- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Probing the gaps : the influence of social context...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Probing the gaps : the influence of social context and stance on second language students’ co-construction of a literary work Pohn, Joanne Inger
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of social context and stance on second language (L2) students co-construction of a literary work. To this end, it examined three small groups of L2 students, first investigating the influence of social interaction, group composition and the management of the task on the students' coconstruction of the literary work, and then investigating the influence of three types of stances, post-structuralist, response, and literary, on the literary work constructed. The study was conducted over a unit of instruction in a Transitional English 11 classroom. As the researcher was also the students' teacher, the study employed both a qualitative and action research approach and analysed data from three sources: audiotaped discussions, questionnaires, and individual interviews. The first question was analysed from a social perspective, using social theories of reader-response as well as Vygotsty's theories (1978) as the framework. The findings for the second question, which explored the influence of stance on the students' discourse, are presented in a summary of how the students' discourse varied as they discussed questions from different stances and an analysis of the discourse. The findings for the first question indicated that social context did influence the literary work the students constructed. Students did model for each other the knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary for in depth literary analysis, but their interaction was influenced by both how they managed the task and by the composition of the group. Findings for the second question indicated that questions from a number of stances were productive. Post-structuralist stances were successful in highlighting differences in how students constructed the implied content of the text. Response stances produced the most varied discourse, which included students sharing personal opinions, experience, and moral judgements. Literary stances produced the most abstract discourse. Limitations of the study are detailed as well as suggestions for future research and suggestions for teaching practice.
Item Metadata
Title |
Probing the gaps : the influence of social context and stance on second language students’ co-construction of a literary work
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1999
|
Description |
The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of social context and
stance on second language (L2) students co-construction of a literary work. To this end,
it examined three small groups of L2 students, first investigating the influence of social
interaction, group composition and the management of the task on the students' coconstruction
of the literary work, and then investigating the influence of three types of
stances, post-structuralist, response, and literary, on the literary work constructed.
The study was conducted over a unit of instruction in a Transitional English 11
classroom. As the researcher was also the students' teacher, the study employed both a
qualitative and action research approach and analysed data from three sources:
audiotaped discussions, questionnaires, and individual interviews. The first question was
analysed from a social perspective, using social theories of reader-response as well as
Vygotsty's theories (1978) as the framework. The findings for the second question, which
explored the influence of stance on the students' discourse, are presented in a summary of
how the students' discourse varied as they discussed questions from different stances and
an analysis of the discourse.
The findings for the first question indicated that social context did influence the
literary work the students constructed. Students did model for each other the knowledge,
skills, and dispositions necessary for in depth literary analysis, but their interaction was
influenced by both how they managed the task and by the composition of the group.
Findings for the second question indicated that questions from a number of stances were
productive. Post-structuralist stances were successful in highlighting differences in how students constructed the implied content of the text. Response stances produced the most
varied discourse, which included students sharing personal opinions, experience, and
moral judgements. Literary stances produced the most abstract discourse. Limitations of
the study are detailed as well as suggestions for future research and suggestions for
teaching practice.
|
Extent |
6960100 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-06-16
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0078190
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1999-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.