- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Research Data /
- Data from: Environmental stress does not increase the...
Open Collections
UBC Research Data
Data from: Environmental stress does not increase the mean strength of selection Arbuthnott, Devin; Whitlock, Michael C.
Description
<b>Abstract</b><br/>A common intuition among evolutionary biologists and ecologists is that environmental stress will increase the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and among alternate genotypes. However, the strength of selection is determined by the relative fitness differences among genotypes, and there is no theoretical reason why these differences should be exaggerated as mean fitness decreases. We update a recent review of the empirical results pertaining to environmental stress and the strength of selection and find that there is no overall trend towards increased selection under stress. The majority of past studies measure the strength of selection by quantifying the decrease in fitness imposed by single or multiple mutations in different environments. However, selection rarely acts on one locus independently, and the strength of selection will be determined by variation across the whole genome. We used 20 inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster to make repeated fitness measurements of the same genotypes in four different environments. This framework allowed us to determine the variation in fitness attributable to genotype across stressful environments and to calculate the opportunity for selection among these genotypes in each stress. While we found significant decreases in mean fitness in our stressful environments, we did not find any significant differences in the strength of selection among any of the four measured environments. Therefore, in agreement with our updated review, we find no evidence for the oft-cited verbal model that stress increases the strength of selection.; <b>Usage notes</b><br /><div class="o-metadata__file-usage-entry"><h4 class="o-heading__level3-file-title">Block 1</h4><div class="o-metadata__file-description">Data from block 1, measuring offspring production of fruit fly pairs raised in control or diluted food</div><div class="o-metadata__file-name"></div><div class="o-metadata__file-name"></div></div><div class="o-metadata__file-usage-entry"><h4 class="o-heading__level3-file-title">Block 2</h4><div class="o-metadata__file-description">Data from block 2, which measured offspring production of fruit fly pairs raised in control, ethanol, and salt food.</div><div class="o-metadata__file-name"></div></div>
Item Metadata
Title |
Data from: Environmental stress does not increase the mean strength of selection
|
Creator | |
Date Issued |
2021-05-19
|
Description |
<b>Abstract</b><br/>A common intuition among evolutionary biologists and ecologists is that environmental stress will increase the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and among alternate genotypes. However, the strength of selection is determined by the relative fitness differences among genotypes, and there is no theoretical reason why these differences should be exaggerated as mean fitness decreases. We update a recent review of the empirical results pertaining to environmental stress and the strength of selection and find that there is no overall trend towards increased selection under stress. The majority of past studies measure the strength of selection by quantifying the decrease in fitness imposed by single or multiple mutations in different environments. However, selection rarely acts on one locus independently, and the strength of selection will be determined by variation across the whole genome. We used 20 inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster to make repeated fitness measurements of the same genotypes in four different environments. This framework allowed us to determine the variation in fitness attributable to genotype across stressful environments and to calculate the opportunity for selection among these genotypes in each stress. While we found significant decreases in mean fitness in our stressful environments, we did not find any significant differences in the strength of selection among any of the four measured environments. Therefore, in agreement with our updated review, we find no evidence for the oft-cited verbal model that stress increases the strength of selection.; <b>Usage notes</b><br /><div class="o-metadata__file-usage-entry"><h4 class="o-heading__level3-file-title">Block 1</h4><div class="o-metadata__file-description">Data from block 1, measuring offspring production of fruit fly pairs raised in control or diluted food</div><div class="o-metadata__file-name"></div><div class="o-metadata__file-name"></div></div><div class="o-metadata__file-usage-entry"><h4 class="o-heading__level3-file-title">Block 2</h4><div class="o-metadata__file-description">Data from block 2, which measured offspring production of fruit fly pairs raised in control, ethanol, and salt food.</div><div class="o-metadata__file-name"></div></div>
|
Subject | |
Type | |
Notes |
Dryad version number: 1</p> Version status: submitted</p> Dryad curation status: Published</p> Sharing link: https://datadryad.org/stash/share/C3k-plrJKWGpoYNZn0noQVAb_Q0m0KzsDRdE-6OJniQ</p> Storage size: 55161</p> Visibility: public</p> |
Date Available |
2020-06-24
|
Provider |
University of British Columbia Library
|
License |
CC0 1.0
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0397996
|
URI | |
Publisher DOI | |
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
Dataverse
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Licence
CC0 1.0