Open Collections

UBC Undergraduate Research

Modelling Reductions of Carbon Emissions Under Various Scenarios of a Public Bicycle Share System Within.. Elsliger, Julie 2012

You don't seem to have a PDF reader installed, try download the pdf

Item Metadata

Download

Media
Modelling_Reductions_Carbon_Bicycle_Share_Vancouver_UBC.ENVR400_Report.pdf [ 2.47MB ]
Model_Reductions_Carbon_Bicycle_Share_Vancouver_UBC.ENVR400_Report.xls
Model_Reductions_Carbon_Bicycle_Share_Vancouver_UBC.ENVR400_Report.xls
Model_Reductions_Carbon_Bicycle_Share_Vancouver_UBC.ENVR400_Report.xls [ 378kB ]
Metadata
JSON: 1.0074566.json
JSON-LD: 1.0074566+ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 1.0074566.xml
RDF/JSON: 1.0074566+rdf.json
Turtle: 1.0074566+rdf-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 1.0074566+rdf-ntriples.txt
Citation
1.0074566.ris

Full Text

 Modelling Reductions of Carbon Emissions Under Various Scenarios of a Public Bicycle Share System Within Vancouver, BC  April 5th, 2012           Submitted to:          Dr. Douw Steyn Dr. Erin Lane                      UBC Environmental Sciences Department                                 Vancouver Campus    Submitted by:         ENVR Group 1 Julie Elsliger Chelsea Enslow WK Connie Lam Nur Shodjai Zolzaya Tuguldur Vincent Yeh          ii | P a g e  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  This study estimates the impact of a public bicycle share system (PBS) in Vancouver on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction due to transportation mode- switching from fuel-propelled vehicles to bicycles. There has been little research on the potential of bicycle share systems to reduce urban carbon emissions; the results of this study contextualize the effectiveness of a bicycle share system as a potential greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction strategy. From our research and survey results we formulated a numerical model, which was used to approximate the magnitude of carbon dioxide emissions reduction (tonnes per year) as a result of the implementation of a PBS in Vancouver. Our numerical model incorporates significant variables --such as season (precipitation) and the current law in British Columbia requiring cyclists to wear a helmet-- which significantly impact the use of a PBS within Vancouver. The model domain considers a limited geographical area within the City of Vancouver. A survey (sample size 231) was conducted in the chosen domain to provide input data for the numerical model, information about citizens’ preferences and concerns, and to gain valuable information pertaining to the potential success of a PBS in Vancouver. The projected CO2 emissions reduction ranged from 820 to 990 tonnes CO2 per year depending on the modelled scenario. The results of this study indicate that the potential of CO2 emissions reduction from mode-switching resulting from the use of a PBS in Vancouver is 0.07% potential minimum to 0.14% potential maximum of total annual transportation emissions within the City of Vancouver. Thus, a bicycle share system may be more effectively marketed as a strategy for increasing physical activity and improving the population’s health and lifestyle rather than a strategy, which mainly focuses on reducing CO2 emissions.                iii | P a g e  Table of Contents   1. Introduction          1 1.1 Objectives         1  1.2 A Brief History of Public Bicycle Share Systems    1  1.3 Literature Review: PBS and Cycling      2  1.4 Context and Rationale        2  2. Methods           3  2.1 Population of Domain        4  2.2 The Social Survey        4  2.3 The Numerical Model        4   a. Model Descriptors: Definitions      4   b. Model Calculations       4  2.4 Model Assumptions        5  3. Results and Discussion        5 3.1 Trip Distribution by Distance and Activity     5 3.2 Current and Potential CO2 Reductions      7 3.3 Distance Replaced per Activity with PBS     8 3.4 Ranking of Concerns with a PBS System     9 3.5 Willingness to use the PBS: Weather Conditions    11 3.6. User Cost Preferences       12 3.7. Discussion: Impact of Errors on Model     13  4. Conclusion          13 4.1. Study Implications        14 4.2. Recommendations         14  5. Acknowledgements         15  6. References          16  APPENDIX A: Model Calculations       20 Finding current emissions        20 Finding distance (km) ideally to be replaced by users    20 Finding CO2 Reduction per week for various scenarios   21 Finding CO2 reduction per season      21  Calculating Weighted Concerns       21  iv | P a g e  APPENDIX B: Survey Questionnaire       23  APPENDIX C: Survey Sample Demographics     29 Figure C1: Population Density Map      29 Figure C2: General Flowchart of Proposed Model    30 Figure C3: Age and Gender Distribution       30 Table C1: Willingness to use bicycle share program grouped by zone of residence.           29 Table C2: Survey results of distance willing to travel on bicycle share system, grouped by zone of residence.        30  APPENDIX D: Ethics Board Approval Certificate     31                           v | P a g e   1 | P a g e  1. Introduction  The City of Vancouver is looking to implement a public bicycle share system (PBS) in order to support active and healthy living, increase the overall volume of cycling trips in Vancouver, extend the reach of vehicle, transit and walking trips, and replace vehicle and transit trips (City of Vancouver, 2009 c). A PBS is a system that allows users to borrow bicycles for short term use, often for a fee. The bicycles are generally integrated with specific docking stations, which are equipt with user-friendly self-service interfaces to borrow the bicycles at a station and return them at the same or other docking stations (City of Vancouver, 2009 c).  1.1 Objectives This study aims to determine the impact of a PBS on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction from transportation mode-switching from fuel-propelled vehicles within the City of Vancouver. We determine the CO2 reductions associated with implementing a PBS in Vancouver through a numerical model. This model incorporates variables such as season, precipitation, and the BC Motor Vehicle Act’s requirement for mandatory helmet usage (hereby referred to as the “helmet law”). We also attempted to examine which factors affect the use of a bicycle share system, and the overall impacts of a PBS on decreasing carbon emissions under various scenarios.  1.2 A Brief History of Public Bicycle Share Systems The first generation of PBS started in Amsterdam in 1965, with white bicycles throughout the city. They were available for everyone to use with no associated cost. This form of bicycle share was largely unsuccessful due to vandalism and theft. The idea persisted and the second generation of PBS was born in 1991 in Denmark. Since then a number of cities, including Copenhagen, have adopted PBS programs with minor alterations to the system. The Copenhagen bicycles had advertising plates in their wheels and were to be picked up and returned to designated stations with a coin deposit. Despite the small deposit, the bicycles were still susceptible to theft, which eventually gave rise to the more technologically advanced third generation of PBS. In 1996, the first of third generation bicycle share program was developed in Portsmouth University in England. This new generation was more secure due to the magnetic stripe cards which were required to rent the bicycles. PBS systems are currently in the third generation, where technology is used to track users, collect deposits, and access online reservation systems (DeMaio, 2009). PBS began to expand outside of Europe since 2008, with programs in Brazil, Chile, China, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan, Italy, and the United States (DeMaio, 2009). These bicycle share systems can be further categorized by the organizations that administer the systems: public, private, non-profit organizations or partnerships between these groups. The progression of change to different generations of PBS has been slow; however, newer generations of bicycle share systems have been extremely successful in parts of Europe and North America (Shaheen et al., 2010). The accounts 2 | P a g e  of successes in other countries have set the stage for the development of a PBS that will meet the needs of Vancouverites.  1.3 Literature Review: PBS and Cycling There is a large amount of academic literature focusing on cycling as form of transportation in urban areas. Cycling in Cities is a research program at the University of British Columbia investigating factors that encourage or discourage cycling for urban transportation including motivators and deterrents of cycling, and transportation infrastructure associated with increased or decreased risks of injuries to cyclists (Cycling in Cities, 2012). There have been numerous studies done on PBS programs, which examine: feasibility, transportation mode share, and capital and operating expenses. PBS programs have had a significant effect on increasing the proportion of the cycling population, improving public health, increasing public transit use, and decreasing greenhouse gases (DeMaio, 2009). With the bicycle share program available for short trips, more people are willing to use the public transit and as a result reduce the use of personal automobiles and corresponding greenhouse gas emissions (DeMaio, 2009). According to a survey conducted by the City of Vancouver, 75% of people said that they would use the PBS for errands/social/leisure trips (2009).  The proximity of docking stations to the household of potential users has been found to have the greatest impact on the likelihood of using PBS systems (Fuller et al., 2011). However, due to weather, time of the day, and public holidays, the total number of cyclists fluctuates throughout the year (City of Vancouver, 2011). Social surveys have gathered information about public acceptability and likelihood of use. From the feasibility study done for Vancouver in 2009 (sample size , 81% of the respondents said they would use a PBS system if it were implemented in Vancouver, and 7% of the respondents said that they would use the program to commute to work. (City of Vancouver, 2009 d). Despite the existing literature on bicycle share systems and urban cycling, little research has been done on the potential reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from mode-share changes when a bicycle share system is implemented. In fact, no studies to date have attempted to model the GHG emissions changes for the city of Vancouver with the introduction of a bicycle share system.  1.4 Context and Rationale In the face of the environmental, economic and social costs linked to over- reliance on the automobile, urban planners and transportation professionals around the world are promoting sustainable alternatives such as walking, cycling, and public transit either as single modes or in combination (Bachand-Marleau, 2011). In 2007, the provincial government of British Columbia (BC) declared a goal of reducing GHG emissions by 33% below 2007 levels by the year 2020 and 80% below 2007 levels by 2050 (Campbell, 2008; City of Vancouver, 2009 a). It will be particularly 3 | P a g e  important to cut down automobile emissions, since it accounts for a third of the total GHG emission (City of Vancouver, 2009 a). Vancouver has a high influx of immigrants and a population that is continuing to grow at a steady rate (AKCanada, 2011). This surging population has resulted in a rising number of transit and vehicle usages on the roads. This has created significant transit pressure and traffic congestion. Implementation of a PBS system may help to partially relieve these pressures by causing individuals to mode switch from transit or other vehicles to bicycles. BC’s relatively high percentage of cyclists do not currently make a significant impact on GHG reductions since most of them are frequent cyclists who don’t drive automobiles on a regular basis (Pucher & Buehler, 2005). Introducing a PBS system in Vancouver may encourage non-cyclists to cycle, and as a consequence may cause a mode shift from cars to bicycles. The City revealed interest in promoting a public cycling system in March 2009 (City of Vancouver, 2009 d). By implementing a properly designed bicycle share system, Vancouver may be able to decrease its greenhouse gas emissions from fuel vehicles, as well as mitigate transit pressure and traffic congestion. Cycling provides a cost-effective solution to alleviate the above symptoms and parallels the city’s ambition of becoming the greenest city in the world by 2020 (City of Vancouver, 2009 b).   2. Methods  This study has two main components: a social survey and a numerical model. The scope of the study is restricted to a portion of the City of Vancouver, which comprises the domain of the model (Figure 1).  Figure 1: Domain of model and survey. Red line indicates the zone boundaries. 4 | P a g e  2.1 Population of Domain We found the population size in our domain with the aid of graphical information system software (GIS) and Statistics Canada 2006. We calculated the adult population in each dissemination area in our research domain. We then used that information to map out the population density for survey distribution. Areas with higher population would require more survey results. Please refer to the population map in the Appendix C.  2.2 The Social Survey We conducted a survey yielding 324 results, of that number we excluded people who lived outside our domain, leaving a sample size of 231. The survey was designed to gather data on the likelihoods of PBS use under various scenarios, as well as the magnitude of transportation mode switching from motor vehicles to bicycles for input into the numerical model. The survey also gathered data on citizens’ preferences and concerns about a PBS, which is used for making recommendations for a successful PBS system in Vancouver in this report. In order for individual responses to be included as valid data, there were two requirements the potential participant had to satisfy. First, he or she had to be 18 and older, and second, live within any of the zones listed in Figure 1. Our survey was reviewed and approved by the UBC Behavioural Research Ethics Board (Appendix D) The survey was only accessible online and for a period of five weeks in late February to Mid-March of 2012. Please refer to the survey questionnaire in the Appendix B.  2.3 The Numerical Model We developed a numerical accounting model using Excel. The spreadsheet is available for download from cIRcle (https://circle.ubc.ca/).  2.3a. Model Descriptors: Definitions Survey respondents who selected “yes” to using a PBS system are hereafter referred to as “users”. “Ideally” refers to the survey projected usage of the PBS system without factoring in seasonal and helmet requirement factors. “Replaced” refers to LDV travel distance replaced by PBS bicycles. “Winter” refers to the 26 weeks from October to March inclusively. “Summer” refers to the 26 weeks from April to September inclusively.  2.3b. Model Calculations The following is a list of values that were calculated within the model. For a detailed explanation of the calculations please refer to Appendix A. A conceptual flowchart representing the factors that contributed to the model is found in figure 2.  5 | P a g e    Figure 2: Conceptual flowchart for the proposed model   1. Current LDV emissions within domain 2. Distance (km) ideally to be replaced by users 3. Probabilities of use given various conditions 4. CO2 Reduction per week for various scenarios 5. CO2 reduction per season (Winter, Summer) 6. Calculating weighted concerns  2.4 Model Assumptions A literature review indicates that any data set values for Metro Vancouver will include (but are not limited to) surrounding municipalities such as Surrey, Burnaby and West Vancouver. The scope of our project focused on a smaller portion, namely, a part of City of Vancouver and part of the Greater Vancouver Electoral A (i.e. University of British Columbia). In order to utilize Environment Canada data and data from the City Vancouver, we assumed a proportional relationship between the data and our domain.  In order to create a numerical model, we needed specific data that was attained via the survey that we administered. This survey was solely available in an electronic format that required internet access. Forms of advertising were limited to word of mouth, email listservs, paper flyers and handbills and social media such as Facebook. Due to time constraints, personal bias and platforms of advertising, we believe that there may be substantial bias in the surveyed participants.  To simplify our numerical model, we assumed that some factors such as winter and precipitation were not mutually exclusive (i.e. dependent). Instead we took the lower of the two values to create a conservative estimate for a coefficient value.   3. RESULTS and DISCUSSION  3.1. Trip Distribution by Distance and Activity Figure 2 compares the trip length distribution for work, errand, post-secondary education, and recreational trips. Following data analysis, we realized that the survey 6 | P a g e  lacked an option for people who were not attending post-secondary education or were not within in the labour force. These individuals were left with the only option of choosing ‘0 km’ to indicate that they were not part of either category. This would add a significant bias to our dataset and so the zero values were emitted from our graphed results below. It appeared that most people lived close to where they do their errands, assuming that the short distance of the majority of errand trips was reflective of the proximity of participants’ houses to the destination for their errands.  In contrast, trips categorized under ‘recreation’ appear to be approximately 2 to 4 km further than errand based trips.   Figure 3: Distribution of trips by distance and category of activity based on survey results from all respondents.   Note that the unit for the y-axis in Figure 3 is percentage of trips; therefore, this figure cannot be used to yield the possible vehicle distances displaced with a PBS. This figure is used to describe the general distances the surveyed population currently travels for regularly performed activities. Lastly, the majority of survey respondents generally travel under 10km for any listed activity. These short travel distances increase the likelihood of a PBS system to succeed in reducing CO2 emissions, since our survey data indicated that individuals were willing to travel distances up to and including 13 km. Recreation may refer to several activities- the PBS can be used for a utilitarian purpose (i.e. travelling to a recreational activity) or for leisure (i.e. riding a bicycle around scenic route). This difference in perspective will be an important inconsistency when considering how people answered survey questions on activities for which they would use the PBS (based on trip purpose categories). 7 | P a g e  3.2. Current and Potential CO2 Reductions The most recent emissions data from 2008 reports Vancouver’s CO2 emissions from light duty vehicles was approximately 880,000 tonnes per year, and was projected to remain the same into 2012 (City of Vancouver, 2009). Thus, in order to determine a net reduction of CO2 emissions, we used this value to represent current emissions and to calculate percent reductions. The helmet law and the seasonal variation have the greatest effect on respondents decisions to use the bicycle share (Table 1) and were chosen as the significant variables in our model. Under each variable, the amount of CO2 reduced was found to be greatest in the summer and lowest in the winter (Table 1). Respondents’ preference of using the PBS in the summer is likely due to the weather patterns in Vancouver--the seasonal difference in temperature and the amount of precipitation. Vancouver experiences on average 1588 mm of precipitation annually, most of which falls in the winter, whereas Toronto and Montreal experience 830 mm and 980 mm of annual precipitation respectively (Environment Canada, 2011). Thus the greater amount of precipitation in Vancouver may be an extra challenge. It is clear that weather has a large impact on when and how often people are willing to bicycle.  Table 1. CO2 reductions in tonnes per year under various scenarios. TOTALS WITH HELMET LAW CO2 Reduced (tonnes) Per Winter 330  ± 70 Per Summer 490 ± 110 Total Per Year 820 ±180 TOTALS WITH HELMET RENTAL Per Winter 340 ±70 Per Summer 590 ±130 Total Per Year 930 ± 200 TOTALS WITHOUT HELMET LAW Per Winter 410 ± 90 Per Summer 590 ± 130 Total Per Year 990 ± 220   Moreover, it is important to note that the amount of CO2 reduced is significantly influenced by the helmet law. With the current law and no helmet rentals, the maximum 8 | P a g e  potential CO2 reduction would be 820 ± 180 tonnes per year. With the current helmet law and helmet rentals provided, there is a maximum potential reduction of 930 ± 200 tonnes per year. Finally, with no helmet law there is an even greater reduction of 990 ± 220 tonnes of CO2 per year. This variation is based on survey results which indicate there is greater likelihood of using the PBS in Vancouver if there were either helmet rentals, or no requirement for helmets.  Other studies have shown that the social benefits of programs to increase cycling outweigh the greenhouse gas emissions reductions in the short term (Bansal and Morrow, 2011). In Washington, DC, increasing cycling and walking resulted in a short term reduction of 0.02% and a long term reduction of 0.3% of transportation emissions (Bansal and Morrow, 2011). This indicates two major findings: firstly, increasing bicycle trips has a greater effect over the long term than the short term. Secondly the short term reductions we calculated are seven times greater than the ones calculated by Bansal and Morrow. Thus the longer term reduction may have a greater potential to reduce CO2 emissions within the City of Vancouver. The study completed by Bansal and Morrow found that due to low reductions of CO2 emissions associated with specific transportation, strategies such as a PBS should not be implemented solely for the purpose of CO2 reductions but also for other benefits such as increased health benefits, mobility and accessibility as well as lowering other pollutants (Bansal and Morrow, 2011). Individuals’ choice of transportation impacts many aspects of their lives in relation to health: road accidents, psychological well-being, air and noise pollution as well as health-related accessibility issues (Kingham et al., 2001).  It is difficult to analyze and quantify the effect that strategies such as a PBS may have on greenhouse gas reductions. Generally, the importance of this type of mode- switching is noticed over a longer time scale (i.e. it is cumulative), yet it is often analyzed on a short term basis. By analyzing greenhouse gas emissions over the long term, better long term planning strategies can be developed (Bansal and Morrow, 2011). However, reductions on a short time scale are still important and can have a compounding effect on future emissions. Making early emission reduction targets can help the strategy gain momentum and support from the community (Bansal and Morrow, 2011).  3.3. Distance Replaced per Activity with PBS There is a substantial difference in commute distances for work between the suburban areas of Metro Vancouver and the urban area of Vancouver. The median commute distance for Metro Vancouver is 7.4 km, whereas the median commute distance for the City of Vancouver is 5 km (Metro Vancouver, 2008). This indicates greater commute distances for those living in an area of lower population density (suburban areas). Our survey shows that people are most likely to use the PBS for trips under 7 km. Therefore, there is a greater likelihood that commuter trips can be replaced 9 | P a g e  by the PBS as the median of commuter trips in Vancouver is 5 km. It should also be noted that Vancouver has been found to already have a large commuter population using bicycles as their main mode of transportation. Vancouver was ranked third after Portland and Minneapolis respectively, for number of bicycle commuters in North America (Pucher et al., 2011).  Work trips comprise roughly 20% of all trips which makes them an excellent target for mode switching in order to reduce CO2 emissions.  It is also important to note that commuter mode choices may reflect their concerns with a PBS system. For example, a study done on commuter mode choices in the United Kingdom had a significant number of respondents reply that less traffic on the roads would encourage them to cycle to work more often (Kingham et al., 2001). This creates a paradoxical situation: people are discouraged from cycling to work because they are concerned about the high volume of traffic related to single occupancy LDV, however, if more people were to cycle, then the traffic congestion would lessen. From the study done by Kingham et al. it is apparent that people were aware of both pollution and congestion due to excessive car use and that most people were prepared to act in some way to improve the situation (2001). However, convincing people to move out of their cars (specifically commuters) may be a difficult task as many people were concerned about the convenience of alternative transportation options (Kingham et al., 2001). If it were possible to get a lot of people occasionally to change their typical mode, this could have a significant impact on emissions as well as traffic levels and congestion which are related to high emission travel modes (Kingham et al., 2001). Most people were willing to replace trips to their post-secondary education trips which were less than 5 km with bicycle share trips, suggesting a potential reduction of transit pressures to and from Zone B (University of British Columbia- Greater Electorial A). Since the trips which are most likely to be replaced are under 5 km, this would not solve the issue of high congestion and overcrowded buses during peak times in the Broadway corridor (City of Vancouver, 2010 a). Also, our survey indicated that many of the trips to post-secondary educational facilities are done by walking and cycling.  3.4. Ranking of Concerns with a PBS System In order from highest to lowest, the top concerns that survey respondents had with implementing a PBS in Vancouver were poor weather, the helmet law, road safety and cycling infrastructure (Table 2). The majority of people were not overly concerned with night-time riding or end-of-trip facilities. It is interesting to note that safety was a top concern for cyclists in the city of Montreal when the BIXI Program was implemented (Bachand-Marleau, 2011). Nonetheless, it is difficult to directly compare concerns with a PBS specifically for Vancouver with the concerns of other cities because British Columbia is one of the few places in the world that has mandatory helmet legislation that is actively enforced. Melbourne, Australia is one of the few exceptions and that has both a helmet requirement and a PBS. However very few scientific articles have been published, there have been a number of news articles stating that the Melbourne Bicycle Share was not very successful in its first 2 years (Preiss, 2011). 10 | P a g e  Table 2. Weighted concerns associated with bicycle share system. Concerns Percentage of Total Standard Error Poor weather conditions 21.54 0.009 Helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bicycle rental) 19.83 0.009 Road safety 14.43 0.009 Current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bicycle lanes) 13.01 0.009 Transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) 11.37 0.009 Costs 9.38 0.0108 End of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) 6.61 0.013 Night time riding 3.84 0.013   A study on concerns with cycling in cities and health benefits found that the health benefits far exceed any health risks from traffic injuries. This indicates that our surveyed population has a misconception about the magnitude of the dangers of cycling, which is common in many cities (Pucher et al., 2010). In a comparative study of North American cities which have PBS systems, Vancouver was found to have the fewest annual fatalities per year than any other city in North America (Pucher et al., 2011). Increasing educational programs regarding cycling and road safety may help alleviate safety concerns. Moreover, the Pucher et al. revealed that as cycling levels increased, injury rates fell, which made cycling safer and provided greater net health benefits (2010). It has also been found that cities with outstanding bicycle safety rates and high levels of cycling tend to be cities which have extensive infrastructure and pro- bicycle policies and programs (Pucher et al., 2010). Thus, improving infrastructure and implementing these programs may increase the success of this PBS by helping to address safety concerns regarding cycling. Vancouver has been steadily improving its cycling infrastructure, which will encourage more cyclists and thus more PBS users. Over the past seventeen years, Vancouver has implemented a number of programs to increase cycling rates in Vancouver, specifically on cycling infrastructure development. So far, major programs which have taken place in Vancouver include: the Greenways Plan, the Cycling Plan, 11 | P a g e  Downtown Transport Plan, and the Cycling Network (Scott, 2009). All of these implemented plans or programs have helped to increase the distance and connectivity of cycling routes within Vancouver. The programs also improved laneways for bicycles by installing separated bicycle lanes and painted bicycle routes (Scott, 2009). Bicycle lanes encourage higher levels of cycling within cities, which is reflected in a number of statistically significant relationships from various studies (Pucher et al., 2010). A study done at the city level of over forty American cities found that each additional mile of bicycle lane per square mile corresponded with a 1% increase in the share of workers who regularly commute by bicycle (Pucher et al., 2010). Furthermore, in Seattle, it was found that the closer someone lives to a bicycle lane, the more likely they are to use it (Pucher et al., 2010). From that notion, increasing the number of bicycle routes may help to increase ridership. In addition, a study of regular commuters in the UK concluded that a significant number of respondents would cycle more with the improvement of cycling facilities (Kingham et al., 2001). Other concerns with a PBS for Vancouver included the convenience of bicycle docking stations. From a social survey implemented in another study, 57% of respondents seemed to be highly concerned with the convenience and proximity of docking stations (Scott, 2009).  3.5. Willingness to use the PBS: Weather Conditions There was high variation in the percentage of people willing to use the PBS in the summer versus the winter (Table 3). This confirms previous studies done in 2009 regarding the implementation of a PBS for Vancouver (Scott, 2009). Of the survey respondents who said that they would use the PBS, approximately 48% were willing to use the bicycle share in the winter, whereas approximately 77% were willing to use it in the summer. These results directly corresponded with the values obtained during the PBS trial which took place near the Science Center on the seawall in the summer of 2009 (Scott). The values were approximately 80% and 48% of respondents were willing to use the PBS during the summer and winter months respectively (Scott, 2009).  This observation was mostly attributed to different weather conditions between the seasons. As Vancouver has heavy rainfall in the winter months, many cyclists may be discouraged from using the bicycle share program in the winter.            12 | P a g e  Table 3: Percentage of people surveyed who are willing to use the bicycle share under the following conditions from the survey results Conditions Percentage (%) Winter 47.7 Summer 76.7 Rainy 43.1 With Helmet Law 46.1 With Helmet Law and Rentals 48 Without Helmet Law 57.3    Next, the helmet law also had a large influence on whether people will use the bicycle share program. Of the respondents who answered “yes” to using the bicycle share program, 46% of the respondents would use it if they were required to carry their own helmet,  48% would use the bicycle share program with current law but with helmet rentals as optional, and 57% would use the bicycle share program without a helmet law (Table 3). It is evident that the helmet law was a big concern for people interested in using the bicycle share program and could potentially act as an inhibitor to the success of a bicycle share program.  3.6. User Cost Preferences From figure 4, it appears that the majority of respondents were willing to pay a maximum monthly fee of 10 dollars. Many respondents who commented on this section of the survey stated that they would use the PBS occasionally and thus would prefer to not purchase a membership but instead opt for a pay per use fee. Next, a study on the PBS system in Montreal indicated that 63% of sampled population would integrate PBS use with public transit (Fuller et al., 2011). Thus, having transit passes which are transferable between the PBS and public transit services may enhance usage of the PBS. To further support this, 62 % of the people who would be willing to use the PBS in our survey said they would be highly likely to use it if it were included in a transit pass.  13 | P a g e   Figure 4: Maximum amount people are willing to pay for bicycle share system.   3.7. Discussion: Impact of Errors on Model Bias may have had a large impact on our model output. Firstly, our networking was most effective at reaching the demographics aged 18-25. Secondly, volunteer bias may have been important. Individuals with an interest in cycling or vehicle cooperatives would be more likely to be willing to complete our survey than someone with a neutral standpoint. Survey respondents reported unusually high values for walking and cycling. These discrepancies may also reflect a bias in the people who have been surveyed. We used census data to find the actual proportion of the population that lives in each zone considered in this model (Figure 1), and compared this to the proportion of respondents who live in each zone. We considered the difference between these proportions to be significant when it was greater than 5%. Within our survey there was overrepresentation and underrepresentation of specific zones:  Zones A and E were significantly underrepresented, while zones B and C were significantly overrepresented. Basic statistical analysis indicated that there were significant differences between the zones, and this may have had an important impact on our results.   4. CONCLUSION  Through our research, we found that CO2 emissions for LDVs were 880,000 tonnes/year in 2008; this value was also forecasted to remain the same for 2012. With the implementation of a PBS in Vancouver, we expect the potential maximum CO2 14 | P a g e  reduction to be 1,210 tonnes/year. Comparing the pre and post-bicycle share scenarios, this yields a 0.14% maximum potential reduction of total LDV CO2 emissions. According to our survey data collection, the top concerns that affect individuals’ willingness to use a bicycle share system, in descending order, are: the poor weather condition, helmet law, road safety, and current cycling infrastructure.  4.1. Study Implications Initially, we created research project based on the idea that a PBS would result in CO2 emission reduction. However, upon more intensive research we noticed that many cities had different goals for implementing a PBS such as alleviating traffic pressures and improving public health. In the short term it seems that greenhouse gas emissions reductions will be largely overshadowed by the social impacts of implementing a PBS system. However, the use of the system may gain momentum over-time, and the increased bicycle use may have spill over effects that lead to a larger decrease in greenhouse gas emissions over the long term.  4.2. Recommendations From the analysis of our social survey, it appeared that the majority of people were more likely to cycle distances within a 5 km range. Hence, it would be reasonable to install bicycle share docking stations at a maximum of 5 km apart. Nonetheless, ideally they should be closer than this to encourage short bicycle trips. All major transit hubs and areas for connections such as bus loops and skytrain stops are ideal locations to situate a PBS station. As the helmet law has a large influence on the usage of PBS, it could be beneficial if the city of Vancouver make the helmet law optional. In regard to prices, the cost of using a PBS should be cheaper or the same as a single zone bus ticket (i.e. $2.50 per use) to encourage use of bicycle share over transit. A potentially effective strategy would be to include the PBS as part of the bus passes since 62% of potential users said they would be more likely to use the PBS if it was included in a transit pass.  Weather conditions remain a main deterrent on individuals’ willingness to bicycle. Our social survey indicated that people are less likely to use bicycle share during winter. To alleviate this challenge, end-of-trip facilities could be set up for users to change, shower, rent helmets, and store bicycles. Providing such services not only gives user comforts and safe storage, but it also shields the bikes from elements that causes wear and tear. Alternatively, Vancouver could consider having a seasonal PBS that only operates in the summer.    15 | P a g e  5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  We would like to acknowledge Professors Douw Steyn and Erin Lane for their constant assistance and advice, as well as Stephen Stewart and Jimmy Wong from Translink for providing information GHG emissions data and their advice and ongoing support. We would also like to extend a special thank you to Ilan Elgar from Translink for going out of his way to re-analyze data to create a trip length distribution for us as well as Amanda Mitchell from the City of Vancouver, Megan Winters, and Todd Litman for their support.                               16 | P a g e   REFERENCES   AKCanada (2011).  Immigrate to Vancouver, British Columbia. From Canadian Immigration Lawyers: Retrieved October 23, 2011, From: www.akcanada.com/lic_vancouver.cfm  Alta Planning + Design (2011). Bicycle share planning studies. Retrieved November 5, 2011, From: www.altaplanning.com/bicycle_pedestrian+planning+_+design.aspx  Bachand-Marleau, Julie (2011). Innovations in utilitarian cycling: Analyzing characteristics of users and factors influencing their travel behavior. McGill School of Urban Planning.  Bansal M, Morrow E (2011). Meeting Transportation Goals to Reduce Greenhouse Gases in the National Capital Region: “What would it take?” Scenario. Journal of the Transportation Board of Metropolitan Washington.  Barnes G, Thompson K, Krizek K (2005). A longitudinal analysis of the effect of bicycle facilities on commute mode share. Humphries Institute of Public Affairs, The University of Minnesota.  City of Vancouver (2008). Climate protection. Retrieved March 12, 2012, From: www.vancouver.ca/sustainability/climate_protection.htm  City of Vancouver (2009 a). 2008 greenhouse gas emissions inventory summary and methodologies. Retrieved October 12, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/sustainability/documents/2008GHGInventoryMethodologiesD ocument20091210.pdf  City of Vancouver (2009 b). Greenest city 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/greenestcity/index.htm  City of Vancouver. (2009 c) FAQs: Public bicycle system. Retrieved November 5, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/cycling/faqs/publicBikeSystem.htm  City of Vancouver. (2009 d) Public bicycle system. Retrieved November 5, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/cycling/plans/publicbikeshare.htm  City of Vancouver (2010 a, January 12). Policy Report Urban Structure. Retrieved March 20, 2012, From: www.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20100119/documents/ttra4.pdf  City of Vancouver. (2010 b, February 19). 2008/2009 Cycling Statistics Update. 17 | P a g e  Retrieved: November 5, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20090217/documents/tt1.pdf  City of Vancouver (2010 c, March 10). How patterns of work to travel have changed. Retrieved March 15, 2012, From: www.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/stats/travelwork/index.htm  City of Vancouver (2011 a, March 2). Burrard Bridge Statistics. Retrieved November 6, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/projects/burrard/statistics.htm  City of Vancouver. (2011 b, September 14). Bicycle Share -- Cycle. Retrieved November 6, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/cycling/plans/ publicbicycleshare.htm  City of Vancouver (2011 c, October 26). Dunsmuir Street and Hornby Street separated bicycle lanes statistics. Retrieved November 6, 2011, From: www.vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/cycling/separated/dunsmuir_results.htm  Cycling in Cities (2012). Overview. Retrieved April 1, 2012, From: www.cyclingincities.spph.ubc.ca/  DeMaio, P. (2009). Bicycle-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Transportation. 12.4: 41-56.  Environment Canada (2004). Canada’s greenhouse gas inventory, 1990-2002. Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved on November 5, 2011, From:  www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/1990_02_report/toc_e.cfm  Environment Canada. (2011, September 14). National climate data and information archive. Retrieved November 6, 2011, From: www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climateData/canada_e.html  Jones T(2010). Understanding Walking and Cycling: A Multi-Method Approach to Investigating Household Decision Making in Relation to Short Journeys in Urban Areas. 12th WCTR.  Fuller D, Gauvin L, Kestens Y, Daniel M, Fournier M, Morency P, Drouin L (2011). Use of a new bicycle share system in Montreal, Canada. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 41(1): 80-83.  Lee, J. M. (2009). Increasing cycling as a commute mode in Metro Vancouver. Simon Fraser University: Public Policy Masters.  Midgley, P, Global Transport Knowledge Partnership. (2011). Bicycle Sharing Schemes:  Enhancing Sustainable Mobility in Urban Areas. New York: United Nations  18 | P a g e  Natural Resources Canada (2008). Fuel consumptions rating. Retrieved January 12, 2012, From: www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca/transportation/tools/fuelratings/ratings- search.cfm  Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V, Petticrew M (2004). Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars a systematic review. BMJ.  Porter C (2011). Spacing Vancouver. Retrieved November 6, 2011, From: www.spacingvancouver.ca/2011/09/26/vancouver%E2%80%99s-separated- bicycle- lanes-%E2%80%93-more-popular-than-ever/  Preiss B (2011). Bike share scheme disappointing. The Age: Victoria News. Retrieved March 30, 2012. From: www.theage.com.au/victoria/bike-share-scheme- disappointing-20110531-1fdto.html  Pucher, John and Ralph Buehler (2005). Cycling trends and policies in Canadian cities. World Transport Policy and Practice, 11(1): 43-61.  Pucher J, Dill J, Handy S (2010). Infrastructure, programs and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventative Medicine 50: 106 - 125.  Pucher J, Buehler R, Seinen M (2011). Bicycling Renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research Part A 45: 451 - 475.  Scott, Douglas (2009) Vancouver’s Public Bicycle System. Retrieved March 12, 2012, From: www.ite.org/meetings/2010AM/Session%2031%20- %20Douglas%20Scott.pdf  Shaheen S (2011). Hangzhou Public Bicycle: Understanding Early Adoption and Behavioral Response to bicycle-sharing. UC Berkeley.  Statistics Canada (2005). Work and commuting in urban centres. Retrieved January 6, 2012, From: www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/050601/dq050601a-eng.htm  Statistics Canada (2009). Commuting patterns and places of work of Canadians, 2006 Census. Retrieved January 6, 2012, From: www12.statcan.ca/census-  recensement/2006/as-sa/97-561/p35-eng.cfm  Statistics Canada (2012). Commuting to work: Results of the 2010 general social survey. Retrieved February 28, 2012, From: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-  x/2011002/article/11531-eng.htm#a3  Statistics Canada (2011). Average time to work and proportion of workers, by selected characteristics, 2010. Retrieved February 28, 2012, From: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2011002/t/11531/tbl001-eng.htm 19 | P a g e  Statistics Canada (2011). Commuting distance, age group, sex for the employed labour  force 15 years and over having a usual place of work in Canada, provinces,  territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations, 2006 Census  - 20% sample data. Retrieved February 28, 2012, From:  www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/tbt/Rp-  eng.cfm?LANG=E&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=0&GID  =0&GK=0&GRP=1&PID=90655&PRID=0&PTYPE=88971,97154&S=0&SHOWA  LL=0& SUB=0&Temporal=2006&THEME=76&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=  Translink (2006, October 19). Bus Technology and Alternative Fuels Demonstration Project. Retrieved January 12, 2012, From: www.translink.ca/~/media/documents/bpotp/projects/bus_tech_evaluation/bus%2 0technology%20phase%201%20final%20test%20program%20report.ashx  Translink (n.d.). Schedules and maps. Retrieved January 12, 2012, From: www.translink.ca/en/Schedules-and-Maps/Timetables.aspx  Translink (2008). Public Bicycle System Feasibility Study. Retrieved November 4, 2011, From: www.translink.ca/~/media/Documents/cycling/Public%20Bicycle%20System%20I nvestigation/Public%20Bicycle%20System%20Investigation%20Part%203%20- %20Market%20Research.ashx  US Environmental Protection Agency (2005). Emission facts: Greenhouse gas emissions from a typical passenger vehicle. Retrieved November 5, 2011, From:  www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/420f05004.htm  Winters M, Davidson G, Kao D, Teshke K (2011). Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride. Transportation 38:153-168.              20 | P a g e  APPENDIX A: Model Calculations  1. Finding current emissions: We separated current CO2 emissions for light-duty vehicles (LDV) and buses. We assumed zero emissions from bicycles as we did not factor in the production or transportation of bicycles.  Total LDV CO2 emissions in domain: ed,LDV =  AT   D   n    eLDV             ed,LDV = total LDV CO2 emissions in domain (g/week): AT  = average number of trips made per person per week (trips/[person week]), provided by Translink D = trip distance distribution (km), provided by Translink n = population of our domain (person) eLDV = CO2 emissions for an average LDV in Vancouver (g/km), provided by Aircare  Total bus CO2 emissions in domain: ed,BUS =  eBUS    d    f  ed,BUS = Total bus CO2 emissions in domain (g/day) eBUS= average CO2 emissions for buses (g/km) d= distances travelled per trip (km) f = frequency of bus trips per day  (1/day)  2. Finding distance (km) ideally to be replaced by users a. Trip distance distribution**** (from Translink) / person / day   number of trips / person / week (Translink) = Trip distance distribution / person / week b. Trip length distribution was cut off at the maximum number of kilometers that survey respondents were willing to travel on a PBS bicycle to give [Trip length distribution PBS replaceable trips / user / week]. c. [Trip length distribution under 13 km / user / week] SUMMARIZED to [total distance of PBS replaceable trips / user / week] d. [total distance of PBS replaceable trips] * [fraction of trips users willing to replace] * [fraction of travel distance users were willing to replace] = [car travel distance / user / week ideally replaced by PBS].  3. Probabilities of use given various conditions a. PR[rain in winter] * (MINIMUM of  PR[ user uses in the rain] AND PR[ user uses in  winter] ) + PR[ not rain in winter] * PR[ user uses in winter] = PR[ user uses in winter] b. PR[rain in summer] * (MINIMUM of PR[ user uses in the rain] AND PR[ user uses in  summer] ) + PR[not rain in summer] * PR[user uses in summer] = PR[ user uses in summer] 21 | P a g e  a. PR[user uses if required to carry own helmet], PR[user uses if helmet rentals are available], and PR[user uses if not required to wear a helmet by law], were all taken directly from the survey results.  4. Finding CO2 Reduction per week for various scenarios a. [Fraction of respondents willing to use the PBS (“users”)]*[car travel distance (km) / user / week ideally replaced by PBS] * [CO2 / typical light duty vehicle / distance (km) ] * [population of domain]= [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS]  b. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in winter] * PR[ user uses if required to carry own helmet]  = [CO2 reduced / week during winter if users must carry their own helmet] c. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in summer] * PR[ user uses if required to carry own helmet]  = [CO2 reduced / week during summer if users must carry their own helmet] d. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in winter] * PR[ user uses if helmet rentals are available]  = [CO2 reduced / week during winter if helmet rentals are available] e. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in summer] * PR[ user uses if helmet rentals are available]  = [CO2 reduced / week during summer if helmet rentals are available]  f. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in winter] * PR[ user uses if there were no law requiring helmets]  = [CO2 reduced / week during winter if there were no law requiring helmets] g. [CO2  / day ideally replaced by PBS] * PR[ user uses in summer] * PR[ user uses if there were no law requiring helmets]  = [CO2 reduced / week during summer if there were no law requiring helmets]  5. Finding CO2 reduction per season a. [CO2 reduced / week during winter if users must carry their own helmet] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during winter if users must carry their own helmet] b. [CO2 reduced / week during summer if users must carry their own helmet] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during summer if users must carry their own helmet] c. [CO2 reduced / week during winter if helmet rentals are available] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during winter if helmet rentals are available] d. [CO2 reduced / week during summer if helmet rentals are available] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during summer if helmet rentals are available] e. [CO2 reduced / week during winter if there were no law requiring helmets] * 26 weeks = [CO2 reduced / during winter if there were no law requiring helmets]   6. Calculating weighted concerns are found by multiplying the highest concern by 4, the second highest concern by 2 and  the third highest concern by 1. The percentage represents the count  for each concern divided by the total count for all concerns.  ****The South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority expressly disclaims any representations and warranties of any kind with respect to the files being released. In particular, The South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority and any additional third parties do not represent or warrant that the 22 | P a g e  information contained in the files listed is accurate, complete or current. Neither The South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority nor any third parties, employees or other representatives will be liable for any damage of any kind, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages for loss of income profit or savings, and claims of third parties, arising out of or in connection with the use of the files provided. All files are released “as is” and cannot be re-distributed without permission.                                          23 | P a g e  APPENDIX B: Survey Questionnaire  We conducted a survey to help us factor the bicycle share into our model. We asked respondents whether or not they would use the bicycle share, how likely they were to use it under certain conditions (winter, rain, summer), with the current helmet law, without a helmet law, with helmet rentals, and the distance of one way trip they would be willing to replace with the bicycle share. Likelihoods were presented as very likely, likely, don’t know/ unsure, unlikely, and very unlikely. We took these as probabilities that an individual would use the bicycle share under each condition, with very likely, likely, don’t know/ unsure, unlikely, and very unlikely, corresponding to  the following probabilities; .9, .7, .5, .3, and .1 respectively.  Survey Questionnaire:  1)  Which gender do you identify with?           a. Male          b. Female          c. Other or prefer not to disclose  2)  What is your age?           a. 18-25          b. 25-35          c. 35-45          d. 45-65          e. 65+  3)  Which of the following best describes your current occupation?           a. Student          b Research or lab work          c. Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)          d. Office work          e. Retail / sales / service          f. Other (please specify)  If you selected other, please specify ________________________________________________________________  4)  Would you use the bike share system?           a. Yes          b. No 24 | P a g e   5)  Please identify what zone you live in (see map):           a. Zone A          b. Zone B          c. Zone C          d. Zone D          e. Zone E          f. Zone F          g. Zone G          h. Zone H          i. Zone I        j. Zone J          k. None of the listed zones          l. None: I am visiting  6)  Please identify what zone your workplace is in (see map):           a. Not Applicable          b. Zone A          c. Zone B          d. Zone C          e. Zone D          f. Zone E          g. Zone F          h. Zone F          i. Zone G          j. Zone H          k. Zone I          l. Zone J          m. None of the listed zones  7)  Please identify which zone your post secondary institute is in (see map):          a. Not Applicable          b. Zone A          c. Zone B          d. Zone C          e. Zone D          f. Zone E          g. Zone F          h. Zone F          i. Zone G          j. Zone H          k. Zone I          l. Zone J 25 | P a g e           m. None of the listed zones  8)  What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:    Walking Cycling Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle) Carpooling Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain) Not Applicable Work q q q q q q Post secondary education q q q q q q Personal errands q q q q q q Soclal and recreational activities q q q q q q  9)  How likely would you be to use public transit (or use it more often) if it was less crowded?           a. Very Unlikely          b. Unlikely          c. Don't know/ unsure/ not applicable          d. Likely          e. Very Likely          f. Does not affect my decision  10)  Which of the following activities would you use the bike share for? Check all that apply.           a. Work          b. Post secondary education          c. Errands          d. Social and recreational activities          e. Other (please specify)  If you selected other, please specify ________________________________________________________________   26 | P a g e  11)  On average how many one way trips per week do you make for:    0 1- 3 4- 6 7- 9 10 or more Work m m m m M Post secondary education m m m m M Errands m m m m M Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc) m m m m M   12)  On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system:    0 1- 3 4- 6 7- 9 10 or more Work m m m m M Post secondary education m m m m M Errands m m m m M Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc) m m m m M   13)  In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for:    0 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 Over 15 Work m m m m m m M Errands m m m m m m M Post secondary education m m m m m m M Recreation and Leisure m m m m m m M     27 | P a g e  14)  How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share?    0 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 Over 15 Work m m m m m m M Errands m m m m m m M Post secondary education m m m m m m M Recreation and Leisure m m m m m m M  15)  How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions?     Very unlikely Unlikely Don't know/ Unsure Likely Very likely Does not affect decision Winter m m m m m M Summer m m m m m M Rainy conditions m m m m m M With the current helmet law (i.e. you are required to carry your own helmet) m m m m m M With the current helmet law, but where helment rental would be available m m m m m M Without a law requiring helmets m m m m m M  16)  What is the maximum amount you would be willing to pay for access to the bike share ?           a. Less than $10 per month          b. $10 per month          c. $20 per month 28 | P a g e           d. $30 per month          e. $40 per month          f. Other (please specify)  If you selected other, please specify ________________________________________________________________  17)  How likely are you to use the bike share if the service was included in a transit pass? (Eg. Zone transit passes or U-Pass)           a. Very Unlikely          b. Unlikely          c. Don't know/ unsure/ not applicable          d. Likely          e. Very Likely  18)  Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver with 1 being the largest concern.   helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)  ____________________  current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) ____________________  end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)  ____________________  road safety ____________________  poor weather conditions ____________________  Costs ____________________  night time riding ____________________  transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)  ____________________   Thank you for completing our survey!   29 | P a g e  APPENDIX C: Survey Sample Demographics  Figure C1: Adult population density within domain.   Table C1: Willingness to use bicycle share program grouped by zone of residence. Residence  Yes  No  Total Count Zone A  35  10  45 Zone B  23  5  28 Zone C  41  5  46 Zone D  23  7  30 Zone E  8  3  11 Zone F  11  4  15 Zone G  19  2  21 Zone H  10  6  16 Zone I  9  4  13 Zone J  5  1  6 Total      231  30 | P a g e   Table C2: Survey results of distance willing to travel on bicycle share system, grouped by zone of residence.   1-3km  4-6km  7-9km  10-12km  13-15km  >15 km Zone A  41  14  2  1  3  2 Zone B  32  9  3  2  0  8 Zone C  34  21  18  1  0  2 Zone D  25  15  4  0  0  0 Zone E  6  3  0  0  0  0 Zone F  9  3  0  0  0  0 Zone G  14  6  2  2  1  0 Zone H  12  2  1  0  0  1 Zone I  6  4  4  2  0  0 Zone J  4  0  1  1  1  0     Figure C3: Age and gender distribution of survey participants.                31 | P a g e  APPENDIX D: Ethics Board Approval Certificate   LDV 230 g/km Bus 12982358.57 g/day bikes 0 g/km 0.1 0.3 likelyhood of using BS under helmet law car trips/ person/ week (2008 trip diary) 10.37 Number of individuals in survey 231 EMISSIONS: LDV avg emission (g/km) (need info from Steven Stuart) 230 4 bus fleet type avg emission (g/km) diesel/CNF/biodiesel/regular/short 1500 28.4 Notes and Assumptio ns Total CO2 emission per type of vehicle (g/km) NB: Anything in bold is not a researche d value(Value for LDV now correct) chance of biking depending on weather (%) for a given month likelyhood of using BS depending on the proximity to BS stations likelyhood of using BS depending on the cost of BS ADDITIONAL Analysis ADDITIONAL Analysis # of LDV (pre bike share) km travelled per trip =round((0.88*13898 05)) # of buses in our domain km travelled per trip 1500 9 1500 9 1500 10.4 1500 19.4 1500 9 1500 9 1500 9 1500 9 1500 6 1500 13.6 1500 4.4 1500 16.2 1500 12.22 1500 4.6 1500 7.4 1500 7.4 1500 7.4 1500 7.4 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 4.6 1500 23.6 1500 25.6 1500 10.4 1500 22 1500 3 1500 3 1500 18.3 1500 6.1 1500 6 Trolley 0 18 15 *assume the above is average emission for all bus fleet types Bike avg emission (g/km) 0 * MODELLING SURVEY DATA # of people willing to use bike share 184 # of people not willing to use bike share 47 0.8 0.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 fraction of respondents 0.213 0.149 0.043 # of ppl who will use public transit 35,384.362 19,264.819 3,931.596 # of bikes in our domain km travelled per trip fraction of people willing to use bike share in domain fraction of people not willing to use bike share in domain Likelyhood of using public transit (if less crowded) Number of one way trips/week 0 2 work 0.21 0.13 post secondary ed. 0.56 0.07 errands 0.03 0.31 0.03 0.29 work 39027.87 23098.13 post secondary ed. 104339.81 12743.79 errands 4778.92 57347.07 6371.9 53364.63 0 2 work 0.74 0.16 post secondary ed. 0.78 0.1 errands 0.39 0.46 soc and rec 0.35 0.51 0 2 **fraction of people from total survey (all people surveyed) social and rec activities **Total Population - number of one way trips social and rec activities Number of one way trips/week by car that would be replaced by bike share **total number of trips from total survey (all people surveyed), of whom would replace car trips with bike share fraction of one way trips/week by car that would be replaced by bike share work 0 0 post secondary ed. 0 0 errands 0 0 soc and rec 0 0 Distance of one way trips (in km) 0 2 work 0.2 0.24 post secondary 0.03 0.54 errands 0.54 0.11 social and rec 0.03 0.18 Distance of one way trips (in km)  b 0 2 work 36638.41 43806.79 post secondary 5575.41 100357.37 errands 99560.88 20708.66 social and rec 5575.41 33452.46 0 2 work 0.7 0.13 post secondary 0.4 0.41 errands 0.74 0.12 social and rec 0.37 0.32 **fraction of respondants of whom would replace car trips with bike share fraction of people in survey taking that distance of one way trip Proportion of Total Population making one way trips of length.. Distance of one way trips replaced by bike share (in km) fraction of people in survey replacing that distance of one way trip 0 2 work 129848.92 23972.11 post secondary 73914 75911.68 errands 136840.78 22973.27 social and rec 68919.81 59930.27 Fraction of one way trips replaced 0 2 work 0 0.55 post secondary 0 0.76 errands 0 1 social and rec 0 1 ave 0 0.83 0 2 ave 0 0.83 0.9 0.7 winter 0.114 0.293 summer 0.674 0.196 rainy 0.082 0.234 with helmet law 0.195 0.205 with law and rentals 0.265 0.211 without helmet law 0.489 0.136 lower of winter+rain 0.082 0.234 lower of summer +rain 0.082 0.196 Distance of one way trip km replaced by bike share (km per person) Number from Total Population relacing one way trips of length.. Number from Total Population relacing one way trips of length.. probability of using bike-share under these conditions: Fraction of respondents who are willing to use under different conditions 0.900 0.7 winter 21089.59 54230.38 summer 124529.02 36153.59 rainy 15063.99 43183.45 with helmet law 35958.16 37955.84 with law and rentals 48943.05 38954.68 without helmet law 90383.97 25106.66 likelihood of raining rain not rain November 0.8 0.2 December 0.9 0.1 January 0.9 0.1 February 0.6 0.4 March 0.6 0.4 April 0.5 0.5 May 0.4 0.6 June 0.3 0.7 July 0.1 0.9 August 0.05 0.95 September 0.1 0.9 October 0.6 0.4 rain not rain November 0.33 0.1 December 0.37 0.05 January 0.37 0.05 February 0.24 0.19 March 0.24 0.19 April 0.12 0.24 May 0.09 0.46 June 0.07 0.54 July 0.02 0.69 August 0.01 0.73 September 0.02 0.69 October 0.24 0.19 probability of using bike-share under these conditions: number of people in domain who are willing to use under different conditions fraction of respondents willing to use bike share in ... FINAL RESULTS SECTION winter 0.43 summer 0.62 with helmet law 0.46 with law and rentals 0.48 without helmet law 0.57 0.13 fraction of of km indiv will to replac w bs 0.34 44.59 winter 0.64 summer 0.93 ave 0.79 % of car km 0.04 winter 119003.41 summer 172044.64 with helmet law 3027795.34 with law and rentals 3152030.78 without helmet law 3772301.34 winter hel law 54870.22 winter rentals 57121.64 winter no law 68362.29 fraction of respondents willing to use bike share in fraction of trips that indiv are willing to replace by bike share km that could be replaced by bike share (km/person/week) km that are likely to be replaced given survey data per PERSON  per week km that are likely to be replaced given survey data/week summer hel law 82581.43 summer rentals 98832.16 summer no law 98832.16 Carbon dioxide reduced (tonnes/ week) winter hel law 12.62 winter rentals 13.14 winter no law 15.72 summer hel law 18.99 summer rentals 22.73 summer no law 22.73 TOTALS WITH HELMET LAW per season winter 328.12 '+/- per season summer 493.84 '+/- tot year 821.96 '+/- TOTALS WITH HELMET RENTAL per season winter 341.59 '+/- per season summer 591.02 '+/- tot year 932.6 '+/- TOTALS WITHOUT HELMET LAW per season winter 408.81 '+/- per season summer 591.02 '+/- tot year 999.82 '+/- '+/- CO2 reduced (tonnes) distance (km) frequency (car trips/ person/we ek) frequency (% car trips) mode share pre bike share mode change w bs car drive 55.9 car pass 17.8 % share before % share after transit 12.6 12.6 bike 1.5 5.54 walk 11 11 other 1.2 1.2 car gen 73.7 69.66 Error Analysis Factor Value fraction of error error 44.59 0.05 2.23 fraction of trips willing to replace 0.09 0.01 fraction of km willing to replace 0.33 0.1 0.03 fract of respondents willing to use population 184785 0.05 9239.25 CO2 230 0.05 11.5 likelihoods - - - winter 0.42 0.1 0.04 summer 0.61 0.1 0.06 with helmet law 0.46 0.1 0.05 with law and rentals 0.48 0.1 0.05 without helmet law 0.57 0.1 0.06 rain 0 % share (metro van, before BS) fraction of km that is theoretically replaceable Consider: Car occupancy 1.24 184785 2.3000 kg/l 230 10.0000 l/100km avg # km per day # of trips/day CO2 emitted (g/day) 16.0000 4 3680 unknowns 214.0000 134 Total 19+ population of domain weekdays (5days) frequency (number of trips) weekend (2days) frequency CO2 emission emitted per day (g/day) 150.0000 144 2117828.57 6.0000 6 23142.86 6.0000 6 26742.86 14.0000 0 58200 254.0000 92 667285.71 86.0000 165857.14 140.0000 0 270000 126.0000 0 243000 114.0000 88 259714.29 190.0000 84 798514.29 150.0000 144 277200 6.0000 0 20828.57 6.0000 6 31422.86 14.0000 14 27600 6.0000 6 19028.57 276.0000 148 672342.86 76.0000 68 228342.86 12.0000 0 19028.57 92.0000 134 222771.43 26.0000 0 25628.57 0.0000 6 5914.29 40.0000 52 90685.71 10.0000 0 9857.14 140.0000 120 256285.71 30.0000 10 39428.57 32.0000 10 41400 26.0000 0 25628.57 8.0000 0 7885.71 62.0000 46 106457.14 0 0 436.0000 206 3521828.57 218.0000 158 837942.86 138.0000 66 961714.29 206.0000 158 234000 226.0000 124 225000 0.0000 26 101957.14 94.0000 81 228750 48.0000 40 113142.86 total CO2/day 12982358.57 15 0 # of trips/day 0 0.3 0.1 0.085 0.106 4,717.915 1,965.798 total 65264.49 CO2 emission emitted per day (g/day) 5 8 10 0.24 0.11 0.31 5.38 0.1 0.06 0.2 3.1 0.39 0.13 0.13 4.97 0.44 0.15 0.08 4.77 TOT TRIPS 18.21 44603.28 19912.18 56550.58 183192.03 18319.2 11150.82 36638.41 183192.03 71683.84 24691.1 24691.1 183192.03 81241.68 27080.56 15133.25 183192.03 5 8 10 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.95 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.6 0.1 0.01 0.02 0.36 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.38 2.3 5 8 10 total (trips * fraction of respondants) 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 0.02 TOT 0.08 5 8 11 14 0.19 0.16 0.09 0.06 0.27 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.1 0.07 0.08 0.04 0.34 0.19 0.09 0.04 5 8 11 14 35841.92 28673.53 15929.74 11150.82 50178.69 15133.25 3982.44 4778.92 19115.69 13540.28 14336.77 7168.38 62922.48 35841.92 16726.23 7964.87 5 8 11 14 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.01 0 0.18 0.06 0.02 0.01 5 8 11 14 13983.73 8989.54 2996.51 998.84 18977.92 9988.38 1997.68 998.84 9988.38 6991.86 998.84 0 32961.65 11986.05 3995.35 1997.68 5 8 11 14 0.39 0.31 0.19 0.09 0.38 0.66 0.5 0.21 0.52 0.52 0.07 0 0.52 0.33 0.24 0.25 0.45 0.46 0.25 0.14 5 8 11 14 0.45 0.33 0.25 0.14 0.5 0.3 0.1 total 0.179 0.223 0.136 0.478 0.038 0.022 0.000 0.769 0.190 0.293 0.147 0.435 0.168 0.151 0.130 0.461 0.0000 0.135 0.059 0.086 0.480 0.065 0.011 0.033 0.574 0.179 0.223 0.136 0.407 0.038 0.022 0.000 0.236 0.5 0.3 0.1 33140.79 41174.92 24 7029.86 4017.07 0 35149.32 54230.38 27115.19 30963.97 27967.46 23972.11 24970.95 10987.22 15981.41 12051.2 2008.53 6025.6 total 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.44 0.44 0.36 0.56 0.61 0.72 0.74 0.72 0.44 km ideally repleaced 1.9 71.5130 107.6293 179.1422 74.4472 128.8090 203.2563 89.0973 128.8090 217.9063 1 3 5 7 2.7 2.7 1.97 1.45 kilometers 0-1 2 -  4 4 - 6 6 - 8 0.26 0.26 0.19 0.14 Frequency (fraction of trips) dx/x 0.0025 wint hel 0.22 0.0100 wint rent 0.22 0.0100 wint no sum hel 0.0025 sum rent 0.0025 sum no 0.22 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 zone A zone B Zone C Zone D Zone E 59490 5040 20935 22025 18255    15 0.07 5.51 0.02 3.96 0.04 3.37 0.09 6.64 TOT KM 19.48 15 12743.79 3185.95 7964.87 17522.72 15 0.02 1.28 0.01 1.96 0.02 0.88 0.01 2.45 TOT KM REP 6.57 total (km x fract of respondants) total (km replaced x fract of respondants    9 11 13 14 15 0.73 0.41 0.21 0 0 8 - 10 10 -  12 12 - 14 14+ 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.02  Zone F Zone G  Zone H Zone I Zone J 8050 13620 9770 12900 14700        44.59 km total distance of bike share replaceable trips per person per week  Assumptions Buses- constant number of buses over time sample size for the survey is representative of the total population CO2 is the only important anthropogenic pollutant participants aged 18+ is representative of the total population Seasons - Winter October to March, Summer April to September The weighted values assigned are accurate assumed fraction of trips, from model Unique Id 37 Male 26-35 Office work 40 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 109 Male 26-35 Other 138 Male 26-35 Other 144 Female 46-65 Other 157 Male 26-35 Office work Submission Key Which gender do you identify with? What is your age range? Which of the following best describes your current occupation? 290 Male 26-35 Other 310 Male 26-35 Office work 315 Male 26-35 Office work 321 Male 18-25 Office work 375 Male 65+ Other 383 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 405 Female 26-35 Retail / sales / service 444 Male 18-25 Office work 520 Male 26-35 Office work 528 Male 26-35 Retail / sales / service 537 Male 26-35 Other 515 Female 26-35 Office work 556 Male 18-25 Retail / sales / service 557 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 575 Female 18-25 Research or lab work 780 Female 18-25 Office work 810 Female 26-35 Other 813 Female 46-65 Office work 811 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 841 Male 26-35 Retail / sales / service 915 Male 46-65 Other 917 Male 26-35 Office work 984 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 1178 Male 36-45 Retail / sales / service 1242 Female 26-35 Trades (eg. construction, plumbing) 15 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 55 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 65 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 82 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 78 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 88 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 121 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 128 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 193 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 257 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 262 Male 36-45 Student (part time or full time) 331 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 362 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 366 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 562 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 642 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 678 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 74 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 1336 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 2 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 41 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 72 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 92 Male 26-35 Other 96 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 102 Male 46-65 Other 104 Female 26-35 Other 151 Female 18-25 Retail / sales / service 284 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 335 Male 18-25 Office work 355 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 352 Male 26-35 Student (part time or full time) 358 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 532 Male 18-25 Office work 580 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 775 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 833 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 835 Male 46-65 Other 842 Female 46-65 Other 839 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 852 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 853 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 859 Male 36-45 Office work 860 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 926 Female 18-25 Retail / sales / service 965 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 972 Female 18-25 Office work 1140 Male 26-35 Other 1589 Male 46-65 28 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 98 Female 36-45 Research or lab work 108 Male 18-25 Trades (eg. construction, plumbing) 117 Female 18-25 Other 124 Female 36-45 Research or lab work 274 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) Research or lab work 279 Female 18-25 Office work 299 Male 46-65 Other 351 Male 18-25 Research or lab work 402 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 408 Male 46-65 Office work 634 Male 36-45 Other 760 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 786 Female 26-35 Office work 836 Female 46-65 Office work 869 Female 46-65 Other 871 Female 26-35 Office work 947 Male 36-45 Office work 956 Female 26-35 Student (part time or full time) 981 Male 65+ Other 990 Male 26-35 Student (part time or full time) 1585 Female 18-25 Other 83 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 110 Female 18-25 Office work 396 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 398 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 522 Male 26-35 Office work 806 Female 46-65 Other 987 Male 46-65 Other 65+ 217 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 343 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 347 Male 26-35 Research or lab work 353 Male 18-25 Retail / sales / service 394 Male 46-65 Office work 500 Male 46-65 Office work 625 Male 26-35 Office work 815 Female 46-65 Other 919 Female 26-35 Office work 1596 Male 26-35 156 Female 18-25 Office work 301 Male 26-35 Other 319 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) Retail / sales / service 459 Female 26-35 Office work 475 Female 46-65 Other 481 Male 18-25 Research or lab work 518 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 536 Female 26-35 Office work 619 Female 18-25 Office work 627 Female 26-35 Office work 705 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 796 Female 26-35 Other 800 Female 46-65 Other 857 Female 46-65 Other 17 Female 18-25 Other 120 Male 46-65 Trades (eg. construction, plumbing) 305 Male 46-65 Other 423 Female 46-65 Other 470 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 539 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 552 Female 46-65 Other 771 Female 26-35 Other 827 Female 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 43 Male 26-35 Office work 93 Female 18-25 Research or lab work 581 Male 26-35 Other 844 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 6 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 961 Female 26-35 Student (part time or full time) 1586 Female 18-25 Research or lab work 316 Male 18-25 Student (part time or full time) 534 Male 26-35 Office work 774 Male 46-65 Other 808 Male 46-65 Office work 958 Female 26-35 Office work 62 0.53 0.45 Prop 26-35 0.47 0.27 Proportion Male Yes Zone A Zone B Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone A None of the listed zonesN  of the listed zones Health Care Yes Zone A Zone A Zone B resident physicianYes Zone A Zone F Zone F professional Yes Zone A None of the listed zonesN  of the listed zones Yes Zone A Zone B Not Applicable Which of the following best describes your current occupation?  : OtherText Would you use the bike share system? Please identify what zone you live in (see map): Please identify what zone your workplace is in (see map): Please identify which zone your post secondary institute is in (see map): Resident PhysicianYes Zone A Zone F Not Applicable Yes Zone A Zone G Not Applicable Yes Zone A Zone A Zone B Yes Zone A Zone A Not Applicable consultant Yes Zone A Zone A Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone A Not Applicable Zone B Retail / sales / service Yes Zone A Zone A Not Applicable Yes Zone A Zone F Not Applicable Yes Zone A Zone A Not Applicable Retail / sales / service Yes Zone A Zone E Zone B Field engineer Yes Zone A Zone F Not Applicable Yes Zone A Zone E Zone B Retail / sales / service Yes Zone A None of the listed zonesZ  B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone A None of the listed zonesZ  B Research or lab work Yes Zone A Zone G Zone B Yes Zone A Zone A Not Applicable Realtor Yes Zone A Not Applicable Not Applicable Yes Zone A Zone A Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone A Zone B Zone B Retail / sales / service Yes Zone A Zone A None of the listed zones Instructor Yes Zone A Zone B Zone B Yes Zone A Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone A Zone A Zone B Retail / sales / service Yes Zone A Zone A Not Applicable Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)Yes Zone A Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone C Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B None of the listed zonesZ  A Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B None of the listed zonesZ  B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B None of the listed zonesZ  B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone B Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone D Zone D Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone A Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone B Zone B unemployed Yes Zone C Zone C Zone C Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone B Zone B Professor Yes Zone C Zone A Not Applicable Health Care Yes Zone C None of the listed zonesN t Applicable Retail / sales / service Yes Zone C Zone C Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone B Zone B Yes Zone C Zone B Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone B Not Applicable Yes Zone C None of the listed zonesZ  B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone D Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone B Zone B instructor Yes Zone C Zone B Zone B teacher Yes Zone C Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Zone B Zone B Yes Zone C Zone B None of the listed zones Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Not Applicable Zone B Retail / sales / service Yes Zone C Zone F Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone C Not Applicable Zone B Yes Zone C Zone G Not Applicable business developmentY s Zone C None of the listed zonesN t Applicable Yes Zone C Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone D Zone B Zone B Research or lab work Yes Zone D Zone A Zone A Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)Yes Zone D None of the listed zonesN t Applicable unemployed Yes Zone D Zone A Not Applicable Research or lab work Yes Zone D Zone B Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone D Zone D Zone B None of the listed zones Yes Zone D Zone E Zone B Process Control EngineeringYes Zone D None of the listed zonesZ  B Research or lab work Yes Zone D Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone D Not Applicable Zone B Yes Zone D Zone D Not Applicable teacher Yes Zone D Zone A Zone A Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone D Not Applicable Zone B Yes Zone D None of the listed zonesZ  B Yes Zone D Zone B Zone B Educator Yes Zone D Zone B Zone A Yes Zone D Zone B Zone B Yes Zone D Zone E Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone D Zone A Zone A Retired Yes Zone D Not Applicable Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone D Not Applicable Not Applicable Marketing Intern Yes Zone D Not Applicable Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone E Not Applicable Zone B Yes Zone E Zone B Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone E Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone E Zone D Zone B Yes Zone E Zone A Not Applicable self-employed Yes Zone E Zone E Not Applicable Artist Yes Zone E Zone E Not Applicable Zone E Zone E Zone E Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone F None of the listed zonesZ  B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone F Zone F Zone B Research or lab work Yes Zone F Zone A Not Applicable Retail / sales / service Yes Zone F Zone F Not Applicable Yes Zone F Zone A Not Applicable Yes Zone F Zone A Not Applicable Yes Zone F Zone A Not Applicable work from home Yes Zone F Zone F Not Applicable Yes Zone F Zone F Not Applicable Yes Zone F Zone E Not Applicable Yes Zone G Zone B Not Applicable Self Employed - Furniture MakerYes Zone G None of the listed zonesN t Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone G Zone A None of the listed zones Yes Zone G None of the listed zonesN t Applicable library worker Yes Zone G Zone A Not Applicable Research or lab work Yes Zone G Zone B Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone G Not Applicable Not Applicable Yes Zone G Zone F Not Applicable Yes Zone G Zone E Not Applicable Yes Zone G None of the listed zonesN  of the listed zones Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone G Zone B Not Applicable Business Owner (restaurant)Yes Zone G Zone G Not Applicable English Language InstructorYe Zone G Zone B Not Applicable ESL Teacher, Team Leader and MA studentYes Zone G Zone B Not Applicable combo student and researchYes Zone H Zone B Zone B Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)Yes Zone H Not Applicable Not Applicable industrial Yes Zone H None of the listed zonesN t Applicable teacher Yes Zone H Not Applicable Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone H Not Applicable Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone H None of the listed zonesZ  C partially retired Yes Zone H None of the listed zonesN t Applicable Stay at home momYes Zone H Not Applicable Not Applicable Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone H Not Applicable Zone B Yes Zone I None of the listed zonesN  of the listed zones Research or lab work Yes Zone I None of the listed zonesN t Applicable small business owner, logisticsY s Zone I Zone A Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone I Not Applicable None of the listed zones Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone I Zone H Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone I Not Applicable Zone B Research or lab work Yes Zone I Zone F Zone B Student (part time or full time) Yes Zone J Zone G Zone H Yes Zone J Zone A Zone B IT Yes Zone J Zone J Not Applicable Yes Zone J None of the listed zonesN t Applicable Yes Zone J Zone A Not Applicable 6 43 99 Zone F Zone F Zone F Zone G Zone G Zone G 0.8 Zone H Zone H Zone H Prop No 16 1 1 0.2 Zone I Zone I Zone I No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Walking What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Cycling What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle) What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Carpooling Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No 0.28 0.49 0.18 0.04 Proportion No Proportion No Proportion No Proportion No 0.72 0.51 0.82 0.97 Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain) What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Work : Not Applicable What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Walking Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No 0.47 0.15 0.15 Proportion No Proportion No Proportion No 0.53 0.85 0.85 No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Cycling What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle) What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Carpooling No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 0.23 0.05 0.02 Proportion No Proportion No Proportion No 0.77 0.95 0.98 No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain) What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Post secondary education : Not Applicable What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Personal errands : Walking No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 0.34 0.5 0.7 Proportion No Proportion No Proportion No 0.66 0.5 0.3 Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Personal errands : Cycling What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities: Personal errands : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle) What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Personal errands : Carpooling Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No 0.57 0.33 0.13 Proportion No Proportion No Proportion No 0.43 0.67 0.87 Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Personal errands : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain) What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Personal errands : Not Applicable What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Soclal and recreational activities : Walking Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes 0.57 0 0.63 Proportion No Proportion No Proportion No 0.43 1 0.37 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Soclal and recreational activities : Cycling What is your typical mode of transportation for: Social and recreational activities : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle) What is your typical mode of transportation for: Social and recreational activities : Carpooling Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No 0.58 0.38 0.26 Proportion No Proportion No Proportion No 0.42 0.62 0.75 Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No What is your typical mode of transportation for: Social and recreational activities : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain) What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Soclal and recreational activities : Not Applicable What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : CommentText Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No mostly bike, some walking, some skytrain with bike Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Transit in Vancouver is inefficient, expensive, and overly time consuming otherwise it would be a preferred option. Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No I would bike but my bike was stolen Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No by work I mean volunteering Yes No I am a member of the Modo car co-op. Is that 'carpooling' or single occupancy vehicle? my own vehicle is a motorcycle.... Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Work at home Yes No Yes No No No Will also take public transportation, depending on whether and distance Yes No Yes No Depends on distance. Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Use car co-op No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No When the weather is nice I bike. Yes No Err:508 No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No I'm doing an online MA program. Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No carpooling can = carsharing No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Driving = motorcycle Yes No Yes No 0.71 0 Proportion No Proportion No 0.29 1 How likely would you be to use public transit (or use it more often) if it was less crowded? mostly bike, some walking, some skytrain with bike   Transit in Vancouver is inefficient, expensive, and overly time consuming otherwise it would be a preferred option. I would bike but my bike was stolen   by work I mean volunteering I am a member of the Modo car co-op. Is that 'carpooling' or single occupancy vehicle? my own vehicle is a motorcycle....   Will also take public transportation, depending on whether and distance  When the weather is nice I bike. I'm doing an online MA program. carpooling can = carsharing 0.1 5 0.106 School 0.5 2 0.043 0.7 7 0.149 0.9 10 0.213 Recreation al total trips/ week 10 0 5 5 10 0 5 10 10 0 5 8 10 0 5 5 10 0 5 8 5 0 2 5 On average how many one way trips per week do you make for: : Work On average how many one way trips per week do you make for: Post secondary education On average how many one way trips per week do you make for: : Errands On average how many one way trips per week do you make for: Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc) 10 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 5 0 8 5 2 0 10 10 5 0 10 5 0 5 2 2 10 0 10 8 10 0 5 2 10 0 5 5 8 2 5 5 10 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 0 2 2 5 10 2 2 10 10 10 10 10 0 2 2 10 0 8 10 10 0 5 5 10 8 5 8 2 0 2 2 5 0 5 5 10 0 5 2 8 10 10 10 0 0 5 5 5 2 10 5 0 2 2 2 5 8 5 5 5 10 5 2 0 10 2 5 5 10 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 0 10 2 2 2 10 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 2 2 10 10 2 5 5 5 2 2 0 10 2 2 0 5 2 2 0 10 2 2 0 5 5 5 2 10 2 5 0 10 2 5 0 10 5 8 8 8 5 2 8 8 2 5 10 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 8 0 5 5 10 0 8 8 10 0 5 5 5 10 5 2 5 0 2 5 5 8 5 5 0 10 8 5 10 10 8 10 10 0 5 2 8 10 5 10 0 10 8 10 5 5 2 8 10 5 5 5 8 10 8 8 10 10 5 5 0 10 5 5 0 5 5 5 10 0 5 5 0 10 2 2 10 0 8 8 0 10 5 5 8 8 8 8 5 0 2 5 8 0 2 5 5 10 2 5 5 0 5 2 2 0 8 5 2 0 5 5 5 0 8 5 2 10 8 8 8 0 5 2 10 0 2 2 5 0 10 8 0 10 5 5 8 0 8 5 5 5 8 2 0 10 5 5 10 0 2 5 8 2 2 0 10 0 5 5 5 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 5 5 5 5 0 0 2 5 10 0 2 5 8 0 2 2 0 10 10 5 10 0 8 2 0 5 2 5 5 5 10 10 10 0 5 8 0 0 5 2 2 0 2 8 2 5 5 2 2 8 8 5 10 0 5 5 10 0 5 10 10 0 5 8 5 10 2 2 8 0 5 5 5 0 10 5 5 0 5 5 5 0 8 2 10 0 2 5 8 0 8 5 5 5 2 2 10 0 10 5 5 0 2 2 5 0 5 2 10 5 10 8 5 0 8 8 5 0 5 5 8 0 2 2 2 5 5 5 8 0 10 10 8 0 2 5 10 0 5 5 2 2 2 2 10 0 5 5 5 0 8 2 5 0 5 2 8 2 2 2 2 5 5 8 2 0 10 10 0 0 10 5 0 10 2 5 10 2 5 5 10 0 5 5 8 0 5 5 0 5 2 2 2 8 8 5 0 10 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 10 10 0 5 8 5 0 5 5 10 0 5 5 0 2 5 8 0.56 0.07 0.1 0.06 0.03 0.29 0.44 0.15 0 0 0 10 0 5 2 0 2 2 0 0 8 0 5 0 0 2 On average how many one way trips per week do you make for: Comment On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system: Work On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system: Post secondary education On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system: Errands 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 5 0 2 10 0 5 2 2 5 10 0 10 2 0 2 0 0 5 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 5 2 0 2 2 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 2 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 2 2 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 8 5 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 10 10 2 0 2 0 5 5 5 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 by work I mean volunteering 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 When I was in Montreal I used the BIX system extensively.0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 5 0 2 5 0 0 0 2 10 2 5 0 5 S&R includes cycling & motorcycling for pleasure0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 10 # 0 2 0.2 School 0.78 0.1 0.08 Recreation 0.35 0.51 0 11 2 10 11 2 0 2 2 0 5 2 2 5 2 2 11 5 On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system: Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc) On average how many one way car trips per week would you replace with the bike share system: Comments In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: Work In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: Errands 2 5 2 14 0 2 11 2 2 2 5 0 5 8 2 0 8 0 I don't drive a car except for rarely, so I am not sure it would replace a car trip.5 8 2 Work depends on whether appropriate facilities for the lower speed are in place - not going to take it up Smithe from the Cambie bridge5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 5 2 5 8 2 2 11 5 0 5 5 2 2 2 2 8 5 2 2 2 2 15 5 2 2 2 2 11 2 2 11 5 0 don't use car as method of transport - n/a 2 5 5 0 2 2 8 2 2 0 2 0 I don't drive cars 11 15 0 I already bike but with my own bike 0 5 2 0 2 2 2 5 2 14 2 2 14 5 0 Since I dont have a car, I wouldnt replace a car trip with bike share program, but would appreciate the option to hop on a bike downtown when busing there from other areas0 2 2 11 5 2 0 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 14 2 0 8 2 0 2 2 0 11 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 15 14 2 11 5 0 I own a bike so I am less likely to use the bike share system8 2 2 0 2 2 8 2 0 5 2 0 I don't use a car 15 5 8 11 11 2 5 2 2 2 5 0 2 2 2 15 0 10 5 5 0 11 2 8 15 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 i don't have a car 5 5 2 2 2 2 8 2 0 0 2 5 5 5 2 8 8 0 0 2 0 5 2 0 0 5 8 5 5 2 8 8 0 8 0 5 I own my own bike so it really depends on whether I have my bike with me or not8 5 2 5 2 2 15 2 0 0 0 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 2 15 5 2 8 2 5 0 2 0 5 2 2 5 11 2 I don't have a car so I don't drive anywhere but I do carpool to soccer practice0 2 2 15 2 0 I do not own a car.  I joined Car2Go but rarely use it.  The Car2Go parking at UBC is far from the building I work in on campus.8 5 0 8 2 2 5 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 5 0 5 0 8 2 2 14 2 0 0 15 2 8 5 2 5 2 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 I mostly walk 0 2 0 5 2 0 I selected 0 for all as I do not drive a car 15 2 0 8 2 2 8 5 0 2 5 0 2 2 0 5 2 2 5 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 0 2 5 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 14 14 I don't have a car, so it's not applicable 0 8 2 0 5 2 2 11 2 2 2 5 2 8 2 0 8 5 2 8 2 5 14 8 0 I don't drive a car currently. I ride my own bike. I might replace 1 personal bike trip with a bike share trip.2 5 0 Do not own a car. So 'replacement' does not apply.14 5 2 I have 2 jobs -- one at UBC, which is too far for a BIX type bicycle, although I may try to ride my speed bike, and my other job is a 4 minute walk from where I live -- a temp postion. If I had work that was within a bike share system, I wud use it.2 5 0 5 8 0 11 11 2 15 2 2 11 2 2 0 5 2 14 5 2 I would use the PBS for out of town visitors and friends2 5 2 0 2 0 0 5 2 14 2 2 14 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 5 5 8 5 0 2 0 0 0 2 8 11 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 Unsure how many I would replace.  It does provide the option of others who are with me to bicycle.  I have my own bicycle and use it as a main form of transport.5 2 0 8 2 5 8 10 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.03 0.02 0 15 0 0 0 2 0 2 11 8 2 2 0 8 5 2 0 8 5 5 0 5 0 2 In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: Post secondary education In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: Recreation and Leisure How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : Work How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : Errands 0 2 15 2 5 5 14 0 0 5 0 2 0 14 2 2 0 15 0 0 14 5 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 0 5 2 2 0 8 8 2 0 2 0 2 15 5 0 0 11 2 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 8 0 2 0 5 0 2 15 5 15 2 0 2 2 2 0 5 0 2 0 8 0 2 11 5 0 0 0 5 0 2 11 15 0 0 0 2 0 2 8 14 15 15 2 5 11 5 0 2 0 2 2 11 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 2 5 2 5 0 0 2 8 0 2 2 5 0 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 2 14 0 0 2 11 0 8 2 8 0 2 2 11 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 11 0 0 15 14 0 2 11 5 0 2 8 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 8 5 8 8 0 5 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 8 8 11 5 8 5 2 0 11 2 0 2 2 0 0 5 8 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 8 5 0 8 8 15 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 14 0 0 15 15 2 2 8 8 8 2 2 8 2 2 8 5 5 5 0 8 8 8 5 15 0 0 15 5 0 0 11 5 0 0 5 5 8 8 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 8 8 2 0 5 5 2 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 8 11 15 2 2 11 8 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 8 0 2 8 5 0 2 0 5 0 0 5 14 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 5 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 5 5 2 0 5 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 2 15 15 0 5 0 11 0 0 8 15 2 2 11 5 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 0 0 11 2 0 0 15 11 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 5 0 0 Changed values to n=K237 cell 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 11 2 2 0 5 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 8 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 2 14 5 5 5 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 5 11 5 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 0 2 15 11 11 14 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 11 0 0 5 15 0 5 0 11 0 2 0 15 0 0 0 11 0 2 5 8 0 2 11 15 2 2 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 5 5 11 0 0 14 8 0 2 0 2 0 2 5 2 0 0 11 8 0 2 8 8 0 2 11 15 0 2 0 0 8 8 5 5 11 8 8 8 8 0 15 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 5 0.7 0 2 0.1 0 8 0.1 0 5 0.5 2 2 0.7 How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : Post secondary education How many km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : Recreation and Leisure How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Winter 0 2 0.7 0 0 0.5 0 2 0.1 0 5 0.5 0 0 0.7 2 2 0.5 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.7 0 5 0.7 2 5 0.7 0 2 0.7 0 14 0.5 0 2 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.7 0 5 0.5 0 2 0.7 0 2 0.3 0 14 0.5 2 2 0.1 0 2 0.3 0 2 0.5 0 0 0.1 0 5 0.3 0 11 0.7 0 2 0.7 15 15 0.7 0 2 0.5 2 2 0.3 2 5 0.7 0 2 0.1 2 2 0.7 0 2 0.7 2 2 0.3 0 5 0.3 2 0 0.3 2 2 0.3 2 2 0.3 0 0 0.3 2 11 0.1 2 5 0.7 2 5 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.1 2 5 0.1 5 2 0.5 0 0 0.1 2 2 0.3 8 8 0.7 0 2 0.7 0 0 0.5 0 5 0.3 5 2 0.5 0 5 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.5 5 5 0.5 0 0 0.1 15 8 0.3 0 5 0.3 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5 15 2 0.5 8 8 0.7 2 2 0.1 5 5 0.5 0 8 0.7 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.3 8 8 0.5 0 8 0.1 0 2 0.5 5 8 0.7 0 2 0.3 0 2 0.7 0 0 0.5 0 2 0.3 2 2 0.3 0 5 0.3 0 2 0.1 0 2 0.7 2 2 0.5 0 0 0.7 5 5 0.1 0 0 0.5 0 5 0.3 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.7 2 2 0.7 0 2 0.5 0 5 0.7 0 5 0.5 0 0 0.7 0 5 0.3 0 0 0.1 0 2 0.5 8 5 0.3 0 0 0.5 0 5 0.1 0 2 0.7 0 0 0.3 0.1 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.7 0 2 0.7 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.7 0 5 0.7 0 5 0.7 0 2 0.7 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.7 0 2 0.7 5 5 0.1 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.7 0 5 0.7 0 0 0.1 0 2 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 2 0.7 8 11 0.5 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.7 0 2 0.3 0 2 0.1 0 8 0.7 2 2 0.3 0 15 0.1 0 2 0.5 0 2 0.7 0 0 0.3 0 2 0.5 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.1 0 5 0.3 11 5 0.3 8 8 0.7 8 11 0.5 8 0.3 0 2 0.7 0 2 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.130 0.130 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Summer How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Rainy conditions 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.7 Does not affect decision 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.227 0.178 0.292 0.114 0.151 0.168 0.205 0.195 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.7 0.9 How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : With the current helmet law (i.e. you are required to carry your own helmet) How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : With the current helmet law, but where helmet rental would be available 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.1 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.7 Does not affect decision 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.3 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.5 Does not affect decision 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.7 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.3 0.7 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.7 Does not affect decision 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.9 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.5 0.5 0.9 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.7 Does not affect decision 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.3 Does not affect decision 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.7 Does not affect decision 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.9 Does not affect decision 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.7 0.9 Does not affect decision Does not affect decision 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.7 Does not affect decision 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 Other $5 per 24 hour period like Montreal's Bixi 0.9 $20 per month 0.7 $10 per month Does not affect decision $30 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Without a law requiring helmets What is the maximum amount you would be willing to pay for access to the bike share ? What is the maximum amount you would be willing to pay for access to the bike share ? : OtherText 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.7 Other pay per use, equal to transit (less than $2.50) 0.9 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision $20 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.9 Other $90 per year and anyone in our business can use it whenever for short trips and pickups 0.9 $10 per month These prices seem higher than typical 0.9 $20 per month 0.9 $20 per month 0.9 $20 per month $20 per month 0.7 Less than $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision $30 per month 0.7 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month 0.7 Less than $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 $20 per month Does not affect decision $20 per month Does not affect decision $20 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.5 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 $10 per month 0.7 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.5 $20 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision $20 per month 0.9 $20 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 Less than $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 $30 per month 0.7 $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.5 $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.7 Other 50 cents per day 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.1 $10 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month 0.7 Other It should be free of charge just like in Paris 0.5 $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 Less than $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 Other pay per use with some free time (learn Vienna and China systems) 0.5 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision Other my reason for saying I would use it would be when friends visit, like a rental, so I would prefer a per use fee Does not affect decision $10 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month 0.7 Less than $10 per month 0.7 $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.7 $20 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.5 Less than $10 per month 0.7 $10 per month OR, payment per ride. 0.5 $10 per month 0.9 $20 per month 0.9 Other it should be free. Look at London (a bank sponsors it). 0.9 $30 per month 0.1 $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 $10 per month 0.3 $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.9 Other daily payment depending on use, so something like $2-5 for 24hours 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.5 Less than $10 per month 0.5 Less than $10 per month Less than $10 per month I would still use my own bike in most scenarios, so probably wouldn't use a bike share program more than 5 times a month $20 per month Does not affect decision $20 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.5 $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 $40 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.1 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.1 $10 per month 0.9 $20 per month 0.7 $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month Should be pay for use. 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 Other becaue I have bikes I would find it more useful if there was a membership option that required a pay by use option. 0.9 $10 per month 0.7 $10 per month 0.1 $10 per month 0.3 $20 per month 0.5 $10 per month 0.9 Other downtown hourly fee 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.7 $20 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month 0.5 $10 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month 0.9 Less than $10 per month 0.1 $20 per month 0.9 $10 per month 0.9 $20 per month 0.9 Other Unclear: annual membership $25; per use $5 Does not affect decision $10 per month 0.9 $20 per month Does not affect decision Less than $10 per month 0.5 $20 per month 0.5 20 0.152 30 0.027 40 0.011 $5 per 24 hour period like Montreal's Bixi 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 How likely are you to use the bike share if the service was included in a transit pass? (Eg. Zone transit passes or U-Pass) 0.1 0.9 pay per use, equal to transit (less than $2.50) 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 $90 per year and anyone in our business can use it whenever for short trips and pickups0.9 These prices seem higher than typical 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 It should be free of charge just like in Paris 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 pay per use with some free time (learn Vienna and China systems) 0.5 0.5 my reason for saying I would use it would be when friends visit, like a rental, so I would prefer a per use fee0.5 0.9 0.9 I would not use the bike share system at all 0.1 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.5 it should be free. Look at London (a bank sponsors it). 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.9 daily payment depending on use, so something like $2-5 for 24hours 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.9 I would still use my own bike in most scenarios, so probably wouldn't use a bike share program more than 5 times a month0.9 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 becaue I have bikes I would find it more useful if there was a membership option that required a pay by use option.0.9 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Unclear: annual membership $25; per use $5 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.9 poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions poor weather conditions road safety 1 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver (1st) 2 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver (2nd) 3 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver (3rd) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions poor weather conditions costs poor weather conditions costs poor weather conditions costs road safety costs costs road safety costs poor weather conditions road safety helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs poor weather conditions road safety road safety costs night time riding poor weather conditions road safety road safety road safety poor weather conditions costs road safety night time riding current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions road safety road safety road safety costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs costs road safety poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions night time riding poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions night time riding poor weather conditions costs night time riding current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions road safety road safety poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions road safety night time riding costs night time riding road safety road safety road safety costs costs transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions road safety night time riding road safety costs road safety costs costs costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions road safety night time riding costs road safety poor weather conditions night time riding road safety poor weather conditions costs road safety current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety night time riding costs poor weather conditions poor weather conditions night time riding poor weather conditions road safety current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions road safety road safety costs road safety road safety road safety poor weather conditions costs poor weather conditions road safety poor weather conditions road safety helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety road safety road safety costs poor weather conditions night time riding road safety poor weather conditions road safety night time riding road safety night time riding helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) road safety costs poor weather conditions road safety costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety night time riding night time riding costs poor weather conditions road safety costs night time riding road safety helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions costs road safety road safety road safety costs road safety costs costs road safety road safety costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions night time riding poor weather conditions night time riding road safety road safety poor weather conditions costs road safety road safety poor weather conditions poor weather conditions costs road safety night time riding helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions road safety costs costs road safety road safety road safety poor weather conditions road safety costs costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs costs 0.16 Proportion No 0.84 helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) Unique Id Date SubmittedIP A dressLanguage Submission KeyWhich gender do you identify with?What is your age range ### 128.189.200.19eng 22 Female 18-25 ### 154.5.177.106eng 30 Female 46-65 ### 128.189.228.70eng 64 Male 18-25 ### 128.189.207.48eng 73 Female 18-25 ### 173.180.170.127eng 97 Female 18-25 ### 128.189.221.7eng 107 Female 18-25 ### 137.82.118.134eng 126 Female 18-25 ### 128.189.224.201eng 140 Male 26-35 ### 24.83.218.40eng 147 Female 18-25 ### 174.7.175.70eng 256 Female 26-35 ### 207.6.243.73eng 270 Other or prefer not to disclose26-35 ### 207.194.129.215eng 303 Male 65+ ### 24.83.201.231eng 334 Male 26-35 ### 128.189.240.235eng 360 Female 18-25 ### 128.189.67.58eng 363 Female 18-25 ### 205.250.81.143eng 377 Female 46-65 ### 128.189.223.168eng 382 Male 18-25 ### 24.85.169.159eng 386 Male 26-35 ### 128.189.206.156eng 385 Male 18-25 ### 72.2.53.214eng 392 Male 26-35 ### 206.116.99.158eng 400 Female 18-25 ### 174.7.85.135eng 397 Male 18-25 ### 64.180.217.172eng 349 Female 18-25 ### 66.183.144.49eng 413 Female 18-25 ### 206.116.203.149eng 414 Female 46-65 ### 174.7.78.185eng 461 Female 26-35 ### 174.6.34.183eng 478 Male 18-25 ### 24.85.142.112eng 483 Male 36-45 ### 24.85.178.178eng 502 Male 46-65 ### 96.49.121.206eng 504 Male 26-35 ### 207.6.242.45eng 505 Male 36-45 ### 154.5.186.39eng 506 Male 36-45 ### 207.6.226.206eng 525 Male 26-35 ### 173.183.71.34eng 535 Female 46-65 ### 50.92.58.185eng 542 Male 46-65 ### 50.98.136.153eng 550 Male 26-35 ### 79.81.217.177eng 554 Female 36-45 ### 206.116.97.45eng 561 Male 18-25 ### 24.83.206.227eng 578 Male 26-35 ### 24.87.130.160eng 611 Male 36-45 ### 66.183.8.121eng 615 Female 46-65 ### 24.84.216.76eng 628 Female 26-35 ### 206.108.31.36eng 629 Male 46-65 ### 70.79.169.133eng 62 Female 18-25 ### 50.98.170.151eng 643 Male 46-65 ### 142.35.4.130eng 653 Male 18-25 ### 128.189.67.132eng 656 Female 18-25 ### 50.98.72.172eng 644 Male 46-65 ### 142.35.4.130eng 660 Female 18-25 ### 204.239.160.35eng 663 Female 36-45 ### 66.183.145.242eng 695 Male 26-35 ### 96.53.32.2eng 770 Male 65+ ### 24.87.129.34eng 783 Female 18-25 ### 174.6.84.87eng 789 Female 36-45 ### 97.75.213.41eng 797 Male 46-65 ### 207.6.234.47eng 803 Female 26-35 ### 173.183.126.39eng 821 Male 36-45 ### 24.85.142.195eng 823 Female 26-35 ### 50.92.30.72eng 824 Male 18-25 ### 174.7.86.68eng 830 Female 18-25 ### 205.250.164.172eng 828 Female 18-25 ### 99.199.60.92eng 837 Male 26-35 ### 142.58.82.182eng 845 Male 18-25 ### 24.87.89.145eng 862 Female 36-45 ### 70.71.103.129eng 866 Female 46-65 ### 72.2.53.214eng 942 Male 26-35 ### 24.84.136.69eng 950 Female 26-35 ### 207.81.39.223eng 962 Male 26-35 ### 24.85.37.106eng 963 Female 36-45 ### 184.70.6.18eng 791 Male 36-45 ### 24.84.137.131eng 974 Female 26-35 ### 70.79.20.42eng 975 Female 18-25 ### 24.84.137.131eng 983 Female 26-35 ### 207.6.231.226eng 1026 Male 18-25 ### 142.207.176.57eng 1131 Male 26-35 ### 24.80.174.106eng 1172 Female 26-35 ### 24.80.174.106eng 1183 Male 36-45 ### 128.189.213.41eng 1232 Male 18-25 ### 207.6.231.226eng 1352 Male 36-45 ### 207.216.221.149eng 404 Female 46-65 ### 50.98.234.168eng 531 Female 18-25 ### 151.64.29.158eng 631 Female 36-45 ### 142.35.4.130eng 652 Other or prefer not to disclose65+ ### 41.80.31.138eng 805 Female 36-45 Which of the following best describes your current occupation?Which of the following best describes your rrent occupation?  : OtherTextW uld you use the ik  share system?Please identify what zo  you live in (see map):Please identify what zone your workplace is in (see map):Please identify which z ne your post condary institute is in (see map):What i your ty ical mode of tra s ortation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Work : WalkingWhat s your typical ode of ransportation for the following activities. Please c oose all that apply:  : Work : CyclingWha s y ur typical mode of ransportation for the following activities. Please c oose all th t apply:  : Work : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle) Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B No No No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableY s No No Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone B No No No Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone B No No Yes Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B No No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone I Zone B No No Yes Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone B No Yes No Research or lab work Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Not ApplicableNo Yes No Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B Yes No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B Yes No Yes Other self-employedYes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo No No Other retired No None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNo No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone B No No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B No Yes No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone F Zone B No No No Retail / sales / service Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo No Yes Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone B No No No Other unemployed Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNo No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B Yes No No Other Web DeveloperYes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo Yes Yes Retail / sales / service Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone A No No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNone of the listed zonesNo No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone J Zone B No Yes No Other Project ManagementYes None of the listed zonesZone F Not ApplicableYes Yes No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes Yes Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone B No No No Office work No None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNo Y s Yes Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)No None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesZone B No Yes Yes Retail / sales / service Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNo Y s No Other professor Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableYes Yes No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone A None of the listed zonesNo No No Other musician No None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNo Yes No Other Film industry No None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo Yes No Other teaching Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo Yes No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B No Yes No Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Office work No None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Office work No None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableYes Yes No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B No Yes No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo No No Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNo No Yes Other semi-retired Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNo Yes Yes Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesZone C None of the listed zonesNo No Yes Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Zone B No No No Trades (eg. construction, plumbing)Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNo Yes No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesZone A Y s No No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Office work No None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo Yes No Other Entrepreneur, Business OwnerYe No  of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo No Yes Office work No None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo No No Office work No None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo Yes No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Not ApplicableYes Yes No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesZone B No No Yes Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone B No No Yes Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableZone B No No No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesZone F Zone B No No No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNo No Yes Office work Yes None of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNo No Yes Office work Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo No No Office work Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNo Y s Yes Office work Yes None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Other Engineering Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableNo Yes Yes Office work Yes None of the listed zonesZone A None of the listed zonesNo Y s No Other business ownerYes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableY s No Yes Research or lab work Yes None of the listed zonesZone F Not ApplicableNo Yes No Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesZone B Y s No No Office work No None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo Yes No Research or lab work Yes None of the listed zonesZone B Zone B Yes No No Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesY Y s No Student (part time or full time)No None of the listed zonesZone F Zone B No Yes No Research or lab work Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNot ApplicableY s Yes Yes Student (part time or full time)Yes None of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesZone B No No Yes Retail / sales / service No None of the listed zonesZone A Not ApplicableNo No No Other retired No None: I am visitingNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNo No No Retail / sales / service Yes None: I am visitingNone of the listed zonesZone J Y s Yes No Office work No None: I am visitingNot ApplicableNot ApplicableYes Yes No Other pimp/ ho No None: I am visitingNone of the listed zonesNone of the listed zonesNo No No Office work Yes None: I am visitingNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNo No Yes What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Work : CarpoolingWhat s your typical mode of ransportation for the following activities. Please c oose all that apply:  : Work : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain)What s your typical mode of ransportation for the following activities. Please c oose all that apply:  : Work : Not ApplicableWhat s y ur typical m de of ransportation for t e following activities. Please c oose all that apply:  : Post secondary education : WalkingWhat s y ur typical m d  of ran portation for e following activities. Please c oose ll that pply:  : Post econdary education : CyclingWhat s y ur ypical m d  of ran port ion for e f llowing activities. Please c ose all that pply:  : Post secondary edu ation : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle)What s y ur ypical m d  of r n port ion for e f llowing a tivitie . lease oose all that pply:  : Post secondary education : CarpoolingWhat s y ur ypical m d of r n port i n for e f llowing activiti s. leas  oose all th t pply:  : Post secondary educati n : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain)What s y ur pical m d of r n port ion for e foll wing activiti s. leas  oose all that pply:  : Post secondary ed cation : Not Applicable Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Personal errands : WalkingWhat s your typical mode of ransportation for the following activities. Please c oose all that apply:  : Personal errands : CyclingWhat s your typical mode of ransportation for the following activities. Please c oose all that pply:  : Personal erra ds : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle)What s y ur typical m de of ransportation for t e following activities. l ase c oose all that pply:  : Personal erra ds : CarpoolingWhat s y ur typical m d  of ran portation for e following activities. l ase c oose all that pply:  : Personal er ands : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain)What s y ur ypical m d  of ran port ion for e following activities. l ase c oose all that pply:  : P rs nal errands : Not ApplicableWhat s y ur ypical m d  of r n port ion for  following ct vities. l ase c oose all that pp y:  : Soclal d recreational activities : W lkingWhat s y ur ypical m d of r n port ion for  following activities. l ase c oose all th t pp y:  : So lal and r creati nal activities : CyclingWhat s y ur pical m d of port ion for  following activities. lease c oose all that ap y: : So lal and recreational activ ties : Driving (Single Occupancy Vehicle) No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No What is your typical mode of transportation for the following activities. Please choose all that apply:  : Soclal and recreational activities : CarpoolingWhat s your typical mode of ransportation for the following activities. Please c oose all that app y:  : So lal and recreational activities : Public transportation (e.g. bus or skytrain)What s your typical mode of ransportation for the following activities. Please c oose all that app y:  : So lal and recreational activ ties : Not ApplicableWhat s y ur typical m de of ransportation for t e following activities. Please c oose all that app y:  : CommentTextH w l kely w uld you be to u e publ c transit (or use it more ften) if it was less cr wded?On av rage ho many on w y trips per w k do you make fo : : WorkOn av rage how many on way rips per w ek do you ke for: : Pos  secondary education No Yes No Likely 1 to 3 4 to 6 No Yes No be great to buss to Vancouver, then be able to rent a bike to drive all around town.Faster, more convenient that waiting for busses.4 to 6 0 Yes No No Likely 0 10 or more No Yes No Does not affect my decision0 7 to 9 No Yes No 4 to 6 10 or more No Yes No 4 to 6 10 or more No Yes No Unlikely 0 10 or more No Yes No 4 to 6 0 No Yes No Does not affect my decision0 4 to 6 No Yes No 1 to 3 4 to 6 No Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No Does not affect my decision0 0 Yes Yes No 0 7 to 9 No No No 4 to 6 4 to 6 No Yes No 1 to 3 4 to 6 No No No 1 to 3 0 No No No 0 4 to 6 Yes No No 0 0 No Yes No 0 10 or more No Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 0 7 to 9 Yes Yes No 0 10 or more No Yes No 1 to 3 7 to 9 Yes Yes No 10 or more 0 Yes Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 0 10 or more No Yes No Likely 7 to 9 0 No Yes No Does not affect my decision10 or ore 0 Yes Yes No 1 to 3 10 or more No No No 0 0 No Yes No 4 to 6 0 Yes No No 1 to 3 10 or more No No No Unlikely 10 or more 0 No No No Unlikely 1 to 3 0 Yes No No 10 or more 0 Yes Yes No 7 to 9 0 No Yes No 0 10 or more No No No Does not affect my decision4 to 6 4 to 6 No Yes No Does not affect my decision10 or ore 0 No Yes No Likely 10 or more 0 No Yes No 1 to 3 4 to 6 No No No 10 or more 0 No Yes No Very Likely4 to 6 4 to 6 No Yes No 0 0 No No No Very Unlikely4 to 6 4 to 6 Yes Yes No Even if I choose to take public transport, I often bring a bike with me.1 t  3 10 or more Yes Yes No 4 to 6 0 No No No 1 to 3 1 to 3 No No No 7 to 9 0 No Yes No 10 or more 0 No No No 7 to 9 0 No No No Does not affect my decision10 or ore 0 No No No 4 to 6 0 No No No live in Dunbar area - why no zone for this area?Does not affect my decision10 or ore 0 No No No Likely 0 0 No Yes No I use a foldable bike  plus public transit to and from work. I especially use the bike on campus to get to and from meetings.10 or more 0 No No No 10 or more 0 No No Yes 1 to 3 7 to 9 No Yes No 0 10 or more No Yes No 4 to 6 10 or more Yes Yes No 10 or more 0 No No No 4 to 6 1 to 3 Yes Yes No 1 to 3 0 Yes No No 10 or more 0 Yes Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 10 or more 0 Yes Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No 7 to 9 0 Yes Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No Likely 1 to 3 10 or more Yes Yes No Likely 10 or more 0 No Yes No 10 or more 0 No Yes No Shared between in winter, summer more bike.Does not affect my decision10 or ore10 or more No No No Very Likely1 to 3 1 to 3 Yes No No 4 to 6 0 Yes Yes No 1 to 3 10 or more No Yes No Likely 0 0 No No No bring my own bike to VancouverV y Likely 0 0 No Yes No 4 to 6 1 to 3 No Yes No Very Likely4 to 6 0 No No Yes I kayak to work and school Very Unlikely 0 0 No Yes No 1 to 3 4 to 6 On average how many one way trips per week do you make for: : ErrandsOn average how m ny one way trips per week do you make for: : Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc)On average how m ny one way trips per week do you make for: : CommentTextOn average how m ny one way car t ips per week would you r place with th  bike share system: : WorkOn average how m ny one way car trips per we k would you replace with the bike share system: : Post secondary educationOn average how m ny on  way car trips per week would you replace wi h the bike share sy em: : ErrandsOn average how m ny on  way car trips per week would you r place wi h the bike share system: : Social and Recreational Activities (e.g. dining out, etc)On av r ge how ny  ay car trips per week would you r place wi h the bike share system: : CommentTextIn aver ge w ek, how far is a o  way trip (in km) fo : Work 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 I never drive.  Walk or take transit.1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 13-15 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 13-15 1 to 3 0 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 it would make it more convenient on campus when i do not have my bike0 7 to 9 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 7 to 9 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 0 0 1 to 3 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 10 or more 0 0 0 0 0 10 or more7 to 9 0 0 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 10 to 12 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 1 to 3 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 13-15 4 to 6 7 to 9 0 10 or more4 to 6 1 to 3 10 to 12 10 or more4 to 6 0 0 10 or more 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 0 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 I don't driveOver 15 4 to 6 10 or more 0 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 7 to 9 1 to 3 13-15 7 to 9 4 to 6 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 Over 15 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 7 to 9 10 or more4 to 6 0 0 0 0 I would use it only occasionally13-15 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 10 to 12 7 to 9 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 Bike share would not replace car trips as my neighbourhood (Grandview/Woodlands - Cedar Cottage) is not on the map. Bike share would then be something I might use to connect between other transit options, like getting around downtown after taking sky13-15 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 Only on trips to VancouverOver 15 7 to 9 10 or more 4 to 6 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 4 to 6 1 to 3 One trip: one way. 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 For far distances, I can partially bike and leave it at a train station.7 to 9 7 to 9 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 4 to 6 4 to 6 10 to 12 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 10 to 12 4 to 6 4 to 6 10 to 12 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 10 or more10 or more 7 to 9 0 7 to 9 7 to 9 As I am commuting from Burnaby this will depend other factors.Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 13-15 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 10 to 12 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 13-15 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 10 or more1 to 3 0 Over 15 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 13-15 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 4 to 6 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 Over 15 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 7 to 9 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 4 to 6 1 to 3 10 or more 0 1 to 3 0 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 or more10 or more 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 Over 15 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 10 or more 0 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 7 to 9 10 to 12 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 I'm a birdy 0 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 In an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: : ErrandsIn an average week, how far is a one way trip (in km) for: : Post secondary educationIn an verage week, how far is a ne way trip (in km) for: : Recreation and LeisureH man km for one trip by c r would you replac  with the bike share? : WorkH man km for one trip by car would you replace with the bike share? : ErrandsHow man km for one t ip by ca  wo ld y u r plac with the bike share? : Post secondary educationHow many km f r one t ip by car would you replace with the bike shar ? : Recreation and LeisureHow likely ould ou be to se the bi  share u er the following conditi s? : WinteH w likely ould you b to us  the bik  shar under th  followi g cond tions? : Summer 4 to 6 Over 15 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 Over 15 0 0 0 0 Very likelyVery likely 7 to 9 7 to 9 10 to 12 7 to 9 Over 15 Over 15 1 to 3 13-15 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 10 to 12 4 to 6 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely 4 to 6 10 to 12 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 7 to 9 4 to 6 Unlikely Very likely 1 to 3 13-15 4 to 6 10 to 12 0 Over 15 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely 1 to 3 13-15 10 to 12 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely 13-15 0 Over 15 0 0 0 0 Unlikely Very likely 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 7 to 9 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 1 to 3 10 to 12 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 10 to 12 Likely Very likely 4 to 6 Over 15 10 to 12 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Unlikely Very likely 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 0 0 0 1 to 3 Unlikely Likely 4 to 6 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Unlikely Likely 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 Very unlikelyLikely 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 4 to 6 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely 4 to 6 0 10 to 12 0 0 0 4 to 6 Unlikely Likely 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 Don't know/ UnsureLikely 4 to 6 Over 15 10 to 12 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Very unlikelyVery likely 1 to 3 10 to 12 1 to 3 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 10 to 12 0 13-15 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 Likely Very likely 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 13-15 10 to 12 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 Likely Very likely 7 to 9 0 7 to 9 4 to 6 0 Over 15 1 to 3 7 to 9 Over 15 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Likely Very likely 0 0 4 to 6 0 0 0 1 to 3 Very likelyVery likely 10 to 12 0 Over 15 0 0 0 0 Very likelyVery likely 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 0 0 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 13-15 7 to 9 0 0 0 0 Very unlikelyVery unlikely 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 13-15 13-15 0 0 0 0 Don't know/ UnsureDon't know/ Unsure 7 to 9 0 Over 15 0 0 0 0 Don't know/ UnsureLikely 4 to 6 4 to 6 Over 15 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely 13-15 Over 15 Over 15 1 to 3 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely 13-15 0 Over 15 7 to 9 7 to 9 0 7 to 9 Very likelyVery likely 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 Very unlikelyLikely 4 to 6 0 Over 15 0 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 10 to 12 Very likelyVery likely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Very likelyVery likely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 4 to 6 0 13-15 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 0 Very unlikelyLikely 10 to 12 0 Over 15 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Over 15 0 Over 15 10 to 12 10 to 12 0 10 to 12 Does not affect decisionDoes not affect decision 4 to 6 0 10 to 12 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 Very unlikelyLikely 4 to 6 Over 15 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Very unlikelyVery likely 7 to 9 Over 15 10 to 12 0 0 0 0 Likely Very likely 7 to 9 13-15 7 to 9 7 to 9 7 to 9 7 to 9 7 to 9 Very likelyVery likely 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely 4 to 6 Over 15 7 to 9 1 to 3 0 0 0 Very likelyVery unlikely 10 to 12 0 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 10 to 12 Unlikely Very likely 7 to 9 0 Over 15 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Very unlikelyLikely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 0 0 0 0 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely 4 to 6 0 7 to 9 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Don't know/ UnsureLikely 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 Likely Very likely 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 Unlikely Very unlikely 1 to 3 0 Over 15 0 4 to 6 0 4 to 6 Very likelyVery likely 10 to 12 Over 15 Over 15 1 to 3 0 Over 15 4 to 6 0 10 to 12 Over 15 7 to 9 0 1 to 3 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely 4 to 6 1 to 3 4 to 6 1 to 3 Over 15 1 to 3 1 to 3 0 4 to 6 0 1 to 3 0 0 Don't know/ UnsureLikely 10 to 12 10 to 12 Over 15 0 4 to 6 1 to 3 4 to 6 Very unlikelyLikely 1 to 3 0 7 to 9 Over 15 0 Over 15 13-15 Over 15 13-15 10 to 12 10 to 12 10 to 12 10 to 12 Unlikely Very likely 1 to 3 0 1 to 3 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 4 to 6 4 to 6 13-15 4 to 6 7 to 9 4 to 6 7 to 9 Don't know/ UnsureVery likely How likely would you be to use the bike share under the following conditions? : Rainy conditionsH w likely would you b to use the bike shar under the following conditions? : W th the current helmet law (i.e. you are required to carry your own helmet)H w likely would you b  to us  the bike shar u er the following cond ions? : With he current helmet law, but where helmet rental would be availableH w li ly would you b  to us  the bike shar u er the following condi ions? : Without a law requiring lmetsWhat is the maximum am unt you w uld be willing t  pay fo  access to e bik  share ?Wh t s the maximum am unt you w uld be willing t  pay fo access to th  bike shar  ? : OtherTextHow li ly ar  y  o u  the bik share if th  ervice wa incl ded in a transit pass? (Eg. Zo e transit passes or U-Pass)1 : Pleas  rank your con er s wit  a pub i bik sha syst m in Van ouver wi h 1 being the l rgest concern.2 : Please ra k y ur oncerns wit   pub ic bike sha ystem in Vancouv r wi  1 being the large t concern. transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries)night ime ridin Very likelyVery likelyDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decision$40 per month Very Likelynight time ridingtra sporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditionstransporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs road safety Unlikely Very likelyDoes not affect decisionLikely $20 per month Very Likelynight time ridinghelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) Don't know/ UnsureVery likelyVery likelyVery likely$10 per month Very Likelyroad safetynight time riding costs transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) Very unlikelyDon't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureDon't know/ Unsure$20 per month Very Likelypoor weather conditionsroad safety current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)road safety Unlikely Unlikely Likely Very likely$10 per month Very Likelyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)end of trip facili ies (e.g. show r station, lockers, etc) Very unlikelyDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)transporting mat rials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditionsroad safety Don't know/ UnsureDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decision$20 per month Very Likelypoor weather conditionscurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) Don't know/ UnsureUnlikely Very likelyDoes not affect decision$20 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)road safety Unlikely Very likelyDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionLess than $10 per monthVery Likelyend of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)costs Unlikely Likely Very unlikelyVery unlikely$10 per month Don't know/ unsurecurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)transporting mat rials (e.g. electronics, groceries) Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Likely $10 per month Likely poor weather conditionsend f tr p facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) Very unlikelyVery unlikelyVery unlikelyLikely Less than $10 per monthDon't know/ unsurepoor weather conditionsend f tr p facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) Unlikely Very unlikelyUnlikely Very likely$10 per month Very Likelyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)poor weather conditions Don't know/ UnsureUnlikely Unlikely Likely Less than $10 per monthDon't know/ unsurehelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)current cycling infrastructure ( .g. bike lan s) Unlikely Likely Does not affect decisionDoes not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)road safety Unlikely Likely Likely Don't know/ Unsure$10 per month Very Likelyroad safetypoor weather conditions Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Likely $10 per month Very Likelypoor weather conditionshelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) Don't know/ UnsureLikely Does not affect decisionDoes not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelypoor weather conditionstransporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) Likely Likely Does not affect decisionDoes not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelyroad safetyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) Likely Don't know/ UnsureLikely Very likely$10 per month Very Unlikelyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)transporting aterials (e.g. electronics, groceries) Very unlikelyDoes not affect decisionV ry likelyDoes not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelyend of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs road safety costs road safety Unlikely Don't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureVery likelyLess than $10 per monthVery Likelyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)costs Very likelyLikely Don't know/ UnsureVery likely$10 per month Likely helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)road safety Very likelyDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionOther depends on a variety of factorsVery Likelyr ad safetycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) Unlikely Unlikely Likely Very likely$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)poor we ther conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)end of trip facili ies (e.g. show r station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)current cycling infrastructure ( .g. bike lan s) Don't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureLikely Other $3 per ride or $10 per day, I will be visiting from SurreyVery Likelyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)current cycling infrastructure ( .g. bike lan s) Likely Don't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureVery likely$10 per month Unlikely road safetyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) Very unlikelyVery unlikelyVery unlikelyVery unlikelyOther Would not pay a monthly fee for accessLikely costs helm t law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)road safety Don't know/ UnsureUnlikely Unlikely Likely Less than $10 per monthVery Likelyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)costs Don't know/ UnsureUnlikely Unlikely Very likelyOther I wouldn't use it monthly so it would be single usage only.Very Likelyhelmet la  (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)roa  safety poor weather conditionstransporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) Unlikely Does not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionLess than $10 per monthUnlikely costs poor weather conditions road safetynight time riding Very unlikelyDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelyroad safetypoor weather conditions Does not affect decisionLikely Likely Does not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelycosts end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) Very unlikelyLikely Likely Unlikely Less than $10 per monthI would not use the bike share system at allpoor weather conditionroad s f ty Likely Very unlikelyUnlikely Very likelyOther Pay as you go - pay per useVery Unlikelyh lmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)end of trip facili ies (e.g. show r station, lockers, etc) Likely Very likelyVery likelyVery likely$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)costs Very likelyVery likelyDoes not affect decisionV ry likelyLess than $10 per monthDon't know/ unsurehelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)costs Very unlikelyLikely Unlikely Does not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelypoor weather conditionstransporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) Does not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decision$10 per month Very Likelyroad safetycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) Very unlikelyLikely Likely Very unlikely$10 per month I would not use the bike share system at allroad safetynight time riding Unlikely Unlikely Don't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureLess than $10 per monthVery Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)poor we ther conditions Don't know/ UnsureLikely Does not affect decisionV ry likely$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)road safety Likely Does not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionDoes not affect decisionOther 15/month Very Likelycosts night time riding Unlikely Very unlikelyUnlikely Very likely$20 per month Very Likelyhelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)end of trip facili ies (e.g. show r station, lockers, etc) Likely Very unlikelyVery unlikelyVery likelyLess than $10 per monthDon't know/ unsurehelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)poor weather conditions Unlikely Unlikely Likely Likely $10 per month Don't know/ unsureroad safetypoor weather conditions Likely Very likelyVery likelyVery likelyLess than $10 per monthor pay per ride like parking.L k ly costs poor weather conditions Unlikely Don't know/ UnsureUnlikely Likely $10 per month Very Likelypoor weather conditionstransporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) Don't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureDoes not affect decisionV ry likelyOther $2.50 per tripVery Likelycosts poor weather conditions Don't know/ UnsureLikely Very likelyDoes not affect decision$20 per month Likely costs helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) Don't know/ UnsureLikely Very likelyVery likelyLess than $10 per monthLikely helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)costs Unlikely Don't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureVery unlikelyLess than $10 per monthVery Likelycosts current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) Very likelyDon't know/ UnsureVery likelyDoes not affect decisionOther Si ce I own my own bicycles I would be interested in a pay-per-use scheme.Ver  Likelyroad safetyhelmet law (i. . he helmet is NOT includ d in the bike rental) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)e d of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental)night ime riding Unlikely Don't know/ UnsureLikely Very likely$30 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)road safety costs end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)e d of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) Don't know/ UnsureLikely Likely Don't know/ UnsureOther I use my own bike most of the time.  Thus, a fee/use rather than per month would better suit meLikely current cycling infra tructure (e.g. bike lanes)road safety Unlikely Don't know/ UnsureDon't know/ UnsureLikely $10 per month Likely current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)road safety night time ridingpoor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)road safety Likely Very likelyVery likelyVery likely$10 per month Very Likelycurrent cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)transporting mat rials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)costs end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc)costs Likely Very unlikelyUnlikely Very likely$20 per month Don't know/ unsurepoor weather conditionshelmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) 3 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver with 1 being the largest concern. current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety night time riding helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) poor weather conditions road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs road safety poor weather conditions helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) road safety costs night time riding costs poor weather conditions poor weather conditions current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) poor weather conditions end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) costs costs road safety end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions poor weather conditions night time riding road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) poor weather conditions night time riding transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) night time riding night time riding current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs road safety transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) road safety helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) poor weather conditions transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) end of trip facilities (e.g. shower station, lockers, etc) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) night time riding costs transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) current cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes) road safety poor weather conditions poor weather conditions road safety night time riding road safety helmet law (i.e. the helmet is NOT included in the bike rental) transporting materials (e.g. electronics, groceries) costs 3 : Please rank your concerns with a public bike share system in Vancouver with 1 being the largest concern. 

Cite

Citation Scheme:

    

Usage Statistics

Country Views Downloads
United States 22 26
China 7 27
Japan 7 0
Canada 4 4
New Zealand 2 0
City Views Downloads
Tokyo 7 0
Wilmington 7 0
Beijing 5 0
Vancouver 3 0
Providence 3 0
Mountain View 3 0
Shenzhen 2 26
Auckland 2 0
Stanford 2 0
Unknown 2 12
Boardman 2 0
Placerville 2 2
San Diego 1 0

{[{ mDataHeader[type] }]} {[{ month[type] }]} {[{ tData[type] }]}

Share

Share to:

Comment

Related Items