Open Collections

UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

A Monte Carlo study of the momentum dependence on the results of tracking unknown particle species in… Sewerynek, Stephen 1999

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata


831-ubc_1999-0227.pdf [ 3.53MB ]
JSON: 831-1.0099315.json
JSON-LD: 831-1.0099315-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0099315-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 831-1.0099315-rdf.json
Turtle: 831-1.0099315-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 831-1.0099315-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 831-1.0099315-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

A M O N T E C A R L O STUDY OF T H E M O M E N T U M D E P E N D E N C E ON T H E RESULTS OF T R A C K I N G U N K N O W N PARTICLE SPECIES IN T H E B A B A R D E T E C T O R B y Stephen Sewerynek B.Sc.(Hon), University of Toronto, 1996 A T H E S I S S U B M I T T E D I N P A R T I A L F U L F I L L M E N T O F T H E R E Q U I R E M E N T S F O R T H E D E G R E E O F M A S T E R O F S C I E N C E in T H E F A C U L T Y O F G R A D U A T E S T U D I E S D E P A R T M E N T O F P H Y S I C S A N D A S T R O N O M Y We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A A p r i l 1999 © Stephen Sewerynek, 1999 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Br i t i sh Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Br i t i sh Columbia 6224 Agricul tura l Road Vancouver, B C , Canada V 6 T 1Z1 Date: A P R ) L . o i l ( i q ? q Abstract The B A B A R experiment is composed of an international collaboration that wi l l test the Standard Model prediction of CP violation. To accomplish this a new detector was constructed at the asymmetric B Factory, located at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. The tests wi l l shed some light on the origins of CP violation, which is an important aspect in explaining the matter/antimatter asymmetry in the universe. In particular, the B A B A R experiment wi l l measure CP violation in the neutral B meson system. In order to succeed, the B A B A R experiment requires excellent track fitting and particle species identification. Pr ior to the current study, track fitting was done using only one particle species - the pion. But given the momentum dependence on the accuracy of the results from this choice of particle species, a better algorithm needed to be developed. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out and a new algorithm ut i l iz ing al l five particle species present in the B A B A R detector was created. i i T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s Abstract ii List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Quotes ix Acknowledgments x 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Sakharov Cri ter ia 1 1.1.1 Baryon Non-Conservation 2 1.1.2 The Process of CP Viola t ion 2 1.1.3 Thermal Equi l ibr ium Lost 2 1.2 Summary 3 2 CP Violat ion 4 2.1 A Brief History of CP Viola t ion 5 2.1.1 The Neutral K a o n System 5 2.2 The Neutral B Mesons 9 2.3 Three Types of CP Viola t ion in B Decays 10 2.3.1 CP Viola t ion in Decay . . . 11 i i i 2.3.2 CP Vio la t ion in M i x i n g 11 2.3.3 CP Vio la t ion in the Interference Between Decays W i t h and W i t h -out M i x i n g 12 2.4 CP Vio la t ion in B A B A R 12 2.5 Summary 13 3 The BaBar Detector 14 3.1 The Silicon Vertex Tracker 16 3.2 The Drift Chamber 19 3.2.1 The Drift Chamber Design . . . 19 3.3 The D I R C 22 3.4 The Electromagnetic Calorimeter 24 3.5 The Instrumented F l u x Return 25 3.6 Summary 27 4 The Drift Chamber 28 4.1 Ionization Detectors 28 4.2 Gas Properties 30 4.3 Gas Type Choice 31 4.3.1 Electron Diffusion 32 4.3.2 Drift Velocity 34 4.4 A Drift Chamber in a Magnetic F ie ld 34 4.5 Summary 36 5 The Silicon Vertex Tracker 37 5.1 Basic Semiconductor Properties 37 5.1.1 Charge Carriers 38 iv 5.1.2 Intrinsic Charge Carrier Concentration 39 5.1.3 Mobi l i ty 40 5.2 The np Semiconductor Junction . . 41 5.3 Micro-Str ip Detectors 42 5.4 Summary 43 6 Tracking Reconstruction 44 6.1 Reconstruction 45 6.1.1 Tracking 46 6.2 Summary 48 7 Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 49 7.1 Methodology • • 49 7.2 Electron Results 51 7.3 M u o n Results 55 7.4 K a o n Results 59 7.5 Proton Results 59 7.6 The Effect of Changing the Sigma Value 59 7.7 Recommendation 67 8 Conclusion 69 8.1 Summary 69 Bibliography 70 v L i s t o f Tab le s 7.1 Electron Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for AS < 0.1a at a 95% C L . . . 55 7.2 Muon Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for AS < 0.1a at a 95% C L . . . . 55 7.3 K a o n Momentum Cutoffs ( G e V / c ) for AS < 0.1a at a 95% C L 59 7.4 Proton Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for AS < 0.1a at a 95% C L . . . . 66 7.5 Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for Various Values of AS at a 95% C L . . 67 vi L i s t o f F i g u r e s 2.1 Cartoon of an e+e collision and the resulting BB pair 9 3.1 Layout of the B A B A R detector 15 3.2 S V T view in a plane containing the beam axis 17 3.3 Cross-sectional view of the S V T in the plane orthogonal to the beam axis. 18 3.4 Side view of the B A B A R drift chamber 20 3.5 Ce l l layout in the B A B A R drift chamber 21 3.6 Schematic of a single radiator bar of a D I R C counter 23 3.7 Side view of the E M C calorimeter 24 3.8 The I F R Barrel 26 4.1 Side view of the B A B A R drift chamber 29 4.2 50 ns isochrones in a typical B A B A R drift chamber cell 35 5.1 Energy band structure of insulators, semiconductors, and metals. . . . 38 5.2 Schematic diagram of an np junction 42 7.1 AS vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for pz, d, (j), and z for an Electron. . . 52 7.2 AS(pt) vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for an Electron 53 7.3 Electron AS(pt) distribution for 2.1 < p < 2.2 G e V / c 54 7.4 AS vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for pz, d, <fr, and z for a Muon 56 7.5 AS(pt) vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for a Muon 57 7.6 Muon AS(pt) distribution for 0.5 < p < 0.6 G e V / c 58 v i i 7.7 AS vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for pt, d, (j), and z for a K a o n 60 7.8 AS(pz) vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for a K a o n 61 7.9 K a o n AS(pz) distribution for 2.0 < p < 2.1 G e V / c 62 7.10 AS vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for pz, d, <f>, and z for a Proton . . . . 63 7.11 AS(pt) vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for a Proton 64 7.12 Proton AS(pt) distribution for 3.1 < p < 3.2 G e V / c 65 7.13 The Effect of Changing the Sigma Value on Cutoff Momentum 66 v i i i Q u o t e s In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams I don't pretend to understand the Universe - it 's a great deal bigger than I am. - Thomas Carlyle A friend of mine once sent me a post card with a picture of the entire planet Ear th taken from space. O n the back it said, "Wish you were here." - Steven Wright ix A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s Let's see whom do I have to thank? A h yes, I suppose that I owe the most gratitude to my supervisor Dr . Janis McKenna . Her energy rivals that of the Energizer bunny and without it I fear that she would not have been able to correct my many grammar and typing mistakes. I especially wish to thank her for all those free dinners that she and her husband paid for - 3 of which were steak. M y thanks also go out to Chris Hearty and Dave Axen for providing comments and corrections. M y fellow office dwellers also deserve some credit for putt ing up wi th my choice of music and sometimes spontaneous outbursts. They include Douglas Thiessen, Jiansen L u , and Roby Aus t in . Whi le at S L A C I got to enjoy the many benefits of being around so many intelligent people at the top of their field - I also got the enjoy the thr i l l of taking unsanctioned electric cart rides down the klystron gallery and down to the BABAR pit area. I would like to thank Stephen Schaffner for putt ing up with my endless amount of questions and Charlie Young for dealing with al l my Be ta concerns. Lastly I would like to thank my parents for always putt ing up wi th my sometimes crazy ideas and their continued support of al l my endeavours. The fact that they are half way across the country has reduced my stress level by many orders of magnitude and x I am sure that after reading this thesis they wi l l come to the conclusion that their is further out there than mere geography dictates. x i C h a p t e r 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n The B i g Bang created the universe some 14 bi l l ion year ago. The very early universe was filled wi th matter, antimatter, and energy. Two of these quantites, matter and energy, are st i l l prevalent in today's universe. Bu t one may then ask, "what happened to al l the antimatter?" Upon combination, matter and antimatter annihilate one another in a burst of energy. If the early universe consisted of equal amounts matter and antimatter then we would not exist today. One is then forced to suppose that there was a slight asymmetry between the quantities of matter/antimatter which would then account for there being any matter in the present day universe at a l l . 1 . 1 T h e S a k h a r o v C r i t e r i a In an attempt to explain the matter/antimatter asymmetry in the universe A . D . Sakharov [1] proposed that the following three requirements be satisfied: (?) a non-conservation of baryons, (ii) a process of CP violation, and (m) the absence of ther-modynamic equilibrium. 1 Chapter 1. Introduction 2 1.1.1 Baryon Non-Conservation The asymmetry between matter/antimatter manifests itself in an imbalance between the numbers of baryons and antibaryons present in the universe. If such a baryon/anti-baryon imbalance does exist it would mean that baryons could decay into non-baryons (the opposite being true as well). A s an example, imagine a baryon, X, decaying into quarks, q, and an electron, e~, through the reaction X —> qq + e~ (similarly an antibaryon through the process X —» qq + e + ) . If this process were possible, then baryon number would not be conserved as the products on the right side of the above equations are mesons and leptons. Al though certain Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) predict baryon non-conservation, to date no experimental evidence has been gathered to support the existence of baryon number non-conservation. 1.1.2 The Process of C P Violation Taken alone, a baryon non-conserving interaction could not likely account for all the matter/antimatter irregularity in the universe. The only way an excess of quarks over antiquarks could develop is if the partial decay rate of the X to a quark was slightly greater than that of an X to an antiquark. This mechanism, of favouring the production of matter over antimatter (or vice-versa), is called the process of CP violation. This important subject is dealt with in more detail in Chapter 2. 1.1.3 Thermal Equilibrium Lost The last Sakharov condition deals with the evolution of the universe from a state of thermal equilibrium to a state of non-equilibrium. This is needed because while the universe is in thermal equilibrium matter and antimatter are constantly being interchanged wi th energy. In such a state, any asymmetry between the matter and Chapter 1. Introduction 3 antimatter that may have developed would be erased. The current scenario for the evolution of the universe is that ini t ia l ly baryons and antibaryons existed in equal proportions. A t some later time, processes that violate CP and baryon number conservation started to occur which led to an excess of baryons over antibaryons. This imbalance was preserved by having the universe out of thermal equilibrium. After a short while the baryon number violat ing reactions were suppressed and the baryon excess in the universe was "frozen in . " The remaining antibaryons combined wi th some of the baryons and produced photons. After this, the only particles left over were photons and baryons, which is what populates the universe today. 1 . 2 S u m m a r y As the previous argument outlined, CP violation is an essential ingredient in the recipe of matter/antimatter asymmetry. The B A B A R experiment w i l l experimentally examine this important aspect in explaining the evolution of the universe. Excellent track fitting and particle species identification is essential for the B A B A R experiment to succeed. This thesis wi l l deal wi th the investigation of multiple fittings of tracks of unknown species in the B A B A R detector. O f the five types of charged particle species detected (electrons, muons, pions, kaons, and protons), the most abundant are the pions. The identification of these tracks are not known a priori . Because of this, all tracks are tracked as a pion by default. Given the momentum dependence on the accuracy of results from this default choice of particle species, a better algorithm needed to be developed. Specifically, at what momentum is it beneficial, in terms of accuracy, to track the unknown particles as al l five particle species rather than as just the default pion choice? C h a p t e r 2 CP V i o l a t i o n There are three discrete transformations one can perform on a given object that are of interest in the attempt to understand CP violation. The first is charge conjugation, denoted by C. When performed it changes the particle into its antiparticle. Consider a state X\x,t >, when acted upon by C: CX\x,t>=X\x,t>, (2.1) where X denotes the antiparticle of X . Another transformation, parity or P, replaces an object with its mirror image and rotates it 180 degrees about the axis perpendicular to the mirror. Using the same state as above one gets, PX\x,t >= X\ - x,t > . (2.2) Another operation is called time reversal or just simply T. A s its name implies it reverses the direction of time when applied to a state TX\x,t >=X\x,-t > . (2.3) A system is said to exhibit a given symmetry if the action of a certain transformation leaves that system unchanged as far as physical laws are concerned. Charge conjugation and parity when applied individually are not symmetries of nature. It was thought that Chapter 2. CP Violation 5 the combination of CP would however be a conserved quantity. This idea was shattered in the early 1960's when it was discovered that the kaons, Kg and K°, are not invariant with respect to CP symmetry [2]. Later it was shown that the Standard Model (SM) does indeed allow CP to be violated in the presence of three quark generations [3]. However the allowed amount of CP violation in the S M is likely not sufficient to account for the level of asymmetry needed to explain the matter/antimatter asymmetry of the universe [4]. Below is a further explanation of what CP violation is and how its measured. For an excellent and more detailed review and discussion of CP violation please see section 1 in The BABAR Physics Book [5]. 2.1 A Brief History of C P Violation It is beneficial first to see where one has been before attempting to go further. CP violation was first discovered in the neutral kaon system and it is wi th this topic that this discussion begins. 2 . 1 . 1 T h e N e u t r a l K a o n S y s t e m Kaons were discovered in cosmic rays by physicists in Europe shortly after the end of the Second Wor ld War. They are neutral particles that decay into positive and negative (or neutral) pions. Because of their relatively long life-times they were assigned a quantum number called strangeness. The K° meson is assigned a strangeness of +1 and the pions it decays to are each said to have 0 strangeness. The antiparticle partner to the neutral kaon, the ~K°, is given a strangeness of -1. The K° and K° both decay Chapter 2. CP Violation 6 into two pions K° ^TT+7T-,K° - > 7 r 0 7 T ° (2.4) It was unusual to have separate particles decaying into exactly the same final state. So much so that there was a real problem of how you should distinguish them at al l . In 1955 Murray Ge l l -Mann and Abraham Pais postulated that the K° and 7Z° are coupled v ia their final states and that during decays are not observed separately but in two "normal modes" characterized by two different lifetimes [6]. Ge l l -Mann and Paz's said that CP symmetry would reveal information about the "normal modes" or the proper linear combination of K° and K°. Let t ing the CP operation act on a state of two pions one gets CP\7V+7T- > = ( —1) 2|7T +7T- > = + l|7T + 7 r > (2.5) since pions are odd under a parity transformation. Now if one tries to perform the same operation on a system of three pions the outcome turns out to be a state that has a CP eigenvalue of -1. C P | 7 r + 7 r - 7 r 0 > = ( - 1 ) 3 | T T + " ° > = - l | 7 T + 7 r - 7 r ° > (2.6) CP acting on any state twice gives back the ini t ia l state again, {CP)2X\x,t>= X\x,t> . (2.7) This characteristic of the CP operation can be summed up by saying that it has two eigenvalues, +1 and -1. This lead to a definition for the two "normal modes" of the K Chapter 2. CP Violation 7 system; one combination being symmetric and the other antisymmetric 1 K >=-j=(\K° >+\K° >) (2-8) \K2 >= -±=(\K° > -\T? >). (2.9) Solving for Ku and IC one finds \K° >= -^=(\KX > + \K2 >) (2.10) \K° >= ±=(\KX > -\K2 >). (2.11) Described in this way, if C P were a perfect symmetry, a beam of K° mesons would be composed of equal parts K\ and K2. The action of CP on \K° > and \K° > may be deduced from the above definitions: CP\K° >= \K° > CP\K° >= \K° > (2.12). If CP was respected by the mechanism responsible for the decay of the K meson system then the final state would either consist of two or three pions. Let t ing CP act on the symmetric state, Ki, gives back the same state wi th an eigenvalue of +1. CP\KX > = C P ( 4 = ) ( I # ° > >) v 2 -±=(\K° > +\K° >) \K, > (2.13) Bu t CP acting on the antisymmetric state, K2, yields an eigenvalue of -1. CP\K2> = CP{^){\K° >-\K° >) v 2 Chapter 2. CP Violation 8 - l ( - ^ = ) ( i i ^ ° > >) -l\Ko > (2.14) It was found that the K\ had a shorter lifetime than the K2, which lead to the conven-tion of calling the symmetric state K$ and the antisymmetric state KL,. So if CP was conserved in the K system then the symmetric state could only decay into two pions (but not three) and the antisymmetric state is forced to decay into three pions only (not two). Since the rate of decay for a particle system depends on the excess energy available (or phase space), the Ks and Ki w i l l have dramatically different lifetimes because the mass of a K is ^500 M e V while the mass of a pion is only ~140 M e V . It is clear to see that there is more kinetic energy available, hence more phase space, for the two pion decay than the three pion decay. This huge difference in phase space is why there is such a large difference in the Kg and K ° lifetimes. The lifetime of a Ks is only 0.8927 x 1 0 _ 1 0 s , compared to the lifetime of a KL which is 5.17 x 10" 8 s [7]. A beam of kaons would ini t ia l ly contain equal parts of K$ and KL but i f one waited long enough, al l the Ks would decay and only the KL would remain. This fact also provided a test of CP symmetry. Since the KL is odd under CP then it is forbidden to decay into two pions, a CP even state. It was experimentally discovered that KL did indeed decay into 7T + 7r~ about 1 out of every 500 times [8]. It then had to be conceded that CP was not a perfect symmetry after al l , but just a nearly perfect symmetry. Chapter 2. CP Violation 9 Figure 2.1: Cartoon of an e + e collision and the resulting BB pair. 2 .2 T h e N e u t r a l B M e s o n s A neutral Bd meson is composed of two quarks, a b type quark or antiquark and one d type. It is sometimes denoted as Bd but in the following it w i l l be abbreviated as simply B°. Similar to the kaons discussed above, the physical neutral B° mesons (B°H and B°L) are also linear combinations of B° and B°. Instead of a long-lived and short-lived combination the B° mesons are combined such that \BL >= p\B° > +q\B° > (2.15) \BH >= p\B° > -q\B° > (2.16) where the subscripts refer to light and heavy mass eigenstates respectively (In the kaon system the lifetimes differ vastly, yet the masses are very close, while in the B system, the masses are expected to differ significantly more than their lifetimes). The time evolution mixes the two B° and B° states as one changes into the other (and back again - equation 2.17). B° -> B° -> B°... (2.17) The B° and B mesons produced at S L A C are in a coherent L = 1 state. The total Chapter 2. CP Violation 10 angular momentum for a system is given by J = L + S (2.18) where L is the angular momentum and S is the combined spin of the particles. S L A C is operating at the T(4«S) resonance which is a J = 1 state. Since the B° and B° produced from the decay of the T(AS) particle have zero spin they must be in an L — 1 state for the conservation of angular momentum (equation 2.18) to hold. A l l this means is that the two components of a physical B meson evolve in a coherent state so that at anytime there is exactly one B° and one 7J° present (figure 2.1), as Bose symmetry states that a pair of identical bosons would have to be in a symmetric state. If two B ' s are identical then the overall wavefunction would be symmetric, but the L = 1 state is antisymmetric. Therefore, the two components of a B meson cannot both be a B° or £ ° , but must be one of each. When one of the B° particles decays, the other continues to evolve, and depending on the time difference between the decays of the first and second B°, there is a possibility of detecting an event wi th two final state B°s or 73°s. To measure CP asymmetries one looks for events were one B decays to a final CP eigenstate and the other to a "tagging" mode - that is one that identifies its b-flavour. 2.3 Three Types of C P Violation in B Decays In the Standard Model the B mesons can violate CP symmetry in one of the following three ways: (i) CP violation in decay, (ii) direct CP violation in mixing, and (iii) CP violation in the interference between decays wi th and without mixing. To date there is no experimental evidence for CP violation in B decays at a l l . Chapter 2. CP Violation 11 2.3.1 C P Violation in Decay This occurs when the transitions to the final states for the B° and B are not of equal magnitude. As an example, if a B° decays according to, where X is a final state consisting of 2 or more particles, then the corresponding B decay would look like where X is the charge conjugate of the X state. If the decay rate for the processes in equations 2.19 and 2.20 are not equal then the system exhibits CP violation in decay. This is often referred to as direct CP violation. The asymmetries in charged B decays are from CP violation in decay. This occurs when the mass eigenstates are different from the weak eigenstates. This type of CP violation has been seen in the neutral kaon system. It is also referred to as indirect CP violation. The magnitude of this effect would be dependent on the difference in lifetimes of the two B decays. Since the neutral B mesons have a negligible fractional difference in lifetime, O(10~ 2 ) , this effect is expected to be small in the B system, but is large in the kaon system, where the K masses differ by 2 orders of magnitude. (2.19) (2.20) 2.3.2 C P Violation in Mixing Chapter 2. CP Violation 12 2.3.3 C P Violation in the Interference Between Decays With and Without Mixing To explore this effect consider a neutral B decay into a final CP eigenstate. Both the B° and W can decay to the same final state. To observe the CP violation, the decays of a time-evolving neutral B° state that began as a B° at time zero are compared to one that started out as a B°. If one starts with a B°, then the amplitude for the process interferes with the process in equation 2.19. The quantum mechanical interference between these two processes leads to CP violation in the system. The B A B A R experiment is designed to be very sensitive to the CP violation denoted as the third type described above (although B A B A R is also sensitive to the first two types - it is optimized for the third). Experiments done at S L A C in 1983 found that the B mesons have a lifetime of order of a picosecond. This long lifetime is beneficial, as it improves the chances that a B° would oscillate into a B ° before decaying. Because the lifetime is of the order of the B° mixing parameter, one would expect ~ 1 B° —> B° oscillation before the B decayed. B mesons can be easily produced from an electron positron collider tuned to a center of mass energy of ~10 G e V , which is the T(4S) resonance. If the beams have equal energies, then the resulting B mesons would be roughly stationary - making it hard to measure the decay time. Measuring the lifetime directly would be a difficult task. Instead, if a particle is boosted significantly with respect to the center of mass frame, a measurement of the distance a particle travels, (2-21) 2 . 4 CP V i o l a t i o n i n B A B 'AR Chapter 2. CP Violation 13 and its velocity, allow one to calculate its lifetime (B^CT = d), where d is the decay distance, r is the lifetime, B is the velocity/c and 7 is the relativistic boost. It was proposed by Pier Oddone of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory that if the electron and positron beams had different energies, then the resulting B mesons would be moving as the center of mass after the collision would be moving/boosted [9], and hence easier to measure the small distances the B mesons move. This is desirable, as then one only has to measure the position of production and decay of a B meson to determine its lifetime. The P E P - I I collider at S L A C stores an electron beam of energy ~9.0 G e V and a positron beam of ~3.1 G e V . In this configuration, the B mesons produced move at approximately half the speed of light and travel approximately 250 microns before decaying. This distance can be measured accurately but it requires a detector that is capable of measuring distances wi th an intrinsic resolution of ~ 15pm, in order to achieve a vertex resolution of approximately 80 pm. 2 . 5 S u m m a r y After being first observed in the kaon system the origin of CP violation is st i l l a puzzle to physicists. It is hoped that the B A B A R experiment w i l l shed some light on this intriguing problem and determine whether its origins are indeed in the current Standard Model . C h a p t e r 3 T h e B a B a r D e t e c t o r The main goal of the B A B A R experiment is to measure CP asymmetries in the neutral B meson system to determine if C P violation originates in C K M mixing in the S M . To facilitate this, a new detector has been built at S L A C . The various collaboration members from each country were assigned specific parts of the overall detector. A t this moment the completed sub-detectors are being fully assembled at S L A C . In the building/planning of such a detector, numerous criteria needed to be addressed: • The need for an asymmetric detector. Since the two beams are of unequal energy the decay products are boosted forward in the laboratory frame. • The fact that various machine elements have to come very close to the interaction region. Because of the high luminosities needed in the experiment unusual beam optics must be placed within close proximity of the interaction point where the two beams cross. • A need for outstanding vertex resolution. The B mesons travel roughly parallel to the z-axis so that the decay times are measured v ia the difference in their decay positions. • To be able to perform tracking over a wide momentum range ~ 60 M e V / c < Pt < ~ 4 G e V / c . Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 15 6 Figure 3.1: Layout of the B A B A R detector. See text for key. • To have the abili ty to discriminate between electrons, muons, pions, kaons and protons over a wide kinematic range. The process of tagging can only be done with a high efficiency if electrons, muons, and kaons can be identified. Also a TT — K discrimination at high momentum (2-4 GeV) is essential in order to distinguish the different decay channels (B° -> fT+n-,B° - * A ^ T T ^ B 0 -4 p+n-,B0 -> Kp, and B° ->• Kir). • To be able to detect photons and 7r°s over the wide energy range ~ 20 M e V < E < - 5 G e V . • To have neutral hadron identification capability. After all the above required criteria were assessed, a design was established and the detector constructed. A schematic of the detector is shown in Figure 3.1. The major Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 16 subsystems of the detector are: 1. A Silicon Vertex Tracker ( S V T ) . This provides precise position information on charged tracks and also is the sole tracking device for very low energy charged particles (eg pt < 100 M e V / c ) . 2. A Drift Chamber ( D C H ) filled with a helium-based gas, in order to minimize multiple scattering. This is responsible for the main momentum measurements for charged particles and helps in particle identification (PID) through energy loss measurements (dE/dx) and also contributes to the trigger. 3. A Detector of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light ( D I R C ) . This is designed and optimized for charged hadron P I D . 4. A Cesium Iodide Electromagnetic Calorimeter ( E M C ) . It provides good identifi-cation and energy measurements for neutral particles as well as electrons down to an energy of about 0.5 G e V as well as contributing to the trigger. 5. A superconducting coil, which provides a 1.5 T solenoidal magnetic field. 6. A n Instrumented F l u x Return (IFR) for muon identification down to about 0.6 G e V and neutral hadron P I D . The B A B A R detector is extensively described in the Technical Design Report ( T D R ) [10]. This chapter serves only to highlight the main features of each sub-detector. 3.1 The Silicon Vertex Tracker The main task of the vertex detector is to reconstruct the spatially separated decay vertices of the two primary B mesons in order to determine the time between the two Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 17 10 cm I 1 Figure 3.2: Detai l of the inner part of the apparatus, showing the cross-sectional view of the silicon vertex tracker in a plane containing the beam axis. decays. The S V T also provides excellent angular information as it is not so severely l imited by the multiple scattering which plagues the other sub-detectors. For charged particles with transverse momenta less than 100 M e V / c , the S V T supplies all the tracking information as such low momentum particles w i l l not reach the drift chamber. The basis on which B A B A R hopes to observe CP violation is to measure the separation between the two B vertices wi th a precision better than one half the mean separation of ~ 250pm at P E P - I I [11]. This works out to a precision of better than 80 pm for a single vertex position measurement. Better precision would aid in pattern recognition, vertex reconstruction and background rejection, so the S V T is designed to have an intrinsic hit resolution of 10 — 15pm for the inner layers and 30 — 40pm for the outer ones. Figures 3.2 and 3.3 show two different views of the Silicon Vertex Tracker. The S V T Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 18 Figure 3 . 3 : Layout of the B A B A R silicon vertex tracker. Cross-sectional view in the plane orthogonal to the beam axis. consists of five concentric cylindrical layers of double-sided silicon wafer detectors. Each layer is divided in azimuth into modules. The three inner layers have 6 detector modules. Layers 4 and 5 contain 16 and 18 detector modules respectively. The two outer layers are further divided into "a" and "b" modules, wi th "a"-type modules situated at a slightly smaller radius than the corresponding "b"-type ones (Fig 3.3), which allows the detectors to overlap. A pin-wheel type arrangement is employed in the inner modules to guarantee a similar overlap. Each module is divided into two electrically separated forward and backward half-modules. The inner sides of the detectors have strips oriented perpendicular to the Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 19 beam direction to measure the z coordinate, while the outer sides have longitudinal strips, which allow for the (f> coordinate measurement. The modules are supported on Kevlar ribs mounted to the end cones located in the forward and backward directions. A carbon-fiber space frame supports the assembly, which is mounted on the P E P - I I final focusing magnets. The B A B A R S V T has 340 silicon detectors in total, covering an area of about l m 2 wi th a total of ~ 150, 000 readout channels. 3 . 2 T h e D r i f t C h a m b e r The drift chamber is the primary tracking device of the B A B A R detector. It provides up to 40 measurements of space coordinates per track, which wi l l ensure a high recon-struction efficiency for tracks with transverse momenta greater than 100 M e V / c . The D C H performance goals are to provide spatial resolution better than 140/im, averaged over the cell in the r — <j) plane, and to supply particle identification (PID) for low momentum tracks by d E / d x 1 . For low momentum tracks, the momentum resolution is l imited by the multiple coulomb scattering in the inner cylinder of the D C H as well as in the silicon vertex detector. 3.2.1 T h e D r i f t C h a m b e r D e s i g n A schematic view of the B A B A R drift chamber is shown in figure 3.4. The D C H is a 280 cm long cylinder with inner radius of 23.6 cm and outer radius of 80.9 cm. Since the collision products are boosted forward in the lab frame, the detector is designed to reduce the amount of material in the forward end. To accomplish this, the forward 1 dE/dx is the energy loss per unit length for a particle traversing a particular medium. Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 20 Figure 3.4: Side view of the B A B A R drift chamber. The dimensions are in mm. end plate is only 12 m m thick, compared to the rear end plate which has a thickness of 24 mm. Also al l the readout electronics and cooling apparatus are mounted on the rear end plate. The inner cylinder is made of 1 mm beryl l ium while the outer cylinder consists of 2 layers of carbon-fiber on a Nomex core. The D C H cells are arranged in 10 superlayers of 4 layers each, giving a total of 40 layers. A x i a l (A) and stereo (U and V) superlayers alternate following the pattern A U V A U V A U V A as shown in figure 3.5. The stereo angle varies from a minimum of 40 mrad in the innermost stereo superlayer to a maximum of 70 mrad in the outermost stereo superlayer. The 7104 cells are hexagonal in shape with typical dimension of 1.2 x 1.8 c m 2 . The sense wires are 20//m gold-plated tungsten-rhenium wiring while the field wires are 120/xm and 80//m gold-plated aluminum. In order to keep the amount of material to a minimum, a gas mixture of Helium-isobutane (80%:20%) was chosen to fill the chamber. This mixture provides good spatial and d E / d x resolutions and a reasonably Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 21 Figure 3.5: Cell layout in the B A B A R drift chamber. Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 22 short drift time. Nominal voltages of 1960 V for the sense wires, 340 V for the field-shaping wires, and 900 V for the field wires at the boundaries of the superlayers are supplied by high voltage assemblies mounted on the rear end plate. For drift-time measurements, the electronics detects the leading edge of the signal from the charge arriving at the sense wires and then digitizes the time wi th a 1 ns resolution. The d E / d x measurements require integrating the total charge in the pulse. 3 . 3 T h e D I R C The D I R C is a new type of Cherenkov-based detector devoted to P I D . Specifically it is designed to provide excellent kaon identification for both tagging purposes and at high momenta for rare B meson decays. To differentiate the two-body decay modes B° —> ir+ir~ and B° —> K+TT~, the D I R C must be able to separate pions from kaons up to about 4 G e V / c , at large dip angles in the laboratory frame. The D I R C wi l l also aid in muon identification in the low momentum range where the I F R is inefficient (< 750 M e V / c ) . The D I R C operates on the principle that charged particles traversing a D I R C quartz bar produce Cherenkov light. Through internal reflections the Cherenkov light is carried to the backward end of the bar (forward-going light is first reflected from a mirror located at the front end of the bar - see figure 3.6). The high optical quality of the quartz bar preserves the angle of the emitted Cherenkov light. The measurement of this angle, along with knowledge of track angle and momentum from the drift chamber, allows a determination of the particle velocity, from which its mass can be deduced. A n advantage of the D I R C for an asymmetric collider is that the high momentum tracks are boosted forward, which causes a much higher light yield than for particles Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 23 Figure 3.6: Schematic of a single radiator bar of a D I R C counter. The particle trajectory is shown as a connected line of dots; representative trajectories of Cherenkov photons are shown by lines with arrows. at normal incidence. This is due to two effects: the longer path length in the quartz and a larger fraction of the produced light being internally reflected in the bar. The D I R C is made up of 144 long straight polished bars of synthetic quartz with rect-angular section, arranged in a 12-sided polygonal barrel. The D I R C radiator extends through the steel of the solenoid flux return in the backward direction to bring the Cherenkov light outside the tracking and magnetic volumes. A t the instrumented end of the quartz bars, the Cherenkov image is permitted to expand and be projected into a tank of purified water, called the Standoff Box. Water was chosen because its refractive index matches pretty closely to that of the quartz Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 24 112.7 cm-»4* 180.9 cm 15.8° 91 cm 7-96 8184A1 Figure 3.7: The E M C layout: Side view showing dimensions (in mm) of the calorime-ter barrel and forward endcap. bars, thus minimizing the total internal reflection at the quartz-water interface. The Standoff Box contains approximately 11,000 photo multiplier tubes ( P M T s ) to cover the detector area. The P M T s are located about 1.2 m from the end of the quartz bars. The phototubes are located in a gas-tight volume as protection against helium leaks from the drift chamber. The D I R C occupies only, 8 cm in radial direction of the detector, which allows for a relatively large radius for the drift chamber while at the same time keeping the volume of the C s l Calorimeter reasonably low. 3.4 The Electromagnetic Calorimeter The primary physics goals of the B A B A R detector, which require the tagging and recon-struction of B events containing CP eigenstate decays, are ideally suited to Cesium Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 25 Iodide (Csl) calorimetry. The need to effectively and cleanly reconstruct CP eigen-states containing one or more 7r° decays makes excellent electromagnetic calorimetry essential. High efficiency for low energy photons is also required to offset the small branching fractions typical of most CP eigenstates and to make it possible to recon-struct final states containing several 7T°s. B y facilitating lepton identification (e/ir and e/p separation) the calorimeter also provides one of the tags needed for every CP analysis. The calorimeter consists of a cylindrical barrel section and a forward conic endcap (Figure 3.7). Radially, the barrel is located outside the D I R C system and within the magnet cryostat. The barrel has an inner radius of 91 cm and an outer radius of 136 cm. It is located asymmetrically about the interaction point. The barrel consists of 5760 CsI(Tl) crystals, arranged in 48 polar-angle (6) rows of distinct crystal sizes, each having 120 identical crystals in azimuthal angle ((b). The forward endcap is a conic section wi th front and back surfaces t i l ted 22.7° with respect to the vertical. It contains 820 CsI(Tl) crystals, arranged in 8 </> rings, starting at an inner radius of 55.3 cm from the beam line. In order to reduce the amount of inactive material in front of the detector al l the cooling, cables, and services are located at the back. 3.5 The Instrumented Flux Return Muon identification and neutral hadron detection are provided by the Instrumented F l u x Return, which makes use of the large iron structure needed as the magnet return yoke. It is segmented and instrumented with Resistive Plate Counters (RPCs) and consists of a central part (Barrel) and two plugs (End Caps) (figure 3.8). Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 26 A n interesting feature of the B A B A R experiment is the graded segmentation of the iron, which varies from 2 - 1 0 cm, increasing with the radial distance from the interaction region. This segmentation is the result of detailed Monte Carlo studies which have shown that muon identification at low momentum and K°L detection improve, for a given amount of absorber, as the thickness of the iron plates decreases. This effect is most important in the first absorption length, so that grading the segmentation improves the performance without increasing the number of layers significantly. The iron is segmented into 18 plates, giving a total thickness of 65 cm in the Barrel and 60 cm in the E n d Caps. Each End Cap door has a hexagonal shape and is divided vertically into 2 halves to allow access to the inner detectors. Chapter 3. The BaBar Detector 27 The main goal of the I F R detector is to achieve the highest practical muon tagging efficiency. About 18% of all B decays contain at least one muon in the region covered by the B A B A R detector. Charged tracks found in the D C H wi l l be matched wi th segments in the I F R and be identified using a detailed analysis of the hit patterns in the active detectors. Neutral hadron (K^ and neutrons) identification wi l l result from a detailed analysis of the hit patterns in the active detectors wi th no track matches from the tracking chambers. 3 . 6 S u m m a r y The B A B A R detector has taken years to plan and build. This effort w i l l be justified by the observation (though not guaranteed, a non-observation of CP asymmetry would also have strong implications on the SM) and understanding of CP violat ing processes in the neutral B meson system. Bu t the physical detector is only the first step in the journey of observing, cataloging, and fully understanding the origin of CP violation. The output from the various sub-detector components are used as input in the reconstruction software. This software is responsible for taking al l the electronic information and making an accurate representation of what actually happened in the detector. It is only after this is done can one see if CP violation has occurred. C h a p t e r 4 T h e D r i f t C h a m b e r Drift chambers are used to detect and measure ionizing radiation. This radiation is the result of charged particles passing through the chamber and interacting with the gas contained inside. The three original gas type detectors were the ionization chamber, the proportional counter and the Geiger-Muller counter. Not until the late 1960's with the invention of the multi-wire proportional chamber did these gas ionization instruments become a integral part of high energy physics experiments. From this renewed interest came the development of the drift chamber as well as the time projection chamber. Although employing the same basic principles as the proportional counter, these two new detectors bore little resemblance to their simple predecessor. 4 . 1 I o n i z a t i o n D e t e c t o r s A l l ionization detectors work in essentially the same way. The detectors are composed of cells. A wire running through the center of the cell, called the anode or sense wire, is maintained at a positive voltage relative to the wires that surround it. These surrounding wires are called cathode or field wires and together with the anode create an electric field directed from the anode to the cathode. When a high energy particle traverses the chamber it has the potential to create 28 Chapter 4. The Drift Chamber 29 Figure 4.1: Side view of the B A B A R drift chamber. The dimensions are in mm. electron-ion pairs (Figure 4.1) . This process is referred to as ionization and is a result of the particle colliding wi th one of the atoms in the gas, releasing an electron. In an electric field, the negatively charged electrons wi l l then drift toward the nearest anode wire because of its positive potential. The remaining ions wi l l move toward the cathode wires which are kept at a negative potential relative to the anode ones. The anode wires in a drift chamber have a high voltage applied to them. The reasoning for this is that it causes the newly freed electrons to accelerate toward the anode wire. Due to this high acceleration, each of the original or primary electrons is then able to gain sufficient energy to further ionize the gas molecules that lie in its path. These Chapter 4. The Drift Chamber 30 secondary electrons can then repeat the process, increasing the number of electrons that are moving toward the anode wire. This procedure escalates and is referred to as an ionization avalanche. If there are enough electrons in the avalanche that are collected at the anode wire then a signal may be detected on the wire. The number of electrons that are collected on the sense wire is directly proportional to the energy of the charged particle that produced the primary electron. The gas gain is defined to be the ratio of the number of electrons in the avalanche that arrive at the sense wire to the number of ini t ia l primary ions, and is typically on the order of 10 6 [12]. The time between the first ionization at time to, and the arrival of the signal at the wire at time, t, can be measured using an external trigger (t 0 is also obtained from an iteration fit of al l the tracks in an event). Using this information the drift time can be determined. If the electrons drift toward the sense wire wi th a known velocity, va, called the drift velocity, then the drift distance of the particle to the wire when it passed through the cell can also be calculated: Jt0 How well the position of the particle is known and the detection efficiency is primarily governed by the choice of gas and the cell size and geometry used in the chamber. 4 . 2 G a s P r o p e r t i e s Numerous gas properties dictate whether a certain gas is appropriate to fill a drift chamber. A few of these characteristics include the type of gas, drift velocities and how the quality for various gases reflect on chamber stability. (4.1) Chapter 4. The Drift Chamber 31 4 . 3 G a s T y p e C h o i c e The specific requirements for the B A B A R drift chamber were outlined in Chapter 3. These included a gas that minimized multiple Coulomb scattering and provided good spatial and d E / d x resolutions with a reasonably short drift time. Al though important for this particular experiment, there are a number of more generic issues one faces when deciding what gas to use to fill a drift chamber. A drift chamber operating at room temperature can only be filled wi th elements that are in a gaseous state. These include oxygen ( 0 2 ) , nitrogen ( N 2 ) , fluorine ( F 2 ) , and the noble gases, helium (He), neon (Ne), argon (Ar) , krypton (Kr) , and xenon (Xe). In the above list only the noble gases are monatomic while the others (oxygen, nitrogen and fluorine) are diatomic. Diatomic molecules are more complex than monatomic ones and i f molecular size is an issue, then this needs to be addressed. A main function of the gas in a drift chamber is to aid in the production of an ionization avalanche. Depending on whether the gas is monatomic or diatomic, this avalanche can occur at different operating anode voltages. This avalanche arises in noble gases at a much lower anode voltage than with gas mixtures comprised of complex diatomic molecules. Due to the numerous non-ionizing energy dissipative modes present in the diatomic molecules, they are able disperse energy through collisions or disassocations into smaller molecules. These modes are not accessible in the noble gas molecules which can only return to their ground states by the release of a photon. This photon is then able to continue the process of ionization avalanche and hence a lower anode voltage is needed to obtain a sufficiently large pulse arriving at the wire. A t high voltages there is a problem with having only noble gases present in the chamber. Chapter 4. The Drift Chamber 32 The photon released during a noble gases de-excitation is ultraviolet. A s a consequence, it possesses an energy (11.6 eV for argon, 19.8 eV for helium)[13] that is greater than the work function 1 of any metal cathode (4.82 eV for a gold plated cathode) [14]. These newly freed electrons then repeat the process of ionization on their journey toward the anode. The solution to this dilemma is to add what is called a quencher gas. This quencher gas is a complex molecule, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) or iso-butane (i-C4H10), that retards the ejection of these unwanted electrons from the cathode wires. This is accomplished because these complex molecules have a large number of non-radiative excited states - both rotational and vibrational. U t i l i z ing these states, it is possible for a complex molecule to absorb and then dissipate a wide range of photon energies, thereby eliminating the ultraviolet radiation before it reaches the cathode. Since these modes do not result in a production of an electron, the extra ionization process is stopped from occurring. Al though the quencher gas solves one problem it creates another, the process of wire aging. This occurs when l iquid or solid polymer deposits begin to form on the chamber wires, seriously affecting the operation of the drift chamber [15]. 4 .3 .1 E l e c t r o n D i f f u s i o n The l imit on the spatial resolution of a drift chamber is governed predominantly by the diffusion of electrons in the chamber medium as they move toward the anode wire [13]. In the absence of an electric field, the electron-ion pair formed by the particle diffuses uniformly outward, from regions of high concentration to regions of low concentration from their point of creation. The concentration of electrons at a 1The work function of a metal is the energy that a photon needs in order to just free one of the outermost electrons. Chapter 4. The Drift Chamber 33 later position x after diffusing at time t is approximately Gaussian, and is given by the following expression [13]: dN N0 f x - T T T : (4-2) dx ^AT7D~1 V 4 D t / where x is the distance from the point of ionization, NQ is the in i t ia l number of electrons at x = 0 and t — 0, and D is the diffusion coefficient which, from kinetic theory, is given by: D=(pj =\lu (4.3) \ ^/ average where u is the mean thermal velocity of the electron discharged by the incoming ionizing particle, v is the frequency of electron collisions with the chamber gas and I is the mean distance that the electron travels before colliding wi th an atom or molecule in the chamber medium (called the mean free path). Comparing Equation 4.2 to the form of a Gaussian distribution, distributed about x = 0: K =^ e x pH^)' {4A) the standard deviation of the electron distribution, or the spatial spread of electrons at x is identified as: o(x) = VtDt = J 2 D . - ± - = J ^ - l , (4.5) y vd(x) y eE(x) where E(x) is the electric field, e is the charge of an electron and me is the electron mass. The dependence of spatial resolution on the size of the cell is now explicitly clear. The diffusion distribution varies as the square root of the drift length, which means that the longer the path the electron travels, the more diffuse the distribution wi l l be due to an increase in the number of collisions. Ultimately, a high diffusion wi l l adversely affect the spatial resolution of a drift chamber since the t iming for a •^2 Chapter 4. The Drift Chamber 34 dispersed group of electrons becomes difficult to determine accurately. Therefore, a small cell size should give improved spatial resolution as well as avoid the use of very high voltages. W i t h drift path lengths on the order of 1 cm, spatial resolution values of less than 100 are expected [17]. 4 . 3 . 2 D r i f t V e l o c i t y The drift velocity, of an electron superimposed on random thermal motion in the presence of an electric field, is given by the expression [16]: vd(x) = \ ~ E { x ) (4.6) 3 me u Low drift velocities lead to large drift times and therefore better position resolution because of the improved t iming resolution. In experiments such as B A B A R where there is expected to be a high count rate, a high drift velocity is required as one has to worry about deadtime 2 in the drift chamber. 4.4 A Drift Chamber in a Magnetic Field Another method of gaining more information from the drift chamber is by placing it in a magnetic field. The Lorentz force, F , is defined as, F = ( ? v x B (4.7) where B is a uniform magnetic field. The magnetic field deflects charged particles that have a component of velocity perpendicular to B causing them to trace out a helix as they propagate along the z-axis. The radius of curvature, r, for this helix is given by, m v sin 0 p sin 9 r = qB qB (4-8) 2 This is the finite time required by the detector to process an event during which time it is unable to react to any other signals. Chapter 4. The Drift Chamber 3 5 Figure 4.2: 5 0 ns isochrones in a typical B A B A R drift chamber cell. where q is the charge of the particle. Taking the expression for the transverse momen-tum, pt = psin.0, together with Equation 4.8 gives, Pt = rqB. (4.9) So if one knows the magnetic field, then one can determine the radius of curvature and hence the momentum of a charged particle in the drift chamber. The B A B A R experiment uses a 1.5 T magnetic field which has been extensively studied. Figure 4.2 shows the 5 0 ns isochrones in a typical cell of the drift chamber. Chapter 4. The Drift Chamber 36 4.5 S u m m a r y The advent of the drift chamber has meant that it is now possible to measure the trajectories of particles in high energy physics experiments wi th great precision. B y careful consideration on the choice of gas type, cell size and drift velocity, one can localize particles to distances of 0 ( l O ~ 4 m ) . In the B A B A R experiment this increased accuracy wi l l aid in pattern recognition, and wi l l be used in d E / d x calculations. C h a p t e r 5 T h e S i l i c o n V e r t e x T r a c k e r The silicon vertex tracker is a type of detector based on the crystalline semiconductor silicon. Work on crystal detectors was performed back in the early 1930's [18] but it was not unti l the late 1950's that real development on these instruments began. The basic operating principle of a semiconductor detector is analogous to gas ionization detectors. Instead of a gas, the medium is now a solid semiconductor material. Passing ionizing radiation creates electron-hole pairs (instead of electron-ion pairs) which are then collected by an electric field. The average energy required to create an electron-hole pair is about 10 times smaller than the energy needed for gas ionization. This advantage leads to a better energy resolution. Because they are crystalline materials, semiconductor detectors have a greater sensitivity to radiation, which limits their long term use. To fully understand the operation of the S V T , one first needs a brief overview of semiconductor properties along with a general outline of semiconductor detectors. 5.1 Basic Semiconductor Properties A semiconductor is a crystalline material whose outer shell atomic levels display an energy band structure [13]. This structure consists of a valence band, a "forbidden" energy gap and a conduction band (Figure 5.1). The energy bands are actually regions 37 Chapter 5. The Silicon Vertex Tracker 38 Insulator; Semiconductor Metal Figure 5.1: Energy band structure of insulators, semiconductors, and metals. of closely spaced energy levels which are close enough to be regarded as a continuum. The "forbidden" energy gap is a region devoid of energy levels. The conduction band is the highest energy band. In this region, electrons are detached from their parent atoms and are free to roam the entire crystal. In contrast, the valence band electrons are more tightly bound and remain associated wi th their respective atoms. The width of the gap and bands is determined by the lattice spacing between the atoms. In a conductor the energy gap is nonexistent, while for insulators the gap is large. In a semiconductor, the energy gap is intermediate in size so that only a few electrons are excited into the conduction band by thermal energy. Therefore, when an electric field is applied, a small current is produced. 5.1.1 Charge Carriers Thermal energy can excite a valence electron into the conduction band, thereby leaving a hole in its original position. In such a state the neighbouring valence electron wi l l Chapter 5. The Silicon Vertex Tracker 39 jump from its bond to fill this hole. This leaves a hole in the now neighbouring position. If the next neighbouring electron repeats the process and so on, then the hole appears to move through the crystal. The hole is positive relative to the sea of negative electrons in the valence band and its movement through the crystal creates an electric current. In a semiconductor, the electric current arises from two sources: the movement of free electrons in the conduction band and the movement of holes in the valence band. If the major charge carriers are the electrons then the semiconductor is referred to as a n-type semiconductor. If on the other hand the holes are the ones carrying most of the charge then the semiconductor is called a p-type semiconductor. 5 . 1 . 2 I n t r i n s i c C h a r g e C a r r i e r C o n c e n t r a t i o n As stated above, electron-hole pairs are constantly being generated by thermal energy. Simultaneously, there are a certain number of electrons and holes which recombine. Under stable conditions, an equilibrium concentration of electron-hole pairs is estab-lished. If rii is the concentration of electrons (or holes) and T is the temperature then, = v ^ e x p ( ^ | ) = A T ^ e M ^ ) (5-1) where Nc is the number of states in the conduction band, Nv is the number of states in the valence band, Eg is the energy gap at 0 K , k is the Bol tzmann constant and A is a constant independent of T . Typica l values of rii are on the order of 1.5 x 10 1 0 c m - 3 for silicon at T = 300 K . Chapter 5. The Silicon Vertex Tracker 40 5.1.3 Mobility The drift velocity of the electrons and holes through a semiconductor under the action of an externally applied electric field are ve = tieE (5.2) vh = nhE (5.3) where E is the magnitude of the electric field and fie and / i / i are the mobilities of the electrons and holes respectively. For a given material, the mobilities are functions of E and the temperature T . For silicon at normal temperatures [19], / i e and ph are constant for E < 10 3 V / c m , thereby making the relationship between velocity and E linear. For E between 10 3 - 10 4 V / c m , p, varies approximately as E-1/2, while for E > 10 4 V / c m , p varies as E~l. A t these high E values the velocity saturates, due in part to a proportional fraction of the kinetic energy acquired by the electrons and holes being drained by collisions with the lattice atoms. For temperatures between 100K and 400K, p also varies approximately as T~m. In silicon m = 2.5 for electrons and m = 2.7 for holes. The current in a semiconductor is determined by the mobilities. The current density J = pv, where p is the charge density and v is the velocity in a semiconductor is given by J = erii(pe + ph)E, (5.4) where the fact that current is carried by both electrons and holes has been used. Chapter 5. The Silicon Vertex Tracker 41 5.2 The np Semiconductor Junction A l l present day semiconductor detectors depend on the formation of a semiconductor junction to function. A simple junction is the np junction which is formed by the juxtaposition of a n-type material and a p-type semiconductor. One method of achiev-ing this is to diffuse sufficient p-type impurities into one end of a homogeneous bar of n-type material so as to change that end into a p-type semiconductor [13]. The np junction creates a special zone around the interface between the two materials. Due to the difference in the concentration of electrons and holes between the two materials, there is an in i t ia l diffusion of holes toward the n-region and a corresponding diffusion of electrons toward the p-region. Consequently, the diffusing electrons fill up holes in the p-region while the holes capture electrons in the n-region (figure 5.2). Al though ini t ial ly neutral, the n and p structures begin to develop a definite charge. Being injected with extra electrons, the p-region becomes negative while the n-region becomes positive. This creates an electric field across the junction that eventually stops the diffusion process. As a result a region of immobile charge is created referred to as the depletion zone. The electric field gives rise to a potential difference across the junction, called the contact potential. A n y electron or hole created or entering the depletion zone is swept out by the electric field. If ionizing radiation enters this zone and produces an electron-hole pair then a current signal proportional to the ionization wi l l be detected by placing contacts on either end of the junction. Chapter 5. The Silicon Vertex Tracker 42 /electrons: ; holes • > ^ j •r 'Ok . • • . | 4- :-h | :!Of •I- 1 -0 Donor ion "V -Acceptor, ion I crmi level (bV Figure 5.2: (a) Schematic diagram of an np junction, (b) Diagram of electron energy levels showing creation of a contact potential V0. 5.3 M i c r o - S t r i p De tec tors In the 1980's, there was a renewed interest in using semiconductor detectors in high energy physics. This was due in part to a demonstration that showed a 5 pm spa-t ia l resolution using a silicon micro-strip detector [20]. Such a device is composed of separate readout strips arranged at very small intervals, O(10 pm). The micro-strip detector that B A B A R is using use double-sided silicon strips, A C coupled with polysil i-con bias resistors [21]. Six different types of detectors are needed (I to VI) in B A B A R , each having a different physical dimension, number of strips and readout pitches. The "barrel" portion of the detector (I to V ) have orthogonal strips on two sides. The strips responsible for reading out the z coordinate are on the junction side for the model I, II, and III detectors, and on the ohmic side for models I V and V . The strip on the "wedge" detectors are not orthogonal on the two sides. The ohmic side, responsible for measuring the z coordinate, has strips that with a constant width and pitch. The junction side has strips having different starting and ending pitches and is responsible for reading out the cb coordinate. Chapter 5. The Silicon Vertex Tracker 4 3 5 . 4 Summary Semiconductor detectors have advanced along way since they were used primarily for energy measurements. B A B A R is employing a silicon detector wi th an intrinsic resolution of ~ 10 pm. This great precision wi l l aid the in the position measurements of the decaying particles in the B A B A R detector and wi l l be a valuable asset in the search for CP asymmetry. C h a p t e r 6 Tracking Reconstruction The most important role of the tracking reconstruction is finding charged tracks and providing the most accurate possible estimate of the physics parameters of the un-derlying charged particle. Efficiency of close to 100% in CP physics events that have a transverse momenta, pt, greater than 50 M e V / c is required wi thin the acceptance of the Silicon Vertex Tracker and the Drift Chamber. A long wi th the CP physics requirements are: 1. Documentation of the efficiency of tracking. This includes information on rates of lost and unphysical tracks, two track resolutions, etc. 2. Provide precise position and angular information to the D I R C , E M C , and I F R , wi th accuracy consistent with their resolution. 3. Provide an estimate of the position of the beam spot, and do production primary vertex finding. In addition, many detector sub-systems require an accurate estimate of in which bunch a given event originated. Al though this wi l l involve the use of detailed information from other systems, responsibility for this is placed wi th the D C H and tracking software because of need and opportunity. 44 Chapter 6. Tracking Reconstruction 45 6.1 Reconstruction The B A B A R reconstruction software [22] is organized as a set of Modules, which process sequentially the data in an Event. The execution of these modules is controlled by a Framework, which provides a command line facility for controlling execution and access to the Tc l /Tk scripting language. A typical reconstruction package usually consists of approximately 60 modules, arranged in Sequences to do subdetector-specific processing (hit finding, etc.), followed by pattern recognition, fitting, and subdetector-specific particle identification. Eventually the results of these computations will be saved in an event store that is currently being constructed. During this construction phase another means of data storage needed to be developed. The B A B A R Event Analysis Summary Tapes (Beast tapes) were the solution that was used. Utilizing these tapes meant that certain of the high-level reconstruction results could be stored after computation and read back into simple analysis software. The output of reconstruction is accessed through an analysis toolkit called Beta [23]. Beta provides code enabling the analyst to treat charged tracks and clusters as four-vectors. It also provides access to vertexing, particle identification, Monte-Carlo sim-ulation truth information, and reconstruction of sequential decay chains. Beta can be used with either the output of the fast simulation, Aslund, the summary tapes (Beast), or the full reconstruction. In this way, the same analysis program can generally be used for each kind of input. Chapter 6. Tracking Reconstruction 46 6.1.1 Tracking Before a charged particle trajectory can be reconstructed it must first be tracked. What this entails can be broken down into two stages, pattern recognition and fitting. Pattern Recognition The two tracking devices, the silicon vertex detector and the drift chamber, each use their own specific track finding algorithms to locate tracks. The silicon vertex detector algorithm first combines r — cb and z hits in the same silicon wafer to form space points. It then does an exhaustive search for good helical tracks, requiring hits in at least four out of the five layers of silicon. Two drift chamber algorithms are run in sequence. The first drift chamber algorithm finds straight-line track segments in all ten superlayers. It then combines segments to form first a circular track using r and 4> information (using axial segments only, and with a strong bias towards tracks coming from the interaction point), and then a helical track (by adding stereo segments to the axial track). The second drift chamber tracking-finding algorithm uses 2D circular superlayer seg-ments in three adjacent superlayers (all eight possibilities are tried) to form a trial helix. If a helix of sufficient quality is found, it is projected forward and backward, and other segments are added. This algorithm is designed to find tracks not coming from the primary vertex (such as K°s and other decays), tracks which only pass through a small number of superlayers (large dip angle tracks), and low pt tracks (loopers). Another piece of code merges the separately-found drift chamber and silicon vertex detector tracks. It projects each silicon vertex detector and drift chamber track to the Chapter 6. Tracking Reconstruction 47 support tube and looks for good matches. Those that match are combined into a single track, which is placed in the output list of good tracks. Fitting After pattern recognition, all tracks are ini t ial ly fitted wi th a simple helix fitter, which ignores interactions with materials. After merging of drift chamber and silicon vertex detector tracks, the merged tracks are assigned track parameters based on a weighted average of the two input tracks. A l l tracks in the output list (merged or not) are then refitted with a Ka lman filter fitter, using as a mass hypothesis the mass of the pion. The effects of multiple scattering and energy loss in the detector are included in the fit. The detector description used in the calculation of material effects includes a fairly detailed model of the vertex detector, including support structure, models of the beampipe and support tube, and a simple model of the drift chamber (treating the gas as a set of concentric cylinders of homogeneous wire/gas mixture). Kalman Filtering In the standard least squares fit formalism for vertex reconstruction, al l the tracks wi thin an event are fitted to a single vertex in one single step. Due to this, it is often regarded as a global method. The dimensions of matrices and vectors in this formalism are proportional to the total number of measured tracks in the event, N. Because the required processing time for the inversion of a matr ix is proportional to N3, this method runs into trouble when trying to deal wi th events containing a high mult ipl ici ty of charged particles. Addit ionally, due to the global structure of this formalism, it is less flexible in handling different vertex hypotheses wi thin a single event. B y contrast, the K a l m a n filter, which was originally designed to optimize dynamical Chapter 6. Tracking Reconstruction 48 systems, uses the information of different particle trajectories about the vertex con-secutively one after another [24]. Because of this the K a l m a n filter is considered a local technique. Beginning with a start value for the vertex position, one compares this position wi th the information about the vertex from one track. B y a correct weighting of the start value and the information from the track, one calculates a new estimate for the vertex position. This position is then compared wi th the information of the next particle track in the event producing another new estimate. This procedure is then repeated for each track one wants to fit to a single vertex, unti l one obtains the final vertex position. This technique is called filter. 6.2 Summary The B A B A R reconstruction package is the result of many people's work over the last few years. It reconstructs the many different event types at high speed (~ 10 Hz) that are expected to occur in the interaction region of the B A B A R experiment. It relies heavily on the quality of output from the various sub-detectors to function adequately. C h a p t e r 7 Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis The classification of particle species in the B A B A R detector is of paramount importance if one wishes to observe CP violation processes. Determining when it is acceptable to track unknown species as pions, as al l five particle species, or as some subset of the five particle species in the detector plays a vi ta l role in obtaining the best kinematic information for the events and hence plays a crit ical role in species classification. 7.1 Methodology The first step in addressing the issue of multiple mass fits was to be able to read-in and analyze given events and then change the tracking particle hypothesis. The specific code needed was not in existence so a C + + class was designed and constructed which was responsible for organizing the results of a given simulation into a form that would make it possible to examine. This code was inserted into the B e t a framework and numerous computer simulations were carried out. The computer simulations that were performed numbered four, one for each particle type (the pion was not addressed as it is the default choice in the fitting algorithm). For an individual mass hypothesis, approximately 10,000 Monte Car lo ( M C ) events were considered, ranging in momenta from 50 M e V / c to 4.1 G e V / c . The M C events included 49 Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 50 backgrounds and resolution, which fully simulated the detector response down to the electronics/readout and is based on GEANT [25]. Output simulated electron signals and is similar in format to the raw data read off the detector. The track parameters chosen to examine the momentum dependence were: 1. d (the distance to closest approach to the IP) 2. <j> 3. z 4. pz 5. pt A l l but d were examined at three locations in the detector, 1. Interaction Point (IP) 2. The entrance to the D C H (defined as the lowest wire hit) 3. The exit of the D C H (defined as the highest wire hit) For the distance of closest approach to the IP, d, which is only defined at the IP, no other location was considered. Three locations were chosen because of the different aspects each one offers in testing the momentum dependence of the tracking results. The IP is important for vertexing and physics information, the entrance to the D C H is needed to help match tracks coming from the S V T , and the exit of the D C H is required to match tracks in the outer detectors ( D I R C , E M C , I F R ) . Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 51 The output from these track fits were stored in the form of H B O O K [26] files that were then loaded into Physics Analysis Workstation (PAW) [26] for further analysis. Once in P A W the results from the fits could be analyzed. A new parameter, AS, was constructed which gauged the momentum dependence of a certain parameter. It was defined as, The units of d and z are in cm, <f> is in radians, pz and pt are in G e V / c and AS has units of a. In this way the result from tracking a particle as what it really is, for a given parameter, could be compared to the result of tracking this particle as a pion. The parameter AS was plotted as a function of Monte Carlo momentum to observe its momentum dependency. To facilitate statistical analysis, the full momentum range was sub-divided into 100 M e V / c partitions. The AS parameter was then examined in each of these momentum "slices." The momentum cutoff was defined to be the maximum momentum "slice" at which AS failed to be less than 0.1a at a 95% Confidence Level ( C L ) . This investigation was repeated for each parameter at each location for all four computer simulations. 7.2 Electron Results The momentum dependence of AS for the five chosen parameters at the IP is shown in figures 7.1 and 7.2. The various electron cutoff values are summarized in table 7.1. After looking through the table, the l imi t ing case was found to be for the parameter Pt at the IP. This momentum "slice" is shown in figure 7.3. AS {parameter) parameter(WhatParticleIs) — parameter (Pion) (7.1) parameter Err or (WhatParticlels) Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP 0.8 0.6 \-0.4 0.2 h AS(pz) AS(d) 3 a o s o u 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 h F i g u r e 7.1: AS* vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for pz, d, (b, and z for an Electron. Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP 6 o s o U 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 _ ! _ L _ -10 -4 AS(pt) Figure 7.2: AS(pt) vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for an Electron. Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP F i g u r e 7.3: Electron AS(pt) distribution for 2.1 < p < 2.2 GeV/c Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 55 IP D C H E N T E R D C H E X I T d 0.4 (566) — — 0.3 (506) 0.5 (151) 0.7 (138) z 0.5 (149) 0.3 (499) 0.5 (137) Pz 2.1 (126) 0.3 (499) 0.5 (137) Pt 2.1 (126) 0.3 (499) 0.5 (138) Table 7.1: Electron Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for AS < 0.1a at a 95% C L . The numbers in brackets indicate the number of tracks in the 100 M e V "slice" starting at the indicated momentum. IP D C H E N T E R D C H E X I T d 0.4 (466) — — 0.2 (525) 0.5 (160) 0.5 (145) z 0.5 (169) 0.5 (160) 0.5 (145) Pz 0.4 (466) 0.2 (444) 0.4 (370) Pt 0.5 (169) 0.2 (443) 0.4 (372) Table 7.2: Muon Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for AS < 0.1a at a 95% C L . The numbers in brackets indicate the number of tracks in the 100 M e V "slice" starting at the indicated momentum. 7.3 Muon Results The momentum dependence of AS for the five chosen parameters at the IP is shown in figures 7.4 and 7.5. The various muon cutoff values are summarized in table 7.2. After looking through the table, the l imi t ing case was found to be for the parameter pt at the IP. This momentum "slice" is shown in figure 7.6. Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP -- , , i , , ' , ", i , i i , i i i > O 3 c a o s o o -5 AS(pz) 0.# 0.6 r-0.2 AS(z) Figure 7.4: AS* vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for pz, d, (f), and z for a Muon. Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 -4 AS(pt) Figure 7.5: AS(pt) vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for a Muon . Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP -0.18 -0.16 -0.14 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 AS(pt) Figure 7.6: Muon AS(pt) distribution for 0.5 < p < 0.6.GeV/c Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 59 IP D C H E N T E R D C H E X I T d 1.3 (145) — — 0.4 (406) 1.2 (107) 1.1 (95) z 1.3 (145) 1.5 (124) 1.7 (112) Pz 2.0 (97) 1.4 (146) 1.2 (106) Pt 1.9 (131) 1.5 (124) 1.2 (106) Table 7.3: K a o n Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for AS < 0.1a at a 95% C L . The numbers in brackets indicate the number of tracks in the 100 M e V "slice" starting at the indicated momentum. 7.4 Kaon Results The momentum dependence of AS for the five chosen parameters at the IP is shown in figures 7.7 and 7.8. The various kaon cutoff values are summarized in table 7.3. After looking through the table, the l imi t ing case was found to be for the parameter pz at the IP. This momentum "slice" is shown in figure 7.9. 7.5 Proton Results The momentum dependence of AS for the five chosen parameters at the IP is shown in figures 7.10 and 7.11. The various proton cutoff values are summarized in table 7.4. After looking through the table, the l imi t ing case was found to be for the parameter pt at the IP. This momentum "slice" is shown in figure 7.12. 7.6 The Effect of Changing the Sigma Value Due to the time constraints placed on the tracking/reconstruction software and the extra time required to refit tracks using multiple mass hypotheses, additional analysis Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP > a "E 2 1.75 c 1.5 u E 2 1-25 1 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 -r • . - '••{ : n i i M . i 1 < < < i 1 -2.5 2.5 7.5 AS(pt) AS(4>) 4 AS(z) Figure 7.7: AS" vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for pt, d, (b, and z for a Kaon. Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP 2 h 1.75 1.5 1.25 h 0.75 0.5 h 0.25 AS(pz) Figure 7.8: AS(pz) vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for a Kaon Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP M i l i i I L L U l _ U I I! J I I i L I I I . I I I -0.1 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 AS(pz) Figure 7.9: Kaon AS(pz) distribution for 2 .0 < p < 2 .1 GeV/c Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 6 3 Values at the IP 3.5 AS(pz) AS(d) 3.5 3 2.5 h 1.5 0.5 AS(<t» AS(z) Figure 7.10: AS" vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for pz, d, (b, and z for a Proton Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP Figure 7.11: AS(pt) vs. Monte Carlo Momentum for a Proton Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis Values at the IP -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.6 0.7 AS(pt) Figure 7.12: Proton AS(pt) distribution for 3.1 < p < 3.2 GeV/c Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 66 IP D C H E N T E R D C H E X I T d 2.7 (126) — — 0.5 (97) 2.0 (93) 2.0 (91) z 2.0 (94) 2.2 (108) 2.9 (103) Pz 2.9 (106) 2.4 (110) 2.4 (107) Pt 3.1 (108) 2.7 (125) 2.7 (122) T a b l e 7.4: Proton Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for AS < 0.1a at a 95% C L . The numbers in brackets indicate the number of tracks in the 100 M e V "slice" starting at the indicated momentum. Effect of Cluuiuhis tl ie Simua V a l u e cn Cutof f M o m e n t u m 1.-5-' - - - 1 - v - E l e c t r c h ; I — '——; K a o n ; I .Protbri* 'O.'i -!fj'2i o:i (M m o:s:: ;'o.7- ^QI& 0:9. Sigma-F i g u r e 7.13: The Effect of Changing the Sigma Value on Cutoff Momentum. Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 67 AS < Electron Muon K a o n Proton 0.1a 2.1 (126) 0.5 (169) 2.0 (131) 3.1 (108) 0.2cr 1.8 (146) 0.5 (169) 1.4 (146) 2.4 (107) 0.3a 1.2 (145) 0.4 (466) 1.2 (107) 1.9 (107) 0.4a 0.8 (157) 0.4 (466) 1.0 (105) 1.7 (113) 0.5a 0.6 (144) 0.3 (497) 1.0 (152) 1.6 (109) 0.6a 0.5 (150) 0.3 (497) 0.9 (152) 1.4 (118) 0.7a 0.5 (150) 0.3 (497) 0.9 (118) 1.3 (128) 0.8a 0.5 (150) 0.2 (498) 0.8 (118) 1.2 (135) 0.9a 0.4 (564) 0.2 (498) 0.8 (117) 1.2 (135) 1.0a 0.4 (564) 0.2 (498) 0.8 (117) 1.1 (116) Table 7.5: Momentum Cutoffs (GeV/c ) for Various Values of AS at a 95% C L . The numbers in brackets indicate the number of tracks in the 100 M e V range starting at the indicated momentum. was done using various acceptable values of AS. The tight constraint of AS < 0.1a at 95% C L was relaxed in 0.1a steps and its effect on the momentum cutoff values were tallied (table 7.5). This effect is also shown graphically in figure 7.13. 7.7 Recommendation Instead of using an "all or nothing" approach to tracking the unknown species in the detector as pions or as al l five particle species, a cascading cutoff is recommended. Due to the wide momentum range between the various cutoffs for the four particle species it would be beneficial to only turn on fitting of each particle species as it is warranted. For the original requirement that the parameter AS be less than 0.1a at a 95% C L the momentum cutoffs for the respective particle species are: Electron 2.1 GeV/c Muon 0.5 GeV/c Chapter 7. Multiple Mass Hypothesis Analysis 68 Kaon 2.0 GeV/c Proton 3.1 GeV/c (eg. For momenta greater than 3.1 G e V / c , fit track as a pion only. For momenta greater than 2.1 G e V / c , fit track as a pion and proton. For momenta greater than 2.0 G e V / c , fit track as a pion, proton, and electron. For momenta greater than 0.5 G e V / c , fit track as a pion, proton, electron, and kaon. For values of momenta below 0.5 G e V / c , fit track as al l 5 particle species.) These values, along with the cascading condition, are currently being implemented in version 7.11.1 of the B A B A R reconstruction software. Currently work is being done to optimize performance vs. C P U time using the momentum cutoffs given in table 7.5. Chapter 8 Conclusion Deciding when it is necessary to track particles of unknown species in the B A B A R detector as pions or as al l five particle species is crucial for both computational time constraints and the accuracy of track fit results. Naively, one could choose to always track particles in the detector as al l five particle species. This dramatically increases the processing time required for each track and is highly inefficient. This thesis deals with an analysis of Monte Carlo events in an effort to quantify the momentum cutoffs of the five particle species in the detector. The results of this analysis w i l l aid in B A B A R ' S goal of quickly and cleanly observing CP violation in the neutral B system. 8.1 Summary The code to implement the cascading condition algorithm is currently installed and in use in the B A B A R reconstruction software version 7 . 1 1 . 1 . The values for the momentum cut-offs for the four particle species are also included in the above code. 69 Bibliography [1] A . D . Sakharov Soviet Physics Usp 3 4 , 5 (1991). [2] J . H . Christenson et al. Physical Review Letters 1 3 , 138 (1964). [3] M . Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, " C P Viola t ion in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction",Progress Theoretical Physics, 4 9 , 652 (1973). [4] G . Farrar, " C P Viola t ion and the Baryonic Asymmetry of the Universe", Nuclear Physics B, Proceedings, Supplements, 4 3 , 312 (1995). [5] Y . N i r and H . Quinn, The BABAR Physics Book, S L A C Report 504, October 1998. [6] M . Ge l l -Mann and A . Pais, "Behavior of Neutral Particles Under Charge Conju-gation", Physical Review Letters, 9 7 , 1387 (1955). [7] Particle Da ta Group, C. Caso et ai, The European Physical Journal C 3 , 1 (1998). [8] J . H . Christenson, J . W . Cronin, V . L . F i tch and R. Turlay, "Evidence for the 2TT decay of the K\ meson", Physical Review Letters, 1 3 , 138 (1964). [9] P. Oddone, in Proceedings of the UCLA Workshop: Linear Collider BB Factory Conceptual Design, edited by D . Stork, Wor ld Scientific (1987), p. 243. [10] "Technical Design Report," ( B A B A R Collaboration), S L A C - R E P - 3 7 2 (1995). [11] A . Snyder, "The Effect of Vertex Cuts on CP Reach," B A B A R Note #177 (1994). [12] G . Charpak, "Applications of proportional chambers and drift chambers in high-energy physics and other fields," Nature, 2 7 0 , (1977). [13] W . R . Leo, Techniques for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments, Springer-Verlag, 1992. [14] R . C . Weast and S . M . Selby, Eds., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, forty-eightth edition, The Chemical Rubber Company, 1967. [15] J . Heise, "Studies of Helium-Based Gas Mixtures Using a Small Cell Drift Cham-ber", U B C M.Sc . Thesis, 1996. 70 Bibliography 71 [16] P. Rice-Evans, Spark, Streamer, Proportional and Drift Chambers, The Richelieu Press, London, 1974. [17] S. Uno, et ai, "Study of a drift chamber filled wi th a helium-ethane mixture", Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, A330 , 55 (1993). [18] J . M . McKenzie , " Development of the Semiconductor Radiat ion Detector", Nu-clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 162, 49 (1979). [19] J . M i l l m a n and C C . Halkias, Integrated Electronics: Analog and Digital Circuits and Systems, M c G r a w - H i l l Book Company, 1972. [20] B . Hyams, et ai, " A Silicon Counter Telescope to Study Shortlived Particles in High-Energy Hadronic Interactions", Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 205, 99 (1983). [21] D . Barbieri et ai, "Silicon Sensors for the B A B A R Vertex Tracker," submitted to Nuovo Cimento. [22] E . D . Frank et ai,"Architecture of the B A B A R Reconstruction System," to be pub-lished in Computer Physics Communications. [23] B . Jacobsen, "Beta: A High-level Toolkit for B A B A R Physics Analysis ," submitted to Computer Physics Communications. [24] R . Luchsinger and C. Grab, "Vertex reconstruction by means of the method of K a l m a n filtering," Computer Physics Communications, 76, 1993. [25] R. Brun et al, "GEANT: Simulation Program for Particle Physics Experiments. User Guide and Reference Manual" , C E R N - D D / 7 8 / 2 Rev., July 1978. [26] R. Brun et al, "Physics Analysis Workstation", C E R N L I B , Q121, 1989. 


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items