UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

The influence of photoperiod on male courtship and nest-building in the Ring dove, Streptopelia risoria McDonald, Pam 1976

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Notice for Google Chrome users:
If you are having trouble viewing or searching the PDF with Google Chrome, please download it here instead.

Item Metadata


831-UBC_1976_A6_7 M22_4.pdf [ 4.5MB ]
JSON: 831-1.0100120.json
JSON-LD: 831-1.0100120-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0100120-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 831-1.0100120-rdf.json
Turtle: 831-1.0100120-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 831-1.0100120-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 831-1.0100120-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

THE INFLUENCE OF PHOTOPERIOD ON MALE COURTSHIP AMD NEST-BUILDING IN THE RING DOVE, STREPTOPELIA RISORIA by PAM McDONALD B.Sc, University of Toronto, 1973 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of Zoology We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA . October, 1976 © Pam M c D o n a l d , 1976 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make i t freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by hi representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permi sion. Department of Zoology The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, British Columbia Date _SL£_JjsJsiL ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to examine the influence of photo-period on the hormonal induction of courtship and nest-building behaviour in the male ring dove (Streptopelia risoria). In the f irst experiment 24 intact males were divided into two groups and held on long (16L:8D) or short (8L:16D) photoregimes for five weeks. They were then paired with intact females and their behaviour recorded. Long day males exhibited significantly higher levels of bowing and nest-soliciting. In the second experiment males were again held on long or short photoperiods. Half of each group received daily injections of testosterone propionate. Testosterone treatment eliminated dif-ferences in courtship between the two groups, but nest-building remained significantly higher in hormone-treated long day birds. The experiment was then repeated using TP-treated castrates. In this case courtship did not vary between long and short groups, although nest-building was s t i l l greater under the long photoregime. These results indicate that photoperiod alters male court-ship by stimulating endogenous androgen production. The influence on nest-building, however, appears to be least partially dependent upon some other mechanism. i i i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION T A. General Introduction and Background 1 B. General Methods 8 1. Experimental Animals . . . 8 2. Experience Prior to Testing 8 3. Housing and Maintenance 8 C. A Synopsis of Courtship and Nest-building Behaviour . . 9 1. Chasing and Pecking 9 2. Bow-cooing . . . 9 3. Male Nest-soliciting 11 4. Female Nest-soliciting 11 5. Nest-building IT 6. Copulatory behaviours 12 II. EXPERIMENTS I & la - THE EFFECT OF PHOTOPERIOD ON COURTSHIP IN INTACT MALES 13 A. Introduction 13 B. Methods 13 1. Subjects 13 2. Maintenance 13 3. Experimental Procedure 14 4. Behavioural Recordings 15 C. Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . 16 D. Supplementary Experiment la . 16 1. Introduction . 16 2. Materials and Methods 16 3. Results and Discussion 18 III. EXPERIMENT II - THE INTERACTION OF PHOTOPERIOD AND ANDROGEN TREATMENT IN INTACT MALES . 23 A. Introduction 23 B. Methods . 23 1. Subjects 23 2. Experimental Procedure . 24 3. Recording Methods 26 4. Behaviours Recorded 27 5. Statistical Treatment of Data 29 C. Results and Discussion 29 1. Initial 20 Minute Interaction 29 2. Check Sheets 29 a) Aggressive Behaviour 29 b) Courtship 33 c) Nest-building 35 i v Page 3. Latency to Egg-Laying 45 4. Testis Weight 45 D. Summary . . • 49 IV. EXPERIMENT III - THE EFFECT OF PHOTOPERIOD ON THE HORMONAL INDUCTION OF REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOUR IM CASTRATE MALES . . 53 A. Introduction 53 B. Methods . . . . . . 53 1. Subjects . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 2. Surgery 53 3. Housing 53 4. Experimental Procedure and Recordings 53 ' 5. Elimination of Data 56 C. Results and Discussion 56 1. Aggressive Behaviour 56 2. Courtship . . 56 3. Nest-building 58 4. Latency to Egg-laying 68 D. Summary 68 V. GENERAL DISCUSSION 71 A. Aggressive Behaviour 71 1. The Role of Photoperiod 71 2. The Effects of Castration and Androgen Treatment . . 71 •^•3. Evidence of Two Distinct Types of Chasing 73 4. The Possible Involvement of Gonadotropins 76 B. Courtship and Copulatory Behaviour 79 1. The Role of Photoperiod 79 2. Control of Copulatory Behaviour 80 '3. The Relationship of the Male's Photoregime to Female Behaviour and the Latency to Egg-laying . . 81 C. Male Nest-building . . . 84 1. The Influence of Daylength and Androgens . . . . . . 84 - 2 . The Relationship of Nest-building to other Reproductive Behaviours 85 3. Possible Non-gonadal Mechanisms Involved in the Control of Male Nest-building by Photoperiod . . . 86 BIBLIOGRAPHY 92 V LIST OF TABLES Table Page I The effects of intramuscular injections and intra-cranial implants of steroids on courtship and nest-building behaviour in castrated doves 2 II Comparison of the courtship displayed by intact males held on long or short photoregimes 17 III Nest-soliciting displayed over a 3-day period by intact males held on long or short photoperiods prior to pairing 19 IV The number of males performing courtship activities over the 3-day test period 22 V Schedule for treatment of experimental males in experi-ment II 25 VI Summary of the courtship activity of Hormone-treated and control males during the initial 20 minute interaction in experiment II 30 VII Occurrance of chasing/peckina in relation to the time of day , • • . 31 VIII Frequency of aggressive and courtship activities in TP-treated and control males held on long or short photoperiods 32 IX Frequency of copulatory and female courtship activities performed by pairs in which the males had been treated -with TP or oil while being held on long or short photo-periods . 34 X Nest-building activity of TP-treated and control males held on long or short photoperiods 36 / ' XI Spearman rank correlation coefficients among male and female activities, latency to egg-laying, and testis weight/in experiment II 42 XII Latency to f irst egg of pairs in which the males were treated with TP or oil while being held on long or short photoperiods 46 v i Table Page XIII Testis weight of TP-treated and control males held on long or short photoperiods 47 XIV Treatment schedule for experiment III 55 XV Frequency of aggressive and courtship activities in TP-treated and control castrates held on long or short periods 57 XVI Frequency of copulatory and female courtship activities of pairs in which the males were treated with TP or oil while being held on long or short photoperiods 61 XVII Nest-building activity of TP-treated and control cas-trates held on long or short photoperiods 64 XVIII Spearman rank correlation coefficients among male and female activities and the latency to egg-laying, in experiment III 69 XIX Latency to f irst egg of pairs in which the males castrated and then treated with TP or oil while being held on long or short photoperiods 70 v i i LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Isolation and experimental cages . . 10 2. Changes in the nest-soliciting behaviour of long and short day males over a 3-day test period 21 3. Amount of string collected in experiment II in relation to the number of days since pairing 37 4. Frequency of male nest-building in experimen II in relation to the number of days since pairing 38 5. Female nest-soliciting in experiment II in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 40 6. Time spent by the female at the nest site in experiment II in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 41 7. Frequency of male nest-building in experiment II in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 43 8. Amount of string collected in experiment II in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 44 9. Summary of the differences between the various groups of males in experiment II 52 10. Frequency of male nest-soliciting in experiment III in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 59 11. Amount of time spent by castrates at the nest site in relation to the laying of the f irst egg - 50 12. Frequency of female nest-soliciting in experiment III in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 62 13. Amount of time spent by the females at the nest in experiment III in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 63 14. Nest-building by castrates in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 65 15. Amount of string collected by castrates in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 66 v i i i Figure Page 16. Frequency of carrying by castrates in relation to the laying of the f irst egg 67 17. Frequency of chasing by castrates in relation to the time since pairing 75 18. Frequency of various reproductive behaviours in relation to the laying of the f irst egg .. 88 ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my supervisor, Dr. N.R. Liley, for his guidance at all stages of my work, and for his helpful discussion and careful criticism throughout the study. Part or all of the manuscript has benefitted from critical reading by B. Gorzalka, J.N.M. Smith and A. Perks, as well as N.R. Liley. I would also like to thank Armin for his help in obtaining and setting up equipment. This work was supported by a National Research Council operating grant to N.R. Liley, and by NRC postgraduate and UBC open scholarships to myself. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND In birds, as in other vertebrates, the endocrine system controls both physiological and behavioural changes occurring within the reproduc-tive cycle. Gcnadectomy has been shown to result in the virtual loss of reproductive activity in male and female birds of numerous species, including ducks (Collias, 1962), Japanese quail (Brody, 1969), feral pigeons (Columba livia) (Erpino, 1969) and chickens (Young, 1961); while replacement therapy using homologous hormones (androgens in males, estrogens in females) reinstates the lost behaviour patterns (see van Tienhoven. 1968, for a review). Extensive studies have been conducted concerning the hormonal control of reproduction in ring doves. Castration abolishes courtship in both males (Erickson & Lehrman, 1964) and females (Cheng, 1973). Pigeon testes, and presumably those of doves as well, contain androgens, estrogens, and progesterone (Hohne et a l . , 1967) and i t is therefore possible that male courtship is controlled by any of these three steroids. Investigations using castrates have shown that intramuscular injections and intracranial implants of testosterone propionate will restore courtship and nest-building, and that estradiol benzoate reinstates nest-oriented behaviours but not the more aggressive displays (see Table I). Progesterone alone will not induce any sexual behaviours, although it does stimulate incubation (Komisaruk, 1966). When given in 2 TABLE I The effects of intramuscualr injections (im) and intracranial implants (ic) of estradiol benzoate (EB), progesterone (Prog), and testosterone propionate (TP) on courtship in castrated male doves. (CH, chasing; BC, bow-cooing; NS, nest-soliciting; NB, nest-building; 4, , suppression of androgen-induced behaviour; +, induction cf the behaviour in castrates; failure of the hormone to induce the behaviour in castrates; plasma E, Prog T, plasma levels observed in intact doves) CH BC NS NB references castration EB (im) EB (ic) plasma E Prog (im) Prog (ic) plasma Prog TP (im) TP (ic) plasma T + - + + + + - + not detectable (<25 pg/ml) My constant at 1.27 mg/ml .11 1.01 (ng/ml) Hutchison Erickson Cheng & Lehrman Martinez-Vargas Hutchison Korenbrot et al. Erickson et a l . Hutchison* Komisaruk** Silver et al. Cheng & Lehrman Martinez-Vargas Hutchison Barfield Hutchison Hutchison et al. 1967 1970 1975 1974 1976 1974 1967 1976 1967 1975 1975 1974 1970 1971 1967 1975 * castrates with ic TP implants ** intact males 3 conjunction with testosterone, either endogenous or exogenous, progesterone appears to antagonize the androgen, suppressing aggressive courtship (bow-cooing) (Komisaruk, 1966; Erickson et a l . , 1967). Since estrogen has not been detected in the plasma of male doves by radioimmunoassay (Korenbrot et a l . , 1974) it appears that testosterone is primarily responsible for the control of male courtship and nesting activity. This is supported by the observations that testosterone is present in the plasma in increasing concentrations as the cycle progresses (Hutchinson & Katongole, 1975) and is accumulated in the cell nuclei of the hypothalamus and pituitary in castrates (Zigmond et a l . , 1972; Stern, 1972). The hormonal induction of behaviour is not an isolated process, but an integral step in the integration of external stimuli and behaviour. The effects of various factors on sexual activity are mediated by the endocrine system, either through changes in hormone production or changes in the influence of hormones on behaviour. A major factor which is known to alter hormonal activity is photoperiod, which has been shown to control reproduction in numerous bird species (see reviews by Farner, 1970a & 1970b; Imrnelmann, 1971; Lofts & Murton, 1968; Wolfson, 1970). Long daylengths appear to stimulate development of the reproductive system by means of the pituitary-gonad axis. A change from short to long daylengths causes an increase in gonadal growth and a rise in plasma FSH, LH and testosterone levels in both immature (Follett,'1975) and mature (Follett, 1976) quail, and an init ial increase in plasma LH and testis size in canaries (Nicholls, 1974). 4 Synthesis and release of gonadotropins in quail (Follett & Farner, 1966) and FSH levels in turkeys (Godden et a l . , 1975) are greater on long days than short. These shifts in pituitary function seem to be controlled by the hypothalamus. Variations in the hypothalamic neurosecretory system have been observed in several bird species in response to changes in photo-period (see Kobayshi & Wada, 1973; and van Tienhoven, 1968, for reviews) and lesions of the median emminence have been shown to abolish the photoperiodic response of the testes in ducks and white-crowned sparrows (van Tienhoven, 1968; Farner & Follett, 1966; Stetson, 1969). Light-induced changes in testicular weight appear to be related to variations in testosterone secretion. In tree sparrows (Passer  montanus) and green-winged teals (Anus crecca), for example, cycles of testis weight occurring under natural daylengths are paralleled by fluc-tuations in both total testosterone production and production per average testis weight (Lofts, 1975). It thus seems logical to assume that long photoperiods cause an increase in gonadotropin synthesis and release— possibly as a result of changes at the hypothalamic level--and that these in turn result in increased testis size and steroid production." Since male courtship has been shown to be.dependent upon the presence of gonadal hormones, photoperiodic effects on the hormonal control of male behaviour may be limited to changes in androgen levels as a result of stimulation of the hypothalamo-hypophyseal-gonad axis. This appears to be the case in the Japanese quail. In both males and females held on short days (8L:16D) sexual behaviour drops to the level 5 of long day (16L:8D) gonadectomized birds (Adkins, 1973; Adkins & Nock, 1976). Androgen treatment of either SD males or castrates causes an increase in sexual activity (Beach & Inman, 1955; Sachs, 1969) as does estrogen treatment of SD or ovariectomized LD females (Adkins & Adler, 1972; Adkins & Nock, 1976). Because the gonads seem to be nonfunctional in quail held on short days, and because no differences in behaviour were observed between SD and gonadectomized LD birds in response to hormone treatment, i t has been concluded that in quail photoperiod functions solely via altered steroid concentrations (Sachs, 1969; Adkins & Nock, 1976). Evidence does exist, however, indicating that in some species the effect of photoperiod cannot be entirely explained by changes in steroid levels. For example, castrated male sticklebacks which have been treated with methyl-testosterone are more likely to engage .in nest-building acti-vities i f they have been held on long (16L:8D) rather than short (8L:16D) daylengths (Hoar, 1962). In female domestic canaries, nest-building activity is greatly reduced by ovariectomy (Steel & Hinde, 1972). Estradiol injections will increase gathering in ovariectomized females exposed to long daylengths but have l i t t l e effect under short photoperiods (Steel & Hinde, 1972; Hinde et al . , 1974). Since gonadotropins are not directly involved (Hinde & Steel, 1975) i t appears that photoperiod may be altering responsiveness to the exogenous estrogen. Liley has found evidence of a similar effect in ring doves. Females held under long days (16L:8D) lay eggs in response to male courtship sooner 6 than females held under short days (8L:16D). In addition, LD birds engage in more nest-soliciting and nest-building (Liley, 1976). Treatment with estrogen and/or progesterone indicates that these behavioural differences persist even in the presence of high levels of exogenous hormone (Liley, in press). The birds used in this study were intact, however, and the endogenous hormone contribution was both unknown and uncontrolled. All three of these studies indicate that photoperiod in some way alters the effectiveness of exogenous hormone treatment. In the absence of information concerning plasma and hypothalmic hormone levels it is impos-sible to determine the point at which photoperiod is having its effect. The purpose of the present study was to examine what Hinde and Steel (1975) refer to as the dual role of photoperiod, as it relates to the reproductive behaviour of male ring doves. In other words, an attempt has been made to discover the effect of daylength, and to then determine whether this effect is the result of photic stimulation of the pituitary-gonad axis resulting in increased steroid levels, alteration of the effectiveness of hormones in inducing reproductive behaviour, or a combination of the two. Of particular interest is the question of whether the hormonal induction of behaviour is a relatively stable process or one which fluctuates as a result of interaction with the environment or endogenous physiological changes. The f irst problem to be considered was the actual effect of daylength on intact males. Ring doves have been domesticated for a long period of time, and their presumed ancestors inhabit regions close to the equator where annual variations in daylength are small (Goodwin, 1967; Vaurie, 1961.; Parkes, 1973). It has therefore been suggested that they are unresponsive 7 to photoperiod (van Tienhoven, 1968). Certainly the effect is not nearly so dramatic as that seen in many temperate species, but evidence does exist suggesting that reproductive activity declines during periods of short daylength. Whitman (1919) noted that the intervals between laying increased in late fal l and winter. Goodwin (1952) states that his doves, which were held at semi-liberty in England, usually bred from late February or March to early September. In Australia birds kept in outdoor aviaries ceased breeding in May and began again in July (Davies, 1974a). Although this indicates that ring doves stop breeding during periods of short daylength, i t must be recognized that corresponding low temperatures could be the controlling factor. Liley (1976) found that in winter long daylengths were associated with significantly higher levels of female courtship and egg production than short daylengths. And finally, preliminary results reported by Hutchison (1976) suggest that males held on 6L:18D for 30 days exhibit much lower levels of aggressive courtship than do males held on 14L:10D. In the f irst experiment, then, male doves held on long or short photoperiods were paired with receptive females during 20 minute tests and their behaviour compared. The second and third experiments examined the interaction between daylength and exogenous testosterone. Intact (Exp. II) or castrated (Exp. Ill) males received daily injections of testosterone proprionate (TP) for 5 weeks while being held on the two light cycles. During the 2 weeks following the treatment period each male was paired with a female for 6% hours/day, and observed at various times throughout the day. 8 B. GENERAL METHODS 1. Experimental Animals All of the experimental subjects were the offspring of ten breeding pairs of ring doves (Streptopelia risoria) obtained from Rutgers University in the spring of 1974. At between three and four weeks of age the young were removed from their parents and held in large indoor/outdoor aviaries in mixed groups ranging from 40 to 80 birds. Between 8 and 14 months of age they were sexed by exploratory laparotomy and banded. 2. Experience Prior to Testing The reproductive experience of individuals was unknown; undoubtedly most mature birds had taken part in some degree of courtship, although the absence of nesting sites prevented the successful hatching of eggs and subsequent participation in parental activities. However, since their ages varied—and possibly their state of reproductive development—all birds were allowed to breed in the laboratory before being used. Pairs were placed in cages containing nesting material (pine needles or string) and a nest bowl, and were allowed to build a nest and lay two eggs, which were then checked to insure that they were ferti le. Following this initial breeding experience the birds were returned to the aviaries until needed. 3. Housing and Maintenance Aviaries: The doves were held in three aviaries, each consisting of a long room (6.2x3.6x2.4 m) connected to an enclosed outside area (3.8x3.9x2.3 m). Holding Cages: Experimental birds were held in small isolation 9 cages made of aluminum and wire mesh. Each cage measured 43x43x43 cm and was equipped with a perch, water tube and feeder (see fig. 1). Experimental Cages: During experiments the birds were placed in aluminium cages measuring 120x45x65 cm. Each cage was fitted with an opaque partition dividing i t into halves, 2 perches, 2 water dishes, and a feeder. A glass nest bowl was suspended 15 cm above the floor on the left side. In experiments II and III two of the eight cages had 10 cm wide shelves attached to the ends 30 cm above the floor instead of perches. C. A SYNOPSIS OF COURTSHIP AND NEST-BUILDING BEHAVIOUR The courtship behaviour of ring doves has been discussed at length by several authors (see Lovari & Hutchinson, 1975; Liley, 1976; Miller & Miller, 1958; Hutchinson, 1970a). The following is a brief summary of the activities recorded in this study. 1. Chasing and Pecking When a pair of ring doves is f i rst placed together the male usually rushes towards the female, his head held low and his rump feathers ruffled. If she flees he continues to chase her, frequently pecking her on the head and neck. This display is usually accompanied by a 'kah' or 'laughing' cal l . 2. Bow-Cooing Chasing rapidly gives way to the 'bow-coo' in which the male stretches his neck upward, then bows forward with his bi l l pointing towards the ground, uttering a characteristic cooing sound. The underlying moti-vation of the bow-coo has been the subject of considerable speculation Fig. 1 Isolation and experimental cages. 11 (see Lovari & Hutchinson, 1975; Davies, 1974b; Goodwin, 1956a; Lofts & Murton, 1973), but i t is generally agreed to be indicative of a mixture of aggressive and sexual tendencies. 3. Male Nest-Soliciting Following repeated bow-coos the male usually moves to a corner of the cage or to the nest bowl and begins nest-soliciting; standing or squat-ting in an oblique position, his head close to the ground, he vibrates both wings simultaneously, intermittently uttering 'nest-coos'. Various forms of this behaviour occur, including oblique posturing in the absence of either cooing or wing-flipping, or both. In the following tests nest-soliciting was defined by the presence of both the oblique stance and wing-flipping. 4. Female Nest-Soliciting N Soliciting by the male appears to attract the female--she even-tually approaches him and begins to spend more and more time in his vicinity, often engaging in allopreening. After a period which may vary from a few minutes to several days the female also begins to nest-solicit. Initially this el icits an aggressive response from the male, who pecks at her head and neck. Nest-soliciting by the female is also variable; wing-flips and/or nest coos in the absence of the oblique posture being common. For this reason it was identified simply by the occurrence of wing-flipping at the nest. 5. Nest-Building As the female becomes firmly attached to the nest site male soliciting gives way to nest-building. Building is a co-operative effort: 12 following varying amounts of time spent picking up and dropping nesting material (handling), the male carries a piece to the female, who remains at the nest. She takes the material from the male and tucks i t beneath her. However, this division of labour is not strict (see White, 1975a) and females may occasionally pick up material and carry it to the nest. 6. Copulatory Behaviours Behaviours associated with copulation usually occur during the afternoon. The female approaches the male and pecks gently at the base of his b i l l , while rhythmically flipping her wings (begging). The male then takes her bi l l in his and appears to regurgitate food, which she swallows (billing). After one or several bouts of begging and billing the female crouches, her upper wings extended. This is followed either by a repeti-tion of the above sequence, or by mounting and copulation. Crouching may also occur shortly after a pair is placed together, in response to chasing and bowing by the male. In such cases begging and billing are absent and the crouch is rarely followed by mounting. Cheng (1973a) calls this form of crouching an 'aggressive crouch' as i t may be accompanied by 'kah' calls. But similar female behaviour is also seen during vigorous attacks by the male (cf. 'cringing' in pigeons (Akerman, 1966)) and the 'fl ight stance' in doves .((Miller & Miller, 1957)), both of which are classified as escape responses.), and appears to inhibit both chasing and pecking by the male. In this context the early crouch appears to serve as an appeasement display rather than an aggressive behaviour, which could also explain its appearance in response to bow-cooing and chasing at the beginning of an encounter. CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTS I & la - THE EFFECT OF PHOTOPERIOD ON COURTSHIP IN INTACT MALES A. INTRODUCTION As was mentioned earlier, there has been no detailed study examining the effect of daylength on the behaviour of male ring doves. The present study was undertaken in order to measure differences in court-ship between individuals held on different photoperiods. Male doves were exposed to long or short light cycles for five weeks. They were then tested by pairing them for 20 minutes with a female which had been held on an intermediate light cycle. Each male was given three tests at two-day intervals. B. METHODS 1. Subjects The subjects were 24 mature male doves which had been treated as described in section IB. They were moved from the aviaries into holding cages on July 7, 1975 (one bird became i l l and was replaced on July 12). Twelve mature females used as stimulus birds were moved into the laboratory on July 28. 2. Maintenance The 24 experimental birds were divided between two rooms, each of which had controlled lighting. Each room contained a rack of 12 holding cages in which individuals were visually isolated. There was no apparent 13 14 transfer of sound between the two rooms. Lighting was supplied by two 40 watt fluorescent tubes mounted 1.7 m in front of each rack of cages. The average light intensity in the centre of the cages was 390 lux (range: 350-425 lux). One room was placed on a light schedule of 16L:8D (light:.8:00 - 24:00), the other on 8L:16D (light: 8:00 - 16:00). Food and water were available at all times. The temperatures in the two rooms varied widely, with the short day room averaging .1° C above the long day room (LD room: 21± 3° C; SD room: 22± 3° C). The stimulus females were held in groups of four in test cages, visually isolated from any males, for 3 weeks. The cages were i l -luminated by fluorescent lights on a 14.5L:9.5D cycle. 3. Experimental Procedure The males were held on 16L:8D (L) or 8L:16D (S) light schedules for 5 weeks. Testing began on August 18, and continued for 9 days. A male and female were placed on either side of a partitioned test cage in one of the two holding rooms, and allowed to adjust for half an hour. Each cage was supplied with a nest bowl and 50 pieces of string, approxi-mately 12 cm long. At the end of the adjustment period the partition was removed and a record made of the ensuing courtship. After 20 minutes the partition was replaced and the male returned to his holding cage. The birds being tested were visually isolated from those in the holding cages, but sound transferred freely between them. In order to balance the auditory stimuli received by the isolated males the room in which the tests were performed was alternated, even though auditory 15 stimulation, which has a marked effect on the female reproductive system (Lott & Brody, 1965; Lott et a l . , 1967; Lehrman & Friedman, 1969) does not appear to affect the breeding behaviour of males (Nottebohm & Nottebohm, 1971). Each male was given three tests at intervals of three days. Eight males, four from each of the two rooms, were tested every day, between 9:00 and 13:00. Due to limited space each female was used for two consecutive days (a total of 8 trials, 4 with LD males and 4 with SD males). The females had been separated from any males for 3 weeks prior to testing, while being held on a constant light cycle in order to minimize differences in responsiveness. Because the order of testing was varied so that each male was paired with 3 different females it is assumed that females provided the males from the two experimental groups with a relatively 'constant' stimulus. 4. Behavioural Recordings The following behaviours were recorded on a 20 channel Esterline Angus event recorder at a chart speed of 3in/min.: 1. chasing 2. pecking 3. bow-cooing 4. male nest-soliciting 5. begging 6. bill ing 7. crouching 8. mount/copulation 9. male nest-building 10. female nest-soliciting 11. female nest-building 16 C. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Of the behaviours recorded only the five listed in Table II were observed in the majority of birds. This is not surprising as copulatory and nesting activities occur during more advanced stages of the reproduc-tive cycle. Courtship does appear to be influenced by photoperiod; L birds showed higher levels of both bow-cooing and male nest-soliciting. Aggressive behaviour did not differ significantly between the two groups. The behaviour of the females seemed to relate more closely to the individual involved than to the type of male encountered. Three females accounted for two-thirds of the tests in which female nest-soliciting was observed, while three others did not display soliciting with any males. D. SUPPLEMENTARY EXPERIMENT la 1. Introduction Although the previous experiment gave a good indication that day-lengths affected male courtship, i t dealt only with responses occurring during the f irst 20 minutes of an encounter. In order to gain some idea as to whether or not the observed differences between the two groups persist over a longer time interval, experiment I was followed by a supplementary test covering a 3-day period. 2. Materials and Methods Upon completion of experiment I all of the males were retained in their holding cages. At 8:30 on the following day 24 experimentally naive females were moved from the aviary and one female placed in each cage, along 17 TABLE II Summary of the courtship displayed by intact males held on long or short photoregimes. Chasing, male soliciting and female soliciting are based on the number of seconds spent performing the given activity per 20 minute test; pecks and bow-coos are based on the number of events per 20 minute test. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD n=12 LONG PHOTOPERIOD n=12 P* Mean range mean range chasing 28 (0-207) 11 (1-39) ns pecks 13 (1-92) 8 (0-100) ns bow-coos 9 (0-26) 32 (0-83) <.05 o soliciting 455 (0-874) 776 (560-1069) <.01 9 soliciting 176 (0-409 143 (0-289) ns * based on Mann-Whitney U-test between means,. 1-tailed for long>short. with a nest bowl and 50 pieces of string. The lights in the two rooms were switched to 12L:12D (8:00 - 16.00) so that both groups of males spent the same number of daylight hours with the females. Recordings of the same behaviours as in experiment I were made using a check-sheet divided into 15 sec. intervals. Each row of 3 cages was observed for 2 minutes (i.e. a total of eight 15 sec. intervals) at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 hours after the onset of light. An activity was scored as having either occurred or not during each interval. At the end of 3 days the females were removed and the lights returned to the original cycles. 3. Results and Discussion Male nest-soliciting was displayed more frequently by L birds throughout the 3-day period (Table III). Soliciting shows a marked diurnal variation under both light regimes (see also Martinez-Vargas & Erickson, 1973), peak periods occurring early in the morning (fig. 2), but was higher in L birds than in S birds throughout the day. More L males were observed bow-cooing and pecking, although the total number of occurrences recorded was very small. Significantly more L males exhibited nest-soliciting on days 2 and 3 (Table IV). No other behaviours were recorded at levels high enough to analyse. It thus appears that photoperiod not only affects courtship behaviour seen at the beginning of an encounter but also influences reproductive activities over an extended period, long days resulting in an increase in courtship displays. TABLE III Nest-soliciting displayed over a 3-day period by intact males held on short or long photoperiods prior to pairing. Values are based on the total number of 15 sec. intervals/day during which soliciting was observed (max. possible = 48). SHORT LONG pj^  n=12 n=12 Day 1 9 a 28 <.01 (0-24)b (17-45) Day 2 4 16 <.01 (0-14) (3.27) Day 3 5 16 <.01 (0-13) (6-27) * based on Mann-Whitney U-test between means, 1-tailed for long > short a mean b range Fig. 2: Changes in the nest-soliciting behaviour of long and short day males over the 3-day test period, as measured by the number of intervals during which soliciting was observed. Open bars represent long day males, solid bars represent short day males. NEST-COLICITING INTERVALS/2 MIN TEST 21 o I ro J oo _ i tn _J I 0 1 0 1 fesisg^^^ESss^^SKS'ssiiiaa" O O i r (V) o CO TABLE IV The number of males observed performing courtship activities during the 3-day test period. Birds were held on short and long photoperiods prior to testing. SHORT LONG n=12 n=12 1 ns chasing 3 pecking 2 7 .05 bow-cooing 1 6 .05 nest-soliciting: day 1 9 12 ns day 2 6 12 .05 day 3 ,6 12 .05 * based on Fisher Exact Probability Test, 1-tailed for long > short (Siege!, 1956). CHAPTER III EXPERIMENT II - THE INTERACTION OF PHOTOPERIOD AND ANDROGEN TREATMENT IN INTACT MALES A. INTRODUCTION In order to determine whether the differences seen in experiment I were due to changes in hormone levels or to some other mechanism, intact birds held on long and short days were treated with testosterone propionate. The levels of exogenous hormone administered were high, and i t was assumed that gonadotropin secretion would be inhibited, reducing gonadal steroid production to a minimum and thereby eliminating any effect of endogenous androgen. If the effect of photoperiod on male courtship is due to changes in testosterone levels, then no differences would be expected between the two hormone-treated groups, both of which would presumably experience similar high androgen concentrations. If, on the other hand, photoperiod serves to alter responsiveness to testosterone, then hormone-treated males held on long daylengths would be expected to court more actively than those held on short daylengths. B. METHODS 1. Subjects The 24 males from the previous experiment were used again. The 24 stimulus females, which had been treated as described in section IB, had no prior experimental experience. 23 2. Experimental Procedure Light cycles and housing were the same as those described for experiment I. The 12 males in each room were randomly divided into 3 groups of 4 each. In each of these groups 2 birds were injected daily with .2 mg testosterone propionate in .1 ml peanut oil (ST and LT birds). The remainder were controls, receiving .1 ml of the vehicle each day (SC • and LC birds). Injections were administered intramuscularly, alternating between the right and left pectoral muscles. Treatment began 2 weeks before testing commenced and continued through the 2 weeks of the tests. Treatment and testing of the 3 sets of birds in each room was staggered, the f i rst beginning on October 20, 1975 and the next two sets following at 2 week intervals (see Table V). Following 2 weeks of hormone treatment each male was paired with a female. Prior to testing the females were kept visually isolated in holding cages on a light cycle of 14L:10D (8:00 - 22:00) for two weeks in an attempt to insure that they were in a similar reproductive condition. At the beginning of the test period each female was moved into the side of a partitioned experimental cage containing the nest bowl. Males were moved into the opposite side of the cages and 50 pieces of string, 12 cm long, were scattered on the floor on the male's side. If during the day most of the string was removed from the floor of the cage more was added. The eight test cages were suspended along the wall of the experimental room in two rows of 4 cages, and were visually isolated from each other. There was no transfer of sound between this room and either of the holding rooms. Males were moved into the test room at 8:30 each day. On day 1 25 TABLE V Schedule for treatment of experimental males in experiment II. Birds were held under short (S) or long (L) photoperiods. Controls (C) were administered .1 ml peanut oil daily (0), while experimental (T) received daily injections of .2 mg TP in .1 ml peanut o i l . Oct 20-Nov 2 Nov 2-Nov 17 Nov 17-Nov 30 Dec 1-Dec 14 SC (2) 0 1 OP ST (2) A I A P LC (2) 0 I OP LT (2) A I A P SC (2) 0 1 OP ST (2) A I A P LC (2) 0 1 OP LT (2) A I A P SC (2) 0 1 OP ST (2) A I A P LC (2) 0 1 OP LT (2) A I A P I isolated P paired for 6h hrs/day during test period (n) number of birds the partitions in each cage were removed for 20 minutes, one at a time, between 9:00 and 11:40, and then replaced. At 11:45 all partitions were removed. They were replaced at 3:30 and the males injected and returned to their holding cages in the short and long day rooms. The females remained in the nest-bowl side of the experimental cages. The light schedule in their room was 14L:10D (7:30 - 17:30). From days 2-14 the same procedure was followed except that all the partitions were removed at 9:00 or 9:15 and not replaced until 3:30. Thus all of the males interacted with the females for the same length of time each day, and s t i l l experienced the two experimental light cycles. At the same time all females exposed to the males were maintained on the same 14L:10D schedule. The males were killed or castrated on day 15 and their testes weighed. 3. Recording Methods Because of indications in experiment la that the effects of photoperiod are not restricted to init ial courtship behaviour, i t was decided that recordings should be made measuring reproductive activity over a 2 week period. Due to diurnal variations in behaviour short records were made throughout the day. The initial 20 minute encounter on day 1 of each pair was recorded on an Ester!ine Angus 20 channel event.recorder at a chart speed of 3 in/min. At 13:00 and 15:00 on day 1, and at 9:00, 11:00, 13:00, and 15:00 on days 2-14 15 minute check sheets divided into 15 second intervals were used. Four pairs of birds were observed at a time from behind a blind. The order in which the two sets of 4 pairs were observed was alternated (i.e. set A was checked at 9:00, 11:00, etc. on day 2; 9:15, 11:15, etc. on day 3). Each set of birds contained one individual from each treatment group (ST; LT; SC; LC). Any eggs laid were removed as soon as they were noticed, and the date recorded. In order to minimize differences in the stimuli produced by the nest, the string was taken from the nests at the end of each day, counted, and scattered on the floor on the opposite side of the cage. Any pieces lying directly beneath the nest had presumably been carried over the 1" high partition holder which lay across the centre of the cage, and were therefore also counted. 4. Behaviours Recorded The behaviours recorded on the event recorder were the same as in experiment I. When using the check sheet most behaviours were scored if they were observed within a 15 sec. interval, although some activities, such as carrying, were noted every time they occurred. The activities recorded were as follows: a) chase/peck (no. intervals) - Because chasing and pecking occur in close temporal association, bouts of one rapidly giving way to the other; and because the underlying moti-vation of both appears to be primarily aggressive, these two behaviours have been grouped together. b) bow-coos (no. intervals) c) male-nest soliciting (no. intervals) d) male at-nest (no. intervals) - This is a measure of the total amount of time spent by the male at the nest site, 28 and includes sitting, allopreening, and soliciting at the nest. male carrying (no. events) male nest-building (no. intervals - This is a measure of the total amount of time spent nest-building. It includes time spent handling or carrying string. In order to account for short breaks between these two behaviours during which the male returned from the nest to the floor, or appeared to search among the pieces of string before actually handling them, any intervals of less than 30 seconds occurring between handling and/or carrying are also included. female nest-soliciting (no. intervals) female at-nest (no. intervals) - This was recorded in the same manner as male at-nest. female carrying (no. events) active female nest-building (no. intervals) - This is a measure of the amount of time which the female spent perform-ing 'male-type' building, and was measured in the same way as male nest-building. It does not include sitting at the nest and tucking material bought by the male into the nest. begging (no. events) -billing (ho. events) sexual crouch (no. events) - This category includes only those crouches preceded by begging and bill ing. Mount/copulation (no. events) submissive crouch (no. events) - This includes crouches occurring within the f i rst 2 minutes after the partition was removed and preceded by chasing and/or bowing. 29 5. Statistical Treatment of Data All of the behavioural recordings, as well as the amount of string gathered were analysed using a Kruskal-Wall is one-way analysis of variance (Siege!, 1956). If the over-all differences were significant then selected pairs were compared (Kolstoe, 1973) using the Mann-Whitney U-test (Siege!, 1956). Testis weight was analysed with a two-way ANOVA followed by a Newman-keul test (Armitage, 1971). C. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1. Initial 20 minute Interaction Only male nest-so!iciting, bowing, chasing, and pecking were seen in substantial numbers during the f irst 20 minutes of courtship (Table VI). No significant differences were observed for any of these activities. Testosterone appeared to diminish aggressive behaviour and increase court-ship. The frequencies of male soliciting and bowing were slightly higher in LT than in ST birds. Bowing also appeared to be greater in LC than in SC males. 2. Check Sheets a) Aggressive behaviour Chasing and pecking occurred primarily and in the early morning, when the pair were placed together (Table VII). Although the differences among the groups were not significant, TP appeared to diminish aggressive behaviour. Longer daylengths were associated with a higher frequency of attacks (Table VIII). TABLE VI Summary of the courtship activity of hormone-treated and control males during the initial 20 minute interaction in experiment II. Chasing and soliciting are based on the number of seconds spent performing the activity per 20 minute test; pecking and bow-cooing are based on the number of events per 20 minute test. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD Control n=6 TP n=6 LONG PHOTOPERIOD Control n=6 TP n=6 chasing 50 (0-137) 21° (0-60)1 45 35 (17-157) (4-109) ns pecks 11.5 (1-22) 4.5 (0-18) 9.5 12.5 (1-23) (0-34) ns bow-coos 17.5 36.5 (6-26) (11-105) 23.5 39.5 (8-55) (0-73) ns soliciting 410 338 (223-661) (132-732) 403 519 (60-667) (120-805) ns * based on Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA (Siefel, 1956) a mean b range 31 TABLE VII The total number of 15 second intervals in which either chasing or pecking were observed in relation to the time of day. Males were treated with TP or oil while being held on long or short photoperiods. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD Control TP n=6 n=6 9:00 75 39 11:00 6 0 13:00 3 1 15:00 2 0 LONG PHOTOPERIOD Control TP Total n=6 n=6 72 63 249 1 8 15 20 6 30 3 6 11 TABLE VIII The frequency of aggressive and courtship activities in TP-treated and control males hel on long or short photoperiods. The results are based on the total number of intervals during which the activities were observed over the 14 day test period. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD LONG PHOTOPERIOD ANOVA* U-TEST Control TP Control IP n=6 n=6 n=6 n=6 chase/peck 14a 7 16 14 ns (4-30)b (1-16) (2-47) (2-35) bow-coo 12 7 16 32 ns (5-18) (2-19) (6-36) (6-54) soliciting 630 798 980 924 .01 (448-840) (462-1162) (476-1232) (560-1092) time-at-nest 756 882 1316 1302 .05 (322-1204) (434-1176) (588-1806) (938-1862) * based on Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA (Siege!, 1956) a mean . > b range LT>ST ns LC>SC <.013 LT>LC ns ST>SC <.047 LT>ST ns LC>SC ns LT>LC ns ST>SC ns 33 b) Courtship Bow-cooing was more frequent in LT and LC birds than in the short., day groups, although the differences were not significant (Table V I I I ) . Control birds performed significantly more nest-soliciting when held on long days, but there was no difference between the two photo-periods in the androgen-treated males. Testosterone increased soliciting under short daylengths but was ineffective under long ones. This pattern suggests that daylength may influence nest-soliciting via changes in steroid levels. If i t is assumed that LC males are producing endogenous testosterone at concentrations capable of inducing maximum levels of soliciting while SC birds are producing much lower amounts, and that the TP injections are capable of supplementing submaximal levels of endogenous testosterone, then no differences would be expected among LC, LT, and ST birds, all of which experienced maximal androgen stimulation, while SC birds would be less active than the rest. Alternatively long daylengths may increase responsiveness to testosterone, resulting in higher levels of soliciting in LC than-SC birds. If those males receiving exogenous androgen are already exhibiting maximum levels of soliciting, then the sensitizing effect of long photoperiods would not be observed between LT and ST males. Overall variations in the amount of time spent by the male at the nest site were significant, although the differences between pairs of treatments were not. This behaviour appears to vary in a manner similar to soliciting, but with a greater difference between LT and ST males. There were no significant differences in any of the copulatory behaviours or in female courtship (Table IX). TABLE IX Frequency of copulatory and female courtship activities performed by pairs in which the males had been treated with TP or oil while being held on long or short photoperiods. Based on the total number of events or 15 sec. intervals over the 14 day test period. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD LONG PHOTOPERIOD ANOVA* Control TP Control TP n=6 n=6 n=6 n=6 Begging events 24a 23 36 25 ns (17-30)° (4-41) (21-66) (15-49) bill ing events 11 14 17 15 ns (0-24) (2-22) (10-27) (9-30) sexual crouch events 11 7 10 7 ns (8-17) (0-17) (3-18) (4-10) mounts/copulati ons events 2.5 3.0 3.2 4.3 ns (0-5) (0-8) (1-4) (3-6) submissive crouch events 1.0 2.2 1.7 2.7 ns (0-5) (0-8) (0-4) (0-8) female soliciting intervals 588 588 679 630 ns (28-784) (28-1330) (406-952) (560-714) female-at-nest intervals 1218 1554 2016 1932 ns (14-2688) (28-2618) (1400-2590) (1624-2352) female carrying events 4 3 10 10 ns (0-13) (0-12) (0-45) (0-28) female building intervals 12 6 29 36 ns (0-32) (0-18) (0-126) (5-109) * based on Kruskal-Wallis AN0VA (Siegel, 1956) a mean » b range 35 c) Nest-building Of the three measures of male nest-building recorded--time spent building, number of carrying events, and amount of string found in the -nest—all indicated that LT and LC birds build at higher rates than ST and SC birds respectively, and that TP increases building in short but not long day males (Table X). Figs. 3 and 4 show that these differences persisted over most of the 14 day test period. It is thus apparent that testosterone increases nest-building, on short days at least. But large differences were seen between LT and ST birds, both of which presumably had very high plasma testosterone concentrations, suggesting that day-length alters male building through some means other than steroid levels. Although measures of male building were positively correlated with female carrying and building, i t is unlikely that active building by the female was responsible for differences in the amount of string collected, as neither activity varied significantly among the groups; and in any event both were infrequent in all pairs. The female may influence nest-building through her effect on male behaviour. Attachment of the female to the nest site is necessary for successful nest-building. Several authors have suggested that female activities such as nest-soliciting or time spent at the nest site determine the degree of building exhibited by the male (Martinez-Vargas & Erickson, 1973; Martinez-Vargas, 1971; White, 1975a; Cheng & Silver, 1975; Liley, 1976). In this study all of the females were isolated prior to pairing and were held on identical photoperiods. Thus they were all presumably TABLE X Nest-building activity of TP-treated and control males held on long or short photoperiods. Based on totals for the 14-day test period. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD LONG PHOTOPERIOD ANOVA* U-TEST** Control n=6 TP n=6 Control n=6 TP n=6 nest-building intervals 42a (0-140)b 126 (0-224) 280 (154-518 350 (210-532) .01 LT>ST LC>SC LT>LC ST>SC .002 .002 ns ns carrying events 10 (0-30) 35 (0-63 72 (12-81) 91 (41-139) .01 LT>ST LC>SC LT>LC ST>SC .021 .008 ns .047 string pieces 112 (0-238) 266 (0-406) 700 (98-1890) 826 (448-1470) .01 LT>ST LC>SC LT>LC ST>SC .001 .008 ns .021 string relative 0 to ? at nest 10 (0-21) 17 (14-22) 33 (6-84) 42 (21-63 .001 LT>ST LC>SC LT>LC ST>SC .002 .032 ms .047 * ** a b c based on Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA (Siefel, 1956) between means based on Mann-Whitney U-test (Siegel, 1956) between means, 1-tailed mean range based on total string 100 total intervals o at nest co <7V "1 i 1 r—j 1 1 1 1 1 r^—i 1 r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DAYS SINCE PAIRING" Fig. 3. The amount of string collected in relation to the number of days since pairing, n = 6 for all groups. 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 10 11 12 13 14 DAYS SINCE PAIRING Fig.- 4 Frequency of male nest-building in relation to the number of days since pairing, n = 6 for all groups. 39 in similar reproductive condition at the beginning of the tests, and any; differences in their behaviour were probably a reflection of differences in the behaviour of the males. Although male courtship did vary among... the groups, no significant differences were observed for either female nest-soliciting or time-at-nest (Table IX). In addition, figs. 5 and 6 indicate that the nest-related behaviour of the four groups of females was very similar. The total amount of building performed by the males therefore appears unrelated to the female. However, evidence does exist suggesting that the female may have a more subtle effect. Examination of Table XI shows that measures of male building were positively correlated with both female soliciting and time-at-nest. This correlation may be the result of small variations in female behaviour which were not obvious enough to show up in comparisons between groups. It could be argued that these might account for the differences between groups in male nest-building, but by taking the average amount of string collected by the pair as a proportion of the number of intervals spent by the female at the nest, it can be seen that group differences in nest-building occur indepen-dently of the female's attachment to the nest site (Table X). Moreover, i t is equally possible that the degree of nesting behaviour displayed by the male influences female nesting behaviour (see also Martinez-Vargas, 1974). Even though the absolute levels of building cannot be accounted for by differences in the female's behaviour, she does appear to play a. role in determining its occurrence. Figs. 7 and 8 show that the measures of male building are related to the laying of the eggs, peaking either the day before or the day of the f i rst egg (see also Liley, 1976). In order' 40 Fig. 5. Female nest-soliciting in relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day 0). DAYS IN RELATION TO FIRST EGG Fig. 6. The amount of time spent by the female at the nest site in relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day 0). TABLE XI Spearman rank correlation coefficients (Siege!, 1956) among male and female activities, latency to egg-laying, and testis weight. Based on combined values for all groups (n=24) except those correlations involving testis weight which are based on combined values for SC and LC (n-12). 4-> CO <L> E cn OQ >> c -t-> o • r— re • S-+-) CO 4-» CO O) CZ _C: CL LO O O OJ QJ C _ _ CO -M S T O •!- -M OO CO >> 1— 3 (J to CQ O rXD * 0 O  0 + O + O + O t - -Q -O O S CU -t-> NS .047 .221 .886** .499** .536** .477* .003 -.089** .442* .371* .092 -.072 -.342 .228 .048 .054 BC .528** .033 .412* .317 .443* .017 .312 .321 .316 .187 -.134 .241 .204 -.111 .275 Chase .210 .288 .233 .233 -.263 .189 .197 .158 .277 .066 .393* .343 -.074 -.100 cf at nest .580** .546** .570** .107 -.069 .555** .322 .127 .229 -.247 .325 -.216 .018 cf NB .935** .962** .695** .497** .539** .479* .038 .113 -.130 .435* -.383* .5641 cf Cy .929** .606** .431* .505** .431* .03! .121 -.104 .404* -.426* .664 .624** .450* .532** .445* .104 .145 -.093 .348* -.498** .627 b i l l Mt/cop eggs o " \ . , t .781** .329 .344* -.090 .100 .162 .291 -.585** .009 £ * \ n e S t .040 .087 .073 -.080 .287 .358* -.356* .455 * B .920** .122 -.070 .082 .314 -.374* .318 r ..051 -.212 .064 -.238 -.222 .318 . L y .637** .623** .007 .029 .318 ???, .387* .157 -.180 .036 210 -.202 . .143 crouch ..368* .291 ,509 * p =.05 * * p=.01 ro 80-43 70J Fig. 7. Male nest-building in relation to the laying of the egg (day 0). Fig. '8. The amount of string collected in relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day =0). 45 for building to be synchronized with egg-laying, the female must neces-sarily be involved in controlling, or at least stimulating, building by the male. Thus i t is likely that the female regulates the timing of nest-building behaviour in the male, but that other factors, such as photoperiod, control his responsiveness to the stimuli presented by the female, resulting in variations in the absolute amount of building. 3. Latency to Egg-laying Eggs were laid by all LT and LC, 5 of 6 ST, and 3 of 6 SC females. Table XII shows that there was l i t t le difference in the latency to laying of the four groups. It thus appears that the level of courtship displayed by all of the males was great enough to stimulate ovulation, although there is some indication that SC males, which exhibited the lowest levels of nest-soliciting were somewhat less effective. 4. Testis Weight Because some males were castrated rather than killed at the end of the experiment, the right testis being removed one week after the left, only the weights of the left testes were considered. Long daylengths resulted in higher testis weights in control birds (Table XIII). This is in keeping with preliminary results reported by Hutchison (1976); but whereas the increase in testis weight in the present study was slight (.08 gm), Hutchison observed a ten-fold difference (LD, 0.45 gm; SD, 0.04 gm). One possible explanation is that the birds may have been tested at different times of year. Liley found that female ring doves held on long and short photoregimes in December exhibited a much greater degree of oviduct and foll icular development on long days (Liley, 1976), 46 TABLE XII Latency to f irst egg, based on the number of days since pairing. The mean was calculated by assigning a value of 15 to all birds which did not lay within the test period. Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14+ x n LT 1 1 2 1 1 9.8 6 ST 1 1 1 1 1 1 9.5 6 LC 1 1 1 1 1 1 10.5 6 SC 1 1 1 3 11.5 6 47 TABLE XIII Testis weight in grams, based on left testis. n=6 in all-four groups. Values = mean ± standard error. SHORT DAY LONG DAY Control .41 ± .05 .49 ± .04 TP .18 ± .06- .32 ± .04--Two-way ANOVA (Armitage, 1971): F Newman-keul test (Armitage, 1971) df Q a.05 LT f ST 2.87 2,20 2.95 LC f SC 1.64 2,20 2.95 LT t LC 3.49 3,20 3.58 Effect of photoperiod. 4.93 <.05 Effect of hormone treatment 16.53 <.005 Interaction .48 ns ns ns ns ST f SC 4.72 3,20 3.58 <.05 while no differences were observed in birds tested during the spring (Liley, in press). In addition, the photoperiods used by Hutchinson (LD 13L:11D; SD 6L:18D) were not the same as those employed here (LD 16L:8D; SD 8L:16D). Conflicting effects of exogenous androgen treatment on testis function in birds have been cited in the literature. In pigeons and doves exogenous testosterone has been reported to stimulate testis functions (Chu & You, 1946; Lofts & Murton, 1973), cause testicular degeneration (Chu, 1940) or have l i t t le effect (Lahr & Riddle, 1944). In the current study TP reduced testicular weight in both L and S birds. Testicular atrophy would be expected in response to androgen treatment, as testosterone is known to decrease endogenous LRF in mammals, resul-ting in lowered LH, and possibly FSH, release (Franchimont, 1975). Steroids have also been shown to act at the pituitary level, reducing responsiveness to LRF (McCann, 1974). Contrary to expectations the collapse of the testes was not complete, and those of LT males remained nearly twice as large as those of ST males, although the difference was not significant. This might be attributed to several possible causes. Because the birds had been held on the two light schedules prior to hormone administration, i t is quite likely that the init ial size of the testes in the two groups varied. Collapse of the (presumably) larger testes of the L birds might have required higher levels of TP or a longer period of administration. It is also conceivable that photoperiod affects some aspect of the endo-crine system such as hypothalamic/pituitary responsiveness to testosterone 49 inhibition, LRF or LH production, testicular responses to LH, etc. At the moment, however, such suggestions remain purely speculative. The finding that the testes of LT birds were larger than those of ST birds casts doubt upon the earlier interpretation of the influence of photoperiod on nest-building. While it can be argued that natural plasma testosterone levels are low (1.60 ng/ml - Hutchison & Katongole, 1975) and that daily injections of .2 mg TP are probably high enough to mask any endogenous differences, no studies have yet been done examining plasma levels resulting from such injections and the possibility remains that LT males experienced greater androgenic stimulation, due to sum-mation of endogenous and exogenous testosterone, than did ST males. It is therefore possible that the observed differences in nest-building are, after a l l , the result of differences in androgen levels and that i t is not necessary to hypothesize the existence of an alternate mechanism. D. SUMMARY 1. Neither aggressive behaviour nor bow-cooing varied significantly among the four treatment groups, although bowing was more frequent on long days than short (fig. 9). 2. Nest-soliciting was less intense in SC birds than in the remaining three groups. It is suggested that long daylengths cause an increase in either androgen levels or responsiveness to androgens. 3. Nest-building was greater in LD birds in both TP and control groups, suggesting that i t is influenced by photoperiod via some nongonadal mechanism. 4. TP causes testicular regression, while long daylengths stimulate growth. No differences were observed in copulatcry behaviours, female activities, or latency to egg laying. Fig. 9. Summary of the differences between the various groups of males in experiment II. CH/PK = chase/peck; BC = bow-coo; NS = male nest-soliciting; NB = male nest-building; CY = male carrying; STRING = amount of string collected. The scales vary. One unit = 10 intervals for CH/PK, BC, NS, and NB; 20 intervals for Cy; 10 pieces for string; .10 gm for testes. CH/PK, BC, and Cy are based on totals over the 14 day test period; NS, NB, and string are based on average values/day. A= LT; B= LC; C= ST; D= SC males 8. 7 i 'A B C D TESTES A B C D CH/PK A B C D BC A B C D NS A B C D NB A B C D CY A B C D STRING CHAPTER IV EXPERIMENT III - THE EFFECT OF PHOTOPERIOD ON THE HORMONAL INDUCTION OF REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOUR IN CASTRATE MALES A. INTRODUCTION Because testis weight varied between LT and ST birds in experiment II no definite conclusions could be drawn concerning the effect of photo-period on hormone action. In order to eliminate any possible differences arising from unequal endogenous androgen contributions the experiment was repeated using castrates. B. METHODS 1. Subjects Thirty experimentally naive males were used as subjects, and twenty-four experimentally naive females as stimulus animals. 2. Surgery The males were bilaterally castrated under sodium pentabarbitol (•Nembutal) anaesthesia (3.0 - 3.5 mg pentabarbitol/bird) in a two-stage operation, the second testis being removed one week after the f i rst . 3. Housing The birds were housed in exactly the same manner as that described in experiment II. 4. Experimental Procedure and Recordings The males were divided into three groups, ten animals apiece, 53 54 and the entire procedure was staggered to allow for two weeks difference between consecutive groups (see Table XIV). .„ The males were brought in from the aviary in April 1976, and held in individual cages on a 14L:10D cycle for one week. They were then pre-tested by pairing each male with a responsive female for 10 minutes. Any male failing to display both bowing and nest-soliciting within that interval was discarded. The remaining birds were castrated, the left testis being removed on the day of the pre-test, the right testis a week later. After a recovery period of two weeks each male was again paired with a female for 10 minutes and any birds which either bowed or solicited were eliminated. Of the original 30 males three failed to exhibit both bow-cooing and nest-soliciting during the pre-test, three were eliminated due to breakage of the testes during castration, and two displayed during the post-castration test. Following the post-castration test the males were moved to the two experimental rooms and held on LD (16L:8D) or SD(8L:16D) cycles for five weeks. Of the 11 birds in each room 8 were chosen for hormone treatment (LT and ST birds) and 3 as controls (LC and SC birds). Because the ability of exogenous testosterone to induce sexual behaviour is known to decrease with time since castration in ring doves (Hutchison, 1969 & 1974a) as well as mammals (Davidson, 1972), the LT and ST birds were given maintenance doses of testosterone (.2 mg TP in 1. ml peanut oil twice a week) for the f irst five weeks. Controls received .1 ml of the vehicle only. Testing began at the end of the five week period. During that TABLE XIV Treatment Schedule for Experiment III weeks -2— I—3—1—4—1 — 5 — 1 — 6 — 1 — 7 — 1 — 8 — 1 — 9 - -10--11- -12- -13-ch-c|-cr ch •R--R--R--R--IPI-H pl-i p i --iph ch C r Ch -R--R--R--S, MT--L, MT--S, MC--L, M0--|pl-i P r Hph ST (2) LT (2) SC (1) LC (1) ST (3) LT (3) SC (1) LC (1) ST (1) LT fl) SC (3) LC (3) (n) number of birds 1 c castration, i.e.. removal of 2nd testis R post-castration recovery period p post-castration test - R - —IPr cr ct-c l -cl--R-•R-•+ f— S,T,test—! H h-L,T,test—| -\ f—S,P,test—I -I I—L,0,test—I -|S, MTf-HL, MTh HS, MOh -|L, MOl--I I—S,T,test ^ -I \ — L,T,test 1 -\ 1—S,0,test 1 H |—L,0,test 1 Hpr -S, MT--Ipl-Hpl-•L, -S, MT-MO HPH L, MO-H I—S,T,,test—I -\ I—L,T test—I -| I—S,0, test—| -I I—L,0 test—| S,L short or long daylengths MT,M0 maintenance treatment with TP or oil T,0 daily treatment with TP or oil Test daily pairing and observations cn cn 56 period the hormone and control injections were administered daily. The procedure was identical to that used in experiment II with three exceptions:. (1) during the test pericd injections were administered at 8:30; (2) on day 1 all partitions were removed at 0:00 and recordings. made using a check sheet rather than the event recorder; and (3) in addition to those behaviours listed for experiment II, male and female-all opreening were also recorded. 5. Elimination of Data. At the end of the test period all of the males were killed and checked for testicular material. One ST and one LC bird were discarded,, as their testes had partially regenerated. An LT bird which spent virtually all of its time sleeping was also eliminated. It is possible that for some reason testosterone, which is known to have an anaesthetic effect in high doses (Davis, 1964) acted as a sedative in this particular bird. C. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. 1. Aggressive Behaviour The frequency of chasing/pecking was twice as high in ST as LT birds, but the difference was not significant (Table XV). Controls on both photo-regimes were much more aggressive than testosterone-treated males, and frequently engaged in wing-beating, a behaviour usually seen only in male-male interactions. 2. Courtship The only courtship performed by the control castrates consisted of 57 TABLE XV Frequency of aggressive and courtship activities in castrates, based on the total number of intervals during which the activities were observed. The males were treated with TP or oil while being held on long or short photoperiods. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD LONG PHOTOPERIOD P* Control TP Control TP n=3 n=7 n=2 n=7 chasing/pecking 53a 28 68 14 ns (5-80)b (0-75) (43-93) (8-25) bow-cooing - 13 - 16 ns ( 7 - 2 6 ) (0-40) nest-soliciting - 604 - 673 ns (164-1180) (545-927) male-at-nest 6 748 1.5 1076 ns (0-17) (213-1117) (0-3) (542-1792) allopreening 5 93 30 132 ns (2-13) (28-145) (1-60) (47-281) * based on Mann-Whitney U-test (Siegel, 1956) of means, 1-tailed for LT>ST a mean b range low levels of allopreen.ing and sitting at the nest site. Testosterone-treated males, on the other hand, exhibited the various courtship-activities at levels comparable to those seen in intact birds in,. experiment II (Table XV, figs. 10 & 11). There were no differences between LT and ST birds in terms of any of these behaviours. Similarly, copulatory behaviours were infrequent or absent in controls, while in both the LT and ST groups levels resembled those of intact pairs (Table-XVI). Females mated with oil-treated males continued to sol icit, sit at the nest, and allopreen, but at lower levels than those of hormone-treated pairs; no doubt as a result of the lack of male courtship. There were no significant differences between the LT and ST females (Table XVI; figs. 12 and 13). 3. Nest-building Control males did not participate in nest-building despite the fact that females paired with them exhibited considerable nest-soliciting and sitting at the nest (Table XVII). LT males were more active than ST males in terms of all three-measures of nest-building. The differences in the amount of time spent building and the number of pieces of string collected were significant. As in experiment II building peaked shortly before the f irst egg was laid (figs. 14, 15, and 16). LT females also built significantly more than ST females, but the frequency was so low that i t was not likely to have seriously in-fluenced the total string counts. DAYS IN RELATION TO FIRST EGG Fig. 10. Nest-soliciting performed by castrates in relation to laying of the 1st egg (day 0). 60 1201 20 i 10" i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j — -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 LT©- » n= 3 4 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 STO— — S n = 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 - 4 3 3 3 DAYS IN RELATION TO FIRST EGG Fig. 11 Amount of time spent by castrates at the nest site in. relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day 0 ) / -TABLE XVI Frequency of copulatory and female courtship activities of pairs in which the males were treated with TP or oil while being held on long or short photoperiods. Values are based on totals for the 14 day test period. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD LONG PHOTOPERIOD p* Control n=3 TP n=7 Control n=2 TP n=7 begging events 2a (0-4)b 20 (10-31) 2 (0-4) 40 (11-100) ns bil l ing events - 8 (1-12) — 19 (4-40) ns sexual crouch events .3 (0-1) 6 (1-12) — 14 (1-41) ns mounts/copulations events - 2.7 (0-7) . .3.0 (0-8) ns submissive crouch events 0.7 (0-2) 1.1 (1-4) — 4.9 (0-9) ns female soliciting intervals 441 (118-737) 425 (217-760) 296 (3-591) 491 (221-945) ns female-at-nest intervals 800 (336-1242) 1279 (401-2078) • 549 (0-1098) 1736 (809-2821) . ns female carrying events 1.7 (0-5) 1.7 (0-10) 1.0 (0-2) 5.6 (0-12) ns female building intervals 7.7 (0-23) 4.7 (0-19) 1.5 (0-3) 22.0 (3-47) <.026 female allopreening intervals 7 (0-14) 92 (64-145) 22 (0-44) 64 (10-104 ns * based on Mann-Whitney U-test (Siegel, 1956) of means, 2-tailed for LT^ST a mean b range DAYS IN RELATION TO FIRST EGG Fig. 12 Female nest-soliciting in relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day 0). 63 2404 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 LT ©——® n= 3 4- 6 7 7 7 7 . 7 7 7 7 S T 0 - - - - 0 n = 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 DAYS IN RELATION TO FIRST EGG Fig. 13 Amount of time spent by females at the nest site in relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day 0). 64 TABLE XVII Nest-building activity of TP-treated and control castrates held on long or short photoperiods.. Based on totals for the 14-day test period. SHORT PHOTOPERIOD LONG PHOTOPERIOD nest building intervals carrying string events pieces string relative to $ at nest Control n=3 (0-4) TP n=7 71a (15-1791° 19 (3-63) 137 (46-395) 10.2 (4.9-19.0) Control n=2 TP n=7 255 (22-631) 69 (4-167) .049 .064 3 525 .006 (0-6) (95-1009) 30.8 .002 (11.7-63.1) * based on Mann-Whitney U-test (Siegel, 1956) of means, 1-tailed for LT<ST a mean b range c based on total string 100 total intervals 9 at nest DAYS IN RELATION TO FIRST EGG Fig. 14 Nest-building by castrates in relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day 0). 66 Fig. 15 Amount of string collected by castrates in relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day 0). Fig. 16. Carrying by castrates in relation to the laying.; of the 1st egg (day 0). 68 Table XVIII indicates a positive correlation between the females' behaviour and nest-building, but again the total amount of string col-lected by birds exposed to long daylengths was greater regardless of the amount of time spent by the females at the nest (Table XVII). 4. Latency to Egg-laying The latency to the f irst egg was shorter for LT females than the other 3 groups (Table XIX). The significant difference between the two hormone-treated groups cannot be explained in terms of male courtship, since levels exhibited by the two groups were similar. There is a possibility, however, that male nest-building behaviour, which begins about 5 days prior to egg-laying, or stimuli emanating from the nest, may stimulate ovulation (see Lehrman et a l . , 1961). The females used in this study were obviously at advanced stages of ovarian growth when paired, as evidenced by the fact that 3 of 5 females paired with castrates laid eggs (see Cheng, 1974). D. SUMMARY 1. Castrated males ceased to exhibit courtship and nest-building behaviour, but were highly aggressive. 2. No differences were seen between LT and ST pairs in terms of male or female courtship or copulatory behaviour. 3. LT males built significantly more than ST males as did females paired with LT birds. 4. Females paired with LT males laid sooner than those paired with ST or control males, suggesting that stimuli from male nest-building or the nest may be involved in the induction of ovulation. TABLE XVIII Spearman rank correlation coefficients (Siegel, 1956) among male and female activities and the latency to egg-laying. Based on combined values for LT and ST castrates (n=14). cu OJ e ca J=. CL o o o </> ra Z <-> T " c n ^ Z o ^ ro c n ro j - GJ •!— S_ +-1 K_ 0 5 y ^ f ^ ^ i v ^ T « o + o + o + o + - 0 - Q o 2: CM- cu 038 .403 .448 .391 .067 -.329 -.115 264 .059 -.216 .100 .774** -.116 .035 087 .311 .133 .215 -.519* -.332 .246 180 .517* .682** .386 .210 -.251 -.476 731** .305 .507* .213 -.042 -.483* -.557 679** .257 .428 .158 -.035 -.382 -.520 string .ico- .aio- .oo*.-- .562* .308 .496* .199 .036 -.460 -.737 o at nest 738** .516* .401 .283 -.076 .133 -.130 -.162 -.246 -.745 - OIA AKQ* n /L nzin - n?? .D5R -.527* -.312 -.450 cf NS .024 .405 BC .228 Chase <f at nest cf NB cf Cy $' NS .456* .064 -.023 .146 - .045 - .015 .111 - .015 .147 .423 .178 .121 .153 .358 - .202 - .163 .130 -.179 -.291 - .273 - .063 - .054 - .421 - .091 .458* .462* .597* .375 - .058 .570 .274 .978** .931** .711** .558* .774** .158 .920** .707** .519* .721** .092 .726** 513* 832** .280  01 .214 .458* .380 134 .040 .022 0 5 -.645** .308 .494* .316 .199 -.265 -.650 I rl -.163 -.045 -.079 .017 .235 -.089 -.550 +\„ ' .389 .508* .330 .173 -.408 -.172 beg bi l l crouch 786** .515 -.144 -.712** .111 .559* .087 -.128 -.127 233 -.415 .192 cf alio $ alio * p=.05 ** p=.ol .261 KD 70 TABLE XIX Latency to f irst egg, based on the number of days since pairing. The mean was calculated by assigning a value of 15 to all birds which did not lay within the test period. Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14+ n LT 1 2 1 2 1 1 7 ST 1 2 2 1 3 7 LC 1 1 2 SC 1 1 1 3 ST SC LT LC p_*_ mean 12.9 12.3 8.4 11.5 .025 range (9-15) (8-15) (6-11) (8-15) * based on Median Test (Siegel, 1956), 1-tailed for LT>ST CHAPTER V GENERAL DISCUSSION A. AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR 1. The Role of Photoperiod Photoperiod does not have any clear effect on aggressive behaviour in doves. In all of the treatment groups—intacts and castrates, with or without testosterone treatment—levels of chasing/pecking were similar in birds held on both long and short days. Hutchison (1976) reported that male doves implanted i'ntra-cranically with TP 30 days after castration exhibit similar levels of chasing whether they are exposed to 14Lday or 6L/day. An earlier experi-ment (Hutchison, 1974) had indicated that castrates implanted 90 days after gonadectomy are more aggressive if held on 13L/day than i f held on 8.5L/day. This difference may reflect an increase in sensitivity to photo-period with time following castration, or may stem from the fact that the two groups in the earlier experiment were tested several years apart. The more recent results are in agreement with those reported here in relation to the effects of photoperiod on aggression in androgen-treated castrates. They differ, however, in that Hutchison recorded much higher levels of chasing in intact birds held on long than on short days, while no differences were seen in the present study. 2. The Effects of Castration and Androgen In the majority of birds which have been studied aggression has been shown to depend upon the presence of testosterone (see van Tienhoven, 71 1968, for review). Evidence based on doves and pigeons is conflicting. In intact birds exogenous testosterone will increase social rank' (Bennett, 1940) but will not alter the frequency of attacks (Murton et al. 1969; Vowels & Harwood, 1966). Results reported here also indicate l i t t l e effect of TP in intact birds. Gonadectomy has been reported to result in total (Hutchison, 1967 & 1970a; Pietras & Wenzel, 1976) or partial (Erickson, 1966; Hutchison, 1970b & 1971; Silver et a l . , 1973) elimination of chasing in both doves and pigeons. Brain implants or injections of TP restore chasing in castrates, but only to levels significantly lower than those seen prior to gonadectomy (Hutchison, 1971 & 1974a). Contrary to these results, Martinez-Vargas (1974) observed no differences between oil and TP treated castrated doves; both attacked females upon their introduction. In the present study castration resulted in an increase in aggression which was reversed by androgen treatment. One possible reason fcr the disparity between this report and previous ones is that results reported here were based on observations extending over a two week period, while those listed above record responses occurring only during the init ial interaction of a pair, in some cases using periods as short as 3 minutes (i.e. Hutchison's papers). If the percentage of males exhibiting chasing/pecking during the f irst 15 minutes of experiment III are compared, adding together birds from the two photoperiods, then only 40% (2/5) of the control males displayed aggressive behaviour, as com-pared to 86% (12/14) of the TP-treated castrates and 92% (11/12) of the oil-treated intacts in experiment II. 73 It appears that although castrates are slower to respond, once they do the frequency and duration of their attacks exceed those of the androgen-treated groups. 3. Evidence of Two Distinct Types of 'Chasing Up to this point chasing of female doves by the males has been considered an 'aggressive' behaviour. The term 'aggressive' is commonly used for a number of activities which may occur in various different contexts, including behaviour directed towards conspecific males and females in flocking, terr itorial , sexual, and hierarchal situations. It should be recognized that several kinds of aggression exist, each probably associated with different casual mechanisms. In ring doves chasing of the female appears to be indicative of a sexual as well as an aggressive tendency; i t occurs in close temporal association with more overtly sexual activities such as bowing and soliciting, and certain postural features, such as the raising of the dorsal feathers, are similar to those seen prior to copulation. It is therefore likely that chasing, like driving in the pigeon, is an ambi-valent behaviour involving sexual, aggressive, and possibly escape tendencies (Goodwin, 1952 & 1956b; Fabricius & Jansson, 1963). Aggressive behaviour.occurring during encounters between males differs from that described above. Chasing is rarely accompanied by dorsal feather raising (McFarland & Bahr, 1968), and commonly gives way to wing-beating, a behaviour which is absent from interactions between-successfully paired males and females (Lovari & Hutchison, 1975). In the present study both types of chasing were observed. The 74 behaviour of intact males and TP treated castrates was the same as that seen in normal male-female interactions. Chasing by the oil-treated castrates, however, more closely resembled that of male-male encounters— the rump feathers were rarely raised and bouts of wing-beating occurred frequently. Coupled with the fact that the sexual motivation of these birds was obviously very low, as would be expected in fights between males, these factors suggest that the oil-treated castrates responded to females as they would to consexual intruders. Fig. 17 shows that unlike TP-castrates, which exhibit a steady decline in chasing following pairing, controls continued to show a high response during initial morning encounters for the f irst five days. Perhaps increasing sexual tendencies in hormone-treated birds progressively inhibited aggression, while controls fought for five days before accepting the intruder? Somewhat similar results have been reported in pigeons. Both gonadectomized (Carpenter, 1958) and hypophysectomized (Collias, 1944) pigeons have been observed to successfully defend their territories against intact male intruders. In the case of the hypophysectomized birds fighting was vigorous and included wing-beating but no bow-cooing. Females were also attacked, but when the males were treated with TP aggression towards the females ceased and pairing occurred (Collias, 1944). If, as has been suggested, the behaviour of the castrates more closely resembled that displayed towards intruding males than responsive females, then the apparent independence of aggressive behaviour from testosterone is less puzzling. In numerous bird species males remain 75 oo TIME SINCE PAIRING 17 Chasing by control and TP-treated castrates in relation to the " time since pairing. Values are given for all four daily tests (9-00 11-00, 1:00, 3:00). Solid squares represent the combined scores for ST and LT males (n=14), open squares represent the combined scores for SC and LC males (n-5). 76 aggressive during the winter months when the testes are small, and androgen levels presumably low (Davis, 1964). In some species (i.e. the ring-necked pheasant) other males may be tolerated outside the breeding season and females attacked (Guhl, 1961). Often there is a shift throughout the year in the amount of space which is defended (Wilson, 1975). Thus i t can be seen that the type of agnostic behaviour displayed varies in form, and in its relation to androgen concentrations. Aggression in the absence of high testosterone levels has also been observed in mammals. Mice will continue to fight for several months following gonadectomy, even in the absence of the adrenals (Edwards & Rowe, 1975). Castration of infant or adult mongolian gerbils (Meriones  unguiculatus) increases intermale aggression, while TP treatment decreases fighting in both gonadectomized males and females (Anisko et a l . , 1973). 4. The Possible Involvement of Gonadotropins Because aggression occurs in the absence of testosterone and occasionally is even increased by castration, i t has been suggested that LH may be responsible for controlling aggressive behaviour in some species (Davis, 1964). Castration stimulates the synthesis arid release of LRF in rats (Moguilevsky, 1975) and increased pituitary responsiveness to i t (McCann, 1974). In the Japanese quail gonadectomy causes large increases in plasma LH and FSH (Follett, 1976). Baggerman (1966) found that gonadectomy had l i t t l e effect on the agnostic behaviour of male stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) i f performed before the onset of breeding. Castrates held on long (16L:8D) days remain aggressive, but those held on short (8L:16D) days do not (Hoar, 1962). It has been proposed that LH is responsible for agonistic behaviour in sticklebacks prior to the breeding season. Exogenous LH will increase the level of aggression seen in methyl-testosterone treated castrates, but neither hormone alone will induce fighting in SD fish (Hoar, 1962). Female Quelea quelea show an increase in agonistic behaviour i f ovariectomized during the breeding season (Lazarus & Crook, 1973). Injections of TP do not alter the dominance.status or agonistic behaviour of intact males; LH, on the other hand, will increase aggres-sion in intact males or females and in ovariectomized females (Lazarus & Crook, 1973; Crook & Butterfield, 1968). Gonadotropins may play a direct role in the control of aggres-sion in starlings, as well. If male starlings are castrated they continue to sing, and in some cases their social rank may increase (Davis, 1964). In paired encounters between intacts and castrates, the castrates were found to be dominant in the majority of cases (Mathewson, 1961). Testosterone injections do not increase rank positions (Davis, 1957), but LH injections do (Davis, 1964; Mathewson, 1961). Vandenbergh (1964) paired intact males held on 15L/day with males held on 8L/day. In 58 of 85 pairs the long day bird was submissive. He suggests that these results support claims that LH causes increased aggression in starlings, since the testes of the SD birds appeared to be inactive. However, short photoperiods would also be expected to lower LH levels. Van Tienhoven (1968) has cautioned against considering the starling work as conclusive evidence of direct gonadotropic involvement in aggressive behaviour, since all of the experiments cited above, with 78 the exception of Vanderbergh's, failed to give statistically significant results, or involved injection of hormones at levels far outside the physiological range. LH control of intermale aggressiveness could account for the-, large increase in agonistic behaviour seen in castrated ring doves, i f i t is assumed that they reacted towards females as consexual intruders. If testosterone stimulates the normal chasing of females, which is related to sexual behaviour, and inhibits gonadotropin secretion, then lower levels of intermale-type chasing would be expected in TP-treated castrates, as was observed. This explanation, however, is purely hypothetical, and depends on several questionable assumptions. In addition, l i t t l e is known of the normal levels of LH in doves, although Murton et al. (1969) report that it is very low in feral pigeons during the bowing and nest-soliciting stages of the cycle. In summary, then, it is proposed that the aggressive behaviour displayed by castrated male doves is qualitatively distinct from that seen in normal male-female pairs. What is commonly termed chasing in doves is probably an ambivalent behaviour involving sexual as well as aggressive tendencies. Chasing by oil-treated castrates, however, is likely a pure agonistic behaviour related to normal intermale aggression and possibly to the male-female aggression observed outside the breeding season in many species. In addition, i t is suggested that hormonal control of these two types of behaviour differ; sexual chasing appears to depend upon the pre-sence of high androgen levels (see Hutchison, 1974c), while intermale-type 79 chasing does not. It is tempting to suggest that this second type of aggression is related to high gonadotropin concentrations, but such a conclusion is, as yet, unjustified. B. COURTSHIP AND COPULATORY BEHAVIOUR 1. The Role of Photoperiod Intact male doves held on long days court more actively than those held on short days, exhibiting higher levels of bow-cooing, nest-soliciting, and time spent at the nest-site. Androgen treatment of intacts in experiment II abolished differences in nest-soliciting, but bow-cooing and time-at-nest remained higher in LT birds (differences in the mean levels of these last two behaviours were large but not sig-nificant in both oil and TP-treated birds). Because the testis weight was greater in LT than ST males the role played endogenous androgens was unclear. Repetition of the experiment using castrates injected with TP showed that all three measures of hormone-induced courtship were similar in birds held on the two photoregimes. Oil-treated castrates did not display, indicating that male courtship is dependent upon the presence of androgens. It has been suggested that long daylengths affect courtship by means of either an increase in testosterone levels or an increase in sensitivity to androgens (see Chapter III, section C2). In experiment III exogenous TP was equally effective on long and short days. Since the levels of soliciting exhibited were similar to those of the SC birds in experiment II (cf. tables VIII and XV), i t cannot be assumed that the LT and ST males were performing at a maximum level, thereby masking any differences 80 in sensitivity to testosterone. It therefore seems likely that photoperiod controls male courtship by stimulating the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonad axis, resulting in an increase in secretion of testicular androgen. Such an interpretation depends upon the assumption that all three activities vary directly with androgen concentration. In experiment II there was no correlation between testis size and courtship in control birds, and only soliciting was significantly altered by TP injections. However, courtship in male doves has been observed to increase with higher hypothalamic concentrations of TP (BarfieTd, 1971; Hutchison, 1970b). In addition with daily injections of TP at levels of 100 yg or less there is a direct relationship between androgen concen-tration and the level of courtship activity (Erickson, 1970). Thus i t is plausible that increasing endogenous testosterone levels are respon-sible for the higher courtship activity observed in intact male birds on long days, although the evidence presented thus far is inconclusive. 2. Control of Copulatory Behaviour. The daylengths to which the males were exposed had no effect on any of the activities associated with copulation. The mean values of begging, bil l ing, and crouching for the LT-castrate pairs in experiment III were double those of the ST-castrate pairs, but the variability in both groups was large, and none of the differences was significant. Although oil-treated castrates were not involved in copulatory activities, indicating that androgen is necessary for their occurrence, TP injections had virtually no effect in intact birds. Bil l ing, sexual crouching and mounting may persist longer than 81 courtship behaviour in gonadectomized male and female doves (Cheng, 1973a). Liley observed no clear relationship between copulation in female doves and the endocrine state as assessed on the basis of ovary and oviduct development (Liley, 1976) and exogenous hormone treatment (Liley, in press). He concludes that nest-oriented and copulatory behaviours are under the control of different casual factors. It is of interest that androgen implanted into the preoptic region of capons will induce copulatory behaviour in the absence of any courtship or aggressive displays (Barfield, 1965 & 1969). The present study also indicates that copulatory behaviour may not be influenced by the same factors as courtship and nest-building. Although the female initiates the sequence by begging, the levels of bil l ing and mounting suggest that the males' responsiveness is indepen-dent of both photoregime and androgen concentration (provided some is present). In intact birds the four copulatory activities were not correlated with courtship or nest-building behaviours, or with testis size in control birds (Table XI). In TP-treated castrates there was a positive correlation between billing and time spent by the male at the nest, but otherwise both billing and mounting/copulation were again independent of courtship and building activities (Table XVIII). 3. The Relationship of the Male's Photoregime to Female Behaviour and the Latency to Egg-laying The courtship behaviour of the females did not vary significantly with changes in the treatment of their mates. Even those females paired with oil-treated castrates exhibited quite high levels of soliciting and 82 sitting at the nest. There was no correlation between either of these behaviours and levels of chasing, bowing, or nest-building in the males. High levels of female courtship were, however, associated with shorter latencies to egg-laying, suggesting that the females' behaviour was dependent upon their endocrine state rather than upon the behaviour of the males (cf. Martinez-Vargas, 1974). The relationship of female soliciting and time spent at the nest to male nest-building has been discussed previously. Females paired with long-day males displayed more active nest-building than those paired with short-day males (the only significant difference was between the LT-castrate and ST-castrate groups). Both active nest-building and carrying were strongly correlated with measures of male nest-building. Active building by females usually occurred after male building had declined, and was possibly influenced by stimuli emanating from the nest or from participation in building. The latency to egg-laying did not vary between groups in experiment II, although male courtship is known to stimulate ovulation (Erickson & Lehrman, 1964; Erickson, 1970; Barfield, 1971). The effec-tiveness of male behaviour depends, however, on the reproductive state of the female. Castrated males are ineffective in inducing ovulation in birds with small fol l icles (1.5 - 5.5 mm), but are as effective as intacts for birds with large foll icles (7 - 13 mm) (Cheng, 1974). Thus there appears to be a threshold of responsiveness in females which is related to their endocrine condition; above this threshold the mere presence of another bird is effective, while below it complete male 83 courtship activity is required. Lambe & Erickson (1973) noted a similar all-or-none phenomenon. In groups of females exposed to the shadow of a courting male or to castrates half laid eggs within 7 days while the remainder not only failed to ovulate, but also exhibited very l i t t l e development of the reproductive tract. Since.the stimulus females in the present study were held on 14L:10D for two weeks prior to testing i t is likely that they were in advanced ovarian stages when the experiments began, and thus responded equally well to all males. In experiment III the latencies of the ST, LC, and SC groups were similar, but the LT pairs laid significantly sooner than the ST pairs. The explanation outlined above could account for the similarity between the control castrates and ST groups, but not for the shorter latency in the LT group. Courtship activity of the LT males did not differ from that of the others. In fact, the only distinction was in nest-building: LT males built much more than ST males or controls. White (1975b) has reviewed the evidence of stimulation of ovulation b y the nest and by participation in nest-building. She concludes that "some participation in nest-building is important in facilitating egg-laying." The reason why nest-building should have affected the latency to laying in the third experiment but not in the second is unclear. Liley (in press) noted that paired female doves held on long photo-periods came into breeding condition sooner than those held on short ones in December but not in March, and he suggests that courtship stimulation may be more effective in the spring. It is possible that the females used in this study exhibited a similar change in responsiveness to males; 84 and that those paired in late October/early November (experiment II) were not responsive to male building activity, while those paired in June (experiment III) were. C. MALE NEST-BUILDING 1. The Influence of Daylength and Androgens The occurrence of nest-building behaviour in male ring doves is dependent upon the presence of gonadal hormones. If males are castrated they will not participate in nest-construction, even i f presented with adequate stimulation from the female. Injections of testosterone propionate and estradiol benzoate are both effective at reinstating build-ing in castrated male doves (Martinez-Vargas, 1974). The amount of building exhibited by any individual is determined by the interaction of both external and internal factors. Thus, testos-terone propionate and estradiol benzoate will not induce building in intact male feral pigeons paired with females for only 30 minutes/day (Murton et a l . , 1969). In the dove the gathering behaviour of males is related to the firmness with which the female is attached to the nest site. Males whose mates perform high levels of soliciting and spend much of their time in the nest build more actively than those whose mates display l i t t l e nest-oriented behaviour (Martinez-Vargas & Erickson, 1973). The state of the nest also influences building. Pairs given complete nests follow the same cycle of building as those without nest, with building beginning to increase about 4 days before the f irst egg is laid. The absolute amounts of building, however, are much greater in pairs with no nest (White, 1975b). Photoperiod has a marked effect on building behaviour. Long-day birds are more active than short-day birds over much of the building cycle, but the pattern remains the same in both groups, with building increasing from day -5 or -4 to day -2 or -1, then dropping off. (This pattern is similar to that described by White ((1975b)), although she noted that the drop just prior to egg laying was not seen in those pairs whose nests were removed each day.) Since LT castrates build more than ST castrates, the photoperiodic effect does not appear to be mediated by changes in the levels of gonadal hormones. 2. The Relationship of Nest-Building to Other Reproductive Bahvaiours It is of interest that although both courtship and building activities can be induced by testosterone treatment in male doves, only those behaviours directly associated with nest-construction are subject to the non-gonadal influence of photoperiod. Also, i t is striking that i t is nest-building behaviour which has been shown to be influenced by similar effects in both stickleback, (Hoar, 1962) and canaries (Hinde & Steel, 1975). In female doves both nest-soliciting and nest-building appear to be affected by daylength. Because the birds were intact, however, i t is possible that one or both of these behaviours were affected by endogenous hormone production, as was courtship in experiment II of the present study. The results cited above suggest that the control of nest-building behaviours may be separate from that governing courtship. In the normal reproductive cycle courtship and building activities 86 occur at different times of day. Soliciting and bowing are most frequent soon after the onset of light; building several hours later (Martinez-Vargas & Erickson, 1973; Martinez-Vargas, 1974). Moreover, courtship declines.as the date of egg-laying approaches, while building increases until shortly before ovulation (fig. 18; see also Martinez-Vargas & Erickson, 1973; Gerlach et a l . , 1975; White, 1975b). Thus, even though both groups of activities are androgen-dependent, their occurrence is not determined by a unitary drive. The mechanisms con-trolling the appearance of courtship and nest-building are distinct and seem to be differentially affected by various external factors. 3. Possible Non-gonadal Mechanisms Involved in the Control of Male Nest-building by Photoperiod There are several possible mechanisms which might be responsible for the observed differences in nest-building seen between the two photo-periods; daylength may function via a non-gonadal endocrine system; it may alter hypothalamic responsiveness to steroids as a result of changes in endogenous hormone levels, or it may affect hypothalamic sensitivity directly. Hormones other than gonadal steroids are know to alter various aspects of behaviour. For instance, migatory restlessness and hyperphagia associated with pre-migratory fat deposition can be induced by long photoperiods in both intact and castrated birds (Lofts & Lam, 1973). These behaviours appear to be dependent upon prolactin, which may act synergist!'cally with adrenocortical and gonadotropic hormones (Meier, 1972, van Tienhoyen, 1968). Litt le is known of any possible synergistic Fig. 18 The frequency of various reproductive activities in relation to the laying of the 1st egg (day 0). CH/PK = chase/peck BC = bow-coo; NS = male nest-soliciting; NB = male nest-building. Values represent the combined scores of all males in experiment I I . CH/PK 88 n = 7 10 14 16 17 19 20 20 20 20 19 17 16 13 10 DAYS IN RELATION TO FIRST EGG 89 effects between these hormones and androgens in male doves. Prolactin will not augment nest-building in short day estrogen-treated ovariectomized canaries (Hinde & Stae'l, 1975) but does induce later stages of nesting behaviour in estrogen-treated ovariectomized budgerigars (Hutchison, 1975)..... Furthermore, prolactin levels in male doves are low prior to incubation (Lehrman, 1964). Evidence of gonadotropic involvement in aggressive behaviour has been mentioned. Involvement in nest-building is unlikely, however, as LH has been found to have no effect on building in gonadectomized female canaries (Hinde & Steel, 1975) or in Quelea quelea (Crook & Butterfield, 1968). In addition, LH levels appear to be very low in courting pigeons (Murton et a l . , 1969). More recently hypothalmic releasing factors have been implicated in the control of mammalian sexual behaviour. LRF injections potentiate the lordosis-inducing effect of low doses of estrogen in ovariectomized rats (Moss & McCann, 1973 & 1975). The effect of LRF is independent of changes at the pituitary level, since neither LH nor FSH will increase the response to estrogen (Moss, 1974), and releasing factor is s t i l l effective in hypophysectomized rats (Pfaff, 1973). It would be interesting to see whether hypothalamic hormones affect behaviour in birds as well. The pineal gland has been examined as a possible mediator of photoperiodic effects in vertebrates (see reviews by Wurtman et a l . , 1968; Ralph, 1970; Menaker & Oksche, 1974) and Steel & Hinde (1972) have suggested that i t may play a role in the photoperiodic control of nest-building in canaries. A second possible mechanism of photoperiodic influence involves changes in endogenous steroid production (Liley, 1976). Responsiveness to steroid hormones is known to decrease with time; after gonadectomy in male (Davidson, 1972) and female (Damasa & Davidson, 1973) rats and in male ring doves (Hutchison, 1969 & 1974a). Thus, male doves exhibit significantly less courtship in response to intramuscular injections and intrahypothalmic implants of testosterone propionate if treated 90 days after castration than i f treated 15 days after (Hutchison, 1974b). This decline in responsiveness appears to be reversed following exposure to testosterone (Hutchison, 1975 & 1976). Liley (in press) has suggested that differences in the ability of exogenous hormones to e l ic i t nest-oriented behaviour in female doves held on long and short photoregimes may be due to differences in endo-genous hormone levels prior to treatment. Thus low production of endogenous estrogen by short day females, whose reproductive tracts were poorly developed, could have resulted in a decline in hypothalmic sensi-tivity such that lower levels of behaviour were displayed in response to exogenous hormones. Similar consequences, of variations in endogenous steroids could account for the differences observed in the building behaviour of the males in experiment II. This is supported by Hutchison's (1976) observation that male doves display less aggression and courtship i f implanted with TP in winter, when testosterone production is presumably low, than i f implanted in the summer. In experiment III of the current study, however, endogenous 91 hormone levels did not differ between the long and short day groups, as all experimental males had experienced the same photoperiod prior to castration. Moreover, both groups were given similar maintenance levels of TP before being tested. In spite of this, levels of nest-building were greater on long days. It must be concluded, therefore, that i f the responsiveness of the hypothalmus to androgens was altered by photoperiod the effect must have been direct or else mediated by some factor other than gonadal hormones. In conclusion, daylength appears to influence both the production of and responsiveness to gonadal steroids. Long days result in greater gonad weights and an increase in courtship which appears to be due to higher testosterone levels. Long daylengths also potentiate the ability of testosterone to induce nest-building behaviour. Thus it is clear that the hormonal induction of behaviour is not a stable stimulus-response type of mechanism, but rather part of a dynamic relationship between the external and internal environments. 92 BIBLIOGRAPHY Akennan, B. 1966. Behavioural effects of electrical stimulation in the forebrain of the pigeon. II Protective behaviour. Behaviour 26: 339-349. Adkins, E.K. 1973. Functional castration of the female Japanese quail. Physiol. Beh. 10: 619-621. Adkins, E.K. and N.T. Adler. 1972. Hormonal control of behaviour in the Japanese quail. J . Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 81: 27-36. Adkins, E.K. and B. Mock. 1976. Behavioural responses to sex steroids of gonadectomized and sexually repressed quail. E. Endocr. 68: 49-55. Anisko, J . J . , T. Christenson, and M.G. Buehler. 1973. Effects of androgen on fighting behaviour in male and female mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Horm. & Behav. 4: 199-208. Armitage, P. 1971. Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 573 p . Baggerman, B. 1966. On the endocrine control of reproductive behaviour in the male three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Aymp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 20: 427-456. Barfield, R.J. 1965. Induction of aggressive and courtship behavior by intracerebral implants of androgen in capons. Am. Zool. • 5: 203. Barfield, R.J. 1969. Activation of copulatory behaviour by androgen implanted into the preoptic area of the male fowl. Horm. & Behav. 1: 37-52. ~ Barfield, R.S.. 1971. Activation of sexual and aggressive behavior by androgen implanted into the male ring dove brain. Endocrinology 89: 1470-1476. Beach, F.A. and N.G. Inman. 1965. Effects of castration and androgen replacement on mating in male quail. Proc. Mat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 54: 1426-1431. Bennett, M.A. 1940. The social hierarchy in ring doves. II The effect of treatmen with testosterone propionate. Ecology 21: 148-165. 93 Brody, P.N. 1969. Endocrine aspects of the physiology and behaviour of reproduction of coturnix quail. Ph.D thesis. Purdue univ. Carpenter, CR. 1958. Territoriality: a review of concepts and problems, p. 224-250. J_n A. Roe and G.G. Simpson (eds.) Behavior and. Evolution. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven. Cheng, Mei-Fang. 1973. Effect of ovariectomy on the reproductive behavior of female ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). J . Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 83: 221-233. Cheng, Mei-Fang. 1974. Ovarian development in the ring dove in response to stimulation by intact and castrated male ring doves. J . Endocr. 63: 43-53. Cheng, Mei-Fang and D. Lehrman. 1975. Gonodal hormone specificity in the sexual behavior of ring doves. Psychonevroendocrinology 1: 95-102. Cheng, Mei-Fang and Rae Silver. 1975. Estrogen-progesterone regulation of nest-building and incubation behavior in ovariectomized ring . doves (Streptopelia risoria). J . Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 88: 256-263. Chu, J.P. 1940. The effects of estrone and testosterone and of pituitary extracts on the gonads of hypophosectomized pigeons. J. Endocr. 2: 21-37. Chu, J.P. and S.S. You. 1946. Gonad stimulation by androgens in hypophosectomized pigeons. J. Endocr. 4: 431-435. Col 1ias, N.E. 1944. Aggressive behavior among vertebrate animals. Physiol. Zool. 17: 83-213. Collias, N.E. 1962. The behavior of ducks, p. 565-585. J_n_ E.S.E. Hafez (ed.) The sexual behavior of domestic animals. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore. Crook,'J,H,- and P.A. Butterfield. 1968. Effect of testosterone propionate and leutinizing hormone on agonistic and nest-building behaviour of Quelea quelea. Anim. Behav. 16: 370-384. Damassa, D. and J.M. Davidson. 1973. Effects of ovariectomy and constant light on responsiveness to estrogen in the rat. Horm. & Behav. 4: 269-279. Davidson, J.M. 1972. Hormones and reproductive behavior, p. 63-134. J_n S. Levine (ed.) Hormones and behavior. Academic Press New York. 94 Davies, S.J.J.F. 1974a. The breeding season of captive barbary doves, Streptopelia risoria,at Helena Valley, Western Australia. Aust. Wildl. Res. 1: 85-88. Davies, S.J.J.F. 1974b. Studies of the three coo-calls of the male barbary dove. Emu 74. 18-26. Davis, D.E. 1957. Aggressive behavior in castrated starlings. Science 126: 253. Davis, D.E. 1964. The physiological analysis of aggressive behavior. p. 53-74. In W. Etkin (ed.) Social Behaviour and organization among vertebrates. Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago. Edwards, D.A. and F.A. Rcwe. 1975. Neural factors in aggression, p. 275-303. In B.E. Eleftheriou and R.L. Sprott (eds.) Hormonal correlates of behavior, Vol. I. Plenum Pres, New York. Erickson, C.J. 1966. A study of the courtship behavior of male'ring doves and its relationship to ovarian activity of females. Ph.D. thesis. Rutgers Univ. 177 p. Erickson C.J. 1970. Induction of ovarian activity in female ring doves by androgen treatment of castrated males. J . ComD. Physiol. Psychol. 71: 210-215. Erickson C.J. and D. Lehrman. 1964. Effect of castration of male ring doves upon ovarian activity of females J . Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 58: 164-166. Erickson, C.J., R.H. Bruder, B.A. Komisaruk, and D.S. Lehrman. 1967. Selective inhibition by profesterone of androgen-induced behavior in niale ring doves. Endocrinology 81: 39-45. Erpino, M.J. 1969. Hormonal control of courtship behavior in the pigeon (Columba l ivia). Anim. Behav. 17: 401-405. Fabricius, E. and A.M. Jansson. 1963. Laboratory observations on the reproductive behaviour of the pigeon (Columba 1ivia) during the pre-incubation phase of the breeding cycle. Anim. Behav. 11: 534-547. Farner, D.S. 1970. Daylength as environmental information in the con-trol of reproduction of birds, p. 71-88. In_ J. Benoit andl. Assenmacher (eds.). La Photoregulation de la reproduction chez les oiseaux et les mammiferes. CNRS, Paris. Farner, D.S. 1970. Predictive functions in the control of annual cycles. Environ. Res. 3: 119-131. 95 Farner, D.S. and B.K. Follett. 1966. Light and other environmental factors affecting avian reproduction. J . Anim Sci. 25:90-118. Follett, B.K. 1975 Follicle-stimulating hormone in the Japanese quail: variation in plasma levels during photoperiodically induced testicular growth and maturation. H. Endocr. 67: 19p-20p. Follett, B.K. 1976. Plasma follicle-stimulating hormone during photo-periodically induced sexual maturation in male Japanese quail. J . Endocr. 69: 117-126. Follett, B.K. and D.S. Farner. 1966. Pituitary gonadotropins in the Japanese quail (coturnix coturnix japonica) during photoperiodically induced gonadal growth. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 7: 125-131. Franchimont, P., S. Chari, and A. Demoulin. 1975. Hypothalamus-pituitary-testis interaction. 5. Reprod. Fert. 44: 335-350. Gerlach, J.L., W. Heinrich, and D.S. Lehrman. 1975. Quantitative Beobachtungen zum tagesrhythmischen Balzen, Bruten und Hudern der Lachtaube (Streptopelia risoria). Vehr. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1974: 351-357. Godden, P.M.M., CG. Scanes, and P.O. Sharp. 1975. Variations in the level of follicle-stimulating hormone in the circulation of birds, as determined by homologous radioimmunoassay.. J . Endocr. 67: 20p.-21p. Goodwin, D. 1952. Observations on the barbary dove kept at semi-liberty. Avicult. Mag. 58: 205-219. Goodwin, D. 1956a. Observations on the voice and displays of certain pigeons. Avicult. Mag. 62: 17-33, 62-70. Goodwin, D. 1956b. The significance of some behaviour patterns of pigeons. Bird Study 3: 25-37*. Goodwin, D. 1967. Pigeons and doves of the world. British Museum of Natural History, London. 446 p. Guhl, A.M. 1961. Gorndal hormones and social behavior in infrahuman vertebrates, p. 1088-1196. J_n W.C. Young (ed.) Sex and internal secretions. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore. Hinde, R.A. and E. Steel. The dual role of day length in controlling canary reproduction. Symp. Zool. Soc. London. 35: 245-259. Hinde, R.A., E. Steel, and B.K. Follett. 1974. Effect of photoperiod on oestrogen-induced nest-building in ovariectomized or refractory female canaries (serinus canarius). J . Reprod. Fert. 40: 383-399. 96 Hoar, W.S. 1962. Hormones and the reproductive behaviour of the male three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Anim. Behav. 10: 247-266. Hohn, E. and S.C. Cheng. 1967. Gonadal hormones in Wilson's phalarope (Steganopus tricolor) and other birds in relation to plumage and sex behaviour. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 8: 1-11. Hutchison, J.B. 1967. Initiation of courtship by Hypothalamic implants of testosterone propionate in castrated doves (Streptopelia  risoria). Nature 216: 591-592. Hutchison, J.B. 1969. Changes in hypothalamic responsiveness to testosterone in male barbary doves. Nature 222: 176-177. Hutchison, J.B. 1970a. Differential effects of testosterone and oestradiol on.male courtship in barbary doves. Anim. Behav: 18: 41-51. Hutchison, J.B. 1970b. Influence of gonadal hormones on the hypothalamic integration of courtship behaviour in the barbary dove. J . Reprod. Fert. Suppl. 11: 15-41. Hutchison, J.B. 1971. Effects of hypothalamic implants of gonadal steroids on courtship behaviour in barbary doves. J . Endocr. 50: 97-113. Hutchison, J.B. 1974a. Post-castration decline in behavioural respon-siveness to intrahypothalamic androgen in doves. Brain Research 81: 169-181. Hutchison J.B. 1974b. Effect of photoperiod on the decline in behavioural responsiveness to intra-hypothalamic androgen in doves (Streptopelia risoria). J. Endocr. 63: 583, Hutchison, J.B. 1974c. Differential hypothalamic sensitivity to androgen in the activation of•reproductive behaviour, p. 593-597. J_n F.O. Schmitt and F.G. Worden (eds.) The neurosciences, 3rd study volume. MIT Press, Cambridge. Hutchison, J.B. 1975. Sensitizing effects of androgen and photoperiod on hypothalamic mechanisms of sexual behaviour. Prog. Brain. Res. 42: 367. Hutchison, J.B. 1976. Hypothalamic mechanisms of sexual behaviour, with special reference to birds. Adv. Study Behav. 6: 159-200. Hutchison, J.B. and CB. Katongole. 1975. Plasma testosterone in courting and incubating male barbary doves (Streptopelia risoria). J. Endocr. 65: 275-276. Immelmann, K. 1971. Ecologic aspects of avian periodicities, p. 341-389. In D.S. Farner and J.R. Kong (eds.) Avian biology. Academic Press, New York. 9 7 Kobayshi, H. and M. Wade. 1973. Neuroendocrinology in birds, p. 2 8 7 -347. j_n D.S. Farner and J.R. King (eds.) Avian biology. Academic Press, New York. Komisaruk, B.R. 1966. Localization in the brain of reproductive behavior responses to progesterone in ring doves. Ph.D. thesis. Rutgers Univ. 171 p. Komisaruk, B.R. 1967. Effects of local brain implants of progesterone on reproductive behavior in ring doves. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 64: 219-224. Korenbrot, C C , D.W. Schomberg, and C J . Erickson. 1974. Radioimmunoassay of plasma estradiol during the breeding cycle of ring doves. Endocrinology. 94: 1126-1132. Lahr, E.L. and 0. Riddle. 1944. The action of steroid hormones on the male dove testis. Endocrinology 35: 261-266. Lambe, D.R. and C J . Erickson. 1973. Ovarian activity of female ring doves exposed to marginal stimol from males. Physiol. Psychol. 1: 281-283. Lazarus,. J. and J.H. Crook. 1973. The effects of luteinizing hormone, oestrogen and ovariectomy on the agonistic behaviour of female Quela guela. Anim. Behav. 21: 49-60. Lehrman, D.S. 1964. Control of behavior cycles in reproduction, p. 143-166. j_n W. Etkin (ed.) Social behavior and organization among vertebrates. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. Lehrman, D.S. and M.B. Friedman. 1969. Auditory stimulation of ovarian activity in the ring dove (Streptopelia risoria). Anim. Behav. 17: 494-497. Lehrman, D.S., P.N. Brody, and R.P. Works. 1961. The presence of the mate and of nesting material as stimuli for the development of incubation behavior and for gonodotropin secretion in the ring dove. Endocr. 68: 507-516. Liley, N.R. 1976. Physiological maturation and reproductive behaviour of female doves (Streptopelia risoria) held under long and short photoperiods. Can. J . Zool. 54: 343-354. Liley, N.R. in press. The role of estrogen and progesterone in the regulation of reproductive behaviour in female ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). Lofts, B. 1975. Environmental control of reproduction. Symp. Zool Soc. Lond. 35: 177-197. 98 Lofts, B. and W.L. Lam. 1973. Arcadian regulation of gonado trophin secretion. J. Rep. Fert. Suppl. 19: 19-34. Lofts, B. and R.K. Murton. 1968. Photoperiodic and physiological adaptations regulating avian breeding cycles and their ecological significance. J . Zool. 155: 327-394. Lofts, B. and R.K. Murton. 1973. Reproduction in birds, p. 1-107. J_n D.S. Farner and J. King (eds.) Avian Biology III. Academic Press, New York. Lott, D.F. and P.N. Brody. 1965. Support of ovulation in the ring dove by auditory and visual stimuli. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 62: 311-316. Lott, D.F., S.D. Scholz, and D.S. Lehrman. 1967. Exteroceptive stimulation of the reproductive system of the female ring dove by the mate and by the colony mileau. Anim. Behav. 15: 433-437. Lovari, S. and J.B. Hutchison. 1975. Behavioural transitions in the reproductive cycle of barbary doves (Streptopelia risoria). Behaviour 53: 126-149. Martinez-Vargasj C. 1971. Female control of male nest building behaviour in ring dove (Streptopelia risoria). Am. Zool. 11: 622-623. Martinez-Vargas, M.C. 1974. The induction of nest-building in the ring dove (Streptopelia risoria): hormonal and social factors. Behaviour 50: 123-151. Martinez-Vargas, M. and C. Erickson. 1973. Some social and hormonal determinants of next-building behaviour in the ring dove. Behaviour 45: 12-37. Mathewson, S.F. 1961. Gonadotropic control of aggressive behavior in starlings. Science 134: 1522. • McCann, S.M. 1974. Neural control of gonadotropin secretion, p. 1-21. In W. Montagna and W.A. Sadler (eds.) Reproductive Behavior. Plenum Press, New York. McFarland, D.J. and E. Baher. 1968. Factors affecting feather posture in the barbary dove. Anim. Behav. 6: 3-8. Meier, A.H. 1972. Temporal synergism of prolactin and adrenal steroids. Gen. Comp. Endocr. Suppl. 3: 499-508. Menaker, M. and A. Oksche. 1974. The avian pineal organ, p. 80-119. In D.S. Farner and J.R. King (eds.) Avian Biology IV. Academic Press, New York. Miller, W.J. and J.S. Miller. 1957. Synopsis of behavior traits of the ring neck dove. Anim Behav. 6: 10-15. 99 Moguilevsky, J.A., P. Scacchi, L. Dubeljuk, and M.R. Taigon. 1975. Effect of castration upon hypothalamic luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LH-RF). Neuroendocrinology. 17: 189-192. Moss, R.L. 1974. Relationship between the central regulation of gonadotropins and mating behavior in female rats. p. 55-76. In W. Montagna and W.A. Sadler (eds.) Reproductive Behavior. Plenum Press, New York. Moss, R.L. and S.M. McCann. 1973. Induction of mating behaviour in rats by luteinizing hormone-releasing factor. Science 181: 177-179. Moss, R.L. and S.M. McCann. 1975. Action of luteinizing hormone-releasing factor (LHF) in the initiation of lordusis behavior in the estrone-primed ovariectomized female rat. Neuroendocrinology 17: 309-318. Murton, R.K., R.J. Thearle, and B. Lofts. 1969. The endocrine basis of breeding behavior in the feral pigeon (Columba 1ivia). I Effects of exogenous hormones on the pre-incubation behavior of intact males. Anim. Behav. 17: 286-306. Nicholls, T.J. 1974. Changes in plasma LH levels during a photoperiodically controlled reproductive cycle in the canary (Serinus canarius). Gen. Comp. Endocr. 24: 442-445. Nottebohm, F. and M.E. Nottebohm. 1971. Vocalizations and breeding behavior of surgically deagened ring doves, Streptopelia risoria. Anim. Behav. 19: 313-327. Parkes, K.C. 1973. Note on taxonomy, p xvii-xix. J J J D . S . Farner and and J.R. King (eds.) Avian Biology III. Academic Press, New York. Pfaff, D.W. 1973. Luteinizing hormone-releasing factor potentiates lordosis behavior in hypophysectomized ovariectomized female rats. Science 182: 1148-1149. Pietras, R.J. and B.M. Wenzel. 1974. Effects of androgens on body weight, feeding, and courship behavior in the pigeon. Horm. & Behav. 5: 289-302. Ralph, CL . 1970. Structure and alledged function of avian pineals. Am. Zool. 10: 217-235. Sachs, B.D. 1969. Photoperiodic control of reproductive behavior and physiology of the male Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Horm. & Behav. 1: 7-24. Siege!, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Toronto. 312 p. 100 Silver, R., H.H. Feder, and D.S. Lehrman. 1973. Situ ational and hor-monal determinants of courtship, aggressive and incubation behavior in male ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). Horm. & Behav. 4: 163-172. Steel, E. ard R.A. Hinde. 1972. Influence of photoperiod on oesirogenic induction of nest-building in canaries. J . Endocr. 55: 265-278. Stern, J.M. 1972. Androgen accumulation in hypothalamus and anterior pituitary of male doves: Influence of steroid hormones. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 18: 439-449. Stetson, M.H. 1969. The role of the median eminence in control of photoperiodically induced testicular growth in the white-crowned sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 93: 369-394. Vandenbergh, J.G. 1964. The effects of photoperiod on testicular activity and aggressive behavior of starlings. J. Exp. Zool. 156: 323-330. Van Tienhoven, A. 1968. Reproductive physiology of vertebrates. W.B. Saunders Company, Toronto. 498 p. Vaurie, C. 1961. Systematic notes on Paleartic birds, No. 49. Columbidae: The genius Streptopelia. Am. Mus. Novit. No. 2058: 1-2.5. Vowles, D.M. and D. Harwood. 1966. The effect of exogenous hormones on aggression and defensive behaviour in the ring dove (Streptopleia  risoria).J. Endocr. 36: 35-51. White, S.J. 1975a. Effects of stimuli emanating from the nest on the reproductive cycle in the ring dove. I. Pre-laying behaviour. Anim. Behav. 23: 854-868. White, S.J. 1975b. Effects of stimuli emanating from the nest on the reproductive cycle in the ring dove. II Building during the pre-laying period. Anim. Behav. 23: 869-882. Whitman, CO. 1919. The behavior of pigeons, posthumous works of Charles 0. Whitman. Vol. II. (0. Riddle, ed.) Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington. 224 p. Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobioloby. Harvard University Press, Mass. 697 p. Woolfson, A. 1970. Light and darkness and circadian rhythms in the regulation of annual reproduction cycles in birds, p. 93-112. ln_ J. Benoit and I. Assenmacher (eds.) La Photoregulation de la reproduction chez les oiseaux et les mammifexes. CNRS, Paris. Wortman, R., J. Axelrod, and D. Kelley. 1968. The pineal. Academic Press, New York. 199p. Young, W.C. 1961. The hormones and mating behavior, p. 1173-1239. W.C. Young (ed.) Sex and internal secretions. The Williams & Wi1ki ns Co., Baltimore. Zigmond, R.E., J.M. Stern, and B.S. McEwen. 1972. Retention of radioactivity in cell nuclei in the hypothalamus of the ring dove after injection of ^H-testosterone. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 18: 450-453. 


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items