Open Collections

UBC Undergraduate Research

Measuring the Change in the Refractive Index of Water with a Michelson Interferometer Tan, Andy 2010-05-05

You don't seem to have a PDF reader installed, try download the pdf

Item Metadata


Tan_Andy_Science_One_Program_2009-2010.pdf [ 247.07kB ]
JSON: 1.0107217.json
JSON-LD: 1.0107217+ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 1.0107217.xml
RDF/JSON: 1.0107217+rdf.json
Turtle: 1.0107217+rdf-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 1.0107217+rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 1.0107217 +original-record.json
Full Text

Full Text

Measuring the Change in the Refractive Index of Water with a Michelson Interferometer Andy Tan Science One 2009-2010 The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada  May 5th, 2010  1  Measuring the Change in the Refractive Index of Water with a Michelson Interferometer Andy Tan The refractive index n of a substance varies as a function of temperature. A water-containing cell was placed in one leg of a Michelson interferometer, producing fringe shifts (laser interference patterns) on a screen as the water cooled. By counting the fringe shifts for each change in temperature of 1°C, a set of values for n could be created. These values agreed with values of n found in two separate papers to within 2 x 10-5.  Introduction When hot water is poured into a glass containing cold water, there appears to be “ripples” within the glass. It seems like two immiscible liquids have been put together and two liquid phases can almost be distinguished. This is due to the difference in the refractive index of water at different temperatures. A Michelson interferometer (Figure 1) can be used to measure changes in the index of refraction by inserting a water-containing cell in one leg of the interferometer and letting the laser beam pass through the water. As the laser beam interferes with another beam from a second leg of the interferometer, an image consisting of a pattern of stripes (light and dark lines) appears on a screen placed in front of the laser. If the temperature of the water changes, then so does the refractive index of the water, which affects the manner in which laser beams from each leg of the interferometer interfere. This is seen as movement of the pattern of light and dark stripes on the screen. The object of this paper is to measure the change in the refractive index of water by counting the number of dark-light-dark fringe shifts that appeared per degree Celsius.  Diagram of Michelson Interferometer Fringes  Direction of movement  Screen Lens Beam Splitter He-Ne Laser Mirror  Cell  Mirror Figure 1. Diagram of the Michelson interferometer. The distance between the beam splitter to the screen and each mirror is 15 cm, the distance between the beam splitter and the laser is 30 cm.  2  Methods A Michelson interferometer was first constructed from a 5mW 632.8 nm He-Ne laser, a beam splitter, two mirrors, a converging lens and a white screen (Figure 1). The mirrors and beam splitter were adjusted as necessary to observe an interference pattern of light and dark fringes on the display screen. A lens was placed before the screen to widen the fringe pattern and facilitate observation. A rectangular optical cell was then constructed out of three flat pieces of wood and two microscope slides (Figure 2) and placed in one leg of the Michelson interferometer (Figure 1). The cell was filled with warm, deionized water at about 70°C and allowed to cool to room temperature. A thermometer supported by a stand was suspended in the cell as close to the laser beam as possible without disturbing it. Diagram of the Glass Cell  9 cm  Laser beam  4 cm  2 cm  Figure 2. The base and the two long vertical sides were made by joining the pieces of wood (pine) with a framing machine, while the front and back faces of the cell were made by gluing one microscope slide on each face. The top of the cell was left open.  As the water cooled, the refractive index of the water changed, affecting the way light from one leg of the interferometer interfered with light from the other leg (e.g. from constructive, to destructive, to constructive again) causing fringe shifts, which move in a direction perpendicular to the stripes of light, to appear on the screen. At any particular point on the screen, one fringe shift is said to have occurred if a dark stripe passed by that point, followed by a light stripe, followed by a dark stripe again. The number of fringe shifts passing a marked point on the screen was recorded for every drop of a degree in temperature. One cycle of constructive-destructive-constructive interference (one fringe shift) occurs as the number of wavelengths of light contained in the cell changes by 1. The total path length of the laser as it passes through the cell twice is 2L where L is the interior length of the cell. The wavelength of the laser in the cell λ is given by  𝜆𝜆 =  𝜆𝜆 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣 𝑛𝑛  (1)  where n is the index of refraction of the cell's contents. Then the number of wavelengths m in the cell is  𝑚𝑚 =  2𝐿𝐿 𝜆𝜆  =  2𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿  𝜆𝜆 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣  (2)  As the number of wavelengths changes by 1, one fringe shift is seen and so the number of fringe shifts seen is equal to the difference in the number of wavelengths at temperatures T1 and T2. The difference in the number of wavelengths at two temperatures T1 and T2 is given by (3) 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 = 𝑚𝑚2 − 𝑚𝑚1 3  But since n changes with temperature, m2 and m1 are given by  𝑚𝑚2 =  2𝐿𝐿𝑛𝑛 2 𝜆𝜆 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣  𝑚𝑚1 =  and  2𝐿𝐿𝑛𝑛 1 𝜆𝜆 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣  .  (4), (5)  Combining equations (3), (4), (5) and rearranging for n2 - n1 results in the following expression  𝑛𝑛2 − 𝑛𝑛1 =  𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 𝜆𝜆 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣  (6)  2𝐿𝐿  The change in the index of refraction can be written as Δn = n2 - n1. Making this substitution and dividing both sides of (6) by ΔT = T2 - T1 yields the final expression 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  =  𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 𝜆𝜆 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣  (7)  2𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿  𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥, the number of fringe shifts seen for each change in temperature of 1°C was observed and recorded.  𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  for a particular temperature could then be calculated. This process was repeated about 5 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  times for each temperature from 28°C to 72°C and the average 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 found for each temperature was plotted (Figure 3).  Results & Discussion Table 1 contains the errors that arose when conducting the measurements. Summary of possible errors Source of error Fringe miscount at T ≥ 60°C Fringe miscount at 45°C ≤ T < 60°C Fringe miscount at T < 45°C Cell length measurement Cell length thermal expansion  Error contribution 6.7%; 1 miscount in 15 fringe shifts 2.5%; 1 miscount in 40 fringe shifts 1%; 1 miscount in 100 fringe shifts 0.1% 0.0225%  Table 1. The error rate is greater at higher temperatures due to the greater rate of cooling, and hence a greater speed at which fringe shifts occurred. The cell length was measured by a digital caliper with an accuracy of 0.02 mm. The cell length expansion for pine is 5 parts per million per change in °C measured along the grain[1]. With a cell length of 2 cm and maximum temperature difference of 45°C, the change in length of the cell is at most 0.0225%.  The length of the cell was measured prior to each trial to minimize the effect of the swelling of wood due to water. The fringe miscounts were chiefly due to the necessity of monitoring the thermometer while counting fringes. There were other factors that limited the quality of the data such as the precision of the thermometer, the warming of the air by the faces of the cell, and the exact wavelength of the laser output. Their contribution to error was difficult to quantify. It was found that as the temperature increased, the rate of change of the refractive index of water grew 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  appears to be nonlinear in temperature, n is likely nonlinear in increasingly negative (Figure 3). As 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 temperature as well. There appears to be anomalies in the temperature ranges of 33°C to 39°C and 50°C to 57°C which deviate from the general decreasing trend. There were fewer trials conducted in the lower temperature range of 40°C and below, which may have lead to rougher data in comparison to temperatures above 40°C. At temperatures 50°C to 57°C, the data is again irregular as this was the range where the refractive index of water had changed sufficiently compared to at 72°C that the beams from each leg of the interferometer strayed from alignment and no longer interfered with each other (perfectly positioning the mirrors right at the start of the trial to avoid this problem was difficult for practical reasons). A readjustment of the mirrors became necessary to continue getting interference of the laser. 4  Average Δn/ΔT At Temperatures From 28°C to 72°C Temperature (°C)  -0.0001  25  30  35  40  45  50  55  60  65  70  75  Δn/ΔT (°C-1)  -0.00015  -0.0002  -0.00025  -0.0003 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  Figure 3. Each data point is the average value of for a particular temperature as calculated by equation (7) 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 from several trials, and is interpreted as the change in n from the temperature indicated to the temperature one 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 degree lower. The error bars are a percentage of each value as indicated in Table 1. 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  In order to compare the results of 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 with values of n found in the literature, the value of n at 30°C was set to 1.33107 (the average of values of n at 30°C published by Schiebener et al. [2] and Stanley [3]). The negative values shown in Figure 3 were added cumulatively one at a time to 1.33107, and each sum represented the value of n at a particular temperature. Thus, a set of values of n was calculated from the 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 measured values of by first setting n at 30°C to a standard literature value (1.33107), and then adding 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  to 1.33107 for each degree Celsius up to 70°C. Comparisons were made between papers which published values of n at 1 atm for a wavelength of 632.8 nm (Figure 4). 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  The error ε for the purpose of comparing values of n (cumulative sums of Δn) to values found in the literature is given by 72  𝜀𝜀 = � � (𝜀𝜀𝑇𝑇 )2 = 5.5 ∗ 10−5 𝑇𝑇=30  where 𝜀𝜀𝑇𝑇 is the error associated with each individual measurement of the change of refractive index at temperature T. This method of adding errors in quadrature assumes that erring on either side of the true value is equally likely, so that an error given by the cumulative sum of the errors in Figure 3 is unnecessarily large [4]. The smaller value ε is a better indication of the error of each point presented by this paper in Figure 4. 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥  The values obtained for 𝛥𝛥𝛥𝛥 yield a reasonable set of values for n, and the error bars of values at the same temperature overlap or are at most 2 x 10-5 from overlapping with two independent sources that also measured n at 1 atm for 632.8 nm light. The zoomed-in graphs in Figure 4 show that the values of n calculated by this paper are consistently larger than the other two sources. This may be due to fringe miscounts. 5  (8)  Figure 4. The error for values by Schiebener et al. [2] is 1.5 x 10-5 for T < 60°C and 2 x 10-4 for T ≥ 60°C. The error for values by Stanley [3] is 6 x 10-5. The error for values calculated by this paper is 5.5 x 10-5. The large graph shows the overall trend of n, while the smaller graphs are zoomed in on single specific temperatures so that error bars can be compared. Schiebener et al.[2] did not publish a value at 55°C, and Stanley [3] did not publish a value at 70°C.  Conclusion Using a self-assembled Michelson interferometer and a home-built optical cell, the change in the refractive index of water was measured from degree to degree in temperature. The range of temperatures observed was 28°C to 72°C. By counting fringe shifts and applying that number to equation (7), a set of values for n could be generated with an initial value of n from a separate source. It was found that the set of values generated by the measurements conducted either agreed or were within 2 x 10-5 of agreeing with values found in the literature.  Acknowledgements The author thanks Professor Mark Halpern for the use of the Michelson interferometer parts and his advice on how to produce the clearest fringe pattern. Microscope slides were graciously provided by Professor Carol Pollock. Measurements were conducted using a thermometer and thermometer stand borrowed from Science One. Without the expertise and materials provided by the author’s father, the optical glass cell could not have been made.  References: [1] Coefficients of Linear Expansion. The Engineering Toolbox. 2005. Date accessed: Feb 26th 2010. [2] Schiebener, P., Straub, J., Sengers, J.M.H.L, Gallagher J.S. Refractive index of water and steam as function of wavelength, temperature and density. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 19, 677 – 717 (1990). [3] Stanley, E.M. Refractive index of pure water for wavelength of 6328 Ä at high pressure and moderate temperature. J. Chem. Eng. Data 16, 454 – 457 (1971). [4] Personal communication with Geoff Topping, TA for PHYS 109 in the Winter 2010 session, on Mar 9th 2010. 6  Appendix: Experimental Data Feb 10th Trial 1  Temp 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 0.00017839 52 0.00016217 51 0.00019461 50 49 0.00017839 48 0.00016217 47 0.00016217 46 0.00017839 45 0.00017839  Δn/ΔT Feb 10th Feb 10th Feb 10th Feb 11th Feb 11th Feb 11th Feb 11th Feb 12th Feb 12th Average Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 1 Trial 2 Δn/ΔT 0.00027 0.00027 0.00025 0.00022 0.00024 0.00019 0.00041 0.00024 0.00025 0.00027 0.00022 0.00024 0.00021 0.00024 0.00023 0.00021 0.00021 0.00022 0.00022 0.00021 0.00022 0.00019 0.00021 0.00021 0.00021 0.00021 0.00021 0.00022 0.00022 0.00019 0.00021 0.00021 0.00019 0.00017 0.00021 0.00022 0.0002 0.00021 0.00021 0.00019 0.00021 0.00022 0.00021 0.00019 0.00021 0.00021 0.00019 0.0002 0.0002 0.00018 0.00018 0.00019 0.00019 0.00019 0.00017 0.00019 0.00018 0.00019 0.00018 0.00021 0.00019 0.00019 0.00019 0.00018 0.00016 0.00019 0.00017 0.00019 0.00017 0.00019 0.00018 0.00016 0.00018 0.00019 0.00017 0.00019 0.00019 0.00017 0.00018 0.00016 0.00021 0.00016 0.00016 0.00017 0.00017 0.00016 0.00017 0.00014 0.00013 0.00016 0.00017 0.00017 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00017 0.00017 0.00016 0.00019 0.00014 0.00017 0.00017 0.00017 0.00017 0.00016 0.00016 0.00017 0.00016 0.00016 0.00017 0.00016 0.00014 0.00013 0.00017 0.00016 0.00017 0.00016 0.00018 0.00016 0.00017 0.00019 0.00017 0.00016 0.00016 0.00017 0.00016 0.00016 0.00017 0.00018 0.00013 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00018 0.00024 0.00014 0.00014 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00017 0.00016 0.00021 0.00017 0.00016 0.00014 0.00017 0.00016 0.00018 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00019 0.00016 0.00013 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00018 0.00016 0.00016 0.00013 0.00016 0.00014 0.00016  44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28  0.00017839 0.00017839 0.00017839 0.00017839 0.00016217 0.00016217 0.00016217 0.00016217  0.00018 0.00013  0.00018 0.00016 0.00016 0.00016 0.00014 0.00014 0.00014 0.00013  0.00016 0.00014 0.00013 0.00013 0.00014 0.00011 0.00013 8E-05 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011  0.00016 0.00014 0.00016 0.00014 0.00013 0.00013 0.00013 0.00013 0.00011 0.00013 0.00011  0.00011 0.00013 0.00014 0.00014 0.00013 0.00014 0.00013 0.00011 0.00013 0.00011 0.00013 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011  0.00016 0.00014 0.00016 0.00014 0.00014 0.00013 0.00013 0.00013 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011  0.00016 0.00014 0.00014 0.00014 0.00014 0.00013 0.00013 0.00013 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011 0.00011  0.00015 0.00015 0.00015 0.00015 0.00014 0.00013 0.00014 0.00012 0.00011 0.00013 0.00012 0.00012 0.00013 0.00013 0.00013 0.00013 0.00013  


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Country Views Downloads
China 9 4
France 6 0
United States 5 0
Russia 2 0
Australia 1 0
City Views Downloads
Shenzhen 9 4
Roubaix 6 0
Ashburn 5 0
Saint Petersburg 2 0
Clayton North 1 0

{[{ mDataHeader[type] }]} {[{ month[type] }]} {[{ tData[type] }]}
Download Stats



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items