UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

Biomechanics of rheotaxis in hill stream fish Macdonnell, John Andrew 1990

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata

Download

Media
831-UBC_1990_A6_7 M34.pdf [ 5.41MB ]
Metadata
JSON: 831-1.0098344.json
JSON-LD: 831-1.0098344-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0098344-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 831-1.0098344-rdf.json
Turtle: 831-1.0098344-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 831-1.0098344-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 831-1.0098344-source.json
Full Text
831-1.0098344-fulltext.txt
Citation
831-1.0098344.ris

Full Text

BIOMECHANICS OF RHEOTAXIS IN HILL S T R E A M FISH By John Andrew Macdonnell B.Sc. The University of British Columbia, 1988 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN P A R T I A L F U L F I L L M E N T OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR T H E D E G R E E OF M A S T E R OF SCIENCE in THE F A C U L T Y OF G R A D U A T E STUDIES (Department of Zoology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH C O L U M B I A APRIL 1990 © John Andrew Macdonnell, 1990 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Department DE-6 (2/88) ii ABSTRACT Behaviour to increased water velocity is examined in fast stream fish (Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma and Gyrinocheilus) and a slow water form (Farlowella). Behaviour can be divided into two stages; resting and adhesion (Chapter I). In Otocinclus a third fin extension stage is apparent. Based on the slipping velocity of live and dead fish it is determined that Gyrinocheilus has the greatest station holding ability on a smooth perspex surface. This is attributed to a complete seal produced by its oral sucker lips (closed sucker). Station-holding ability is also examined on rougher surfaces. Slipping does not occur in any of the genera at water velocities up to 90 cm s"1. Morphological adaptations (eg. oral sucker, pectoral fins, frictional pad and odontodes) that may contribute to increasing slipping velocity are examined. In Otocinclus these structures are analyzed using a Scanning Electron Microscope. Otocinclus is the only genera with the ventral dermal plates between the pelvic and pectoral fins organized laterally into a frictional pad. Drag on fish is directly measured with strain gauges and used to calculate drag coefficients (0.10 - 0.94; Chapter II). Drag coefficients for low fineness ratio (length/height < 10) forms at Reynold's numbers below 104 compare poorly with literature values for technical bodies. Drag coefficients determined for fish are high due to roughness and interference drag produced by the fins. Using morphological measurements, dead slipping velocities, drag coefficients, static frictional coefficients and submerged body weight, lift coefficients (-0.55 - 1.23) w me calculated. Fast stream fish maximize slipping speed by having high frictional coefficients (0.67 - 0.95, on a smooth perspex surface), density (1.03 -1.10 g cm"3), rheotactic suction pressure (13 - 173 N m"2) and negative lift Although Farlowella has high density (1.129 g cm'3) and a low drag coefficient (0.23), its lift to drag ratio is high (6.71) and rheotactic suction pressures (2 - 27 N m"2) are low. In general Farlowella does not exhibit hydrodynamic, behavioural or morphological characteristics that enhance station-holding. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract - ii Table of Contents - iv List of Tables - J-V List of Figures - vi List of Symbols - ix Acknowledgements xii General Introduction - -— 1 Chapter One: Behaviour and Morphology Abstract 3 Introduction - - — - — - 5 Materials and Methods - 7 Results - 14 Discussion 29 Chapter Two: Biomechanics and Energetics Abstract - — - - 36 Introduction - 38 Materials and Methods - 40 Results 57 Discussion 73 Concluding Remarks 87 Literature Cited 89 V LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Ratio means ("2b7h, T/h, ~x/T, and T/Tsp), best fit 28 regression lines, multiple pair wise comparisons between means and slopes for Otocinclus^ Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma and Farlowella. Table 2.1 Body density ~p~, frictional coefficients "p7, projected 66 frontal area of the anterior pectoral fin spine or ray Af and total area A range for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella. Table 2.2 The constants al, a2 and a3 for the drag velocity 67 curves in Fig. 2.10 (Drag (Kg m s"2) = al + a2 (v) + a3 (v2)). Table 2.3 Hydrodynamic coefficients, ratios and rheotactic 68 suction pressures for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Chaetostoma, Pterygoplichthys, fish 1, Hypostomus, and Farlowella. Table 2.4 Comparison of measured and estimated drag 83 coefficients. vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Pictures and tracings of side view, frontal cross 8 section, plan form view and morphological measurements made for Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Farlowella, Chaetostoma, and Gyrinocheilus. Figure 1.2: Recirculating perspex flow tank and shelf used for 10 behavioural observations. Figure 1.3: Bar plot of mean live slipping velocity "VI, mean 16 dead slipping velocity "V2 and Vi-~V2 difference for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella. Figure 1.4: Scanning electron microscopy photographs of 19 Otocinclus's oral sucker, pectoral fin, ventral frictional pad, and close up of the odontodes and dermal plates on the ventral fictional pad. Figure 1.5: Body width to height ratio (2b/h) plotted against 24 standard length for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella. Figure 1.6: Total length to height ratio (1/h) plotted against 25 total length for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella. Figure 1.7: Distance from end of rostrum to maximal height to total length ratio (x/1) plotted against total length for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella. Figure 1.8: Total length to spine length ratio (1/lsp) plotted against total length for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella Figure 2.1: Measurements required for estimating the total projected frontal area of the fish. Figure 2.2: Forces acting on the body of a hill stream fish. Figure 2.3: Recirculating perspex flow tank and strain gauge apparatus used for determining the drag acting on hillstream fish Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Farlowella, Chaetostoma, and Gyrinocheilus. Figure 2.4: Typical boundary layer profile near the surface of a force plate. Figure 2.5: Calibration curve for the fine tip hot bead anemometer used for boundary layer velocity measurement. Figure 2.6: Relationship between the projected frontal area determined from tracings and geometry for Pterygoplichthys. Figure 2.7: Linear regression lines of best fit for body projected frontal area Ab plotted against standard length squared. Figure 2.8: Linear regression lines of best fit for submerged body weight Wo plotted against total length cubed. Figure 2.9: Linear regression lines of best fit for density plotted against total length 1. Figure 2.10: Drag plotted against velocity for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma and Farlowella. Figure 2.11: Frontal drag coefficient plotted against Reynold's number. Figure 2.12: Oxygen consumption and repositionings per minute plotted against water velocity for Pterygoplichthys. ix LIST OF SYMBOLS L E N G T H 1 total length 1 standard length x distance from h to end of rostrum 2b maximal body width 1 length of the pectoral fin anterior spine or ray W pectoral fin anterior spine or ray width h maximal body height A R E A A total projected frontal area (Ab + Af) Ab projected frontal area of body, circle (TC (h/2)) or ellipse (TC (b + h/2)) Af projected frontal area of pectoral fin anterior spine ANGLES 0 angle between perspex plate and bottom 0 g perpendicular angle relative to fin extension FORCES L lift D drag Wa weight of fish in air Wo weight of fish in water RHEOTACTIC SUCTION PRESSURE Si suction pressure referenced to total ventral surface area S2 suction pressure referenced to oral sucker surface area VELOCITY V water velocity during drag measurement Vi slipping velocity of live fish V2 slipping velocity of dead fish COEFFICIENTS mean drag coefficient lift coefficient calculated fromT^ maximum lift coefficient calculated from the minimum C D miriimum lift coefficient calculated from the maximum C D n static factional coefficient DENSITY P fish body density P. water density (998.2 kg m"3 at 26° C) REYNOLD'S NUMBERS Re Reynold's number of flat plate normal to flow R l Reynold's number of fish based on Vi *2 Reynold's number of fish based on V2 R 3 Reynold's number of fish based on V critical Reynold's number VISCOSITY u kinematic viscosity (8.97 X 10"7 in 2 s'1 at 26° C) BOUNDARY LAYER 5 boundary layer thickness x critical transition point ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. R. W. Blake, my research supervisor, for his continued support throughout this project and providing me with the opportunity to write my first scientific paper. Special thanks to Dr. J. M. Gosline and Dr. N. J. Wilimovsky for their valuable discussion and advice. I would also like to thank Mike Smith and Collin Brauner for their experimental assistance as well as the Vancouver Aquarium for providing me with a specimen of Ptergoplichthys. Thanks also to Mr. Robert Carveth whose discussion on taxonomy was of great value and whose wry perspective gave an added element to this thesis. This work could not have been completed without the assistance of members from the Biomechanic labs of Dr. R. W. Blake and Dr. J. M. Gosline (1988-1990). 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Organisms that live in fast flowing environments have developed a number of adaptations for preventing displacement (Nachtigall, 1974). These adaptations maximize slipping speed by opposing or reducing the forces of lift and drag. Arguably, adaptations for preventing displacement are selected. Extensive work done by Hora between 1921 and 1930 on the hill stream fish (Cyprinoidea and Siluroidea) of India showed unique morphological adaptations that may be utilized to prevent displacement. These adaptations include skin folded into ridges, dorsal-ventral flattening, spines and oral suckers. Furthermore, a number of rheotactic behaviours have been documented suggesting that body and fin position improves station-holding (eg. Keenleyside, 1962; Arnold, 1969; Macdonnell and Blake, 1990). This thesis addresses the behavioural and morphological adaptations in five genera of fast stream fish (Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys and Chaetostoma) and a slower stream form (Farlowella). Although Gyrinocheilus is best known as a fast water form it also occurs in slower flow (Smith, 1945). In the first chapter rheotactic behaviours and gross external morphology that may be used to maximize slipping speed are examined. Furthermore, geometric ratios are determined and compared to low drag forms of technical bodies (smooth blisters attached to a surface). In the second chapter hydrodynamic characteristics are analyzed in fast and slow stream fish. The drag acting on these fish is directly measured and drag coefficients C determined. From drag coefficients, 2 dead slipping velocities Vi (Chapter I) morphological measurements and frictional coefficients | i , lift coefficients C L are calculated using a model developed by Arnold and Weihs (1978). In addition, the oxygen consumption rate at various water velocities is measured for a specimen of Pterygoplichthys. Each chapter is written as a complete scientific paper with an Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion section. The last section of this thesis (Concluding Remarks) summarizes the main findings of each chapter and proposes further research suggested by this thesis. 3 CHAPTER I BEHAVIOUR AND MORPHOLOGY ABSTRACT Behaviour, morphology and geometry of five genera of fast stream fish {Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys and Chaetostoma) and one genus of slow stream fish {Farlowella) are studied to determine adaptations preventing displacement. All genera show rheotactic behaviour to increased water velocity. Fast and slow stream fish react actively and passively to increased water velocity respectively. Behaviour is divided into two stages, resting and adhesion. In Otocinclus a third fin extension stage occurs. In addition, the station-holding ability of Gyrinocheilus, (closed sucker) is compared to the loricariids (open sucker). To compare station-holding ability live and dead slipping velocities (~V1 and"V2 respectively) are measured on a smooth perspex surface. Based on"Yi (59.1 cm s'1) and~Vi-~V2 (45.7 cm s"1) it is detennined that Gyrinocheilus has the greatest station-holding ability. Farlowella has a relatively large "Vi (19.2 cm s"1) and"Vi-"V2 (29.1 cm s"1), however, it has behavioural and morphological adaptations that do not enhance station-holding ability in fast flow (slow orientation to water flow and high fineness ratio; length/height = 21). In addition, slipping velocity is measured on rough surfaces. Slipping did not occur in any of the genera because of effective frictional devices and oral suction. Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, 4 Chaetostoma and Farlowella all have spines, odontodes and dermal plates that aid in station-holding. However, Otocinclus is the only form with the ventral dermal plates between the pectoral and pelvic fins organized laterally into a frictional pad. Gross morphological adaptations that could aid in station-holding besides the oral sucker are not apparent in Gyrinocheilus. For fast stream fish fineness ratios (total length/maximal height, 1/h) are between 6.7 and 9.0. Also, flattening (maximal body width/maximal height, 2b/h = 0.9 - 2.0) and lengthening (distance from end of rostrum to maximal height/total length, x/1 = 0.17 - 0.22) of the fore body is pronounced. Values of 1/h, 2b/h, and x/1 are similar to the optimal values corresponding to technical bodies of low drag (10, 2.0, and 0.3 for 1/h, 2b/h, and x/1 respectively for smooth blisters attached to surfaces). The form of fast stream fish is consistent with low drag. 5 INTRODUCTION Organisms face strong forces from water currents caused by tides, wave action or torrential streams (eg. Jones, 1968; Gibson, 1969; Vogel, 1981; Denny, 1988; Statzner and Holme, 1989). A number of studies have documented and analyzed rheotactic behaviours from a variety of perspectives (eg. Keenleyside, 1962; Arnold 1969; Nachtigall, 1974; Matthews, 1985; Taylor, 1988; Macdonnell and Blake 1990). Arnold and Weihs (1978) analyzed the rheotactic behaviour in the plaice {Pleuronectes platessa) and document adaptations that may d^ iminish lifting forces. Blake (1985) analyzed the carapace design in crabs and argues that the design of Cancer productus maximizes slipping speed while Lopholithodes mandtii resists displacement by actively holding. Webb (1989) examined the rheotactic behaviour and station-holding ability in three species of benthic fish {Pleuronectes platessa, Raja clavata and Myoxocephalus scorpius), arguing that variation in body design results in different strategies of preventing displacement. Compressed forms (eg. P. platessa and R. clavata) are characterized by high lift and low drag, and exhibit behaviours which reduce lift. Fusiform fish (eg. M. scorpius) of high drag and low lift increase frictional forces to prevent displacement. Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella are armored catfish indigenous to the hill streams of Brazil (Sterba 1983). Gyrinocheilus is found in the hill streams of South Eastern Asia (Wheeler, 1975). All these fish are bottom dwellers and feed on algal mats using their oral sucker. Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, 6 Chaetostoma, and Gyrinocheilus are found in fast flowing water and also use their oral sucker for preventing displacement (Burgess, 1989). Farlowella occurs in slower water. Annandale and Hora (1920, 1922, 1925), and Hora (1921, 1922, 1923a, 1923b, 1925a, 1925b, 1925c, 1927, 1930) examined the adhesive apparatus (spines and frictional pads) of torrential stream fauna in India and found a number of adaptations that could be used to prevent displacement. Here, the behavioural and morphological adaptations for station-holding in rapidly moving water are investigated in six genera of hill stream fish. 7 MATERIALS AND METHODS Fish Specimens of Otocinclus (Cope, 1871), Hypostomus (Lacepede, 1803), Pterygoplichthys (Gill, 1858), Farlowella (Eigenmann and Eigenmann, 1889), Chaetostoma (von Tschudi, 1845), and Gyrinocheilus (Tirant, 1883) (Fig. 1.1) were obtained from a local, (Vancouver, B.C.), commercial dealer. Healthy animals were maintained in a fresh water aquarium, (75 cm X 40 cm X 50 cm), equipped with a recirculating charcoal filter and air stone. Temperature was maintained between 24° C and 28° C. Fish were fed food flakes and pellets. Identification of the loricariids (Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma and Farlowella) and Gyrinocheilus was only possible to the genera level. Collection areas were unknown and unresolved taxonomy makes identification questionable using existing descriptions (eg. Fowler 1937; Smith 1945; Isbriicker, 1980; Roberts 1982). However, meristic characteristics were compared to eliminate obviously different species. Fish were deposited and catalogue in the Fish Museum at the University of British Columbia (No. B C 89-500). Measurements were made using calipers (30 cm, Helios 0.005 ± 0.0025 cm). Total length 1, standard length 1^ , anterior spine or fin ray of the pectoral fin length 1 , maximal body height h, maximal body width 2b, and distance from h to rostrum x were measured (see Fig 1.1). In Farlowella the dorsal and ventral lobes of the tail are highly elongated and were not included in the 1 measurement. 8 Fig. 1.1 Pictures and tracings of side view, frontal cross section and plan form view of Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Farlowella, Chaetostoma, and Gyrinocheilus. A 0.5 X 0.5 cm grid scale is used for the backdrop. The tracing of Hypostomus shows the morphological measurements made for all fish (total length 1, standard length l s , maximal body height h, distance from h to end of rostrum x, maximal body width 2b, and spine length lsp). 9 Flow tank Behavioural observations were made in a perspex recirculating flow tank (250 cm X 25 cm X 60 cm). A 0.5 HP electric motor rotated a propeller (diameter 15 cm) to produce flow. A screen was placed at the end of the upper level to prevent fish, that opted to drift down stream, from being swept into the propeller. A flow rectifying grid (20 cm X 20 cm) made of straws (0.55 cm diameter) was located just in front of the propeller (Fig. 1.2). Temperature was maintained (24°-28° C) using a recirculating heater (Brinkmann instruments, Model IC-2, 1000 W). Individual fish were placed into the upper level of the flow tank (Fig. 1.2). Water velocity was gradually increased by increments of 5.0 cm s"1 starting at 0.0 cm s"1 and maintained for 5 min at each velocity. The mean slipping velocity on a perspex surface for live fish~Vl, was recorded when the fish first began to slide backwards continuously (n = 10 trials per fish). Mean slipping velocity ~Vi was also measured for dead fish (n = 10 trials per fish). Fish were killed with a strong solution of tricaine methanesulphonate (MS222) and preserved in a 37 % isopropyl alcohol solution. The freshly killed fish were placed 50 cm downstream of the flow rectifying grid facing head first upstream. Water velocity was increased by 2.0 cm s'1 increments and left for 3 min at each velocity. V2 was only recorded when the fish slipped directly backwards. If the fish turned side ways before slipping the measurement was not taken, but if rotation occurred after slipping these values were recorded following Arnold and Weihs (1978). Behavioural observations on Otocinclus were more difficult due to Fig. 1.2 Recirculating perspex flow tank and shelf used for behavioural observations (minor a, flow rectifying grid b, 0.5 HP electric motor c, upper level d, screen for catching fish e, water velocity meter f, perspex shelf g, and water velocity direction v). 11 their small size. To see more clearly a mirror was angled at 45° and placed under a perspex shelf (50 cm X 10 cm X 10 cm). The shelf and niirror were then put into the flow tank and a specimen of Otocinclus was placed onto the shelf (Fig. 1.2). This gave a ventral and side view. Otocinclus was removed from the shelf and placed onto the upper level of the flow tank to record V2. In addition, observations were also conducted on rougher surfaces for live specimens. Sand was sifted (Endecotts limited model E.V.F. 1 sifter) to produce three groups of sand grain diameters (0.695 mm - 0.355 mm, 0.355 mm - 0.180 mm, and 0.180 mm - 0.075 mm). The sand was placed into a tray and a piece of perspex, covered with contact cement, was placed face down onto it. This produced a uniform cover of sand on the perspex of a given grain size. Fish were placed onto the sand coated perspex plates and exposed to increasing water velocity. Water velocities were determined using a battery operated current meter (A. OTT Kempton TYP. 12.400, ± 0.50 cm s'1). The current meter propeller was placed 75 cm down stream from the flow rectifying grid and 10 cm from the bottom (Fig. 1.2). Video and Still Photography Rheotactic behaviour was recorded (Mitsubishi color monitor model CM-2501C, RCA closed-circuit video camera, Tamron 60-300 mm macro zoom lens, f 3.8-32, Sony Beta Max VCR) at various water velocities. Photographs (Kodak TMAX-36, 100 ASA film at / 8-11) were taken of side, top and front views of all six genera of fish using a Pentax Super 12 Program reflex camera with a Tamron macro zoom lens mounted on a tripod. Illumination was supplemented by two Crown 650 W SL tungsten lamps. Microscopy Fish were examined using a dissecting microscope (Wild Leitz Heerbrugg, maximum magnification 15 X 40). Otocinclus was also observed under the scanning electron microscope (S. E. M., Stereoscan 250). S. E. M. preparations were dissected from freshly killed fish and placed into a primary fixative consisting of 2.5 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 molar of sodium cacodylate and left three hours on ice. Preparations were then rinsed three times with 10 ml of 0.1 sodium cacodylate and placed into a secondary fixative (1 % 0 ^ in 0.1 molar of sodium cacodylate) for 1-2 hours. Dissections were washed three times with 10 ml of distilled water and dehydrated in consecutive washings of 30, 50, 70, 85, 95, 100, 100 percent alcohol, 10 minutes per step. Preparations were mounted on stubs and left for a day before they were critical-point dried (CPD 020 Balzers Union) and thinly gold coated (Nanoteck SEM Prep 2 Sputter Coater). S. E. M. was used to observe the mounts and photographs were taken (55 polaroid, 50 ASA) of the oral sucker, pectoral fin, ventral frictional pad and close up of the spines on the ventral frictional pad surface. Statistics All regression lines for the four ratios 2b/h, 1/h, x/1, and 1/lsp were tested to see if the correlation coefficients were significantly 13 different from zero (t-test, Ho: p = 0, p < 0.05). Analysis of covariance was used to determine if there were significant differences among slopes (Ho^ Pa = Pb = p*c = Bd = |3e = pf, p < 0.05). Analysis of variance was used to test if a significant difference existed between means (Ho2: iia = (lb = Lie = Lid = Lie = |if, p < 0.05). Multiple pair wise comparisons were done if HOj and Ho 2 were rejected using the Tukey (HSD) test. All statistical operations were performed using the SYSTAT statistical package. 14 RESULTS Behaviour Rheotaxis towards increased water velocity, in Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella can be divided into two stages, resting and adhesion. In Otocinclus a third fin extension stage not seen in the other genera occurs (Macdonnell and Blake, 1990). Resting occurs in still water. In Otocinclus the pectoral fins are folded along the sides of the body. However, in Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma and Farlowella the pectoral fins are extended at all times when resting or adhered to the substrate. The only time the pectoral fins are folded against the body in these fish is when they are swimming against a current. Occasionally feeding activity is seen with the teeth rasping the bottom. The oral sucker is relaxed, and a large gap exists between the anterior and posterior lips of the sucker for all genera. When resting, the body of Otocinclus and Gyrinocheilus is suspended between the • pelvic fins and oral sucker, leaving a space between the ventral surface and the bottom. In Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella the ventral surface is in contact with the bottom. Adhesion occurs in all genera when water velocity is increased (10.0 cm s'1 - 20.0 cm s"1). Initially fish respond to increased water velocity by passively or actively orientating themselves head first into the flow, if they are not already in this position. In Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, 15 Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, and Chaetostoma an increase in water velocity results in a release of suction and active swimming facilitating upstream orientation. Farlowella remains attached to the substrate, allowing the current to push the tail down stream, using the oral sucker as a pivot until the fish is facing into flow direction. This passive mode of orientation is much slower than the active process observed in the other genera. Once orientated upstream the fish move about the perspex surface seeking regions for adhesion. When a place is found the sucker tightly clamps to the surface. In the loricariids this greatly decreases the respiratory gap posterior to the maxillary barbel and stops displacement. In Gyrinocheilus the gap between the anterior and posterior hps completely disappears. The dorsal fin in all genera is depressed and the tail is folded. This occurs during up stream orientation. The dorsal fin is erected when water velocity is stopped or the fish begin swimming. At water velocities Vi fish begin to slip backwards on a smooth perspex surface. The mean for Vi , V2 and their difference is given for all genera in Fig. 1.3. Vi in Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella ranges from 19-35 cm s"1, 50-67 cm s"1, 22-40 cm s\ 32-48 cm s"1, 42-56 cm s"1 and 42-56 cm s"1 respectively. Fish adhere to the bottom and are pushed down stream while maintaining suction during slipping. At Vi the pectoral fin extension stage occurs in Otocinclus. During this stage the pectoral fins are unfolded to clamp the anterior spine to the substrate, and the ventral surface is pressed down. This stage does not occur in the other genera where the pectoral fins are extended 16 Fig. 1.3 Mean live slipping velocity "Yi L V \ , mean dead slipping velocity Y 2 1 • , Y 1 - Y 2 difference ESSCa and number of fish n for Otocinclus a, Gyrinocheilus b, Hypostomus c, Pterygoplichthys d, Chaetostoma e, and Farlowella f with standard error bars on Y i and Y 2 . 17 already, however, the pectoral fins are applied to the substrate. In all genera the pectoral fin rays angled upward from the anterior spine (loricariids) or anterior fin ray (Gyrinocheilus) so that they are orientated at a negative angle to the oncoming flow. In addition, the pelvic fins become more erect and spread out in all genera. This behaviour causes the dorso-ventrally flattened head of the loricariids to be pushed down and brings the anterior spines of the pectoral fins in closer contact with the bottom. This is greatly exaggerated in Otocinclus, and Gyrinocheilus relative to Farlowella. While slipping the pectoral fins and oral sucker remain firmly pressed against the bottom. In Otocinclus the space between the ventral surface and bottom is also reduced. If the current is stopped the pectoral fins of Otocinclus fold in and a resting posture is resumed. The pectoral fins of the other genera remain extended. All fish move forward and reposition themselves when water velocity is decreased. At times slipping is compensated for by rapid tail beating to reclaim lost ground. When suction is released, the pectoral fins are folded, and swirrrrning occurs in the free stream. All genera are able to move forward using their oral sucker in currents of the order of Vi . In the loricariids the gap in the oral sucker posterior to the maxillary barbel decreases its size at higher water velocities. Flaring of this gap is out of phase with contractions of the buccopharnyx. Even at higher water velocities, when slipping becomes more pronounced, the respiratory gap does not disappear in the loricariids and movements of the buccopharnyx continue for all fish. 18 At water velocities greater than Vi the tail and caudal peduncle of Farlowella begins to move erratically, destabilizing the fish. This is also observed in Gyrinocheilus when water velocity is increased rapidly not allowing the fish a chance to gain proper position with the pelvic fins. Gyrinocheilus is able to maintain position with the oral sucker, however, the pelvic fins are not firmly stationed and the caudal peduncle and tail are lifted away from the bottom. There is a difference between slipping and foraging. Foraging occurs in any direction along the surface with noticeable abduction of the oral sucker lips. During slipping abduction of the lips does not occur and the fish moves directly backwards. Similar rheotactic behaviour is observed on the rougher surfaces. However, steady slipping is not seen on any of the three rough surfaces at water velocities up to 90.0 cm s"1. Chaetostoma, and Gyrinocheilus show a jerky downstream movement that is too irregular to consider slipping. In addition, Gyrinocheilus is the only fish that shows a preference for the perspex surface. Gyrinocheilus often drifts down stream from the roughness element and adheres to the perspex. This occurs most frequently on the coarser sanded perspex plate (0.695-0.355 mm). Morphology Morphological features that might contribute to maintaining position in fast flowing water are examined (definitions of the terms used to describe S.E.M. photographs are given in Fig. 1.4). All genera studied have an external oral sucker. Fig. 1.4A, shows a ventral view of the oral 19 Fig. 1.4 S. E. M. photographs of Otocinclus's oral sucker A (Outside diameter ~ 3.3 mm) pectoral fin B (Anterior spine length ~ 5.4 mm), ventral frictional pad C (length from anterior to posterior end = 7.1 mm), and close up of the odontodes and dermal plates ( ~ 200 urn in length) on the ventral fictional pad D. Scale is located in the bottom left hand corner of each picture. a anterior, p posterior, c cross-sectional axis, s saggital axis, t teeth, v oral valve, f respiratory fissure, b maxillary barbel, A s anterior pectoral fin spine, fr fine rays, Dp dermal plates, O odontodes, d dentary, Pr premaxillae. 20 sucker of Otocinclus which is covered in papillae. The teeth are spatulate and bifurcated distally. The posterior and anterior teeth are attached to the dentary and premaxillae respectively (Eaton, 1935). Teeth of the posterior and anterior oral sucker lips point towards the cross sectional axis running through the respiratory fissure. The teeth are separated into posterior and anterior, left and right by a septum lying in the saggital axis on each lip. Posterior to the maxillary barbels, between the posterior and anterior lips, is the respiratory fissure water passes through to enter the buccopharnyx when the lips are applied to the substrate. The posterior lips are approximately 3.5 times thicker (thickness, measured from the inside to outside margin along the saggital axis) than the anterior hps (1.13 mm and 0.32 mm respectively). The oral valve lies in the center of the oral sucker and isolates the sucker from the buccopharnyx. Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, and Farlowella have oral sucker morphology that most closely resembles that of Otocinclus. In Chaetostoma the oral sucker lips are broader and the anterior and posterior lips are of equal size. For Gyrinocheilus the posterior and anterior oral sucker lips are fleshier than in the loricariids (see Benjamin, 1986 for a detailed description of the oral sucker in Gyrinocheilus aymonieri). All the loricariid's have curved spines (odontodes) distributed in sockets of the dermal plates along their surface (0rvig, 1977). Fig. 1.4D shows a magnified view of the ventral frictional pad in Otocinclus. The spiny odontodes that sit in sockets are scattered across the dermal plates surface. The arrangement of the odontodes along the body in Pterygoplichthys is different from the other species of loricariids 21 examined. In Pterygoplichthys dermal plates with odontodes are located in discreet lines running parallel with the body from the pectoral fins to the caudal peduncle. The odontode pattern in Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Chaetostoma and Farlowella covers the body more densely and is not isolated in lines along the body. Fig. 1.4B shows the pectoral fin of Otocinclus. The five loricariids examined all have odontodes covering their ventral and dorsal surface, pectoral and pelvic fin spines, pectoral and pelvic fin rays and dorsal fin rays and spines as seen in Otocinclus. Pterygoplichthys and Chaetostoma are the only genera that have no odontodes or dermal plates on the ventral surface in the area between the pelvic and pectoral fins. Otocinclus is the only genus examined that has dermal plates on the ventral surface between the pelvic and pectoral fins organized laterally into a frictional pad (Fig. 1.4C). The spines are pointed and dermal plates over lapped in the downstream direction (Fig. 1.4D). In all genera the odontodes covering the body are curved in the direction of water flow and tend to lie parallel with the length of the body (Fig. 1.4A and 1.4B). However, in Chaetostoma the dorsal surface of the anterior pectoral fin spine has large odontodes projecting vertically from it. The five loricariids examined all have large anterior pectoral fin spines relative to their fin rays (Fig. 1.4B). Gyrinocheilus has no obvious gross morphological features on the paired fins, dorsal and ventral surfaces that might act as frictional pads or anchoring devices other than its oral sucker. Geometry 22 Four ratios are determined, 2b/h, 1/h, x/1, and 1/lsp to allow for a comparison of overall form. Correlation coefficients significantly different from zero are found in all ratio plots against standard and total length (Fig. 1.5 - 1.8). Fig. 1.5 shows the plot body width to height ratio (2b/h) versus standard length. Only Pterygoplichthys shows a correlation coefficient significantly different from zero. Multiple pair wise comparisons between 2b/h values show significant differences between all of the means for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella (Table 1.1). For all genera examined 2b/h is significantly different from a ratio of one (two-tailed t-test, reject Ho: |i=l, p<0.05) except Gyrinocheilus (p<0.05, t = 0.886, n = 25). Chaetostoma has the flattest frontal profile (Table 1.1 and Fig 1.1). Fineness ratio (1/h) is plotted against total length in Fig. 1.6. Chaetostoma and Farlowella have correlation coefficients significantly different from zero (Table 1.1). Multiple pair wise comparisons between 1/h for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, and Pterygoplichthys show no significant difference between three of the loricariids {Otocinclus, Hypostomus, and Pterygoplichthys). It is not possible to detenriine which population Pterygoplichthys belongs to (Table 1.1). Farlowella has the highest fineness ratio (Table 1.1 and Fig. 1.1). In Fig. 1.7 x/1 is plotted against total length. Otocinclus, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella have correlation coefficients not statistically different from zero. Multiple pair wise comparisons 23 between x/1 in these fish are significantly different from one another in all cases (Table 1.1). Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, and Pterygoplichthys have similar slopes (Table 1.1). Otocinclus and Farlowella have the point of maximal thickness displaced down the body the furthest and least respectively. The total length to spine length ratio (1/1 ) is plotted against total length in Fig. 1.8. For Gyrinocheilus, Pterygoplichthys, Hypostomus, and Chaetostoma correlation coefficients are not statistically different from zero. Multiple pair wise comparisons between 1/lsp indicate that there is a significant difference between means except for Hypostomus and Pterygoplichthys (Table 1.1). The slopes of Otocinclus and Farlowella are not significantly different from one another. The greatest 1/lsp ratio is seen in Farlowella (Table 1.1 and Fig. 1.1). 24 0 . 5 + 1 1 H 0 5 1 0 1 5 S t a n d a r d L e n g t h 1 (cm) Fig. 1.5 Lines of best fit for body width to height ratio 2b/h versus standard length for Otocinclus a (o), Gyrinocheilus b (V), Hypostomus c (A), Pterygoplichthys d (O), Chaetostoma e (•), and Farlowella f (•). The only line with a correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.30) significantly different from zero (t-test, reject Ho: p = 0, p < 0.05) is Pterygoplichthys (Table 1.1). 25 25.5T T o t a l L e n g t h 1 (cm) Fig. 1.6 Lines of best fit for fineness ratio versus total length for Otocinclus a (o), Gyrinocheilus b (V), Hypostomus c (A), Pterygoplichthys d ( 0 ) i Chaetostoma e (•), and Farlowella f (•). Chaetostoma and Farlowella have correlation coefficients (r2 = 0.24 and 0.43, respectively) significandy different from zero (t-test, reject Ho: p=0, p < 0.05; Table 1.1). 26 T o t a l L e n g t h (cm) Fig. 1.7 Lines of best fit for x/1 versus total length for Otocinclus a (o), Gyrinocheilus b (V), Hypostomus c (A), Pterygoplichthys d (<>). Chaetostoma e (a), and Farlowella f (•). Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus and Pterygoplichthys have correlation coefficients (r2 = 0.11, 0.22 and 0.42 respectively) significantly different from zero (t-test, reject Ho: p=0, p<0.05) and common slope (bc = -0.003, p < 0.05; Table 1.1). 27 Fig. 1.8 Lines of best fit for l/liP versus total length for Otocinclus a (o), Gyrinocheilus b (V), Hypostomus c (A), Pterygoplichthys d (0) , Chaetostoma e (o), and Farlowella f (•). Otocinclus and Farlowella have correlation coefficients (r2 = 0.17 and 0.21 respectively) significandy different from zero (t-test, reject Ho: p=0, p<0.05; Table 1.1). 00 CN n 2b/h = r1 2E/F S.E. 1/h = 2 r W S.E. x/1 = "i7T S.E. l / . S ( = T / r sp S.E. a) Otocinclus 35 -0.075(1^+1.384 0.18 1.183 0.008 0.102(0+6416 0.01 6.756 0.085 0.005(0+0.208 0.01 0.224 0.004 1.203(0+2.012 0.17* 6.223 0.222 b) Gyrinocheilus 25 -0.009(L)+0.979 0.05 0.969 0.035 0.I27(!)+7.88I 0.10 8.670 0.104 -0.004(0+0.212 0.11* 0.188 0.003 0.065(0+6.139 0.01 6.542 0.172 c) Hypostomus 36 0.006(L)+1.570 0.01 1.622 0.025 0.024(l)+7.110 0.01 7.370 0.104 -0.002(0+0.199 0.22* 0.178 0.002 -0.075(0+5.632 0.04 4.822 0.057 d) Pterygoplichthys 17 -0.027(L)+1.701 0.30* 1.465 0.056 -O.OI9(l)+7.287 0.02 6.916 0.253 -0.003(0+0.222 0.42* 0.192 0.004 0.047(0+4.052 005 4.494 0.176 c) Chaetostoma 22 -0.041(L)+2.072 0.02 1.918 0.048 -0.450(0+9.929 0.24* 7.620 0.138 0.007(0+0.174 0.12 0.209 0.003 -0.359(0+7.259 007 5.416 0.201 0 Farlowella 25 -0.0002(y+1.454 0.01 1.452 0.014 0.459(0+16 76 0.43* 21.51 0.308 -0.002(0+0.211 0.10 0.191 0.003 0.193(0+9.223 0.21* 11.22 0.187 Multiple Comparisons Among Slopes. Ho:p=0 rejected (p < 0.05) d e_ (_ q=3.98. d.OIIO b e d , b.=-0.003 q=3.92, d.f.=148 a_f bc=0,2l8 q=3.92. d.f=135 Multiple Comparisons Among Means. H°:p=0 a b c e f a d c b 11 1 e c d b accepted (p < 0.05) q=3.66. d.f.=138 q=3.74.~dX=109 q=3.40. d.f.=79 q=3„74, d.f.=95 Tabic 1.1 Sample sire n, ratio means ( 2b/h, T/h, T/T, and l/ISp) coefficient of determination r2, multiple pair wise comparisons among slopes and means, common slope b^  and best fit regression equations for Fig. 1.5 to 1-8 in Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella. Correlation coefficients significantly different from zero (•) Tukey statistic q and degrees of freedom df. 29 DISCUSSION Fast stream fish face the continuous task of preventing displacement. Fish may accomplish this by seeking cover behind large stones and back eddies or burrowing into the substrate (Daniels, 1989; Burgess, 1989). However, the need to find food (algal mats, Colgan and Cross 1982) exposes them to fast currents. Morphology and behaviour that reduces displacement is, therefore, advantageous. The main adaptations of fish in this study to station-holding are oral suction, spines, overlapping dermal plates and odontodes pointing in the downstream direction (Fig. 1.4C and D). Odontodes, spines and dermal plates provide a method of increasing frictional coefficients by acting as anchors on substrates. In particular, the ventral location of Otocinclus's frictional pad (Fig. 1.4C and D) provides a weight bearing surface which enhances its effect. In addition, the long anterior spines of the loricariids (Fig. 1.4B) provide anchors which resist displacement. Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, and Chaetostoma have the lowest l/hP ratios (Table 1.1). These fish are also found in the fastest waters (Burgess, 1989). Longer anterior spines projecting from the body may increase drag, however, this is countered by providing a greater surface for anchorage and increasing frictional coefficients. Gyrinocheilus's pectoral and pelvic fins are flexible compared to those of the loricariids. This flexibility allows bending and greater contact between the fin rays and substrate helping to maximize slipping speed (Fig. 1.3). In the loricariids the lack of flexibility in the pectoral and pelvic fins is compensated for by odontodes covering the fin 30 spines. From roughness element results it is apparent that frictional pads (Otocinclus), fin spines and odontodes are advantageous to increasing frictional coefficients and acting as anchors on course surfaces in all loricariids (Fig. 1.4). These spines may anchor the fish to algal mats on which they feed. There is no obvious gross external morphology in Gyrinocheilus in the form of frictional pads or spines that may be used to prevent displacement. However, Lundberg and Marsh (1976) found that the anterior fin ray segments of the pectoral fins have been shortened to possibly resist pressure due to fin appression. In addition, thickened skin and spines along the fins surface of Gyrinocheilus and loricariids respectively can act to prevent mechanical abrasion similar to the keratinized skin of the cat fish Bagarius bagarius (Mittal and Whitear, 1979). In a natural habitat, fish may have the option of choosing a particular substrate where morphology is best adapted to maximize friction and slipping speed. The loricariids erect the pelvic fins, pushing the head against the substrate to form a wedged posture that may increase their station-holding ability in a similar manner as that observed in the crayfish (Maude and William, 1983). In Otocinclus this brings the frictional pad (Fig. 1.4C) into contact with the substrate allowing the bony scutes to act as frictional devices. Furthermore, the negative angle of the pectoral fins in all genera (Fig. 1.1) may produce forces pushing the fins against the substrate (negative lift). Matthews (1985) argues that the pectoral fins do not act as negative lift hydrofoils (based on the results of amputation experiments) in darters (Percina roanoka and Etheostoma flabellare). Negative lift may not produce detectable changes 31 in slipping velocity on smooth surfaces, however, on rougher surfaces negative lift may maintain stability and keep the fins stationed for anchorage. There are a number of descriptions of the environments occupied by fish in this study (eg. Boseman, 1968; Sterba, 1983; Burgess, 1989). Species of the genus Chaetostoma (C. fischeri) are found in high altitude mountain streams or large rivers where water velocities exceed 40 cm s"1 (Gee, 1976). Even on a smooth perspex surface these fish are able to prevent displacement nearly 10 cm s"1 above this value (Fig 1.3). The lack of ventral dermal plates provides increased contact between the smooth perspex surface and body. This may result in increased frictional forces and the high~V~i and^ v*2 observed. Members of Hypostomus and Pterygoplichthys are often v found in riffles or cataracts (water velocity » 40.0 cm s"1) and are unable to exploit slower flow habitats (Burgess, 1989). Boseman (1968) records that during dam construction, where back f^locxling produced stagnant pools, large numbers of Hypostomus died I because adults were unable to traverse slower moving waters of lower 'oxygen content. For Hypostomus ~V\ -~V2 is lower than Pterygoplichthys. Under similar flow conditions Hypostomus may place a greater reliance on f^riction ; rather than suction relative to Pterygoplichthys. The loricariid's odontodes and spines may be less effective than suction for gripping the smooth perspex surface. Therefore, fish that rely on friction for preventing displacement have reduced station-holding ability. The movement of Pterygoplichthys on the roughness element may be attributed to low friction (lack of dermal plates and odontodes between the pelvic and pectoral fins) and suction (inadequate seal). Arguably, 32 fish of similar morphology with relatively high"V2 and lowYi-"Y2 place a greater reliance on frictional devices rather than suction. The pectoral fin extension stage of Otocinclus is not seen in the other genera of fish. A possible reason is that the ventral frictional pad is sufficient to hold station up to Vi . For Otocinclus, fin extension may only become necessary for additional anchorage when slipping occurs. Whenever water velocity is increased adhesion occurs. The suction force and other rheotactic behaviour preventing displacement are reflected by the~V~i-~V2 difference shown in Fig. 1.3. The ability to maximize ~V1-"V2 will vary between genera depending on the effectiveness of rheotactic behaviours. In the loricariids the respiratory gap remains open under all flow conditions. Water is drawn through the fissure (Fig 1.4A), posterior to the maxillary barbel and pushed past the gills by contractions of the buccopharnyx. During contraction of the buccopharnyx an oral valve (Fig. 1.4A) closes isolating the oral sucker (Gradwell, 1971). The fissure posterior to the maxillary barbel must remain open to allow water flow. This prevents the formation of a complete seal by the oral sucker lips (Alexander, 1965). Although this is the case it is apparent that loricariids produce suction (Alexander, 1965). Loricariids have several options for producing suction. Water can be drawn rapidly through spaces between the papillae and respiratory fissure which will form a partial vacuum (open sucker), or the respiratory current may be stopped and the oral sucker cavity isolated (closed sucker) by sealing the lips to the substrate similar to Gyrinocheilus. Benjamin (1986) suggests that due to oral sucker structure, vacuum suction using a complete seal is not possible for loricariids (eg. Plecostomus punctatus 33 and Otocinclus mariae). Observations support these conclusions and indicate that during fast flow the size of the fissure becomes smaller but, does not close. Vandewalle et al. (1986) also noticed that narrowing of the fissure occurred during adhesion in Plecostomus punctatus. A reduction in oxygenated water passing by the gills can be compensated for by water pumped into the intestine by contractions of the cloaca (Sawaya and Petrini, 1960). In addition, movement of the operculum can produce water circulation that aids in providing oxygen. Gyrinocheilus's high slipping velocity may be attributed to its ability to form a complete seal with its oral sucker. In Gyrinocheilus during adhesion water flows into the buccopharnyx through oral valves (modifications of the brachial chambers) above the operculum. Sealing the oral sucker lips onto a surface and isolating the oral cavity allows the formation of a closed vacuum sucker. This is reflected in the high ~Vi-~V2 for Gyrinocheilus (Fig. 1.3). The tendency for Gyrinocheilus to drift off of the roughness element and adhere to the perspex indicates it may find a seal easier to attain on a smoother surface. This behaviour is supported by Benjamin (1986), where it was found that Gyrinocheilus had difficulty attaching to surfaces in which holes or grooves had been made. Arguably, Farlowella''s oral sucker functions to a greater extent for feeding rather than preventing displacement. It has been suggested that Farlowella uses its long slender profile (high 1/h, Fig. 1.1 and Table 1.1) and elongated rostrum for camouflage. Farlowella resembles twigs or branches when hiding in rotting leaves along the banks of rivers (Wheeler, 1975). Farlowella^ passive orientation to water flow suggests that it would have difficulty coping with swiftly moving water even 34 though "VI -"V2 is large (Fig. 1.3). Having no way of attaching the extended caudal peduncle (past the pelvic fins) to the substrate can produce the destabilizing effect observed at higher water velocities due to lift over this portion of the body. Camouflage from predators (birds and fish) may have higher priority in deterauning body design (Power, 1984). Gyrinocheilus may also experience lifting forces similar to Farlowella over the latter half of the body. Gyrinocheilus is another high fineness ratio form (Table 1.1 and Fig. 1.6) and has difficulty keeping its tail on the bottom when caught with the pelvic fins off the substrate by a rapid increase in water velocity. However, unlike Farlowella, its rheotactic adaptations are able to effectively counter lift and bring the body back against the substrate. Geometry (ratios 2b/h, 1/h and x/1) effects the lift, drag and flow conditions experienced. These ratios are plotted against length (Fig. 1.5 - 1.7) to determine if they are near values for low drag and if there is consistency in geometry with length in genera. For technical bodies attached to a surface the ratios of 1/h, 2b/h, and x/1 for low drag and lift are approximately 10, 2.0 and 0.3 respectively (Hoerner, 1965). The fast stream fish Chaetostoma has similar values for these ratios (Table 1.1). In general the frontal profile and fore body (x) of the fast stream loricariids is flattened and extended respectively (Table 1.1). Extending and flattening the fore body delays separation of the boundary layer reducing pressure drag (Hoerner, 1965). In addition, folding of the tail and dorsal fin against the body would reduce drag in all genera. Farlowella, a slower stream fish, has a 1/h above and x/1 below low drag values (Fig. 1.6, 1.7 and Table 1.1). Trade offs between lift and drag are influenced by body morphology. Unlike Farlowella, rheotactic behaviour in the plaice, Pleuronectes platessa, compensates for high lift forces caused by its flattened profile and high fineness ratio (Arnold and Weihs, 1978; Webb, 1989). Geometry is consistent over the range of lengths measured within genera with correlations being low (Fig. 1.5 - 1.7 and Table 1.1). Burgess (1989) records that generally, smaller loricariids are found near the edges of fast flowing rivers where water velocity is diminished. Matthews (1985) suggests that differences in morphology between species of darters allows for the exploitation of different benthic, riffle, micro habitats. Statzner and Holme (1989) analyzed the water flow around several lotic macro invertebrates and concluded that to accommodate Reynold's number effects body geometry must change as the organism grows (lotic invertebrates). Based on the above hydrodynamic considerations changes in geometry with size may also effect the distribution of fast stream fish within rivers. In general, Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, and Chaetostoma face fast currents and maximize slipping speed by using frictional devices (spines, odontodes and frictional pad) and rheotactic behaviour (suction and fin extension). Although Farlowella is able to maintain station at higher water velocities, morphological and behavioural characteristics suggest that other constraints besides fast flow are more important for governing adaptation to its habitat. This leads to considerations, addressed in Chapter II, about the hydrodynamic forces acting on these fish. 36 CHAPTER II MECHANICS AND ENERGETICS ABSTRACT The behavioural and morphological adaptations of hill stream fish found in fast flow (Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, and Chaetostoma) and slow flow (Farlowella) are analyzed using a hydrodynamic model developed by Arnold and Weihs (1978). Drag coefficients are directly measured using strain gauges and force platforms. Lift coefficients are detennined from the model (based on the slipping velocities of dead fish and morphological measurements from Chapter I). Mean drag coefficients (referenced to projected frontal area) in fast stream fish range between 0.2 and 0.9. Drag coefficients are elevated due to roughness and interference drag produced by the pectoral fins. Fast stream fish compensate for higher drag coefficients and maximize slipping speed through high density (1.06 g cm'3- 1.10 g cm"3), frictional coefficients (0.63 - 0.95, on a perspex surface) and rheotactic suction pressure (2.0 N m"2- 173 N m'2). In addition, negative lift coefficients are calculated for Pterygoplichthys (-0.03) and Chaetostoma (-0.29 to -0.55). These values are attributed to forces produced by the pectoral fins that are orientated at a negative angle to the flow. Farlowella, a slower water form, is characterized by relatively low drag coefficients (0.23), high fineness ratio (total length/height ~ 21) 37 and density (1.129 g cm"). However, orientation to water flow is slow, the lift to drag ratio and lift coefficient are high (6.7 and 1.52 -2 -2 respectively) and rheotactic suction pressure (2.0 N m" - 27 N m") is low. In addition, estimated drag coefficients are compared to measured values. The closest agreement is for high fineness ratio forms (eg. Farlowella). It is shown that force coefficients for forms of low fineness ratio (1/h < 10) at low Reynold's number (< 104) attached to a surface can not be accurately predicted from data on technical bodies. Oxygen consumption is measured in a specimen of Pterygoplichthys (mass «= 318.5 g) at various water velocities (20 cm s'1 - 160 cm s"1). The mean O. consumption rate increases from 52 mg O kg"1 hr'1 to 97 mg O kg"1 2 2 !• hr"1 when slipping occurs and repositionings per minute increase (slipping velocity = 110 cm s"2). Oxygen consumption rates at higher water velocities (110 cm s'1- 160 cm s"1) are lower than those for fish of similar size swimrriing in the free stream. Station holding on a substrate reduces the energy required to maintain position against rapidly moving water. 38 INTRODUCTION Arnold and Weihs (1978) developed a mathematical model for analyzing the hydrodynamic forces acting on the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). Webb (1989) applied this model to Pleuronectes platessa, Raja clavata and Myoxocephalus scorpius. These fish experience forces from ocean currents and show behaviour that may be advantageous to maintaining position by reducing or opposing lift and drag acting on the body. The difficulty faced in both these studies in assessing forces on the body is that either the lift coefficient C L or drag coefficient C Q must be known. C D and C L are not easily attained. Both Arnold and Weihs (1978) and Webb (1989) resort to estimates of C Q based on technical data for blisters attached to smooth surfaces. Blake (1985) was able to measure the lift and drag force acting on the carapaces of three crab species (Callinectes sapidus, Cancer productus, and Lopholithodes mandtii). Fish found in rivers may experience higher and more consistent water flow than ocean currents. Body morphology and behaviour that aids in station-holding reduces the energy required to prevent displacement expended through swirnming or actively holding to the substrate. Arguably, preventing displacement and adaptations for station-holding are important. Fish may maximize slipping speed by increasing friction and submerged weight (density), decreasing drag, reducing positive lift or producing negative lift. In this study the drag coefficients C Q in members of the South American and East Asian hill stream fish belonging to the genera Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, Farlowella and 39 Gyrinocheilus are determined. From drag, morphological and slipping velocity measurements (Chapter I and II) the effectiveness of body design and rheotactic behaviour in hill stream fish is assessed. In addition, the oxygen consumption rate of a specimen of Pterygoplichthys is measured. 40 MATERIALS AND METHODS To estimate the projected frontal area of fish, measurements of maximal body width 2b, maximal body height h, and spine length 1 were taken from Chapter I. Additional morphological measurements (perpendicular angle relative to fin extension, 0 ,^ and anterior pectoral fin spine width W) were made using calipers (30 cm, Helios 0.005 ± 0.0025). Spine width was measured from the center of the anterior pectoral fin spine or ray (see Fig. 2.1). Hill stream fish face two main forces that act to displace them down stream; drag and lift. For the fish to slip the drag D required must be equal to the product of the frictional forces generated by their weight Wo and the static frictional coefficient p: between the substrate and the ventral surface of the fish (see Fig 2.2; Arnold and Weihs, 1978). Model D = u Wo (2.1) However, as water flows over the fish lift L acts on Wo. D = u (Wo - L). (2.2) Fig. 2.2 illustrates the forces acting on a hill stream fish. Lift may act in a positive (away from the substrate) or negative (towards the 41 Fig. 2.1 Measurements required for estimating the projected frontal area of the body Ab, and projected frontal area of pectoral fin anterior spine or fin ray Af. Pectoral spine width W, perpendicular insertion angle of the pectoral fin spine 0 and spine length 1 . • (p 42 Fig. 2.2 Forces acting on the body of a hill stream fish. Lift L (negative and positive), drag D, submerged body weight Wo, static frictional coefficient | i and velocity V. Slipping speed is maximized by increasing -L , | i , and Wo and reducing D. 43 substrate) direction. Positive lift acts to reduce the submerged weight of the fish and, therefore, the frictional forces opposing drag. Negative lift acts in the opposite manner. When the frictional force becomes less than the drag force slipping occurs. Drag at slipping can be expressed as D = T A C D V ' P w ' W where A is the total projected frontal area, C D is the frontal drag coefficient, V2 is the dead slipping velocity (determined in Chapter I) and p w is the density of the water (998.2 kg m"3 at 26° C). Lift at slipping is given by where C is the lift coefficient referenced to A. By inserting equations 2.3 and 2.4 into 2.2 we have (Arnold and Weihs, 1978) A C L V 2 pw _ Wo - i - A p m (2.5) and ~TJL * L 2 w r w 2 Ll Wo, A , V2, |i and C of this equation are measured here, leaving C as an unknown, which can be solved for C - 2 W ° - C D L L ~ p A V 2 r w 2 Ll (2.7) 44 Rheotactic Pressure The suction pressure produced for station-holding by rheotactic behaviour was not directly measured. Suction pressure was estimated based on morphological measurements, slipping velocities, and drag coefficients. Using equation 2.3 the drag on live and dead fish at V i and V2 Qive and dead slipping velocities respectively on a smooth perspex surface; Chapter I) was determined. The difference between the drag on a live and dead fish is an estimate of the lateral force applied by suction and other rheotactic behaviour that opposes displacement. Dividing the force by a surface area (total ventral area or sucker area) yields a pressure (Si or S2 respectively, N m'2). Model Variables Total projected frontal area A is the sum of the frontal area of the body Ab and anterior pectoral fin spine or ray Af (A = Ab + Af). For the loricariids (Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Farlowella, and Chaetostoma) Ab was estimated using the equation for the area of an ellipse 7t (b (h/2)) and for Gyrinocheilus the area of a circle K (h/2)2. To ensure that this was an accurate representation of Ab a different method of estimation was also used. Head on photographs of fish were taken (see Chapter I for method). Outlines were then traced using a Houston Instruments Hipad digitizer and mouse to estimate the area. For convenience the geometric method was employed to determine Ab. Tracings were also taken and digitized to determine the ventral surface area of 45 tiie body and sucker for calculating Si and S 2 respectively. Af was estimated by considering the angle which the anterior pectoral fin spines made relative to a perpendicular line drawn from the insertion point in the body 0, its length 1 and width W (Fig. 2.1). Af = W (1 cos 0 ) (2.8) sp s This estimate is based on the assumption that W is constant from the point of insertion to the distal end. In reality this is not the case. The spines are slightly tapered towards the distal end. Measurement of the spine was made from the center giving an estimate of W. Only the anterior spine was considered for determining projected frontal area of pectoral fins in the loricariids because it was the only portion of the fin that appeared to have a stable projected area during drag measurements. However, Gyrinocheilus''s fin rays were relatively stable and made up a significant proportion of A (40 % - 50 %). Estimates of fin ray area in Gyrinocheilus were made using frontal photographs and were included in A. In addition, 0 was determined based on the observed angle S of the fins for fish in a rheotactic posture (0^= 10° for Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma and Farlowella; 0^ ~ 5° for Gyrinocheilus). For fish with the dorsal fin extended during drag measurements similar methods were applied to estimate the projected frontal area of the dorsal spine. 46 Coefficient of Friction A freshly killed fish was placed, facing uphill in the center and parallel with the length of a submerged perspex plate (20 cm X 20 cm). The plate was secured at one end by a hinge and gently raised by a string attached to the other end. As soon as the fish began slipping backwards raising of the plate was stopped and the string secured. The angle between the bottom and perspex plate 0 was then measured with a protractor and calculated using \i = tan 0 . Density Dry and submerged mass was measured with a Mettler PK 300 (± 0.0005 g) weighing scale and suspension apparatus. Fish were killed with a strong solution of MS222 shortly before being placed on the scale. Submerged mass included gas trapped in their bone-encased swim bladder and accessory respiratory organ (Gee, 1976). Air bubbles trapped in their oral sucker during transfer to the scale were tapped out with a dissecting needle. Submerged mass was multiplied by the gravitational acceleration constant (9.78 m s'2) to determine the weight of the fish. The density of a fish p was determined from P = (wT-Wo) Pw' ( 2-9 ) where Wa and Wo is the dry and wet weight of the fish respectively. 47 Flow tank For these experiments the flow tank described in Chapter I was modified. A perspex plate (0.6 cm X 20 cm X 10 cm) was fitted in front of the flow straightener to prevent over flow. In addition, a forward (0.6 cm X 40 cm X 20 cm), center (0.6 cm X 20 cm X 20 cm) and end (0.6 cm X 16 cm X 20 cm) perspex plate, was fitted on the top of the flow tank level with the flow rectifying grid and secured using rubber stoppers. A hole was cut into the center plate for the insertion of a force plate. Four different center plates were made to accommodate four different shaped force plates. The water level was kept at 1.0 cm above the plates (Fig. 2.3). Four sizes of perspex force plates, 0.6 cm thick (4.5 cm X 4.0 cm; 4.8 cm X 2.3 cm; 7.2 cm X 2.5 cm; and 9.0 cm by 6.0 cm) were machined for the differently sized and shaped fish (Fig. 2.3). The force plates were shaped as blunt elongated diamonds to form to the fish body and reduce frictional drag. To each force plate two extension struts (0.3 cm diameter by 3.0 cm long) were attached which in turn were attached to a another perspex plate (0.2 cm X 1.5 cm X 7.5 cm). On either end of the plate threaded blocks (1.5 cm X 1.5 cm X 1.5 cm) were glued that joined the force plate to the strain gauges via the shim stock with screws. The two struts were used to extend the shim stock above the water line which reduced the drag acting on the system. 48 Fig. 2.3 Recirculating perspex flow tank used for determining the drag acting on hillstream fish (Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Farlowella, Chaetostoma, and Gyrinocheilus). Force plates for Otocinclus a, Gyrinocheilus and Farlowella b, Hypostomus and Pterygoplichthys c, Chaetostoma d, amplifier e, low pass filter f, digital oscilloscope g, center plate h, U-shaped aluminum bar i, strain gauge j , shim stock k, perspex over flow plate 1, forward perspex plate m, end perspex plate n, clamps o, perspex plate p, extension strut q, rubber stopper r, scaffolding s, support plate t, water velocity direction v. Boundary Layer Effects 49 Drag measurements were taken 50 cm downstream from the flow rectifying grid. Two boundary layer characteristics are considered here. First, boundary layer thickness defined as the, distance from the bottom to the start of free stream velocity 8. Second, boundary layer type (turbulent or laminar) and particularly the critical point (distance transition occurs from the leading edge of the plate; Streeter and Wylie, 1979). 8 for laminar flow is calculated from s _ 4.65 x 5 = - ^ = (2.10) where x is the distance from the leading edge of the plate (50 cm), and is the Reynold's number based on x, water velocity V, and kinematic viscosity of the water «. 8 calculated from these equations for five free stream water velocities, (14.0, 17.0, 21.9, < 25.8, and 28.6 cm s"1) are 0.83 cm, 0.75 cm, 0.67 cm, 0.61 cm, and 0.58 cm respectively. Water velocities in the boundary layer were measured using a fine point hot bead anemometer at free stream water velocities between 14.0 cm s'1 and 30.0 cm s"1. The anemometer tip was placed into the space between the force plate and center plate. Fig. 2.4 is a typical boundary layer profile obtained during measurement. 50 Fig. 2.4 Typical boundary layer profile near the surface of a force plate at a freestream velocity of 14.0 cm s"\ 50 cm downstream of the flow rectifing grid. Standard error bars are for water velocity, n = 5. 51 V o l t s Fig. 2.5 Calibration curve for the fine tip hot bead anemometer used for boundary layer velocity measurement. Water velocity was detennined in the free stream using a A. OTT Kempton TYP. 12.400 velocity meter. 52 Estimates of boundary layer thickness based on equation 2.10 are within 85 % of measured values. Calibration of the anemometer was in the free stream using the current meter previously described (Chapter I). Fig. 2.5 is the calibration curve obtained. Laminar tends to turbulent flow at critical Reynold's numbers ranging from 5 X 105 to 1 X 106 (Blake, 1983). Using equation 2.11 we can find the critical point for water flowing over a smooth perspex surface. Using a conservative critical Reynold's number of 5 X 105 and water velocity range between 14.0 cm s"1 and 28.6 cm s'1 the transition point x is calculated to be between 319 cm and 156 cm downstream respectively. Drag measurements were made well upstream of the lowest theoretical transition point (156 cm). Strain Gauges Strain gauges (BLH Electronics, SR-4, resistance = 350.0 ± 0.5 ohms) were mounted on shim stock (1000 gauge, 1.0 cm X 17.5 cm) using EPY-500 two part epoxy. They were then sandwiched between a clamp (3.0 cm X 3.0 cm) made of 0.2 cm aluminum angle-bar and a piece of aluminum (3.0 cm X 3.0 cm) using two screws for each clamp. The clamps and strain gauges were coated (Sr-4 Barrier 4 Protective Coating 2 component epoxy resin system) to protect them from water. At the end and center of the shim stock, furthest from the clamps, holes were drilled for attachment to the force plates. Each clamp was slotted (0.7 cm) at right angles to a slot in a support plate. The support plate (0.6 cm 20 cm X 20 cm) was attached to a U-shaped aluminum bar (1.3 cm diameter) with screws. The whole 53 apparatus was suspended by a scaffolding separate from the flow tank and rested on rubber pads in order to niinimize vibrations produced by the electric motor (Fig. 2.3). Furthermore, the space between the force plate and center plate (« 2.0 mm) was minimized to reduce the spaces effect on water flowing over it. Four strain gauges mounted on either side of two pieces of parallel shim stock were wired into a full bridge. The deflection of the shim stock was measured as a voltage change on a digital oscilloscope (Nicolet XF-44). The oscilloscope was set to take an average of consecutive sweeps. Fish were mounted upside down to the underside of the force plate, using perspex glue and the force plate was attached to the shim stock. Fish were only attached to the force plate in areas that were naturally in contact with the substrate (ventral side of the oral sucker, anterior pectoral and pelvic fin spines, anal fin, frictional pad and tail). Furthermore, fish were positioned in a rheotactic posture (dorsal fin folded, pectoral fin extension angle 5° - 10°). The apparatus was then attached to the scaffolding and the force plate centered and leveled in the central plate. This left approximately a 2.0 mm gap between the force plate and the center plate which allowed for free deflection of the shim stock. Before each measurement an average voltage was taken at zero water velocity. Water velocity was then increased to the correct value and the voltage was allowed to stabilize before a reading was taken. The voltage change (measured in miLlivolts, mv) was determined by taking the difference between the voltage at zero water velocity and final water velocity. Drag measurements were made at five water velocities V , (14.0, 17.4, 21.9, 25.8 and 28.6 cm s"1) for five fish of each species (except 54 Chaetostoma, n = 2 fish). 10 drag measurements were taken per velocity and averaged. Strain gauges were wired through a amplifier and a 1 Hz low pass filter (Fig. 2.3). The oscilloscope was set to a sampling rate of 100 us per point, 1 volt scale and measured to ± 0.1 mv. The drag acting on the fish alone was determined by subtracting the drag on the force plate and extension struts, from the drag of the system (force plate, extension struts and fish) at equivalent water velocities. From the drag forces D measured with the strain gauges a drag coefficient C D was determined Co-ZrV (2-12> rw Drag coefficients for fish of the same genera and similar Reynold's number range were averaged to give a mean drag coefficient TT. Drag coefficients C D for fish with the dorsal fin extended during drag measurement were calculated and averaged separately. Furthermore, the mean drag coefficient for fish number 1 of Pterygoplichthys, was calculated separately. The Reynold's number R^ ^ 3 ^ o r ?lsn w a s calculated from R1 0 a (2-13) where 1 is the total length of the fish, « is the kinematic viscosity (8.97 X 10"7 m 2 s"1 at 26° C) and V is live slipping, dead slipping (Chapter I) and drag velocity corresponding to R^, R^ and R3 respectively. 55 Calibration Sto-A-Weigh calibration weights (1 g - 1 kg) lead shot (0.04 g / shot) and tin foil were used to calibrate the strain gauges. The apparatus was removed from the scaffolding and attached in the same position to a stand with a vertical metal rod. A thread was then attached to the base of the posterior extension strut of the force plate and brought over a pulley (friction = 0.001 g) level with the plate. To the end of the thread various weights could be hung to correlate force with voltage. At the beginning and end of each series of measurements the system was calibrated. The system was then checked for accuracy by determining the known drag coefficient of a three dimensional flat plate orientated normal to flow (C - 1.2, Reynold's numbers = 103-104; Hoerner, 1965). The plate (0.1 cm X 2.5 cm X 2.5 cm) was suspended by a spar (0.3 cm diameter, 2.0 cm long) from the center of the force plate. The drag was measured with the flat plate and spar and then with just the spar. The two drags were then subtracted to determine the drag acting on the plate alone. Drag measurements on the plate correspond to drag coefficients (± S.E., n = 5) of 1.20 ± 0.12, 1.19 ± 0.15, 1.21 ± 0.23 and 1.15 ± 0.21 at Reynold's numbers of 3.9 x 103, 4.7 x 103, 6.1 x 103 and 7.9 x 103 respectively. Respirometry Respirometry experiments were conducted on a specimen of Pterygoplichthys (Weight = 318.5 g, 1 = 34.5 cm and l s = 27 cm). The fish 56 was placed into the respirometer (modified Brett-type) and allowed to acclimatize for 24 hours before experiments were started and remained here until the experiment was over. The respirometer had a standard water volume of 37.5 1. Temperature was maintained by a controller (model FTS TC-400) and recirculating cooler (model FTS RC-100). The partial pressure of oxygen p 0 2 was set with a artificial lung (Sci-Med Membrane Blood Oxygenator 2500). Oxygen consumption could be measured at maximal water velocities of 2.5 m s"1 with fish up to 2 kg in weight. Data acquisition was performed by computer and initial analysis done using a number of .macro commands in a LOTUS 1-2-3 spread sheet (Gehrke et al. 1990). Temperature and pH were maintained at 26° C and 7 respectively. The system was pressurized to 30 KPa and p 0 2 stabilized at 156 mm Hg inside the respirometer. The water was allowed to mix for approximately 5 minutes before measurements were taken to ensure a uniform distribution of oxygen. Oxygen consumption rates were measured (continuous automated samples) for a 20 min to 40 min period at fourteen different water velocities. Between each measurement a 30 min to 45 min recovery period was allowed. Background measurements (without fish) were conducted three times and the mean was subtracted from the oxygen consumption rates determined. In addition, the number of times the fish repositioned itself over the measurement interval was recorded at eight water velocities using a video system (see Chapter I for details). Repositioning was defined as a release of suction from the bottom and a shift in position. 57 RESULTS Calibration Equations The calibration equations relating drag force to voltage output from the strain gauges for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, Farlowella and the flat plate are; Drag (Kg m s"2) = 9.98 x 10'5(mv), 7.58 x 10'5(mv), 2.39 x l(rVv), 9.98 x 10"5(mv), 3.03 x lO^mv), 5.32 x 10"5(mv) and 9.17 x 10'5(mv) respectively. The calibration remained linear over the forces measured (r = 0.99). Between Reynold's numbers 10 and 10 the mean drag coefficient for the flat plate normal to flow is 1.19 (see Materials and Methods, Chapter II). Geometry and Density In Fig. 2.6 the projected frontal area of the body determined from tracings versus the geometric method (area of a equivalar ellipse, it l/2h b) is plotted for Pterygoplichthys. The best fit regression line is Geometric area = Trace area (0.96) + 0.013, r 2 = 0.86. A 6.8 % difference is found between estimates based on geometry and traces. The dotted line in Fig. 2.6 represents the trace equals geometric axis. In Fig. 2.7 Ab is plotted against l 2 . The insert is taken from the cluster of data points between 0 - 1.2 cm 2 and 0 - 3 0 cm 2 for Ab and l 2 respectively. A two tailed t-test (p < 0.05) shoes no significant difference in the mean 2b/h ratio from one in Gyrinocheilus (Chapter I). o 58 Therefore, the area of a circle rather than an ellipse is used to determine A b for this fish. The coefficients of determination range between 0.89 and 0.94. The greatest and least slope is obtained in Hypostomus and Farlowella respectively. A f and A b range between 0.01 -1.6 cm 2 and 0.10 - 7.50 cm 2 respectively for all genera (Table 2.1). In Fig. 2.8 W o is plotted against l 3 . The coefficient of detennination ranges between 0.86 and 0.97. The greatest and least slope is obtained in Chaetostoma and Farlowella respectively. The insert in Fig. 2.8 is taken from the cluster of data points between 0-400 g cm s"2 and 0-600 cm 3 for W o and l 3 respectively. The maximum and minimum mean body density ~p~, 1.035 g cm' 3 and 1.129 g cm' 3 occurs in Pterygoplichthys and Farlowella respectively. For Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus and Chaetostoma ~p~ ranges from 1.062 g cm' 3 to 1.097 g cm' 3 (± S.E. = 0.003 - 0.004, Table 2.1). In Fig. 2.9 Otocinclus and Gyrinocheilus have correlation coefficients significantly different from zero (t-test, Ho: p = 0, p < 0.05). Hydrodynamic and Frictional Coefficients Drag forces measured (water velocity range 14.0 - 28.6 cm s"1) are between 5.43 x 1 0 s and 8.07 x 10' 3 Newtons (Kg m s"2) in all genera (Fig. 2.10). Fish number 1, 2, 2 and 2 of Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Farlowella and Chaetostoma respectively have their dorsal fin extended during measurement, resulting in the steeper slopes of the drag velocity curves (Fig. 2.10). The best fit second degree regression constants, coefficients of determination, standard and total length for each fish of 59 the drag versus velocity plots (Fig. 2.10) are given in Table 2.2. The maximum and minimum mean drag coefficients T T determined using the force platform are 0.23 and 0.87 for Farlowella and Chaetostoma respectively. Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, and Pterygoplichthys have~U^ between 0.29 and 0.50 ( ± S . E . = 0.015 - 0.035). CT * is generally higher than the"C^ for fish with the dorsal fin folded (Table 2.3). Lift coefficients C , C , and~C~ are determined using maximum, minimum and mean drag coefficients respectively in Table 2.3. Otocinclus, Pterygoplichthys, and Chaetostoma have negative lift coefficients. For Otocinclus and Pterygoplichthys negative lift coefficients are only obtained when calculated with maximal drag coefficients. Chaetostoma has a negative lift coefficient for all C D values. The minimum (-0.55) and maximum (1.70) lift coefficients are found in Chaetostoma and Farlowella respectively. In Fig. 2.11 frontal drag coefficient is plotted against Reynold's number. The best fit second degree regression line for all genera is C D = 6.81 x 10' 1 - 2.23 x 10 ' 5 R 3 + 2.96 x 10" 1 0 R 3 2 , r 2 = 0.32. Fish number 1 of Pterygoplichthys has generally lower drag coefficients than the other specimens of the same genera (Table 2.3 and Fig. 2.11; R^ = 1.80 X 10 4 -3.67 X 10 4 ). The minimum (0.71) and maximum (1.85) value for the ratio 2 W o / p w A V 2 occurs in Chaetostoma and Farlowella respectively. The standard error for this ratio is between 0.03 and 0.21. This ratio is used to calculate the lift coefficients C u , C^) in Table 2.3 using equation 2.7. The minimum and maximum ~]T is 0.63 and 0.95 for Pterygoplichthys and Gyrinocheilus respectively. Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Chaetostoma, Farlowella have"pT between 0.67 and 0.74 (± S.E. = 0.015 - 0.021, 2.1). 61 Fig. 2.6 Relationship between the projected frontal area of the body determined by tracings and geometry for Pterygoplichthys (Geometric = 0.962 Trace + 0.01, r 2 = 0.86). There is a 6.8 % difference between the two methods of estimating body frontal area. The dotted line is the X equals Y axis. 6 2 Standard Length Squared 1* (cm2) Fig. 2.7 Linear regression lines of best fit for body projected frontal area Ab versus standard length squared l f for Otocinclus a, o (n = 35, Ab = 12(0.039) - 0.050, r 2 = 0.90), Gyrinocheilus b, V (n = 25, Ab = 12(0.015) + 0.043, r 2 = 0.93), Hypostomus c, A (n = 36, Ab = 12(0.042) -0.031, r 2 = 0.89), Pterygoplichthys d, 0 (n = 17, Ab = £(0.041) + 0.034, r 2 = 0.93), Chaetostoma e, • (n = 22, Ab = 4(0-040) + 0.066, r 2 = 0.94) and Farlowella f, • (n = 25, Ab = 12(0.002) - 0.010, r 2 = 0.90). Insert is expanded from the large plot for the ranges 0 cm2 for Ab and l | respectively. 1.2 cm and 0 30 63 Fig. 2.8 Linear regression lines of best fit for submerged body weight Wo versus total length cubed l 3 for Otocinclus a, o (n = 21, Wo = l3(0.699) - 4.999, r 2 = 0.89), Gyrinocheilus b, V (n = 20, Wo = 13(0.529) - 27.48, r 2 = 0.86), Hypostomus c, A (n = 31, Wo = 13(0.651) + 20.28, r 2 = 0.97), Pterygoplichthys d, O (n = 12, Wo = 13(0.327) - 24.47, r 2 = 0.89), Chaetostoma e, a (n = 20, Wo = 13(1.149) - 9.138, r 2 = 0.91) and Farlowella f, • (n = 20, Wo = 13(0.075) + 24.99, r 2 = 0.93). The insert is expanded from the large plot for the ranges 0 - 0.4 x 103 and 0 - 0.6 x 103 for Wo and l 3 respectively. 64 120T T o t a l L e n g t h 1 (cm) Fig. 2.9 Linear regression lines of best fit for density versus total length 1 for Otocinclus a, o (n = 21, p = 1(0.023) + 0.987, r 2 = 0.26), Gyrinocheilus b, V (n = 20, p = 1(0.007) + 1.022, r 2 = 0.73), Hypostomus c, A (n = 29, p = l(-O.OOl) + 1.089, r 2 = 0.01), Pterygoplichthys d, O (n = 12, p = 1(0.001) + 1.023, r 2 = 0.08), Chaetostoma e, • (n = 20, p = K-0.003) + 1.109, r 2 = 0.01) and Farlowella f, • (n = 20, p = K-0.003) + 1.153, r 2 = 0.12). Otocinclus and Gyrinocheilus have correlation coefficients significantly different from zero (t-test, reject Ho: p=0, p<0.05). 65 1.5 0.75" m l O i—I X — Otocinclus Gyrinocheilus 1 0-—» -jQ Hypostomus 4_ Pterygoplichthys i Farlowella g Chaetostoma 05" - l , W a t e r V e l o c i t y (cm s ) Fig. 2.10 Drag (Newtons = kg m s"2) versus velocity (cm s*1) plots for Otocinclus (o), Gyrinocheilus (V), Hypostomus (A), Pterygoplicthys ( O ) , Chaetostoma (•) and Farlowella (•) with standard error bars (n = 10/symbol). Constants and coefficients of determination for the regression lines are in Table 2.2. Fish number 1, 2, 2, and 2 have their dorsal fins extended for Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Farlowella and Chaetostoma respectively. 66 n S.E. n P S.E. Af range A range (g cm"3) (cm2) (cm2) Otocinclus 17 0.67 0.02 21 1.062 0.004 0.02-0.06 0.10-0.40 Gyrinocheilus 20 0.95 0.02 20 1.069 0.003 0.18-0.80 0.40-1.60 Hypostomus 26 0.70 0.02 29 1.086 0.003 0.22-1.58 1.40-7.50 Pterygoplichthys 12 0.63 0.02 12 1.035 0.004 0.10-1.10 0.80-6.00 Chaetostoma 19 0.74 0.02 20 1.097 0.004 0.07-0.30 0.40-1.30 Farlowella 20 0.70 0.02 20 1.129 0.003 0.02-0.10 0.10-0.60 Table 2.1 Sample size n, standard error S.E., mean body density "p", mean frictional coefficient on a smooth perspex surface "jT, projected frontal area of the anterior pectoral fin or ray range Af and total frontal area range A for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, Chaetostoma, and Farlowella. al a2 a3 r2 1 1S - (cm) (cm) Otocinclus 1 9.24 X 10' -1.02 X io-J 3.76 x IO"2 0.97 4.03 3.15 2 7.55 X io-5 •1.17 X IO'3 1.16 x IO"2 0.99 3.94 3.09 3 -3.09 X 10' 2.63 X IO"3 3.33 x IO"3 0.99 3.59 2.89 4 6.82 X IO5 -2.53 X io-s 7.96 x IO"3 0.99 3.09 2.97 5 -2.10 X 10s 6.07 X 10' 3.16 x IO"3 0.99 3.54 2.80 Gyrinocheilus 1 -1.76 X 10' 1.80 X IO'3 4.97 x io-3 0.99 4.66 3.88 2 4.80 X io-s -2.82 X 10' 9.40 x IO* 0.99 6.52 5.40 3 -7.98 X 10s 6.87 X 10' 6.01 x IO3 0.99 6.13 4.82 4 4.54 X 10' -6.06 X IO"3 2.70 x 10* 0.99 6.18 4.96 Hypostomus 1 -4.74 X 10' 1.01 X IO2 5.20 x IO"2 0.99 12.35 9.54 2 8.56 X IO3 -9.68 X IO2 3.28 x IO'1 , 0.97 12.82 9.43 3 9.72 X 10' -1.31 X IO'2 8.46 x 10* 0.99 11.64 9.14 4 7.29 X 10' -1.01 X IO2 7.78 x IO'2 0.99 10.68 8.95 5 -9.32 X 10' 5.00 X IO"3 4.77 x 10* 0.99 11.70 9.19 Pterygoplichthys 1 -3.09 X 10' 3.73 X IO3 2.92 x IO2 0.99 11.50 8.15 2 2.20 X IO3 -2.50 X IO"2 8.94 x IO"2 0.97 6.38 4.89 3 1.25 X 103 -1.50 X IO'2 6.22 x IO"2 0.99 5.61 4.80 4 7.79 X 10s -4.33 X IO3 4.01 x IO2 0.99 5.75 4.57 5 1.07 X 10* -1.37 X IO'2 6.52 x IO"2 0.99 5.55 4.73 Chaetostoma 1 -4.84 X 10' 4.49 X io-3 1.23 x IO"2 0.99 4.74 3.53 2 -1.59 X 10' -4.83 X IO3 8.57 x IO2 0.99 4.97 3.81 Farlowella 1 -4.22 X 10s -1.45 X io-3 1.51 x IO"2 0.98 14.94 13.91 2 -1.22 X IO"5 -6.34 X 10' 8.97 x io-2 0.99 11.60 10.97 3 3.27 X 10' -3.92 X IO"3 1.49 x IO2 0.99 11.49 10.25 4 4.34 X 10"5 -4.48 X IO"3 1.67 x IO'2 0.98 12.65 11.52 5 8.80 X 10'5 -9.06 X 10' 6.58 x IO3 0.97 14.62 13.21 67 Table 2.2 The coefficient of determination r2, standard length U total length 1 and constants a l , a2 and a3 for the drag velocity curves in Fig. 2.10 (Drag (kg m s"2) = al + a2 (v) + a3 (v2)). 03 n S.E. < S.E. range 2 W o , P . A V 2 S.E. Ri (X Iff) (X 10*) R) (X 10*} n S ( (N m 7) S.E. S 2 (N m 7) s.o. Otocinclus 20 0.46 0.02 0.63 0.04 0.32-0.77 0.78 0.05 -0.37 0.30 0.09 0.20 0.52-1.55 0.45-0.88 0.55-1.28 10 i 2.65 0.53 52.6 13.4 Gyrinocheilus 25 0.42 0.03 — — 0.23-0.69 1.68 0.21 0.95 1.44 1.23 2.93 3.22-4.40 0.36-1.67 0.59-2.08 5 9.75 0.13 94.7 14.4 Hypostomus 20 0.29 0.02 0.32 0.04 0.17-0.45 1.14 0.06 0.50 0.90 0.73 2.60 2.24-6.21 1.27-4.31 1.93-4.10 5 2.35 0.12 13.4 6.70 Pterygoplichthys 20 0.47 0.02 — — 0.31-0.65 1.00 0.13 -0.03 0.64 0.26 0.57 5.09-7.01 0.98-3.15 0.87-2.03 4 9.90 0.17 140 21.3 Fish 1 5 0.24 0.01 — — 0.23-0.26 — — — — 0.62 2.62 1.80-3.67 — — — — — Chaetostoma 5 0.87 0.04 0.82 0.0S 0.74-0.94 0.71 0.03 -0.55 -0.29 -0.47 -0.52 2.72-3.38 0.93-1.70 0.74-1.58 5 23.6 5.26 173 54.2 Farlowella 20 0.23 0.02 0.29 0.03 0.10-0.36 1.85 0.12 1.34 1.70 1.52 6.71 3.47-7.69 1.34-3.16 1.79-4.76 9 2.04 0.20 26.2 3.54 Table 2.3 Hydrodynamic coefficients for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Chaetostoma, Pterygoplichthys, Hypostomus, and Farlowella. Sample size n, standard error S.E., mean drag coefficients with dorsal fin folded TT and extended TJ^ (n=5), drag coefficient range, Reynold's number range for live slipping, dead slipping and drag velocities Ri, Ri and Ri respectively; maximum, minimum, and mean lift coefficients C L | , Cu> and TJ"L respectively; mean lift to drag ratio ~CJ TT rheotactic suction pressure Si and Si determined from total ventral area and sucker area respectively and 2Wa/p>AVJ; ratio. 69 Fig. 2.11 Frontal drag coefficient versus Reynold's number for Otocinclus (o), Gyrinocheilus (V), Hypostomus (A), Pterygoplichthys (O), Chaetostoma (n) and Farlowella (•). The solid line is the best fit second degree regression curve for all genera (C D = 6.81 x 10"1 - 2.23 x 10' 5R 3 + 2.96 x 10 1 0 R 3 2 , r 2 = 0.32, n = 135). Respirometry and Behaviour 70 The typical behaviour observed in Pterygoplichthys during a progressive increase in water velocity is described below. At zero water velocity the fish remains on the bottom of the respirometer with the oral sucker applied to the substrate and the respiratory gap open. The pectoral fins are extended at all water velocities. When water velocity is increased slowly to approximately 23 cm s"1 the dorsal fin remains erect and there is movement to find secure attachment. At 55 cm s"1 the dorsal fin begins to flutter. At this moment the dorsal fin is folded and the oral sucker lips secure to the bottom with a noticeable reduction in the diameter of the respiratory gap and fissure. Repositioning movements increase at about 81 cm s"\ During repositioning the dorsal fin becomes erect until the fish reattaches to the substrate. At 94 cm s"1 the tail and pelvic fin rays begin to flutter. At this water velocity there is a slight increase in the number of repositionings per minute, however, the fish does not slip. Slipping occurs at about 105 cm s"1 with a large increase in repositioning movement (Fig. 2.12). At 120 cm s"1 the tail and pelvic fin ray flutter increases, however, there is no change in posture. Pterygoplichthys starts to slide backwards into the electric grid at approximately 153 cm s"1. When contact with the grid is made the fish burst swims to the front of the flow tank. However, sliding into the electric grid rarely occurred and is not necessary to initiate burst swimming. When the velocity is reduced to zero the fish extends the dorsal fin. The dorsal fin of larger specimens of Pterygoplichthys folds down at higher water velocities (50 cm s"1- 64 cm s"1) than smaller 71 W a t e r V e l o c i t y (cm s" 1) Fig. 2.12 Oxygen consumption (o) at 20-110 cm s"1 and 120-160 cm s"1 (mg 0 2 kg 1 hr*1 = V(-0.04) + 55.0, r 2 = 0.02, n = 10 and mg 0 2 kg 1 hr"1 = V(0.13) + 77.7, r 2 = 0.21, n = 4 respectively) and repositionings per ininute (•) versus water velocity for Pterygoplichthys. 72 specimens (10 cm s"1-20 cm s"1). Between water velocities 20 cm s'1 - 110 cm s"1 and 120 cm s"1- 160 cm s'1 the oxygen consumption rate regression lines are mg 0 2 kg"1 hr'1 = V (-0.04) + 55.0, r 2 = 0.02 and mg 0 2 kg"1 hr"1 = V (0.13) + 77.7, r 2 = 0.21 respectively (Fig. 2.12). Correlation coefficients are not significantly different from zero (t-test, Accept Ho: p = 0, p < 0.05). Between water velocities 110 cm s'1 and 120 cm s"1 the mean oxygen consumption rate increases from 52.2 (± S.E. = 2.59) to 96.6 (± S.E. = 2.48) mg C*2 kg' 1 hr'1. In addition, there is a gradual increase in the number of repositionings per minute between water velocities 20 cm s"1 and 100 cm s*1. At 120 cm s"1 there is a large increase in the number of repositionings per minute from about 20 to 40. The large increase occurs at approximately the same time oxygen consumption rates increase. The highest and lowest rheotactic suction pressures based on total ventral surface area are found in Chaetostoma (Si = 23.6 N m"2 ) and Farlowella (Si = 2.04 N m"2). Hypostomus (S2 = 13.4 N m"2) and Chaetostoma (S2 = 173 N m"2) have the lowest and highest rheotactic suction pressures based on sucker area (± S.E. = 0.1 - 5.2; Table 2.3). 73 DISCUSSION Sources of Error Errors associated with calculating drag and lift coefficients include measurements of Wo, A , V, V2, and |X. Errors in measuring Wo, V, V2 and |! are unlikely. The weighing scale and current meter have reproducibilities of 5 x 10"4 g and 0.50 cm s*1 respectively. Furthermore, the standard error of p: is less than 3 % of measured values (Table 2.1). Although drag coefficients of fish within genera vary, the drag velocity curves are consistent (Fig. 2.10). This suggests that the greatest error in calculating C L and C D arises from estimates of the total projected frontal area A . Under estimates of A will result in increased calculated drag coefficients. Due to bony scutes along the head of Pterygoplichthys (occipital process, temporal and cleithrum), the Ab perimeter is not smooth. Although Pterygoplichthys has a rougher outline only a 6.8 % difference was found between to independent methods of estimation. The perimeter of Ab for Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus and Chaetostoma is relatively smooth (Fig 1.1). Using geometry to estimate Ab in these fish would improve accuracy. In addition, A did not include the projected frontal area of the pectoral fin rays in the loricariids. The fin rays in these fish were not stable, but fluttered in water flow during drag measurements, producing unpredictable frontal areas. Rough estimates on the projected frontal area of the fin rays (using tracings and angle to flow) increases Ab by about 5 % for loricariids in a rheotactic posture. 74 This percent reduction in estimated area is compensated to a certain degree by an over estimate of Af (assuming spine width does not change with length). In Gyrinocheilus fin ray projected frontal areas were substantially larger (40 % - 50 % of A). For this reason their areas were estimated. Furthermore, drag coefficients on dead specimens may be elevated if the body does not remain stiff or fin flutter occurs (Webb, 1975; Blake 1983). In this study live and dead specimens remained rigidly attached to the substrate eliminating body movement. Although pectoral fin ray flutter is minimal and not noticeably different in dead fish, it may contribute to increasing drag. Arnold and Weihs (1978) found that the model used in this study may 4 not be applicable for Reynold's numbers < 10 without modification to the velocity exponent using a correction factor a according to Otocinclus is the only genera with Reynold's numbers consistently lower than 10 4 (Fig. 2.11). Following Arnold and Weihs (1978) a value of 0.2 for o is applied to the velocity exponent of V2. In addition, a must be applied to the velocity (V) exponent used to calculate "C^ (Equation 2.12). This produces a 30 % decrease in~C^ and 40 % increase in the ratio 2Wo /p A V 2 resulting in T T , C . C, a n d T T / T T ratio equal to 0.83, 1 w 2 L L 1 L 2 L U (2.14) and (2.15) 75 0.66, 1.01. and 2.41 respectively. The negative lift coefficient originally determined for Otocinclus using a maximum C D value is eliminated by this correction. The minimum difference between lift coefficients calculated for Otocinclus at V2 with a velocity exponent equal to 1.8 and 2.0 is 50 %. The model is most sensitive to adjustments in the velocity exponent. However, from measurements its apparent that the drag velocity curve is adequately described using a velocity exponent equal to 2 (Fig. 2.10 and Table 2.2). Although some measurements are below Reynold's numbers of 104 average values reduce their effect on calculated C and C . L D Furthermore, boundary layer effects may reduce the water velocity experienced by smaller fish. Otocinclus generally had the smallest specimens (maximal body height = 0.5 cm - 0.7 cm). Measured boundary layer thickness at lower water velocities is similar to the height of Otocinclus (see Materials and Methods, Chapter II). However, drag measurements were taken a higher water velocities and specimens were placed at the front of the force plate. Both these methods would reduce boundary layer thickness resulting in a closer prediction (using free stream velocity) of the water velocity experienced by the fish. Density and Weight The densities determined for Otocinclus and Gyrinocheilus (Fig. 2.9 and Table 2.1) are similar to those found in other benthic fish like the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa, p = 1.074 g cm"3) and ray (Raja clavata, p = 1.066 g cm*3; Arnold and Weihs, 1978; Webb, 1989; Table 2.1). 76 Hypostomus, Chaetostoma and Farlowella have particularly high body densities similar to several species of crab (Callinectes sapidus, Cancer productus and Lopholithodes mandtii, p = 1.13 g cm"3 - 1.14 g cm"3; Blake, 1985). Dense dermal plates in Farlowella and Chaetostoma contribute to high values (Alexander, 1965). Pterygoplichthys has a low "p~ relative to other genera. Although Pterygoplichthys was kept in a well oxygenated aquarium aerial respiration did occur in some specimens. Air trapped in accessory respiratory organs and swim bladders may account for the reduced density. Density measurements did not compensate for these gases (Gee, 1976). However, control of gases with these organs would allow Pterygoplichthys to increase density. Higher body density in all genera increases their effective submerged weight, resulting in higher frictional forces opposing drag. An increase in density with length, as seen in Otocinclus and Gyrinocheilus, may give older individuals increased station-holding ability (Fig. 2.9). According to Gee (1976) species of Chaetostoma (C. fischeri) are found in water velocities exceeding 40 cm s"1. Fish in this type of environment have an advantage in preventing displacement if submerged weight is increased at a rapid rate as seen in this genus (Fig 2.8). Frictional pads and odontodes in Otocinclus and other loricariids contribute to maximizing slipping speed on rough surfaces (Macdonnell and Blake, 1990). The frictional coefficients determined for the loricariids and Gyrinocheilus on a perspex surface are generally higher than those determined for other benthic fish (eg. R. clavata and P. platessa, \i = 0.36 and 0.21 respectively; Webb, 1989; Table 2.1). Besides acting as an effective method for protection the pectoral fin spines increase friction 77 (Schaefer, 1984). The odontodes of the loricariids are not particularly useful for increasing p. on a smooth surface, however they would be on algal mats or rougher substrates. Gyrinocheilus and Chaetostoma have higher "]T relative to the other genera. The smooth ventral surface of Chaetostoma and flexible pectoral fins and oral sucker of Gyrinocheilus provides mtimate contact with the perspex increasing frictional coefficients. Both these characteristics would contribute to maximizing slipping velocity on smooth rock substrates. Morphology Trade offs occur between lift and drag reflecting differences in body morphology. Lift and drag act to displace and remove the fish from the bottom in fast flow. Drag coefficients can be reduced by increasing fineness ratio (1/h « 10), flattening (2b/h = 2) and lengthening (x/1 = 0.3) the fore body (Hoerner, 1965). However, these changes in morphology increase lift (Hoerner and Borst, 1975). For fast stream fish morphological ratios 2b/h, 1/h and x/1 range between 0.9 - 2.0, 6.0 -8.0, and 0.1 - 0.3 respectively (Chapter I). In Fig. 2.10 fish number 1, 2, 2, and 2 of Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Chaetostoma and Farlowella respectively have their dorsal fins extended during drag measurements. Generally the mean drag coefficients calculated and drag measured for these fish is higher than those with the dorsal fin folded (Table 2.3). Lowering the dorsal fin and folding the tail in response to increased water velocity is a behaviour adapted to minimize drag. In contrast, at slipping speed Otocinclus extends its pectoral fins 78 (Macdonnell and Blake, 1990). This would increase drag; however, if the drag increase is low compared to the frictional forces gained (by negative lift and odontodes) the behaviour is advantageous to preventing displacement. Otocinclus has low drag due to its small size (Fig. 2.10). However, over a similar Reynold's number range Gyrinocheilus has a lower TJ^ than Otocinclus, Pterygoplichthys and Chaetostoma (Table 2.3). This can be attributed to the lack of odontodes and smoother body surface found in Gyrinocheilus. Pterygoplichthys and Hypostomus have similar body morphology. Most drag measurements are made on smaller specimens of Pterygoplichthys relative to Hypostomus (Table 2.2). However, for Pterygoplichthys, fish number 1 is considerably larger (Table 2.2), resulting in higher Reynold's numbers and in turn lower "C^ siinilar to larger specimens of Hypostomus (Table 2.3). Relative to smooth bodies drag coefficients are elevated (Table 2.4). However, the relationship between Reynold's number and drag coefficient is typical for objects attached to surfaces (Fig. 2.11; eg. Hoerner, 1965 and Denny, 1988). The highest XT a n d T T / T T is found in Farlowella (Table 2.3). Its high fineness ratio and extended rostrum contribute to increasing lift. However, relative to flatter form fish lift coefficients are low (plaice C L ~ 2.0; Arnold and Weihs, 1978). Gyrinocheilus also has a high C L / C D ratio relative to the other loricariids. Flattening and elongation of the fore body is not present in Gyrinocheilus to the extent seen in the fast stream loricariids (Chapter I). However, Gyrinocheilus's high fineness ratio contributes to increasing its lift coefficient. Relatively high 79 lift coefficients explain behavioural observations (tail instabihty for Farlowella and Gyrinocheilus; Chapter I). These observations are similar to those made by Stuart (1958) on body posture to increasing water velocity in the nymph Rhithrogena semicolorata. Farlowella is found in slow moving waters, hiding in detritus and leaves on stream bottoms. If found in faster flow it is usually attached behind large logs or rocks, taking advantage of back eddies (Burgess, 1989). Low rheotactic suction pressures and high C L / C D in Farlowella are not characteristics that enhance station-holding ability. In contrast Gyrinocheilus can be found in open fast flowing water (Sterba, 1983). Unlike Farlowella, Gyrinocheilus is able to gain control of the tail at high water velocity. The lift to drag ratios determined for Otocinclus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys and Chaetostoma are similar to Myoxocephalus scorpius ( C L / C D = 2.08; Webb, 1989) and Cancer productus ( C L / C D = 1.7-2.0; Blake, 1985). Al l C L / C D ratios are relatively small compared to efficiently designed wings ( C L / C Q > 20; Hoerner and Borst, 1975). Lower lift to drag ratios maximize slipping speed by allowing fish to utilize frictional devices for preventing displacement. In Gyrinocheilus higher lift to drag ratios can be compensated for by relatively high pressures produced by rheotaxis and suction (Table 2.3). Another method of reducing lift is to have the pectoral fins act as wings, orientated at a negative angle to water flow. This occurs in all genera. Negative lift coefficients are calculated for Pterygoplichthys using maximum C Q . Chaetostoma has negative lift coefficients in all cases. These hill stream fish have their posterior pectoral fin rays at a 80 30° and 40° angle to the oncoming flow, the fin rays unfold easily and do not show movement drastically different from live fish during measurements. At the insertion point of the pectoral fin a small gap exists between the body, substrate and anterior pectoral fin spine. Water passing under the spine at high velocity maintains continuity of flow (Bernouli's theorem) and could contribute to producing downward forces. Relatively large pectoral fin areas are correlated with benthic environments (Gatz, 1979). In addition, studies have observed behaviour suggesting that the pectoral fins act as negative lift hydrofoils. For example, Keast and Webb (1966), observed that the pectoral fins in the catfish, Ictalurus nebulosus, may produce forces that push the mouth against the substrate as it feeds. Lift by the pectoral fins may not be sufficient to give an overall negative C L for the fish. However, they can act separately, producing forces sufficient to reduce lift. Rheotactic suction pressure is produced by oral suction and rheotaxis opposing lateral displacement. Gyrinocheilus, Pterygoplichthys and Chaetostoma produce the largest pressures (Table 2.3). However, compared to pressures measured by Gibson (1969) in intertidal fish they are low (eg. Liparis montagui, 3 cm - 8 cm, S2 = 8.2 x 104 N m"2- 1.5 x 104 N m"2 respectively). Although the pressures measured by Gibson (1969; perpendicular to the substrate) are not directly comparable to the rheotactic pressures determined for fish in this study, slipping velocities are comparable. The intertidal fish, Liparis montagui, Liparis liparis, and Cyclopterus lumpus are able to prevent slipping by water velocities equal to 170 cm s"\ Powerful closed vacuum sucking discs in intertidal fish are derived from pelvic and pectoral fins specifically 81 adapted for adhesion. Although Gyrinocheilus has the ability to form a complete seal (closed sucker) other biological constraints (feeding) effect design which may limit pressures produced by the sucker benjamin, 1986). Within the loricariids there are no gross differences in oral sucker morphology (Gradwell, 1971). However, there are large differences in suction pressure. Otocinclus, Chaetostoma, Pterygoplichthys and Hypostomus are found in fast flowing water (Burgess, 1989). Otocinclus and Hypostomus may rely on frictional devices to compensate for their lower suction pressures. Both these fish have dermal plates and odontodes on their ventral surface, high V2 and low V1-V2 (Chapter I). This is further supported by the reduction in rheotactic suction pressure for Hypostomus, relative to the other fish, when calculated using oral sucker area, S2 (Table 2.3). Morphology, oral sucker pressures, low V2 and high V1-V2 in Pterygoplichthys and Chaetostoma suggest that these fish place a greater reliance on suction for station-holding. Estimating Drag Coefficients Technical bodies attached to surfaces have lower drag coefficients than bodies of similar fineness ratio and shape in the free stream (Hoerner, 1965). However, roughness (odontodes and eyes) and uneven transition to a substrate may increase drag coefficients by a factor of 2 (Arnold and Weihs, 1978; Webb 1989). In addition, appendages interfering with flow around a body can increase drag by 1.7 times (Hoerner, 1965). Interference drag is greatest when the appendage is inserted at the point 82 of maximal height. In the genera exainined maximal height occurs at pectoral fin insertion. Taking these factors into consideration estimates of drag coefficients are compared to measured values. In Table 2.4 drag coefficients measured from technical bodies C Do (smooth blisters attached to a surface; Hoerner, 1965), calculated larninar frictional coefficients and estimates ( C ^ and ^ y ^ ) based on the above factors are listed. For streamlined bodies attached to surfaces the dominant force between Reynold's numbers of 104 and 105 is frictional drag. Frictional drag results from the tangential shear stresses developed between layers of fluid as it moves over the body. Values for the case of a frictional coefficient for turbulent flow give similar results to the laminar case at these Reynold's numbers and are not shown in Table 2.4. The frictional drag coefficient for a laminar boundary layer (Cy^^) is obtained from the empirical equation where R^ is the maximum and minimum Reynold's number for each genera taken from Table 2.3. From Hoerner (1965) drag coefficients for fineness ratios > 10 (Farlowella) can be estimated using Using equation 2.16 measured drag coefficients are 2 to 30 times greater than f ° r Reynold's numbers ranging from 104 to 105 (Table 2.4). In general Farlowella has estimated drag coefficients closest to 83 Do Do "/(Urn) c' Do c1 Otocinclus 0.042 0.14 0.012-0.017 0.04-0.06 3 8-11 Gyrinocheilus 0.035 0.12 0.009-0.017 0.03-0.06 4 7-14 Hypostomus 0.037 0.13 0.006-0.010 0.02-0.03 2 10-14 Pterygoplichthys 0.040 0.14 0.009-0.014 0.03-0.05 3 9-16 Fish 1 0.040 0.14 0.006-0.009 0.02-0.03 3 8-12 Chaetostoma 0.038 0.13 0.011-0.015 0.03-0.05 7 18-30 Farlowella 0.045 0.22 0.006-0.010 0.06-0.11* 1 2-3 Table 2.4 Calculated laminar frictional drag coefficients Cr , drag / G u n ) coefficients measured from technical bodies C„ with fineness ratios Do equivalent to the fish and estimated values multiplied by a factor of 3.4, C J - ^ and C ^ . Multiple difference between measured and estimated drag coefficients, TIT/CJ.(Um) and T J ^ / C ^ for the Reynold's number range R 3 in Table 2.3 (R3 = 0.55 x 104 - 4.76 x 104). Frictional drag coefficient deterrnined from equation 2.17 (*). 84 measured values (Table 2.4). The high fineness ratio, and small anterior pectoral fin spines contribute to a relatively smooth body and an accurate prediction of C D . It would seem that estimating C D is reliable for fineness ratios £ 10 using equations 2.16, 2.17 and technical body data. Estimated drag coefficients for lower fineness ratio forms (1/h < 10) compares poorly with measured values. At fineness ratios less than 10 separation of the boundary layer over the fore body may produce varying degrees of pressure drag due to roughness that is difficult to predict. In addition, it has already been pointed out that predicted values of drag and lift coefficients are unreliable for Reynold's numbers < 104 where resistance is not a quadratic function of velocity. Force coefficients for fish of low fineness ratio at lower Reynold's number on a ground plane can not be accurately predicted and should be measured. Respirometry Although fish are able to swim in a fast flowing environment (eg. Salmo gairdneri, 75.0 cm s"1- 90.0 cm s' 1; Everest and Chapman, 1970), the ability to maintain position is dependant to a greater extent on the efficiency of their active propulsive mechanism rather than the passive methods seen in benthic fish. Even fish that tend to swim away from the bottom will utilize the substrate to prevent displacement (Keenleyside, 1962). The resting 0 2 consumption rate (~ 50 mg 0 2 kg"1 hr"1) in Pterygoplichthys is similar to other fish (eg. Beamish, 1964; Hughes et al. 1983). However, the O consumption rate at higher water velocities is 85 lower than values determined for fish swimming in the free stream. For example, Steffensen et al. (1987) found Rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri, 285-700 g) had O consumption rates of approximately 300 mg O kg"1 hr"1 at a water velocity of 85 cm s"1 for a 20 to 40 min swim time. In contrast the 0 2 consumption rates at even higher water velocities in Pterygoplichthys are lower (97 mg 0 2 kg"1 hr"1, 120 - 160 cm s' 1, 20 min swim time). Utilizing the substrate to prevent displacement using body morphology (odontodes and spines) and rheotactic behaviour is advantageous for reducing the effort required to maintain position. From the respirometry results (Fig. 2.12) an increase in oxygen consumption and repositioning occurs at approximately the same water velocity (110 cm s"1). This indicates that at critical speeds (slipping speed) the fish exerts greater effort to maintain position. This is accomplished by increasing rheotactic suction pressure and burst swimming. Unlike littoral zone fish, that use a ventral sucking disc made from modified fins (Gibson, 1969), the loricariids must form suction with their mouths. At faster water velocities, where suction is an asset, the effort required to maintain position increases. However, the respiratory fissure becomes smaller and flaring of the gap more pronounced which may restrict water flow. To compensate for reduced flow the breathing rate may be increased (Burgess, 1989) or alternate methods of respiration utilized (Sawaya and Petrini, 1960). This particular diphasic oxygen consumption rate is probably applicable to the loricariids. However, Gyrinocheilus uses a different mechanism of suction that may result in a different oxygen consumption curve. In a natural habitat fish have a number of options not presented to 86 them in this study. These include positioning in back eddies behind rocks and boulders, moving into reduced water flow along the sides of rivers, borrowing and selection of substrate (Probst et al. 1984 and Daniels, 1989). Furthermore, other ecological factors like predation and food resources effect their distribution (Zaret, 1970; Colgan and Cross, 1982). Power (1984) found size-specific depth distributions occur for four species of loricariids (Ancistrus, Hypostomus, Chaetostoma, and Rineloricaria). During the day fish opt for deeper waters where they can avoid predation from birds, moving into shallow algal rich areas during the night to feed. However, hill stream fish are generally restricted to fast flow. Species of Hypostomus must remain in cataracts were oxygen content is high (Boseman, 1968). Behavioural and morphological adaptations found in fast stream fish (Otocinclus, Gyrinocheilus, Hypostomus, Pterygoplichthys, and Chaetostoma) do maximize slipping speed and, likely, reduce the energy required for maintaining position. Frictional devices (spines, odontodes, and frictional pad), high rheotactic suction pressures, tissue densities and hydrodynamic characteristics increase forces opposing drag and lift. In contrast, Farlowella exhibits hydrodynamic characteristics (high C L and C J C ) , low rheotactic suction pressure, and behaviour (passive rheotactic behaviour) indicating that relative to station-holding other factors are of greater priority in determining habitat adaptation. 87 Concluding Comments Results from Chapter I suggest that behavioural and morphological adaptations in fast stream fish contribute to increasing station-holding ability. Although drag coefficients for fast stream fish are relatively high, geometry conforms to low drag shapes. The presence of dorso-ventral flattening and frictional devices in the loricariids are characteristics similar to the fast stream fish studied by Hora (1921 - 1930). Furthermore, variation in body geometry and density with size may be a contributing factor in determining the micro-habitats fish are able to exploit within species. The physical parameters placed on fast stream fish may be a significant component in determining adaptation. In addition, the contribution of pectoral fin extension to station-holding may provide insight into the reasons for this behaviour in Otocinclus. This study supports previous observations suggesting that the pectoral fins act to produce negative lift. By adapting current methods it may be possible to measure the lift and drag acting on benthic fish with and without fins, therefore, ascertaining their contribution to station-holding. Results from Chapters I and U indicate that a significant proportion of their station-holding ability is dependant on suction. Direct measurement of the actual suction pressure produced by these fish from a variety of directions would be a useful exercise. Trade offs between suction pressure and morphology adapted to maximize friction may occur depending on the substrate. It would seem that, besides biological factors, the extreme environmental conditions that these fish face have a significant effect on hydrodynamic adaptation. Detailed investigation into the physical constraints (eg. water velocity, substrate type and natural shelter) placed on these fish may reveal evidence supporting the explanations based on the behavioural, morphological and hydrodynamic data obtained in this study. 89 LITERATURE CITED Alexander, R. McN. (1965). Structure and Function in the Catfish. J. Zool. 148, 88-152. Annandale, N. and Hora, S.L. (1920). The Fish of Seistan. Rec. Indian Mus. 18, 191. Annandale, N. and Hora, S.L. (1922). Parallel evolution in the fish and tadpoles of mountain torrents. Rec. Indian Mus. 24, 505-509. Annandale, N., and Hora, S.L. (1925). The Fresh Water Fish from the Andaman Islands. Rec. Indian Mus. 27, 33-43. Arnold, G.P. (1969). A flume for behaviour studies of marine fish, J. Exp. Biol. 51, 671-679. Arnold, G.P. and Weihs, D. (1978). The hydrodynamics of rheotaxis in the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). J. Exp. Biol. 75, 147-169. Beamish, F.W.H. (1964). Influence of starvation on standard and routine oxygen consumption. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 93: 103-107. Benjamin, M. (1986). The oral sucker in Gyrinocheilus aymonieri (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). J. Zool. B 1, 211-254. 90 Blake, R.W. (1983). Fish Locomotion. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain. Blake, R.W. (1985). Crab Carapace Hydrodynaniics. J. Zool. A 207, 407-423. Boseman, M. (1968). The Genus Hypostomus Lacepede, 1803, and its Surinam representatives (Siluriformes, Loricariidae). Zool. Verh. 99, 1-89. Burgess, W.E. (1989). An Atlas of Freshwater and Marine Catfishes (A preliminary survey of the Siluriformes). T. F. H. Publications Inc. Colgan, W.P. and Cross, J.A. (1982). Laboratory food exploitation in the algae-eater (Gyrinocheilus aymonieri) (Tirant 1883) Pisces: Cypriniformes. Biol. Behav. 7, 109-117. Cope, E.D. (1871). [Prof. Cope demonstrated some anatomical points of importance in the classification of some of the siluroids of the Amazon, etc.]. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 23, 112. Daniels, R.A. (1989). Significance of Burying in Ammocrypta pellucida. Copeia. 29-34. Denny, M. (1988). A limpet shell shape that reduces drag: laboratory demonstration of a hydrodynamic mechanism and an exploration of its effectiveness in nature. Can. J. Zool. 67, 2098-2106. 91 Eaton, T.H. (1935). The teeth of Plecostomus, an armoured catfish. Copeia. 161-163. Eigenmann, C H . and Eigenmann, R.S. (1889). Preliminary notes of the south American nematognathi. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (2) 2, 28-56. Everst, F.H. and Chapman, D.W. (1972). Habitat selection and spatial interaction by juvenille chinook salmon and steelhead trout in two Idaho streams. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29, 91-100. Fowler, H.W. (1937). Zoological results of the third De Schauensee Siamese Expedition. Part 8. Fishes obtained in 1936. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 89, 125-264. Gatz, A.J. (1979). Ecological morphology of fresh water streamfishes. Tulane Stud. Zool. Biol. (21) 2, 91-124. Gee, J.H. (1976). Buoyancy and aerial respiration: factors influencing the evolution of reduced swim-bladder volume of some Central American catfishes (Trichomycteridae, Callichthyidae, Loricariidae, Astroblepidae). Can. J. Zool. 54, 1030-1037. 92 Gehrke, P.C., Fidler, L.E., Mense, D . C , and Randall, D J . (1990). A respirometer with controlled water quality and computorized data aquisition for experiments with swimming fish. Fish Physiol. Bioch. (8) 1, 61-67. Gibson, R.N. (1969). Powers of adhesion in Liparis Montagui (Donovan) and other shore fish, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 3, 179-190. Gill, T. (1858). Synopsis of the fresh water fishes of the western portion of the island of Trinidad, W.I. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Sci. Hist. (New York). 6, (38), 363-339. Gradwell, N. (1971). A Muscular Oral Valve Unique in Fishes. Can. J. Zool. 49, 837-839. Hoerner, S.F. (1965). Fluid-Dynamic Drag. Brick Town, NJ: Hoerner Fluid Dynamics. Hoerner, S.F. (1975). Fluid-Dynamic Lift. Brick Town, NJ: Hoerner Fluid Dynamics. Ed. H.V. Borst. Hora, S.L. (1921). Indian Cyprinoid fishes belonging to the Genus Garra, with Notes on Related Species from other Countries. Rec. Indian Mus. 29, 633-683. 93 Hora, S.L. (1922). Structural modifications in the fish of mountain torrents. Rec. Indian Mus. 24, 31-61. Hora, S.L. (1923a). The adhesive apparatus of the sucking fish. Nature 111, 668. Hora, S.L. (1923b). On a collection of fish from Siam. J. Nat. His. Soc. Siam. 6, 143-184. Hora, S.L. (1925a). The adhesive apparatus of the sucking fish. Nature 115, 48. Hora, S.L. (1925b). Notes on fishes in the Indian museum. Rec. Indian Mus. 25, 1-44. Hora, S.L. (1925c). Observations on the fauna of certain torrential streams in the Khasi hills. Rec. Indian Mus. 25, 579-605. Hora, S.L. (1927). Animal Life in Torrential Streams. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 32, 111-126. Hora, S.L. (1930). Ecology, bionomics and evolution of the torrential fauna, with special reference to the organs of attachment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 218, 171-282. 94 Hughes, G.M., Albers, C , Muster, D., and G6tz, K.H. (1983). Respiration of the carp, Cyprinus carpio L., at 10° and 20° C and the effects of hypoxia. J. Fish Biol. 22, 613-628. Isbriiker, IJ.H. (1980). Classification and catalogue of the mailed catfish (Pisces, Siluriformes). Verslagen Tech. Gegevens. 22, 1-181. Jones, W.E. (1968). Exposure to wave action: Measurements of an important ecological parameter on rocky shores on Auglesey, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2, 46-63. Keast, A. , and Webb, D. (1966). Mouth and body form relative to feeding ecology in the fish fauna of a small lake, lake Opinicon, Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 23 (12), 1845-1874. Keenleyside, M.H.A. (1962). Skin-diving observations of Atlantic salmon and brook trout in the Mirarnichi River, New Brunswick. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 19, 625-634. Lundberg, J.C. and Marsh, E. (1976). Evolution and functional anatomy of the pectoral fin rays in the cyprinoid fishes, with emphasis on the suckers (family Catostomidae). Am. Midi. Nat. 96, 332-349. Lacepede, B.G.E. (1803). Histoire naturelle des poissons, decliee a Anne-Caroline La Cepe, par le Citoyen La Cepe (P. Plassen, Paris), 5 (1), 1-803. 95 Macdonnell, A J . and Blake R.W. (1990). Rheotaxis in Otocinclus sp. (Teleostei: Loricariidae). Can. J. Zool. In Press. Matthews, W J . (1985). Critical current speeds and microhabitats of the benthic fishes Percina roanoka and Etheostoma flabellare. Envirn. Biol. Fishes. 12, 303-308. Maude, S. H. and Williams, D.D. (1983). Behavior of the crayfish in water currents: hydrodynamics of eight species with reference to their distribution patterns in Southern Ontario. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40, 68-77. Mittal, A. K. and Whitear, M. (1979). Keratinization of fish skin with special reference to the Catfish Bagarius bagarius. Cell Tissue Res. 202, 213-230. Nachtigall, W. (1974). Biological mechanisms of attachment (transl. by M.A. Biederman-Thorson). Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 0rvig, T. (1977). A survey of odontodes ("Dermal teeth") from a developmental, structural, functional and phyletic point of view. Linn. Soc. Sym. Ser. No. 4. Problems in vertebrate evolution. Academic Press, London. 96 Power, M.E. (1984). Depth distribution of armoured catfish: Predator induced resource avoidance? Ecology 65 (2), 523-528. Probst, W.E., C F . , Rabeni, W.G., Covington and R.E., Marteney. (1984). Resource use by stream dwelling rock bass and small mouth bass. Am. Fish. Soc, 113, 283-294. Roberts, T.R. (1982). Unclui (horny projections arising from single cells), an adaptive feature of the epidermis of ostariophysin fishes. Zool. Scr. 11, 55-76. Sawaya, P. and Petrini, L. M. de (1960). Sobre a presenga de cloaca e respirafSo intestinal no Cascudo (Loricariidae: Plecostomus plecostomus (Linn.)). Bolm Fac. Filos. Cienc. Univ. S. Paulo 23, 5-23. Schaefer, S.A. (1984). Mechanical strength of the pectoral spine/girdle complex in Pterygoplichthys (Loricariidae: Siluroidei). Copeia. 1005-1008. Smith, H.M. (1945). The fresh-water fishes of Siam, or Thailand. U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 188, 1-622. Statzner, B. and Holme, T.F. (1989). Morphological adaptations of Shape to Flow: Microcurrents around Lotic Macroinvertebrates with known Reynolds numbers at quasi-natural flow conditions. Oecologia 79, 145-157. a 97 Steffensen, J.R, Tufts, B.L. and Randall, D J . (1987). Effect of burst swirrrming and adrenaline infusion on 0 2 consumption and C 0 2 excretion in Rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. J. Exp. Biol. 131, 427-434. Sterba, G. (1983). Aquarium Encyclopedia, (transl. Susan Simpson). M.LT. Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Streeter, V .L . and Wylie, E.B. (1979). Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, Inc. Stuart A .M . (1958). The efficiency of adaptive structures in the nymph of Rhithrogena semicolorata (Curtis) (Ephemeroptera). J. Exp. Biol. 35, 27-38. Taylor, E. B. (1988). Adaptive Variation and Agonistic Behavior in Newly Emerged Fry of Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, from Ocean - and Stream - Type Populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., Vol. 45, 237-243. Tirant, G. (1883). Note sur quelques especes de poissons des montagnes de Samrong-Tong (Cambodge). Bull. Soc. Etudes Indochinoises Saigon. (Reprint in 1929 as one of the series of papers under the title: Oeuvre ichthyologique de G. Tirant. Reimpression. Note Service Ocean. Peches Indochine Saigon. 6, 1-175. Tschudi, J J . von. (1845). Untersuchungen iiber die Fauna peruana. Ichthyologie (Scheitlin and Zollikofer, St. Gallen). 1-35 98 Vandewalle, P., Bmnin P., and Chardon M. (1986). Functional approach to the morphology of the buccal region of Cteniloricaria platystoma (Gunther) (Pisces, Ostariophysi, Loricariidae) with respect to a peculiar respiration, Zool. Anz. 217, 363-373. Vogel, S. (1981). Life in Moving Fluids. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Webb, P.W. (1975). Hydrodynamics and Energetics of Fish Propulsion. Bull. Fish. Res. Can. 190, 1-158. Webb, P. W. (1989). Station-holding by three species of benthic fish. J. Exp. Biol. 145, 303-320. Wheeler, A. (1975). Fishes of the World. MacMillan Publishing Co. Inc., New York. Zaret, T.M., and A.S. Rand. (1971). Competition in tropical stream fishes: support for the competitve exclusion principle. Ecology 52, 336-342. 

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
https://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.831.1-0098344/manifest

Comment

Related Items