Open Collections

UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

Camera lucida : the moving image as evocative document : film form, film meaning and the grammatology… Ljunggren, Rhonda L. 1986

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata

Download

Media
831-UBC_1986_A3 L58_5.pdf [ 5.83MB ]
Metadata
JSON: 831-1.0096625.json
JSON-LD: 831-1.0096625-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0096625-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 831-1.0096625-rdf.json
Turtle: 831-1.0096625-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 831-1.0096625-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 831-1.0096625-source.json
Full Text
831-1.0096625-fulltext.txt
Citation
831-1.0096625.ris

Full Text

CAMERA LUCIDA: THE MOVING IMAGE AS EVOCATIVE DOCUMENT FILM FORM, FILM MEANING AND THE GRAMMATOLOGI OF ARCHIVAL SELECTION BY RHONDA L. LJUNGGREN M.A., UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM, 1983 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARCHIVAL STUDIES THE FACULTY OF ARTS A d m i n i s t e r e d by The S c h o o l o f L i b r a r y , A r c h i v a l and I n f o r m a t i o n S t u d i e s and the Department of H i s t o r y We a c c e p t t h i s t h e s i s as co n f o r m i n g to the r e q u i r e d s t a n d a r d : THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA MARCH 1986 © Rhonda L. Ljun g g r e n 7 In presenting t h i s thesis i n p a r t i a l f u l f i l m e n t of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of B r i t i s h Columbia, I agree that the Library s h a l l make i t f r e e l y a v a i l a b l e for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of t h i s thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by h i s or her representatives. It i s understood that copying or pu b l i c a t i o n of t h i s thesis for f i n a n c i a l gain s h a l l not be allowed without my written permission. The University of B r i t i s h Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date Of Aful 11% W & I O / - 7 Q \ ABSTRACT T h i s t h e s i s examines the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of moving image documents such as they p e r t a i n t o the s e l e c t i o n of f i l m s f o r a r -c h i v a l p r e s e r v a t i o n . I t i s advanced t h a t both the p h y s i c a l na-t u r e o f the f i l m r e c o r d and the n a t u r e of the evidence i t p r e s e n t s are prime c o n s i d e r a t i o n s i n the development o f a r c h i v a l s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a . F urthermore i t i s argued t h a t the s t r u c t u r e and con-t e n t o f f i l m a re i n t e r r e l a t e d f a c t o r s which impact s i g n i f i c a n t l y upon the d e t e r m i n a t i o n of a r c h i v a l v a l u e , and the s u i t a b i l i t y of the f i l m r e c o r d f o r permanent p r e s e r v a t i o n . F i n a l l y , a major f a c t o r a f f e c t i n g s e l e c t i o n i n v o l v e s a c c o u n t i n g f o r the impact of f i l m as a r e f l e c t o r and p u r v e y o r o f p o p u l a r c u l t u r e . Given the p o w e r f u l i n f l u e n c e of f i l m i n moulding p o p u l a r i d e a s , a t t i t u d e s , and v a l u e systems, a r c h i v a l s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a must take i n t o a ccount f i l m of a l l t ypes i f t h e r e i s to be any f u t u r e p r o s p e c t of a s s e s s i n g the impact o f f i l m on s o c i e t y i n a g i v e n p e r i o d . The s o u r c e s used f o r t h i s study i n c l u d e the w r i t i n g s o f h i s -t o r i a n s and a r c h i v i s t s c o n c e r n i n g f i l m as h i s t o r i c a l e v i d e n c e and the a r c h i v a l s e l e c t i o n t h e r e o f , as w e l l as t r a d i t i o n a l f i l m l i t e r a -t u r e . The st u d y proceeds from a c o n s i d e r a t i o n of the t e c h n i c a l and s t r u c t u r a l a s p e c t s of f i l m to a c o n t e n t - o r i e n t e d d i s c u s s i o n i n v o l v i n g the r e f l e c t i v e and i n f l u e n t i a l n a t u r e of the moving image document. A r c h i v a l s e l e c t i o n i s c o n s i d e r e d i n terms of i t s n e c e s s i t y and j u s t i f i a b i l i t y w i t h r e g a r d t o the n a t u r e o f the f i l m r e c o r d , and a l t e r n a t i v e modes o f s e l e c t i o n are i n v e s t i g a t e d . i i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT . i i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ' i v CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION. . . 1 CHAPTER I I THE NATURE OF THE MEDIUM AND AVENUES FOR HISTORICAL RESEARCH 6 CHAPTER I I I THE MOVING IMAGE DOCUMENT AND SOCIETAL REFLECTION 21 CHAPTER IV SOCIETY AS AUDIENCE: FILM INFLUENCE AND IMPACT. 50 CHAPTER V ARCHIVAL SELECTION AND THE MOVING IMAGE DOCUMENT 66 CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION 88 BIBLIOGRAPHY 97 i i i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would l i k e to e x p r e s s my i n d e b t e d n e s s t o the f o l l o w i n g i n d i v i d u a l s : t o Hugh T a y l o r , f o r h i s i n s p i r a t i o n and support d u r i n g f i r s t year and h i s e x p a n s i v e v i s i o n of the a r c h i v a l u n i v e r s e ; t o . H e a t h e r M a c N e i l , f o r o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c r i t i c i s m , t i t l e i n s p i r a t i o n , and ( a ) m o r a l ( M a r x i s t m e t a - r e a l i s t ) s u p p o r t ; to T e r r y Eastwood, f o r t h e s i s s u p e r v i s i o n and support t h r o u g h -out the two y e a r s and pra c t i c u m . d e s p i t e my n o n - t r a d i t i o n a l l e a n i n g s ; and to B i l l O ' F a r r e l l , f o r i n t r o d u c i n g me to the r i o t o u s t e c h n i c a l w o r l d of f i l m a r c h i v e s and o f f e r i n g me a p l a c e t h e r e i n . i v PREFACE A NOTE REGARDING THE TITLE Camera l u c i d a i s L a t i n f o r a l i g h t or c l e a r chamber. The use of the term i n t h i s t i t l e i s i n t e n d e d to be e v o c a t i v e r a t h e r than s p e c i f i c , i n a manner s i m i l a r to the usage of Roland B a r t h e s i n h i s work of the same name. I t i s a m i s t a k e to a s s o c i a t e Photography, by r e a s o n of i t s t e c h n i c a l o r i g i n s , w i t h the n o t i o n of a dark . passage (camera o b s c u r a ) . I t i s camera l u c i d a t h a t we s h o u l d s a y ( s u c h was the name of t h a t a p p a r a t u s , a n t e r i o r t o Photography, which p e r m i t t e d drawing an o b j e c t t h r o u g h a p r i s m , one eye on the model, the o t h e r on t h e p a p e r ) ; f o r , from the eye's v i e w p o i n t , 'the essence of the image i s t o be a l t o g e t h e r o u t s i d e , w i t h o u t i n t i m a c y , and y e t more i n a c c e s s i b l e and mys-t e r i o u s than the thought of the i n n e r m o s t b e i n g ; w i t h -out s i g n i f i c a t i o n , y e t summoning up the depth of any p o s s i b l e meaning; u n r e v e a l e d y e t m a n i f e s t , h a v i n g t h a t absence-as-presence which c o n s t i t u t e s the l u r e and the f a s c i n a t i o n o f the S i r e n s ' (Blanchot).1 I n t e r p r e t e d as a c l e a r chamber, camera l u c i d a a l s o i n v o k e s the 2 i d e a of " l i g h t t h r o u g h " which i n f o r m s both the p h y s i c a l s t r u c -t u r e and p s y c h o l o g i c a l n a t u r e of the f i l m medium. As a r c h i v i s t s we have always been l e s s concerned w i t h * shedding l i g h t on , ; the s u r f a c e of our r e c o r d from a f i x e d p o i n t of view than h i s t o r i a n s i n the p a s t have sought to do. We t r y t o i l l u m i n e the whole corpus of our c o l l e c t i o n s and a l l o w the l i g h t of r e l a t e d n e s s to p e n e t r a t e through our i n t r i c a t e a r c h i v a l r e c o n s t r u c t i o n s as through the i n t e r l a c e of an i l l u m i n a t e d m a n u s c r i p t or a s t a i n e d g l a s s window. We have a l s o r e - e n t e r e d an e r a of ' l i g h t t h r o u g h ' i n a p h y s i c a l sense as we r e c o g n i z e the power of the f i l m , and the t r a n s p a r e n t s l i d e which may be j u s t as i n v o l v i n g as the s t a i n e d g l a s s window and the stone t r a c e r y . 3 The term grammatology has been a p p r o p r i a t e d from Jacques v D e r r i d a , and i s employed here as b e i n g e x p r e s s i v e of s i t u a t i n g an a n a l y s i s of f i l m v a l u e w i t h i n the terms of f i l m r e f e r e n c e ; of a t t e m p t i n g t o e s t a b l i s h a framework f o r a d i s c o u r s e o f f i l m v a l u e w i t h i n which a m e a n i n g f u l d i s c u s s i o n of s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a can take p l a c e . R o l a n d B a r t h e s , Camera L u c i d a : R e f l e c t i o n s on Photography, t r a n s l a t e d by R i c h a r d Howard (New York: H i l l and Wang, 1981) , p. 1 0 6 . " 2 Hugh A. T a y l o r , "The Media of Record: A r c h i v e s i n the Wake of McLuhan," G e o r g i a A r c h i v e 6 (1978), p. 8. 3 I b i d . v i 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The h i s t o r i a n of the t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y " f a c e s n ot a s c a r -1 c i t y but an embarrassment of e v i d e n c e . " The new media-domina-t e d i n f o r m a t i o n age has i n u n d a t e d s o c i e t y w i t h a seemingly end-l e s s u n i v e r s e o f i n f o r m a t i o n r e c o r d e d i n a v a r i e t y of f o r m a t s . D e s p i t e the p r o l i f e r a t i o n of h i s t o r i c a l s o u r c e s , h i s t o r i c a l r e -s e a r c h e r s and a r c h i v i s t s a l i k e have c l u n g w i t h t e n a c i t y to the media of p r i n t and paper .as the prime r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of h i s t o r i -c a l " f a c t . " T h i s i s h a r d l y s u r p r i s i n g i n view of the f a c t t h a t the c u r r e n t g e n e r a t i o n of a r c h i v i s t s and r e s e a r c h e r s came to ma-t u r i t y i n an age c h a r a c t e r i z e d by a preponderance of t e x t u a l me-d i a and appear to e x h i b i t a p r e d i l e c t i o n f o r the p r i n t e d media of r e c o r d . T h i s s i t u a t i o n has r e s u l t e d i n a c e r t a i n amount of aca-demic "snobbery a g a i n s t the new media, a f e e l i n g t h a t p r i n t i s the 2 o n l y p l a c e where ' t r u t h 1 hangs o u t . " I n f o r m a t i o n r e c o r d e d on o t h e r media has been r e g a r d e d w i t h r e s e r v a t i o n or d i s m i s s e d as b e i n g too much o r i e n t e d towards p o p u l a r c u l t u r e t o be of h i s t o r i c a l s i g -n i f i c a n c e . Contemporary s o c i e t y e x h i b i t s a l a m e n t a b l e tendency to m a r g i n a l i s e the importance • of- p r o d u c t s of p o p u l a r c u l t u r e on the b a s i s o f t h e i r mass a p p e a l and consumption. T h i s has been i l l u s t r a t e d by the l e n g t h y t r a d i t i o n of r e l e g a t i n g such mass phe-nomena as p o p u l a r music and f i l m t o the. .periphery of contemporary h i s t o r y i n s t e a d of s u b j e c t i n g them to the s e r i o u s s c r u t i n y they demand, i f o n l y i n view of t h e . s h e e r numbers they r e a c h . There seems t o be a wi d e s p r e a d and g e n e r a l o b l i v i o n of the 2 degree t o which the media- and t e c h n o l o g y - o r i e n t e d i n f o r m a t i o n age has permeated a l l s t r a t a of s o c i e t y , t r a n s m u t i n g the form and n a t u r e of h i s t o r i c a l , e v i d e n c e i n . t h e p r o c e s s . The a r c h i -v a l community, e n t r u s t e d w i t h the task, of p r e s e r v i n g r e c o r d s of h i s t o r i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e , has t r a d i t i o n a l l y sought out mate-r i a l . r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , of the " i n t e r e s t s o f h i s t o r i a n s of c e n t r i s t 3 p o l i t i c a l h i s t o r y . " In f a c t , the v e r y language of a r c h i v e s has e v o l v e d from the medium .of t e x t u a l , r e c o r d s , p a r t i c u l a r l y those produced by an o r g a n i z a t i o n or i n d i v i d u a l i n the course of p e r -s o n a l or c o r p o r a t e a c t i v i t y . Some l i b e r a l - m i n d e d a r c h i v i s t s , , s p e a k i n g from the new f r o n -t i e r s of the " a r c h i v a l edge,"^ are c a l l i n g f o r a r e - e v a l u a t i o n of the a r c h i v i s t ' s r o l e i n s o c i e t y . Hugh T a y l o r has spoken of the a r c h i v i s t ' s duty t o t a k e on the r o l e , of a modern-day p r o p h e t , 5 a c q u i r i n g and p r e s e r v i n g m a t e r i a l w i t h a.sense of p r e s c i e n c e . I f the r e c o r d of contemporary h i s t o r y i s - t o be p r e s e r v e d , the a r c h i v i s t s of today and. p a r t i c u l a r l y of tomorrow "may have to assume the shaman's r o l e as keepers of the t r i b a l memory i n our g l o b a l v i l l a g e . - " ^ T h i s b e l i e f , would appear to be e s p e c i a l l y p e r -t i n e n t to the a r e a of the s o - c a l l e d " s p e c i a l " media, which, be-cause of t h e i r e s s e n t i a l l y ephemeral p h y s i c a l n a t u r e , are i n dan-ger of p a s s i n g permanently out of the a r c h i v i s t ' s grasp i f s t e p s are not taken to save such r e c o r d s of the p o s t - i n d u s t r i a l i n f o r -m ation age. In o r d e r t o p r e s e r v e such r e c o r d s f o r p o s t e r i t y , the i d i o -s y n c r a t i c p h y s i c a l n a t u r e of the new media w i l l need to be c o n s i -dered i n s o f a r as p h y s i c a l form . w i l l by n e c e s s i t y i n f l u e n c e c o n t e n t . I t i s t h e r e f o r e i m p o r t a n t t h a t a r c h i v i s t s " t r y to u n d e r s t a n d the 3 c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f the media i n . . . (^theirj c u stody which are e x p r e s s e d i n 'messages' beyond t h e i r , l i t e r a r y c o n t e n t , and pass 7 on t h i s awareness to the u s e r . " A r e c o r d t h a t needs to b e . c o n s i d e r e d . i n t h i s l i g h t i s t h a t of the moving image document, a source t h a t . h a s t r a d i t i o n a l l y been viewed as a phenomenon of mass c u l t u r e , but has l a r g e l y been i g n o r e d as a source f o r s e r i o u s r e s e a r c h . That f i l m i s a p o p u l a r a r t form seems to have worked a g a i n s t i t s r e c o g n i t i o n as a v i a b l e h i s t o r i c a l source,, w h i l e the v e r y f a c t of i t s p o p u l a r i t y s h o u l d have i n s u r e d , i-t l e g i t i m a c y a t the v e r y l e a s t as a source a f f e c t i n g v a s t numbers of p e o p l e . The v e r y f a c t t h a t f i l m has e x i s t e d as a p o p u l a r e n t e r t a i n m e n t f o r c l o s e to one hundred y e a r s would seem to imbue i t w i t h some s o r t o f h i s t o r i c a l s t a t u s . The p r e s e n t study w i l l seek to p r e s e n t an ov e r v i e w of the medium of f i l m , , or moving images., i n l i g h t of i t s n a t u r e as a c u l -t u r a l and h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d , capable of both r e f l e c t i n g and i n f l u -e n c i n g s o c i e t y . C o n s i d e r e d as such, the i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r the a p p r a i s a l and s e l e c t i o n of f i l m i n a r c h i v a l r e p o s i t o r i e s w i l l be i n v e s t i g a t e d . . . The study w i l l attempt to p r e s e n t f i l m as a h i g h l y r e f l e c t i v e and i n f l u e n t i a l medium, and w i l l c o n s i d e r such c h a r a c -t e r i s t i c s as they impact upon the development o f s e l e c t i o n c r i -t e r i a . The v e r y i s s u e of s e l e c t i o n w i l l be p r e s e n t e d as one deman-d i n g j u s t i f i c a t i o n i n l i g h t o f the n a t u r e of the medium, and v a r i o u s a l t e r n a t i v e s t o the t r a d i t i o n a l modes o f s e l e c t i o n w i l l be c o n s i -dered. The study w i l l c o n c e n t r a t e s p e c i f i c a l l y on the medium of f i l m ; the a r c h i v a l p r e s e r v a t i o n of t e l e v i s i o n w i l l not be d i s c u s s e d . The d i s c u s s i o n w i l l p r o c e e d from a s t r u c t u r a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n i n t o the n a t u r e of the f i l m medium, i t s c a p a b i l i t i e s , l i m i t a -t i o n s and c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , i n c l u d i n g f i l m t y p o l o g i e s and avenues f o r h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h , to a more c o n t e n t - o r i e n t e d a n a l y s i s , f o c u s s i n g on the medium's p o t e n t i a l to r e f l e c t and/or d i s t o r t v a r i o u s f a c e t s of s o c i e t y , as e x e m p l i f i e d by both a c t u a l i t y and f e a t u r e f i l m . Elements of b i a s and d i s t o r t i o n , propaganda, spon-s o r s h i p , and a r e a s of common abuse w i l l be d i s c u s s e d as they p e r -t a i n t o f i l m i n g e n e r a l , and w i t h s p e c i f i c r e f e r e n c e t o the news-r e e l and documentary. F e a t u r e f i l m i n p a r t i c u l a r w i l l be i n v e s t i -g a ted as a r e f l e c t o r of both o v e r t and c o v e r t s o c i e t a l v a l u e s and a t t i t u d e s , as w e l l as a form of mass e n t e r t a i n m e n t . The e x p r e s s i o n and source of the a t t i t u d e s e x p r e s s e d i n f i l m , the concept of f i l m as an i n d i c a t o r of n a t i o n a l c o n s c i o u s n e s s , and the r e f l e c t i v e phenomenon of the box o f f i c e are among the t o p i c s to be d i s c u s s e d . The ways i n which moving images impact upon v i e w i n g a u diences and s o c i e t y i n g e n e r a l w i l l a l s o be c o n s i d e r e d , i n c l u d i n g the n a t u r e of the v i e w i n g e x p e r i e n c e , and the i s s u e of f i l m c e n s o r s h i p . F i n a l l y , , the medium's p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and r e f l e c -t i v e n a t u r e w i l l be c o n s i d e r e d i n terms of the i m p l i c a t i o n s h e l d f o r the s e l e c t i o n o f moving images f o r permanent p r e s e r v a t i o n i n a r c h i v a l r e p o s i t o r i e s . . A s p e c t s of s t r u c t u r e , i n f l u e n c e , and moreover the n a t u r e of the e v idence c o n t a i n e d w i t h i n the f i l m document, w i l l be seen to impact s i g n i f i c a n t l y upon the i s s u e of a r c h i v a l s e l e c t i o n . The i s s u e of s e l e c t i o n i t s e l f w i l l be c o n s i d e r e d i n terms of i t s n e c e s s i t y , j u s t i f i a b i l i t y , and p r a c t i -c a l i t y i n l i g h t of both the volume and n a t u r e of the moving image document. 5 NOTES John E. 0 * Connor,.and. M a r t i n A. J a c k s o n , American H i s t o r y /  American F i l m : I n t e r p r e t i n g the Holl y w o o d Image (New York: F r e d e r i c k Ungar P u b l i s h i n g Co., 1979), P^ i x . 2 James Quinn, The F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n as an Aspe c t o f  European C u l t u r e (Leyden: A.W. S i j t h o f f , 1968), p. 79. 3 ^Hugh A. T a y l o r , "The Media of Record: A r c h i v e s i n the Wake o f McLuhan," G e o r g i a A r c h i v e 6 (1978), p. 6. ^ I b i d . 5 I b i d . ^ I b i d . , p. 5. I b i d . , p. 3-6 CHAPTER I I THE NATURE OF THE MEDIUM AND- AVENUES FOR HISTORICAL RESEARCH I f f i l m i s to be c o l l e c t e d and r e t a i n e d i n a r c h i v a l r e p o s i -t o r i e s , a b a s i c knowledge of the medium w i l l be r e q u i r e d of both a r c h i v i s t s and p o t e n t i a l users.' When a p p r o a c h i n g f i l m as a source f o r h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h , due c o n s i d e r a t i o n must be p a i d to i t s form and the unique c i n e m a t i c language by which i t communicates, as the p h y s i c a l n a t u r e of the medium impac t s upon i t s p o t e n t i a l f o r r e s e a r c h use.. T h i s c h a p t e r w i l l examine f i l m s t r u c t u r a l l y , f i r s t e xamining the p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the medium, and then c a t e g o r i z i n g f i l m i n t o t y p o l o g i e s and o u t l i n i n g p o t e n t i a l avenues f o r h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h . B e f o r e the r e s e a r c h e r can maximize the i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d w i t h i n f i l m and u n d e r s t a n d the ways i n which s t r u c t u r e i n f l u e n c e s both c o n t e n t and meaning, c e r t a i n t e c h n o l o g i c a l and t h e o r e t i c a l elements of the medium, need to be c o n s i d e r e d . J u s t as the r e s e a r -cher approaches the t e x t u a l document w i t h a c r i t i c a l mind, ques-t i o n i n g a l l a s p e c t s of i t s c o n t e n t , c o n t e x t , and c r e a t i o n , so must the f i l m document be approached, b e a r i n g i n mind t h a t the t e c h -n o l o g y of f i l m w i l l by i t s n a t u r e be more complex than t h a t of p r i n t and paper. Image t e c h n o l o g y had i t s b e g i n n i n g s e a r l y i n the n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y w i t h the i n v e n t i o n o f a number of o p t i c a l t o y s e x p l o i t i n g a c h a r a c t e r i s t i c i n h e r e n t i n human v i s i o n known as p e r s i s t e n c e o f v i s i o n . T h i s p h y s i o l o g i c a l phenomenon was f i r s t d e s c r i b e d s c i e n t i f i c a l l y by P e t e r Mark RogSt i n 1 824-- As a r e s u l t of 7 t h i s " d e f e c t " i n v i s i o n , "the b r a i n r e t a i n s images c a s t upon the r e t i n a of the eye f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y o n e - t w e n t i e t h to one-f i f t h of a second beyond t h e i r a c t u a l removal from the f i e l d of-. 2 v i s i o n . " T h i s phenomenon makes the i l l u s i o n of motion p o s s i b l e , f o r when another imageEtakes the p l a c e of the f i r s t i n q u i c k s u c c e s s i o n , the b r a i n superimposes the two images over the b l a n k space between them. F i l m i s composed of a number of s t i l l images which are c o n c a t e n a t e d i n t o an i l l u s i o n of c o n t i n u o u s motion by the b r a i n . A l t h o u g h the i l l u s i o n of motion can be c r e a t e d a t f i l m speeds as low as t w e l v e frames per second, a s t a n d a r d of t w e n t y - f o u r frames per second e v e n t u a l l y became a c c e p t e d as a g e n e r a l norm f o r o p t i m a l image q u a l i t y . U n t i l motion p i c t u r e t e c h n o l o g y was a b l e to r e c o r d and p r o j e c t f i l m a t speeds s u f f i -c i e n t to produce a seamless semblance of m o t i o n , a f l i c k e r e f f e c t was v i s i b l e on the s c r e e n . T h i s e f f e c t .in e a r l y f i l m s draws a t t e n t i o n to the f a c t t h a t the image i s n o t c o n t i n u o u s l y upon the s c r e e n ; i n f a c t , when w a t c h i n g a f i l m , we are a c t u a l l y f i x i n g our eyes on a darkened s c r e e n f o r as much as f i f t y per cent of the t i m e . Thus the p r o j e c t e d f i l m i l l u s i o n e x i s t s o n l y i n the mind, by means of a f l a w i n h e r e n t i n human v i s i o n . Opera-t i n g i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h p e r s i s t e n c e of v i s i o n i s a p s y c h o l o g i c a l phenomenon known as " p h i e f f e c t , " d e f i n e d as "the p s y c h o l o g i c a l p e r c e p t i o n o f motion which i s caused by the d i s p l a c e m e n t of 3 two o b j e c t s seen i n q u i c k s u c c e s s i o n i n n e i g h b o r i n g p o s i t i o n s . " The c o m b i n a t i o n of these two phenomena makes f i l m "the f i r s t communications medium to be based upon p s y c h o - p e r c e p t u a l i l l u -s i o n s c r e a t e d by machines."^ The b a s i s of moving image t e c h n o l o g y has thus been s c i e n -8 t i f i c a l l y e s t a b l i s h e d as a s e r i e s of s t i l l images p r o j e c t e d a t a speed s u f f i c i e n t t o c r e a t e the i l l u s i o n of motion. The n e x t c r u c i a l s t r u c t u r a l element to be grapsed by the u s e r of f i l m i s the manipu-l a t i o n o f these images. Through e d i t i n g , l i t e r a l l y the " c u t t i n g " of the f i l m , the f i l m m a k e r m a n i p u l a t e s images to produce a d e s i r e d effecjb.. One o f the most b a s i c t h e o r i e s o p e r a t i v e i n the a r t of e d i t i n g i s t h a t o f montage, a concept o p e r a t i n g a t the l e v e l of p s y c h o l o g i c a l awareness. The t h e o r y of montage was f i r s t advanced by S o v i e t f i l m m a k e r S e r g e i E i s e n s t e i n (1898-1 94-8), who was a c t i v e i n the e x p e r i m e n t a l P r o l e t k u l t T heater i n Moscow i n the 1920s. E i s e n s t e i n ' s t h e o r y of montage o p e r a t e d a l o n g the l i n e s of M a r x i s t d i a l e c t i c : "The d i a l e c t i c i s a way of l o o k i n g a t human h i s t o r y and e x p e r i e n c e as a p e r p e t u a l c o n f l i c t i n which a f o r c e ( t h e s i s ) c o l l i d e s w i t h a c o u n t e r f o r c e ( a n t i t h e s i s ) . t o produce from t h e i r c o l l i s i o n a w h o l l y new phenomenon ( s y n t h e s i s )• which i s not the sum of the two f o r c e s but something g r e a t e r than and d i f f e r e n t 5 from them b o t h . " A c c o r d i n g to E i s e n s t e i n , . . . i n f i l m e d i t i n g the shot . . . i s a t h e s i s which when p l a c e d i n t o j u x t a p o s i t i o n w i t h a n o t h e r shot of opposing v i s u a l c o n t e n t - i t s a n t i t h e s i s - produces a s y n t h e s i s (a s y n t h e t i c i d e a or i m p r e s s i o n ) which i n t u r n becomes the t h e s i s o f .a new d i a l e c t i c as the montage sequence c o n t i n u e s . T h i s v i s u a l o p p o s i t i o n between shots may be a c o n f l i c t of l i n e a r d i r e c t i o n s , p l a n e s , volumes, l i g h t i n g , e t c . , and.need not extend to the d r a m a t i c con-t e n t of the s h o t . " E i s e n s t e i n f a v o u r e d the example of the Japanese ideogram to i l l u s t r a t e the p r o c e s s b e h i n d d i a l e c t i c a l montage: c h i l d b i r d k n i f e water door + + + + + mouth mouth h e a r t eye ear sorrow weep l i s t e n scream s i n g 7 9 A more s o p h i s t i c a t e d example can.be seen i n . t h e f o l l o w i n g example, wherein the p r o c e s s .of.montage s y n t h e s i z e s an e n t i r e l y new meaning a r i s i n g out of. the j u x t a p o s i t i o n of u n r e l a t e d e l e ments: man ,. t r e e . sun. . . , sun t a n g l e d i n the t r e e ' s b r a n c h e s , as a t s u n r i s e , meaning now the e a s t . ^ The t h e o r y of montage i s i l l u s t r a t i v e of the depth of c o n t r o l e x e r t e d over m a t e r i a l by the .filmmaker, the element of s e l e c -t i o n or o m i s s i o n , and the p s y c h o l o g i c a l r a m i f i c a t i o n s such de-c i s i o n s can h o l d f o r the v i e w i n g a u d i ence. .. S i n c e one o f the major c r i t i c i s m s l e v e l l e d .at film..as a p o t e n t i a l source f o r h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h has always been i t s p o t e n t i a l f o r d i s t o r -t i o n , an u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e . p o s s i b l e f o r c e s o p e r a t i v e behind such d i s t o r t i o n c o u l d perhap.s. b e t t e r equipi.the r e s e a r c h e r to d e t e c t and account f o r such biases, i n the f i l m document. Other elements enter, i n t o , . s t r u c t u r e as i t a f f e c t s meaning, elements i n c l u d i n g c o m p o s i t i o n , f r a m i n g , camera l e n s e s , l i g h t i n g , the type o f e m u l s i o n used, f o c u s , and camera .placement, a l l of which impact upon the s i n g l e .frame, and the s h o t . The most b a s i c v i s u a l u n i t o f f i l m ( a f t e r the i n d i v i d u a l frame) i s the 9 s h o t , d e f i n e d as "a s i n g l e u n i n t e r r u p t e d , a c t i o n , o f a camera." Shots are combined.into scenes, scenes i n t o sequences, and so on. A l l elements which impinge upon . the. make-up and c o m p o s i t i o n 10 of a shot or scene must be c o n s i d e r e d as a p o t e n t i a l element of d i s t o r t i o n , i n c l u d i n g the p o s s i b l e a f . f e c t i n g p r e s ence o f the camera i n a c t u a l i t y f i l m , . o r f i l m which p u r p o r t s to r e c o r d e m p i r i c a l l y " r e a l " events i n . a t r u t h f u l manner. From the b e g i n n i n g s o f f i l m t e c h n o l o g y the medium's c a p a c i t y f o r a c t i n g as a r e c o r d e r of. h i s t o r i c a l e v i d e n c e has been r e c o g -n i z e d , both by those i n v o l v e d i n . i t s . i n c e p t i o n , and contemporary c r i t i c s . F o l l o w i n g , the i n v e n t i o n of the k i n e t o g r a p h i n 1 895» W.K.L. D i c k s o n w r o t e : The advantages to s t u d e n t s a n d . h i s t o r i a n s w i l l be immeasurable. I n s t e a d o f dry and m i s l e a d i n g a c c o u n t s , t i n g e d w i t h the. e x a g g e r a t i o n s - o f the c h r o n i c l e r s ' minds, our a r c h i v e s w i l l be e n r i c h e d - b y the v i t a l i z e d p i c t u r e s of g r e a t n a t i o n a l scenes, i n s t i n c t w i t h a l l the g l o w i n g p e r s o n a l i t i e s which c h a r a c t e r i z e d them.10 S i m i l a r s e n t i m e n t s were e x p r e s s e d by contemporary f i l m c r i t i c s who d e s c r i b e d . t h e . p i o n e e r i n g work of the Lumiere b r o t h e r s i n F r a n c e , r e c o r d i n g events such as workers l e a v i n g a f a c t o r y or a t r a i n a r r i v i n g at. a . s t a t i o n , as "nature taken a l i v e " or 11 "nature caught i n the a c t . " . W r i t i n g , i n , .1 8:98, B o l e s l a w Matus-zewski was s t r u c k by .the. motion p i c t u r e - camera' s n o v e l p o t e n t i a l f o r p h y s i c a l m o b i l i t y , . a n d the i m p l i c a t i o n s t h i s c a p a c i t y h e l d f o r the r e c o r d i n g of h i s t o r y . What i s more p r o p h e t i c f o r the f i l m a r c h i v i s t o f today are Matuszewski! s, remarks about the i n a b i l i t y of the cameraman, or f i l m m a k e r . t o c o r r e c t l y p r e d i c t which events would have h i s t o r i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e c o n f e r r e d upon 1 2 them by the p a s s i n g of t i m e . In the 1920s, i n t e r e s t i n the use o f f i l m f o r h i s t o r i c a l d ocumentation spread to h i s t o r i c a l c i r c l e s . . In the U n i t e d S t a t e s , the I c o n o g r a p h i c a l Commission (1 926-1 93-4) embarked on 11 a m i s s i o n t h a t i s s t i l l b e i n g c a r r i e d on today -- the q u e s t to c a t e g o r i z e f i l m i n t o . a h i e r a r c h y of t y p o l o g i e s u s e f u l to h i s -t o r i a n s and h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h . The term " h i s t o r i c a l f i l m " was employed to d e s c r i b e f i l m s "which r e c o r d a person or p e r i o d from the time a f t e r the i n v e n t i o n of cinematography and w i t h o u t d r a m a t u r g i c a l or ' a r t i s t i c ' p u r p o s e s : those f i l m s which p r e -sent a v i s u a l r e c o r d o f a d e f i n i t e event, p e r s o n or l o c a l i t y , and which presuppose a c l e a r l y r e c o g n i z a b l e h i s t o r i c a l i n t e r e s t 1 3 i n h e r e n t i n the s u b j e c t m a t t e r . " The Commission was a n x i o u s to e x c l u d e from t h i s d e f i n i t i o n f i c t i o n a l or f e a t u r e f i l m s and d o c u m e n t a r i e s , genres which i n v o l v e d a c e r t a i n amount of "per-1 4. s o n a l i n t e r p o l a t i o n " * by the f i l m m a k e r . A c t u a l i t y f i l m , a l -ready w i d e l y d i s s e m i n a t e d through the s t a n d a r d i z e d format of the n e w s r e e l , was c o n s i d e r e d to be o f most i n t e r e s t to the h i s t o r i a n as " i l l u s i o n s of o b j e c t i v e r e a l i t y , o f events.and p e o p l e , a 1 5 v i s u a l v e r s i o n of newspapers." The A c t e s t a b l i s h i n g the N a t i o n a l A r c h i v e s i n the U n i t e d S t a t e s (approved 19 June, 1934), r e c o g n i z e d the h i s t o r i c a l capa-c i t y o f f i l m by i n c l u d i n g a p r o v i s i o n f o r the p r e s e r v a t i o n of f i l m of h i s t o r i c a l m e r i t . "Indeed, the unique a b i l i t y of the m o t i o n - p i c t u r e camera t o . r e c o r d e v e n t s . f o r h i s t o r i c a l purposes was e s p e c i a l l y r e c o g n i z e d by a. p r o v i s i o n i n the a c t which a u t h o r -i z e d , i n a d d i t i o n t o the motion p i c t u r e s to be a c c e p t e d from governmental a g e n c i e s , the acceptance from non-governmental 1 6 s o u r c e s o f motion p i c t u r e s i l l u s t r a t i v e of American h i s t o r y . " Both John B r a d l e y , motion p i c t u r e c o n s u l t a n t to the 1 7 L i b r a r y o f Congress, w r i t i n g i n 194-8, and S i r A r t h u r E l t o n , w r i t i n g i n 1955, compare the r e c o r d i n g of images and sound on 12 f i l m t o o t h e r more a n c i e n t forms of r e c o r d i n g i n f o r m a t i o n . E l t o n l i k e n s the f i l m document to o t h e r modes o f r e c o r d - k e e p i n g employed th r o u g h o u t the ages: " I want to c o n s i d e r the f i l m as source m a t e r i a l f o r h i s t o r y i n the sense t h a t p a l i m p s e s t and parchment, h i e r o g l y p h and rune, c l a y t a b l e t and m a n o r i a l r o l l are source m a t e r i a l s - f r a g m e n t s , sometimes fragments of f r a g -ments, o f t e n d e f a c e d by t i m e , and a p p l i e d t o purposes of h i s t o r i -1 8 c a l r e c o n s t r u c t i o n r a r e l y contemplated by the o r i g i n a l a u t h o r s . " In the y e a r s f o l l o w i n g the I c o n o g r a p h i c a l Commission, t h e r e were s e v e r a l a t t e m p t s to c l a s s i f y f i l m s s a c c o r d i n g t o t h e i r s i g n i -f i c a n c e to the h i s t o r i c a l researcher.. In 1939 the N a t i o n a l A r -c h i v e s of the U n i t e d S t a t e s a r r i v e d a t s t a n d a r d s t o d e f i n e c a t e -g o r i e s of f i l m t h a t would be c o l l e c t e d f o r r e s e a r c h p urposes. The major c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s were: f a c t u a l per se ( i n c l u d i n g news* r e e l s and o t h e r r e c o r d f i l m of h i s t o r i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e ) : f a c t u a l -e x p o s i t o r y ( f a c t u a l f i l m s c o n s t r u c t e d a c c o r d i n g t o some s e t mode of c o m p o s i t i o n , i n c l u d i n g t r a v e l o g u e s and e d u c a t i o n a l f i l m s ) ; a r t - c r a f t ( f i l m s documenting major t e c h n o l o g i c a l developments i n the motion p i c t u r e a r t s or i n d u s t r y ) ; and " h i s t o r i c " f i l m s (those which have e x e r c i s e d a c o n s i d e r a b l e i n f l u e n c e on p u b l i c o p i n i o n and have i n t h a t sense become h i s t o r i c , a s , f o r example, Uncle \ 1 9 Tom 1s C a b i n ) . T h i s system of c l a s s i f i c a t i o n c o v e r s a wide range of f i l m , but i s something l e s s than s a t i s f a c t o r y as much o f the c l a s s i f i c a t i o n h i n g e s on the concept of American " h i s t o r i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e , " which i n most i n s t a n c e s i s bound to be an a r b i t r a r y or s u b j e c t i v e d e c i s i o n . C h r i s t o p h e r Roads o f the I m p e r i a l War Museum, England, has dev e l o p e d a c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f f i l m i n t o f i v e c a t e g o r i e s , which 13 f o c u s e s more on the form and s t r u c t u r e o f the f i l m as i t a f f e c t s 20 i t s v a l u e as h i s t o r i c a l e v i d e n c e . The f i r s t c a t e g o r y i n c l u d e s o r i g i n a l a c t u a l i t y o r r e c o r d f i l m i n a t o t a l l y u n e d i t e d form. The second c a t e g o r y i n v o l v e s the same f i l m i n a s e m i - e d i t e d con-d i t i o n w i t h excess f o o t a g e and t e c h n i c a l l y f l a w e d p o r t i o n s ex-c i s e d . T h i r d l y , t h e r e i s r e c o r d f i l m which has been e d i t e d i n t o the n e w s r e e l or some s i m i l a r f ormat. The f o u r t h c a t e g o r y com-p r i s e s documentary f i l m s , which i n v o l v e the m a n i p u l a t i o n of o r i g i n a l f o o t a g e i n t o a s i n g l e - p u r p o s e d format and as such are o f l i t t l e v a l u e to the h i s t o r i a n as p r i m a r y h i s t o r i c a l e v i d e n c e . The f i n a l c a t e g o r y i n c l u d e s f e a t u r e f i l m s , w hich are v e r y much 21 secondary s o u r c e s , a c c o r d i n g to Roads. T h i s mode of c l a s s i f i -c a t i o n i s l i k e l y t o be o f more use to the h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h e r , w i t h i t s emphasis on form and s t r u c t u r e r a t h e r than on d e c i s i o n s r e g a r d i n g the s u b j e c t i v e n a t u r e of f i l m c o n t e n t . 1 s i m i l a r c l a s s i -22 f i c a t i o n scheme i s advocated by W i l l i a m Hughes, who l i k e w i s e d i v i d e s a c t u a l i t y f i l m i n t o e d i t e d and u n e d i t e d f o r m a t s . News-' f i l m i s d i s t i n g u i s h e d from n e w s r e e l s on the b a s i s of not b e i n g d i s t r i b u t e d on a r e g u l a r s c h e d u l e . In a d d i t i o n to documentary and c o m p i l a t i o n f i l m s , the l a t t e r b e i n g c o n s t r u c t e d out o f e x t a n t f o o t a g e , Hughes i n c l u d e s what he c a l l s "magazine f i l m s , " which he d e f i n e s as b e i n g r e l e a s e d i n s e r i e s on a r e g u l a r b a s i s , s i m i l a r 23 to n e w s r e e l s , but f e a t u r i n g g r e a t e r l e n g t h and depth of coverage. From the p r e c e d i n g a t t e m p t s to c l a s s i f y f i l m a c c o r d i n g to i t s u s e f u l n e s s to the h i s t o r i a n , i t would seem t h a t the f i l m of r e c o r d i s g e n e r a l l y c o n s i d e r e d by many to be the most u s e f u l form of f i l m document f o r h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h p u r p o s e s . The use of f e a t u r e f i l m as a p u r v e y o r of h i s t o r i c a l e v i d e n c e i s not as 1 w i d e l y a c c e p t e d , and w i l l be d i s c u s s e d s e p a r a t e l y . P r e s e n t - d a y h i s t o r i a n s were f o r the most p a r t educated i n a p r i n t - o r i e n t e d c u l t u r e and tend to view the f i l m r e c o r d w i t h d i s t r u s t , a c c u s i n g i t of a p a r t i s a n s h i p which does not a l l o w f o r u n b i a s e d communication. The w r i t t e n r e c o r d has t r a d i t i o n -a l l y conveyed a sense of " i m p a r t i a l i t y " which i s r a r e l y a t t r i b u t e d to f i l m . But f i l m has the c a p a c i t y to make a unique c o n t r i b u t i o n to the f i e l d o f h i s t o r i c a l i n q u i r y , as e x e m p l i f i e d by what J.A..S. G r e n v i l l e r e f e r s to as a " k i n d o f e y e - w i t n e s s 25 q u a l i t y , " r e f e r r i n g to the motion p i c t u r e camera's a b i l i t y to r e c o r d events o c c u r r i n g i n f r o n t o f i t . A number of unique a t t r i b u t e s making f i l m a v a l u a b l e form of h i s t o r i c a l documen-t a t i o n have been o u t l i n e d by A r t h u r E l t o n : 1 ) I t can show as n o t h i n g e l s e the r o u t i n e s o f p r o c e d u r e and p r o c e s s , of custom and c r a f t ; 2) F i l m ' s p e c u l i a r command of movement r e s u l t s i n i t s a b i l i t y to r e c o r d more or l e s s u n s e l e c t i v e l y every-t h i n g t a k i n g p l a c e i n f r o n t of the l e n s ; 3) F i l m ' s a b i l i t y to r e c o r d the c o m p a r a t i v e study of p e r s o n a l and crowd p s y c h o l o g y i n terms of movement, g e s t u r e , a t t i t u d e and s e t of muscle; L) F i l m can a l s o be used d i r e c t l y t g ^ p r e s e n t h i s t o r y and an h i s t o r i c a l p o i n t of view. E l t o n does modify the f o u r t h p o i n t somewhat by p o i n t i n g out the i n e v i t a b i l i t y of s e l e c t i o n and c o n d e n s a t i o n , .and how these f a c -t o r s can r e s u l t i n an a c q u i r e d s y m b o l i c v a l u e t hrough emphasis 27 and/or d i s t o r t i o n . For E l t o n , the g r e a t e s t a t t r i b u t e o f f i l m would seem to be i t s a b i l i t y to a c t as an u n b i a s e d r e c o r d e r of e vents t a k i n g p l a c e i n f r o n t o f the camera, and i n t h i s sense, the camera does not l i e . U s i n g f i l m as a source f o r h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h , M a r t i n A. J a c k s o n has a d v o c a t e d two p o t e n t i a l avenues which can be t a k e n : 15 the v i e w i n g o f f i l m as s i m p l y a v i s u a l r e c o r d , or the v i e w i n g of f i l m as a r e f l e c t i o n of p u b l i c o p i n i o n a t a g i v e n moment i n 28 h i s t o r y . H i s t o r i a n s have t r a d i t i o n a l l y been b i a s e d towards the former approach, i n which f i l m a p p roximates " r e a l i t y " by r e c o r d i n g s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n . The l a t t e r avenue of r e s e a r c h d e a l s l e s s w i t h the i s s u e of h i s t o r i c a l or v i s u a l a u t h e n t i c i t y and more w i t h the r e f l e c t i o n of p u b l i c a t t i t u d e a t a g i v e n t i m e . As such, i t i s an approach more s u i t e d to the f e a t u r e f i l m i n many ways, and w i l l be d i s c u s s e d i n t h a t c o n t e x t . While much d i s c u s s i o n has c e n t e r e d around the i s s u e of how h i s t o r i a n s can use f i l m as an h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d , l e s s a t t e n -t i o n has been g i v e n to the q u e s t i o n o f j u s t what h i s t o r i a n s can expect to c o n t r i b u t e to the f i e l d o f h i s t o r i c a l i n q u i r y t h rough t h e i r use of the f i l m document. There has been some d i s c u s s i o n c o n c e r n i n g the h i s t o r i a n ' s p o t e n t i a l . r o l e as a m e d i a t o r i n b r i n g -i n g t o g e t h e r the d i v e r s e elements communicated by the f i l m r e c o r d i n t o some s o r t o f broader o v e r v i e w o f h i s t o r y and s o c i e t y . S t u a r t Samuels and Robert Rosen w r i t e t h a t " g i v e n the h i s t o r i a n ' s p r i m a r y concern w i t h the p r o c e s s e s , of. s o c i a l development, he i s p a r t i c u l a r l y s u i t e d t o s p e c i f y the m e d i a t i n g f a c t o r s t h a t e n t e r i n t o f i l m p r o d u c t i o n - the r o l e of the market, govern-ment, p o l i t i c a l p r e s s u r e s , and mass i d e o l o g i e s , to mention o n l y 29 a few examples." They go on to s t a t e t h a t . . . we c o u l d b r i n g our p r e o c c u p a t i o n w i t h the p r o c e s s e s o f change to bear on two l e v e l s . The f i r s t c o u l d p r e s e n t a s y n t h e s i z e d p i c t u r e o f the p r o c e s s o f f i l m m a k i n g i t s e l f to demonstrate the s t r u c t u r a l l i n k s between systems o f p r o d u c t i o n , d i s t r i b u t i o n , consumption, c r i t i c i s m and s o c i a l l c o n t r o l . . . . The 16 second l e v e l would r e l a t e both t h e m a t i c c o n t e n t and f i l m ' t e c h n i q u e to the s p e c i f i c h i s t o r i c a l c o n t e x t i n which they are developed and consumed.30 Others f e e l the h i s t o r i a n i s . n o t s u i t e d to be the c a t a l y s t o f such a s y n t h e s i s . Frans Nieuwenhof f e e l s t h a t . . . the i n t e l l e c t u a l t r a d i t i o n stands i n the way o f the movement towards s y n t h e s i s , towards o v e r a l l p i c -t u r e s . The wide approach i s r e p u d i a t e d s i n c e i t i s u n f e a s i b l e w i t h modern s p e c i a l i z a t i o n i n method and r e s e a r c h .3 1 Nieuwenhof f u r t h e r s t a t e s t h a t w h i l e i t i s " d o u b t f u l whether h i s t o r i a n s are the r i g h t men i n the r i g h t p l a c e f o r the u l t i -mate c o m p i l a t i o n of such 1 p i c t u r i z i n g ' t h r ough mass communica-t i o n media . . . s t i l l i t i s obvious t h a t r e c o g n i t i o n of the r e l e v a n c e of the mass communication media f o r the h i s t o r i c a l p i c t u r e - m a k i n g may l e a d to a t o t a l l y d i f f e r e n t a t t i t u d e o f 32 t r a d i t i o n a l h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h and the p r e s e n t a t i o n t h e r e o f . " Whether or not the h i s t o r i a n i s s u i t e d to s y n t h e s i z e a new p i c t u r e of s o c i e t y t h r o u g h the. use of f i l m and s i m i l a r media, t h e r e are f u r t h e r m a t t e r s to c o n s i d e r when u s i n g the moving image document f o r any s e r i o u s r e s e a r c h purpose, . A p p r o a c h i n g f i l m as an h i s t o r i c a l document, the r e s e a r c h e r w i l l f i n d i t i m p o r t a n t to be a b l e to e s t a b l i s h h i s source c o n t e x t u a l l y , and may f i n d i t n e c e s s a r y to date the f i l m i n o r d e r to v e r i f y i t s a u t h e n t i c i t y or e s t a b l i s h an a p p r o p r i a t e h i s t o r i c a l c o n t e x t w i t h i n which to, view the f i l m . Both v i s u a l i n t e r n a l elements and e x t e r n a l e v i d e n c e may p r o v i d e c l u e s to e s t a b l i s h the p e r i o d of p r o d u c t i o n . P h y s i c a l f e a t u r e s such as f i l m s t o c k , d e v e l o p -ment p r o c e s s , s p a c i n g of s p r o c k e t h o l e s , m a n u f a c t u r e r ' s codes 17 i m p r i n t e d on the f i l m s t o c k , the presence o f a so u n d t r a c k (and whether o r not i t i s s y n c h r o n o u s ) , and the type o f equipment used (such as zoom l e n s e s , whose appearance i n the i n d u s t r y can be a c c u r a t e l y d a t e d ) , a l l a s s i s t i n e s t a b l i s h i n g a p e r i o d of p r o d u c t i o n f o r a fiibm. The p r o j e c t e d f i l m o f t e n r e v e a l s names of the c a s t , d i r e c t o r , date of c o p y r i g h t , and so on, i n the c r e d i t s . I n t e r n a l s t y l i s t i c elements can a l s o p r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n d e r i v e d from s t y l e s o f e d i t i n g , l i g h t i n g , d i r e c t i n g , a c t i n g , camera placement, and depth o f f i e l d , as w e l l as more o v e r t v i s u a l i n d i c a t o r s i n the form o f a r c h i t e c t u r a l s t y l e s , l andmarks, t e c h n o l o g i c a l development, c l o t h i n g s t y l e s , and 33 p a t t e r n s o f language and b e h a v i o u r . A f i n a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n i s t h a t of t e x t u a l documentation. T h i s i s an i m p o r t a n t a r e a both f o r a r c h i v a l r e p o s i t o r i e s which c o l l e c t f i l m , and p o t e n t i a l u s e r s of those f i l m s . C e r t a i n i n f o r -m a tion, i f a v a i l a b l e , can i l l u m i n a t e many f a c e t s o f the f i l m document which may o t h e r w i s e remain i n o b s c u r i t y . T e x t u a l documentation can i n c l u d e the "dope s h e e t s " t h a t n e w s r e e l camera-men k e p t on e v e r y s h o t , and s h o o t i n g s c r i p t s , which r e f l e c t the f i l m m a k i n g p r o c e s s . C o l l e c t i o n s such as the B r i t i s h Boasd o f F i l m Censors s c r i p t f i l e s , accumulated i n the p u r s u i t o f ex e r -c i s i n g c o n t r o l over f i l m c o n t e n t , may be o f s i g n i f i c a n c e t o the r e s e a r c h e r . F i l m t r e a t m e n t s and s c e n a r i o s a re l i k e w i s e v a l u a b l e f o r t r a c i n g the p r e l i m i n a r y form o f a f i l m t h r ough to i t s d e f i n i t i v e f i n a l form. The t r e a t m e n t i s the f i r s t o u t l i n e or p r o p o s a l p r e s e n t e d to the p r o d u c e r , w h i l e the s c e n a r i o i s a more d e t a i l e d o u t l i n e , c o n t a i n i n g a f u l l l i s t o f sh o t s and a 3 A s e q u e n t i a l d e s c r i p t i o n o f stage and t e c h n i c a l a c t i o n s . I n f o r -1 8 mation r e g a r d i n g f i l m d i r e c t o r s , s t u d i o s , d i s t r i b u t o r s , w r i t e r s and e d i t o r s , can o f t e n be gleaned from f i l m company r e c o r d s , i f a v a i l a b l e f o r c o n s u l t a t i o n , and from f i l m magazines and j o u r -n a l s . Back i s s u e s of d i s t r i b u t o r s ' c a t a l o g u e s can a l s o be con-s u l t e d to e s t a b l i s h the c o n t e n t o f i n d i v i d u a l f i l m s and t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e r u n n i n g t i m e s . F i l m t i m i n g can be a c r i t i c a l f a c t o r i n d e t e r m i n i n g which copy of a f i l m i s b e i n g d e a l t w i t h , p a r t i -c u l a r l y when the f i l m e x i s t s i n m u l t i p l e v e r s i o n s as a r e s u l t o f a complex p r o d u c t i o n h i s t o r y or r e - c u t t i n g f o r f o r e i g n d i s -t r i b u t i o n . The p h y s i c a l n a t u r e and s t r u c t u r a l a s p e c t s of the medium impact s i g n i f i c a n t l y upon the f i l m document's v a l u e and p o t e n -t i a l as an h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d . F u l l u t i l i z a t i o n of the medium's i n f o r m a t i o n a l c a p a c i t y i s o n l y p o s s i b l e i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h a thorough u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f the document's s t r u c t u r e , and the ways i n which form can i n f l u e n c e c o n t e n t . Such knowledge i s c r i t i c a l n o t o n l y f o r r e s e a r c h e r s w i s h i n g to use the medium, but a l s o to the a r c h i v i s t s who must s e l e c t and care f o r the f i l m documents i n t h e i r c u s t o d y . As the i s s u e of s e l e c t i o n h i n g e s upon the i n t r i n s i c v a l u e o f a r e c o r d , a l l elements which may p o t e n t i a l l y impact upon v a l u e must of n e c e s s i t y be r e c o g n i z e d . Inasmuch as form i n f l u e n c e s c o n t e n t , i t i s the f i r s t element to be c o n s i d e r e d when a s s e s s i n g the f i l m r e c o r d ' s v a l u e and u s e f u l -n e s s . Next, the moving image document w i l l be c o n s i d e r e d i n terms of c o n t e n t and the i m p l i c a t i o n s c o n t e n t h o l d s f o r i t s use as a r e c o r d f o r h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h . 19 NOTES 1 D a v i d A. Cook, A H i s t o r y o f N a r r a t i v e F i l m (New York: W.W. N o r t o n & Co., 1981), p. 1. 2 I b i d . 3 James Monaco, How to Read, a F i l m : The A r t , Technology, Language, H i s t o r y , and Theory of F i l m and Media. R e v i s e d e d i t i o n . (New Y o rk: O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1981), p. 4.4.5. ^"Cook, A H i s t o r y of N a r r a t i v e F i l m , p. 2. 5 I b i d . , p. 171. 6 I b i d . , p. 172. 7 I b i d . , p. 173. g W i l l i a m J i n k s , The C e l l u l o i d . L i t e r a t u r e : F i l m i n the  h u m a n i t i e s . Second e d i t i o n . ( B e v e r l y H i l l s : Glencoe P r e s s , 1974), p. 8. 9 John H a r r i n g t o n , The R h e t o r i c of F i l m (New York: H o l t , R i n e h a r t and Win s t o n , I n c . , 1 973) » ~- 3~* 1 0 John B.. K u i p e r , "The H i s t o r i c a l V alue of Motion P i c t u r e s , " American A r c h i v i s t 31 (1 968), p. -385. 11 Eugene C. McCreary, " F i l m and H i s t o r y : Some Thoughts on T h e i r I n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p , " S o c i e t a s 1 (1971), p. 54.. 1 2 Anthony A l d g a t e , Cinema and H i s t o r y : B r i t i s h Newsreels  and the S p a n i s h C i v i l War (London: S c o l a r P r e s s , 1979), p. ~ 1 3 I b i d . , p. 6. U I b i d . 1 5 I b i d . , p. 3. 1 6 Dorothy Arbaugh, "Motion P i c t u r e s and the F u t u r e H i s t o r i a n , " American A r c h i v i s t 2 (1939), p. 1 0 6 . 1 7 ' K u i p e r , "The H i s t o r i c a l Value of Motion P i c t u r e s , " pp. 385-386. 1 8 A r t h u r E l t o n , " F i l m as Source M a t e r i a l f o r H i s t o r y , " A.S.L.I.B. P r o c e e d i n g s 7 (1955), p. 207. 1 9 Arbaugh, "Motion P i c t u r e s and the F u t u r e H i s t o r i a n , " p. 109. 20 20 C h r i s t o p h e r H. Roads, " F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l E v i d e n c e , " J o u r n a l o f the S o c i e t y of A r c h i v i s t s 3 (1966), p. 184. 21 ' I b i d . 22 W i l l i a m Hughes, "The e v a l u a t i o n o f f i l m as e v i d e n c e , " i n The h i s t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1976), pp. 55-56. 2 3 I b i d . , p. 56. 24 ^Penelope Houston, "The Nature o f the E v i d e n c e , " S i g h t  and Sound 36 (1967), p. 90. 25 J.A.S. G r e n v i l l e and N i c h o l a s Pronay, "The H i s t o r i a n and H i s t o r i c a l F i l m s , " U n i v e r s i t y . V i s i o n 1 (1 968), p. 3. E l t o n , " F i l m as Source M a t e r i a l f o r H i s t o r y , " pp. 209-210. 27 I b i d . , p. 210. 28 M a r t i n A. J a c k s o n , " F i l m as a Source M a t e r i a l : Some P r e l i m i n a r y Notes Toward a Methodology," J o u r n a l o f I n t e r d i s c i -p l i n a r y H i s t o r y 4 (1973), p. 78. 29 S t u a r t Samuels and Robe r t Rosen, "Film- and the H i s t o r i a n , " American H i s t o r i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n N e w s l e t t e r 11 (1973), p. 33. 3C 31 F r a n s Nieuwenhof, "The Relevance of A u d i o v i s u a l Mass Communication f o r the H i s t o r i a n , " i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m  and S o c i e t y 1: H i s t o r y and the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e t a l (Copenhagen: - "Eve n t u s , 1~979)» p. 311. 3 2 I b i d . , p. 316. 3 3 Hughes, "The e v a l u a t i o n of f i l m as e v i d e n c e , " p. 4-9. 3 4 P i e r r e S o r l i n , The F i l m i n H i s t o r y : R e s t a g i n g the P a s t ( O x f o r d : B a s i l B l a c k w e l l , 1980), p. 28. 3 0 I b i d . , pp. 3 2 - 3 3 . CHAPTER I I I THE MOVING IMAGE DOCUMENT AND SOCIETAL REFLECTION In today's v i s u a l l y - o r i e n t e d s o c i e t y the c r e a t i o n o f images and t h e i r mass consumption has become an i n c r e a s i n g l y s i g n i f i c a n t a c t i v i t y . The moving image r e c o r d has e v o l v e d i n t o a h i g h l y s o p h i s t i c a t e d medium capable of r e c o r d i n g i n f o r m a t i o n about r e a l e v e n t s , and about s o c i e t y and i t s p e r c e p t i o n o f i t -s e l f . The medium f u n c t i o n s i n a m u l t i - f a c e t e d r o l e stemming from i t s c o n t e x t of i n v e n t i v e c r e a t i o n , i t s c a p a c i t y to c r e a t e an image of s o c i e t y and a l s o p r o j e c t the image back to s o c i e t y , and the degree of i n f l u e n c e i t w i e l d s over the v i e w i n g a u d i e n c e . F i l m has the a b i l i t y to r e f l e c t , d i s t o r t and a f f e c t the way i n which s o c i e t y p e r c e i v e s contemporary i s s u e s , and i t s e l f . The r e f l e c t e d image has the p o t e n t i a l f o r d i s t o r t i o n , and i t i s t h i s c h a r a c -t e r i s t i c which has r e s u l t e d i n a good d e a l of d i s t r u s t d i r e c t e d a t the medium both as a r e c o r d e r of e m p i r i c a l l y " r e a l " events and as a p u r v e y o r of works o f c r e a t i v e imagination.•> Both a c t u a l i t y and f e a t u r e f i l m can be viewed as a r e f l e c t i o n of a g i v e n s o c i e t y a t a p a r t i c u l a r moment, and a l t h o u g h both are i n h e r e n t l y b i a s e d i n one way or a n o t h e r , they remain v a l u a b l e i f l a r g e l y untapped r e s o u r c e s f o r h i s t o r i c a l , s o c i e t a l , and c u l t u r a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n . The type of f i l m r e c o r d t r a d i t i o n a l l y c o n s i d e r e d by the h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h e r t o be the most r e l i a b l e f o r r e s e a r c h p ur-poses i s t h a t o f a c t u a l t i y f i l m , or f i l m t h a t p u r p o r t s to convey an a c c u r a t e r e c o r d of r e a l i t y as i t was r e c o r d e d by the camera. 22 H i s t o r i c a l l y s p e a k i n g , the most common form of a c t u a l i t y f i l m i s the n e w s r e e l . D u r i n g the f i r s t h a l f o f t h i s c e n t u r y n e w s r e e l s packaged c u r r e n t events i n t o an e x t r e m e l y r i g i d and s t a n d a r d i z e d f o r m a t which r e a c h e d a wide v i e w i n g p u b l i c . W h i l e the n e w s r e e l was once a major source of news and i n f o r m a t i o n f o r a l a r g e num-ber of p e o p l e , i t i s today r e g a r d e d as a h i g h l y b i a s e d and d i s -t o r t e d source o f r e c o r d f i l m , due to i t s l i m i t a t i o n o f coverage and m a n i p u l a t i o n of c o n t e n t . In a d d i t i o n to examining the na-t u r e of the n e w s r e e l ' s d i s t o r t i o n and p r o p a g a n d i z i n g , perhaps one of the main v a l u e s o f the n e w s r e e l as a source of a c t u a l i t y f i l m i s the o p p o r t u n i t y t o view what contemporary cinema a u d i e n c e s 1 a c t u a l l y saw t h e m s e l v e s . Newsreels have come t o be r e g a r d e d as b e i n g b i a s e d towards the e n t e r t a i n i n g r a t h e r than the e d u c a t i o n a l or i n f o r m a t i v e . Many of the n e w s r e e l companies were s u b s i d i a r i e s of the f e a t u r e f i l m c o n g l o m e r a t e s , and i t was the f e a t u r e f i l m w i t h i t s p o t e n -t i a l f o r monetary g a i n t h a t the conglomerates were concerned w i t h p r o m o t i n g . Hence the n e w s r e e l p r e c e d i n g the f e a t u r e was s u b j e c t e d t o a c e r t a i n amount of s e l f - i m p o s e d c e n s o r s h i p by the i n d u s t r y , i n o r d e r to p r e s e n t t o p i c s c a l c u l a t e d n ot to annoy the customers,.or to i n f l a m e p u b l i c o p i n i o n . . . . The n e w s r e e l s show .us today what t h e i r p r o d u c e r s thought y e s t e r d a y ' s a u d i e n c e s wanted to see as e n t e r -t a i n m e n t ; the n e w s r e e l i s a l s o a p r i m a r y source f o r what the c o n t r o l l i n g e l i t e , whether t h r o u g h f o r m a l c e n s o r s h i p or t h r o u g h i n f o r m a l i n f l u e n c e , wanted the movie a u d i e n c e s - the p o p u l a r masses - to know or b e l i e v e . . . . I t was e n t e r t a i n m e n t and n o t educa-t i o n t h a t m o t i v a t e d the. newsreel. makers. Humourist Oscar Levant has d e s c r i b e d the n e w s r e e l g e n e r i c a l l y 23 as "a s e r i e s of c a t a s t r o p h e s , ended by a f a s h i o n show," a view which seems i n d i c a t i v e of some s o r t of p o p u l a r consensus. In 1937 a Paramount news e d i t o r o f f e r e d an e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h i s phenomenon: The t h e a t r e managers who have t o show our n e w s r e e l s do not t h i n k t h e i r f u n c t i o n i s to educate. They go to g r e a t e f f o r t i n t h e i r t h e a t r e s to s e t up the de-s i r e d atmosphere of romance, h a p p i n e s s , music and s o f t l i g h t , and a l o n g comes.a n e w s r e e l w i t h the l a t e s t r a c e , r i o t or something e l s e t h a t makes the audience h o t . 4 As an e n t e r t a i n m e n t i t e m , n e w s r e e l s were f o r c e d to c o n c e n t r a t e on the c e r e m o n i a l s i d e of l i f e , w i t h the emphasis on " s p o r t s , f a d s and f a s h i o n s , p a r a d e s , b a t h i n g b e a u t i e s , s h i p l a u n c h i n g s , 5 and mere c u r i o s i t i e s . " W h i l e such s u b j e c t s may not always be what the h i s t o r i a n i s seeking,, n e w s r e e l s may c o n s t i t u t e a r i c h s ource of documentation c o n c e r n i n g p o p u l a r i n f l u e n c e s upon p u b l i c t a s t e and a t t i t u d e , as w e l l as a r i c h source f o r documenting contemporary t r e n d s i n s e l f - i m p o s e d c e n s o r s h i p . The n e w s r e e l may a l s o be c o n s i d e r e d as a form of mass communication and s t u -d i e d f o r i t s i m p l i c a t i o n s as such. The e d i t i n g o f "news" it e m s i n t o an e n t e r t a i n m e n t package s h o u l d l e a d a r e s e a r c h e r to t r e a t n e w s r e e l s .as d i s t o r t e d or " d i r e c t e d " images of s o c i e t y , r a t h e r than as s t r i c t r e p r e s e n t a -6 t i o n s of h i s t o r i c a l " f a c t . " The r e s e a r c h e r u s i n g n e w s r e e l s as source m a t e r i a l needs to c o n s i d e r the elements of s e l e c t i o n , omissionriand s equencing t h a t c o n t r i b u t e to the e v o l u t i o n of a news " s t o r y , " as w e l l as the s u b j e c t i v e and p o s s i b l y m i s l e a d i n g n a t u r e of v o i c e - o v e r commentary. A f u r t h e r element c o n t r i b u t i n g to d i s t o r t i o n c o n s t i t u t e s 21 what C h r i s t o p h e r Roads r e f e r s to as a " b i a s towards a r e c o r d 7 of what o c c u r r e d by day under r e a s o n a b l e weather c o n d i t i o n s , " d rawing a t t e n t i o n to the f a c t t h a t f i l m i s a v u l n e r a b l e and ephemeral medium and i s thus b e t t e r s u i t e d t e c h n i c a l l y to p e r i o d s of calm and f a v o u r a b l e p h y s i c a l c o n d i t i o n s . T h i s f a c t o f t e n works a g a i n s t the s u r v i v a l of r e c o r d s made i n the arenas of war and n a t u r a l d i s a s t e r . The v e r y p r e s e n c e of t h e .camera i n a g i v e n s i t u a t i o n may5 a l s o r e s u l t i n a c e r t a i n amount of d i s t o r t i o n . . A r t h u r Marwick, however, f e e l s the camera has an i m p o r t a n t i n v o l u n t a r y f u n c t i o n i n r e c o r d i n g an event, however b i a s e d the message i t i n t e n t i o n -g a l l y w i shes to convey. Where newsreel.s are concerned, Mar-wick s t a t e s t h a t "the message t h a t such a f i l m wishes to put f o r w a r d i s d e s c r i b e d as 'the w i t t i n g t e s t i m o n y , ' arid the term used to d e s c r i b e the amount of i n f o r m a t i o n a f i l m might con-Q t a i n i s 'the u n w i t t i n g t e s t i m o n y . ' " U n w i t t i n g t e s t i m o n y c o u l d c o n c e i v a b l y i n c l u d e such f e a t u r e s as the p h y s i c a l e n v i r -onment, l i f e s t y l e s , and p a t t e r n s o f b e h a v i o u r , p o r t r a i t u r e ( t h a t i s , how p e o p l e a c t u a l l y appeared a t a g i v e n t i m e ) , the c o n c r e t e r e a l i t y o f p a r t i c u l a r s i t u a t i o n s , , and what Marwick 1 0 r e f e r s to as the " c r a s h c o u r s e " f u n c t i o n o f a r c h i v a l f o o t a g e , a l l u d i n g to f i l m ' s p o t e n t i a l to r e v e a l . i n an i n s t a n t what would r e q u i r e pages i n p r i n t . The n a t u r e o f u n w i t t i n g t e s t i m o n y r e i n f o r c e s the camera's c a p a c i t y to f u n c t i o n as a n e u t r a l obser-ve r i n a g i v e n s i t u a t i o n . As a " w i t n e s s to the c a t a s t r o p h i c events of our epoch, i t r e t a i n s a l e v e l of o b j e c t i v i t y t h a t i s 11 o f t e n beyond the c a p a c i t y of the a g i t a t e d human p a r t i c i p a n t . " Examples of t h i s can be s e e n n i n contemporary news coverage. 25 As a n e u t r a l r e c o r d e r o f v i s u a l images, a c t u a l i t y f i l m has the-f u r t h e r c a p a c i t y t o r e c o r d those s o c i a l groups t r a d i t i o n a l l y i g n o r e d u n t i l r e c e n t l y by c o n v e n t i o n a l h i s t o r i c a l s o u r c e s . The h i s t o r i c a l r e s e a r c h e r w i l l s u r e l y b e n e f i t from f i l m ' s a b i l i t y t o c a p t u r e t h e ' c u l t u r e and i c o n o g r a p h y of the "man i n the s t r e e t , " the u n d e r p r i v i l e g e d , e t h n i c m i n o r i t i e s , women and c h i l d r e n ; i n s h o r t , those s o c i a l groups who have f o r the most p a r t been de-p r i v e d of a w r i t t e n h i s t o r y . A c t u a l i t y f i l m a l s o has a s i m i l a r r o l e to p l a y i n a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l and e t h n o g r a p h i c s t u d i e s . At the o p p o s i t e end o f the spectrum l i e s the p o t e n t i a l of a c t u a l i t y f i l m t o c r e a t e symbols e v o c a t i v e of a p a r t i c u l a r e r a . "Cameramen have p r o v i d e d us w i t h a k i n d o f sh o r t h a n d v i s u a l imagery f o r t h i s c e n t u r y : a B r i t i s h p o l i t i c a l c r i s i s means a crowd i n the r a i n o u t s i d e Number Ten; the D e p r e s s i o n means c l o t h - c a p p e d men on s t r e e t c o r n e r s ; the G e n e r a l S t r i k e , a shot o f i d l e machinery or empty r a i l w a y l i n e s ; the B a t t l e o f B r i t a i n , t h a t shot from F i r e s Were S t a r t e d o f f i r e - h o s e s s n a k i n g 1 p away down a London s t r e e t a f t e r a r a i d . " The power o f f i l m t o f a s h i o n such p o t e n t v i s u a l imagery f o r an age has i n f l u e n c e d us t o such a degree t h a t i t has become d i f f i c u l t t o e n v i s i o n the e a r l y p a r t o f t h i s c e n t u r y i n a n y t h i n g o t h e r than b l a c k and w h i t e . I t i s t h i s power which makes a c t u a l i t y f i l m a d i f f i c u l t h i s t o r i c a l source t o d i s m i s s , whatever i t s s h o r t c o m i n g s as an u n b i a s e d r e c o r d . A p a r t from contemporary n e w s f i l m , and w i t h the demise of the n e w s r e e l , the most common form of a c t u a l i t y f i l m b e i n g p r o -duced today i s the documentary. The Fre n c h who f i r s t used the term documentaire were r e f e r r i n g t o t r a v e l o g u e s or educa-26 t i o n a l t r a v e l f i l m s . The term "documentary" was f i r s t used i n t he contemporary sense by John G r i e r s o n , i n an anonymous r e v i e w o f R o b e r t F l a h e r t y ' s Moana: "Being a v i s u a l a ccount of the d a i l y l i f e of a P o l y n e s i a n y o u t h , . . . the f i l m has 1L 15 documentary v a l u e . " H " F o r m a l l y s t r u c t u r e d n o n - f i c t i o n f i l m s " g r a d u a l l y came to be d e s c r i b e d as "the c r e a t i v e t r e a t m e n t of 1 6 a c t u a l i t y . " " C r e a t i v e " s h o u l d perhaps be c o n s i d e r e d the o p e r a t i v e term h e r e , f o r r e g a r d l e s s of the f i l m m a k e r ' s i n t e n -t i o n s , some degree of b i a s i s always i m p a r t e d t o the documentary f i l m . " F o r m a l l y s t r u c t u r e d " i s a l s o a c r u c i a l term; documen-t a r i e s are not s i m p l y hundreds o f f e e t of f o o t a g e t a c k e d t o -ge t h e r a r b i t r a r i l y . They are o r g a n i z e d and s t r u c t u r e d i n a manner t h a t . w i l l b e s t s e r v e to promote the f i l m m a k e r ' s i n t e n -t i o n s . The f a c t t h a t documentaries a re c o m p i l e d from a c t u a l i t y f o o t a g e has o f t e n imbued them w i t h an.undeserved aura o f authen-t i c i t y and r e s p e c t a b i l i t y . . Those who see t h r o u g h the veneer of " r e a l i t y " t h a t many documentaries p u r p o r t to convey, o f t e n r e a c t v i o l e n t l y t o the documentary's c l a i m of s u p e r i o r i t y over t h e . f i c t i o n f i l m . M a r c e l Ophuls, d i r e c t o r of. The Sorrow and  the P i t y , w r i t e s : As I've p o i n t e d out whenever and wherever I can, documentaries - or whatever t h e i r d i r e c t o r s care to c a l l them - are j u s t not my;-/favorite k i n d of movie w a t c h i n g . The f a c t i s t h a t I don't t r u s t the l i t t l e b a s t a r d s . I don't t r u s t the m o t i v e s of those who t h i n k they a re s u p e r i o r t o f i c t i o n f i l m s , I don't t r u s t t h e i r c l a i m to have c o r n e r e d the market on t r u t h , I don't t r u s t t h e i r i n o r d i n a t e l y h i g h , and e n t i r e l y u n deserved, s t a t u s of b o u r g e o i s r e s p e c t a -b i l i t y . " 1 The extreme example of m a n i p u l a t i o n i n the .documentary 27 c o n t e x t i s the use o f the documentary format as a t o o l f o r s p r e a d i n g propaganda. W h i l e the h i s t o r i a n may p e r e m p t o r i l y d i s m i s s such f i l m as b e i n g b l a t a n t l y m a n i p u l a t i v e and a h i g h l y d i s t o r t e d v e r s i o n o f " r e a l i t y , " the propaganda f i l m can p r o v i d e s o c i e t a l i n s i g h t s o f a s o c i o l o g i c a l and p s y c h o l o g i c a l n a t u r e . Propaganda f i l m s a re . . . c o n s c i o u s l y made to promote c e r t a i n g o a l s , to persuade, to u n i t e , and to s t i m u l a t e to a c t i o n . I t i s t h i s c o n s c i o u s n e s s , t h i s p u r p o s i v e n e s s , which g i v e s to the propaganda f i l m i t s d i s t i n c t v a l u e f o r s o c i o -p s y c h o l o g i c a l a n a l y s i s . . . . In the propaganda f i l m , the a t t i t u d e s and v a l u e s o f a s o c i e t y , n o r m a l l y the backdrop f o r d r a m a t i c a c t i o n , come i n t o the f o r e g r o u n d to s t a n d naked f o r a n a l y s i s . 1 8 Another i s s u e c l o s e l y r e l a t e d to propaganda i s t h a t of s p o n s o r s h i p , an element t h a t a l s o must be taken i n t o account when a s c e r t a i n i n g , the v e r a c i t y o f the f i l m r e c o r d . Sponsor-s h i p has t r a d i t i o n a l l y been more of an i s s u e w i t h the documen-t a r y and c o m p i l a t i o n f i l m than w i t h the f e a t u r e f i l m i n d u s t r y , as n e i t h e r the documentary or c o m p i l a t i o n a re p a r t i c u l a r l y commercial i n nature.. Because of t h i s f a c t , an element of compromise i n the form o f s p o n s o r s h i p has o f t e n e n t e r e d i n t o t h e i r p r o d u c t i o n . C o n s i d e r e d as r e c o r d f i l m , sponsored f i l m does p r o v i d e some degree of i n s i g h t i n t o the mot i v e s of the s p o n s o r i n g i n t e r e s t by " r e v e a l i n g the views which they wanted 1 9 the p u b l i c to h o l d on the v i t a l i s s u e s o f the day." F i l m would seem to p o s s e s s the c a p a c i t y f o r r e c o r d i n g a s p e c t s of r e a l i t y , w i t h a degree of v e r a c i t y u n p a r a l l e l e d i n the t e x t u a l r e c o r d . By the same token i t p o s s e s s e s an almost e q u a l c a p a c i t y f o r f a l s i f i c a t i o n : 28 C o n t r a r y to some p o p u l a r l y h e l d b e l i e f s the camera does l i e and i t can l i e . v e r y c o n s i s t e n t l y and f o r the g e n e r a l p u b l i c v e r y e f f e c t i v e l y . I t i s t h i s f a c i l i t y t h a t f i l m has f o r n o t t e l l i n g the t r u t h w h ich c r e a t e s the g r e a t e s t abuse of f i l m as an h i s -t o r i c a l source.20 A l l documents i n v i t e f a l s i f i c a t i o n . The f i l m r e c o r d , because of the number of hands i n v o l v e d i n i t s c r e a t i o n and i t s manner of p r o d u c t i o n , has l o n g been r e g a r d e d by h i s t o r i a n s w i t h a g r e a t d e a l of s u s p i c i o n . One of the major r e a s o n s f o r t h i s s u s p i c i o n , and one o f theiamore f r e q u e n t a r e a s of abuse i n a c t u a l i t y f i l m i s the use of s t o c k - s h o t s , w herein a t o t a l l y u n r e l a t e d shot i s s u b s t i t u t e d f o r the r e a l t h i n g ( u s u a l l y f o r r e a s o n s of convenience and expense, and not n e c e s s a r i l y to d e l i b e r a t e l y m i s l e a d ) , w i t h o u t a c k n o w l e d g i n g the source or the m i s r e p r e s e n t a t i o n i n v o l v e d . S t o c k - s h o t s have a l o n g h i s t o r y o f use and abuse i n a l l t y p e s of f i l m s , as do r e c o n -s t r u c t i o n sequences, whereby an attempt i s made to r e - e n a c t an h i s t o r i c event w i t h o u t a c knowledging i t s removal from r e a l i t y . Such p a t t e r n s o f f a l s i f i c a t i o n have confounded h i s t o r i a n s f o r y e a r s , l e a d i n g many to advocate methods of i d e n t i f y i n g the o f f e n d i n g s h o t s and sequences. C h r i s t o p h e r Roads has sugges-t e d f i l m m a k e r s employ c o l o u r t i n t i n g o f r e c o n s t r u c t e d sequences, 21 to d i s t i n g u i s h them from a c t u a l r e c o r d f i l m . Penelope Houston adv o c a t e s the use of f o o t n o t e s to accompany c o m p i l a t i o n f i l m s f o r the same purpose. R e c o n s t r u c t i o n s h o u l d be i d e n t i f i e d , n ot a l l o w e d to masquerade as the r e a l t h i n g . D o u b t f u l a t t r i b u t i o n s might be acknowledged; d i s t i n c t i o n s might be drawn between f i r s t h a n d m a t e r i a l which can.be e x a c t l y i d e n -t i f i e d , and m a t e r i a l which has a l r e a d y been put t h rough one p r o p a g a n d i s t mincer or a n o t h e r . . . . . 29 H i s t o r i a n W i l l i a m H. M c N e i l l i s even more adamant on t h i s p o i n t , which he c a r r i e s to i t s somewhat i l l o g i c a l extreme: "Only i f an h i s t o r i c a l i d e a i s used to d i c t a t e how. f o o t a g e s h o u l d be a r r a n g e d and s e l e c t e d can the wisdom and i n s i g h t of our p r o -23 f e s s i o n f i n d e x p r e s s i o n i n t h i s k i n d o f f i l m m a k i n g . " A s i m i l a r s e n t i m e n t i s echoed by J.A.S.. G r e n v i l l e and N i c h o l a s Pronay: " I d e a l l y both the ' t e c h n i c a l 1 and ' s c h o l a r l y ' h a l v e s o f . . . a f i l m p r o j e c t s h o u l d both be h i s t o r i a n s by t r a i n i n g . " 2 Perhaps the most extreme view on t h i s p o i n t i s t h a t e x p r e s s e d by F r i t z Terveen, who s t a t e s t h a t an a n a l y s i s o f form and t e c h -n i q u e s h o u l d be determined f o r every s h o t , . . . and must be a t t a c h e d as accompanying t e x t or c r i t i c a l a p p a r a t u s i n a w r i t t e n form i n o r d e r to enable i t to be used f o r r e s e a r c h p u r p o s e s . Only thus can a sequence of shots..be p l a c e d e x a c t l y i n i t s a p p r o p r i a t e h i s t o r i c a l c o n t e x t . T h i s i s a t a s k which can be c a r r i e d out o n l y by the h i s t o r i a n i n ? c. c o l l a b o r a t i o n w i t h s c i e n t i f i c a l l y t r a i n e d e x p e r t s . The f o r e g o i n g d i s c u s s i o n has o u t l i n e d what c o n s t i t u t e s -the most common form of abuse i n r e c o r d f i l m , t h a t of the f a l s i f i -c a t i o n o f the f i l m r e c o r d which i s p r e s e n t e d as a r e p r e s e n t a -t i o n of " r e a l i t y . " At the o t h e r end o f the spectrum t h e r e i s a c o n f u s i n g s i t u a t i o n which o c c u r s when shots are e x t r a c t e d from f i c t i o n a l f i l m s and p r e s e n t e d as h i s t o r i c a l f a c t . T h i s s i t u a t i o n more t y p i c a l l y a r i s e s w i t h a h i s t o r i c a l r e - c r e a t i o n f i l m such as E i s e n s t e i n ' s S t r i k e (1924.), which l o o k s so o l d and " r e a l " t h a t i t has become imbued w i t h a f a l s e a u r a of a u t h e n t i c i t y . T h i s has r e s u l t e d i n a c e r t a i n amount of con-f u s i o n and has p r o p a g a t e d a c o n t i n u e d p a t h o l o g y of abuse: 30 "Sequences from .his ( E i s e n s t e i n . ' s ) h i s t o r i c a l r e c r e a t i o n s of r e v o l u t i o n a r y R u s s i a have been p r e s e n t e d , i n documentary and 2 6 c o m p i l a t i o n f i l m s as a u t h e n t i c f o o t a g e . " Another case i n v o l v e s f o o t a g e supposedly of the R u s s i a n R e v o l t o f 1905 d e p i c t i n g the events o f "Bloody Sunday" (09 Ja n u a r y , 1905). In r e a l i t y , the f o o t a g e was from a 1925 f i l m , 9 th o f Ja n u a r y , by V.K. V i s k o v s k i j . The complete 1925 f i l m was not d i s c o v e r e d u n t i l 1956, r e v e a l i n g a l o n g t r a d i t i o n o f misuse o f the Bloody Sunday f o o t a g e as a c t u a l f o o t a g e . o f an h i s t o r i c a l event. I f a r e s e a r c h e r i s a t t e m p t i n g to seek out and compensate f o r a r e a s o f abuse and d i s t o r t i o n , or to . a s c e r t a i n a f i l m m a k e r ' s p a r t i c u l a r mode of s e l e c t i v i t y , i t may be of b e n e f i t to c o n s u l t p r e c i s e l y t h a t f o o t a g e which i s abs:ent from the f i n a l e d i t e d form. A good d e a l more f o o t a g e i s shot than u l t i m a t e l y appears on s c r e e n , and i t i s sometimes the e x c i s e d f o o t a g e t h a t may be of more h i s t o r i c a l . i n t e r e s t t o the r e s e a r c h e r . The e x i s t e n c e o f such o u t - t a k e m a t e r i a l (known s i m p l y as " o u t s " i n the i n d u s t r y ) can p r o v i d e v a l u a b l e e v i d e n c e i n order, t o c o n s t r u c t a more com-p r e h e n s i v e p i c t u r e of the f i l m e d event. The removed f o o t a g e may have been e x c i s e d f o r reasons of p o l i t i c a l or s o c i a l s e n s i -t i v i t y , as w e l l as f o r the more mundane reaso n s o f l e n g t h or t e c h n i c a l i n a d e q u a c i e s . Whatever the r e a s o n s , t h i s type of ma-t e r i a l , i f a v a i l a b l e f o r c o n s u l t a t i o n , s h o u l d n o t be o v e r l o o k e d by the r e s e a r c h e r s e e k i n g to complement e x i s t i n g f o o t a g e . 31 In c o n t r a s t to a c t u a l i t y f i l m , f i c t i o n a l f i l m , c o n s t i t u t i n g the c r e a t i v e t r e a t m e n t of some s i t u a t i o n or e vent, e i t h e r r e a l or i m a g i n e d , demands a c o n s i d e r a b l y d i f f e r e n t approach on the p a r t o f the r e s e a r c h e r to e x t r a c t i n f o r m a t i o n c a p t u r e d i n the p r o c e s s of c o n s c i o u s or u n c o n s c i o u s s o c i e t a l r e f l e c t i o n . L i k e a c t u a l i t y f i l m , the f i c t i o n a l or f e a t u r e f i l m has the c a p a c i t y to both r e f l e c t and d i s t o r t v a r i o u s , f a c e t s of " r e a l i t y . " In the case of the f e a t u r e f i l m , the r e f l e c t i o n a p p l i e s to the v a l u e systems and a t t i t u d e s o f s o c i e t y , as w e l l as to more o v e r t i c o n o g r a p h i c a l d i s p l a y s . The v a l u e o f the f i c t i o n a l f i l m may not l i e i n what the h i s t o r i a n would n e c e s s a r i l y con-s i d e r to be s t r i c t l y " h i s t o r i c a l , " , but r a t h e r i n a broader sense of s o c i e t a l and c u l t u r a l documentation. A r t h u r E l t o n a d v o c a t e s an approach to the f e a t u r e f i l m w hich p o s i t s i t as a v a l u a b l e a r t e f a c t o f p o p u l a r c u l t u r e , e x i s t i n g w i t h i n an a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l c o n t e x t : The f i c t i o n f i l m g i v e s a c l u e to the p o i n t o f view of i t s t i m e , and the p o p u l a r a t t i t u d e towards l i f e . F i c t i o n f i l m s are t o d a y ' s f o l k l o r e , and w i l l be as u s e f u l to the h i s t o r i a n , or a t l e a s t t o the a n t h r o -p o l o g i s t , as the b a l l a d and the f a i r y t a l e . ° R e f l e c t i o n i n the f e a t u r e f i l m can t a k e many forms, and can o p e r a t e on many l e v e l s , from u n c o n s c i o u s m a n i f e s t a t i o n s o f p r e -v a i l i n g s o c i e t a l concerns to s e l f - c o n s c i o u s p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f propaganda, r a n g i n g from m i l d s u a s i o n to b l a t a n t c o e r c i o n . As i n the a c t u a l i t y f i l m , the f e a t u r e f i l m can bear u n w i t t i n g t e s t i m o n y to immutable p h y s i c a l " t r u t h s . " For example, on the s t r i c t l y p h y s i c a l l e v e l , the camera may c o n s c i o u s l y or u n c o n s c i o u s -l y c a p t u r e the i c o n o g r a p h y c o n t a i n e d w i t h i n the environment. 32 In the course o f t h e i r s p a t i a l conquests , f i l m s o f f i c t i o n and f i l m s o f f a c t a l i k e c a p t u r e Innumerable components o f the w o r l d they m i r r o r : huge mass d i s -p l a y s , c a s u a l c o n f i g u r a t i o n s of human b o d i e s and i n a n i -mate o b j e c t s and an e n d l e s s s u c c e s s i o n of u n o b t r u s i v e phenomena. As a ma t t e r of f a c t , the s c r e e n shows i t s e l f p a r t i c u l a r l y concerned w i t h the u n o b t r u s i v e , the n o r m a l l y n e g l e c t e d . 2 9 In a d d i t i o n to c a p t u r i n g the p h y s i c a l r e a l i t y of a g i v e n s o c i e t y a t a g i v e n t i m e , the s u b j e c t matter o f f i c t i o n a l f i l m can f u n c -t i o n as a barometer f o r c u r r e n t p u b l i c concerns and the p r e v a i l -i n g a t t i t u d e s r e g a r d i n g these c o n c e r n s . Whether or not such i n f o r m a t i o n can be r e g a r d e d as " h i s t o r i c a l f a c t " i s l i k e l y t o be the s t u m b l i n g b l o c k a s . f a r as h i s t o r i a n s are concerned. P a u l Smith laments the u n f o r t u n a t e tendency of h i s t o r i a n s t o seek out o n l y the ty p e s of f i l m s which, p u r p o r t to p r e s e n t f a c t and " r e a l i t y ; " the f i c t i o n f i l m i s " h e l d to be of i t s na-t u r e a n t i t h e t i c a l t o f a c t and r e a l i t y , t o be make-believe and i n v e n t i o n , i n which f a c t and r e a l i t y can be shadowed but not 30 d i r e c t l y conveyed." F i c t i o n f i l m n o t o n l y s u f f e r s from the s o - c a l l e d s tigma of c r e a t i v e i n v e n t i o n , but a l s o from a l o n g t r a d i t i o n of t r i v i a l i t y r e s u l t i n g from i t s w i d e s p r e a d d i s s e m i n a t i o n t h r o u g h -out the s t r a t a of s o c i e t y . I t has a l r e a d y been remarked t h a t contemporary s o c i e t y e x h i b i t s an u n f o r t u n a t e p r o c l i v i t y towards m a r g i n a l i s i n g the s i g n i f i c a n c e of p r o d u c t s o f p o p u l a r c u l t u r e because o f t h e i r mass a p p e a l . The c o n t i n u e d t r a d i t i o n of p u s h i n g such mass phenomena as p o p u l a r music and f i l m to the 33 p e r i p h e r y of contemporary h i s t o r y has caused f i l m to have been r e c o g n i z e d as a p o p u l a r phenomenon w h i l e i t has l a r g e -l y been d i s m i s s e d as an h i s t o r i c a l s o u r c e . Because of t h i s , o n l y a c t u a l i t y f i l m has g a i n e d some r e s p e c t f o r i t s e l f as a p u r v e y o r o f h i s t o r i c a l e v i d e n c e , w h i l e "the f i c t i o n f i l m has borne l o n g e r and more d e e p l y than o t h e r types of f i l m the s t i g -ma of b e i n g merely- t r i v i a l and ephemeral p o p u l a r e n t e r t a i n m e n t , a v e h i c l e of d i v e r s i o n and escape f o r uneducated or semi-edu-c a t e d masses b r u t a l i s e d by t h e i r t o i l , which c o u l d have no 31 r e l e v a n c e to the concerns of s e r i o u s h i s t o r y . " Only the h i s t o r i c a l re-enactment has been c o n s i d e r e d to f a l l w i t h i n the h i s t o r i a n ' s sphere of i n t e r e s t , but t h i s too has u s u a l l y been 32 r e j e c t e d as " f a l s i f y i n g and d i s t o r t i n g h i s t o r i c a l r e a l i t y . " The s o - c a l l e d "problem" of r e l a t i n g the c o n t e n t of f i l m s to r e a l i t y i s not c o n f i n e d to f i c t i o n f i l m s , but a p p l i e s to a l l c a t e g o r i e s of f i l m , and thus s h o u l d not be t o u t e d as a. r e a s o n f o r i g n o r i n g the f i c t i o n a l f i l m as an h i s t o r i c a l s o u r c e . F i l m does not always p u r p o s i v e l y attempt to r e f l e c t r e a l i t y , 33 but more o f t e n than not " r e f r a c t s " i t . In o r d e r to u t i l i z e f i c t i o n a l f i l m as source m a t e r i a l a broader framework of r e f e r e n c e i s needed. The f e a t u r e f i l m must be c o n s i d e r e d w i t h i n the c o n t e x t of i t s c r e a t i o n and p r o d u c t i o n as w e l l as i t s r e c e p t i o n i n o r d e r to r e a l i z e i t s f u l l p o t e n t i a l and maximize the amount of i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t can be gleaned from i t . Of c o u r s e , the same can be s a i d of c o n v e n t i o n a l t e x t u a l documentation. 3A I t i s a fundamental p r i n c i p l e of h i s t o r i c a l work t h a t documents are e v i d e n c e not o n l y of a more or l e s s mediated r e a l i t y to which they have e x p l i c i t r e f e r -ence but a l s o of the p r o c e s s of m e d i a t i o n i t s e l f and of the m e n t a l i t y and i n t e n t of t h e i r o r i g i n a t o r s , as w e l l , perhaps, as of t h e i r r e c e i v e r s . . . . F i l m i t s e l f i s a p a r t o f r e a l i t y , and f i l m s are the p r o -d u c t s of r e a l a c t i o n s and p r o c e s s e s , mental and p h y s i c a l , capable of e x e r c i s i n g r e a l i n f l u e n c e on those who see them. The r e a l i t y c o n s t i t u t e d by f i l m i s j u s t as much a p r o p e r o b j e c t of the h i s t o r -i a n ' s Q a t t e n t i o n as t h a t a p p a r e n t l y p e r c e i v e d on f i l m . ^ 4 C o n s i d e r i n g f i c t i o n l f i l m as the p r o d u c t of a m e d i a t i o n p r o -c e s s , a c r u c i a l f a c t o r to take i n t o account i s t h a t of whose a t t i t u d e s are b e i n g e x p r e s s e d i n the f i l m p r o d u c t . F i l m i s n o t so much an i n d i v i d u a l a r t , a l t h o u g h f i l m s are made by i n d i v i d u a l f i l m m a k e r s , as a c o r p o r a t e a r t , and the p r o d u c t of a community. To t h i s end, t h e r e has been c o n s i d e r a b l e d i s c u s s i o n c o n c e r n i n g the concept of a n a t i o n a l c o n s c i o u s n e s s , as r e f l e c t e d i n a n a t i o n ' s f i l m i c o u t p u t . T h i s concept i s i n d i r e c t o p p o s i t i o n to the a u t e u r t h e o r y , which has t r a d i t i o n -a l l y c o n c e i v e d of f i l m s as the e x c l u s i v e p r o d u c t s of an i n d i -v i d u a l , "seen as e x i s t i n g l a r g e l y o u t s i d e h i s t o r y , e x p r e s s i n g a v i s i o n which owed l i t t l e t o s o c i a l f o r m a t i o n s , to g e o g r a p h i -35 c a l or p o l i t i c a l b o u n d a r i e s . " Edward Buscombe argues a g a i n s t t h i s t h e o r y , s t a t i n g t h a t the i n d i v i d u a l s c r e a t i n g the f i l m s , r e g a r d l e s s of how unique t h e i r v i s i o n , have themselves been formed In a s o c i a l p r o c e s s . "American f i l m s are n e i t h e r sim-p l y the unmediated e x p r e s s i o n of a c o l l e c t i v e c o n s c i o u s n e s s , nor i n d i v i d u a l a c t s o f s e l f - e x p r e s s i o n , but the p r o d u c t s o f 35 some p o s s i b l y r a t h e r c o m p l i c a t e d r e l a t i o n s h i p between the two." On the o t h e r hand, P a u l Smith f e e l s f i l m s need to be c o n s i d e r e d w i t h i n the framework of a c o l l e c t i v e c o n s c i o u s -ness i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n n o t o n l y some i d e a of how f i l m s were 0 7 c r e a t e d , but a l s o how they impacted upon t h e i r a u d i e n c e s . He goes on to a s s e r t t h a t i t w i l l n o t s u f f i c e to s i m p l y de-t e c t f i l m s i l l u s t r a t i v e of s o c i e t y ' s p r e o c c u p a t i o n s , but t h a t i t i s " n e c e s s a r y to go f u r t h e r and to examine what i t i s t h a t t h e i r s p e c i f i c appearance i n f i l m can t e l l us about the provenance, n a t u r e , d i s s e m i n a t i o n and i n f l u e n c e o f those o o i d e a s . " Smith o f f e r s no answers, but f e e l s i t i s i m p o r t a n t to a t l e a s t ask how f i l m s can h e l p h i s t o r i a n s t o d e f i n e , l o -39 c a t e , mediate and d i s s e m i n a t e such i d e a s . Buscombe does not b e l i e v e i n the i d e a of a n a t i o n a l con-s c i o u s n e s s , and c i t e s the t r a d i t i o n a l d i v i s i o n s i n Ameria which H o l l y w o o d has p e r p e t u a t e d r a t h e r than t r a n s c e n d e d , such as the " n o r t h e r n and p r o t e s t a n t t r a d i t i o n , " ^ which has r e s u l t e d i n a s e p a r a t e c i n e m a t i c t r a d i t i o n f o r m i n o r i t y groups. On the s u b j e c t of c l a s s d i v i s i o n s , the assumption t h a t f i l m was c r e -a t e d as a mass • e n t e r t a i n m e n t p a n d e r i n g to the " o r d i n a r y " ma-j o r i t y i s a l s o r e j e c t e d by Buscombe, who s t a t e s t h a t t h e r e i s no e v i d e n c e as to whether mid d l e and w o r k i n g c l a s s e s i n f a c t a t t e n d e d the same f i l m s , and whether Hollywood was a c t i n g on the demands of a s i n g l e audience or a d i v i d e d one. D u r i n g the heyday of Hol l y w o o d i n the f i r s t h a l f of t h i s c e n t u r y , those i n v o l v e d i n the p r o d u c t i o n of f i l m s , or i n the r e g u l a -36 t o r y i n s t i t u t i o n s c o n t r o l l i n g f i l m p r o d u c t i o n and c o n t e n t , h a i l e d m o s t l y from the middle' c l a s s , as d i d the c r i t i c s who / 2 r e v i e w e d the f i l m s . These f a c t s , a c c o r d i n g t o Buscombe, p o i n t to the absence of any s o r t of c o l l e c t i v e c o n s c i o u s n e s s o p e r a t i v e b e h i n d the c r e a t i o n of American f i l m s . The s e m i n a l work i n t h i s a r e a i s s t i l l S i e g f r i e d K r a c a u e r ' s s t u d y o f German f i l m from.1918 to 1933, which has been blamed f o r " h e l p i n g b r i n g on H i t l e r through sheer m o r b i d i t y . " K r a -cauer w r i t e s : " I t i s my c o n t e n t i o n t h a t t h r o u g h an a n a l y s i s o f the German f i l m s deep p s y c h o l o g i c a l d i s p o s i t i o n s predominant i n Germany from T.91 8 to 1 933 can be exposed - d i s p o s i t i o n s which i n f l u e n c e d the course of events d u r i n g t h a t , time and which w i l l have to be r e c k o n e d w i t h i n t h e p o s t - H i t l e r e r a . " 4 4 The e x p r e s s i o n i s t f i l m s made between the wars, c h a r a c t e r i z e d by morbid p s y c h o l o g i c a l , s u b j e c t s p r e s e n t e d i n a grotesque and h i g h l y s t y l i z e d manner, came to be e p i t o m i z e d by Das K a b i n e t t des Dr. C a l i g a r i (The C a b i n e t o f Dr.. C a l i g a r i , R o b e r t Wiene, 1 91 9) • The f i l m was d e s c r i b e d , by one c r i t i c as "the f i r s t s i g n i f i c a n t attempt a t the e x p r e s s i o n o f a., c r e a t i v e mind i n / 5 the medium of cinematography," w h i l e another c r i t i c w r o t e : I t has the odor of t a i n t e d f o o d . I t l e a v e s a t a s t e of c i n d e r s i n the mouth. 4 The n i g h t m a r i s h decor a n d . l i g h t i n g e f f e c t s of e x p r e s s i o n i s t f i l m sought t o " p o r t r a y s u b j e c t i v e r e a l i t i e s i n o b j e c t i v e terms, to r e n d e r not s i m p l y n a r r a t i v e s but s t a t e s of minds, moods, and atmosphere through the .medium of the p h o t o g r a p h i c image,. ... 37 The r e s u l t i n g f i l m s were f e l t by K r a c a u e r to expose the German s o u l i n a l l i t s d e p r a v i t y , u l t i m a t e l y to bear f r u i t i n the r i s e of H i t l e r . A c c o r d i n g to K r a c a u e r , What f i l m s r e f l e c t are not so much e x p l i c i t credos as p s y c h o l o g i c a l d i s p o s i t i o n s - those deep l a y e r s of c o l l e c t i v e m e n t a l i t y which extend more or l e s s below the dimension o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s . Of c o u r s e , p o p u l a r magazines and broadcasts,, b e s t s e l l e r s , ads, f a s h i o n s i n language and o t h e r s e d i m e n t a r y p r o d u c t s of a p e o p l e ' s c u l t u r a l l i f e a l s o y i e l d v a l u a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n about predominant a t t i t u d e s , w i d e s p r e a d i n n e r t e n d e n c i e s . But the medium of thggScreen exceeds t h e s e s o u r c e s i n i n c l u s i v e n e s s . • An approach t o f e a t u r e f i l m a n t i t h e t i c a l to the i d e a of f i l m as a r e f l e c t i o n o f c o l l e c t i v e c o n s c i o u s n e s s i s t h a t which views f i l m as an escape v a l v e t h rough which s o c i e t y seeks r e l i e f from i t s overwhelming p r e s s u r e s and p r e o c c u p a t i o n s . Many argue a g a i n s t t h i s view, b e l i e v i n g t h a t even i n s e e k i n g r e l i e f from everyday p r e s s u r e s s o c i e t y w i l l u n c o n s c i o u s l y r e v e a l i t s i n n e r m o s t secrets.. Andrew S a r r i s c i t e s s o c i a l c r i -t i c s o f the l e f t who argue a g a i n s t j u s t such a t h e o r y . They s t a t e t h a t even the most e s c a p i s t f i l m s are r e v e a l i n g i n what they c o v e r t l y say about s o c i e t y . Hence the o l d K i n g Kong was presumed to be the u n c o n s c i o u s p r o d u c t o f Freud's C i v i l i z a t i o n and  I t s D i s c o n t e n t s , whereas the new K i n g Kong has been r e p o r t e d l y programmed to i l l u s t r a t e Fanon's Wretched of the E a r t h . The Graduate was c o n s i d e r e d ' s i g n i f i c a n t ' p r e c i s e l y because i t evaded the i l l s of Vietnam, and poor C a l i g a r i was blamed by K r a c a u e r f o r h e l p i n g b r i n g on H i t l e r t h r o u g h sheer m o r b i d i t y . T h i s o p i n i o n i s backed up by Hugh Gray ( i n the i n t r o d u c t i o n to 38 Andre B a z i n ' s What i s Cinema? v o l . 1, 1967), who sees i n the cinema the o p p o r t u n i t y to a n t i c i p a t e the u l t i m a t e c o n f r o n t a -50 t i o n between man and a u t o m a t i o n . T h i s o p p o r t u n i t y w i l l o c c u r o n l y as l o n g as f i l m f u n c t i o n s i n the c a p a c i t y as a r e f l e c t o r and n o t merely as a p u r v e y o r of e s c a p i s t p l e a s u r e . Too many f o r too l o n g , n o t a b l y i n the U n i t e d S t a t e s , have p r e f e r r e d to t h i n k of i t s i m p l y as an avenue of escape par e x c e l l e n c e from a h i g h - p r e s s u r e l i f e , f o r which we are ever s e e k i n g - a new w o r l d , as i t were, to l i v e i n . But such s o - c a l l e d p a t h s of es-cape, p l e a s a n t as they are to wander i n , are i n r e a l i t y each but a c u l - d e - s a c . The more we see the s c r e e n as a m i r r o r r a t h e r than an escape h a t c h , the more we w i l l be p r e p a r e d f o r what i s to come.5' R e t u r n i n g to the i s s u e of c o n s i d e r i n g f i l m as j u s t such a r e f l e c t o r , the q u e s t i o n to be asked i s e x a c t l y what i s the s c r e e n r e f l e c t i n g ? I t would seem to be r e f l e c t i n g the a t t i -tudes and v a l u e s o f some s o c i a l group, but t h e r e i s no easy or s i m p l e answer to the q u e s t i o n of whose a t t i t u d e s are ex-p r e s s e d i n f i l m s , or to what e x t e n t such a t t i t u d e s c o r r e s -pond to those o f s o c i e t y i n g e n e r a l . In the n a r r o w e s t sense, i t c o u l d be assumed t h a t the a t t i t u d e s e x p r e s s e d are those of the s o c i a l a g g r e g a t i o n i n v o l v e d i n the p r o d u c t i o n of f i l m s , and i n the c o n t e x t o f the American mass f i l m , those a t t i t u d e s i n most cases would have t h e i r o r i g i n s i n the H o l l y -wood f i l m f a c t o r y . . The q u e s t i o n to be asked i n t h i s c o n t e x t i s to what e x t e n t do the a t t i t u d e s and v a l u e s of Hollywood c o r r e s p o n d to those of s o c i e t y i n g e n e r a l ? S o c i o l o g i s t Leo Rosten has s t u d i e d the H o l l y w o o d f i l m i n d u s t r y o f the 1930s and 1940s, and found H o l l y w o o d to be "an i n d e x o f our s o c i e t y 39 and our c u l t u r e , " c a s t i n g the v a l u e s of American s o c i e t y i n t o s t a r k r e l i e f . 1 Whether or n o t t h i s t e n e t i s a c c e p t e d , i t would appear l o g i c a l t o assume t h a t the c r e a t o r s o f a f i l m s h o u l d assume some r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r the c o n t e n t of a f i l m , whether or not the c o n t e n t i s a r e f l e c t i o n of an i n d i v i d u a l or s o c i e t y i n g e n e r a l . As a r e f l e c t o r o f s o c i e t y and a p u r v e y o r of a t t i t u d e s , f e a t u r e f i l m can be approached i n two ways, a c c o r d i n g to Eugene C. McCreary. I t can be c o n s i d e r e d as the work of one man, u s u a l l y the d i r e c t o r , whose t o t a l work can be examined to r e v e a l r e c u r r e n t themes, f o r m a l s t y l e s , and "elements of f i l m language r e v e l a t o r y of one man's r e l a t i o n s h i p to the. , 5 3 s o c i e t y and eppoh i n which he l i v e s or l i v e d . " In t h i s approach, the r e s e a r c h e r must come to terms w i t h the r o l e o f the d i r e c t o r and h i s p o t e n t i a l f u n c t i o n as a d i s t i l l e r of-p u b l i c awareness: The d i r e c t o r ' s i s r a r e l y , i f e v e r , a s e m i n a l mind. H i s importance l i e s elsewhere - i n p o p u l a r i z a t i o n , i n v u l g a r i z a t i o n of contemporary i n t e l l e c t u a l c u r r e n t s , or i n b r i n g i n g to e s s e n t i a l l y mass a u d i e n c e s a h e i g h t e n e d awareness of a contemporary s i t u a t i o n and i t s i m p l i c a t i o n s . 54-Thus the d i r e c t o r i s c o n s i d e r e d as an i n d i v i d u a l shaped by s o c i e t y , and r e f l e c t i v e of the u n d e r c u r r e n t s o p e r a t i v e i n t h a t s o c i e t y , r a t h e r than as a c r e a t i v e and o r i g i n a l mind o p e r a t i n g o u t s i d e the b o u n d a r i e s of s o c i e t y . McCreary's o t h e r approach i n v o l v e s an e x a m i n a t i o n of the t o t a l f i l m p r o d u c t i o n of a s o c i e t y a t a g i v e n moment, to r e v e a l a common body of a t t i t u d e s , v a l u e s , and c o n c e r n s ; f i l m as a s o c i e t a l m i r r o r , as i t were./ F e a t u r e f i l m s can a l s o a c t r e f l e c t i v e l y i n a more s u b t l e manner, i n t h e i r f u n c t i o n as " i n d i c a t o r s of c o v e r t c u l t u r e 56 v a l u e s . " As a p r o d u c t of p o p u l a r c u l t u r e , f i l m can be s t u d i e d f o r what i t b e t r a y s both o v e r t l y and c o v e r t l y , some-times r e v e a l i n g u n d e r l y i n g c o n t r a d i c t i o n s or t e n s i o n s t h rough c o v e r t v a l u e s i n d i r e c t o p p o s i t i o n t o openly acknowledged v a l u e s . An example of t h i s can be seen i n the d e p i c t i o n o f b l a c k s i n e a r l y American f i l m s , p a r t i c u l a r l y i n D.W. G r i f f i t h ' s The B i r t h of a N a t i o n (1915), i n which m a l i c i o u s p o r t r a y a l s of r a c i a l s t e r e o t y p e s had to be e x c i s e d from the o r i g i n a l f i l m , w h i l e a t the same time t h e r e was no d e s i r e to p r e s e n t " a s s e r -57 t i v e , competent, v i r i l e b l a c k h e r o e s . " The r e s u l t of t h i s c o n f l i c t between o v e r t and c o v e r t c u l t u r a l v a l u e s was the e v o l u t i o n o f the n e u t r a l , harmless image of the b l a c k , e p i -tomized, by the "Aunt Jemima" s t e r e o t y p e . As a medium o f r e f l e c t i o n , a m i r r o r of s o c i o - c u l t u r a l a t t i t u d e s and i c o n o g r a p h y , f i l m as a v i s u a l r e c o r d needs to be s u b j e c t e d to s p e c i f i c a n a l y s e s i n o r d e r t o maximize the v a l u e of the i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d t h e r e i n . The major con-temporary approaches to the a n a l y s i s o f f i l m can be r o u g h l y c l a s s i f i e d i n t o two c a t e g o r i e s , a c c o r d i n g to whether the a n a l y s i s i s c e n t e r e d on c o n t e n t or s t r u c t u r e . The s t r u c t u r a l a n a l y s i s approach examines l a r g e r u n i t s o f c i n e m a t i c meaning, w h i l e the s i g n a n a l y s i s approach ( c e n t e r e d on c o n t e n t ) exa-mines s i n g l e u n i t s of meaning w i t h i n both the v i s u a l and 41 a u d i o components of f i l m (what K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s r e f e r s to c o r e s p e c t i v e l y as the "macro-plane" and the " m i c r o - p l a n e " ) . A complete f i l m a n a l y s i s would have to combine both approaches. A c c o r d i n g to W i l l i a m Hughes, we r a r e l y e x p l o r e the con-59 t e n t o f v i s u a l images beyond the l e v e l . o f mere r e c o g n i t i o n , and i g n o r e the c a p a c i t y of f i l m to p r e s e n t a p l e t h o r a o f imagery which can be s u b j e c t e d to the above o u t l i n e d forms of a n a l y s e s . F i l m c o n s i d e r e d as a r e c o r d e r of such images i s an i m p o r t a n t source o f s t u d y f o r s e m i o l o g i s t s , who a n a l y s e f i l m i n terms of the symbols i t c o n t a i n s . P e t e r W o l l e n ( i n h i s i n f l u e n t i a l S i g n s and Meaning in. the Cinema, 1 969), has borrowed a t r i c h o -tomy of c i n e m a t i c " s i g n s " from p h i l o s o p h e r C.S. P e i r c e : -The I c o n : a s i g n i n which the s i g n i f i e r r e p r e s e n t s the s i g n i f i e d m a i n l y by i t s s i m i l a r i t y to I t , i t s l i k e n e s s ; -The Index: which measures a q u a l i t y not because i t i s i d e n t i c a l to i t but'because i t has an i n h e r e n t r e l a t i o n s h i p to i t ; -The Symbol: an a r b i t r a r y s i g n i n which the s i g n i f i e r has n e i t h e r a d i r e c t o r an i n d e x i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p to the s i g n i f i e d , but r a t h e r r e p r e s e n t s i t through c o n v e n t i o n . 6 0 T h i s type o f f i l m a n a l y s i s has been termed a " s t r u c t u r a l i s t 61 r e f o r m u l a t i o n o f the t h e o r y o f a u t h o r s h i p , " i n which " f i l m i s no l o n g e r posed as a communication but as an a r t e f a c t which i s u n c o n s c i o u s l y s t r u c t u r e d i n a c e r t a i n way; the a u t h o r i s no l o n g e r seen as the c r e a t i v e source but as an e f f e c t o f 62 the f i l m t e x t . " A c c o r d i n g to t h i s view, f i l m i s not so much a p r o d u c t to be consumed by c u l t u r e , but i s a p r o d u c t 4.2 o f meaning i n which the " r e a d i n g " of the f i l m i s emphasized. The s t r u c t u r a l approach seeks to p r o v i d e a l a r g e r frame-work w i t h i n which to p e r f o r m an a n a l y s i s of the m i c r o - p l a n e . The a n a l y s t l o o k s f o r p a t t e r n s or s t r u c t u r e s which impinge s i g -n i f i c a n t l y on f i l m c o n t e n t , p a t t e r n s which may or may n o t have been c o n s c i o u s l y i n c l u d e d by the f i l m m a k e r . In such a n a l y s i s the rhythm of the f i l m ' s e d i t e d s t r u c t u r e may a c t as a guide by e m p h a s i z i n g or a n t i c i p a t i n g key elements of e x p r e s s i o n or c o n t e n t . ^ In these a n a l y s e s , the r e f l e c t i v e n a t u r e of f i l m i s t a k e n as a given,, and t h i s n a t u r e i s e x p l o i t e d by s u b j e c -t i n g the v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d . w i t h i n a f i l m to r i g o r -ous s c r u t i n y and c l a s s i f i c a t i o n . A f u r t h e r avenue f o r the study of the f e a t u r e f i l m as a r e f l e c t i v e phenomenon i s t h a t of c r i t i c a l r e a c t i o n s . The b o x - o f f i c e s u c c e s s i s o f t e n panned by c r i t i c s , w h i l e the b o x - o f f i c e f a i l u r e i s o f t e n o f more m e r i t i n terms of the c i n e m a t i c medium. Both the success and f a i l u r e can be s i g -n i f i c a n t i n documenting s o c i e t a l c o n c e r n s ; "whereas the excep-t i o n a l f i l m w i l l p o i n t to the s o f t s p o t s of a s o c i e t y , the u n e x c e p t i o n a l r u n - o f - t h e - m i l l movie t e s t i f i e s b r o a d l y to t h a t 65 s o c i e t y ' s p o l i t i c a l , s o c i a l and economic consensus." The term "consensus," however, c o n j u r e s up v i s i o n s o f S o v i e t R u s s i a and N a z i Germany and t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e propaganda machines, which churned out f i l m s " i n d i c a t i v e of what the t o t a l i t a r i a n regime wanted i t s p o p u l a t i o n to b e l i e v e , r e i n f o r c i n g a c c e p t a b l e l a t e n t c o n v i c t i o n s a b o u t . o t h e r n a t i o n a l i t i e s w h i l e s u p p o r t i n g 43 the b a s i c i d e a l s and p o l i c i e s of the g o v e r n i n g e l i t e . " In S o v i e t R u s s i a , h i s t o r i o g r a p h y f o l l o w e d a development p a r a -l l e l e d by the d e p i c t i o n of R u s s i a n h i s t o r y i n f e a t u r e f i l m s . "The ' t r u t h of the p a s t ' was to be communicated to the p r e s e n t so t h a t R u s s i a ' s p e o p l e c o u l d be m o t i v a t e d by i t , as i n the 67 case o f S e r g e i E i s e n s t e i n ' s A l e x a n d e r Nevsky." R e t u r n i n g to the r o l e of the. box o f f i c e , i t would seem t h a t f i l m s cannot be c o n s i d e r e d as p u r e l y unmediated r e f l e c -t i o n s of any s o r t of mass or i n d i v i d u a l c o n s c i o u s n e s s due to the c o n t e x t of t h e i r c r e a t i o n and p r o d u c t i o n . In any d i s -c u s s i o n of f i l m as a r e f l e c t i v e medium, the r o l e of the box o f f i c e must be c o n s i d e r e d a c r i t i c a l element. The f i l m i n d u s -t r y i s a c o r p o r a t e a r t c o n c e r n e d . p r i m a r i l y w i t h monetary g a i n . Thus f i l m s are viewed more as a p r o d u c t than a r t , and moreover, as a p r o d u c t which must c a t e r to an e x i s t i n g market i n o r d e r to s e l l . I f the f i l m i n d u s t r y can be assumed to o p e r a t e under a system of p a t r o n a g e , the t i c k e t - b u y i n g p u b l i c would have to be c o n s i d e r e d the u l t i m a t e p a t r o n . T h e r e f o r e , i n o r d e r to ensure i t s s u r v i v a l , the i n d u s t r y must of n e c e s s i t y concern i t s e l f w i t h p r o v i d i n g a s a t i s f y i n g p r o d u c t f o r i t s consumers. I t has l o n g been f e l t t h a t s uccess a t the box o f f i c e "was to be o b t a i n e d by g i v i n g the people what they wanted; i . e . something to which they c o u l d r e l a t e and which t h e r e f o r e r e f l e c -68 t e d t h e m s e l v e s . " D i s s e n t e r s from t h i s o p i n i o n doubt the v a l u e o f the box o f f i c e as a barometer of p u b l i c p r e f e r e n c e f o r a v a r i e t y o f r e a s o n s . F i r s t l y , because i t cannot t e l l you whether the audience might l i k e n ot o n l y what i t i s g e t t i n g but a l s o o t h e r t h i n g s which i t i s n o t g e t t i n g . S e c o n d l y , p e o p l e pay f o r a f i l m b e f o r e they have seen i t . Box o f f i c e r e c e i p t s t h e r e f o r e s t r i c t l y o n l y r e c o r d how many people have seen a f i l m , not how many p e o p l e ^ l i k e d i t , or thought i t e x p r e s s e d what they f e l t . 6 9 T h i s argument r a i s e s some p e r t i n e n t and s eemingly i r r e f u t a b l e p o i n t s . However, i t was i n f a c t c o u n t e r e d by S i e g f r i e d K r a -cauer some t h i r t y y e a r s or so b e f o r e i t was w r i t t e n : I t has o c c a s i o n a l l y been remarked t h a t H ollywood manages to s e l l f i l m s which do not g i v e the masses what they r e a l l y want. In t h i s o p i n i o n H ollywood f i l m s more o f t e n than n o t s t u l t i f y and m i s d i r e c t a p u b l i c persuaded by i t s own p a s s i v i t y and by overwhelming p u b l i c i t y i n t o a c c e p t i n g them.,.- However, . t h e d i s t o r t i n g i n -f l u e n c e of H ollywood mass e n t e r t a i n m e n t s h o u l d not be overrated.. The m a n i p u l a t o r depends upon, the i n h e r e n t q u a l i t i e s of h i s m a t e r i a l . . . . I t i s K r a c a u e r " s b e l i e f t h a t p u b l i c d i s c o n t e n t w i t h what i s b e i n g s e r v e d up by the f i l m m a k i n g i n d u s t r y w i l l be immediate-l y be r e f l e c t e d by d e c r e a s i n g b o x - o f f i c e r e c e i p t s , a s i t u a -t i o n which the i n d u s t r y w i l l qui.ckly attempt to remedy by a l t e r i n g i t s t a c t i c s . But even K r a c a u e r a d m i t t e d t h a t a b o x - o f f i c e h i t may c a t e r to o n l y one of s e v e r a l c o - e x i s t i n g demands, and n o t n e c e s s a r i l y to a p a r t i c u l a r l y s p e c i f i c or 71 even p r e v a l e n t one. What Kraca u e r b e l i e v e s to be u l t i m a t e -l y of more importance than b o x - o f f i c e p o p u l a r i t y i s the popu-l a r i t y of the s p e c i f i c m o t i f s of f i l m s , p a r t i c u l a r l y those m o t i f s which r e c u r both i n b o x - o f f i c e s u c c e s s e s and b o x - o f f i c e 45 f l o p s a l i k e . I t i s these m o t i f s which . t e s t i f y t o the broad consensus of s o c i e t y and which r e v e a l the most about the s o c i e t y which produced them. The f i l m medium has thus demonstrated i t s a b i l i t y to f u n c -t i o n as a s o r t of s o c i e t a l m i r r o r . As a document r e v e l a t o r y of c u l t u r a l i c o n o g r a p h y as w e l l as the c o n s c i o u s and u n c o n s c i o u s -m a n i f e s t a t i o n s of s o c i e t a l a t t i t u d e s and d e s i r e s , the moving image record::, o c c u p i e s an i n t e g r a l p a r t of the f a b r i c of modern s o c i e t y and as such u n q u e s t i o n a b l y c o n s t i t u t e s a component of the a r c h i v a l r e c o r d of contemporary s o c i e t y . 4.6 NOTES 1 J u d i t h H. Gann, " R e f l e c t i o n s on the A u t h e n t i c i t y Q u e s t i o n , " i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m and S o c i e t y T: H i s t o r y and the  A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d b y - K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e t a l (Copenhagen:. E v e n t u s , 1 979), p. 185. 2 K.R.M. S h o r t , F e a t u r e F i l m s as H i s t o r y (London: Croom Helm L t d . , 1981), p. 17. 3 W i l l i a m Hughes., "The e v a l u a t i o n of. f i l m as e v i d e n c e , " i n The h i s t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1976), p. 56 . 4 I b i d . 5 I b i d . P i e r r e S o r l i n , . The F i l m i n H i s t o r y : R e s t a g i n g the P a s t ( O x f o r d : B a s i l B l a c k w e l l , 1980), p. 15. 7 C h r i s t o p h e r H. Roads, " F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l E v i d e n c e , " J o u r n a l of the S o c i e t y of A r c h i v i s t s 3 (1966), p. 187. 8 Anthony A l d g a t e , Cinema and H i s t o r y : B r i t i s h Newsreels  and the S p a n i s h . C i v i l War (London: S c o l a r P r e s s , 1 979) , p. 12. 9 I b i d . I b i d . 1 1 Hughes, "The e v a l u a t i o n of f i l m as e v i d e n c e , " p. 52. 12 Penelope Houston, "The Nature of the E v i d e n c e , " S i g h t and Sound. 36 (1 967), p. 92 . 13 D a vid A. Cook, A H i s t o r y of N a r r a t i v e F i l m (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, I n c . , 1981), p"I 220. 1 4. F o r s y t h Hardy, e d i t o r , G r i e r s o n on Documentary (London: Faber and Faber, 1 966), ~. 11 . 1 5 Cook, A H i s t o r y of N a r r a t i v e F i l m , p. 220. 1 6 Hardy, G r i e r s o n on Documentary, p. 11. 1 7 Jay S c o t t , " J u s t f a c t s . . . u n f o r t u n a t e l y , " Globe and  M a i l 07 F e b r u a r y (1986), p. 12. 47 1 8 Eugene C.. McCreary, " F i l m and H i s t o r y : Some Thoughts on T h e i r I n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p , " S o c i e t a s 1 (1971), pp. 65-66. 19 Hughes, "The e v a l u a t i o n of f i l m as e v i d e n c e , " p. 64-20 Roads, " F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l E v i d e n c e , " p. 184-. 21 Houston, "The Nature of. the E v i d e n c e , " p. 90. 22 ^ I b i d . 23 W i l l i a m H. M c N e i l l , "The H i s t o r i a n and H i s t o r i c a l F i l m s : The P r e s e n t S t a t e of Things and a Look a t the F u t u r e , " J o u r n a l o f H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n 29 (1968), p. 391. 24 J.A.S. G r e n v i l l e and N. Pronay, "The H i s t o r i a n and H i s t o r i c a l F i l m s , " U n i v e r s i t y V i s i o n 1 (1968), p. 4« 25 F r i t z Terveen, " F i l m as a H i s t o r i c a l Document," U n i v e r s i t y V i s i o n 1 (1968), p. 24. 2 6 K.M. L a r o s e , " P r e s e r v i n g the P a s t on F i l m : Problems f o r t h e A r c h i v i s t , " "Archi v a r i a 6 (1978), p. 1 4 3 . 27 ' N i e l s Skyum-Nielsen, "The Use" o f S t i l l s from F i c t i o n a l F i l m s as H i s t o r i c a l Documents," i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m  and S o c i e t y : : H i s t o r y and the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , et a l (Copenhagen:. Eventus, 1 979), p. 3..'.-28 A r t h u r E l t o n , " F i l m as Source M a t e r i a l f o r H i s t o r y , " A.S.L.I.B. P r o c e e d i n g s 7 (1955), p. 208. 29 S i e g f r i e d K r a c a u e r , From C a l i g a r i to H i t l e r : A  P s y c h o l o g i c a l H i s t o r y o f the German F i l m ( L o n d o n : D e n n i s Dobson L t d . , 1974), p. 7. 30 P a u l S m ith, "The F i c t i o n F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l Source: Problems and Approaches," i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m and  S o c i e t y 1: H i s t o r y and the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , - j e t a l (Copenhagen: E v e n t u s , 1 979), p. 202. 3 1 I b i d . , pp.. 201 - 2 0 2 . 3 2 I b i d . , p. 203. 3 4 I b i d . , pp. 204-205. 3 5 Edward Buscombe, "America on screen? Hollywood f e a t u r e f i l m s as s o c i a l and p o l i t i c a l e v i d e n c e " i n P o l i t i c s and the  Media: F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n f o r , the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n " e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k (London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979), p. 27. A8 3 6 I b i d . 3 7 S m i t h , "The F i c t i o n F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l Source," p. 206. 3 8 I b i d . , p. 207. 3 9 I b i d . ^Buscombe, "America on s c r e e n ? " , p. 27. 4 - 1 I b i d . , p. 28. / V 2 I b i d . ^ 3Andrew S a r r i s , P o l i t i c s and Cinema (Hew York: Columbia U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1978), p. 9. " 4 4 K r a c a u e r , From C a l i g a r i to H i t l e r , p. v. * I b i d . , p. 3. 4 6 I b i d . 4^Cook, A H i s t o r y of N a r r a t i v e F i l m , p. 115. ^ K r a c a u e r , From C a l i g a r i to H i t l e r , p. 6. 4 ^ S a r r i s , P o l i t i c s and Cinema, p. 9. -^Andre B a z i n , What i s Cinema? v o l . 1 ( B e r k e l e y and Los A n g e l e s : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1967), p. 7. 5 1 I b i d . ^ 2Hughes, "The e v a l u a t i o n o f f i l m as e v i d e n c e , " p. 68. McCreary, " F i l m and H i s t o r y , " p. 55. 5 4 - I b i d . , p. 57. 5 5 I b i d . , p. 55. 56 Hughes, "The e v a l u a t i o n of f i l m as e v i d e n c e " p. 71. 5 7 I b i d . , p. 72. ^ 8 K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , " F i l m A n a l y s i s : the S t r u c t u r a l Approach, " i n P o l i t i c s and the Media:',..•Film.:and T e l e v i s i o n f o r  the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k ( L o n d o n : P e r g a m o n P r e s s , 1979), p. 106. 49 ^ H u g h e s , "The e v a l u a t i o n of f i l m as e v i d e n c e , " p. 5 1 . ^°James Monaco. How t o Read a Fi l m : . . The A r t , Technology,  Language, H i s t o r y , and Theory of F i l m and Media. R e v i s e d e d i t i o n . (New York: O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 8 1 ) , p. 1 3 3 . C l a i r e J o h n s t o n , " B r i t i s h F i l m C u l t u r e , " i n Media,  P o l i t i c s and C u l t u r e : . A S o c i a l i s t View, e d i t e d by C a r l Gardener (London: M a c m i l l a n P r e s s L t d . , 1 9 7 9 ) , p. 8 4 . 6 2 I b i d . 6 3 I b i d . , p. 8 5 . 6 4 F l e d e l i u s , " F i l m A n a l y s i s , " pp. 2 - 3 . 65 S h o r t , F e a t u r e F i l m s as H i s t o r y , p. 3 2 . 6 6 I b i d . ^ 7 I b i d . , p. 3 3 . ^ 8 J e f f r e y R i c h a r d s , V i s i o n s of Y e s t e r d a y (London: R o u t l e d g e and Kegan P a u l , 1 9 7 3 ) , p . xv. ^Buscombe, "America on s c r e e n ? " , p. 2 6 . K r a c a u e r , From C a l l g a r l to' H i t l e r , pp. 5 - 6 . 7 1 I b i d . , p. 7 . 7 2 I b i d . 50 CHAPTER IV SOCIETY AS AUDIENCE: FILM INFLUENCE AND IMPACT V i e w i n g the f i l m medium as a s o r t of s o c i e t a l m i r r o r , a f u r t h e r i s s u e worthy of c o n s i d e r a t i o n i s t h a t of the impact of the r e f l e c t i o n c o n s t i t u t e d by the moving image document. Does the message conveyed by f i l m impact s i g n i f i c a n t l y upon those who p a r t a k e of i t ? O p i n i o n on t h i s i s s u e ranges from t h a t o f i t b e i n g a n o n - i s s u e to the more commonly h e l d b e l i e f , a t l e a s t i n so-c i o l o g i c a l c i r c l e s , t h a t " f e a t u r e f i l m s e x e r t the most power-f u l i n f l u e n c e i n our l i v e s , an i n f l u e n c e which i n a l l proba-1 b i l i t y i s s t r o n g e r than t h a t w i e l d e d by p r e s s and r a d i o . " Thus wrote J . P . Mayer i n 194-6, a d d i n g t h a t " v a l u e p a t t e r n s , a c t u a l b e h a v i o u r , (and) the o u t l o o k on l i f e g e n e r a l l y , are 2 m a n i f e s t l y shaped by f i l m i n f l u e n c e . " Over twenty y e a r s e a r l i e r , <the impact of f i l m upon a u d i e n c e s had been p r o c l a i m e d i n p o s i t i v e l y V i c t o r i a n tones by Donald Ramsey Young: " S o c i a l s t a n d a r d s are i n f l u e n c e d by motion p i c t u r e s . . . and . . . by the f a c t t h a t the a u d i e n c e , o f t e n young boys and g i r l s , are 3 packed i n narrow s e a t s , c l o s e t o g e t h e r , i n a darkened room." T h i s a t t i t u d e , f o c u s s i n g as i t does on the p h y s i c a l e n v i r o n -ment of the t h e a t r e - g o i n g e x p e r i e n c e , was s t i l l b e i n g echoed i n 194-2 by U.E. H a r d i n g : "We are defaming our m o r a l s , c o r -r u p t i n g our y o u t h , i n f l a m i n g our young p e o p l e , e x c i t i n g 51 p a s s i o n , d e b a u c h i n g o u r c h i l d r e n , m a k i n g p r o s t i t u t e s and c r i m i n a l s t h r o u g h p i c t u r e - g o i n g ! 1 , 4 Today, a more r a t i o n a l v i e w i s b e i n g p r o p a g a t e d t h r o u g h a s o c i o l o g i c a l a p p r o a c h , a s e x e m p l i f i e d by t h e work o f I . C . J a r v i e , who f o c u s e s on t h e s o c i a l s i g n i f i c a n c e o f f i l m - g o i n g , 5 and t h e i n f l u e n c e o f f i l m s on g r o u p s o f p e o p l e . T h e i r u n i n t e n d e d s o c i a l s i g n i f i c a n c e s tems f r o m . . . t h e f a c t t h a t t h e y t e l l s t o r i e s ; s t o r i e s c o n v e y i n f o r m a t i o n a n d i d e a s ; i n f o r m a t i o n a n d i d e a s a f f e c t t h e way p e o p l e a c t ; and s t o r i e s m e l d p e o p l e t o g e t h e r i n t o a u d i e n c e s -- t h i s t o o a f f e c t s t h e way t h e y a c t . The s o c i a l c o n s e -q u e n c e s o f b e i n g an a u d i e n c e , a r e t h e most i m p o r -t a n t a n d u s u a l l y u n d e r r a t e d . J a r v i e i n t e r p r e t s t h e s t o r y - t e l l i n g a s p e c t o f f i l m content&.as a f o r m o f s o c i a l c o n t r o l , a n d s u p p o r t s t h i s t e n e t by o u t l i n i n g t h e t h r e e m a j o r c a t e g o r i e s o f s o c i a l i n t e r a c t i o n , as d e f i n e d by s o c i a l p s y c h o l o g i s t s , w h i c h c a n p o t e n t i a l l y be i n f l u e n c e d by f i l m - g o i n g : " t h e i n i t i a t i o n o f b o t h c h i l d r e n and a d u l t s i n t o t h e r u l e s , o b l i g a t i o n s a n d p r i v i l e g e s o f s o c i a l g r o u p s ( s o c i a l i z a t i o n ) ; t h e e f f e c t s o f s o c i a l g r o u p s on t h e d e v e l o p -ment o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l ( p e r s o n a l i t y f o r m a t i o n ) ; and t h e u n i q u e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s t a k e n on by p e o p l e i n g r o u p s ( c o l l e c -t i v e b e h a v i o u r ) . " A c c o r d i n g t o J a r v i e , t h e r e a r e two f a c e t s t o f i l m a s a s o c i a l phenomenon: c o n t e n t a nd c o n t e x t . I n t e r m s o f t h e s o c i o l o g i c a l m o d e l , J a r v i e b e l i e v e s c o n t e x t t o be more i n f l u e n t i a l t h a n c o n t e n t : " l e a r n i n g , s o c i a l i z a -t i o n , p e r s o n a l i t y f o r m a t i o n , and e v e n t h e way p e o p l e f o r m 52 i n t o and behave i n groups may be i n f l u e n c e d by movie c o n t e n t ; w h i l e s o c i a l i z a t i o n , p e r s o n a l i t y f o r m a t i o n and group b e h a v i o r g are c e r t a i n l y a f f e c t e d by movie c o n t e x t . " C o n t r a r y to the views of Ramsey Young and H a r d i n g , Jarvi.e b e l i e v e s t h a t the c o n t e x t o f f i l m - g o i n g can c o n t r i b u t e i n a p o s i t i v e way towards "normal and h e a l t h y s o c i a l i z a t i o n , p e r s o n a l i t y f o r m a t i o n and g group b e h a v i o r . " The e x t e n t of f i l m ' s p s y c h o l o g i c a l impact i s d e t e r m i n e d not o n l y b y the s o c i a l c o n t e x t o f f i l m - g o i n g , but a l s o by the n a t u r e of the f i l m - v i e w i n g e x p e r i e n c e i t s e l f . The c o n d i t i o n s under which a f i l m i s viewed may a t f i r s t seem to c o n f e r a p a s s i v e r o l e upon the film-goer., .but the v e r y i l l u s o r y n a t u r e of f i l m as p e r c e i v e d by the v i e w e r i n v o l v e s p a r t i c i p a t i o n , both v o l u n t a r y and i n v o l u n t a r y , c o n s c i o u s and u n c o n s c i o u s : F i l m i s founded upon an i l l u s i o n and the I l l u s i o n i s a c h i e v e d o n l y t h r o u g h the s p e c t a t o r ' s u n w i l l e d and u n c o n s c i o u s p a r t i c i p a t i o n . Most c i n e m a t i c e f f e c t s depend upon the s p e c t a t o r e n t e r i n g the t h e a t e r w i t h a whole s e r i e s of v i s u a l r e a c t i o n s formed by h i s d a i l y e x p e r i e n c e . 1 0 The e v o l u t i o n o f the s p e c t a t o r ' s i n c r e a s i n g p a r t i c i p a t i o n can be t r a c e d t h r o u g h o u t the e a r l y h i s t o r y of f i l m , v i a the work of Edwin S. P o r t e r , D.W. G r i f f i t h , and the S o v i e t s . The B r i g h t o n S c h o o l i n B r i t a i n and Edwin S. P o r t e r i n the e a r l y y e a r s of the t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y . . . decomposed the c o n t i n u o u s scene i n t o I t s component sh o t s and the s p e c t a t o r was asked to c r e a t e the t e m p o r a l and s p a t i a l c o n t i n u i t y h i m s e l f . Then G r i f f i t h i n a l t e r n a t e montage . . . asked the spec-t a t o r to a c h i e v e the p s y c h o l o g i c a l u n i t y o f two 53 s p a t i a l l y s e p a r a t e d but t e m p o r a l l y p a r a l l e l e v e n t s . The n e x t s t e p was t a k e n when the S o v i e t s c h o o l o f documentary r e a l i s m s y s t e m a t i c a l l y extended G r i f f i t h ' s p r a c t i c e s of a l t e r n a t e montage, to s y m b o l i c p a r a l l e l s . The c o n c e p t u a l u n i t y was to be- c r e a t e d and e m o t i o n a l l y e n l a r g e d by the s p e c t a t o r h i m s e l f t h r o u g h h i s i d e n t i -f i c a t i o n of two f a c t u a l l y q u i t e d i s t i n c t events pos-s e s s i n g p a r a l l e l i m p l i c a t i o n s . . Thus i t can be seen t h a t the f i l m - g o e r has had an i n c r e a s i n g l y a c t i v e r o l e i n the f i l m e x p e r i e n c e , f i r s t t h r o u g h the j u x t a -p o s i t i o n of o p p o s i n g s h o t s which had to be combined to a c h i e v e the u n i t y o f the s t o r y l i n e . , and then through the S o v i e t system of s y m b o l i c montage. E x i s t i n g q u i t e s e p a r a t e l y from the f i l m m a k e r * s power of m a n i p u l a t i o n of images and the p s y c h o l o g i c a l r a m i f i -c a t i o n s such m a n i p u l a t i o n h o l d s f o r the a u d i e n c e , and y e t opera-t i n g i n tandem w i t h such e f f e c t s , i s the a c t u a l p h y s i c a l e n v i r o n -ment of the cinema which makes the t o t a l f i l m e x p e r i e n c e p o s s i -b l e . The audience e n t e r s i n t o a realm o f d a r kness and i s o l a -t i o n , becoming more s u s c e p t i b l e to m a n i p u l a t i o n and s u g g e s t i o n . In a movie t h e a t e r , the o n l y source o f l i g h t , sound, and motion i s the s c r e e n . T h i s means t h a t the s p e c t a t o r ' s a t t e n t i o n i s . a u t o m a t i c a l l y and almost f o r c i b l y c o n c e n t r a t e d upon what the s c r e e n i s con-v e y i n g . The eye may wander,, but v e r y l i t t l e ; i i t i s almost i m p o s s i b l e to i g n o r e motion or l i g h t . ' ' The h i g h r e s o l u t i o n o f the b i g s c r e e n image i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h the dense amount of i n f o r m a t i o n f i l m i s c a p a b l e of con-v e y i n g , has c r e a t e d a v e r y "hot" medium i n McLuhanesque terms, a medium which, i s capable of w i e l d i n g a pow.erful i n f l u e n c e 54-over i t s a u d i e n c e . The v i e w e r e n t e r s i n t o the f i l m e x p e r i -ence w i l l i n g to suspend d i s b e l i e f , w i l l i n g to g i v e up i n d i v i -d u a l i d e n t i t y f o r a time i n the darkened t h e a t r e , to e n t e r a t r a n c e - l i k e s t a t e . The cinema has become "a s h r i n e a t which modern r i t u a l s r o o t e d i n a t a v i s t i c memories and s u b c o n s c i o u s d e s i r e s are a c t e d out i n . d a r k n e s s and s e c l u s i o n from the o u t e r 1 3 w o r l d . " The cinema a u d i e n c e t a k e s on an i d e n t i t y t h a t i s something more than the sum t o t a l of i t s p a r t s ; i t becomes a mass e n t i t y c a p a b l e of a c t i n g c o l l e c t i v e l y . The audience i n the cinema i s p l u r a l . . . . At the same t i m e , the audience i s s i n g u l a r : I t i s the im-p a c t e d s o l i d a r i t y o f so many i n d i v i d u a l s congrega-t e d to g i v e up or. escape t h e i r u niqueness . . . . Only a.'mass as hardened as a f i g h t i n g u n i t c o u l d endure the i m p l a c a b i l i t y o f a screen p r e t e n d i n g to ^ , be an animated w a l l , but a c t u a l l y an i n e r t s u r f a c e . The mass a s p e c t o f the f i l m audience e n a b l e s the powers be-h i n d the p r o d u c t i o n of f i l m s t o m a n i p u l a t e en masse. "The audience i n the movies t y p i f i e s the modern crowd, t h a t sham-b l i n g mass o f humanity, so l a r g e t h a t . i t i s measured i n s t a -t i s t i c s , a h e r d t h a t a u t h o r i t y t e n d s , f e e d s , p a c i f i e s , and r e g u l a t e s : T h i s i s .the crowd t h a t goes to the f a c t o r y , the 1 5 supermarket, and the bank, the m a t e r i a l of armies and mobs." T h i s crowd t h a t has been obse r v e d i n such complimentary terms has i t s e l f become a commodity t h a t i s sought out by the mass f i l m i n d u s t r y . Because of the crowd's c o l l e c t i v e n a t u r e , i t i s c a p a b l e of b e i n g m a n i p u l a t e d i n terms of s t a t i s t i c s by those who are b e h i n d the p r o d u c t i o n of f i l m s , and the crowd r e -f l e c t s the e f f e c t s of such m a n i p u l a t i o n t h r o u g h the phenomenon 55 of the box o f f i c e . The box o f f i c e becomes a barometer of p u b l i c p r e f e r e n c e , i n d i c a t i v e o f the s a t i s f a c t i o n or d i s s a t i s -f a c t i o n of the f i l m - g o i n g mob w i t h the p r o d u c t i t has been s e r v e d . Recent d i s c u s s i o n on the f i l m - g o i n g , e x p e r i e n c e has cen-t e r e d on the p u r p o r t e d k i n s h i p between the s t a t e of the f i l m -v i e w e r and the s t a t e of dreaming,,, or the s t a t e "between waking and s l e e p i n g , i n which he - Qfche , view.er) abandons the r a t i o n a l i t y o f d a i l y l i f e w h i l e not y e t c o m p l e t e l y s u r r e n d e r i n g to h i s un-1 6 c o n s c i o u s . " The darkened.environment of the cinema, the c o n t i n u o u s y e t r h y t h m i c a l l y i n t e r r u p t e d n a t u r e of the p r o -j e c t e d image, and the l a c k o f s o c i a l ' c o n t a c t work t o g e t h e r to c r e a t e a s e m i - h y p n o t i c s t a t e i n the v i e w e r , I n which i n h i b i t i o n s are s u p p r e s s e d , and the u n c o n s c i o u s i s more s u s c e p t i b l e to s u g g e s t i o n . P a u l Monaco has d e s c r i b e d f i l m s as " d r e a m l i k e r e f l e c t i o n s o f s h a r e d , c o l l e c t i v e concerns of the mass, na-1 7 t i o n a l a u d i e n c e . " T h i s view i s n o t e n t i r e l y shared by Ed-ward Buscombe, a l t h o u g h he. agrees t h e r e i s a k i n s h i p between f i l m s and dreams. " F o r . j u s t as, a c c o r d i n g to F r e u d , dreams are not the d i r e c t e x p r e s s i o n , of our u n c o n s c i o u s d e s i r e s , but a d i s t o r t e d r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f them a f t e r the work of r e p r e s s i o n has been performed, so w i t h movies, whatever i n them does c o r r e s p o n d to the a u d i e n c e ' s own t h o u g h t s and f e e l -1 8 i n g s has been worked upon by. o t h e r f a c t o r s . " The r e l a t i o n s h i p between f i l m s and dreaming has been . c a r r i e d even f u r t h e r , by comparing the p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s -56 t i c o f r a p i d eye movement (R.E.M.) i n s l e e p to the " f l i c k e r " e f f e c t sometimes d i s c e r n i b l e on s c r e e n , as w e l l as to the eye movements of the f i l m v i e w e r . a s he or. she watches the f i l m . The eye movements of the dreamer are not random but are ' a s s o c i a t e d w i t h the v i s u a l c h a r a c t e r i s -t i c s of Qiis) dream.' The same i s t r u e of watch-i n g a movie: 'The f i l m s p e c t a t o r o c c u p i e s a f i x e d s e a t , but o n l y p h y s i c a l l y . - . . . A e s t h e t i -c a l l y he i s i n permanent motion as h i s eye i d e n -t i f i e s w i t h the l e n s of the camera, which^perma-n e n t l y s h i f t s i n d i s t a n c e and d i r e c t i o n . 1 S i m i l a r l y , the i n s t a n t a n e o u s c u t s i n f i l m have been l i k e n e d 20 to the i n s t a n t a n e o u s n a t u r e of t r a n s i t i o n s i n dreaming. Amos V o g e l sees a f u r t h e r p o w e r f u l d e t e r m i n a n t o p e r a t i n g upon the u n c o n s c i o u s i n the darkness which l i e s a t the v e r y h e a r t of image t e c h n o l o g y : The v e r y darkness e n v e l o p i n g the v i e w e r i s more complete than he r e a l i z e s . ; f o r . the essence of cinema i s not l i g h t , but a s e c r e t compact be-tween l i g h t and d a r k n e s s . H a l f o f a l l the time a t the movies i s spent by the t r a n s f i x e d v i c t i m s of t h i s t e c h n o l o g i c a l a r t i n complete d a r k n e s s . . . . Could i t be p r e c i s e l y d u r i n g the p e r i o d s of t o t a l d arkness . . . t h a t our v o r a c i o u s sub-c o n s c i o u s , newly n o u r i s h e d by y e t another p r o -v o c a t i v e image,.'absorbs' the work's deeper ^ meaning and s e t s o f f c h a i n s of a s s o c i a t i o n s ? Thus the p e r i o d s of darkness which i n t e r r u p t the p r o j e c t e d images c o u l d be viewed as a p o w e r f u l i n f l u e n c e which causes the s u b c o n s c i o u s to absorb the images i t i s p r e s e n t e d w i t h on-a deeper l e v e l . R e i n f o r c i n g t h i s power of darkness i s the p r i m i t i v e i n f l u e n c e of the image, which p r e - d a t e s v e r b a l 57 communication and i s assumed to a c t upon a deeper l e v e l of the s u b c o n s c i o u s . V o g e l s t a t e s t h a t **. . . . In man's e v o l u t i o n , images a n t e d a t e words and t h o u g h t , thus r e a c h i n g deeper, o l d e r , more b a s i c l a y e r s o f the s e l f . . . . A s h o l y today as i n man's p r e - h i s t o r y , the image i s a c c e p t e d as i f i t were l i f e , r e a l i t y , t r u t h . I t i s a c c e p t e d on a f e e l i n g - r a t h e r than m i n d - l e v e l . 2 2 From the f o r e g o i n g d i s c u s s i o n t h e r e . w o u l d seem to e x i s t some degree of consensus r e g a r d i n g the power of the f i l m medium to e x e r t a c e r t a i n . a m o u n t of i n f l u e n c e over i t s a u d i -ence, be i t t h r o u g h the power of the- image, the power of l i g h t and/or:, d a r k n e s s , the n a t u r e of • the t h e a t r e environment, or the s o c i a l c o n t e x t of f i l m - g o i n g . I t i s perhaps t h i s v e r y p o t e n t i a l f o r power and i n f l u e n c e t h a t has worked a g a i n s t the medium where the i s s u e of c o n t r o l l i n g the c o n t e n t of f i l m i s concerned. I f t h e r e was not some concern about the i n f l u -ence of f i l m c o n t e n t , t h e r e would.be no need f o r the i n s t i t u -t i o n s which seek to r e g u l a t e f i l m content.. The v e r y f a c t o f the e x i s t e n c e of such i n s t i t u t i o n s would seem to r e i n f o r c e the i d e a t h a t f i l m i n f l u e n c e s i t s audience i n no u n c e r t a i n terms. The r e g u l a t i o n of f i l m c o n t e n t can take two forms: cen-so r s h i p , , and c o n t r o l . . The d i s t i n c t i o n between the two has been d e f i n e d as f o l l o w s : C e n s o r s h i p c o n s t i t u t e s the l e g a l i m p o s i t i o n of r e s t r a i n t s upon the p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n , and s a l e s of some photograph, f i l m , a r t o b j e c t , book, magazine:,' or o t h e r r e a d i n g m a t e r i a l i n o r d e r to 58 make i t u n a v a i l a b l e t o . t h e g e n e r a l p u b l i c as w e l l as upon the p r o d u c t i o n or performance of any p u b l i c entertainment:. . . . C o n t r o l i s p r a c t i c e d by those who have no l e g a l - a u t h o r i t y , to censor or t h r e a t e n to censor but use p e r s u a s i o n and even c o e r c i o n to r e s t r i c t freedom of speech. ^ There are s e v e r a l problems a r i s i n g from the i s s u e o f f i l m cen-s o r s h i p r e g a r d i n g the d u a l p o s i t i o n of f i l m as an a r t form and a p o p u l a r c u l t u r a l a r t e f a c t . In a d d i t i o n . , t h e r e are prob-lems a r i s i n g from t h e . p o s i t i o n . i n s o c i e t y of the persons or r e g u l a t o r y a g e n c i e s which seek.to r e s t r i c t the c o n t e n t of f i l m . The f i r s t law of c e n s o r s h i p . - and p r o b a b l y the o n l y i m p o r t a n t one not i n s c r i b e d on the s t a t u t e books -i s t h i s : i n a democracy, the more p o p u l a r the a r t form, the g r e a t e r the demands f o r c e n s o r s h i p of i t . T h i s theorem has two c o r o l l a r i e s . F i r s t , the q u a l i t y of the a r t has l i t t l e . t o do w i t h the m a t t e r . Second, those who a r r o g a t e to themselves the p r i v i l e g e o f e x e r c i s i n g c e n s o r s h i p may. or may not be c u l t u r e d , u n b i a s e d and/or s i n c e r e . 4 In 194-8 the United. N a t i o n s passed the o r i g i n a l v e r s i o n of the U n i v e r s a l D e c l a r a t i o n , of Human R i g h t s , the embodi-ment o f the concept of freedom.of e x p r e s s i o n , as c o n t a i n e d i n A r t i c l e 19' "Everyone has t h e . r i g h t to freedom of o p i n i o n and e x p r e s s i o n ; t h i s r i g h t i n c l u d e s freedom t o h o l d o p i n i o n s w i t h -out i n t e r f e r e n c e and to see, r e c e i v e and i m p a r t I n f o r m a t i o n 25 and i d e a s t h r o u g h any media and r e g a r d l e s s of f r o n t i e r s . " S i n c e t h i s d e c l a r a t i o n a w a s passed r e s t r i c t i o n s d e a l i n g w i t h l i b e l , n a t i o n a l s e c u r i t y , war propaganda,. and the advocacy of 2 6 h a t r e d have been added. Such r e s t r i c t i o n s would appear to have l i t t l e t o do w i t h f i l m as an a r t form, or p o p u l a r e n t e r -59 t a i n m e n t . F i l m c e n s o r s h i p can range, from the c u t t i n g o f a s i n g l e image, a scene, or a s c r i p t , to r a d i c a l r e - e d i t i n g o f an en-t i r e f i l m . Why are f i l m s s u b j e c t to t h i s k i n d o f c e n s o r s h i p ? A c c o r d i n g to Judy W o l f e , i t . i s because f i l m s are b e l i e v e d to be the most i n f l u e n t i a l . of t o day's media,, and i t i s assumed t h a t p e o p l e . • . . . t e n d to b e l i e v e what they see on the s c r e e n more r e a d i l y than what they r e a d i n books or hear on the r a d i o . The c o r o l l a r y of- t h i s i s t h a t be-h a v i o u r w i l l be m o d i f i e d as a r e s u l t . o f s e e i n g c e r -t a i n emotions or b e l i e f s o r a c t i o n s p o r t r a y e d on the screen/27 The power of f i l m t o . i n f l u e n c e b e h a v i o u r has been t r a n s l a t e d i n t o d i f f e r e n t modes of a c t i o n by v a r i o u s governments a t d i f f e r -ent t i m e s . The cinema has been w i d e l y used f o r p r o p a g a n d i z i n g i n both the e a s t e r n b l o c and the - t h i r d - w o r l d , w h i l e i n the wes-t e r n hemisphere c e n s o r s h i p has been' concerned.more w i t h p o r -t r a y a l s o f pornography and v i o l e n c e - , " i n the hope t h a t t h i s w i l l reduce p e r v e r s e , c o n t r a r y , or a b u s i v e b e h a v i o u r i n the 28 p o p u l a t i o n . " I.C. J a r v i e has a c c u r a t e l y . p i n p o i n t e d a b a s i c f l a w i n the s o - c a l l e d l o g i c of c e n s o r s h i p , i n t h a t w h i l e i t i s assumed t h a t p e o p l e have no defenses to r e s i s t b l a t a n t s u a s i o n , i t i s n o n e t h e l e s s assumed t h a t ."a p r i v i l e g e d few . ... can r e s i s t m a n i p u l a t i o n and hence can and s h o u l d p r o t e c t the 29 r e s t . " J a r v i e a l s o a d v o c a t e s the b e l i e f t h a t the i n f l u e n c e f i l m i s capable of w i e l d i n g over an audience i s e x t r e m e l y l i m i t e d due to v a r y i n g a u d i e n c e . r e a c t i o n s a r i s i n g o u t . o f d i -v e r s e s o c i a l , c u l t u r a l , p o l i t i c a l .and economic c o n t e x t s of 60 f i l m , and t h a t no two a u d i e n c e s w i l l r e a c t i n the same way to a g i v e n f i l m because of the n a t u r e of the a u d i e n c e ' s composi-30 t i o n . Andrew Tudor pu t s f o r w a r d an argument a g a i n s t censor-s h i p by s t a t i n g t h a t a t b e s t the v i e w e r ' s response t o f i l m i s m a i n l y e m o t i o n a l , and i s t h e r e f o r e o n l y a temporary e f f e c t : Indeed, i f the medium can be s a i d to have any c h a r a c -t e r i s t i c i n and of i t s e l f i t i s s u r e l y t h i s h i g h de-pendence on a p r e d o m i n a n t l y e m o t i o n a l e f f e c t . . . . I t does not f o l l o w t h a t the movies are t h e r e f o r e an out-s t a n d i n g l y p o w e r f u l medium of p e r s u a s i o n . Long-term a t t i t u d e change i s v e r y d i f f e r e n t to s h o r t - t i m e emo-t i o n a l i n v o l v e m e n t . The degree of i n f l u e n c e of f i l m thus seems to be an i s s u e of d i s p u t e where c e n s o r s h i p i s concerned. Whatever the i n f l u e n c e o f the f i l m medium, c e n s o r s h i p i t -s e l f remains an U n d i s p u t e d f a c t . Many arguments i n f a v o u r of c e n s o r s h i p have been p r e s e n t e d , but the main reas o n s b e h i n d the p r a c t i c e o f c e n s o r s h i p would seem to f a l l i n t o t h r e e broad c a t e g o r i e s : " p r o t e c t i o n of community s t a n d a r d s , m o r a l i t y , or 32 33 r e l i g i o n ; " "enforcement of a dominant c u l t u r e ; " and "pro-'s / t e c t i o n or p r o m o t i o n of a g i v e n p o l i t i c a l regime." A c c o r d i n g to Judy Wo l f e , t h e r e seems t o be a somewhat i n c e s t u o u s r e l a t i o n -s h i p between these competing i m p e r a t i v e s : Where t h e r e i s c e n s o r s h i p to p r o t e c t a p o l i t i c a l r e -gime, the f i r s t two r e a s o n s f o r c e n s o r s h i p w i l l a l s o be found. Where t h e r e i s d i s c r i m i n a t i o n , t h e r e may or may not be p o l i t i c a l c e n s o r s h i p but t h e r e w i l l be an i n s i s t e n c e on the maintenance of community s t a n d a r d s . C e n s o r s h i p seems to e x i s t i n i t s most severe form d u r i n g and d i r e c t l y a f t e r p e r i o d s o f i n s t a b i l i t y , u p h e a v a l , and r e v o l u t i o n . 61 For example, under the A l l e n d e government i n C h i l e many f i l m s were produced by C h i l e / F i l m . F o l l o w i n g the overthrow of the A l l e n d e government, the m i l i t a r y d e s t r o y e d t h e . f i l m i n d u s t r y by d i s m a n t l i n g C h i l e . F i l m . Many of the c o u n t r y ' s l e a d i n g f i l m d i r e c t o r s , i n c l u d i n g Eduardo Paredes, were k i l l e d , w h i l e s e v e r a l o t h e r s f l e d i n t o e x i l e . A s i m i l a r s i t u a t i o n e x i s t s even today i n South A f r i c a , a c o u n t r y c u r r e n t l y b e s i e g e d by w i d e s p r e a d c i v i l and p o l i t i c a l u n r e s t . R i g o r o u s c o n t r o l i s m a i n t a i n e d 37 over f i l m s and " u n p l e a s a n t t r u t h s " are r o u t i n e l y e x c i s e d . ' M i s c e g e n a t i o n . i s , of c o u r s e , not. p e r m i t t e d , and a major c h a r a c t e r - the b l a c k s e c r e t agent - was cut from L i v e and L e t Die by the d i s t r i b u t o r s be-f o r e i t was s e n t to South A f r i c a - , because o f her r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h James Bond.' V i o l e n c e of any k i n d i s not p e r m i t t e d i n f i l m s t h a t are to be shown t o b l a c k a u d i e n c e s . ^ 8 A l t h o u g h the major impetus, f o r c e n s o r s h i p u s u a l l y stems from s t a t e a u t h o r i t i e s , t h e r e a l s o e x i s t s a good d e a l of s e l f -r e g u l a t i o n w i t h i n the i n d u s t r y i t s e l f , e i t h e r i n a n t i c i p a t i o n of what the a u t h o r i t i e s would p e r c e i v e as o b j e c t i o n a b l e , or so the f i l m r e c e i v e s a l e s s r e s t r i c t i v e a udience r a t i n g , or be-39 cause i t i n f a c t s u p p o r t s the s t a t u s quo. H ollywood i s ob-v i o u s l y a good i l l u s t r a t i o n of t h i s model, as c e n s o r s h i p i s o f t e n o p e r a t i v e d u r i n g the p r e - p r o d u c t i o n p r o c e s s i t s e l f . In c o n c l u s i o n , i t would seem t h a t t h e r e e x i s t s some s o r t of consensus c o n c e r n i n g the a b i l i t y of the f i l m medium to not o n l y r e f l e c t c e r t a i n f a c e t s o f s o c i e t y , but a l s o to w i e l d con-s i d e r a b l e i n f l u e n c e over those who p a r t a k e of the r e f l e c t i o n s , 62 d e s p i t e t h e o p i n i o n s o f d i s s e n t e r s l i k e Andrew.. T u d o r . Why e l s e w o u l d c e n s o r s h i p e x i s t , i f n o t t o " p r o t e c t " c e r t a i n e l e m e n t s o f s o c i e t y f r o m u n p l e a s a n t o r u n p a l a t a b l e " t r u t h s " a b o u t i t s e l f ? I f f i l m d i d n o t d e m o n s t r a t e a c o n s i d e r a b l e i m p a c t upon i t s a u d i -e n c e , c e n s o r s h i p w o u l d n o t be an i s s u e . I t w o u l d a p p e a r t h a t c e n s o r s h i p s e e k s t o c o m p r o m i s e t h e r e f l e c t i v e n a t u r e o f t h e f i l m medium by d a r k e n i n g a p o r t i o n o f t h e m i r r o r ' s s u r f a c e a n d i n t e r -r u p t i n g t h e i n t e n d e d m e s s a g e . I f t h e f i l m m a k e r i s a member o f s o c i e t y a n d i f t h e message p r e s e n t e d i n a f i l m i s a p r o d u c t o r a r e a c -t i o n t o t h e s o c i e t y .then i t may be f a i r l y s a i d t h a t t h e f i l m i s a r e f l e c t i o n o f t h a t s o c i e t y . The mes-sage may n o t be a p r e t t y one, b u t t h e q u e s t i o n must be a s k e d : i s t h e p a i n i n t h e message a b o u t t h a t s o -c i e t y c a u s e d by t h e f i l m o r by t h e s o c i e t y ? I t seems r a t h e r t h a n a t t e m p t t o i m p r o v e t h e f a c e o f j - j S o c i e t y , t h e c e n s o r w o u l d r a t h e r b r e a k t h e m i r r o r . The d e b a t e o v e r c e n s o r s h i p w o u l d seem t o r e i n f o r c e b o t h t h e r e f l e c t i v e a n d i n f l u e n t i a l a s p e c t s o f t h e f i l m document. As a p e c u l i a r l y p o w e r f u l a n d i n t e g r a l component o f t h e t i s s u e o f s o c i e t y , t h e f i l m document must be c o n s i d e r e d f o r a r c h i v a l p r e s e r v a t i o n w i t h s p e c i f i c r e f e r e n c e n o t o n l y t o i t s p h y s i c a l n a t u r e , b u t m o r e o v e r t o t h e r e f l e c t i v e and i n f l u e n t i a l n a t u r e o f i t s c o n t e n t . . 63 NOTES 1 J.P. Mayer, S o c i o l o g y o f F i l m : S t u d i e s and Documents (London: Faber and Faber L t d . , 194-6), p. 17. 2 I b i d . 3 P h i l i p J . D a v i e s , " F i l m as a t e a c h i n g r e s o u r c e , " i n P o l i t i c s and the Media: F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l  S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M . J . C l a r k ( L o n d o n : Pergamon P r e s s , 1979), p. 97. 4 I b i d . 5 I.C. J a r v i e , Movies as S o c i a l C r i t i c i s m : A s p e c t s o f  T h e i r S o c i a l P s y c h o l o g y ( M e t u c h e n , N , J , : S c a r e c r o w P r e s s , I n c . , 1978), p . i x . 6 I b i d . 7 I b i d . ,. pp. x - x i . ^ I b i d . , p. x i . 9 I b i d . 1 0 Eugene C. McCreary, " F i l m and H i s t o r y : Some Thoughts on T h e i r I n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p , " S o c i e t a s 1 (1971), p. 63. 11 ' I b i d . ^ 2 I b i d . , p. 64-. 1 3 Amos V o g e l , F i l m as a S u b v e r s i v e A r t (New York: Random House, 1 974-)» P- 9-1 4 Dav i d Thomson, America i n the Dark: Ho l l y w o o d and the G i f t o f U n r e a l i t y (New York: W i l l i a m Morrow and Company, I n c . , 1977), p. 94. 1 5 I b i d . , pp. 97-98. 1 6 V o g e l , F i l m as a S u b v e r s i v e A r t , p. 10. 1 7 P a u l Monaco, Cinema and S o c i e t y : France and Germany  D u r i n g the Twenties (New York: E l s e v i e r , 1976), pp. 10-11. 64 1 8 Edward Buscombe, "America on screen? Hollywood f e a t u r e f i l m s as s o c i a l and p o l i t i c a l e v i d e n c e , " i n P o l i t i c s and the Media: F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n T o r . t h e P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n ] e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k (London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979), p. 26. 1 9 Monaco, Cinema and S o c i e t y , p. 8. 2 0 I b i d . , pp. 8-9. 21 V o g e l , F i l m as a S u b v e r s i v e A r t , p. 10. 22 I b i d . , p. 11. 2 3 P e r r y C. Cotham, O b s c e n i t y , Pornography, and Censor-s h i p (Grand R a p i d s , M i c h i g a n : Baker Book H o u s e , 1 9 7 3 ) , pT 79. 24 Murray Schumach, The Face on the C u t t i n g Room F l o o r : The s t o r y o f movie and t e l e v i s i o n c e n s o r s h i p ( N e w York: W i l l i a m Morrow and Company, I n c . , 1 964), p~i 3. 25 Judy W o l f e , "The Filmmaker and Human R i g h t s : Some R e f l e c t i o n s , " i n F o r b i d d e n F i l m s : The Filmmaker and Human  R i g h t s , e d i t e d by Marc Glassman ( T o r o n t o : T o r o n t o A r t s Group f o r Human R i g h t s and b l e w o i n t m e n t p r e s s , 1984), p. 4-2 6 I b i d . 2 7 I b i d . 2 8 I b i d . 2 9 I b i d . 3°Ibid. 3 1 I b i d . 3 2 I b i d . 3 3 I b i d . 3 4 I b i d . , p. 5. 3 5 I b i d . 3 6 I b i d . 3 7 I b i d . 65 3 8 I b i d . 3 9 I b i d . , p. 6. ^ I b i d . , p. 7. 66 CHAPTER V ARCHIVAL SELECTION OF THE MOVING IMAGE DOCUMENT I f f i l m can be viewed as a medium of r e f l e c t i o n , the p r o -blem f o r the a r c h i v e s concerned w i t h p r e s e r v i n g f i l m becomes one of s e l e c t i n g which moving image documents to r e t a i n as a v a l u a b l e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of such r e f l e c t i o n . The i s s u e o f se-l e c t i o n i s c o m p l i c a t e d by the f a c t t h a t , h a v i n g come of age In an e r a c h a r a c t e r i s e d by p r i n t e d , media, many a r c h i v i s t s today are e i t h e r u n f a m i l i a r w i t h the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of o t h e r media, or c o n s i d e r i t too ephemeral.or p o p u l a r to c o n s t i t u t e a major r e s e a r c h r e s o u r c e f o r the t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y . The s i g n i f i c a n c e of the s o - c a l l e d " s p e c i a l " media i n the c o n t e x t o f the new i n f o r m a t i o n age needs t o be c l a r i f i e d f o r the bene-f i t o f a r c h i v i s t s and r e s e a r c h e r s a l i k e , but i n the meantime, s t e p s must be taken to p r e s e r v e such r e c o r d s i n o r d e r to com-p l e t e the h i s t o r i c a l " p i c t u r e " of contemporary s o c i e t y t h a t i s b e i n g c r e a t e d by the h o l d i n g s i n a r c h i v a l r e p o s i t o r i e s . The moving image document has demonstrated i t s e l f t o be c a p a b l e o f r e c o r d i n g d i v e r s e f a c e t s of contemporary c u l t u r e and s o c i e t y , from e m p i r i c a l l y " r e a l " events and p o p u l a r i c o n o -graphy to the c o n s c i o u s or u n c o n s c i o u s m a n i f e s t a t i o n s o f so-c i e t a l v a l u e s . As such, the medium must be c o n s i d e r e d to con-s t i t u t e a major i n f o r m a t i o n a l r e c o r d of t h i s c e n t u r y , a r e c o r d which c o u l d r e a s o n a b l y be assumed to be of c o n s i d e r a b l e h i s t o r i -67 c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e . . T h e r e f o r e i t would f o l l o w t h a t such a r e c o r d s h o u l d be p r e s e r v e d f o r the f u t u r e b e n e f i t of r e s e a r c h e r s . Given the q u a n t i t y , of moving images produced by s o c i e t y , the i s s u e f o r a r c h i v e s i s how much to r e t a i n . I f a l l moving images can be c o n s i d e r e d as r e f l e c t i v e of s o c i e t y i n some way, how i s the a r c h i v i s t to d e c i d e which to p r e s e r v e f o r pos-t e r i t y and which to r e j e c t ? T h i s i s a c r u c i a l i s s u e f o r the a r c h i v a l community, and i s an i s s u e on which t h e r e has to date been l i t t l e consensus. The extremes of c u r r e n t o p i n i o n run the gamut from the view, t h a t a b s o l u t e l y e v e r y t h i n g s h o u l d be p r e s e r v e d , to the a d v o c a t i o n of modern r e c o r d s management t e c h n i q u e s to d e s i g n a t e p r o d u c t i o n elements and r e l a t e d docu-m e n t a t i o n f o r a r c h i v a l r e t e n t i o n d u r i n g the f i l m p r o d u c t i o n 1 p r o c e s s i t s e l f . One of the b a s i c problems t h w a r t i n g the development of s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a i s the w i d e l y - h e l d b e l i e f t h a t "the p r e s e n t i s s i n g u l a r l y i l l - e q u i p p e d to d e c i d e what w i l l prove to be 2 o f h i s t o r i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e i n the f u t u r e . " Indeed, i t i s n e a r l y i m p o s s i b l e to p r e d i c t a c c u r a t e l y which events or c u l -t u r a l a r t e f a c t s w i l l have the mantle of h i s t o r i c a l importance c o n f e r r e d upon them by the p a s s i n g of t i m e . The a l t e r n a t i v e to such a c t s of n e a r - p r e s c i e n c e which by n e c e s s i t y c a s t the a r c h i v i s t i n t o the r o l e of a modern-day p r o p h e t , i s to cover a l l c o n c e i v a b l e bases by c o l l e c t i n g e v e r y t h i n g . T h i s i s an a l t e r n a t i v e s u p p o r t e d by many a r c h i v i s t s and h i s t o r i a n s . 68 As f a r as the h i s t o r i a n i s concerned, f i l m and t e l e v i s i o n are media of mass communications f i r s t and f o r e m o s t . The h i s t o r i a n needs, i d e a l l y , the whole of what the . . . p u b l i c was g i v e n t hrough the media i n o r d e r to be a b l e to a p p l y s t a t i s t i c a l / a n a l y t i c a l methods.3 T h i s view i s s u p p o r t e d by C l i v e C o u l t a s s , who b e l i e v e s t h a t the e n t i r e p r o c e s s of s e l e c t i o n c o u l d be a v o i d e d by p r e s e r v i n g as much as p o s s i b l e : D e c i s i o n s about what t o p r e s e r v e and what to r e j e c t are so a r b i t r a r y and s u s p e c t t h a t i t i s b e t t e r i n p r i n c i p l e to keep e v e r y t h i n g . Any k i n d o f f i l m i n time becomes i n t e r e s t i n g to someone. 4-C o u l t a s s b e l i e v e s t h a t even the most mundane f i l m s can have i n f o r m a t i o n a l v a l u e , and t h a t t h i s s o r t of v a l u e must be 5 d i f f e r e n t i a t e d from a f i l m ' s p o t e n t i a l a r t i s t i c v a l u e . In terms of mass communications, and i n an e f f o r t to p r e s e r v e the t o t a l i t y o f events r e c o r d e d by the media, C o u l t a s s advo-c a t e s u n i v e r s a l r e t e n t i o n on i n t e r n a t i o n a l terms i n o r d e r to m a i n t a i n "a v i s u a l r e c o r d of contemporary events on an i n t e r n a -t i o n a l s c a l e . The main drawback of s e l e c t i o n would seem to be t h a t by i t s v e r y n a t u r e . . i t throws the a r c h i v i s t i n t o the u n e n v i a b l e p o s i t i o n of h a v i n g to make g o d l i k e d e c i s i o n s o f l i f e and death f o r f i l m s , whether or not such powers are d e s e r v e d . T h i s argument a g a i n s t s e l e c t i o n has i t s o r i g i n s e a r l y i n the h i s t o r y of f i l m a r c h i v e s . Indeed, H e n r i L a n g l o i s , one of the 69 o r i g i n a l f o u n d e r s of the I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n o f F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) , " m a i n t a i n e d t h a t any s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a was i n d e f e n s i b l e , t h a t no a r c h i v i s t had the r i g h t to p l a y God i n d e t e r m i n i n g which f i l m s would l i v e and which would d i e . " T h i s s e n t i m e n t was a l s o v o i c e d by some of the e a r l y propaga-t o r s o f g e n e r a l a r c h i v a l t h e o r y , who, w h i l e a c k n o w l e d g i n g t h a t some amount o f s e l e c t i o n was n e c e s s a r y , f e l t t h a t s e l e c t i o n by the a r c h i v i s t was i n c o r r e c t . Some a r c h i v a l t h e o r i s t s argued t h a t t r i a g e , or s e l e c t i o n , w h i l e e v i d e n t l y n e c e s s a r y , s h o u l d be the r e s p o n s i b i l i t y of the a d m i n i s t r a t o r s d i r e c t l y i n v o l v e d i n g e n e r a t i n g the documents i n the f i r s t p l a c e . H i l a r y J e n k i n s o n h e l d t h a t t h i s r e d u c t i o n s h o u l d t a k e p l a c e b e f o r e the documents reached the a r c h i v e s , and t h a t i t was the a r c h i v i s t ' s t a s k to g conserve a l l the r e c o r d s e n t r u s t e d to the a r c h i v e s . T h i s type of s e l e c t i o n as i t p e r t a i n s to f i l m w i l l be d i s c u s s e d l a t e r . In a d d i t i o n t o the o v e r t i n f o r m a t i o n a l v a l u e c o n t a i n e d i n f i l m , i t has been argued t h a t " a l l f i l m s . . . have some s o c i o l o g i c a l v a l u e , r e g a r d l e s s o f how p r o s a i c the s u b j e c t Q m a t t e r or the t r e a t m e n t . " S o c i o l o g i c a l v a l u e p o t e n t i a l l y embraces not o n l y the r e f l e c t i v e q u a l i t y of moving images, but a l s o the impact and i n f l u e n c e f i l m e x e r c i s e s over i t s a u d i e n c e . In the Manuel d ' A r c h i v i s t i q u e ( P a r i s , 1970), f i l m i s c l a s s i f i e d i n t o t h r e e major c a t e g o r i e s : oeuvres d r a m a t i q u e s, oeuvres a r t i s t i q u e s , and documents d ' h i s t o r i q u e s , and i t i s proposed t h a t o n l y documents h i s t o r i q u e s s h o u l d be r e t a i n e d 1 0 by a r c h i v e s . However, i n the course of d e f i n i n g the term 70 " h i s t o r i c a l , " the manual c o n c l u d e s t h a t . . . not o n l y do a c t u a l i t i e s q u a l i f y . . ., but f i c t i o n f i l m s t h a t r e f l e c t the manners, mores, and language o f the s o c i e t y t h a t produced them q u a l i f y as w e l l . Such an i n t e r p r e t a t i o n c o u l d embrace a l l moving images, p a r t i c u l a r l y when the impact of the images i n r e l a t i o n t o the mass audience they a t t r a c t i s considered.'''' T h i s approach, s u p p o r t i n g as i t does the concept of t o t a l r e t e n t i o n , has been a t t a c k e d i n terms of the p o s s i b l e conse-quences i t would have I f put i n t o a c t i o n : f i l l i n g the v a u l t s " w i t h m a t e r i a l o f m a r g i n a l v a l u e (ephemera i n terms of c o n t e n t and form) u n t i l t h e r e i s no s t o r a g e c a p a c i t y l e f t f o r r e c o r d s of o b v i o u s v a l u e (based on form, c o n t e n t or a s s o c i a t i o n ) ..12 • • * • An a l t e r n a t i v e to t o t a l r e t e n t i o n i s what c o u l d be termed " m o d i f i e d t o t a l r e t e n t i o n . " T h i s approach, which has not ga i n e d much p o p u l a r i t y , i n v o l v e s the r e t e n t i o n o f a l l moving Images f o r a c e r t a i n s e t p e r i o d a t which p o i n t i t i s presumed t h a t the p a s s i n g o f time w i l l have p r o v i d e d some semblance of 1 3 h i s t o r i c a l p e r s p e c t i v e . While such an approach would r e l i e v e the p r e s s u r e on p r e s e n t - d a y a r c h i v i s t s , o t h e r w i s e f o r c e d to make g o d l i k e d e c i s i o n s c o n c e r n i n g s e l e c t i o n , i t would l i k e l y pose extreme and p o s s i b l y i n s u r m o u n t a b l e d i f f i c u l t i e s r e g a r -d i n g s t o r a g e space, a t l e a s t i n i t i a l l y , n o t to mention prob-lems a r i s i n g from e s t a b l i s h i n g some s o r t of consensus on r e -t e n t i o n and d i s p o s a l s c h e d u l e s . Such p r a c t i c a l o b s t a c l e s t o t o t a l r e t e n t i o n have caused some f i l m a r c h i v i s t s , g r a p p l i n g 71 w i t h the m o r a l i t y o f d e s t r o y i n g moving images, to advocate 1 A the e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f a "world-wide network of a r c h i v e s , " which would c o n c e i v a b l y make i t both p o s s i b l e and p r a c t i c a b l e to p r e s e r v e a l l moving images and e l i m i n a t e the c o n t e n t i o u s i s s u e of s e l e c t i o n . However a t t r a c t i v e the p r o p o s i t i o n of t o t a l r e t e n t i o n may seem, a t l e a s t i n t h e o r y , i t seems u n l i k e l y to t r a n s l a t e i n t o u n i v e r s a l p r a c t i c e due .to overwhelming problems c o n c e r n i n g s t o r a g e space, i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o o r d i n a t i o n , and mounting c o s t s . I t would seem t h a t the concept of t o t a l r e t e n t i o n i s workable o n l y i n the " i d e a l world,", and t h a t s e l e c t i o n of some s o r t i s the o n l y r e a l l y f e a s i b l e a l t e r n a t i v e a t p r e s e n t , d e s p i t e the p o s s i b i l i t y of new s t o r a g e t e c h n o l o g i e s i n the not so d i s -t a n t f u t u r e . "Even w i t h the p o s s i b i l i t y of a p p l y i n g the emer-g i n g t e c h n o l o g i e s of the v i d e o d i s c and the d i g i t a l e n coding o f moving images to the development of new, l o w - c o s t s t o r a g e me-diums and i n s t a n t a n e o u s modes o f d i f f u s i o n , t h i s g e n e r a t i o n of moving image a r c h i v i s t s w i l l s t i l l have to a p p l y a p p r a i s a l p o l i c i e s to p r e v e n t the a r c h i v e s from s i n k i n g under the weight of a c c e s s i o n s , and the r e s e a r c h e r o f the f u t u r e from drowning 1 5 i n a sea of redundant, and t r i v i a l images." T h i s l a s t i s s u e r a i s e s the one o v e r w h e l m i n g l y . p o s i t i v e a s p e c t about s e l e c t i o n : the e l i m i n a t i o n of s o - c a l l e d "ephemera" from v a l u a b l e s t o r a g e space, a c o s t - e f f e c t i v e measure which has always been one of the key arguments on the s i d e of s e l e c t i o n . I m p l i c i t i n the concept of s e l e c t i o n of moving images i s the i s s u e of a p p r a i s a l , i n o r d e r to determine the s u i t a b i l i t y 72 of the document f o r r e t e n t i o n or d i s p o s a l . . To date no s p e c i -f i c d e f i n i t i o n f o r the a p p r a i s a l of moving images has been p r e s e n t e d , but t h e r e i s something to be g a i n e d from examining the concepts c o n t a i n e d i n a s t a n d a r d d e f i n i t i o n of a p p r a i s a l as i t a p p l i e s to t e x t u a l r e c o r d s . l a A p p r a i s a l has been d e f i n e d as "the p r o c e s s of d e t e r m i n i n g the v a l u e and t h u s . t h e d i s p o s i t i o n of r e c o r d s based upon t h e i r c u r r e n t a d m i n i s t r a t i v e , l e g a l , and f i s c a l use; t h e i r e v i d e n t i a l and i n f o r m a t i o n a l or r e s e a r c h v a l u e ; t h e i r arrangement; and t h e i r r e l a t i o n s h i p to o t h e r 1 6 r e c o r d s . " T h i s d e f i n i t i o n has more.relevance to t e x t u a l r e c o r d s of corporate,, government, or p r i v a t e c r e a t i o n , but some p o i n t s o f s i g n i f i c a n c e can be gleaned by a s c e r t a i n i n g a r e a s of r e l e v a n c e to the f i l m medium. A p p r a i s i n g the h i s t o r i -c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e o f moving images i s p r o b l e m a t i c a l because moving images themselves cannot always be c a t e g o r i z e d as h a v i n g e v i d e n -t i a l v a l u e i n the S c h e l l e n b e r g i a n sense, t h a t i s , those r e -cords " n e c e s s a r y t o p r o v i d e an a u t h e n t i c and adequate docu-m e n t a t i o n o f i t s the c r e a t i n g body's o r g a n i z a t i o n and f u n c -1 7 t i o n i n g , " nor can they always be judged f o r t h e i r v a l u e to a d m i n i s t r a t i v e or l e g a l use, a l t h o u g h f i s c a l use c o u l d p e r -haps be l o o s e l y t r a n s l a t e d as p e r t a i n i n g to the p o t e n t i a l of the f e a t u r e f i l m f o r monetary g a i n . The arrangement of moving images I s not u s u a l l y a s i g n i f i c a n t f a c t o r , u n l e s s t h i s concept i s a p p l i e d to the e d i t e d s t r u c t u r e w i t h i n the f i l m or the accompanying t e x t u a l documentation. Moving images can have s i g n i f i c a n t r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h o t h e r f i l m r e c o r d s , e i t h e r i n s u b j e c t m a t t e r , c o n t e x t , or t r e a t m e n t , or by b e i n g 73 the p r o d u c t s of the same f i l m m a k e r or d i r e c t o r or cinematograph W h i l e moving images themselves are most l i k e l y t o be of i n f o r -m a t i o n a l v a l u e ( t h a t i s , c o n t a i n i n g i n f o r m a t i o n on p e r s o n s , 1 8 p l a c e s , s u b j e c t s , and so on ), and hence have h i g h r e s e a r c h v a l u e , they a re i n t i m a t e l y l i n k e d t o t e x t u a l r e c o r d s of h i g h e v i d e n t i a l v a l u e -I t s h o u l d be c l e a r , based on any u n d e r s t a n d i n g of the way i n which moving images a r e produced and d i s t r i b u t e d t h r o u g h o u t the w o r l d , t h a t the end p r o d u c t , the images t h e m s e l v e s , have l i t t l e or no e v i d e n t i a r y v a l u e . The r e l a t e d documentation -p r o d u c t i o n f i l e s , f i n a n c i a l and p e r s o n n e l r e c o r d s , c o n t r a c t s and correspondence - may r e v e a l how the . p r o d u c t i o n company or a d m i n i s t r a t i v e e n t i t y . . . f u n c t i o n e d , but t h e v a l u e of the end p r o d u c t , w h i l e i t may speak volumes t o the., p r o d u c e r ' s purpose, i s p r i m a r i l y i n f o r m a t i o n a l . ' At the 1980 Belgrade. Conference UNESCO f o r m u l a t e d a "Recommendation f o r the S a f e g u a r d i n g and P r e s e r v a t i o n of Moving Images" d e s i g n e d t o cover "those moving images which are i n t e n d e d f o r communication or d i s t r i b u t i o n to the p u b l i c 20 or a re made f o r documentation p u r p o s e s . " The Recommendation 21 was " t o p r o t e c t moving images from b e i n g d e s t r o y e d . " The i n t r o d u c t i o n o f a mandatory system of d e p o s i t ' f o r n a t i o n a l l y -produced moving images was recommended, a l t h o u g h no d e t a i l s on such a system were g i v e n , a p a r t from s p e c i f y i n g such p r o -d u c t i o n s be p r e f e r a b l y d e p o s i t e d i n the form of p r e - p r i n t 22 m a t e r i a l . The Recommendation lamented.the s u b j e c t i v e n a t u r e of s e l e c t i o n and the f a c t t h a t sheer volume o f t e n n e c e s s i t a t e d a d e n i a l of the i d e a l s i t u a t i o n i n which a l l moving images 74 would be p r e s e r v e d . W h i l e s p e c i f i c s are a v o i d e d , p a r t i c u l a r mention i s made of those moving images "which, because of t h e i r e d u c a t i o n a l , c u l t u r a l , , a r t i s t i c , s c i e n t i f i c a n d h i s t o r i -c a l v a l u e , form p a r t of a n a t i o n ' s c u l t u r a l h e r i t a g e s h o u l d be 23 r e t a i n e d on a p r i o r i t y b a s i s . " A p r o v i s i o n i s a l s o made to the e f f e c t t h a t moving images s h o u l d not be d i s p o s e d of u n t i l a f u t u r e date a l l o w i n g f o r some degree of h i s t o r i c a l 24 p e r s p e c t i v e . Such g u i d e l i n e s do not s t a t e much t h a t i s not a l r e a d y known by a r c h i v e s i n v o l v e d i n c o l l e c t i n g f i l m . Few a r c h i v e s have developed f u l l y a r t i c u l a t e d g u i d e l i n e s c o n c e r n i n g s e l e c t i o n , r e j e c t i o n , and d i s p o s a l of f i l m m a t e r i a l . Even i n t e r n a t i o n a l a u t h o r i t i e s l i k e Unesco and F.I.A.F. would appear to be h e d g i n g the i s s u e when they s t a t e t h a t "every 25 a r c h i v e must develop i t s own c r i t e r i a f o r a c q u i r i n g f i l m s , " b e a r i n g i n mind the proposed shape of a r e p o s i t o r y ' s c o l l e c -t i o n , i n c l u d i n g the t y p e s and p h y s i c a l f o r m a t s of f i l m s to be a c q u i r e d . The p r e s e r v a t i o n of n a t i o n a l l y - p r o d u c e d f i l m s seems t o be an agreed-upon p r i o r i t y , but the b a s i c problem of s e l e c t i o n would appear to be an i s s u e t h a t h a s . t o be r e s o l -ved by the i n d i v i d u a l r e p o s i t o r y , i n accordance w i t h i t s gene-r a l mandate and f a c i l i t i e s . The f u n c t i o n and purpose of a f i l m a r c h i v e w i l l be s i g n i f i c a n t In d e v e l o p i n g s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a , a l t h o u g h the m a t t e r of d e t e r m i n i n g a r e p o s i t o r y ' s f u n c t i o n may be l e s s than c l e a r . Ken Larose has^ c a t e g o r i z e d the gene-r a l purposes of a f i l m a r c h i v e i n t o t h r e e b a s i c f u n c t i o n s : . . . to document an a r t form; to r e c o r d a mass medium; and to be the r e p o s i t o r y f o r motion p i c t u r e 75 images of r e a l p e o p l e , e v e n t s , and p l a c e s . I t i s t e m p t i n g to add a f o u r t h f u n c t i o n , t h a t f i l m a r c h i v e s are e x p e c ted to,house v i s u a l r e c o r d s f o r f u t u r e use by h i s t o r i a n s . The a p p l i c a t i o n of t h i s type of d e f i n i t i o n c o u l d c o n c e i v a b l y c o n s t i t u t e a c a l l f o r t o t a l r e t e n t i o n , embracing as i t does f i l m s judged v a l u a b l e f o r a r t i s t i c m e r i t , as w e l l as those f i l m s documenting both a c t u a l i t i e s and a contemporary mass phenomenon. I t has a l r e a d y been s t a t e d t h a t such mass r e t e n -t i o n seems o n l y p r a c t i c a b l e i n the i d e a l s i t u a t i o n , w h i l e i n the r e a l w o r l d some degree of s e l e c t i o n w i l l have to take p l a c e i n view of the volume of a v a i l a b l e m a t e r i a l . The r e -p o s i t o r y ' s aim i n t h i s r e s p e c t has been d e s c r i b e d by V l a d i m i r Opela of C z e c h o s l o v a k i a as the attempt "to p r e s e r v e a l l r e -cords of permanent documentary v a l u e w h i l e l e a v i n g out l e s s 27 v a l u a b l e documents,". w i t h documentary v a l u e b e i n g d e t e r -mined by both the i m p o r t a n c e and range of the c o n t e n t of the f i l m r e c o r d , as w e l l as the form and degree of a u t h e n t i c i t y 28 of the r e c o r d . A c c o r d i n g to Opela, any assessment of moving images has to t a k e i n t o a ccount " t h e i r f u t u r e p r a c t i c a l u t i l i -z a t i o n , the p e r i o d i n which they were made, and i n the case of foreign-made r e c o r d s , the c o p y r i g h t and the p o s s i b i l i t y of 29 a c q u i r i n g the r e c o r d from i t s o r i g i n a t o r . " Examples of f u r t h e r c r i t e r i a used to determine what moving images are wor-thy of r e t e n t i o n i n c l u d e : c o n t e n t and t r e a t m e n t ; a e s t h e t i c s ; those f i l m s documenting the h i s t o r y , and t e c h n o l o g i c a l d e v e l o p -76 ment o f the i n d u s t r y ; f i l m s i l l u s t r a t i v e of m i l e s t o n e s , " f i r s t s , " b o x - o f f i c e s u c c e s s e s , trends,, " s t a r s , " the work of 30 c e r t a i n d i r e c t o r s , p r o d u c e r s , c i n e m a t o g r a p h e r s , and so on; f i l m s . " r e f l e c t i n g the p o l i t i c a l and s o c i a l c h a r a c t e r of a 31 p e r i o d and environment;" f i l m a d a p t a t i o n s o f famous works of l i t e r a t u r e ; remakes o f s u c c e s s f u l f i l m s of the p a s t ; f i l m s awarded a t i m p o r t a n t f i l m f e s t i v a l s ; and f i l m s i l l u s t r a t i v e of c e r t a i n genres and n a t i o n a l " s c h o o l s " o f f i l m m a k i n g , and 32 t h e i r development. S t i l l o t h e r c r i t e r i a i n c l u d e : f i l m s r e f l e c t i n g the i n f l u e n c e , o f o t h e r media and the c o m p l e t i o n 33 o f e x i s t i n g c o l l e c t i o n s ; f i l m s documenting e t h n i c or r a c i a l m i n o r i t i e s ; f i l m s which " c h a l l e n g e contemporary community s t a n d a r d s and/or c e n s o r s h i p laws on what i s a c c e p t a b l e i n s u b j e c t m a t t e r , t r e a t m e n t or form;" ^ and those f i l m s which " e x p l o r e the r e l a t i o n s h i p between the audie n c e and the s c r e e n , 35 or which r e f l e x i v e l y examine the image-making p r o c e s s . " A l s o c o n s i d e r e d are " v a r i a n t v e r s i o n s of moving images r e g a r -ded as ' c l a s s i c s ' which a re v a l u a b l e f o r f i l m study and f o r the purpose of f i l m r e s t o r a t i o n . ; ' o u t t a k e s ' from such p r o -d u c t i o n s i f s i g n i f i c a n t i n documenting the p r o c e s s of produc-t i o n ; and ' c u t s ' made from such p r o d u c t i o n s on demand o f cen-s o r s h i p a u t h o r i t i e s . " 3 ^ The development of s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a can be made l e s s a r b i t r a r y f o r c e r t a i n p e r i o d s i n f i l m h i s t o r y f o r which a l l or most f i l m s are p r e s e r v e d f o r reaso n s of r a r i t y and poor r e p r e s e n t a t i o n i n e x i s t i n g c o l l e c t i o n s . For example, any 77 f i l m produced p r i o r t o 1920 i s always a c q u i r e d , and i t i s u s u a l -l y o n l y f o r f i l m s , from the p e r i o d l a t e r than the mid-1 920s t h a t s e l e c t i o n becomes o p e r a t i v e . The American F i l m I n s t i t u t e ( L i -b r a r y of Congress) bases i t s p r i n c i p l e s of s e l e c t i o n on s u r v i -v a l r a t e s f o r c e r t a i n p e r i o d s of f i l m development: a) 1894-1920: Perhaps 15% of the f e a t u r e s s u r v i v e and p o s s i b l y 10-20% o f the s h o r t s . T h e r e f o r e a l l f i l m from t h i s p e r i o d , r e g a r d l e s s of c o u n t r y o f o r i g i n s h o u l d be p r e s e r v e d . b) 1921-1930: The s u r v i v a l r a t e f o r f e a t u r e s has grown from 12% to 20% over the p a s t t w e l v e y e a r s . U s i n g the AFI C a t a l o g as a base, some s e l e c t i o n s h o u l d be made when e n c o u n t e r i n g r o u t i n e B f e a -t u r e s o f obscure companies whose o u t p u t i s ade-q u a t e l y r e p r e s e n t e d , and no s o c i a l l y redeeming elements can be d i s c e r n e d . c) 1 930-1 935: With a number o f n o t a b l e e x c e p t i o n s , the b u l k of the s t u d i o o u t p u t s t i l l e x i s t s and i s more or l e s s under c o n t r o l , and v i r t u a l l y a l l of the b/w f i l m s w i l l end up b e i n g p r e s e r v e d from these companies. Some s e l e c t i o n i s needed f o r the B p r o d u c t and s m a l l company p r o d u c t i o n s . . . . A f u r t h e r s e l e c t i o n i s s u e i n v o l v e s the p h y s i c a l makeup o f the f i l m base i t s e l f , p a r t i c u l a r l y t h o s e . f i l m s on a n i t r a t e base. Because of i t s i n h e r e n t l y u n s t a b l e c h e m i c a l composi-t i o n c e l l u l o s e n i t r a t e d e t e r i o r a t e s q u i c k l y and must be s t o r e d under s t r i c t l y c o n t r o l l e d c o n d i t i o n s i n o r d e r to r e t a r d d e t e r i -o r a t i o n o f the image, and p o s s i b l e i g n i t i o n . T h i s type o f f i l m s t o c k was phased out and r e p l a c e d by a more s t a b l e ace-t a t e base i n the e a r l y 1 9 5 0 s . T h e r e f o r e a l l f i l m s produced b e f o r e c i r c a 1950 on n i t r a t e base ( o n l y 35 mm s t o c k i s i n v o l -ved) s h o u l d be c o l l e c t e d and t r a n s f e r r e d onto a c e t a t e " s a f e t y " s t o c k b e f o r e the image has d e t e r i o r a t e d . b e y o n d s a l v a g e . 78 C e r t a i n c a t e g o r i e s o f f i l m . h a v e t r a d i t i o n a l l y been..rejec-t e d by a r c h i v a l r e p o s i t o r i e s . . These i n c l u d e : s t o c k f o o t a g e l a c k i n g p r o p e r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n or t e x t u a l documentation; o u t -t a k e s (because of sheer volume); p r e - p r o d u c t i o n and. d i s t r i b u -t i o n elements i n c l u d i n g s u b t i t l e bands, main and c o n c l u d i n g 39 t i t l e s ; m a t e r i a l a l r e a d y p r e s e n t i n the h o l d i n g s or d u p l i c a -t e d i n o t h e r a r c h i v e s ; amateur c o m p i l a t i o n s , p r o d u c t i o n s and home movies; m a t e r i a l which i s i n c o m p l e t e or i n poor p h y s i c a l c o n d i t i o n ; m a t e r i a l a v a i l a b l e o n l y a t u n r e a s o n a b l e c o s t or w i t h heavy r e s t r i c t i o n s on use; and f o r e i g n f i l m s o t h e r w i s e a v a i l a b l e i n the c o u n t r y which a re a l r e a d y p r e s e r v e d i n the F.I.A.F. a r c h i v e o f the c o u n t r y of p r o d u c t i o n . 4 ^ Some r e v i s i o n of the a b o v e - o u t l i n e d c l a s s i f i c a t i o n would seem to be c a l l e d f o r , a t l e a s t w i t h r e g a r d to o u t - t a k e s , c e r -t a i n p r o d u c t i o n elements, and amateur f o o t a g e , where c o n t e n t may r e a s o n a b l y be seen to o v e r r i d e the i n t r a c t a b l e n a t u r e of the f o o t a g e ' s f o r m a t . R e j e c t i o n of f i l m m a t e r i a l s h o u l d n o t take p l a c e w i t h o u t due c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f the c o n t e n t of the m a t e r i a l c o n t a i n e d w i t h i n a cumbersome form.. A case i n p o i n t i s t h a t o f o u t - t a k e s , which o f t e n c o n s t i t u t e a v a l u a b l e r e c o r d o f c e n s o r e d or o t h e r w i s e s e n s i t i v e or " u n d e s i r a b l e " m a t e r i a l , as w e l l as t e c h n i c a l l y i n a d e q u a t e or r e p e t i t i o u s f o o t a g e . For example, the p r e s e n t a u t h o r r e c e n t l y spent s e v e r a l weeks a t the N a t i o n a l F i l m , T e l e v i s i o n and Sound A r c h i v e s i n Ottawa, o r g a n i z i n g a c o l l e c t i o n based on A l l a n K i n g ' s Warrendale (1966), a documentary f i l m e d i n a r e s i d e n t i a l t r e a t m e n t c e n t e r 79 f o r e m o t i o n a l l y d i s t u r b e d c h i l d r e n . The c o l l e c t i o n , c o n s i s -t i n g o f 615 cans of f i l m ( c o n t a i n i n g over one thousand r o l l s o f 16 mm f i l m ) , was almost, e n t i r e l y comprised of o u t - t a k e ma-t e r i a l , most of which was to be r e t a i n e d by the r e p o s i t o r y based on the c o n t e n t of the m a t e r i a l . The documentary had o r i g i n a l l y been commissioned by the CBC,. who r e f u s e d to a i r i t upon c o m p l e t i o n f o r r e a s o n s of p r o f a n i t y . W a r r e n d a l e , d e s p i t e the c o n t r o v e r s y s u r r o u n d i n g i t , went on to a l i m i t e d t h e a t r i c a l r e l e a s e , and shared top honours a t the Cannes f i l m f e s t i v a l w i t h A n t o n i o n i ' s Blow-Up. The c o n t r o v e r s i a l n a t u r e of the t r e a t -ment d e p i c t e d i n the f i l m ( W a r r e n d a l e . d i r e c t o r John Brown's " h o l d i n g " t h e r a p y , wherein c h i l d r e n vented t h e i r rage w h i l e b e i n g p i n n e d down by two or t h r e e s t a f f members) r e s u l t e d i n the c l o -sure o f the c l i n i c s h o r t l y a f t e r f i l m i n g was completed. Thus, the r e c o r d c o n s t i t u t e d by the outs was v a l u a b l e f o r a v a r i e t y of r e a s o n s : the documentary was a Canadian p r o d u c t i o n by an eminent Canadian documentary f i l m m a k e r ; i t won i n t e r n a t i o n a l a c c l a i m ; i t was c o n t r o v e r s i a l i n n a t u r e , both i n terms of i t s p r o d u c t i o n h i s t o r y and the t r e a t m e n t d e p i c t e d ; i t was noteworthy f o r the time i n terms of. the s h o o t i n g r a t i o (some f o r t y hours of o r i g i n a l f o o t a g e were e v e n t u a l l y e d i t e d down to a p p r o x i m a t e l y one hundred m i n u t e s ) ; and today s t i l l s tands as a landmark i n cinema v e r i t e documentary h i s t o r y . I t would t h e r e f o r e seem r e a s o n a b l e t o assume t h a t outs and s i m i l a r f i l m m a t e r i a l s h o u l d be judged by c o n t e n t , and not s o l e l y by t h e i r p h y s i c a l s t r u c t u r e . The same c o u l d be s a i d of amateur f i l m , w h i ch, w h i l e i t i s sometimes l e s s than o p t i m a l i n t e c h n i c a l 80 terras, may c o n t a i n unique or o t h e r w i s e undocumented m a t e r i a l . C e r t a i n p r o d u c t i o n elements may.also prove v a l u a b l e . I f the r e -p o s i t o r y does n o t a l r e a d y p o s s e s s a r e a s o n a b l e copy o f a c e r -t a i n f i l m t i t l e , i t may be m o r e . c o s t - e f f e c t i v e t o make a com-p o s i t e p r i n t from the a p p r o p r i a t e p r i n t i n g elements, i f i t has such a t i t s d i s p o s a l , than, p u r c h a s i n g a composite r e l e a s e p r i n t c o m m e r c i a l l y . Many of the d e c i s i o n s i n v o l v e d i n c a r r y i n g out the types o f s e l e c t i o n o u t l i n e d above,, s u b j e c t i v e and a r b i t r a r y as some of them a r e , c o u l d be a v o i d e d a l t o g e t h e r i f a c e r t a i n amount of s e l e c t i o n was e x e r c i s e d b e f o r e m a t e r i a l r e a c h e d the a r c h i v e s . There has been some c a l l f o r the i m p l e m e n t a t i o n of modern r e -cords management t e c h n i q u e s d u r i n g the p r o d u c t i o n or even p r e -p r o d u c t i o n stage of f i l m m a k i n g . A l l p r o d u c t i o n elements ( n e g a t i v e s , p r i n t s , v i d e o -t a p e s , e t c . ) , and r e l a t e d documentation, s h o u l d be i d e n t i f i e d , d e s i g n a t e d , and s c h e d u l e d so t h a t the d i s p o s i t i o n of the elements can be c o n t r o l l e d a t ever y stage o f the p r o d u c t i o n / d i f f u s i o n p r o c e s s . The s h o r t term ( 3 - 5 y e a r s ) r e t e n t i o n o f the b r o a d e s t p o s s i b l e s e l e c t i o n o f moving images s h o u l d be the o b j e c t i v e , to p r o v i d e o p p o r t u n i t y f o r a f i n a l s e l e c -t i o n w i t h some sense of h i s t o r i c a l p e r s p e c t i v e . 41 Such a system would appear to s a t i s f y both the proponents and opponents o f the p r a c t i c e of s e l e c t i o n . I t would r e t a i n a broad sample o f v a l u a b l e m a t e r i a l w h i l e weeding out the more ephemeral elements b e f o r e a n y t h i n g a r r i v e d a t the a r c h i v e , w h i l e t a k i n g I n t o account the f a l l i b i l i t y of contemporary judgements c o n c e r n i n g h i s t o r i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e . However, t h i s system would r e q u i r e c l o s e c o o p e r a t i o n between f i l m a r c h i v e s 81 and the f i l m i n d u s t r y , . a n d such c o o r d i n a t i o n seems to be the e x c e p t i o n , r a t h e r than the r u l e . One such e x c e p t i o n i s the F i l m s A r c h i v e s of the C z e c h o s l o v a k F i l m I n s t i t u t e . " A l l n a t i o n a l f i l m p r o d u c t i o n s are s y s t e m a t i c a l l y m o n i t o r e d , and a l l p r o d u c t i o n e lements, whether n e g a t i v e s or p r i n t s , d omestic or f o r e i g n , i n a l l c a t e g o r i e s o f p r o d u c t i o n , are s c h e d u l e d e i t h e r f o r r e t e n t i o n f o r a p e r i o d o f y e a r s , and then d i s p o s a l a t the end of t h a t p e r i o d , or f o r d e p o s i t w i t h the A r c h i v e s f o r l o n g term r e t e n t i o n . " T h i s program c o n t r o l s a l l s i g n i f i c a n t p r o -d u c t i o n elements from the time they are c r e a t e d to the p o i n t of t h e i r u l t i m a t e a r c h i v a l d i s p o s i t i o n . C o n t r o l to such a degree i s l i k e l y p o s s i b l e o n l y i n c o u n t r i e s where f i l m p r o -/ 3 d u c t i o n i s c e n t r a l l y c o n t r o l l e d by the s t a t e . D i f f i c u l t i e s p o s s i b l y encountered, i n such a system i n c l u d e both the time i n v o l v e d i n i t e m i z e d s c h e d u l i n g , as w e l l as r e a c h i n g a con-sensus on p e r i o d s o f r e t e n t i o n and the u l t i m a t e d i s p o s i t i o n o f f i l m elements. In a d d i t i o n , r e l a t e d t e x t u a l documentation s h o u l d i d e a l l y be i n c l u d e d i n the s c h e d u l i n g p r o c e s s , i n c l u -d i n g m a t e r i a l c r e a t e d d u r i n g p r o d u c t i o n ( p r o d u c t i o n f i l e s , c o r r e s p o n d e n c e , r e c e i p t s , s c r i p t s , g r a p h i c s ) , as w e l l as the b y - p r o d u c t s of d i s t r i b u t i o n ( c r i t i c a l r e v i e w s , i n t e r v i e w s , p r e s s books, and so o n ) . 4 4 In c o n c l u s i o n , the a l t e r n a t i v e s r e g a r d i n g the s e l e c t i o n of moving image documents i n an a r c h i v a l s e t t i n g would appear to f a l l i n t o two broad c a t e g o r i e s : to s e l e c t , or to not s e l e c t . By f a r the e a s i e s t to j u s t i f y i n terms of s a t i s f y i n g 82 a l l p o t e n t i a l needs of f u t u r e u s e r s would be to p r a c t i c e no s e l e c t i o n and p r e s e r v e e v e r y t h i n g . T h i s p r a c t i c e would e l i m i -n a t e the need to second-guess the needs of f u t u r e r e s e a r c h e r s . I t would a l s o remove a good d e a l of. r e s p o n s i b i l i t y from the s h o u l d e r s of the b e l e a g u e r e d a r c h i v i s t , who i s f o r c e d to a c t p r e s c i e n t l y by the v e r y n a t u r e of s e l e c t i o n , and i s the one who w i l l be blamed when f u t u r e u s e r s d i s c o v e r the r e c o r d they need was not p r e s e r v e d . The r e f l e c t i v e n a t u r e o f the moving image document would a l s o seem to count i n f a v o u r of s a v i n g e v e r y t h i n g , as e v e r y f i l m r e c o r d r e f l e c t s something about s o c i e t y , and thus c o u l d c o n c e i v a b l y be of i n t e r e s t to someone, sometime.' The main problem l y i n g i n the way of t o t a l r e t e n t i o n i s t h a t o f i n a d e q u a t e s t o r a g e space and l a c k of funds to ensure the f a c i l i t i e s n e c e s s a r y f o r the maintenance of such a c o l l e c -t i o n . In the f a c e of c u t - b a c k s and d e c r e a s e d a r c h i v a l s p e n d i n g , i t seems u n l i k e l y t h a t t h i s s i t u a t i o n w i l l change i n the near f u t u r e , so u n l e s s t h e r e are d r a s t i c improvements i n l o w - c o s t s t o r a g e t e c h n o l o g y , the o n l y v i a b l e a l t e r n a t i v e would seem to be to p r a c t i c e some degree of s e l e c t i o n w h i l e a t t e m p t i n g to p r e s e r v e the b r o a d e s t and most comprehensive sam p l i n g o f the a v a i l a b l e moving image i n f o r m a t i o n a l u n i v e r s e . The n a t u r e of a r e p o s i t o r y ' s c o l l e c t i o n . w i l l have to be d e t e r m i n e d by the r e -p o s i t o r y ' s o v e r a l l mandate, b e a r i n g i n mind the g e n e r a l c r i -t e r i a e s t a b l i s h e d by a u t h o r i t i e s l i k e Unesco and F.I.A.F. con-c e r n i n g the s i g n i f i c a n c e of the moving image document, and such p r e s e r v a t i o n i m p e r a t i v e s as the documentation of n a t i o n a l 83 f i l m p r o d u c t i o n . The i s s u e of s e l e c t i o n c o u l d be c o n s i d e r a b l y s i m p l i f i e d by the u t i l i z a t i o n of r e c o r d s management t e c h n i q u e s to c u l l ephemera b e f o r e i t ever a r r i v e d a t a r e p o s i t o r y to confound the a r c h i v i s t . The s c h e d u l i n g of p r o d u c t i o n elements would n o t o n l y be an e f f i c i e n t way to c o n t r o l a s u b s t a n t i a l p o r t i o n of the f i l m r e c o r d , but"..would a l s o a l l o w f o r the development of some semblance of h i s t o r i c a l p e r s p e c t i v e b e f o r e the. u l t i m a t e d i s p o -s i t i o n of the r e c o r d was r e a c h e d . The i m p l e m e n t a t i o n of manage-ment of t h i s type would r e q u i r e c l o s e c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h the f i l m i n d u s t r y i t s e l f , and w h i l e i t would i n i t i a l l y i n v o l v e a good d e a l o f e f f o r t to s e t up, i n l i g h t of the s a v i n g s i n time and money i t would b r i n g t o a r c h i v e s , i t would seem to be w e l l worth the e f f o r t . T h i s type o f endeavour appears to work be s t i n a n a t i o n where f i l m i c output, i s c e n t r a l i z e d under one a u t h o r i t y , and t h e r e i s one n a t i o n a l f i l m a r c h i v e . A l t h o u g h t h i s system c o u l d be i m p l e m e n t ed.in a c o u n t r y such as Canada which does not have a c e n t r a l i z e d f i l m i n d u s t r y , i t would be much s i m p l e r to implement i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h a s i n g l e na-t i o n a l f i l m archive.. The e x i s t e n c e of one major n a t i o n a l f i l m a r c h i v e per c o u n t r y would seem to s i m p l i f y o t h e r m a t t e r s as w e l l . I f a n a t i o n houses s e v e r a l competing f i l m r e p o s i t o r i e s t h e r e w i l l be a g r e a t e r r i s k of d u p l i c a t i o n of e f f o r t and c o m p e t i t i o n , b oth of which would r e s u l t i n a l e s s than o p t i m a l use of a v a i l a b l e r e s o u r c e s . In t h i s s i t u a t i o n , i n d i v i d u a l r e p o s i t o r y mandates would i n c r e a s e i n prominence and i m p o r t a n c e , and would n e c e s s i t a t e the e v o l u t i o n of c l e a r l y - d e v e l o p e d , a r t i -84 c u l a t e d and s p e c i f i c s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a . As the development of such seems t o be i m p o s s i b l e w i t h j u s t one,-major f i l m r e p o s i -t o r y c u r r e n t l y i n Canada, i t would appear t h a t f o r r e a s o n s of r e s o u r c e s and e x p e n d i t u r e , the i d e a of one major f i l m a r c h i v e per c o u n t r y i s the most v i a b l e a t p r e s e n t . I t would n o t be i n the b e s t i n t e r e s t s of c o s t - e f f e c t i v e n e s s to d u p l i c a t e the s o p h i s t i c a t e d equipment n e c e s s a r y to house and a c c e s s f i l m a l l a c r o s s the c o u n t r y , when a c e n t r a l i z e d f i l m a r c h i v e c o u l d ade-q u a t e l y p r e s e r v e those f i l m r e c o r d s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of a n a t i o n ' s f i l m i c o u t p u t . In the f i n a l a n a l y s i s , i t would seem.that the n a t u r e of the f i l m document s h o u l d d i c t a t e the most a p p r o p r i a t e mode of s e l e c t i o n . The development of any s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a w i l l of n e c e s s i t y have to take i n t o account not. o n l y the p h y s i c a l s t r u c -t u r e of f i l m ( i n c l u d i n g c o n d i t i o n and f i l m base, and moreover, a g e ) , but a l s o the t y p o l o g y of the f i l m and i t s i n f o r m a t i o n a l c o n t e n t . For c e r t a i n c a t e g o r i e s o f f i l m , such assessment may be s u f f i c i e n t . For o t h e r s , l i k e the f e a t u r e f i l m , a p p r a i -s a l must a l s o t a k e i n t o account the p o s i t i o n of f i l m i n s o c i e t y , p a r t i c u l a r l y w i t h r e g a r d to i t s r e f l e c t i v e n a t u r e , p o p u l a r a p p e a l , and i n f l u e n c e . 85 NOTES 1 Sam K u l a , The A r c h i v a l a p p r a i s a l of moving images: a  RAMP stu d y w i t h g u i d e l i n e s ( P a r i s l Unesco, 1983)» p. 96. N i c h o l a s Pronay, " A r c h i v e f i l m / t e l e v i s i o n p r e s e r v a t i o n : the h i s t o r i a n ' s p e r s p e c t i v e , " The A u d i o v i s u a l L i b r a r i a n 5 (1 979), p. 24. 3 I b i d . ^ C l i v e C o u l t a s s , "The s e l e c t i o n o f n o n - f i c t i o n f i l m , " i n Problems o f S e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s by the I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n o f F i l m A r c h i v e s ( B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980), p. 87. 5 I b i d . , p. 89. ^ I b i d . , p. 92. 7 K u l a , The A r c h i v a l a p p r a i s a l of moving images , p. 2. 8 I b i d . , p. 23. 9 I b i d . , p. 44. ^ ^ I b i d . , p. 26. 11 ' ' I b i d . 1 2 I b i d . , p. 34. 13-1 4 I b i d . , p. 49. I b i d . , p. 45. 1 5 I b i d . , p. 16 T Frank B. Evans, Donald F. H a r r i s o n , and Edwin A. Thompson, c o m p i l e r s , "A B a s i c G l o s s a r y f o r A r c h i v i s t s , Manu-s c r i p t C u r a t o r s , and Records Managers," American A r c h i v i s t 37 (1 974), p. 417. 1 7 I b i d . , p. 422. 1 8 I b i d . , p. 424. 1 9 K u l a , The A r c h i v a l a p p r a i s a l of moving images, p. 26. 20 Margaret van V l i e t , "The Unesco Recommendation f o r the S a f e g u a r d i n g and P r e s e r v a t i o n o f Moving Images," European  B r o a d c a s t i n g Union Review 32 (1 981 ), p. 16. 86 21 ' i b i d . 2 2 I b i d . , p. 17. 2 3 I b i d . 2 4 I b i d . 25 K u l a , The A r c h i v a l a p p r a i s a l o f moving images, p. 27. 2 6 K.M. L a r o s e , " P r e s e r v i n g the P a s t on F i l m , " A r c h i y a r i a 6 (1 978), p. 137. 27 V l a d i m i r Opela, "Problems o f s e l e c t i o n of f i l m m a t e r i a l s and the a r c h i v a l system i n C z e c h o s l o v a k i a , " i n Problems of S e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s by the I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980), p. 10. 2 8 I b i d . , pp. 10-11. 2 9 I b i d . , p. 12. 30 K u l a , The A r c h i v a l a p p r a i s a l of, moving images, pp. 4-2-4-3. 31 ^ B l a z ena U r g o ^ i k o v a , "System o f A r c h i v a l S e l e c t i o n of Moving Images i n the Prague F i l m A r c h i v e , " i n Problems o f S e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s , by the I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980), p. 17. 3 2 I b i d . , pp. 17-18. 33 I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s , Problems of  S e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s ( B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980), pp. 134-135. 34 K u l a , The A r c h i v a l a p p r a i s a l of moving images, p. 95. 3 5 I b i d . 3 6 I b i d . 37 L a r r y K a r r , "The American S i t u a t i o n , " i n Problems o f ^ e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s by the I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980), p. 58. 38 I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s , Problems of  S e l e c t i o n , p. 134. 39 K a r r , "The American S i t u a t i o n , " pp. 61-62. ^ I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s , Problems of S e l e c t i o n , p p . 1 3 5 - 1 3 6 . 87 K u l a , The A r c h i v a l a p p r a i s a l of moving images, pp. 96-4 2 I b i d . , p. 31• 4 3 I b i d . , p. 32. 4 4 I b i d . , p. 89, 88 CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION S o c i e t y i s p r e s e n t l y overwhelmed by an e f f l o r e s c e n c e of i n f o r m a t i o n r e c o r d e d i n a v a r i e t y of d i v e r s e forms. The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and morphology of the s p e c i a l media c o n s t i t u -t i n g the r e c o r d s o f the p o s t - i n d u s t r i a l i n f o r m a t i o n age are e f f e c t i n g a change i n the form and n a t u r e . o f contemporary h i s -t o r i c a l evidence.. The p r e s e r v a t i o n of h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d s has t r a d i t i o n a l l y f a l l e n t o a n a t i o n ' s a r c h i v a l r e p o s i t o r i e s , which i n c r e a s i n g l y f i n d themselves i n a p o s i t i o n of h a v i n g to a c t p r o p h e t i c a l l y i n o r d e r to p r e s e r v e r e c o r d s which may become imbued w i t h h i s t o r i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e by the p a s s i n g of t i m e . The c a p a c i t y to a c t w i t h p r e s c i e n c e may be c r u c i a l i n s a v i n g many of the new media which a re i n danger of d i s a p p e a r i n g due to t h e i r ephemeral n a t u r e , combined w i t h a g e n e r a l l a c k of r e g a r d f o r t h e i r r e s e a r c h p o t e n t i a l . In o r d e r to p r e s e r v e such media, a r c h i v i s t s and r e s e a r c h e r s a l i k e need to be cog-n i z a n t of the e x t e n t to which the new media of r e c o r d have permeated s o c i e t y , as w e l l as the degree o f t h e i r i n f l u e n c e . The p r e s e n t study has c o n c e n t r a t e d on one such medium, t h a t of f i l m i c moving images, w i t h s p e c i f i c r e f e r e n c e to i s s u e s c o n c e r n i n g the medium's p h y s i c a l morphology, as w e l l as how the r e f l e c t i v e n a t u r e of c o n t e n t Impinges upon the s e l e c t i o n of moving images f o r permanent a r c h i v a l p r e s e r v a t i o n . In the case o f f i l m , a l o n g t r a d i t i o n of benign n e g l e c t due to i t s p o s i t i o n as a p r o d u c t of mass p o p u l a r c u l t u r e has 89 s i g n i f i c a n t l y impaired, i t s acceptance as an h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d . F i l m has l o n g been r e c o g n i z e d as a mass phenomenon, but the s o - c a l l e d " s t i g m a " of mass p o p u l a r i t y has t h w a r t e d i t s r e c o g -n i t i o n as a s o c i e t a l document of h i s t o r i c a l i m p o r t . As a phenomenon of mass c u l t u r e , the f i l m document o c c u p i e s a unique d u a l r o l e i n the f a b r i c of contemporary s o c i e t y due to i t s r e -f l e c t i v e n a t u r e , and the i n f l u e n c e i t w i e l d s over i t s a u d i e n c e . Throughout i t s h i s t o r y , . ' f i l m has demonstrated the a b i l i t y to not o n l y r e f l e c t or " r e f r a c t " m a n i f e s t a t i o n s of s o c i e t a l con-c e r n s , but to a l s o i n f l u e n c e and m a n i p u l a t e i t s audience through the message i t conveys. The f o l l o w i n g p r e s e n t - d a y example i s o f f e r e d t o i l l u s t r a t e b o th the r e f l e c t i v e and i n f l u e n t i a l na-t u r e o f f i l m . In r e c e n t y e a r s H o l l y w o o d has produced a num-ber o f f i l m s r e f l e c t i n g t he a n t i - S o v i e t s e n t i m e n t r e s u l t i n g from s t r a i n e d East-West r e l a t i o n s . . F i l m s l i k e Re.d Dawn, Rambo, and Rocky IV were r e c e n t l y c i t e d a t a S o v i e t p r e s s c o n f e r e n c e as h a v i n g spawned a p a t h o l o g y o f h a t r e d a g a i n s t the S o v i e t Union. The r e a c t i o n t o such condemnation i s a l r e a d y apparent i n the American f i l m i n d u s t r y , , as e x e m p l i f i e d by the announce-ment o f p r o d u c t i o n of .The R u s s k i e s , i n which a S o v i e t spy submarine i s s t r a n d e d i n a s m a l l town on the American c o a s t . The f i l m i s b e i n g t o u t e d as the a n t i t h e s i s . of those f i l m s which have t r a d i t i o n a l l y p o r t r a y e d the R u s s i a n s as m a n i a c a l enemies of the West. T h i s example i s i l l u s t r a t i v e of f i l m ' s p o t e n t i a l f o r both r e f l e c t i o n and d i s t o r t i o n . A knowledge o f the n a t u r e of the medium s h o u l d make apparent those f a c t o r s ? : c o n t r i b u t i n g to 90 d i s t o r t i o n and thus make i t p o s s i b l e to account f o r such when u t i l i z i n g the f i l m document as a r e s e a r c h t o o l . I f f i l m i s to be p r e s e r v e d f o r f u t u r e use, those who s e l e c t and care f o r i t w i l l need to u n d e r s t a n d the p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the medium, as w e l l as the ways i n which p h y s i c a l s t r u c t u r e i n f l u -ences c o n t e n t . As the medium i t s e l f can o p e r a t e as an i n f o r -m a t i o n a l f a c t o r of the r e c o r d , an awareness of both form and c o n t e n t w i l l e nable the a r c h i v i s t to convey p e r t i n e n t i n f o r -mation to the user.. S e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a cannot be developed w i t h o u t f i r s t u n d e r s t a n d i n g the p h y s i c a l n a t u r e of the docu-ment, as w e l l as the n a t u r e o f t h e . e v i d e n c e p r e s e n t e d by the document. In the case of the f i l m r e c o r d , s t r u c t u r e i s opera-t i v e i n d e t e r m i n i n g c o n t e n t , and as such, the two elements are c r u c i a l l y i n t e r w o v e n and cannot be c o n s i d e r e d i n t o t a l i s o l a t i o n . The r a m i f i c a t i o n s the n a t u r e o f the f i l m document h o l d s f o r the development of s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a are m a n i f o l d . Per-haps the p r i m a r y f a c t o r h i n d e r i n g the a r t i c u l a t i o n of c o n c r e t e s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a i s the i m p o s s i b i l i t y of endowing contemporary judgements of h i s t o r i c a l a r t e f a c t s ( p a r t i c u l a r l y those of popu-l a r c u l t u r e ) w i t h any semblance of h i s t o r i c a l p e r s p e c t i v e . Con-temporary v a l u e judgements a r e o f t e n marred by b i a s and s u b j e c -t i v i t y , and i n many cases a r e j u s t p l a i n wrong. Because of t h i s f a c t o r , as w e l l as the f a c t t h a t any f i l m c o u l d c o n c e i v a -b l y be o f i m p o rtance to someone, sometime, s e l e c t i o n becomes a moot p o i n t . A f u r t h e r f a c t o r h i n d e r i n g s e l e c t i o n concerns the r e f l e c t i v e n a t u r e of the f i l m document.. I f a l l f i l m can 91 be c o n s i d e r e d t o c o n s t i t u t e some form of s o c i e t a l r e f l e c t i o n , how can i t be p o s s i b l e t o d i s m i s s summarily a p o r t i o n of t h a t r e f l e c t i o n as b e i n g i r r e l e v a n t , ephemeral, or t r i v i a l ? Se-l e c t i o n t h e r e f o r e cannot be r e a s o n a b l y j u s t i f i e d , a t l e a s t on such grounds. I d e a l l y , t h e n , the a r c h i v a l r e p o s i t o r y s h o u l d concern i t s e l f w i t h c o l l e c t i n g a l l moving images, r e p r e s e n t a -t i v e as they a re of some a s p e c t of s o c i e t y and human endeavour. I f such a scheme of t o t a l r e t e n t i o n i s not p r a c t i c a b l e , e i t h e r i n terms of s t o r a g e . space or e x p e n d i t u r e , s t e p s c o u l d be tak:en to i n c r e a s e the p o s s i b i l i t y o f i t s r e a l i z a t i o n . P o s s i b l e modes of a c t i o n c o u l d c o n c e i v a b l y i n c l u d e i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o o p e r a t i o n t o a v o i d d u p l i c a t i o n o f e f f o r t , and c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h the f i l m i n d u s t r y t o earmark e s s e n t i a l f i l m r e c o r d s w h i l e d i s m i s s i n g o b v i o u s ephemera. L e a v i n g a s i d e the most obvious i m p r a c t i c a l i t i e s of t o t a l r e t e n t i o n , a f u r t h e r c r i t i c a l element would be the de t e r m i n a -t i o n o f e x a c t l y what c o n s t i t u t e s " e v e r y t h i n g . " O b v i o u s l y , " e v e r y t h i n g " would n ot be a l i t e r a l term, and would perhaps be more i n d i c a t i v e of a p h i l o s o p h y of. s e l e c t i o n r a t h e r than a dogmatic h o a r d i n g of e v e r y t h i n g c e l l u l o i d . The a r c h i v a l v a l u e of f i l m documents w i l l have to be de t e r m i n e d by an a n a l y s i s or a p p r a i s a l e x p r e s s l y d e s i g n e d f o r the c e l l u l o i d r e c o r d , an a p p r a i s a l t h a t t a k e s i n t o account the p h y s i c a l make-up o f the document and the n a t u r e . o f the i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d t h e r e i n . The concept o f no s e l e c t i o n would t h e r e f o r e be i n d i -c a t i v e of a p h i l o s o p h y o f s e l e c t i o n which would r e t a i n a l l f i l m o f i n t r i n s i c a r c h i v a l v a l u e , a f t e r h a v i n g d e t e r m i n e d e x a c t l y 92 what c o n s t i t u t e s a r c h i v a l v a l u e i n terms of. the moving image document. D e t e r m i n i n g the v a l u e of the f i l m r e c o r d i s a problema-t i c a l p o i n t , i n v o l v i n g as i t o f t e n does s u b j e c t i v e and/or a r b i -t r a r y v a l u e judgements.- While' t h e r e appears to e x i s t a g e n e r a l l a c k o f consensus among the w o r l d ' s f i l m a r c h i v e a u t h o r i t i e s r e g a r d i n g s p e c i f i c s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a , . c e r t a i n p o i n t s seem to have emerged to f u n c t i o n as g u i d e l i n e s , however vague. S e l e c -t i o n appears t o be r e g a r d e d as a n e c e s s a r y e v i l , u n d e s i r a b l e and u l t i m a t e l y i n d e f e n s i b l e , y e t ne.cessary. under p r e s e n t - d a y c o n d i t i o n s to implement c e r t a i n p r e s e r v a t i o n p r i o r i t i e s , such as the p r e s e r v a t i o n o f f i l m o f n a t i o n a l , p r o d u c t i o n , and the f i l m i c o u t p u t o f c e r t a i n h i s t o r i c a l time p e r i o d s . For f i l m c o v e r e d by t h e s e a r e a s , the concept of s e l e c t i o n seems to be l a r g e l y i n a p p l i c a b l e . . F or these c a t e g o r i e s , the term "every-t h i n g " i s i n d e e d l i t e r a l . . . In the case o f f i l m n o t covered by these c a t e g o r i e s . , i s s u e s o f form and c o n t e n t appear to govern d e c i s i o n s r e g a r d i n g a r c h i v a l v a l u e , w i t h form o f t e n w i n n i n g out over c o n t e n t where c e r t a i n . p r o d u c t i o n elements and the s e d i m e n t a r y b y - p r o d u c t s o f f i l m m a k i n g are concerned. The p r e s e n t a u t h o r would l i k e to suggest t h a t c o n t e n t i s d e s e r -v i n g a f more c a r e f u l c o n s i d e r a t i o n i n those cases where an i n -t r a c t a b l e p h y s i c a l s t r u c t u r e t h r e a t e n s to negate the p o t e n t i a l v a l u e o f the r e c o r d ' s content.. Such i s the case w i t h o u t - t a k e s , amateur f o o t a g e , and c e r t a i n p r o d u c t i o n e l e m e n t s , where t e c h -n i c a l i n a d e q u a c i e s or an u n e d i t e d s t r u c t u r e have t r a d i t i o n a l l y assumed p r i o r i t y over i n f o r m a t i o n a l v a l u e , r e g a r d l e s s of the 93 p o t e n t i a l r e s e a r c h v a l u e of the r e c o r d . The p o s i t i o n o f f i l m i n s o c i e t y , i t s f u n c t i o n as both p u r v e y o r and r e f l e c t o r o f p o p u l a r c u l t u r e , i t s i n f l u e n c e and v a s t p o p u l a r a p p e a l -- these are a l l elements which have s i g n i -f i c a n t impact upon the s e l e c t i o n of f i l m f o r a r c h i v a l p r e s e r -v a t i o n . The n a t u r e of the evidence p r e s e n t e d by the f i l m docu-ment i s i n t i m a t e l y i n t e r t w i n e d w i t h the p h y s i c a l s t r u c t u r e of the r e c o r d . The p h y s i c a l form which encompasses the i n f o r m a -t i o n a l c o n t e n t of f i l m w i l l n e c e s s a r i l y a f f e c t f i l m c o n t e n t to a v e r y h i g h degree, but i t s h o u l d n o t be a l l o w e d to c o m p l e t e l y overwhelm the i n t r i n s i c v a l u e of c o n t e n t . I f s e l e c t i o n i_s •neces-sary,., f i l m must be e v a l u a t e d a c c o r d i n g to i t s p h y s i c a l s t r u c t u r e ( i n c l u d i n g i t s age, c o n d i t i o n , and s t o c k ) , t y p o l o g y , and c o n t e n t ( i n c l u d i n g b oth " w i t t i n g " and " u n w i t t i n g " i n f o r m a t i o n ) . T h i s l i m i t e d assessment may be s u f f i c i e n t . f o r a c t u a l i t y f o o t a g e , but f o r o t h e r c a t e g o r i e s , such as f i c t i o n f i l m , a d d i t i o n a l elements of a p p r a i s a l w i l l e n t e r i n t o the p i c t u r e , such as the r o l e of f i l m i n s o c i e t y , p a r t i c u l a r l y i t s r e f l e c t i v e n a t u r e , p o p u l a r a p p e a l , and degree of i n f l u e n c e . For example, a r e p o s i t o r y c o n s t r a i n e d by budget l i m i t a t i o n s may d e c i d e to c o n c e n t r a t e on b o x - o f f i c e s u c c e s s e s , i n o r d e r to r e t a i n a r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of those f i l m s which t e s t i f y i n the broadest, sense to mass p u b l i c p r e f e r e n c e . Another r e p o s i t o r y may. f o c u s i n s t e a d on o n l y n a t i o n a l f i l m p r o d u c t i o n w i t h the r e a l i z a t i o n t h a t i f the a r c h i v e does not p r e s e r v e the n a t i o n ' s f i l m i c o u t p u t , compre-h e n s i v e p r e s e r v a t i o n w i l l n o t be guaranteed by any o t h e r c o l -l e c t i n g body. Space and budget p e r m i t t i n g , a r e p o s i t o r y s h o u l d i d e a l l y concern i t s e l f w i t h r e t a i n i n g as broad a s a m p l i n g as 94 p o s s i b l e of a l l t y p e s o f f i l m s produced, i n o r d e r to m a i n t a i n a r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s a m p l i n g o f the c i n e m a t i c p r o d u c t consumed by the p opulace a t a g i v e n t i m e . Such s a m p l i n g c o u l d c o n c e i v a -b l y i n c l u d e not only, b o x - o f f i c e s u c c e s s e s and f i l m s deemed to be o f a r t i s t i c v a l u e , but a l s o the b o x - o f f i c e " f l o p s , " i ndepen-dent p r o d u c t i o n s , f i l m s t h a t have been the s u b j e c t of c o n t r o -v e r s y and c e n s o r s h i p , f i l m s e l e v a t e d to " c u l t " s t a t u s , and the e n d l e s s r u n - o f - t h e - m i l l B grade f i l m s ( i n c l u d i n g h o r r o r and e x p l o i t a t i o n p r o d u c t s ) which c a t e r to a s p e c i f i c but s i z e -a b l e common i n t e r e s t group t y p i f y i n g sub-genres of p u b l i c t a s t e . The g o a l of s e l e c t i o n s h o u l d u l t i m a t e l y be the r e t e n t i o n o f the b r o a d e s t p o s s i b l e s a m p l i n g of the a v a i l a b l e moving image u n i v e r s e , i n o r d e r to i n s u r e the w i d e s t coverage of contemporary s o c i e t y f o r f u t u r e r e s e a r c h use. I f t h e r e are s e v e r a l r e p o s i t o r i e s i n a g i v e n c o u n t r y c o l -l e c t i n g f i l m , the i s s u e of s e l e c t i o n i s bound to be f u r t h e r c o m p l i c a t e d by o v e r l a p p i n g p r e s e r v a t i o n i m p e r a t i v e s , and the need f o r c l e a r l y - a r t i c u l a t e d s e l e c t i o n p o l i c i e s , i f o n l y to a v o i d c o m p e t i t i o n and d u p l i c a t i o n of e f f o r t . T h e r e f o r e , the s i m p l e s t s o l u t i o n would seem to be the e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f one major f i l m a r c h i v e per c o u n t r y , p o s s e s s i n g the equipment neces-s a r y to p r o p e r l y m a i n t a i n and a c c e s s moving images. The c o s t of such equipment a l o n e would seem to n e c e s s i t a t e such a move. L o c a l and p r o v i n c i a l a r c h i v e s need n o t be p r e v e n t e d from ac-q u i r i n g s m a l l c o l l e c t i o n s of l o c a l i n t e r e s t w hich f a l l under t h e i r mandate, a l t h o u g h they may f i n d i t n e c e s s a r y to u t i l i z e the t e c h n i c a l r e s o u r c e s of the n a t i o n a l a r c h i v e from time to 95 t i m e . The p r e s e r v a t i o n s c e n a r i o .which e n v i s i o n s one major f i l m a r c h i v e per c o u n t r y would i n c r e a s e the f e a s i b i l i t y o f i m p l e -menting f i l m r e c o r d s management t e c h n i q u e s i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h r the f i l m i n d u s t r y . W h i l e such a program would i d e a l l y work most e f f i c i e n t l y i n a c o u n t r y h o u s i n g one f i l m a r c h i v e and a c e n t r a l i z e d n a t i o n a l f i l m i n d u s t r y , i t c o u l d c o n c e i v a b l y be implemented i n a n a t i o n w i t h a d e c e n t r a l i z e d f i l m i n d u s t r y . Problems of c o o r d i n a t i o n and c o o p e r a t i o n would l i k e l y be i n -surmountable i f both the f i l m i n d u s t r y and f i l m a r c h i v e s were d e c e n t r a l i z e d . T a k i n g i n t o account the r e a l i t i e s of d e c r e a s e d a r c h i v a l spending and the remote p o s s i b i l i t i e s of new l o w - c o s t s t o r a g e f o r m a t s , i t would appear t h a t f o r the m a j o r i t y of f i l m a r c h i v e s some form of s e l e c t i o n may be the o n l y v i a b l e a l t e r n a t i v e i n o r d e r to c u l l the more ephemeral r e c o r d s and thus i n s u r e the s u r v i v a l of the most v a l u a b l e moving image documents. De t e r -m i n i n g what c o n s t i t u t e s v a l u e would appear to be the b i g g e s t c h a l l e n g e f o r f i l m a r c h i v e s s e e k i n g t o e s t a b l i s h s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a . Such judgements are by n a t u r e l i k e l y to be somewhat s u b j e c t i v e , but contemporary v a l u e judgements can be made more o b j e c t i v e by c o n s i d e r i n g the moving image document i n terms of both p h y s i c a l s t r u c t u r e and i n f o r m a t i o n a l c o n t e n t , as w e l l as the i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p between the two. In a d d i t i o n , the r o l e of f i l m i n s o c i e t y , p a r t i c u l a r l y the f e a t u r e f i l m , w i t h i t s c a p a c i t y t o m a n i f e s t both c o n s c i o u s and u n c o n s c i o u s v a l u e systems and to sway i t s a u d i e n c e , must be c o n s i d e r e d a 96 c r i t i c a l element i n a s c e r t a i n i n g the v a l u e of the f i l m docu-ment. Value can take many forms i n the f i l m r e c o r d , some more ob v i o u s than o t h e r s . S e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a must take i n t o account both f i l m s of o b v i o u s v a l u e , such as a r t i s t i c and b o x - o f f i c e s u c c e s s e s , propaganda and f i l m of h i g h i n f o r m a t i o n a l v a l u e , as w e l l as f i l m s of l e s s o b v i o u s v a l u e , such as the p o p u l a r "B" . p r o d u c t , h o r r o r and teen f i l m s , which c a t e r to a s p e c i f i c and s i z e a b l e market, and as such, t e s t i f y to some s o r t of mass con-sensus. Once d e c i s i o n s r e g a r d i n g what c o n s t i t u t e s " v a l u e " have been e s t a b l i s h e d f o r the i n d i v i d u a l f i l m a r c h i v e , the g o a l of s e l e c t i o n would i d e a l l y embrace the r e t e n t i o n of the e n t i r e u n i v e r s e of " v a l u a b l e " f i l m documentation, i n o r d e r to b e s t s e r v e a l l c o n c e i v a b l e f u t u r e r e s e a r c h needs. 97 BIBLIOGRAPHY A l d g a t e , Anthony. Cinema and H i s t o r y : B r i t i s h Hewsreels and the S p a n i s h C i v i l War. London: S c o l a r P r e s s , 1979. A l l i s o n , Mary L., Jones, E m i l y S., and S c h o f i e l d , Edward T. A Manual f o r E v a l u a t o r s ' of F i l m s and F i l m s t r i p s . P a r i s: Unesco, 1 956. Anderson, P a t r i c k Donald. In i t s Own Image: The C i n e m a t i c  V i s i o n o f H ollywood . New York: Arno P r e s s , 1978. Arbaugh, Dorothy. "Motion P i c t u r e s and the F u t u r e H i s t o r i a n . " American A r c h i v i s t 2 (1 939)': 1 06-1 A. Arnheim, R u d o l f . F i l m as A r t . B e r k e l e y and Los A n g e l e s : U n i v e r s i t y of C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1957. Bachmann, Gideon. " R e a p p r a i s a l s : a n o v e l l o o k a t some uses of the c i n e m a t i c p a s t . " F i l m Q u a r t e r l y 26 (1972/73): 1 0 - U . Barnouw, E r i k . The Sponsor: Notes on a Modern P o r t e n t a t e . New York: Ox f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1978. B a r r y , I r i s . " F i l m s f o r H i s t o r y . " S p e c i a l L i b r a r i e s 30 (1 939): 258-60. Baumhoher, Hermine M. " F i l m r e c o r d s management." American  A r c h i v i s t 19 (1956): 235-48. . "Motion p i c t u r e s become f e d e r a l r e c o r d s . " American A r c h i v i s t 15 (1952): 15-26. B a z i n , Andre. What i s Cinema? V o l . I . B e r k e l e y and Los A n g e l e s : U n i v e r s i t y of C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1967. Beaumont, Roger A. "Images of War: f i l m s as documentary h i s t o r y . " M i l i t a r y A f f a i r s 35 (1971): 5-7. B e n b e r t , T. M i c h a e l . "A r e l a t i o n s h i p of c o n s t r a i n e d a n x i e t y : h i s t o r i a n s and f i l m . " H i s t o r y Teacher 6 (1973): 553-68. B e r g e r , John. Ways of S e e i n g . London: B r i t i s h B r o a d c a s t i n g C o r p o r a t i o n and Penguin Books, 1972. B e r t r a n d , Ina. F i l m C e n s o r s h i p i n A u s t r a l i a . B r i s b a n e : U n i v e r s i t y o f Queensland P r e s s , 1978. B i r r e l l , Andrew. "The Tyranny of . T r a d i t i o n . " A r c h i v a r i a 10 (1980): 249-52. 98 Blumer, H e r b e r t . Movies and Conduct. New York: M a c m i l l a n Co., 1933. B l u m l e r , Jay G.. "An o v e r v i e w of r e c e n t r e s e a r c h i n t o the impact of b r o a d c a s t i n g i n d e m o c r a t i c p o l i t i c s , " i n P o l i t i c s and t h e-Media: F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n f o r the  P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and :the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 71-85. Bowser, E i l e e n . " S e t t i n g p r i o r i t i e s , " i n Problems of S e l e c -t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n o f F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) . B r u s s e l s ; F.I.A.F., 1980, 103 -04 . , and K u i p e r , John, eds. A Handbook f o r F i l m A r c h i v e s . B r u s s e l s : I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) , 1980. B o y l e , D e i r d r e , ed. E xp an d i n g Media. P h o e n i x : Oryx P r e s s , 1 977. B r a d l e y , John G.. "Motion p i c t u r e s as government a r c h i v e s . " S o c i e t y o f Motion P i c t u r e E n g i n e e r s J o u r n a l 25 (1936): 653-60. . "A n a t i o n a l f i l m l i b r a r y . - the problem of s e l e c t i o n , " S o c i e t y o f Motion P i c t u r e E n g i n e e r s J o u r n a l 4-7 (194-6): 63-72. B u r n e t t e , 0. Lawrence,. J r . Beneath the F o o t n o t e : A guide to  the Use and P r e s e r v a t i o n of American H i s t o r i c a l Sources. W i s c o n s i n : S t a t e H i s t o r i c a l S o c i e t y of W i s c o n s i n , 1969. Burns, E. Bradford.. " C o n c e p t u a l i z i n g the Use of F i l m to Study H i s t o r y : a B i b l i o - F i l m o g r a p h y . . " F i l m and H i s t o r y 4- (1 974) : 1-11. Buscombe, Edward. "America on screen? H o l l y w o o d f e a t u r e . f i l m s as s o c i a l and p o l i t i c a l e v i d e n c e , " i n P o l i t i c s and  the Media: F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n -t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n . , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 25-29. B u t l e r , I v a n . To Encourage the A r t of F i l m : The S t o r y o f the  B r i t i s h F i l m I n s t i t u t e . London: Ro b e r t H a l e , 1971. . The War F i l m . South Br u n s w i c k : A.S. Barnes, 1 974. C a r l s e n , M i c h a e l K., N ^ r g a r t , Per, and Skyum-Nielsen, N i e l s . " Report: Methodology and A u t h e n t i c i t y , " i n S t u d i e s i n  H i s t o r y , F i l m and S o c i e t y 1: H i s t o r y and the A u dio-V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e_t a l . Copenhagen: Ev e n t u s , 1979, 271-74. 99 C l a r k , M.J., od.•. P o l i t i c s and the Media: F i l m and T e l e -v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979. C o l l i n g r i d g e , John H. "The S e l e c t i o n o f a r c h i v e s f o r perma-nent p r e s e r v a t i o n . " Archlvum 6 (1956): 25-35. Cook, David A.. A H i s t o r y of N a r r a t i v e F i l m . New l o r k : W.W. Norton and Co., I n c . , 1981. Cotham, P e r r y C. O b s c e n i t y , Pornography, and C e n s o r s h i p . , Grand R a p i d s , M i c h i g a n : Baker Book House, 1973. C o u l t a s s , C l i v e . " F i l m as an H i s t o r i c a l S o urce: I t s Use and Abuse." A r c h i v e s 13 ( S p r i n g 1977): 12-19. . " F i l m p r e s e r v a t i o n : the a r c h i v e s , " i n The h i s t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1976, 32-47. . "The s e l e c t i o n of. n o n - f i c t i o n f i l m , " i n Problems of S e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) . B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980, 87-94. D a v i e s , P h i l i p J . " F i l m as a t e a c h i n g r e s o u r c e : the p o s s i -b i l i t i e s of u s i n g f i l m i n American government and p o l i -t i c s c o u r s e s , " i n P o l i t i c s . a n d the Media: F i l m and T e l e -v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.'J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1 979, 95-1 04. Duckworth, Jack W. " ' F i l m i c ' v e r s u s ' R e a l ' R e a l i t y i n the H i s t o r y F i l m , " i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m and S o c i e t y 1_: H i s t o r y and the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e t a l . Copenhagen: Eventus, 1979, 171-79. E l l i o t t , P h i l i p . " P r o d u c t i o n and the p o l i t i c a l c o n t e n t of b r o a d c a s t i n g , " i n P o l i t i c s and the Media: F i l m and  T e l e v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 1 7-24. E l t o n , A r t h u r . " F i l m as Source M a t e r i a l f o r H i s t o r y . " A.S.L.I.B. P r o c e e d i n g s 7 (1955): 207-39. Evans, Frank B., H a r r i s o n , Donald F., and Thompson, Edwin A., c o m p i l e r s . "A B a s i c G l o s s a r y f o r A r c h i v i s t s , M a n u s c r i p t C u r a t o r s , and Records Managers." American A r c h i v i s t 37 (1 974): 41 5-33. Feldman, S e t h . "Expanding: A N a t i o n w i d e Program f o r the Study o f F i l m . " F i l m L i b r a r y Q u a r t e r l y 7 (1974): 34-40. 1 00 F e r r o , Marc. "The f i c t i o n f i l m and h i s t o r i c a l a n a l y s i s , " i n The h i s t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1976, 80-94. F i e l d i n g , Raymond. " A r c h i v e s o f the motion p i c t u r e : a g e n e r a l view." American A r c h i v i s t 30 (1967): 493-500. F i s h b e i n , Meyer H.. " A p p r a i s a l of t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y r e c o r d s f o r h i s t o r i c a l use." I l l i n o i s L i b r a r i e s 52 (1970): 154-62. F i s h e r , Loran L. "Notes on f i l m r e c o r d s . " American Documen-t a t i o n 1 (1950: 184 - 90 . F l e d e l i u s , K a r s t e n . " C o n s i d e r a t i o n s about Content A n a l y s i s of A u d i o v i s u a l s , " . i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , . F i l m and S o c i e t y 1 : H i s t o r y and the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e t a l . Copenhagen: Ev e n t u s , 1979, 277-300. ' . " F i l m A n a l y s i s : the S t r u c t u r a l Approach," i n P o l i -t i c s and the Media: F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l  S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n , , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 105-26. __________ "Report: Methods of Content A n a l y s i s and t h e i r V alue f o r the H i s t o r i a n , " i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m  and S o c i e t y 1: H i s t o r y and the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , 'et ' a l . Copenhagen: Eventus, 405-09. , e_t a l , eds. S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m and S o c i e t y k: H i s t o r y and the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media. Copehnagen: Eventus, 1 979. Furhammar, L e i f , and I s a k s s o n , F o l k e . P o l i t i c s and F i l m . London: S t u d i o Visjfea,. 1971. Gane, J u d i t h H... " H i s t o r y and F i l m - Some R e f l e c t i o n s on the A u t h e n t i c i t y Q u e s t i o n , " In S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m and  S o c i e t y 1:- H i s t o r y and the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e_t a l . Copenhagen: Eventus, 1979, 181-99. Gann, L.H. " A r c h i v e s and the study of s o c i e t y . " Rhodes L i v i n g -stone I n s t i t u t e J o u r n a l 20 (1956): 49-67. Gardener, C a r l , ed. Media, P o l i t i c s and C u l t u r e : A S o c i a l i s t  View. London: M a c m i l l a n • P r e s s L t d . , 1979. Glassman, Marc, ed. . F o r b i d d e n F i l m s : The Filmmaker &..Human  R i g h t s . T o r o n t o : Toronto A r t s Group f o r Human R i g h t s and b l e w o i n t m e n t p r e s s , 1984. 1 01 G r e n v i l l e , J.A.S.., and. Pronay, N i c h o l a s . "The H i s t o r i a n and H i s t o r i c a l F i l m s . " U n i v e r s i t y V i s i o n 1 (1968): 3-8. G r i f f i n , P a t r i c k . " F i l m , Document, and the H i s t o r i a n . " F i l m and H i s t o r y 2 (1972): 1-5. Groves, P e t e r D. F i l m i n H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n and R e s e a r c h . O x f o r d : Pergamon P r e s s , 1966. Guback, Thomas H. " C u l t u r a l i d e n t i t y and f i l m i n the European Economic Community." Cinema J o u r n a l 2 (1 974-) : 2-1 7. G u r e v i t c h , M i c h a e l , 'et a l , .eds.. C u l t u r e , S o c i e t y and the  Media. London: Methuen, 1982. Hardy, F o r s y t h , ed. G r i e r s o n on Documentary. London: Faber and Faber l t d . , 1966. H a r g r e a v e s , R o b e r t . " T e l e v i s i o n and c u r r e n t a f f a i r s , " i n P o l i t i c s and the Media: F i l m and . T e l e v i s i o n f o r the  P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and t h e H i s t o r i a n , - e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 9-16. H a r r i n g t o n , John. The R h e t o r i c of F i l m . New York: H o l t , R i n e h a r t and Winston, I n c . , 1973. H a r r i s o n , Helen P. " P r o g r e s s i n documentation: non-book m a t e r i a l s ; a decade of development?" J o u r n a l of Documen-t a t i o n 35 (1979): 207-48. H e r r i c k , Doug. "Toward a n a t i o n a l f i l m c o l l e c t i o n : motion p i c t u r e s a t the L i b r a r y of Congress." F i l m L i b r a r y  Q u a r t e r l y 13 (1980): 5-25. Hope, A d r i a n . " P r e s e r v i n g f o r P o s t e r i t y . " V i d e o and Audio-v i s u a l Review 1 (1975): 24-26. H o r n s h s z i j - M i l l e r , S t i g . "The p o l i t i c a l s c i e n t i s t as f i l m m a k e r : some r e f l e c t i o n s c o n c e r n i n g a German f i l m i c documenta-t i o n p r o j e c t on e l e c t i o n campaigning.." i n P o l i t i c s and  the Media: F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n f o r t h e P o l i t i c a l S c i e n -t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 59-69. Houston, Penelope. "The Nature of the Evidence.': 1 S S i g h t and  Sound 36 ( S p r i n g 1967): 88 -92 . Hughes, W i l l i a m . "The e v a l u a t i o n of f i l m as e v i d e n c e , " i n The h i s t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l S m i th. Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1976, 49-79. Hunnings, N e v i l l e March. F i l m Censors and the Law. London: A l l e n and Unwin, 1967. 1 02 Huthmacher, J . Joseph. " B r i t i s h h i s t o r i a n s and f i l m . " American H i s t o r i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n N e w s l e t t e r 7 (1969): 25-28. I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n o f F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) . The  P r e s e r v a t i o n arid R e s t o r a t i o n of C o l o u r and Sound i n  F i l m s . B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1977. . Problems of S e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s . B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980. J a c k s o n , M a r t i n A. " F i l m as a Source M a t e r i a l : Some P r e l i m i -n a r y Notes Toward a Methodology.." J o u r n a l o f I n t e r d i s c i -p l i n a r y H i s t o r y 4 (1973): 73-80. J a c o b s , L e w i s , ed.. The. Movies as Medium. New York: F a r r a r , S t r a u s and G i r o u x , 1970. J a r v i e , I.C. Movies and S o c i e t y . New York: B a s i c Books, I n c . , 1970. . Movies as S o c i a l C r i t i c i s m : A s p e c t s of T h e i r S o c i a l P s y c h o l o g y . Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow P r e s s , I n c . , 1 978.. J a v e l i n , M u r i e l C. " P u t t i n g F i l m s to Work." American L i b r a r y  A s s o c i a t i o n B u l l e t i n 50 (1956): 220 -24 . Jeavons, C l y d e . " S e l e c t i o n i n the N a t i o n a l F i l m A r c h i v e o f Gre a t B r i t a i n , " i n Problem's of S e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) . B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980, 25-51. J e f f e r y s , C h a r l e s W.. " H i s t o r y i n motion p i c t u r e s , " Canadian  H i s t o r i c a l Review 22 (1941): 361-68. J i n k s , W i l l i a m . The C e l l u l o i d L i t e r a t u r e : f i l m i n the h u m a n i t i e s . Second e d i t i o n . B e v e r l y H i l l s : Glencoe P r e s s , 1974. J o h n s t o n , C l a i r e . " B r i t i s h F i l m C u l t u r e , " i n Media, P o l i t i c s  and C u l t u r e : A S o c i a l i s t View, e d i t e d by C a r l Gardener. London: M a c m i l l a n P r e s s L t d . , 1979. 81-87. K a h l e n b e r g , F r i e d r i c h P. "Toward a v i t a l f i l m c u l t u r e : f i l m a r c h i v e s i n Germany." Q u a r t e r l y Review o f F i l m S t u d i e s 5 (1 980): 253-61 . K a r r , L a r r y . "The American s i t u a t i o n , " i n Problems of S e l e c t i o n  i n F i l m A r c h i v e s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) . B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980, 53-78. 1 03 K i n g , B a r r i e E. " F i l m a r c h i v e s : t h e i r purpose and problems," A r c h i v e s and M a n u s c r i p t s 4 ( 1 9 7 0 ) : 8 - 1 6 . K o e n i g i l , Mark. Movies i n S o c i e t y (Sex,. Crime and C e n s o r s h i p ) . New York: R o b e r t S p e l l e r and Sons, I n c . , 1 9 6 2 . K r a c a u e r , S i e g f r i e d . From C a l i g a r i to H i t l e r : A P s y c h o l o g i c a l  H i s t o r y o f the German F i l m . London: Dennis Dobson L t d . , 1 9 4 7 . K u e h l , J e r r y . " T h e . h i s t o r i a n and f i l m . " S i g h t and Sound 45 (1 9 7 6 ) : 1 1 8-1 9 . . " H i s t o r y on the p u b l i c s c r e e n I I , " i n The h i s t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 7 6 , 1 1 7 - 8 5 . K u l a , Sam. The A r c h i v a l , ' a p p r a i s a l of moving images: a RAMP  study w i t h g u i d e l i n e s . P a r i s : Unesco, 1 9 8 3 . . " C o n s e r v i n g the Canadian Image." J o u r n a l of the ' U n i v e r s i t y F i l m A s s o c i a t i o n 27 (1 9 7 5 ) : 5 5 - 5 7 . ' "Documentation of s o c i a l change." H i s t o r y Teacher 5~T1 9 7 3 ) : 3 0 3 - 0 7 . K u i p e r , John B. "The H i s t o r i c a l V alue of Motion P i c t u r e s . " American A r c h i v i s t 31 ( 1 9 6 8 ) : 3 8 5 - 9 0 . L a r o s e , K.M. " P r e s e r v i n g the P a s t on F i l m : Problems f o r the A r c h i v i s t . " A r c h i v a r i a 6 ( 1 9 7 8 ) : 1 3 7 - 5 0 . Leyda, Jay. F i l m s Beget F i l m s . London: George A l l e n and Unwin, L t d . , 1 964-. L o v e l l , A l a n , and H i l l i e r , J i m . S t u d i e s i n Documentary. London: Seeker and Warburg and the B r i t i s h F i l m I n s t i -t u t e , 1 9 7 2 . MacCann, R i c h a r d Dyer. F i l m and S o c i e t y . New York: C h a r l e s S c r i b n e r ' s Sons, 1 964-• McCreary, Eugene C. " F i l m and H i s t o r y : Some Thoughts on T h e i r I n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p . " S o c i e t a s 1 ( 1 9 7 1 ) : 5 1 - 6 6 . M c N e i l l , W i l l i a m H. "The H i s t o r i a n and H i s t o r i c a l F i l m s : The P r e s e n t S t a t e of Things and.a Look a t the F u t u r e . " J o u r n a l o f H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n 39 ( 1 9 6 8 ) : 3 8 8 - 9 4 -Madsen, Roy P a u l . The Impact of. F i l m : How Ideas a re Communi-c a t e d Through Cinema and T e l e v i s i o n . New York: Mac-m i l l a n P u b l i s h i n g Co., I n c . , 1 9 7 3 . 1 04. Mamber, Stephen. Cinema V e r i t e i n America,: S t u d i e s i n Uncon-t r o l l e d Documentary. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. P r e s s , 1974. M a n v e l l , Roger. F i l m s and 1 the Second World War. South Bruns-wick and London: A.S. Barnes and Co., 1 974-. Marwick, A r t h u r . "Notes on the use o f a r c h i v e f i l m , " i n War  and s o c i a l change i n the t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y : a compara-t i v e study of B r i t a i n , F r a n c e , Germany, R u s s i a and the  U n i t e d S t a t e s . . London: M a c m i l l a n P u b l i s h i n g Co., 1 974-. Mayer, Jacob P e t e r . S o c i o l o g y of F i l m : S t u d i e s and Documents. London: Faber and Faber L t d . , 194-6. • Metz, C h r i s t i a n . Language and Cinema. The Hague: Mouton and Co.. N.V., 1974. M e t z er, Newton E. "Are Newsreels News?" Hollywood' Q u a r t e r l y 2 (194-6/47): 270-72. Monaco, P a u l . Cinema & S o c i e t y : France and Germany D u r i n g  the Twenties.. New York: E l s e v i e r , 1 976. Monaco, James. How to Read a F i l m : The A r t , Technology, Language, H i s t o r y , and Theory of F i l m and Media. R e v i s e d e d i t i o n . New York: O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1981. Mraz, John. " L u c i a : F i l m and H i s t o r y i n R e v o l u t i o n a r y Cuba." F i l m and H i s t o r y 5 (1975): 8 -14. Munsterberg, Hugo. The. Film:. . A P s y c h o l o g i c a l Study; the s i l e n t p h o t o p l a y i n 1 9 1 o . N e w Y o r k : D o v e r P u b l i c a t i o n s r e p r i n t , 1970. Murphy, W i l l i a m . "The N a t i o n a l A r c h i v e s and the h i s t o r i a n ' s use of f i l m . " H i s t o r y Teacher 6 (1972): 119-34. Murray, Lawrence L. "The F e a t u r e F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l Document." S o c i a l S t u d i e s . 68 (1 977): 1 0-1 4-Nieuwenhof, F r a n s . "The R elevance of A u d i o v i s u a l Mass Communi-c a t i o n f o r the H i s t o r i a n , " i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m  and S o c i e t y 1: H i s t o r y . a n d the A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e_t a l . Copenhagen: E v e n t u s , 1 979, 311-18. Nygren, S c o t t . "The S t o r y o f F i l m / The S t o r y of Man." F i l m L i b r a r y Q u a r t e r l y 7 (1974): 62-70. O b e r h o l t z e r , E l l i s Paxson. The Morals of the Movie. P h i l a -d e l p h i a : Penn P u b l i s h i n g Co., 1922. 1 05 O'Connor, B r i a n G. "Access to Moving Image Documents: Back-ground Concepts and. P r o p o s a l s f o r S u r r o g a t e s f o r F i l m and Video Works. " •Jo u r n a l ; of Documentation 41 (1 9 8 5 ) : 2 0 9 - 2 0 . O'Connor, John E. " H i s t o r i a n s and f i l m : some problems and p r o s p e c t s . " H i s t o r y .Teacher 6 (1 973 ) : 5 4 2 - 5 2 . __, and J a c k s o n , M a r t i n A., eds. American H i s t o r y / American F i l m : - I n t e r p r e t i n g the Hollywood Image. New York: F r e d e r i c k Ungar P u b l i s h i n g Co., 1 9 7 9 . Ogui, M. "On f i l m a r c h i v e s . " L i b r a r y , and I n f o r m a t i o n S c i e n c e U (1 9 7 8 ) : 3 5 5 - 6 8 . Opela, V l a d i m i r . . "Problems of s e l e c t i o n of f i l m m a t e r i a l s and the a r c h i v a l system i n C z e c h o s l o v a k i a , '.' i n Problems of S e l e c t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) . B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1 9 8 0 , 9 - 1 6 . Ozimek, S t a n i s l a w . " F i l m as a Witness of H i s t o r y , " i n S t u d i e s  i n H i s t o r y , F i l m and S o c i e t y T: H i s t o r y and the Au d i o -V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , _et a l . Copen-hagen: E v e n t u s , 1 9 7 9 , 2 3 7 - 4 6 . P h e l p s , Guy. F i l m C e n s o r s h i p . London: G o l l a n c z , 1 9 7 5 . P o n t e c o r v o , L i s a . " F i l m r e s o u r c e s , " i n The h i s t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l Smith.. Cambridge: Cambridge U n i -v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 7 6 , 1 5-31 * Powdermaker, H o r t e n s e . . H o l l y w o o d the Dream F a c t o r y : An  A n t h r o p o l o g i s t Looks ..at the Movie-Makers. Boston: L i t t l e , Brown and Co., 1 9 5 0 . Pronay, N i c h o l a s . " A r c h i v e f i l m / t e l e v i s i o n p r e s e r v a t i o n : the h i s t o r i a n ' s p e r s p e c t i v e . " The A u d i o v i s u a l L i b r a r i a n 5 ( 1 9 7 9 ) : 2 4 - 2 5 . . "The n e w s r e e l s : the i l l u s i o n of a c t u a l i t y , " i n The h i s t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 7 6 , 9 5 - 1 1 9 . . " T e l e v i s i o n - b a s e d h i s t o r y t e a c h i n g i n the c o n t e x t of the t r a d i t i o n a l u n i v e r s i t y , " ' i n P o l i t i c s and the Media: F i l m and t e l e v i s i o n . f o r the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the  H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1 9 7 9 , 4 5 - 5 8 . , and S p r i n g , D.W., eds. Propaganda, P o l i t i c s and F i l m , 1918-1945. London: M a c m i l l a n P u b l i s h i n g Co., 1982. 106 Quinn, James. The F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n as an A s p e c t of Euro-pean C u l t u r e . Leyden: A.W. S i j t h o f f , 1968. Raack. R.C. " C l i o ' s dark m i r r o r : the documentary f i l m i n h i s t o r y . " H i s t o r y Teacher 6.(1972): 109-18. R a n d a l l , R i c h a r d S. C e n s o r s h i p of the Movies: The S o c i a l and  P o l i t i c a l C o n t r o l o f a Mass Medium. Madison, W i s c o n s i n : U n i v e r s i t y of W i s c o n s i n P r e s s , 1968. R i c h a r d s , J e f f r e y . V i s i o n s o f Y e s t e r d a y . London: R o u t l e d g e and Kegan P a u l , 1973. Roads, C h r i s t o p h e r H. " F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l E v i d e n c e . " J o u r n a l  o f the S o c i e t y of. A r c h i v i s t s 3 (1 966): 1-83-91 . R o b e r t s o n , P e t e r . "More than Meets the Eye." A r c h i y a r i a 2 (1976): 33-43. R o l l i n s , P e t e r C.,.ed. Hol l y w o o d as H i s t o r i a n : American F i l m i n a C u l t u r a l C o n t e x t . L e x i n g t o n : U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s o f Kentucky, 1983. R o s e n t h a l , A l a n . The Documentary C o n s c i e n c e : A Casebook i n  F i l m - M a k i n g . B e r k e l e y : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1 980. Rowan, K a t h r y n . " A u d i o - v i s u a l s o u r c e s and r e s e a r c h i n t o mo-dern B r i t i s h p o l i t i c s , " i n P o l i t i c s and the Media:  F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the  H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979. Samuels, S t u a r t , and Rosen, Ro b e r t . " F i l m and the H i s t o r i a n . " American H i s t o r i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n N e w s l e t t e r 11 (1973): 31-37. S a r r i s , Andrew. P o l i t i c s and Cinema. New Y ork: Columbia U n i -v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1978. S e h u l z , G i i n t e r . "On the S t r u c t u r e o f an E v a l u a t i n g System f o r A u d i o v i s u a l M a t e r i a l s i n the GDR," i n Problems of S e l e c -ti'o'n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n of F i l m A r c h i v e s ( F . I . A . F . ) . B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980, 79-85. Schumach, Murray. The Face oh the C u t t i n g Room F l o o r : The  s t o r y o f movie and t e l e v i s i o n c e n s o r s h i p . New York: W i l l i a m Morrow and Co., 1964. Schuursma, R o l f L. " F i l m and H i s t o r y i n the N e t h e r l a n d s . " F i l m and H i s t o r y 2 (1972): 10-16. 1 07 S h o r t , K.R.M. F e a t u r e F i l m s as H i s t o r y . London: Croom Helm L t d . , S i m c o v i t c h , Maxim. "The Impact of G r i f f i t h ' s B i r t h of a N a t i o n on the Modern Ku K l u x E l a n . ". J o u r n a l . of P o p u l a r F i l m 1 (1 972): 4-5-54--Skyum-Nielsen, N i e l s . "The Use of S t i l l s from F i c t i o n a l F i l m s as H i s t o r i c a l Documents," i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , F i l m  and S o c i e t y 1: H i s t o r y and t h e A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e t a l . Copenhagen: Eventus, 1 9 7 9 , 1 -1 6 . Smith, Anthony. " M i x i n g C h e m i s t r y w i t h C u l t u r e : P r e s e r v i n g F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n . " R o y a l S o c i e t y o f -Arts J o u r n a l 29 (1 980/81 ) : 423-34-. Smith, J u l i a n . L o o k i n g Away: Hollywood and V ietnam . New Y o r k: C h a r l e r s S c r i b n e r ' s Sons, 1975. S m i th, P a u l . "The F i c t i o n F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l S ource," i n S t u d i e s i n H i s t o r y , Film... and S o c i e t y 1.: H i s t o r y and the  A u d i o - V i s u a l Media, e d i t e d by K a r s t e n F l e d e l i u s , e t a l . Copenhagen: E v e n t u s , 1979, 201-11. . ' , ed. T h e ' h i s t o r i a n and f i l m . Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1976. . " P o l i t i c a l S t y l e on F i l m : N e v i l l e C h a m b e r l a i n , " i n P o l i t i c s and the Media: F i l m . a n d T e l e v i s i o n f o r the  P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and, the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 87_93. S o r l i n , P i e r r e . The Film, i n . H i s t o r y : Re s t a g i n g the P a s t . O x f o r d : B a s i l B l a c k w e l l , 1 980. _____ Speed, F r a n c i s . • "The f u n c t i o n of the f i l m as h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d . " A f r i c a n Notes 6 (1968): 45-51. T a y l o r , Hugh. "Documentary A r t and the R o l e of the A r c h i v i s t . " American . A r c h i v i s t 42 (1 979): 41 7-28. . "The Media o f R e c o r d : A r c h i v e s i n the Wake of McLuhan." G e o r g i a A r c h i v e 6 (1978): 1-10. T a y l o r , R i c h a r d . "From October .to 'October:' the S o v i e t p o l i t i c a l ' s y s t e m i n the 1920s and i t s f i l m s , " i n P o l i t i c s  and the Media: F i l m and T e l e v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l  S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 31 -42 . Terveen, F r i t z . " F i l m as H i s t o r i c a l Document." U n i v e r s i t y V i s i o n 1 (1968): 22-25. 1 08 Thomson, D a v i d . America i n the Dark;. Hollywood.and the G i f t  o f U n r e a l i t y . New York: W i l l i a m Morrow and Co., I n c . , 1 977. T o l l , R obert C. The' E n t e r t a i n m e n t - M a c h i n e : American Show  B u s i n e s s i n the T w e n t i e t h Century. New York: Oxford U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1982. Tudor, Andrew. Image and I n f l u e n c e : S t u d i e s i n the S o c i o l o g y  of Film.. London: George A l l e n and Unwin, 1 974--Unesco. Recommendation, f o r the S a f e g u a r d i n g and P r e s e r v a t i o n  o f Moving Images: .Adopted' by the G e n e r a l Converence, B e l g r a d e , 27 October, T980. P a r i s : Unesco, 1981. U r g o s i k o v a , B l a z e n a . "System of A r c h i v a l . S e l e c t i o n of Moving Images i n the. Prague F i l m A r c h i v e , " , i n Problems o f S e l e c -t i o n i n F i l m A r c h i v e s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n o f Film. A r c h i v e s { F . I . A . F . ) . B r u s s e l s : F.I.A.F., 1980, 17-23. van V l i e t , M a rgaret. "The Unesco Recommendation f o r the S a f e -g u a r d i n g and P r e s e r v a t i o n of Moving Images." European  B r o a d c a s t i n g Union Review 32 (1 981 ) : 1 6-1 8. V o g e l , Amos. F i l m as a S u b v e r s i v e A r t . New York: Random House, 1 974-. Watt, Donald. " H i s t o r y on the p u b l i c s c r e e n I , " i n The h i s -t o r i a n and f i l m , e d i t e d by P a u l Smith. Cambridge: Cam-b r i d g e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1976, 169-176. Wees, W i l l i a m C , and Dorland,. M i c h a e l , eds. Words & Moving  Images: Essays on V e r b a l .and V i s u a l E x p r e s s i o n i n F i l m  and T e l e v i s i o n . M o n t r e a l : M e d i a t e x t e . P u b l i c a t i o n s I n c . , 1984. Welch, D a v i d . Propaganda, .and the German Cinema 1 933-1 945. New York: O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1983. W i l l i a m s , A l d e n . " S e i z i n g the moving image: b r o a d c a s t t e l e -v i s i o n a r c h i v e s , " i n P o l i t i c s and the Media: F i l m and  T e l e v i s i o n f o r the P o l i t i c a l S c i e n t i s t and the H i s t o r i a n , e d i t e d by M.J. C l a r k . London: Pergamon P r e s s , 1979, 129-38. W o l f e , Judy. "The Filmmaker and Human R i g h t s : Some R e f l e c t i o n s , " i n F o r b i d d e n F i l m s : The Filmmaker and Human R i g h t s , e d i t e d by Marc Glassman. T o r o n t o : Toronto A r t s Group f o r Human R i g h t s and b l e w o i n t m e n t p r e s s , 1984, 4-7. W o l l e n , P e t e r . S i g n s and Meaning i n t h e Cinema. Bloomington; I n d i a n a U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1969. 1 09 Wood, M i c h a e l . - America i n . t h e Movies: ,Or "Santa M a r i a , I t  Had S l i p p e d My Mind." New York: B a s i c Books, 1975. Yamaguchi, J.. "Pornography i s P e r c e p t i o n " i n Words and Moving  Images": Essays on V e r b a l and V i s u a l . E x p r e s s i o n i n F i l m  and T e l e v i s i o n , e d i t e d by W i l l i a m C. Wees and M i c h a e l D o r l a n d . M o n t r e a l : M e d i a t e x t e P u b l i c a t i o n s I n c . , 1984, 171-79. Youngblood, Gene. " A r t , E n t e r t a i n m e n t , E n t r o p y , " i n F i l m Theory and C r i t i c i s m , e d i t e d by Gerald-'Mast and M a r s h a l l Cohen. New York: O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1974, 605-11. . Expanded Cinema. New York: E.P. Dutton and Co., I n c . , 1 970. 

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.831.1-0096625/manifest

Comment

Related Items