Open Collections

UBC Undergraduate Research

An Investigation into Sustainable Building Materials – Laminate Wood Cho, Sam (Sang Han); Huang, Jimme 2010

You don't seem to have a PDF reader installed, try download the pdf

Item Metadata


APSC262_SUBBuildingMaterialsWOOD_Group1_CLEAN%20FINAL.pdf [ 530.59kB ]
JSON: 1.0108212.json
JSON-LD: 1.0108212+ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 1.0108212.xml
RDF/JSON: 1.0108212+rdf.json
Turtle: 1.0108212+rdf-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 1.0108212+rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 1.0108212 +original-record.json
Full Text

Full Text

SEEDS Student Reports  1  UBC Social, Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Reports  An Investigation into Sustainable Building Materials – Laminate Wood Sam (Sang Han), Cho Jimme, Huang University of British Columbia APSC 262 April 2010  Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”  An Investigation into Sustainable Building Materials – 2.0 ABSTRACT Laminate Wood Utilizing Mountain Pine Beetle Infested Wood  Sam (Sang Han), Cho The Industrial revolution, which began during 18th century brought wealth and prosperity Jimme, Huang April 6th, 2010 to many nations, however there has been growing number of significant negative side effects. The increase human population and their activities dramatically degraded quality and quantity of the surrounding natural resources. This paper analyzes the sustainable building materials and investigates further into the implication of Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB) infected laminate wood as dominant building material for the new Student Union Building (SUB) in University of British Columbia. Some of data and numbers were referenced from dated sources (i.e. 2004), which may slightly alter the conclusion of this paper. However, this paper is written with assumption that the environment, economic, and social aspect of sustainable building materials remains constant. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to analyze and investigate the sustainable building materials for the SUB. Examination of the life cycle stages of laminate wood show significant sustainability compared to the conventional building By utilizing infected laminate APSCmaterials. 262 - Technology andMPB Society II - Section 201wood, objective of satisfying the environment, economic, and social aspect of sustainability can be achieved more Course Coordinator: Dr. Carla Paterson effectively Tutorial T2A: Patcompared Cramond to using typical SPF laminate wood.  TABLE OF CONTENTS  1.0 TITLE PAGE  1  2.0 ABSTRACT  2  3.0 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS  4  4.0 GLOSSARY  5  5.0 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS  5  6.1 SOCIAL IMPACT  6  6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT  8  6.2.1 New SUB Building  11  6.3 ECONOMIC IMPACT  11  6.3.1 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)  12  6.3.2 Local economic benefit  13  7.0 Works Cited  15  APPENDIX A  17  APPENDIX B  18  2  3.0 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS  Table 1 – Material Properties for Steel Reinforced concrete and Wood Figure 1 – Mountain Pine Beetle infected pine stands in interior B.C Figure 2 – CO2 Emission in Production of Materials for Wood and Concrete Frame Figure 3 – Energy Consumption in Production of Material for Wood and Concrete Frame Figure 4 – Growth of the Recovered Wood Market in Spain Figure 5 – Comparison between Canadian lumber mills and other North American competitors  Appendix A – Richmond Olympic Oval Building Appendix B – Forestry Sector Vulnerability in B.C.  3  4.0 GLOSSARY  Yonung’s Modulus: quantitative measure of stiffness of the elastic material. Safety Factor: indicator of the structural capacity of a system under the applied loads. Rotary kiln: an instrument that heat the material to high temperature in the continuous process. Lignin: is a complex chemical compound most commonly derived from wood, and an integral part of the secondary cell walls of plants[1] and some algae.  Vessel: Wood vessels are the thin "tubes / pipes" that transport the water in the stem (trunk) of a woody plant. They consist of many linked empty cells, the wood vessel members. These have perforations in the ends and link toghether to form long tubes, the wood vessels. Wood vessels carry water and minerals from the roots of a woody plant (a tree, for instance) to the leaves.  Laminated Wood (Engineered wood): also called composite wood, man-made wood includes a range of derivative wood products which are manufactured by binding together the strands, particles, fibers, or veneers of wood, together with adhesives, to form composite materials. These products are engineered to precise design specifications, which are tested to meet national or international standards.  5.0 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS  MPB: Mountain Pine Beetle SPF: spruce-pine-fir  4  SUB: Student Union Building LCA: Life Cycle Assessment ISO: International Organization for Standardization  6.1 SOCIAL IMPACT The most important evaluation criterion for laminate wood is to look at the social aspect. To assess the laminate wood in terms of the social perspectives, we have compared and listed the advantages and disadvantages of the using the laminate wood against the conventional reinforced concrete as the primary building materials. The evaluation of the laminate wood starts from the origin raw material of the wood, which is the mountain pine beetle wood. The primary benefit of using the mountain pine beetle wood is to demonstrate the application of sustainable design. The rejection of the mountain pine beetle due to the blue stain on the surface, which is caused by micro-  fungi, isolates the materials in using in any building applications (Lum, Byrne & Casilla, 2006). According to Ministry of Forest and Range, the mountain pine beetle has  affected more than 400 million cubic meters of wood, which is approximately 22% of the British Columbia’s merchantable lodgepole pine, since mid 1990. It has also  been estimated that more than 80% of the pine will be affected in year 2013 (Mountain Pine Beetle in B.C., 2005). Despite of the blue stain caused by the beetle, the mechanical properties of material do not change at all (Lum et al., 2006). Instead of wasting the  material, we should apply the mountain pine beetle wood in the form of laminate and utilize them in the building structure. The second advantage of using the wood over the reinforced concrete is more general acceptable natural design and form of the wood. Statistic has shown that people love the appearance of wood more than the monochromic concrete. The third benefit of using laminate wood over the conventional concrete is the creations of more job opportunity for small communities who rely their living on extraction and processing of wood materials. It has been reported that more than 800 B.C. 5  forestry workers lost their jobs due to the impacts of mountain pine beetles in the beginning of 2010 (“Pine Beetle Blamed,” 2010). The initiation of applying the mountain pine beetle timbers on the building structure in the laminate form will create more job opportunities especially for those small communities who depend their living on forestry works.  Figure 1: Mountain Pine Beetle infected pine stands in interior B.C.. The red- colored Region indicates that the “Red-attack” ( recently infected pine) Source:  Despite the benefits of the wood structure against the reinforced concrete as discussed above, the disadvantages of using the wood to replace the concrete are also evaluated in terms of social perspectives. The primary disadvantage of the wood structure comparing to the reinforced concrete is the physical properties of the materials. The young’s  6  modulus, which is defined as the stiffness of the material for both laminate wood and reinforced concrete, are illustrated in the figure 2 on next page.  As shown in figure 2, the young’s modulus of steel reinforced concrete is measured 2x higher than modulus of the wood (Data Table for: Miscellaneous Materials: Concrete: Steel Reinforced Concrete, n.d.). In addition to the less promising physical properties of wood, the varied range of safety factors of wood materials is considered as the disadvantage of laminated wood. The varied range of safety factor is due to the random hole and moisture content inside the wood structure, which also reduces the material properties of the materials. As a result, people’s life might be in risk due to the varied range of the safety factor and less promising material properties of wooden frame structure.  Materials  Young’s Modulus (GPa)  Steel Reinforced  26.0  Concrete Laminate wood  8.0-18.5  Table 1: Material Properties for Steel Reinforced concrete and Wood Source: (Data Table for: Miscellaneous Materials: Concrete: Steel Reinforced Concrete, n.d.) and (Lynnelle, 2004)  6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In terms of the environmental aspect, one of the most significant and distinctive advantages of using the wood is less emission of carbon dioxide (European Commission DG ENV, 2006). The cement is produced by grinding and intimately mixing clay and  7  lime-bearing in the proper composition and heating the mixture about 1400ºC in the rotary kiln (Callister, 2007). In the heating process, carbon dioxides are liberated. Although the drying process of the wood in the kiln heating system involves the consumption of oil and natural gas (Ruddick, 2008), the production of carbon dioxide is much less than that of concrete. Swedish and Finnish scientist has compared the net carbon dioxide emission and energy consumption of concrete and wood frame building. The result shows that the wood-based building material reduces the carbon dioxide emission and energy consumption relative to the concrete building material (Gustavsson, & Sathre, 2006). Figure 3 and 4 demonstrates the carbon dioxide emission and energy consumption in production of materials for both wood-based building frame and concrete-based building frame.  Figure 2: CO2 Emission in Production of Materials for Wood and Concrete Frame Source: (Gustavsson, & Sathre, 2006)  8  Figure 3: Energy Consumption in Production of Material for Wood and Concrete Frame Source: (Gustavsson, & Sathre, 2006)  Another very important parameter to determine whether the material is environmentalfriendly or not is recyclability. Wood is much easy to recycle comparing to concrete. The waste wood or demolition wood can be crushed, grinded and used in the pulp and paper industry. In addition, the waste wood can also be used in the heating system for residential house (The Eco-cycle of Wood and Wood-based Products, 2006). In fact, the laminate wood can be made from the waste and demolition wood. With the innovative technology, there is a growing trend of recovered wood in the global. Figure 5 shows the growth of the recovered wood market in Spain.  Figure 4: Growth of the Recovered Wood Market in Spain Source: (The Eco-cycle of Wood and Wood-based Products, 2006)  9  Although wood material is much more environmental friendly relative to the concrete, the manufacturing process of laminated wood involving binding the layer or chopped wood contains toxic chemical substance. The adhesive, either synthetic or natural in assembling layers of wood contains toxic solvents (Black, 2003). When contacting with flame, the adhesive releases solvent in the air and pollute the environment and health of the staff (Black, 2003).  6.2.1 New SUB Building The material selection becomes critical in terms of social, environmental and economical impacts. The laminate-glued wood is proposed in the choice of the materials. In terms of social perspective, the application of the mountain pine beetle wood fully demonstrates the application of sustainable design. Furthermore, the utilization of the wood materials creates more job opportunities for the forestry dependent communities. However, the less promising mechanical properties of the laminate wood comparing to the conventional reinforced concrete should be considered since students and staff walks frequently into the SUB building. Since wood is much flammable than the concrete, the safety factor of using the laminate wood has also to be considered. In terms of environment impact, manufacturing concrete building frame produces much more CO2 emission and consumes more energy than those of laminate wood. In addition, laminate wood can be easily recycled where as concrete cannot.  6.3 ECONOMIC IMPACT  There are substantial economic advantages in using Mountain Pine Beetle  (MPB) infested laminate woods for the Student Union Building (SUB). Carefully  engineered laminate wood frames are as durable as concrete and steels but also at a  10  fraction of cost of the conventional building materials (Lam et al, 2005). The “Life  Cycle Assessment” (LCA) of a wood products and conventional building materials  show comparable costs and economic value of wood structures versus concrete and steels. Utilizing the MPB infested laminate woods in SUB building can also provide economic benefits to many of the forestry dependent communities in British Columbia.  6.3.1 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is based on ISO 14040, which analyzes the  environmental impacts of a material, product or service through its entire life cycle, from raw resource or material acquisition through manufacture and use to waste  disposal (Canadian Wood Council, 2001). The LCA not only provides green building standards but also the rough estimates of the cost of resource extraction,  manufacturing, onsite construction, occupancy/maintenance, demolition, and  recycling/ Reuse/disposal of various raw materials. Compared to conventional building materials (Concrete and steel), the full life cycle of wood tend to have  substantially lower costs and less overall environment impacts. For example, there are abundant sources of standing MPB infested pines in central and interior B.C.. Acquiring raw materials (i.e. MPB infested pines) and processing them locally  reduces transportation cost and ecological footprint. Many sawmills in B.C. are  capable of processing various sizes of lumbers at an efficient rate at reasonable  prices (refer to Figure 2b) (Economics and Trade Branch, 2009). The usage of MPB  infested laminate wood products could increase productivity of on-site construction due to its lightweight and familiarity of laminate wood materials as one of a typical building materials in B.C.. Efficient productivity could also mean short labor periods, which is directly related to the cost of the construction.  Unlike the conventional building materials, the occupancy and maintenance cost is  11  dramatically less in wood structured buildings (Canfor, 2007). Wood is a better  insulator than the concrete and steel material. Wood’s cellular structures such as  lignin and vessels, limits heat transfer, which makes the indoor cooler during the summer and warmer during the winter, thus reducing energy consumption.  According to Canfor, average wood panel of same thickness traps heat 15 times  better than concrete and 400 times better than steel (Canfor, 2007). Furthermore, indoor implications (walls, ceiling, post, truss beams, and etc) of MPB Infested  laminate wood can be easily replaced at lower cost and less effort compared to the  conventional steel framed concrete indoor/internal structures. Lightweight of wood material requires less effort when demolishing while providing sustainable recycle and disposal processes compared to the heavy concrete and steels that contain  various toxins. However, when exposed to outdoor weather, the laminate wood requires more frequent replacement compared to concrete/steel structures. North American Lumber Mills Variable Cost Structure in 2007 B.C. VS North American Competitors 600  CDN$/'000 bd ft  500 *: Harvest cost includes Stumpage rate  400 300 200 100 0 US Coast  US Inland  Stumpage  US South  Harvest  BC Coast  BC Interior  Ontario*  Labor (Direct Operations & Maintenance)  Quebec*  Energy  Source: RISI  Figure 5: Comparison between Canadian lumber mills and other North American competitors. Notice that B.C. Coast has the highest variable cost in North America, whereas the B.C. Interior has the lowest.  Source: Economics and Trade branch (July 2009)  12  6.3.2 Local economic benefit B.C.’s rural community is feeling the direct impact of the U.S. recession; especially the central and interior where the majority of small communities are solely  dependent on Forestry (refer to Figure 1b)(Economics and Trade Branch, 2009).  The majority of B.C. central and interior forest products are exported into the U.S. lumber market, mill dependent communities are having difficulties due to mill production curtailments.  The U.S. housing market collapse and the shifting Canadian/U.S. currency exchange rates are severely limiting sales into the U.S. market (Economics and Trade Branch, 2009). The fibre supply in the B.C. Interior region has dropped significantly due to  the Mountain Pine beetle epidemic. According to the Natural Resources Canada, 80 per cent of the mature pine will be dead by year 2013 (Natural Resources Canada, 2009). Utilizing the MPB infested laminate woods will produce jobs in forestry dependent communities in central and interior B.C..  13  7.0 Works Cited Canadian Wood Council. (2001). Energyand the Environment In Residential Construction. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from Canadian Wood Council: Canfor. (2007, August 27). Products Lumber and Building Materials. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from Canfor: Lam et al, F. (2005, May). CFS Bookstore . Retrieved April 1, 2010, from Natural Resources Canada - Canadian Forest service: Wood Works! (2009, April 19). What's New. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from Wood Works!: Natural Resources Canada. (2009, September 1). Canadian Forest Service. Retrieved September 6, 2009, from Forest. Forward. moving beyond the pine beetle: Natural Resources Canada. (2008, February 4). Wood Markets: Annual Report 20052006. Retrieved June 2, 2009, from Canadian Forest Service: Economics and Trade Branch. (2009, July). BC Forest Sector Economic Issues. Retrieved July 30, 2009, from Ministry of Forest and Range: Lum, C., Byrne, T., & Casilla R. (2006). Mechanical Properties of Lodgepole Pine Containing Beetle-Transmitted Blue Stain. Forest Products Journal. Retrieved from  14  Mountain Pine Beetle in B.C. (n.d.). Retrieved from Pine Beetle Blamed for B.C forestry Layoffs. (2010. January 7). CBC News. Retrieved from Data Table For: Miscellaneous Materials: Concrete: Steel Reinforced Concrete. (n.d.). Retrieved from Lynnelle. (2004). Glued Laminated Timber (Glulam). Engineered Wood Products. Retrieved from William D. Callister, Jr. (2007). Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction.7th Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. European Commission DG ENV. (2006). Wood-framed Construction Requires Less Energy and Emit less CO2, Retrieved from Ruddick, J, N.R. (2008). Wood Drying. Retrieved from University of British Columbia Gustavsson, L., & Sathre, R. (2006) Variability in Energy and Carbon Dioxide Balances of Wood and Concrete Building Materials. Building and Environment, 41, 940-951. Retrieved from The Eco-cycle of Wood and Wood-based Products. (2006). Retrieved from Black, S. (2003). Getting to the Core of Composite Laminate. Composite Technology. Retrieved from Young’s Modulus. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from's_modulus Factor of Safety. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from Rotary Kiln. (n.d.). In WiKipedia. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from  15  APPENDIX A  16  Appendix A: Richmond Olympic Oval Building. Example of utilizing MPB infested pine throughout the building. Source: (Wood Works!, 2009)  APPENDIX B  17  Appendix B: Forestry Sector Vulnerability in B.C.. Dark red represents high economic dependency on forestry sector. Notice that Northern Interior communities have greater vulnerability than the Lower Mainland regions. Source: Economics and Trade branch (July 2009)  18  


Citation Scheme:


Usage Statistics

Country Views Downloads
United States 6 0
Germany 4 1
Canada 2 0
China 2 2
France 1 0
Netherlands 1 0
City Views Downloads
Unknown 7 1
Ashburn 5 0
Shenzhen 2 2
Mountain View 1 0
Vancouver 1 0

{[{ mDataHeader[type] }]} {[{ month[type] }]} {[{ tData[type] }]}
Download Stats



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items