- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- The effects of regulatory changes on insider trading...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
The effects of regulatory changes on insider trading and price movements during corporate takeovers Liu, Zhu Stuart
Abstract
This thesis addresses two important issues necessary to understand whether insider trading should be prohibited: the effects of insider trading on stock prices and the compensation to insiders for providing information and other related services. This task is accomplished by analyzing stock price changes during corporate takeovers, before and after the regulatory changes in the 1980's that were designed to reduce the level of insider trading. In this thesis, we develop an indirect measure of insider trading that shows how observable stock price movements during takeovers allow one to make inferences about changes in insider trading after regulatory changes. Specifically, we show that when inside information is partially revealed to the market, the effects of regulatory changes on insider trading can be identified by examining the price movements of stocks around takeover announcements. If, however, information is not revealed at all or is fully revealed, it is impossible to identify the effects of regulatory changes on insider trading. We also develop a segmented diffusion model to analyze price movements characterized by cumulative abnormal returns during the period surrounding a takeover announcement. An econometric model is developed to estimate the segmented diffusion model. Naturally, this methodology applies to the study of various events in addition to corporate takeovers and regulatory changes. We conduct empirical analysis to test three hypotheses. With regard to Hypothesis I, we find strong evidence that the tightening of insider trading regulations in the 1980's was effective and that inside information was partially revealed to the market. With regard to Hypothesis II, we find evidence that insider trading regulations have more effect on negotiated takeovers than on takeovers initiated by bidding. With regard to Hypothesis III, we find weak evidence that insiders associated with acquiring firms seek fewer but more profitable takeovers after the introduction of tighter regulations.
Item Metadata
Title |
The effects of regulatory changes on insider trading and price movements during corporate takeovers
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1994
|
Description |
This thesis addresses two important issues necessary to understand whether insider trading
should be prohibited: the effects of insider trading on stock prices and the compensation to insiders
for providing information and other related services. This task is accomplished by analyzing stock
price changes during corporate takeovers, before and after the regulatory changes in the 1980's that
were designed to reduce the level of insider trading.
In this thesis, we develop an indirect measure of insider trading that shows how observable
stock price movements during takeovers allow one to make inferences about changes in insider
trading after regulatory changes. Specifically, we show that when inside information is partially
revealed to the market, the effects of regulatory changes on insider trading can be identified by
examining the price movements of stocks around takeover announcements. If, however, information
is not revealed at all or is fully revealed, it is impossible to identify the effects of regulatory changes
on insider trading.
We also develop a segmented diffusion model to analyze price movements characterized by
cumulative abnormal returns during the period surrounding a takeover announcement. An
econometric model is developed to estimate the segmented diffusion model. Naturally, this
methodology applies to the study of various events in addition to corporate takeovers and regulatory
changes.
We conduct empirical analysis to test three hypotheses. With regard to Hypothesis I, we find
strong evidence that the tightening of insider trading regulations in the 1980's was effective and that
inside information was partially revealed to the market. With regard to Hypothesis II, we find
evidence that insider trading regulations have more effect on negotiated takeovers than on takeovers
initiated by bidding. With regard to Hypothesis III, we find weak evidence that insiders associated
with acquiring firms seek fewer but more profitable takeovers after the introduction of tighter
regulations.
|
Extent |
5564305 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-06-04
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0088832
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1995-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.