BC Sessional Papers

PETITION. British Columbia. Legislative Assembly 1888

Item Metadata

Download

Media
bcsessional-1.0061830.pdf
Metadata
JSON: bcsessional-1.0061830.json
JSON-LD: bcsessional-1.0061830-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): bcsessional-1.0061830-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: bcsessional-1.0061830-rdf.json
Turtle: bcsessional-1.0061830-turtle.txt
N-Triples: bcsessional-1.0061830-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: bcsessional-1.0061830-source.json
Full Text
bcsessional-1.0061830-fulltext.txt
Citation
bcsessional-1.0061830.ris

Full Text

 51 Vic. Petition—Sumas Dyking Act (against.) 481
PETITION.
To  the  Honourable the Speaker and Members  of the Legislative Assembly of the
Province of British Columbia.
The humble petition of Colin Buchanan Sword, of Matsqui, sheweth :—
That a Bill is now before your Honourable House for an Act to be entitled " An Act for
the relief of Settlers and Owners of Land upon Matsqui Prairie."
This Bill proposes to repeal the " Sumas Dyking Amendment Act, 1883," and part of the
" Sumas Dyking Act, 1878."
Your Petitioner is an assign of E. L. Derby, to whom the franchise created by the 1878
Act was granted, and he has invested money on the security of the said Act amounting to
more than $65,000.
The grievances alleged as a justification of the proposed Relief Act are not real.
By the Amendment Act of 1883, interest ceases on the charges registered against the
lands until the dyke shall have been repaired ; thus no bar to the disposal or utilization of the
lands is created by the existence of these charges, as the applicants themselves will acknowledge
that when the dyke is repaired, and these dormant charges revive and carry interest, their lands
will be enhanced in value to a much greater extent than the amount of the charges.
Your Petitioner has made an agreement with the " Matsqui Land Company (Limited),"
that they will repair the dyke in terms of the Amendment Act of 1883, before 1st November,
1888.
The applicants seek to be relieved from their liability after the dyke shall have been
repaired to pay interest on and, in due course, the principal of the charges now registered
against their lands; and they are not entitled to such relief, because by the repair of the dyke
their lands will be enhanced in value at least fourfold.
Your Petitioner, therefore, with all due respect, protests against the passing of the proposed
Bill, as altering, to his detriment, the terms of the contract contained in the " Sumas Dyking
Act, 1878," as a breach of public faith, and as a confiscation (to the amount of the aforesaid
charges) of his investment.
Your Petitioner, therefore, humbly prays that the aforesaid Bill now before your Honourable
House be not passed.
And your Petitioner will ever pray, &c.
0. B. Sword.
Victoria, 12th March, 1888.
VICTORIA: Printed by Richard Wolfendeh, Government Printer,
at the Government Printing Office, James' Bay.

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/cdm.bcsessional.1-0061830/manifest

Comment

Related Items