- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Comparison of the amnesic deficits associated with...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Comparison of the amnesic deficits associated with damage to the medial temporal lobe, medial diencephalon, or basal forebrain in rats Kornecook, Tom John
Abstract
There is general agreement that human brain-damaged-produced amnesia can be caused by damage in one of three separate brain regions: (1) the medial temporal lobe, (2) the medial diencephalon, or (3) the basal forebrain. However, the issue of whether there is a unitary amnesic syndrome, or whether the amnesia produced by damage to these three different brain areas are qualitatively distinct remains a matter of debate. The major purpose of the experiments in this thesis was to compare the nature of the impairment in memory for objects associated with bilateral medial-temporal-lobe, medial-diencephalic, or basal-forebrain damage in rats. Four experiments comprise this thesis. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 described the effects of selective damage to the medial temporal lobe, basal forebrain, or medial diencephalon on a battery of anterograde object-memory tasks. This test battery included: (i) object discrimination, (ii) discrimination reversal, (iii) eight-pair concurrent object discrimination, (iv) delayed nonmatching-to-sample (DNMS) with retention delays of 4, 15, 30, 60, and 120 s, (v) DNMS with lists of three, five , and seven sample objects, and (vi) order discrimination. In Experiment 1, rats with lesions of the hippocampus were impaired only in the acquisition of the simple and concurrent object-discrimination tasks, whereas rats with lesions of the amygdala were impaired only in the acquisition of the concurrent-object-discrimination and DNMS tasks. Both groups were able to learn all tasks to the same level as controls, and once the tasks were learned, they did not display any impairments when the mnemonic demands of the task were increased. In Experiment 2, rats with lesions of either the rhinal cortex or basal forebrain (i.e., medial septum and diagonal band) displayed DNMS deficits at all retention delays longer than 4 s and all sample list lengths, and they were impaired on the order-discrimination task. Rhinal-lesioned rats were also impaired in learning the object-discrimination, discrimination-reversal, and concurrent-object-discrimination tasks, but not the DNMS task, whereas basal-forebrain-lesioned rats displayed the exact opposite pattern of deficits on these four tasks. In Experiment 3, lesions of the mediodorsal thalamus in rats produced a profile of anterograde object-memory deficits similar to that produced by lesions of the rhinal cortex in Experiment 2. However, thalamiclesioned rats also displayed evidence of an abnormal perseverative tendency on the discrimination-reversal task and, unlike the delay-dependent DNMS deficit seen in the rhinallesioned rats, their DNMS impairment was delay-independent. Experiment 4 was an analysis of the retrograde object-memory impairment associated with damage to the medial temporal lobe, medial diencephalon, or basal forebrain. Rats with lesions of the rhinal cortex or basal forebrain (i.e., medial septum and diagonal band) were impaired relative to controls in the retention of object-discrimination problems learned 2 or 9 days, but 16, 37, or 58 days, prior to surgery; in contrast, lesions of the mediodorsal thalamus had no significant effect. The present experiments demonstrated that lesions of the medial temporal lobe, medial diencephalon, or basal forebrain in rats produce different profiles of anterograde and retrograde object-memory deficits, thereby establishing that different syndromes of amnesia result from damage to the various memory structures of the brain. The scope and systematic nature of the present experiments are without parallel in this field of research. Their findings confirm and extend the results of less comprehensive human clinical studies and monkey and rat experiments. In doing so, they underscore the value of the comparative approach in the study of the neuroanatomy of brain-damage-produced amnesia.
Item Metadata
Title |
Comparison of the amnesic deficits associated with damage to the medial temporal lobe, medial diencephalon, or basal forebrain in rats
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1998
|
Description |
There is general agreement that human brain-damaged-produced amnesia can be caused
by damage in one of three separate brain regions: (1) the medial temporal lobe, (2) the medial
diencephalon, or (3) the basal forebrain. However, the issue of whether there is a unitary
amnesic syndrome, or whether the amnesia produced by damage to these three different brain
areas are qualitatively distinct remains a matter of debate. The major purpose of the experiments
in this thesis was to compare the nature of the impairment in memory for objects associated with
bilateral medial-temporal-lobe, medial-diencephalic, or basal-forebrain damage in rats.
Four experiments comprise this thesis. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 described the effects of
selective damage to the medial temporal lobe, basal forebrain, or medial diencephalon on a
battery of anterograde object-memory tasks. This test battery included: (i) object discrimination,
(ii) discrimination reversal, (iii) eight-pair concurrent object discrimination, (iv) delayed
nonmatching-to-sample (DNMS) with retention delays of 4, 15, 30, 60, and 120 s, (v) DNMS
with lists of three, five , and seven sample objects, and (vi) order discrimination. In Experiment
1, rats with lesions of the hippocampus were impaired only in the acquisition of the simple and
concurrent object-discrimination tasks, whereas rats with lesions of the amygdala were impaired
only in the acquisition of the concurrent-object-discrimination and DNMS tasks. Both groups
were able to learn all tasks to the same level as controls, and once the tasks were learned, they
did not display any impairments when the mnemonic demands of the task were increased. In
Experiment 2, rats with lesions of either the rhinal cortex or basal forebrain (i.e., medial septum
and diagonal band) displayed DNMS deficits at all retention delays longer than 4 s and all
sample list lengths, and they were impaired on the order-discrimination task. Rhinal-lesioned
rats were also impaired in learning the object-discrimination, discrimination-reversal, and concurrent-object-discrimination tasks, but not the DNMS task, whereas basal-forebrain-lesioned
rats displayed the exact opposite pattern of deficits on these four tasks. In Experiment 3, lesions
of the mediodorsal thalamus in rats produced a profile of anterograde object-memory deficits
similar to that produced by lesions of the rhinal cortex in Experiment 2. However, thalamiclesioned
rats also displayed evidence of an abnormal perseverative tendency on the
discrimination-reversal task and, unlike the delay-dependent DNMS deficit seen in the rhinallesioned
rats, their DNMS impairment was delay-independent.
Experiment 4 was an analysis of the retrograde object-memory impairment associated
with damage to the medial temporal lobe, medial diencephalon, or basal forebrain. Rats with
lesions of the rhinal cortex or basal forebrain (i.e., medial septum and diagonal band) were
impaired relative to controls in the retention of object-discrimination problems learned 2 or 9
days, but 16, 37, or 58 days, prior to surgery; in contrast, lesions of the mediodorsal thalamus
had no significant effect.
The present experiments demonstrated that lesions of the medial temporal lobe, medial
diencephalon, or basal forebrain in rats produce different profiles of anterograde and retrograde
object-memory deficits, thereby establishing that different syndromes of amnesia result from
damage to the various memory structures of the brain. The scope and systematic nature of the
present experiments are without parallel in this field of research. Their findings confirm and
extend the results of less comprehensive human clinical studies and monkey and rat experiments.
In doing so, they underscore the value of the comparative approach in the study of the
neuroanatomy of brain-damage-produced amnesia.
|
Extent |
12590250 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-05-28
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0088699
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1998-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.