Open Collections

UBC Undergraduate Research

Modelling Reductions of Carbon Emissions Under Various Scenarios of a Public Bicycle Share System Within.. Elsliger, Julie; Enslow, Chelsea; Lam, Connie W.K.; Shodjai, Nur; Tuguldur, Zolzaya; Yeh, Vincent 2012

You don't seem to have a PDF reader installed, try download the pdf

Item Metadata

Download

Media
Modelling_Reductions_Carbon_Bicycle_Share_Vancouver_UBC.ENVR400_Report.pdf [ 2.47MB ]
Model_Reductions_Carbon_Bicycle_Share_Vancouver_UBC.ENVR400_Report.xls [ 378kB ]
[if-you-see-this-DO-NOT-CLICK]
Metadata
JSON: 1.0074566.json
JSON-LD: 1.0074566+ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 1.0074566.xml
RDF/JSON: 1.0074566+rdf.json
Turtle: 1.0074566+rdf-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 1.0074566+rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 1.0074566 +original-record.json
Full Text
1.0074566.txt
Citation
1.0074566.ris

Full Text

  Modelling Reductions of Carbon Emissions Under Various Scenarios of a Public Bicycle Share System Within Vancouver, BC  April 5th, 2012           Submitted to:          Dr. Douw Steyn Dr. Erin Lane                      UBC Environmental Sciences Department                                 Vancouver Campus    Submitted by:         ENVR Group 1 Julie Elsliger Chelsea Enslow WK Connie Lam Nur Shodjai Zolzaya Tuguldur Vincent Yeh          ii | P a g e   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  This study estimates the impact of a public bicycle share system (PBS) in Vancouver on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction due to transportation mode- switching from fuel-propelled vehicles to bicycles. There has been little research on the potential of bicycle share systems to reduce urban carbon emissions; the results of this study contextualize the effectiveness of a bicycle share system as a potential greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction strategy.  From our research and survey results we formulated a numerical model, which was used to approximate the magnitude of carbon dioxide emissions reduction (tonnes per year) as a result of the implementation of a PBS in Vancouver. Our numerical model incorporates significant variables --such as season (precipitation) and the current law in British Columbia requiring cyclists to wear a helmet-- which significantly impact the use of a PBS within Vancouver. The model domain considers a limited geographical area within the City of Vancouver. A survey (sample size 231) was conducted in the chosen domain to provide input data for the numerical model, information about citizens’ preferences and concerns, and to gain valuable information pertaining to the potential success of a PBS in Vancouver.  The projected CO2 emissions reduction ranged from 820 to 990 tonnes CO2 per year depending on the modelled scenario. The results of this study indicate that the potential of CO2 emissions reduction from mode-switching resulting from the use of a PBS in Vancouver is 0.07% potential minimum to 0.14% potential maximum of total annual transportation emissions within the City of Vancouver. Thus, a bicycle share system may be more effectively marketed as a strategy for increasing physical activity and improving the population’s health and lifestyle rather than a strategy, which mainly focuses on reducing CO2 emissions.                 iii | P a g e   Table of Contents                                                                                                1. Introduction          1 1.1 Objectives         1  1.2 A Brief History of Public Bicycle Share Systems    1  1.3 Literature Review: PBS and Cycling      2  1.4 Context and Rationale        2  2. Methods           3  2.1 Population of Domain        4  2.2 The Social Survey        4  2.3 The Numerical Model        4   a. Model Descriptors: Definitions      4   b. Model Calculations       4  2.4 Model Assumptions        5  3. Results and Discussion        5 3.1 Trip Distribution by Distance and Activity     5 3.2 Current and Potential CO2 Reductions      7 3.3 Distance Replaced per Activity with PBS     8 3.4 Ranking of Concerns with a PBS System     9 3.5 Willingness to use the PBS: Weather Conditions    11 3.6. User Cost Preferences       12 3.7. Discussion: Impact of Errors on Model     13  4. Conclusion          13 4.1. Study Implications        14 4.2. Recommendations         14  5. Acknowledgements         15                                                                                                      6. References          16                                                                                                  APPENDIX A: Model Calculations       20 Finding current emissions        20 Finding distance (km) ideally to be replaced by users    20 Finding CO2 Reduction per week for various scenarios   21 Finding CO2 reduction per season      21  Calculating Weighted Concerns       21  iv | P a g e   APPENDIX B: Survey Questionnaire       23  APPENDIX C: Survey Sample Demographics     29 Figure C1: Population Density Map      29                                                                 Figure C2: General Flowchart of Proposed Model    30 Figure C3: Age and Gender Distribution       30 Table C1: Willingness to use bicycle share program grouped by zone of residence.           29 Table C2: Survey results of distance willing to travel on bicycle share system, grouped by zone of residence.        30  APPENDIX D: Ethics Board Approval Certificate     31                                                               v | P a g e    1 | P a g e   1. Introduction  The City of Vancouver is looking to implement a public bicycle share system (PBS) in order to support active and healthy living, increase the overall volume of cycling trips in Vancouver, extend the reach of vehicle, transit and walking trips, and replace vehicle and transit trips (City of Vancouver, 2009 c). A PBS is a system that allows users to borrow bicycles for short term use, often for a fee. The bicycles are generally integrated with specific docking stations, which are equipt with user-friendly self-service interfaces to borrow the bicycles at a station and return them at the same or other docking stations (City of Vancouver, 2009 c).  1.1 Objectives This study aims to determine the impact of a PBS on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction from transportation mode-switching from fuel-propelled vehicles within the City of Vancouver. We determine the CO2 reductions associated with implementing a PBS in Vancouver through a numerical model. This model incorporates variables such as season, precipitation, and the BC Motor Vehicle Act’s requirement for mandatory helmet usage (hereby referred to as the “helmet law”). We also attempted to examine which factors affect the use of a bicycle share system, and the overall impacts of a PBS on decreasing carbon emissions under various scenarios.   1.2 A Brief History of Public Bicycle Share Systems The first generation of PBS started in Amsterdam in 1965, with white bicycles throughout the city. They were available for everyone to use with no associated cost. This form of bicycle share was largely unsuccessful due to vandalism and theft. The idea persisted and the second generation of PBS was born in 1991 in Denmark. Since then a number of cities, including Copenhagen, have adopted PBS programs with minor alterations to the system. The Copenhagen bicycles had advertising plates in their wheels and were to be picked up and returned to designated stations with a coin deposit. Despite the small deposit, the bicycles were still susceptible to theft, which eventually gave rise to the more technologically advanced third generation of PBS. In 1996, the first of third generation bicycle share program was developed in Portsmouth University in England. This new generation was more secure due to the magnetic stripe cards which were required to rent the bicycles. PBS systems are currently in the third generation, where technology is used to track users, collect deposits, and access online reservation systems (DeMaio, 2009). PBS began to expand outside of Europe since 2008, with programs in Brazil, Chile, China, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan, Italy, and the United States (DeMaio, 2009).   These bicycle share systems can be further categorized by the organizations that administer the systems: public, private, non-profit organizations or partnerships between these groups. The progression of change to different generations of PBS has been slow; however, newer generations of bicycle share systems have been extremely successful in parts of Europe and North America (Shaheen et al., 2010). The accounts 2 | P a g e   of successes in other countries have set the stage for the development of a PBS that will meet the needs of Vancouverites.  1.3 Literature Review: PBS and Cycling There is a large amount of academic literature focusing on cycling as form of transportation in urban areas. Cycling in Cities is a research program at the University of British Columbia investigating factors that encourage or discourage cycling for urban transportation including motivators and deterrents of cycling, and transportation infrastructure associated with increased or decreased risks of injuries to cyclists (Cycling in Cities, 2012).  There have been numerous studies done on PBS programs, which examine: feasibility, transportation mode share, and capital and operating expenses. PBS programs have had a significant effect on increasing the proportion of the cycling population, improving public health, increasing public transit use, and decreasing greenhouse gases (DeMaio, 2009). With the bicycle share program available for short trips, more people are willing to use the public transit and as a result reduce the use of personal automobiles and corresponding greenhouse gas emissions (DeMaio, 2009). According to a survey conducted by the City of Vancouver, 75% of people said that they would use the PBS for errands/social/leisure trips (2009).   The proximity of docking stations to the household of potential users has been found to have the greatest impact on the likelihood of using PBS systems (Fuller et al., 2011). However, due to weather, time of the day, and public holidays, the total number of cyclists fluctuates throughout the year (City of Vancouver, 2011). Social surveys have gathered information about public acceptability and likelihood of use. From the feasibility study done for Vancouver in 2009 (sample size , 81% of the respondents said they would use a PBS system if it were implemented in Vancouver, and 7% of the respondents said that they would use the program to commute to work. (City of Vancouver, 2009 d). Despite the existing literature on bicycle share systems and urban cycling, little research has been done on the potential reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from mode-share changes when a bicycle share system is implemented. In fact, no studies to date have attempted to model the GHG emissions changes for the city of Vancouver with the introduction of a bicycle share system.  1.4 Context and Rationale In the face of the environmental, economic and social costs linked to over- reliance on the automobile, urban planners and transportation professionals around the world are promoting sustainable alternatives such as walking, cycling, and public transit either as single modes or in combination (Bachand-Marleau, 2011).  In 2007, the provincial government of British Columbia (BC) declared a goal of reducing GHG emissions by 33% below 2007 levels by the year 2020 and 80% below 2007 levels by 2050 (Campbell, 2008; City of Vancouver, 2009 a). It will be particularly 3 | P a g e   important to cut down automobile emissions, since it accounts for a third of the total GHG emission (City of Vancouver, 2009 a). Vancouver has a high influx of immigrants and a population that is continuing to grow at a steady rate (AKCanada, 2011). This surging population has resulted in a rising number of transit and vehicle usages on the roads. This has created significant transit pressure and traffic congestion. Implementation of a PBS system may help to partially relieve these pressures by causing individuals to mode switch from transit or other vehicles to bicycles. BC’s relatively high percentage of cyclists do not currently make a significant impact on GHG reductions since most of them are frequent cyclists who don’t drive automobiles on a regular basis (Pucher & Buehler, 2005). Introducing a PBS system in Vancouver may encourage non-cyclists to cycle, and as a consequence may cause a mode shift from cars to bicycles. The City revealed interest in promoting a public cycling system in March 2009 (City of Vancouver, 2009 d). By implementing a properly designed bicycle share system, Vancouver may be able to decrease its greenhouse gas emissions from fuel vehicles, as well as mitigate transit pressure and traffic congestion. Cycling provides a cost-effective solution to alleviate the above symptoms and parallels the city’s ambition of becoming the greenest city in the world by 2020 (City of Vancouver, 2009 b).   2. Methods  This study has two main components: a social survey and a numerical model. The scope of the study is restricted to a portion of the City of Vancouver, which comprises the domain of the model (Figure 1).    Figure 1: Domain of model and survey. Red line indicates the zone boundaries. 4 | P a g e   2.1 Population of Domain  We found the population size in our domain with the aid of graphical information system software (GIS) and Statistics Canada 2006. We calculated the adult population in each dissemination area in our research domain. We then used that information to map out the population density for survey distribution. Areas with higher population would require more survey results. Please refer to the population map in the Appendix C.  2.2 The Social Survey We conducted a survey yielding 324 results, of that number we excluded people who lived outside our domain, leaving a sample size of 231. The survey was designed to gather data on the likelihoods of PBS use under various scenarios, as well as the magnitude of transportation mode switching from motor vehicles to bicycles for input into the numerical model. The survey also gathered data on citizens’ preferences and concerns about a PBS, which is used for making recommendations for a successful PBS system in Vancouver in this report.  In order for individual responses to be included as valid data, there were two requirements the potential participant had to satisfy. First, he or she had to be 18 and older, and second, live within any of the zones listed in Figure 1. Our survey was reviewed and approved by the UBC Behavioural Research Ethics Board (Appendix D) The survey was only accessible online and for a period of five weeks in late February to Mid-March of 2012. Please refer to the survey questionnaire in the Appendix B.   2.3 The Numerical Model We developed a numerical accounting model using Excel. The spreadsheet is available for download from cIRcle (https://circle.ubc.ca/).  2.3a. Model Descriptors: Definitions Survey respondents who selected “yes” to using a PBS system are hereafter referred to as “users”. “Ideally” refers to the survey projected usage of the PBS system without factoring in seasonal and helmet requirement factors. “Replaced” refers to LDV travel distance replaced by PBS bicycles. “Winter” refers to the 26 weeks from October to March inclusively. “Summer” refers to the 26 weeks from April to September inclusively.   2.3b. Model Calculations The following is a list of values that were calculated within the model. For a detailed explanation of the calculations please refer to Appendix A. A conceptual flowchart representing the factors that contributed to the model is found in figure 2.   5 | P a g e     Figure 2: Conceptual flowchart for the proposed model   1. Current LDV emissions within domain  2. Distance (km) ideally to be replaced by users 3. Probabilities of use given various conditions  4. CO2 Reduction per week for various scenarios  5. CO2 reduction per season (Winter, Summer) 6. Calculating weighted concerns    2.4 Model Assumptions A literature review indicates that any data set values for Metro Vancouver will include (but are not limited to) surrounding municipalities such as Surrey, Burnaby and West Vancouver. The scope of our project focused on a smaller portion, namely, a part of City of Vancouver and part of the Greater Vancouver Electoral A (i.e. University of British Columbia). In order to utilize Environment Canada data and data from the City Vancouver, we assumed a proportional relationship between the data and our domain.   In order to create a numerical model, we needed specific data that was attained via the survey that we administered. This survey was solely available in an electronic format that required internet access. Forms of advertising were limited to word of mouth, email listservs, paper flyers and handbills and social media such as Facebook. Due to time constraints, personal bias and platforms of advertising, we believe that there may be substantial bias in the surveyed participants.   To simplify our numerical model, we assumed that some factors such as winter and precipitation were not mutually exclusive (i.e. dependent). Instead we took the lower of the two values to create a conservative estimate for a coefficient value.    3. RESULTS and DISCUSSION   3.1. Trip Distribution by Distance and Activity Figure 2 compares the trip length distribution for work, errand, post-secondary education, and recreational trips. Following data analysis, we realized that the survey 6 | P a g e   lacked an option for people who were not attending post-secondary education or were not within in the labour force. These individuals were left with the only option of choosing ‘0 km’ to indicate that they were not part of either category. This would add a significant bias to our dataset and so the zero values were emitted from our graphed results below. It appeared that most people lived close to where they do their errands, assuming that the short distance of the majority of errand trips was reflective of the proximity of participants’ houses to the destination for their errands.  In contrast, trips categorized under ‘recreation’ appear to be approximately 2 to 4 km further than errand based trips.    Figure 3: Distribution of trips by distance and category of activity based on survey results from all respondents.    Note that the unit for the y-axis in Figure 3 is percentage of trips; therefore, this figure cannot be used to yield the possible vehicle distances displaced with a PBS. This figure is used to describe the general distances the surveyed population currently travels for regularly performed activities. Lastly, the majority of survey respondents generally travel under 10km for any listed activity. These short travel distances increase the likelihood of a PBS system to succeed in reducing CO2 emissions, since our survey data indicated that individuals were willing to travel distances up to and including 13 km. Recreation may refer to several activities- the PBS can be used for a utilitarian purpose (i.e. travelling to a recreational activity) or for leisure (i.e. riding a bicycle around scenic route). This difference in perspective will be an important inconsistency when considering how people answered survey questions on activities for which they would use the PBS (based on trip purpose categories).  7 | P a g e   3.2. Current and Potential CO2 Reductions  The most recent emissions data from 2008 reports Vancouver’s CO2 emissions from light duty vehicles was approximately 880,000 tonnes per year, and was projected to remain the same into 2012 (City of Vancouver, 2009). Thus, in order to determine a net reduction of CO2 emissions, we used this value to represent current emissions and to calculate percent reductions. The helmet law and the seasonal variation have the greatest effect on respondents decisions to use the bicycle share (Table 1) and were chosen as the significant variables in our model. Under each variable, the amount of CO2 reduced was found to be greatest in the summer and lowest in the winter (Table 1). Respondents’ preference of using the PBS in the summer is likely due to the weather patterns in Vancouver--the seasonal difference in temperature and the amount of precipitation. Vancouver experiences on average 1588 mm of precipitation annually, most of which falls in the winter, whereas Toronto and Montreal experience 830 mm and 980 mm of annual precipitation respectively (Environment Canada, 2011). Thus the greater amount of precipitation in Vancouver may be an extra challenge. It is clear that weather has a large impact on when and how often people are willing to bicycle.  Table 1. CO2 reductions in tonnes per year under various scenarios.  TOTALS WITH HELMET LAW CO2 Reduced (tonnes) Per Winter 330  ± 70 Per Summer 490 ± 110 Total Per Year 820 ±180 TOTALS WITH HELMET RENTAL  Per Winter 340 ±70 Per Summer 590 ±130 Total Per Year 930 ± 200 TOTALS WITHOUT HELMET LAW  Per Winter 410 ± 90 Per Summer 590 ± 130 Total Per Year 990 ± 220   Moreover, it is important to note that the amount of CO2 reduced is significantly influenced by the helmet law. With the current law and no helmet rentals, the maximum 8 | P a g e   potential CO2 reduction would be 820 ± 180 tonnes per year. With the current helmet law and helmet rentals provided, there is a maximum potential reduction of 930 ± 200 tonnes per year. Finally, with no helmet law there is an even greater reduction of 990 ± 220 tonnes of CO2 per year. This variation is based on survey results which indicate there is greater likelihood of using the PBS in Vancouver if there were either helmet rentals, or no requirement for helmets.   Other studies have shown that the social benefits of programs to increase cycling outweigh the greenhouse gas emissions reductions in the short term (Bansal and Morrow, 2011). In Washington, DC, increasing cycling and walking resulted in a short term reduction of 0.02% and a long term reduction of 0.3% of transportation emissions (Bansal and Morrow, 2011). This indicates two major findings: firstly, increasing bicycle trips has a greater effect over the long term than the short term. Secondly the short term reductions we calculated are seven times greater than the ones calculated by Bansal and Morrow. Thus the longer term reduction may have a greater potential to reduce CO2 emissions within the City of Vancouver. The study completed by Bansal and Morrow found that due to low reductions of CO2 emissions associated with specific transportation, strategies such as a PBS should not be implemented solely for the purpose of CO2 reductions but also for other benefits such as increased health benefits, mobility and accessibility as well as lowering other pollutants (Bansal and Morrow, 2011). Individuals’ choice of transportation impacts many aspects of their lives in relation to health: road accidents, psychological well-being, air and noise pollution as well as health-related accessibility issues (Kingham et al., 2001).  It is difficult to analyze and quantify the effect that strategies such as a PBS may have on greenhouse gas reductions. Generally, the importance of this type of mode- switching is noticed over a longer time scale (i.e. it is cumulative), yet it is often analyzed on a short term basis. By analyzing greenhouse gas emissions over the long term, better long term planning strategies can be developed (Bansal and Morrow, 2011). However, reductions on a short time scale are still important and can have a compounding effect on future emissions. Making early emission reduction targets can help the strategy gain momentum and support from the community (Bansal and Morrow, 2011).  3.3. Distance Replaced per Activity with PBS There is a substantial difference in commute distances for work between the suburban areas of Metro Vancouver and the urban area of Vancouver. The median commute distance for Metro Vancouver is 7.4 km, whereas the median commute distance for the City of Vancouver is 5 km (Metro Vancouver, 2008). This indicates greater commute distances for those living in an area of lower population density (suburban areas). Our survey shows that people are most likely to use the PBS for trips under 7 km. Therefore, there is a greater likelihood that commuter trips can be replaced 9 | P a g e   by the PBS as the median of commuter trips in Vancouver is 5 km. It should also be noted that Vancouver has been found to already have a large commuter population using bicycles as their main mode of transportation. Vancouver was ranked third after Portland and Minneapolis respectively, for number of bicycle commuters in North America (Pucher et al., 2011).  Work trips comprise roughly 20% of all trips which makes them an excellent target for mode switching in order to reduce CO2 emissions.  It is also important to note that commuter mode choices may reflect their concerns with a PBS system. For example, a study done on commuter mode choices in the United Kingdom had a significant number of respondents reply that less traffic on the roads would encourage them to cycle to work more often (Kingham et al., 2001). This creates a paradoxical situation: people are discouraged from cycling to work because they are concerned about the high volume of traffic related to single occupancy LDV, however, if more people were to cycle, then the traffic congestion would lessen. From the study done by Kingham et al. it is apparent that people were aware of both pollution and congestion due to excessive car use and that most people were prepared to act in some way to improve the situation (2001). However, convincing people to move out of their cars (specifically commuters) may be a difficult task as many people were concerned about the convenience of alternative transportation options (Kingham et al., 2001). If it were possible to get a lot of people occasionally to change their typical mode, this could have a significant impact on emissions as well as traffic levels and congestion which are related to high emission travel modes (Kingham et al., 2001). Most people were willing to replace trips to their post-secondary education trips which were less than 5 km with bicycle share trips, suggesting a potential reduction of transit pressures to and from Zone B (University of British Columbia- Greater Electorial A). Since the trips which are most likely to be replaced are under 5 km, this would not solve the issue of high congestion and overcrowded buses during peak times in the Broadway corridor (City of Vancouver, 2010 a). Also, our survey indicated that many of the trips to post-secondary educational facilities are done by walking and cycling.  3.4. Ranking of Concerns with a PBS System In order from highest to lowest, the top concerns that survey respondents had with implementing a PBS in Vancouver were poor weather, the helmet law, road safety and cycling infrastructure (Table 2). The majority of people were not overly concerned with night-time riding or end-of-trip facilities. It is interesting to note that safety was a top concern for cyclists in the city of Montreal when the BIXI Program was implemented (Bachand-Marleau, 2011). Nonetheless, it is difficult to directly compare concerns with a PBS specifically for Vancouver with the concerns of other cities because British Columbia is one of the few places in the world that has mandatory helmet legislation that is actively enforced. Melbourne, Australia is one of the few exceptions and that has both a helmet requirement and a PBS. However very few scientific articles have been published, there have been a number of news articles stating that the Melbourne Bicycle Share was not very successful in its first 2 years (Preiss, 2011). 10 | P a g e   Table 2. Weighted concerns associated with bicycle share system.  Concerns Percentage of Total Standard Error Poor weather conditions 21.54 0.009 Helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bicycle rental) 19.83 0.009 Road safety 14.43 0.009 Current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bicycle lanes) 13.01 0.009 Transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) 11.37 0.009 Costs 9.38 0.0108 End of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) 6.61 0.013 Night time riding 3.84 0.013   A study on concerns with cycling in cities and health benefits found that the health benefits far exceed any health risks from traffic injuries. This indicates that our surveyed population has a misconception about the magnitude of the dangers of cycling, which is common in many cities (Pucher et al., 2010). In a comparative study of North American cities which have PBS systems, Vancouver was found to have the fewest annual fatalities per year than any other city in North America (Pucher et al., 2011). Increasing educational programs regarding cycling and road safety may help alleviate safety concerns. Moreover, the Pucher et al. revealed that as cycling levels increased, injury rates fell, which made cycling safer and provided greater net health benefits (2010). It has also been found that cities with outstanding bicycle safety rates and high levels of cycling tend to be cities which have extensive infrastructure and pro- bicycle policies and programs (Pucher et al., 2010). Thus, improving infrastructure and implementing these programs may increase the success of this PBS by helping to address safety concerns regarding cycling.  Vancouver has been steadily improving its cycling infrastructure, which will encourage more cyclists and thus more PBS users. Over the past seventeen years, Vancouver has implemented a number of programs to increase cycling rates in Vancouver, specifically on cycling infrastructure development. So far, major programs which have taken place in Vancouver include: the Greenways Plan, the Cycling Plan, 11 | P a g e   Downtown Transport Plan, and the Cycling Network (Scott, 2009). All of these implemented plans or programs have helped to increase the distance and connectivity of cycling routes within Vancouver. The programs also improved laneways for bicycles by installing separated bicycle lanes and painted bicycle routes (Scott, 2009). Bicycle lanes encourage higher levels of cycling within cities, which is reflected in a number of statistically significant relationships from various studies (Pucher et al., 2010). A study done at the city level of over forty American cities found that each additional mile of bicycle lane per square mile corresponded with a 1% increase in the share of workers who regularly commute by bicycle (Pucher et al., 2010). Furthermore, in Seattle, it was found that the closer someone lives to a bicycle lane, the more likely they are to use it (Pucher et al., 2010). From that notion, increasing the number of bicycle routes may help to increase ridership. In addition, a study of regular commuters in the UK concluded that a significant number of respondents would cycle more with the improvement of cycling facilities (Kingham et al., 2001).  Other concerns with a PBS for Vancouver included the convenience of bicycle docking stations. From a social survey implemented in another study, 57% of respondents seemed to be highly concerned with the convenience and proximity of docking stations (Scott, 2009).   3.5. Willingness to use the PBS: Weather Conditions There was high variation in the percentage of people willing to use the PBS in the summer versus the winter (Table 3). This confirms previous studies done in 2009 regarding the implementation of a PBS for Vancouver (Scott, 2009). Of the survey respondents who said that they would use the PBS, approximately 48% were willing to use the bicycle share in the winter, whereas approximately 77% were willing to use it in the summer. These results directly corresponded with the values obtained during the PBS trial which took place near the Science Center on the seawall in the summer of 2009 (Scott). The values were approximately 80% and 48% of respondents were willing to use the PBS during the summer and winter months respectively (Scott, 2009).  This observation was mostly attributed to different weather conditions between the seasons. As Vancouver has heavy rainfall in the winter months, many cyclists may be discouraged from using the bicycle share program in the winter.             12 | P a g e   Table 3: Percentage of people surveyed who are willing to use the bicycle share under the following conditions from the survey results Conditions Percentage (%) Winter 47.7 Summer 76.7 Rainy 43.1 With Helmet Law 46.1 With Helmet Law and Rentals 48 Without Helmet Law 57.3    Next, the helmet law also had a large influence on whether people will use the bicycle share program. Of the respondents who answered “yes” to using the bicycle share program, 46% of the respondents would use it if they were required to carry their own helmet,  48% would use the bicycle share program with current law but with helmet rentals as optional, and 57% would use the bicycle share program without a helmet law (Table 3). It is evident that the helmet law was a big concern for people interested in using the bicycle share program and could potentially act as an inhibitor to the success of a bicycle share program.   3.6. User Cost Preferences From figure 4, it appears that the majority of respondents were willing to pay a maximum monthly fee of 10 dollars. Many respondents who commented on this section of the survey stated that they would use the PBS occasionally and thus would prefer to not purchase a membership but instead opt for a pay per use fee. Next, a study on the PBS system in Montreal indicated that 63% of sampled population would integrate PBS use with public transit (Fuller et al., 2011). Thus, having transit passes which are transferable between the PBS and public transit services may enhance usage of the PBS. To further support this, 62 % of the people who would be willing to use the PBS in our survey said they would be highly likely to use it if it were included in a transit pass.   13 | P a g e    Figure 4: Maximum amount people are willing to pay for bicycle share system.    3.7. Discussion: Impact of Errors on Model Bias may have had a large impact on our model output. Firstly, our networking was most effective at reaching the demographics aged 18-25. Secondly, volunteer bias may have been important. Individuals with an interest in cycling or vehicle cooperatives would be more likely to be willing to complete our survey than someone with a neutral standpoint. Survey respondents reported unusually high values for walking and cycling. These discrepancies may also reflect a bias in the people who have been surveyed.  We used census data to find the actual proportion of the population that lives in each zone considered in this model (Figure 1), and compared this to the proportion of respondents who live in each zone. We considered the difference between these proportions to be significant when it was greater than 5%. Within our survey there was overrepresentation and underrepresentation of specific zones:  Zones A and E were significantly underrepresented, while zones B and C were significantly overrepresented. Basic statistical analysis indicated that there were significant differences between the zones, and this may have had an important impact on our results.   4. CONCLUSION   Through our research, we found that CO2 emissions for LDVs were 880,000 tonnes/year in 2008; this value was also forecasted to remain the same for 2012. With the implementation of a PBS in Vancouver, we expect the potential maximum CO2 14 | P a g e   reduction to be 1,210 tonnes/year. Comparing the pre and post-bicycle share scenarios, this yields a 0.14% maximum potential reduction of total LDV CO2 emissions. According to our survey data collection, the top concerns that affect individuals’ willingness to use a bicycle share system, in descending order, are: the poor weather condition, helmet law, road safety, and current cycling infrastructure.  4.1. Study Implications Initially, we created research project based on the idea that a PBS would result in CO2 emission reduction. However, upon more intensive research we noticed that many cities had different goals for implementing a PBS such as alleviating traffic pressures and improving public health. In the short term it seems that greenhouse gas emissions reductions will be largely overshadowed by the social impacts of implementing a PBS system. However, the use of the system may gain momentum over-time, and the increased bicycle use may have spill over effects that lead to a larger decrease in greenhouse gas emissions over the long term.    4.2. Recommendations From the analysis of our social survey, it appeared that the majority of people were more likely to cycle distances within a 5 km range. Hence, it would be reasonable to install bicycle share docking stations at a maximum of 5 km apart. Nonetheless, ideally they should be closer than this to encourage short bicycle trips. All major transit hubs and areas for connections such as bus loops and skytrain stops are ideal locations to situate a PBS station. As the helmet law has a large influence on the usage of PBS, it could be beneficial if the city of Vancouver make the helmet law optional.  In regard to prices, the cost of using a PBS should be cheaper or the same as a single zone bus ticket (i.e. $2.50 per use) to encourage use of bicycle share over transit. A potentially effective strategy would be to include the PBS as part of the bus passes since 62% of potential users said they would be more likely to use the PBS if it was included in a transit pass.    Weather conditions remain a main deterrent on individuals’ willingness to bicycle. Our social survey indicated that people are less likely to use bicycle share during winter. To alleviate this challenge, end-of-trip facilities could be set up for users to change, shower, rent helmets, and store bicycles. Providing such services not only gives user comforts and safe storage, but it also shields the bikes from elements that causes wear and tear. Alternatively, Vancouver could consider having a seasonal PBS that only operates in the summer.    15 | P a g e   5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  We would like to acknowledge Professors Douw Steyn and Erin Lane for their constant assistance and advice, as well as Stephen Stewart and Jimmy Wong from Translink for providing information GHG emissions data and their advice and ongoing support. We would also like to extend a special thank you to Ilan Elgar from Translink for going out of his way to re-analyze data to create a trip length distribution for us as well as Amanda Mitchell from the City of Vancouver, Megan Winters, and Todd Litman for their support.                               16 | P a g e    REFERENCES   AKCanada (2011).  Immigrate to Vancouver, British Columbia. From Canadian  Immigration Lawyers: Retrieved October 23, 2011, From: www.akcanada.com/lic_vancouver.cfm  Alta Planning + Design (2011). Bicycle share planning studies. Retrieved November 5,  2011, From: www.altaplanning.com/bicycle_pedestrian+planning+_+design.aspx  Bachand-Marleau, Julie (2011). Innovations in utilitarian cycling: Analyzing  characteristics of users and factors influencing their travel behavior. McGill School of Urban Planning.  Bansal M, Morrow E (2011). Meeting Transportation Goals to Reduce Greenhouse  Gases in the National Capital Region: “What would it take?” Scenario. Journal of the Transportation Board of Metropolitan Washington.  Barnes G, Thompson K, Krizek K (2005). A longitudinal analysis of the effect of bicycle  facilities on commute mode share. Humphries Institute of Public Affairs, The University of Minnesota.  City of Vancouver (2008). Climate protection. Retrieved March 12, 2012, From:  www.vancouver.ca/sustainability/climate_protection.htm  City of Vancouver (2009 a). 2008 greenhouse gas emissions inventory summary and  methodologies. Retrieved October 12, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/sustainability/documents/2008GHGInventoryMethodologiesD ocument20091210.pdf  City of Vancouver (2009 b). Greenest city 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2011, From:  www.vancouver.ca/greenestcity/index.htm  City of Vancouver. (2009 c) FAQs: Public bicycle system. Retrieved November 5, 2011,  From: www.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/cycling/faqs/publicBikeSystem.htm  City of Vancouver. (2009 d) Public bicycle system. Retrieved November 5, 2011, From:  www.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/cycling/plans/publicbikeshare.htm  City of Vancouver (2010 a, January 12). Policy Report Urban Structure. Retrieved  March 20, 2012, From: www.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20100119/documents/ttra4.pdf  City of Vancouver. (2010 b, February 19). 2008/2009 Cycling Statistics Update.  17 | P a g e   Retrieved: November 5, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20090217/documents/tt1.pdf  City of Vancouver (2010 c, March 10). How patterns of work to travel have changed.  Retrieved March 15, 2012, From: www.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/stats/travelwork/index.htm  City of Vancouver (2011 a, March 2). Burrard Bridge Statistics. Retrieved November 6,  2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/projects/burrard/statistics.htm  City of Vancouver. (2011 b, September 14). Bicycle Share -- Cycle. Retrieved  November 6, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/cycling/plans/ publicbicycleshare.htm  City of Vancouver (2011 c, October 26). Dunsmuir Street and Hornby Street separated  bicycle lanes statistics. Retrieved November 6, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/cycling/separated/dunsmuir_results.htm  Cycling in Cities (2012). Overview. Retrieved April 1, 2012, From:  www.cyclingincities.spph.ubc.ca/  DeMaio, P. (2009). Bicycle-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future.  Journal of Transportation. 12.4: 41-56.  Environment Canada (2004). Canada’s greenhouse gas inventory, 1990-2002. Ottawa,  Canada. Retrieved on November 5, 2011, From:  www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/1990_02_report/toc_e.cfm  Environment Canada. (2011, September 14). National climate data and information  archive. Retrieved November 6, 2011, From: www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climateData/canada_e.html  Jones T(2010). Understanding Walking and Cycling: A Multi-Method Approach to  Investigating Household Decision Making in Relation to Short Journeys in Urban Areas. 12th WCTR.  Fuller D, Gauvin L, Kestens Y, Daniel M, Fournier M, Morency P, Drouin L (2011). Use  of a new bicycle share system in Montreal, Canada. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 41(1): 80-83.  Lee, J. M. (2009). Increasing cycling as a commute mode in Metro Vancouver. Simon  Fraser University: Public Policy Masters.  Midgley, P, Global Transport Knowledge Partnership. (2011). Bicycle Sharing Schemes:  Enhancing Sustainable Mobility in Urban Areas. New York: United Nations  18 | P a g e   Natural Resources Canada (2008). Fuel consumptions rating. Retrieved January 12,  2012, From: www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca/transportation/tools/fuelratings/ratings- search.cfm  Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V, Petticrew M (2004). Promoting walking and cycling as  an alternative to using cars a systematic review. BMJ.  Porter C (2011). Spacing Vancouver. Retrieved November 6, 2011, From:  www.spacingvancouver.ca/2011/09/26/vancouver%E2%80%99s-separated- bicycle- lanes-%E2%80%93-more-popular-than-ever/  Preiss B (2011). Bike share scheme disappointing. The Age: Victoria News. Retrieved  March 30, 2012. From: www.theage.com.au/victoria/bike-share-scheme- disappointing-20110531-1fdto.html  Pucher, John and Ralph Buehler (2005). Cycling trends and policies in Canadian cities.  World Transport Policy and Practice, 11(1): 43-61.  Pucher J, Dill J, Handy S (2010). Infrastructure, programs and policies to increase  bicycling: An international review. Preventative Medicine 50: 106 - 125.  Pucher J, Buehler R, Seinen M (2011). Bicycling Renaissance in North America? An  update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research Part A 45: 451 - 475.  Scott, Douglas (2009) Vancouver’s Public Bicycle System. Retrieved March 12, 2012,  From: www.ite.org/meetings/2010AM/Session%2031%20- %20Douglas%20Scott.pdf  Shaheen S (2011). Hangzhou Public Bicycle: Understanding Early Adoption and  Behavioral Response to bicycle-sharing. UC Berkeley.  Statistics Canada (2005). Work and commuting in urban centres. Retrieved January 6,  2012, From: www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/050601/dq050601a-eng.htm  Statistics Canada (2009). Commuting patterns and places of work of Canadians, 2006  Census. Retrieved January 6, 2012, From: www12.statcan.ca/census-  recensement/2006/as-sa/97-561/p35-eng.cfm  Statistics Canada (2012). Commuting to work: Results of the 2010 general social  survey. Retrieved February 28, 2012, From: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-  x/2011002/article/11531-eng.htm#a3   Statistics Canada (2011). Average time to work and proportion of workers, by selected  characteristics, 2010. Retrieved February 28, 2012, From: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2011002/t/11531/tbl001-eng.htm 19 | P a g e   Statistics Canada (2011). Commuting distance, age group, sex for the employed labour  force 15 years and over having a usual place of work in Canada, provinces,  territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations, 2006 Census  - 20% sample data. Retrieved February 28, 2012, From:  www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/tbt/Rp-  eng.cfm?LANG=E&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=0&GID  =0&GK=0&GRP=1&PID=90655&PRID=0&PTYPE=88971,97154&S=0&SHOWA  LL=0& SUB=0&Temporal=2006&THEME=76&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=  Translink (2006, October 19). Bus Technology and Alternative Fuels Demonstration  Project. Retrieved January 12, 2012, From: www.translink.ca/~/media/documents/bpotp/projects/bus_tech_evaluation/bus%2 0technology%20phase%201%20final%20test%20program%20report.ashx  Translink (n.d.). Schedules and maps. Retrieved January 12, 2012, From:  www.translink.ca/en/Schedules-and-Maps/Timetables.aspx  Translink (2008). Public Bicycle System Feasibility Study. Retrieved November 4, 2011,  From: www.translink.ca/~/media/Documents/cycling/Public%20Bicycle%20System%20I nvestigation/Public%20Bicycle%20System%20Investigation%20Part%203%20- %20Market%20Research.ashx  US Environmental Protection Agency (2005). Emission facts: Greenhouse gas  emissions from a typical passenger vehicle. Retrieved November 5, 2011, From:  www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/420f05004.htm  Winters M, Davidson G, Kao D, Teshke K (2011). Motivators and deterrents of bicycling:  comparing influences on decisions to ride. Transportation 38:153-168.               20 | P a g e   APPENDIX A: Model Calculations  1. Finding current emissions:  We separated current CO2 emissions for light-duty vehicles (LDV) and buses. We assumed zero emissions from bicycles as we did not factor in the production or transportation of bicycles.   Total LDV CO2 emissions in domain:  ed,LDV =  AT   D   n    eLDV              ed,LDV = total LDV CO2 emissions in domain (g/week): AT  = average number of trips made per person per week (trips/[person week]), provided by Translink D = trip distance distribution (km), provided by Translink n = population of our domain (person)  eLDV = CO2 emissions for an average LDV in Vancouver (g/km), provided by Aircare  Total bus CO2 emissions in domain: ed,BUS =  eBUS    d    f  ed,BUS = Total bus CO2 emissions in domain (g/day) eBUS= average CO2 emissions for buses (g/km) d= distances travelled per trip (km) f = frequency of bus trips per day  (1/day)   2. Finding distance (km) ideally to be replaced by users a. Trip distance distribution**** (from Translink) / person / day   number of trips / person / week (Translink) = Trip distance distribution / person / week b. Trip length distribution was cut off at the maximum number of kilometers that survey respondents were willing to travel on a PBS bicycle to give [Trip length distribution PBS replaceable trips / user / week].  c. [Trip length distribution under 13 km / user / week] SUMMARIZED to [total distance of PBS replaceable trips / user / week]  d. [total distance of PBS replaceable trips] * [fraction of trips users willing to replace] * [fraction of travel distance users were willing to replace] = [car travel distance / user / week ideally replaced by PBS].   3. Probabilities of use given various conditions  a. PR[rain in winter] * (MINIMUM of  PR[ user uses in the rain] AND PR[ user uses in  winter] ) + PR[ not rain in winter] * PR[ user uses in winter] = PR[ user uses in winter]  b. PR[rain in summer] * (MINIMUM of PR[ user uses in the rain] AND PR[ user uses in  summer] ) + PR[not rain in summer] * PR[user uses in summer] = PR[ user uses in summer]  21 | P a g e   a. PR[user uses if required to carry own helmet], PR[user uses if helmet rentals are available], and PR[user uses if not required to wear a helmet by law], were all taken directly from the survey results.   4. Finding CO2 Reduction per week for various scenarios a. [Fraction of respondents willing to use the PBS (“users”)]*[car travel distance (km) / user / week ideally replaced by PBS] * [CO2 / typical light duty vehicle / distance (km) ] * [population of domain]= [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS]  b. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in winter] * PR[ user uses if required to carry own helmet]  = [CO2 reduced / week during winter if users must carry their own helmet] c. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in summer] * PR[ user uses if required to carry own helmet]  = [CO2 reduced / week during summer if users must carry their own helmet] d. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in winter] * PR[ user uses if helmet rentals are available]  = [CO2 reduced / week during winter if helmet rentals are available] e. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in summer] * PR[ user uses if helmet rentals are available]  = [CO2 reduced / week during summer if helmet rentals are available]  f. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in winter] * PR[ user uses if there were no law requiring helmets]  = [CO2 reduced / week during winter if there were no law requiring helmets] g. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in summer] * PR[ user uses if there were no law requiring helmets]  = [CO2 reduced / week during summer if there were no law requiring helmets]  5. Finding CO2 reduction per season a. [CO2 reduced / week during winter if users must carry their own helmet] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during winter if users must carry their own helmet]  b. [CO2 reduced / week during summer if users must carry their own helmet] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during summer if users must carry their own helmet]  c. [CO2 reduced / week during winter if helmet rentals are available] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during winter if helmet rentals are available] d. [CO2 reduced / week during summer if helmet rentals are available] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during summer if helmet rentals are available] e. [CO2 reduced / week during winter if there were no law requiring helmets] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during winter if there were no law requiring helmets]   6. Calculating weighted concerns are found by multiplying the highest concern by 4, the second highest concern by 2 and  the third highest concern by 1. The percentage represents the count  for each concern divided by the total count for all concerns.  ****The South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority expressly disclaims any representations and warranties of any kind with respect to the files being released. In particular, The South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority and any additional third parties do not represent or warrant that the 22 | P a g e   information contained in the files listed is accurate, complete or current. Neither The South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority nor any third parties, employees or other representatives will be liable for any damage of any kind, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages for loss of income profit or savings, and claims of third parties, arising out of or in connection with the use of the files provided. All files are released “as is” and cannot be re-distributed without permission.                                           23 | P a g e   APPENDIX B: Survey Questionnaire  We conducted a survey to help us factor the bicycle share into our model. We asked respondents whether or not they would use the bicycle share, how likely they were to use it under certain conditions (winter, rain, summer), with the current helmet law, without a helmet law, with helmet rentals, and the distance of one way trip they would be willing to replace with the bicycle share. Likelihoods were presented as very likely, likely, don’t know/ unsure, unlikely, and very unlikely. We took these as probabilities that an individual would use the bicycle share under each condition, with very likely, likely, don’t know/ unsure, unlikely, and very unlikely, corresponding to  the following probabilities; .9, .7, .5, .3, and .1 respectively.  Survey Questionnaire:  1)  Which gender do you identify with?            a. Male          b. Female          c. Other or prefer not to disclose   2)  What is your age?            a. 18-25          b. 25-35          c. 35-45          d. 45-65          e. 65+   3)  Which of the following best describes your current occupation?            a. Student          b Research or lab work          c. Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)          d. Office work          e. Retail / sales / service          f. Other (please specify)   If you selected other, please specify               ________________________________________________________________   4)  Would you use the bike share system?            a. Yes          b. No 24 | P a g e     5)  Please identify what zone you live in (see map):            a. Zone A          b. Zone B          c. Zone C          d. Zone D          e. Zone E          f. Zone F          g. Zone G          h. Zone H          i. Zone I        j. Zone J          k. None of the listed zones          l. None: I am visiting   6)  Please identify what zone your workplace is in (see map):            a. Not Applicable          b. Zone A          c. Zone B          d. Zone C          e. Zone D          f. Zone E          g. Zone F          h. Zone F          i. Zone G          j. Zone H          k. Zone I          l. Zone J          m. None of the listed zones   7)  Please identify which zone your post secondary institute is in (see map):           a. Not Applicable          b. Zone A          c. Zone B          d. Zone C          e. Zone D          f. Zone E          g. Zone F          h. Zone F          i. Zone G          j. Zone H          k. Zone I          l. Zone J 25 | P a g e            m. None of the listed zones   8)  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:      Walking Cycling Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle) Carpooling Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain) Not Applicable Work q q q q q q Post secondary education q q q q q q Personal errands q q q q q q Soclal and recreational activities q q q q q q   9)  How likely would you be to use public transit (or use it more often) if it was less crowded?            a. Very Unlikely          b. Unlikely          c. Don't know/ unsure/ not applicable          d. Likely          e. Very Likely          f. Does not affect my decision   10)  Which of the following activities would you use the bike share for? Check all that apply.            a. Work          b. Post secondary education          c. Errands          d. Social and recreational activities          e. Other (please specify)          If you selected other, please specify               ________________________________________________________________    26 | P a g e   11)  On average how many one way trips per week do you make for:      0 1- 3 4- 6 7- 9 10 or more Work m m m m M Post secondary education m m m m M Errands m m m m M Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc) m m m m M     12)  On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system:      0 1- 3 4- 6 7- 9 10 or more Work m m m m M Post secondary education m m m m M Errands m m m m M Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc) m m m m M     13)  In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for:      0 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 Over 15 Work m m m m m m M Errands m m m m m m M Post secondary education m m m m m m M Recreation and Leisure m m m m m m M       27 | P a g e   14)  How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share?      0 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 Over 15 Work m m m m m m M Errands m m m m m m M Post secondary education m m m m m m M Recreation and Leisure m m m m m m M   15)  How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions?       Very unlikely Unlikely Don't know/ Unsure Likely Very likely Does not affect decision Winter m m m m m M Summer m m m m m M Rainy conditions m m m m m M With the current helmet law (i.e. you are required to carry your own helmet) m m m m m M With the current helmet law, but where helment rental would be available m m m m m M Without a law requiring helmets m m m m m M   16)  What is the maximum amount you would be willing to pay for access to the bike share ?            a. Less than $10 per month          b. $10 per month          c. $20 per month 28 | P a g e            d. $30 per month          e. $40 per month          f. Other (please specify)           If you selected other, please specify               ________________________________________________________________   17)  How likely are you to use the bike share if the service was included in a transit pass? (Eg. Zone transit passes or U-Pass)            a. Very Unlikely          b. Unlikely          c. Don't know/ unsure/ not applicable          d. Likely          e. Very Likely   18)  Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver with 1 being the largest concern.    helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  ____________________  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  ____________________  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  ____________________  road safety  ____________________  poor weather conditions  ____________________  Costs  ____________________  night time riding  ____________________  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  ____________________     Thank you for completing our survey!    29 | P a g e   APPENDIX C: Survey Sample Demographics  Figure C1: Adult population density within domain.   Table C1: Willingness to use bicycle share program grouped by zone of residence.  Residence  Yes  No  Total Count  Zone A  35  10  45  Zone B  23  5  28  Zone C  41  5  46  Zone D  23  7  30  Zone E  8  3  11  Zone F  11  4  15  Zone G  19  2  21  Zone H  10  6  16  Zone I  9  4  13  Zone J  5  1  6  Total        231   30 | P a g e    Table C2: Survey results of distance willing to travel on bicycle share system, grouped by zone of residence.   1-3km  4-6km  7-9km  10-12km  13-15km  >15 km  Zone A  41  14  2  1  3  2  Zone B  32  9  3  2  0  8  Zone C  34  21  18  1  0  2  Zone D  25  15  4  0  0  0  Zone E  6  3  0  0  0  0  Zone F  9  3  0  0  0  0  Zone G  14  6  2  2  1  0  Zone H  12  2  1  0  0  1  Zone I  6  4  4  2  0  0  Zone J  4  0  1  1  1  0       Figure C3: Age and gender distribution of survey participants.                 31 | P a g e   APPENDIX D: Ethics Board Approval Certificate     Total CO2 emission per type of vehicle (g/km) LDV Bus bikes  230 g/km 12982358.57 g/day 0 g/km  chance of biking depending on weather (%) for a given month  0.1  likelyhood of using BS depending on the proximity to BS stations  0.3  Notes and Assumptio ns NB: Anything in bold is not a researche d value (Value for LDV now correct)  likelyhood of using BS depending on the cost of BS ADDITIONAL Analysis  likelyhood of using BS under helmet law ADDITIONAL Analysis  car trips/ person/ week (2008 trip diary)  Number of individuals in survey  10.37  231  EMISSIONS: LDV (need info from Steven Stuart)  bus fleet type  diesel/CNF/biodiesel/regular/short  avg emission (g/km)  # of LDV (pre bike share)  km travelled per trip  =round((0.88*13898 230 05))  avg emission (g/km)  1500  # of buses in our domain  4 km travelled per trip  28.4  1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500  Trolley  0 *assume the above is average emission for all bus fleet types  9 9 10.4 19.4 9 9 9 9 6 13.6 4.4 16.2 12.22 4.6 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 23.6 25.6 10.4 22 3 3 18.3 6.1 6  18  15  Bike  km travelled per trip  # of bikes in our domain  avg emission (g/km) 0  *  MODELLING SURVEY DATA  # of people willing to use bike share  184  # of people not willing to use bike share  47  fraction of people willing to use bike share in domain  0.8  fraction of people not willing to use bike share in domain  0.2  Likelyhood of using public transit (if less crowded)  0.9  0.7  0.5  0.213  0.149  0.043  fraction of respondents  # of ppl who will use public transit  35,384.362  19,264.819 3,931.596  Number of one way trips/week  0  2  0.21  0.13  post secondary ed. errands  0.56 0.03  0.07 0.31  social and rec activities  0.03  0.29  **fraction of people from total survey (all people surveyed) work  **Total Population - number of one way trips  work post secondary ed. errands social and rec activities  Number of one way trips/week by car that would be replaced by bike share  **total number of trips from total survey (all people surveyed), of whom would replace car trips with bike share  fraction of one way trips/week by car that would be replaced by bike share  39027.87 23098.13 104339.81 12743.79 4778.92 57347.07 6371.9 53364.63  0  2  work  0.74  0.16  post secondary ed. errands soc and rec  0.78 0.39 0.35  0.1 0.46 0.51  0  2  **fraction of respondants of whom would replace car trips with bike share work post secondary ed. errands soc and rec  Distance of one way trips (in km)  fraction of people in survey taking that distance of one way trip  Distance of one way trips (in km)  Proportion of Total Population making one way trips of length..  work post secondary errands social and rec  b  work post secondary errands social and rec  Distance of one way trips replaced by bike share (in km)  fraction of people in survey replacing that distance of one way trip work post secondary errands social and rec  0  0  0 0 0  0 0 0  0  2  0.2 0.03 0.54 0.03  0.24 0.54 0.11 0.18  0  2  36638.41 5575.41 99560.88 5575.41  43806.79 100357.37 20708.66 33452.46  0  2  0.7 0.4 0.74 0.37  0.13 0.41 0.12 0.32  Distance of one way trip km replaced by bike share (km per person)  Number from Total Population relacing one way trips of length..  0  2  129848.92 73914 136840.78 68919.81  23972.11 75911.68 22973.27 59930.27  0  2  work post secondary errands social and rec ave  0 0 0 0 0  0.55 0.76 1 1 0.83  ave  0 0  2 0.83  0.9  0.7  winter summer rainy with helmet law  0.114 0.674 0.082 0.195  0.293 0.196 0.234 0.205  with law and rentals  0.265  0.211  without helmet law  0.489  0.136  lower of winter+rain  0.082  0.234  lower of summer +rain  0.082  0.196  work post secondary errands social and rec  Fraction of one way trips replaced  Number from Total Population relacing one way trips of length..  probability of using bike-share under these conditions:  Fraction of respondents who are willing to use under different conditions  probability of using bike-share under these conditions:  number of people in domain who are willing to use under different conditions  winter summer rainy with helmet law  0.900  0.7  21089.59 124529.02 15063.99 35958.16  54230.38 36153.59 43183.45 37955.84  with law and rentals  48943.05 38954.68  without helmet law  90383.97 25106.66  likelihood of raining  rain November December January February March April May June July August September October  not rain 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.6  0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.4 not rain  0.33 0.37 0.37 0.24 0.24 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.24  0.1 0.05 0.05 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.46 0.54 0.69 0.73 0.69 0.19  rain  fraction of respondents willing to use bike share in ...  November December January February March April May June July August September October  FINAL RESULTS SECTION  fraction of respondents willing to use bike share in winter summer with helmet law  0.43 0.62 0.46  with law and rentals  0.48  without helmet law  0.57  fraction of trips that indiv are willing to replace by bike share  0.13  fraction of of km indiv will to replac w bs  0.34  km that could be replaced by bike share (km/person/week)  44.59  km that are likely to be replaced given survey data per PERSON per week  km that are likely to be replaced given survey data/week  winter summer ave % of car km  0.64 0.93 0.79 0.04  winter summer with helmet law  119003.41 172044.64 3027795.34  with law and rentals  3152030.78  without helmet law winter hel law winter rentals winter no law  3772301.34 54870.22 57121.64 68362.29  Carbon dioxide reduced (tonnes/ week)  summer hel law summer rentals summer no law  82581.43 98832.16 98832.16  winter hel law winter rentals winter no law summer hel law summer rentals summer no law  12.62 13.14 15.72 18.99 22.73 22.73  CO2 reduced (tonnes)  TOTALS WITH HELMET LAW per season per season tot year  winter summer  328.12 '+/493.84 '+/821.96 '+/-  TOTALS WITH HELMET RENTAL per season per season tot year  winter summer  341.59 '+/591.02 '+/932.6 '+/-  TOTALS WITHOUT HELMET LAW per season per season tot year  winter summer  408.81 '+/591.02 '+/999.82 '+/'+/-  distance (km) frequency (car trips/ person/we ek)  frequency (% car trips)  mode share pre bike share mode car drive car pass transit bike walk other car gen  % share (metro van, before BS) change w bs 55.9 17.8 % share before % share after 12.6 12.6 1.5 5.54 11 11 1.2 1.2 73.7 69.66  Error Analysis Factor  Value  fraction of error  error  fraction of km that is theoretically replaceable  44.59  fraction of trips willing to replace  0.09  fraction of km willing to replace  0.33  0.1  0.03  184785 230  0.05 0.05  9239.25 11.5  fract of respondents willing to use population CO2 likelihoods winter summer with helmet law  -  0.05  2.23 0.01  -  -  0.42 0.61 0.46  0.1 0.1 0.1  0.04 0.06 0.05  with law and rentals  0.48  0.1  0.05  without helmet law rain  0.57  0.1  0.06  0  Consider:  Total 19+ population of domain  Car occupancy 1.24  2.3000 kg/l  184785  230  10.0000 l/100km  avg # km per day  # of trips/day  CO2 emitted (g/day)  16.0000 weekdays (5days) frequency (number of trips)  214.0000  4  weekend (2days) frequency CO2 emission emitted per day 134 (g/day)  3680  unknowns  150.0000 6.0000 6.0000 14.0000 254.0000 86.0000 140.0000 126.0000 114.0000 190.0000 150.0000 6.0000 6.0000 14.0000 6.0000 276.0000 76.0000 12.0000 92.0000 26.0000 0.0000 40.0000 10.0000 140.0000 30.0000 32.0000 26.0000 8.0000 62.0000  144 6 6 0 92 0 0 88 84 144 0 6 14 6 148 68 0 134 0 6 52 0 120 10 10 0 0 46 0 206 158 66 158 124 26 81 40  436.0000 218.0000 138.0000 206.0000 226.0000 0.0000 94.0000 48.0000 total CO2/day  15  2117828.57 23142.86 26742.86 58200 667285.71 165857.14 270000 243000 259714.29 798514.29 277200 20828.57 31422.86 27600 19028.57 672342.86 228342.86 19028.57 222771.43 25628.57 5914.29 90685.71 9857.14 256285.71 39428.57 41400 25628.57 7885.71 106457.14 0 3521828.57 837942.86 961714.29 234000 225000 101957.14 228750 113142.86 12982358.57  0  CO2 emission emitted per day (g/day)  # of trips/day  0  0.3  0.1  0.085  0.106  4,717.915  1,965.798 total  65264.49  5  8  10  0.24  0.11  0.31  5.38  0.1 0.39  0.06 0.13  0.2 0.13  3.1 4.97  0.44  0.15  0.08  4.77 18.21  TOT TRIPS  44603.28  19912.18  56550.58  183192.03  18319.2 71683.84  11150.82 24691.1  36638.41 24691.1  183192.03 183192.03  81241.68  27080.56  15133.25  183192.03  5  8  0.04  0.01  0.03  0.95  0.04 0.1 0.09  0.02 0.01 0.03  0.04 0.02 0.02  0.6 0.36 0.38 2.3  5  8  10  total (trips * fraction 10 of respondants)  0  0  0  0.02  0 0 0  0 0 0  0 0 0  0.01 0.02 0.02 0.08  TOT  5  8  11  14  0.19 0.27 0.1 0.34  0.16 0.08 0.07 0.19  0.09 0.02 0.08 0.09  0.06 0.03 0.04 0.04  5  8  11  14  35841.92 50178.69 19115.69 62922.48  28673.53 15133.25 13540.28 35841.92  15929.74 3982.44 14336.77 16726.23  11150.82 4778.92 7168.38 7964.87  5  8  11  14  0.08 0.1 0.05 0.18  0.05 0.05 0.04 0.06  0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02  0.01 0.01 0 0.01  0.0000  5  8  11  14  13983.73 18977.92 9988.38 32961.65  8989.54 9988.38 6991.86 11986.05  2996.51 1997.68 998.84 3995.35  998.84 998.84 0 1997.68  5  8  11  14  0.39 0.38 0.52 0.52 0.45  0.31 0.66 0.52 0.33 0.46  0.19 0.5 0.07 0.24 0.25  0.09 0.21 0 0.25 0.14  5 0.45  8 0.33  11 0.25  14 0.14  0.5  0.3  0.179 0.038 0.190 0.168  0.223 0.022 0.293 0.151  0.136 0.000 0.147 0.130  0.478 0.769 0.435 0.461  0.135  0.059  0.086  0.480  0.065  0.011  0.033  0.574  0.179  0.223  0.136  0.407  0.038  0.022  0.000  0.236  0.1 total  0.5  0.3  0.1  33140.79 7029.86 35149.32 30963.97  41174.92 4017.07 54230.38 27967.46  24 0 27115.19 23972.11  24970.95  10987.22  15981.41  12051.2  2008.53  6025.6  total  0.42 0.41 0.41 0.44 0.44 0.36 0.56 0.61 0.72 0.74 0.72 0.44  km ideally repleaced  1.9  71.5130 107.6293 179.1422  74.4472 128.8090 203.2563  89.0973 128.8090 217.9063  kilometers Frequency (fraction of trips)  1  3  5  7  2.7  2.7  1.97  1.45  0-1  2- 4 0.26  4-6 0.26  6-8 0.19  0.14  dx/x  0.0025  wint hel  0.22  0.0100  wint rent  0.22  0.0100  wint no  0.0025 0.0025  sum hel sum rent sum no  0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100  0.22  zone A  zone B 59490  Zone C 5040  Zone D 20935  Zone E 22025  18255  total (km x fract of 15 respondants)  0.07 0.02 0.04 0.09 TOT KM  5.51 3.96 3.37 6.64 19.48  15  12743.79 3185.95 7964.87 17522.72  total (km replaced x 15 fract of respondants  0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 TOT KM REP  1.28 1.96 0.88 2.45 6.57  9  11  13  14  15  0.73  0.41  0.21  0  0  8 - 10  10 - 12 0.07  12 - 14 0.04  14+ 0.02  0.02  Zone F  Zone G 8050  Zone H 13620  Zone I 9770  Zone J 12900  14700  total distance of bike share replaceable trips per person per week 44.59 km  Assumptions Buses- constant number of buses over time  sample size for the survey is representative of the total population CO2 is the only important anthropogenic pollutant  participants aged 18+ is representative of the total population  Seasons - Winter October to March, Summer April to September The weighted values assigned are accurate  assumed fraction of trips, from model  Submission Unique Id Key  Which gender do you identify with?  Which of the following best describes your What is your current age range? occupation?  37 Male  26-35  Office work  40 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  109 Male  26-35  Other  138 Male  26-35  Other  144 Female  46-65  Other  157 Male  26-35  Office work  290 Male  26-35  Other  310 Male  26-35  Office work  315 Male  26-35  Office work  321 Male  18-25  Office work  375 Male  65+  Other  383 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  405 Female  26-35  Retail / sales / service  444 Male  18-25  Office work  520 Male  26-35  Office work  528 Male  26-35  Retail / sales / service  537 Male  26-35  Other  515 Female  26-35  Office work  556 Male  18-25  Retail / sales / service  557 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  575 Female  18-25  Research or lab work  780 Female  18-25  Office work  810 Female  26-35  Other  813 Female  46-65  Office work  811 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  841 Male  26-35  Retail / sales / service  915 Male  46-65  Other  917 Male  26-35  Office work  984 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  1178 Male  36-45  Retail / sales / service  1242 Female  26-35  Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)  15 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  55 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  65 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  82 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  78 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  88 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  121 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  128 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  193 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  257 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  262 Male  36-45  Student (part time or full time)  331 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  362 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  366 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  562 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  642 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  678 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  74 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  1336 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  2 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  41 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  72 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  92 Male  26-35  Other  96 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  46-65  Other  102 Male  104 Female  26-35  Other  151 Female  18-25  Retail / sales / service  284 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  335 Male  18-25  Office work  355 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  352 Male  26-35  Student (part time or full time)  358 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  532 Male  18-25  Office work  580 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  775 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  833 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  835 Male  46-65  Other  842 Female  46-65  Other  839 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  852 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  853 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  859 Male  36-45  Office work  860 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  926 Female  18-25  Retail / sales / service  965 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  972 Female  18-25  Office work  1140 Male  26-35  Other  1589 Male  46-65  Research or lab work  28 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  98 Female  36-45  Research or lab work  108 Male  18-25  Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)  117 Female  18-25  Other  124 Female  36-45  Research or lab work  274 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  279 Female  18-25  Office work  299 Male  46-65  Other  351 Male  18-25  Research or lab work  402 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  408 Male  46-65  Office work  634 Male  36-45  Other  760 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  786 Female  26-35  Office work  836 Female  46-65  Office work  869 Female  46-65  Other  871 Female  26-35  Office work  947 Male  36-45  Office work  956 Female  26-35  Student (part time or full time)  981 Male  65+  Other  990 Male  26-35  Student (part time or full time)  1585 Female  18-25  Other  83 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  110 Female  18-25  Office work  396 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  398 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  522 Male  26-35  Office work  806 Female  46-65  Other  987 Male  46-65  Other  65+  217 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  343 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  347 Male  26-35  Research or lab work  353 Male  18-25  Retail / sales / service  394 Male  46-65  Office work  500 Male  46-65  Office work  625 Male  26-35  Office work  815 Female  46-65  Other  919 Female  26-35  Office work  26-35  Retail / sales / service  156 Female  18-25  Office work  301 Male  26-35  Other  319 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  1596 Male  459 Female  26-35  Office work  475 Female  46-65  Other  481 Male  18-25  Research or lab work  518 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  536 Female  26-35  Office work  619 Female  18-25  Office work  627 Female  26-35  Office work  705 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  796 Female  26-35  Other  800 Female  46-65  Other  857 Female  46-65  Other  17 Female  18-25  Other  120 Male  46-65  Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)  305 Male  46-65  Other  423 Female  46-65  Other  470 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  539 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  552 Female  46-65  Other  771 Female  26-35  Other  827 Female  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  43 Male  26-35  Office work  93 Female  18-25  Research or lab work  581 Male  26-35  Other  844 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  6 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  961 Female  26-35  Student (part time or full time)  1586 Female  18-25  Research or lab work  316 Male  18-25  Student (part time or full time)  534 Male  26-35  Office work  774 Male  46-65  Other  808 Male  46-65  Office work  958 Female  26-35  Office work 62  0.53  0.45  Proportion Prop 26-35 Male 0.47 0.27  Which of the following best describes your current occupation? : OtherText  Would you use the bike share system?  Please identify what zone you live in (see map):  Please identify what zone your workplace is in (see map):  Please identify which zone your post secondary institute is in (see map):  Yes  Zone A  Zone B  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone A  None of the listed None zonesof the listed zones  Health Care  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Zone B  resident physicianYes  Zone A  Zone F  Zone F  professional  Yes  Zone A  None of the listed None zonesof the listed zones  Yes  Zone A  Zone B  Not Applicable  Resident Physician Yes  Zone A  Zone F  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Zone G  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Zone B  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone A  Not Applicable  Zone B  / sales / service  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Zone F  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Zone E  Zone B  consultant  / sales / service  Field engineer  Yes  Zone A  Zone F  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Zone E  Zone B  / sales / service  Yes  Zone A  None of the listed Zone zonesB  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone A  None of the listed Zone zonesB  arch or lab work  Yes  Zone A  Zone G  Zone B  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Not Applicable  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone A  Zone B  Zone B  / sales / service  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  None of the listed zones  Realtor  Instructor  Yes  Zone A  Zone B  Zone B  Yes  Zone A  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Zone B  / sales / service  Yes  Zone A  Zone A  Not Applicable  s (eg. construction, plumbing)Yes  Zone A  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone C  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  None of the listed Zone zonesA  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  None of the listed Zone zonesB  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  None of the listed Zone zonesB  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone B  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone D  Zone D  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone A  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Zone B  unemployed  Yes  Zone C  Zone C  Zone C  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Zone B  Yes  Zone C  Zone A  Not Applicable  Professor  Health Care  Yes  Zone C  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  / sales / service  Yes  Zone C  Zone C  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Zone B  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone C  None of the listed Zone zonesB  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone D  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Zone B  instructor  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Zone B  teacher  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  Zone B  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  None of the listed zones  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Not Applicable  Zone B  / sales / service  Yes  Zone C  Zone F  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone C  Not Applicable  Zone B  Yes  Zone C  Zone G  Zone C  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  Yes  Zone C  Zone B  None of the listed zones  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone D  Zone B  Zone B  arch or lab work  Yes  Zone D  Zone A  Zone A  s (eg. construction, plumbing)Yes  Zone D  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  Yes  Zone D  Zone A  Not Applicable  arch or lab work  Yes  Zone D  Zone B  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone D  Zone D  Zone B  business development Yes  unemployed  Not Applicable  Yes  Process Control Engineering Yes  Zone D  Zone E  Zone B  Zone D  None of the listed Zone zonesB  arch or lab work  Yes  Zone D  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone D  Not Applicable  Zone B  Yes  Zone D  Zone D  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone D  Zone A  Zone A  Yes  Zone D  Not Applicable  Zone B  Yes  Zone D  None of the listed Zone zonesB  Yes  Zone D  Zone B  teacher  nt (part time or full time)  Zone B  Educator  Yes  Zone D  Zone B  Zone A  Yes  Zone D  Zone B  Zone B  Yes  Zone D  Zone E  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone D  Zone A  Zone A  Yes  Zone D  Not Applicable  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone D  Not Applicable  Not Applicable  Marketing Intern Yes  Zone D  Not Applicable  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone E  Not Applicable  Zone B  Yes  Zone E  Zone B  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone E  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Retired  nt (part time or full time)  nt (part time or full time)  nt (part time or full time)  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone E  Zone D  Zone B  Yes  Zone E  Zone A  Not Applicable  self-employed  Yes  Zone E  Zone E  Not Applicable  Artist  Yes  Zone E  Zone E  Not Applicable  Zone E  Zone E  Zone E  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone F  None of the listed Zone zonesB  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone F  Zone F  Zone B  arch or lab work  Yes  Zone F  Zone A  Not Applicable  / sales / service  Yes  Zone F  Zone F  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone F  Zone A  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone F  Zone A  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone F  Zone A  Not Applicable  work from home Yes  Zone F  Zone F  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone F  Zone F  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone F  Zone E  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone G  Zone B  Not Applicable  Zone G  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  Zone G  Zone A  Self Employed - Furniture Yes Maker  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  None of the listed zones  Yes  Zone G  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  Yes  Zone G  Zone A  Not Applicable  arch or lab work  Yes  Zone G  Zone B  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone G  Not Applicable  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone G  Zone F  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone G  Zone E  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone G  None of the listed None zonesof the listed zones  Yes  Zone G  Zone B  Not Applicable  Zone G  Zone G  Not Applicable  library worker  nt (part time or full time)  Business Owner (restaurant) Yes  English LanguageYes Instructor  Zone B  Not Applicable  ESL Teacher, Team YesLeader and MAZone student G  Zone B  Not Applicable  combo student and Yes research  Zone H  Zone B  Zone B  s (eg. construction, plumbing)Yes  Zone H  Not Applicable  Not Applicable  industrial  Yes  Zone H  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  teacher  Yes  Zone H  Not Applicable  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone H  Not Applicable  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone H  None of the listed Zone zonesC  Yes  Zone H  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  Stay at home mom Yes  Zone H  Not Applicable  partially retired  Zone G  Not Applicable  nt (part time or full time)  arch or lab work  Yes  Zone H  Not Applicable  Yes  Zone I  None of the listed None zonesof the listed zones  Yes  Zone I  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  Zone I  Zone A  Zone B  small business owner, Yes logistics  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone I  Not Applicable  None of the listed zones  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone I  Zone H  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone I  Not Applicable  Zone B  arch or lab work  Yes  Zone I  Zone F  Zone B  nt (part time or full time)  Yes  Zone J  Zone G  Zone H  Yes  Zone J  Zone A  Zone B  IT  Yes  Zone J  Zone J  Yes  Zone J  None of the listed Not zones Applicable  Yes  Zone J  Zone A 6  Zone F Zone G 0.8 Zone H Prop No  Not Applicable 43  Zone F Zone G Zone H 16  0.2 Zone I  Not Applicable  99 Zone F Zone G Zone H  1 Zone I  1 Zone I  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Walking  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Cycling  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle)  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Carpooling  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  0.28 Proportion No  0.49 Proportion No  0.72  0.18 Proportion No  0.51  0.04 Proportion No  0.82  0.97  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain)  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Not Applicable  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Walking  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  0.47 Proportion No  0.15 Proportion No  0.53  0.15 Proportion No  0.85  0.85  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Cycling  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle)  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Carpooling  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  0.23 Proportion No  0.05 Proportion No  0.77  0.02 Proportion No  0.95  0.98  What is your typical What is your typical mode of mode of transportation for the following transportation for the activities: Post secondary following activities: education : Public Post secondary transportation (e.g. bus or education : Not skytrain) Applicable  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Personal errands : Walking  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  0.34 Proportion No  0.5 Proportion No  0.66  0.7 Proportion No  0.5  0.3  What is your typical mode What is your typical mode of of transportation for the transportation for the following following activities: activities: Personal errands : Personal errands : Driving (Single Occupancy Cycling Vehicle)  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply: : Personal errands : Carpooling  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  0.57 Proportion No  0.33 Proportion No  0.43  0.13 Proportion No  0.67  0.87  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply: : Personal errands : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain)  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply: : Personal errands : Not Applicable  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply: : Soclal and recreational activities : Walking  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  0.57 Proportion No  0 Proportion No  0.43  0.63 Proportion No  1  0.37  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply: : Soclal and recreational activities : Cycling  What is your typical mode of transportation for: Social and recreational activities : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle)  What is your typical mode of transportation for: Social and recreational activities : Carpooling  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  No  No  0.58 Proportion No  0.38 Proportion No  0.42  0.26 Proportion No  0.62  0.75  What is your typical mode of transportation for: Social and recreational activities : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain)  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following What is your typical mode activities. Please choose of transportation for the all that apply: : Soclal following activities. Please and recreational choose all that apply: : activities : Not Applicable CommentText  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  mostly bike, some walking, some skytrain with bike  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Transit in Vancouver is inefficient, expensive, and overly time  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  I would bike but my bike was stolen  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  by work I mean volunteering  Yes  No  I am a member of the Modo car co-op. Is that 'carpooling' or  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Work at home  Will also take public transportation, depending on whether an  Depends on distance.  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Use car co-op  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  When the weather is nice I bike.  Yes  No  Err:508  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  I'm doing an online MA program.  Yes  No  No  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  carpooling can = carsharing  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  0.71 Proportion No  Driving = motorcycle  0 Proportion No  0.29  1  How likely would you be to use public transit (or use it more often) if it was less crowded?  me walking, some skytrain with bike  ouver is inefficient, expensive, and overly time consuming otherwise it would be a preferred option.  my bike was stolen  volunteering  of the Modo car co-op. Is that 'carpooling' or single occupancy vehicle? my own vehicle is a motorcycle....  ublic transportation, depending on whether and distance  her is nice I bike.  ine MA program.  = carsharing  0.1 0.5  5 2  0.106 School Recreation 0.043 al  0.7 0.9  7 10  total trips/ 0.149 week 0.213  On average how many one way trips per week do you On average how many make for: Post one way trips per week secondary do you make for: : Work education  On average how many one way trips per week do you make for: Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc)  On average how many one way trips per week do you make for: : Errands  10  0  5  5  10  0  5  10  10  0  5  8  10  0  5  5  10  0  5  8  5  0  2  5  10  0  2  2  2  0  2  2  5  0  8  5  2  0  10  10  5  0  10  5  0  5  2  2  10  0  10  8  10  0  5  2  10  0  5  5  8  2  5  5  10  0  10  10  10  0  10  10  10  0  2  2  5  10  2  2  10  10  10  10  10  0  2  2  10  0  8  10  10  0  5  5  10  8  5  8  2  0  2  2  5  0  5  5  10  0  5  2  8  10  10  10  0  0  5  5  5  2  10  5  0  2  2  2  5  8  5  5  5  10  5  2  0  10  2  5  5  10  2  5  2  2  2  2  2  8  2  2  0  10  2  2  2  10  2  2  0  0  0  0  2  10  2  2  10  10  2  5  5  5  2  2  0  10  2  2  0  5  2  2  0  10  2  2  0  5  5  5  2  10  2  5  0  10  2  5  0  10  5  8  8  8  5  2  8  8  2  5  10  2  2  2  5  5  2  2  8  0  5  5  10  0  8  8  10  0  5  5  5  10  5  2  5  0  2  5  5  8  5  5  0  10  8  5  10  10  8  10  10  0  5  2  8  10  5  10  0  10  8  10  5  5  2  8  10  5  5  5  8  10  8  8  10  10  5  5  0  10  5  5  0  5  5  5  10  0  5  5  0  10  2  2  10  0  8  8  0  10  5  5  8  8  8  8  5  0  2  5  8  0  2  5  5  10  2  5  5  0  5  2  2  0  8  5  2  0  5  5  5  0  8  5  2  10  8  8  8  0  5  2  10  0  2  2  5  0  10  8  0  10  5  5  8  0  8  5  5  5  8  2  0  10  5  5  10  0  2  5  8  2  2  0  10  0  5  5  5  2  2  2  0  0  2  2  5  5  5  5  0  0  2  5  10  0  2  5  8  0  2  2  0  10  10  5  10  0  8  2  0  5  2  5  5  5  10  10  10  0  5  8  0  0  5  2  2  0  2  8  2  5  5  2  2  8  8  5  10  0  5  5  10  0  5  10  10  0  5  8  5  10  2  2  8  0  5  5  5  0  10  5  5  0  5  5  5  0  8  2  10  0  2  5  8  0  8  5  5  5  2  2  10  0  10  5  5  0  2  2  5  0  5  2  10  5  10  8  5  0  8  8  5  0  5  5  8  0  2  2  2  5  5  5  8  0  10  10  8  0  2  5  10  0  5  5  2  2  2  2  10  0  5  5  5  0  8  2  5  0  5  2  8  2  2  2  2  5  5  8  2  0  10  10  0  0  10  5  0  10  2  5  10  2  5  5  10  0  5  5  8  0  5  5  0  5  2  2  2  8  8  5  0  10  5  5  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  10  0  10  10  10  0  5  8  5  0  5  5  10  0  5  5  0 0.56 0.03  2 0.07 0.29  5 0.1 0.44  8 0.06 0.15  On average how many On average how many one way car trips per one way trips per week week would you replace do you make for: with the bike share Comment system: Work  On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system: Post secondary education  0  0  0  10  0  5  2  0  2  2  0  0  8  0  5  0  0  2  On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system: Errands  5  0  2  2  0  0  0  2  2  0  2  0  0  0  0  2  2  0  0  0  5  0  2  10  0  5  2  2  5  10  0  10  2  0  2  0  0  5  2  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  2  5  0  2  2  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  0  5  5  2  0  2  2  0  8  2  0  0  0  0  2  2  0  0  2  2  10  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  0  0  0  0  5  2  0  0  2  0  5  2  0  0  0  0  5  2  0  2  2  0  5  2  0  0  0  0  2  2  0  0  2  2  0  2  0  0  0  2  0  8  5  8  2  2  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  2  10  10  10  0  0  0  0  10  5  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  10  2  10  10  2  0  2  0  5  5  5  0  0  2  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  by work I mean volunteering  8  8  8  0  0  0  0  0  0  2  2  2  2  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  2  2  0  5  0  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  5  0  2  5  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  2  2  2  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  5  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  5  0  0  0  2  2  2  0  2  2  0  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  2  2  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  2  2  2  2  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  2  2  5  2  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  5  0  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  2  2  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  2  When I was in Montreal I used the BIX system extensively. 0  0  0  0  0  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  2  2  5  5  0  2  5  0  0  0  2  10  2  5  0  5  S&R includes cycling & motorcycling for pleasure0  0  2  0  0  2  0  0  0  0 0.78 0.35  2 0.1 0.51  10 # 0.2 School 0.08 Recreation  On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system: Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc)  On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike In an average week, share system: how far is a one way Comments trip (in km) for: Work  In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: Errands  0  11  2  10  11  2  0  2  2  0  5  2  2  5  2  2  11  5  2  5  2  14  0  2  11  2  2  2  5  0  5  8  2  0  8  0 I don't drive a car except for rarely, so I am not5sure it would replace a8car trip.  2 Work depends on whether appropriate facilities5 for the lower speed are 2 in place - not g  5  5  5  5  5  5  5  2  2  2  5  2  5  8  2  2  11  5  0  5  5  2  2  2  2  8  5  2  2  2  2  15  5  2  2  2  2  11  2  2  11  5  0 don't use car as method of transport - n/a  2  5  5  0  2  2  8  2  2  0  2  11  15  0 I already bike but with my own bike  0  5  2  0  2  0 I don't drive cars  2  2  5  2  14  2  2  14  5  0 Since I dont have a car, I wouldnt replace a car0 trip with bike share program, 2 but would  2  11  5  2  0  2  2  2  2  5  2  2  2  2  2  0  0  14  2  0  8  2  0  2  2  0  11  0  2  2  0  0  2  2  15  14  2  11  5  0 I own a bike so I am less likely to use the bike 8share system  2  2  0  2  2  8  2  0  5  2  0 I don't use a car  15  5  8  11  11  2  5  2  2  2  5  0  2  2  2  15  0  10  5  5  0  11  2  8  15  2  2  0  2  0  2  2  0 i don't have a car  5  5  2  2  2  2  8  2  0  0  2  5  5  5  2  8  8  0  0  2  0  5  2  0  0  5  8  5  5  2  8  8  0  8  0  5 I own my own bike so it really depends on whether 8 I have my bike with5me or not  2  5  2  2  15  2  0  0  0  2  5  2  2  2  2  2  5  5  2  15  5  2  8  2  5  0  2  0  5  2  2  5  11  2 I don't have a car so I don't drive anywhere but0I do carpool to soccer 2 practice  2  15  2  0 I do not own a car. I joined Car2Go but rarely 8use it. The Car2Go parking 5 at UBC is fa  0  8  2  2  5  2  2  0  2  2  2  2  5  0  5  0  8  2  2  14  2  0  0  15  2  8  5  2  5  2  2  2  2  5  5  2  2 I mostly walk  0  2  0  5  2  15  2  0  8  2  2  8  5  0  2  5  0 I selected 0 for all as I do not drive a car  0  2  2  0  5  2  2  5  2  2  5  2  2  2  2  I don't have a car, so it's 0 not applicable  2  5  2  14  2  2  2  2  2  14  14  0  8  2  0  5  2  2  11  2  2  2  5  2  8  2  0  8  5  2  8  2  5  14  8  0 I don't drive a car currently. I ride my own bike.2I might replace 1 personal 5 bike trip with  0 Do not own a car. So 'replacement' does not 14 apply.  5  2 I have 2 jobs -- one at UBC, which is too far for2 a BIX type bicycle, although 5 I may try t  0  5  8  0  11  11  2  15  2  2  11  2  2  0  5  2  14  5  2 I would use the PBS for out of town visitors and 2 friends  5  2  2  0  0  0  5  2  14  2  2  14  2  0  2  2  0  0  2  5  5  8  5  0  2  0  0  0  2  8  11  8  8  8  2  2  2  2 Unsure how many I would replace. It does provide 5 the option of others2 who are with m 0 5 0.04 0.09  8 8 0.02 0.03  10 0.04 0.02  2  In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: Post secondary education  In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: Recreation and Leisure  How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : Work  How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : Errands  0  15  0  0  0  2  0  2  11  8  2  2  0  8  5  2  0  8  5  5  0  5  0  2  0  2  15  2  5  5  14  0  0  5  0  2  0  14  2  2  0  15  0  0  14  5  0  0  0  8  0  0  0  2  0  0  0  5  5  5  5  8  5  5  0  5  2  2  0  8  8  2  0  2  0  2  15  5  0  0  11  2  0  0  0  5  0  2  0  8  0  2  0  5  0  2  15  5  15  2  0  2  2  2  0  5  0  2  0  8  0  2  11  5  0  0  0  5  0  2  11  15  0  0  0  2  0  2  8  14  15  15  2  5  11  5  0  2  0  2  2  11  2  5  0  0  0  0  2  5  2  5  2  5  0  0  2  8  0  2  2  5  0  5  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  8  2  2  2  14  0  0  2  11  0  8  2  8  0  2  2  11  0  2  2  2  0  0  2  11  0  0  15  14  0  2  11  5  0  2  8  2  2  0  2  2  0  2  8  5  8  8  0  5  2  0  0  5  0  0  0  8  8  11  5  8  5  2  0  11  2  0  2  2  0  0  5  8  0  0  5  5  5  5  5  5  0  0  8  5  0  8  8  15  0  0  2  5  0  0  2  14  0  0  15  15  2  2  8  8  8  2  2  8  2  2  8  5  5  5  0  8  8  8  5  15  0  0  15  5  0  0  11  5  0  0  5  5  8  8  0  8  0  0  0  8  0  0  8  8  8  2  0  5  5  2  0  5  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  11  0  8  11  15  2  2  11  8  0  5  0  5  0  2  0  8  0  2  8  5  0  2  0  5  0  0  5  14  5  5  5  5  0  0  0  5  0  2  5  2  0  0  0  2  0  0  5  5  5  2  0  5  0  2  2  5  0  0  0  2  0  2  0  5  0  0  0  5  0  2  15  15  0  5  0  11  0  0  8  15  2  2  11  5  0  0  0  8  0  2  0  2  0  2  0  8  0  0  Changed values to n=K237 cell  11  2  0  0  15  11  0  0  0  8  0  2  0  5  0  0  0  8  0  0  0  2  0  5  0  11  2  2  0  5  2  2  0  2  2  2  0  8  0  0  0  5  0  0  0  2  0  2  14  5  5  5  0  5  0  0  0  2  0  0  0  2  0  5  11  5  0  2  0  8  0  0  0  8  0  0  0  5  0  2  15  11  11  14  0  8  0  0  0  8  0  0  0  11  0  0  5  15  0  5  0  11  0  2  0  15  0  0  0  11  0  2  5  8  0  2  11  15  2  2  0  5  0  2  0  2  0  5  5  11  0  0  14  8  0  2  0  2  0  2  5  2  0  0  11  8  0  2  8  8  0  2  11  15  0  2  0  0  8  8  5  5  11  8  8  8  8  0  15  0  2  0  5  0  2  0  5  0  0  How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : Post secondary education  How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : Recreation and Leisure  How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Winter  0  0  0.7  0  5  0.7  0  2  0.1  0  8  0.1  0  5  0.5  2  2  0.7  0  2  0.7  0  0  0.5  0  2  0.1  0  5  0.5  0  0  0.7  2  2  0.5  0  0  0.7  0  0  0.7  0  5  0.7  2  5  0.7  0  2  0.7  0  14  0.5  0  2  0.3  0  0  0.3  0  0  0.7  0  5  0.5  0  2  0.7  0  2  0.3  0  14  0.5  2  2  0.1  0  2  0.3  0  2  0.5  0  0  0.1  0  5  0.3  0  11  0.7  0  2  0.7  15  15  0.7  0  2  0.5  2  2  0.3  2  5  0.7  0  2  0.1  2  2  0.7  0  2  0.7  2  2  0.3  0  5  0.3  2  0  0.3  2  2  0.3  2  2  0.3  0  0  0.3  2  11  0.1  2  5  0.7  2  5  0.3  0  0  0.3  0  0  0.1  2  5  0.1  5  2  0.5  0  0  0.1  2  2  0.3  8  8  0.7  0  2  0.7  0  0  0.5  0  5  0.3  5  2  0.5  0  5  0.3  0  0  0.3  0  0  0.5  5  5  0.5  0  0  0.1  15  8  0.3  0  5  0.3  0  0  0.5  0  0  0.5  15  2  0.5  8  8  0.7  2  2  0.1  5  5  0.5  0  8  0.7  0  0  0.1  0  0  0.5  0  0  0.3  8  8  0.5  0  8  0.1  0  2  0.5  5  8  0.7  0  2  0.3  0  2  0.7  0  0  0.5  0  2  0.3  2  2  0.3  0  5  0.3  0  2  0.1  0  2  0.7  2  2  0.5  0  0  0.7  5  5  0.1  0  0  0.5  0  5  0.3  0  0  0.7  0  0  0.7  2  2  0.7  0  2  0.5  0  5  0.7  0  5  0.5  0  0  0.7  0  5  0.3  0  0  0.1  0  2  0.5  8  5  0.3  0  0  0.5  0  5  0.1  0  2  0.7  0  0  0.3  0.1  0  0  0.3  0  0  0.7  0  2  0.7  0  0  0.7  0  0  0.7  0  5  0.7  0  5  0.7  0  2  0.7  0  0  0.1  0  0  0.3  0  0  0.7  0  2  0.7  5  5  0.1  0  0  0.7  0  0  0.7  0  5  0.7  0  0  0.1  0  2  0.3  0  0  0.3  0  2  0.7  8  11  0.5  0  0  0.7  0  0  0.7  0  0  0.3  0  0  0.7  0  2  0.3  0  2  0.1  0  8  0.7  2  2  0.3  0  15  0.1  0  2  0.5  0  2  0.7  0  0  0.3  0  2  0.5  0  0  0.3  0  0  0.7  0  0  0.1  0  5  0.3  11  5  0.3  8  8  0.7  8  11  0.5  8  0.3  0  2  0.7  0  2  0.5  0  0  0.3 0.130  0.130  How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Summer  How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Rainy conditions  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.1  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.7  0.1  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.1  0.7  0.1  0.9  0.1  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.1  0.7  0.1  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.5  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.1  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.5  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.7  0.5  0.1  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.5  0.5  0.3  0.7  0.3  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.1  0.7  0.1  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.3  0.1  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.1  0.5  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.3  0.5  0.7  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.5  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.3  0.7  0.5  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.5  0.5  0.3  0.5  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.3  0.3  0.5  0.5  0.5  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.1  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.1  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.1  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.5  0.3  0.5  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.7  0.5  0.5  0.9  0.7  0.227  0.178  0.292  0.114  0.151  0.168  0.205  0.195  How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : With the current helmet law (i.e. you are required to carry your own helmet)  How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : With the current helmet law, but where helmet rental would be available  0.3  0.3  0.5  0.5  0.3  0.5  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.1  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.5  0.1  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.7  0.7  0.1  0.1  0.5  0.5  0.1  0.5  0.9  0.9  0.3  0.5  0.5  0.7  0.1  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.7  0.7  0.3  0.7  0.3  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.1  0.3  0.5  0.7  0.3  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.1  0.1  0.3  0.7  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.3  0.5  Does not affect decision  0.1  0.9  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.5  Does not affect decision  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.3  Does not affect decision  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.5  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.7  0.5  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.3  0.5  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.9  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.1  0.3  0.7  0.1  0.5  0.9  0.1  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.1  0.1  0.5  0.5  0.5  0.5  0.3  0.5  0.5  0.5  0.1  0.1  0.5  0.5  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.1  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.9  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.5  0.5  Does not affect decision  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.9  0.3  0.7  0.1  0.1  0.9  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.7  0.5  0.7  0.5  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.9  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.1  0.5  0.7  0.9  0.3  0.3  0.3  0.7  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.3  0.3  0.5  0.5  0.3  0.3  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.5  0.7  0.7  0.5  0.1  0.1  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.3  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.1  Does not affect decision  0.9  0.7  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.9  0.1  0.1  0.7  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.3  0.7  0.7  0.5  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.5  0.1  0.9  0.1  Does not affect decision  0.3  0.9  0.1  0.1  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.7  0.7  0.1  0.5  0.5  0.5  0.1  0.3  0.5  0.9  Does not affect decision  Does not affect decision  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.9  Does not affect decision  0.5  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.5  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.7  0.5  0.9  0.9  0.7  Does not affect decision  0.5  0.5  0.5  0.7  How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Without a law requiring helmets  What is the maximum amount you would be willing to pay for access to the bike share ?  What is the maximum amount you would be willing to pay for access to the bike share ? : OtherText  0.9  Other  $5 per 24 hour period like Montreal's Bixi  0.9  $20 per month  0.7  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $30 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.7  Other  0.9  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  pay per use, equal to transit (less than $2.50  $20 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  Other  $90 per year and anyone in our business can  0.9  $10 per month  These prices seem higher than typical  0.9  $20 per month  0.9  $20 per month  0.9  $20 per month  $20 per month  0.7  Less than $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  0.7  $30 per month  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  Less than $10 per month  0.7  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  $20 per month  Does not affect decision  $20 per month  Does not affect decision  $20 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.5  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  $10 per month  0.7  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.5  $20 per month  Does not affect decision  Less than $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $20 per month  0.9  $20 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  $30 per month  0.7  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.5  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.7  Other  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.1  $10 per month  50 cents per day  Does not affect decision  Less than $10 per month  0.7  Other  0.5  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  Other  0.5  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  Other  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  It should be free of charge just like in Paris  pay per use with some free time (learn Vienn  my reason for saying I would use it would be  Does not affect decision  Less than $10 per month  0.7  Less than $10 per month  0.7  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.7  $20 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.5  Less than $10 per month  0.7  $10 per month  0.5  $10 per month  0.9  $20 per month  0.9  Other  0.9  $30 per month  0.1  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  OR, payment per ride.  it should be free. Look at London (a bank spo  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  $10 per month  0.3  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  Other  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  daily payment depending on use, so somethi  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.5  Less than $10 per month  0.5  Less than $10 per month  Less than $10 per month I would still use my own bike in most scenario  $20 per month  Does not affect decision  $20 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.5  $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  $40 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  0.1  $10 per month  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.1  $10 per month  0.9  $20 per month  0.7  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month Should be pay for use.  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  Other  0.9  $10 per month  0.7  $10 per month  0.1  $10 per month  0.3  $20 per month  0.5  $10 per month  becaue I have bikes I would find it more usefu  0.9  Other  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.7  $20 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  downtown hourly fee  Does not affect decision  0.5  Less than $10 per month  $10 per month  Does not affect decision  Less than $10 per month  0.9  Less than $10 per month  0.1  $20 per month  0.9  $10 per month  0.9  $20 per month  0.9  Other  Does not affect decision  $10 per month  0.9  $20 per month  Unclear: annual membership $25; per use $5  Does not affect decision  Less than $10 per month  0.5 0.5  $20 per month 20 30 40  0.152 0.027 0.011  r period like Montreal's Bixi  How likely are you to use the bike share if the service was included in a transit pass? (Eg. Zone transit passes or U-Pass)  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  qual to transit (less than $2.50)  0.1  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.9  and anyone in our business can use it whenever for short 0.9 trips and pickups  seem higher than typical  0.5  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9 0.9  0.7  0.7  0.5  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9 0.9  0.9 0.7  0.7 0.9  0.5  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9 0.9  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  ee of charge just like in Paris  0.3  0.5  0.9  0.9  0.9  ith some free time (learn Vienna and China systems)  0.5  0.5 saying I would use it would be when friends visit, like a 0.5 rental, so I would prefer a per use fee  0.9  0.9  I would not use the bike share system at all  0.1  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.5  ee. Look at London (a bank sponsors it).  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.5  0.3  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.5  0.9  0.7  0.7  0.5  0.9  0.9  depending on use, so something like $2-5 for 24hours 0.9  0.1  0.9  0.9  0.5  0.3  0.5  0.9  e my own bike in most scenarios, so probably wouldn't use 0.9 a bike share program more than 5 times a month  0.9  0.9  0.5  0.5  0.3  0.5  0.5  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.3  0.9  0.7  0.9  0.9  bikes I would find it more useful if there was a membership 0.9 option that required a pay by use option.  0.9  0.5  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.1  0.3  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.5  0.5  0.9  0.7 0.9  al membership $25; per use $5  0.5  0.7  0.7  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.9  0.5  0.5  0.9  0.7  0.9  1 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver (1st)  2 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver (2nd)  3 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver (3rd)  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT end of trip facilities included in the bike (e.g. shower station, rental) lockers, etc)  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower current cycling infrastructure station, lockers, (e.g. bike lanes) etc) road safety  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the transporting helmet is NOT materials (e.g. included in the bike electronics, rental) groceries)  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT current cycling infrastructure included in the bike poor weather (e.g. bike lanes) rental) conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. poor weather rental) bike lanes) conditions  poor weather conditions  poor weather conditions  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  costs  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  costs  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  costs  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes) costs  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes) road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes) costs  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT current cycling infrastructure included in the bike (e.g. bike lanes) rental) costs  poor weather conditions  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  road safety  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. poor weather bike lanes) conditions  costs  poor weather conditions  night time riding  poor weather conditions  road safety  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety  road safety  costs  night time riding  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the transporting helmet is NOT materials (e.g. included in the bike electronics, rental) groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  poor weather conditions  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  helmet law (i.e. the transporting helmet is NOT materials (e.g. included in the bike electronics, rental) groceries)  transporting materials (e.g. current cycling infrastructure electronics, (e.g. bike lanes) groceries)  road safety  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower current cycling infrastructure station, lockers, (e.g. bike lanes) etc) road safety  road safety  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) costs  transporting current cycling materials (e.g. end of trip facilities (e.g. infrastructure (e.g. electronics, shower station, lockers, etc) bike lanes) groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower current cycling infrastructure station, lockers, poor weather (e.g. bike lanes) etc) conditions  current cycling infrastructure poor weather (e.g. bike lanes) conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  costs  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. poor weather bike lanes) conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety  poor weather conditions  poor weather conditions  road safety  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  poor weather conditions  night time riding  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  poor weather conditions  night time riding  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  transporting materials (e.g. current cycling infrastructure electronics, (e.g. bike lanes) groceries)  costs  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  night time riding  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  end of trip facilities helmet law (i.e. the helmet is (e.g. shower NOT included in the bike station, lockers, poor weather rental) etc) conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  poor weather conditions  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) road safety  poor weather conditions  road safety  night time riding  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  costs  night time riding  road safety  poor weather conditions  road safety  current cycling end of trip facilities infrastructure (e.g. (e.g. shower station, bike lanes) lockers, etc)  road safety  poor weather conditions  costs  costs  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  poor weather conditions  transporting helmet law (i.e. the helmet is materials (e.g. NOT included in the bike electronics, rental) groceries)  road safety  poor weather conditions  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT current cycling included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes)  end of trip facilities (e.g. poor weather shower station, lockers, etc) conditions  road safety  poor weather conditions  road safety  night time riding  road safety  poor weather conditions  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) costs  road safety  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) costs  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  costs  current cycling infrastructure poor weather (e.g. bike lanes) conditions  costs  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  road safety  night time riding  costs  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  road safety  current cycling end of trip facilities infrastructure (e.g. (e.g. shower station, bike lanes) lockers, etc)  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  transporting helmet law (i.e. the helmet is materials (e.g. NOT included in the bike electronics, rental) groceries)  night time riding  road safety  end of trip facilities helmet law (i.e. the helmet is (e.g. shower NOT included in the bike station, lockers, poor weather rental) etc) conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. poor weather rental) bike lanes) conditions  end of trip facilities (e.g. poor weather shower station, lockers, etc) conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  road safety  costs  transporting materials (e.g. end of trip facilities (e.g. electronics, shower station, lockers, etc) groceries)  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower current cycling infrastructure station, lockers, (e.g. bike lanes) etc) road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) night time riding  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  costs  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. poor weather rental) bike lanes) conditions  poor weather conditions  night time riding  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  current cycling end of trip facilities (e.g. infrastructure (e.g. poor weather shower station, lockers, etc) bike lanes) conditions  transporting helmet law (i.e. the helmet is materials (e.g. NOT included in the bike electronics, rental) groceries)  road safety  end of trip facilities helmet law (i.e. the helmet is (e.g. shower NOT included in the bike station, lockers, poor weather rental) etc) conditions  road safety  costs  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes) road safety  road safety  helmet law (i.e. the current cycling helmet is NOT infrastructure (e.g. included in the bike bike lanes) rental)  poor weather conditions  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  costs  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  road safety  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  road safety  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  road safety  road safety  costs  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  poor weather conditions  night time riding  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the current cycling helmet is NOT infrastructure (e.g. included in the bike bike lanes) rental)  road safety  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) night time riding  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  road safety  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  night time riding  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety  transporting helmet law (i.e. the helmet is materials (e.g. NOT included in the bike electronics, rental) groceries)  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  poor weather conditions  current cycling infrastructure poor weather (e.g. bike lanes) conditions  costs  end of trip facilities helmet law (i.e. the helmet is (e.g. shower current cycling NOT included in the bike station, lockers, infrastructure (e.g. rental) etc) bike lanes)  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes) road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes) road safety  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  night time riding transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  night time riding  current cycling end of trip facilities infrastructure (e.g. (e.g. shower station, bike lanes) lockers, etc)  costs  transporting current cycling materials (e.g. infrastructure (e.g. electronics, bike lanes) groceries)  poor weather conditions  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  transporting helmet law (i.e. the helmet is materials (e.g. NOT included in the bike electronics, rental) groceries)  night time riding  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs  road safety  helmet law (i.e. the current cycling helmet is NOT infrastructure (e.g. included in the bike bike lanes) rental)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  poor weather conditions  road safety  costs  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes) road safety  road safety  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. poor weather bike lanes) conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  costs  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike poor weather rental) conditions  poor weather conditions  road safety  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  night time riding  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  poor weather conditions  night time riding  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions  costs  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is current cycling NOT included in the bike infrastructure (e.g. rental) bike lanes) road safety  road safety  poor weather conditions  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  poor weather conditions  costs  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  road safety  poor weather conditions  night time riding  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  transporting materials (e.g. end of trip facilities (e.g. electronics, shower station, lockers, etc) groceries)  poor weather conditions  current cycling infrastructure poor weather (e.g. bike lanes) conditions  costs  costs  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety  current cycling end of trip facilities (e.g. infrastructure (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) bike lanes) road safety  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety  poor weather conditions  poor weather conditions  road safety  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)  costs  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  costs  transporting current cycling materials (e.g. infrastructure (e.g. electronics, bike lanes) groceries)  end of trip facilities helmet law (i.e. the helmet is (e.g. shower NOT included in the bike station, lockers, rental) etc)  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs  costs  poor weather conditions  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  0.16 Proportion No 0.84  Unique Id Date Submitted IP AddressLanguage Submission Which Key gender Whatdoisyou youridentify age range? with? ### 128.189.200.19 eng 22 Female 18-25 ### 154.5.177.106 eng 30 Female 46-65 ### 128.189.228.70 eng 64 Male 18-25 ### 128.189.207.48 eng 73 Female 18-25 ### 173.180.170.127 eng 97 Female 18-25 ### 128.189.221.7 eng 107 Female 18-25 ### 137.82.118.134 eng 126 Female 18-25 ### 128.189.224.201 eng 140 Male 26-35 ### 24.83.218.40 eng 147 Female 18-25 ### 174.7.175.70 eng 256 Female 26-35 ### 207.6.243.73 eng 270 Other or prefer 26-35not to disclose ### 207.194.129.215 eng 303 Male 65+ ### 24.83.201.231 eng 334 Male 26-35 ### 128.189.240.235 eng 360 Female 18-25 ### 128.189.67.58 eng 363 Female 18-25 ### 205.250.81.143 eng 377 Female 46-65 ### 128.189.223.168 eng 382 Male 18-25 ### 24.85.169.159 eng 386 Male 26-35 ### 128.189.206.156 eng 385 Male 18-25 ### 72.2.53.214 eng 392 Male 26-35 ### 206.116.99.158 eng 400 Female 18-25 ### 174.7.85.135 eng 397 Male 18-25 ### 64.180.217.172 eng 349 Female 18-25 ### 66.183.144.49 eng 413 Female 18-25 ### 206.116.203.149 eng 414 Female 46-65 ### 174.7.78.185 eng 461 Female 26-35 ### 174.6.34.183 eng 478 Male 18-25 ### 24.85.142.112 eng 483 Male 36-45 ### 24.85.178.178 eng 502 Male 46-65 ### 96.49.121.206 eng 504 Male 26-35 ### 207.6.242.45 eng 505 Male 36-45 ### 154.5.186.39 eng 506 Male 36-45 ### 207.6.226.206 eng 525 Male 26-35 ### 173.183.71.34 eng 535 Female 46-65 ### 50.92.58.185 eng 542 Male 46-65 ### 50.98.136.153 eng 550 Male 26-35 ### 79.81.217.177 eng 554 Female 36-45 ### 206.116.97.45 eng 561 Male 18-25 ### 24.83.206.227 eng 578 Male 26-35 ### 24.87.130.160 eng 611 Male 36-45 ### 66.183.8.121 eng 615 Female 46-65 ### 24.84.216.76 eng 628 Female 26-35 ### 206.108.31.36 eng 629 Male 46-65 ### 70.79.169.133 eng 62 Female 18-25 ### 50.98.170.151 eng 643 Male 46-65  ### 142.35.4.130 eng ### 128.189.67.132 eng ### 50.98.72.172 eng ### 142.35.4.130 eng ### 204.239.160.35 eng ### 66.183.145.242 eng ### 96.53.32.2eng ### 24.87.129.34 eng ### 174.6.84.87 eng ### 97.75.213.41 eng ### 207.6.234.47 eng ### 173.183.126.39 eng ### 24.85.142.195 eng ### 50.92.30.72 eng ### 174.7.86.68 eng ### 205.250.164.172 eng ### 99.199.60.92 eng ### 142.58.82.182 eng ### 24.87.89.145 eng ### 70.71.103.129 eng ### 72.2.53.214 eng ### 24.84.136.69 eng ### 207.81.39.223 eng ### 24.85.37.106 eng ### 184.70.6.18 eng ### 24.84.137.131 eng ### 70.79.20.42 eng ### 24.84.137.131 eng ### 207.6.231.226 eng ### 142.207.176.57 eng ### 24.80.174.106 eng ### 24.80.174.106 eng ### 128.189.213.41 eng ### 207.6.231.226 eng ### 207.216.221.149 eng ### 50.98.234.168 eng ### 151.64.29.158 eng ### 142.35.4.130 eng ### 41.80.31.138 eng  653 Male 18-25 656 Female 18-25 644 Male 46-65 660 Female 18-25 663 Female 36-45 695 Male 26-35 770 Male 65+ 783 Female 18-25 789 Female 36-45 797 Male 46-65 803 Female 26-35 821 Male 36-45 823 Female 26-35 824 Male 18-25 830 Female 18-25 828 Female 18-25 837 Male 26-35 845 Male 18-25 862 Female 36-45 866 Female 46-65 942 Male 26-35 950 Female 26-35 962 Male 26-35 963 Female 36-45 791 Male 36-45 974 Female 26-35 975 Female 18-25 983 Female 26-35 1026 Male 18-25 1131 Male 26-35 1172 Female 26-35 1183 Male 36-45 1232 Male 18-25 1352 Male 36-45 404 Female 46-65 531 Female 18-25 631 Female 36-45 652 Other or prefer 65+ not to disclose 805 Female 36-45  Which of the Which following of thebest following Would describes you best Please use your describes theidentify current bike Please your share what occupation? identify current system? zone Please what occupation? you identify live zone What inwhich your (see is your : OtherText What workplace map): zone typical isyour your mode What ispost in typical (see of is secondary your transportation mode map): typical ofinstitute transp mod fo Student (part time or full No time) None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B No No No Office work Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones Yes No No Student (part time or full No time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone B No No No Student (part time or full No time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone B No No Yes Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B No No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed I zones Zone B No No Yes Student (part time or full No time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone B No Yes No Research or lab work Yes None of the Zone listed B zones Not Applicable No Yes No Student (part time or full No time) None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B Yes No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B Yes No Yes Other self-employedYes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No No No Other retired No None of the None listed ofzones the None listed ofzones the Nolisted zones No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone B No No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B No Yes No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed F zones Zone B No No No Retail / sales / service Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No No Yes Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone B No No No Other unemployed Yes None of the Not listed Applicable zones Not Applicable No No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B Yes No No Other Web Developer Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No Yes Yes Retail / sales / service Yes None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone A No No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones None of the Nolisted zones No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed J zones Zone B No Yes No Other Project Management Yes None of the Zone listed F zones Not Applicable Yes Yes No Office work Yes None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes Yes Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone B No No No Office work No None of the None listed ofzones the None listed ofzones the Nolisted zones Yes Yes Trades (eg. construction,No plumbing)None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the None listed ofzones the Zone listed B zones No Yes Yes Retail / sales / service Yes None of the None listed ofzones the None listed ofzones the Nolisted zones Yes No Other professor Yes None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable Yes Yes No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed A zones None of the Nolisted zones No No Other musician No None of the Not listed Applicable zones Not Applicable No Yes No Other Film industry No None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes No Office work Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No Yes No Other teaching Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No Yes No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B No Yes No Student (part time or full No time) None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes No Office work No None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes No Office work No None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable Yes Yes No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B No Yes No Office work Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No No No Student (part time or full No time) None of the None listed ofzones the None listed ofzones the Nolisted zones No Yes Other semi-retired Yes None of the Not listed Applicable zones Not Applicable No Yes Yes  Student (part time or full No time) None of the Zone listed C zones None of the Nolisted zones No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed A zones Zone B No No Trades (eg. construction,Yes plumbing)None of the Not listed Applicable zones Not Applicable No Yes Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the None listed ofzones the Zone listed A zones Yes No Office work Yes None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes Office work Yes None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes Office work Yes None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes Office work No None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No Yes Other Entrepreneur, Yes Business Owner None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No No Office work No None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No No Office work No None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No Yes Office work Yes None of the Zone listed B zones Not Applicable Yes Yes Office work Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Zone listed B zones No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone B No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Not listed Applicable zones Zone B No No Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the Zone listed F zones Zone B No No Office work Yes None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the None listed ofzones the None listed ofzones the Nolisted zones No Office work Yes None of the Not listed Applicable zones Not Applicable No No Office work Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No No Office work Yes None of the None listed ofzones the None listed ofzones the Nolisted zones Yes Office work Yes None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes Other Engineering Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones No Yes Office work Yes None of the Zone listed A zones None of the Nolisted zones Yes Other business owner Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones Yes No Research or lab work Yes None of the Zone listed F zones Not Applicable No Yes Student (part time or full No time) None of the None listed ofzones the Zone listed B zones Yes No Office work No None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No Yes Research or lab work Yes None of the Zone listed B zones Zone B Yes No Student (part time or full No time) None of the None listed ofzones the None listed ofzones the Yes listed zones Yes Student (part time or full No time) None of the Zone listed F zones Zone B No Yes Research or lab work Yes None of the None listed ofzones the Not listed Applicable zones Yes Yes Student (part time or full Yes time) None of the None listed ofzones the Zone listed B zones No No Retail / sales / service No None of the Zone listed A zones Not Applicable No No Other retired No None: I amNone visiting of the None listed ofzones the Nolisted zones No Retail / sales / service Yes None: I amNone visiting of the Zone listed J zones Yes Yes Office work No None: I amNot visiting Applicable Not Applicable Yes Yes Other pimp/ ho No None: I amNone visiting of the None listed ofzones the Nolisted zones No Office work Yes None: I amNot visiting Applicable Not Applicable No No  Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes  What is your What typical is your mode What typical of is your transportation mode What typical of is your transportation mode What for typical the of is your transportation following mode What for typical the of is activities. your transportation following mode What for typical the of isPlease activities. your transportation following mode What for typical choose the of is Please activities. your transportation following mode What for all typical choose that the of isPlease activities. your transportation following apply: mode for all typical choose that the of : Please Work activities. transporta following apply: mode for all : Ca cho tha the of : Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No  No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No  No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No  No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No  No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No  No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No  Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes  No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes  No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No  No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No  What is your What typical is your mode What typical of is your transportation mode What typical of is your transportation mode What for typical the of is your transportation following mode What for typical the of is activities. your transportation following mode What for typical the of isPlease activities. your transportation following mode What for typical choose the of is Please activities. your transportation following mode What for all typical choose that the of isPlease activities. your transportation following apply: mode for all typical choose that the of : Please Personal activities. transporta following apply: mode for all cho tha the of :e No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes  No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes  No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes  Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes  No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No  No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No  No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No  No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes  No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes  Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No  What is your What typical is your mode What typical of is your transportation mode What typical of is your transportation mode for typical the of transportation following mode for the of activities. How transportation following for likely thePlease activities. On would following average foryou choose thePlease activities. On be following how average to alluse many choose that Please activities. public apply: how one allmany transit choose way that : Please Soclal trips apply: one (or allper and use cho wa tha : No Yes No Likely 1 to 3 4 to 6 No Yes No be great to buss to Vancouver, then be 4able to 6to rent a bike to 0 drive all around tow Yes No No Likely 0 10 or more No Yes No Does not affect my 0decision 7 to 9 No Yes No 4 to 6 10 or more No Yes No 4 to 6 10 or more No Yes No Unlikely 0 10 or more No Yes No 4 to 6 0 No Yes No Does not affect my 0decision 4 to 6 No Yes No 1 to 3 4 to 6 No Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No Does not affect my 0decision 0 Yes Yes No 0 7 to 9 No No No 4 to 6 4 to 6 No Yes No 1 to 3 4 to 6 No No No 1 to 3 0 No No No 0 4 to 6 Yes No No 0 0 No Yes No 0 10 or more No Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 0 7 to 9 Yes Yes No 0 10 or more No Yes No 1 to 3 7 to 9 Yes Yes No 10 or more 0 Yes Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 0 10 or more No Yes No Likely 7 to 9 0 No Yes No Does not affect 10 or my more decision 0 Yes Yes No 1 to 3 10 or more No No No 0 0 No Yes No 4 to 6 0 Yes No No 1 to 3 10 or more No No No Unlikely 10 or more 0 No No No Unlikely 1 to 3 0 Yes No No 10 or more 0 Yes Yes No 7 to 9 0 No Yes No 0 10 or more No No No Does not affect 4 to 6my decision 4 to 6 No Yes No Does not affect 10 or my more decision 0 No Yes No Likely 10 or more 0 No Yes No 1 to 3 4 to 6 No No No 10 or more 0 No Yes No Very Likely4 to 6 4 to 6 No Yes No 0 0  No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No  No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes  No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No  Very Unlikely 4 to 6 4 to 6 Even if I choose to take public transport,1 Itooften 3 bring 10 or a bike morewith me. 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 0 10 or more 0 7 to 9 0 Does not affect 10 or my more decision 0 4 to 6 0 live in Dunbar area - why no zone Does for notthis affect 10area? or my more decision 0 Likely 0 0 I use a foldable bike plus public transit 10 to and or more from work. I 0especially use the bik 10 or more 0 1 to 3 7 to 9 0 10 or more 4 to 6 10 or more 10 or more 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 10 or more 0 10 or more 0 10 or more 0 10 or more 0 10 or more 0 7 to 9 0 10 or more 0 Likely 1 to 3 10 or more Likely 10 or more 0 10 or more 0 Shared between in winter, summer Does not more affect 10bike. or my more decision 10 or more Very Likely1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 10 or more Likely 0 0 bring my own bike to Vancouver Very Likely 0 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 Very Likely4 to 6 0 I kayak to work and school Very Unlikely 0 0 1 to 3 4 to 6  On average Onhow average many Onhow one average many wayOn trips how one average per many wayweek On trips how one average do per many way you week On trips how one make average do per many way you for: week On car how :one make Errands average trips do many way you for: per On car how :one make week Social average trips many way for: would per In and car how :an one week CommentText Recreational trips you average many way would replace per car one week week, trips you way Activities with would replace per how car the wee far trip bi yo ( 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 I never drive. 1 to Walk 3 or take transit. 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 13-15 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 13-15 1 to 3 0 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 it would make it more 0 convenient on ca 7 to 9 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 7 to 9 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 0 0 1 to 3 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 10 or more 0 0 0 0 0 10 or more7 to 9 0 0 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 10 to 12 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 1 to 3 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 13-15 4 to 6 7 to 9 0 10 or more4 to 6 1 to 3 10 to 12 10 or more4 to 6 0 0 10 or more 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 0 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 I don't drive Over 15 4 to 6 10 or more 0 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 7 to 9 1 to 3 13-15 7 to 9 4 to 6 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 Over 15 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 7 to 9 10 or more4 to 6 0 0 0 0 I would use13-15 it only occasionally 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 10 to 12 7 to 9 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 Bike share13-15 would not replace car trips a 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 Only on trips Over to Vancouver 15 7 to 9 10 or more 4 to 6 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0  1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 One trip: one way. 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 or more10 or more 7 to 9 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 0 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 10 or more1 to 3 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 10 or more 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 or more10 or more 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 7 to 9 10 or more 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 I'm a birdy 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 4 to 6  1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3  7 to 9 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3  1 to 3 0 1 to 3  7 to 9  4 to 6  Over 15 For far distances, 7 to 9 I can partially bike an Over 15 1 to 3 7 to 9 7 to 9 10 to 12 10 to 12 0 10 to 12 10 to 12 0 As I am commuting Over 15 from Burnaby this 13-15 1 to 3 0 0 10 to 12 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 13-15 0 Over 15 13-15 0 4 to 6 Over 15 4 to 6 4 to 6 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 Over 15 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 Over 15 4 to 6 0 10 to 12 1 to 3 0 4 to 6  In an average In anweek, average In how anweek, far average is How a how one week, far many way is How a how trip km one (in for far many way km) one is How atrip km for: trip one (in for many :by way Errands km) one car How trip km for: trip would (in for many :by Post km) one you car How km secondary for: trip would replace for likely :by Recreation one you car How with would trip would education replace the likely by you and bike you car with would be Leisure would replace share? tothe use you bike you :with the be Work repla shar to bike the u 4 to 6 Over 15 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 Over 15 0 0 0 0 Very likelyVery likely 7 to 9 7 to 9 10 to 12 7 to 9 Over 15 Over 15 1 to 3 13-15 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 10 to 12 4 to 6 Don't know/ Very Unsure likely 4 to 6 10 to 12 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 7 to 9 4 to 6 Unlikely Very likely 1 to 3 13-15 4 to 6 10 to 12 0 Over 15 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Don't know/ Very Unsure likely 1 to 3 13-15 10 to 12 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 Don't know/ Very Unsure likely 13-15 0 Over 15 0 0 0 0 Unlikely Very likely 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 7 to 9 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 10 to 12 Likely Very likely 4 to 6 Over 15 10 to 12 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Unlikely Very likely 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 0 0 0 1 to 3 Unlikely Likely 4 to 6 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Unlikely Likely 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 Very unlikely Likely 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 Don't know/ Very Unsure likely 4 to 6 0 10 to 12 0 0 0 4 to 6 Unlikely Likely 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 Don't know/ Very Unsure likely 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 Don't know/ Likely Unsure 4 to 6 Over 15 10 to 12 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Very unlikely Very likely 1 to 3 10 to 12 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 10 to 12 0 13-15 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 Likely Very likely 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 13-15 10 to 12 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 Likely Very likely 7 to 9 0 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 Over 15 1 to 3 7 to 9 Over 15 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Likely Very likely 0 0 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 Very likelyVery likely 10 to 12 0 Over 15 0 0 0 0 Very likelyVery likely 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 0 0 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 13-15 7 to 9 0 0 0 0 Very unlikely Very unlikely 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 13-15 13-15 0 0 0 0 Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Unsure 7 to 9 0 Over 15 0 0 0 0 Don't know/ Likely Unsure 4 to 6 4 to 6 Over 15 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely  13-15 1 to 3 13-15 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 10 to 12 1 to 3 Over 15 4 to 6 4 to 6 7 to 9 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 10 to 12 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 1 to 3 Over 15 13-15 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6  Over 15 Over 15  Over 15 1 to 3 0 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 Over 15 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 13-15 0 Over 15 0 1 to 3 0 Over 15 0 10 to 12 Over 15 4 to 6 Over 15 10 to 12 13-15 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 Over 15 7 to 9 0 Over 15 0 Over 15 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 0 Over 15 Over 15 Over 15 0 Over 15 0 10 to 12 1 to 3 4 to 6 Over 15 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 10 to 12 Over 15 0 7 to 9 0 Over 15 Over 15 13-15 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 4 to 6 13-15  1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3  1 to 3  1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3  1 to 3  1 to 3  1 to 3 1 to 3  1 to 3 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 0 10 to 12 0 1 to 3 0  Don't know/ Very Unsure likely Very likelyVery likely Very unlikely Likely Likely Very likely Very likelyVery likely Very likelyVery likely 0 Very unlikely Likely  10 to 12 10 to 12 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 0 7 to 9 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 0 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 4 to 6  0 10 to 12 Does not affect Does decision not affect decision 0 4 to 6 Very unlikely Likely 0 1 to 3 Very unlikely Very likely 0 0 Likely Very likely 7 to 9 Very likelyVery likely 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely 0 0 Very likelyVery unlikely 0 10 to 12 Unlikely Very likely 0 1 to 3 Likely Very likely 0 1 to 3 Very unlikely Likely 0 0 Don't know/ Very Unsure likely 0 4 to 6 Don't know/ Likely Unsure 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely 0 1 to 3 Unlikely Very unlikely 0 4 to 6 Very likelyVery likely  Over 15  0 1 to 3  7 to 9  0 1 to 3 0 4 to 6  0 1 to 3  4 to 6  Don't know/ Very Unsure likely  0 Don't know/ Likely Unsure Very unlikely Likely  10 to 12 10 to 12 10 to 12 10 to 12 Unlikely  4 to 6  7 to 9  4 to 6  7 to 9  Very likely  Don't know/ Very Unsure likely  How likely How wouldlikely youHow would be tolikely use youHow the would be to bike likely use you share What the would be to bike under isuse you the share What the be the maximum to bike following under isuse the share How the the maximum amount conditions? bike following under likely share you 1are the amount : Please conditions? would you following under : Rainy toyou be 2rank use the :conditions willing Please conditions? would following the :your With bike to be concerns rank the pay willing share conditions? current :your for With access ifto with concern the the pay helm aser cu :pfo W t transporting night materials time riding (e.g. electronics Very likelyVery likelyDoes not affect Does decision not affect $40 per decision month Very Likelynight time transporting riding materials (e.g. e poor weather transporting conditionsmaterials (e.g. e costs road safety Unlikely Very likelyDoes not affect Likelydecision $20 per month Very Likelynight time helmet riding law (i.e. the helmet is Don't know/ Very Unsure likelyVery likelyVery likely$10 per month Very Likelyroad safetynight time riding costs transporting materials (e.g. e Very unlikely Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Don't Unsure know/ $20 Unsure per month Very Likelypoor weather roadconditions safety current cycling road infrastructure safety (e.g. bike Unlikely Unlikely Likely Very likely$10 per month Very Likelyhelmet lawend (i.e.ofthe triphelmet facilities is NOT (e.g. inclu sho Very unlikely Does not affect Does decision not affect Does decision not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelycurrent cycling transporting infrastructure materials (e.g.(e.g. bikee poor weather roadconditions safety Don't know/ Does Unsure not affect Does decision not affect Does decision not affect $20 per decision month Very Likelypoor weather current conditions cycling infrastructure Don't know/ Unlikely Unsure Very likelyDoes not affect $20 per decision month Very Likelycurrent cycling road infrastructure safety (e.g. bike Unlikely Very likelyDoes not affect Does decision not affect Less than decision $10 per month Very Likelyend of trip costs facilities (e.g. shower station Unlikely Likely Very unlikely Very unlikely $10 per month Don't know/ current unsure cycling transporting infrastructure materials (e.g.(e.g. bikee Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Likely $10 per month Likely poor weather endconditions of trip facilities (e.g. sho Very unlikely Very unlikely Very unlikely Likely Less than $10 per month Don't know/ poor unsure weather endconditions of trip facilities (e.g. sho Unlikely Very unlikely Unlikely Very likely$10 per month Very Likelyhelmet lawpoor (i.e. weather the helmet conditions is NOT inclu Don't know/ Unlikely Unsure Unlikely Likely Less than $10 per month Don't know/ helmet unsure lawcurrent (i.e. thecycling helmetinfrastructure is NOT inclu Unlikely Likely Does not affect Does decision not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelycurrent cycling road infrastructure safety (e.g. bike Unlikely Likely Likely Don't know/ $10 Unsure per month Very Likelyroad safetypoor weather conditions Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Likely $10 per month Very Likelypoor weather helmet conditions law (i.e. the helmet is Don't know/ Likely Unsure Does not affect Does decision not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelypoor weather transporting conditionsmaterials (e.g. e Likely Likely Does not affect Does decision not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelyroad safetyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is Likely Don't know/ Likely Unsure Very likely$10 per month Very Unlikely helmet lawtransporting (i.e. the helmet materials is NOT (e.g. inclu e Very unlikely Does not affect Very likelyDoes decision not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelyend of trip transporting facilities (e.g.materials shower station (e.g. e costs road safety costs road safety Unlikely Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Very Unsure likelyLess than $10 per month Very Likelyhelmet lawcosts (i.e. the helmet is NOT inclu Very likelyLikely Don't know/ Very Unsure likely$10 per month Likely helmet lawroad (i.e. safety the helmet is NOT inclu Very likelyDoes not affect Does decision not affect Does decision not affect Otherdecision depends on Very a variety Likelyroad of factors safetycurrent cycling infrastructure Unlikely Unlikely Likely Very likely$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling poor infrastructure weather conditions (e.g. bike helmet lawend (i.e.ofthe triphelmet facilities is NOT (e.g. inclu sho helmet lawcurrent (i.e. thecycling helmetinfrastructure is NOT inclu Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Don't Unsure know/ Likely Unsure Other $3 per rideVery or $10 Likely perhelmet day, I law willcurrent (i.e. be visiting thecycling helmet from infrastructure is Surrey NOT inclu Likely Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Very Unsure likely$10 per month Unlikely road safetyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is Very unlikely Very unlikely Very unlikely Very unlikely Other Would not Likely pay a monthly costsfee forhelmet accesslaw (i.e. the helmet is costs transporting materials (e.g. e helmet lawpoor (i.e. weather the helmet conditions is NOT inclu helmet lawroad (i.e. safety the helmet is NOT inclu Don't know/ Unlikely Unsure Unlikely Likely Less than $10 per month Very Likelyhelmet lawcosts (i.e. the helmet is NOT inclu Don't know/ Unlikely Unsure Unlikely Very likelyOther I wouldn't use Veryit Likely monthly helmet so itlaw would road (i.e.be safety thesingle helmet usage is NOT only. inclu poor weather transporting conditionsmaterials (e.g. e Unlikely Does not affect Does decision not affect Does decision not affect Less than decision $10 per month Unlikely costs poor weather conditions  road safetynight time riding Very unlikely Does not affect Does decision not affect Does decision not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelyroad safetypoor weather conditions Does not affect Likelydecision Likely Does not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelycosts end of trip facilities (e.g. sho Very unlikely Likely Likely Unlikely Less than $10 per month I would notpoor use weather the bike roadconditions share safety system at all Likely Very unlikely Unlikely Very likelyOther Pay as youVery go -Unlikely pay per helmet uselawend (i.e.ofthe triphelmet facilities is NOT (e.g. inclu sho Likely Very likelyVery likelyVery likely$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling costsinfrastructure (e.g. bike Very likelyVery likelyDoes not affect Very likelyLess decision than $10 per month Don't know/ helmet unsure lawpoor (i.e. weather the helmet conditions is NOT inclu helmet lawcosts (i.e. the helmet is NOT inclu Very unlikely Likely Unlikely Does not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelypoor weather transporting conditionsmaterials (e.g. e costs transporting materials (e.g. e costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is Does not affect Does decision not affect Does decision not affect Does decision not affect $10 per decision month Very Likelyroad safetycurrent cycling infrastructure Very unlikely Likely Likely Very unlikely $10 per month I would notroad use safety the bike night share time system riding at all Unlikely Unlikely Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Less Unsure than $10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling poor infrastructure weather conditions (e.g. bike Don't know/ Likely Unsure Does not affect Very likely$10 decision per month Very Likelycurrent cycling road infrastructure safety (e.g. bike Likely Does not affect Does decision not affect Does decision not affect Otherdecision 15/month Very Likelycosts night time riding Unlikely Very unlikely Unlikely Very likely$20 per month Very Likelyhelmet lawend (i.e.ofthe triphelmet facilities is NOT (e.g. inclu sho Likely Very unlikely Very unlikely Very likelyLess than $10 per month Don't know/ helmet unsure lawpoor (i.e. weather the helmet conditions is NOT inclu Unlikely Unlikely Likely Likely $10 per month Don't know/ road unsure safetypoor weather conditions Likely Very likelyVery likelyVery likelyLess than or $10 pay perper month Likely ride like parking. costs poor weather conditions Unlikely Don't know/ Unlikely Unsure Likely $10 per month Very Likelypoor weather transporting conditionsmaterials (e.g. e Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Does Unsure not affect Very likelyOther decision $2.50 per trip Very Likelycosts poor weather conditions Don't know/ Likely Unsure Very likelyDoes not affect $20 per decision month Likely costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is Don't know/ Likely Unsure Very likelyVery likelyLess than $10 per month Likely helmet lawcosts (i.e. the helmet is NOT inclu Unlikely Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Very Unsure unlikely Less than $10 per month Very Likelycosts current cycling infrastructure Very likelyDon't know/ Very Unsure likelyDoes not affect Otherdecision Since I own Very my Likely own bicycles road safety I would helmetbelaw interested (i.e. the helmet in a payis current cycling end of infrastructure trip facilities(e.g. (e.g.bike sho helmet lawnight (i.e. the timehelmet riding is NOT inclu Unlikely Don't know/ Likely Unsure Very likely$30 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling road infrastructure safety (e.g. bike costs end of trip facilities (e.g. sho current cycling end of infrastructure trip facilities(e.g. (e.g.bike sho Don't know/ Likely Unsure Likely Don't know/ Other Unsure I use my own Likely bike most current of the cycling time. road infrastructure safety Thus, a fee/use (e.g. rather bike Unlikely Don't know/ Don't Unsure know/ Likely Unsure $10 per month Likely current cycling road infrastructure safety (e.g. bike night time poor ridingweather conditions current cycling road infrastructure safety (e.g. bike Likely Very likelyVery likelyVery likely$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling transporting infrastructure materials (e.g.(e.g. bikee current cycling costsinfrastructure (e.g. bike end of trip costs facilities (e.g. shower station Likely Very unlikely Unlikely Very likely$20 per month Don't know/ poor unsure weather helmet conditions law (i.e. the helmet is  3 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver with 1 being the largest concern. current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety night time riding helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs road safety poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety costs night time riding costs poor weather conditions poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs costs road safety end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions poor weather conditions night time riding road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  poor weather conditions night time riding transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) night time riding night time riding current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) road safety helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) night time riding costs transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety poor weather conditions poor weather conditions road safety night time riding road safety helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs  with 1 being the largest concern.  

Cite

Citation Scheme:

    

Usage Statistics

Country Views Downloads
China 5 0
United States 1 4
City Views Downloads
Guangzhou 4 0
Shenzhen 1 0
Ashburn 1 2

{[{ mDataHeader[type] }]} {[{ month[type] }]} {[{ tData[type] }]}
Download Stats

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.52966.1-0074566/manifest

Comment

Related Items