UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

Structure-function relationships of endoglucanase C (CenC) from Cellulomonas fimi Coutinho , John B.

Abstract

The CenC gene of Cellulomonas fimi, encoding endoglucanase CenC had an open reading frame of 1101 codons closely followed by a 9 bp inverted repeat. The amino acid sequence of mature CenC, which was 1069 amino acids long, is very unusual in that it had a 150 amino acid-long tandem repeat (N1N2) at the N-terminus and an unrelated 100 amino acid-long tandem repeat (C1C2) at the C-terminus. Similarity of the central domain of CenC to the catalytic domains of other endoglucanases placed CenC in subfamily El of the β-l,4-glycanases. CenC could be affinity purified on cellulose or Sephadex. The catalytic properties of recombinant CenC from E. coil, for the substrate carboxymethylcellulose were indistinguishable from those of native CenC from C. fimi. In order to determine which of the repeats N1N2 or C1C2 bind to cellulose or to Sephadex, both repeats were cloned separately. N1N2 mediated binding to both cellulose and Sephadex. Nl or N2 alone did not bind Sephadex but did bind cellulose. The C-terminal repeats, alone or in combination, did not mediate binding to cellulose or to Sephadex. N1N2 bound to regenerated cellulose (phosphoric acid swollen cellulose) but had negligible affinity for bacterial microcrystalline cellulose. To show that the N-terminal repeats could be used as an affinity tag for a polypeptide other than CenC, N1N2 was fused to the catalytic domain of CenA (another endoglucanase from C. fimi). The resulting fusion polypeptide C’ ‘A could be affinity purified on cellulose or Sephadex and retained catalytic activity. C’ ‘A was also used to study the influence of the binding domain on the hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates by comparison to CenA. C’ ‘A had higher activity on the amorphous substrate cellulose azure when compared to CenA. C’ ‘A and CenA had similar activities on regenerated cellulose with the most striking difference being the poor activity of C’ ‘A on crystalline cellulose. The ability (or lack thereof) of the binding domain to adsorb to crystalline cellulose correlated well with the ability of the enzyme to hydrolyze the substrate.

Item Media

Item Citations and Data

Rights

For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.