- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- The language of deceit: are there reliable verbal clues...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
The language of deceit: are there reliable verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context? Porter, Stephen B.
Abstract
In recent years, the need for enhanced methods of credibility assessment in criminal cases has become illuminated. Especially in cases of sexual assault, the words of the accused and complainant are often the sole evidence available to police. Consequently, researchers and practitioners have been searching for ways of differentiating truthful and deceptive accounts, focussing mainly on witnesses and victims. With its recent history, however, assessment based on verbal clues has been somewhat myopic and not well grounded in theory or integration. This thesis examined a general hypothesis, based upon conceptual information from a variety of perspectives, that reliable verbal indicators of deception exist in the interrogation situation. Sixty undergraduates were recruited for participation in research addressing “security effectiveness.” Participants either committed a theft “to test the effectiveness of a new security guard” or carried out a similar but innocuous task. They were then asked to provide either: (1)a truthful alibi (2)a partially deceptive account (3)a completely false alibi or (4)a truthful confession regarding the theft to “an interviewer also hired for the purpose of investigating thefts.” To increase motivation in the interview, honest and dishonest participants were offered a monetary incentive for convincing the interrogator of their veracity. The accounts were then transcribed and examined for the presence of eighteen language variables. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed a profile of three variables which significantly differentiated the truthful and deceptive accounts (amount of detail reported, coherence of the account, and admissions of lack of memory). For example, dishonest participants provided much less detail (although not fewer words) in relating an event than truthful participants describing a similar event. Implications for credibility assessment in forensic interrogations are discussed, emphasizing the need for establishing external validity with eclectic research strategies.
Item Metadata
Title |
The language of deceit: are there reliable verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context?
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1994
|
Description |
In recent years, the need for enhanced methods of
credibility assessment in criminal cases has become
illuminated. Especially in cases of sexual assault, the
words of the accused and complainant are often the sole
evidence available to police. Consequently, researchers and
practitioners have been searching for ways of
differentiating truthful and deceptive accounts, focussing
mainly on witnesses and victims. With its recent history,
however, assessment based on verbal clues has been somewhat
myopic and not well grounded in theory or integration. This
thesis examined a general hypothesis, based upon conceptual
information from a variety of perspectives, that reliable
verbal indicators of deception exist in the interrogation
situation. Sixty undergraduates were recruited for
participation in research addressing “security
effectiveness.” Participants either committed a theft “to
test the effectiveness of a new security guard” or carried
out a similar but innocuous task. They were then asked to
provide either: (1)a truthful alibi (2)a partially
deceptive account (3)a completely false alibi or (4)a
truthful confession regarding the theft to “an interviewer
also hired for the purpose of investigating thefts.” To
increase motivation in the interview, honest and dishonest
participants were offered a monetary incentive for
convincing the interrogator of their veracity. The accounts were then transcribed and examined for the presence of
eighteen language variables. A multivariate analysis of
variance (MANOVA) revealed a profile of three variables
which significantly differentiated the truthful and
deceptive accounts (amount of detail reported, coherence of
the account, and admissions of lack of memory). For
example, dishonest participants provided much less detail
(although not fewer words) in relating an event than
truthful participants describing a similar event.
Implications for credibility assessment in forensic
interrogations are discussed, emphasizing the need for
establishing external validity with eclectic research
strategies.
|
Extent |
1489264 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-03-04
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0087391
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1994-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.