[{"key":"dc.contributor.author","value":"Swihart, Gayla","language":null},{"key":"dc.date.accessioned","value":"2009-05-26T22:47:34Z","language":null},{"key":"dc.date.available","value":"2009-05-26T22:47:34Z","language":null},{"key":"dc.date.issued","value":"1998","language":null},{"key":"dc.identifier.uri","value":"http:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/2429\/8279","language":null},{"key":"dc.description.abstract","value":"The Cognitive Interview is currently being used by various law enforcement agencies as\r\na credibility assessment tool. This research is designed to investigate whether there is utility in\r\nusing the CI in this way. Seventy-eight subjects were interviewed, each telling 2 stories, one true\r\nand one false, and these stories were coded for various verbal content characteristics- number of\r\nwords, number of details, number of new details generated by the CI, filled pauses, repetitions,\r\nsubjective details, and references to the difficulty of the task. There was a significant difference\r\nin the number of overall new details between the true and false accounts. There were more new\r\ndetails (as a function of total number of words) for the true stories at least when the true stories\r\nwere told first. There were several interactions involving version and order for word count,\r\ndetails, and new details, but no other significant findings for other coded clues to deception. The\r\nfindings suggest that the CI may be useful as a credibility assessment tool, however caution is\r\nsuggested before accepting its utility until further investigation is complete.","language":"en"},{"key":"dc.format.extent","value":"2094858 bytes","language":null},{"key":"dc.format.mimetype","value":"application\/pdf","language":null},{"key":"dc.language.iso","value":"eng","language":"en"},{"key":"dc.publisher","value":"University of British Columbia","language":null},{"key":"dc.rights","value":"For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https:\/\/open.library.ubc.ca\/terms_of_use.","language":null},{"key":"dc.title","value":"The utility of the cognitive interview as a credibility assessment tool","language":"en"},{"key":"dc.type","value":"Text","language":null},{"key":"dc.degree.name","value":"Master of Arts - MA","language":"en"},{"key":"dc.degree.discipline","value":"Psychology","language":"en"},{"key":"dc.degree.grantor","value":"University of British Columbia","language":null},{"key":"dc.date.graduation","value":"1998-11","language":"en"},{"key":"dc.type.text","value":"Thesis\/Dissertation","language":"en"},{"key":"dc.description.affiliation","value":"Arts, Faculty of","language":null},{"key":"dc.description.affiliation","value":"Psychology, Department of","language":null},{"key":"dc.degree.campus","value":"UBCV","language":"en"},{"key":"dc.description.scholarlevel","value":"Graduate","language":"en"}]