UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

Mould growth on building materials and the effects of borate-based preservatives Li, Raymond 2005

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata

Download

Media
831-ubc_2005-0251.pdf [ 14.99MB ]
Metadata
JSON: 831-1.0091964.json
JSON-LD: 831-1.0091964-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0091964-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 831-1.0091964-rdf.json
Turtle: 831-1.0091964-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 831-1.0091964-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 831-1.0091964-source.json
Full Text
831-1.0091964-fulltext.txt
Citation
831-1.0091964.ris

Full Text

M O U L D G R O W T H O N BUILDING M A T E R I A L S A N D T H E EFFECTS OF B O R A T E - B A S E D P R E S E R V A T I V E S By Raymond L i B . S c , B.Sc.(Pharm.), University of British Columbia, 2005 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN P A R T I A L F U L F I L L M E N T OF T H E REQUIREMENTS FOR T H E D E G R E E OF M A S T E R OF SCIENCE in  T H E F A C U L T Y OF G R A D U A T E STUDIES Occupational and Environmental Hygiene  T H E UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH C O L U M B I A April 2005 © Raymond L i , 2005  1  Abstract O n e o f the d i f f i c u l t i e s i n e s t a b l i s h i n g causal roles for i n d o o r m o u l d g r o w t h and adverse health effects is that the g r o w t h , m e t a b o l i s m , and b i o l o g i c a l a c t i v i t y o f m o u l d s depend o n the interaction o f the m o u l d s w i t h their g r o w t h substrates and e n v i r o n m e n t . Further, one o f the approaches to p r e v e n t i n g i n d o o r m o u l d g r o w t h is to treat b u i l d i n g materials w i t h preservatives. Borates are a class o f preservatives w i t h l o w t o x i c i t y that c a n b e u s e d to protect a v a r i e t y o f different materials.  Objectives: T h e g r o w t h and m e t a b o l i s m o f three m o u l d s associated w i t h i n d o o r e n v i r o n m e n t p r o b l e m s w e r e investigated o n untreated and borate-treated versions o f six b u i l d i n g materials.  Methods: Untreated and treated s p e c i m e n s o f Southern Y e l l o w pine, l o d g e p o l e p i n e , p i n e oriented strandboard, aspen o r i e n t e d strandboard, c e l l u l o s e i n s u l a t i o n , and g y p s u m b o a r d were i n o c u l a t e d w i t h spores o f S. chartarum ( A T C C 2 0 1 2 1 2 ) , A. versicolor ( A T C C 2 6 9 3 9 ) , or P . brevicompactum ( A T C C 9 0 5 6 ) , and incubated at 2 0 - 2 3 ° C and - 1 0 0 % relative h u m i d i t y for 4 weeks. T h e v i s u a l appearance o f m o u l d g r o w t h and changes i n the v o l a t i l e o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d profile were measured each week. C a r b o n d i o x i d e p r o d u c t i o n a n d ergosterol were measured at the end o f the i n c u b a t i o n p e r i o d .  Results: T h e b u i l d i n g materials tested differed i n their a b i l i t y to support m o u l d g r o w t h .  S. chartarum d i d  not g r o w o n untreated or treated w o o d or w o o d c o m p o s i t e s . T h e pattern o f v o l a t i l e organic c o m p o u n d s p r o d u c e d b y e a c h m o u l d depended o n the g r o w t h substrate. B o r a t e s w e r e effective at preventing or r e d u c i n g m o u l d g r o w t h , although O S B m a y require h i g h e r levels o f treatment than currently used. A dose-response trend was observed w i t h g y p s u m board. S u b - i n h i b i t o r y levels o f borates d i d not stimulate the p r o d u c t i o n o f different v o l a t i l e metabolites, suggesting the lack o f stress m e t a b o l i s m . T h e use o f different methods for e v a l u a t i n g g r o w t h revealed that there c o u l d be m o u l d g r o w t h o n materials that d i d not appear to be c o n t a m i n a t e d .  Conclusions: M o u l d g r o w t h and m e t a b o l i s m is i n f l u e n c e d b y the specific mould-substrate interactions. Borate-based preservatives i n h i b i t m o u l d g r o w t h and do not appear to i n d u c e stress m e t a b o l i s m at s u b - i n h i b i t o r y concentrations. Further studies o n other aspects o f m o u l d g r o w t h , s u c h as m y c o t o x i n p r o d u c t i o n and the b i o l o g i c a l a c t i v i t y o f spores, o n treated and untreated b u i l d i n g materials are needed.  Table of Contents Abstract Table of Contents  ii - iii  List of Tables  ix  List of Figures  x  Abbreviations and Definitions  xi i  Acknowledgments  xiii  1. INTRODUCTION  1  1.1 The indoor environment and indoor air quality  1  1.2 Introduction to fungi and moulds 1.2.1. Structure and metabolism  1 2  1.3 Mould growth indoors 1.3.1 Moulds in indoor spaces and adverse health effects 1.3.1.1 Allergens 1.3.1.2 Glucans 1.3.1.3 VOCs 1.3.1.4 Mycotoxins 1.3.1.5 Epidemiological evidence  4 5 5 6 6 7 7  1.4 Prevention of mould growth 1.4.1 Boron and borates 1.4.2 Toxicity of borates , 1.4.3 Borates as preservatives 1.4.3.1 Solid wood 1.4.3.2 Oriented strandboard (OSB) 1.4.3.3 Cellulose insulation 1.4.3.4 Gypsum board  9 10 11 12 12 12 13 13  1.5 Moulds and building materials 1.5.1 Literature review 1.5.1.1 Studies of interactions between moulds and building materials 1.5.1.2 Studies on the effectiveness of borate-based preservatives  13 14 14 17  1.6 Objectives of the study  18  in  2. M E T H O D S . . .  19  2.1 Overall Study Design  19  2.2 Test Materials... 2.2.1 Preparation of test materials 2.2.1.1 Solid wood (Southern Yellow pine and lodgepole pine) 2.2.1.2 Oriented strandboard 2.2.1.3 Cellulose insulation 2.2.1.4 Gypsum board., 2.2.2 Sterilisation of test materials 2.2.3 Conditioning of test materials  20 21 21 21 21 21 21 22  2.3 Inoculation 2.3.1 Organisms 2.3.2 Culturing organisms 2.3.3 Preparation of the spore suspension 2.3.4 Inoculation  22 22 23 23 24  2.4 Incubation 2.4.1 Incubation chambers 2.4.2 Incubation conditions  25 25 26  2.5 Assessment of growth 2.5.1 Visual assessment 2.5.1.1 Growth visible to the unaided eye 2.5.1.2 Microscopic examination 2.5.1.3 Volunteer rating of visible growth 2.5.2 Volatile organic compound extraction and analysis 2.5.2.1 Extraction 2.5.2.2 Gas chromatography analysis 2.5.2.3 Identification of compounds 2.5.3 Carbon dioxide measurement 2.5.4 Ergosterol measurement : 2.5.4.1 Ergosterol sampling 2.5.4.2 Ergosterol Analysis  26 27 27 27 27 28 28 29 30 30 31 31 31  2.6 Comparison of methods to assess growth  32  2.7 Data handling and analysis 2.7.1 Visual assessment 2.7.2 Volatile Organic Compound Profiles 2.7.3 Carbon dioxide 2.7.4 Ergosterol  33 33 33 33 33  2.8 Heartwood determination and borate treatment status  34  iv  2.8.1 Heartwood determination 2.8.2 Borate treatment status  34 34  3. RESULTS  35  3.1 Mould growth on building materials  ••  3.1.1 Solid wood 3.1.1.1 Visible growth 3.1.1.1.1 Visible growth - Southern Yellow pine 3.1.1.1.1.1 S. chartarum 3.1.1.1.1.2 A. versicolor 3.1.1.1.1.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.1.1.2 Visible growth - Lodgepole pine 3.1.1.1.2.1 S. chartarum 3.1.1.1.2.2 A. versicolor 3.1.1.1.2.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.1.2 Volatile Organic Compound Profile. 3.1.1.2.1 VOCs - Southern Yellow pine 3.1.1.2.1.1 S. chartarum 3.1.1.2.1.2/1. versicolor 3 A A.2 A.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.1.2.2 VOCs-Lodgepole pine 3.1.1.2.2.1 S. chartarum 3-1.1.2.2.2 A versicolor 3.1.1.2.2.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.1.3 Carbon dioxide 3.1.1.4 Ergosterol 3.1.2 Wood composites 3.1.2.1 Visual growth 3.1.2.1.1 Visual growth - Pine oriented strandboard 3.1.2.1.1.1 S. chartarum 3.1.2.1.1.2 A versicolor 3.1.2.1.1.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.2.1.2 Visual growth - Aspen oriented strandboard 3.1.2.1.2.1 S. chartarum 3A2A.22 A. versicolor 3A.2A.2.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.2.2 Volatile organic compounds • 3.1.2.2.1 VOCs - Pine oriented strandboard 3.1.2.2.1.1 S. chartarum 3.1.2.2.1.2 A versicolor 3A.2.2A.3 P. brevicompactum  35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 36 37 37 37 37 39 40 40 40 41 42 43  :  ;  •••  44 44 44 44 44 44 45 45 46 46 46 47 47 47 48  3.1.2.2.2 VOCs - Aspen Oriented Strandboard (Aspen OSB) 3.1.2.2.2.1 S. chartarum 3.1.2.2.2.2 A. versicolor 3.1.2.2.2.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.2.3 Carbon dioxide 3.1.2.4 Ergosterol  49 49 49 50 51 52  3.1.3 Cellulose insulation 3.1.3.1 Visual growth - cellulose insulation 3.1.3.1.1 S. chartarum 3.1.3.1.2 A. versicolor 3.1.3.1.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.3.2 VOCs - Cellulose Insulation 3.1.3.1.1 S. chartarum 3.1.3.1.2 A. versicolor 3.1.3.1.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.3.3 Carbon dioxide - cellulose insulation 3.1.3.4 Ergosterol  53 53 53 53 53 53 54 55 55 56 56  3.1.4 Gypsum board 3.1.4.1 Visual growth - Gypsum boards 3.1.4.1.1 S. chartarum 3.1.4.1.2 A. versicolor 3.1.4.1.3 P. brevicompactum 3.1.4.1.4 Independent rating of visual growth 3.1.4.2 VOCs - Gypsum board 3.1.4.2.1 S. chartarum on gypsum board 3.1.4.2.1.1 Sesquiterpene production by S. chartarum on gypsum board 3.1.4.2.2 A. versicolor on gypsum board 3.1.4.2.3 P. brevicompactum on gypsum board 3.1.4.3 Carbon dioxide - Gypsum board 3.1.4.4 Ergosterol - Gypsum board  57 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 63 64 65 66 68  3.1.5 Summary of results of mould growth on building materials  69  3.2 Comparisons between measures of growth - gypsum board experiments 3.2.1 Carbon dioxide versus Week 4 Visual Score 3.2.2 Ergosterol versus Week 4 Visual Score 3.2.3 Carbon Dioxide versus Ergosterol  71 71 72 73  4. DISCUSSION  74"  4.1 Overview  74  4.2 Organism-substrate interactions  75  VI  4.2.1 Differing abilities of materials to support mould growth 4.2.2 V O C profiles produced by each organism on different substrates 4.2.2.1 Solid wood 4.2.2.2 Wood composites 4.2.2.3 Cellulose insulation 4.2.2.4 Gypsum board 4.2.3 Variability of volatile metabolites 4.2.4 Comparison with other studies 4.2.5 Potential use of VOCs as identifiers of mould contamination  75 76 76 76 77 77 78 78 78  4.3 Effects of borate preservatives 4.3.1 Solid wood 4.3.2 Wood composites. 4.3.3 Cellulose insulation 4.3.4 Gypsum board 4.3.5 Comparison with other studies  79 79 80 81 81 81  4.4. Use of different measures to assess fungal growth 4.4.1 Visual assessment 4.4.2 Changes in the V O C profile. 4.4.3 Carbon dioxide... -. 4.4.4 Ergosterol  82 82 83 84 86  4.5 Strengths and limitations of the study 4.5.1 Strengths ..: 4.5.2 Limitations 4.5.2.1 Methodology 4.5.2.1.1 Duration of experiments 4.5.2.1.2 Visual assessment 4.5.2.1.3 Measuring the volatile organic compound profile 4.5.2.1.4 Carbon dioxide 4.5.2.1.5 Ergosterol 4.5.2.2 Generalisability of the results 4.5.2.2.1 Interactions between organisms and substrates 4.5.2.2.2 Effectiveness of borate preservatives  89 89 90 90 90 90 91 91 91 91 91 92  -•  4.6 Future directions 4.6.1 Mycotoxin analysis and biological activity of spores and fungal fragments 4.6.2 Long-term performance of borates 4.6.3 Different environmental conditions 4.6.4 Effects of accumulation of carbon dioxide and VOCs 4.6.5 Tests of materials under in-use conditions 4.6.6 Toxicity of V O C metabolites 4.6.7 Mechanism of resistance to borates  ,.  92 92 93 93 93 94 94 94  vu  5. CONCLUSIONS  95  REFERENCES  97  Appendices Appendix A - Conditioning materials Appendix B - Preparation of the spore suspension Appendix C - Inoculation procedure Appendix D - S P M E desorption and sample carry-over Appendix E - Comparison of SPME fibers Appendix F - Effects of extraction time Appendix G - Gas chromatography conditions Appendix H - Development of CO2 measurement method Appendix I - Ergosterol method Appendix J - Photographs of specimens after 4 weeks. Appendix K - Sample V O C chromatograms  108 109 112 113 115 116 118 119 121 122 134 145  Vlll  List of Tables Table 1.1: Environmental factors influencing fungal growth Table 1.2: Levels of evidence for adverse health effects associated with damp indoor spaces and mould growth Table 1.3: Toxic effects of borates Table 1.4: Boron compounds used commercially in material preservation  8 11 12  Table 2.1: Test materials used in the study Table 2.2: Organisms used in the study Table 2.3: Rating scale used for the intensity of fungal growth  20 23 27  :  Table 3.1: Volatile organic compounds from fungal growth on Southern Yellow pine and lodgepole pine Table 3.2: Average carbon dioxide concentration - solid wood Table 3.3: Average ergosterol content (u,g/cm2) - solid wood , Table 3.4: Volatile organic compounds from fungal growth on pine oriented strandboard and aspen oriented strandboard Table 3.5: Average carbon dioxide concentration (ppm) - OSB Table 3.6: Average ergosterol content (u.g/cm2) - OSB Table 3.7: Volatile organic compounds from fungal growth on cellulose insulation... Table 3.8: Average carbon dioxide concentration (ppm) - cellulose insulation Table 3.9: Average ergosterol content (mean ± SD) (pg/g) - cellulose insulation Table 3.10: Volatile organic compounds from fungal growth on gypsum boards Table 3.11: Overall results - growth or no growth (all materials except gypsum board). Table 3.12: Overall results - growth or no growth (gypsum board) Table 4.1: Comparison of the V O C s produced by similar organisms on similar building materials in reports in the literature and in this study. Table 4.2: Advantages and disadvantages of the different measured of fungal growth used in this study  3  38 42 43 47 51 52 54 56 56 60 70 70  78 88  ix  List of Figures Figure 1.1: The three critical factors for mould growth indoors Figure 2.1: Experimental design for solid wood, oriented strandboard, and cellulose insulation experiments Figure 2.2: Experimental design for gypsum board experiments Figure 2.3: Stainless steel lid for incubation chamber Figure 2.4: Taking a V O C sample Figure 2.5: Measuring carbon dioxide levels Figure 3.1: Individual visual growth scores for A. versicolor on untreated Southern Yellow pine Figure 3.2: Individual visual growth scores for P. brevicompactum on untreated Southern Yellow pine Figure 3.3: Individual visual growth scores for A. versicolor on untreated lodgepole pine Figure 3.4: 2-Pentanone production by A. versicolor on untreated Southern Yellow pine Figure 3.5: Acetone production by P. brevicompactum on untreated Southern Yellow pine Figure 3.6: 2-Pentanone production by P. brevicompactum on untreated Southern Yellow pine Figure 3.7: 2-Butanone production by P. brevicompactum on untreated Southern Yellow pine Figure 3.8: 2-Pentanone production by A. versicolor on untreated lodgepole pine Figure 3.9: Hexanal concentrations for untreated lodgepole pine inoculated with P. brevicompactum (experiment 1) Figure 3.10: Hexanal concentrations for untreated lodgepole pine inoculated with P. brevicompactum (experiment 2) Figure 3.11: Individual visual growth scores for A. versicolor on untreated pine OSB Figure 3.12: Individual visual growth scores for P. brevicompactum on treated pine OSB .. Figure 3.13: Individual visual growth scores for P. brevicompactum on untreated pine OSB Figure 3.14: Individual visual growth scores for A. versicolor on untreated aspen OSB ' Figure 3.15: Individual visual growth scores for P. brevicompactum on untreated aspen OSB Figure 3.16: Hexanal concentrations for A. versicolor on untreated pine OSB Figure 3.17: Styrene production by A versicolor on untreated aspen OSB Figure 3.18: 2-pentanone production by P. brevicompactum on untreated aspen OSB Figure 3.19: Styrene production by P. brevicompactum on untreated aspen OSB Figure 3.20: Anisole production by S. chartarum on untreated cellulose insulation... Figure 3.21: 2-Pentanone production by A. versicolor on untreated cellulose insulation  5  19 19 25 29 31  36 36 37 38 39 39 40 41 42 42 45 45 45 46 46 48 50 51 51 55 55  x  Figure 3.22: Average visual growth scores for S. chartarum on gypsum board Figure 3.23: Average visual growth scores for A. versicolor on gypsum board Figure 3.24: Average visual growth scores for P. brevicompactum on gypsum board Figure 3.25: Average hexanal concentration for S. chartarum on gypsum boards Figure 3.26: Average anisole production by S. chartarum on gypsum board Figure 3.27: Average trichodiene concentration for S. chartarum on gypsum boards Figure 3.28: Anisole production by S. chartarum on gypsum board for experiments 1,2, and 3.... Figure 3.29: Chromatograms showing terpene production by S. chartarum on gypsum board Figure 3.30: Mass spectra of trichodiene from S. chartarum on gypsum Figure 3.31: Average hexanal concentration for A. versicolor on gypsum board Figure 3.32: Acetone production by A. versicolor on gypsum board Figure 3.33: Average hexanal concentration for P. brevicompactum on gypsum board Figure 3.34: Average acetone production for P. brevicompactum on gypsum board... Figure 3.35: Average carbon dioxide levels for S. chartarum on gypsum board Figure 3.36: Average carbon dioxide levels for A. versicolor on gypsum board Figure 3.37: Average carbon dioxide levels for P. brevicompactum on gypsum board Figure 3.38: Average ergosterol content for S. chartarum on gypsum boards Figure 3.39: Average ergosterol content for A. versicolor on gypsum board Figure 3.40: Average ergosterol content for P. brevicompactum on gypsum boards... Figure 3.41: Carbon dioxide versus Week 4 visual score, S. chartarum on gypsum board Figure 3.42: Carbon dioxide versus Week 4 visual score, A. versicolor on gypsum board Figure 3.43: Carbon dioxide versus Week 4 visual score, P. brevicompactum on gypsum board Figure 3.44: Ergosterol versus Week 4 visual score, S. chartarum on gypsum board.. Figure 3.45: Ergosterol versus Week 4 visual score, A. versicolor on gypsum board.. Figure 3.46: Ergosterol versus Week 4 visual score, P. brevicompactum on gypsum board Figure 3.47: Carbon dioxide versus ergosterol, S. chartarum on gypsum board Figure 3.48: Carbon dioxide versus ergosterol, A. versicolor on gypsum board Figure 3.49: Carbon dioxide versus ergosterol, P. brevicompactum on gypsum board Figure 4.1: Ergosterol measurements (average ± SD) for materials with a visual rating of "3" at week 4  57 58 59 61 61 61 62 63 64 65 65 66 66 67 67 67 68 69 69 71 71 71 72 72 72 73 73 73  88  Abbreviations, symbols and definitions ASTM ATCC a BAE BSI BSTFA cm w  2  co  2  Composi-Bor® CW DL DOT DVB EMC Ergosterol-TMS FID g GC H He L/min MC mm H 0 L/min MS MSF MS/MS MVOC 2  2  m/z  NIST OSB pcf PDMS ppb ppm psi RH RSD SD SEM SIS SPME Tim-Bor® Tween 80® UMVOC VOC % w/v  American Society for Testing and Materials American Type Culture Collection Water activity Boric acid equivalent British Standards Institute B is(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide Square centimeter Carbon dioxide Registered tradename for preservative containing zinc borate Carbowax® Detection limit Disodium octaborate tetrahydrate Divinyl benzene Equilibrium moisture content Trimethylsilyl ester of ergosterol Flame ionization detector/detection gram Gas chromatography Hydrogen Helium Litres per minute Moisture content Millimeters of water Liters per minute Mass spectrometer/spectrometry Thousand square feet Tandem mass spectrometry Microbial volatile organic compound Mass to charge ratio National Institute of Standards and Technology Oriented strand board Pounds per cubic foot Polydimethylsiloxane Parts per billion Parts per million Pounds per square inch Relative humidity Relative standard deviation (standard deviation/average x 100%) Standard deviation Standard error of the mean Selected ion storage Solid phase microextraction Registered tradename for preservative containing disodium octaborate tetrahydrate Registered tradename for a surfactant containing polysorbate 80 Microgram Unique microbial volatile organic compound Volatile organic compound Percent weight in volume (1% w/v = 1 gram substance per 100 mL total volume)  Acknowledgments  There are many people who I wish to thank for their contributions to this project and for seeing me through it. Firstly, I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Chris van Netten, Dr. Michael Brauer, and Dr. Karen Bartlett, for their support and guidance through this project. I would especially like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Bartlett for introducing me to the fascinating world of mycology, keeping me on track, and for always taking the time to discuss, coach, and offer encouragement. Many thanks to Timothy M a for his assistance with the gas chromatography and ergosterol analysis, and for his friendship. Thank you also to Dr. Winnie Chu and Tracy Kirkham for allowing me to grab equipment with short notice and for keeping the gas from running out, and to Victor Leung for helping me get started with the gas chromatography. I would also like to acknowledge the generous people at Forintek Canada Corporation (Vancouver) for their advice and expertise, use of their library, and use of their equipment and facilities: Dave Minchin, Dr. Adnan Uzunovic, Dr. Paul Morris, Jean Clark, and A l Matsala. Thank you to Rashmi Patwardhan of U.S. Borax Inc. for supplying the building materials and providing technical details. Thanks also to Dr. Bob Bruce of Bob Bruce and Associates, Inc. for information regarding gypsum board manufacturing. Thanks to my office "roomie" Melissa Friesen for the statistics pointers, as well as for the distractions. I would also like to extend my appreciation to other investigators who took the time to answer e-mails and offered information or advice, especially when I first started: Dr. AnnaLisa Pasanen, Dr. Hannu Viitanen, Dr. Kristian Fog Nielsen, Dr. Jessie Micales-Glaeser, and Dr. Ken Wilkins. To my family and friends, the guys from the M G , friends from U-Chapel and St. John's, thank you for your moral support and for your prayers. Lastly, to Dorothy - danke fur Ihre Liebe und Geduld. You are truly a blessing to me!  This work was funded in part by grants from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and from U.S. Borax, Inc.  1. Introduction 1.1 The indoor environment and indoor air quality Canadians, on average, spend close to 90% of their time indoors, with about 65% of their time inside homes (Leech et al. 2002). Over the past few decades there has been increasing concern over the healthiness of our indoor spaces, with the development of entities such as "sick building syndrome" and "building-related illness". In a recent survey, over 75% of Canadians felt that indoor air pollution posed as great a risk, or greater, than outdoor air pollution (Environics 2001). Traditionally, the main indoor air pollutants of concern have been mostly chemical in nature, derived from both outdoor sources and indoor sources (Health Canada 1995). Combustion products including cigarette smoke, releases from building products and furnishings, cleaners, personal care products, etc., all contribute to indoor air pollution. However, more recent attention has been focused on biological contaminants, and moulds in particular (Samson 1985; Strom et al. 1994; Straus 2003).  1.2 Introduction to fungi and moulds Fungi are a group of eukaryotic organisms that are neither animal nor plant, and thus form their own kingdom. Fungi are among the most plentiful organisms on the planet, accounting for an estimated 25% of the earth's biomass. There are hundreds of thousands of species of fungi, whose diverse members range from the useful yeasts and edible mushrooms, to wooddestroying organisms and agents of disease, like Cryptococcus. They range in size from microscopic unicellular yeasts to "mushrooms" with contiguous subterranean networks estimated to be hundreds or thousands of acres in size. "Mould" is not a scientific word, but it is often used to refer to fungi that grow as filamentous networks, visible to the eye as smudges of colour or patches of fluffy or powdery growth. In this thesis, we are solely Concerned with such mould fungi.  1  1.2.1. Structure and metabolism Microscopically, moulds consist of individual filaments called hyphae, which are the basic cellular unit of most fungi. A visible mass of hyphae is called a mycelium. Moulds resemble plants in that their cells consist of a plasma membrane surrounded by a rigid carbohydrate polymer cell wall, though there are differences in their respective chemical compositions. Firstly, fungal plasma membranes contain the sterol ergosterol, as opposed to stigmasterol in plants (or cholesterol in animals). Secondly, fungal cell walls are composed of aminosugar polymers (chitin) and glucose polymers joined in a l->3 configuration (P(l->3)-D-glucans) as opposed to the l->4 configuration found in cellulose. Since ergosterol is unique to fungi, and since the cell wall polymers account for 80-90% of the fungal mass, chemical analysis of ergosterol and |3(1 -^3)-D-glucans has been used to quantify fungal biomass. Fungi also contain small amounts of proteins, including enzymes and glycoproteins that maybe important as allergens (Zabel & Morell 1992; Rose 1999; Kurup & Banerjee 2000).  Mould reproduce by producing spores that are typically borne externally on specialized hyphal structures and give moulds their characteristic coloured, powdery appearance.  Fungi are heterotrophs, meaning they must have an external source of nutrients such as carbon sources, nitrogen, and trace elements. Fungi in general are able to use a wide variety of carbon sources, ranging from simple sugars to complex polymers such as cellulose. Other carbon sources that can serve as food for various fungi include lignin from wood (a complex phenolic polymer); oils and waxes; resins and glues; low-molecular weight organic additives in paints, plastics, and rubbers; and amino acids from proteins (Zabel & Morrell 1992; Plastic Pipe Institute 2000). Fungi are capable of colonizing even inorganic materials, provided with just a thin film of organic debris such as dead skin cells or oil mists from cooking. (Zabel & Morrell 1992; Becker 1994). Building structures and the indoor environment provide many of these carbon sources in abundance.  Fungi, as with all living things, also require moisture. Water serves 4 main purposes for fungal growth: it is a solvent for cellular processes; it is a reactant in hydrolysis (e.g., for exocellular digestion of complex carbohydrates like cellulose); it provides a diffusion medium for secreted enzymes and digested/solubilized substrate; and it acts as a swelling agent for the substrate to facilitate penetration of digestive enzymes (Zabel & Morrell 1992).  There are several different ways in which moisture can be described that are relevant to mould growth in buildings and on building material: relative humidity, moisture content, and water activity. Of these, water activity is the most useful. Water activity (a ) is related to both the w  moisture content of a substrate and the relative humidity of the surrounding atmosphere, when conditions have reached equilibrium. When a material is placed in a closed container and allowed to come to moisture equilibrium with the atmosphere inside the container, the water activity of the material is calculated as the equilibrium relative humidity (ERH) inside the container expressed as a fraction (i.e. 100% E R H = a of 1.00). It represents water that is not w  bound to the material that is available for chemical reactions and for use by microorganisms. Most fungi require a water activity of at least 0.80 for growth (Burge & Otten 1999), although factors such as temperature and the nutrient content of the growth substrate can affect water requirements. Table 1.1 lists some environmental factors affecting mould growth. Table 1.1: Environmental Environmental factor Moisture requirements a = water activity, a measure of biologically available water. w  factors influencing Category Xerophilic Xerotolerant  fungal growth (Zabel & Morrell 1992; Burge & Otten 1999). Conditions Examples Minimum a <0.80  Aspergillus resthctus  Minimum a <0.80, Optimum a >0.80  Some Aspergillus and Penicillium spp.  Minimum a > 0.80 but  Most mycelial fungi. Xerotolerant species will also grow under these conditions.  w  w  w  Mesophilic  w  <0.90  Optimum a > 0.90 w  Hydrophilic Temperature requirements  Psychrophilic  Minimum a >0.90  Stachybotrys spp., Fusarium spp., Rhizopus spp.  Tmin <0, Tmax <20°C  Some Cladosporium spp, Sporotrichum spp., Fusarium spp.  w  T pt0-17°C O  Psychrotolerant Mesophilic  T pt<15-17°C  Cladosporium spp. (C. herbarum)  Tmin >0°C  Most fungi. Room temperature falls into the T t for these fungi. Some wood decaying species  0  To t15-40°C P  Thermophilic  Tmin >20, Tmax >50°C  op  (Penicillium duponti, Chaetomium thermophile)  Oxygen requirements  Light requirements  pH  Most fungi are obligate aerobes, requiring at least some oxygen for growth, with optimal growth seen with oxygen levels greater than 4% (compared to normal atmospheric oxygen concentration of 21%). However, most fungi are able to tolerate low levels of oxygen (to about 1% oxygen, or <10 mm Hg partial pressure) before growth stops. Some fungi (e.g. yeasts) are capable of anaerobic metabolism. Fungi do not require light for growth, although light is felt to stimulate sporulation. Some species, such as Stachybotrys chartarum, will still sporulate in the absence of light (e.g. in enclosed spaces and behind walls) (Heinsohn et al., 2001). Ultraviolet radiation can inhibit mycelial growth; dark fungi are more resistant to ultraviolet radiation. Most fungi can grow over a wide range of pH, with optimal conditions favouring slightly acidic pH. Spore formation and germination have more restrictive pH tolerances. pH can also affect substrate and nutrient availability, as well as exoenzyme reactions and stability.  During growth, moulds also produce various metabolites. Among them are a wide variety of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), some of which are responsible for the typical musty, mouldy smell associated with their presence indoors. Hundreds of VOCs have been reported to be produced by mould fungi (Ammann 1999; Fiedler et al. 2001). Some fungal VOCs can have non-fungal origins as well, e.g., plants, furnishings, cleaners, plastics, and combustion sources, but there are VOCs that are felt to be unique to microbial production and these are termed microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) or unique microbial volatile organic compounds (UMVOCs) (Wessen & Schoeps 1996; Gao et al. 2002).  The production of VOCs by fungi is highly dependent on the growth substrate. Much of the literature on fungal VOCs comes from studies of mould growth on foodstuff or laboratory media that are markedly different from building material in nutritional composition, so compounds listed in the literature may not necessarily be representative of what might be found with mould growth on building material. Production of certain compounds may be characteristic of certain species, leading to interest in using VOCs as chemical taxonomic markers. However, production of some VOCs may only occur at certain stages of the fungal life cycle and may also be dependent on other environmental interactions (Ammann 1999). Moulds can also produce various toxins as they grow. A single fungal species may produce more than one toxin, and conversely, a toxin may be produced by more than one species. (Burge & Ammann 1999) These fungal toxins or mycotoxins are regarded as products of secondary metabolism - compounds not normally produced, but formed in response to some internal or external factors. Theories on why secondary metabolism occurs include: internal necessity (e.g. need for a pathway to eliminate other by-products); ecological adaptation (e.g. the production of toxins to gain a survival advantage); manifestation of morphological differentiation (e.g. production of volatile compounds or toxins during a particular stage of growth); and response to stress, a broad view that can include aspects of internal necessity and ecologic adaptation (Frank 1998). The implications are that a toxin-producing mould might not always produce mycotoxins, depending on the conditions. 1.3 Mould growth indoors Mould spores are ubiquitous outdoors, and are carried indoors on air currents, on people, pets, and objects. Under favorable conditions, these spores will germinate and grow. The indoor  4  environment provides most of the essential conditions for mould growth - nutrients, oxygen, and favorable temperatures. The limiting factor is the availability of adequate moisture (Figure 1.1). However, various factors in building design, construction, and use have led to an increase in the number of buildings with moisture problems that could encourage mould growth (Hutton 2003). Estimates from surveys in North America and various European countries indicate that up to 40 to 50% of buildings may have moisture problems that could lead to mould growth (Nielsen 2003; Gorny et al. 2002; N A S 2004). Locally, it was reported in the Barrett Commission report of the inquiry into condominium construction in British Columbia that 50% or more of condominiums in the lower mainland have exterior walls with leak problems (Barrett 1998).  \  i  Moistuic  1  /MOULD \ Mould Spoil's i  fou.itl fitfyv.lu-rb  s  Figure 1.1: The three critical factors for mould growth indoors. (From Moisture control: system performance. Canadian Gypsum Company, 2003.)  / Nutrients  I '  P q , A n u d lll|< I •mil d l l .1 \ V  1.3.1 Moulds in indoor spaces and adverse health effects Various mould components and metabolites can potentially have health effects. The main ones can be classified as structural components of moulds (cell wall components found in spores and hyphae), and metabolites such as VOCs and mycotoxins.  1.3.1.1 Allergens Fungi cell walls contain various proteins and glycoproteins, including some soluble enzymes such as proteases intended for excretion into the environment that can act as allergens or antigens. Some fungal antigens have been studied in detail (the antigens of certain Aspergillus  5  and Cladosporium species, for example). Exposure to antigens can result in a variety of symptoms, ranging from acute asthma attacks and hay-fever symptoms, to chronic inflammation of the airways as in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. However, the difficulties in measuring fungal allergens, the multitude of potential organisms and antigens, the non-specificity of allergy testing, and the variability in individual sensitivity make detailed assessment of the relationships between fungal allergens and health effects difficult (Money 2004; Rose 1999).  1.3.1.2 Glucans Glucans comprise a significant proportion of fungal biomass. p-(l->3)-D-glucans are known to have immunomodulating effects, and it is hypothesized that inhalation of P-(l->3)-D-glucan may induce some sort of control defect in macrophages and other cells involved in inflammatory processes (Rylander 2001). While studies have demonstrated associations between respiratory symptoms (nose and throat irritation, cough, hoarseness), headache, and fatigue and higher levels of measured P-(l->3)-D-glucan, the levels of p-(l->3)-D-glucan measured ranged widely and there was overlap between levels in problem buildings and nonproblem buildings between studies (Rylander 1999).  1.3.1.3 VOCs Experience with V O C exposure in other settings (industrial exposures, sick building syndrome) has laid the foundation for investigating microbial VOCs as potential causes of health effects, particularly irritation symptoms, but modeling experiments and animal experiments suggest that M V O C levels that can be expected from mould growth would not be high enough to cause irritation (Wilkins 1998; Pasanen et al. 1998; Korpi et al. 1999; Menetrez & Foarde 2002). Field studies have shown associations between elevated levels of certain M V O C s and allergy and respiratory symptoms, but the associations were not statistically significant (Elke et al. 1999). However, these limited studies do not rule out the possibility of low-levels of M V O C s having negative effects on occupants. The mechanisms by which low levels of VOCs and odours may elicit physiologic responses (such as sensory irritation, innate aversion, annoyance and stress reactions) are not well understood, and more study is needed (Shusterman 1992).  "Many problems (are) connected with odours produced by mould growth (headaches, eye, nose, and throat irritation, fatigue, nausea)... Unfortunately, the significance of the compounds known to be produced with the symptoms described in patients is still unknown. " (Samson 1985). 6  1.3.1.4 Mycotoxins. "A new paradigm for the significance of exposure to microfungi in the indoor climate has been developed since mycotoxins of the trichothecene type have been detected from airborne spores, dust, and infected buildings. " (Gravesen et al. 1999).  Mycotoxins tend to be non-volatile, and are usually associated with spores, mycelial fragments, and the surrounding growth substrate. While ingestion of mycotoxin-contaminated food provides clear examples of the dangers of some mycotoxins, the importance of toxin exposure from airborne mould spores or fragments and contaminated building materials remains unclear. Extrapolations from animal data on toxic doses have led to estimates that toxic effects would only be seen under conditions that resemble industrial or agricultural exposures. Many authorities have taken the position that while toxicity is possible, toxicity from mycotoxin exposures typically encountered in buildings with mould growth is unlikely (Robbins et al. 2000; Hardin et al. 2002; Miller et al. 2003; NAS 2004).  1.3.1.5 Epidemiological evidence A number of studies from different countries have shown associations between respiratory symptoms and indicators of moisture problems or mould growth in buildings. The most consistent associations have been found between self-reported symptoms and self-reported or investigator-reported presence of mould or indicators of moisture.  More recently, case series and anecdotal reports both in the scientific literature and the lay media of more serious adverse effects ranging from pulmonary hemorrhages in infants, to neurologic and immune system dysfunction and cancer in occupants of mould-infested building; have also raised concerns about indoor mould (CDC 1997; Gray et al. 2003; Campbell et al. 2003). One mould in particular — Stachybotrys chartarum (a black mould capable of producing trichothecene toxins) — has received a lot of attention following initial reports that it was associated with lung hemorrhages in children living in homes where the organism was recovered (CDC 1997). However, the recent evaluation of the evidence by the National Academies of Science found that while there was sufficient evidence for an association between dampness and/or the  presence of mould indoors and respiratory symptoms (upper respiratory irritation, cough, wheeze, asthma in sensitized persons, hypersensitivity pneumonitis), there was limited or insufficient evidence for many of the other purported effects (Table 1.2). Table (NAS  1.2:  Levels  of evidence  for  adverse  health  effects  associated  with damp  indoor  spaces  and  mould  growth  2004).  Symptom/effect  Upper respiratory (nose and throat) symptoms Cough Wheeze Asthma symptoms in sensitized persons Hypersensitivity pneumonitis in susceptible individuals Dyspnea Asthma development Lower respiratory tract illness in children Airflow obstruction in otherwise healthy persons Mucous membrane irritation syndrome Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Inhalation fevers in non-occupational settings Lower respiratory tract illness in otherwise healthy adults Acute idiopathic hemorrhage in infants Skin symptoms Gastrointestinal tract problems Fatigue Neuropsychiatric symptoms Cancer Reproductive effects Rheumatological and immune disorders  Sufficient evidence Dampness X  Mould X  X X X  X X X X  Limited or suggestive evidence Dampness Mould  X X X  Inadequate or insufficient evidence Dampness Mould  X X X X  X  X X X  X X X  X  X  X X X X X X  X X X X X X  X X  X X  We still do not know exactly how moulds can affect health and negatively affect the indoor environment. Relationships or associations by themselves are not proof of causality, and such proof may be difficult to obtain. Some of the challenges faced in establishing causal relationships between mould exposure and health effects include the facts that some symptoms may be caused by multiple agents, and moulds exist in complicated ecological relationships (Rylander 2001). Other challenges relate to the fact that mould growth, mould metabolites, and the biological activity of mould spores and fragments can be influenced by environmental conditions, such as the growth substrate. Hence, understanding the interactions between moulds  and building materials as their growth substrate is of critical importance to clarifying the relationships between indoor moulds and health effect.  1.4 Prevention of mould growth Despite uncertainties and gaps in knowledge about the health effects of moulds in the indoor environment, it is agreed that mould growth indoors is unacceptable and needs to be addressed (Burge & Otten 1999; Robbins et al. 2000).  It is clear that controlling excessive moisture is the key to preventing mould growth. (Small 2003) However, due to the complexities of moisture management, building design, current construction practices, and the fact that accidents happen, moisture control in buildings has proved to be a challenge. The high prevalence of moisture problems in buildings indicates that a "back-up plan" is still needed.  One approach would be to use materials that are inherently resistant to mould growth. Alternatives to wood that are more resistant to fungal attack such as steel, aluminum, plastic composites, and concrete are being promoted (Warsco & Lindsey 2003, Masonry Canada 2004). However, wood is still valued as a construction material for its material properties (good strength/weight ratio, easy machinability), aesthetic qualities, and because it is renewable and energy efficient in terms of production and use compared to other materials (Scharai-Rad & Welling 2002; Canada Wood Council 2005). Likewise, inorganic alternatives to cellulosecontaining products such as ceiling tiles (Karunesena et al. 2001) and the paper facings on gypsum boards (e.g. DensArmour® panels by Georgia-Pacific) have been shown to resist mould growth, but these come with increased costs.  Another approach would be to use preservatives to increase the resistance of materials to fungal attack. The leaky building problem in has encouraged increased use of preservative-treated wood by builders (Baker et al. 2000), and in some countries, the use of preservative-treated wood is specified in building codes (NZ-DBH 2005). Wood preservatives have been used for over a century to guard against damage from insects and fungi. However, there has been recent public and regulatory pressure on the wood preservation industry to use preservatives with lower human and ecological toxicity, and some traditional agents, such as copper chromated  arsenic (which had accounted for the vast majority of preserved wood used in building construction) are being phased out. Additionally, wood is being used in different ways (e.g. wood composites), and other susceptible building materials need protection against mould growth. Borate compounds meet the requirements of low toxicity, and versatility in protecting various kinds of materials.  1.4.1 Boron and borates Boron is a semimetallic element comprising only 0.001% of the" earth's crust, though it is widespread in soil and water at low levels (-10-20 ppm average in soil, <2 ppm in freshwater, and <10 ppm in saltwater). Boron does not exist in its elemental form in nature, but rather is found as various oxides such as boron oxide (B2O3), boric acid (B(OH)3), and borax (NaB O -10H O) (Lloyd 1997; A T S D R 1992; Wood 1994). In this thesis, "borates" will be used 2  7  2  to refer to boron compounds in general.  Boron is an essential nutrient for plants, and possibly animals, though the physiologic roles of boron are unclear. Boron deficient soils produce lower plant yields. Lack of boron reduces the viability of fish embryos, and there is evidence that boron is beneficial for the development and maintenance of healthy bones in mammals. Yet boron compounds are also biostatic at higher concentrations. In biological systems, the most important boron species is boric acid, or more precisely the tetrahydroxyborate anion that boric acid forms in aqueous solution (Eq.l). Most inorganic boron compounds also form the tetrahydroxyborate anion in water. B(OH) + H 0 <-> B(OH) " + H 3  2  4  +  (Eq. 1)  It is suggested that the biological activity of borates relates to the ability of the tetrahydroxyborate anion to form complexes with hydroxyl groups found in various cellular components such as enzymes and cofactors like NAD+. At higher concentrations, similar interactions result in biostatic activity (Lloyd 1997; Manning, Lloyd, & Schoeman 1997).  10  1.4.2 Toxicity of borates Humans are exposed to boron mainly through food (fruits, vegetables, nuts). Drinking water is another source of boron exposure, although this can vary depending on the geographic location and the presence of industrial sources. The average intake of boron is estimated to be 1-2 mg of boron per day for adults (range 1-7 mg B/day); vegetarian diets may have more B. A tolerable daily intake of 18 mg B/day has been proposed. Borate exposure may also occur from consumer products such as detergents and toiletries (Richold 1998; A T S D R 1992). At high doses (5-20 grams orally of boric acid for a human), borates can cause toxicity (Table 1.3). Exposure to occupants of buildings with borates as preservatives in building materials is likely to be minimal since borates are essentially non-volatile, and such materials are likely to be enclosed, preventing direct skin contact. Table  1.3:  Toxic  CNS Gl Skin  Kidney Reproductive  effects  of borates  (Kent  et al.  1997).  Acute Agitation, excitation, seizures Nausea, vomiting.and diarrhea Local irritation from topical exposure. Rash, bullous lesions, exfoliation from ingestion of large doses. Kidney toxicity following massive doses  Chronic -  Animal studies have shown reduced fertility (male), but human studies of exposed workers have not shown similar effect. It was recently proposed to place borates on list as reproductive toxicants by the European Commission - action postponed for now.  Borates possess low acute mammalian toxicity, with oral LD o's ranging from 2550 mg/kg for 5  disodium octaborate tetrahydrate to 6000 mg/kg for borax. Reviews of the aquatic and terrestrial eco-toxicity have been published, and the risk to aquatic ecosystems from borates appears to be low. Toxicity from excess boron in soils is much less common than boron deficiency (Hubbard 1998; Howe.1998). Life cycle analysis has estimated that the increased environmental boron burden from end use as a preservative is considered to be minor compared to natural and other anthropogenic releases to the environment. Anthropogenic releases of borates, such as releases from burning of fossil fuels, mining processes, stack emissions from glass and ceramic manufacturing, agricultural use (soil application of boron-containing fertilizers, sewage sludge and waste waters), use of borate cleaning products, and leaching from discarded items in  11  landfills are estimated to represent less than 1% of the total movement of borates in the environment. (ATSDR 1992; Rainer 1993; Argust 1998)  1.4.3 Borates as preservatives Borates are used to protect wood and wood composites from wood destroying fungi and insects. They are also used in other products such as cellulose insulation and gypsum board for other reasons, although they may also provide protection against fungal growth in these materials. The main commercially used borates are listed in Table 1.4.  Table  1.4:  Boron  compounds  used commercially  in material  preservation  (ATSDR;  Laks  & Manning  1997).  Chemical formula Mol. Wt.  Water solubility  Boron content (%wt)  Boric acid  B(OH) 61.8 g  63.5 g/L @ 30°C  17.5% B  Borax  NaB O -10H O 336.6 g  20.1 g/L @ 0°C  6.4% B  Disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (DOT)  Na B 0i3 4H20* 412.5 g  95 g/L @ 20°C  21% B  Zinc borate  2Zn0 3 B 0 - 3 . 5 H 0 434.7 g  2  2  3  7  2  8  2  3  >300 g/L @ 50°C 2  2.8 g/L at room temp.  14.9% B _  * D O T is a mixture of boric acid and borax roughly corresponding to the above chemical formula.  1.4.3.1 Solid wood Dimensional lumber such as 2-by-4's are commercially treated with water-soluble disodium octaborate tetrahydrate by pressure treatment, similar to other water-borne wood preservatives. The standard recommended by the American Wood Preservers Association (AWPA) is to treat to a borate retention of-0.9% DOT (-0.25 pounds per cubic foot - pcf) for protection against wood-destroying fungi, beetles, and native termites. For protection against the subterranean Formosan termite (in export markets), higher borate retentions are used (-1.5% DOT or -0.42 pcf) (Fogel & Lloyd 2002).  1.4.3.2 Oriented strandboard (OSB) Oriented strandboard is made of layers of strands of wood glued and pressed together into a sheet. In the manufacture of OSB, wood strands are mixed with waxes and adhesive resins (usually phenol-formaldehyde, but about 35% of OSB manufacturers use polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyante or pMDI) (Structural Board Association 1996). Preservatives are added during the mixing step. The mixed wood strands are spread out in layers with specific 12  orientation to maximize the dimensional stability of the resulting sheet. Zinc borate, which is relatively water insoluble, currently is the only commercially used borate preservative for OSB. The A W P A recommends treating wood composites to a borate retention of 0.75% zinc borate for protection against fungal decay and termites (Fogel and Lloyd 2002).  1.4.3.3 Cellulose insulation Cellulose insulation is essentially ground and shredded newsprint. Due to the flarnmability hazard, all cellulose insulation must be treated with fire retardants. Borates such as boric acid and borax are commonly used as the fire retardant, often at concentrations -15% or higher (CIMA 2005).  1.4.3.4 Gypsum board Gypsum board (also known as plasterboard) is typically composed of a core of gypsum (calcium sulphate dihydrate) sandwiched between two facings of paper. In the manufacture of gypsum board, gypsum is made into a slurry with water, and additives such as waxes, foaming agents, and starch are added. The wet slurry is poured between the paper facings and rolled to the desired thickness and then dried. Boric acid can be added to the gypsum slurry in concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 0.3% to increase the stiffness of the gypsum, core, reduce delamination of the paper facings, and accelerate curing. As the gypsum board dries, some of the boric acid will migrate through the paper to the paper surface, which may provide some measure of protection against fungal growth (Fogel & Lloyd 2002).  1.5 Moulds and building materials Over the past 20 years there has been a progression in knowledge of mould interactions with building materials, from understanding what materials and conditions encourage mould growth, to gaining insights into the complex biology of moulds and the production of their metabolites. There has also been some recent work done on the effectiveness of borates against mould growth on building materials. However, further work is needed as there are challenges in applying existing data as well as gaps in the data, since:  13  most of the literature comes from Europe where different building materials may be used; more data on mould-substrate interactions with building materials used locally is needed; borate-treated products are commercially available. Few studies have been done on these materials and more data are needed; published data on the mould-resistance of borate-treated cellulose insulation is lacking; data on the effects of borate preservatives on the metabolism of mould fungi growing on building materials is lacking. 1.5.1  Literature review  1.5.1.1 Studies of interactions between moulds and building materials The literature dealing with mould growth on building materials goes back to the 1930's. This early literature primarily dealt with relative humidity requirements for mould growth and the relative susceptibility of materials (Coppock & Cookson 1951; Block 1953). Such studies generally involved inoculating test specimens , incubating them under various controlled temperature and relative humidity conditions in sealed chambers such as bell jars or mason jars, and following mould growth over time. With the growing concern over mould growth in buildings, more literature has appeared in the past 2 decades, broadening our knowledge of fungal interactions with more current materials. Following similar methods as above, the earlier of these "chamber studies" primarily dealt with determining the moisture requirements for mould growth and the susceptibility of various building materials (Grant et al. 1989; Viitanen & Ritschkoff 1991; Pasanen et al. 1992; Kalliokoski et al. 1993; Wang 1993; Pasanen et al. 1994; Ezeonu et al. 1994; Viitanen & Bjurman 1995; Chang et al. 1995; Chang et al. 1996; Pasanen et al. 2000; Nielsen & Madsen 2000). Materials studied included various woods, plywood, particle board, wallpaper, ceiling tile, gypsum board, cardboard, fiberglass and mineral wool insulation. In some studies, mouldcontaminated materials taken from water-damaged buildings were used. In other studies, samples of new materials were used. The moulds studied could be mixtures of natural flora, mixtures of specific organisms, or sometimes single organisms, usually belonging to genera often found in indoor air investigations such as Penicillium or Aspergillus. Toxin-producing moulds such as S. chartarum were included in a few of these studies, but in often in mixtures with other organisms. Growth was usually assessed by dilution plating or visual and 14  microscopic inspection using a variety of rating scales, although carbon dioxide measurements and ergosterol measurements were used in some studies (Pasanen et al. 1992; Korpi et al. 1998; Nielsen and Madsen 2000).' These studies confirmed that mould growth usually requires water activities greater than 0.80, although the minimum a requirements varies depending on the w  materials and temperature.  Later studies began looking at the production of VOCs from mould growth on building materials. In addition to characterizing what compounds might be produced (Ezeonu et al. 1994; Sunesson et al. 1996; Wilkins 2000; Fiedler et al. 2001; Miranda 2001; Gao et al. 2002; Gao & Martin 2002; Claeson et al. 2002), investigators also hoped to see if VOCs could be used as indicators of fungal contamination (Korpi et al. 1998; Miranda 2001; Wessen et al. 2002; Gao et al. 2002; Schleibinger et al. 2002) or even specific markers of various species (Pasanen et al. 1996; Wilkins et al. 2003). In these V O C studies, materials tested included fiberglass insulation, different types of woods, particle board, gypsum boards, wallpaper, chipboard, ceramic tile, and cardboard. Mixtures of organisms were often used, although some studies were performed with single species or different isolates of a species such as A. versicolor (Schleibinger et al. 2002) or S. chartarum (Korpi et al. 1999; Wilkins 2000; Gao & Martin 2002; Wilkins et al. 2003). V O C emissions from naturally contaminated materials taken from water-damaged buildings have also been evaluated.  The V O C studies revealed that fungi produce hundred of different compounds when growing on building materials, and that the growth substrate has an effect on the types of compounds produced (Pasanen et al. 1996; Wilkins et al. 2000; Fiedler et al. 2001; Gao & Martin 2002; Gao et al. 2002). V O C production could vary within a species, depending on the strain (Pasanen et al. 1996; Schleibinger et al. 2002), and V O C production could also vary with time (Sunesson et al. 1996; Korpi et al. 1998; Gao & Martin 2002; Gao et al. 2002). Attempts to show VOCs as useful indicators of microbial contamination were unsuccessful due to variability in V O C production and the finding of the same compounds in sterile materials, although some did find that V O C emissions were much higher in buildings with moisture problems (-200 pg/m ) 3  compared to reference buildings (<10 ug/m ) (Wessen et al. 2002). As far as using VOCs as 3  specific markers of specific species, differences in the patterns of VOCs produced by toxigenic versus non-toxigenic strains of Penicillium verruscosum (Pasanen et al. 1996) and S. chartarum (Wilkins et al. 2003) were found, and the production of certain VOCs such as terpenes and '»  15  ketones correlated with the production of toxins, but further characterization of VOCs would need to be done before such results could be used to predict the presence of toxins in the field (Pasanen et al. 1996).  Although mycotoxins are generally regarded as non-volatile, trichodiene (a precursor to the trichothecene toxins) was found as a V O C from certain strains of S. chartarum growing on cardboard (Wilkins 2000; Wilkins et al. 2003).  Finally, studies have also looked at.the production of mycotoxins during mould growth on various materials and the biological activity (cytotoxicity or ability to stimulate production of inflammatory markers in macrophages) of the mould spores (Nikulin et al. 1994; Nielsen, Thrane, Larsen et al. 1998; Nielsen et al. 1999; Nielsen et al. 2000; Murtoniemi et al. 2002; Murtoniemi et al. 2003; Wilkins et al. 2003; Murtoniemi, Nevalainen & Hirvonen 2003). Toxin production by S. chartarum has been the most frequently studied, although toxin production by A. versicolor, P. brevicompactum, Fusarium spp, Trichoderma spp., and others (alone or in mixtures) has also been investigated. Materials studied have included gypsum boards of varying composition (Nielsen et al. 1999; Murtoniemi et al. 2002; Murtoniemi, Nevalainen & Hirvonen 2003; Murtoniemi et al. 2003), cardboard (Wilkins et al. 2003), wallpapers, woods, plywood, cellulose insulation, mineral wool and ceiling tile (Nielsen, Thrane, Larsen et al. 1998; Nielsen et al. 2004). The presence of toxins in naturally contaminated materials has also been studied (Nielsen et al. 1999; Tuomi et al. 2000).  The studies showed that the growth substrate influences the production of toxins. In some instances, nutrient poor substrates such as gypsum boards and chipboards gave lower production of toxins compared to artificial media (Nielsen et al. 1999), and the addition of a nutrient (1glutamine) increased toxin production (Wilkins et al. 2003). Toxin production was also decreased by unfavorable conditions such as reduced water activity (Nielsen et al. 2004).  However, the addition of a biocide (Parmetol® DF 17) to gypsum boards caused spores of S. chartarum to be highly cytotoxic compared to S. chartarum spores from gypsum boards without the biocide, although toxins were not directly measured (Murtoniemi, Nevalainen & Hirvonen 2003). In this experiment, the biocide decreased the growth of S. chartarum, but increased the cytotoxicity of the spores. The appearance of growth did not always correlate well with the 16  biological activity of spores. Murtoniemi et al. found that in general, gypsum boards that , produced good growth of different moulds yielded spores with lower ability to induce production of inflammatory markers in a macrophage cell test system (Murtoniemi et al. 2003). Additionally, Nielsen et al. found that poorly sporulating isolates of A. versicolor produced higher levels of sterigmatocystin (Nielsen et al. 1999). These results suggest that the biological activity of moulds cannot be judged by their appearance, and that the effects of preservatives need to be carefully assessed if they are not completely effective at preventing mould growth.  1.5.1.2 Studies on the effectiveness ofborate-based preservatives A few studies on the effectiveness of borates against mould growth on building materials such as solid wood, oriented strandboard, and gypsum board have been published. (Byrne 1991, Fogel and Lloyd 2002, Micales-Glaeser 2004) These studies have shown borates to be effective at reducing but not completely preventing mould growth. While it is anticipated that fungal control will be achieved with the high concentrations of borates used as fire retardants in cellulose insulation (Fogel & Lloyd 2002), published data on the mould resistance of borate treated cellulose insulation is limited (Viitanen 1991; Nikulin et al. 1994).  The studies looking at borate preservatives have only used visual methods for assessing mould growth, and none have examined the effects of borates on other aspects of mould growth such as metabolites.  17  1.6 Objectives of our study: T h e w o r k presented i n this thesis is part o f a larger study e x a m i n i n g interactions between organisms, g r o w t h substrates, e n v i r o n m e n t a l factors, and the effect o f borate preservatives o n different aspects o f m o u l d g r o w t h . I n this thesis, the objectives w e r e :  1. T o investigate the i n t e r a c t i o n o f three m o u l d s o f i m p o r t a n c e to i n d o o r air q u a l i t y (S.  chartarum, A. versicolor, and P. brevicompactum) w i t h b u i l d i n g materials c o m m o n l y used i n b u i l d i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n ( s o l i d l u m b e r , oriented strandboard, c e l l u l o s e i n s u l a t i o n , and g y p s u m boards) b y e x a m i n i n g their g r o w t h and metabolites. Different measures w e r e used to assess m o u l d g r o w t h : v i s i b l e g r o w t h , p r o d u c t i o n o f v o l a t i l e organic c o m p o u n d s , p r o d u c t i o n o f c a r b o n d i o x i d e , and ergosterol. Q u e s t i o n s to be answered i n c l u d e d : Is there a difference b e t w e e n b u i l d i n g materials i n their a b i l i t y to support m o u l d g r o w t h ? H o w are m o u l d metabolites affected b y the substrate?  2. T o e x a m i n e the effectiveness o f c o m m e r c i a l l y a v a i l a b l e borate-treated b u i l d i n g materials against m o u l d g r o w t h , u s i n g the same organisms and measures o f g r o w t h . Questions to be answered i n c l u d e d : A r e borate preservatives effective at i n h i b i t i n g or p r e v e n t i n g m o u l d g r o w t h , and at what concentrations? C o u l d s u b - i n h i b i t o r y concentrations o f borates stimulate the p r o d u c t i o n o f different metabolites?  3. T o c o m p a r e v a r i o u s measures o f m o u l d g r o w t h . Questions to be a n s w e r e d i n c l u d e d : H o w w e l l do different measures correlate w i t h one another? A r e any measures better than the others?  18  2. Methods 2.1 Overall Study Design T h e g r o w t h o f three different fungi,  Stachybotrys chartarum, Aspergillus versicolor, and  Penicillium brevicompactum, was tested i n d i v i d u a l l y o n 6 different b u i l d i n g materials: S o u t h e r n Y e l l o w p i n e and l o d g e p o l e p i n e s o l i d w o o d , p i n e and aspen oriented strandboards, c e l l u l o s e insulation, and g y p s u m boards. F o r a l l materials except g y p s u m board, borate-treated and untreated m a t e r i a l for c o m p a r i s o n was p r o v i d e d . E a c h experiment c o n s i s t e d o f one o r g a n i s m o n 3 replicate test samples p l u s one u n i n o c u l a t e d c o n t r o l for each m a t e r i a l , borate-treated and untreated ( F i g u r e 2.1).  Organism  Borate treated material Untreated material  3 test samples 1 uninoculated control 3 test samples 1 uninoculated control  F o r g y p s u m boards, boards w i t h 6 different borate treatment levels were p r o v i d e d , and each experiment consisted o f one o r g a n i s m o n two samples from each b o r i c a c i d concentration, one inoculated o n the front paper f a c i n g and the other o n the reverse, p l u s one u n i n o c u l a t e d c o n t r o l . T h e g y p s u m b o a r d experiments w e r e repeated i n triplicate ( F i g u r e 2.2).  Untreated  Organism  front back  Treatment level 1  front  Treatment level 2  front  Treatment level 3  front  Treatment level 4  front back  Treatment level 5  front  Control  Uninoculated control  back back back  back  i repeated in triplicate.  G r o w t h was evaluated b y four parameters: v i s u a l g r o w t h , changes i n the p r o f i l e o f v o l a t i l e organic c o m p o u n d s , c a r b o n d i o x i d e p r o d u c t i o n , and ergosterol p r o d u c t i o n .  19  2.2 Test Materials A l l test materials were supplied by US Borax Inc. and included: solid wood (Southern Yellow pine and lodgepole pine two-by-fours); I/2" thick oriented strandboards made from either Southern Yellow pine or aspen; cellulose insulation; and V" thick gypsum boards (Table 2.1). Untreated and treated materials were supplied. For treated materials, the two-by-four lumber was pressure-treated with disodium octaborate tetrahydrate. Oriented strandboards were treated with zinc borate. Details on the composition of the oriented strandboard (e.g. the types of resins and waxes) were unavailable. Cellulose insulation was treated with boric acid. Gypsum boards were made at a commercial gypsum board plant and different levels of boric acid were incorporated into the gypsum slurry. Borate retentions were determined by US Borax Inc. Samples of each material were digested in hydrochloric acid for one hour, and the supernatant analysed by inductively coupled plasma with atomic emission spectroscopy detection. (Personal communication, R. Patwardhan, US Borax, Inc.) Table 2.1: Test materials used in the study ?;TfeatnilpIEyi||l 11 Untreated Solid lumber Borate retentions in pounds per cubic foot (pcf)  Southern Yellow pine  Disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (TimBor®) 0.42 pcf Untreated  Lodgepole pine  Disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (TimBor®) 0.36 - 0.42 pcf  Wood composites Borate retentions in % boric acid equivalents (BAE)  Pine oriented strandboard  Aspen oriented strandboard  Cellulose insulation  Untreated Zinc borate (Composi-Bor®) 0.726-0.781% (0.618-0.655 % BAE) Untreated Zinc borate (Composi-Bor®) 1.159% -1.137% (0.968-0.986% BAE) Untreated Boric acid 13% Boric acid 0 Ib/MSF  Gypsum board Specified boric acid retentions in pounds per thousand square feet (Ib/MSF)  Boric acid 1 Ib/MSF Boric acid 2 Ib/MSF Boric acid 2.57 Ib/MSF Boric acid 4 Ib/MSF Boric acid 5 Ib/MSF  20  2.2.1 Preparation of test materials  2.2.1.1 Solid wood (Southern  Yellow pine and lodgepole  pine)  Southern Yellow pine and lodgepole pine two-by-fours were trimmed to 7 cm width, then sawn into half-thickness planks. 3 mm were planed from both of the main faces, leaving a plank 7 cm wide and 1.2 cm thick, which was then cut into 7 cm squares and labeled. Each square was then individually wrapped in kraft paper and labeled. Untreated Southern Yellow pine specimens arrived without identifiers and were left unlabelled. 2.2.1.2 Oriented  strandboard  Oriented strandboard was cut into 9 cm squares and labeled. The 9 cm size was chosen initially to maximize the surface area for mould growth, before realizing that the maximum size of square samples obtainable from the two-by-fours was 7 cm square. Each piece was wrapped in kraft paper and labeled. 2.2.1.3 Cellulose  insulation  The cellulose insulation was supplied in bags of approximately 2 pounds. No specific preparation was needed for cellulose insulation and the insulation was not subdivided into aliquots and pre-packaged like the other materials. Prior to autoclaving and inoculation, 2 to 3 grams of insulation were placed in glass Petri plates and gently tamped down. 2.2.1.4 Gypsum  board  Commercially made 4 ' x 8 ' gypsum boards were cut into 4 ' x 4 ' boards for ease of handling and storing. Before cutting the boards into smaller specimens, six inches were removed from each edge of the boards to avoid areas where the boric acid may have concentrated during drying, The paper facings on front and back surfaces were scored in 7 cm squares with a utility knife, each square was labeled, and the board was broken into squares by hand. Each piece was wrapped in kraft paper and labeled.  2.2.2 Sterilisation of test materials Solid wood, OSB, and gypsum board samples were packaged 4 layers thick into cardboard boxes and sterilized with 25 kGy beta radiation at a commercial electron beam facility (Iotron Technologies Corporation, Port Coquitlam, B.C.).  21  The bulk container of cellulose insulation was sterilized by beta radiation in April 2003 along with the gypsum boards. However, since the cellulose insulation could not be pre-packaged into glass Petri dishes, and it was difficult to handle the insulation in a completely aseptic manner while loading the Petri dishes, once in the dishes the cellulose insulation was sterilized again by autoclaving at 120°C for 20 minutes, prior holnoculation.  2.2.3 Conditioning of test materials Conditioning of the materials was necessary to give them sufficient initial moisture to support mould growth. Wood, wood composite, and gypsum board specimens were conditioned over a layer of sterile distilled water in sterile, covered polypropylene boxes for a minimum of 14 days (See Appendix A). Cellulose insulation was not conditioned, although some moisture would be gained during autoclaving prior to inoculation. 2.3 Inoculation  A l l work with organisms and sterile materials was done in a Class II Type A biosafety cabinet to prevent contamination of the materials and to prevent exposure to the organisms. 2.3.1 Organisms Organisms were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, V A . Three organisms of importance to indoor air quality and the indoor environment were studied (Table 2.2). The following organisms were used: Stachybotrys chartarum (ATCC 201212), Aspergillus versicolor (ATCC 26939), and Penicillium brevicompactum (ATCC 9056). Freeze-dried organisms were reconstituted with 0.85% saline with Tween® 80 and stored frozen at -80°C in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with 15% glycerol until needed.  22  Table 2.2: Organisms used in the study Organism S. chartarum  ATCC 201212  Comments" Commonly referred to in the media as the "toxic black mould", Stachybotrys chartarum has been isolated from up to 30% of wallboard samples from water-damaged buildings (Hyvarinen 2002), but it is infrequently isolated from the air of homes with moisture problems. It was implicated in outbreaks of idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage in the US (CDC 1997), and while the causative role of S. chartarum in these cases remains controversial (CDC 2000), publicity surrounding these outbreaks generated a lot of interest in (and fear of) Stachybotrys and moulds in general. S. chartarum requires a very high level of moisture (a >0.90) and produces large, dark, oval spores (4-6 um x 7-12 urn) (Samson & Hoekstra 1994) that are borne in a wet mass when the fungus is growing. S. chartarum species produce toxins including potent trichothecene toxins but there are different strains of S. chartarum and only about 60% of them produce the more toxic macrocyclic trichothecenes (Andersen et al. 2002). The strain used in our experiments, ATCC 201212, is a macrocyclic trichothecene producer. Aspergillus versicolor is commonly found indoors. A versicolor is mesophilic in terms of moisture requirements, but will tolerate some degree of dryness. It produces small spores (2-3.5 um) (Samson & Hoekstra 1994), and A. versicolors capable of producing mycotoxins, including sterigmatocystin which is potentially carcinogenic. Some Aspergillus species are also capable of causing infection, although A versicolor's only rarely associated with infection. Penicillium brevicompactum is another commonly isolated indoor mould. P. brevicompactum is mesophilic in terms of moisture requirements. P. brevicompactum spores small (3-4.5 um) (Samson & Hoekstra 1994). P. brevicompactum is another toxin producer, capable of producing toxins including the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid, and tremor-inducing compounds such as roquefortine C and penitrem A. | w  A versicolor  ATCC 26939  P. brevicompactum ATCC 9056  2.3.2 Culturing organisms S. chartarum spores were removed from frozen storage and suspended in a small amount of sterile water, then added to a flask of autoclaved Uncle Ben's converted rice (Jarvis et al. 1998). A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum spores were plated directly on malt extract agar (MEA) from frozen storage. Cultures were kept at room temperature under normal ambient light conditions. Spores were harvested after 5 to 7 days. 2.3.3 Preparation of the spore suspension A detailed procedure is attached in Appendix B. Spores were harvested into a sterile solution containing 0.01% Tween® 80 in distilled water. For Stachybotrys, the Tween® solution was added to the flask of rice and the flask was gently shaken to liberate spores. For Aspergillus and Penicillium, the Tween solution was added to the agar plates and a sterile inoculating loop was used to gently scrape the agar surface to liberate spores. The spore suspension was filtered through a sterilized cosmetic puff to remove large pieces of debris (rice, agar, mycelia and hyphae) and collected in sterile 15 mL centrifuge tubes. 23  T h e filtered suspension w a s then w a s h e d b y p e l l e t i n g the spores i n a centrifuge at a relative centrifugal force o f 1500 x g for 5 m i n u t e s , decanting the supernatant, a n d resuspending the spores i n fresh sterile T w e e n ® s o l u t i o n . T h e p e l l e t i n g - r e s u s p e n d i n g steps w e r e repeated three times for a total o f three washes.  T h e spore c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f the w a s h e d suspension was determined b y c o u n t i n g spores i n a hemacytometer, and the c o n c e n t r a t i o n w a s adjusted to a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 x 1 0 s p o r e s / m L b y 7  either a d d i n g m o r e T w e e n ® s o l u t i o n , or p e l l e t i n g the spores and r e m o v i n g excess supernatant as necessary.  S e r i a l d i l u t i o n s o f the final spore s u s p e n s i o n were made ( 1 0 , 1 0 , and 1 0 s p o r e s / m L ) , and 0.5 5  3  2  m L o f the 10 s p o r e s / m L s u s p e n s i o n w e r e plated o n M E A as a c h e c k for v i a b i l i t y and contamination.  2.3.4 I n o c u l a t i o n  T h e biosafety cabinet floor w a s sterilised b y b r i e f l y f l a m i n g w i t h a propane burner p r i o r to i n o c u l a t i o n and each t i m e a n e w set o f materials was m o v e d into the biosafety cabinet for i n o c u l a t i o n . Stainless steel w i r e supports were attached to test s p e c i m e n s to h o l d t h e m i n an upright p o s i t i o n . C e l l u l o s e i n s u l a t i o n w a s p a c k e d into glass P e t r i plates.  A n artist's a i r b r u s h ( A z t e k M o d e l A 4 3 0 , Testors Inc, R o c k f i e l d , I L ) was used to inoculate the b u i l d i n g materials. T h e a i r b r u s h settings were pre-adjusted to d e l i v e r ~0.1 m L o v e r 8 to 10 seconds, d e t e r m i n e d b y s p r a y i n g water into a beaker a n d i m m e d i a t e l y w e i g h i n g it. A detailed procedure is g i v e n i n A p p e n d i x C .  Sterile T w e e n ® s o l u t i o n w a s added to the airbrush reservoir for " s h a m " i n o c u l a t i n g the controls. T h e controls were sprayed w i t h ~0.1 m L o f the sterile T w e e n ® s o l u t i o n a n d then p l a c e d i n i n c u b a t i o n c h a m b e r s (see b e l o w ) . T h e airbrush w a s e m p t i e d o f the r e m a i n i n g T w e e n ® s o l u t i o n and the spore suspension w a s added to the airbrush reservoir and the a i r b r u s h w a s p r i m e d .  Test specimens were l i n e d up i n groups o f three or four and i n o c u l a t e d w i t h ~0.1 m L o f spore suspension. F o r s o l i d w o o d , w o o d c o m p o s i t e s , and g y p s u m b o a r d , o n l y one face o f the  24  specimens was inoculated, although the sides and the reverse of each specimen received some overspray. For Southern Yellow pine and lodgepole pine, the convex side of the growth rings was inoculated so that if there were specimens with heartwood and sapwood, the sapwood would be inoculated. Inoculated test specimens were placed in incubation chambers as described below. Sections of an M E A plate were sprayed before and after inoculating each group with spore suspension to check that the airbrush was working properly and to check the viability and purity of the inoculum. The day of inoculation was taken as day 0.  2.4 Incubation 2.4.1 Incubation chambers Chambers and all glassware and supports used inside the chambers were sterilized by autoclaving at 120°C for 20-25 minutes prior to each experiment. 2-litre I-CHEM® glass jars were used as incubation chambers. The lids that came with the jars were polypropylene plastic with Teflon liners, however, the plastics emitted volatile compounds, especially after autoclaving, that could have potentially interfered with monitoring volatile metabolites from the moulds. Lids were designed and machined from 316 stainless steel (Craig Machining, Vancouver, B.C.), and stainless steel Swagelok® fittings were installed (Figure 2.3).  Figure 2.3: Stainless steel lid with channel (arrow 1) to mate with rim of the jar, 2 Swagelock® fittings, and access hole for VOC sampling (arrow 2).  25  A layer (approximately 20-30 mL) of sterile distilled water was added to each chamber to maintain the relative humidity. A n inverted glass Petri plate inside the jars was used to keep specimens out of the water. Inoculated specimens and the uninoculated controls were placed one-apiece in the chambers. Chambers were purged with charcoal-filtered and HEPA-filtered air that was humidified by bubbling through sterile distilled water for 5-10 minutes to reduce extraneous volatile compounds (mainly alcohol vapours from wiping down the biosafety cabinet) within the chambers. The lids were affixed to the jars with Parafilm® wrapped around the outside of lids and threads of the jars. Later, straps were added to further secure the lids to the jars. A thin layer of watersoluble K - Y Jelly™ was applied to the channel of the lids to provide a better seal between the lids and the jars. Parafilm® and aluminum foil were used to seal the Swagelock fittings, and a small square of aluminum foil was secured over the access hole used for sampling volatile organic compounds.  2.4.2 Incubation conditions Chambers were kept on the bench top in the lab at room temperature (20-23°C). The temperature was monitored with a simple digital thermohygrometer (Baxter Corp., DeerfieldJL). The temperature was recorded with each volatile organic compound sampling occasion. Specimens were exposed to normal ambient lighting conditions (a combination of daylight and fluorescent lighting, with varying light-dark cycles). Specimens were incubated for 29 days.  2.5 Assessment of growth Four parameters of mould growth were examined in this study: visible mould growth on the inoculated material, changes in the volatile organic compound profile, production of carbon dioxide, and ergosterol content. The presence of visible growth and changes in the volatile organic compound profile were assessed at weekly intervals starting on day 1. Carbon dioxide production and ergosterol content were assessed at the end of the 4-week study period. 26  2.5.1 Visual assessment 2.5.1.1 Growth visible to the unaided eye The appearance of growth on the inoculated surface was assessed by one investigator throughout the experiments. Visible growth was assessed on day 1 and every week thereafter for 4 weeks. Side lighting was used to enhance surface detail for better visualization of fine growth. Visible growth was rated according to surface area covered and the intensity of growth (Table 2.3). For example, a specimen might be 25% covered with level 1 growth (hyphae only), and 50% covered with level 2 growth (sporulation just visible). The score assigned was a composite of the intensity and percent surface area, so for the example given, the rating score would be ((0.25 x 1) +(0.50x2))= 1.25. Table 2.3: Rating scale used for the intensity of fungal growth Intensity rating Description 0 1  No growth Hyphae only  2  Sporulation is just visible  3  Moderate sporulation (obvious discolouration or disfigurement) Heavy sporulation (underlying material is not visible)  4  Photographs were taken of specimens each week for illustration and to facilitate the visual assessment. 2.5.1.2 Microscopic examination At the end of the 4-week incubation period and after monitoring the volatile organic compound profile and measuring carbon dioxide, specimens were removed from the incubation chambers and examined under 3 Ox magnification using a binocular dissection microscope. 2.5.1.3 Volunteer rating of visible growth During the experiments, changes in the VOC profile gave an indication of whether fungal growth was present, knowledge of which could bias the rating of visible growth. Knowledge of the borate treatment status could also affect the rating. To investigate whether the results of VOC monitoring or borate treatment status might have affected the assignment of scores for visible growth by the investigator, volunteers were asked to rate the visual appearance of mould growth on gypsum board during the third experiments with S. chartarum and A. versicolor, and the volunteers' scores were compared to the 27  investigator's scores. The incubation chambers were relabeled with a randomly chosen code so that the raters would be blinded to the organism and the boric acid treatment level. The volunteers were given a brief training session with visual aids and actual samples of growth for comparison. Volunteers rated the growth on samples once weekly in the same way as the investigator except no special side lighting was used, and volunteers did not do a microscopic examination at the end of the 4th week.  2.5.2 Volatile organic compound extraction and analysis Introduction to solid-phase microextraction (SPME) Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a sample preparation technique where analytes are extracted from liquid or gaseous samples by a fiber coated with a sorbent coating or phase, and are then introduced directly into the analytical instrument such as a gas chromatograph or highperformance liquid chromatograph. In our experiments, gaseous volatile organic compounds were extracted from the headspace of the incubation chambers and introduced directly into gas chromatographs.  Analyte extraction by SPME is an equilibrium or partitioning process where analytes partition between the sample and the S P M E fiber, rather than an exhaustive process where all of the analyte in the sample is transferred to the extraction medium as in charcoal tube and other adsorbent tube sampling. As the name implies, the amount of analyte extracted is very small so that the sample usually is not significantly altered by the extraction process per se, a feature that is attractive for experiments involving serial samples such as this.  There are many factors that can influence analyte extraction by SPME, but the main ones important to our experiments are the selection of the fiber coating, the extraction time, and extraction temperature. 2.5.2.1 Extraction Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the headspace of the incubation chambers were monitored on day 1 and every week thereafter for 4 weeks. VOCs were extracted from the headspace using SPME samplers with polydimethylsiloxane/Carboxen® fibers (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). The S P M E fiber was inserted through an access hole in the chamber lids and 28  extended into the headspace. (Figure 2.4) The headspace was extracted for 30 minutes at room temperature (20-23°C). The temperature in the room was recorded at the beginning of each extraction.  The SPME fibers were conditioned in the injection port of the gas chromatograph for 10 minutes at the beginning of each sampling day. Fibers were not re-conditioned between samples as the 4-minute sample desorption time was sufficient to minimize sample carry-over. (Appendix D).  Figure 2.4: Taking a VOC sample from gypsum board with the solid-phase microextractor (arrow). The coatedfiberis inserted into the headspace of the chamber through a small access hole in the lid.  2.5.2.2 Gas chromatography analysis After extraction, the SPME fiber was desorbed for 4 minutes in the injection port of a gas chromatograph equipped with a Merlin Microseal® septum (Merlin Instrument Company, Half Moon Bay, CA). Desorption of volatiles from wood and OSB specimens was done with the injection port in split mode to avoid sample overloading. Desorption of volatiles from cellulose insulation and gypsum board specimens was done using a timed-split program. Details on the gas chromatography parameters are given in Appendix G.  V O C monitoring for several early experiments (S. chartarum on Southern Yellow pine, S. chartarum on aspen OSB, and S. chartarum on cellulose insulation) was done using a Varian 3400 gas chromatograph with a Saturn 2000 ion trap mass spectrometer detector (GC-MS).  29  Subsequent weekly analysis was performed on a Varian 3400 gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector (GC-FID). 2.5.2.3 Identification of compounds  After an initial review of the literature, 8 of the most frequently mentioned compounds were chosen as our initial standards, although other compounds could easily have been chosen as well. The eight compounds chosen were: 1-pentanol, 2-pentanone, 1-hexanol, 2-methyl propanol, 3-methyl butanol, 3-octanol, l-octen-3-ol, and 3-octanone. Later, as compounds were tentatively identified using G C - M S , other standards were obtained (eg. 2-hexanone, 2heptanone, anisole). Chemical standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.  Compounds of interest were identified by comparison of the retention times and mass spectra with known standards if available. Other compounds were tentatively identified by manually comparing their mass spectra with those in the NIST'98 mass spectra library, using Varian Saturn GC/MS Workstation v. 5.51 Saturn Search software. 2.5.3 Carbon dioxide measurement Carbon dioxide production was assessed at the end of the 4-week incubation period. After the V O C sampling was finished, the Swagelock® fittings were opened and an S K C sampling pump running at 1 L/minute was connected to one of the Swagelock® fittings. The atmosphere was withdrawn from the chamber and fed to the carbon dioxide sensor of Q-Trak® or Q-Trak® Plus indoor air quality monitors (TSI Incorporated, Shoreview, MN), via the carbon dioxide calibration collar (Figure 2.5).  30  Figure 2.5: Measuring carbon dioxide levels. A sampling pump withdraws the atmosphere from the incubation chamber andfeeds it to the C0 calibration collar of a TSI Q-Trak Plus indoor air quality monitor. The peak carbon dioxide level is recorded. 2  %  The peak carbon dioxide level was recorded for each sample. The tubing was disconnected from the chambers in between samples and the Q-Trak® carbon dioxide reading was allowed to come back down to ambient levels. The ambient carbon dioxide level preceding each sample reading was also recorded. Details on the development of this method are given in Appendix H .  2.5.4 Ergosterol measurement 2.5.4.1 Ergosterol sampling For all materials except cellulose insulation, a sample of 5 square centimeters was taken from each specimen at the end of the 4-week incubation period. One square centimeter was taken from each corner and one from the center of the inoculated face of each specimen. For solid wood material, the samples for ergosterol analysis were cut to a depth of about 1 mm; for oriented strandboard, the top layer of strands was taken; and for gypsum boards, the top few layers of paper were taken, sometimes down to the gypsum core. Ergosterol results were expressed as pg/cm . 2  Samples were stored in 15 mL screw-top test tubes at - 8 0 ° C until analysis. Some samples were stored at - 2 0 ° C for a few months, until it was realized that there may be some concerns about the stability of ergosterol at - 2 0 ° C .  31  For cellulose insulation, the entire contents of each glass Petri plate were transferred to sterile disposable Petri plates and stored at -20°C or -80°C until analysis. Prior to ergosterol analysis, the cellulose insulation was dried at room temperature for 48-72 hours in a dessicator over anhydrous calcium sulfate granules (Drierite®, W A Hammond Dierite Co, Ltd., Xenia, OH). A n aliquot of cellulose insulation was transferred to pre-weighed 30 mL screw-top test tubes and the weight of insulation recorded. Ergosterol results were expressed as pg/g of insulation. 2.5.4.2 Ergosterol  Analysis  Ergosterol analysis was performed according to a modified method by Saraf et al. (1997). Detailed procedures are provide in Appendix I. In brief, ergosterol was extracted from samples using 10% potassium hydroxide in methanol. The ergosterol was then extracted from the methanolic potassium hydroxide into pentane, dried, and derivatized to a trimethylsilyl derivative using bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetate. The derivatized ergosterol product was analysed by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry detection (Varian 3400 GC with Saturn 2000 ion trap mass spectrometer), initially in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) mode focusing on the m/z 157 product ion, and later in selected ion storage (SIS) mode focusing on the m/z 363 ion.  2.6 Comparison of methods to assess growth Using data from the gypsum board experiments, three parameters (Week 4 visual score, carbon dioxide, and ergosterol) were compared to one another to see how well they correlated with each other. Since Visual assessment has been the most common method of evaluating mould growth on building materials, and is used by industry, scatter plots and simple linear regression models were made for carbon dioxide versus Week 4 visual score, ergosterol versus Week 4 visual score. Scatter plots of carbon dioxide versus ergosterol were also made to compare a measure of metabolism to a measure of biomass. Since we expected the data to be distributed non-normally given the unequal steps in boric acid concentration, and since the Week 4 visual score was considered to be ordinal level data, correlations were tested using Spearman's rank correlation. Stata® statistical software, version 8.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used.  32  2.7 Data handling and analysis 2.7.1 V i s u a l assessment  Scores for each s p e c i m e n w e r e reported i n d i v i d u a l l y , except for the g y p s u m b o a r d scores w h e r e the scores for front a n d b a c k paper facings at each b o r i c a c i d treatment l e v e l w e r e c o m b i n e d a n d averaged across the three experiments.  2.7.2 V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d P r o f i l e s  C h a n g e s i n the V O C p r o f i l e for each s p e c i m e n were tracked b y c o m p a r i s o n to the u n i n o c u l a t e d c o n t r o l , as w e l l as b y c o m p a r i s o n to the p r e v i o u s w e e k s ' c h r o m a t o g r a m s . P e a k s f r o m chromatograms o b t a i n e d b y G C - F I D w e r e integrated a u t o m a t i c a l l y u s i n g the V a r i a n Star C h r o m a t o g r a p h y W o r k s t a t i o n Interactive G r a p h i c s v. 5.52 ( V a r i a n Inc., W a l n u t C r e e k , C A ) and results were reported as area counts. G r a p h s o f the area counts for peaks o f interest w e r e p r o d u c e d w i t h M i c r o s o f t E x c e l . Peak areas were not corrected for c o n t r o l values; instead, the control results w e r e presented a l o n g w i t h the test s p e c i m e n results for c o m p a r i s o n . R e s u l t s for each s p e c i m e n w e r e presented i n d i v i d u a l l y , except for the g y p s u m b o a r d experiments w h e r e results for front a n d b a c k paper facings at each b o r i c a c i d treatment l e v e l w e r e c o m b i n e d and averaged across the three experiments  2.7.3 C a r b o n d i o x i d e  Results for each test group w e r e averaged. R e s u l t s for the front and b a c k paper facings o f the g y p s u m boards at each b o r i c a c i d treatment l e v e l were c o m b i n e d a n d averaged across the three experiments.  2.7.4 E r g o s t e r o l  Results for each test group w e r e averaged. A s w i t h the c a r b o n d i o x i d e results, results for the front and b a c k paper facings o f the g y p s u m boards at each b o r i c a c i d treatment l e v e l w e r e c o m b i n e d a n d averaged across the three experiments.  33  2.8 Heartwood determination and Borate treatment status In cases where unexpected results were obtained (eg. growth on "treated" material or the lack of growth on'untreated material), specimens were tested to determine whether they were heartwood or sapwood (in the case of solid wood), and for the presence of borates in case treated and untreated material had been inadvertently mislabeled. 2.8.1 Heartwood determination The presence of heartwood was determined using the heartwood indicator for pine species, according to the American Wood Preservation Association method " M 2 - Standard for Inspection of Wood Products Treated with Preservatives 1996". The indicator solution, an acidic mixture of o-anisidine hydrochloride and sodium nitrate, reacts with pinosilvins in heartwood of pine species, turning red or reddish-orange. Sapwood remains a uniform pale yellow-orange colour. Heartwood indicator solution was provided by Forintek Canada Corporation, Vancouver. 2.8.2 Borate treatment status The presence of borates was determined using the indicator solutions specified in the Borax Consolidated Ltd. spot test procedure. The first solution, a 10% alcoholic extract of turmeric, was sprayed on specimens and allowed to dry. The second solution, a saturated alcoholic solution of salicylic acid with 20% hydrochloric acid, was then sprayed on. The solution turns red in the presence of borates. Colour development was noted after 20 minutes. Borate indicator solutions were provided by Forintek Canada Corporation, Vancouver.  34  3. Results  3 . 1 Mould growth on building materials Results of the experiments are presented according material groups: solid wood, wood composites, cellulose insulation, and gypsum boards for each fungal species. 3.1.1 Solid wood 3.1.1.1 Visible growth  3.1.1.1.1 Southern Yellow pine 3.1.1.1.1.1 S. chartarum  No growth was observed on the treated or the untreated material. 3.1.1.1.1.2 A. versicolor  No growth was observed on the treated material. Growth of A versicolor on untreated Southern Yellow pine was strong (Appendix J, Photo 1) with obvious growth of A. versicolor appearing at week 2. The weekly visual growth scores for untreated Southern Yellow pine are shown in Figure 3.1. 3.1.1.1.1.3 P. brevicompactum  No growth was observed on the treated material. Growth of P. brevicompactum  on untreated  Southern Yellow pine was strong (Appendix J, Photo 2), with obvious growth of P. brevicompactum after 1 week. The weekly visual growth scores for untreated Southern Yellow pine are shown in Figure 3.2. 3.1.1.1.2 Lodgepole pine 3.1.1.1.2.1 S. chartarum  No growth occurred on the treated or untreated lodgepole pine during the 4 weeks. 3.1.1.1.2.2 A. versicolor  No growth occurred on the treated material. Growth of A. versicolor was observed on only 2 of 3 specimens of untreated lodgepole pine (Appendix J, Photo 3), and the growth was not  35  as intense as it w a s o n S o u t h e r n Y e l l o w pine. T h e w e e k l y v i s u a l g r o w t h scores for untreated l o d g e p o l e p i n e are s h o w n i n F i g u r e 3.3.  3.1.1.1.2.3 P. brevicompactum N o g r o w t h was o b s e r v e d o n either treated o r untreated s p e c i m e n s i n the first e x p e r i m e n t , so the experiment w a s repeated w i t h a s e c o n d set o f s p e c i m e n s . T w o v i s i b l e c o l o n i e s w e r e seen on the edge o f one o f the treated specimens ( A p p e n d i x J , P h o t o 4). G r o w t h o f P .  brevicompactum o n untreated l o d g e p o l e p i n e w a s l i m i t e d . M i c r o s c o p i c e x a m i n a t i o n o f the untreated s p e c i m e n s r e v e a l e d m y c e l i u m d e v e l o p m e n t o n one untreated s p e c i m e n that was not apparent to the n a k e d eye (estimated surface area <1%) ( A p p e n d i x J , P h o t o 5). S p e c i m e n s w e r e tested w i t h h e a r t w o o d i n d i c a t o r a n d w e r e f o u n d to be s a p w o o d , a n d testing w i t h the borate i n d i c a t o r s o l u t i o n s c o n f i r m e d that samples w e r e not m i s l a b e l e d .  Visual growth rating - A. versicolor / untreated Southern  Visual growth rating - P.brevicompactum I untreated  Yellow pine  Southern Yellow pine  0 day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  week 4  0 day 1  j  week 1  III  il week 2  •i  week 3  1 i week'  El specimen 1 0 specimen 2 • specimen 3 H control  U specimen 1 0 specimen 2 Q specimen 3 E control  Figure 3.1: Individual visual growth scores for A. versicolor on untreated Southern Yellow pine.  Figure 3.2: Individual visual growth scores for P. brevicompactum on untreated Southern Yellow pine.  36  Visual growth rating - A.versicolorI untreated  Figure 3.3: Individual visual growth scores for A. versicolor on untreated lodgepole pine. Visible growth was seen on specimens 2 and 3 only.  Lodgepole pine (SPF)  4 -| 3-  I day 1  week 1  week 2  1 week 3  I  P. brevicompactum did not grow on treated or untreated lodgepole pine, so the experiments were repeated. In the second experiment, fine microscopic growth was seen on one specimen of untreated lodgepole pine, and a couple of small colonies of growth were seen on a specimen of treated lodgepole pine (weekly scores not shown.  week 4  H specimen 1 0 specimen 2 El specimen 3 E3 control  3.LI.2 Volatile Organic Compound Profile In chambers where there was growth, there was both the production of new compounds, as well as a decrease in aldehydes. Table 3.1 lists volatile organic compounds detected in the headspace of chambers with growth that were not detected in the controls, or were present in higher concentrations compared to the controls (e.g. acetone). 3.1.1.2.1 V O C s - Southern Yellow pine 3.1.1.2.1.1 S. chartarum Weekly monitoring of the V O C profile was done using G C - M S . However, there were problems with monitoring the V O C profile during this experiment and the results were not usable. 3.1.1.2.1.2 A. versicolor For the borate-treated southern yellow pine, the emissions of wood terpenes from the test specimens were considerably higher than from the control. However, no other changes consistent with growth were noted. For the untreated specimens, production of 2-ketones (C4-C9) in test specimens 1 and 2 was strong and levels of these compounds remained high throughout the incubation  37  period. In test specimen 3, however, production of 2-ketones was limited and transient. The V O C profile at week 4 is shown in Appendix K , Figure K - l . The time trend of 2-pentanone production by A. versicolor on Southern Yellow pine is shown in Figure 3.4.  2-pentanone - A. versicolor I untreated Southern yellow pine Figure  3.4: 2-Pentanone  versicolor pine  on untreated  over  time. Production  by test specimen transient  day 1  week 1  week 2 week 3  production  by A.  Southern of  Yellow 2-pentanone  3 was diminished  compared  to specimens  and I and 2.  week 4  time  Table  -specimen 1  — • — specimen 2  -specimen 3  —X—control  3.1: Volatile  organic  compounds  from  fungal  growth  on Southern  Yellow  pine  Southern yellow pine  Compound  GC-FID Retentioi time (minutes) S. chartarum  Rt 2.4*  2.4  Furan  2.9  Acetone  3.7  A. versicolor  P. brevicom.  6.5  X  x  x  x  2-pentanone  9.3  x  Rt 10.9  10.9 11.3  Rt 12.9  12.9  Rt 13.2  13.2  1-hexanol  14.2  2-heptanone  15.1  2-octanone  17.6  2-nonanone  20.1  C9 cyclic ketone Rt 23.3 Rt 25  S. chartarum  A. versicolor  P brevicom.  x  8.2  12.4  Lodgepole pine  x X  Dimethyl furan  Rt 11.3  pine  X  2-butanone  2-hexanone  and lodgepole  -t—>  o  J—  X  x  x X x  x x x  —<a L/  x  x  x  —  x  — mm ©  r  x x  x  x  x  x  x  X  23  X  23.3  x  25  x  , I V I M U I U U n i n e uuiy a n u 1 101 l u e n i l l eluting with a retention time of 2.4 minutes, but not identified further.  :  compound  38  3.1.1.2.1.3 P. brevicompactum No major differences in the V O C profiles between the test specimens and the control noted for the borate-treated specimens. Production of 2-ketones was strong in all test specimens (Appendix K , Figure K-2), although in specimens 2 and 3, some of the ketones (C5-C9) began to disappear while in specimen 1 they remained fairly constant (Appendix K, Figure K-3). Specimens 2 and 3 also differed from specimen 1 by producing more acetone, while the differences in production of 2-butanone were less dramatic. The time trends for acetone, 2-pentanone, and 2-butanone are shown in Figures 3.5 to 3.7.  Acetone - P. brevicompactum I untreated Southern Yellow pine  2-pentanone - P. brevicompactum I untreated Southern Yellow pine  700000 600000 -| _ 500000 § 400000 g 300000 -I ™ 200000 100000 0 day 1 dayl  weekl  week 2  week 3  week 4  week 1  week 2  week 3  week 4  time  time -specimen 1  - specimen 2  - specimen 1  - specimen 2  -specimen 3  - control  -specimen 3  - control  Figure 3.5: Acetone production by P. brevicompactum on untreated Southern Yellow pine. The concentration of acetone in specimen 1 was much lower than in specimens 2 and 3, and similar to the control.  Figure 3.6: 2-Pentanone production by P. brevicompactum on untreated Southern Yellow pine. Production in specimens 2 and 3 was transient, but levels remained elevated in specimen 1.  39  2-butanone - P. brevicompactum I untreated Southern Yellow pine  Figure  50000 -i  — • — specimen 2  -A— specimen 3  —X— control  2-Butanone  production  on untreated  pine.  in specimen  than  - • — specimen 1  3.7:  brevicompactum Production in specimens  2 and  by P.  Southern  Yellow  I is slightly  lower  3.  3.1.1.2.2 VOCs - Lodgepole pine 3.1.1.2.2.1 S. chartarum No visible growth of S. chartarum was detected on untreated or treated lodgepole pine. Accordingly, no major differences in the V O C pattern were noted between inoculated test specimens and the control (Appendix K , Figure K-4). 3.1.1.2.2.2 A. versicolor No major differences in the V O C profiles between the test specimens and the control were noted for the borate-treated specimens. On untreated lodgepole pine, A. versicolor produced 2-ketones (mostly 2-pentanone and 2heptanone, with smaller amounts of 2-butanone, 2-hexanone, 2-octanone and 2-nonanone), but only in the specimens 2 and 3 that exhibited visible growth. The V O C profile of specimen 3 is shown in Appendix K , Figure K-5. Changes in the V O C profile were evident by week 1. Figure 3.8 shows the time trend for 2-pentanone. (Pentanal elutes at a similar retention time, and area counts for the pentanal peak are shown for specimen 1 and the control). A very small amount of hexanol was detected by G C - M S in specimen 2.  40  2-pentanone - A. versicolor / untreated Lodgepole pine  Figure  600000 500000 Z3  o o  CD <D CO  production  consistent  shown  200000 100000 • n  U -  pentanone  growth  300000 -  — * —  day 1  week 1  £  $  week 2  week 3  *  2-Pentanone on untreated  are  400000 -  3.8:  versicolor  production lodgepole by specimens  with the observation  on these specimens for  by A. pine.  the pentanal  same  time as 2-pentanone  the  control.  only.  peak for  2-  2 and of  Area  which  3  only  visible counts  elutes  specimen  1  at  are the  and  week 4  time  —•—specimen 1  —•—specimen 2  — A — specimen 3  —X— control  3.1.1.2.2.3 P. brevicompactum No growth of P. brevicompactum was observed on treated or untreated lodgepole pine in the first experiment, and only minute growth was detected in the second experiment. Accordingly, there were no major changes in the V O C profile over time (Appendix K , Figures K-6 and K-7). The time trends for hexanal from untreated lodgepole pine from the first and second experiments are shown in Figures 3.9 and 3.10. In the first experiment, the VOC profiles of the test specimens follow that of the control. In the second experiment, a very slight decrease in hexanal compared to the control was seen in specimens 2 and 3 at the end of the incubation period. Specimen 2 had microscopic growth, and ergosterol was detected on specimens 2 and 3.  41  Hexanal - P. brevicompactum I untreated Lodgepole  Hexanal - P.brevicompactum I untreated Lodgepole  pine(exp.l)  pine (exp.2)  400000 300000 o  200000 100000 A  day 1 day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  week 1  week 2  week 3  week 4  time  week 4  time  Figure  - specimen 1  — • — specimen 2  -specimen 1  -specimen 2  - specimen 3  —X— control  - specimen 3  - control  3.9: Hexanal  untreated  lodgepole  brevicompactum concentrations  concentrations pine  (experiment remained  for  inoculated I).  stable,  Figure  with P. Hexanal  indicating  3. JO: Hexanal  untreated  lodgepole  brevicompactum no  slightly  a small  specimens  Hexanal  control  growth.  was seen  of ergosterol  decreased  1 and the  suggesting  growth  amount  with P.  2 and 3  to specimen  at week 4, possibly Microscopic  2).  in specimens  compared  for  inoculated  (experiment  concentrations  growth.  concentrations pine  on specimen was detected  2 and on  2 and 3.  3A. 1.3 Carbon dioxide In general, the carbon dioxide measurements were in agreement with the visual observations of growth. Results are summarized in Table 3.1. Table  3.2: Average  ±SD carbon  dioxide  concentration  (ppm) after  4 weeks  Average ± SD carbon dioxide concentration (ppm) S. chartarum Untreated Southern Yellow pine Lodgepole pine experiment 1 Lodgepole pine experiment 2  547 ± 55 •  501 ± 2 4  A  Treated 602 ± 1 8 1 b 505 ± 32  b  0  P. brevicompactum  Treated  Untreated  Treated.  >6000  492 ± 1 0  >6000  437 ± 22  523 ± 2 9  478 ± 4  562 ± 51  4028 ± 3 0 7 9  c  ambient  461 ± 48  460 ± 53  B M P '  a includes • t i < 1 specimen contaminated with Penicillium a  versicolor  Untreated  M  f  spp., C 0  includes 1 chamber with contamination in the water, C 0  2  l  2  H  M  P  732 ± 3 8 4  531 ± 29 *  d  = 610 ppm  = 810 ppm  1 specimen showed no growth; actual values: 480 ppm, >6000 ppm, 5605 ppm  d  results from second experiment: 1 untreated specimen had microscopic growth ( C 0 = 1163 ppm)  e  results from second experiment: 1 treated specimen had a small spot of visible growth ( C 0 = 525 ppm)  2  2  42  3.1.1.4 Ergosterol The average ergosterol measurements are presented in Table 3.3. The results are generally consistent with the other parameters of growth. In the second experiment with P. brevicompactum on lodgepole pine, ergosterol was detected on 2 of the untreated specimens, both at very low levels, but microscopic growth was seen on only one of them. Ergosterol was also detected on the one treated specimen that showed growth. Table  3.3:  Average  ±SD  ergosterol  content  (jug/cm ) 2  after  4  weeks  Average ± SD ergosterol content (uq/cm ) A versicolor 2  . S. chartarum Untreated Treated Southern Yellow pine Lodgepole pine experiment 1 Lodgepole pine experiment 2  P. brevicompactum  '  Untreated  Treated  Untreated  Treated  N/A  1.24 + 0.33  <DL  <DL  <DL  <DL  0.02 b  0.05  N/A  N/A  N/A  <DL  <DL  0.27 ± 0 . 0 5  3  c  <DL = below detection limit (0.01 ug/cm ) actual values (growth on only 2 of 3 samples) 0.306 and 0.235 ug/cm no growth detected in first experiment. In the second experiment, growth seen on 1/3 untreated samples and ergosterol detected in 2/3 samples (0.015 and 0.026 ug/cm ). No growth detected in the first experiment. In the second experiment, growth and ergosterol detected in 1/3 of treated samples (0.054 ug/cm ). 2  a  2  2  0  2  43  3.1.2 Wood composites 3.1.2.1 Visible growth 3.1.2.1.1 Pine oriented strandboard 3.1.2.1.1.1 S. chartarum S. chartarum did not grow on either treated or untreated pine OSB. 3.1.2.1.1.2 A. versicolor Growth of A. versicolor on untreated pine OSB was variable, with growth on one specimen being strong (Appendix J, Photo '6) while growth on the other two test specimens was limited. No growth of A. versicolor was detected oh the inoculated surface of the borate treated pine OSB, but some growth did occur on the cut edges (Appendix J, Photos 7 and 8). The weekly trends in visual growth scores are shown in Figure 3.11. 3.1.2.1.1.3 P. brevicompactum The first experiment with P. brevicompactum on pine OSB yielded unexpected results. In the initial experiment, sparse growth (Appendix J, Photo 9) occurred on the three borate treated specimens while none occurred on the untreated specimens. The experiment was repeated with a second set of specimens, and growth was observed on the untreated but not on the treated specimens, as expected. Growth on the untreated specimens was variable and somewhat limited as well (Appendix J, Photo 10). The weekly trends in visual growth scores from experiment 1 and experiment 2 are shown in Figures 3.12 and 3.13.  Testing with the borate indicator solution confirmed that the specimens were not mislabeled.  44  Visual growth rating - A.versicolor I untreated Pine OSB  Figure  3.11:  versicolor variable  Individual  on untreated between  specimens  visual pine  specimens,  growth OSB.  scores  Growth  with limited  1 and 2, but marked  growth  for  A.  was growth  on  on  specimen  3.  JL  0 day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  ism  week 4  H specimen 1 0 specimen 2 • specimen 3 0 control  Visual growth rating - P.brevicompactum I treated Pine OSB (exp.1)  Visual growth rating - P. brevicompactum I untreated Pine OSB (exp. 2)  3  2  11  0 day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  day 1  week 4  3.12:  Individual  P. brevicompactum first  experiment.  visual  on treated Growth  was  growth pine  OSB  scores from  limited.  for the  week 2  week 3  week 4  3 specimen 1 0 specimen 2 ED specimen 3 E3 control  0 specimen 1 0 specimen 2 EI specimen 3 E3 control Figure  week 1  Figure  3.13:  Individual  P. brevicompactum the second  experiment.  seen on the untreated again  limited,  visual  growth  on untreated  pine  scores OSB  This time growth specimens,  and variable  was  but growth  between  for from  was  specimens.  3.1.2.1.2 A s p e n oriented strandboard  3.1.2.1.2.1 S. chartarum S. chartarum d i d not g r o w o n either treated o r untreated aspen O S B .  45  3.1.2.1.2.2 A. versicolor A. versicolor grew well on the untreated aspen OSB (Appendix J, Photo 11). The weeklytrends in visual growth scores are shown in Figure 3.14. A small patch of growth (<1% surface area) was also observed on a single flake of wood on one specimen of treated aspen OSB, but otherwise no growth of A. versicolor was observed on the treated material. 3.1.2.1.2.3 P. brevicompactum The growth of P. brevicompactum on aspen OSB appeared to be a little slower compared to A. versicolor, but there was substantial growth by weeks 3 and 4 (Appendix J, Photo 12). The weekly trends in visual growth scores are shown in Figure 3.15. No growth was observed on the treated specimens.  Visual growth rating - A.versicolor I untreated Aspen OSB  Visual growth rating - P.brevicompactum I untreated Aspen OSB  1r  2\  L  1 i  day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  week 4  day 1  0 sample 1 0 sample 2 • sample 3 • control Figure A.  3.14:  versicolor  Individual on untreated  visual  growth  aspen  scores  for  OSB.  week 1  week 2  week 3  1!i  week 4  B sample 1 E3 sample 2 0 sample 3 E3 control Figure  3.15:  Individual  P. brevicompactum  visual  on untreated  growth aspen  scores  for  OSB.  3.1.2.2 Volatile organic compound profile As seen in the experiments with solid wood, in chambers where there was growth, there was both the production of new compounds, as well as a decrease in aldehydes. Table 3.4 lists volatile organic compounds detected in the headspace of chambers with growth that were not detected in the controls, or were present in higher concentrations compared to the controls.  46  Table  3.4:  Volatile  organic  compounds  from  fungal  growth  on pine  oriented  strandboard  and  aspen  oriented  strandboard.  Compound  GC-FID Retention time (minutes) Q  Rt 2.4*  2.4  Acetone  3.7  2-butanone  6.5  Pine OSB c a au h  ri  r  m  A. versicolor  X  Aspen OSB P. brevicom.  X X  2-pentanone  9.3  x  Methyl pyrrole Pyrrole 2-hexanone  10.6 12.3 12.4  x  Rt 12.9  12.9  Styrene Methoxymethyl  14 17.2  benzene 2-octanone Ethoxy methyl  17.6  benzene Rt 21 Rt 23 Rt 24 Rt 25 other terpenes  19.9  >  X  S chartarum  '  X X  •> ....  CJ)  o  x  r  u CD  o  c  21  x  22.9 24  x  25  x  *  A. versicolor  X  X X  P. brevicom  X X X X X X X  X X X  X  *Rt denotes compounds labelled by retention time only and not identified further. Example: Rt 2.4 = compound eluting with a retention time of 2.4 minutes, but not identified further.  3.1.2.2.1 VOCs - Pine oriented strandboard 3.1.2.2.1.1 S. chartarum A splitless injection technique was used during this experiment, with the result that some peaks were broad and overloaded. However, no significant differences in the V O C profiles were noted between inoculated test specimens and the controls for either untreated or treated pine OSB. The V O C profile for untreated pine OSB inoculated with S. chartarum after 4 weeks is shown in Appendix K, Figure K-8. 3J.2.2.1.2 A. versicolor The VOC profile for borate-treated specimens showed noticeable decreases in aldehydes at week 2, but production of new compounds was limited to a very small amount of 2hexanone.  47  The change in V O C profile for A. versicolor growing on untreated pine OSB was characterized mainly by decreases in aldehydes. One sample (specimen 3) started to show a loss of aldehydes at week 1, consistent with the early visual appearance of growth on this specimen (Appendix K, Figure K-8). The VOC profile of the other test specimens showed noticeable decreases in aldehydes compared to the control by the third and fourth weeks, consistent with the later appearance of growth (Appendix K, Figure K-10). The time trends of hexanal for A, versicolor on untreated pine OSB are shown in Figure 3.16. Production of new compounds was limited (small quantities of 2-hexanone, 2-octanone, and several unidentified compounds eluting between 20-25 minutes, possibly terpenes).  Hexanal - A. versicolor 1 untreated Pine OSB 250000 200000 I O  /  150000 -  Figure  Hexanal  fastest  the observation  CO  50000 -  growth slowly \  day 1  —•— specimen 1 —•— specimen 3  m  i-  m  1  •  i  •  —  week 1 week 2 week 3 week 4 time •  i  in the  concentrations  on untreated  decreased  2.100000 n u -  3.16:  versicolor  pine  OSB.  in specimen of the most  on specimen in specimens  A.  3, consistent intense  3. Hexanal I and  for  Hexanal with  visible  decreased  more  2, but remained  high  control.  specimen 2  —X— control  3.1.2.2.13 P. brevicompactum With the unexpected growth on treated pine OSB, changes in the V O C profile for the treated material were mainly decreases in aldehydes, but small amounts of new products (mostly ketones such as acetone, 2-butanone, 2-pentanone, 2-hexanone) were also detected. The VOC profile remained unchanged for the untreated material on which no growth was seen. In the second experiment, changes in the V O C profile were seen for the untreated material, consistent with observed growth. VOC production by P. brevicompactum on the untreated OSB consisted of ketones again, and also small amounts of compounds tentatively identified as nitrogen-containing compounds methyl pyrrole and pyrrole (Appendix K, Figure K - l 1).  48  As expected, no major changes were seen in the V O C profile of the treated pine OSB in this experiment.  3.1.2.2.2 VOCs - Aspen oriented strandboard 3.1.2.2.2.1 S. chartarum V O C monitoring was begun using GC-MS from day 1 to week 2, then monitoring was done using GC-FID for the weeks 3 and 4. The area counts are not transposable between methods, but consistent with the absence of visible growth, there were no significant changes in the V O C profile between inoculated test specimens and the controls for both untreated and borate-treated material. The V O C profile for the untreated material after 4 weeks in shown in Appendix K, Figure K-12. 3.1.2.2.2.2 A. versicolor No major differences in the V O C profiles between the test specimens and the control were noted for the borate-treated specimens. On untreated material, aldehydes decreased and new compounds were formed. Styrene was the main compound produced by A. versicolor on untreated aspen OSB. The times trends for styrene production are shown in Figure 3.17. Small quantities of compounds tentatively identified as methoxymethyl benzene and ethoxymethyl benzene were also detected (Appendix K, Figure K-13). In contrast to the observations with A. versicolor on solid pine wood and pine OSB, ketone production was not observed with A. versicolor on aspen OSB.  49  Styrene - A. versicolor I untreated Aspen OSB  250000 A 200000 A §  150000  e  100000 A  Figure versicolor  3.17:  Styrene  production  on untreated  aspen  by A. OSB.  50000 0  —£—i—K—I—K—I—X  day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  ,  week 4  time  —specimen 1 specimen 3  specimen 2 control  3.1.2.2.2.3 P. brevicompactum No major differences in the V O C profiles between the test specimens and the control were noted for the borate-treated specimens. On untreated material, aldehydes decreased and new compounds, mostly 2-pentanone and styrene, were produced (Appendix K, Figure K-14). Other ketones (acetone, 2-butanone) were also produced, as well as compounds tentatively identified as pyrrole and methyl pyrrole (detected only in specimens 2 and 3). Times trends for 2-pentanone and styrene are shown in Figures 3.18 and 3.19.  50  2-pentanone - P. brevicompactum I untreated Aspen  Styrene - P. brevicompactum I untreated Aspen OSB  OSB  350000 300000 _ 250000 | 200000 g 150000 <° 100000 50000 0  150000 \ 100000 50000  day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  week 4  day 1  week 1  time  Figure  week 2  week 3  week 4  time  - specimen 1  -•—specimen 2  -specimen 1.  - specimen 2  - specimen 3  -K— control  - specimen 3  - control  3.18:  2-pentanone  brevicompactum pentanone  production  specimens  2 and  the pentanal  for  by P.  aspen  decreased  3. Area  peak  as 2-pentanone  production  on untreated  counts  which  elutes  the  control.  OSB.  after are  Figure 2-  3.19:  Styrene  brevicompactum  production  on untreated  by P. aspen  OSB.  week 3 in  shown  for  at the same  time  3.1.2.3 Carbon dioxide In general, the c a r b o n d i o x i d e measurements were i n agreement w i t h the v i s u a l observations o f g r o w t h . R e s u l t s are s u m m a r i z e d i n T a b l e 3.5. T h e c a r b o n d i o x i d e l e v e l s for oriented strandboard w h e r e n o g r o w t h w a s o b s e r v e d (borate-treated s p e c i m e n s a n d u n i n o c u l a t e d controls) tended to be h i g h e r c o m p a r e d to other materials.  Table  3.5:  Average  ± SD  carbon  dioxide  concentration  (ppm)  after  4  weeks  Average ± SD carbon dioxide concentration (ppm) S. chartarumUntreated Treated Pine OSB experiment 1  664 ± 97  A. versicolor  789 + 186  Treated  Untreated  Treated  >6000  4448 ± 697^  832 ± 87"  >6000 b  '6000  605 ± 2 3  Pine OSB experiment 2 Aspen OSB  P brevicompactum  Untreated  Ambient  478 ± 31 r  c  107. _ 861 ± 262 476 ± 5 3 106 growth occurred on the cut edges of pine OSB, but none was observed on>6000 the inoculated face anomalous results in first experiment - growth on 3/3 treated specimens and 0/3 untreated specimens results of second experiment - growth on 0/3 treated specimens and 3/3 untreated specimens 620 ± 84  >6000  654 ±109  t  51  3.1.2.4 Ergosterol T h e ergosterol results w e r e consistent w i t h the observations o f g r o w t h . T h e average ergosterol measurements are presented i n T a b l e 3.6.  Table  3.6:  Average  ± SD  ergosterol  content  (fig/cm ) 2  Average ± SD ergosterol content (uq/cm ) A versicolor 2  S chartarum Untreated Treated Pine OSB experiment 1 Pine OSB experiment 2 Aspen OSB  N/A  Untreated  N/A  N/A  1.2 ± 1.0  N/A  . a  3.0 ± 0.46  Treated <DL  <DL  P. brevicompactum Untreated Treated <DL  0.42 ± .15"  0.80 ± 0.50  <DL  1.39 ±0.51  <DL  N / A = not assayed <DL = below detection limit (0.01 ug/cm ) actual values for 3 samples: 0.40, 0.89, 2.34 pg/cm Anomalous results - growth on treated material first experiment but growth occurred on untreated material in second experiment) 2  a  2  52  3.1.3 Cellulose insulation 3.1.3.1 Visible growth Growth on cellulose insulation was difficult to see with the naked eye, especially through the glass of the chambers, so rating the visual appearance each week was often not possible. However, microscopic examination showed that all three organisms grew on untreated cellulose insulation. 3.1.3.1.1 S. chartarum Black spores of 6". chartarum were visible on larger pieces of paper in untreated cellulose insulation. Microscopic examination revealed hyphal structures and masses of spores on untreated insulation (Appendix J, Photo 13), but no growth on the treated insulation (Appendix J, Photo 14). 3.1.3.1.2 A. versicolor Due to its light colour, A. versicolor was difficult to see with the unaided eye, but was visible under microscopic examination after 4 weeks. Even under magnification it was still somewhat difficult to distinguish among the cellulose fibers unless there were conidia (Appendix J, Photo 15). No growth was seen on the treated material (Appendix J, Photo 16). 3.1.3.1.3 P. brevicompactum Similarly, P. brevicompactum was difficult to see with the unaided eye but was visible under microscopic examination after 4 weeks, though it was still somewhat difficult to distinguish among the cellulose fibers (Appendix J, Photo 17). No growth was seen on the treated material (Appendix J, Photo 18).  3.1.3.2 Volatile organic compound profile Growth was associated with production of new compounds as well as a decrease in aldehydes. Table 3.7 lists volatile organic compounds detected in the headspace of chambers with growth that were not detected in the controls, or were present in significantly higher concentrations compared to the controls.  53  Table  3.7:  Volatile  Compound  organic  compounds  from  Acetone  3.6  2-butanone  6.3  2-pentanone  9.1  growth  on cellulose  insulation  Cellulose insulation  GC-FID Retention time (minutes)  fungal  S. chartarum A. versicolor X  P. brevicom. X X  X  dimethyl disulfide  9.6  dimethyl  10.3  cyclopentenone 2-hexanone 2-heptanone  12.2 14.7  Anisole  14.8  X  Rt 26.6*  26.6  X  Trichodiene other terpenes  29.3  X  X X  X X X  X  *Rt denotes compounds labelled by retention time only and not identified further. Example: Rt 26.6 = compound eluting with a retention time of 26.6 minutes, but not identified further.  3.1.3.1.1 S. chartarum In the initial experiment, V O C monitoring was begun using G C - M S for the first 2 weeks and then monitoring was done using GC-FID for the remainder of the experiment. The area counts are not transposable between methods, and the GC-FID settings were not very sensitive yielding poor results. The experiment was repeated using GC-FID to monitor the V O C profile, this time with a splitless injection method that resulted in broad, overloaded peaks. A different chromatography column was installed between day 1 and week 1 V O C monitoring resulting in shifted retention times for week 1. However, changes in the V O C profile consistent with fungal growth were observed. The original column was replaced for subsequent monitoring. On untreated cellulose insulation, growth of S. chartarum was associated with both a decrease in aldehydes and the production of new compounds. Acetone and anisole (methoxybenzene) were the main VOCs produced, as well as smaller amounts of 2 compounds identified as a sesquiterpene (retention time 26.6 minutes) and trichodiene (retention time 29.3 minutes) (Wilkins 2000). The V O C profile for untreated cellulose inoculated with S. chartarum after 4 weeks is shown in Appendix K , Figure K-15. The time trend for anisole production is shown in Figure 3.20.  54  While no growth was found on the treated cellulose insulation, the water in one of the chambers became contaminated and a decrease in aldehydes was observed in this specimen.  Anisole - S. chartarum I untreated cellulose insulation  2-pentanone - A. versicolor I untreated cellulose insulation  800000 600000 t Q 400000 200000  day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  week 4  dayl  day 5  day 12  time  Figure  day 26  time  - • — specimen 1  - specimen 2  - • — specimen 1  — • — specimen 2  -A—specimen 3  - control  - A — specimen 3  —X-— control  3.20:  on untreated injection  day 19  Anisole cellulose  method  was  production insulation.  by S. A  chartarum splitless  used.  Figure  3.21:  versicolor Production pentanalpeak 2-pentanone  2-Pentanoneproduction  on untreated  cellulose  was transient. which  elutes  are shown for  Area  by A. insulation. counts for  at the same the  the  time  as  control.  3.1.3.1.2 A. versicolor The chromatography from the initial experiment was poor due to low sensitivity from use of a split injection method. The experiment was later repeated using only untreated cellulose insulation to better characterize the VOC profile using the timed-split injection method. Compounds produced by A. versicolor on untreated cellulose insulation included 2pentanone, 2-hexanone, and 2-heptanone. Production of these ketones was limited and transient (Appendix K, Figures K-16 and K-17). Figure 3.21 shows the time trend for 2pentanone production. 3.1.3.1.3 P. brevicompactum A splitless injection method was used resulting in overloaded peaks. For the borate-treated material, no major differences in the VOC profiles between the test specimens and the control were noted.  55  For the untreated material, changes in the VOC profile were characterised mainly by a decrease in aldehydes (Appendix K, Figure K-18). Acetone and small amounts 2-butanone and 2-pentanone were produced, but overall P. brevicompactum did not produce many detectable V O C metabolites on untreated cellulose insulation. 3.1.3.3 Carbon dioxide In general, the carbon dioxide measurements were in agreement with the visual observations of growth. Results are summarized in Table 3.8. The carbon dioxide levels associated with growth on untreated cellulose insulation were lower compared to the carbon dioxide levels seen with other materials that supported fungal growth. Table 3.8: Average ± SD carbon dioxide concentration (ppm) after 4 weeks  Cellulose insulation  Average ± SD carbon dioxide concentration (ppm) S. chartarum A. versicolor P. brevicompactum Untreated Treated Untreated Treated IlUhtreltell Treated  Cellulose insulation experiment 2  2038 ± 332  464 ± 24  3208 ± 952  671 ± 250  2440 ± 405  533 ± 3  1458 ± 323  Ambient  530 ± 8 1 467 ± 4 2  3.1.3.4 Ergosterol Ergosterol results are summarized in Table 3.9 (ergosterol content expressed as ug/g of dry insulation). Of note is that the ergosterol levels for S. chartarum on cellulose insulation are much higher than for both A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum, indicating that cellulose insulation is an excellent substrate for S. chartarum. Table 3.9: Average ± SD ergosterol content (pg/g)  S chartarum Untreated Treated Cellulose insulation  22.65 ± 3 . 0  Cellulose insulation experiment 2  20.16 ± 1 . 6  a  ND ND  Average ± SD ergosterol content (uc /g) A. versicolor P. brevicompactum Untreated Treated;., Untreated Treated ND 2.51 ± 0.39 ND 1.76 ±0.31  ^^^^^^^  ND = not detected 0.72 ug/g detected in control. a  56  3.1.4 Gypsum board 3.1.4.1 Visible growth There were no differences in scores for visible growth for the front and back faces at each week and at each boric acid level (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p > 0.05), so front and back scores were combined and averaged across the three experiments for each organism. 3.1.4.1.1 S. chartarum Growth of S. chartarum was rapid on boards with lower boric acid concentrations (no added boric acid and 1 lb boric acid/MSF; Appendix J, Photos 19 to 22), with substantial growth being apparent after 1 week. Visual growth scores were much lower for boards with boric acid concentrations of 2 lbs/MSF and higher. Weekly trends in visual growth scores are shown in Figure 3.22. Some visible growth was detected on several specimens at boric acid concentrations of 2 and 2.57 lbs/MSF, but growth at this level was mostly microscopic (Appendix J, Photos 23 to 31). Microscopic examination revealed very slight growth on one sample each at the highest boric acid concentrations (Appendix J, Photo 32).  Average visual growth score - S. chartarum I gypsum board  3  fflT  B O lbs 0 1 lb • 2 lbs  day 1  Figure front  3.22:  week 1  Average  visual  and back paper  facings  three experiments. concentration.  growth at each  A dose-response  Boric  acid  scores boric trend  concentrations  1  02.57 lbs • 4 lbs 0 5 lbs  week 2  (error acid  bars  = 2 SEM)  concentration  is evident, of 2 lbs/MSF  week 3  for  S. chartarum  (lbs/MSF)  with decreasing and above  week 4  were  visible  on gypsum  combined  growth  had a significant  and  board.  with increasing suppressive  Scores  averaged  for  across  boric  effect on  the  acid visible  growth.  57  3.1.4.1.2 A. versicolor Growth of A. versicolor was observed only on the boards with no added boric acid and was consistently inhibited at 1 lb boric acid/MSF and above (Appendix J, Photos 33 to 42). The weekly visual growth scores are shown in Figure 3.23.  Average visual growth score - A. versicolor I gypsum board  3  no  ibs  0 1 lb 0 2 lbs 02.57 lbs  1111  • 4 lbs H5lbs  0 day 1  weekl  week 2  week 3  week 4  Figure 3.23: Average visual growth scores for A. versicolor on gypsum board. Growth was seen only on untreated boards. Scores for front and back paper facings of the untreated boards were combined and averaged across the three experiments. Growth scores were uniform across the three experiments at each time period.  3.1.4.1.3 P. brevicompactum Growth of P. brevicompactum was rapid at the lower boric acid concentrations (no added boric acid and 1 lb/MSF) (Appendix J, Photos 43 to 53). Growth at 1 lb boric acid/MSF had a "spotted" appearance that accentuated growth compared to the uniform lawn of growth seen on the boards with no added boric acid (Appendix J, Photos 49, 50, and 53), but the visual scores were similar as shown in Figure 3.24. Isolated patches of growth (Appendix J, Photos 54 to 57) were seen at 2 lbs boric acid/MSF on 4 of 6 specimens, but no growth was observed at higher concentrations.  58  Average visual growth score - P. brevicompactum I gypsum board 4 ->  • Olbs 0 1 lb • 2 lbs H2.57 lbs • 4 lbs 135 lbs  day 1  week 1  week 2  week 3  week 4  Figure 3.24: Average visual growth scores (error bars = 2 SEM) for P. brevicompactum on gypsum board. Scores for front and back paper facings at each boric acid concentration (Ibs/MSF) were combined and averaged across the three experiments. As with the experiments with S. chartarum, boric acid concentrations of 2 Ibs/MSF in the gypsum board had a significant suppressive effect on the visible growth of P. brevicompactum.  3.1.4.1.4 Independent rating of visual growth The scores for obvious growth (eg. black S. chartarum growth on the boards with lower boric acid content) were similar between raters, but for fine, non-sporulating growth and for A. versicolor with its lightly coloured spores, the scores varied widely. Some high scores were given to boards with little or no growth (as determined by the investigator's ratings and by the lack of change in the V O C profile), and volunteers commented that fine growth was difficult to see against the fibrous surface of the gypsum boards.  3.1.4.2 Volatile organic compound profile Growth was associated with production of new compounds as well as a decrease in aldehydes. Table 3.10 lists volatile organic compounds detected in the headspace of chambers with growth that were not detected in the controls, or were present in significantly higher concentrations compared to the controls.  59  Table 3.10: Volatile organic compounds from fungal growth on gypsum boards  Compound Acetone  G ypsum board  GC-FID Retention time (minutes)  S. chartarum A. versicolor P. brevicom.  3.7  X  2-butanone  6.5  2-pentanone  9.3  x  10  x  dimethyl disulfide dimethyl cyclopentenone 2-hexanone Anisole  x  X  X  X  X  X X  • 10.6 x 12.4 15.3  X  X  x  Limonene  16.7  x  Rt 27.2*  27.2  x  Trichodiene other terpenes  29.9  x x  *Rt denotes compounds labelled by retention time only and not identified further. Example: Rt 27.2 = compound eluting with a retention time of 27.2 minutes, but not identified further.  3.1.4.2.1 S. chartarum on gypsum board A variety of compounds were produced by S. chartarum on gypsum board, including ketones such as acetone, 2-butanone, 2-pentanone, dimethylcyclopentenone; anisole (the main metabolite); terpenes and sesquiterpenes (limonene and other unidentified compounds); and the tricothecene pre-cursor trichodiene. A dose-response trend was observed (Appendix K , Figure K-19), with the rate of decrease in hexanal and the rate of production of anisole and other volatile metabolites being inversely related to the level of boric acid treatment. Hexanal concentrations were already decreased on day 1 in the gypsum boards with the lower boric acid concentrations. The time trends for hexanal, anisole, and trichodiene averaged over the three experiments and combining results for the front and back paper facings, are shown in Figures 3.25 to 3.27. The production of VOCs varied between experiments. However, visual inspection of plots for each experiment showed that the dose-response trends were consistent between experiments (Figure 3.28).  60  Average hex anal - S. chartarum I gypsum board  Average anisole - S. chartarum I gypsum board  - • — control HB—0 lbs - A — 1 lbs  - X — 2 lbs 2.57 lbs - • — 4 lbs ^  #-  N  ^  a ?  *•*  H — 5 lbs  time  dayl week week week week 1 2 3 4 time  Figure 3.25: Average hexanal concentration for S. chartarum on gypsum boards. A doseresponse trend can be seen, with rapid decreases in hexanal at the lower boric acid concentrations, less dramatic decreases at intermediate boric acid concentrations, and concentrations similar to the control at the higher boric acid concentration.  Figure 3.26: Average anisole production by S. chartarum on gypsum board. Again, a doseresponse trends can be seen, with inhibition of anisole production increasing as the boric acid concentration increases.  Average trichodiene - S. chartarum I gypsum board  — control - H B — 0 lbs  1 lbs - X — 2 lbs  Figure 3.27: Average trichodiene concentration for S. chartarum on gypsum boards. Trichodiene production was strongest on the untreated boards and greatly reduced at 1 lb boric acid/MSF. Trichodiene was not detected in any significant quantities at higher boric acid concentration.  - * — 2.57 lbs -r*—4  lbs  - f — 5 lbs  61  Anisole - S. chartarum /gypsum board exp. 1 front  Anisole - S. chartarum /gypsum board exp. 2 front  -  200000 -  area count  CD cn CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD  200000 4  Anisole - S. chartarum /gypsum board exp. 3 front  7/7  50000 -  o day 1  week 1 week 2  week 3  week 4  time -2.57  - + _  Anisole - S. chartarum /gypsum board exp. 1 back  mS ™  «  day 1  weekl ^  0  mt  IK  wm  ~ m i m i  week 2 time _  2  .  5  mm •  week 3 _  7  day 1  week 4 ^  _  Anisole - S. chartarum /gypsum board exp. 2 back  Anisole - S. chartarum /gypsum board exp. 3 back  CD cn CD O CD CD O CD CD O  200000 150000  area count week 2  week 3  week 4  n o  |  -2.57  100000  CO  0 -  50000 WoC^r-—  «  ™»  dayl  weekl  time -1  week 4  •2.57 — * — 4  5  50000 -  weekl  week 3  time  200000 -  day 1  week 1 week 2  Mt  >f  ™  BB  week 2  week 3  -mt  H  week 4  day 1  time - * - 2  -*-2.57 - * - 4  weekl  week2  week3  week4  time -«-5  -1  Figure 3.28: Anisole production by S. chartarum on gypsum board for experiments 1,2, and 3, front and back sides, the dose-response trend was generally consistent in each experiment.  -2.57  -5  Production varied between experiments, but  62  3.1.4.2.1.1 Sesquiterpene production by S. chartarum on gypsum board S. chartarum produced a number of compounds eluting after 25 minutes, most in small quantities. Of particular interest are the 15-carbon (CI 5) compounds (peaks A through J), including the trichothecene precursor, trichodiene (peak K). These are most abundant with the untreated boards, and most are still present at 1 lb boric acid/MSF, but their concentration was lower and their appearance was delayed. These compounds were not detected in samples at 2 lbs boric acid/MSF or higher (Figures 3.27 and 3.29). The mass spectra of trichodiene is shown in Figure 3.30.  Chromatooram  Pints  P lo 1 1 : u :\. ., U 2 f . b 0 4 1 y p 0 _ , t . _ 1 2 f . b 0 4 .r u A P to l 2 : u : \, .. \ 1 2 C b 0 4 \ g y p l _ . t . I2t.b04.run A P l o t 3 : »12i. b 0 4 \ y p 2 - i t « - 1 2 i . b 0 4 . r u n A B  n  B  Figure board  3.29:  GC-FID  at 4 weeks,  these sesquiterpenes acid/MSF  chromatograms  showing  (secondfrom  CI5  were greatest top),  from  compounds  the headspace (A-J)  on untreated  of chambers  as determined gypsum  but not at 2 lbs boric  board  acid/MSF  with S. chartarum  by GC-MS, (top). (thirdfrom  Some  and were  top)  growing  trichodiene also  detected  (K).  on  at I lb  or in the uninoculated  gypsum  The amounts  of  boric control  (bottom).  63  Scan  1922 fiom u:Vray*s ptojocl_gc-ms\29jan04\gyp0_sla_29)ar.04,s  Figure  3.30:  chartarum trichodiene (Wilkins  Mass  spectra  on gypsum (C H 4, ]5  2  of Peak  board,  K from  corresponding  molecular  weight  =  S. to 204).  2000).  Trichodiene  3.1.4.2.2 A. versicolor on gypsum board Consistent w i t h the o b s e r v a t i o n o f g r o w t h o n l y o n the untreated boards, the changes i n the V O C p r o f i l e s o v e r t i m e w e r e noted o n l y for the untreated g y p s u m b o a r d ( A p p e n d i x K , Figure K-20). V O C production by  A. versicolor o n g y p s u m b o a r d w a s l i m i t e d , w i t h the m a i n  metabolite detected b e i n g acetone. Other 2-ketones w e r e also detected ( C 4 - C 7 ) but at v e r y l o w levels. T h e t i m e trends for h e x a n a l and acetone, averaged o v e r the three experiments and c o m b i n i n g results for the front and back paper facings, are s h o w n i n F i g u r e s 3.31 and 3.32.  64  Average hexanal - A. versicolor / gypsum board  Average acetone - A. versicolor I gypsum board  120000 n  140000  100000  •  120000  control  80000 A  - A — 1 lbs  60000  §  - X — 2 lbs  - A — 1 lbs  80000  - X — 2 lbs  o  -*—2.57 lbs  5> 60000  - • — 4 lbs  - • — 4 lbs'  to  - H — 5 lbs  20000  - • — 0 lbs  o  2.57 lbs  40000 J  -•— control  100000  -HB—0 lbs  - 4 — 5 lbs  40000 20000  dayl week week week week 1 2 3 4  0  dayl week week week week 1 2 3 4  time  Figure 3.31: Average hexanal concentration for A. versicolor on gypsum board. A decrease in hexanal was observed for only untreated boards, consistent with the observations of visible growth.  time  Figure 3.32: Acetone production by A. versicolor on gypsum board. Acetone was detected in all samples, but was significantly higher only in the untreated boards.  3.1.4.2.3 P. brevicompactum on gypsum board The changes i n the V O C p r o f i l e for the untreated g y p s u m boards a n d boards w i t h 1 lb b o r i c a c i d / M S F w e r e v e r y s i m i l a r . P r o d u c t i o n o f new  compounds b y  P. brevicompactum o n  g y p s u m b o a r d w a s l i m i t e d , w i t h 2-ketones (acetone, 2-butanone, 2-pentanone, 2-hexanone) b e i n g the m a i n c o m p o u n d s p r o d u c e d , and d i m e t h y l d i s u l f i d e b e i n g detected.  Consistent w i t h the observations o f o n l y l i m i t e d , patchy g r o w t h o n 4 o f 6 test specimens at 21bs b o r i c a c i d / M S F , p r o d u c t i o n o f n e w c o m p o u n d s w a s n e g l i g i b l e o r v e r y l i m i t e d at this c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( A p p e n d i x K , F i g u r e K - 2 1 ) . In a d d i t i o n , the decrease i n aldehydes w a s delayed a n d less m a r k e d at 2 lbs b o r i c a c i d / M S F . N o s i g n i f i c a n t changes i n the V O C  profile  w e r e noted at h i g h e r b o r i c a c i d concentrations. T h e time trends for h e x a n a l a n d acetone, averaged o v e r the three experiments a n d c o m b i n i n g results for the front a n d b a c k paper facings, are s h o w n i n F i g u r e s 3.33 a n d 3.34.  65  Average hexanal - P. brevicompactum I gypsum board  Average acetone - P. brevicompactum I gypsum board  120000  300000  100000  •  250000  control  -m— Olbs  80000  - K — 2 lbs  - K — 2 lbs  100000  - • — 4 lbs  - • — 4 lbs -+—5 lbs  20000  - A — 1 lbs  ° 150000 CO CU  —2.57 lbs  40000  -•—Olbs  200000  - ± — 1 lbs  60000  -•— control  2.57 lbs - H — 5 lbs  50000 0  dayl week week week week 1 2 3 4  dayl week week week week 1 2 3 4  time Figure  3.33:  Average  P. brevicompactum response  trend  in hexanal  decreases  can be seen,  concentration  delayed  compared  board.  A  and  for dose-  with rapid  boric  at 2 lbs boric  differences acid  hexanal on gypsum  at the lower  concentrations,  time  decreases  acid less  acid/MSF,  to controls  Figure  3.34  Average  brevicompactum production boric  acetone  on gypsum  was significantly  production board. inhibited  for  P.  Acetone at 2 lbs  acid/MSF.  dramatic and  no  at higher  boric  concentrations.  3.1.4.3 Carbon dioxide There were no statistically significant differences in carbon dioxide production between specimens inoculated on the front or back paper facings at each boric acid concentration (paired t-test, p>0.05) so front and back results were combined and averaged. Note that growth on the reverse sides of specimens (eg. from overspray) would have contributed to the carbon dioxide levels, which would obscure differences between front and back results. The carbon dioxide measurements for gypsum board specimens showed a dose-response trend that was consistent with the observations of visual growth. Results are shown in Figures 3.35 to 3.37.  66  Average carbon dioxide - S. chartarum I gypsum board  6000  Average carbon dioxide - A. versicolor I gypsum board  6000  n  5000 •E a 4000  _ 5000 E S 4000  1 3000  |  3000  |  2000 -  CU  CD  § 2000  4<),'4  '440?  CO S  ° 1000 0  1000 0  boric acid (lbs/MSF)  • Olbs 0 1 lbs ED2lbs 02.57 lbs 04lbs H5lbs  Figure 3.35: Average carbon dioxide levels (error bars = 2SEM) for S. chartarum on gypsum board, showing a dose-response trend consistent with visible growth.  804 2744  484  486  485  491  boric acid (lbs/MSF)  • Olbs 0 1 lbs Q2lbs E32.57lbs 0 4 lbs H5lbs  Figure 3.36: Average carbon dioxide levels (error bars = 2SEM) for A. versicolor on gypsum board. One specimen at 1 lb boric acid/MSF had an elevated carbon dioxide level of2302 ppm, but no growth was seen on the specimen, and no contamination was found in the chamber.  Average carbon dioxide - P. brevicompactum I gypsum board  6000 E  Q. CL  CD  5000 -  Figure 3.37: Average carbon dioxide levels (error bars = 2SEM) for P. brevicompactum on gypsum board, also showing a dose-response trend consistent with visible growth,  4000 -  'x o 3000 TZ>  o 2000 CO  1000 -  5323 ,50sf 637  451  455  476  0 boric acid (lbs/MSF) HOIbs 0 1 lbs Q2lbs B2.57lbs Q4lbs H5lbs  67  3.1.4.4 Ergosterol No statistically significant differences in ergosterol measurements were found between specimens inoculated on the front or back paper facings at each boric acid concentration (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p>0.05) so front and back results were combined and averaged. The ergosterol results show dose-response trends that are consistent with the observations of visible growth (Figures 3.38 to 3.40). For S. chartarum on gypsum board, ergosterol was detected on 2 specimens at the 4 Ibs/MSF boric acid level, although growth was seen on only 1 of them. Conversely, ergosterol was not detected in the sample taken from the one specimen at 5 Ibs/MSF boric acid that showed microscopic growth.  Average ergosterol - S. chartarum I gypsum board  £ 2  Figure 3.38: Average ergosterol content (error bars = 2SEM) for S. chartarum on gypsum boards. A dose response trend is evident, with a noticeable reduction in ergosterol being seen at a boric acid concentration of 2.57 Ibs/MSF.  o  0.11  <DL  boric acid (Ib/MSF) UOIbs 0 1 lbs Q2lbs 02.57lbs 04lbs H5lbs  68  Average ergosterol - A. versicolor I gypsum board  Average ergosterol - P. brevicompactum I gypsum board  3 i 3  T 0 79 ' <DL  <DL  <DL  <DL  <DL  i  0.47 T ' J_  boric acid (Ib/MSF) HO lbs 0 1 lbs H2lbs 02.57 lbs 0 4 lbs H5lbs  Figure 3.39: Average ergosterol content (error bars = 2SEM) for A. versicolor on gypsum board . Consistent with the visible growth, ergosterol was detected only on the untreated boards.  0.35 0.05  <DL  <DL  <DL  boric acid (Ib/MSF) HOIbs 0 1 lbs 02lbs E32.57lbs D4lbs H5lbs  Figure 3.40: Average ergosterol content (error bars = 2SEM) for P. brevicompactum on gypsum boards. A dose response trend is evident, and is consistent with the visible growth.  3.1.5 S u m m a r y o f results o f m o u l d g r o w t h o n b u i l d i n g materials Tables 3.11 and 3.12 p r o v i d e a s u m m a r y o f h o w m a n y test s p e c i m e n s s h o w e d evidence o f g r o w t h i n one or m o r e parameters measured. O v e r a l l , the results s h o w that there are differences b e t w e e n materials i n terms o f their a b i l i t i e s to support m o u l d g r o w t h , w i t h w o o d not b e i n g a g o o d substrate for growth o f  S. chartarum g r o w t h , and l o d g e p o l e p i n e s e e m i n g to s h o w s o m e resistance to  A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum.  Other differences i n organism-substrate interactions w e r e evident i n the different patterns o f V O C s p r o d u c e d w i t h each o f the c o m b i n a t i o n s o f o r g a n i s m s a n d b u i l d i n g materials.  The results also s h o w that borate treatments do i n h i b i t m o u l d g r o w t h , a l t h o u g h not c o m p l e t e l y at the levels tested for s o m e materials. T h e results f r o m the g y p s u m b o a r d experiments s h o w different dose-response trends for e a c h o r g a n i s m tested, i n d i c a t i n g that there are differences i n the s e n s i t i v i t y to borates b e t w e e n fungal species.  69  Table  3.11:  Overall  results  Southern Yellow pine Lodgepole exp.1 pine exp.2 exp.1 Pine OSB exp.2 Aspen OSB Cellulose insulation c  - growth  or no growth  (all materials  S. chartarum Untreated Treated 0/3 0/3 0/3 0/3  except  gypsum  board)  Overall - any growth A. versicolor Untreated Treated 3/3 0/3 ' 2/3 0/3  0/3  0/3  3/3  3/3 c  0/3 6/6  0/3 0/6  3/3  3/3  1/3 0/3  P. brevicompactum Untreated Treated 3/3, 0/3 0/3 0/3 2/3 a 1/3" 3/3 d 0/3 d 3/3 0/3 3/3 0/3 3/3 0/3  very limited growth (several small colonies) on the side of one specimen growth noted only on the cut edges of treated material  unexpected results: growth on 3/3 treated specimens and 0/3 untreated specimens in the first experiment. The experiment was repeated with new material, and growth occurred on 0/3 treated specimens and 3/3 untreated specimens as expected. growth on one flake of wood (<1% surface area)  e  Table  3.12:  Gypsum board  Overall  ."2 c r o CO o O CD C o O 1B T— co ro  results  0 1 2 2.57 4 5  - growth  or no growth  (gypsum  S. chartarum 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 2/6 1/6^  board)  Overall - any growth ' • . A . versicolor 6/6 0/6 0/6 . 0/6 • , 0/6 0/6  P. brevicompactum 6/6 6/6 4/6 0/6 0/6 0/6  One other specimen showed V O C changes consistent with growth but no growth was seen, carbon dioxide levels were not significantly elevated, and no ergosterol was detected. a  70  3,2 Comparisons between measures of growth - gypsum board experiments 3.2.1 Carbon dioxide versus Week 4 Visual Score Scatter plots and simple linear regression relationships between carbon dioxide and the week 4 visual scores are presented in Figures 3.41 to 3.43. For S. chartarum on gypsum board, the yintercept (carbon dioxide) indicates that carbon dioxide levels maybe elevated, indicating growth, even when no growth is visible. Carbon dioxide vs Week 4 visual scon»  Carbon dioxide vs Week 4 visual score  S.xhartafum on gypsum b o a d  o, o o  A versicolor on gypsum board  •3>xo  go •on  13CO  • • S i Figure visual  3.41: score,  Intercept: Spearman's  Carbon  2 " Week 4 visual score dioxide  S. chartarum  1149  versus  Week 4 visual score Week 4  on gypsum  ppm; coefficient:  rho = 0.87; p  "3  board.  1297 ;  <0.001.  Figure visual  3.42: score,  Intercept:  Carbon  dioxide  A. versicolor  versus  543 ppm; coefficient:  Spearman's  Week 4  on gypsum  rho = 0.61; p  board.  733;  <0.001.  ^Carbon dioxide vs Week 4 visual score .  P brrwompactum on gypsum bo.ru ' ,  Figure visual board.  3.43: score,  Carbon  Intercept:  Spearman's  dioxide  versus  P. brevicompactum  on  580 ppm; coefficient:  rho = 0.87;p  Week 4 gypsum 1666;  <0.001  • 'So .xo  > D O x>r>  '•Week 4 visual score  71  3.2.2 Ergosterol versus Week 4 Visual Score Scatter plots and simple linear regression relationships between ergosterol and the week 4 visual scores are presented in Figures 3.44 to 3.46. They-intercept (ergosterol) for S. chartarum on gypsum board indicates that significant amounts of ergosterol or fungal biomass may be present even when no growth is visible.  i  * ,  .  *'  Figure  3.44:  score,  ^  p  coefficient  i  r  * .Week 4 visual score  Ergosterol  S. chartarum  0.5292, 0.84;  i  -  versus  on gypsum 0.5192,  Week  Week 4 visual score * 4  board.  Spearman's  visual  Figure  Intercept  score,  rho  <0.001.  =  0.005, 0.99;  3.45:  Ergosterol  A. versicolor coefficient p  versus  on gypsum 0.2611,  Week  4  board.  "  A  * "  visual Intercept  Spearman's  rho  =  <0.001.  "Ergosterol vs Week 4 visual score ^  P Ixevcompactum on gypsum board  11  Figure score,  3.46:  Intercept rho  =  Ergosterol  versus  P. brevicompactum 0.0163,  coefficient  Week  on gypsum 0.1383,  4  visual board. Spearman's  0.88;p<0.001  \Week 4 visual score  72  3.2.3 Carbon Dioxide versus Ergosterol Scatter plots and simple linear regression relationships between carbon dioxide and ergosterol are presented in Figures 3.47 to 3.49. There was a variable relationship between carbon dioxide production and ergosterol level between the organisms. P. brevicompactum produced a lot of carbon dioxide, but little ergosterol, while S. chartarum produced the most ergosterol for the amount of carbon dioxide.  Carbon dioxide vs Ergosterol  Carbon dioxide vs Ergosterol  S chartanjm on gypsum board •  A.wrsjcolorongyusymboard  *:  dioxide  ergosterol,  •  Ergosterol (ug/cm2)Figure  3.47:  S. chartarum ppm,  Carbon  dioxide  on gypsum  coefficient  versus  board.  1725, Spearman's  ergosterol,  Intercept  Figure  581  rho = 0.85;  3.48:  A. versicolor p  <0.001.  ppm,  Carbon  on gypsum  coefficient  2122,  versus  board.  Intercept  Spearman's  616  rho = 0.61;  p  <0.001.  Carbon dioxide vs Ergosterol-: ,  o o  P browampactiJfr. on gypsum board .  o  o  Figure  3.49:  Carbon  P. brevicompactum 650ppm, •So  0.82;p  IS  coefficient  dioxide  versus  on gypsum 9997,  board.  Spearman's  ergosterol, Intercept rho  =  <0.001.  "Co  o o  P i 1;  " --'2 Ergosterol (ug/cm2)  • 3  73  4. Discussion 4.1 Overview Several questions were posed in the introduction to the study regarding the interactions of moulds with building materials, the effectiveness of borate preservatives, and the use of different measures for assessing mould growth.  Mould interactions with building materials Is there a difference between building materials in their ability to support mould growth? How are mould metabolites affected by the substrate? Our results showed that the building materials tested differed in their abilities to support the growth of moulds, notably that wood and wood composites were not good substrates for the growth of S. chartarum. Our results also showed that the volatile metabolites produced by moulds are influenced by the growth substrate.  Effectiveness of borate preservatives against mould growth Are borate preservatives effective at inhibiting or preventing mould growth, and at what concentrations? Could sub-inhibitory concentrations of borates stimulate the production of different metabolites or induce "stress metabolism"? Our results showed that borate preservatives are generally effective at inhibiting mould growth on building materials, although wood composites may need a higher level of treatment than what is currently recommended. We observed different dose-responses for each organism on gypsum board, indicating that there are differences in the susceptibility of the different moulds to borates. We also observed that sub-inhibitory concentrations of borates suppressed the production of volatile metabolites, and did not result in production of different volatile compounds.  Comparison of different measures of mould growth How well do different measures correlate with one another? Are any measures better than the others? Our comparisons of three different measures of growth found that there was a good correlation between the different measures, although there were differences in sensitivity, with carbon dioxide and ergosterol potentially being more sensitive than visual evaluation. The monitoring  74  of the V O C profile revealed that changes in the V O C profile, namely decreases in aldehyde concentration, might also be a useful means of monitoring mould growth in laboratory experiments such as ours.  4.2 Organism-substrate interactions 4.2.1 Differing abilities of materials to support mould growth This was most clearly demonstrated by the observations that S. chartarum did not grow on wood (solid wood, wood composites), but grew readily on cellulose insulation and gypsum board papers, producing strikingly high levels of ergosterol on cellulose insulation compared to the other two organisms tested.  Another example of the different abilities of the materials to support growth was the observation that lodgepole pine supported the growth of P. brevicompactum poorly. A. versicolor also seemed to grow poorly on lodgepole pine compared to Southern Yellow pine, with growth on only 2 of 3 specimens, lower visual growth scores after 4 weeks, and a lower level of ergosterol than other materials. The reasons for this are unclear. The inoculated sides of the lodgepole pine used in our experiments (the convex side of the growth rings) were sapwood. Compared to Southern Yellow pine sapwood, on which we observed fairly consistent growth of Aspergillus and Penicillium, lodgepole pine sapwood has fungal decay resistance that is roughly equivalent or even slightly less, although there may be significant variations within a species and even within a single tree (Viitanen 1991). Further experiments are needed to shed more light on our lodgepole pine observations.  Organic or cellulose-containing materials such as wood have been implicated as "risk materials" for mould growth (Gravesen et al. 1999). It has been reported that wood framing is associated with higher levels of airborne mould spores compared to concrete construction (Meklin et al. 2003). However, our observations that wood did not support the growth of S. chartarum and that our lodgepole pine specimens displayed some resistance to A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum suggest that labeling wood as a risk material may be an over-generalization. The reasons for the unexpected lack of growth of P. brevicompactum on the untreated pine OSB in the first experiment are unclear. One possible explanation is that formaldehyde emissions 75  from phenol-formaldehyde adhesives used in OSB may have had an inhibitory effect on mould growth. However, the type of adhesive used to manufacture the OSB used in this study was not confirmed. Formaldehyde emissions from commercially made oriented strandboards have been found to be very low. (Structural Board Association 2005). Additionally, the pine OSB specimens had been stored in the lab for at least 12 months prior to the experiments. A. versicolor grew on untreated pine OSB in experiments done prior to the first experiment with P. brevicompactum on pine OSB, and growth of P. brevicompactum was subsequently achieved on the pine OSB a month later. It therefore seems unlikely that formaldehyde emissions explain the unexpected lack of growth of P. brevicompactum on the pine OSB, nevertheless, formaldehyde emission and aging of building materials should be considered in tests of microbial growth on building materials. 4.2.2 Unique V O C profiles were produced by each organism on different substrates. Within our experiments, each organism produced a different pattern of volatile metabolites depending on the substrate it was growing on, though some similarities were seen between similar materials (e.g. pine wood and pine OSB, cellulose insulation and paper covered gypsum board). Each material resulted in a different pattern of volatile metabolites depending on the organism, thus confirming that each organism-substrate interaction is unique.  4.2.2.1 Solid wood 2-ketones (C3 to C9) were the most common and plentiful volatile metabolites produced by A versicolor and P. brevicompactum on Southern yellow pine and lodgepole pine. This is in agreement with Fiedler et al., who reported that 2-ketones were typical of all fungal species they tested when grown on wood, and attributed this to the metabolism of free fatty acids from woods (Fiedler et al. 2001). 2-ketones are often found in mouldy buildings and are on the V O C "hit list" (Wilkins & Larsen 1995). Thus, the frequent occurrence of 2-ketones in our results is consistent with the observations of others.  4.2.2.2 Wood composites Similar volatile metabolites were produced on solid pine above and pine OSB, but a different pattern of compounds was produced on aspen OSB. Like the pine woods above, 2-ketones were the main volatile metabolites detected from both A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum on pine  76  OSB. Other compounds were also detected that could be the result of metabolism of the additives used in the OSB. The V O C metabolites produced by A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum on aspen OSB, however, were different. P. brevicompactum produced some 2ketones, but A. versicolor did not, and both A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum produced styrene as a metabolite.  Commonly regarded as an industrial chemical, styrene is a naturally occurring compound, being produced by plants (eg. Liquidambar spp.) (Budavari et al. 1996), and styrene has been reported as a fungal metabolite (Claeson et al. 2002). It is unlikely that the source of styrene was the OSB itself since styrene was not detected in the controls, nor is styrene typically used as an adhesive in OSB. Styrene is a compound of potential toxicological significance as it is classified as a possible human carcinogen (IARC 2002).  These results exemplify how the substrate can influence the production of fungal metabolites.  4.2.2.3 Cellulose insulation A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum produced few volatile metabolites on cellulose insulation, suggesting that cellulose insulation has poor nutrient value for these organisms. The strongly cellulolytic organism S. chartarum, on the other hand, was able to synthesize a variety of compounds ranging from ketones to aromatic compounds and terpenes. The detection of anisole as a metabolite from S. chartarum on cellulose insulation is consistent with other reports. So was the detection of trichodiene, a precursor to the production of the trichothecene mycotoxins.  4.2.2.4 Gypsum board Just as we saw similarities between our results with pine OSB and pine wood, there were similarities between the results with gypsum board and cellulose insulation. A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum did not produce many volatile metabolites while growing on the paper facings of the gypsum boards, with a small number of 2-ketones being detected. Once again, however, S. chartarum, produced a variety of compounds, indicating that while the cellulosic materials such as cellulose insulation and the paper facings of gypsum boards may not be ideal substrates for A. versicolor or P. brevicompactum, they are preferred substrates for S. chartarum. The results show the importance of the organism in determining the nature of VOCs that might be emitted from contaminated materials. 77  4.2.2.5 Variability of volatile metabolites In our results we observed that the production of volatile metabolites was sometimes transient (e.g. 2-ketone production by P. brevicompactum on Southern Yellow pine and aspen OSB; 2pentanone production by A. versicolor on cellulose insulation). Even within an experiment there was variability between test specimens. Time-dependent production of volatile metabolites and variable reproducibility between experiments has been noted by others (Fiedler et al. 2001; Schleibinger et al. 2002; Gao & Martin 2002; Gao et al. 2002).  4.2.2.6 Comparison with other studies Several studies were located that looked at VOC production by organisms similar to ours (S. chartarum, A. versicolor, and P. brevicompactum) on materials like wood (pine and spruce), gypsum boards, cardboard, etc. (Ezeonu et al. 1994; Korpi et al. 1998; Korpi et al. 1999; Wilkins 2000; Wilkins et al. 2000; Fiedler et al. 2001; Gao & Martin 2002; Gao et al. 2002; Schleibinger et al. 2002; Wady et al. 2003; Wilkins et al. 2003). O f the V O C s reported in these studies, few were found in our experiments (Table 4.1), reinforcing the fact that fungal metabolites are indeed dependent on the specific organism-substrate interaction. There are differences in metabolites produced even among strains of a particular organism. Table  4.1:  literature  Comparison and  of the  in our study.  VOCs  produced  by similar  organisms  on similar  building  materials  in reports  in  the  .  S. chartarum  A. versicolor  P. brevicompactum  27  35  8  9  18  5  7  16  3  Number of VOCs reported in the literature  0  Number of VOCs found in our experiments' Number of VOCs in common between our data and the literature  1  different strains than ours were used " no studies with P. brevicompactum alone - the only study located with organisms. not including compounds such as unspecified terpenes major peaks, not including compounds such as unspecified terpenes  3  P. brevicompactum  b  4  used a mixture of  c  d  4.2.2.7 Potential use of VOCs as identifiers of mould contamination For a VOC to be useful as a marker of fungal presence, it should be reliably produced by a fungi on different substrates but it should not have other sources. In our results, no one compound was detected as a metabolite in all organism-substrate combinations. The 2-ketones were common, with occurrences ranging from 4/14 of the combinations where growth and VOC production  78  o c c u r r e d (2-nonanone) to 12/14 o f the c o m b i n a t i o n s (2-pentanone). M o s t o f the other c o m p o u n d s w e detected w e r e p r o d u c e d b y o n l y one or t w o organism-substrate c o m b i n a t i o n s .  W e s s e n a n d S c h o e p s p r o p o s e d a list o f 23 V O C s o f u n i q u e l y m i c r o b i a l o r i g i n ( J J M V O C s ) that c o u l d a i d i n d i a g n o s i n g the cause o f " p r o b l e m b u i l d i n g s " ( W e s s e n & S c h o e p s 1996). In our results, o n l y 4 o f the 23 U M V O C s (2-hexanone, 2-heptanone, 2-nonanone, a n d d i m e t h y l disulfide) w e r e f o u n d a m o n g the c o m p o u n d s w e detected and i d e n t i f i e d . T h e o c c u r r e n c e o f these four U M V O C s i n o u r experiments ranged f r o m 3/14 o f the organism-substrate c o m b i n a t i o n s ( d i m e t h y l disulfide) to 8/14 (2-hexanone). Others h a v e also f o u n d that few o f these U M V O C s w e r e f o u n d i n their o w n experiments w i t h m o u l d s o n v a r i o u s b u i l d i n g materials ( G a o & M a r t i n 2 0 0 2 ; G a o et a l . 2 0 0 2 ) .  T h u s , w i t h respect to the use o f V O C s as c h e m i c a l markers or fingerprints, the v a r i a b i l i t y i n v o l a t i l e metabolites w e h a v e seen w i t h o u r c o n t r o l l e d c o n d i t i o n s a n d the heterogeneity o f c o m p o u n d s found b y others suggests that the use o f V O C profiles for fungal identification, e s p e c i a l l y i n i n d o o r air q u a l i t y investigations w h e r e variables m a y be m u l t i p l i e d , is still i m p r a c t i c a l . It underscores the need for m o r e data o n metabolite profiles o f different o r g a n i s m substrate interactions. A s stated almost a decade ago: "...Several compounds may be useful as indicators for mold growth undoubtedly depending on the specific substrate(s) and the microbiological  entities involved, but more detailed studies of VOC biosynthesis for  indoor  molds under a variety of growth conditions, including building material substrates, are required before indoor air analyses can be used effectively. " ( W i l k i n s & L a r s e n 1995)  4.3 Effects of borate preservatives 4.3.1 S o l i d w o o d Pressure treatment o f S o u t h e r n Y e l l o w a n d l o d g e p o l e p i n e s a p w o o d w i t h d i s o d i u m octaborate tetrahydrate to c o m m e r c i a l l y a v a i l a b l e treatment l e v e l s w a s e s s e n t i a l l y c o m p l e t e l y effective at p r e v e n t i n g m o u l d g r o w t h o v e r a 4 w e e k p e r i o d under o u r test c o n d i t i o n s .  79  4.3.2 Wood composites The visual scores and ergosterol results from experiments with the untreated pine and aspen OSB suggest that aspen OSB is more susceptible to fungal attack than pine OSB, which is not surprising since aspen is generally considered to be less resistant to fungal attack than softwoods like pine (Laks et al. 2002). However, treated aspen OSB performed better than treated pine OSB, with virtually no growth occurring on the treated aspen boards while growth occurred on both the inoculated faces and cut edges of treated pine OSB. These results are probably due to the higher zinc borate content of the aspen OSB compared to the pine OSB (1.148% zinc borate versus 0.754% zinc borate). The American Wood Preservers Association recommends treating OSB to a zinc borate retention of 0.75% for protection against decay fungi and Formosan termites, and commercially available OSB is treated to this level. Our results suggest that higher borate retentions may be needed to improve the mould resistance of OSB. Growth on the cut edges of the pine OSB may also indicate that the full thickness of the wood flakes was not completely protected. Incorporation of zinc borate into the wood flakes along with waxes and adhesives results in a surface treatment on each flake. However, zinc borate is relatively insoluble, and even though wood flakes used in OSB are generally less than 1 mm thick, unless the borates diffuse into the flake to provide protection throughout, the inside of the flakes may be susceptible to mould attack. Note that oriented strandboard is usually edge-coated at the time of manufacture to protect against edge swelling caused by moisture, which may provide some protection against mould attack, but on construction sites, cut edges are rarely coated or treated in any way.  Although growth of A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum was seen on the treated pine OSB, the production of VOCs was reduced compared to the untreated pine OSB. The compounds detected from growth on the treated pine OSB (mainly 2-ketones) were also detected in untreated pine OSB and no new or unique compounds were detected on the treated OSB. These results show that sub-inhibitory concentrations of borates did not stimulate the production of new volatile metabolites, which suggests that the borates did not cause "stress metabolism" in these two organisms.  80  4.3.3 Cellulose insulation Boric acid treatment of cellulose insulation was completely protective against mould growth under our test conditions. This was not surprising given the high levels of boric acid (13%) used to impart the necessary fire resistance. 4.3.4 Gypsum board Dose-response trends with increasing boric acid content were seen in all 4 parameters of growth for each organism, notably for S. chartarum and P. brevicompactum since A. versicolor only grew on the untreated gypsum boards. For S. chartarum and P. brevicompactum, visual growth scores and carbon dioxide levels were significantly lower compared to untreated boards at a boric acid concentration of 2 lbs/MSF. Ergosterol levels were also significantly lower at 2 Ibs/MSF for P. brevicompactum, but for S. chartarum, the difference was significant at 2.57 lbs/MSF.  The results also showed that the organisms differ in their sensitivity to borates. S. chartarum was more resistant than P. brevicompactum, which in turn was more resistant than A. versicolor with gypsum board as the substrate. However, S. chartarum's resistance to borates might differ on less favorable substrates, and similarly, it is possible that P. brevicompactum and A. versicolor might exhibit higher tolerances to borates on other substrates that they prefer, pointing to the importance of considering organism-substrate interactions when testing preservatives. Boric acid also produced a dose-dependent suppression in the production of volatile metabolites. As with the treated pine OSB, no new or unique metabolites were detected with sub-inhibitory concentrations of boric acid compared to the untreated gypsum boards. In particular, boric acid inhibited the production of trichodiene in a dose-dependent fashion. As trichodiene is a precursor to trichothecene mycotoxins, from these results, it does not appear that the lower doses of borates would result in increased trichothecene production as a result of stress metabolism. However, actual analysis for trichothecenes would be necessary to confirm this.  4.3.5 Comparison with other studies Our results are consistent with the work of others who have also tested the mould resistance of borate-treated material. Fogel and Lloyd found that borates provided dose-related protection 81  against mould growth on solid wood, OSB, and gypsum boards exposed continuously to a natural mixed inoculum (Fogel & Lloyd 2000; Fogel & Lloyd 2002). However, while we observed almost complete inhibition of mold growth for most of our materials (Southern Yellow pine, lodgepole pine, aspen OSB, gypsum boards with higher boric acid content), Fogel and Lloyd found growth ranging from traces to light growth on their treated material, even at borate retentions higher than our test material. The difference in results may be due to their use of constant exposure to a natural inoculum, higher incubation temperatures, and for the gypsum boards, longer incubation times. Most recently, Micales-Glaeser et al. tested various preservatives (disodium octaborate tetrahydrate, didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, and chlorthalonil, alone and in combinations) against common indoor mould species on wood and gypsum board (MicalesGlaeser et al. 2004). They found there were differences in the sensitivity to borates between the species, with Cladosporium cladosporoides and P. brevicompactum being the most difficult to control. They also found that the material had an effect, with mould growth being easier to control on gypsum boards than on pine or aspen wood with the same borate treatments. While the treatments and experimental conditions used in this study were quite different from ours, the findings that mould growth and the performance of borate preservatives depend on both species and material were consistent with our observations. Neither study looked at metabolites, so an important aspect of our results was that as far as can be determined from the volatile metabolites, borates inhibited mould growth and did not appear to induce "stress metabolism". Reduced fungal growth was simply associated with reduced V O C production.  4 . 4 . Use of different measures to assess fungal growth  4.4.1 Visual assessment and microscopy Visual assessment allowed the determination between growth and no growth, as well as allowing observation of time trends and dose-response trends. However, despite similar rating scores, the materials varied in their actual appearance. Visual assessment was also somewhat subjective as demonstrated by the different scores given by the independent volunteers during the gypsum board experiments, and the intensity criteria used were arbitrary. 82  Various rating scales have been used in previous studies sometimes with vague criteria such as "material only partially covered after 4 weeks" so that comparing studies can be difficult (Nielsen et al. 1998; Nielsen et al. 1999; Viitanen & Bjurman 1995; Nikulin et al. 1994; Adan et al. 1994; Wang 1993; Viitanen & Ritschkoff 1991). Visual assessment also forms the basis for a number of standards that are used by industry (Adan et al. 1994; A S T M 1995; A S T M 2000;. A S T M 2002; Canadian Gypsum Company 2003), but again, comparing between standards, and between materials can be difficult.  Visual assessment with the unaided eye also missed some growth that was detected using microscopy. We did a microscopic examination at the end of the incubation period, and in terms of sensitivity, microscopy was probably as sensitive as any of the other measures we used (see carbon dioxide and ergosterol below). Some researchers agree that macroscopic examination alone might allow significant fungal colonization and sporulation to go undetected, especially with light coloured organisms or if the material itself is fibrous or difficult to see discoloration on. Micales-Glaeser et al. found that samples that were even just slightly discoloured had large spore loads that could potentially affect sensitive individuals (Micales-Glaeser et al. 2004). However, as with macroscopic examination, describing microscopic growth quantitatively is difficult. Photographs 5, 13, 15, 17, and 24 in Appendix J give examples of difficult to quantify microscopic growth.  "Quantification subjectivity  of mold biomass by microscopy  and interference  microbiologists.  may be influenced  by a high degree of  due to debris and fibers and can only be performed  by  observer  trained  " (Reeslev et al. 2003).  4.4.2 Changes in the V O C profile We observed two patterns of change in the V O C profile when mould growth occurred: production of new compounds, and the disappearance of aldehydes. Both were useful as measures of mould growth. However, while focusing on the production of specific V O C metabolites might be used to monitor growth, given the dependency of metabolites on the growth substrate and other environmental factors, predicting what compounds to focus on would be difficult.  83  On the other hand, we observed a ubiquitous presence of aldehydes in all materials tested, and consistently saw a decrease in these aldehydes when there was growth. The rate of decrease seemed to correlate well with observed growth over time in several of our experiments (A. versicolor on untreated pine OSB, S. chartarum and P. brevicompactum on gypsum board) and followed the general dose-response trend seen with the varying levels of boric acid in the gypsum board. Aldehydes have been found in natural wood and in wood composites, although there is some uncertainty over the source of these aldehydes (Baumann et al. 2000). The most likely source of aldehydes is probably oxidation of fatty acids. Fatty acids make up a substantial proportion of the extractives in wood (Leone & Breuil 1998). The source of the aldehydes in the cellulose f  insulation and the gypsum boards is also unclear, although it would be reasonable to speculate that they are also the oxidation products of fatty acids. The decrease in aldehydes with fungal growth on building materials, as well as on laboratory culture media, has been observed by others. (Pasanen et al. 1998, Kiviranta et al. 1998, Claeson et al. 2002) It has been suggested that growth of mould on building materials "restrained their emissions" (Pasanen et al. 1998), and that, "according to some assumptions, microorganisms can decrease airborne concentrations by presenting a diffusion barrier, providing a larger surface area increasing vapor deposition or simply by depleting the compounds." (Korpi, Pasanen & Viitanen 1999) However, we observed decreases in aldehydes when there was no growth on the material itself but instead when there was contamination growing in the water of the chambers, so it would appear that the fungi are catabolising the aldehydes. We were able to use the decrease in aldehydes to monitor growth in our experiments, and this may be applicable to similar laboratory experiments testing the fungal resistance of materials. Monitoring the levels of aldehydes to diagnose mould growth in buildings, however, may be impractical because other sources of aldehydes maybe present indoors that can confound results. 4.4.3 Carbon dioxide The carbon dioxide measurements agreed with the observations of visible growth, and in some cases, were more sensitive than visual observation with the unaided eye. For example, CO2 was elevated in the specimen of lodgepole pine that exhibited microscopic growth of P. 84  brevicompactum. Carbon dioxide was also elevated in one specimen of gypsum board containing 5 lbs boric acid/MSF that exhibited microscopic growth of S. chartarum. The scatter plot and regression line for CO2 versus visual score for S. chartarum on gypsum board showed that there could be significant amounts of CO2 (and hence growth) on materials that did not appear to be contaminated. On the other hand, carbon dioxide measurements did not capture the microscopic growth of S. chartarum observed on a specimen of gypsum board containing 4 lbs boric acid/MSF, so there are limits to the sensitivity of CO2 as a measure of fungal growth. Note that C 0 levels measured in this study represented growth on all surfaces of the specimens, 2  growth that may have resulted from deposition of spores on the sides and reverse of the specimens during inoculation or from spread of growth during the incubation.  In studies of mould growth on building material, rapid increases of carbon dioxide have been reported beginning as early as day 2 of incubation (Pasanen et al. 1992). High levels, up to ~67% (60,000-70,000 ppm) have been reported in studies with similar inoculated surface-tochamber volume ratios as ours (Korpi et al. 1998). Carbon dioxide measurements, especially if they can be done serially, appear to be a useful tool to track mould growth on building materials, yet it seems carbon dioxide has been used infrequently in published studies.  One potential drawback of using carbon dioxide as a measure of growth in studies using building materials is that it may be subject to confounding by chemical reactions. We observed that carbon dioxide levels from OSB were elevated, even for the borate-treated specimens where there was no growth detected by other means and for the uninoculated controls. It could be speculated that there may have been a chemical reaction that resulted in the generation of small amounts of carbon dioxide, perhaps initiated by moisture. Conversely, Korpi et al. observed a lack of elevated carbon dioxide when there was fungal growth on ceramic tile attached to aggregate block (Korpi et al. 1998). They suggested that the carbon dioxide reacted with calcium hydroxide in the aggregate block to form calcium carbonate and water.  A second drawback to using carbon dioxide as a measurement of mould growth is that carbon dioxide levels did not necessarily correlate with fungal biomass. For example, P. brevicompactum produced the highest average levels of carbon dioxide on gypsum boards at the low end of the boric acid range, yet the ergosterol levels were the lowest of the three organisms. This is also evident from the scatter plot of carbon dioxide versus ergosterol (Figure 3.49). A. 85  versicolor produced higher levels of CO2 on cellulose insulation than S. chartarum, but S. chartarum produced more VOCs and about 8 times more ergosterol. It can be argued that in terms of potential impact on health, fungal biomass is probably more important than carbon dioxide production.  Thus, while carbon dioxide measurements can be useful for monitoring mould growth on building materials, other measures may be needed to corroborate the results, and caution should be applied in the interpretation of the results.  4.4.4 Ergosterol The ergosterol results generally agreed well with other measures of growth. Ergosterol was also fairly sensitive. Ergosterol was detected in a couple of specimens (P. brevicompactum on lodgepole pine, S. chartarum on gypsum board at 4 lbs boric acid/MSF) where no growth was seen with the unaided eye. Conversely, ergosterol measurements failed to detect growth of P. brevicompactum on 4 specimens of gypsum boards that showed visible growth. The sampling pattern we used may have had an effect on results: when growth was patchy, the arbitrary sampling pattern we used may have missed isolated areas of growth.  Comparing ergosterol to visual assessment, the scatterplot and regression line for ergosterol versus visual score at week 4 for S. chartarum on gypsum board showed that there could be appreciable amounts of mould on materials that do not appear to be contaminated. Gutarowska and Zakowska compared ergosterol measurements to propagule counts (determined by dilution plating) for a variety of materials ("cellular concrete", plain gypsum-carton board, and painted gypsum-carton board) (Gutarowska & Zakowska 2002). They developed a model that predicted that ergosterol levels less than 1.92 mg/m (0.19 pg/cm ) corresponded to a "normal" level of 2  2  contamination without active growth on gypsum-carton board, while levels greater than 3.69 2 2 mg/m (0.37 pg/cm ) represented active growth with a high level of contamination. The yintercept from our regression line was 0.53 pg/cm for S. chartarum on gypsum board, with 4 2  specimens having > 1 ug/cm ergosterol given a visual score of 0. The organism may have had an impact on our ability to detect ergosterol. In general, we found that S. chartarum produced the highest levels of ergosterol for a given visual score or carbon dioxide level. Ranking organisms in terms of ergosterol levels from cellulose insulation and 86  g y p s u m boards, the order w a s  S. chartarum > A. versicolor > P. brevicompactum. F o r w o o d  products, ergosterol levels w e r e h i g h e r for  A. versicolor than for P. brevicompactum. T h i s  agrees w i t h the findings o f P a s a n e n et a l , w h o f o u n d that  S. chartarum a n d A. versicolor had 10  to 30 times m o r e ergosterol content o n a per-spore basis than  P. brevicompactum. ( N o t e that S.  chartarum has r e l a t i v e l y large spores, but the d i m e n s i o n s o f A. versicolor a n d P. brevicompactum spores are s i m i l a r . ) O n a d r y - w e i g h t basis, S. chartarum a n d A. versicolor h a d r o u g h l y t w i c e the ergosterol content o f P .  brevicompactum (Pasanen et a l . 1999). T h u s , o u r  o b s e r v a t i o n o f detectable ergosterol o n material that d i d not appear to h a v e m o u l d g r o w t h (and hence better s e n s i t i v i t y c o m p a r e d to v i s u a l inspection) m a y o n l y be a p p l i c a b l e to certain m o u l d s , that is, those w i t h h i g h e r ergosterol content.  Is m e a s u r i n g ergosterol useful? N i e l s e n f o u n d that ergosterol w a s detectable e v e n w h e n n o g r o w t h seemed to o c c u r , e s p e c i a l l y o n fibrous materials ( N i e l s e n & M a d s e n 2 0 0 0 ; N i e l s e n et a l . 2004), but also stated that " n o significant quantities o f b i o m a s s were o v e r l o o k e d " u s i n g stereomicroscopy, and d e c i d e d not to do further b i o m a s s determinations i n future experiments. H o w e v e r , w e do not k n o w i f the s m a l l amounts o f ergosterol that w e f o u n d w h e r e there was i n v i s i b l e g r o w t h c o u l d b e c o m e larger g i v e n e n o u g h t i m e , so w e have to q u e s t i o n what is "significant". Further, o u r results s h o w that the ergosterol l e v e l s are not the same f r o m one material to another at a g i v e n v i s u a l rating score ( F i g u r e 4.1). T h e r e i s c o n s i d e r a b l e v a r i a t i o n i n ergosterol measurements b e t w e e n organisms and materials g i v e n the same v i s u a l score. A s m e n t i o n e d above, v i s u a l assessments c a n be subjective, a n d there are d i f f i c u l t i e s c o m p a r i n g results o f one study to another w h e n different rating systems are used. A n o b j e c t i v e measurement l i k e ergosterol m a y help s o l v e these p r o b l e m s .  87  Average +/- SD ergosterol for materials rated "3" at 4 weeks 3.5  II P. brevicompactum/southern yellow pine 0 A. versicolor/pine OSB  Figure  4.1:  • P.brevicompactum/aspen OSB  • A.versicolor/aspen OSB  • S. chartarum/gypsum board  • P. brevicompactum/gypsum  Ergosterol  measurements  (average  ±SD)  for  materials  with a visual  rating  of "3 " at week  4.  Table 4.2 lists some of the advantages and disadvantages of the methods that we used. Overall, no one measure stood out as being ultimately superior to the others for assessing mould growth. In the end, deciding on what measures to use to assess fungal growth likely depends on the questions to be answered. For determining fungal resistance (i.e. growth or no growth), visual and microscopic examination will likely suffice. However, to compare one material to another objectively, ergosterol measurements may be useful. To explore other aspects of mould growth on building materials, other methods such as measuring and characterizing metabolites may be necessary.  Table  4.2:  Advantages  and  disadvantages  of the different  measurements  Advantages  offungal  growth  used  in our  study  Disadvantages  Visual  Simple, rapid, and inexpensive. Visual assessment forms the basis of several testing standards. Can be done serially.  Visual assessment without microscopy may not be able to detect fine growth, such as the beginnings of growth, and may be difficult on dark or fibrous surfaces. Visual assessment may also be somewhat subjective, and is dependent on the training and experience of the examiner.  Microscopic  Fairly sensitive and inexpensive. Allows better assessment of hyphal development and sporulation.  Can be time consuming. Removal of specimens from incubation vessels can upset environmental conditions, which can affect growth as well as make it difficult to collect other data (eg. VOCs) serially. If done serially, requires handling of specimens, which may lead to unwanted contamination. Might still miss some growth, although probably not significant amounts.  Changes in VOC pattern  Can be done serially. Decreases in aldehydes can be fairly sensitive.  Requires specialized equipment. Ability to indicate growth (sensitivity) can depend on the type and quantity of background VOCs, as well as VOC sampling and analysis techniques. Production of new compounds can be unpredictable. Aldehydes may not be present in all material, and decreases in aldehydes can also be caused by microbial contamination of the test chamber.  Carbon dioxide  Relatively simple. Can be done serially with the right equipment.  May not be very sensitive, although our gypsum board results with S. chartarum indicated that carbon dioxide levels can be elevated even when no growth is seen.  Ergosterol  Sensitive. Objective measure of fungal biomass, can be used to directly compare growth on one material to growth on another.  Requires extensive sample preparation and complicated analysis. Sensitivity can depend on how samples are obtained. Analysis is destructive, so serial sampling cannot be done.  4.5 Strengths and limitations of our study 4.5.1 Strengths Few  other c h a m b e r studies o f m o u l d g r o w t h o n b u i l d i n g materials have l o o k e d at m o r e than one  parameter o f g r o w t h o r t r i e d to c o m p a r e them. O b j e c t i v e measures o f fungal b i o m a s s s u c h as ergosterol have also b e e n infrequently used i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h other measures. W e found fairly g o o d agreement w i t h the 4 different measures used, a n d the results r e v e a l e d s o m e advantages and disadvantages o f each m e t h o d .  Studies l o o k i n g at the effectiveness o f borate preservatives at p r e v e n t i n g m o u l d g r o w t h o n c o m m e r c i a l l y a v a i l a b l e b u i l d i n g products are few, a n d none o f the studies located have l o o k e d at v o l a t i l e metabolites o r u s e d ergosterol measurements. T h u s o u r data p r o v i d e s o m e objective i n f o r m a t i o n o n the effects o f borate preservatives o n m o r e than one aspect o f fungal g r o w t h .  L a s t l y , our experiments a d d to the experience u s i n g S P M E as a s i m p l e , n o n - i n t e r f e r i n g m e t h o d for fungal V O C  a n a l y s i s , O u r results also a d d n e w data o n the V O C  metabolites p r o d u c e d b y S.  chartarum (3 n e w c o m p o u n d s ) , A. versicolor (11 n e w c o m p o u n d s ) , a n d P. brevicompactum (12 new  c o m p o u n d s ) w h e n these o r g a n i s m s g r o w o n b u i l d i n g materials.  89  4.5.2 Limitations 4.5.2.1 Methodology 4.5.2.1.1 Duration of experiments Although 4 weeks was sufficient to demonstrate differences between treated and borate-treated materials for A. versicolor and P. brevicompactum on all materials, and S. chartarum on cellulose and gypsum boards, a longer incubation period may be necessary for experiments with S. chartarum on wood. Two studies that found growth of S. chartarum on wood were located; both were of 12 weeks duration, although neither stated how long it took before S. chartarum growth was noticeable (Nikulin et al. 1994; Micales-Glaeser et al. 2004).  4.5.2.1.2 Visual assessment Determining the surface area covered by growth was sometimes difficult, especially for fine growth on fibrous materials like the paper coverings of the gypsum boards and the cellulose insulation. The optics of the glass jars further hampered visual inspection so that the surface area covered in mould from week to week could really only be estimated. Rating the severity of growth was also somewhat subjective. Early sporulation of A. versicolor or P. brevicompactum, with their light-coloured spores, may have been assigned scores of 1 (hyphal growth only) instead of 2 (sporulation) due to inability to see spores that were actually present.  4.5.2.1.3 Measuring the volatile organic compound profile The selection of the S P M E fiber, the duration of sample extraction, and the gas chromatograph operating parameters could have an effect on the number and types of VOCs detected. Wady et al. reported that the Carbowax®/divinylbenzene coated S P M E fiber gave the best extraction of alcohols and ketones, and used that fiber in their studies of VOCs from mould-contaminated materials (Wady et al. 2003). However, the Carboxen®/PDMS S P M E coating we used is recommended as a good all-purpose coating for a variety of compounds. We compared the performance of the Carboxen®/PDMS fiber to the Carbowax®/divinylbenzene with actual test specimens, and found the Carboxen®/PDMS to be better (Appendix E).  Exposing the S P M E fiber for longer periods would have resulted in increased sorption of compounds from the chamber headspace, especially compounds with higher boiling points (Appendix F). The 30-minute SPME extraction time was chosen as a compromise between convenience and sensitivity.  The high background levels of VOCs from the wood and wood composites necessitated using a split injection method of sample introduction into the gas chromatograph to avoid some very broad, overloaded peaks. Split injection means that only a fraction of the sample is actually deposited onto the column, the remainder being vented away. This reduces the sensitivity of the method, so that some volatile fungal metabolites that were produced in small quantities may have gone undetected.  4.5.2.1.4 Carbon dioxide Some dilution of the atmosphere within the chambers would have occurred while taking the carbon dioxide readings, so the reported values are only approximations. The instrument was calibrated using available calibration gas that was only -1000 ppm, and linearity of the response through the instruments' entire range (0-6000 ppm) was assumed. Also, carbon dioxide levels in 26 of 102 of the test specimens exceeded the range of the Q-Trak® monitors used, so no estimates of the actual carbon dioxide levels for these specimens can be made.  4.5.2.1.5 Ergosterol Samples of the materials (taken from each corner and the center of the inoculated face) rather than the entire specimens were used for ergosterol analysis. Since only 5 square centimeters from the inoculated face of the woods, OSB, and gypsum boards were used (representing roughly 6% or 10% of the inoculated surface), the sensitivity would be decreased. Such sampling may have also introduced bias into the ergosterol results. For example, the sampling pattern chosen missed areas of growth, as was the case for specimens of gypsum board inoculated with P. brevicompactum, which could result in artificially low results. However, using the entire inoculated surface would have required the use of excessive amounts of solvents and extensive sample preparation time.  4.5.2.2 Generalisability of our results 4.5.2.2.1 Interactions between organisms and substrates Our results show that the growth of moulds and the production of their metabolites are dependent on the substrate. It is clear then that the main limitations to the generalisability of our study are that we studied only a few organisms on a few materials under specific conditions.  91  A d d i t i o n a l l y , the g r o w t h a n d V O C patterns f o u n d m a y not be representative o f the organisms tested o n materials under different e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s , o r w h e n they g r o w as m i x e d flora.  F o r e x a m p l e , m o u l d g r o w t h i n a b u i l d i n g can o c c u r o n interior surfaces, but often also occurs i n enclosed spaces w i t h o u t exposure to light. T h e test specimens i n this study w e r e e x p o s e d to n o r m a l ambient l i g h t i n g c o n d i t i o n s - a c o m b i n a t i o n o f d a y l i g h t w i t h seasonal v a r i a t i o n , and fluorescent l i g h t i n g . It is p o s s i b l e that exposure to light m a y have h a d a n effect o n the g r o w t h o f the m o u l d s , and c o u l d h a v e affected the v o l a t i l e organic c o m p o u n d metabolites formed.  A l s o , i n natural systems a v a r i e t y o f organisms co-exist o n substrates a n d there is b i o l o g i c a l succession w h e r e the f l o r a changes w i t h t i m e and c h a n g i n g c o n d i t i o n s . T h e potential for antagonistic or synergistic effects o f m i x e d flora o n the g r o w t h o f m o u l d s o n b u i l d i n g materials and the metabolites f o r m e d w a s not evaluated i n this study.  4.5.2.2.2 Effectiveness o f borate preservatives O u r results s h o w e d that borates at c o m m e r c i a l l y used treatment l e v e l s have an i n h i b i t o r y effect o n m o u l d g r o w t h under s p e c i f i c laboratory c o n d i t i o n s . H o w e v e r , c a u t i o n is necessary i n extending the results to other situations, s u c h as the c o n d i t i o n s that b u i l d i n g materials w o u l d be subject to i n actual use. O t h e r m o u l d s m a y have different sensitivities to borates, a n d as m e n t i o n e d above, the resistance o f borate-treated materials to m i x e d flora m a y differ.  4.6 Future directions 4.6.1 M y c o t o x i n analysis and b i o l o g i c a l a c t i v i t y o f spores and fungal fragments. W e found that the v o l a t i l e metabolites are i n f l u e n c e d b y the g r o w t h substrate. W h e t h e r the p r o d u c t i o n o f other metabolites s u c h as t o x i n s , and whether the b i o l o g i c a l a c t i v i t y o f spores and fungal fragments is also i n f l u e n c e d b y the g r o w t h substrate remains to be seen.  O u r results also s h o w that borates i n h i b i t the p r o d u c t i o n o f v o l a t i l e metabolites and d o not stimulate the p r o d u c t i o n o f different v o l a t i l e c o m p o u n d s . C o n f i r m a t i o n that borates do not stimulate p r o d u c t i o n o f t o x i n s or enhance the b i o l o g i c a l a c t i v i t y o f spores is required.  92  4.6.2 Long-term performance of borates Since moisture problems in buildings may go undetected for some time, the long-term performance of borates needs to be investigated. We observed some growth of S. chartarum and P. brevicompactum on gypsum board containing 2 lbs boric acid/MSF that was delayed, both in terms of the visual appearance as well as in the effects on the V O C profile. It would be interesting to know the extent to which these organisms could grow at these higher borate concentrations, given enough time.  4.6.3 Different environmental conditions The effects of varying moisture levels on the growth of our moulds on the building materials, and the performance of the borates at different moisture levels remains to be determined. We might reasonably expect even less growth and volatile metabolite production at lower moisture levels (Viitanen & Bjurman 1995; Nielsen et al. 2004). However, a report that decreased water activity led to decreased growth (mm/day) but significantly increased toxin production by Fusarium spp. on wheat treated with low levels of fungicides should make us cautious.  "Environmental stress factors, particularly water availability and temperature, and low fungicide doses may stimulate mycotoxin production (in Fusarium). " (Magan et al. 2002).  Thus the combined effects of different temperatures, moisture levels, and the presence of borates need to be examined.  4.6.4 Effects of accumulation of carbon dioxide and VOCs Some of our specimens had carbon dioxide levels that exceeded the measurement range of the instruments we used (6000 ppm or 0.6%), so we do not know how high carbon dioxide levels were in these specimens. We did not explore whether CO2 accumulation may have had an effect on mould growth and metabolism. Nilsson et al. found that the V O C profile for Penicillium species differed when the culture was grown in a Petri dish with no air flow compared to the same culture grown in a specially designed flow-through system (air flow 5 mL/min) (Nilsson 1996). When grown in a Petri dish, the metabolites were mainly small alcohols, ketones and esters, while in flow-through equipment, terpenes were the main metabolites. Insufficient information was found on whether other species are likely to be affected by oxygen and carbon dioxide conditions. In our experiments, the carbon dioxide levels attained did not prevent the 93  formation of terpenes by S. chartarum, but whether or not A. versicolor (which has been reported to produce terpenes on building materials in other studies) or P. brevicompactum would have produced terpenes or other metabolites under different conditions remains unknown. The effect of V O C metabolite accumulation on further V O C metabolite production remains unknown in our test system. VOCs can affect various aspects of mould growth, such as spore germination and mycelial growth, and also production of new VOCs. (Wilkins et al. 1995). Miranda tested the effects of various VOCs, alone and in paired combinations, on the production of V O C metabolites in A. niger and P. viridicatum, and found variable metabolite production depending on the VOC(s) tested (Miranda 2001). This indicates that the effects of V O C accumulation in our system may have effects that can only be determined by actual testing.  4.6.5 Tests of materials under in-use conditions While we found that commercial borate treatments were generally effective in preventing or inhibiting mould growth in the lab, the true test would be to study these materials under conditions more similar to in-use conditions - in combination with each other as in wall assemblies, for example, and subject to inoculation with mixtures of organisms.  4.6.6 Toxicity of V O C metabolites While we did not quantify the VOCs produced, we did find ample production of certain compounds, including some that may have toxicological significance such as styrene and 2hexanone, so further research may look at the potential for toxic effects from fungal VOCs. Further work may also include refinement of the experimental methods, such as optimizing V O C sampling and analysis.  4.6.7 Mechanism of resistance to borates Different sensitivities to boric acid were observed between the organisms on gypsum board. Further elucidation of the mechanism of borates, or the mechanisms of mould resistance to borates, may help to optimize preservative treatments.  94  5. Conclusions Our results support that mould-substrate interactions influence mould growth on building materials and the types of volatile metabolites that are produced. Building materials differ in their ability to support mould growth, and organisms produce different metabolites depending on their growth substrate. One of the difficulties in establishing causal roles for mould growth and certain health effects may be linked to the variability in mould biology as a result of mould interactions with their growth substrate. Gaining an understanding of these interactions may help answer some of the questions surrounding the potential health effects of moulds growing in indoor spaces. However, given the numerous other variables that need to be considered, much more work needs to be done.  In the meantime, steps need to be taken to prevent mould growth indoors. Moisture control is the key, but we have provided evidence that borate preservatives at levels currently found in commercially available building materials offers some protection against mould growth. Pressure treatment of solid wood with disodium octaborate tetrahydrate to a retention of 0.42 pcf was very effective at preventing mould growth on Southern Yellow pine and lodgepole pine. Oriented strandboard, however, may benefit from higher treatment levels with zinc borate than the current standard of 0.75%  zinc borate. The high levels of boric acid used to make cellulose  insulation fire-resistant were protective against mould growth as well, as expected. Boric acid incorporated into the gypsum slurry of gypsum boards had a dose-dependent protective effect, with substantial effects against S. chartarum (the most resistant species in the tests with gypsum board) at boric acid loadings of 2 to 2.57 lbs per thousand square feet.  Our results also suggest that borates inhibit mould growth without causing shifts in metabolism and the production of different metabolites. However, our results may not predict how boratetreated materials will perform under actual in-use conditions, and studies are needed to determine the effects of borates on toxin production and the biological activity of mould spores. Finally, our simple test system and use of different measures to asses mould growth shed some light on potentially useful methods for monitoring mould growth on building on materials in the laboratory. Visual assessment was subjective, and if used alone may result in some mould growth being missed. Microscopy, changes in the VOC profile, carbon dioxide measurements,  95  and ergosterol measurements each had their advantages and added useful information, but none stood out as being superior to the others.  Further work needs to be done in the area of assessing mould growth, both in the laboratory as well as in the field. Some of the measures used in this study have limited utility in assessing mould growth in studies of actual buildings. Measuring carbon dioxide and the V O C profile, for example, can be confounded in the field by non-fungal emissions of CO2 and VOCs. However, the test system and protocols developed for this study could be adapted to study other materials and preservatives in the laboratory. Future studies of mould growth on building materials should attempt to use objective measures of mould growth. Standardization of measures will help researchers collaborate and share data to advance our understanding of this complex problem.  96  References A d a n , O . C . G . , S a m s o n , R A . , W i j n e n , J . T h . M . 1994. ' F u n g a l resistance tests: a p r o p o s e d m e t h o d for testing resistance o f interior finishes', i n  Health Implications of Fungi in Indoor  Environments, eds R A . S a m s o n , B . F l a n n i g a n , M . E . F l a n n i g a n , A . P . V e r h o e f f , O . C . G . A d a n , & E . S . H o e k s t r a , E l s e v i e r , A m s t e r d a m , pp. 4 1 5 - 4 3 7 . A m m a n n , H . A . 1999, ' M i c r o b i a l v o l a t i l e organic c o m p o u n d s ' , i n  Bioaerosols: Assessment  and Controlled J . M a c h e r , A m e r i c a n Congress o f G o v e r n m e n t a l Industrial H y g i e n i s t s , C i n c i n n a t i , O H , p p . 26.1 - 26.17. A n d e r s e n , B . , N i e l s e n , K . F . & Jarvis B . B . 2 0 0 2 , ' C h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f  Stachybotrys from  water-damaged b u i l d i n g s based o n m o r p h o l o g y , g r o w t h , a n d metabolite p r o d u c t i o n ' ,  Mycologia, v o l . 94, pp. 3 9 2 - 4 0 3 . A r g u s t , P . 1998, ' D i s t r i b u t i o n o f b o r o n i n the e n v i r o n m e n t ' , Research, v o l . 6 6 , pp. 131-143.  Biological Trace Element  A S T M . 1994, A S T M Standard D 4 9 3 3 - 9 1 . Standard guide for c o n d i t i o n i n g w o o d and w o o d based materials. A m e r i c a n S o c i e t y for T e s t i n g and M a t e r i a l s , W e s t C o n s h o h o c k e n , P A . A S T M . 1995, A S T M Standard D 3 2 7 4 - 9 5 . Standard test m e t h o d for e v a l u a t i n g degree o f surface d i s f i g u r e m e n t o f paint films b y m i c r o b i a l (fungal or algal) g r o w t h or s o i l and dirt a c c u m u l a t i o n . A m e r i c a n S o c i e t y for T e s t i n g and M a t e r i a l s , W e s t C o n s h o h o c k e n , P A . A S T M . 2 0 0 0 , A S T M Standard D 3273-00. Standard test m e t h o d for resistance to g r o w t h o f m o l d o n the surface o f interior coatings i n an e n v i r o n m e n t a l chamber. A m e r i c a n S o c i e t y for T e s t i n g and M a t e r i a l s , W e s t C o n s h o h o c k e n , P A . A S T M . 2 0 0 2 , A S T M Standard G - 2 1 - 9 6 . Standard practice for d e t e r m i n i n g resistance o f synthetic p o l y m e r i c materials to fungi. A m e r i c a n S o c i e t y for T e s t i n g a n d M a t e r i a l s , W e s t Conshohocken, P A . A T S D R A g e n c y for T o x i c Substances and D i s e a s e R e g i s t r y . 1992, boron and compounds, U . S . P u b l i c H e a l t h S e r v i c e , A t l a n t a , G A .  Toxicological profile for  B a k e r , C , W i l s o n , C , M c F a r l i n g , S., M o r r i s , P . 2 0 0 0 , ' P r e s s u r e treatment o f C a n a d i a n S P F  Proceedings of the 21 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Wood Preservation Association, O c t o b e r 2 0 0 0 , M o n t r e a l , Q C , p p . 6 9 - 7 7 .  w i t h heated borate s o l u t i o n s , '  st  The renewal of trust in residential construction. Commission of inquiry into the quality of condominium construction in British Columbia. A v a i l a b l e f r o m  Barrett, D . 1998,  U R L : h t t p : / / w w w . q p . g o v . b c . c a / c o n d o / . A c c e s s e d 15/3/05. B a u m a n n , M . G . D . , L o r e n z , L . F . , Batterman, S . A . , & Z h a n g , G - Z . 2 0 0 0 , ' A l d e h y d e e m i s s i o n s f r o m p a r t i c l e b o a r d a n d m e d i u m density fiberboard p r o d u c t s ' ,  Forest Products  Journal, v o l . 50, p p . 75-82.  97  Becker, R. 1994, 'Fungal disfigurement of constructions - analysis of the effects of various factors, in Health Implications of Fungi in Indoor Environments, eds R. A. Samson, B . Flannigan, M.E. Flannigan, A.P. Verhoeff, O.C.G. Adan, & E.S. Hoekstra, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.361-378. Block, S.S. 1953, 'Humidity requirements for mold growth', Applied Microbiology, vol. 1, pp. 287-293. Budavari, S., O'Neil, M.J., Smith, A., Heckelman, P.E., & Kinneary, J.F. 1996, The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, & Biologicals - 12th Edition. Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N J . Burge, H.A., Ammann, H.A. 1999, 'Fungal toxins and |3-l->3-D-glucans', in Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control, ed J. Macher, American Congress of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 24.1 - 24.13. Burge, H.A., Otten, J.A. 1999, 'Fungi', in Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control, ed J. Macher, American Congress of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 19.1-19.13. Byrne, T. 1990, 'Recent research in boron treatment of Canadian wood species: stain and mold preventives', Proceedings of the First International Conference on Wood Protection with Diffusible Preservatives, November 1990, Nashville, TN. pp. 66-75. Campbell, A.W., Thrasher , J.D., Madison , R.A., Vojdani, A., Gray, M.R., et al. 2003, 'Neural antibodies and neurophysiological abnormalities in patients exposed to molds in water-damaged buildings', Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 58, pp. 464-474. Canadian Gypsum Company. 2003, Moisture Control, available from U R L : http://www.cgcinc.com/pdf/MSDS/EWB W i l l MoistureCOMBO CP.pdf. Accessed 13/1/05. Canada Wood Council. 2005, 'Green by design: Wood - the best choice for the environment', available from URL: http://www.cwc.ca/publications/brochures/green by design/wood.php. Accessed 15/03/05. CDC. 1997, 'Update: Pulmonary hemorrhage/hemosiderosis among infants — Cleveland, Ohio, 1993-1996'', Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 46, pp. 33-35. CDC. 2000, 'Update: Pulmonary hemorrhage/hemosiderosis among infants — Cleveland, Ohio, 1993-1996', Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 49, pp. 180-184. Chang, J.C.S., Foarde, K . K . , & Vanosdel D.W. 1995, 'Growth evaluation of fungi (Penicillium and Aspergillus) on ceiling tiles', Atmospheric Environment, vol. 29, pp. 23312337.1995 Chang, J.C.S., Foarde, K . K . , & Vanosdel D.W. 1996, 'Assessment of fungal (Penicillium chrysogenum) growth on three H V A C duct materials', Environment International, vol. 22, pp. 425-431. 98  CIMA. 2005, Cellulose Insulation Manufacturers Association Website. Available from URL:http://www.cellulose.org. Accessed 15/3/05. Claeson, A-S., Levin, J-O., Blomquist, G., & Sunesson, A - L . 2002, 'Volatile metabolites from microorganisms grown on building materials', Proceedings: Indoor Air 2002, July 3, 2002, Monterey, C A , pp. 437-442. Coppock, J.B.M. & Cookson, E.D. 1951, 'The effect of humidity on mould growth on construction materials', Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 2, pp. 534-537. Elke, K., Begerow, J., Oppermann, H., Kramer, U., Jermann, E., & Duneman, L. 1999, 'Determination of selected microbial volatile organic compounds by diffusive sampling and dual-column GC-FTD - a new feasible approach for the detection of an exposure to indoor mould fungi?', Journal of Environmental Monitoring, vol. 1, pp. 445-52. Environics Research Group. 2002, ' A i r pollution: information needs and the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of Canadians.' Available from U R L : http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hecssesc/air qualitv/pdf/Environics_Air_Pollution_Survey_E.pdfhttp://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hecssesc/airquality/pdf/Environics A i r Pollution_Survev_E.pdf. Accessed August 2004. Health Canada. 1995. Exposure Guidelines for Residential Indoor Air Quality: A Report of the Federal-Provincial Advisory Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, ON. Ezeonu, I. M . , Price, D. L., Simmons, R. B., Crow, S. A . and Ahearn, D. G . 1994, 'Fungal production of volatiles during growth on fiberglass', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 60, pp. 4172-4173. Fiedler, K., Scutz, E., & Geh, S. 2001, 'Detection of microbial volatile organic compounds M V O C s produced by moulds on various materials', International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 204, pp. 111-121. Fogel, J.L. & Lloyd, J.D. 2002, 'Mold performance of some construction products with and without borates', Forest Products Journal, vol. 52, pp. 38-43. Fogel, J.L. & Lloyd JD. 2000, 'Biological performance of gypsum products containing borates', International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Document No. IRG/WP 0030237. IRG Secretariat, Stockholm, Sweden. Frank, J.M. 1998, 'Special metabolites in relation to conditions of growth', in Chemical Fungal Taxonomy, eds. J.C. Frisvad, P.D. Bridge PD & D.K. Arora, Marcel K . Dekker, pp. 321-344. Gao, P. & Martin, J. 2002, 'Volatile metabolites produced by three strains of Stachybotrys chartarum cultivated on rice and gypsum board', Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, vol. 176, pp. 430-6.  99  Gao, P., Korley, F., Martin, J., & Chen, B.T. 2002, 'Determination of unique microbial volatile organic compounds produced by five Aspergillus species commonly found in problem buildings', American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, vol. 63, pp. 135-40. Gorny, R.L., Reponen T., Willeke, K., Schmechel, D., Robine, E., Boisser, M . , & Grinshpun, S.A. 2002, 'Fungal fragments as indoor air biocontaminants', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, pp. 3522-3531. Grant. C , Hunter, C.A., Flannigan, B., & Bravery, A.F. 1989, 'The moisture requirements of moulds isolated from domestic dwellings', International Biodeterioration, vol. 25, pp. 259-284. Gravesen, S., Nielsen, P.A., Iversen, R., & Nielsen, K.F. 1999, 'Microfungal contamination of damp buildings - examples of risk constructions and risk materials', Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 107, Suppl. 3, pp. 505-508. Gray, M.R., Thrasher, J.D., Crago, R., Madison, R.A., Arnold, L., Campbell, A.W., et al. 2003, ' Mixed mold mycotoxicosis: immunological changes in humans following exposure in water-damaged buildings', Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 58, pp. 410-420. Gutarowska, B., Zakowska, Z. 2002, 'Elaboration and application of mathematical model for estimation of mould contamination of some building materials based on ergosterol content determination', International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 49, pp. 299305. Hardin, B.D., Kelman, B.J., Saxon, A. 2002, 'American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Evidence Based Statements: adverse human health effects associated with molds in the indoor environment'. Available from U R L : http://www/acoem.org/guidelines/article.asp?ID==52. Accessed 11/02. Heinsohn, P., Harney, S., Exuzides K . A . 2001, 'Sporulation of the hyphomycete Stachybotrys chartarum under three light conditions', in Bioaerosols, fungi and mycotoxins: health effects, assessment, prevention and control - updated and revised edition, ed E. Johanning, Fungal Research Group FRG, Inc., Albany, N Y , pp. 411-417. Howe, P.D. 1998, A review of boron effects in the environment. Biological Trace Element Research; vol. 66, pp. 153-166. Hubbard, S.A. 1998, 'Comparative toxicology of borates', Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 66, pp. 343-357. Hutton, G.H. 2003, 'The way we build now', Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 58, pp. 505-511. Hyvarinen, A., Meklin, T., Vepsalainen, A., & Nevalainen, A. 2002, 'Fungi and actinobacteria in moisture-damaged building materials - concentrations and diversity', International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 49, pp. 21-31.  100  IARC 2002. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Styrene. Available from U R L : http://www-cie.iarc.fr/htdocs/monographs/vol82/82-07.html. Accessed 15/3/05. Jarvis, B.B., Sorenson, W.G., Hintikka, E-L., Nikulin, M . , Zhou, Y . , Jiang, J., Wang, S., Hinkley, S., Etzel, R.A., & Dearborn, D. 1998, 'Study of toxin production by isolates of Stachybotrys chartarum and Memnoniella echinata isolated during a study of pulmonary hemosiderosis in infants', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, pp. 3620-3625. Kalliokoski, P., Juutinen, T., Pasanen, P., & Pasanen, A - L . 1993, 'Fungal growth and activity on moist building materials', Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, vol. 4, pp. 299-303. Karunesena, E., Markham, N , Basel, T., Cooley, J.D., & Straus, D.C. Evaluation of fungal growth on cellulose-containing and inorganic ceiling tile', Mycopathologia, vol. 150, pp. 9195. Kent, D.A., Willis, G.A. & Lepik K.J. (eds) 1997, Poison management manual, 4 edition, B.C. Drug and Poison Information Centre, Vancouver, B C . th  Kiviranta, H., Tuomainen, A . , Laitinen, S., Liesivuori, J., & Nevalainen, A . 1998, 'Qualitative identification of volatile metabolites from two fungi and three bacteria species cultivated on two media', Central European Public Health Journal, vol. 6, pp. 296-299. Korpi, A . , Pasanen,A-L., & Pasanen,P. 1998, 'Volatile compounds originating from mixed microbial cultures on building materials under various humidity conditions', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, pp. 2914-2919. Korpi, A., Pasanen, A - L . , & Viitanen, H . 1999, 'Volatile metabolites of Serpula lacrymans, Coniophora puteana, Poria placenta, Stachybotrys chartarum and Chaetomium globosum\ Building and Environment, vol. 34, pp. 205-211. Korpi, A . , Kasanen, J-P., Alarie, Y . , Kosma, V . , & Pasanen, A - L . 1999, 'Sensory irritating potency of some microbial volatile organic compounds M V O C s and a mixture of five . M V O C s ' , Archives of Environmental Health, 545:347-352. Kurup, V . K . & Banerjee, B. 2000, 'Fungal allergens and peptide epitopes', Peptides, vol. 21, pp. 589-599. Laks, P.E. & Manning, M.J. 1997, 'Update on the use of borates as preservatives for wood composites', in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Wood Protection with Diffusible Preservatives and Pesticides, Forest Products Society, Madison, WI, pp.6268. Laks, P.E., Richter, D.L. & Larkin, G . M . 2002, 'Fungal susceptibility of interior commercial building panels', Forest Products Journal, vol. 52, pp. 41-44. Leech, J.A., Nelson, W.C., Burnett, R.T., Aaron, S., & Raizenne, M . E . 2002, 'It's about time: A comparison of Canadian and American time-activity patterns', Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, vol.12, pp. 427-432. 101  Leone, R., Breuil, C. 1998, 'Filamentous fungi can degrade aspen steryl esters and waxes', International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 41, pp. 133-137. Lloyd, J.D. 1997, 'International status of borate preservative systems', in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Wood Protection with Diffusible Preservatives and Pesticides, Forest Products Society, Madison, WI, pp. 45-54. Magan, N . , Hope, R., Colleate, A., & Baxter, E.S. 2002, 'Relationship between growth and mycotoxin production by Fusarium species, biocides and environment', European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 108, pp. 685-90. Manning, M.J., Lloyd, J., Schoeman, M . 1997, 'The future of diffusible preservative and pesticide systems', in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Wood Protection with Diffusible Preservatives and Pesticides, Forest Products Society, Madison, WI, pp. 157-168. Masonry Canada. 2004, 'Fungal mould resistance testing (FMRT) of common building materials according to MIL-STD 810E', Available from U R L : http://www.masonrycanada.ca/ Meklin, T., Hyvarinen, A., Toivola, M . , Reponen, T., Koponen, V., et al. 2003, 'Effect of building frame and moisture damage on microbial indoor air quality in school buildings', American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, vol. 64, pp. 108-116. Menetrez, M . Y . & Foarde, K . K . 2002, 'Microbial volatile organic compound emission rates and exposure model', Indoor and Built Environment, vol. 11, pp. 208-213. Micales-Glaeser, J.A, Lloyd, J.D., & Woods, T.L. 2004. Efficacy of didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DDAC), disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (DOT)) against common mold fungi. International Research Group on Wood Preservation Document Number IRG/WP 04-30338. Stockholm, Sweden, 14 pp. Miller, J.D., Rand, T.G., Jarvis, B.B. 2003, 'Stachybotrys chartarum: cause of human disease or media darling?', Medical Mycology, vol. 41, pp. 271-91. Miranda, V.R.D.J. 2001, The role of fungal metabolic by-products in indoor air chemistry: analytical considerations for the evaluation of poor indoor environments, PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology. Money, N.P. 2004, Carpet monsters and killer spores: a natural history of toxic mold, Oxford University Press, New York. Mullins, E.J. & McKnight, T.S. (eds). 1981, Canadian woods: their properties and uses, third edition, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, O N , pp. 152-153. Murtoniemei, T., Nevalinen, A., Suutari, M . , & Hirvonen, M-R. 2002. 'Effect of liner and core materials of plasterboard on microbial growth, spore-induced inflammatory reponses, and cytotoxicity in macrophages', Inhalation Toxicology, vol. 14, pp. 1087-1101. 102  Murtoniemi, T., Nevalainen, A., & Hirvonen, M-R. 2003, 'Effect of plasterboard composition on Stachybotrys chartarum growth and biological activity of spores,' Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 69, pp. 3751-3757. Murtoniemi, T., Hirvonen, M-R., Nevalainen, A., & Suutari, M . 2003, 'The relation between growth of four microbes on six different plasterboards and biological activity of spores', Indoor Air, vol. 13, pp. 65-73. NAS (National Academy of Sciences), Committee on Damp Indoor Spaces and Health. 2004, Damp indoor spaces and health, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Nielsen, K.F., Hansen, M.O., Larsen, T.O., & Thrane, U . 1998, Production of trichothecene mycotoxins on water damaged gypsum boards in Danish buildings', International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 42: pp. 1-7. Nielsen, K.F., Thrane, U., Larsen, T.O., Nielsen, P.A., & Gravesen, S. 1998, 'Production of mycotoxins on artificially inoculated building materials', International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 42, pp. 9-16. Nielsen, K.F., Gravesen, S., Nielsen, P.A., Andersen, B., Thrane, U . , & Frisvad, J.C. 1999, 'Production of mycotoxins on artificially and naturally infested building materials', Mycopathologia, vol. 145, pp. 43-56. Nielsen, K.F., Nielsen, P.A., & Holm, G. 2000, 'Growth of moulds on building materials under different humidities', Proceedings of Healthy Buildings, vol. 3, pp. 283-288. Nielsen, K.F., Madsen, J.O. 2000, 'Determination of ergosterol on mouldy building materials using isotope dilution and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry', Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 898, pp. 227-234. Nielsen K F . 2003, 'Mycotoxin production by indoor molds', Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 39,pp.l03-17. Nielsen, K.F., Holm, G., Uttrup, L.P., & Nielsen, P.A. 2004, 'Mould growth on building materials under low water activities. Influence of humidity and temperature on fungal growth and secondary metabolism', International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 54, pp. 325-336. Nikulin, M . , Pasanen, A - L . , Berg, S., Hintikka, E-L. 1994, 'Stachybotrys atra growth and toxin production in some building materials and fodder under different relative humidities', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 60, pp. 3421-3424. Nilsson, T., Larsen, T.O., Montanarella, L., & Madsen, J.O. 1996, 'Application of headspace solid-phase microextraction for the analysis of volatile metabolites emitted by Penicillium species', Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 25, pp. 245-255. N Z - D B H . 2005, New Zealand Department of Building and Housing Website. Available from: URL:http://www.building.govt.nz/. Accessed 15/3/05. 103  Pasanen, A - L . , Juutinen, T., Jantunen, M.J,, & Kalliokoski, P. 1992, 'Occurrence and moisture requirements of microbial growth in building materials', International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 30, pp. 273-283. Pasanen, A - L . , Kalliokoski, P., & Jantunen, M . 1994,'Recent studies on fungal growth on building materials', in Health Implications of Fungi in Indoor Environments, eds R.A. Samson, B. Flannigan, M . E . Flannigan, A.P. Verhoeff, O.C.G. Adan, & E.S. Hoekstra, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 485-493. Pasanen, A - L . , Lappalainen, S., & Pasanen, P. 1996, 'Volatile organic metabolites associated with some toxic fungi and their mycotoxins', Analyst, vol. 121, pp. 1949-1953. Pasanen, A - L . , Korpi, A., Kasenen, J-P., &. Pasanen, P. 1998, 'Critical aspects on the significance of microbial volatile metabolites as indoor air pollutants', Environment International, vol. 24, pp. 703-712. Pasanen, A - L . , Yli-Pietila, K , Pasanen, P., Kalliokoski, P., & Tarhanen, J. 1999, 'Ergosterol content in various fungal species and biocontaminated building materials', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, pp. 138-142 . Pasanen, A - L . , Kasanen, J-K., Rautila, S., Ikaheimo, M . , Rantamaki, J., Kaartinen, H., & Kalliokoski, P. 2000, 'Fungal growth and survival in building materials inder fluctuating moisture and temperature conditions', International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 46, pp. 117-127. Plastic Pipe Institute. 2000, 'Resistance of thermoplastic piping materials to micro- and macro- biological attack', Plastic Pipe Institute. Available from U R L : http://www.plasticpipe.org/pdf/pubs/reports/TRl 1 -00.PDF. Accessed August 2004. Rainer, J.B. 1993, 'Borates as wood preservatives - an environmental, health and safety perspective', IRG International Conference Proceedings Cannes 1993. pp. 60-76. Reeslev, M . , Miller, J.D., & Nielsen, K.F. 2003, 'Quantifying mold biomass on gypsum board: comparison of ergosterol and beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase as mold biomass parameters', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 69, pp. 3996-3998. Richold, M . 1998. Boron exposure from consumer products. Biological Trace Element Research 1998; 66: 121-9. Robbins, C.A., Swenson, L.J., Neally, M . N . , Gots, R.E., & Kelman B.J. 2000, 'Health effects of mycotoxins in indoor air: a critical review', Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, vol. 15, pp. 773-784. Rose, C.S. 1999. Antigens, in Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control, ed J. Macher, American Congress of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 25.1-25.11. Rylander, R. .1999, 'Indoor air-related effects and airborne l->3-B-D-glucan', Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 107, Suppl. 3, pp. 501-503. 104  Rylander, R. 2001, 'Effects after mold exposure - which are the causative agents?', in Bioaerosols, fungi and mycotoxins: health effects, assessment, prevention and control updated and revised edition, ed E. Johanning, Fungal Research Group F R G , Inc., Albany, N Y , pp. p. 28-31. Samson, R.A. & Hoekstra, E.S. 1994,, "Common fungi occurring in indoor environments', in Health Implications of Fungi in Indoor Environments, eds R. A . Samson, B. Flannigan, M.E. Flannigan, A.P. Verhoeff, O.C.G. Adan, & E.S. Hoekstra, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 541-587. Samson, R.A. 1985, 'Occurrence of moulds in modern living and working environments', European Journal of Epidemiology, vol.1, pp. 54-61. Saraf, A., Larsson, L., Burge, H., & Milton, D. 1997, 'Quantification of ergosterol and 3hydroxy fatty acids in settled house dust by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: comparison with fungal culture and determination of endotoxin by a Limulus amebocyte lysate assay', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 63, pp. 2554-2559. Scharai-Rad, M . & Welling, J. 2002, Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available from: URL:http://www.fao.org/documents/show cdr.asp?url file=/DOCREP/004/Y3609E /v3609e00.htm Schleibinger, H., Brattig C , Mangier, M . , Samwer. H., Laussmann, D., Eis, D. et al. 2002, 'Microbial volatile organic compounds M V O C as indicators for fungal damage', Proceedings Indoor Air 2002, p. 707-12 2002 Shusterman, D. 1992, 'Critical review: the health significance of environmental odor pollution', Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 47, pp. 76-87. Small, B . M . 2003, "Creating mold-free buildings: a key to avoiding health effects of indoor molds', Archives of Environmental Health, vol., 58, pp. 523-527. Strom, G., West, J., Wessen, B., & Palmgren, U . 1994, "Quantitative analysis of microbial volatiles in damp Swedish houses', in Health Implications of Fungi in Indoor Environments, eds R.A. Samson, B . Flannigan, M . E . Flannigan, A.P. Verhoeff, O.C.G. Adan, & E.S. Hoekstra, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.291-305. Straus, D.C., Coley,J.D., Wong,W.,C, & Jumper, C.A. 2003, 'Studies on the role of fungi in sick building syndrome', Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 58, pp. 475-478. Structural Board Association. 1996, Technical Bulletin: binders and waxes in OSB. Available from U R L : http://www.osbguide.com/pdfs/TBl 14.pdf. Accessed 15/3/05. Structural Board Association. 2005, Technical Bulletin: negligible or non-existent formaldehyde emissions from OSB panels. AvailablefromU R L : http://www.osbguide.com/pdfs/TB102.pdf. Accessed 16/4/05.  105  Sunesson, A - L . , N i l s s o n , C - A . , A n d e r s s o n , B . , & B l o m q u i s t , G . 1996, ' V o l a t i l e metabolites p r o d u c e d b y t w o fungal species c u l t i v a t e d o n b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s ' ,  Annals of Occupational  Hygiene, v o l . 4 0 , p p . 397-410. T u o m i , T . , R e i j u l a , K . , J o h n s s o n , T . , H e m m i n k i , K . , H i n t i k k a , E - L , et a l . 2 0 0 0 , ' M y c o t o x i n s i n crude b u i l d i n g materials f r o m water-damaged b u i l d i n g s ' , Applied  and Environmental  Microbiology, v o l . 6 6 , p p . 1899-1904. V i i t a n e n , H . 1991. P r e s e r v a t i v e effect o f c e l l u l o s e i n s u l a t i o n m a t e r i a l against some m o u l d fungi and b r o w n rot fungus Coniophora puteana i n p i n e s a p w o o d . International R e s e a r c h G r o u p o n W o o d Preservatives D o c u m e n t N u m b e r I R G / W P / 1 4 8 4 . S t o c k h o l m , S w e d e n , 9 pp. V i i t a n e n , H , & B j u r m a n , J . 1995, ' M o u l d g r o w t h o n w o o d under f l u c t u a t i n g h u m i d i t y  conditions,' Material und Organismen, v o l . 2 9 , p p . 27-46. V i i t a n e n , H . , & R i t s c h k o f f , A - C . 1991. M o u l d g r o w t h i n p i n e and spruce s a p w o o d i n relation to air h u m i d i t y a n d temperature. S w e d i s h U n i v e r s i t y o f A g r i c u l t u r a l Sciences, Department o f Forest P r o d u c t s R e p o r t N o . 2 2 1 . U p p s a l a , S w e d e n , 52 p p . Wady, L . , Bunte, A . , Pehrson, C , & Larsson, L . 2002, 'Gas  chromatography-mass  spectrometry/solid phase m i c r o e x t r a c t i o n : a n e w technique for the i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f M V O C s f r o m m o l d y b u i l d i n g materials.  Proceedings: Indoor Air 2002, J u l y 3, 2 0 0 2 , M o n t e r e y , C A ,  pp. 4 1 4 - 4 1 9 . W a d y , L . , B u n t e , A . , P e h r s o n , C , & L a r s s o n , L . 2 0 0 3 , ' U s e o f gas  chromatography-mass  s p e c t r o m e t r y / s o l i d phase m i c r o e x t r a c t i o n for the i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f M V O C s f r o m m o l d y building materials,'  Journal of Microbiological Methods, v o l . 52, pp. 3 2 5 - 3 3 2 .  W a n g , Q . 1993, ' G r o w t h o f m o u l d and stain fungi i o n w o o d - b a s e d boards i n r e l a t i o n to  temperature a n d relative h u m i d i t y ' , Material und Organismen, v o l . 2 8 , p p . 8 1 - 1 0 3 . W a r s c o , K . , & L i n d s e y , P . F . 2 0 0 3 , ' P r o a c t i v e approaches for mold-free interior environments',  Archives of Environmental Health, v o l . 58, pp. 5 1 2 - 5 2 2 .  W e s s e n , B . & S c h o e p s , K - O . 1996, ' M i c r o b i a l v o l a t i l e o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d s - what substances cane be f o u n d i n s i c k b u i l d i n g s ? ' , Analyst, v o l . 121, pp. 1 2 0 3 - 1 2 0 5 . W e s s e n B , H o n k a n e n J , M a l a r s t i g B . M i c r o o r g a n i s m s , M V O C and the health c o m p l a i n t s .  Proceedings: Indoor Air 2002, J u l y 3, 2 0 0 2 , M o n t e r e y , C A , pp. 3 1 9 - 2 2 . W i l k i n s , K . & L a r s e n , K . 1995, ' V a r i a t i o n o f v o l a t i l e o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d patterns o f m o l d species f r o m d a m p b u i l d i n g s ' , Chemosphere, v o l . 5, p p . 3 2 2 5 - 3 2 3 6 . W i l k i n s , C . K . , Larsen, S.T., Hammer, M . , Poulsen, O . M . , Wolkoff, P., & Nielsen, G . D . 1998, ' R e s p i r a t o r y effects i n m i c e e x p o s e d to airborne e m i s s i o n s f r o m Stachybotrys  chartarum and i m p l i c a t i o n s for risk assessment', Pharmacology & Toxicology, v o l . 8 3 , pp. 112-119.  106  Wilkins, K., Larsen, K., & Simkus, M . 2000, 'Volatile metabolites from mold growth on building materials and synthetic media', Chemosphere, vol. 41, pp. 437-446. 1998, Wilkins, K. 2000, 'Volatile sesquiterpenes from Stachybotrys chartarum: indicators for trichothecene producing mold species?', Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 7, pp. 77-78. Wilkins K, Nielsen K F , & Din SU. 2003, 'Patterns of volatile metabolites and nonvolatile tricothecenes produced by isolates of Stachybotrys, Fusarium, Trichoderma, Tricothecium, and Memnonielld', Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 10, pp. 162-6. Wood W G . 1994, ' A n introduction to boron: history, sources, uses, and chemistry', Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 102, Suppl. 7, pp. 5-11. Zabel, R.A, & Morrell, J. J. 1992, Wood microbiology. Decay and its prevention. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, C A .  107  Appendices  108  Appendix A - Conditioning materials C o n d i t i o n i n g o f the materials w a s necessary to g i v e t h e m sufficient i n i t i a l m o i s t u r e to support m o u l d g r o w t h . M e t h o d s used i n other studies have i n c l u d e d p l a c i n g the m a t e r i a l i n sealed chambers at h i g h h u m i d i t y , a u t o c l a v i n g , a n d p l a c i n g m a t e r i a l i n i m p e r v i o u s bags a n d a d d i n g a n amount o f water c a l c u l a t e d to g i v e a specific m o i s t u r e content. W e d i d not want to wet the material as this m i g h t result i n l e a c h i n g o r w a s h i n g a w a y o f surface borates o r nutrients, so c o n d i t i o n i n g at h i g h h u m i d i t y at r o o m temp w a s the most suitable m e t h o d for o u r study. A n attempt w a s m a d e to determine an appropriate c o n d i t i o n i n g times for the b u i l d i n g materials. A standard m e t h o d for c o n d i t i o n i n g w o o d a n d w o o d - b a s e d materials exists [ A S T M D 4 9 3 3 ] . T h e procedures used i n o u r experiments w e r e not as stringent as those o u t l i n e d i n the standard. A . l Solid wood F u l l - s i z e d specimens w e r e used; s o m e specimens were o v e n d r i e d for several days beforehand, others w e r e c o n d i t i o n e d "as i s . " S p e c i m e n s w e r e p l a c e d i n sealed c h a m b e r above a t h i n layer o f water and the w e i g h t w a s d e t e r m i n e d p e r i o d i c a l l y . A f t e r 14 days w e i g h t g a i n h a d begun to plateau ( F i g u r e A . l ) , and the total percentage w e i g h t g a i n w a s 2 2 - 2 4 % i n the o v e n - d r i e d specimens, a n d 1 5 - 1 7 % i n the "as i s " specimens, i n c l u d i n g one l o d g e p o l e p i n e s p e c i m e n . ( N o t e : it was p r e v i o u s l y d e t e r m i n e d that "as i s " s o l i d l u m b e r has about 6 % m o i s t u r e content at the storage c o n d i t i o n s i n s i d e the lab, so the "as i s " specimens w o u l d have g a i n e d 2 1 - 2 3 % m o i s t u r e by w e i g h t h a d they b e e n o v e n - d r i e d as w e l l . ) T h e fiber saturation p o i n t o f most w o o d s is u s u a l l y considered to be 2 8 % o n average, so o u r e x p e r i m e n t a l l y d e t e r m i n e d w e i g h t gains fall short o f this. H o w e v e r , s o m e o f o u r s p e c i m e n s s h o w e d m o u l d g r o w t h d u r i n g this t i m e , i n d i c a t i n g that the w o o d surface at least w a s m o i s t e n o u g h to support g r o w t h o f s o m e m o u l d species. N o t e : T h e e q u i l i b r i u m m o i s t u r e content [ E M C ]  o f C a n a d i a n w o o d s is l i s t e d as 2 3 . 4 % at 2 0 ° C  and 9 6 % relative h u m i d i t y ( M u l l i n s & M c K n i g h t 1981). A S T M D 4 9 3 3 lists the E M C o f s o l i d w o o d at 2 0 ° C to be 2 3 . 9 % at 9 5 % R H , and 2 6 . 9 % at 9 8 % R H ( A S T M 1994).  Solid lumber - hydration - percent weight gain  Figure  A.l:  starting -before  Hydration  "as is"  (percent  weight  (estimatedstarting  conditioning,  so their  total  gain)  moisture weight  of  solid  content  gain from  lumber 6%):  over  Oven  baseline  time. SYP1,  SYP1,  (22-24%)  Oven  SYP2,  SYP2,  is higher  and SPF1  and  Oven  compared  were  SYP3  to the  conditioned  were oven  "as is"  dried  specimens  (15-17%).  109  A . 2 Oriented Strandboard ( O S B ) O r i e n t e d strandboard is a c o m p o s i t e material m a d e o f flakes o f w o o d , adhesives, w a x e s , and other additives. M o i s t u r e s o r p t i o n curves for w o o d composites s u c h as O S B , p l y w o o d and p a r t i c l e b o a r d are a v a i l a b l e , but the t i m e required to r e a c h e q u i l i b r i u m w o u l d d e p e n d o n factors such as what type o f w o o d furnish w a s used, what additives w e r e i n c o r p o r a t e d into the b o a r d , and p o s s i b l y o n the p r o c e s s i n g parameters s u c h as pressing t i m e and temperature o f the b o a r d . T o get an i d e a o f h o w l o n g it m i g h t take to c o n d i t i o n our m a t e r i a l , s m a l l test b l o c k s ( 1 - i n c h squares) cut f r o m aspen O S B boards ( G e n i c s O S B ) w e r e p l a c e d i n a sealed beaker a b o v e a t h i n layer o f water. T h e w e i g h t g a i n was recorded p e r i o d i c a l l y and h a d s t a b i l i z e d after about 10 days (Figure A . 2 ) . It was later r e a l i z e d that c o n d i t i o n i n g times are dependent o n the d i m e n s i o n s o f the specimens, so the c o n d i t i o n i n g t i m e s d e t e r m i n e d for the s m a l l test b l o c k s w o u l d b e m u c h shorter than w h a t w o u l d be r e q u i r e d for actual test specimens. H o w e v e r , it was felt that after 2 w e e k s o f c o n d i t i o n i n g the surface o f the O S B , but not the deeper layers, w o u l d e s s e n t i a l l y be at e q u i l i b r i u m w i t h the atmosphere [personal c o m m u n i c a t i o n , P . M o r r i s , F o r i n t e k C a n a d a C o r p . ]  OSB test blocks hydration - percent weight gain 20  n  18 4  Figure  A.2:  experiment square)  Hydration were  1-inch  used in our  (percent  weight  squares  and  gain)  would  of  aspen  hydrate  OSB  test blocks  much faster  over  time.  than the full-sized  The test blocks OSB  specimens  used in  this  (3.5  inches  experiments.  A . 3 G y p s u m board G y p s u m b o a r d is a c o m p o s i t e m a t e r i a l m a d e o f m u l t i p l e layers o f paper facings s a n d w i c h i n g a core o f g y p s u m , w h i c h contains various additives such as f o a m i n g agents, w a x e s , fire retardants, and r e i n f o r c i n g fibers. W h e n e x p o s e d to h u m i d i t y , the paper facings w o u l d be expected to reach e q u i l i b r i u m q u i c k l y , but the core m a y take longer. F o r m u l a e for p r e d i c t i n g the moisture content o f g y p s u m boards at certain relative h u m i d i t i e s exist, but no data o n h o w q u i c k l y g y p s u m b o a r d w o u l d reach e q u i l i b r i u m w a s located. C o n d i t i o n i n g times for f u l l - s i z e d s p e c i m e n s (7 c m squares) were d e t e r m i n e d u s i n g the same procedures as above. W e i g h t g a i n s t a b i l i z e d after 9 days, and after 2 w e e k s s o m e specimens were c o v e r e d i n m o u l d . T h e percentage w e i g h t g a i n after 9 days at - 1 0 0 % relative h u m i d i t y was about 5-6% ( F i g u r e A . 3 ) . It has been reported that a moisture content o f o v e r 1.4% i n g y p s u m board is sufficient to a l l o w m o u l d g r o w t h .  110  Gypsum board hydration - percent weight gain  Figure  A3:  Hydration  (percent  weight  gain)  of  gypsum  board  over  time.  Appendix B - Preparation of fungal spore suspension Materials and supplies: • • • • •  filter funnel gauze sterile transfer pipettes sterile culture tubes ± glass beads sterile 15 mL centrifuge tubes  •  sterile water (+0.01% w/v Tween 80)  • • • •  micro-pipetters (1 m L and 100 uL) and sterile micro-pipetter tips beakers for liquid waste tube racks sterile inoculating loop  • •  vortex mixer counting chamber  1.  Sterilise filter funnel containing small plug of gauze.  2.  Add several mL sterile water with 0.01% Tween 80 to media (agar plate, rice). Volume is not critical.  3.  Gently agitate, stir or scrape with sterile inoculating loop to release spores.  4.  Transfer suspension into culture tube containing glass beads and vortex to break up clumps.  5.  Transfer suspension to sterile funnel containing sterile plug of gauze; filter into sterile centrifuge tube.  6.  Centrifuge @ 3000 rpm x 5 minutes to pellet spores.  7.  Remove supernatant, and resuspend spores in sterile water/Tween 80. Repeat x 2 (ie. centrifuge and resuspend 3 times, for a total of 3 washes).  8.  Determine spore concentration with counting chamber. Adjust concentration to 10 spores/mL by adding appropriate amount of sterile water/Tween 80 to dilute, or i f concentration is less than 10 spores/mL, pellet spores again and resuspend in smaller volume of sterile water/Tween 80. 7  7  9.  Prepare serial dilutions for plating (to check viability of spore suspension). Plate 0.5 mL of the final suspension (10 ) onto agar media. 2  spore concentration 10 10 10 3  J  2  volume, spore susp 100 uL ofTO 100 uL of 10' lOOuLof 10 7  3  volume sterile.water 9.9 m L 9.9 m L 0.9 mL  If several inoculations with different organisms will be done during the week, spore suspensions may be made several days in advance and can be kept in the refrigerator (ASTM G21-96 states 4 days @ 3-10°C; A S T M C 739 states 7 days @ 2-10°C)  112  Appendix C - Air brush calibration and inoculation of samples Materials and supplies: • • •  Agar media plate (positive control) timer air compressor (Campbell Hausfeld standard duty air compressor, model FP200400) with HEP A filter (Balston disposable filter cartridge 9933-05-BQ) attached to outlet with tubing (see picture)  airbrush (Aztek, part no. A430, with 0.40 mm general purpose nozzle) weigh scale (Sartorius BA110S) sterile forceps or tweezers for handling materials alcohol for sterilising propane burner beakers for waste  1. Calibrate airbrush to deliver ca. 100 uL over 10 seconds: a. Set compressor pressure to lowest setting (est. 5 psi). b. Allow air compressor and pressure regulator valve to warm up several minutes (this also flushes the air line with filtered air). c. Connect airbrush. d. Fill airbrush reservoir with deionized water. e. Weigh and tare a small beaker. f. Spray (with airbrush at maximum flow) into beaker for 10 seconds (using a timer), then weigh. Volume delivered is calculated using density of water (~ 1 g/mL). g. Adjust air compressor pressure or adjust spray time so that volume delivered per spray is approximately 0.1 mL (100 uL). h. Spray and weigh 10 times to calculate and average volume and a standard deviation. Repeat. Eg1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Average SD  Weight (g) .1018 .1072 .1187 .1027 .1157 .0995 .1035 .1265 .1172 .0852 .1078 .0119  Weight (g) .0984 .1188 .1265 .1043 .0945 .1088 .1168 .0960 .1085 .1097 .1077 .0105  2. Sterilize airbrush by spraying alcohol through it. 3. Drain reservoir and spray out excess alcohol from nozzle. Allow to dry. Rinse with sterile water. 4. Place incubation chambers with conditioned materials in biosafety cabinet. 113  5.  S t e r i l i s e area i n biosafety cabinet (briefly flame surface).  6.  R e m o v e test m a t e r i a l f r o m jars and line up o n sterilised surface for i n o c u l a t i o n . ( U n m a r k e d l u m b e r s h o u l d be inoculated o n c o n v e x side o f g r o w t h rings).  7.  S p r a y c o n t r o l pieces w i t h sterile w a t e r / T w e e n 80 s o l u t i o n ( s h a m i n o c u l a t i o n ) .  8.  E m p t y r e s e r v o i r a n d spray r e m a i n i n g sterile water out o f n o z z l e .  9.  R e s u s p e n d spore s u s p e n s i o n and transfer some into airbrush reservoir. S p r a y some suspension into waste beaker to ensure airbrush is p r i m e d w i t h suspension.  10. S p r a y each test p i e c e w i t h 100 u L spore suspension. 11. In between sets o f i n o c u l a t i o n s , spray agar m e d i a ( M E A o r C M A ) plate w i t h spore suspension to c h e c k that the airbrush is p r i m e d and that the spore suspension is v i a b l e ( p o s i t i v e g r o w t h control). 12. P l a c e i n o c u l a t e d test pieces b a c k into i n c u b a t i o n chambers. 13. A p p l y a s m a l l a m o u n t o f K Y Jelly® to the g r o o v e i n the l i d o f the c h a m b e r to help seal the chamber.  Appendix D - Sample desorption and carry-over D . l Timed splitless mode Figure D . l shows a sample chromatograph and the SPME fiber run again after desorbing the sample (4 minutes). There is minimal sample carry-over (total peak area for the sample = 338544, total peak area for the S P M E fiber post-sample = 1084).  IAJUAMIJLJ  1>A  Figure  D.l:  desorption  GC-FID (bottom).  chromatograph There  is minimal  for  a gypsum  sample  board  sample  (top),  and  the SPME  fiber  run again  after  carry-over.  D.2 Split mode Figure D.2 shows a sample chromatograph and the SPME fiber run again after desorbing the sample (4 minutes). There is very little sample carry-over (total peak area for the sample = 587039, total peak area for the S P M E fiber post-sample = 20317).  JU  Figure  D.2:  (bottom).  GC-FID  There  chromatograph  is little sample  for  carry-over  a pine  OSB  sample  (top),  and  the SPME  fiber  run  again  after  desorption  (~3%).  115  Appendix E - Selection of the S P M E fiber coating Different S P M E fiber coatings will extract different types of analytes, depending on their chemical and physical properties. Some of the common coatings are summarized in Table E . l .  Table Consult  E.l:  Some  SPME  fiber  the manufacturer's  Fiber coating Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)  coatings. literature  Fibers for  more  are  available  information  in a wide  variety  on the range  of coatings  of coatings  Characteristics Non-polar liquid phase, similar to G C column coatings. Absorbs analytes.  and  available  coating and  thicknesses. applications.  Suitable for Volatile and semi-volatile compounds, non-polar high-molecular weight compounds Polar semi-volatile compounds  Polyacrylate  Polar phase, resistant to solvents. Absorbs and desorbs analytes more slowly than other "liquid" phases.  Carbowax® (CW)  Moderately polar liquid phase, absorbs analytes.  Carbowax®/divinylbenzene (CW/DVB)  Divinylbenzene is a porous particle with primarily medium sized pores (20-500 angstroms) that adsorb analytes in the C6C15 range and higher. Blending DVB with carbowax® increases the polarity of the coating.  Alcohols and polar compounds.  PDMS/Carboxen®  Carboxen® 1006 is another porous particle that has an even distribution of pore sizes from micropores (2-20 angstroms) to macropores (>500 angstroms), suitable for a range of analytes in the C2-C12 range.  Gases, low-molecular-weight compounds  PDMS/DVB  A combination coating that is less polar than Carbowax®/DVB.  Polar compounds, amines, and nitroaromatic compounds  Not available by itself - only available as a combination of Carbowax®/divinylbenzene (see below) or Carbowax® divinylbenzene templated resin. Combining porous particles in liquid phases can alter the polarity of the coating, and broadens the range of molecular weights of analytes that can be extracted.  SPME has been used for characterizing fungal volatiles in a small number of published studies. In the first study [Nilsson 1996], PDMS and polyacrylate fibers were used, with the fibers performing similarly in most respects, but with the polyacrylate fiber giving better sensitivity for polar compounds. In another study [Fiedler 2001], four different fibers were used (polydimethylsiloxane, polyacrylate, Carbowax®/divinylbenzene, and polydimethylsiloxane/Carboxen®) to capture a wide variety of volatiles. The relative merits and performance of the different fibers were not discussed. Several studies involving S P M E for microbial volatiles were presented at the 2002 Indoor Air conference in Monterey, California. A PDMS fiber was used to extract volatiles from house dust in one study [Nilsson et al 2002], but details on the type(s) of SPME fibers used in another study were not provided [Wessen 2002]. Another group of researchers reported that based on some experiments using aqueous mixtures of M V O C standards (alcohols and ketones) to determine the optimal extraction conditions for fungal volatiles from building materials, of the threee fibers tested (PDMS/Carboxen®, P D M S / D V B , or Carbowax®/DVB), the Carbowax®/DVB fiber was the best fiber [Wady et al 2002]. For extraction of M V O C s from actual building materials, they found that extraction at 70°C for 20 minutes was optimal. (These authors later published an 116  article stating that a " C a r b o w a x fiber) [ W a d y e t a l 2 0 0 3 ] .  5  fiber was the best, p r o b a b l y m e a n i n g the C a r b o w a x ® / D V B  A c c o r d i n g to t e c h n i c a l i n f o r m a t i o n from the manufacturer, the P D M S / C a r b o x e n ® fiber is the best a l l - a r o u n d fiber c h o i c e for l o w - m o l e c u l a r weight v o l a t i l e c o m p o u n d s across a range o f functional c h e m i c a l groups ( a l c o h o l s , aldehydes, ketones, c a r b o x y l i c a c i d s , aromatic c o m p o u n d s ) . T h e i r experiments found responses w i t h the P D M S / C a r b o x e n ® fiber to be m o r e than 10 to 100 t i m e s that for other fibers for m a n y o f the tested c o m p o u n d s w i t h m o l e c u l a r weights less than 9 0 . O u r lab already h a d P D M S / C a r b o x e n ® fibers available. B a s e d o n the report b y W a d y et a l , w e c o m p a r e d the P D M S / C a r b o x e n ® fiber to the C a r b o w a x ® / D V B fiber for e x t r a c t i n g actual samples under o u r e x t r a c t i o n c o n d i t i o n s ( r o o m temperature [ 2 1 - 2 2 ° C ] for 3 0 minutes). T h e results are s h o w n i n F i g u r e E . 1. T h e P D M S / C a r b o x e n ® fiber w a s c l e a r l y better than the C a r b o w a x ® / D V B fiber under our extraction c o n d i t i o n s , i n agreement w i t h the manufacturer's t e c h n i c a l literature.  j u:\rayg projacl\aapenoifa_pen_ap(03130apr03\ttOsbl_pen_3Qapr03.run |  JLl u'.Vays pro|acftaspenosb_pan_apr03mimay03\aosb1 jan_01rnaydvb.ru  Figure  E.l:  comparing coating  GC-FID results  thickness)  had much  greater  chromatograms  of the  from  the Carboxen®/PDMS  fiber  (bottom)  sensitivity  for  VOC  profile  (75  under  the same  a broad  range  for  extraction of  P. brevicompactum  urn coating  thickness)  and  analysis  fiber  on aspen (top)  conditions.  oriented  to the Carbowax/DVB The  Carboxen®/PDMS  strandboard, (70  urn fiber  compounds.  117  Appendix F - Extraction time An extraction time of 30 minutes was initially chosen out of convenience, since the gas chromatography analysis time was about the same including oven cycling time. It was also previously reported that 30 minutes was sufficient to establish equilibrium with fungal volatiles using a PDMS-coated fiber [Nilsson 1996]. We chose to stay with an extraction time of 30 minutes for convenience, although longer extraction times may have allowed us to detect less volatile and semi-volatile compounds with greater sensitivity. Figure F. 1 shows the effect of varying extraction times under our experimental conditions. No significant qualitative differences were noted between 30 and 60 minutes, but increasing the extraction time to 120 minutes resulted in increased response for the less volatile compounds. mVolts a  a y* pioj nc i'g ypt ti nw< i p_ 3u;i03>2 SaugO iji ra «• tiyp-i _.  75-  50 —  25 —  0 — mVotts 75  H  JlL. m Volts 75-  jjiL mVotts  75-j  UMrn*\|VL\j  Figure  F.I:  Effect  PDMS/Carboxen® GC-FID minutes  with timed for  compounds  of increasing coated  splitless  the volatile eluting  after  extraction  SPME  fiber  injection.  compounds 15 minutes  times.  at 21-22  The sample  <Cfor  No significant  eluting  before  is evident  after  15, 30,  was gypsum 60, and  qualitative 15 minutes, extraction  120  board. minutes  differences but an increase for  120  were  Extraction  was with  (top  to bottom).  noted  between  in response  for  a  Analysis 30,  the less  was  60, and  by  120  volatile  minutes.  118  Appendix G - Gas chromatograph parameters  G . 1 G a s c h r o m a t o g r a p h parameters V a r i o u s gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h parameters were tried before the methods w e r e f i n a l i z e d , and some early data was c o l l e c t e d before the methods were o p t i m i z e d . T h e biggest i m p r o v e m e n t s i n chromatography p e r f o r m a n c e w a s seen w i t h i n s t a l l a t i o n o f a c o l u m n d e s i g n e d for v o l a t i l e c o m p o u n d analysis (Restek R t x - V M S ® ) and adjusting the c o l u m n temperature p r o g r a m .  Split versus splitless injection In gas chromatography, a s a m p l e c a n be d e l i v e r e d i n its entirety to the c o l u m n , or part o f it c a n be diverted or s p l i t a w a y before r e a c h i n g the c o l u m n a n d v e n t e d out o f the gas chromatograph. The former is c a l l e d splitless i n j e c t i o n and the latter is c a l l e d s p l i t i n j e c t i o n . S P M E is intended for splitless i n j e c t i o n , but because the w o o d specimens gave o f f h i g h b a c k g r o u n d levels o f V O C s , a split i n j e c t i o n w a s u s e d because otherwise some o f the peaks w o u l d be broad and o v e r l o a d e d w i t h p o o r separation. S p l i t injection resulted i n p o o r s e n s i t i v i t y w i t h the c e l l u l o s e and g y p s u m specimens, but splitless i n j e c t i o n a g a i n led to broad, o v e r l o a d e d peaks. A t i m e d splitless i n j e c t i o n p r o g r a m w a s used as a c o m p r o m i s e b e t w e e n s e n s i t i v i t y a n d c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c separation. T a b l e G . 1 s u m m a r i z e s the gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h parameters for the v a r i o u s methods used for data c o l l e c t i o n . G C - F f D m e t h o d s ( A ) and ( C ) were the final methods used to c o l l e c t most o f the data. G C - M S methods ( B ) a n d ( C ) w e r e the final methods for G C - M S , a l t h o u g h due to other demands for G C - M S a n a l y s i s , it was a l w a y s p o s s i b l e to analyse samples w i t h these methods, and samples w e r e o c c a s i o n a l l y analysed w i t h w h a t e v e r c o l u m n and injector l i n e r were installed at the time. Table  G.l:  Gas chromatography  of the data.  GC-MS  (A)  methods  used in the study.  was used to collect  the data from  GC-FID  S. chartarum  methods  (A) and  on Southern  (C)  were  Yellow  used to collect  most  Pine.  GC-FID GC-FID (A)  GC-FID (B)  Carrier gas  Hydrogen  Hydrogen  Column head  8 psi  GC-FID (C) Hydrogen  8 psi  8 psi  260°C  260°C  260°C  Open 35 mL/min  Closed N/A  Restek Rtx-VMS 30 m x 0.25 mm, 1.4 urn film thickness  Closed x 0.2 minutes, then open 35 mL/min  Restek Rtx-VMS , 30 m x 0.25 mm, 1.4 urn film thickness  Restek Rtx-VMS 30 m x 0.25 mm, 1.4 urn film thickness 40°C for 4 minutes, then  pressure Injector temperature Split valve Split flow rate Column  Column  40°C for 4 minutes, then  temperature  40°C for 4 minutes, then  increase to 140°C at 8°C/min,  program  increase to 140°C at 8°C/min,  then increase to 200°C at  increase to 140°C at8°C/min,  then increase to 200°C at  5°C/min, hold x 3.5 to 6.5 minutes (total runtime: 32 to 35 minutes)  then increase to 200°C at  5°C/min, hold x 3.5 to 6.5 minutes (total runtime: 32 to 35 minutes)  5°C/min, hold x 3.5 to 6.5 minutes (total runtime: 32 to 35 minutes)  220°C  220°C  220°C  Detector temperature  119  Detector settings Comments  Attenuation 4, detector range 12 (most sensitive) Final method for wood products (solid wood, OSB). A narrowbore injector liner designed for SPME was used.  Attenuation 4, detector range 12 (most sensitive) Broad, overloaded peaks. A narrow-bore injector liner designed for SPME was used.  Attenuation 4, detector range 12 (most sensitive) Final method for cellulose insulation and gypsum board. A narrow-bore injector liner designed for SPME was used.  GC-MS G C - M S (A) Helium  GC-MS (B) Helium  G C - M S (C) Helium  12 psi  8-10 psi  8-10 psi  280°C Open  230°C Open  ? Supelco PTE-5 30 m x 0.25 mm, 0.25 um film thickness  42-43 mL/min Restek Rtx-VMS 20 m x 0.18 mm, 1 umfilm thickness  230°C Closed x 0.33 minutes, then open 42-43 mL/min Restek Rtx-VMS 20 m x 0.18 mm, 1 um film thickness  Column temperature  35°C for 4 minutes, then  40°C for 4 minutes, then  40°C for 4 minutes, then  program  increase to 160°C at 10°C/min, hold x 2 minutes (total run time 18.5 minutes).  increase to 140°C at 8°C/min,  increase to 140°C at8°C/min,  then increase to 200°C at 5°C/min, hold x 6.5 minutes (total runtime: 35 minutes)  then increase to 200°C at 5°C/min, hold x 6.5 minutes (total runtime: 35 minutes)  280°C  285°C  285°C  220°C Full scan 30-450 m/z  150°C Full scan 40-650 m/z  150°C Full scan 40-650 m/z  Poor separation with this column and column temperature program.  Final method for wood products. A narrow-bore injector liner designed for SPME was used, although sometimes analysis would have to be done with whatever injector liner and column was installed at the time.  Final method for cellulose insulation and gypsum board. A narrow-bore injector liner designed for SPME was used, although sometimes analysis would have to be done with whatever injector liner and column was installed at the time.  Carrier gas Column head pressure Injector temperature Split valve Split flow rate Column  Transfer line temperature Ion trap temperature Mass spectrometer settings Comments  '  120  Appendix H - Monitoring carbon dioxide production A couple of studies have used carbon dioxide to monitor growth rate of mould [Pasanen 1992, 1994; Korpi 1998], but others have apparently used carbon dioxide levels simply as a check for sterility. [Pasanen 1996; Kalliokoski 1993] Our initial goal was to monitor carbon dioxide levels each week. This would require that only small samples be taken from the chambers so that the concentration of volatile compounds within the chambers would not be altered significantly. The option of inserting or enclosing carbon dioxide sensors within the chambers was not feasible. Gas chromatography was tried initially. Gas chromatography with a thermal conductivity detector (GC-TCD) is one of the standard methods used for monitoring carbon dioxide in the workplace, but our gas chromatography instruments lacked thermal conductivity detectors, so GC-MS was tried instead. Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is specified for monitoring carbon dioxide in the workplace if compound confirmation is required. Carbon dioxide standards of 0, 249, 498, and 995 ppm were made by mixing appropriate volumes of a 995 ppm carbon dioxide calibration standard and zero air in Tedlar bags. 100 uL of each mixture were manually injected using a Gastight® syringe into the G C - M S , but poor reproducibility and non-linear calibration curves were obtained. A MIRAN® infrared detector able to detect C 0 2 at a wavelength of 4.3 um was also tried. The sampling cell was made into a closed loop and samples of 2 to 10 mL of calibration gas (995 ppm C02) were introduced into the closed sample loop, but this did not produce a detectable signal. Others have reported that aliquots of 50 to 100 mL are needed to produce an adequate signal [OSHA]; such volumes would have too large for our experimental set-up. A hand-held Q-Trak® indoor air quality monitor with non-dispersive infrared detector was also tried. Introducing small samples (up to 10 mL) into the Q-Trak® sensor using the carbon dioxide calibration collar was not feasible since the sample was not large enough to fully flood the sensor chamber, and since the Q-Trak sensor is not completely enclosed some dilution was probably occurring during the sample reading. Weekly monitoring of carbon dioxide was abandoned in favour of measuring the carbon dioxide levels once at the end of the incubation period. This involved purging the incubation chambers contents and feeding the contents to the Q-Trak® sensor, using the calibration collar. To test the set-up, a 2-L incubation chamber was filled with carbon dioxide calibration gas (995 ppm) and evacuated with an S K C sampling pump at lL/minute, with the exhaust fed into the calibration collar of the Q-Trak®. The peak carbon dioxide reading was 94% (+2%) of the actual calibration gas concentration. The apparent reduced concentration inside the jars was due to dilution of the carbon dioxide by incoming room air. While this method would not be able to provide exact measurements of carbon dioxide inside the incubation chambers, it was felt that it would still provide useful data on carbon dioxide production and allow comparisons between samples.  121  Appendix I - Extraction and analysis of ergosterol UBC School of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene (SOEH) Procedure for Analysis of Ergosterol in Air Filters, Fungal Biomass and Building Materials by GC/MS/MS C r e a t i o n D a t e : 02/15/03  Method Version: SOEF£-SOP# A.00.02  1.0 Introduction T h i s procedure describes the s a m p l e extraction, preparation a n d analysis o f air s a m p l i n g filters and b u i l d i n g materials s u c h as w o o d , i n s u l a t i o n a n d g y p r o c for E r g o s t e r o l b y G a s Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry ( G C / M S / M S ) .  T h i s substance i s a c h e m i c a l m a r k e r o f  fungal b i o m a s s (spores a n d m y c e l i u m ) a n d c a n be detected i n air b o r n e dust o r b u i l d i n g materials. A V a r i a n Saturn 2 0 0 0 I o n T r a p instrument operated i n the M S / M S m o d e is h i g h l y sensitive a n d selective for the d e t e c t i o n o f E r g o s t e r o l - T M S d e r i v a t i v e ( o n c o l u m n 5 0 - 1 0 0 p i c o g r a m s ) . T h e t r i m e t h y l s i l y l d e r i v a t i v e o f E r g o s t e r o l y i e l d s a u n i q u e mass s p e c t r u m a n d w i t h the mass spectrometer operated i n the M S / M S m o d e y i e l d s increased specificity.  Ergosterol  C28H44O  M.W. = 396.665 (CAS # 57-87-4)  P r e c a u t i o n a r y Properties: A i r a n d L i g h t s e n s i t i v i t y (photo degradation) Storage: Storage i n desicator i n dark cabinet.  122  7-DehydrochoIesterol (Internal Standard)  C27H44O  M . W . = 384.664 C A S # 67-97-0 Precautionary Properties: Air and Light sensitivity (photo degradation) Storage Recommendations: Storage in desicator in dark cabinet. Stigmasterol (Surrogate)  C28H48O  M . W . = 412 C A S # 83-47-8 Precautionary Properties: Air and Light sensitivity (photo degradation) Storage Recommendations: Storage in desicator in dark cabinet. Derivatization of Ergosterol Jnternal Standard and Surrogate The derivatization of ergosterol, the internal standard and surrogate by B S T F A (bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide) forms trimethylsilyl derivatives that are amenable to chromatography/mass spectrometric analysis.  R - OH + Pyridine + BSTFA x  > R - O-Si (CH ) x  3  3  Where Rx-OH is underivatized Ergosterol, 7-Dehydrocholesterol or Stigmasterol (pyridine is a catalyst in the reaction)  The Electron Impact (E.I.) mass spectrum of ergosterol-TMS derivative is dominated by a m/z 363 ion (M-105, loss of the trimethylsilanol group and one methyl group). This ion is used to yield a product of m/z 157 ion for the quantification of the derivative in the M S / M S mode. The internal standard, 7-dehydrocholesterol, yield a mass spectrum with the G C / M S operating in the full scan mode and acquiring the data in the range of m/z 315 to 375. This yields a base peak ion of m/z 351 for the internal standard that is used in the quantification of the ergosterolTMS. The surrogate (Stigmasterol) yields m/z 394 and is monitored with the G C / M S operating in the full scan mode. Chemicals Ergosterol - Sigma-Aldrich # E-6510 (lot 88H1343) - 90 % purity 7-Dehydrocholesterol - Sigma-Aldrich # D-4429 (lot 71K2510) - 93.4% purity Stigmasterol - Sigma-Aldrich # S4409 - 93 % purity BSFTA - (N)-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluofoacetamde - Aldrich Cataloq No. 39,485-8 derivatization grade in 1.0 mL X 10 vials Pyridine (ACS grade) - Fluka # 82702 - 99.8% purity Pentane (Pesticide grade) - Fisher Chemicals Pyrogen Free Water - prepared by BarnStead Mega Pure@System (ACS) Potassium Hydrohydroxide Pellets (ACS certified) - Fisher Chemicals # P250-1 Methanol (ACS grade) - Fisher Chemicals Toluene (ACS grade) - Fisher Chemicals 10% KOH/Methanol solution - prepared as weight percent (50 g K O H to 450 mLs of MeOH) Glassware 8 mL pyrex cell culture tubes equipped with PTFE lined screw caps 2 mL disposable glass pipets 50 mL Amber Colored Volumetric Flask (Grade A ) 25 mL Amber Colored Volumetric Flask (Grade A) 10 mL Amber Colored Volumetric Flask (Grade A) 5 mL Amber Colored Volumetric Flask (Grade A) Glass Chemical Storage Desiccator Apparatus: Varian Saturn 2000 G C / M S / M S Varian Star 3400 G C 124  V a r i a n 8200 C X A u t o s a m p l e r H e i d o l p h R o t o M a x 120 M i x e r C a n L a b D r y B l o c k Heater - M o d e l H 2 0 2 5 V o r t e x M i x e r M i x II - T y p e 3 7 6 0 0  Software V a r i a n Saturn V i e w ™ V e r s i o n 5.51 Microsoft E x c e l - V e r s i o n 2000 Professional N I S T 9 8 M a s s S p e c t r a l Database  Stock Solution Preparations Ergosterol W e i g h and r e c o r d p r e c i s e l y an amount o f ergosterol crystals into a n a l u m i n u m boat. T h i s final amount can be i n the 0.01 to 0.02 grams range but must be r e c o r d e d p r e c i s e l y (0.0001 d e c i m a l place). T h e final c o n c e n t r a t i o n is corrected for the percent p u r i t y as s u p p l i e d b y S i g m a C h e m i c a l s ( 9 0 % y i e l d s a 0.90 c o r r e c t i o n factor). Transfer into a 50 m L a m b e r c o l o r e d v o l u m e t r i c flask and top up to v o l u m e w i t h toluene. M i x w e l l a n d then transfer to storage v i a l s (25 m L telfon c a p p e d v i a l s ) . T h e storage v i a l s are then w r a p p e d i n a l u m i n u m f o i l to m i n i m i z e the effects o f l i g h t w h e n i n use. Store the stocks at - 8 0 ° C . T h e stocks must be l a b e l e d w i t h the date o f preparation, n a m e o f the analyst and the concentration c a l c u l a t e d i n n g / u L . A w o r k i n g standard is prepared from this stock and then a set o f c a l i b r a t i o n standards is prepared from the w o r k i n g standard.  7-Dehydrocholesterol (Internal Standard) W e i g h and r e c o r d p r e c i s e l y an amount o f 7 - D e h y d r o c h o l e s t e r o l crystals into an a l u m i n u m boat. T h i s final amount c a n be i n the 0.01 to 0.02 grams range but m u s t b e r e c o r d e d p r e c i s e l y (0.0001 d e c i m a l place). T h e final concentration is corrected for the percent p u r i t y as s u p p l i e d b y S i g m a C h e m i c a l s ( 9 3 . 4 % y i e l d s a 0.934 c o r r e c t i o n factor). Transfer into a 25 m L amber c o l o r e d v o l u m e t r i c flask a n d top up to v o l u m e w i t h toluene. M i x w e l l and then transfer to a storage v i a l (25 m L telfon c a p p e d v i a l ) . T h e storage v i a l s are then w r a p p e d i n a l u m i n u m f o i l to m i n i m i z e the effects o f light w h e n i n use. Store the stock s o l u t i o n i n the - 8 0 ° C freezer. T h e stock must b e l a b e l e d w i t h the date o f preparation, n a m e o f the analyst and the concentration i n n g / u L .  Stigmasterol (Surrogate) W e i g h and r e c o r d p r e c i s e l y an amount o f S t i g m a s t e r o l crystals into an a l u m i n u m boat. T h i s final amount c a n b e i n the 0.01 to 0.02 grams range but m u s t be r e c o r d e d p r e c i s e l y (0.0001 d e c i m a l place). T h e final concentration is corrected for the percent p u r i t y as s u p p l i e d b y S i g m a C h e m i c a l s (93%o y i e l d s a 0.90 c o r r e c t i o n factor). Transfer into a 25 m L a m b e r c o l o r e d v o l u m e t r i c flask and top up to v o l u m e w i t h toluene. M i x w e l l a n d then transfer to a storage v i a l  125  (25 mL telfon capped vial). The storage vial is then wrapped in aluminum foil to minimize the effects of light when in use. Store the stock solution in the -80° C freezer. The stock must be labeled with the date of preparation, name of the analyst and the concentration in ng/uL.  Working Internal Standard/Surrogate Standard Preparation Working standard (Internal Standard and Surrogate) is prepared by dilution of each stock into a single 25 mL volumetric flask. Remove the stock solutions (internal standard and the surrogate) from the -80° C freezer and warm to room temperature. Examine the solutions for undissolved crystals and gently warm and handshake to re-dissolve. Transfer a volume (uL) of each stock solution into a 25 mL volumetric flask to prepare the working standard in the 60.0 ng/uL range. After transfer, top up the volumetric with toluene. Calculate the concentration of the internal standard and surrogate working standard as such:  [Working Std] = [ISTD/Surrogate Stock Soln] x Transfer Vol(ul)/25mL x 1000 (units are ng/uL)  Each sample and calibration standard is spiked with the working solution prior to the extraction procedure or standard preparation.  Ergosterol Working and Calibration Standards Preparation  Working Ergosterol standard is prepared by dilution of the stock and the calibration standards are prepared from this working standard: 1) Remove the stock solution from the -80° C freezer and warm to room temperature. Examine the solution for undissolved crystals and gently warm and handshake to redissolve. 2) Transfer a volume (uL) of the stock solution into a 25 mL or suitable volumetric flask to prepare the working standard ( T A B L E 1 example). This transfer volume can be altered 126  to a "target concentration" so that the calibration standards can be in a desired range. After transfer, top up the volumetric with toluene. 3)  Calculate the concentration of the working standard as such:  [Working Std] = [Erg Stock Solution] x Transfer Vol(ul)/25mL x 1000 (units are ng/uL)  4) The calibration standards (STD-A-1 to 9) are prepared in glass 8 mL culture test tubes from a working standard as outlined in example T A B L E 1.  5)  The transfer volume (uL) from the working standard can be altered to meet a "target calibration" range as desired by the analyst. The final concentrations of the calibration standards are calculated as follows:  [Std-A-1 to 9] = uL transferred to test tube x [Working Std]/Final Volume a. units are in ng/ul b. final vol (ul) is the total volume (uL) of derivatization reagents and reconstitution solvent (toluene) spiked into the tube (15 + 50 + 500 ul = 565 ul)  6) Each calibration standard is spiked with 50 uL of the internal standard/surrogate working standard prior to derivatization.  7) The solvent in each calibration standard is evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen gas. The evaporation process can be enhanced with the tubes placed in a warm water bath.  8) Each calibration standard is spiked with derivatization agents (15 uL of neat pyridine and then 50 uL of BSTFA). Cap tightly and immediately vortex each tube. Transfer to the dry block heater and heat to 60° C for 30 minutes.  9) Cool the tubes and add 500 uL of toluene (re-constitution solvent) or an appropriate volume. Vortex and transfer the contents to G C vials and run on the GC/MS/MS.  127  TABLE 1 Working Std Calibration Standard  Std-A-1 Std-A-2 Std-A-3 Std-A-4 Std-A-5 Std-A-6 Std-A-7 Std-A-8 Std-A-9  Calibration Std  Final Amount  Transfer Volume (ul)  Volumetric Flask Size  Working Std Cone*  Transfer Volume (uL) into  Spike Amount  with Reconstitution Solvent  of Stock Solution  (mL)  (ng/uL)  test tube  (ng)  (ng/uL)  645 645 645 645 645 645 645 645 645  25 25 25 25  5.670 5.670 5.670 5.670  25 25 25 25 25  5.670 5.670 5.670 5.670 5.670  5.000 10.000 15.000 25.000 50.000 75.000 200.000 500.000 1000.000  28.35 56.70 85.05 141.76 283.52 425.27 1134.06 2835.16 5670.32  0.052 0.100 0.150 0.251 0.502 0.753 2.01 5.02 10.04  Note: *Working standard solution used for preparation of calibration standards that can be altered for a desired range.  Sample Preparation and Extraction Procedure 1. Air Filters: Remove the air sampling filters from their storage containers (50 mL centrifuge tubes) and prepare to spike each filter with the internal standard/surrogate. Place the filters slightly suspended above a clean surface (Kim Wipe tissue) so that the spike solution does not transfer to the lower surface. 2. Spike each filter with 50 uL of the working internal standard/surrogate solution directly in the center of the filter and allow 5 minutes for the solvent to evaporate. 3. Carefully fold and place each filter into separate 8 mL culture tubes and add 3-4 mL of a 10% solution of KOH/Methanol so that the filter is submerged. Tightly cap the tubes. Proceed to step 10. 4. Fungal Biomass: Obtain a record the spore counts as spores/mL and proceed to spike an appropriate volume of suspended fungal spores into the center of a Gelman Glass Fiber filter. Vortex the solution to suspended spores before spiking. Let the filter dry for 1 hour.  5. Spike each filter with 50 uL of the working internal standard/surrogate solution directly in the center of the filter and allow 5 minutes for the solvent to evaporate. 6. Carefully fold and place each filter into a separate 8 mL culture tube and add 3-4 mL of a 10% solution of KOH/Methanol so that the filter is submerged. Tightly cap the tubes. Proceed to step 10.  128  7.  Building Materials (Wood, Insulation or Gyproc type materials): R e c o r d the surface area o f the m a t e r i a l that has been s a m p l e d o r p r e c i s e l y w e i g h a n d r e c o r d an appropriate amount o f s a m p l e m a t e r i a l . P l a c e the s a m p l e i n 8 m L culture tubes o r suitable container.  8.  S p i k e each s a m p l e w i t h 5 0 u L o f the w o r k i n g internal standard/surrogate s o l u t i o n .  9.  A d d an appropriate amount o f a s o l u t i o n o f 1 0 % K O H / M e t h a n o l so that the m a t e r i a l is submerged. P r o c e e d to step 10.  10. T h e tubes c a n be incubated i n a d r y b l o c k heater o r water bath at a temperature o f 8 0 ° C for 9 0 m i n u t e s o r a u t o c l a v e d for 2 0 m i n u t e s at 2 5 0 ° C i n the a u t o c l a v e unit. I f a u t o c l a v i n g is p e r f o r m e d each s a m p l e m u s t b e c a p p e d w i t h a G C type s e p t u m cap a n d sealed into a p l a s t i c 5 0 m L centrifuge type tube. T h e setting for the exhaust c o l l e c t o r s h o u l d be " F o r L i q u i d s ( S l o w ) " .  THIS PRECA UTIONIS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE THE DANGER OF THE SAMPLE TUBES EXPLODING AND RELEASING THE CA USTIC SOLUTION IN THE AUTOCLAVE.  11. R e m o v e the tubes from the heat source a n d a l l o w the tubes to c o o l to r o o m temperature. I f the a u t o c l a v e m e t h o d has been used a l l o w the unit to c o o l so there is a gradual drop i n pressure before o p e n i n g the unit. P r o c e e d w i t h the s a m p l e e x t r a c t i o n steps.  Sample Extraction 12. Air Filters Extraction Step: A f t e r s p o n a f i c a t i o n , each s a m p l e is extracted 2 times w i t h pentane. A d d 1 m L o f p y r o g e n free water a n d g e n t l y vortex. A d d 2 m L o f pentane to each tube a n d cap tightly. P l a c e a n d secure the tubes o n the R o t a m a x m i x e r a n d m i x for 5 m i n u t e s w i t h an agitation speed o f 10. P r o c e e d to step 15  13. Fungal Biomass Extraction Step: A f t e r s p o n a f i c a t i o n , each s a m p l e is extracted 2 times w i t h pentane. A d d 1 m L o f p y r o g e n free water a n d g e n t l y v o r t e x . A d d 2 m L o f pentane to each tube a n d cap tightly. P l a c e and secure the tubes o n the R o t a m a x m i x e r a n d m i x for 5 m i n u t e s w i t h a n agitation speed o f 10. P r o c e e d to step 15.  14. Building Materials Extraction Step (Wood, Insulation or Gyproc type materials) Step A f t e r s p o n i f i c a t i o n , each s a m p l e is extracted 2 times w i t h pentane. D e c a n t the 1 0 % K O H / M e t h a n o l s o l u t i o n into separate l a b e l e d test tubes. W a s h each tube 2 X w i t h a 2 m L v o l u m e o f 1 0 % K O H / M e t h a n o l and decant into the appropriate tubes. A d d 1 m L o f p y r o g e n free water a n d g e n t l y v o r t e x . A d d 2 m L o f pentane to each tube a n d cap tightly. P l a c e a n d secure the tubes o n the R o t a m a x m i x e r a n d m i x for 5 m i n u t e s w i t h an agitation speed o f 10. P r o c e e d to step 15.  129  15. After mixing, remove the tubes and transfer the pentane (upper phase) to a labeled clean test tube. 16. Repeat the extraction step and transfer the remaining pentane to the appropriate test tubes. i  ' . 17 . The extracts are evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen gas. The evaporation process can be enhanced with the tubes placed in a warm water bath. V  Derivatization Steps: 18. Add the derivatization reagents to each tube. First 15 uL of neat Pyridine then add 50 uL of B S T F A and tightly cap the tubes. Vortex each tube for 5 seconds. 19. Place the tubes in a dry block heater and heat to 60°C for 30 minutes. 20. Remove the tubes from the dry block heater and allow the tubes to cool to room temperature. 21. Add 500 uL of toluene (re-constitution solvent) or an appropriate volume and cap the vials. Vortex well. 22. Transfer the derivatized extracts to GC vials and prepare to run the samples on the GC/MS/MS. •  Ergosterol-TMS Standard Calibration The range of the calibration curve can be adjusted according to the expected range of the analyte found in sample matrices (air samples on gelman filters, biomass or building materials). Ergosterol G C / M S / M S is an internal standard quantation method. The calibration curve of ergosterol-TMS is a plot the peak ratios of 157/351 m/z versus nanograms injected. The quan ion of the derivative of the ergosterol is m/z 157 and the internal standard is m/z 351. The calibration curve is a quadratic curve fit, including zero and a weighing of 1/x .  GC/MS/MS Conditions: Gas Chromatographic Parameters Column Type:  PTE -5, HP-5 or DB-5 0.25 m.m. I.D. x 30 meters 250 microns film thickness  130  GC Oven Temperature Program 95° C (1 min hold) to 310° C @ 20° C/min hold for 10.5 minutes  Injection Port Temperature  290° C  Splitless Injection time:  0.60 minutes splitless time  Interface Temperature:  290° C  Injector (Model 8200) Injection Amount (ul):  1.0 uL or upto 2.0 uL  Solvent Plug Size (uL):  0.4 uL  Syringe Needle Wash Time: 30 seconds Injection Rate (uL/sec):  10 uL/sec  Mass Spectrometer: G C / M S / M S Saturn 2000  Segment 1: Filament off (start time = 0 min End time = 14 min) Segment 2 - Full Scan Mode: Internal Standard Emission Current: 50 microamps Mass Defect: 85 mmu/lOOu Count Threshold: 1 counts Mulitplier Offset: 0 volts Scaqn Time: 0.78 sees Segment Start time: 12mins Segment End time: 16.50 mins Segment Low Mass: 315 m/z Segment High Mass: 375 m/z Ionization Mode: EI A G C Segment 2: EI-AutoMode Target TIC: 20000 counts Prescan Ionization Time: 100 microseconds Background Mass: 45 m/z RF Dump Value: 650.0 m/z  Mass Range: 315 to 375 Target Counts: 40000 Prescan Ionization Time: 1500 microseconds Background Mass: 149 m/z RF Dump Value: 650:0 m/z  Segment 3 - M S M S mode:  Ergosterol-TMS Emission Current: 90 microamps Mass Defect: 85 mmu/lOOu Count Threshold: 1 counts Mulitplier Offset: 300 volts Scan Time: 0.67 sees Segment Start time: 16.50 mins Segment End time: 18.50 mins Segment Low Mass: 150 m/z Segment High Mass: 160 m/z Ionization Mode: EI A G C  Segment 3: EI-Auto Mode Target TIC: 40000 counts Prescan Ionization Time: 1500 microseconds Background Mass: 149 m/z RF Dump Value: 650.0 m/z Segment 3: MS/MS Ion Preparation  Ionization Parameters:  Ionization Storage Level: Ejection Amplitude:  48.0 m/z 20.0 volts  Isolation Parameters:  Parent Ion Mass: Isolation Window: Low-Edge Offset: High Edge Offset: High-Edge Amplitude: Isolation Time:  363.0 m/z 2.0 m/z 6 steps 2 steps 30.0 volts 5 sees  Waveform Type: Excitation Storage Level: Excitation Amplitude: Modulation Range: Modulation Rate: Number of Frequencies: Excitation Time: CID Frequency Offset:  Resonant 79.9 m/z 0.40 volts 2 steps 3000 usecs/step 1 20 milliseconds 0 Hertz  •  Dissocation Parameters:  Segment 4 - Full Scan (Surrogate - Stigmasterol) Emission Current: 50 microamps Mass Defect: 85 mmu/lOOu Count Threshold: 1 counts Mulitplier Offset: 0 volts Scaqn Time: 0.78 sees Segment Start time: 12mins Segment End time: 16.50 mins Segment Low Mass: 390 m/z Segment High Mass: 398 m/z Ionization Mode: EI A G C  • Segment 4: El-Auto Mode  Target TIC: 20000 counts Prescan Ionization Time: 100 microseconds Background Mass: 45 m/z RF Dump Value: 650.0 m/z Segment 4: E.I. - Auto Mode Mass Range: 390 to 398 Target Counts: 40000 Prescan Ionization Time: 1500 microseconds Background Mass: 149 m/z RF Dump Value: 650.0 m/z  Segment start and end times will change depending on the column dimensions, performance, and carrier gas (He) flow rate as determined by the injection port head pressure. The start and end times must be changed in the method prior to GC/MS/MS analysis when there have been major changes with the listed parameters. Definitions GC/MS/MS - Gas chromatography/Mass Spec/Mass Spec Gelman Glass Filters - air sampling glass fiber type filters B S T F A - derivatization agent (N)-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamde) m/z - mass to charge ratio MS/MS - mass spec/mass spec mode of operation of the mass spectrometer Quan ion - the m/z peak in a mass spectrum used for quantification Method Revisions Revision Number SOEH-SOP# A.00.01 SOEH-SOP# A-00.02  Author Timothy M a Timothy M a  Date 02/19/03 04/23/03  Description 1 Version Added Surrogate Stigmastrol st  133  Appendix J : Photographs of test specimens after 4 weeks  Photo 1: A. versicolor on untreated southern yellow pine.  Photo 2: P. brevicompactum on untreated southern yellow pine.  Photo 3: A. versicolor on untreated lodgepole pine.  Photo 4: P. brevicompactum on treated lodgepole pine.  Photo 5: P. brevicompactum on untreated lodgepole pine (specimen 2, 30x magnification).  Photo 6: A. versicolor on untreated Pine OSB (specimen 3).  134  Photo 7: A. versicolor (arrow) on treated Pine OSB (specimen I).  Photo 8: A. versicolor (arrow) on treated Pine OSB (specimen 3).  Photo 9: P. brevicompactum on treated Pine OSB (specimen 1).  Photo 11: A. versicolor on untreated Aspen OSB (specimen 2).  Photo 12: P. brevicompactum on untreated Aspen OSB (specimen 1).  135  Photo  13: S. chartarum  insulation  Photo  (30x  on untreated  on untreated  (30x  cellulose  on untreated  magnification).  Photo  14: Treated  chartarum  magnification).  17: P. brevicompactum  insulation  cellulose  magnification).  15: A. versicolor  insulation  Photo  (30x  Photo  16: Treated  versicolor  cellulose  Photo  (30x  (30x  18: Treated  insulation  inoculated  with  S.  with  A.  with  P.  magnification).  insulation  inoculated  magnification).  insulation  inoculated  brevicompactum.  136  137  Photo boric  25: S. chartarum acid  - gypsum  board  Ib/MSF  Ib/MSF  Photo boric  Photo  Photo  2 Ib/MSF  (back).  28: S. chartarum boric  acid  (front).  - gypsum  board  27:  S. chartarum  boric  2.57  acid  showing  26: S. chartarum acid  hyphal  strands  - 2  Ib/MSF  (30x).  sporulation  - 2  (30x).  Photo  29: S. chartarum  board  2.57 Ib/MSF  boric  hyphal acid  strands {front -  -  gypsum  30x).  138  Photo  30:  Ib/MSF  S. chartarum  boric  acid  - gypsum  Photo acid  Photo acid  33:  A. versicolor  added  (front)  board  2.57  (back).  32:  S. chartarum  hyphal  Photo  31:  board  2.57  strands  S. chartarum Ib/MSF  - 4 Ib/MSF  hyphal  boric  acid  strands (back  -  -  gypsum  30x).  boric  (3 Ox).  on gypsum  board  - no  boric  Photo acid  34: A. versicolor added  growth  compared  easier  on gypsum to control.  board  Side  - no  lighting  boric makes  to see.  139  HB  Photo acid  36: added  A. versicolor (back).  on gypsum  Photo  35:  boric  acid  board  A. versicolor (front  - no boric  - 30x  on gypsum  board  - no  added  magnification).  Photo acid  37: A. versicolor added  growth  compared  easier  on gypsum to control.  board  Side  - no  lighting  boric makes  to see.  140  Photo boric  39: A. versicolor acid  (front)  Photo  41:  boric  acid  Photo  43:  added  boric  - gypsum  - no visible  A. versicolor(back)  P. brevicompactum acid  gypsum  - no visible  (front).  board  1  Ib/MSF  growth.  board  1  Ib/MSF  growth.  — gypsum  board  no  Photo  42: A. versicolor  boric  acid  Photo  44:  lighting  (30x):  Same  makes  - gypsum  board  1  Ib/MSF  clean.  specimen growth  as previous,  easier  but  side  to see.  141  Photo  46:  added  boric  P. brevicompactum acid  - gypsum  board  no  Photo  (back).  lighting  Photo  48:  added  boric  P. brevicompactum acid  (back  -  47:  Same  makes  - gypsum  specimen growth  board  as previous,  easier  but  side  to see.  no  30x).  142  Photo Ib/MSF  49: P. brevicompactum boric  acid  - gypsum  board  Photo  Ib/MSF  52: P. brevicompactum boric  acid  Photo  51: P. brevicompactum  Ib/MSF  Photo  1  50:..  .with  side  lighting...  (front)...  - gypsum  boric  board  1  acid  (front  -  - gypsum  board  1  30x).  Photo  53: ...with  side  lighting...  (back)...  143  Photo 54: P. brevicompactum - gypsum board 2 Ib/MSF boric acid (front).  Photo 56: P. brevicompactum - isolated growth onPhoto 57: P. brevicompactum, patchy growth another gypsum board @ 2 Ib/MSF boric acid gypsum board 2 Ib/MSF boric acid (back). (front).  144  Appendix K - Sample chromatograms C h r o m a to g r a m P l o t 1: Plo(2: P l o t 3: P l o t 4: mVolls  Plots  u:\... \ 2 6 f e b 0 3 \ s y p 1_aspe r _ 2 6 f e b . r u n u:\..\26feb03\syp2_asper_26feb.run u:\... \ 2 6 f e b 0 3 \ s y p 3 _ a s p e r _ 2 6 f e b . r u n u:\... \ 2 6 f e b 0 3 \ s y p 4 _ a s p e r _ 2 6 f e b . r u n  A A A A  A  A s y p1 _ a s p e r _ 2 6 f e b . r u n  200-  3 15 0 -  5 0-  I  omVolts  B  200-  1 10 0 -  5 0 -  .  o-  \  I  6  \ ;  I  UJLJJW A  4  6  5  \  \  s y p 2 _ a s p e r _ 2 6 f e b. r u n  \  2  I,  I  \  \  ,1  3  15 0 -  m Volls  \  \i  10 0 -  5  4  j j  I  . . .  .  1  c  A  s y p  3_asper_26feb,run  20 0 -  15 0 -  9  10 0 - :  I  5 0-  0mVolts 20 0 -  D  1.1  .  .  J  A'  150-:  10 0 -  50-  0-  L L.l  *  A  5 -—  t J  J ,JA  ,  ilLJ  lb  15  ,  J  10  A sy p 4 _ a s p e r _ 2 6 f e b . r u n  ^ 2b  ]  25 m i n u te s  Figure K - l . GC-FDD chromatograms of the V O C profile for Aspergillus versicolor on untreated southern yellow pine at week 4, top to bottom: specimens 1, 2, 3, and control. Production of V O C s in specimen 3 differed from specimens 1 and 2. Labels: 1 = 2-butanone; 2 = dimethyl furan; 3 = 2-pentanone; 4 = 2-hexanone; 5 = 2-heptanone; 6 = 2-octanone; 7 = 2-nonanone; 8 = Rt. 2.4; 9 = Rt. 23.3; 10 = Rt. 25; 11 = hexanal; 12 = heptanal; 13 = nonanal. The lowermolecular weight aliphatic aldehydes (pentanal, hexanal, heptanal) elute at the same time as the corresponding 2-ketones.  145  C h r o m a to g r a m Plol Plot Plot Plot  l: 2: 3: 4:  u A... u A... u A... u A...  Plots  \syp_pen_O \syp_pen_O \syp_pen_0 \sy p _ p e n _ 0  1 1 1 1  ap ap ap ap  rll03\syp1_p ril03\s y p 2 _ p rM03\s y p 3 _ p ril03\s y p 4 _ p  e n _ 0 1 aprll.ru n A e n _ 0 1 april.ru n A en_01 aprll.ru n A e n _ 0 1 april.ru n A  F i g u r e K - 2 . G C - F I D c h r o m a t o g r a m s o f the V O C p r o f i l e for  Penicillium brevicompactum o n  untreated southern y e l l o w p i n e at w e e k 1. top to b o t t o m : specimens 1, 2, 3 a n d c o n t r o l . L a b e l s : 1 = 2-butanone; 2 = 2-pentanone; 3 = 2-hexanone; 3 = 3-heptanone; 4 = 2-heptanone; 5 = 2octanone; 6 = 2 nonanone; 7 = acetone; 8 = h e x a n a l ; 9 = heptanal; 10 = o c t a n a l ; 11 = n o n a n a l .  146  C h ro m a to q ra m P l o t s P lot  1  u:\...  \ s y p _ p e n _ 2 2 a p r 0 3 \ s y p 1 _ p e n _ 2 2 a p r 0  P  lot  2  u:\...  \sy p _ p e n _ 2 2 a p r 0 3 \ s y p 2 _ p e n _ 2 2 a p r 0 3 . r u n  P  lot  3  u:V...  \sy p _ p e n _ 2 2 a p  P  lot  4  u:\...  \ s y p _ p e n _ 2 2 a p r 0 3 \ s y p 4 _ p e n _ 2 2 a p r 0 3 . r u n  rf)3\syp3  3.run  _ p e n _ 2 2 a pr.run  A  Figure K-3. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Penicillium brevicompactum on untreated southern yellow pine at week 4, top to bottom: specimens 1, 2, 3 and control. Some of the compounds seen in specimens 2 and 3 at week 1 have now disappeared (*), but still remain in specimen 1. The production of acetone and furan in specimens 2 and 3 is stronger than in specimen 1. Labels: 1 = 2-butanone; 2 = 2-pentanone; 3 = 2-hexanone; 3 = 3-heptanone; 4 = 2heptanone; 5 = 2-octanone; 6 = 2 nonanone; 7 = acetone; 8 = hexanal; 9 = heptanal; 10 = octanal; 11 = nonanal; 12 = dimethyl furan; 13 = furan.  147  C h r o m a to g r a m P lol  Plots  1  u:\...  \ 1 1 j u n 0 3 \ s p f 1 _ s t a c h y _ 1  P lol  2  u:\...  \ 1 1 j u n 0 3 \ s p f 2 _ s t a c h y _ 1 1 j u n . r u n  A  P lot  3  u:\...  \1 1 j u n 0  A  P lot  4  u :\...  \1 1 j u n 0 3 \ s p f 4 _ s t a c h y _ 1 1 j u n  1 jun.run  3 \ s p f 3 _ s t a c h y _ 1 l j u n . r u n ru n  A  A  Figure K-4. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Stachybotrys chartarum on untreated lodgepole pine at week 4. Top to bottom: specimens 1, 2, 3 and control. No growth was observed during the experiment; correspondingly, no changes in the V O C profile compared to the control were observed, although specimen 3 emitted higher levels of wood terpenes (*). Labels: 1 = toluene.  148  C h ro m a to q ra m P l o t s P lot  1:  u:\...  Plot  2:  u : \ . . - \ 2 6 a u g 0 3 \ s p f 4 _ a s p _ 2 6 a u g . r u n A  \ 2 6 a u g 0 3 \ s p f 3 _ a s p _ 2 6 a u g . r u n  T  ~ — — —  A  10  ite . — ™  20 .  2fe  — — m inu le s  Figure K-5. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Aspergillus versicolor on untreated lodgepole pine at week 4: specimen 3 (top) vs. control (bottom). 2-ketones were the main compounds produced with fungal growth. 1 = 2-butanone; 2 = 2-pentanone; 3 = 2hexanone; 4 = 2-heptanone; 5 = 2-octanone; 6 = 2-nonanone; 7 = C9 cyclic ketone; 8 = pentanal; 9 = toluene; 10 = hexanal.  149  C h ro m a to g ra m P l o t s P lot Plot Plot Plot  1: 2: 3: 4:  u:\..\spf_pen_jun03\16jul03\spf1_pen_16jul.run A u : \ . . M 6 j u l 0 3\spf2b_pen_16jul.run A u :\... \spt_pen_ju n 03\1 6jul0 3\s pf3_pen_ 1 6 ju I. run A u:\... \spf_pen_jun 0 3\1 6jul03\s pf4_pen_1 6 ju I. run - A  A  mVolts  30  0-  200-  10  0-  o— mVolts  B  30  0-  20  0-  10  0-  ., 11 . . Lll...j j .. —' L.  , 11  0— m Volls  1  c  0-  100-  0— mVolts  {  D  30  0-  20  0-  ioo-  ,II  n—  '  4  .. I l i . /  ib  ,  U Jl_j/Jlu ib  JL A  sp(1_pen_ 1 6jul.run  A  s p f 2 b _ p e n _ 16ju l.ru n  LA.^/IIM..^ l IA_J . . . .  1  300-  20  111 J1  A  2  A  s p f 3 _ p e n _ 1 6jul.run  A  s p f 4 _ p e n_  b  F i g u r e K - 6 . G C - F I D c h r o m a t o g r a m s o f the V O C p r o f i l e for Penicillium  1 6j ul. ru  2^  ;  n  , , m in u te s  brevicompactum o n  untreated l o d g e p o l e p i n e at w e e k 4 (experiment 1). T o p to b o t t o m : s p e c i m e n s 1, 2, 3, a n d Control. N o g r o w t h w a s o b s e r v e d o n a n y o f the test s p e c i m e n s ; c o r r e s p o n d i n g l y , no changes i n the V O C p r o f i l e w e r e seen.  150  C h r o m a to g r a m P lot 2 P lol 3 P lol 4 mVolts  u:\... u:\... u:\... u:\...  \20a \20a \20a \20a  Plots  ugO 3\spf 1 _ pen_20aug .ru n A ug03\spf2_ pen_2 Oaug .ru n A ug03\spf3_ pen_20aug .ru n A ug03\spf4_ pen_20aug .ru n A A spf1_pen_20aug .run  A  30 0 -  1 \  200-  100-  LL«  _u m Volls  —.—n__A>JV~jLjtj_ 1  JD  A s p f 2 _ p e n _ 2 O a u g .ru n  B 1  300—  \  200—  100-  j m Volts  /.  ^ _  .  . . .  Iv  1  ..,. I, i J,  .l .  A s p f 3 _ p e n _ 2 0 a u g .ru n  C  300-  1 \  200—  100-  mVolls  liLuJ ^  __u__jJLl  A  D  ,  spf4_pen_20aug.run  1  30 0 —  \  20 0 —  J ii  10 0 -  . , 1 .  .  4  -  i  l  l  .  l  .  ^  1  lfe  Ail. 11 .  - JiJn^. .  ^> 2  F i g u r e K - 7 . G C - F E D c h r o m a t o g r a m s o f the V O C p r o f i l e for Penicillium  L n.  s  2fe  -  „,!„.,,„«  m i n u le s  brevicompactum o n  untreated l o d g e p o l e p i n e , e x p e r i m e n t 2. T o p to b o t t o m : s p e c i m e n s 1, 2 , 3 a n d c o n t r o l . M i c r o s c o p i c g r o w t h w a s o b s e r v e d o n s p e c i m e n 2 at the e n d o f the e x p e r i m e n t , but no o b v i o u s g r o w t h w a s seen. N o s i g n i f i c a n t changes i n the V O C p r o f i l e w e r e o b s e r v e d d u r i n g the experiment, except f o r a v e r y slight decrease i n h e x a n a l i n s p e c i m e n s 2 a n d 3 at w e e k 4. E m i s s i o n s o f s o m e c o m p o u n d s (*) w e r e higher i n s p e c i m e n 3 c o m p a r e d to the other test specimens a n d the c o n t r o l . L a b e l s : 1 = h e x a n a l .  151  C h ro m a to q ra m P l o t s P lot 1 u:\... \1 8m a r03\os b 1 _s  P lol 2 P lol 3 P lot 4  ta chy_1 8m ar.ru n A u:\... \1 8m a r03\os b2_s tachy_1 8m ar.run A u:\... \1 8m a r03\os b3_s tach y_1 8m ar.run A u:\... \1 8m ar03\os b4_s tach y_1 8m a r.run A A o s b 1 _ s t a c h y _ 1 8 m a r . ru rt  M_JLX.J A o sb 2_st a c h y _ 1 8 m ar.run  A o s b 3 _ s t a c h y _ 1 8 m a r . ru n  A osb4_stachy_ 1 E  J j J Figure K-8. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Stachybotrys chartarum on untreated pine OSB at week 4. Top to bottom: specimens 1, 2, 3 and control. A splitless injection method was used. No growth was seen during the experiment, and no major changes in the V O C profile compared to control were observed. Labels: 1 = acetic acid; 2 = pentanal; 3 = hexanal.  152  C h r o m a to gram Plots Plot Plot Plot Plot  1: 2: 3: 4:  m Volts  u:\... u :\... u :\... u :\...  \1 2m a r03\pos \1 2m a r03\pos \1 2m ar03\pos \1 2 m arO 3\pos  b 1 _as per__1 2m ar.ru n b2_a s per_ 1 2m a r.ru n b3_a s per_ 1 2m a r.ru n b4_as per_ 1 2m a r.ru n  A A A A  A  A p o s b 1_aspei__ 1 2 m ar. r u n  150-  100-  5 0-  1.  0m Volts  L  .  .  .  B  1 11  Lli»jL1  A posb2_asper_ 1 2mar.run  150-  10 0 -  5 0 -  -1  0 -  -  - J A  l  .  i  I.  ±  IA  i  JILL }  m Volts  A posb3_asper_ 1 2mar.run c  15 0 -  10 0 -  3  50-  I*,. .  hhL*......  om Volts ;  D  A p o s b 4 _ a s p e r_ 1 2 m a r . r u n  150-  2  100-  50-  • 1 , ..1,  0—  i  4  .  JjJ  l b  I  \ IJLLL  : 4  J  tfe  F i g u r e K - 9 . G C - F E ) c h r o m a t o g r a m s o f the V O C p r o f i l e for  20  25  m i n u le s  Aspergillus versicolor o n untreated  p i n e O S B at w e e k 1. T o p to b o t t o m : specimens 1, 2 , 3, a n d c o n t r o l . V i s i b l e g r o w t h w a s seen o n s p e c i m e n 3, and n o t i c e a b l e changes i n the V O C p r o f i l e were also evident i n s p e c i m e n 3, m a i n l y as decreases i n aldehydes ( c h r o m a t o g r a m C ) . N o v i s i b l e g r o w t h w a s seen o n specimens 1 o r 2 at w e e k l ; c o r r e s p o n d i n g l y , the V O C p r o f i l e s for s p e c i m e n s 1 a n d 2 w e r e s i m i l a r to the c o n t r o l . L a b e l s : 1 = pentanal; 2 = h e x a n a l ; 3 = benzaldehyde; 4 = n o n a n a l .  153  C h ro m a to q ra m P l o t s Plot Plot Plot Plot  1: 2: 3: 4:  m V oils  u:\... \02apriI03\pos b 1 _as per_ 02a pr.run u:\..\02april03\posb2_asper_02apr.run u:\... \0 2 a p MIO 3\pos b3_a s p e r_ 0 2 a pr.ru n u :\... \02april03\pos b4_as per_ 02a pr.run  A A A A  L  A  15 0 -  10 0 -  5 0-  0m Volts  B 15 0 -  isb 1_asper_02apr.run  A pc sb2_asper_02apr.run  100-  *  5 0-  0— m Volls  c  A p osb 3 _ a s p e r_02 apr.ru n  15 0 -  100-  i  5 0-  j  . I  om Volts;  IK  hi  V  . I  '..Lfu_J  ,  , . . . | i \ ^ : .  ...  A po sb4_asper_02apr.run  D 1  150-  4  2 100-  ul  5 0-  o-  II  I — lj  ^jj  JLJI_  A *  ~  i b —  ..  is —  2  b  2  b minutes  Figure K-10. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Aspergillus versicolor on untreated pine OSB at week 4, top to bottom: specimens 1, 2, 3, and control. Decreases in some compounds (*) are now evident in specimens 1 and 2, as in specimen 3. Production of small amounts of new compounds was noted (eg. 2-hexanone eluting at the same time as hexanal; 2octanone appearing in specimen 1). Labels: 1 = acetic acid; 2 = pentanal; 3 = hexanal; 4 = benzaldehyde; 5 = nonanal; 6 = 2-octanone; 7 = 2-hexanone.  154  C h r o m a to g r a m  Plots  Plot 1. u:\... \03jul03\posb3_pen_03jul.run' A PI012: u:\... \03jul03\posb4_pen_03jul.run A  1  •  '  4  10 •  15  2b  25 ,  m i n u te s |  Figure K - l l . GC-FED chromatograms of the V O C profile for Penicillium brevicompactum on untreated pine OSB at week 4, specimen 3 (top) vs. control (bottom). Labels: 1 = acetone; 2 = 2butanone; 3 = 2-pentanone; 4 = methyl pyrrole; 5 = pyrrole;. 6 = 2-hexanone; 7 = acetic acid; 8 = pentanal; 9 = hexanal; 10 = benzaldehyde= 11= nonanal.  155  Chromatooram Plot Plot Plot Plot  1: 2: 3: 4:  Plots  u:V... \0 4feb0 3\a sp_o sb 1 _s ta c h y.ru n u:\..-\04feb03\asp_osb2_stachy.run u :\... \04feb03\asp_o sb3_s tachy.run u:\... \04feb03\asp_o sb 4_s ta c h y.ru n  A A A A  A  mVolls  A a s p _ o s b1  s t a c hy .ru n  100-  1  7 5-  \  5 0-  2 5-  A  0mVolls 10 0 -  2  I  AL  /  3  L  t i t .  UX^-JUJL.. ^ J L .  B  A a s p _ o s b 2 _ s t a c hy . r u n  75-  5 0-  2 5-  i  I  0m Volts  A a s p o s b 3 _ s t a c hy .ru n  c 10 0 -  7 5-  5 0-  2 5H  . «i  0-. mVolts:  I Jl  h  L  t »  L  ,  D  100-i  A a s p _ o s b 4 _ s l ac hy.ru n  1  75-i  2  /  \  3  5 0-  2 5  J  .. . L I AL  o-; ~  i  4  R .  u 10  15  2b  F i g u r e K - 1 2 . G C - F I D c h r o m a t o g r a m s o f the V O C p r o f i l e for Stachybotrys  2fe  m i n u te s  chartarum o n  untreated aspen O S B at w e e k 4. T o p to bottorn: specimens 1, 2 , 3 a n d c o n t r o l . N o g r o w t h w a s observed d u r i n g the e x p e r i m e n t ; c o r r e s p o n d i n g l y , no changes i n the V O C p r o f i l e c o m p a r e d to the c o n t r o l were seen. L a b e l s : 1 = acetic a c i d ; 2 = pentanal; 3 = h e x a n a l .  156  C h ro m a to g ra m P l o t s P l o M : u:\..\02april03\aosb1_asper_02apr.run A Plot 2: u \02a pri!03\aos b4_as per_ 02apr.run A A aosb 1_asper_02apr.run  II A a o s b 4_ a s p e r _ 0 2 a p r ,  JL IT  Figure K-13. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Aspergillus versicolor on untreated aspen OSB at week 4: specimen 1 (top) and control (bottom). Labels: 1 = Rt. 2.4; 2 = Rt. 12.9; 3 = styrene; 4 = methoxymethyl benzene; 5 = ethoxymethyl benzene; 6 = Rt. 23; 7 = acetic acid; 8 = pentanal; 9 = hexanal; 10 = heptanal; 11= benzaldehyde.  157  C h r o m a to g r a m  Plots  P lol 1: u:\...\07may0 3\aosb3_pen_07may03.run A Plot 2: u : \ . . \ 0 7 m a y 0 3\aosb4_pen_07may03.run A A a o s b 3 _ p e n _ 0 7 m ay 03 .nj n  'b  -ife  .  —  2 D  '  _  F i g u r e K - 1 4 . G C - F I D c h r o m a t o g r a m s o f the V O C profile for Penicillium  '  2fe  '  '  ' ' m i n u le s  brevicompactum o n  untreated aspen O S B at w e e k 4 : s p e c i m e n 3 (top) vs. c o n t r o l (bottom). L a b e l s : 1 = acetone; 2 = 2-butanone; 3 = 2-pentanone; 4 = m e t h y l p y r r o l e ; 5 = p y r r o l e ; 6 = R t . 12.9; 7 = styrene; 8 = acetic a c i d ; 9 = pentanal; 10 = h e x a n a l ; 11 = heptanal; 12 = b e n z a l d e h y d e .  158  C h r o m a to g r a m  Plots  P l o t l : u:\... M 8m a rO 3\c ell _s ta c h y__ 1 8m ar.run A Plot 2: u:\..\18mar03\cel4_stachy_18mar.run A A  ib  2b -  r  ~  ceM_slachy_1flmar.run  '  2b  '  ~~  m i n u le s  Figure K-15. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Stachybotrys chartarum on untreated cellulose insulation at week 4: specimen 1 (top) vs. control (bottom). A splitless injection method was used. Labels: 1 = isopropanol; 2 = acetone; 3 = dimethylcyclopentenone (tentative); 4 = anisole; 5 = Rt. 26.6; 6 = trichodiene; 7 = pentanal; 8 = hexanal; 9 = heptanal.  159  C h ro m a to q ra m P l o t s P lot 1 : u :\... \30s ep03\c eM _a s p_30s ep.run A Plot 2: u : \ . . \ 3 0 s e p 0 3 \ c e l 4 _ a s p _ 3 0 s e p . r u n A mVolts  ;  A c e 11 _ a s p_ 3 0 se p.run  A  200-  1  \  15 0 -  3 100-  4  2  /  5 0-  LAA_I\  0-  t •  1  » n  .  *—J\  ^^kJl^^  JL  m Volts  _ A ce I 4 _ as p_ 3 O s e p run  B  200-  150-  6  /  8 /  10 0 -  7  / 50-  9  /  .WJJUAJ  0-  1  *  ———  10  tfe  20  2fe  minutes  Figure K-16. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Aspergillus versicolor on untreated cellulose insulation at week 1: specimen 1 (top) vs. control (bottom). Labels: 1 = 2pentanone; 2 = 2-hexanone; 3 = 2-heptanone; 4 = 2-octanone; 5 = pentanal; 6 = hexanal; 7 = heptanal; 8 = benzaldehyde; 9 = octanal.  160  C h ro m a to g ra m P lo ts Plot 1: u:\... \21 oct03\cet1 _asp_2 1 oct.run A Plot 2: u:\... \2 1 oc 10 3\c el4_a s p_2 1 oc t.ru n A A c e l l _ a s p_2 1 o c t . r u n  200-1  5 0-  -  '  tb  ' ' ' ' ' '  ^  '  "  2b  '  '  '  ' '  '  2b ;  m i n u le s  Figure K-17. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Aspergillus versicolor on untreated cellulose insulation at week 4: specimen 1 (top) vs. control (bottom). The 2-ketones seen at week 1 have disappeared (*). Labels: 5 = pentanal; 6 = hexanal; 7 = heptanal; 8 = benzaldehyde; 9 = octanal.  161  C h ro m a to q ra m P l o t s Plot 1: u:\... \cell_p e n_ 2 2 a p rO 3\c e I3_pe n_22apr03.run A Plot 2: u:\..\cell_pen_22apr03\cel4_pen_22apr03.run A A c e I3__ p e n _ 2 2 a p r 0 3 . r u n  3  4  A  cel4_pen_22apr03.run  Ul Figure K-18. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile for Penicillium brevicompactum on untreated cellulose insulation at week 4: specimen 3 (top) vs. control (bottom). A splitless injection method was used. V O C production was limited. Labels: 1 = acetone; 2 = 2-butanone; 3 = 2-pentanone, 4 = dimethyl disulfide; 5 = pentanal; 6 = hexanal.  162  C h ro m a to g ra m P lo ts P P P P  lot lot lot lot  1 2 3 4  nVolls  u:\... u:\... u:\... u:\...  \10jun0 3\gyp0_stachy_10jun.run A \1 OjunO 3\g yp2_s ta c h y_ 1 Ojun.run A \1 Oju n 0 3\gyp4_s ta c hy_ 1 Oju n .ru n A \10jun0 3\gypOc__stachy_1Qjun.run A A g y p 0 _ s ta c h y _ 1 0 j u n . r u n  25 0 20015010 0 -  m Volts  A g y p 2 _ s t a c h y_ 1 0 j u n .r  25020 0 150-  m Volts  A g y p 4 _ s t a c h y_ l O j u n  25 0 -  n Volts  A gypOc_stachy_  1 Ojun .t  25020015 0 ' 100-  Figure K-19. GC-FID chromatbgrams of the V O C profile for Stachybotrys chartarum on gypsum board at week 4. Top to bottom: 0 lbs boric acid/MSF, 2 lbs boric acid/MSF, 4 lbs boric acid/MSF, control. At 2 lbs boric acid/MSF the production of new compounds is significantly reduced, and the production of trichodiene is undetectable. Labels: 1 = acetone; 2 = dimethylcyclopentenone; 3 = anisole; 4 =' limonene; 5 = Rt. 27.2; 6 = trichodiene; 7 = pentanal; 8 = hexanal; 9 = heptanal.  163  C h r o m a to g r a m Plotl: Plot 2: Plot 3: Plot 4: m Volts  Plots  u :\... \27 no vO 3\gyp 0_asp_ 27 nov. ru n A u:\... \27nov03\gyp 1 _a sp_ 2 7 n o v. ru n A u:\..\27nov03\gyp 257_asp_27nov.run A u :\... \gyps u m as p_oct03\2 7 n o v03\gy p_c_27 nov.run A  A  A g y p 0_ a s p _ 2 7 n o v . ru n  20 0 -  1  \  150-  2  10 0 -  50-  omVolls 200-  B  A  4  15 0 -  \  6  7  5  100-  gyp1_asp_27nov.fun  8 I  "  5 0-  0 mVolts  A g y p 2 5 7 _ a s p _ 2 7 no v .ru n  C  \  200-  4 1 so-  3  \  io o5 0-  m  0vans:  A g y p _ c _ 2 7 no v.ru n  D  20 0 -  4 15 0 -  I  10 0 -  50-  oJ 5 1  — — —  —  10 —•  .  15 —-  -.  2b „  25 minutes  Figure K-20. GC-FID chromatograms of the V O C profile fox Aspergillus versicolor on gypsum board at week 4. Top to bottom: 0 lbs boric acid/MSF, 1 lb boric acid/MSF, 2.57 lbs boric acid/MSF, control. Growth of A. versicolor did not occur at boric acid concentrations of 1 lb boric acid/MSF and above; correspondingly, no changes in the V O C profile compared to the control were seen. Labels: 1 = acetone; 2 = 2-butanone; 3 = pentanal; 4 = hexanal; 5 =• heptanal; 6 = benzaldehyde; 7 = octanal; 8 = nonanal.  164  C h ro m a to q ra m P l o t s Plot Plot Plot Plot  1: 2: 3: 4:  u:\... \23oc t03\g yp 0_pen_2 3oc t.run A u :\... \2 3oct0 3\g yp 2_pen_2 3oc t.run A u : \ . . \ 2 3oct0 3\gyp 2 57_pen_23oct.run A u :\... \23oc t03\g yp control_pen_23oc .ru n A  Figure K-21. GC-FED chromatograms of the V O C profile for Penicillium brevicompactum on gypsum board at week 4. Top to bottom: 0 lbs boric acid/MSF, 2 lbs boric acid/MSF, 2.57 lbs boric acid/MSF, control. At 2 lbs boric acid/MSF, aldehydes (*) have disappeared but production of new compounds is negligible. Growth was not observed at boric acid concentrations of 2.57 lbs boric acid/MSF and above; correspondingly, there were no changes in the V O C profile compared to the control. Labels: 1= acetone; 2 = 2-butanone; 3 = 2-pentanone; 4 = dimethyl disulfide; 5 = pentanal; 6 = hexanal; 7 = heptanal; 8 = benzaldehyde; 9 = octanal; 10 = nonanal.  165  

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.831.1-0091964/manifest

Comment

Related Items