEC 371 (1)\nSTAT 251 (1.5)\nCPSC 310 (3)\nand three of the following six courses:\nCPSC 220 (1.5)\nELEC 258 (1)\nELEC 352 (1.5)\nELEC 360 (1.5)\nELEC 363 (1.5)\nELEC 372 (1.5)\nElectives:\nHumanities Elective (3)\nEngineering Physics\nChanges    PHYS 250 - change prerequisites and description\nPHYS 251 - change prerequisites\nGeological Engineering\nOption I (Minerals and Fuels) change Technical Electives from (3) to (1.5)\nChanges    GEOL 499, GEOP 499 - change units to (3)\nProgram changes (effective September 1987)\nThird Year Core\nCIVL 3 36 (2)\nGEOL 302 (1.5)\nGEOL 3 04 (3)\nGEOL 305 (1.5)\nGEOL 3 35 (1.5)\nGEOL 342 (1.5)\nGEOL 351 (1.5)\nTechnical Elective(s)  (3)\nOPTION I (Minerals and Fuels) and OPTION III (Geotechnical)\nCIVL 310 (1.5)\nCIVL 311 (1.5)\nGEOL 303 (1.5)\nMMPE 303 (1)\nHumanities Elective(s)  (3) 9023.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nGeological Engineering  (continued)\nOPTION II (Applied Geophysics)\nGEOP 320 (1.5)\nGEOP 321 (1.5)\nGEOP 322 (1.5)\nMATH 357 (1.5)\nPHYS 251 (2)\nHumanities Elective (1.5)\niMATH 350 (1.5) Complex Variables, may be substituted for MATH 357.\n4th Year Core\nAPSC 450 (.5)\nGEOL 499 (3)+\nOR\nGEOP 499 (3)+\n+ Options I and III take GEOL 499;  Option II takes GEOP 499.\n4th Year, Option I (Minerals and Fuels)\nGEOL 321 (1.5)**\nGEOL 368 (1.5)** #\nGEOL 418 (3)**\nGEOL 425 (1.5)\nGEOL 4 45 (1.5)\nGEOL 447 (1.5)\nGEOP 400 (3)\nMMPE 403 (1)\nMMPE 404 (1)\nMMPE 491 (1.5)\nHumanities Elective (1.5)\nOR\nTechnical Elective(s) (1.5)\n* Students specializing in Fuels will take GEOL 321 and GEOL 368;\nthose specializing in Minerals will take GEOL 418.\nI Students in Option I (Fuels) and Option II who choose to take GEOL\n418 instead of GEOL 368 will be able to apply the additional 1.5\nunits of credit to their Technical Elective requirement. 9024.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nGeological Engineering  (continued)\n4th Year, Option II (Applied Geophysics)\nGEOP 420 (1\n.5)\nGEOP 421 (1\n.5)\nGEOP 426 (1\n.5)\nTWO OF.\nCIVL\n310\n(1.\n5)\nGEOL\n368\n(1.\n5)#\nGEOL\n445\n(1.\n5)\nGEOL\n447\n(1.\n5)\nGEOL\n462\n(1.\n5)\nMMPE\n491\n(1.\n5)\nHumanities Elective(s) (3)\nTechnical Electives (4.5)\n\\ Students in Option I (Fuels) and Option II who choose to take GEOL 418\ninstead of GEOL 368 will be able to apply the additional 1.5 units of\ncredit to their Technical Elective requirement.\nNote: In 1987\/88 only, students in 4th year must still take GEOL 305\nand 351 as part of their 4th year core, and will therefore take only 1.5\nunits of technical electives instead of 4.5 units.\n4th Year, Option III (Geotechnical)\nCIVL 402 (1.5)\nCIVL 410 (1.5)\nCIVL 411 (1.5)\nGEOL 4 52 (1)\nGEOL 462 (1.5)\nGEOL 4 72 (1)\nGEOP 400 (3)\nEither:\nMMPE 4 03 (1)\nOR\nMMPE 404 (1)\nHumanities Elective (1.5)\nOR\nTechnical Electives(s) (3) 9025.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE  (continued)\nMechanical Engineering\nNew course MECH 410 (l-3)d Special Topics in Mechanical Engineering\nFor the following courses - the addition or change of prerequisites or\ncorequisites as indicated (effective September, 1987):\nMECH 265 - delete prerequisite PHYS 170\nMECH 270 - replace prerequisite PHYS 150 by PHYS 151 and 152\nMECH 280 - replace prerequisite PHYS 150 by PHYS 152\nMECH 290 - replace prerequisite PHYS 150 by PHYS 152\nNew option  (effective September 1987)\nIn the New Option, Computer-Aided Automation, it was pointed out that\nthe course ELEC 359 should be listed under Fourth Year\nComputer-Aided Automation Option\nBy taking the following modified program in Third and Fourth Years,\nstudents can complete the requirements of this option in Mechnical\nEngineering:\n(1) Third Year:   Defer MECH 375, 391, 398 to Fourth Year,\ndelete MECH 380; add APSC 380, CPSC 118,\nMECH 466.\n(2) Fourth Year:  Delete MECH 451, 456, 460, 470, 475, and the\nTechnical electives requirement; add MECH\n490, ELEC 359, 468, and 3.5 to 4.5 units of\nelectives from a list of courses made\navailable by the Department of Mechanical\nEngineering.\nStudents who satisfactorily complete this program will be given\nrecognition as receiving the B.A.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering\n(Computer-Aided Automation Option). Admission into the\nComputer-Aided Automation Option is limited to students with\nhigh academic standing. Interested students are encouraged to\napply to the Department.\nMetals and Materials Engineering\nFor the following courses - the addition or change of\nprerequisites or corequisites as indicated (effective September\n1987): 9026.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nMetals and Materials Engineering  (continued)\nMMAT 264 - add prerequisite MMAT 262\nMMAT 350 - add prerequisite MMAT 264\nMMAT 352 - add prerequisite MMAT 264\nMMAT 360 - add prerequisite CHML 251 or MECH 280\nMMAT 362 - add prerequisite CHML 251 or MECH 280\nMMAT 380 - add prerequisite APSC 278\nMMAT 450 - add prerequisite MMAT 350\nMMAT 452 - add prerequisite MMAT 3 50\nMMAT 454 - add prerequisite MMAT 350\nMMAT 458 - add prerequisite MMAT 352\nMMAT 462 - add prerequisite MMAT 360 and 362\nMMAT 4 66 - add prerequisite MMAT 3 52\nMMAT 468 - add prerequisite MMAT 450\nMMAT 470 - add prerequisite MMAT 376\nMMAT 47 2 - add prerequisite MMAT 376\nMining and Mineral Process Engineering\nFor the following courses - the addition or change of prerequisite or\ncorequisite as indicated (effective September, 1987):\nMMPE 300 - add prerequisite MMPE 201\nMMPE 301 - add prerequisite MMPE 201\nMMPE 331 - add prerequisite MMPE 231\nMMPE 332 - add prerequisite MMPE 231\nMMPE 3 33 - add prerequisite MMPE 2 31\nMMPE 391 - add prerequisite MMPE 231\nMMPE 392 - add prerequisite MMPE 231\nMMPE 393 - add prerequisite 3rd year standing in MMPE\nMMPE 394 - add prerequisite 3rd year standing in MMPE\nMMPE 401 - add prerequisite 4th year standing in MMPE\nMMPE 402 - add prerequisite MMPE 2 01\nMMPE 431 - add prerequisite 4th year standing in MMPE\nMMPE 432 - add prerequisite 4th year standing in MMPE\nMMPE 450 - add prerequisite 4th year standing in MMPE\nMMPE 4 57 - add statement:  Not for students in Mining and\nMineral Process Engineering\nMMPE 4 61 - add prerequisite MMPE 2 01\nMMPE 462 - add prerequisite MMPE 231\nMMPE 4 91 - add prerequisite MMPE 2 01\nMMPE 492 - add prerequisite 4th year standing in MMPE\nMMPE 4 93 - add prerequisite 4th year standing in MMPE\nMMPE 494 - add prerequisite 4th year standing in MMPE 9027.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCE\nMining and Mineral Process Engineering  (continued)\nProgram change  (effective September 1987)\n4th Year\nReplace the existing short list of 4th year electives by the following:\nCore subjects:\nAPSC 450\nMMAT 372\nMMPE 491\nMMPE 493\nMMPE 494\nMMPE 495\nMMPE 49 6\nMMPE 492\nMMPE 401\nMMPE 431\n3 units of Humanities, Socials, Admin.\nMining Option:\nMMPE 402\nMMPE 403\nMMPE 404\nMMPE 461\n*Plus a minimum of 2.5 units of technical electives\nMineral Processing Option:\nMMPE 462\nMMPE 432\nMMPE 433\nMMAT 351\n*Plus a minimum of 1.5 units of technical electives\n*Other electives can be scheduled in consultation with the Department.\nFACULTY OF ARTS\nClassics\nChange CLST 303 - change in description, units to (1.5\/3)\nCLST 306, 307, 308 - change in number, title, description,\nhours (was 303)\nCLST 430 - split into two courses:\nCLST 430 (1.5) Topography and Monuments of Ancient Athens\nCLST 431 (1.5) Topography and Monuments of Ancient Rome 9028.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS  (continued)\nEconomics\nChange in Program\nEconomic History\nThe Departments of Economics and History jointly offer a program in\nEconomic History designed to provide a common core of training for\nEconomic History Students in both departments, while also permitting a\nmeasure of specialization in either of the two parent disciplines.\nStudents may enrol in a Major program in Economics (Economic History) or\nHistory (Economic History), or an Honours program in Economics (Economic\nHistory). Students planning to enrol in these programs should consult\nProfessor Paterson (Economics).\nRequirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts\nMajor in Economics (Economic History)\nPrerequisites\nAdmission to the Major program in Economics (see Economics).\nThe required units must include 6 units from any of the 100- or 200- level\ncourses in History.\nMajor Requirements\nEconomics 3 25 and 3 26\nOne of: Economics 334, 336, 437\nEconomics 490\n3 units in Economics at the 400-level (not to include Economics 437)\n3 units in Economic History (from the joint list)\n3 units in History at the 200-, 300- or 400- level (may include courses on\nthe joint list offered by the Department of History).\nHonours in Economics (Economic History)\nPrerequisites\nAdmission to the Honours program in Economics (see Economics)\nThe required units must include 6 units from any of the 100- or 200- level\ncourses in History.\nHonours Requirements\nEconomics 306 and 3 07\nEconomics 325 and 326\nOne of: Economics 3 34, 3 36, 4 37\nEconomics 495 and 499\n3 units in Economics at the 400-level (not to include Economics 437)\n3 units in Economic History (from the joint list)\n3 units in History at the 200-, 300- or 400-level (may include courses on\nthe joint list offered by the Department of History).\nMathematics 200 and 221 are recommended, but not required.\nMajor in History (Economic History)\nMathematics 140 and 141 9029.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS\nEconomics  (continued)\nThe Department of Economics offers programs of study that lead to the\ndegree of Ph.D., M.A., B.A.\nRequirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts\nMajor\nPrerequisites\nTo be admitted to the Major program a student must have obtained 30\nunits of credit applicable to a B.A. degree from this University,\nincluding credit for:\nEnglish 100\nMathematics 140 and 141 or 100 and 101\nEconomics 100\nEconomics 201 and 202, or 206 and 207, or 301 and 302\nStudents without Economics 201 and 202 (or their equivalents) may be\nconsidered for admission.\nMajor Requirements\nEconomics  325 and  326\nOne of: Economics 334, 336, 437\nEconomics 490\nAnother 3 units in Economics at the 400-level\nAnother 3 units in Economics at the 300- or 400-level\nMathematics 200 and 221 are recommended, but not required\nStudents should note the prerequisites for senior courses and plan their\nprograms accordingly. Particular attention should be paid to the\nprerequisites for Economics 490; Economics 325 and 326 (or their\nequivalents) must be successfully completed before the beginning of the\nstudent's final year.\nHonours\nPrerequisites\nTo be admitted to the Honours program a student must have obtained 30\nunits of credit applicable to a B.A. degree from this University with an\noverall second class standing or better;\nhave completed successfully English 100, Mathematics 140 and 141, or 100\nand 101;\nand obtained at least second class standing in Economics 100, Economics\n206 and 207 (or, with permission of the Honours Adviser, Economics 201\nand 202).\nStudents considering an Honours program in Economics should consult the\nDepartment's Honours Adviser on completion of their second year and, if\npossible, on complete of their first year.  Students without Economics\n206 and 207 (or their equivalents) may be considered for admission\npending satisfactory completion of the required courses. 9030.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS\nEconomics\nHonours  (continued)\nHonours Requirements\nTo continue in the Honours program a student must attain at least a\nsecond class average in all courses taken in Economics.\nEconomics 325 and 326\nOne of:  Economics 334, 336, 437\n3 units of advanced Economic theory (as approved by the Honours Adviser)\nAnother 3 units in Economics at the 400-level\nAnother 3 units in Economics at the 300- or 400-level\nEconomics 495 and 499\nMathematics 200 and 221 are strongly recommended.\nFamily and Nutritional Sciences\nChange in Degree Designation\nDIVISION OF FAMILY SCIENCE - B.H.E. changed to:\nBACHELOR OF ARTS - B.A. FAMILY SCIENCE\nChange in Program\n(See page 123 for Calendar entry replaced by version passed by Senate,\nMay 1986.)\nProposed Calendar Entry\nDIVISION OF FAMILY SCIENCE\nFamily Science Program (B.A.)\nThe Family Science Major is an academic program in social science\nleading to the Bachelor of Arts degree.\nAdmission\nFor admission requirements see the section on Admission in the General\nInformation section of the Calendar.\nRequirements for the Bachelor of Arts Degree (Family Science Major):\nGeneral  Requirements:   Must  satisfy  Faculty  of  Arts  requirements\n(pp.66-69)\nFirst and Second Years:\n- FMSC 200\n- Statistics 203 9031.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS  (continued)\nFamily and Nutritional Sciences\nRequirements for the Bachelor of Arts Degree (Family Science Major):\n(continued)\nThird and Fourth Years:\n- FMSC 422\n- FMSC 420\nAt least 12 additional units of Family Science including:\n- at least one of:  320, 322, 324, 326, 436\n- at least one of:  312, 314, 316, 410, 414\n- at least one of:  338, 340, 342, 440, 442\nChange in Program Description\nProposed Calendar entry:  to be inserted above the present Calendar entry\nfor Fine Arts, p.75, col.B.\nFamily Science\nThe School of Family and Nutritional Sciences offers the Family Science\nMajor. This is an academic program in social science leading to the\nBachelor of Arts degree.\nRequirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts:\nMajor\nFirst and Second Years:\nFamily Science 200 and Statistics 203\nThird and Fourth Years:\nFamily Science 422 and Family Science 420\nAt least 12 additional units of Family Science including:\nat least one of: 320, 322, 324, 326, 436\nat least one of: 312, 314, 316, 410, 414\nat least one of: 338, 340, 342, 440, 442\nChange in Course Selection Lists\nAdd to List A:  Family Science 200 (3)\nAdd to List B:  Family Science 314 (1.5)\nProposed B.Sc. Degree\nDIVISION OF HUMAN NUTRITION\nNutritional Sciences Program - B.Sc.\nThe program in Nutritional Sciences is specifically intended for those\nstudents  interested  in  basic  nutritional  sciences,  who  desire 9032.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS\nFamily and Nutritional Sciences\nNutritional Sciences Program - B.Sc.  (continued)\npreparation for graduate study and research in Nutrition, and for students\nwho plan to proceed to an area of Agricultural or Health Sciences in which\na background in nutrition would be of value. All students take required\ncourses in both animal (comparative) and human nutrition, but each student\nmay select additional courses to emphasize one area or the other.\nStudents registered in this program must satisfy all requirements,\nincluding Admission requirements, of the Faculty of Science, as described\non pages 000-000 of the calendar.\nBefore registering for each of the Second, Third and Fourth years of this\nprogram, every student must obtain formal program approval from an adviser\nin either the School of Family and Nutritional Sciences or the Faculty of\nAgricultural Sciences.\nRequirements for the B.Sc. Degree:\nMajor\nFirst Year\nBIOL 101 or 102\nCHEM 110 or 120\nENGL 10 0\nMATH 100, 101 (120, 121)\nPHYS 110, 115, or 120\nTotal:\nSecond Year\n3.0\nBIOL 200 and 201\n3.0\nCHEM 230 (or 203)\n3.0\nMICB 200\n3.0\nArts Elective1\n3.0\nScience Elective1\n15.0\nTotal\n3.0\n3.0\n3.0\n3.0\n3.0\n15.0\nThird Year\nFourth Year\nANSC 3212 or\nANSC 3232 or\nFOOD 3012\n1.5\nHUNU 3092\n1.5\nBIOC 301 and\n302\n3.0\nANSC 425\n1.5\nBIOL 300\n1.5\nBIOL 334 and 336\n3.0\nHUNU 3 05 and\n307\n3.0\nArts Elective\n3.0\nZOOL 303\n3.0\nScience Elective\n1.5\nElectives1\n3.0\nElectives1\n4.5\nTotal\n15.0\nTotal\n15.0 9033.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS\nFamily and Nutritional Sciences\nNutritional Sciences Program - B.Sc.  (continued)\n1 Electives must be chosen in consultation with adviser.  Students are\ncautioned to take due regard to prerequisites.\n2 Students must take either Sequence A: Animal Science 321 and 323; or\nSequence B: Food Science 301 and Human Nutrition 309.\nRecommended Science Electives\nBiochemistry 402 (1.5), 403 (1.5)\nBiology 302 (1.5, 330 (1.5)\nChemistry 205 (3), 311 (2), 313 (3), 335 (3), 421 (1)\nComputer Science 111 (1.5), 114 (1.5), 116 (1.5), 118 (1.5)\nMathematics 200 (1.5), 221 (1.5)\nMedical Genetics 410 (1.5), 420 (1.5)\nMicrobiology 302 (1.5), 307 (1.5), 308 (1.5)\nPharmacology 390 (3)\nPhysiology 422 (1.5), 423 (1.5), 424 (1.5), 426 (1.5)\nStatistics 205 (1.5)\nZoology 307 (1.5), 323 (1.5), 405 (1.5), 408 (1.5), 428 (1.5), 431 (1.5)\nNutritional Science Electives\nHuman Nutrition 303 (1.5), 403 (1.5), 407 (3), 409 (1.5), 411 (1.5), 419\n(1.5), 467 (1.5\/3)\nAnimal Science 412 (1.5), 420 (1.5)\nFood Science 302 (1.5), 402 (1.5), 418 (1.5)\n(Note: with the exception of Human Nutrition 409, none of the\nNutritional Sciences electives may be used to satisfy the Faculty of\nScience requirement of 21 units of Arts and Science courses, including\n15 units of Science, numbered 300 and above).\nFrench\nNew      FREN 3 40 (3) French for Reading Knowledge I\nFREN 341 (3) French for Reading Knowledge II\nHistory\nChanges  HIST 101 - change in title, hours\nHIST 319, 370, 405 - change in title, description\nHIST 325, 408 - change in title, description, units\nDeletions HIST 371, 373, 374 9034.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS  (continued)\nMusic\nNew Program - Major in Guitar\nCalendar entry:\nMajor in Guitar\nAll students planning to major in guitar in the Bachelor of Music program\nare required to audition during registration week. Transfer students from\nother colleges and universities will audition at the same time. Students\ncurrently registered in guitar performance will be examined each Spring\nbefore the end of Term. The results of these auditions and examinations\nwill determine whether a student will be admitted to the performance\nprogram, will be allowed to transfer credits in guitar performance from\nother universities and colleges, or will be permitted to continue in the\nprogram. All students in the performance major are on probation during\ntheir first two years regardless of entrance level and, unless accepted\nstandards are met each year, will be required to withdraw from the program.\nIn general, the entrance level corresponds to the Toronto or Western Board\nGrade X, and there must also be the probability of significant development\nduring th years of study at the University. The possession of a diploma\nis not a guarantee of acceptance.\nStudents accepted as first-year guitar majors will be expected to attain\nannual levels corresponding approximately to those given below. The works\ncited are given as guides to the levels of technical and musical\nachievement to be attained and do not indicate specific repertoire\nrequirements.\nEntrance auditions and term examinations will include sight reading and\nquick study in addition to the performance of prepared repertoire.\nThird-year students will be required to study French and Italian lute\ntablature systems (in their private lessons). Fourth-year students will\nbe expected to transcribe a work from the repertoire of another instrument\n(e.g., piano, violin).\nEnd of First Year. Etudes (Villa-Lobos No. 1, Mignone No. 10); Dowland,\nLacrimae Pavan; Weiss, Fantasia; Sor, Fantasia Op. 7; Berkeley, Theme and\nVariations.\nEnd of Second Year. Etudes (Villa-Lobos No. 6, Sor [Segovia] No. 12);\nDowland, Fantasia; Bach, Third Lute Suite; Somers, Sonata; Torroba, Suite\nCastellana.\nEnd of Third Year. Etudes (Villa-Lobos No. 2, Dodgson [Quine] No. 20);\nBach, Prelude, Fugue and Allegro; Sor, Sonata Op. 22; Walton, Bagatelles;\nConcertos (e.g., Castelnuovo-Tedesco); Vocal and instrumental\naccompaniments; Chamber works; Third-year recital.\nEnd of Fourth Year. Etudes (Villa-Lobos No. 10, Mignone No. 3); Bach,\nFourth Lute Suite; Castelnuovo-Tedesco, Sonata; Britten, Nocturnal;\nBolcom, Seasons; Concertos (e.g. Rodrigo, Aranjuez); Vocal and\ninstrumental accompaniements; Chamber works; Fourth-year recital. 9035.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS\nMusic\nNew Program - Major in Guitar  (continued)\nFirst Year Second Year\n(100) Theory of Music I\n(101) Theory of Music II\n(120) History of Music I\n(121) History of Music II\n(193)  Music Performance\n(Guitar)\n(171) !piano\n2Large Ensemble\n(160) 3Chamber Ensemble\n(100)  English\nElective in Arts\n1.5\n1.5\n1.5\n1.5\n3\n1\n1\n1\n3\n3\n18\n(200) Theory of Music III\n(201) Theory of Music IV\n(220) History of Music III\n(221) History of Music IV\n(293)  Music Performance\n(Guitar)\n(271) !piano\n2Large Ensemble\n(160) 3Chamber Ensemble\nArts Lit. Requirement\nElective in Arts\n1.5\n1.5\n1.5\n1.5\n3\n1\n1\n1\n3\n_3\n18\nThird\nYear\n(300)\nTheory of Music V\n1.5\n(301)\nTheory of Music VI\n1.5\n(395)\nMusic Performance\n(Guitar Recital)\n5\n(309)\nInstrumentation\n1\n(310)\nOrchestration\n1\nMusic Electives\n3\nElectives in Arts\n3\n4Small Ensemble\n1\n17\nFourth Year\n(495) Music Performance\nGuitar (Recital)\n4Small Ensemble\nMusic Electives\nElectives in Arts\n5\n1\n3\n_6\n15\n2\n3\n4\nPiano.  The secondary instrument must be piano unless the student\npasses the piano proficiency examination at the end of the first\nyear.\nLarge Ensemble.  students may elect any one of Music 150, 152,\n153, or 154, with the permission of the Department.\nChamber Ensemble.  Students will take the Guitar Ensemble section\nof 160.\nSmall Ensemble.  Students will be placed in one of the Small\nEnsembles (Collegium Musicuum, Asian Music Ensemble, Contemporary\nPlayers, or String Chamber Ensembles).\nNew course\nMUSC 360 (1) Lyric Diction 9036.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF ARTS\nMusic  (continued)\nChange in Course Units:\nEnsembles.\u2014(These courses may be repeated for credit in accordance\nwith program requirements. Open to non-music majors, after audition.)\n150. (1)  University Symphony ...\n151. (1) University Chamber ...\n152. (1)  University Wind Ensembles ...\n165.  (1)  Asian Music Ensemble.\u2014Study ...\nAddition to List A\nAdd Music 157 to read:\nMusic 103 (1.5\/3), 106 (1.5\/3), ...150-157 (1) and 159-165 (1).\nAddition to \"Courses in Other Faculties or Degree Programs.\"\nAdd Music 157 to read:\nAll courses in the history, theory, composition of Music are acceptable\nfor credit toward the Bachelor of Arts degree. Courses in musical\nperformance are not acceptable except for the ensemble courses between\nMusic 150 and 165; a maximum of 3 units from these courses may count\ntoward the degree.\nReligious Studies\nNew     RELG 310 (1.5) Jewish Responses to Catastrophe\nChanges  RELG 202 - change in title, description\nRELG 208 - change in number, description  (was 308)\nRELG 309 - change in number, description, credit (was 390)\nDeletions RELG 391, 421, 422, 425\nFACULTY OF EDUCATION\nVisual and Performing Arts in Education\nNew      ARTE 400 (l-6)d Studies in an Art Education Studio Area\nChange   ARTE 441 - change units, description, prerequisite, hours\nARTE 303 and 305 - change prerequisites from ARTE 100 and 201\nto Fine Arts 181 + 3 units of Art History\nDeletions ARTE 100, 201, 341, 302, 307, 401, 402, 403, 405, 407, 413,\n415, 417, 442 9037.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF EDUCATION  (continued)\nSocial and Educational Studies\nVI. THE DIPLOMA IN EDUCATION\nD. Fields of Specialization\nadd the following to the list of Specializations:\nCanadian Studies\nEducational Studies\nLaw-Related Education\nSocial Studies (Elementary)\nChange   SSED 402 (3) Social Studies-Advanced Course in Elementary\nSocial Studies - split into two courses:\nSSED 421 (1.5) Advanced Social Studies Curriculum:\nElementary  and\nSSED 422 (1.5) Advanced Social Studies Instruction:\nElementary\nFACULTY OF FORESTRY\nNew       FRST 205 (1.5) Forest Ecology\nFACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES\nAnimal Science\nNew      ANSC 580 (1.5) Advanced Topics in Fish Culture\nANSC 581 (1.5) Fish Diseases\nBiochemistry\nChange   BIOC 511 - change in title, description\nElectrical Engineering\nChange   ELEC 552 - change in title, description\nMetals and Materials Engineering\nChanges  MMAT 550, 558, 560, 575, 585 - add prerequisites\nMining and Mineral Process Engineering\nChanges  MMPE 573, 576, 590 - add prerequisites 9038.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES  (continued)\nPhysical Education and Recreation\nNew      PHED 574 (1.5) Seminar in Health Promotion Through Physical\nActivity\nChange PHED 581 - change title, description, prerequisite\nPsychology\nNew PSYC 5 20 (1.5) Cognitive Processes in Animal Behaviour\nChange PSYC 500 - change in units to (1.5\/3)d\nFACULTY OF MEDICINE\nHealth Care and Epidemiology\nDeletion HCEP 410\nMedicine\nNew     MEDI 453 (1.5) Introduction to Electrocardiography\nPathology\nNew      PATH 467 (1.5) Microbiological Basis for Infection Control\nSurgery\nChange   SURG 7 02 - change in description\nFACULTY OF SCIENCE\nChange Calendar Statement:\nFaculty Requirements  for  B.Sc.  (Graduation Requirements),  p.  216,\n1986\/87 Calendar:\n(e) Other Credit: A few courses in Faculties other than\nScience or Arts are acceptable for credit towards the\nB.Sc. degree in certain programs. A list of such courses\nis available in the Office of the Dean of Science.\nStudents should note that these courses may not replace\nspecific courses in a Science program or count toward the\n36 units of Science and the 9 units of Arts courses\nrequired by the B.Sc. program. Furthermore, courses for\nOther Credit may not be included in the 15 units of\nScience  or  the  21  units  of  Arts  and  Science 9039.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF SCIENCE\nChange Calendar Statement:\nFaculty Requirements for B.Sc. (Graduation Requirements), p.\n216, 1986\/87 Calendar:\nnumbered 3 00 and above. Any exception to the above, or the\ninclusion of courses not listed in the Program description,\nmay be made only with the prior written permission of the Head\nof the Department offering the program concerned and the Dean\nof Science.\nChemistry\nChange   CHEM 352 - change units to (1.5), hours\nCHEM 406 - change prerequisite\nComputer Science\nChange   CPSC 417 - change description, prerequisite\nGeography\nChange   GEOG 214 - change in description and number, now 204\nGeological Sciences\nChange   GEOL 235 - change description\nGEOL 499 - change units to (3)\nGeophysics\nChange   GEOP 499 - change units to (3)\nMathematics\nNew     MATH 223 (1.5) Linear Algebra I\nMATH 224 (1.5) Linear Algebra II\nChange       MATH 307, 322 - change prerequisite\nDeletion MATH 222\nEditorial Notes (Courses of Instruction)\nThe split of MATH 222 into MATH 223 and MATH 224 has made necessary the\nfollowing prerequisite changes: 9040.\nMay 20, 1987\nAPPENDIX 'B'\nCourse and curriculum proposals\nFACULTY OF SCIENCE\nEditorial Notes (Courses of Instruction)  (continued)\n1. In each of MATH 310, 311, 320, 323 and 340 change 222 to 223.\n2. In MATH 315 change \"(or corequisite MATH 222)\" to \"(or 223)\".\n3. In MATH 407 substitute 224 for 222.\nEditorial Notes (Programs)\n1. On page 68 column 2 change 222(3) to 223(1.5), 224(1.5)\n2. Replace 222 by 223, 224 in each of the following cases:\nPage 81  Column 1, notes 1 & 2 at page bottom\nColumn 2, line 9\nColumn 2, note 1 at the middle of the page\nPage 227  Column 2, note 4, honours programs\nColumn 2, note 1, major program\nPage 228 Column 1, Mathematics Honours, 2nd year\nPage 232 Column 1, Physics & Mathematics Combined Honours, 2nd year\n3. Replace on page 228 column 1, note 2 \"in the first term in MATH 222\nand MATH 225\" by \"in MATH 223 and MATH 226\".\nMicrobiology\nChange   MICB 415 - change in hours and units to (1.5)\nPhysics\nChange   PHYS 200 - change hours, prerequisites\n*PHYS 250 - change description, prerequisite\n*PHYS 251 - change prerequisite\n*PHYS 452 - change title\n*PHYS 473 - change number, units to (1.5), hours (was 453)\n*PHYS 474 - change number (was 454)\n*PHYS 4 55 - change  hours","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2009\/08\/skos-reference\/skos.html#note","classmap":"oc:AnnotationContainer"},"iri":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2009\/08\/skos-reference\/skos.html#note","explain":"Simple Knowledge Organisation System; Notes are used to provide information relating to SKOS concepts. There is no restriction on the nature of this information, e.g., it could be plain text, hypertext, or an image; it could be a definition, information about the scope of a concept, editorial information, or any other type of information."}],"Genre":[{"label":"Genre","value":"Periodicals","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/hasType","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"edm:hasType"},"iri":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/hasType","explain":"A Europeana Data Model Property; This property relates a resource with the concepts it belongs to in a suitable type system such as MIME or any thesaurus that captures categories of objects in a given field. It does NOT capture aboutness"}],"GeographicLocation":[{"label":"Geographic Location ","value":"Vancouver (B.C.)","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/spatial","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:spatial"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/spatial","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; Spatial characteristics of the resource."}],"Identifier":[{"label":"Identifier","value":"UBC_Senate_Minutes_1987_05_20","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/identifier","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:identifier"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/identifier","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context.; Recommended best practice is to identify the resource by means of a string conforming to a formal identification system."}],"IsShownAt":[{"label":"DOI","value":"10.14288\/1.0115441","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/isShownAt","classmap":"edm:WebResource","property":"edm:isShownAt"},"iri":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/isShownAt","explain":"A Europeana Data Model Property; An unambiguous URL reference to the digital object on the provider\u2019s website in its full information context."}],"Language":[{"label":"Language","value":"English","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/language","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:language"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/language","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; A language of the resource.; Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary such as RFC 4646 [RFC4646]."}],"Provider":[{"label":"Provider","value":"Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/provider","classmap":"ore:Aggregation","property":"edm:provider"},"iri":"http:\/\/www.europeana.eu\/schemas\/edm\/provider","explain":"A Europeana Data Model Property; The name or identifier of the organization who delivers data directly to an aggregation service (e.g. Europeana)"}],"Publisher":[{"label":"Publisher","value":"[Vancouver : University of British Columbia Senate]","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/publisher","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:publisher"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/publisher","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; An entity responsible for making the resource available.; Examples of a Publisher include a person, an organization, or a service."}],"Rights":[{"label":"Rights","value":"Images provided for research and reference use only. Permission to publish, copy, or otherwise use these images must be obtained from the University of British Columbia Senate: http:\/\/senate.ubc.ca\/","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/rights","classmap":"edm:WebResource","property":"dcterms:rights"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/rights","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; Information about rights held in and over the resource.; Typically, rights information includes a statement about various property rights associated with the resource, including intellectual property rights."}],"SortDate":[{"label":"Sort Date","value":"1987-05-20 AD","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/elements\/1.1\/date","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/elements\/1.1\/date","explain":"A Dublin Core Elements Property; A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource.; Date may be used to express temporal information at any level of granularity. Recommended best practice is to use an encoding scheme, such as the W3CDTF profile of ISO 8601 [W3CDTF]."},{"label":"Sort Date","value":"1987-05-20 AD","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/date","classmap":"oc:InternalResource","property":"dcterms:date"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/date","explain":"A Dublin Core Elements Property; A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource.; Date may be used to express temporal information at any level of granularity. Recommended best practice is to use an encoding scheme, such as the W3CDTF profile of ISO 8601 [W3CDTF].; A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource.; Date may be used to express temporal information at any level of granularity. Recommended best practice is to use an encoding scheme, such as the W3CDTF profile of ISO 8601 [W3CDTF]."}],"Source":[{"label":"Source","value":"Original Format: University of British Columbia. Archives","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/source","classmap":"oc:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:source"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/source","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; A related resource from which the described resource is derived.; The described resource may be derived from the related resource in whole or in part. Recommended best practice is to identify the related resource by means of a string conforming to a formal identification system."}],"Subject":[{"label":"Subject","value":"University of British Columbia","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/subject","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:subject"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/subject","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; The topic of the resource.; Typically, the subject will be represented using keywords, key phrases, or classification codes. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary."}],"Title":[{"label":"Title ","value":"[Meeting minutes of the Senate of The University of British Columbia]","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/title","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:title"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/title","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; The name given to the resource."}],"Type":[{"label":"Type","value":"Text","attrs":{"lang":"en","ns":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/type","classmap":"dpla:SourceResource","property":"dcterms:type"},"iri":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/type","explain":"A Dublin Core Terms Property; The nature or genre of the resource.; Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary such as the DCMI Type Vocabulary [DCMITYPE]. To describe the file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource, use the Format element."}],"Translation":[{"property":"Translation","language":"en","label":"Translation","value":""}]}