UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

New residential wood building systems in Switzerland and their potential to meet the local requirements… Ehrbar, Doris 2005

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata


831-ubc_2005-0034.pdf [ 32.45MB ]
JSON: 831-1.0091816.json
JSON-LD: 831-1.0091816-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0091816-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 831-1.0091816-rdf.json
Turtle: 831-1.0091816-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 831-1.0091816-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 831-1.0091816-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

NEW RESIDENTIAL WOOD BUILDING SYSTEMS IN SWITZERLAND AND THEIR POTENTIAL TO M E E T THE L O C A L R E Q U I R E M E N T S O F PLACE, PEOPLE AND PRODUCT WITHOUT COMPROMISING THE GLOBAL CONTEXT  by  DORIS E H R B A R Dipl. Arch. E T H , Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, 1992  A T H E S I S S U B M I T T E D IN PARTIAL F U L F I L M E N T O F THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF  M A S T E R O F A D V A N C E D S T U D I E S IN A R C H I T E C T U R E in THE FACULTY OF G R A D U A T E S STUDIES (School of Architecture)  T H E UNIVERSITY O F BRITISH C O L U M B I A (UBC) January 2005  © Doris Ehrbar, 2005  ABSTRACT  >>  After a long dominance of brick masonry and concrete, wood, a traditional local building material, has had a remarkable revival in the single-family house market in Switzerland since the mid 1980s. Among the vast variety of new wood building systems, Swiss wood frames (SWF) and Ribbed panel system (RPS) are considered the most promising ones. Despite different construction principles both systems assist in achieving highly thermal-efficient buildings, and both are built in the factory. The panellised wall, floor and roof elements are assembled on-site in only one or two days. In this thesis, I hypothesise that the success of a new wood building system depends on its ability to meet the local requirements of place, people and product ( P - P - P concept) without compromising the global context). By conforming to the P - P - P concept, the success of the new wood building systems not only acquires a strong market share, but also conforms to the requirements of a more sustainable local building development. The investigation of the local building context reveals the characteristics of 'Swissness', the basis for the investigation of S W F and R P S . The characteristics of, and differences between, the two wood building systems are discussed according to their production and construction principles, where good thermal efficiency, vapour and air movement, differential movement, thermal and structural redundancy, maintenance work, indoor environment quality and sound protection are important characteristics of the wood building systems that allow them to achieve efficiently constructed, long-lasting and healthy housing. In this thesis, I show that the two wood building systems, S W F and R P S , provide powerful strategies to achieve a more sustainable local building development. However, besides the strong marketing of the Minergie label that limits the use of non-renewable operational energy, political and institutional support as well as technical innovation, construction quality, design, comfort and financial benefits have also been necessary to turn the strategies into accepted buildings with the prospect of high asset values. Combining a broad range of requirements of place, people and product as well as key global needs, S W F and R P S are promising systems for a new and successful local building culture in Switzerland.  TABLE OF CONTENTS  ABSTRACT  ii  TABLE OF CONTENTS  iii  LIST O F T A B L E S  v  LIST O F F I G U R E S  vi  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  ix  1.  INTRODUCTION  1  1.1  Thesis Interest  3  1.2  Methodology  3  1.3  Aim of the Thesis  6  2.  BUILDING CONTEXT IN SWITZERLAND  9  2.1  Place  9  2.2  People  29  2.3  Product  52  2.4  Global Factors  76  2.5  Summary  82  3.  THE SWISS WOOD FRAME AND RIBBED PANEL SYSTEM  85  3.1  Swiss Wood Frame  85  3.2  Ribbed Panel System  98  3.3  Summary  110  4.  CRITICAL ANALYSIS  112  4.1  Thermal efficiency  114  4.2  Vapour and air movement  117  iii  4.3  Differential movement  123  4.4  Thermal redundancy  126  4.5  Structural redundancy  130  4.6  Maintainability  133  4.7  Indoor environmental quality  135  4.8  Noise protection  137  4.9  Summary  140  5.  CONCLUSION  142  APPENDICES  146  BIBLIOGRAPHY  153  iv  LIST OF TABLES  Table 2.1  Statistical data Canton of Zurich and Switzerland  11  Table 2.2  Climate data of different Swiss Cities, 1961 -1990  12  Table 2.3  Tree species in Swiss forests  15  Table 2.4  Annual consumption of building materials  18  Table 2.5  Import and export of wood in 2002  20  Table 2.6  G D P 2000 of selected O E C D countries  23  Table 2.7  Foreign trade by product groups  24  Table 2.8  Construction expenditures between 1980 and 2000  26  Table 2.9  Thermal insulation regulation of the canton of Zurich  38  Table 2.10  Education of the 20-year olds  41  Table 2.11  Workforce in percent of the respective population  41  Table 2.12  Prices and earnings of selected cities in 2000  42  Table 2.13  Income and expenditure structure of private households in 2000  45  Table 2.14  Expenditures for specific products in relation to the average of the 15 E U countries  45  Table 2.15  Major structural boards used for wood panel systems  64  Table 2.16  Major wood module systems for load-bearing walls  67  Table 2.17  Goals and achievements of Energy 2000  78  Table 2.18  Standards generated during the Energy 2000 program  78  Table 2.19  Key characteristics of the Swiss building context  82  Table 3.1  Summary of the characteristics of S W F and R P S  111  Table4.1  Criteria for the analysis of S W F and R P S  113  Table 4.2  Thermal efficiency of S W F and R P S  117  Table 4.3  Thermal irregularities and thermal bridges of S W F  126  Table 4.4  Load-bearing capacity of S W F and R P S  133  Table 4.5  Sound insulation requirements for living spaces according to SIA 181  138  Table 4.6  Sound level difference and impact sound level of S W F and R P S  139  Table 4.7  Summary of characteristics of S W F and R P S  141  v  LIST OF FIGURES  Figure 1.1  The P - P - P concept  4  Figure 1.2  Major local and global factors determining a contemporary building type  5  Figure 2.1  Countries of central Europe  9  Figure 2.2  Geographical regions in Switzerland  9  Figure 2.3  Location of the canton Zurich  11  Figure 2.4  Climate data from Zurich S M A , Toronto and Vancouver Int. Airport  13  Figure 2.5  Landscape textures in Switzerland  14  Figure 2.6  Forest ownership in Switzerland  15  Figure 2.7  Domestic electricity production in 2000  19  Figure 2.8  Energy consumption by sources of energy since 1910  21  Figure 2.9  Energy consumption of private households in 1980 and 2000  22  Figure 2.10  Development and importance of wood as a work and building material in Switzerland  27  Figure 2.11  Current wood consumption and annual unused potential  27  Figure 2.12  Language boundaries in Switzerland  29  Figure 2.13  Structures of private households  43  Figure 2.14  Age of residential buildings in Switzerland  47  Figure 2.15  Inhabitant type in Switzerland and owner-occupancy in Europe  47  Figure 2.16  Number of new dwellings in Single-family and multiple-residential buildings  48  Figure 2.17  Price development of residential land costs in the canton of Zurich  50  Figure 2.18  Initial costs for an average detached single-family house in the canton of Zurich  50  Figure 2.19  Map of regional-traditional storage buildings in Switzerland  52  Figure 2.20  Traditional residential building types  53  Figure 2.21  Contemporary non-residential architecture  55  Figure 2.22  Architect-designed new residential architecture in wood  56  Figure 2.23  Extent of wood buildings in Europe  57  Figure 2.24  Traditional log construction  59  Figure 2.25  Primary timber-frame construction  61  vi  Figure 2.26  Half-timbered house in Pembridge, UK  61  Figure 2.27  Half-timbered house in Wigoltingen  62  Figure 2.28  Common bracing patterns in C H  62  Figure 2.29  Timber frame principle  62  Figure 2.30  On-site timber frame construction with pre-cut members  62  Figure 2.31  Homogen 80  65  Figure 2.32  Ribbed panel system  66  Figure 2.33  Steko system  68  Figure 2.34  Lignotrend system  69  Figure 2.35  Ysox system  70  Figure 2.36  Lignatur system  70  Figure 2.37  W E - K A system  71  Figure 2.38  Briiggo Holes  72  Figure 2.39  Energy consumption of houses in Switzerland  75  Figure 2.40  Linking the global to the local activities and responsibilities  77  Figure 2.41  Chart of basic factors of sustainability  79  Figure 3.1  S W F houses built by the Renggli A G  86  Figure 3.2  Horizontal and vertical section of the three thermal insulation standards of the S W F  88  Figure 3.3  Enclosure section and floor construction of the S W F at the Minergie standard  89  Figure 3.4  Scheme of the structural wall and floor frame of S W F  90  Figure 3.5  Vertical and horizontal element joint of S W F  92  Figure 3.6  Layering of enclosure and floor elements at the enclosure-floor joint  93  Figure 3.7  Factory production of S W F enclosure elements  95  Figure 3.8  On-site preparation works of a S W F house  96  Figure 3.9  On-site assembly and exterior finishing works of a S W F house  97  Figure 3.10  New Ribbed Panel System (RPS) houses  98  Figure 3.11  Block boards and block board products  99  Figure 3.12  House Bearth-Candinas, Sumvitg, Pilot Project 1996-98, designed by Deplazes  100  Figure 3.13  Selection of three different enclosure elements and vertical joint section of R P S  101  vi  Figure 3.14  Selection of four different floor and two roof elements of R P S  102  Figure 3.15  Vertical and horizontal enclosure sections, and rib extender  103  Figure 3.16  Scheme of the structural wall frame of R P S  104  Figure 3.17  Vertical and horizontal element joint of R P S  105  Figure 3.18  Layering of enclosure and floor elements of R P S at the enclosure-floor joint  106  Figure 3.19  Production and transport of a R P S house  109  Figure 3.20  On-site assembly of a R P S house  109  Figure 4.1  Thermal efficiency of S W F  115  Figure 4.2  Thermal efficiency of R P S  116  Figure 4.3  Control of vapour and air movement in S W F  120  Figure 4.4  Control of vapour and air tightness in R P S  122  Figure 4.5  Differential movement within the enclosure core of S W F and R P S  125  Figure 4.6  Suggested insulation standards of S W F  127  Figure 4.7  Possible insulation upgrades of S W F  128  Figure 4.8  Thermal insulation standards of R P S  129  Figure 4.9  Possible insulation upgrades of R P S  129  viii  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  A long journey with many ups and downs has finally come to an end. I am thankful to all being at my side throughout the last years. Your support and your encouragement were of great importance for the outcome of my thesis. I would like to thank Linda Brock, School of Architecture, U B C , for supporting me throughout the entire time as a M A S A student. Linda, thank you for your interest in my thesis topic and the many critical reviews and comments as well as the long, interesting and inspiring discussions we had during the time I was in Vancouver. I am grateful you were my thesis advisor. In addition, I would like to thank Dave Cohen, Wood Science Department, U B C , for your commitment in my committee, the interesting discussions and straightforward inputs during our meetings. Many thanks also go to Inge Roecker, School of Architecture, U B C , for reviewing my theses. Also many thanks to Ray Cole and Steve Taylor, School of Architecture, U B C , as well as Dalibor Houdek, Forintek Canada in Vancouver for the fruitful discussions during the initial stages of my thesis. Thanks to Walter Schoeb, Schoeb A G , G a m s , and Max Renggli, Renggli A G , Schotz, for the personal interview and the visitation of theirs firms. Also many thanks to Pius Schuler, Pius Schuler A G , Rothenthurm, for the interesting discussion at the housing exhibition in Bern and Uwe Germerott, University for Architecture, Building and W o o d , H S B , Biel, for the interesting interview. Your professional experience and know-how were of great importance to this thesis. Many thank also to my friends and colleagues in Vancouver, especially my M A S A co-students Adele Weder, Debra Barnes, Michelle Mathews, Esteban (Jaime) Undurraga, David Rossing and Tadakazu Urano, for the great time Marco and I had together with you. Jaime and Kazu I missed the many interesting and fruitful discussions on methodological, architectural and philosophical topics after my return to Switzerland. A particular thank goes to Lesley Weston for proofreading my thesis. Lesley, thank you so much for the interest in my thesis and the great job you did, even more, as this topic was not familiar to you! Many thanks also go to my friends and colleagues here in Switzerland for supporting me and my long-during 'Canadian Dream' and for encouraging me to keep on going. A particular thank goes to  ix  Christian Diirrenberger for the intense discussions on wood constructions and the critical review of my preliminary draft. Christian, your comments and inputs became of great value to the final result. Many thanks also go to Andrea Eichelmann for a first linguistic review of my thesis. Finally, I wish to thank mine and Marco's family for supporting me during the last three years. A very special thank goes to you, Marco, for your love, your patience and your endless support, as well as the many hours you spent reading my thesis sequences and discussing the various topics and ideas. I am thankful you didn't stop encouraging me in finishing this thesis; your personal and professional help was important for me to find my way.  x  INTRODUCTION  1.  After the long-time dominance of brick masonry and concrete in the Swiss housing industry, wood - an almost-forgotten building material - has had a remarkable revival in the building market since the mid 1980s. Within little more than a decade, the market share of single-family houses in wood has risen from about 2% to 10 - 12% (Germerott, 2002). Considering the fact that the total number of new single-family houses rose from 11,200 units in 1990 to 13,770 units in 2000, the number of new single-family houses in wood actually increased by a factor of 6 - 7, or from about 224 units (1990) to about 1,337 - 1,650 units (2001), a year. In comparison, during the same period of time the total number of new dwellings decreased from 39,980 to 32,210 units (SFSO, 2002:421). This is despite the fact that land is scarce and building is very expensive. Whereas the market share of single-family houses in wood has considerably increased, multifamily residential buildings in wood are rarely built in Switzerland. There are still strict fire regulations applied to residential buildings with three or more storeys . In these buildings all structural parts must 1  provide a minimal fire resistance of 60 minutes and the use of combustible materials is not allowed (Lignum, 1998). These restrictions, rather than construction problems, may have kept the number of multiresidential buildings in wood negligible. However, this fact could change at the beginning of 2005, when new fire regulations will be put in place. The fast-growing share of wooden single-family houses has coincided with the development of a great variety of new wood building systems relying on wood modules (manufactured elements) as well as on prefabricated (factory-built) wall, floor and roof elements (panellised components) or modular building components. Most of these new systems also comply with the advanced Swiss building standard for a minimized consumption of non-renewable operational energies, the Minergie standard, or they achieve the Passive House standard defined by the Passive House Institute, Darmstadt (PHI). In keeping with the 2  Exceptions to this regulation are made only in regions where multiple storey buildings in wood have traditionally existed, such as in the Valais. In Switzerland, the Minergie-P standard was launched in 2003 in addition to the Passive House standard. The new label basically adapts the European standard to the local settings and combines them with the requirement structure of the Minergie label. 2  1  current building-code requirements in Switzerland, Minergie and Passive houses achieve a reduction of the annual operational energy of about 50 % and 90 %, respectively (Architos, 2000). The use of wood as a construction material, prefabrication as a production mode and operational energy efficiency as a characteristic of the modern house appears to satisfy the requirements and expectations of an increasing number of single-family house owners. A closer look at the building systems reveals that the two systems, Swiss wood frame (SWF) and Ribbed panel system (RPS), might be of particular interest to the residential wood building market. The S W F currently dominates the Swiss wood building market for single-family houses at about 3 0 % (Germerott, 2002). This new system relies on the principles of the Canadian western platform frame. House-long and story-high or storey-wide wall, roof or floor elements finished to a high degree are produced in a factory. Relatively thin structural members (studs and plates) form the structural core of multi-layered wall elements; a sheathing applied on the interior side of the structure provides the frame rigidity. Hollow-core floor or roof modules often replace the joist or rafter construction of the original system. Notably, each carpentry firm has its own unique wood-frame system, varying in the material choice, the sequence and dimension of layers, the size of the structural members or the construction of the element joints. Besides its current success in the residential building market, it is highly-regarded for its flexibility, its constructive performance and its cost efficiency (Schoeb, 2002, and Renggli, 2002). In contrast, R P S is a very new wood building system. Again, house-long and story-high or storeywide wall, roof or floor elements finished to a high degree are produced in a factory; however gluelaminated block boards provide the wall, floor and roof elements with structural and lateral stability. Characteristic of the system is the rib construction of enclosure elements. A set of parallel ribs glued against the thin structural board provides it with additional support and prevent it from bending. Custom production allows matching the factory-produced block boards structurally and aesthetically to the specific requirements of a building. According to Deplazes, this factory-built system will become successful in Switzerland due to a simplified design and an easy construction (Deplazes, 2001). Germerott and Schuler share this opinion (Germerott, 2002, and Schuler, 2003).  2  1.1  T h e s i s interest  It is as yet undecided whether S W F and / or R P S will be successful over time. But the varied statements of different building professionals raise many questions: What does success mean? Will constructive advantages be enough to succeed in the local building market over time? Will the new building systems provide durable and long-lasting buildings? Will these new and operational energy-efficient houses in wood convince a growing number of clients? Are factory-produced houses accepted by the local population? These questions indicate that the success of a building system will be a question of more than market share or construction advantages. In fact, the context of a specific place as well as the requirements and expectations of its people provide important clues as to how products are valued. Even more importantly, environmental problems will more and more change the mindset of future clients and influence the requirements and expectations of the local building market. Therefore, in this thesis I am interested in how these promising new wood building systems, S W F and R P S , match the requirements and expectations of the local building market by asking:  How do the well-tried Swiss Wood Frame (SWF) and the newly-developed System (RPS) fulfil the requirements and expectations in  Ribbed Panel  of the residential building market  Switzerland?  1.2  Methodology  1.2.1  Approach  Today, new residential wood building systems will be successful only if they support attempts to achieve more sustainable local building development and if they rely on a strong long-term market. A s such, the new systems need to conform to local as well as to global requirements. Also, they need to be accepted and supported by the local population. This approach relies on the following definitions and the P - P - P concept.  3  Definitions The Brundtlandt-Commission defines sustainable  development  as a process that meets the requirements  of present generations without jeopardising the chances of future generations (Gotsch, 1999). Therefore, a sustainable development must be economically, ecologically and socio-culturally feasible. Building development  describes the production mode of a building type as well as the building  type itself, while building type describes what a building is built for (use, function), how it is built (building system) and how it looks (design, architecture). Kramel describes a local (traditional) building type as the result of local materials and means grown over generations. Popularity and cultural identity of a [wood] building type is necessary to achieve a [wood] building culture (Kramel, 1998: 18-20).  The P-P-P concept The locally-bound definition as it is postulated by Kramel is no longer applicable to contemporary building types. Today, the coexistence of both local and global factors is a major criterion for the successful development of sustainable housing. The P-P-P concept (Fig. 1.1) states:  A contemporary PRODUCT  building type is defined by the synthesis of present PLACE,  without compromising  Fig. 1.1  PEOPLE  and  the global context.  The P-P-P concept  4  A s such, a contemporary building type that relies on local and global factors best provides the base for sustainable housing. However, popularity and cultural identity of a contemporary building type is necessary to achieve a strong long-term market and a new wood building culture.  Contemporary building type  Global Factors  Local Factors  Place  People  Product  Sustainable development  Geography Climate Natural resources Economy Technology Tools Building Industry  Culture Politics Laws Demography Social life & lifestyle Housing costs  Function Form / Design System - Construction - Production Building standard Building quality  Resources Ecosystem Health & comfort Longevity Quality Life-cycle costs Added value  Others  Others  Others  Others  1 Fig. 1.2  I  Major local and global factors determining a contemporary building type  Figure 1.2 lists basic local and global factors that determine a contemporary building type. The synthesis of these factors forms the glocal (global and local) requirements and expectations of a specific building market. A s the meaning behind the single factors as well as the weight awarded to them change from one location to another, the glocal factors will not be the same in different locations. A s a consequence, a contemporary building type as well as a sustainable local building culture will be defined differently in different locations of the world. Contemporary building types are not only place dependant; they also change over time. This is a result of changing local factors (e.g. technological development or policy) and global factors (e.g. new findings in environmental research) as well as of the weight assigned to the single factors at a given time. It is assumed that the need for more sustainable development will increasingly influence the building market over the coming years and decades. Therefore, a sustainable local building culture must not only rely on local or on global factors, but on glocal ones.  5  1.3  Aim of the Thesis  1.3.1  Thesis scope  The scope of this thesis is meant to go beyond general construction characteristics, such as flexibility, simplified design or easy construction, that are used to promote one or other system. Evaluation of the building context as well as the S W F and the R P S is necessary to evaluate how the two systems meet the requirements and expectations of the local building market. A s well, this discussion allows an evaluation of the potential success of these new wood building systems and gives an insight into the "Swissness" of the systems. Moreover, this thesis may potentially identify factors or strategies that are necessary for a new or a foreign building system to adapt successfully to the (residential) building market in any country.  1.3.2  Thesis limitations Residential  buildings  In this thesis I have limited my investigations to residential buildings or houses. It does not focus on a specific group of residential buildings (e.g. multi-family residential houses, single-family houses or owneroccupied houses) even though the remarkable revival of wood is primarily in the construction of singlefamily houses, and detached single-family houses are preferred by new homeowners. The adoption of the new fire regulations at the beginning of 2005 will potentially increase the use of wood for multiple-storey buildings. Also, an upcoming limitation of urban growth might enforce the construction of denser housing systems. Governmental institutions are already discussing steps to stabilise the size of the urban space at a benchmark of 400 m / capita; presently it has already reached 407 m / capita ( A R E , 2002: 24). 2  2  Form and design of the house In this thesis I do not discuss the form and design of the house. This does not mean that the form and design of a building are not important in order for people to accept it, that the design of the house will be the same when using the different wood building systems or that any design may be applied to a specific building system. But it has been shown that the described building systems allow the building of houses that meet people's expectations in terms of architectural expression, form and floor plan.  6  Building  system  In this thesis I limit the discussion to the building system, particularly to a regular enclosure section as well as to a vertical section of an enclosure-floor joint. Providing the interface between inhabitants and nature, the enclosure has to withstand wear and tear over time. In addition, joints are the critical part of factorybuilt systems. A s such, the regular enclosure section and the enclosure-floor joint represent typical sections for the investigation of the constructive characteristics of building systems in terms of their local and global requirements and expectations.  New wood building  systems  This thesis limits the discussion of the available wood building systems to S W F and R P S . This does not mean that none of the other systems has a chance to succeed in the local building market. But S W F is currently the leading wood building system for single-family houses and the system is strongly supported by carpenters; R P S is a very young building system whose value is strongly supported by engineers and architects. Furthermore, both systems rely on factory-built large wall, floor and roof elements that provide high construction quality and precision, as well as fast assembly on site. In addition, they are designed to achieve highly thermal-insulated enclosures with large heating-energy savings. As well, in this thesis I assume that this production mode (factory production of panellised and individually-designed houses) is accepted by clients, as these houses achieve high-quality standards and showcase a new and fascinating way to build. Despite many similarities, the two wood building systems are very different in the way the buildings are constructed.  Global context Over the last few years, the achievement of a more sustainable development relying on ecological, economic and socio-cultural factors has become one of the most urgent global problems of industrialised countries. In this thesis I limit the discussion of the global context to some key factors of sustainability that stand in close relationship with the new wood building systems, such as fossil-fuel consumption, C 0  2  emission, longevity or health and comfort.  7  1.3.3  Thesis structure  Chapter 1 introduces the objective, the methodology and the structure of the thesis. Chapter 2 investigates the building context in Switzerland, structured into the local factors of place, people and product as well as the global context focusing on sustainable development. This chapter provides an insight into the "Swissness" of the discussion and summarises the findings. Chapter 3 discusses the production and construction principles of Swiss Wood Frame and Ribbed Panel System. It characterises principles, similarities and differences of the two systems. Chapter 4 analyses the two wood building systems on their ability to achieve thermal-efficient, long-lasting and healthy houses and discusses the findings. Chapter 5 summarises the findings of this thesis and gives an outlook on further work and potential implications of the study.  8  2.  BUILDING CONTEXT IN SWITZERLAND  Local and global factors determine a contemporary local building type as discussed in Chapter 1.2, whereby place, people and product as well as global factors provide the basis of the P - P - P concept. In this chapter, I give the Swiss-related background information for the major aspects of each factor.  2.1  Place  The place is seen a s the framework of a location in which people live and work. Geography, climate, natural resources and land use as well as energy consumption, economy, technology and tools are placerelated key aspects for contemporary residential buildings in wood.  2.1.1  Geography Location and size  Fig. 2.1  Countries of central Europe (Alpentouren, 2002)  Fig. 2.2  Geographical regions in Switzerland (Source: Adapted from SFSO, 2001:2)  Switzerland (CH) is a small, landlocked and mountainous country in the centre of Western Europe located at latitudes between 45.5° and 47.5° North. Its area covers 41,285 k m with maximal extents of 2  9  220 km in the North-South and 348 km in the East-West directions . Switzerland is surrounded by 1  Germany (G), France (F), Italy (I), Liechtenstein (L) and Austria (A) (Fig. 2.1).  Geographical regions Switzerland may be divided into three geological regions; 6 3 % of the country belongs to the Alps, 2 7 % to the Central Pfain and 10% to the Jura (Fig. 2.2). All these regions show a great variety of different landscapes and habitats, varying with climate, topography and / or soil composition.  The Alps The Alps, a large mountain chain, cross Austria, northern Italy, Switzerland and France in a NortheastSouthwest direction (Fig.2.1). They form a continental watershed as well as a major dividing line between cultural areas, climates and vegetation types. For hundreds of years major transit routes through the Swiss Alps have connected northern Europe with the Mediterranean. Mountains, ice and rocks dominate the central part of the Alps (altitudes over 2,500 m / 8,202 ft). The highest point in Switzerland is the Dufour Peak with 4,634 m (15,203 ft). Climate and topography strongly restrict population and land use in the central Alps; only 1 1 % of the population live in these areas. However, the Rhone and Rhine valleys, with their arable land and mild climate, are densely populated and intensely used for agriculture (grains, vegetables, fruits and grapes). Tourism (sport, health and recreational activities) is important for many remote municipalities of the central Alps. Alpine meadows (about 1,800 m to 2,500 m) and coniferous forests (up to about 1,800 m) as well as scattered settlements prevail on the lower levels of the Northern part of the Alps (Bar, 1989: 49). But harvesting the forests in these areas are often very difficult due to the impassable terrain and the remoteness of the sites. The Southern part of the Alps is strongly affected by the Mediterranean climate. Deciduous  forests  (e.g. chestnut),  rich agriculture  (grains,  vegetables, fruits and  grapes)  and  Mediterranean vegetation dominate this area.  In comparison, Vancouver Island has more than three-fourth of the size of Switzerland. It covers 32,134 km with maximal extents of 100 km in the East-West and 454 km in the North-South directions. 1  2  10  The Central  Plain  The Central Plain with an average altitude of 580 m (1,903 ft.) above s e a level is built up of layers of rock and covered with moraines of the Alpine glaciers. The undulating landscape of the Central Plain is characterised by rolling hills, plateaus and numerous lakes. The relatively small strip of land (50 to 100 km, Fig. 2.2) between Lake Geneva and Lake Constance is predestined for conflicts in land use. The fairly flat and arable land is suitable for agriculture, but in addition it is the main source of gravel for the building industry, and it also contains most of the big cities and the majority of workplaces; two thirds of the 7.3 million inhabitants live and work in the Central Plain. With about 450 people / k m (1,165 people / sq mile), it is one of the most densely-populated areas 2  in Europe ( P R S , 1999: Landscape and habitat). The canton of Zurich - with 666 inhabitants per k m - is the most densely-populated area in the 2  central plain. The city of Zurich with about 364,000 inhabitants and a size of 92 k m  2  is Switzerland's  largest city as well as its economic centre (SOZ, 2002). Here, sustainable building development is most urgently needed. Table 2.1 provides selected data from the canton of Zurich and from Switzerland. Figure 2.3 shows the geographical location of the canton of Zurich.  Statistical figures Size % of country urban area (1997) agricultural area (1997)  Canton Zurich  Switzerland (CH)  1,792 km2 4.34% 20.1% 43.4%  41,284 km2 100% 6.7% 37.3%  Building zones (1999) unused building zones  282.55 km2 16.80%  Population (end of 1999) % of population Population density  1,193,789 16.66% 666 pers/km2  7,164,444 100% 174 pers/km2  Dwellings (end of 1999) % of dwellings in CH in single-family houses empty dwellings  588,145 16.42% 17.30% 0.97%  3,582,171 100%  Number of new dwellings % of new dwellings  6,520 19.69%  33,108 100%  6,247 kWh 212 kg/a 340 l/d 577,236 16.65%  7,148 kWh  Electricity use / inhabitant Household waste / inhabitant Average water use / inhabitant Number of cars % of cars Tab. 2.1  1.66%  363 kg/a 409 l/d 3,467,275 100%  Statistical data Canton of Zurich and Switzerland  Fig. 2.3 Location of the canton Zurich  (Source: SOZ, 2002: Canton Zurich in numbers: 2002; building and land costs in 2001).  11  The Jura The Jura mountains consist of regular and parallel undulations built up by limestone folds and fairly flat plateaus. With an average altitude of about 700 m (2297 ft.) above s e a level the mountain chain terminates the Central Plain towards the Northwest and West. Scattered settlements, meadows for livestock farming and coniferous forests dominate the Jura landscape ( P R S , 1999: Landscape and habitat; Kummerle+Frey, 2001:2-5). The Jura provides an important source of stone, limestone, chalk and clay. The large supply of chalk, a base material of cement, and clay, the base material of brick, has been very important for the widespread development of local concrete and brick masonry buildings.  Climate  Switzerland has a temperate climate with four seasons: spring, summer, autumn and winter. The winters are cold and cloudy with rain and snow. The summers are cool to warm and humid to cloudy with occasional showers. However, considerable differences in local and regional microclimates exist due to the influence of four different air currents (Atlantic, Continental, Sub-polar and Mediterranean) and geographical characteristics of the location (elevation, exposure to sun or wind, or geographical location). Table 2.2 gives an idea of climate differences among major Swiss cities.  Area City  Elevation [m] o.s.l.  Mean temperatures High [°C] Low [°C]  Precipitation [mm]  Sunshine [h]  Jura La Chaux-de-Fonds  1,018  10.6  1.2  1,406  1,715  316 779 556 565 420  14.1 11.1 12.7 12.9 14.4  5.6 4.1 4.9 4.2 5.5  778 1,248 1,086 1,028 822  1,599 1,390 1,482 1,638 1,694  1,590 1,705 482 273  7.9 8.2 15.1 15.7  -1.7 -6.5 4.3 8.2  1,082 700 598 1,545  1,680 1,732 1,990 2,026  Central Plain Basel San Gall Zurich Bern Geneva Alps Davos (central part) Samedan (central part) Sion (Rhone valley) Lugano (southern part) Tab. 2.2  Climate data of different Swiss Cities, 1961-1990 (MeteoSchweiz,  2003: actual  climate).  12  As a reference to Canada, Figure 2.4 compares the mean temperature and mean precipitation data from Zurich (SMA), Vancouver (International airport) and Toronto. In all three cities the mean temperature gradients achieve the lowest level in winter and the highest in summer. While the seasonal temperature differences in Zurich are more distinct than those of Vancouver, they are less extreme than those in Toronto (Fig.2.4a). Major differences exist in the precipitation patterns. Toronto has an equallydistributed precipitation pattern throughout the year while Zurich shows a considerable peak in summer and Vancouver in winter (Fig.2.4a). Over all, precipitation in Zurich (1,136 mm) and Vancouver (1,167 mm) are much higher than in Toronto (819 mm).  °C 10  Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  • Zurich mean max Zurich mean min -Zurich mean  Jun  Jul  Aug  • Toronto mean max Toronto mean min -Toronto mean  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec  Jan  Vancouver mean max _ Vancouver mean min - - - -Vancouver mean  a) Mean temperatures  200  150 100  Jan  Feb Zurich  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Toronto  Aug  Sep  Oct —  Nov  Dec  Jan  Vancouver  b) Mean precipitation Fig. 2.4  Climate data from Zurich SMA, Toronto and Vancouver Int. Airport (Source: MeteoSchweiz, 2003, and Environment Canada, 2003) 13  Land use  Switzerland consists of 30.8% forested area, 36.9% agricultural area, 6.8% settlement and urban areas and 25.5% unproductive area. Figure 2.5 shows examples of the landscape texture of each area.  Fig. 2.5  Landscape textures in Switzerland: forest area, agricultural land, urban area, and unproductive area (Alps) (Source: SFSO, 2001; RPS, 1999; and photos by author)  Forest area The depletion of the forests for firewood, construction and industry resulted in repeated natural disasters with enormous damage throughout the 19  ,h  century. As a consequence, in 1876 Switzerland limited  logging by law and ordered a large-scale reforestation of mountain areas to protect the country against natural disasters. Over the last century, the forested areas have recovered to an area of 12,716 km or 2  30.8% (1992) of the country. 86.7% of the forested area consists of forests (without brush forests), 4.5% of brush forests and another 8.6% of other woods. However, at the beginning of the 1980s a widespread die-off of the local forests was observed. Investigations revealed that it was caused partly by the increasing air pollution, and partly by over-aged trees due to low logging rates. This worrying fact led to a  14  first political campaign against air pollution in 1984 as well as to a growing environmental consciousness in the population in the second part of the 1980s. In 1991, a new forest law (see chapter 2.2.3: forest laws) was decreed. Over the last twenty years, the forest composition has remained fairly constant at 26% deciduous to 74% coniferous trees (SFSO online, 2002: Agriculture and Forestry). More than 50% of the forests grow at an altitude of over 1,000 m (SFSO, 2001:20-24). The most frequent tree species in the Swiss forests are Norway spruce, silver fir and beech (Tab. 2.3). Satellite data from 1990 indicated that 43.7% of the forests consisted of conifers, 22.8% mixed conifers, 18% mixed deciduous and 15.5% deciduous forests. However, native deciduous forests tend to replace the (cultivated) conifers in the Central Plain.  Coniferous trees  No. of stems %  Growing stock %  Norway spruce Silver fir  40  49  12  15  Pine  4  4  Larch  4  5  Swiss stone pine  1  1  Other conifers  0.4  Total conifers (12 species)  61  0.3 74  Deciduous trees  No. of stems %  Growing stock %  Beech  19  16  Maple  4  2  Ash  4  2  Oak  2  2  Sweet chestnut  2  Other broad-leaved trees  8  Total broad-leaved trees (over 40 species) Tab. 2.3  1  1  3  39  26  Tree species in Swiss forests (SFSO online, 2002: agriculture and forestry)  Forest ownership and size Privately owned forests  27%  belong to 2,500 owners average area is 1.3 ha 0.7% 4.5%  • Municipalities • Federation Fig. 2.6  • Privat owners • Cantons  Public forest  73%  are harvested by 3,500 enterprises 1/4 harvests areas > 200 ha 3/4 harvests areas < 200 ha Total: 250,000 forest owners  Forest ownership in Switzerland (SFSO, 2002:342; Holzindustrie Schweiz, 2002)  15  Characteristic of the Swiss forests are small-scale forest stands that belong to a large and diverse ownership (Fig. 2.6). The high numbers of forest-owners and mixed or fragmented forest stands as well as high elevations makes efficient and economic forest harvesting very difficult.  Agricultural  area  Since 1985, Switzerland has been losing about 11 ha of agricultural land, or the area of a small farm, daily. Two thirds of this land loss is accounted for by settlement and urban areas within the fairly flat arable land within the Central Plain. The rest results from abandoned agricultural land in remote areas where new forest is growing ( S F S O , 2001:7). Despite the vanishing agricultural areas, both the arable production of the Central Plain and the economic value of agricultural products, or the agricultural productivity, are decreasing. Moreover, low income forces farmers to stop farming. Since 1996, the focus of agricultural politics has changed from maximal productivity to high-quality products and sustainable land use. It is now realised that a decreasing number of farmers (about 5 % of the population in 2002) are responsible for the health of more than one third of the country. A s a consequence, nature-oriented farming has increasingly been supported with large amounts of governmental subsidies ( S F S O , 2002:115, 341).  Settlement and urban areas In 1997 settlement and urban areas accounted for 6.8% of the country, and about 2 8 % of this area was occupied by residential areas (houses and surroundings). However, the fast increase in growth of residential areas between 1985 and 1997 (about 25.4%) by far outweighs the population growth (about 9%) as well a s the average annual growth of the settlement and urban areas of 27.2 k m (about 13.3%) 2  ( S F S O , 2001:7, 14). It is assumed that this trend towards bigger living spaces has continued, even though after 1997 no new data have been published. Yet this trend strongly contrasts with the political will to limit the average settlement and urban area to 400 m per capita, to slow down urban sprawl (see chapter 2  2.2.2. Policy). Between the 1960s and 1980s, urban growth mainly affected urban centres in the Central Plain and villages adjacent to agglomerations, while the Jura and the Alps lost much of their population. In the last two decades, improved public transportation systems as well as higher mobility using affordable cars have increasingly allowed people to move to smaller cities and villages in remote areas. Today, the  16  majority of the population lives in locations with less than 10,000 inhabitants, most of them in villages with 2,000 to 5,000 inhabitants ( S F S O , 2002:33-34). Here, land for detached single-family houses is still available at reasonable prices.  Unproductive area The unproductive area has remained fairly stable at 25.5% of the territory. This area consists of lakes (13.5%), rivers (3%), unproductive vegetation (25%), rock, sand and scree (45.7%) as well as glaciers and perpetual  snow  (12.8%).  Despite being  described as  'wasteland', these  areas are  intensively  (economically and physically) used by tourism and for recreational purposes, as well as for the production of hydroelectricity. Also, biotopes and nature-conservation areas within unproductive and untouched zones are vital for the preservation of biodiversity ( S F S O , 2001:24-25).  2.1.2  Natural Resources  Switzerland is a country with few 'valuable' natural resources and limited arable land. Traditionally, gold and other metals, coal, salt and asphalt were mined. Except for the three remaining salt mines that still cover the domestic demand, high mining costs and low outputs have not allowed these mines to keep up with the prices for imported products. Nonetheless, Switzerland relies on vast resources of mineral building materials, water and timber as well as a unique natural and cultural heritage. In the following sections, mineral building materials, water and wood are more closely discussed.  Mineral building materials The vast resources of mineral building materials, such as limestone, granite, stone, brick, clay, chalk gravel, sand and gypsum provide important components for the building industry, so it is no surprise that today two thirds of building materials consist of concrete, stone and artificial stone, brick masonry and tiles ( S F S O , 2000:6) Table 2.4 shows a comparison of annual consumption among the different building materials.  17  As only about 1% of the annual consumption of gravel is naturally built up, the vast resources are steadily decreasing in Switzerland (Wachter, 1995:52). Also, the substantial use of potable water in the making of cement together with the emission of C 0 during the burning process of cement have thrown 2  doubt on the sustainability of concrete.  Building materials  Amount  Brick  851,000 m *  Gravel  32,000,000 tons  Cement  3,540,000 tons *  Concrete  3,500,000 tons  Wood  800,000 tons *  Bitumen  300,000 tons  Glass  114,000 tons **  Tab. 2.4  Annual consumption  3  of building materials (SFSO, 2000: 7).  Water  In contrast to many regions of the world, Switzerland has plenty of water that is regularly recharged by precipitation. Low costs and abundant supply lead to a comparatively high consumption of potable water (162 litres / person / day) of which only about 3 % is used for drinking and cooking ( E A W A G , 2002). A s such, in the building industry (e.g. the cement industry) as well as in the operation of houses, the consumption of water has not yet become an important issue. Besides covering the domestic and industrial demand, water provides a great potential for hydropower. Also, lakes and rivers provide room for sports activities, recreation and health pursuits. Swiss mineral or hot springs are well known for their mineral water and their therapeutic benefits in spas.  Hydropower  production  Hydropower is the largest domestic energy source in Switzerland. In 2000, turbine and storage power stations produced about 37.8 billion kWh of hydropower. This is about 6 5 % of the annual electricity consumption of 58.2 billion kWh. Figure 2.7 shows hydropower production in relation to other domestic electricity sources. In total, 65.3 billion kWh electrical power were produced, including the export surplus of 7.1 billion kWh ( S F S O online, 2002: Energy).  18  • Nuclear power stations 3.9%  • Conventional thermal power • Hydroelectricity (turbine power stations) • Hydroelectricity (storage power stations)  Fig. 2.7  Domestic electricity production in 2000 (SFSO leaflet, 2002: 15)  W o o d  According to the National Forestry Inventory, Swiss forests contain a standing wood stock of 387 million m or 362m / hectares. It is assumed that forests annually grow about 10 million m of wood, 3  3  3  of which 7.5 million m of timber could be harvested. However, over the last twenty years on average only 3  about 4.5 million m have been felled. 69% of this amount consist of logs for the production of timber, 3  lumber, veneers and plywood; 20% are used for fuel purposes; and 11% is industrial wood used for the production of particle- and fibreboard, paper and cardboard. However, Switzerland annually uses about 7.5 million m of timber (log equivalents); 38% (about 2.8 million m ) is used for construction, furniture and 3  3  packaging materials; another 33% is used for paper and cardboard and the last 28% for fuel (App. 1, 2  App. 2) (SAEFL, 2003:41). Currently, the domestic wood harvest is similar to the annual exports; the annual consumption roughly equals the imports. The export of wood is determined by about one-fourth of primary products, about one-fourth of semi-finished products and one-half of final products; the imports consist of about onehalf of semi-finished products and about one half of final products (App. 2) (SAEFL, 2003:41). Almost 50% of the wood exports (without sawdust and paper) go to Italy, whereas almost 50% of the imports come from Germany (Tab. 2.5). In 1995, the forest and timber industry consisted of 12,415 plants and employed 90,817 people. It achieved revenues of 10,317 million CHF. Together, the forest and timber industry have account for about  Appendix 1 specifies the use of wood used for fuel purposes (energy-wood) between 1990 and 2001. Appendix 2 provides an overview of the average wood flow in Switzerland between 1995 and 1999.  2  19  1.5% of the G D P ( S F S O online, 2002: Agriculture and Forestry). However, the economic situation in the Swiss forest and timber industry is difficult. The production of timber has shown economic deficits for years. Despite considerable federal subsidies of about 200,000 million C H F annually, in 2000 public forest enterprises lost 18 C H F per m harvested wood ( S F S O , 2002:343). Also, the recession throughout the 3  1990s caused many traditional sawmills and joiners to close down.  Exports Country  Imports  tons  %  1,080,579  47.7  42,347  Austria  470,186  France Germany  266,126 240,910  20.8 11.7  204,005 401,017  10.6  668,050  27.0 45.0  Other EU countries Non-EU countries  152,062 56,302  6.7  75,933  5.1  2.5  2,266,165  100  92,925 1,484,277  6.3 100  Italy  Total Tab. 2.5  tons  %  2.9 .  13.4  Import and export of wood (without sawdust and paper) in 2002 (SFSO, 2003: 116-117)  As yet, the situation has not changed. The delayed recovery of the building industry, increasing production costs (labour and machines), full wood-storage facilities due to Hurricane Lothar at the end of 1999, and the increasing market presence of European countries with lower wood prices are further putting the Swiss forest and timber industry under pressure (Holzindustrie Schweiz, 2002). This is despite the fact that the domestic timber harvest could be almost doubled, and an increased harvest would improve the health of the forests.  2.1.3  Energy consumption  Since 1950, energy consumption in Switzerland has multiplied by more than a factor of 5 (Fig. 2.8), while the population has increased by only 5 3 % . In 2000, Switzerland used in total about 855,000 T J of energy; about 3 5 % was used by transport, about 2 7 % by private households, about 2 0 % by industry and about 16% by commerce and services ( S F S O , 2002:381-382). In the early 1970s, oil provided almost 8 0 % of the total energy use. After the oil crisis in 1973 / 74, the country tried to limit its dependency on oil. While this strategy was first caused by concern about the limited resources of oil, the emission of greenhouse gases deriving from the burning of fossil fuels has 20  now become a primary issue ( S F S O , 2002:381). Commitments and strategies to reduce greenhouse gases (particularly C 0 ) as well as federal subsidies have supported the development of renewable 2  energies (wind, hydro, solar, bio-gas) over the last decade. But still the most important energy sources are oil (60%), electricity (22%) and natural gas (11%). This is despite the fact that about three fourths of the materials (oil, natural gas and nuclear fuel rods) have to be imported from foreign countries; the use of renewable energies and the reduction of total energy consumption have become a political issue.  Important changes since early 1970s After an enormous growth between the mid 1940s and the early 1970s, the rate increase of total energy consumption has diminished, even though the use of motor fuel, electricity and gas has considerably increased. The 2 5 % decrease in heating-fuel consumption could balance total oil consumption over the last 30 years (Fig. 2.8). With reference to the user groups, the increased energy consumption was primarily in transportation, while that of private households, industry and services remained fairly small ( S F S O , 2002:382).  900000  800000  700000  600000  500000  400000  300000  200000  100000  1910  Fig. 2.8  1920  1930  1940  1950  1960  1970  1980  1990  2000  Energy consumption by sources of energy since 1910 (Source: SFOE, 2002:2)  21  Through the same period of time (1970 - 2000), the consumption of electricity more than doubled. In 2000, industry and trade used 34.5% of the electricity, private households 30%, commerce and services 25.6%, transport 8%, agricultural and gardening 1.9% of the total of 58.2 billion kWh ( S F O E , 2001:4). Renewable sources of energy account for about 17% of the total energy consumption, whereas hydroelectricity, with about 14%, is still the largest source of renewable energy in Switzerland. A s well, wood, solar power, bio-energy and ground heat are becoming increasingly important. Between 2000 and 2001, the use of these energies grew by 12.3% to a total amount of 7,100 T J or 0.8% of the total energy consumption ( S F O E , 2002:7, 20). As yet, their full potential has not been tapped.  Private households  With a share of 2 7 % (2000) the energy consumption of private households is considerable. But between 1980 and 2000 it increased by only 3 % (223.8 to 230.6 TJ), while the population grew by 14% and the real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increased by 33.9% ( S F O E , 2002:22; S F S O , 2002:64; Furrer, 2001). The Swiss federal statistical office (SFSO) attributes the small size of this increase to the improved thermal insulation of building enclosures as well as to more efficient heating systems. Although the overall consumption remained fairly stable, a strong shift from oil to gas (connection to international gas pipeline in the early 1970s) and electricity (construction of nuclear plants at the end of  15.7%  • Petrolium products • Electricity • Gas • Coal and coke • Wood, charcoal • District heating Fig. 2.9  • • • •  Petrolium products • Electricity Gas • Coal and coke Wood, charcoal • District heating Other types of renewable energy  Energy consumption of private households in 1980 and 2000 (SFOE, 2002:23)  22  the 1960s) is observable (Fig. 2.9). While coal has almost disappeared, the use of wood, district heating and other renewable energies has strongly increased.  2.1.4  Economy  Despite its small size and few natural resources, Switzerland has had a flourishing economy for more than 150 years, relying on foreign trade with high-tech products and services. Switzerland's key trading partner is the European Union. In 2000, 58.9% of exports and 74.4% of imports (values) were achieved with the E U , 12.8% / 7.4% with the U S A , 4.2% / 2.8% with Japan, and 2 4 . 1 % / 1 5 . 4 % with the remaining countries ( S F S O , 2002:300). Measured on its gross domestic product (GDP) of 404.4 million C H F and its export volume of almost 127 billion C H F in 2000, Switzerland achieves a middle position among the industrialised countries ( O E C D , 2002). Top-ten ranks are achieved with the G D P per capita, the high-tech goods exports (textile and machine-tools or precision instruments) and the financial market indices (Tab. 2.6). Switzerland's large import surpluses are due to agricultural and forestry products, textiles, clothing and shoes as well as vehicles. In contrast, chemical products, machines and electronic goods as well as precision instruments and watches achieve high export surpluses (Tab. 2.7).  GDP [billion US$]  Rank  GDP / capita [US$]  Rank  USA  9,810  1  35,600  4  Japan  4,765  2  37,500  2  Germany  1,866  3  22,700  15  United Kingdom  1,427  4  23,900  10  France  1,305  5  21,500  17  1,073  6  18,600  19  1  2  Italy  1  Canada  706  7  23,000  14  Switzerland  239  13  33,300  5  Sweden  229  14  25,800  8  19  29  43,000  1  Luxembourg 1  2  at current prices and exchange rates includes overseas departments  Tab. 2.6  GDP 2000 of selected OECD countries (OECD, 2000)  23  Import Products  1990  Total [million CHF]  96,611  Export  2000  2001  128,615 130, 052  1990  2000  2001  88,257  126,549  131,717  Product groups [% of annual total] Agricultural and forestry products  8.38  7.72  7.64  3.40  3.50  3.33  Textiles, clothing, shoes  9.11  6.92  6.91  5.65  3.07  2.99  Chemicals  11.00  17.03  20.19  20.88  28.36  31.76  Metals  9.34  8.35  7.94  8.54  8.61  7.94  Machines, electronic goods  20.49  24.56  22.75  28.92  29.35  27.35  Vehicles  10.59  11.59  10.89  1.68  2.41  2.31  Instruments, watches  5.99  6.24  6.28  15.10  16.21  16.43  Tab. 2.7  Foreign trade by product groups (SFSO online, 2002: Industry and Services)  Economic development  over the last century  After World W a r II, Switzerland experienced a long phase of economic growth. Between 1960 and 1973, the annual average economic growth was more than 4%. Big investments, an increasing domestic workforce and a large number of temporary foreign guest workers brought prosperity and a high standard of living. Throughout that period of time, industry and trade ( 2  nd  sector) compensated for their decreasing  workforce with automation and technological progress, achieving a strong increase in productivity. The oil crisis in 1974 put an end to the long phase of economic growth. The immigration of foreign workers was stopped; economic problems made the dislike of foreigners grow. A s well, the protection of the environment became a political issue; the former economic growth was revealed to be a major result of careless consumption of energy and wasteful use of natural resources. Since then, the environment has become a major factor in political, economic and social considerations. Towards the end of the 1980s, after a phase of low economic growth, the labour market once more needed a large number of foreign workers. By that time, the price for real estate had climbed to the highest levels ever. But in 1990 the situation changed dramatically. The public deficit, subsequent expenditure cuts and a strong Swiss franc brought Swiss industries trouble. Switzerland lost its strong economic position, prices for real estate sank dramatically and the unemployment rate increased to a historical peak of more than 5% in 1996 - which, in comparison to the neighbouring countries, was still very low ( S F S O , 2002:176). Even traditionally strong branches such as mechanical engineering or  24  construction declined, while parts of the 3 service sector (health, social work, education) grew. In 1999, r d  this sector achieved more than 7 0 % of the G D P in 1999 ( S F S O , 2002:234). Since 1994, the Swiss economy has slowly been recovering. The first notable signs of growth were seen in all branches in 2000. But the former strong economic growth has not yet returned.  2.1.5  Industry and trade  In Switzerland, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are important forces within the industry and trade. In 1998, 99.7% of companies had fewer than 250 full-time employees, employing about 6 9 % of the total workforce. These companies have their markets mainly within the country; 86% of the S M E s do not export and 7 9 % do not import. The Swiss federal statistical office attributes this to small outputs, missing distribution channels and the low level of name recognition ( S F S O , 2002:300). The strength of these enterprises is their strong innovation potential and flexibility in their particular markets. Most of the large industrial and trade companies concentrate on specialised high-quality and highprecision  niche products.  Internationally-standardised  or mass products  are rarely  produced in  Switzerland, as these products may not provide sufficiently for the high wage levels and for the strong Swiss franc. For example, about 9 5 % of the 3.4 million Swiss watches were exported in 2000. Despite its price, the luxury Swiss watch is valued for its high-quality production, constant improvements in components and good customer service. These companies invest a large proportion of their turnover in research and development. They account for more than two-thirds of the research and development budget and they reuse about three-fourths of it. 3  In Switzerland, economic crises and technological knowledge, together with a qualified workforce and the ideals of quality and precision have repeatedly developed to produce new ideas and products. Finding market niches, keeping organisation structures simple and promoting creativity and high product quality have been attempts to compensate for the high salary costs and the strong Swiss franc.  In 2000, about 10.7 billion Swiss Francs or 2.7% of the GDP was spent towards research and development within the country. Considering the domestic R+D expenses per capita, Switzerland is ranked third after the USA and Sweden, followed by Japan in fourth position. 3  25  Building industry The building industry is a key element of economic and social life. Despite the depression throughout the 1990s, in 1999 and 2000 this industry obtained about 10% of the G D P ( S F S O leaflet, 2002:10). Between 1997 and 2000, the building industry showed the first signs of slowing, even though the top constructionexpenditure levels were far below those of 1990. The total expenditure increase of 2,484 million C H F is mainly accounted for by public expenditures for underground engineering projects (+ 1,355 million C H F ) and private expenditures other than housing (+ 1,098 million C H F ) , while private expenditures for housing increased by only 503 million C H F . Public expenditures for construction engineering (residential and nonresidential constructions) decreased (Tab. 2.8).  1980  1990  1997  1998  1999  2000  Total [million CHF]  25,336  49,182  41,224  41,542  40,917  43,708  Public expenditure  8,448  14,993  15,100  15,250  14,835  15,983  5,037  7,999  8,705  8,516  8,616  10,060  4,329  4,110  4,349  5,221  6,735  6,219  5,923  Underground engineering of which roads Construction engineering Private expenditure of which housing Tab. 2.8  3,411  6,994  6,395  16,918  34,189  26,124  26,292  26,081  27,725  16,644  17,145  16,783  17,147  Construction expenditures between 1980 and 2000 (SFSO online, 2002: Construction and housing)  Wood building industry The strongly-decreasing market share of wood as a construction and building material in the mid 1960s put an end to the fairly stable level of about 3 0 % since the end of the 1 9 century. About twenty years th  later, the market share of wood achieved its lowest level at less than 10% (Winter, 1995). In the 1970s and early 1980s, wood - the traditional and natural building material - did not have a place in the promising future geared to the achievements of a flourishing economy and technological progress. Throughout that time, wood was used only for roof construction and houses in remote or traditional areas, or for nonresidential buildings (Fig. 2.10).  26  1800  1700  2000  1900  Fig. 2.10 Development and importance of wood as a work and building material in Switzerland (Source: Adapted from Winter, 1995:2)  Between 1991 and 1996, the consumption of wood increased by 8 % to about 850,000 m ( S F S O 3  2000: 7). But according to the Swiss Association of Woodworking Industries (Lignum), the use of wood for construction purposes has still not tapped its full potential. Based on the availability of local wood and current demand, it is believed that the use of construction wood could be about ten times as high as it is now; the use of construction wood would increase from about 1,900 m to 19,000 m annually. A s well, the 3  3  use of wood for finishing materials, facades or insulation might also grow, while the use of wood in roof constructions and furnishing is believed to decrease (Fig. 2.11).  2.0 1.6  Current wood consumption and annual unused potential in 1,000 m wood 3  § 1.2 o  ^•i^H •^^•B  0.8  Construction Roofs  I "'v':':^:Insulation  0.4 0  H •  n  l  n  Wood consumption Fig. 2.11  n  E  1 n  Finishing material Facades Furniture  Unused potential  Current wood consumption and annual unused potential (Lignum online, 2002)  Development since the mid 1980s In contrast to the collapsing economy, the wood building industry was revitalised in the early 1990s. While many traditional sawmills and carpentry firms had to close down throughout the 1990s, many small new  27  carpentry firms have been developing. The influence of telecommunication and computer technology has opened the stagnating traditional wood building industry and called for new products (factory production of houses, new joining techniques or new lumber norms) and services (consultancy, construction and maintenance) (Netzwerk Holz, 1999). Today, successful small or medium-sized carpentry firms are spread all over the country. Most of them (e.g. Renggli A G , or Schoeb A G ) rely on highly industrialised and automated production processes implementing Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) machines or C A D - C A M technology and, potentially soon, robots. It is probable that the development of the new wood building industry in Switzerland has followed a similar path to that of the successful high-tech industries (see Chapter 2.1.5 Industry and traded This means that the deep crisis within the timber and building industry, along with strong technical know-how and a qualified and motivated workforce, as well as ideals of quality and precision, may have evolved to produce quality niche products that accord with the contemporary spirit of the age. Produced as niche products, these new houses in wood are valued for their individuality, design, energy efficiency, health and comfort. For numerous clients these striking characteristics might count much more than a potentially lower price. However, factory-built wooden houses imported from Austria and Germany are putting pressure on the residential wood building market. Between 1998 and 2001, the number of imported factory-built houses jumped from 159 to 279 houses (those from Austria increased from 14 to 76 and those from Germany increased from 145 to 203) and accounts for about 2 0 % of the new wooden houses per year (VGQ, 2002). The benefits of these houses are low primary costs, short delivery times and their readiness for immediate occupation.  28  2.2  People  This chapter discusses aspects of culture, politics, population and demography, education and workforce, social life and lifestyle society, as well as wealth and housing.  2.2.1  Culture  Linguistic and ethnic development  The linguistic and ethnic character of today's Switzerland developed through the immigration and settlement of different population groups into the area of today's Switzerland, up to 900 A . D . Since then, the clear language regions have barely mixed; the four official languages, G e r m a n , French, Italian and Romansh, are still spoken and written in Switzerland (Fig. 2.12). The language boundaries also indicate considerable differences in mentality; often, these differences are visible in the outcome of public votes. Whereas the Swiss Germans care about environmental issues and defend the independence of the country, the French and Italian parts of Switzerland are strongly associated with their neighbours in France and Italy, as well as with their lifestyles.  German (Heathen Allemannian tribes, region became German speaking by 900 A.D.) French (Christian Burgundians, adopted the Latin Language of the resident Roman population) Italian (Lombard tribes, kept their Gallo-ltalian Lombard dialect) Romansh (The Rhaeto-Romans, resisted the Allemannian immigrants and kept their language) Fig. 2.12  Language boundaries in Switzerland (PRS, 2001: Federalism and multilingualism) 29  Conservation of cultural heritage Aware of their cultural wealth, Switzerland started to support the preservation of monuments by federal grants in 1886. Towards the end of the 1 9 century, the increasing reconsideration on national traditional 1  th  values (see chapter 2.3.1 Modern Architecture and Country-Style) also increased interest in vernacular buildings. A s a result, numerous roman ruins, medieval castles, monasteries and churches, along with well-preserved old cities, villages and buildings (including many traditional  buildings in wood) still  showcase Switzerland's large cultural heritage all over the country. For 25 years, the open-air museum at Ballenberg (Bernese Oberland, central part of Switzerland) has exhibited a large collection of traditional Swiss farmhouses. In 1975, a collection of Swiss heritage sites was started. The inventory of Swiss heritage sites (ISOS) currently includes about 5,800 sites, among them many originating in the 2 0  th  century (Heusser, 2004). Customs and festivals (religious and seasonal traditions, popular music, folk dance or theatre) and other aspects of life (e.g. how people feed, clothe or amuse themselves) have been actively or passively preserved by various societies and foundations over the last century. Within the central and eastern part of the Alpine range (Switzerland, Northern Italy, Austria) the festival tradition has remained very rich. In addition, over the past few decades forgotten religious and seasonal customs have been revived and several new festivals have been created (Thuler, 1997:23). These cultural events belong to specific locations or certain regions more than they are determined by political boundaries.  2.2.2  Politics  In 1291 the first three cantons (Uri, Schwyz and Unterwalden) swore mutual aid and support. Other cantons soon joined the alliance to protect their autonomy and their own legal systems against the dominance of the Habsburg Empire. After centuries of internal disputes, the occupation by Napoleon, and religious and civil wars, the democratic 'Confederatio Helvetia' (CH) was founded in the middle of the restored European monarchies in 1848. The new state granted freedom of worship and press, and the  1  In 1999, Switzerland spent about 37 million CHF on the preservation of natural heritages and monuments. 30  J  neutrality of the country was recognised internationally. Today, Switzerland still relies on the essential features of the first constitution, though they have been adapted to meet present-day demands.  Hierarchical structures Switzerland's confederation consists of 26 autonomous cantons (20 full cantons and 6 half cantons) and 2,929 local municipalities. All divisions, the Confederation, the cantons and the municipalities, perform legislative, executive and judicial functions administered by different autonomous authorities. Each division has its own legislation as well as its own financial sources (taxes or charges). The interplay of the autonomous municipalities, cantons and federation is given by the hierarchical structure of the divisions. The federation is in charge of interior and exterior security as well as economic development and general welfare. Cantons are responsible for education, police, health and cantonal roads. Municipalities provide local infrastructures such as the provision of water and energy, the disposal of waste, and local streets, as well as schools and social and cultural institutions. In addition, they are in charge of income taxes. Despite their autonomy, over the past few years a closer cooperation between the cantons has become necessary to master complex problems or duties efficiently (e.g. delinquency, medicine, higher education).  Administrative authorities The organisation of the administrative authorities is similar to that of the divisions themselves. For example, the following sections describe the organisation of the administrative federal authorities.  Administrative  federal authorities  The administrative authorities of the confederation consist of the Federal  Assembly  or parliament  (legislative authority), the Federal Council or government (executive authority) and the Federal  Court  (judicial authority). The Federal Assembly is made up of two chambers, the National Council or big chamber (200 seats) representing the population, and the Council of States or small chamber (46 seats) representing the 31  cantons or states. Decisions taken in the two chambers have equal weight in order to balance the interests of the cantons. The seats in the National Council are distributed between the cantons in proportion to their populations. In contrast, in the Council of States each full canton is represented by two seats and each half canton by one seat. The members of both chambers do the job part-time, and they are elected or re-elected by the citizens every four years. They meet four times a year for 3 weeks at a time to approve federal laws and supervise the government. Each member of the two chambers is entitled to propose a new law or decree and put questions to the Federal Council about any matter concerning state affairs. The Federal Assembly comes together only once a year to elect or re-elect the councillors and the head of the Federal Council as well as other bodies and state officials. The Federal Council consists of 7 councillors representing the major political parties of parliament (two central parties, the Radical Democratic Party (FDP) and the Christian Democratic Party (CVP); one left-wing party, the Social Democratic Party (SPS); and one right-wing party, the Swiss People's Party (SVP)) and the different regions. One of the councillors, annually elected by the Federal Assembly, heads the Federal Council for one year at a time. Each councillor presides over one of the seven Federal Departments: 1) foreign affairs; 2) home affairs; 3) justice and police; 4) defence, civil protection and sport; 5) finance; 6) economic affairs; and 7) environment, transport, energy and communications. According to the collegiate system the councillors are collectively responsible for the decisions taken within the Federal Council. The Federal Court in Lausanne is the highest judicial institution in Switzerland. It protects the constitutional rights of the citizens against the arbitrariness of authorities and administrations (Ambiihler, 2002).  Semi-direct Democracy and Federalism The Swiss Democracy is unique in that the highest political authorities are the citizens themselves. Not only do they elect or re-elect the municipal and cantonal authorities (government and parliament) or the members of the federal assembly; but also four to six times a year all citizens over 18 years are asked to vote on municipal, cantonal and federal issues alike (e.g. changes of the constitution, new laws or approval of federal finances). Together with the right to make initiatives or referendums, citizens may take  32  part actively in democratic aspects of public life or local affairs and themselves play the role of the opposition or the establishment. Federalism has been a way to unite the dissimilitude of the country in terms of natural and geographical regions, cultural and political interests, and economic differences. However, inequality of rights (e.g. varying tax levels from municipality to municipality), inefficiency (e.g. different building laws in each canton), slowness (e.g. public referenda may take several years to go through) and big coordination efforts are strong disadvantages of the system; also, the need to accept a compromise rarely allows taking brave or seminal decisions. Nonetheless, the initiative of individuals has often led to seminal federal discussions or decisions. This has also been the case in initiatives concerning the environment, such as the demand for the abolition of nuclear power plants or the adoption of car-free Sundays.  Policy Home policy As a result of the semi-direct democracy and federalism described above, the political system in Switzerland is very stable; changes take place by a process of gradual changes rather than by sudden disruptions, and decisions are always based on compromises. Despite Switzerland being one of the oldest democracies, women only got the right to vote at the federal level in 1971. Most cantons followed the federal example in 1983, while a mandate of the federal court forced the last canton to change its practice in 1990. Since then, the influence of women in federal and cantonal governments and parliaments has slowly increased; in 1984 the first woman was elected to the Federal Council. However, the Federal Council still consists of one woman and six men.  Foreign  Policy  Switzerland has actively taken part in many different international organisations ( P F P , O S C E , F A O , ILO, U N E S C O , W H O , U N H C R and several others) for many years. Recently, Switzerland's population agreed by public vote to join the United Nations Organisation (UNO), to which it has been affiliated since the end of 2002. Nonetheless, Switzerland is not part of the European Union (EU); the population rejected it by public vote in 1996. Still today, Switzerland is a political island in the middle of Europe with its own  33  currency and policy, dealing with the E U through bilateral agreements in all sectors. However, the increasing dependency of different countries on each other and the growing importance of international cooperation require Switzerland's foreign policy - without a need to give up the commitment to neutrality to be more targeted and internationally present. The basis for such actions (e.g. peacekeeping operations) has newly been included into the revision of the Federal Constitution (January, 2000).  Environmental  concerns  Environmental concerns have become a strong influence on politics over the last thirty years. Prompted by the oil crisis in 1973 / 74 (see also chapter 2.1.3. Energy consumption) and the suspicion that the dying of the forests was a result of increasing air pollution (see also chapter 2.1.1 Land use, and chapter 2.2.2 Forest laws), Switzerland has enforced research into environmental problems such as air pollution, energy use and forest health. Since then, a reduction in fossil-energy consumption, the use of renewable energies and a limit on the emission of C 0 , as well as the health of the forests, have become key issues in the 2  environmental debate. Whereas Switzerland keeps an eye on global development and supports major environmental strategies, it does not often take an active part in the operations of international networks. It appears that Switzerland may not want to subordinate its own interests, and that it aims at being better than the others. A s such, most of its environmental activities are based on federally, cantonally or municipally-launched programs and/or on eager individual initiatives (see also chapter 2.2.2 Semi-direct democracy and federalism), such as the Energy2000 or the 2,000-watt society. The Energy2000  program (1990-2000) was the first voluntary and federally-supported 10-year  program to stabilise the increasing energy use and C 0 emission by 2000, as well as to increase the use 2  of renewable energies ( S F O E , 2001). The goal of this program was to achieve a reduction in C 0  2  emission of 10% between 2000 and 2010, as well as to limit the growth of electricity demand to 5 % and to increase the share of renewable energies used to 1% of transport energy and to 3 % of heating energy ( S F O E , 2001). This national program has funded more than 3,500 research projects with a total of 64 million Swiss Francs (CHF). While the initial goal at the turn of the 1990s was to stimulate the building industry federally, on the initiative of Luzius Schmid, deputy head of the Swiss federal office of energy (SFOE), the subsidies were tied to environmental strategies connected with the content of the Kyoto  34  protocol. In 2001, the program was succeeded by the 10-year SwissEnergy  program, focusing on  buildings, economy, mobility and renewable energies. The idea of a '2000-watt society' was initiated by Dieter Imboden, a member of the council of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Rat) in 1998. The goal was to reduce worldwide energy consumption to a benchmark of 2,000 watts per person by 2050. The benchmark of 2,000 watts per person per year is based on the total global energy consumption in 1990. In that year, the worldwide average energy consumption per person was 17,500 kWh or 2,000 watts (about 45 kWh/d). However, with a consumption of 500 watts per person per year in Ethiopia, 10,000 watts in the U S A and 6,000 watts in Switzerland, the regional differences are huge (Bueller, 2002). That means that Switzerland would have to reduce its energy consumption by two thirds. What started as the idea of an individual person is now seen as a long-term goal to comply with the Swiss energy and climate policy, and to become the successor to the SwissEnergy program in 2011. So far, an unused industrial area in Basel has already been redeveloped to become the first pilot project area (recreational use) for a 2,000-watt society, and others (workplaces and living areas) are yet to come. Besides these specific endeavours to reduce the consumption of energy and the emission of C 0 , 2  Switzerland anchored the protection of the environment into the revised Federal Constitution (January 1, 2000). This step represents a milestone for more sustainable development in Switzerland and has become a symbol of substantial and significant intentions for future changes (Federal Chancellery, 1999). Also, at the Johannesburg conference in 2002, Switzerland presented a program containing 22 environmental strategies. They rely on the attempt to achieve a more sustainable economic, social and environmental development. Key strategies for the planning and building industry are (Swiss Federal Council, 2002): - Environmental and incentive taxes on resources -  A (life) cycle evaluation policy for products and services The vision of a 2,000-watt society The limitation of the average urban area to 400 m per capita The support of public transportation and sustainable mobility New forms of funding for sustainable developments Environmental education, monitoring and assessment of sustainable development 2  In the same year, the Federal council enacted a law to reduce C 0 emission. It requires a 10% 2  reduction in C 0 emission towards the 1996 level by 2010, while the emissions caused by heating and 2  transport fuels have to be reduced by 15% and 8%, respectively. The law includes a potential C 0 tax in 2  35  the case of non-achievement (Federal Chancellery, 2002). Early in 2003, the cement industry - most probably not voluntarily - signed a federal declaration to reduce its C 0 emissions by 2010 to a level of 2  44% (fossil fuels) and 30.3% (production process) below the 1990 level, (Tages Anzeiger, 2003). Only shortly afterwards (July 2003), Switzerland ratified the Kyoto protocol. The broad range of research activities and environmental programs over the last years has not only led to an increased sensibility within the population towards environmental problems, but has also led to the adoption of new laws and regulations within the building industry.  2.2.3  Legislation Planning and building legislation  Planning and building legislation relies on a dense, hierarchical network of federal, cantonal and municipal laws and regulations. Those relevant to building practices are the use-zoning plans of municipalities or towns as well as the federal, cantonal and municipal planning and building laws and regulations. Together they define where, what and how to build by asking a specific goal or performance of a site, a building or a building part. Conformity to these requirements is necessary to obtain a building authorisation for the construction of a new building, major changes to an existing building or major changes of use.  Use-zoning  plans  The federal use-zoning plans assign major use zones (agricultural zone, building or protected zones). While these plans are very general, they are further refined in those of the cantons and municipalities. The cantonal and municipal use-zoning plans assign the major use zones to single lots and give them specific uses and aspects (e.g. type of residential area, maximum number of storeys or maximum living area per lot size). This information is relevant for landowners. (Engeler 1992:15).  Planning and building laws The federal planning and building laws provide the basic principles for planning and building practice in Switzerland. They consider general aspects such as energy, traffic, forestry, environment, water, air, soil, noise, radiation and waste. 36  The cantonal planning and building law contains fire regulations, regulations on thermal insulation and energy use and basic regulations of use, construction, form and size of a building, as well as distances from neighbouring lots, forests or water bodies and green spaces, or specific aspects of a building, such as minimum room height and size. Often, the cantonal legislation includes requirements for the conservation of nature, culture and heritage. Building codes of municipalities or towns further refine the cantonal legislation, or define specific aspects of a building not considered by the canton, such as maximum height of a building, specific roof forms and exterior colours or materials, as well as distances from neighbouring buildings or streets. This may be important for the protection of historic sites or quarters of towns. However, building codes of municipalities and cities often include an 'aesthetics clause' that allows them - very much at the discretion of the local authorities - to deny building permission to buildings that fulfil all legal aspects except for the desired aesthetic value.  Energy performance of buildings Since the oil crisis in 1973 / 74, the increasing requirements for thermal insulation of buildings have considerably reduced heating-energy use (seen section 2.1.2 and Fig. 2.5). By the end of June 2002, most cantons had decreed a new energy law for new buildings, relying on a standard (SIA 380/1, 2001) of the Swiss society of engineers and architects (SIA). In the canton of Zurich, the new energy law requires new buildings to reduce the use of non-renewable energy for heating and domestic hot water to 8 0 % of the permitted energy consumption. Clients determine whether they will use non-renewable energies, waste heat or improved thermal insulation to compensate for the remaining 2 0 % of energy (AWEL, 2002:5). The performance of the enclosure may be proven by the total heating energy need; U-value (thermal transfer of building elements in W7m K) calculations of single building elements are only tolerated 2  if limited elements with low U-values are used (Tab. 2.9). These new requirements considerably improve the energy performance of new buildings towards the goal of the 1997 legislation. In addition, they are about to change the element-related method using the U-values of single elements to a building-related performance evaluation of the building's overall consumption of energy for heating and domestic hot water and, they promote the use of renewable  37  energies. A s such, the new code requirements are adopting the practice defined by the advanced voluntary building standards (Minergie, Minergie-P and Passive House). However, the current code requirements are as yet far from reaching the Minergie or Minergie-P standards (see section 2.3 Advanced voluntary building standards).  U-values for indoor air temperature of 20°C Roof, ceiling, wall, floor - with integrated heating Windows  Requirements according to thermal insulation regulations  Solution A: Improved thermal insulation (minimum plus 30%)  Towards outside climate  Towards outside climate  Doors  Towards nonheated rooms  0.30 W Im K  0.40 W Im K  0.21 W / m K  0.28 W Im K  0.25 W Im K  0.30 W Im K  0.17W/m K  0.21 W Im K  1.70W/m K  2.00 W /m K  1.19W/m K  1.40 W Im K  1.20 W / m K  1.60 W Im K  0.84 W Im K  1.12 W / m K  2.00 W Im K  2.0 W Im K  1.40W/m K  1.40 W Im K  2  2  2  - with adjacent radiator  Towards nonheated rooms*  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  Restrictions: This energy efficiency standard is tolerated only if the total area of windows and doors accounts for less than 20% of the respective heating-energy relevant area. Thermal bridges need to be considered according to SIA 180/1. Tab. 2.9  Thermal insulation regulation of the canton of Zurich (Source: AWEL, 2002).  Forest legislation The prevailing forest legislation is important to the way the local forests can be harvested as well as to the amount, the quality and the costs of the resulting timber. The newest forest law ( W a G , October 4, 1991) not only considers the quantitative aspects of forests (as did the previous ones), but also the qualitative ones. It requires (Article 1): a)  the preservation of the forest in area and spatial distribution  b)  the protection of the forest as an ecosystem near to nature  c) d)  the best possible ability of forests to fulfil their protective, social and commercial functions the promotion and support of forestry  Here, protective functions include protection against natural disasters, such as avalanches, floods, landslides, erosion, falling rocks or storms. Social functions include the provision of natural habitats for plants and animals, recreation and activity space for people, the classification of landscape, the production of oxygen, the filtration and storage of water, the filtration of air, noise protection and the reduction of climate extremes. Commercial functions consider the use of timber as a renewable and domestic natural  38  resource and energy source, as well as employment opportunities in forestry and associated trades for about 90,000 people, mainly in rural areas (Federal Chancellery, 2002: 921.0:1-16). The adoption of the new forest law was an important step towards the re-evaluation of the local forests. The connecting of protective and social functions with commercial ones at once increased the importance of the forest, timber and wood building industry. Moreover, the forest and timber industry were given new arguments to emphasize the importance of a sustainable forest harvest as well as the need for an increased use of wood to limit the number of over-aged trees. Proof of this assumption was given in winter 1999, when hurricane Lothar felled 10 million trees in only few minutes. A s well, the wood building industry strongly emphasises the benefits of wood in the C 0 debate. 2  2.2.4  Population and demography  Since the beginning of the 2 0  th  century the population in Switzerland has more than doubled, reaching  7.2 million inhabitants in 2000. After a peak between 1950 and 1970, population growth has stabilized at an average rate of 0.6 - 0.7% ( S F S O , 2002:32-33). Yet decreasing births rates since 1965 and increasing emigration of Swiss citizens after 1992 would have led to a negative population growth in Switzerland since 1994, if it were not for the foreign population. Birth excess of foreigners (since 1960) and migration (after 1980) have become the deciding factors for the slight population growth in Switzerland. Like other industrialised countries, the age structure of the population in Switzerland has strongly changed over the last century as a consequence of higher life expectancy and lower birth rates. In 2000, the average life expectancy reached 82.6 years for women and 76.9 for men ( S F S O , 2002:64). At the same time, the average birth rate of 1.46 children per woman is far below the critical 2.1 mark. The trend towards an increasing proportion of old people is expected to continue. However, the fast ageing process in Switzerland is reduced by the presence of the foreign population. First, young foreigners often come in for work. After retirement or upon finishing their job they move back to their family in the home country. Second, foreign women tend to have more children than Swiss ones. In 2000, the average birth rate per foreign woman was at 2.0 children versus 1.3 per Swiss woman. In 2000, 2 7 % of the children born in Switzerland were of foreign nationality.  39  In Switzerland, foreigners account for almost 2 0 % of the population as a result of outdated and restrictive immigration regulations. The majority of these people were born in Switzerland (almost 25%) or have been living here for more than 15 years (36%). Unlike other countries, babies born in Switzerland get a Swiss passport only if at least one of their parents has Swiss citizenship. The percentage of foreigners in Switzerland would decrease to less than 7% by counting only those people who have lived in Switzerland for a limited period of time ( S F S O , 2002:33). But, simplified naturalisation of second-generation foreigners and automatic naturalisation of third-generation babies was again rejected by public vote in 2004; a majority of Swiss citizens (particularly in the German and Romansh-speaking part) does not want "to give the Swiss citizenship away". This is despite the fact that Switzerland strongly relies on the foreign workforce (compare to Chapter 2.2.5 Education and Workforce, and 2.3.1 Local building culture).  2.2.5  Education and workforce Education  "Education, research and technology are Switzerland's most important resources" ( S F S O , 2002:652 [translation]). A s a consequence, the federation as well as the cantons and municipalities spend about 6% of the G D P or almost 1 5 % of the total public expenses on education. With this expenditure volume, Switzerland ranks among the top O E C D countries. In Switzerland, compulsory school on average lasts 9 years, followed by several possibilities for post-compulsory education. Due to the cantonal responsibility for the education system, considerable regional differences arise in the length of study, teaching materials or salaries for teachers. Whereas reformations of the education system have created more equity among schools of different regions and eased the acceptance of different diplomas within Switzerland over the last 30 years, international exchanges are still difficult. Vocational training is the most popular post-compulsory education in Switzerland. About threefourths of young men and about two-thirds of young women choose to enter an apprenticeship (Tab. 2.10). In this form of education, the combination of hands-on training and theoretical education provides deep insight into the specific know-how of the future profession. Also, this education hands traditional knowledge down from generation to generation. This is a very important factor in the education of  40  carpenters. Still today, the high levels of know-how in traditional wood building techniques are passed down to the new generation of carpenters.  Education level 2  total  (education determined)  [%]  1990/91 2000/01  men  [%]  women  1990/91 2000/01  [%]  1990/91 2000/01  Vocational training (2 to 4 years)  72  70  77  76  67  64  Gymnasium  13  18  13  16  13  20  Teaching schools (kindergarten, others)  2  1  1  0  3  2  Non post-compulsory or short-term educations  13  11  9  8  17  14  Tab. 2.10 Education of 20-year olds (Source: Adapted from OFS, 2001)  Workforce Switzerland shows the characteristics of a service society that are common to all advanced industrial nations, due to technical progress (automation of fabrication) and globalisation such as outsourcing of production to low-wage countries ( S F S O , 2002:166). Since 1900, employment in the 1 dropped from about 36% to 4.5%. In the 2 whereas the workforce of the 3  r d  n d  st  sector has  sector it has decreased from about 4 0 % to about 26.5%,  sector has increased from about 2 4 % to 6 9 % (see also chapter 2.1.4.  Economy). W o m e n have profited from the increasing number of jobs (also part-time jobs) in the 3  r d  sector,  where they account for 50.7% of the workforce. However, women depend on part-time jobs to be able to combine job and family. In contrast, the number of men in part-time jobs is low and only slowly increasing (Tab. 2.11). Workers [% of population]  1970  1980  1991  1999  2000  Total  48.3  47.8  54.0  53.2  53.0  Women  32.9  34.1  43.2  44.4  44.6  Men  64.4  62.2  65.3  62.4  61.8  Foreigners  63.2  55.3  64.9  58.6  57.4  Swiss Workers in sectors [%] Agriculture and forestry (1 ) st  Industry and trade (2 )  45.5  46.5  51.8  51.9  52.0  1970  1980  1991  1999  2000  8.5  6.9  4.2  4.7  4.5  46.2  38.1  31.0  25.9  26.4  Public and civil services (3 )  45.3  55.0  64.7  69.4  69.1  Part-time workers [% of workforce]  1970  1980  1991  2000  2001  nd  rd  Total  20.6  25.6  26.9  Women  43.3  49.6  51.1  Men  5.7  8.3  9.2  Tab. 2.11 Workforce in percent of the respective population (Source: SFSO leaflet, 2002:8)  41  Within the European context, Switzerland's workplace is characterised by long working hours, high salaries, low unemployment rates and few strikes. In 2000, on average a full-time employee worked 41.8 hours a week or about 1,800 hours a year (Tab. 2.12) and earned 5,220 C H F a month or about 68,000 C H F (gross income) a year (Tab. 2.13). A s yet, women's wages are lower than men's, even though a federal law was implemented two decades ago to address this ( S F S O , 2002:172-173). After a rise in the unemployment rate to more than 5 % in 1997 (up to 14% in E U countries) it sank to about 2 % in 2000 (Kummerle+Frey, 2001:28; S F S O leaflet; 2002:8, 16). Throughout the 1990s, strike losses only made up about 1.5 days per 1,000 workers per year. Since 1937 a 'peace agreement' between employers and major trade unions does not allow an employee to strike or to use other lockout practises. The  fear of attracting too many foreign workers due to the high salaries and the  low  unemployment rate (compare to Chapter 2.2.4 Population and demography) was a main reason why Switzerland hesitated to sign the bilateral negotiations on labour mobility with the E U . On the other hand, 2  high wage levels and expensive products strongly restrict the potential to export locally processed or produced goods. Net wage level r  Taxes [%]  2  Annual Paid vacation working hours days  Prices (excl. rent)  Apartment rents [USD]  3  4  Zurich  100 (index)  26.1  1,868  24.7  100 (index)  1,140  Geneva  90.2  31.6  1,842  24.4  94.4  780  Frankfurt  61.7  36.2  1,688  31  76.2  820  London  66.8  22.8  1,833  22.2  94.8  2,450  Milan  41.9  33.4  1,732  22.8  66.8  810  Paris  57.8  24.5  1,587  28.3  81.6  980  Toronto  61.0  28.8  1,967  11.7  74.9  820  New York  97.2  28.9  1,882  13.3  103.8  2,200  Tokyo  120.8  19.2  1,868  20.5  140.1  2,160  5.9  13.4  1,824  21.4  59.1  1,510  Moscow 1  2 3 4  Actual hourly wages in 12 professions, after deduction of taxes and social contributions. Taxes and social contributions as a percentage of gross wages. Cost of a basket of 111 goods and services, weighted by consumer habits Medium price range of unfurnished 2-bedroom apartment in USD  Tab. 2.12 Prices and earnings of selected cities in 2000 (UBS, 2000:6-8, 17,27)  2  The Schengen-agreement was signed mid 2004; yet it has to be accepted by public vote in 2005. 42  2.2.6  Social life and lifestyle Social life Private households  In 1990, 8 3 % of the population lived in one of the various forms of family households, such as parents or common-law partners with children, couples without children, families with another person or singles with a parent. But private households are no longer dominated by traditional families. Single households account for 32.4% of private households, followed by traditional family households (parents with children) with 30.6% and couples without children with 25.6%. Single-parent families with children account for 4.6%, families with another person for 3.2% and singles with a parent for 0.2%. The majority of single households are accounted for by widowed women over 64 years (59%). Women often live longer than their husbands (higher life expectancy). In contrast, the majority of men in a single household are under 40 years old and divorced. They often live alone as the children generally live with their mothers. Indeed, 8 5 % of single-parent families are women living with their children ( S F S O 2002:37). As a result of the growing number of single-parent family households, couples without children and single households (14% of the population), the average size of households has largely decreased (Fig. 2.13). Three-generation families virtually do not exist any more even though they were widely spread at the beginning of the last century ( S F S O 2002:42). 3.3%  0.3% 5.0% 7.2%  • • •  Familyhouseholds Single households Collective households  a) Private households in 1990 Fig. 2.13  47.6  39.9 % • Couples with kids • Couples without kids • Single parent with kids • Single with Parent(s) • Families with other person b) Family households in 1990  1930  1960  1990  lone • two • three • four • five +  c) Number of persons per household in 1930, 1960 and 1990  Structures of private households (Source: SFSO, 2002: 99).  43  Changes of the traditional family The changing role of women is having a strong impact on the picture of the family. Better education and a changed workplace have increased job opportunities and economic independence for women. A s a consequence, getting married and having children is postponed to a later age, and married women tend to keep on working. In contrast to most European countries, the marriage rate has remained fairly stable over the last two decades. This is a consequence of the unsatisfactory legal situation for common-law partners and parents with children. However, marriages no longer last for a lifetime, and children may only delay an upcoming divorce. Between 1950 and 2000, the divorce rate in Switzerland increased from 4 % to 2 2 % ( S F S O 2002:40). Nonetheless, the traditional family - with women caring for children and household is still central to a large percentage of Swiss people, as well as of political decisions.  Lifestyle Income and expenditure of private  households  Switzerland is a very wealthy country with a high wage level, and it is an expensive land to live in. In fact, 5 0 % of the population earn less than 6,170 C H F a month (80,200 C H F a year), while the monthly expenditures for an average family (with an average of 2.4 persons) amount to 7,634 C H F . Notably, insurances, taxes, accommodation and energy make up 54.5% of the monthly expenditures (Tab. 2.13). Between 1990 and 2000, most of the consumer expenditures (except for accommodation and energy, communication, entertainment, recreation and culture) decreased while major increases occurred in accommodation and energy (about 30%) as well as costs for health insurance (almost 50%). However, consumer prices (increase by 21.2%) and salaries rose in a similar range throughout the 1990s, keeping the purchasing power (prices / salaries) fairly stable. In 1998, the expenditures of private Swiss households were 3 2 % over the average expenditures of the 15 (old) E U countries. There are considerable differences in certain products such as food, medical expenses, accommodation and domestic water, and public transportation. Yet even though building in Switzerland is considered to be very expensive, expenditures for building construction, machines and equipment material appear to be only slightly above the average of the E U countries, while furniture and finish flooring are actually cheaper (Tab. 2.14).  44  G r o s s salaries  [CHF ]  Expenditure structure  67,860  (of total expenditure)  2  Average annual gross income  Consumer spending  Average monthly gross payment  5,220  63.1  Food, non-alcoholic beverages  8.3  Alcoholic beverages and tobacco  1.3  > 8,900  Clothing and footwear  3.3  between  < 8,900  Accommodation and energy  17.6  and  > 3,440  Furnishings  3.2  < 3,440  Health  4.0  (full-time job with 13 monthly salaries) 10% of population 80% of population  [%]  10% of population  Transport  7.5  Swiss men  5,900  Communications  1.8  Foreign men  4,700  Entertainment, recreation and culture  6.7  Swiss women  4,500  Education  0.4  Foreign women  3,700  Restaurants/hotels  6.5  Other goods and services  2.5  Monthly g r o s s income  Average gross income  5,655  (full-time job distributed over 12 months) Monthly expenditure  per household, relying on 2.4 persons 2  7,634  1 CHF = 1 CAD (rate: July 1, 2002)  Withholdings  36.9  Social security contributions  9.5  Health insurance (basic insurance)  4.8  Health insurance (supplements)  1.8  Other insurance payments  4.7  Taxes and fees  13.6  Contributions and other transfers  2.6  Tab. 2.13 Income and expenditure structure of private households in 2000 (Source: SFSO online, 2002: Industry and services, and SFSO, 2002:172).  129%  Individual transportation  89%  meat  172%  Individual vehicle  115%  milk, cheese, eggs  137%  Public transportation  146%  fruits, legumes, potatoes  132%  Hotels and Restaurants  129%  Food  Tobacco  88%  Furniture and floor finishing  96%  Medical expenses  166%  Machines and equipment material  103%  Clothes and shoes  100%  Building construction  105%  Apartment (incl. domestic water)  181%  Mail and telecommunication  104%  Heating and light  92%  Books, magazines, newspapers  123%  Appliances  117%  Leisure articles and equipment  110%  Tab. 2.14 Expenditures for specific products in relation to the average of the 15 EU countries in 1998 (Source: SFSO, 2002:274).  Social security Switzerland has become the best-insured population in the world. Besides a broad range of voluntary and mandatory personal insurances (unemployment, health and accident, third party risk, legal protection, and many more) the pension scheme has become an important factor of the social security of the aging population. The pension scheme consists of three pillars: the national old-age, surviving dependant's and disability pension scheme (AHV/IV), the employer's staff pension scheme (BVG) and the private old-age saving insurance scheme (Kummerle+Frey, 2002:54-55). A s well, Swiss people spend a lot on insurance against potential loss or damage of possessions such as houses, household effects, cars or jewellery.  Waste and  recycling  The amount of household waste has risen considerably since 1996. In 2000, a total of about 4.73 million tons of waste or 660 kg / inhabitant were produced. But Switzerland also is a nation of recyclers: In 2000, about 42.5% (2.01 million tons) of total household waste was recycled. The largest recycle figures were achieved in aluminium tins and glass, at more than 90%. Also, the recycling percentages of P E T (over 80%), tinplate (over 65%), paper (almost 65%) and batteries (60%) were very high. The reasons for the high recycling numbers include taxes on household waste , frequent advertising and the comparatively 3  small effort required to reach the goal. It appears that people support the strategies as long as little time and financial engagement are required. Besides this, every year about 6.4 million tons of construction waste is produced. More than 5 0 % is recycled; the remaining amount is burnt or put in waste-deposal sites. In total, about 1 million tons of construction waste have to be disposed of in hazardous-waste sites every year ( S F S O , 2002:122). However, planning strategies for the waste generated by the demolishing of buildings are not (yet) common in Switzerland. Here, considerable amounts of material are used for the construction of buildings, and they are literally meant to last a lifetime.  3  In Basel, a 35 litre waste bag currently costs about 1.90 CHF. 46  2.2.7  Housing aspects  Housing stock and occupancy  The housing market in Switzerland shows residential buildings of remarkable age (Fig. 2.14). Even though private investors build two-thirds of the new housing units, the majority of the dwellings are inhabited by tenants (67.8% in 1990); less than one-third of the units are occupied by the owners themselves. Despite a federal law that decrees the support of home ownership, the rate of housing owner-occupancy in Switzerland (31%) is very low (Fig. 2.15). High initial costs for housing, an attractive stock of rental dwellings and a large proportion of (lowincome) foreigners, as well as limited governmental support of home ownership, are seen as major reasons why Switzerland has remained a country of tenants (IFS, 2000).  • Coop-inhabitants • Others a) Inhabitant type of dwellings Fig. 2.15  g  u  co  b) Owner-occupancy of dwellings in Europe  Inhabitant type in Switzerland and owner-occupancy in Europe in 1990 (Source: SFSO, 2002: 399). 47  Housing situation There is still a strong demand for single-family houses. Between 1980 and 1990, their share grew from 4 5 % to 5 4 % of the total building stock. While the number of multi-residential buildings remained fairly constant around 4,300 buildings per year, the number of single-family houses, as well as the number of dwellings in multi-residential buildings, altered considerably between 1975 and 2001. The strong decrease in the number of dwellings in multi-residential buildings since 1994 is remarkable. It appears that the high demand for single-family houses (between about 11,000 and 14,000 units) and the low requirement of multi-residential buildings (decline from 6,000 to almost 3,000 buildings) has had an influence on the size of multi-residential buildings. Within this period of time, the average number of dwellings in multiresidential buildings decreased from 6.1 to 5.5 units - the lowest number ever (Fig. 2.16).  50000  40000  30000  20000  10000  1980  1975  Fig. 2.16  1985  1990  1995  2000  Number of new dwellings in Single-family and multiple-residential buildings (Source: SFSO, 2002:421).  In Switzerland, decreasing household size and an increase in the average living space have resulted in considerable growth of the urban space (see chapter 2.1.1: land use). A s we have already seen in Figure 2.13c, the number of single households more than doubled between 1960 and 1990. A s well, the number of apartments with 1 or 2 rooms (bachelors or one-bedrooms) clearly decreased while the number of dwellings with four and five rooms clearly increased. Between 1980 and 1990, the average number of people living in a dwelling decreased from 2.6 to 2.4, while the average living space increased from 34 m  2  to 39 m  2  per person. Today, singles want to live in a 3-room apartment  (two-bedroom  apartment).  48  Wuest & Partner predict that demographic ageing of the population and its growing wealth, along with globalisation, will determine the housing market over the next decade. Luxurious and easilyaccessible dwellings are becoming more important for the growing number of wealthy elderly people. A s well, fewer young people will inhabit the small and modest older apartments. The desire for bigger living spaces will continue despite a limited readiness to pay higher rents. Also, expensive urban regions with a broad range of workplaces, such as Zurich or Geneva, Basel or Berne, will continue to attract people (Fischer, 1999).  Housing costs The initial costs for houses are very high in Switzerland. This is mainly due to fairly high land costs, whereas the average construction costs are comparable with those of the other E U countries. Land prices vary considerably within cantons as well as within different regions of a canton. Closeness to urban centres and urban infrastructure, view or orientation may considerably influence the price for undeveloped building land. However, spacious and flexible indoor and outdoor spaces and expensive interior finishing materials and appliances may considerably increase the construction costs.  Building in the canton of Zurich After an enormous increase between the early 1980s and the early 1990s, land costs have remained fairly stable at an average of slightly above 600 C H F / m . But their variation has become enormous (Fig. 2.17). 2  In Zurich city as well as in the adjacent 'gold coast' (Pfannenstil) undeveloped building land on average costs over 800 C H F / m , whereas for single lots up to 1,100 C H F are paid. In contrast, in remoter regions 2  (e.g. in the Weinland) residential land may be found as low as about 220 C H F / m . 2  Considering average land costs of 550 C H F / m designed residential buildings of 550 C H F / m 4  3  2  and ordinary construction costs for architect-  SIA , a detached single-family house (Fig. 2.18) costs 5  Current construction costs for architect-designed residential buildings are within 1,500 and 2,500 CHF/m net living and utility area or around 500 to 700 CHF/m SIA. Luxurious villas may considerably spread the given boundaries. CHF/m SIA is a measurement defined by the Swiss engineer and architect association (SIA) to allow a comparison of the costs for different houses. 4  2  3  5  3  49  about 650,000 C H F . In comparison with the average annual gross income of about 68,000 C H F in 2000 (Tab. 2.13), the expenditures for an ordinary house are almost 10 times the average annual gross salary.  Fig. 2.17  Price development of residential land in the canton of Zurich (without city of Zurich) (Source: SOZ, 2002: Canton of Zurich in numbers: 2002; building and land costs in 2001).  C o s t s c a l c u l a t i o n s of a n o r d i n a r y d e t a c h e d s i n g l e - f a m i l y h o u s e in the c a n t o n of Z u r i c h  Average land costs Average construction costs Minimal distances to boundary: Lot:  15.20 m x 23.30 m = House: 2 storeys and cellar Size: 7.20 m x 11.30 m = Net living area: 2x75 = Volume SIA: 11 m x 82 m = 2  Land costs: House costs:  Fig. 2.18  „2  A  550.- CHF/m 550.- CHF/m 4/4/4/8m  3 v  3  354 m  2  82 m 150 m 900 m  2  <  8m  2  A  3  3 v  354 m x 550.- = 200,000 CHF 9 0 0 m x 5 5 0 . - = 495,000 CHF 2  3  < 4m >  >  T o t a l initial c o s t s  695.000 C H F  Initial costs for an average detached single-family house in the canton of Zurich (Source: Reiners, 2002:158-196; SOZ, 2002: Building and land costs in the canton of Zurich in 2001).  According to the recommendations of a large Swiss bank, a client would need minimum available savings of 130,000 C H F to finance at least 2 0 % (minimum) of the initial costs. In addition, he would need an annual gross income of about 125,000 C H F (or a monthly gross salary of about 9,600 C H F ) to finance the single-family house in the previous example. On the basis of a 5% mortgage interest, the resulting monthly costs for mortgage interest, amortisation (about 1%) and incidental costs (about 1%) would be at about 3,150 C H F or almost one third of the gross salary (UBS, 2003).  50  Potential for reduced initial housing  costs  In Switzerland, the high initial housing costs are influenced by three major factors; these are the costs for land, labour and building components or materials. Land costs: The ongoing pressure on available land resources - especially in and around urban centres - will not allow land costs to decline. The only way to limit land costs is to limit the use of land by constructing denser housing systems. Considering the example in Figure 2.18, the cost difference between a detached single-family house and a row house would be around 100,000 C H F or about 1 5 % of the initial costs. Labour costs: In Switzerland, the labour costs will not decrease unless wages stop to increase, lower-educated (and lower-paid) people are employed, or the working hours during the planning and construction process are limited. Latter goals might be achieved by employing building contractors or constructing pre-designed and / or factory-built houses. Building-component  and material costs:  Potential cost reductions of building components or  materials will largely depend on the size of the dwelling, the building system, the construction material, the finishing materials and the infrastructure. Today, the desired living area per person is increasing. Also, increasing insulation and quality standards of enclosures do not allow reduction of the  primary  construction costs by much. Renggli has shown that the primary construction costs of a factory-built S W F (transport and erection not included) make up about 10% of the initial costs. Thus, considering a cost reduction in the primary construction of 10%, the initial building costs would be reduced by only 1% (Renggli, 2002). However, there is a potential saving in finishing material costs; using less expensive materials, avoiding finishing materials or applying them at a later stage has to be considered. Also, lower heat losses limit the initial costs of the heating system (smaller sized infrastructure). To sum up, a considerable reduction in the initial housing costs could be achieved by limiting the land costs. Additional, but more cutting, savings might be achieved by limiting the costs of finishing materials and infrastructure or the volume of the dwelling, or by reducing the planning and construction time.  51  2.3  Product  The product describes the goods people produce in a certain place over time. In this chapter I discuss briefly local building culture, building materials, traditional and present-day wood building systems and the advanced voluntary building standards, as these product-related aspects are necessary for the evaluation of present-day wood building systems. Aspects of housing have already been discussed in the housing section (Chapter 2.2.6).  2.3.1  Local building culture  Representative aristocratic, religious or public buildings were mainly built in stone and designed according to the prevailing European style. In contrast, common houses, farms or workspaces were built in stone, wood or a combination of wood and stone depending on the locally-available natural resources. Generally, wood buildings with stone bases were prevalent in the Central Plain and most of the Alps (mainly German and Romansh speaking regions), while stone buildings dominated in the Jura (French speaking) and the  Fig. 2.19  Map of regional-traditional storage buildings in Switzerland (Gschwend, 1989:41). 52  most southern (Italian speaking) parts of the Alps (Fig. 2.19). These buildings were built by local builders using their passed-down skills. Both carpenters and masons were organized into guilds with monopolised skills and high social status. Typical elements of vernacular residential buildings are stone bases, gable roofs and hipped or hipped gable roofs covered by stone slates or tiles, as well as exterior shutters. The stone bases were especially important to protect wood constructions against ascending water and deep snow covers in winter. In addition, they were used to adjust the building to the uneven lots. Often, these stone bases were the visible parts of cellars that provided important storage spaces. Tile roofs with large projections were ideal weather protection for wood buildings and exterior storage spaces. Shutters protected interior spaces against overheating in summer and excessive cooling in winter (Fig. 2.20).  a) Log house, Ausserberg, Valais c) Timber-frame buildings, Stein am Rhine Fig. 2.20  b) Traditional stone house in Cevio, Tessin d) Traditional stone house, La Punt, Engadin  Traditional residential building types (Photos by author, 2002).  Today, the basement cellar is still an indispensable part of residential buildings, even though a storage space could also (sometimes more cheaply) be placed adjacent to the house. Also, tiled pitched  53  roofs with dormer windows - in contrast to flat roofs - and shutters are important elements of residential buildings. Not only are they requested by the inhabitants; they are often indispensable elements required by local building codes (see chapter 2.2.2. Legislation). Moreover, in many places a predefined range of exterior colours, closely-spaced window muntins, specific roof tiles, given roof slopes, or defined form and size of dormers are meant to keep the appearance of new buildings within the rural-traditional settings. These restrictive building regulations (especially for residential buildings in remote areas) often do not allow the broad unfolding of the architectural potential of contemporary buildings.  Modern Architecture and Country-Style The social and technical effects of the industrialisation that affected Switzerland throughout the 1 9  th  century had considerably changed the traditional building culture in Switzerland by the turn of the 2 0  th  century. Increasing urbanisation and social changes as well as an increasing technical materialism and developing international trade quickened the ideas of architects that aspired to meet the needs of the new society with an adequately-built environment. This new approach was characterised by asymmetric forms and floating designs relying on new building materials, industrial production and various international mindsets (Amman, 1988:31). Various international styles or 'Modern architecture' without ornament or historical references developed likewise in different countries throughout the first two decades of the 2 0  th  century. In contrast, the social and technical changes, the opening to trade outside the region, and the influence of new and 'foreign' ideas evoked an increasing reflection of national-traditional values (compare to Chapter 2.2.4 Population and demography). Within the population, regional-traditional, rural-looking buildings became a symbol for the lost local identity and for the 'good old times'. Typical vernacular elements, such as wooden balustrades, bull's-eye panes or barn doors were applied to any building, from houses to hotels to commercial and administration buildings. At the end of the 1 9 century, the Country th  Style was born. In reaction to the threat of war and as a countermovement to the spreading modern architecture, the Country Style once more had a strong revival throughout the 1930s. During that time, the Swiss Chalet - an over-ornamented square-log building - became a symbol of Swiss cultural identity and traditional  54  integrity. In the following decades, the Swiss Chalet became popular in any region and for any use (e.g. large hotels in a rustic Chalet style), even though it strongly opposed the ideas of modern architecture. As well, buildings in wood became a symbol of backwardness and regionalism for many architects.  Present trends in architecture  Switzerland's building culture is often equated with traditional rural buildings or the idea of the Swiss Chalet. However, recent buildings, such as the thermal bath in Vals by Peter Zumthor (1996), the central signal tower (1995), the soccer stadium (1999) or the Schaulager (2002) in Basel by Herzog & De Meuron as well as the Culture and Congress Centre in Lucerne (1999) or the Monolith for Expo 02 (2002) by Jean Nouvel, have been recognised by local and foreign press alike (Fig. 2.21). This recognition found its expression in the awarding of the Pritzker prize to Herzog & De Meuron in 2001. Characteristic of this present trend in non-residential architecture is the radical formal reduction.  a) Thermal bath, Vals, Peter Zumthor, 1996  b) Expo 02 monolith, Murten, Jean Nouvel, 2002  c) Central signal tower, Basel, Herzog & De Meuron, 1995  Fig. 2.21 Contemporary non-residential architecture (Photos by the author).  The growing prestige and popularity of 'good design' is also strengthening the demand for architect-designed residential buildings, even though contractor- or factory-built houses are becoming more and more popular in Switzerland. Whereas contractor-built houses with guaranteed costs, short time frames, limited personal involvement and fixed moving-in dates do not exclude good architectural design  55  or individual solutions, numerous architect-designed and factory-built wood houses demonstrate the strong architectural potential of recent developments in the wood building industry (Fig. 2.22).  a) House Trosch, Epalinges, Novello & Trosch, 1995  b) Estate Spittelhof, Biel-Benken, Peter Zumthor, 1999  c)House Plaschy, Wermatswil Werner Reichle, architect, 1999  d) House Lingg-Steger, Nottwil, Steger& Partner, 1999  Fig. 2.22  2.3.2  Architect designed new residential architecture in wood (Lignum, 2000).  Wood as a building material  In Europe, wood buildings are widely spread, from central and eastern Europe to Russia and from Scandinavia to the Balkans where vast timber resources were (or still are) available (Fig.2.23). During the Middle A g e s (mid 1 3 to 17 century), the fear of large city fires and the fashion of th  th  banning 'rural-looking' wooden buildings from the city resulted in a growing avoidance of wood towards the end of the 17 century. In the following centuries, residential buildings in wood increasingly lost their th  importance, while brick and concrete took over the leading roles in the residential-building industry. In the first half of the 2 0  th  century, the increased desire for protection against threat and / or war (World W a r I  56  and World W a r II) have caused people in central Europe to prefer residential buildings with 'heavy' masonry or concrete walls (Winter, 1995). Even the booming economy between the 1960s and 1980s did not have an impact on the wood building industry. At that time, plastic was the progressive material that showcased belief in the technological progress. While the central European countries stopped building in wood, the Scandinavian countries as well as Canada and the United States established a successful wood building culture throughout the 1 9  th  and 2 0 centuries. th  Fig. 2.23  Extent of wood buildings in Europe (Source: Phleps, 1983).  57  Revival of wood as a residential building material Only at the end of the 1980s did young architects and engineers in Switzerland (as well as in Germany and Austria), together with innovative carpentry firms, start to rediscover the new values of wood. By that time, glue-laminated wood (gluelam) beams in combination with new joining techniques (metal fasteners and glue) had already succeeded in the construction of large roof constructions, such as those for sports halls or other large spaces without columns. In Switzerland, the roofing of the ice hockey hall in Davos (1981) was a first famous example where, instead of an expensive steel construction, a gluelam beam construction was built. Whereas first engineered wood products (EWP's), such as plywood, particleboard and fibreboard had been used since the first half of the last century, oriented strand board (OSB) and glue-laminated boards came up over the last decades. Since, the share of O S B and a growing number of glue-laminated boards has strongly increased in the residential building market in Switzerland . 1  The new joining techniques and the supply of new wood building materials challenged building practices in Switzerland, as did the fast development of information technology throughout the 1980s as well as increasing concerns about the health of the environment. At the end of the 1980s the first federal program, Energy 2000 (see Chapter 2.1.3), launched research into reducing consumption of fossil fuels and the use of renewable energies. Also, over-aged and dying forests became of political interest (see Chapter 2.2.3 Legislation). This initiative was very welcome to the wood building industry. After the long crisis (see Chapter 2.1.5 Industry and trade) that forced many carpentry firms to close down, it urgently needed new input as well as new self-confidence. Supported by Lignum, the Swiss Association of the Woodworking Industry, the wood building industry started to emphasize its advantages in relation to the cement industry. But even though a strong framework for the revival of wood was given, Kramel believes that knowledge of the Danish work of Niels Bohr and Jorn Utzon, relying on the translation of Japanese wood buildings, as well as the modern wood buildings by Richard Meier and Peter Eisenman must have given an important impetus to the idea of the new wood house in Switzerland (Kramel, 98:48-55). Undoubtedly, the renewed interest in wood and the enormous choice of new wood building products and systems for residential (and non-residential) buildings is based on a broad range of technical, economic, ecological and political factors (discussed in various sections throughout this chapter) as well as the existence of a skilled workforce, and a new perception of houses in wood.  1  Other EWP's, such as waferboard, laminated veneer lumber (LVL) or parallel strand lumber (PSL) are barely used.  58  2.3.3  Traditional w o o d building s y s t e m s  Log and timber-frame construction used to be the leading residential wood building systems in Switzerland. They influenced the development of residential buildings up to the 20 century. Yet, over the th  last century, these traditional building systems have lost their importance in the residential building market.  Log construction  Log constructions were widely spread throughout the northern part of the Alps as well as the Rhine and Rhone valleys, where vast wood resources were available. Regional differences are showcased in the shape of the log and the joining and cornering techniques, as well as in the specific decorative carvings. Square logs and rich carvings are typical of houses in villages in the northern part of the Alps as well as  a) Square-log house (Chalet), Grindelwald  b) Round-log cabin, above Chur  c) Square-log storage, Ausserberg  d) Round-log storage, Engadin  Fig. 2.24  Traditional log construction (Photos by the author).  59  the Rhine and Rhone valleys (Fig. 2.24 a), whereas rough square-log and round-log constructions were mainly used for storage buildings, barns and cabins in areas in all parts of the Alps (Fig. 2.24 b - d). Characteristic of log construction are walls of round or square logs laid horizontally on top of each other in courses. Structural strength and lateral support are achieved by fitting and interlocking the logs at the corners. Chinking of the gaps between the logs is necessary to achieve a weather-tight construction; traditionally, different chinking materials such as wood chips, stones, mud, grass, straw or moss were used. The simplicity of this construction method allows the erection of a building with just one tool, the axe (Phleps, 1983: 52). Log construction embodies major disadvantages due to the horizontal layering of the logs. Firstly, the load-bearing capacity of wood across the grain is much lower than along the grain; log construction does not make use of the high vertical load-bearing capacity of wood. Secondly, the radial and tangential wood shrinkage are much higher than the longitudinal; as a result, settling, stability of the corners and tightness of walls are critical constructive aspects that need to be handled with special care. Thirdly, the length of the logs considerably constrains the flexibility of the floor plan. In the Swiss Alps, rustic round-log cabins or restaurants are still popular. Also, traditional squarelog buildings still dominate the local character of many settlements in the northern and central part of the Swiss Alps (e.g. Grindelwald, Vrin and Vals) as well as in the Rhone valley (e.g. Oberberg and Ernen). Yet log constructions are barely feasible for contemporary housing as they use a large amount of wood. In addition, traditional (insinuated) enclosure constructions no longer comply with the enclosure standards of current building codes. Additional insulation must be applied to the interior or exterior of the structure, thereby losing the typical appearance of log constructions. Today, manufactured layered log-like square elements (e.g. the ISOXsystem:  Fig. 2.35, and chapter 2.3.4) often replace the traditional building system.  These building systems visually imitate traditional log construction without disregarding present code requirements or making contemporary building structures impossible.  Timber-frame construction  By the end of the 1 7  th  century, the knowledge of timber-frame construction was almost standardised  throughout Europe. Carpenters were organized into guilds with monopolized skills, and books in  60  numerous languages taught common solutions for the problems of stresses and strains within a structure. Also, young carpenters who had completed an apprenticeship spread their know-how during their compulsory one-year travels all over Europe. Timber-frame buildings consist of a basic load-bearing frame of square timbers, assembled as a set of horizontal and vertical structural members. The vertical (posts) and horizontal members (bottomplates, plates, girts, summer and joists) are connected with mortise-and-tenon joints and locked with wooden pegs or, more recently, with screws (Fig. 2.25). Diagonal braces provide the frame rigidity. Wall infill and / or cladding is necessary to achieve a weather-tight enclosure. In most early European timberframe constructions, the vertical members consisted of load-bearing primary and - often non load-bearing - secondary posts. The widely-spaced primary posts extended to the full height of the wall (Fig. 2.26). Storey-high secondary posts provided additional lateral support.  Fig. 2.25  Primary timber-frame construction (Source: Rempel, 1980).  Fig. 2.26  Half-timbered house in Pembridge, UK (Source: Harris, 1980).  All over Europe, half-timbered constructions - exposed timber-frame constructions with wattle and daub, stone or brick infill - were widely employed until the mid 1 9 century. However, in towns they were th  often covered with plaster by the end of the 1 8  th  century. Plaster was meant to give the rural-looking  timber-frame buildings an urban appearance by imitating stone and masonry facades and to protect them from fires. During the 1 9  th  century, this attitude was also adopted to farmhouses, a s timber-frame  construction was considered to be a poor rural construction mode. In Switzerland, timber-frame buildings with wood board or plank infill were prevalent in the central and north-eastern parts of Switzerland. Around 1500, Southern German half-timbered buildings influenced framing techniques in Switzerland. By the end of the 1 8 century, particularly picturesque and decorative th  half-timbered buildings had developed in North-eastern Switzerland and Southern Germany. These buildings were built up floor-by-floor using pre-cut frame members and storey-high posts (Gschwend,  61  1989: 102-103). Typical of these buildings is the exposure of the floor joists in the facade as well a s rich bracing patterns beneath the windows (Fig. 2.27, Fig. 2.28). Like those in the other European countries, many of these buildings were covered with plaster throughout the 1 9  th  century. However, efforts to  preserve monuments and historic buildings (compare to Chapter 2.2.1 Culture) have unveiled the original beauty of half-timbered villages in Switzerland by giving them back their typical red and white coloration over the last century.  Fig. 2.27  Half-timbered house in Wigoltingen (Source: photo by the author)  Fig. 2.28  Common bracing patterns in CH (Source: Kolb, 1998:24)  Today, timber frame construction is still used in Switzerland. Especially in remote areas, timber frame construction is appreciated as a fast building system at reasonable costs. O n site, the pre-cut frame members are assembled to a rigid frame using floor-by-floor construction a s well as wood-to-wood connections (Fig. 2.29, Fig. 2.30). The frame cavities are filled with insulation. If required, additional insulation may be applied on either side of the frame. Generally, cladding is applied to the structural frame even though an exterior exposure of the frame would still be technically possible. The most probable reasons are reduced maintenance work and / or conformity to present aesthetic values.  Fig. 2.29 Timber frame principle (Source: Kolb, 1998:67)  Fig. 2.30  On-site timber frame construction with precut members (Source: Kolb, 1998:76) 62  2.3.4  New residential wood building systems The following section gives an overview of the vast variety of the new wood building systems for  load-bearing walls available for the construction of residential buildings in Switzerland. According to the characteristics of the load-bearing members I classify the systems into four different groups: wood frame systems, wood panel systems, wood module systems and  wood-lightweight-concrete.  Wood frame systems The structural frames of wood frame systems consist of lumber or timbers. Together with the structural sheathing, the structural frame forms a rigid wall element. In Switzerland, wood frames are generally processed to storey-high wall, storey-wide floor, and roof panels with maximal length and a considerable degree of finishing. On site, these panels are assembled in only one to two days. Modular elements are not common for residential buildings. This standard is most probably limited by the lack of availability of large storage spaces and the means of transport. Also, smaller elements are rare as they increase the number of joints. The Swiss wood frame (SWF) represents a large number of different systems, each one varying in the material used, as well as the number and dimensions of layers. Even though the Swiss wood frame system is not (yet) standardised, it is very successful in the residential building market in Switzerland. A s it is the leading wood building system at present, it requires a closer look at its specific characteristics (see chapter 5).  Wood panel systems Wood panel systems rely on a structural board that provides vertical as well as lateral stability. Like wood frame systems, wood panel systems are processed into wall, floor and roof panels with maximum size and varying degrees of finishing for on-site assembly. Generally, insulation and cladding are applied to the exterior side of the structural board on site. For the interior, the exposed structural boards are painted or oiled. Unless an installation layer is needed, no interior finishing materials are required.  63  The structural board of wood panel systems consists of particleboard  or solid-wood  board. In  Switzerland, Homogen 80 is the only system that employs a structural particleboard. In contrast, the choice of solid-wood panel systems relying on structural solid-wood boards is enormous. Due to the easy production process, carpenters may process low quality and waste wood into their own (non-standardised) solid-wood boards. A s a consequence, the names given to these boards are very different and confusing. Table 2.15 lists major particleboard and solid-wood boards used for load-bearing walls of wood panel systems. Panels for other purposes, such as furniture or sheathing, are not included in this table. Particleboard systems  Brand name  Particleboards  Homogen 80  Solid-wood panel systems  Brand name  Dowelled boards  Bresta  80 - 247  Optiholz  50-210  Panel Thickn. in [mm] 80  Layers S i z e (w x I) in [m] 2.03x5.37/2.65  Number  Section  Wood chips  3  symmetric  Glued, pressed  Section  Wood laths / boards dowelled top-on-top  grooved panel: 2 x 2.65 Panel Thickn. in [mm]  Layers S i z e (w x I) in [m]  Number  up to 3.5 x 9  1  opt: diff. surface relief  0.416 x 13  1  (finger-jointed boards)  force-fit dowelled: multiple 0.416 x 13  Gluelaminated boards  Block boards (subgroup)  Rohrex  35-80  WiehagProfiplan  17-40  Merk Dickholz  85 - 297  4.8 x 14.8 max. 4.8 x 20  Schuler  30-140  max. 2 . 1 7 x 7 . 2  1 / 1.25 x 5  3 or 5  symmetric  3  symmetric  glued sideby-side  force-fit finger jointed: max 1.25 x 20  7-200  K1 Multiplan  1.25x5 max. 1.25 x 6  20 - 75  odd, 5 to 17  3 or 5  symmetric, opt: curved panel, diff. surface materials (finger-jointed boards) symmetric  0.8x9  1  feasible for ribs  2.015x5.03/6.03  3  symmetric (finger-jointed boards)  force-fit finger jointed: max 2 x 24  glued top-on-top  Tab. 2.15 Major structural boards used for wood panel systems (Source: Adapted from Lignum, 1999, and Lignum, 1997)  Particleboard  systems  Homogen 80 relies on an 80 mm thick, three-layered particleboard. Two layers of fine particles enclose a central layer of rough particles. These boards are available with tongues and grooves for tongue-andgroove connections, as well as non-moulded for glued connections. They are applicable for structural walls, but not for the construction of floors or roofs. In the factory, particleboard wall panels including  64  openings and ducts for wiring are prepared for on-site assembly. A s insulation and cladding are applied only on site, protection of structural particleboards against weather influences has to be guaranteed (Fig. 2.31) (Lignum, 1999:38-39, and Clausen, 2004).  Homogen80 Rigid Insulation Stucco Wood plate Mortar levelling plate Flashing Rigid insulation Water barrier_ Cast concrete  a) Enclosure-foundation section Fig. 2.31  b) House Baggenstoos & Hatt, Cham, by HWP architects AG, 2000.  Homogen 80 (Source: Homogen 80, 2004, Bisang, 2004)  Solid-wood panel  systems  Sol id-wood panel systems consist of dowelled boards or glue-laminated  boards, whereas block boards are  specifically glue-laminated boards . A minimum board depth of 7 c m is required for the construction of 1  load-bearing walls to resist structural and lateral loads. All these boards also qualify for the construction of floor and roof elements. However, structural walls of glue-laminated boards, particularly block boards, often consist of thinner structural boards that are supported by a set of parallel ribs. This system also has a specific name; it is called the Ribbed panel system (RPS). It is discussed at the end of this section. Structural dowelled boards mainly consist of sapwood boards of local wood, such a s fir, Norway spruce, larch, Douglas fir or pine, dowelled on top of each other. T h e surface of the single-layered boards is determined by the depth of the basic boards; profiled edges allow the achievement of specific surfaces, such a s for acoustic uses. Dowelled boards such a s 'Bresta' and 'Optiholz' may be used for structural walls a s well as for the construction of floors and roofs (Lignum, 1999:8-9, 12-13; Tschopp, 2004: Bresta, and Timbatec, 2004: Optiholz).  Cerliani and Baggenstos only distinguish between single-layered glue-laminated boards (for non-structural use) and multi-layered glue-laminated boards (for structural use). They do not consider the different production processes (Cerliani, and Baggenstos, 2000:48-51). 1  65  Structural glue-laminated  boards consist of an odd number of layers (Tab. 2.16). Each layer  consists of side-by-side glue-laminated sapwood boards of Spruce fir or Douglas fir. The required number of layers is glued on top of each other with alternate orientation. Variations in the dimensions or the wood quality of the basic boards and in the number or the material sequence of the layers result in a large variety of panels. A s the wide side of the basic boards determines the surface of plank panels, they show a fairly uniform wood texture. As for glue-laminated boards, structural block boards also consist of an odd number of layers, but the production process is different. Here, sapwood boards or laths of Spruce fir or Douglas fir are gluelaminated (side-by-side and top-on-top) to form a large block with equally-oriented boards. In a second step, the block is cut lengthwise into thin slices with the required thickness of the basic block board layers. Finally, the required number of basic layers is crosswise glued on top of each other. Variations in the dimension or the wood quality of the basic boards, the layer thickness, or the number of layers result in a large variety of block boards. A s the depth of the basic boards or laths determines the surface of the block boards, they show a fairly irregular pattern of small wood stripes (Lignum, 1999:10-11, 14-15). The Ribbed panel system was first presented by Schuler in 1997 ( S A H conference, Weinfelden). The system consists of a load-bearing, 3-layered, 35-mm-thick block board. It is structurally supported by a set of parallel ribs glued against the structural board. This idea is strongly reminiscent of concrete slab constructions where secondary beams or ribs are an integral part of the slabs. Together, the thin structural board and the supporting ribs provide structural and lateral stability. In addition, the ribs keep the insulation in place and provide a nailing base for exterior layers (Fig. 2.32) (Schuler, 1997: 93-101).  a) House Bearth, enclosure - floor joint, Deplazes, 1998 Fig. 2.32  b) Sunny woods (multiple-residential building), Zurich, Beat Kampfen, architect, 2001.  Ribbed panel system (Source: Deplazes, 2001, and Pius Schuler, 2004).  66  Wood module systems  Wood module systems show a great diversity in layering, form and size of the elements, from multilayered brick-like elements to large planar ones. Characteristic of these systems is the on-site assembly of walls using manufactured smaller or larger single elements or compounds of elements. W o o d module systems consist of stick connections or tongue-and-groove joints that are fixed with mechanical fasteners or glues. Insulation, exterior cladding, installations and interior finishing are applied on site. Most of these systems are constructed in such a way that wiring can run through a conduit in the structural elements. Not all these systems qualify for the construction of floors or roofs. Table 2.16 gives an overview of the major wood module systems for load-bearing wall systems. Wood module systems  Brand name  Panel Thickn. in mm  Layers Size (h x I) in cm  Orientation, Form  Number  Section  Layer/ modules  horizontal, small rectangle  5  symm. opt: surface choice  glued / stuck  vertical, linear planar  3, 4, 5, 7  opt: choice of surface  glued / mech.  horizontal, linear  3  insulated  1  non-insul.  glued / stuck  horizontal, linear (planar)  3  symm. opt: core insulation  Masonry-like modules  STEKO  160  Plank-like modules  Li g notrend  70 / 90 / 110/150  Beam-like modules  YSOX  12-20  Hollow-core modules  Lignatur LKE  (8, 10), 12-32  LFE  12-32  51.4/100 x max. 1,600  Web modules  WE-KAelement  19-51  1900 x 166.6  vertical, linear (planar)  3  symm.  glued / tie-bar  Stud modules  Bruggo Holes  60 - 260  30-800x30-100 length max. 1,200  vertical, linear (planar)  1,3  symm. / asymm.  Dovetailed / tongue& groove  24 / 32 x 1 6 / 3 2 / 48/64  250 / 300 x 37.5 / 50 / 62.5 / 75 / 87.5 0.14x200-500  10-20 19.5 x (up to) 1,200 opt: longer elements  Glued / tongue& groove  Tab. 2.16 Major wood module systems for load-bearing walls (Source: Lignum, 1999 and, Lignatur, 2001, YSOX 2002)  Steko Steko is a wood building system that is reminiscent of masonry construction (Fig. 2.33). The cubic elements consist of five layers of wood; these are central studs, with horizontal boards and a finishing layer on either side. The system consists of differently-sized modules as well as specific plates a s base for the wall construction, a s well as lintel, sill and reveal elements to frame openings. The central cavities may take up installation and insulation. O n site, the manufactured wood modules are stuck side-by-side and 67  top-on-top with differing joints. This wall construction system is combined with established floor and roof systems, such as solid-wood panel systems or joist and rafter construction. Installations as well as exterior insulation and cladding are applied to the basic structure. Finished surfaces or a specific top layer allow walls to remain visible on the inside (Lignum, 1999:44-45, Steko, 2004).  a) Steko elements (1/1 element, A element, A element, !4 element, plate and lintel, sill and reveal element) 3  1  b) Assembly of wall, isometric corner section  Fig. 2.33  c) Two Boxes, double house, Kummertshausen, Ruth Schwarzenbach, 1999.  Steko system (Source: Steko, 2004).  Lignotrend Lignotrend is a planar module system of manufactured floor-high elements (Fig. 2.34). The basic elements consist of multiple layers of crosswise glue-laminated pieces of finger-jointed boards or laths of sapwood. Variations in the layering and the size and material of the boards or laths, as well as in the size and distribution of gaps, result in a large palette of systems for specific uses. G a p s of several centimetres 68  between the lumber pieces of the interior layers provide space for installations as well as acoustic insulation. Single elements are stuck sidewise to larger wall elements. Specific top and bottom plates allow easy joining of the element compounds to other building parts. The joints between the single elements as well as with other building parts are fixed with mechanical fasteners. Air barrier, insulation and cladding are applied to the exterior side of the basic construction; this system is designed to work without a vapour barrier. According to the particular surface layer used, the structural elements may remain visible on the inside or be covered with finishing materials. A similar system is available for the construction of floors and roofs (Lignum, 1999:42-43).  a) Single element with optional size c) Installation cavities within element Fig. 2.34  b) Selection of different element d) Row houses, Winterthur, Bar & architects, 1996.  Lignotrend system (Source: Lignotrend, 2004).  YSOX Y S O X is a wood building system that is reminiscent of traditional log construction (compare to Chapter 2.3.3 Traditional wood building systems). It relies on manufactured linear elements laid on top of each other in courses and interlocked at the corners. The system consists of three basic elements: a structural non-insulated, a structural insulated and a non-structural insulated element. The structural non-insulated element is a (five to ten-layered) glue-lam beam with tongue-and-groove joints (Fig. 2.35). The structural  69  insulated element contains a polystyrene centre with two-layered flanges to either side. The non-structural insulated element consists of one-half of the structural insulated one. On site, the elements are cut to the required length and assembled into walls, floors and roofs. The elements are interlocked at the corners and fixed with mechanical fasteners. (Samavaz, 1998).  a) Selection of YSOX elements Fig. 2.35  b) Details at openings, joints and corners  Ysox system (Source: Samvaz, 1998).  Lignatur Lignatur L K E (Lignatur Kasten Element (Lignatur case element)) and L F E (Lignatur Flachen Element (Lignatur planar element)) elements are manufactured hollow-core elements of Norway spruce boards, providing tongue-and-groove joints. L K E is a single case element; L F E is a planar (double or quadruple a  a) LKE (top), LFE (centre), LSE (bottom) Fig. 2.36  b) Multi-residential building Blumlimattweg, Thun, Architekturwerkstatt 90, 2002.  Lignatur system (Source: Lignum, 1999:28-29, Lignatur, 2004). 70  case) element (Fig. 2.36). This system is generally used for floor constructions. A s well, specific module, the L S E (Lignatur Schalen element (Lignatur shell element)), is also available for the construction of roofs. Upon request, elements with individual dimensions and optional core insulation are provided. (Lignum, 1999:4-5). Even though this system is meant for floor and roof constructions, it has also been used for the construction of load-bearing walls, where the elements are used in the vertical direction. Using these elements, curved roof and wall sections are easily achievable. Often, single elements are joined to form larger compounds. O n site, the elements or element compounds are assembled into walls, floors and roofs and the construction is wrapped with insulation and cladding.  WE-KA  -elements  Single WE-KA-elements (Wellsteg-Kammer-Element (corrugated web-chamber-element)) are similar to Ijoists. A corrugated birch plywood web is glued into the grooves of the lateral flanges consisting of Norway spruce or fir. The two flanges with tongue-and-groove edges allow single elements to be assembled into large elements, kept together with internal wooden tie-bars. The resulting cores may be filled with thermal insulation or other infill (Fig. 2.37). These elements are used for the construction of walls (vertical cores), floors and roofs alike. The easily-varied depth of the panel allows highly-insulated structural panels. Enclosures of WE-KA-elements need only to be covered with cladding on the outside, along with a vapour barrier and finishing materials on the inside (Lignum, 1999:16-17).  1  S  I  5  1,  t  i  \  * H  \\ V,  f,  fc  t i i  If ! i i  o  1m J  i (  WIDTH  Fig. 2.37  WE-KA system (Source: Lignum, 199:16-179 and, Vial, 2004).  71  Bruggo  Holes  The Bruggo Holes system relies on glue-laminated studs and sheathing boards with tongue-and-groove connections, both consisting of Norway spruce or fir sapwood boards. Instead of being applied to either side of the studs, one or two layers of sheathing are eccentrically fitted between the studs using a dovetail connection. Special plates are used to close the panel at the top and bottom. A s such, this system allows the building of large wall, floor and roof elements. The single-sheathed system is generally used for enclosures, where the large spaces are filled with insulation, and the smaller ones work as installation cavities. Insulation and cladding are applied to the exterior side and finishing materials to the interior one. The double-sheeted system is often used for floor constructions. The three separated cavities allow great freedom in designing the performance of floors. The floor construction may for example contain an installation layer or a layer with crushed stones to achieve increased thermal mass and / or sound insulation, as well as a thermal insulation layer. The single- and double-sheathed system allows very flexible layering of walls, floors and roofs (Fig. 2.38) (Lignum, 1999:40-41).  Fig. 2.38  Bruggo Holes (Source: Lignum, 1999; and Vial carpenters, 2004).  72  Wood-lightweight-concrete Wood-lightweight-concrete is a new type of concrete, using wood fibre aggregates instead of sand and gravel. This new building material allows a cast-on-site construction as well as the use of manufactured modules (e.g. blocks) or factory-built elements (e.g. wall panels with high levels of prefabrication). W o o d lightweight-concrete combines the positive advantages of wood and concrete: It is seen as a potential material for the construction of multiple-storey buildings, as it provides better fire resistance than any other wood building system and, like concrete, it allows the construction of almost any form. In comparison to concrete, the new material is lighter; it has a better thermal performance (thermal conductivity of about 0.3 to 0.75 W/mK), and it provides good sound-insulation values (Gliniorz, 2001).  2.3.5  Advanced voluntary building standards  Encouraged by the Energy 2000 program (see 2.2.2 Politics), the wood building industry has strongly supported the federal attempts to reduce the consumption of non-renewable energies of buildings over the last ten years. Consequently, the new wood building practice in Switzerland is closely linked to the Minergie, the Passive House and the recently-developed Minergie-P  standards. These three labels are  meant to honour buildings with an operational energy use that is substantially lower than is required by the (enhanced) present building code. In addition, factory-built houses in wood that provide high economic, ecological and construction advantages may achieve the label VGQ (Swiss Union for Tested Quality Houses). A s such, this label encourages carpenters to achieve high product and production standards. Also, it markets the idea that factory-built houses in wood are of high construction quality.  Minergie Minergie is a label that may be assigned to buildings, tools, technical installations and machines alike. It stands for "more living quality" and "low energy consumption". In 1998, the first Minergie label was given to three single-family houses in wood built by Renggli A G .  73  The Minergie label limits the consumption of operational energy as well as the initial building costs. The benchmark for the annual consumption of non-renewable operational energy is at 42 k W h / m  2  for new residential buildings and at 80 k W h / m for old ones (built before 1990), whereas electricity used 2  for heating purposes counts as double. In order to limit ventilation heat losses, tight enclosures (of n  5 0  s  1/h) along with controlled ventilation with heat recovery are compulsory. Minergie buildings reduce the use of operational energy to about 4 0 % of conventional ones. Despite, the initial building costs are not allowed to be more than 10% higher than those required for conventional buildings. (Minergie, 2004).  Passive House standard The Passive  House standard has mainly been defined by Dr. Wolfgang Feist of the Passive House  Institute in Darmstadt, Germany, and is standardised for central Europe. The maximum annual heating energy of passive houses must be less than 15 kWh/m ; the annual consumption of primary energy is 2  limited to 120 kWh/m , and the tightness of the enclosure must limit the air exchange rate to n 2  5 0  < 0.6/h.  The heating energy mainly relies on passive energy sources such as passive solar heat, the inhabitants themselves, and appliances. Heat pumps or domestic hot-water systems may provide additional energy and / or hot water. High surface temperatures and controlled ventilation with heat recovery provide a high level of comfort. These compact, Southern-oriented buildings with airtight enclosures consume only about 10% of the operational energy used by conventional houses.  Minergie-P In accordance with the European passive house standard, Switzerland launched the Minergie-P label in 2003. This label basically translates the benchmarks defined for central European countries and the European DIN-norms to the specific settings in Switzerland and the local SIA-norms relating them to the features of the Minergie label. The first Minergie-P label was assigned to the single-family house Setz built by Renggli A G in March 2003 (Fig. 3.1c). Minergie-P limits the consumption of operational energy as well as the initial building costs. Minergie-P buildings limit the annual consumption of non-renewable energy for heating, domestic hot water and ventilation to 30 kWh/m , while renewable energies are desired, and energy-efficient appliances 2  74  (A or A standard ) are required. Air-tight enclosures with a maximum air exchange rate of n +  1  5 0  2 0.6/h and  controlled ventilation with heat recovery are compulsory. The initial building costs must not be more than 15% higher than those for conventional buildings. Similar to Passive Houses, Minergie-P houses consume only about 10% of the operational energy used by conventional houses. Figure 2.39 gives an overview of annual operational energy consumption of different building standards in Switzerland (Minergie, 2004). 60 ] 50 ]  A Appliances B Ventilation C Domestic hot water D Heating system  40  I o  20  10 h  Building stock C H  Fig. 2.39  New code requirements  Minergie  Minergie-P  Minergie-P with heat pump  Energy consumption of houses in Switzerland (Source: Frommelt, 2004).  Label V G Q  The Quality Label VGQ is assigned to factory-built houses in wood that meet the ecological and economic standards defined and controlled by the V G Q . In 2001, the label was set up by a group of carpenters and consultants (e.g. Renggli, Schoeb, Germerott) to strengthen and promote high product and production standards for factory-built houses in Switzerland. Neutral, external and internal tests, assessments and measurements evaluate the building system, the factory production process and the erection on site as well as the completed house. In 2001, the first labels V G Q were assigned to three carpentry firms honouring their production and erection processes; one of which was Renggli A G ( V Q G , 2001).  Classification of appliances according to the guidelines of the European Community. The classification defines 7 levels from G (energy inefficient appliances) to A (energy efficient appliances). 1  75  2.4  Global factors  Over the last three decades, in industrialised countries the achievement of a more sustainable development has become one of the most urging global problems to solve. In 1972 - shortly before the first oil crisis - the world was confronted with a report called "Limits of Growth" by the Club of Rome. It challenged the assumption that the Earth was infinite and would always provide the resources needed for human prosperity. It predicted a worldwide environmental crisis and a shortage of resources if the high population growth and the consumption patterns continued at the same high rates. The report based on research that used first computer modelling to invest the intricate problems. Even though it was very controversial and the predicted crisis in the early 1990s did not happen, the key message is still valid (Suter, 1999).  2.4.1.  Sustainable Development  In 1987, the Brundtlandt-Commission defined sustainable development as a process that meets the requirements of present generations without jeopardising the chances of future generations (see also chapter 1.2. Definitions). This general principle was internationally recognised by most countries at the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992. Despite, the specification and the implementation of this basic concept appear to be very difficult. While it is agreed that all economic, ecologic and social components are an integral part of a sustainable development, disagreement exists on how much of one component might be given up in favour of another one. Also, there is an uncertainty in the rating of the rights and needs of future generations (Gotsch, 1999). The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (Agenda 2 1 , U N , 2003) provides a 1  comprehensive plan of action for the 2 1 century. Considering the broad field of environmental aspects, it st  provides an important  tool for the implementation of environmental strategies. At this point,  the  cooperation of local, national and international partnerships (vertical networks) as well as those of local or national politicians, civil societies and industries (horizontal networks) is necessary to find the most appropriate level to approach the spatially and textually complex environmental problems.  1  This document was adopted by 178 countries at the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992. 76  Figure 2.40 gives a scheme of interactions between global and local activities and responsibilities. Whereas the rule making (e.g. Agenda 21) as well as the generation of information and networks is very important on global level, on local level, the implementation of strategies or the distribution of knowledge is very important. Notably, the achievements on both global and local level depend on the commitment of local agents. Global  -  Rule making  Local Implementation  Structure  Function  Information  Knowledge  Top-down  Bottom-up  Networking  Partnerships  Fig. 2.40  Linking the global to the local activities and responsibilities  (Source: Velasques, 2002: 11).  Sustainable Development in Switzerland Since the early 1990s, the growing global concerns have enforced Switzerland's engagement for the environment.  It  actively  supports  various  international  activities  considering  the  limitation  of  electromagnetic pollution, the protection of forests and water springs, the limitation of desert spread or the handling of hazardous goods. In 1992, it adopted the Agenda 21 and, in 2003 it ratified the Kyoto protocol (see also chapter 2.2.2 environmental concerns). According to Agenda 21, Switzerland has started to convert the global requirements into local strategies. Currently, 17 cantons are in progress to set up a tool for environmental strategies on cantonal level, whereas 94 municipalities in 13 cantons have already implemented their 'local Agenda 21'. Even though the strategies are different from municipality to municipality, their goal is the same: they try to achieve an economically and ecologically sustainable as well as socially-just future ( A R E , 2004). The development of environmental strategies by cantons and municipalities guarantees regionally-bound solutions, as well as an immediate information and communication process. Further more, thriving strategies might push the launch of tightened new laws and regulations. Alongside, federally-funded programs, such as the Energy2000 or the 2,000-watt society (see chapter 2.2.2 environmental concerns), particularly focus the research on the reduction of the fossil fuel consumption and the C 0 exhaustion as well as on the production of renewable energies. Thereby, the 2  77  research of sustainable issues is seen as an 'innovation motor' (Zehnder, 2004) as well as a tool to establish partnerships. Again, a good example is the Energy2000 program. Whereas not all the goals were met (Tab. 2.17), the success of the program is seen in the establishment of partnerships between cantons, municipalities, non-governmental organisations, commercial enterprises and private partners. In addition, it generated new ideas or standards applicable to cities, buildings (enclosure, appliances), mobility issues (fuel, co-ops) or the production of renewable energies (wind, sun, water, ground, wood) ( S F O E , 2001). Even more, the potential to test ideas or standards in pilot projects was an important step to transfer the new standards into feasible tools (Tab. 2.18). Since 1998, about 3,000 Minergie buildings as well as some Minergie-P buildings (Minergie, 2004) have been awarded. By the end of 2003, the "Energiestadt" label (EnergieSchweiz, 2004) was assigned to 102 cities hosting more than one-fourth of Switzerland's inhabitants. Since January 1, 2002, the declaration of the energy efficiency and the energy consumption of appliances with an "Energie Etikette" is mandatory in Switzerland (EnergieSchweiz, 2003). As we have already seen in Chapter 2.3.5 (Advanced voluntary building standards), the Minergie-P label requires the use of appliances rated with an A or higher (A or A**). A s such, this energy and C 0 +  2  focussed research has likewise influenced the building development in Switzerland. Goal (1990 - 1999)  Result (1990 - 1998)  Fossil energy use  Stabilisation  + 6.1%  Electricity use  Increase < + 15%  + 6.5%  - heating energy  +  + 37.2%  - electricity  + 0.5%  +  Hydroelectricity  Increase + 15 %  + 4.3%  Output existing nuclear stations  + 10%  + 6%  C 0 exhaustion  Stabilisation  fairly stable at ± 40 million tons  - 1 0 % (2000-2010)  (light decrease 1990-96, light increase after 1996) ?  Renewable energies  2  3%  60%  Tab. 2.17 Goals and achievements of Energy 2000 (Source: Adapted from SFOE, 2001).  "Energiestadt" (energy-city) "Minergie" (Minergie-P) "Energie Etikette" (energy etiquette)  Label rewarded to municipalities for complying with more than 50% of a total of 91 defined energy saving strategies. Label rewarded to buildings, cars, appliances and processes for lower energy use and higher living quality within a given economic frame Rating of appliances or cars in terms of their energy use according to the directives of the EU (A = lowest energy consumption level, E = highest one)  Tab. 2.18 Standards generated during the Energy 2000 program (Source: Adapted from SFOE, 2001). 78  2.4.2  Sustainable building development  In near future, aspects such as healthy housing, longevity, natural resource efficiency, renewable energy, local and renewable building materials, operational energy consumption, greenhouse gas emission or recycled building content will become more important in the evaluation of a building or a  building  development. Also, they might increase the pressure on politicians, planners, builders and owners alike even though there is yet not much readiness to voluntarily adopt more sustainable building practises neither by the building industry nor by future owners. The expectation of higher costs, the loss of social image as well as a potential change of habits or personal comfort mostly seem to prevent the voluntary adoption of more sustainable building practices and, the adaptation of the local building codes takes time. Over the last 15 years, many countries or regions have launched voluntary building standards or labels for a more sustainable building development. Among them are the B R E E A M  2  (UK 1988, C a n a d a  1998), the L E E D (USA 2000, Canada 2004), the Passive House standard (central Europe 1988) as well 3  as the Minergie label (Switzerland 1998) and the Minergie-P label (Switzerland 2003) (see also chapter 2.3.5 Advanced voluntary building standards). Whereas the overall goal of all standards is the same, the approach differs from standard to standard as well as from region to region. A s such, they differently  Sustainability X  X  X  Ecological sustainability  Social & cultural sustainability  Protection of resources  X  Economic sustainability  Maintenance of health & comfort  H Minimation of life-cycle cost  Human health  H Reduced resource costs  \ Occupant health & comfort  H  Ener  9V  \ Construction worker's health  Reduced maintenance costs Added value  Building quality Improved asset value Protection of ecosystem Longevity Terrestrial ecosystem Aquatic ecosystem  H Avoidance of premature obsolecence  H Quality H Social & cultrual value conservation  H Ozone depleation Cultural continuity Global warming  4  j Conservation of knowledge  Local & Site effects  Fig. 2.41  H Support / creation of regional networks  Chart of basic factors of sustainability (Source: Cole, [2002?]).  B R E E A M stands for Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. L E E D stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.  79  address and value the basic global factors of sustainability, as they are exemplary shown in the chart in Figure 2.41. Nonetheless, the successful implementation of sustainable strategies into the local building practise is a central problem that has yet to be solved in most countries.  Sustainable building development in Switzerland Many global environmental concerns have not become priority issues in Switzerland. The large resources of wood, mineral deposits (lime, clay, sand and gravel) and water have not yet imposed major restrictions on the building practise. Also, the large stock of old buildings, the idea of 'ever lasting' buildings and a comparably small number of disposed buildings has not enforced steps for the reuse of building components or the use of recycled building materials. In contrary, problems of transportation, waste management, air pollution or site effects have gradually have been included into the building legislation. Today, issues such as waste-water management, on-site infiltration of storm-water, minimal size of greenspace ratios, thermal insulation of enclosures, separation and recycling of building materials and components or the use of non-toxic building materials are ruled by federal, cantonal or municipal laws. Despite a steady update of the building legislation, the attempts to reduce the C 0  2  exhaustion  (Kyoto Protocol, C 0 - l a w ) , to maintain the local forests (new forest law) and to reduce the dependency on 2  fossil fuels have considerably changed the building context within only few years. And, these attempts have also had a strong impact in the building practise in Switzerland. In 1998, the launch of the Minergie label (chapter 2.3.5 Advanced building standard) has become a promising tool to achieving these goals. Minergie buildings reduce the consumption of operational energy to about 5 0 % towards conventional buildings (Architos, 2000). And, the local wood building industry is strongly and successfully supporting this strategy. As most of the new wood building systems rely on local wood and assist in providing thin enclosures with high thermal efficiency, they have a strong potential in meeting the new requirements. Thin enclosure save urban land or provide larger living spaces (better construction - living space ratio). A s they are considerably lighter than concrete or brick masonry constructions, the new wood building systems require smaller foundations. Also, an increased use of wood assists in maintaining the health of the local forest as well as in limiting the C 0  2  emission due to its C 0  2  neutrality and limited transport  80  emissions. Even more, wood is a fast renewable as well as a traditional building material. However, it is believed that not the environmental benefits but, that the marketing of the Minergie label, the federal funding and the reduced mortgage interests as well as the focussed content of the label have been important for the fast growing market share of the Minergie buildings. Minergie houses are primarily marketed as houses with increased comfort and security at reasonable costs. These arguments consider aspects like fresh air without the need to open windows (controlled ventilation ), high surface temperature on the inside of the enclosure (thermal insulation), no 4  drafts (air tight enclosure, controlled ventilation) as well as protection against allergenic particles (filtered air), noise and burglary (closed windows). All these arguments are becoming increasingly important as more and more people suffer from noise and allergic reactions. In addition, today more and more houses are unattended for most of the day as both men and women are at work (see also chapter 2.2.4 Education and workforce). The fact that these houses promise more comfort at little higher initial costs as well as a payout over the years due to reduced running costs is a weightily advantage of these houses towards conventional ones. Even more, saving fossil fuels and using renewable energies are supported by governmental subsidies and, some financial institutions support the construction of Minergie houses with lower mortgage interests . Also, long lasting and healthy houses as well as houses that keep their value 5  over time support the Swiss attitude to consider a home a provision for one's old age. The clear focus on reducing the operational energy consumption allows architects and planners to acquire the specific know-how in little time or by employing the advice of a consultant. Even more, the easy achievement of a small goal may encourage planners and clients to go for another one. Even though the growing local responsibility to implement the global requirements for a more sustainable building development will further challenge the building practise in Switzerland, Minergie (or Minergie-P) houses in wood provide a powerful package as long as they provide durable, long lasting and healthy houses. The longer these buildings last, the more the reduced energy costs pay out. Also, durable and long lasting buildings reduce the average live cycle costs as well as its material use. Whereas the local population requests durable and long lasting buildings, healthy houses will become increasingly important to maintain their value over time.  Building biologists consider the Minergie standard, particularly the mechanical ventilation, to be critical to the inhabitant's health. For example, the Raiffeisen banks (regional mutual saving banks) reward future owner of Minergie buildings a fouryear reduction of 0.5% on the interests of primary mortgages up to 250,000 CHF. 4  5  81  2.5.  Summary  The investigation of the building context in Switzerland (Tab. 2.19) revealed a "Swissness" that will be very important for the evaluation of the potential success of the two new wood building systems. The following section briefly summarizes and discusses the key aspects of the Swiss background as well as the local importance of Minergie houses in wood. Place  Small, mountainous and landlocked country Four distinct seasons, temperate climate with considerable regional differences Few natural resources except of water, wood and mineral sediments (sand, gravel, ...) Increasing urbanisation of arable land within the Central Plain Dependency on foreign trade and currency exchange rates (High-tech) industry and trade with expensive, high-quality niche products / no standardized mass products Large percentage of small and medium sized companies  People  Political neutrality, political island within EU countries Federal system recognises cantonal diversities Four different languages, increasing percentage of foreign population Federal support for qualitative production methods in forestry and agriculture Performance oriented building codes and zone planes Federal priority to limit the use of fossil fuels and the exhaustion of CO2 Research on renewable energies Ageing population, almost stagnating population growth Increasing percentage of women in work and politics Highly educated workforce (school, vocational training) Growing employment possibilities and part-time jobs in service sector High incomes and high expenditure levels with expensive insurances Increasing percentage of single households, growing dwelling size /person Old housing stock / country of tenants Buildings are expected to last more than a lifetime High building costs due to land costs, labour costs and building quality expectations  Product  Quality, perfection and reliability - like a Swiss watch Strong wood building culture Prevailing current brick masonry or concrete houses Minimal and clear forms prevail in present architecture Advanced voluntary building standards (Minergie, Passive House, Minergie-P, VGQ label)  Global context  Ecological development (Protection of resources and ecosystems) Social development (Building quality, health maintenance, social and cultural value conservation) Economic development (Minimisation of life-cycle costs, added value) - Glocal activities: Local agenda 21 Limiting the use of fossil fuels and the exhaustion of C 0 Increase of renewable energies Improvement of forest health  2  Tab. 2.19 Key characteristics of the Swiss building context.  82  Switzerland is a small and densely populated country with vast resources of water, mineral sediments and timber as well as attractive natural and cultural sites. The lack of popular primary energy sources, such as oil, gas and uranium as well as the need for exterior trade (import of primary goods and export of processed ones) makes the country strongly dependent from foreign countries. Besides being landlocked within the heart of Europe, Switzerland has also become a political island that is not (yet) part of the E U . Yet, the ideal of being independent, the fear of loosing the high living standard, the difficulty to subordinate itself as well as the difficulty to unite the diverse interests within the country are potential reasons for this attitude. Within the country, differences between the four parts of the country (German, French, Italian and Romansh speaking part), urban and rural sites, cultural groups or political affiliations require strong efforts to take common decisions. Often, ordinary compromises more than brave decisions are the outcome of long debates. Or, decisions are only supported by certain regions. For example, saving energy, the construction of Minergie houses, or building in wood are issues that are mainly limited to the German and Romansh speaking part of Switzerland. Whereas the French part of Switzerland partially supports theses strategies, the Italian barely part does. They traditionally did not have wood buildings and, they do not care too much about saving energy. "Quality instead of quantity" or "quality costs" are major credos that Swiss people use for aspects of live as well as to products, from agriculture and forestry to industrial products and buildings. High technology and production standards, high productivity as well as a workmanship with good practical and theoretical education assist in achieving these goals. In turn, innovation, quality and reliability are key characteristics of the expensive niche products produced by the large number of small and medium sized industry and trade enterprises. A s such, expensive products, high salaries and high living costs make Switzerland another island within Europe. The oil crisis and the dying of the local forests emerged political institutions to address environmental problems in the mid 1980s. Since, the increased use of local wood, the reduction of the consumption of fossil fuels and the C 0 exhaustion have become key strategies of the local policy. And, 2  the implementation of these strategies is becoming increasingly important in the building industry. Whereas brick masonry and concrete dominated the residential building market for many decades, the changed building context is more and more favouring low operational energy consuming houses in wood. These houses, particularly Minergie or Minergie-P houses in wood, address the key strategies of the  83  federal policy and, the acceptance of operational energy-efficient houses in wood is slowly but steadily increasing. Important for this development was the marketing of the Minergie label, assisted by the attempts of the wood building industry to provide high quality houses. Minergie houses promise high comfort and low consumption of operational energy at limited additional initial costs. Generally, people in Switzerland are ready to support environmental strategies as long as few time and financial engagement is required. And, they are ready to invest as long as they get security, material benefits or immaterial values out of it. Considering the housing issue, future clients accept the higher initial building costs in return for comfortable and long lasting houses that save energy and maintenance costs. Even more, federal subsidies and lower mortgage interests reduce the payback time. Minergie houses also promise to achieve high resale values. Since the mid 1980s, the wood building industry is trying to get back to the market with innovative and high quality products that relay on the new wood building products and joining techniques as well as on high technology and production standards. By addressing the need for houses with high production and construction standards as well as by focussing on their advantage to provide enclosures with high thermal efficiency, the wood building industry has found a niche market that will promisingly grow over the next years and, that might exceed the single-family house market. Yet, whereas the overall goals are the same, there are big differences how they can be achieved. A look at the sophisticated (or almost intricate) construction of the S W F still reveals the skilled craftsmanship of traditionally educated carpenters whereas the key details (e.g. joint details) are property of the firm. Latter might have been a strategy for innovative carpentry firms to survive in the small market or even a traditional relict of the carpenter guild where knowledge was monopolized. In any case, this habit strongly restricted the spread of standardised knowledge and, might be a reason why the construction principles of the S W F have not been standardised. On the other side, systems like the R P S do barely relate to the traditional craftsmanship. Glue-laminated boards are joined and glued as if it was cardboard. Even more, detailed information on the joining technique and the dimensioning of the basic boards invite for do-it-yourself experiences. In the following chapters I will more closely investigate similarities and differences of S W F and R P S by discussing the construction principles and the production process, as well as critical aspects considering important issues of climate and inhabitant.  84  3.  THE SWISS WOOD FRAME AND RIBBED PANEL SYSTEM  Both S W F and R P S are new in the Swiss building market. They support the construction of high thermalinsulated enclosures for residential houses, and they are factory-built and panellised constructions. However, they differ considerably in the way they achieve the goal. Major differences exist in the construction principles as well as  in the planning and production processes. In this chapter I give  background information for further investigations of the S W F and the R P S systems. A s different types of S W F and R P S systems exist on the market, I have chosen the S W F system produced by Renggli A G and the R P S system developed by Pius Schuler A G .  3.1.  Swiss Wood Frame  In Switzerland - as well as in Germany and Austria - the Western platform frame as it is built in C a n a d a and the United States has been known since the 1920s, but only a few houses were built in this foreign framing technique. For a second time, the Western platform frame was 'rediscovered' and transferred to the Central European building market in the mid 1980s. In Switzerland, the new framing technique (relying on the principles of the Western platform frame) was published under the title "Holzrahmenbau" (SIA, and Lignum, ed. 1989) in 1989. This document aimed to present anew wood building system that conformed to the present possibilities and requirements in terms of construction, performance and design (SIA, and Lignum, ed. 1989:1, 5), but once more this adapted system was never really accepted. Nonetheless, it was the basis for the development of the successful S W F within only a few years. Within this thesis I use the term Swiss Wood Frame to refer to the specific factory-built wood frame system as it has been developed in Switzerland over the last ten years. This terminology contrasts the attitude to translate the German term Holzrahmen(bau) with f/mber-frame(construction), a term that relates to the traditional timber-frame construction (Fachwerkbau). In addition, the comparatively heavy new Swiss framing technique contrasts with the terms Western platform frame or light-wood frame as they are used in C a n a d a and the United States.  85  The S W F generally relies on large wall, floor or roof elements that are produced in large production halls. The factory production makes use of C A D - C A M technology, transferring computer drawings directly to the respective machines. Means of transportation and storage space as well as the need for flexible floor arrangements in single-family houses might be key reasons why the panellised construction has been preferred to the modular one. Individual and modern design, scientificallyengineered building materials, highly-insulated enclosures and sophisticated construction details are characteristic of these buildings. Despite - or potentially also because of - the high levels of knowledge, technology and tools involved in the construction of these systems, each carpentry firm has its own unique system (see chapter 2.6. Summary). Today, Renggli A G is the leading producer of residential and non-residential S W F buildings, as well as the leading producer of single-family houses in wood. With a current annual production of about  a) House Kiser, Hitzkirch, Concept house 'Futura' c) House Setz, Dintikon, Werner Setz architect Fig. 3.1  b) House Boss, Baar, Custom designed d) House Brun, Geuensee, Custom designed  SWF houses built by the Renggli AG (Source: Renggli, 2004: References, Architos, 2004:  References).  86  100 to 120 S W F single-family houses, Renggli A G accounts for about 1% of the total number of new dwellings or for about 12% of the new single-family houses in wood. Figure 3.1 illustrates a selection of S W F houses built by Renggli A G . This firm goes back to 1923 when it was founded as a carpentry firm with an affiliated sawmill. In 1991, the firm was handed over to the 4  t h  generation. Four years later, in  1995, the first production hall was built. Renggli A G has been involved in research on energy-efficient  buildings as well a s in the  development and launch of the Minergie and the Minergie-P labels. In 1998, the first three Minergie labels were assigned to its concept houses 'Domino', 'Futura' (Fig.3.1a) and 'Familia' (Solar agency, 2003). In 2003, house Setz (Fig.3.1c) became its first Minergie-P house. Renggli A G is a member of Architos , and 1  makes its technical know-how as well as its wood building system available to the association. In addition, it is a founding member of the V G Q (see chapter 2.3.5 Advanced voluntary building standards). In 2001, Renggli A G achieved one of the first three labels V G Q for its building system. In 2003, it also received a label V G Q for its concept houses. Latter rewards the high-quality standards of the entire building process of these ready-to-move-in houses, from the planning phase to the finishing of the house.  3.1.1  Construction principles of SWF  In its technical documentation, Architos (Architos, 2000) presents the three building standards of Renggli A G . The norm standard is used to achieve the code requirements. The Minergie and Passive house (or the Minergie-P) standards are used to promote the respective voluntary building standards. For each standard, a vertical scheme section 1:20 through a two storey house as well as regular sections 1:10 through the enclosure, the roof construction, the ceiling against an unheated roof space and the ground floor ceiling is given, together with information on the materials used (Fig.3.2). As Minergie buildings have become a standard for S W F houses, in this thesis I investigate this building standard, though the norm standard shows the construction principles more clearly. Figure 3.2 shows the three thermal insulation standards, while Figure 3.3 shows the enclosure section a s well a s the roof, ceiling and floor constructions of the Minergie standard. Where no specific reference is given, the data refers to information provided by Renggli A G (Renggli, 2004), Architos (Architos, 2000), general  1  Architos is an association of various experts that tries to develop new environmental strategies for buildings. 87  information on wood building systems published by Kolb (Kolb, 1998), and a personal interview with Max Renggli on the occasion of a visit to the firm (Renggli, 2002).  1 2 3 4  Gypsum board 12,5 mm Vapour retarder and air barrier OSB 15 mm Wood frame 80 /160 mm Mineral fibre boards 160 mm 5 OSB 15 mm 6 Air cavity 30 mm 7 Cladding variable  1  2  Heat transmission coefficient Airborne sound reduction index  Fig. 3.2  Gypsum board 12,5 mm Vapour retarder and air barrier OSB 15 mm Wood frame 80/160 mm Mineral fibre boards 160 mm Furring 60 / 60 mm Mineral fibre boards 60 mm OSB 15 mm Air cavity 30 mm 8 Cladding variable  1 Gypsum board 12,5 mm 2 Wood frame 6 0 / 1 0 0 mm Mineral fibre boards 100 mm 3 Vapour retarder and air barrier 4 OSB 15 mm 5 Wood frame 6 0 / 1 6 0 mm Mineral fibre boards 160 mm 6 Furring 4 0 / 1 2 0 mm Mineral fibre boards 120 mm 7 OSB 15 mm 8 Air cavity 30 mm 9 Cladding variable  Horizontal enclosure section and vertical joint section of the three thermal insulation standards of SWF (Architos, 2000).  88  i  i, i  ^  3  ,  ^--jj~~X] g  m  VAWAWAW U-value = 0.17 W/nfK R'w = 50 dB  Roof construction  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  3-layered glue-laminated board 27 mm Vapour retarder and air barrier Rafters 100/160 mm, mineral fibre boards 160 mm Furring 80/100 mm, mineral fibre boards 100 mm Wood fibreboard 22 mm Furring 40 / 50 mm and air cavity Tile battens 24 / 48 mm Roof tiles  4  U-value = 0.19 W/m*K R'w * 42 dB L'n,w ~85dB w  (unheated roof space)  T o p floor c e i l i n g  1 2 3 4  G r o u n d floor  wood fibreboard 22 mm Joists 80 / 220 mm, mineral fibre boards 220 mm Vapour retarder and air barrier 3-layered glue-laminated board 27 mm l  (against cellar)  1 2 3 4  Finish flooring Cement underlay floor 50 mm Separating foil Impact insulation 20 mm ISOVER PS81 (glass fibre) 5 Expanded foamed plastic 20 + 50 mm 6 Cast concrete slab 200 mm 7 Mineral fibre boards 100 mm L'n,w "40dB (Carpet) L'n,w *=40dB (Hardwood) L'n.w ~40dB (Tiles)  2 3I / I  1 J.. .. .. '.!.!. UJ..U.. .'.' 'I.'.!.' 'J.'.!.'.' ' .'..U..'.'.'.!.!TT 1  1  1  1  <1)  U-value = 0.17 W/m K R'w « 56 dB 2  Weighted normalized impact noise level  Fig. 3.3  Enclosure section and floor construction of SWF at the Minergie standard (Architos, 2000) 89  Structural core of wall and floor elements  In keeping with on-site-built frame constructions, the structural frame of wall elements consists of vertical (studs) and horizontal (top and bottom plates, lintels) members. The studs (80 x 160 mm), the bottom wall plates (80 x 160 mm) and the top plates (80 x 160 mm or L-shaped) are nailed against each other to form the structural frame (Fig. 3.4). In accordance with the available sizes of O S B sheathing (App. 4), the studs will be spaced at 625 mm on centre. A s such, the studs support the joints of the sheathing boards. Supported by jack studs, lintels span openings of doors and windows. O S B sheathing nailed to the inside of the structural frame provides the frame rigidity; application on the exterior side of the frame is not possible, as additional thermal insulation is necessary to achieve the Minergie standard.  Fig. 3.4  Scheme of the structural wall and floor frame of SWF  As in the wall frame, joists and headers of 80 x 220 mm are nailed together to form the floor frame (Fig. 3.4). A wood fibreboard subfloor with tongue-and-groove joints is applied on top of the frame to provide the frame rigidity. It is assumed that the subfloor is glued and nailed on top of the floor frame, as the use of glue may substantially improve the stiffness of the floor. Due to the (most probably glued)  90  tongue-and-groove connections and a crosswise orientation of the boards and studs, the spacing of the studs is independent from the subfloor material; it depends solely on the expected load as well as on the strength of the subfloor material. According to a rule of thumb, joists (80 x 220 mm) with a maximum spacing of 65 mm on centre may span approximately 4.40 m (h = I / 20 and b = h / 2). A s b / h ^ 2.5, no bridging is needed to prevent the joists from twisting (Kolb, 1998:92, 149). The joists may be spaced more closely if larger loads are expected. Often, hollow-core elements replace the joist construction if heavier loads or larger spans occur. The frame members of S W F consist of coniferous construction wood (e.g. Douglas fir or Norway spruce) of regular strength (FK II) and a maximum moisture content of 16% (SIA norm 164). The square sections of 80 x 160 mm and 80 x 220 mm are standardised dimensions of construction wood that that are readily available in Switzerland (App. 3). The structural wall sheathing consists of 15 mm O S B board with standardized sizes (App. 4). If alternative boards such as 12 mm plywood or 22 mm wood fibreboard sheathing are used, the spacing of the studs must be altered accordingly. The subfloor consists of 22 mm wood fibreboard with tongue-and-groove joints. Alternatively, O S B boards with tongue and groove joints are used.  Joints As the representative for all the joints (enclosure / ground floor slab, enclosure / first floor ceiling and enclosure / roof), in this section I will investigate specifically the joint of the enclosure with the first floor ceiling, which is the most difficult one as three different elements meet along this line; it is also characteristic of this type of construction. According to the information published (Fig. 3.3) it is assumed that the elements of this enclosure / floor joint are partitioned as shown in Figure 3.5a. The floor element constructively interlocks with the L-shaped top plate of the lower wall. In contrast, the upper wall panel stands on top of the L-shaped top plate and the floor element. Mechanical fasteners are needed to connect the upper wall panel with the elements beneath. A s the floor construction (impact insulation, cement underlay and finish flooring) as well as the cladding along the horizontal enclosure / floor joints are applied on site, the fit of the joints can be easily controlled and properly fastened and sealed.  91  a) Vertical joint at the first floor ceiling Fig. 3.5  b) Horizontal joint at the building corner  Vertical and horizontal element joint of SWF  It is assumed that the enclosure overlaps a s shown in Figure 3.5b. This constructively interlocking joint allows proper fitting of the elements during the assembly process. The enclosure elements can easily be fixed with long screws from either exterior side of the corner at the top and bottom part of the element (top and bottom plates), as the cladding in the joint area is completed on site.  Layering of enclosure and floor elements Figure 3.6 shows a magnification of the enclosure / floor joint shown in Figure 3.3 and specifies the material layering of the regular enclosure and floor sections as well as the specific materials and elements within the joint. This detail will be the basis for further discussion in the following chapter.  92  E n c l o s u r e layering (inside to outside): 1 2 3 5  4 6 7 8  12.5 mm G y p s u m board P E air and vapour barrier 15 mm O S B sheathing 80 x 160 mm frame at 625 mm on centre 160 mm mineral fibre insulation boards 60 x 60 mm horizontal furring 60 mm mineral fibre insulation boards 15 mm O S B sheathing 30 mm air cavity Horizontal hardboard siding  F l o o r layering (top to bottom): A B C D  E F  G H  11 mm hardwood finish flooring 70 mm cement underlay floor Separating foil 40 mm impact insulation 15 mm I S O V E R P S 8 1 (glass fibre) 25 mm expanded foamed plastic 22 mm wood fibreboard subfloor 80 x 220 mm joists at 625 mm on centre 160 mm air cavity 60 mm mineral fibre insulation boards 24 mm furring and installation cavity 12.5 mm G y p s u m board ceiling  Specific joint elements a b c d  Fig. 3.6  3.1.2  L-shaped top plate End joist 22 mm wood fibreboard underlay (assumption) F o a m gasket (assumption)  Layering of enclosure and floor elements of SWF at the enclosure-floor joint  Planning and building process  The planning and building process of a S W F house may generally be split into three phases: the planning process, the factory production of the elements, and the on-site construction. All in all, the planning and building process may take up to one-and-a-half years, despite the fact that the production and assembly of the house only takes about two weeks. Even though the phases are well defined and coordinated in one location, the planning phase is very long. Also, the finishing work requires a considerable amount of time. As a general contractor, Renggli A G takes responsibility for all stages from the planning to the handing over of the finished building, even though it outsources the on-site finishing work and potentially also the design to tradesmen and architects that work for the firm on a regular basis. A s such, clients not only have a single negotiation partner, they also profit from a holistic service during the planning and construction phase, as well as the straightforward replacement of any guaranteed work during the first ten years of occupation.  93  Planning process The planning process of a factory-built house may take from several months up to one year. Within this time, the house is designed according to the client's needs and expectations. By the time the factory production starts, every detail, such as the number and position of all electrical outlets, is defined. This is a critical aspect of individually-designed and / or factory-produced houses. Even clients without any building experience have to decide on every detail in advance. Renggli A G offers three different design principles, the architect-designed house, the customdesigned house and the concept house. All rely on the standardised principles and details of the building system (system houses). The architect-designed house is the result of the co-operation of an architect (e.g. chosen by the client) and Renggli A G . The custom-designed house is custom-designed by the firm, and the concept house is a pre-designed house. This concept house consists of a basic house design with basic outfitting (e.g. kitchen, appliances, materials) and an estimation of the costs. Still, clients can take various individual decisions, such as minor changes in the floor-plan arrangement, the size or the location of openings or the distribution of electrical outlets, as well as materials and colours. The cost estimation is adjusted according to the chosen outfitting and the appliances. The purchase of a concept house may considerably simplify the planning process, as clients may visit a model house or those of former clients.  Factory-production The production process of a factory-built single-family house takes one to two weeks, where the single steps are as precisely defined as in a script. The enclosure panels generally reach a high degree of finish; they include wiring, cladding (with basic paint coat), interior finishing materials (e.g. gypsum board), windows and doors. The finishing of rooms with tiles or plaster and paint, as well as the final paint coat of the cladding, are applied on site. In contrast, floor and roof panels consist only of the structural core; the upper floor construction (impact insulation, underlay floor, finish flooring) and the suspended ceiling, as well as the exterior roof construction (water barrier, air cavity, tiles), are applied only on site. Top and bottom plates as well as end studs are particularly important to the erection process on site. The wall panels are carried on hooks attached to the top plate. Top and bottom plates are the bases for the attachment of vertical connectors. Similarly, the end studs provide a base for lateral connections. 94  The construction process of an enclosure element depends on the building standard (Norm, Minergie or Passive house) and on the finishing degree. Generally, it takes about five steps to complete a Minergie enclosure element with a high degree of finish. After every step the element is lifted to another construction table and put down on the reverse side; the last step is completed in an upright position. The following section gives examples to describe the production process of a Minergie enclosure panel. 1.  According to the specifications provided by the construction drawings, the structural members are sawn to the required size.  2.  The structural frame is arranged on a construction table and stapled together. T h e interior sheathing is nailed to the frame, and openings for doors, windows and installations are sawn out.  3.  T h e wiring (where necessary) is applied and the cavities between the studs are filled with insulation (Fig. 3.7a). Then the furring layer is nailed to the studs and the cavities are again filled with insulation. Finally, the exterior sheathing is nailed to the furring and the required openings are sawn out.  4.  Door and window frames are attached to the panel (Fig. 3.7b). The vapour barrier is applied. All joints are sealed to achieve a proper vapour barrier. Finally, a gypsum board (with or without installation cavity) is applied to the interior wall panel to provide a basis for additional finishing coatings (Fig. 3.7c).  5.  The air cavity is prepared and the cladding is applied. Generally, the cladding at the top and bottom edges of the panel is not yet applied. This allows tightly screwing the panels against each other from the outside during the assembly process.  6.  The panel is lifted up and moved to a special site. Exterior door and window frames and sills are applied to the upright standing panel (Fig. 3.7d). After completion, the finished enclosure panel is wrapped, together with other elements. The packages are ready to be trucked to the erection site.  Fig. 3.7  frame  Factory production of SWF enclosure elements (Source: Kamber, 2004) 95  On-site construction The on-site construction work is divided into three phases, the on-site preparation work, the on-site assembly of the building and the finishing work. The on-site preparation work starts with ground excavation for the cast-concrete foundation or cellar (Fig. 3.8a); cast-concrete cellars are usual in Swiss houses. T h e excavation (about 2.50 to 3 meters), along with the construction of the cellar and the installation of wiring and pipes takes some weeks (Fig. 3.8b and c). The concrete slab (ground floor ceiling) provides the base for the assembly of the first floor, where the electrical wiring and water pipes are already at the right positions. Before the assembly starts, a scaffold is assembled around the future building. It assists the assembly team during the erection process and for the completion of the exterior finishing works. A s soon as everything is ready and the weather forecast is good, the elements are delivered to the construction site (Fig. 3.8d).  Fig. 3.8  On-site preparation works (Source: Kamber, 2004)  The assembly process only takes one day. Critical for a smooth assembly process are a proper foundation and the availability, chronological ordering (Fig. 3.9a) and precise fit of all elements (Fig. 3.9b), as well as a well-experienced team that works precisely and reliably, and good weather. A team of seven  96  experienced workers is involved in the floor-by-floor assembly of the single elements^. The assembly starts with the fit of the first wall panel and ends with the last roof element (Fig. 3.9c). One element after the other is craned to the right position, manually adjusted and fixed with mechanical fasteners. A s they occur, joints of the vapour retarder foil along the top plate of the wall panels are taped before the floor elements are put in place. After the assembly of the building, the exterior finishing work such as the sealing of the roof with roofing paper, and air cavities and tiles (Fig. 3.9d), as well as the installation of P V panels or the final paint coat of the cladding, have to be done as soon as possible to get the building ready to withstand the climate, as well as to enable the removal of the scaffold. O n the inside, technical installations such as plumbing, heating and electrical services are installed. Afterwards, plaster coatings, impact insulation and underlay floors as well as built-in cabinets, kitchen and bath are added. The finishing work includes the installation of finish floorings, tiles, final paint coatings and baseboards. The time taken may vary between a few weeks and several months, depending on the remaining finishing work.  Fig. 3.9  2  On-site assembly and exterior finishing works (Source: Kamber, 2004)  A single-family house consists of about 30 elements (Renggli, 2003). 97  3.2  Ribbed Panel System  The structural use of multi-layered glue-laminated boards (e.g. block boards) has a very young history in Switzerland as well as in Germany and Austria. They were first used for load-bearing walls around 1995. By that time, engineered wood products such as O S B or plywood for sheathing purposes, structural particleboards such as Homogen80 for the construction of load-bearing walls, as well as glue-lam beams and manufactured wood elements for floor or roof construction (e.g. Lignatur), were already known. In 1997, Pius Schuler first presented the Ribbed Panel System (RPS), the 'Rippenbau' as it is named in German, at the 2 9 conference of the Swiss committee for wood research (SAH) in Weinfelden th  (Schuler, 1997:93-101). This system gets its name from a set of parallel ribs glued against the structural board of enclosure elements, where the structural board consists of a custom-produced block board (see chapter 2.3.4 W o o d panel systems).  a) House Sagesser, Willisau, BAUREAG architects c) House Schilling, Hagendorf Schilling + Partner  b) House Schudel, Feldis, OOS architects AG d) House Meier, Bukten, Peter Guhther architecture AG  Fig. 3.10 New Ribbed Panel System (RPS) houses (Source: Pius Schuler AG, 2004: References; Schilling +Partner, 2004: Individuality).  98  Like S W F , R P S relies on large wall, floor and roof elements that are factory-produced. Engineered building materials and components as well as appropriate construction methods allow the construction of individual, modern houses (Fig. 3.10) with high thermal-efficient building enclosures. However, it appears that no carpentry firm has yet specialized in the factory production of R P S buildings. The production of panellised (residential and non-residential) buildings is only one sector of the firm (Kahlin, 2004; Gfeller, 2004). Even though C N C (Computerized Numerical Control) machines and construction tables are employed, the production process is not yet standardised. Also, the realisation of these houses still relies on the co-operation of architects with consultants (e.g. energy, engineering), suppliers and tradesmen, as is generally the case for residential constructions in Switzerland. However, not the lack of standardisation or experience but the means of transport, the storage space required and the need for flexible ground floor arrangements will be reasons why panellised construction is favoured over modular. Today, Pius Schuler A G is a leading supplier of single- or multi-layered block boards and blockboard products (Fig. 3.11). A s well, they give information on the use of block boards for the construction of walls, floors and roofs. Their spin-off firm, ' A G fur Holzbauplanung', consults with carpenters and architects on specific aspects of building construction such as structure, thermal insulation, vapour balance and infrastructure. In particular, they do structural framework planning for R P S buildings. Pius Schuler A G was founded in 1946. Within a few years, they were a leading producer of wood-core plywood for furniture and casings; in the early 1970s, they started the production of doors. In the early 1990s, Pius Schuler A G , together with the University of Architecture, Building and W o o d , H S B in Biel, developed the block board. Since then, they have conducted research into new approaches to building with block boards and have taken part in research projects by the E T H and the H S B . A s such, the Pius Schuler A G not only  Ribs (single layered)  Ribbed elements Fig. 3.11  Block boards (3- or 5-layered)  Hollow core elements  Folded elements  Block boards and block board products (Source: Schuler, 2004: Block board products) 99  supplies building materials; it is also active in the generation of knowledge and the provision of know-how. But, it does not produce buildings itself. There are no numbers on how many R P S buildings have been realised over the last seven years. Between 1996 and 1998, Deplazes (architect and design professor at ETH) planned and built one of the first R P S single-family houses (Fig. 3.12); Deplazes expects R P S to become the most important system in Switzerland (Deplazes, 2000). Also, Germerott (professor at H S B , and business manager V G Q ) and Pius Schuler (head of the Pius Schuler AG) strongly support this seminal opinion.  Fig. 3.12 House Bearth-Candinas, Sumvitg, Pilot Project 1996-98, designed by Deplazes (Source: Deplazes, 2004: Research, Prefabricated enclosures).  3.2.1  Construction principles of RPS  In their documentation (Pius Schuler A G , 2004), Pius Schuler A G show examples of scheme sections at 1:10 of thirty construction principles for elements that may be used for the construction of enclosures, walls, floors and roofs; all of these elements are described in terms of materials and dimensions, the relevant physical factors and the costs. In addition, he gives a vertical scheme section through the upper part of a building as well as a section through a building corner. Figure 3.13 shows three examples of enclosure elements. Figure 3.14 provides four possibilities for the floor construction as well as two roof elements, and Figure 3.15 shows the vertical scheme section, the building corner as well a s a rib extender.  100  Where no other reference is given, the information refers to the publications of Deplazes (Deplazes, 2000), Pius Schuler (Schuler, 1997:93-101) and Pius Schuler A G (Pius Schuler A G , 2004), and a personal interview with Pius Schuler, head of Pius Schuler A G , at a house-building fair in Bern (Schuler, 2003).  Enclosure elements  1 2  3  4  5  1 2 3  4  5  6  20 c m i n s u l a t i o n  24 + 6 c m i n s u l a t i o n  28 c m i n s u l a t i o n  1 Cladding (e.g. fir coarse) 2 Air cavity 30 mm 3 Wood fibreboard 16 mm, bitumised, joints glued 4 Block board ribs 40 x 160 mm Mineral fibre boards 160 mm 5 3-layered block board 35 mm  1 Mineral plaster 10 - 1 5 mm 2 Wood fibreboard 60 mm (e.g. Pavatex Diffutherm) 3 Block board ribs 40 x 240 mm Mineral fibre boards 240 mm 4 3-layered block board 35 mm  1 Cladding (e.g. fir coarse) 2 Air cavity 30 mm 3 Wood fibreboard 24 mm, bitumised, joints glued 4 Block board ribs 40 x 280 mm Mineral fibre boards 280 mm 5 3-layered block board 35 mm  U = R'w =  U = R'w =  0.18 W / r r f K  g =  49 dB 140 kN/m 45 kg/m  Cost material Cost processing Total costs  105.-CHF 82.- CHF 187.-CHF  q i zu  =  Whereas,  1  2  g=  0.14 57 150 62  Cost material Cost processing Total costs  114.-CHF 48.- CHF 228.- CHF  qzui =  W/irfK dB kN/m kg/m 1  2  U = R'W:  0.13 W / r r f K  9=  54 dB 150 kN/m 50 kg/m  Cost material Cost processing Total costs  121.-CHF 90.- CHF 211.-CHF  q i = zu  1  2  U = heat transmission coefficient R'w = airborne sound reduction index qzui = maximally allowed buckling load Total costs include all work, also the on-sit one  Fig. 3.13 Selection of three different enclosure elements of RPS (Source: Pius Schuler AG, 2004: Elements)  101  Floor Elements  1 Block board 120 mm (1-/ 3- or 5-layered) U= g=  1 Cement underlay floor 60 mm 2 Mineral fibre boards 12 mm (impact noise) 3 Block board 120 mm (1-/ 3- or 5-layered)  0.97 W/m K 54 kg/m  R'w = L'n.w:  2  2  37 dB 88 dB  Cost material 135.-CHF Cost processing 15.- CHF Total costs 150.-CHF  U= g=  0.71 W/rrfK 188 kg/m  Cement underlay floor 60 mm Mineral fibre insulation 12 mm (impact noise) Block board 120 mm (1-/ 3- or 5-layered) Mineral fibre boards 30 mm Furring (springy attachment) Gipsum board 18 mm  U= g=  0.45 W/rrfK 210 kg/m  R'w = L'n.w =  2  53 dB 66 dB  Cost material 135.-CHF Cost processing 15.-CHF Total costs 176.-CHF 1 | i 11 it III 11 III  1 2 3 4 5 6  R'w = L'n.w =  2  Cost material 98.- CHF Cost processing 30.- CHF Total costs 128.-CHF  65 dB 56 dB  1 2 3 4  minimi  iiiiiiniiii  I'"**™  3-layered block board 30 mm Block board ribs 40 x 160 mm Mineral fibre boards 100 mm 3-layered block board 30 mm  U= g=  2,  0.33 W/rrfK 35 kg/m  R'w = L'n.w =  2  44 dB 85 dB  Cost material 98.- CHF Cost processing 30.- CHF Total costs 128.-CHF  Roof Elements  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Tiles Tile battens 24 x 48 mm Furring 50 mm (air cavity) Water foil (open to diffusion) Wood fibreboard 24 mm Block board ribs 40 x 200 mm Mineral fibre boards 200 mm 3-layered block board 35 mm  u=  R'w g=  2u 0.18 W/rrfK 50 dB 37 kg/m 2  Cost material 106.-CHF Cost processing 35.- CHF Total costs 141.-CHF  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Tiles Tile battens 24 x 48 mm Furring 50 mm (air cavity) Water foil (open to diffusion) Wood fibreboard 35 mm Block board ribs 40 x 300 mm Mineral fibre boards 300 mm 3-layered block board 35 mm  U= R'w g=  ,2n 0.12 W/rrfK 55 dB 45 kg/m 2  Cost material 132.-CHF Cost processing 35.- CHF Total costs 167.-CHF  Fig. 3.14 Selection of four different floor and two roof elements of RPS (Source: Pius Schuler AG, 2004: Elements) 102  Extender (rib extension)  Block board rib 40mm  Wood-fibre board \|  Taped joint  Block board  ;.'.Sidcfeure corjs^ctiOT V.GIadding-  r Ptirring • ?:;Bt^:bb^Tibs;/ TTierrnalirisuiatiph;  ::  ; 3-layered  Element joint:air-t!ght giued; :and screwed  a) Vertical enclosure section  b) Extender c) Horizontal enclosure section  Fig. 3.15 Vertical and horizontal enclosure sections, and rib extender (Source: Pius Schuler AG, 2004: Detail; Schuler, 1997:97; and Schuler, 2003)  Structural core of wall and floor elements  The structural cores of both the wall and floor elements consist of block boards. The structural core of an enclosure element consists of structural block boards (35mm thick) as well as a set of supporting ribs (40mm x 220mm) that are glued against the structural board. The ribs are spaced at 630mm on centre to friction fit the semi-rigid mineral fibre insulation boards (600mm). Openings are feasible at any place  1  Extenders are used to extend the depth of the insulation without the need to change the depth of the ribs. 103  without considering the arrangement of the ribs; they are sawn out of the board and framed with lintel-like ribs to distribute the load. In addition, they give a base for the installation of the window and they close the insulation cavity. Where large openings are required, the stresses have to be calculated. The floors consist of block board panels with a thickness of about 90 to 120mm. These block boards are economically feasible for spans up to about 5.5m. If larger loads occur or larger spans are required, ribbed panels or hollow-core elements (see also Fig. 3.11) could replace the block boards. These elements can span up to about 7m and 10m, respectively (Pius Schuler A G , 2004). Figure 3.16 shows schematically the structural cores of R P S enclosures and floor elements. Ribbed enclosure elements generally consist of 3-layered block boards, where ribs are single layered, and floor elements consist of 3- or 5-layered block boards. Block boards are available in sizes up to 2.18 by 7.20 m and a thickness between 24 and 140 mm, with or without with tongue-and-groove joints (Schuler, 2000). The block boards have a moisture content of 10% ± 2%. They are custom produced by Pius Schuler A G in terms of dimensions, number of layers, materials and surface (App. 5).  Fig. 3.16  Scheme of the structural enclosure and floor elements of RPS  104  Joints To illustrate the specifications of R P S , Figure 3.17a shows a horizontal enclosure / floor joint at the first floor ceiling, as well as a vertical one at the building corner. A s shown in Figure 3.15, the floor panel and the structural board of the upper enclosure constructively interlock with the ribs of the lower enclosure panel, whereas the floor element rests on the structural board of the lower enclosure element and the structural board of the upper element is put down on the floor element. Due to the small support precise work is required during the assembly process, but as the cladding as well as the floor construction (impact insulation, cement underlay and finish flooring) are applied only on site, the joints may easily be controlled, filled with gap-filling glue and additionally fixed with screws. Again, the fit of the enclosure elements at the comers requires full attention, due to the thinness of the common joint along the enclosure panels. A s seen in Figure 3.15c, the corner is built up by the enclosure element and an additional corner element (Fig. 3.17b). In the first step, the thin vertical joints along the enclosure panels need to be precisely fitted, glued and fixed with screws. In the second step, the corner element, consisting of insulation and sheathing, is installed in the corner section. The cladding is applied afterwards. This construction principle allows proper sealing and fixing of the joints.  a) Vertical joint at the first floor ceiling Fig. 3.17  b) Horizontal joint at the building corner  Vertical and horizontal element joint of RPS  105  Layering of enclosure and floor elements  Figure 3.18 shows a magnification of the enclosure / floor joint shown in Figure 3.15a. This detail is appropriate for further investigation, because it wraps up the materials and dimensions as well as the layering and the joints. To be able to compare to S W F , this detail relies on 220mm thick thermal insulation of the enclosure.  Wall - floor of the RPS Enclosure (inside to outside): 1 35 mm block board 2 220 mm ribs at 630 mm on centre 220 mm mineral fibre insulation boards 3 16 mm wood fibreboard sheathing, bitumised 4 24 mm furring / air cavity 5 20 mm hardwood siding Floor (top to bottom): A 13 mm hardwood finish flooring B 60 mm cement underlay floor C 12 mm impact insulation D 120 mm block board  Fig. 3.18  3.2.2  Layering of enclosure and floor elements of RPS at the enclosure-floor joint  Planning and building process  As in S W F , the planning and building process of a factory-produced R P S house is split into three phases: the planning, the factory production of the elements, and the construction work on site. Altogether, these phases may take well over a year. Again, while the production of the elements takes a few weeks and the assembly on site only one or two days, the planning phase is very long. Also, the finishing work may take some months. It is assumed that the planning and building process works in a similar fashion to that of conventional on-site-built houses, where architects supported by a team of consultants, such as energy,  106  engineering or process consultants, lead through all the stages. Also, the problems of responsibility and co-operation will still be the same. The tradesmen involved in the building process are basically chosen by the client according to criteria like know-how, price offer or personal relationship. Acting as a trustee, the architect assists in concluding the contracts for work labour between the client and the tradesmen. Thus, the client has many negotiation partners, and the length of the planning and building processes depends considerably on the ease of co-operation and the progress of the work. A s well, the client risks long delays in the completion of guaranteed work, as 'someone else' is always responsible for the failure.  Planning process The planning process of a factory-built R P S house may take up to one year. This stage includes the individual design of the house up to the point where the element plans for factory production are finished. It is assumed that in most cases a consultant (such as the ' A G fur Holzbauplanung') is required to develop the project plans of the architect to the final element plans. However, little experience in the planning of R P S houses, along with loose and temporary co-operation between the building professionals, means that vigorous planning and communication efforts are needed. A s well, future clients of a R P S house have to invest time and uncertainty. They are not able to base their decisions on the nature of similar houses, nor on a fixed move-in date, nor on precise cost estimates. Even more, future clients are required to make decisions on the plans, and once the decisions have been made they will be unchangeable (or expensive to change) after the production process has started.  Factory-production The production process of a R P S house consists of two stages, the production of the structural boards and the production of the wall, floor and roof panels. Pius Schuler A G produces the block boards for R P S houses upon specific orders. A s such, the composition (number and material sequence of layers) and the surface quality of the boards (e.g. swan or ground, spruce / fir or larch) may be matched to the size of the project as well as to the requested constructive and / or visible uses. Unless otherwise ordered, the individually produced block boards are 107  delivered to the carpentry firm in standardised sizes (App. 5). On request, the boards are processed to ribbed panels or delivered in the required size (Pius Schuler A G , 2004). The production of the wall, floor and roof elements is expected to last some weeks, depending on the capacity of the carpentry firm. Carpenters process the block boards to enclosure, floor and roof elements; maximum-sized elements are desired to reduce the number of joints (Schuler, 1997: 99). The enclosure elements of R P S generally have a low degree of finish; they consist of only the structural ribbed panel, the insulation, the exterior sheathing and the furring for the on-site application of the cladding. Wiring and ducts are incorporated into enclosure elements only where they are indispensable; ducts for wiring are preferably included into interior walls, or they run within an installation cavity in front of the structural panel. The corner element, the cladding and the roof construction, as well as windows and doors, are applied on site. The floor elements consist of only the structural board: the floor construction with impact insulation and sand or cement underlay is built-in on site. The finishing of rooms with plaster, wall paint or tiles, a finish flooring and built in cabinets determines the interior work. The production process of a R P S enclosure element does not depend on the thermal-insulation standard; the construction differs only in the depth of the ribs. Theoretically, an enclosure element can be produced on one production table without being turned over; at all stages the inside of the panel is turned downward. A s yet there has no firm specialised in the production of R P S , there will most probably be different production modes, and there will be only limited infrastructure involved. But it is assumed that a construction table and a C N C machine have become standard. The following section describes a possible production process of an enclosure panel. 1.  The basic block boards with tongue-and-groove joints are glued to large sheets.  2.  Panels and ribs are cut to the required sizes. The openings for windows and doors are sawn out of the structural panels (or, the openings are sawn out before the ribs are applied).  3.  Ribs and frames around openings are glued against the structural panel. Wiring (where required) is applied, and the cavities between the ribs are filled with insulation (Fig. 3.19a). Finally, the exterior sheathing and the furring are nailed against the ribs. After completion, the enclosure panels are put aside; they are ready to be trucked to the erection site (Fig. 3.19b). A further production step could improve the low degree of finish of the enclosure panel as it is  generally produced. This step would include the attachment of windows, doors, frames and sills as well as parts of the cladding (compare to chapter 3.1 Production process).  108  a) Production of a RPS element Fig. 3.19  b) Transport to the construction site  Production and transport of a RPS house (Kalin, 2004: Beda Kalin house)  On-site construction  The on-site construction process of a ribbed panel house is similar to that of S W F . Therefore, this section will mention only the most important issues, similarities or differences. The on-site construction process is also divided into three phases: preparation of the site, assembly of the building, and finishing work. However, because of the specific setting of each building, the single steps are not as standardized as for S W F .  Fig. 3.20  On-site assembly of a RPS house (Kalin, 2004: Beda Kalin house)  109  A precisely-prepared concrete foundation or cellar is important for the assembly of the building. It also includes the necessary ducts, wiring and pipes (Fig. 3.20a). Generally, a scaffold surrounding the future house assists the workers during the assembly process and the finishing phase of the house. The assembly of a R P S house takes about 1 to 2 days. The factory-built elements are put in place floor-by-floor (Fig. 3.20b,c,d). The precise fit of wall and floor elements is important, as their joints, which are very small, coincide with the structural supports, and they control air and vapour migration. After the assembly process, priority is given to the finishing of the exterior shell (roof construction, windows, doors, cladding). O n the inside, plumbing, heating and electrical services are installed as well as floor constructions and built-in cabinets, and wall coatings are applied. The finishing phase may take from a few weeks to several months, depending on the required finishing work.  3.3  Summary  The discussion throughout this chapter of the two wood building systems has made it clear that there are major differences in the construction and production of the two systems. The structural frame of S W F consists of linear elements; it gets its rigidity from a structural sheathing (planar element). Relying on mechanical fasteners and dimensional lumber, S W F adopts a wood building technique that has been known in C a n a d a and the United States since the latter part of the 1 9 century. But it has also adopted a th  high level of technology, along with a highly-standardised production process that is led by one firm. The wall, floor and roof elements with a high degree of finish are factory-built, and they rely on C A D - C A M technology. Despite a script-like production process, each carpentry firm has its own construction principles. In contrast, R P S is strongly reminiscent of concrete constructions. The structural core of an enclosure element consists of a structural board (planar element) that is supported by ribs (linear elements). Relying on glue and glue-laminated boards, this building system is a new approach in building in wood. But, whereas the construction principles are standardised, the production process of the factorybuilt elements employs comparably low technology, and the full production process involves a team of building professionals, as is common in Switzerland. Because of the different production principles, the two wood building systems rely on different client groups. Whereas S W F houses from Renggli A G primarily consider clients, R P S provides only a  110  construction principle that addresses carpenters and architects. How many architects consider S W F constructions is not known; but it is assumed that architects are more likely to decide on R P S construction. This is due to their interest in exploring the new wood building materials, their knowledge of designing in concrete, and their being accustomed to leading the production process together with a team of building professionals from beginning to end, as well as the fear of the increasing concurrence of carpenters working as general contractors, such as Renggli A G .  Background  'discovered' in built by product type provided for General publications Specific publications details further information Construction principles  Wall, roof, floor degree of finish Structural core of enclosure Structural core of floor Joints Layering of enclosure principle Planning a n d building p r o c e s s  led by Planning design Production production place Assembly infrastructure site preparation Finishing work on the outside  on the inside  Tab. 3.1  SWF  RPS  Western Platform Frame Mid 1980s Carpenter working as general contractor Ready-to-move-in house Clients (architects) Framing principles Principles of 3 standards Few details Basic element values  Concrete constructions Mid 1990s Team of building professionals Construction principle Carpenters, architects  Sophisticated and partially concealed Large elements High Frame with structural sheathing Frame and subfloor Intricate, interlocking Many layers One function per layer  Easy and disclosed  'Scripted' General contractor Up to 1 year Architect, custom or predesigned 1 to 2 weeks CAD-CAM, series of production tables 1 to 2 days Scaffold, mobile crane concrete cellar with wiring and ducts in place Some months Roof construction, completion of cladding, final paint E.g. plaster, paint, tiles, finish flooring, electrical and sanitary equipment  -  Selection of standards Basic details Detailed values  Large elements Low Structural board with supporting ribs Structural board Simple, interlock partially Few layers Many function per layer Open, varying Architect with team of building professionals Up to 1 year Architect-designed 1 to 2 weeks (assumed) Partially NCS machines, single production tables 1 to 2 days Scaffold, mobile crane concrete cellar with wiring and ducts in place Some months Roof construction, completion of corners, cladding, sills, final paint E.g. windows, doors, paint, tiles, finish flooring, electrical and sanitary equipment  Summary of the characteristics of SWF and RPS.  111  4.  CRITICAL ANALYSIS  The new wood building systems, S W F and R P S , rely on local wood as well as on factory-built wall, floor and roof elements with high production and construction quality, as shown in Chapter 3. Also, they achieve high savings in heating energy, they consider initial cost limits, and they promise comfort and safety to the inhabitants (Chapter 2). Thus, they conform strongly to many of the present basic needs of place, people and product, as well as to global requirements. But the efficiency with which it achieves these goals is crucial for the potential success of a new wood building system, as well as whether it fills the need for long-lasting and healthy houses. The efficiency of a building system considers the effort to achieve a given goal. In Switzerland, a high level of thermal insulation is a key aspect of building. A s such, building systems that provide enclosures with high thermal efficiency, employing limited material and labour costs as well as limited resource use (land, material, energy), are more likely to succeed. While the initial building costs and the operational energy consumption are limited by the Minergie and the Minergie-P labels, the depth and weight of the enclosure as well as potential heat bridges are important characteristics of a thermallyefficient building system. Longevity is a key issue for the acceptance of a new wood building type as well as for the achievement of sustainable housing. People in Switzerland expect buildings to last literally a lifetime or longer. This is despite the fact that acquiring one's own house or condominium is very expensive and often requires future homeowners to cut down on other expenses. Nonetheless, people in Switzerland acknowledge that "good quality has its price" (Renggli, 2003) as long as the investment is beneficial and pays out over time. Therefore homeowners honour high production and construction quality (given by both systems), as well as durable buildings that are easily adaptable to new needs and require low and easilyperformed maintenance work. A s a consequence, they save on material and labour costs throughout the entire lifetime of the building. Moreover, new wooden buildings that are designed to limit the use of operational energy profit strongly from longevity; not only do they pay out the additional initial costs , but 1  the financial benefits increase more the longer they survive. A s a consequence, longevity enhances the  1  Minergie buildings pay out the additional costs within about 7 years (SF DRS, 2004). 112  strong performance of these buildings by limiting the initial consumption of energy and materials as well as the costs for energy, materials and labour over a long lifespan. A s such, building systems that avoid construction failure due to vapour and air movement or differential forces, and buildings that are adaptable to new requirements (thermal insulation, structure, infrastructure) and allow low and easily-carried maintenance costs are more likely to succeed in the local building market. Also, health and comfort are becoming more and more important for houses in Switzerland, where the proportion of elderly people is growing, where people care about their personal health, and where an increasing number of people is ready to invest in their personal health and comfort. This is even more important for houses where tight enclosures impede a natural air exchange through the enclosure fabric, synthetic materials or material components are omnipresent, and the need for noiseless spaces is of increasing importance. Today, comfortable air and radiant temperatures with limited drafts, good indoor air quality, low-emission materials and sound control are important aspects of maintaining the inhabitant's health, well-being and comfort. Moreover, it is assumed that buildings that conform to higher standards of health and comfort will last longer and achieve higher asset values than others. In summary, to succeed in the Swiss building market, the eight criteria listed in Table 4.1 are very important. In this chapter, I analyse the two building systems, S W F and R P S , in light of these criteria; all numerical values have been calculated from published raw data. Where no specific reference is given, the data rely on publications made by Renggli A G (Renggli, 2004), Architos (Architos, 2000), Kolb (Kolb, 1998) and SIA (norm SIA 380/1, SIA 381, SIA bulletin 2001). CRITERIA Efficiency  Thermal efficiency  Longevity  Vapour and air movement  SWF  RPS  Differential forces Thermal redundancy Structural redundancy Maintainability Health  Indoor air quality Sound insulation  Tab. 4.1  Criteria for the evaluation of SWF and RPS  113  4.1  Thermal efficiency  In Switzerland the new building codes, the Minergie and the Minergie-P standards, give benchmarks for annual heating-energy consumption (see also chapter 2.2.3 Legislation, and 2.3.5 Advanced voluntary building standards). A s a rule of thumb, Minergie buildings require the opaque parts of the enclosure to achieve U-values < 0.20 W / m K . But, increasing thermal insulation standards influence the construction 2  2  of enclosures. Therefore, thermal efficiency considers the depth, weight and thermal bridges of enclosures.  4.1.1  Swiss Wood Frame  Renggli A G suggests a S W F construction with an insulation depth of 22 cm to meet the Minergie standard (Fig. 4.1a). It achieves a U-value of 0.194 W / m K using semi-rigid mineral fibre insulation boards. The 2  regular section of the enclosure c o r e has a thickness of 26.25 c m and weighs about 58 kg/m , whereas 3  2  the structure / insulation c o r e of a regular wall section consists of 8 3 % insulation. Considering the entire 4  enclosure, the insulation share decreases to an average of 73.7%, due to the irregularities in the enclosure / floor joint section (Tab. 4.2), and the U-value increases to about 0.233 W / m K . 2  Rigid insulation boards with higher thermal resistance are not feasible for this construction. They could not respond to the dimensional changes of the structure, leading to gaps between the structure and the insulation. But basically any other type of semi-rigid insulation boards, insulation batts or loose-fill insulation (e.g. cellulose fibre) could be used. However, these materials have thermal conductivities (Kvalue) that are > 0.044 W/mK, or a thermal transmittance (RSI-value) of < 22.7 [mKA/V]; therefore, this construction would no longer meet the Minergie requirement. A s a consequence, the use of mineral fibre boards with A ~ 0.036 W/mK (RSI ~ 27.8) provides a good cost / value ratio.  In comparison, code requirements and Minergie-P houses require opaque parts of the enclosure to achieve Uvalues of < 0.30 W/m K and < 0.15 W/m K, respectively. The enclosure core corresponds to the enclosure without the exterior shell (cladding and air cavity). As the cladding is variable for both systems, it is not taken into consideration here. The structure / insulation core corresponds to the structurally-necessary parts (frame and sheathing / structural board and ribs) as well as the insulation layer(s), including the necessary support. It does not include non-structural sheathings, finishing elements or cladding. 2  2  3  4  114  Despite the considerable irregularities in the enclosure / floor joint area, this S W F construction has few heat bridges. There are only two linear horizontal heat bridges (furring strips) following the enclosure / floor joint (Fig. 4.1b), as well as points at the intersections of the three furring strips in the central part of the element with the studs (not shown in Fig. 4.1b).  a) Thermal insulation layer and irregularities Fig. 4.1  4.1.2  b) Thermal bridges in the joint area  Thermal efficiency of SWF  Ribbed Panel System  Pius Schuler A G provide a range of R P S enclosures with insulation depths starting from 16 c m ; generally, the insulation consists of semi-rigid mineral fibre boards. To match the S W F , I will look at a R P S with an insulation depth of 22 cm (Fig. 4.2a), even though 19 cm would be enough to meet the Minergie standard. This construction achieves a U-value of 0.167 W / m K with a depth of the enclosure core of 27.1 cm and a 2  weight of about 34 kg/m . Over the entire enclosure, 80.8% of the structure / insulation core of the R P S 2  consists of insulation (Tab. 4.2). There is no irregularity of the thermal insulation; the layering remains the same from the bottom to the top of the house even in the enclosure / floor joint area. As with S W F , rigid insulation boards are not feasible in R P S . But many other types of semi-rigid insulation boards, insulation batts or loose fill insulations (e.g. cellulose fibre) can be used. Despite their  115  higher thermal conductivities, the Minergie requirement is met as long as the insulation material has a Avalue that is less than 0.046 W/mK. A s the ribs connect the interior shell with the exterior sheathing, linear heat bridges run along the ribs in the vertical direction (Fig. 4.2b). However, the wood fibreboard sheathing reduces the thermal bridges, due to its relatively high thermal resistance (A = 0.06 W / m K or RSI = 16.7).  4.1.3  Summary  Both S W F and R P S provide high thermal-efficient enclosures with few thermal bridges; but the remarkable advantages of R P S are the light and thin enclosure as well as the very simple and consistent construction of the enclosure. The new wood building systems reveal their thermal efficiency in comparison to a standard concrete construction (16 to 20cm depth) with exterior insulation and plaster cladding (Tab. 4.2). Concrete buildings achieve similar thermal values only with enclosures that are more than 10 cm thicker and 5 to 12 times heavier than S W F and R P S .  116  On the other hand, a comparison with an equivalent, highly-insulated Western platform frame construction as it would be built in C a n a d a and the U S A , using 2 x 6 in. (38 x 140mm) studs spaced at 24 in. (600mm) on centre (Allen, 1998:220) and an additional insulation layer with 2 x 4 in. (38 x 89mm) furring, shows a comparatively heavy S W F construction, whereas R P S shows similar values in weight as well as in thermal efficiency (Tab. 4.2).  Summary of characteristics Enclosure core depth Storey height  SWF  [cm]  [cm]  Enclosure weight * (insulation 60kg/m ) [kg/m] (insulation 30kg/m ) 3  3  RPS  Concrete  WPF  26.25  27.1  43  24.92  279.95  260.5  265  =274  1,100-1,400  140 124  1,000-1,300  103 87  198 (184)  (1)  (139) 123  <1)  Enclosure core weight (ins. 60kg/m ) [kg/m] (ins. 30kg/m )  162 (148)  (104) 88  Enclosure core weight (ins. 60kg/m ) [kg/m ] (ins. 30kg/m )  58 (53)  (40) 34  400-500  38 32  Thermal bridges [% of enclosure surface]  5.11  6.35  0  0.44  Insulation share [% of structure - insulation core]  73.7  80.8  51-56  0.195  0.169  0.152  0.172  22  19  17  20  26.25  24.1  38  21.52  0.207  0.194  -  0.201  3  3  3  2  3  Regular wall section  83.0  U-value: [W/m K] mineral fibre insulation (0.036 W/mK)  87.0 91.3  2  Minimal mineral fibre insulation depth to meet Minergie standard [(plain) cm] Respective enclosure core depth  [cm]  U-value: cellulose fibre (0.44 W/m K) 2  (1)  2  S W F employs insulation with 60kg/m , R P S has insulation with 30kg/m  Tab. 4.2  4.2  [W/m K]  3  3  Thermal efficiency of SWF and RPS  Vapour and air movement  Pressure differences between the exterior and the interior side of the enclosure cause vapour and air to move through the construction. In Switzerland, the situation is critical in winter when temperature differences and vapour loads between heated rooms and the outside are high. Controlling the vapour and air movement through the enclosure (from the inside to the outside) is a key requirement to limit the migration of vapour by vapour diffusion as well as the migration of vapour and the loss of heat by travelling air. A s well, a wind-proof layer on the exterior side of the insulation is required to reduce air currents within the insulation.  117  Important for a proper control of migrating vapour by vapour diffusion is the occurrence of an uninterrupted vapour retarder layer (properly sealed, no holes) on the warm side of the insulation. A rule of thumb suggests that one layer (e.g. a vapour-retarder foil) on the warm side of the insulation must be at least 10 times less vapour permeable than the least permeable one on the cold side. A n d , maximally onethird of the insulation may be on the warm side of the vapour retarder layer. These principles prevent vapour being trapped and condensing into the construction. In Switzerland, the diffusion resistance of vapour retarders is characterised by the diffusion 5  equivalent air layer (s ). Starting from s -values of s 1.3 m (vapour permeability i 136 ng/m sPa), foils or 6  D  2  D  other materials are considered vapour retarders (SIA norm 232). Vapour retarders with s -values < 20 m D  (vapour permeability > 9 ng/m sPa) are considered to be open to diffusion (Ampack, 2000). Ampack, a 2  leading producer of vapour-retarder foils recommends s -values between 2 and 23 m (vapour permeability D  between about 90 and 8 ng/m sPa) for framed constructions with air cavities, while in constructions with 2  low-value vapour-permeable claddings s -values > 1800 m (vapour permeability < 0.1 ng/m sPa) are 2  D  recommended (Ampack, 2000). An uninterrupted vapour-retarder layer always works as air barriers, as air particles are larger than vapour particles. A s a consequence, the air barrier often coincides with the vapour-retarder layer. However, the abscence of holes that permit unimpeded migration of air is crucial to prevent moisture damages within the construction as well as to limit heat losses. "Air leakage can transport upwards of 30 times as much vapour as vapour diffusion, depositing water within the building assembly [...]" ( C M H C , 1998:215). Moreover, the better the thermal insulation of an enclosure is, the more migrating air accounts for the fabric heat losses. In contrast to the vapour-retarder layer, the position of the air barrier within the enclosure is free. Minergie houses require enclosures with air-exchanges rates of n  < 1 h" . This means that at a 1  U 5 0  pressure difference of 50 P a the air within a building would exchange less than once an hour. In comparison, building codes and Minergie-P houses require air exchange rates of n o - 3 h" and n o < 1  U5  Li5  0.6 h" , respectively. Critical for the achievement of this high level of air-tightness is not the air barrier (or 1  the vapour retarder) itself, but the occurrence of properly sealed joints and the omission of holes.  In Switzerland, the two terms 'vapour barrier and 'vapour retarder' have been replaced by - strong or weak - 'vapour retarder' (SIA Norm 232). The relationship between the two values: vapour permeability [ng/m s Pa] = 177.92 / SD-value [m].  5  6  1  2  118  4.2.1  Swiss W o o d Frame  S W F stops pressure-driven vapour and air movement through the enclosure with a vapour-retarder foil. This construction may properly control migrating air as long as the vapour barrier is properly sealed and free of wholes. A s well, the exterior O S B sheathing (behind the air cavity) protects the insulation layer from exterior wind. Here, sufficient tightness against wind is given by the furring within the air cavity covering the sheathing joints. S W F employs a transparent polyethylene vapour-retarder foil with a s -value between 40 and 159 D  m or a vapour permeability between 4.44 and 1.12 n g / m s P a ; by definition, this foil is no longer 2  considered to be open to vapour diffusion. However, it is necessary to provide the required vapour permeability difference towards the exterior O S B sheathing. According to the rule of thumb, O S B sheathing with a s -value between 5 and 7 m (vapour permeability between 35 and 25 ng/m sPa) requires 2  D  the use of a vapour-retarder foil with a s -value between about 50 and 70 m. Only the replacement of the D  exterior O S B with another sheathing such as wood fibreboard (e.g. Pavatex U D KN) would change the situation. Having a s -value of about 0.11 m (vapour permeability of about 1,600 ng/m sPa) at a depth of 2  D  21 mm it would be about 10 times as open to vapour diffusion as the mineral fibre insulation (s -value of D  between about 1 and 2 m), as well as about 50 times as open as the structural O S B sheathing on the interior side of the insulation. A s a consequence, S W F could be built as a system that is open to vapour diffusion. Moreover, the use of exterior wood fibreboard sheathing would also improve the U-value of the enclosure from 0.194 to 0.183 W / m K , and it would reduce the existing heat bridges. But, using the 2  structural O S B sheathing as vapour barrier requires special care of the joints to achieve an uninterrupted and air-tight layer. Within the wall section, the vapour barrier is well embedded between the structural O S B sheathing and the interior finishing element consisting of a 12.5 mm gypsum board. In the wall / floor joint, the vapour barrier runs along the enclosure / floor joint. Thus, the vulnerable foil is well protected against decay caused by light exposure and deformations due to pressure differences. It appears that the vapourretarder foils of the upper and lower enclosure elements overlap in the enclosure / floor joint (Fig. 4.3a). It is assumed that these joints are tight, the vertical joints within the elements are reliably and durably sealed (high quality of product, production and construction), potential holes resulting form transport or on-site adjustment are sealed during the assembly process, and breaking seals will not be a issue for unwanted  119  vapour and air migration. In doing so, the air-tightness of the system is given unless the vapour retarder foil will be damaged over time. The position of the vapour retarder foil right behind the thin gypsum board makes it vulnerable to wear and tear caused by the inhabitants. An ordinary picture nail may already perforate the foil and generate a permanent outlet for migrating vapour and air. Also, the installation of a concealed electrical duct is difficult if not impossible (Fig. 4.3a). The use of a thicker gypsum board or another finishing material (e.g. block boards), or more likely the application of an installation cavity (Fig. 4.3b) could solve this problem. Moreover, an installation cavity would increase considerably the adaptability of the enclosure to the future needs of the inhabitants.  a) Run of the vapour-retarder foil Fig. 4.3  4.2.2  b) Installation cavity  Control of vapour and air movement in SWF  Ribbed Panel System  RPS does not employ a specific vapour-retarder layer. The structural board controls vapour and air movement through the enclosure. Gap-filling glues connect the single elements to an uninterrupted shell. On the exterior side of the insulation, wood fibreboard sheathing with tongue-and-groove joints protects the insulation layer against the circulation air within the air cavity.  120  With a s -value of about 2.8m (vapour permeability of about 63.5 ng/m sPa) at a moisture content 2  D  between 6% and 12% (Schuler, 2003), the block board is considered a low-value vapour retarder that is considered to be open to vapour diffusion. Also, it has the highest vapour-diffusion resistance of all enclosure layers. Calculations show that this enclosure construction will be free of condensation in winter (App. 7). Moreover, observations made by Pius Schuler A G allow the assumption that a block board with a thickness of 35mm stores the migrating vapour and gives it back to the indoor air at a later stage (Pius Schuler A G , 2004). During assembly, the element joints are filled with gap-filling glue and fixed with screws. The possibility to control all the joints lets assume that they are properly sealed (production and construction quality). A s such, the air tightness of the system is given, as long as the employed glue may withstand the differential forces and the exposed wall panels are not perforated. Changes in indoor air temperature and humidity evoke differential forces within the exposed structural board as well as along the joints. However, cracks within the block board are not considered critical, as they are temporary, they remain small due to low dimensional changes of the block boards (see chapter 4.3 Differential movement), and they are limited to the top layer (Deplazes, 2001). Also, joints are not considered vulnerable, as multi-layered block boards have small and isotropic shrinkage and swelling rates in length and width. Potential differential forces are assumed to be taken up by the boards as well as by the screws and the gap-filling glue. Nonetheless, a closer investigation of the joints will be necessary to secure vapour and air tighness over time. Also, the type of gap-filling glue may be critical to a proper and durable sealing of the enclosure-floor joints (Fig. 4.4a). Potentially, the application of a tape covering the enclosure-floor joint on the exterior side might eliminate this deficiency and help achieving a durably sealed and air-tight layer. The exposed position of the block-board walls is not considered to make them vulnerable to wear and tear caused by the inhabitants; a thickness of 3.5 cm will be enough to resist perforation by ordinary picture nails (Fig. 4.4b). In contrast, bigger interruptions such as the installation of an electrical duct are perilous. While potential perforations could be eliminated by using a thicker structural board, the installation of an electrical duct requires the application of an installation layer and an additional interior finishing material, such as a gypsum board or a thin block board (Fig. 4.4b). However, this strategy may change the architectural expression of the wall.  121  a) Critical zones Fig. 4.4  4.2.3  b) Protective installation cavity  Control of vapour and air tightness in RPS  Summary  Highly-insulated buildings require enclosures with limited vapour and air movement controlling vapour migration caused by diffusion as well as thermal losses and vapour migration caused by travelling air. S W F employs a specific vapour-retarder foil to control of the occurring vapour and air movement; R P S embodies its control into the structural board. S W F represents an enclosure that is fairly tight to vapour diffusion. Its vapour retarder foil is 14 to 56 times tighter than the appropriate block board of R P S (App. 8). In contrast, the enclosure of R P S may be considered to be open to diffusion or 'breathable'. Moreover, it appears to have the potential to balance the indoor-air humidity, a characteristic that will be beneficial to the indoor-air climate. However, changes in the material choice may also make S W F a system that is open to vapour diffusion. The occurrence of an uninterrupted and properly sealed vapour retarder layer provides both systems with the required air-tightness. However, the position of the vapour retarder foil of S W F , as well as the durability of the joints of R P S are critical for a proper performance over time. Adaptations to the interior finishing layer in S W F , the application of an additional sealing tape in R P S or the use of an  122  installation cavity in both systems may make the systems more resistant to wear and tear over time, as well as more flexible to the changing needs of the inhabitants.  4.3  Differential movement  Temperature and humidity differences result in strong differential forces within the building materials and their joints, as well as between different building materials and layers. Sun-exposed claddings may heat up far above the maximum outside temperature in summer and cool down to minus temperatures in winter. In contrast, within a building, temperature differences vary by only a few degrees throughout the year. In Zurich, air temperatures generally vary between up to + 33°C in summer and about - 10°C in winter, while indoor air temperatures between 18 and 24 °C, and humidity ranges between 3 5 % and 7 0 % are considered to be comfortable for living spaces (Neufert, 1996:30). Major dimensional changes are expected within the exterior layers of the enclosure. Nonetheless, the entire enclosure is required to fulfil its duties over time and to withstand the recurring differential forces. Thus, the choice of materials and the way materials are joined are crucial, whether structural damage occurs over time or not.  4.3.1  Swiss Wood Frame  Under the influence of the local climate, major shrinkage and swelling is expected in the horizontal hardwood siding. In this construction, the overlapping boards are nailed against the flashing within the air cavity. Whereas the single boards have room to move in the vertical direction, they are fixed in the horizontal direction as well as in the layer depth at the nailing points. Considering shrinkage and swelling rates of 0.01% per % humidity change in the longitudinal direction and an assumed humidity range of 15% ± 5% for exposed wood (Maissen, 1985:94), the length of Norway spruce siding boards varies by about ± 0.31 mm within a single section (62.5 cm) of the enclosure. Also, considering radial shrinkage and swelling rates of 0.16% per % humidity change, boards with a thickness of 21 mm change their  123  dimensions by about ± 0.33 mm in depth. Together, the ongoing longitudinal and radial movement will loosen the nails over time, and result in opening and closing gaps between the siding boards. Nonetheless, the central core of the construction will not be endangered as long as basic maintenance is done. The furring within the air cavity works like a flexible joint between the enclosure core and the cladding. In addition, this well-ventilated cavity allows any water to drain out and moisture to dry out again. Considering a maximal initial moisture content of the construction wood of < 16% as well as a moisture balance at 9% ± 3 % within warm and dry rooms over time (Kolb, 1998:81,147), on average the structure will shrink about 9.1 mm per storey, due to a decreasing moisture content from 16 to 9%. Over time, the dimensional changes due to the changing moisture content of the structure will be about ± 3.91 mm per storey, most of it (± 3.20 mm) accounted for by the horizontal wood in the joints (Tab. 4.3). Nailed connections between the exterior sheathing, the furring layer, the structural frame and the interior structural sheathing allow differential movements of the members. Gaps between the sheathing panels are necessary to take up the dimensional changes of the frame (Fig. 4.5a). Still, the tightness of the joints is maintained, as the joints run along flashing strips, studs or plates. Where gaps are needed between sheathing panels, the initial shrinkage of the frame will release potential tensions of the vapour retarder.  4.3.2  Ribbed Panel System  As in S W F , the nailed connections and the intermediary furring take up the dimensional changes of the siding. Nailed to the ribs, the exterior wood fibreboard with tongue-and-groove joints allows differential movement without losing its wind tightness. Considering an initial moisture content of 10% ± 2 % of the 3-layered block board as well as a moisture balance at 9% ± 3 % within warm and dry rooms overtime (Kolb, 1998:81,147), the structure will shrink about 0.65 mm, due to a decrease of the moisture content from ± 10 to ± 9%. Over time, the dimensional changes of the structure will be about ± 1.95 mm per storey, where about ± 1.19 mm is accounted for by dimensional changes in the floor elements (Tab. 4.3). A s the small differential changes in the wall and floor boards are the same in length and width (isotropic characteristic) there is no problem in using fixed connections along the element joints provided by screws and gap-filling glue. Nonetheless, different dimensional changes exist between the single-layered ribs and three-layered structural block  124  boards of the enclosure (along the grain) and the five-layered block-board elements of the floor (against the grain). Glued connections will impede differential movement at the contact area between the ribs and the structural wall board. Also, screwed and glued connections between ribs of the lower element and the structural enclosure board of the upper element, as well as between the ribs of the lower element and the floor element, will impede differential movement. A s a consequence, the differential movement has to be taken up by the material; small cracks are expected along the rib / wall board joint line (Fig. 4.4b), due to strong strains.  a) Critical zones within SWF Fig. 4.5  4.3.3  b) Critical zones within RPS  Differential movement within the enclosure core of SWF and RPS  Summary  Within the structural core, S W F faces dimensional changes that are considerably larger than those of R P S . Most of them are a result of the higher initial moisture content as well a s the large proportion of horizontal wood. However, nail connections and gaps between the sheathing panels that may take up the differential movement of the structural core will prevent structural damage. In contrast, the initial moisture content of the block boards already lies within the moisture balance zone, and the dimensional changes of the R P S are relatively small as well as isotropic in the length and width of the boards. A s a consequence,  125  major differential forces occur only along the joints between ribs and structural wall and floor boards; it is assumed that the stresses are taken up by the material, resulting in small cracks that are continuously opening and closing over time.  Shrinkage and dimensional changes over time  SWF  RPS  Changes along the grain [% per %]  0.01  0.016 0.012 (ribs)  Changes across the grain [% per %]  0.25  0.21  Initial wood moisture content  <16  10±2  [%]  Indoor wood moisture balance  [%]  Storey height [cm] Vertical wood [cm] Horizontal wood [m] Average initial shrinkage in height  [mm]  Vertical wood Horizontal wood Average initial shrinkage of ribs  [mm]  Average dimensional changes in height over time  [mm]  Vertical wood Horizontal wood Ribs Tab. 4.3  4.4  9±3  9±3  279.95  258.5  237.35 42.60  246.5 12.00  9.12  0.65  1.66 7.46  0.40 0.25  -  0.31  ±3.91  ±1.95  ±0.71 ±3.20  ± 1.19 ±0.76 ±0.94  -  Thermal irregularities and thermal bridges of SWF  Thermal redundancy  Over the last 20 years, thermal insulation requirements for building enclosures have considerably increased. Along with the increase in thermal insulation depth, new materials and building components (e.g. windows) have changed the construction principles of buildings. A s a consequence, building systems as well as existing buildings that may be easily adapted to increased standards will be more successful in future. In this section, the two building systems will be evaluated on their flexibility in adapting to new insulation standards during the planning phase as well as after construction.  4.4.1  The Swiss Wood Frame  As we have already seen in chapter 3 (Fig. 3.2), Renggli A G suggests three enclosure constructions to meet code requirements, the Minergie standard and the Passive House standard. While the upgrade from  126  the code requirements to the Minergie standard is achieved with an additional insulation layer on the exterior side of the structural core (Fig. 4.6a), a further upgrade to the Passive House standard goes along with a change in construction (Fig. 4.6b).  Minergie Standard 22 cm insulation, U = 0.194 W/rrfK Fig. 4.6  Passive House / Minergie-P standard 38 cm insulation, U=0.105 W/rrfK  Suggested insulation standards of SWF  Even though this upgrade is feasible only in the planning stages of the building, it embodies major advantages. Firstly, the vapour-retarder foil has moved behind the interior insulation layer, where it is protected against wear and tear caused by the inhabitants. Secondly, the vapour-retarder foil now runs straight through the enclosure. Thirdly, the complexity of the enclosure / floor joint and the proportion of wood have considerably decreased. Fourthly, the interior insulation layer may be used as an installation layer without the risk of losing its air and vapour tightness. At a later stage, an additional insulation layer might be applied to the exterior side of the central core (Fig. 4.7a). This addition considerably improves the thermal insulation standard and reduces the thermal bridges. However, expanded or extruded foamed plastic insulation with plaster cladding may not be applied, due to its low vapour permeability (d -value between 200 and 3,000m). The application of an s  interior insulation layer is critical unless major renovations are done (Fig. 4.7b). Firstly, the additional insulation layer is applied on the warm side of the vapour-retarder foil. To avoid vapour-diffusion problems, the depth of the insulation is limited to about 7 c m ; as a rule of thumb it may be one-fourth to one-third of  127  the insulation depth. Secondly, this insulation layer is never continuous. Between the enclosure and the partition wall, as well as within the enclosure / floor joint, it is not possible to fit additional insulation, or it  IS  very costly. Thirdly, with this strategy the rooms are getting smaller. Finally, the strategy is very expensive, as all rooms are affected and finishing materials have to be adapted. However, an additional insulation layer would protect the vapour-retarder foil and provide an installation cavity.  Additional exterior layer 22 + 10 cm insulation, U = 0.130 W/m K 2  Fig. 4.7  4.4.2  Additional interior layer 22+ 6 cm insulation, U = 0.155  W/rrfK  Possible insulation upgrades of SWF  The Ribbed Panel System  Pius Schuler A G suggest a range of enclosure principles relying on a depth of the ribs between 160 mm and 280 mm (Fig. 4.8a), but virtually any insulation standard is possible either by increasing the depth of the ribs or by using extenders (Fig. 3.13, Fig. 3.15b). A s an increase in the thermal insulation affects only the depth of the ribs, thermal upgrades may easily be achieved without changing the construction principles. Moreover, the use of extenders considerably reduces the thermal bridges by reducing the linear thermal bridges to punctuate ones at the joints between the extenders and the exterior sheathing. A s such, this system allows an easy and flexible thermal upgrade of the basic system in the planning stage as well as at the beginning of the factory production (Fig. 4.8b).  128  a) 16 to 28 cm insulation U« 0.22 to 0.134 W/rrfK Fig. 4.8  Thermal insulation standards of RPS (Source: adapted from Schuler, 2003).  a) Additional exterior layer 22 + 10 cm insulation, U* 0.119 W/rrfK Fig. 4.9  b) 38 cm insulation U * 0.096 W/rrfK  b) Additional interior layer 22+ 6 cm insulation, U*0.137 W/rrfK  Possible insulation upgrades of RPS (Source: adapted from Schuler, 2003).  129  A l s o at a later s t a g e , the a p p l i c a t i o n of e x t e n d e r s a n d a further insulation l a y e r a s s h o w n in F i g u r e 4 . 8 b is p o s s i b l e . A l e s s - c o s t l y alternative is the a p p l i c a t i o n of a n a d d i t i o n a l insulation layer o n top of the c e n t r a l c o r e ( F i g . 4.9a). G i v e n the fact that t h e b l o c k b o a r d m a y t a k e up all the migrating  vapour,  e x p a n d e d or e x t r u d e d f o a m e d plastic insulation with p l a s t e r c l a d d i n g c o u l d theoretically b e a p p l i e d ; practically, this is not r e c o m m e n d e d a s f a i l u r e s of the b l o c k b o a r d (joints or h o l e s ) m a y o c c u r . T h e a p p l i c a t i o n of a n interior insulation l a y e r is a l s o p o s s i b l e ( F i g . 4.9b), e v e n t h o u g h it is m o r e c o s t l y a n d d e c r e a s e s t h e s i z e of the r o o m s . N o v a p o u r - d i f f u s i o n p r o b l e m s a r e e x p e c t e d a s long a s the v a p o u r t a k e n up b y the b l o c k b o a r d c a n b e g i v e n up to either s i d e at a later s t a g e . A l s o , d u e to the regular distribution of insulation o n t h e o u t s i d e ( e s p e c i a l l y in the e n c l o s u r e / floor a r e a ) of the structural b o a r d , t h e irregularities o n t h e i n s i d e a r e a c c e p t a b l e . O n c e m o r e , this s t r a t e g y c h a n g e s the architectural e x p r e s s i o n of the w a l l .  4.4.3  Summary  B o t h S W F a n d R P S a l l o w for a c o n s i d e r a b l e i n c r e a s e in the insulation s t a n d a r d . W h e r e S W F e m p l o y s a different c o n s t r u c t i o n principle for h i g h l y - i n s u l a t e d b u i l d i n g s , the c o n s t r u c t i o n of R P S r e m a i n s the s a m e w h a t e v e r s t a n d a r d it is d e s i g n e d for. O n site, i m p r o v e m e n t to the t h e r m a l insulation p r e f e r a b l y o c c u r s o n the exterior s i d e of t h e e n c l o s u r e . T h u s , the n e w s h e l l is uninterrupted, d e c r e a s e s existing t h e r m a l b r i d g e s a n d d o e s not affect r o o m s a n d interior finishing m a t e r i a l s . V a p o u r - d i f f u s i o n p r o b l e m s a r e a v o i d e d a s l o n g a s the a d d i t i o n a l l a y e r s r e s p e c t the v a p o u r - d i f f u s i o n  requirements. O n the inside, the application  of  a d d i t i o n a l i n s u l a t i o n will m o s t p r o b a b l y b e d o n e a l o n g with m a j o r r e n o v a t i o n w o r k , or in r e s p o n s e to a n e e d for a n installation c a v i t y .  4.5  Structural redundancy  S t r u c t u r a l e l e m e n t s that m a y b e a r larger l o a d s t h a n originally p l a n n e d h a v e a g r e a t e r potential to b e a d a p t e d to t h e c h a n g i n g n e e d s o v e r t i m e . T h e s e n e e d s i n c l u d e c h a n g e s in u s e a s well a s the n e e d for larger or m o r e living s p a c e . T h e latter is e s p e c i a l l y true in S w i t z e r l a n d , w h e r e l a n d is s c a r c e a n d the d e n s i f i c a t i o n of r e s i d e n t i a l e s t a t e s is b e i n g d i s c u s s e d . T h u s , a building s y s t e m that c a n  potentially  w i t h s t a n d t h e f o r c e s of a n a d d i t i o n a l s t o r e y m a y a s s i s t in a c h i e v i n g l o n g - l a s t i n g b u i l d i n g s . A l s o , c h a n g e s in  130  the fire regulations make multi-residential buildings in wood with up to five storeys feasible. This section investigates the load-bearing capacity of S W F and R P S enclosures where the load influence zone of the floors is 2.20m . 7  4.5.1  Swiss W o o d Frame  A stud in a S W F building with 2.40m height and a cross-section of 80 x 160 mm can resist buckling loads of up to 6.2 N/mm . Calculations (App. 4) show that the loads of a five-storey building are not critical (Tab. 2  4.4), but the pressure at the intersection of studs and plates limits the number of storeys. Norway spruce and fir can only resist stresses of 1.6 N/mm against the grain. Stresses of 2 N/mm are allowed only if 2  2  deformations do not endanger the stability of the construction. Thus, stresses against the grain limit the construction of S W F to three storeys (resulting in stresses of 1.68 N/mm ). To be adaptable to a multi2  storey building with four (2.28 N/mm ) or five (2.89 N/mm ) storeys, a reduction in the stresses against the 2  2  grain in the top and bottom plates of lower floors is necessary. The replacement of softwood plates with hardwood plates allows an increase in the critical stresses in plates from 1.6 N/mm to 4.5 N/mm against the grain. While an increase of the stud area 2  2  would also reduce the stresses, changed dimensions in width and depth bear major disadvantages. A n increase of the stud width is not feasible, as it would change the construction grid of the entire construction. Moreover, the respective buckling loads do not require increased width of the studs. Considering an insulation depth of 22 cm needed to achieve the Minergie standard, studs with square sections of 8 x 22 cm could replace the two insulation layers. Thus, the construction would be according to the basic standard. A s a result, a four-storey building with assumed stresses of 1.66 N/mm becomes 2  feasible. But, the use of 8 x 22 studs would increase the thermal bridges of the enclosure. However, this square section is not (yet) readily available in the local market. A look at the floor construction reveals that replacing the 7 cm concrete underlay floor with a 2.5 cm wood fibreboard would reduce the dead load of the floor by about 55%, or the total load of a storey (dead load and life load) by a remarkable 30%. A s a result, a four-storey building with an assumed load of 1.73 N/mm would still be feasible without considering any other changes in the construction. Moreover, if 2  7  According to the rule of thumb, the joists of the SWF (8 x 22 mm) are feasible for spans of 4.40m. 131  hardwood plates are additionally used in lower storeys, theoretically this system could bear the loads of a then-storey building.  4.5.2  Ribbed Panel System  Ribbed panel enclosures with an insulation depth of 22cm, a height of the structural board of 2.50m and a thickness of 35mm can resist buckling loads of about 145 kN/m' (Pius Schuler A G , 2004: Elements) or 91.5 kN per enclosure section (63cm). This construction could therefore resist the buckling load of buildings way higher than five storeys (App. 4, Tab. 4.4). However, at the enclosure / floor joints the pressure against the grain is limited to 1.2 to 2.5 N/mm . This means that a four-storey building with 2  assumed stresses of 1.02 N/mm (without rib areas) is feasible without any further considerations, while a 2  nine-storey building with 2.41 N/mm still lies within the given range for maximum stress against the grain. 2  Considering buildings higher than four storeys, an increase of the thickness of the structural board from 35 mm to 45 mm could reduce the stresses by 28%. This strategy is easily achievable, as it does not affect the grid of the enclosure. Also, thicker block boards could be used in lower storeys only, where larger loads are expected. Alternatively, the use of hardwood block boards for floors could eliminate the stress problem. Both strategies are practicable, as the structural boards are produced only on demand. As with S W F , replacing the 5 cm concrete underlay floor with a 2.5 wood fibreboard would result in a 4 5 % reduction of the dead load of the floors as well as a 2 5 % reduction of the total load per storey, so that a five-storey building (1.03 N/mm ) would still be under the lower stress benchmark for maximum 2  stresses against the grain. Theoretically, a twelve-storey building (2.49 N/mm ) would still be feasible. 2  4.5.3  Summary  Both S W F and R P S are feasible for houses up to five storeys. While buckling loads are not a problem in either system, an increase in the number of floors results in critical stresses against the grain in both systems. Considering the basic construction, S W F is limited to two to three storeys while at least four storeys are feasible for R P S . The use of hardwood sills in lower storeys gives a considerable increase in the stress resistance in S W F and allows the construction of five-storey buildings. Also, the elimination of 132  the heavy concrete underlay floor would considerably reduce the occurring loads. Therefore, structural redundancy for five-storey buildings is most easily achieved by changes in the materials. An increased depth of the structural board is also feasible for R P S .  Loads per load influence zone and storey [kN/section] (load influence zone 2.2m x structural grid) Structural grid [m] Enclosure [kN/section] Floor (life load 2 kN/m ) Roof (life load 1 kN/m ) 2  2  [kN/section] [kN/section]  Maximum buckling load [kN/section] Maximum storeys due to buckling load Maximum stresses against the grain Softwood [N/mm l Hardwood [N/mm ]  SWF  RPS  7.7  4.6  0.625 1.3 6.4 4.8  0.63 0.75 3.85 4.15  79.5  91.5  10  19  1.6-2.0 4.5  2  <1)  1.2 - 2.5  (2)  Maximum storeys due to stresses against the grain Softwood sills Resulting stresses against the grain [N/mm ]  2-3 1.08-1.68  2  7 4.09  Hardwood sills Resulting stresses against the grain [N/mm ] Wood fibreboard underlay floor 2  Maximum storeys due to stresses against the grain Resulting stresses against the grain [N/mm ] 2  3-4 1.30- 1.72  4-9 1.02-2.41  5-12 1.02-2.49  (1) Deformations must be tolerated at stresses of 2 N/mm against the grain (2) This wide range most probably considers the use of different woods 2  Tab. 4.4  4.6  Load-bearing capacity of SWF and RPS.  Maintainability  Over time, building materials and building components wear away, due to climate influences as well as the wear and tear caused by the inhabitants; however, durable materials and constructions achieve longer life spans and reduce the frequency of maintenance work. A s well, exposed components or components with shorter lifespan (e.g. finishing materials) must permit easy replacement without affecting other building parts. Moreover, it is assumed that maintenance work that is easily and cheaply done is more likely to be done, which prevents the premature obsolescence of the entire building and thus saves resources and costs, increases the lifetime of a building, and is beneficial to the inhabitants' health. Generally, the interior and exterior surface layers are the components that suffer the most wear. This section looks at the ease and frequency of maintenance work.  133  4.6.1  Swiss Wood Frame  On the outside, a renewal of the paint on the horizontal wooden siding and driving nails back into the furring are maintenance work that may become necessary once in a while; also, the replacement of a single board or the entire siding may become necessary. Whether single boards or entire sidings are replaced, the maintenance work is limited to the parts requiring it without affecting the adjacent ones. Replacing the siding also allows easy examination and potential maintenance of the exterior sheathing. O n the inside, renewing the paint, along with a potential patch-up of the plaster or the application of another wall finishing such as wallpaper or wooden panels, is easily done; generally, these procedures are more likely to be requested by the inhabitants than to be technically necessary. However, problems with the vapour-retarder foil may require the removal of the gypsum board. Indeed, the vapour-retarder foil in S W F , being right behind the thin gypsum board (see also chapter 4.2 Vapour and air movement), is predestined to be perforated. The sealing of the holes is difficult and costly, even though in this construction it is necessary to limit the number of permanent outlets for vapour and air. This weakness of S W F may be solved by considering an installation cavity or a thicker finishing material during construction.  4.6.2  Ribbed Panel System  On the outside, maintenance of the wooden siding corresponds to that of S W F . The use of an air cavity is central to both constructions; the furring within the air cavity separates and links the exposed building components, which have more frequent maintenance needs, with the central core that is expected to last. On the inside, the oiled or painted surface of the block board can be renewed once in a while. Like hardwood floors, the surface can be sanded; cracks and holes (even large ones) can be filled with a mixture of wood dust and glue. Thus, the control of vapour and air movement may be maintained with low and easily performed measures. If the inhabitants request it, the application of paint or another surface material (e.g. gypsum board with plaster and final paint coat) is generally feasible. But the application of vapour-diffusion resistant layers impedes the ability of the block board to balance the indoor air humidity. Therefore, the application of additional layers is beneficial only if there is a need for an installation cavity.  134  4.6.3  Summary  Both S W F and R P S provide outdoor layers that allow easy maintenance or the replacement of single boards or entire sidings without affecting the adjacent parts. Indoor maintenance of S W F is easily performed and most probably requested by the inhabitants. But, the maintenance of the indoor layers of S W F can become very costly if holes in the vapour-retarder foil have to be sealed to prevent structural damage due to moving air and vapour. In this system, the use of an installation cavity is urgently recommended. Indoor maintenance of R P S is occasional and easily performed.  4.7  Indoor environmental quality  Adhesives, sealants, paints, composite products and carpets may emit contaminants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are odorous, irritating or even dangerous to the inhabitants' health Moreover, the construction of air-tight enclosures as required for highly-insulated buildings (Minergie, Minergie-P or Passive Houses) prevent air from naturally exchanging. Therefore, mechanical or natural strategies (e.g. mechanical ventilation or controlled window ventilation) are required to provide a healthy and comfortable indoor air quality (i.e. C 0 concentration, relative air humidity and pollutants). A s well, the 2  prevention of drafts and the provision of high radiant temperatures that limit the risk of moulds and mildew, enhance the well-being of the inhabitants. This section looks at how the building systems support the need for good indoor environmental quality (e.g. air exchange, air humidity control and the use of low-emission materials), few drafts and high radiant temperatures.  4.7.1  Swiss Wood Frame  A s we have seen in the previous sections, S W F relies on an enclosure with a U-value of 0.194 W / m K , a 2  vapour-retarder foil that is not considered to be open to diffusion (d -value between 40 and 150m), a s  maximum natural air-exchange rate of n  L 5 0  < 1, and necessary mechanical ventilation that is commonly  called 'comfort ventilation'. Gypsum boards with gypsum-based plaster and water-based paint, as well as a hardwood floor (oiled or vanished), are commonly-used indoor finishing materials.  135  Since S W F is highly air and vapour-tight, mechanical ventilation is needed as a controllable method to secure the provision of fresh air (oxygen), and to renew the indoor air in such a way that high levels of humidity and potential pollutants or allergens (e.g. smoke, V O C ' s ) in the indoor air are prevented. As well, this construction allows rooms to be fitted with indoor finishing materials (e.g. omission of solventbased paint, timber preservatives) that have minimal health (and environmental) impact. Unnecessary drafts are prevented by air-tight enclosures and radiant temperatures of exterior walls are only slightly under the room temperature, due to good thermal insulation. For an assumed outside temperature of -10°C and an indoor air temperature of 21 °C, the radiant temperature of the S W F construction is about 20.25°C. This means that S W F works perfectly as long as one can count on the successful operation of the mechanical ventilation. However, this is a factor that is strongly criticised by opponents; they mention aspects such as the risk of insufficient maintenance of filters and the considerable risk of moulds growing in the ducts of mechanical ventilation systems, as well as hygienic problems due to planning errors, and a potential ionisation of the air. These potential risks are contrasted by 'measurable' advantages such as fresh air all day long even if nobody is home, protection against pollution and traffic noise or protection against burglary due to open windows as they have been mentioned in chapter 2.4.  4.7.2  Ribbed Panel System  The R P S relies on an enclosure with an U-value of 0.179 W / m K , a maximum natural air exchange rate of 2  n  L 5 0  < 1 and required mechanical ventilation. The structural block board of the enclosure and floor  elements is air tight but open to diffusion (d -value around 2.8m), and / or it is able to balance the indoor s  air humidity. Therefore, generally no finishing materials are applied on the walls and ceilings; the surfaces are treated with oil or paint. On the floors, hardwood (oiled or vanished), stone or any other finish flooring is possible. The mechanical ventilation system used in R P S has the same advantages and disadvantages as discussed for S W F . Also, unnecessary drafts are prevented by air-tight enclosures. Radiant temperatures of exterior walls are only slightly under the room temperature, due to good thermal insulation. For an outside temperature of -10°C and an indoor air temperature of 21 °C, the radiant temperature of R P S construction is about 20.35°C. But in contrast to S W F , the enclosure is open to vapour diffusion and / or  136  has the ability to balance the indoor air humidity. Thus, it has the potential to improve the well-being of the inhabitants considerably. But block boards, like many other engineered wood products, embody large amounts of urea-formaldehyde (UF) glues, and formaldehyde may harm the health of the inhabitants. Even though the block boards employed conform to the lowest emission class (E1) that requires a maximum emission of formaldehyde < 0.1 ppm (maximum formaldehyde concentration of the indoor air < 12ug/m ) and therefore also comply with legal requirements, sensitive persons may still perceive irritation 3  or a nuisance smell. Also, the W H O suggests that formaldehyde emissions should be limited to < 0.05ppm (concentration < 6pg/m ). Considering a natural formaldehyde concentration of 1ug/m to 20ug/m (WHO, 3  3  3  2004: W H O 5.8) or exposure to tobacco smoke with concentrations of 50 to 350ug/m , the concentrations 3  resulting from the block boards are not exceptional, but they are added to the total of the daily exposure. Furthermore, the inhabitants' exposure may last for many years. Here, major improvements have to be made to achieve a healthier building system.  4.7.3  Summary  Both S W F and R P S are building systems that work only in combination with a reliable ventilation system. A s long as mechanical ventilation systems are considered present-day benefit without major health disadvantages, the synthesis of both S W F and R P S with mechanical ventilation has great potential for success in the local market. However, alternatives to the use of mechanical ventilation systems should be tested, and improvements in the composition of glues in E W P ' s have to be made.  4.8  Noise protection  Good sound insulation against exterior and interior noise is necessary for the maintenance of the inhabitants' health and comfort. In Switzerland, norm SIA 181 defines the noise control requirements. Table 4.5 summarizes the required benchmarks for different noise immissions and sensitivity levels in living spaces. In this thesis, I investigate the enclosure with respect to exterior noise, as well as the suggested floors regarding interior airborne and impact noise. The benchmarks are set at 45 dB for  137  exterior airborne noise, 52 dB for indoor airborne noise through floors, and 55 dB for impact noises through floors (bold numbers in Tab. 4.5). The values D  n t w  and L '  n Tw  describe the weighted standard sound level difference (airborne noise)  and the weighted standard impact sound level (impact noise) in a room, respectively. The relationship between the D  ntw  - v a l u e and the R' -value (weighted standard sound reduction index of a building w  element) is given by a correction factor C that considers the room volume, the exposed area (wall or floor), and the reverberation time. Similarly, the relationship between the L '  nTw  - v a l u e and the L ' - v a l u e aw  (weighted standard impact noise level index of a building element) is given by a correction factor B that considers the room volume as well as the reverberation time (SIA 181:25,34). Bold  numbers: code requirements  Exterior noise  impact  value  normal  increased  strong  D ,w[dB]  >40  >45  nl  very strong  D ,w[dB]  >45  >50  Interior noise  average  D ,w[dB]  >52  >57  strong  D ,w[dB]  >57  >62  Impact noise  average  L'nT.w  [dB]  <55  <50  strong  L'nT.w  [dB]  <50  <45  Tab. 4.5  4.8.1  Sensitivity  nt  nt  nt  Sound insulation requirements for living spaces according to SIA 181 (Source: SIA 181)  Swiss Wood Frame  According to Renggli A G , the sound insulation value (R' -value) of the S W F enclosure is about 50 d B w  (exterior noise). A comparison with Kolb (Kolb, 1998: 428-435) allows the assumption that the R' -value of w  the floor with hardwood finish flooring is about 63 d B (interior noise), and the L ' - v a l u e (impact noise) is nw  about 50 dB. Sound insulation calculations for differently sized and exposed rooms show that the given S W F construction achieves very good sound insulation values against exterior and interior airborne noise, as well as good insulation values against impact noises (Tab 4.6). Using the described strategy to reduce the load of floors by replacing the 7cm cement underlay floor with a 2.5cm wood fibreboard (see Chapter 4.5.1), the sound insulation values for airborne and impact noise would decrease slightly, but they would still meet the given benchmarks (Tab. 4.6).  138  4.8.2  Ribbed Panel System  Pius Schuler A G provides an R' -value (exterior noise) for the R P S enclosure of 49 dB as well as an Rew  value (interior airborne noise) of 53 dB and an L ' - v a l u e (impact noise) of 66 dB for the floor without floor nw  finishing material. A comparison with Kolb (Kolb, 1998: 428-435) shows that the R' -value remains at 53 w  dB for a floor with hardwood finish flooring, whereas the L ' - v a l u e increases to about 62 dB. Sound nw  insulation calculations for differently sized and exposed rooms show that the given R P S construction achieves very good insulation values against exterior noises. The protection against interior (airborne) noise is sufficient, while the impact insulation of floors, particularly for large rooms, is insufficient (Tab 4.6). However, a suspended ceiling (e.g. gypsum board ceiling with flexible connections) could improve the airborne sound insulation by about 12 dB and the impact insulation by about 9 dB. A s such, the floor construction of R P S could also achieve good to very good results. If the 5cm cement underlay floor is replaced with a 2.5cm wood fibreboard (see Chapter 4.5.2), the sound insulation of the floor is insufficient for both airborne and impact noise (Tab 4.6). In this construction, replacing the underlay floor is not recommended or necessitates the application of a suspended ceiling.  4.8.3  Summary  SWF  Sound insulation values  Enclosure: exterior airborne noise  D ,w[dB]  10 m2  54 50  51 47  54 50  51 47  60  65 -  53  58  -  -  50 62 46 58  55 67 51 63  >52  -  43  51 -  47  55  -  -  55 45 56 46  63 53 64 54  <55  -  Wood fibreboard underlay floor Suspended ceiling  >45  (1)  D„ ,w[dB]  (1)  t  Wood fibreboard underlay floor Suspended ceiling Floor: impact noise Suspended ceiling  Goal  100 m2  nt  1 exterior wall 2 exterior walls Floor: interior airborne noise Suspended ceiling  RPS  10 m2  Room size 100 m2  L'nT,w[dB]<  2)  Dnt. is the weighted standard sound level difference where D i. = R'w- C (SIA 181:25) L ' , w is the weighted standard impact sound level where L'nT.w = L' n w - B (SIA 181:34)  ( 1 )  w  (z)  n  w  nT  Tab. 4.6  Sound level difference and impact sound level of SWF and RPS  139  While S W F achieves very good sound insulation values for exterior and interior noise as well as for impact noise control, R P S achieves very good values only for exterior sound protection. Improvements in the impact sound insulation are strongly required for small rooms. This is even more important in multi- family residential constructions, where good sound insulation will be necessary to avoid noise disturbances by neighbours, as well as to promote the acceptance of multi-storey buildings in wood.  4.9  Summary  The key findings of the investigation in this section are summarized in Table 4.7. Both systems achieve good to very good results in most aspects of the analysis on efficiency, longevity and health. Generally, potential deficiencies can generally be solved with easily-achievable strategies. An important feature of both systems is the strong dependence on the mechanical ventilation systems. S W F provides a comparatively sturdy and intricate solution to realise highly energy-efficient wooden houses; this construction principle achieves good to very good scores for most requirements, and where the requirements are not met, there are easy strategies available to improve the system. S W F only faces major difficulties with regard to the position of the vapour barrier and the structural redundancy. However, the application of an installation cavity to protect the air barrier, and the use of hardwood sills to increase the structural redundancy, are improvements that are easy to achieve. A s such, the system becomes very adaptable to infrastructure  upgrades and allows considerable improvements in the  frequency and ease of maintenance work. R P S provides an elegant solution to achieve highly efficient wooden houses. It relies on a very simple and clear geometry, few layers and few geometrical dependencies, which allows changing single parts without affecting others. However, major criticisms are the low noise-protection values of floors, and the formaldehyde content of the block boards. While the sound insulation may be much improved by using a suspended ceiling, the off-gassing of the block boards is a problem that is faced by most engineered wood products. A decrease in health-harming components (e.g. avoidance of formaldehyde) of the glue employed in block boards is essential for R P S to achieve a top score.  140  SWF Thermal efficiency  Thermal insulation depth Enclosure core depth Weight / enclosure section U-value Minimum insulation for Minergie label V a p o u r a n d air m o v e m e n t  Controlled by Diffusion equivalent air layer (SD) Position in relation to insulation Joint connections Vapour diffusion Strategy for open construction Characteristics Air movement Critical issues Improvements For example Differential m o v e m e n t  Cladding Structure: initial shrinkage / storey height dimensional changes over time Difficult parts Thermal redundancy  Increase during planning Variety of possibilities Thermal increase on site Structural r e d u n d a n c y  Maximum number of storeys Adaptations Theoretically-achievable storeys Maintenance work  Cladding Interior shell Difficult parts Possible strategy Indoor air quality  Fresh air and air exchange Critical issues Positive issues Radiant temperature Out-gassing materials Criticisms Noise protection  Exterior noise (enclosure) Interior noise (floor) Impact noise (floor) Improvements Interior noise (floor) Impact noise (floor) Tab. 4.7  Good 22cm 26.25cm 58kg (62.5cm) 0.194W/m2K • 22 cm Good control PE-foil 40-159m Warm side Overlapping, taped Not open to vapour diffusion Exterior fibreboard sheathing  RPS  Very good 22cm 27.10cm 34kg (63cm) 0.169 19 cm Good control Block board 2.8 m Warm side Screwed, glued Open to vapour diffusion  Airtight Foil perforation Protection of foil Installation cavity  Humidity balancing Air tight Joints (gap-filling glue) Durably sealed joints Use of additional tapes  Not a problem Detached 9.1mm ± 3.91mm Sheathing joints  Not a problem Detached 0.65mm ± 1.95mm Rib-wall joint line  Good Change of system Standards Preferably exterior  Very good Same system Any level possible Exterior and interior Given 4-7 Not necessary  Achievable 2-3 Hardwood sills 7 Easy to costly Easy Costly Vapour retarder foil Use of installation cavity  Easy Easy Easy  Good Mechanical ventilation Filters and ducts Safety, avoidance of polls, noise, drafts Very good Avoidable  Critical Mechanical ventilation Filters and ducts Safety, avoidance of polls, noise, drafts Very good Inherent Formaldehyde in glue  -  Good to very good 47 - 54 dB 60 - 65 dB 51 - 43 dB Not necessary -  -  Fair to good 47 - 54 dB 50 - 55 dB 63 - 53 dB Suspended ceiling 62 - 67 dB 53 - 45 dB  Summary of characteristics of SWF and RP  141  5.  CONCLUSION  This investigation of the local building context in Switzerland and the two new wood building systems, S W F and R P S , has revealed that these systems provide powerful strategies to meet the present needs of the residential building market by using local wood and achieving high thermal efficiency. However, the fact that they consider important environmental strategies per se is not relevant to an assumed success in the local building market. Political decisions and federal subsidies, along with innovations in the wood building industry and the strong marketing strategies of the Minergie label, were necessary to push the new ideas. Today, new wood building systems match the principles of 'Swissness' by relying on high quality and technology standards and modern and individual design, by providing comfort and safety, and by offering financial benefits, high asset values and social status. The provision of distinctive, high-quality products has been shown to be a good strategy for success in the stagnating residential building market in Switzerland. Following the credo 'quality costs', the new factory-built houses benefit from individual design, high construction quality and precision rather than from mass production, standardisation or major cost reductions. Moreover, the assembly of the factorybuilt houses in wood in only one or two days evokes a strong fascination and high expectations within the population. These arguments demonstrate that S W F and R P S are products that skilfully connect present needs of place with people's expectations, as well as with global issues, using present day technology and tools. Furthermore, it is assumed that the two building systems will be able to adapt to the changing local and global needs, even though these investigations consider only a few criteria and reflect only a short time period of an ongoing process. Evidence for this assumption is provided by the facts that the wood building industry in general is heavily involved in research into more sustainable development, and that the two wood building systems in particular need to increase their shares within a tight market and a changing building context. A s well, the investigation of key construction principles has shown that the two systems are also capable of adapting to further changes and needs. In doing so, both systems will have a strong potential to achieve a new and successful wood building culture that is locally bound and considers  142  the principles of the global context. This goal will be reached in spite of the considerable idiosyncrasies of the producers, the planning and building process as well as the systems. Renggli and Schoeb, the advocates of S W F , are carpenters with traditional education. Reliability is a key characteristic of their building system as well as of the planning, production, assembly and finishing processes. In contrast, Deplazes, Germerott and Schuler, the advocates of R P S , are involved in research on wood and wood buildings. With their curiosity to push the envelope they prefer systems with potential for innovation and experiments. Considering the different backgrounds, it is clear that S W F and R P S not only cover different ideas and niches on the supplier side but they also serve different client groups. Whereas the planning and building process of S W F is script-like determined and supervised by one firm, R P S still relay on the co-operation of teams of building professionals as it is common in Switzerland. And, as different as the planning and building context differs the building system itself. While S W F uses a structural frame of studs and plates that gets its rigidity from a structural sheathing, R P S reverses the system: a thin structural board supported by a set of ribs provides structural and lateral stability. In this way, R P S shifts the idea of a traditional wood building system; loads are no longer conducted through linear members, but through a planar one. In other words, the linear members of S W F that already works as a planar system are physically amalgamated into a planar member. The development of this wood building system in central Europe most probably did not happen accidentally; the details of R P S are too reminiscent of those found in concrete construction. It is also assumed that this construction especially will attract the attention of architects; being skilled in designing in concrete, they value R P S in terms of easy details, grid independency, neglectable shrinkage rates and room-side exposed structural boards. Potentially, R P S may become an attractive alternative to residential buildings in concrete over time, whereas S W F provides a present-day interpretation of the traditional wood building culture. Despite the simultaneous success stories of the two building systems and the Minergie label, further work should be conducted to investigate critically the dependence of these wood building systems on the Minergie requirements, in terms of mechanical ventilation, enclosure performance and initial building costs. Also, the consumption of wood as well as the potential harmful effects of glue on the health of the inhabitants should be investigated.  143  In accordance with the need to reduce the heating energy consumed by buildings, the Minergie label not only requires an increased thermal insulation standard of the enclosures, but also limits the ventilation heat loss through fabric and windows by demanding fairly air-tight enclosures and mechanical ventilation with heat recovery. But so far it is not known to what degree mechanical ventilation systems create a risk of health problems; researching the potential harm would provide more certainty on this issue. Furthermore, the certainty that mechanical ventilation systems do not harm the inhabitants' health would increase the credibility of Minergie houses, as well as new wood houses, in terms of health, longevity and asset value. Considering the large number of Minergie houses built over the last few years, this investigation is not only important but also feasible. Today, Minergie buildings rely on the fact that mechanical ventilation systems are installed, and that they work. Thus, building enclosures are no longer required to take care of the control of the air and vapour exchange between the building and the environment. But longevity of an enclosure is not secured by responding to a defined and unquestioned requirement. The new generation of enclosures should be researched on their potential to work without mechanical ventilation systems, as breathable enclosures do. The investigation of S W F showed that its enclosure is fairly tight to air and vapour movement, although variations of the materials will allow optimisation of this system. While R P S provides an enclosure that is fairly open to vapour diffusion, it is assumed that the block board takes up the migrating vapour. This building system can most probably provide an enclosure that is not dependant on mechanical ventilation systems. Currently, the initial costs of Minergie buildings are limited to 10% over those of conventional ones, yet the costs for houses vary considerably from less than 400,-- C H F / m to well over 6 0 0 . - C H F / m . 3  3  This makes an objective evaluation of the tolerable additional initial building costs very difficult. The investigation and classification of building costs by building parts, such as foundation, primary structure, finishing materials or appliances would help to achieve more transparency; and it could help to optimise the relation between construction quality standards and costs. In Switzerland, buildings are currently not valued on the consumption of primary energies and resources. On the contrary, the performance of buildings relies on long life cycles and a low consumption of operational energies and resources. However, the consumption of wood could become important for obtaining a maximum market share, as wood is a renewable local building material that is still plentifully  144  available, and an increased use of local wood is still desirable to increase the health of the local forests. These conditions may change with an increase in the demand on wooden buildings; therefore, an optimisation of the amount and the quality of wood used for the construction of buildings might become necessary. The health problem posed by glues, particularly formaldehyde-containing glues, is inherent to all engineered wood products. Even though most products have reduced the emissions below the requested benchmarks, further research on glues is essential to make R P S a building system that does not impose harm on the inhabitants' health. While the investigation and findings of this study are limited to the Swiss context, the structure of the investigation may be applied to the residential building market of any country, where the P - P - P concept will be determined by the specific local key factors of place, people and product, as well as by the locally relevant global factors. A s such, the P - P - P concept is not only a tool to evaluate market opportunities from within a country, but house-exporting countries may also gain better insight into the requirements and expectations of the relevant country or region. In general, the success of a building system or building type relies on its ability to adapt to local and global needs, or to conform to the specific glocal factors.  145  APPENDICIES  Appendix 1  Use of wood for fuel purposes between 1990 and 2001 (Source: S A E F L : 2003:108)  In 2001, about 54% of the wood used for fuel (2.2 million m ) consisted of firewood for domestic uses 3  (manual recharge) and 4 6 % consisted of wood chips and pellets for residential and non-residential stoves with automatic recharge (compare to Appendix 1). Between 1990 and 2001, the use of firewood slightly decreased from 1.3 to 1.2 million tons, whereas the use of wood chips and pellets more than doubled from 0.47 to 1.0 million tons (SAEFL,  2003: 108). Throughout these years, the use of wood chips and pellets  was strongly supported by the Energy2000 program (see also Chapter 2.2.2 Politics). These numbers do not contain the amount of construction waste wood of around 0.3 million tons that were burnt in waste combustors or specific stoves resulting in district heating energy. 1600  -i  1  1990  1992  1994  1996  1998  2000  2002  • Firewood (chimney, stoves) • Chips and pellets (automatically recharged stoves) • Construction waste wood (installations for waste wood, waste combustors)  146  Appendix 2  Overview of the average wood flow in Switzerland between 1995 and 1999 (Source: S A E F L : 2003:41, translation by author)  in 1 '000 m ' feste Holzmasse  INLANDNUTZUNG  in 1,000 m3 compact wood  DOMESTIC HARVEST  I  }  Importo/ Imports  >  Recycling  Exporto/ Exports  iH> II I  Energio / Energy  4528 Rundhojz  Logs  921  479  3128  [5>  LT59/  910  MB> 2211  Stammholz / Logs  Brennholz / Firewood Halbfabrikate  346  Semi-finished products  609  Industrieholz / Industrial wood  R e s t h o l z / By-products Recycling / Recycled  wood  314 ^ [556) 824  19Q0  10/6  my- •. ms>  m> EE* 1510  2070  725  1392 ,  Energieholz  Scfinittwaren, Furniere, Sperrholz  Span- und Faserplatten  Holzschliff, Zellulose  Sawn wood, veneers, plywood  Energy-wood  :  Particle- and fibreboards  Endprodukte.  Sawdust, cellulose  loaf?  Final products  Holzanfali ausser Wald Wood not from forests  2795  Altholz Construction waste wood  Allpapier Used Paper i  11674,  « 298 2118  2800  2503  C Q)  =1  Holz-  Endverbrauch  Construction  ( V a n a t u n g in % feste Holzmasse / distribution in % of the compact wood volume  28%  23%  Mobcl Fumitun  Final wood consumption  7%  $ i 6%  a a a. 0. 33%  147  Appendix 3  Ready available timber sections in Switzerland  In Switzerland, construction wood is standardised on a 20 mm grid for widths and depths between 60 mm and 300 mm. Yet, only those square sections marked with an X are readily available. [cm] 6  6  8  X  X X  8 10  10  12  14  16  X  X  18  20  24  22  26  28  30  X x X  X X  X  12 14  X  X  X  X  16  X X  18  X  20 X  22 24 26 28 30  Readily available square sections of timbers in Switzerland. (Source: Natterer, et al., 1994:46)  Appendix 4  Available dimensions of OSB in Switzerland  The square sections marked with an X are readily available dimensions of O S B boards in Switzerland. EUROSTRAND OSB Standard  12, 15, 18 mm: recommended for wall constructions  Depths [m] / Dimensions  8  9  10  11  12  15  18  22  25  30  40  1.25x2.50  X  X  X  X  x X  X  x  X  X  X  X  1.25x2.65 1.25x2.80  X  X  1.25x3.00  X  v  1.25x5.00 2.07 x 2.80 2.50 x 5.00  EUROSTRAND* OSB (Tongue&Groove)  • i i X  X X  X  X  X  X  X  X  18. 22 mm: recommended for subfloors (spaced at max. 65 cm on centre  2.50 x 1.25  X  X  X  X  2.50 x 6.75  X  X  X  X  Readily available OSB boards in Switzerland. (Source: Available: http://www.baudas.de/52.html [May 12, 2004].  148  Appendix 5  Technical data of block boards produced by Pius Schuler AG  Material and surface treatment Type  1-, 3-, and 5-layered block boards Surface  (other surfaces on demand)  standard  industry  lath  board  veneer  Fir  X  X  X  X  X  Norway Spruce  X  X  X  X  X  Pine  X  X  X  X  X  Material  Dimensions Type  1 -layered block boards (ribs) economic spans < 5.0 - 5.5 m  Dimensions depth  [mm]  8  width  [mm]  75  length [mm] Characteristics Block boards  to  220  to  800  up to  8,000  Moisture content 10% ± 2 %  3- / 5- layered block boards economic spans < 4.5 - 5.5 m 24 to 140 -  up to up to  2,180 7,200  Emission class  Glue Urea (UF)  E1  Technical data of block boards produced by the Pius Schuler AG (Source: Available: http://www.pius-schuler.ch [November 18, 2003]).  Appendix 6  Stress calculation of SWF and RPS  Swiss wood frame Resulting loads:  Effective floor area:  Snow load (up to 800 m o.s.l.) Life load / storey  2  =  1 kN/m 2 kN/m  Roof  =  2.5 k N / m  2  Wall Floor  = =  0.625 m x 2.2 m  =  2  1.3 kN/section 2.66 k N / m 2  1.375 m  2  A) Vertical loads relevant for stresses against the grain Residential building  =  2.5 + 1 .375 x  8.0  2 storeys = 3 storeys =  1 storey  5.0 + 1 .375 x  12.5  7.5 + 1 .375 x  =  13.5 kN/stud 22.2 kN/stud 30.9 kN/stud  17.0  =  39.6 kN/stud 48.3 kN/stud  15.0 + 1 375 x  26.0 a 30.5 a  17.5 + 1 375 x  35.0 ~  56.9 kN/stud 65.6 kN/stud  20.0 + 1 375 x  39.5  74.3 kN/stud  4 storeys = 5 storeys =  10.0 + 1 .375  6 storeys = 7 storeys = 8 storeys =  12.5 + 1 375 x  x21.5  149  B) Maximal buckling loads of the studs  bob  12 ab  i =  16 a Vl2 " Vl2  V12  = 46 mm  Due to the structural sheathing, the depth (a) is relevant for the calculation of 1 A  '  2  k  4  ° °  46  =  S9 =  = 1.2-0.009 L =  ^ CT  i  =  K U  /7^  u  = KK  CT.X  = 6.22  ^  X  N/mm  1  2  X  0.732 1  = ° -  7  3  2  X  8  -  5  =  6  -  2  2  N  x 12,800 = 79,616 N= 79.6  /  M  M  2  kN  Ribbed panel system Resulting loads:  Effective floor area:  Snow load (up to 800 m o.s.l.) Life load / storey Roof Wall Floor  1 kN/nrf 2 kN/m 2 kN/m 0.76 kN/section 1.87 k N / m 2  2  2  1.386 m  0.63 m x 2.2 m  2  A) Vertical loads relevant for stresses against the grain: Residential building  N/mm N/mm  2  N/mm N/mm N/mm  2  34.80 kN/section 40.93 kN/section 47.05 kN/section  1 578 N/mm 1 856 N/mm 2 134 N/mm  2  53.18 kN/section 59.31 kN/section 65.44 kN/section  2 412 N/mm 2 690 N/mm 2 968 N/mm  2  71.57 kN/section 77.69 kN/section 83.82 kN/section  3 246 N/mm 3 524 N/mm 3 801 N/mm 4 079 N/mm  2  0 +1.386 x 3.0 1 storey = 2 storeys = 0.76 + 1.386 x 6.87 3 storeys = 1.53 + 1 3 8 6 x 1 0 . 7 4 4 storeys = 2.29 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 1 4 . 6 1 5 storeys = 3.06 + 1 3 8 6 x 1 8 . 4 8  * * « * =  4.16 10.29 16.41 22.54 28.67  6 storeys = 7 storeys =  3.82 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 2 2 . 3 5 4.58 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 2 6 . 2 2  = ~  8 storeys =  5.35 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 3 0 . 0 9 6.11+1 3 8 6 x 3 3 . 9 6  « *  9 storeys = 10 storeys = 6.88 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 3 7 . 8 3 11 storeys = 7.64 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 4 1 . 7 0 12 storeys = 8.41 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 4 5 . 5 7 13 storeys = 9.17 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 4 9 . 4 4 14 storeys = 9.93 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 5 3 . 3 1 15 storeys = 10.7 + 1 . 3 8 6 x 5 7 . 1 8  * = « = = ~  kN/section kN/section kN/section kN/section kN/section  89.95 kN/section  0 0 0 1 1  189 466 744 022 300  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  B) Maximal buckling load of the wall element (Pius Schuler A G , 2004) Enclosure with  20 cm rib depth 24 cm rib depth  140 kN/m 150 kN/m  88.2 kN/section 94.5 kN/section  22 cm rib depth  ca. 145 kN/m  91.35 kN/section  4.14 N/mm  2  150  Appendix 7  Condensation within the RPS  3,000 4- Pa  Saturation vapour pressure Ps, = 2,486.6 P a  2,500 4-  2,000 +  T  A  = -10  °C  T, =  20 °C  1,500 4V a p o u r pressure P, (50%) = 1,243.3 P a  1,000 +  500 +  P (80%) = 207.9 Pa A  Cold side  Warm side Diffusion equivalent air layers s  D  Vapour pressure within RPS enclosure: Calculation according to Keller, 2004: Building physics: vapour pressure in enclosures)  Appendix 8  Comparison of diffusion equivalent air layers of SWF and RPS  RPS S m  SD3  SD2  SWF SD2  S m  0  SD3  I I  5  I  I  10  S  30  40  20  System  s -layer depth  RPS  SD1  D  material  50 m SD-value scale layer depth  Wood fibreboard sheathing bitumised  SD2  0.16 m 0.97 m  SD3  2.80 m  Block board  total  S  3.93 m  Enclosure depth  SWF  SDI  6.00 m 2.11 m  O S B sheathing  D  SD2  SD4  6.00 m 35.00 m  SDS  0.09 m  SD3  total  6  SD5  SD4  S  D  49.20 m  Ribs with mineral fibre insulation  Studs with mineral fibre insulation O S B sheathing Vapour barrier (PE-foil) Gypsum board Enclosure depth  16 mm 220 mm 35 mm 271 mm 15 mm 220 mm 15 mm 0.2 mm 12.5 mm 262.7 mm  Diffusion equivalent air layers of RPS correspond to the ones shown in Appendix 7. 152  BIBLIOGRAPHY  Allen, Edward. 1998. Fundamentals of Building Construction: Materials and Method 3rd edition. New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons. Alpentouren, ed. 2002. Countries of the Alps. Available: http://alpentouren.teamone.de/start.htm7panorama/index.htrn [August 21, 2004]. Ambuhler, Reto. 2002. Information about Switzerland. Available: http://www.about.ch/welcome.html [Nov. 19, 2002]. Ammann, Walter. 1988. Baustilkunde [Architectural styles]. 3rd edition. Bern: Benteli Verlag. Ampack, ed. 2000. Basics and Theory. Rorschach: 3rd edition. Ampack A G . Architos, ed. 2000. Architos Baustandards der Renggli AG: Technische Dokumentation standards of the Renggli A G : technical documentation]. Available: http://www.architos.ch/baustandards.htm [October 26, 2001].  [Architos building  A R E (Federal Office for Spatial Development), ed. 2002 [?]. Strategy on Sustainable Development Technical appendix. (March 27, 2002). Available: http://www.johannesburg2002.ch/en/materialien/2_2_0_n-strategie.php [June 24, 2002].  2002:  A R E (Federal office for spatial development), ed. 2004. Kantone und Gemeinden: Lokale Agenda 21 [Cantons and Municipalities: local Agenda 21] Available: http://www.are.admin.ch/are/de/nachhaltig/agenda_21/index.html [August 3, 2004]. A W E L (Amt fur Abfall, Wasser, Energie und Luft), ed. 1997. Hochstanteil an nichterneuerbaren Energien fur Neubauten [Maximal amount of non renewable energies for new buildings]. Available: http://www.energie.zh.ch/internet/bd/awel/energie/de/themen/energetische_bauvorschriften.html [July 12, 2002]. A W E L (Amt fur Abfall, Wasser, Energie und Luft), ed. 2002. Warmedammvorschriften [Thermal insulation regulations]. Available: http://www.energie.zh.ch/internet/bd/awel/energie/de/themen/ energetische_bauvorschriften.html [July 12, 2002]. ' C H M C (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation), ed. 1996. Overview of Housing Export for Canadians. [Ottawa]: C M H C . Cerlani Christian, and, Thomas Baggenstos. 2000. Holzplattenbau Dietikon: Baufachverlag Lignum.  Opportunities  [Construction with boards of wood].  Clausen, Rene. 2004 [?]. Homogen80. Available: http://www.homogen80.ch/start.htm [July 26, 2004]. Bar, Oskar. 1989. Geographie der Schweiz [Geography in Switzerland] Zurich: Lehrmittelverlag des Kantons Zurich. Baumberger, Jorg. 2001. Wohneigentum fur eine bessere Welt? [Home ownership for a better world?]. Die Volkswirtschaft. Available: http://www.bwo.admin.ch/de/news/ncont_031.htm [August 9, 2002]. Bueller, Vera 2002. 2000 Watt - aber furalle [2000watts - but, for all]. Available: http://www.selezione.ch/2000-watt-gesellschaft.htm [August 9, 2002].  153  Cole, Ray. 2000 [?]. Sustainability chart. Vancouver, B . C : University of British Columbia. Photocopy. Deplazes, Andrea. 2001. Indifferent, synthetisch, abstrakt- Kunstetoff [Indifferent, synthetic, a b s t r a c t - a n artificial matter]. Werk, Bau + Wohnen 1/2: 10-17. E A W A G (Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology) ed. 2002. Trinkwasserverbrauch im HaushaW [Consumption of potable water of households]. Bulletin 5. http://www.trinkwasser.ch/dt/frameset.htm7html/trinkwasser/nav_tw.html~leftFrame [April 18, 2002]. EnergieSchweiz, ed. 2004 [?]. Energiestadt [energy city]. Available: http://www.energiestadt.ch/index.asp?LA=d1&PA=page.asp?DH=1 [August 21, 2004]. EnergieSchweiz, ed. 2003 [?]. Energie Etikette [energy etiquette]. Available: http://www.energieetikette.ch/geraete/d/index.htm [March 19, 2003]. Engeler, Peter. 1992. Rechtsaspekte beim Planen und Bauen. [Legal aspects of the planning and building process]. Dietikon, Z H : Baufachverlag. Environment Canada. 2003 [?]. Canadian climate and water information. Available: http://www.msc.ec.gc.ca/climate/climate_normals_1990/index_e.cfm [March 19, 2003]. Federal Chancellery, ed. 1999. Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation. Available: http://www.admin.ch/ch/itl/rs/1/c101ENG.pdf [Nov. 19, 2002]. Federal Chancellery, ed. 2002. Systematic collection of the Federal Law. Available: http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/sr.html [Dez. 4, 2002]. Fischer, Peter. 1999. Verstarkter Trend zu zentralem Wohneigentum [Increased trend to central housing ownership]. Neue Zurcher Zeitung (NZZ) Available: http://www.nzz.ch/dossiers/2001/stadtentwicklung/index_bauwesen.html [Aug. 8, 2002]. Frommelt Holzbau A G , ed. 2003 [?]. Energy consumption of Houses in Switzerland. Available:http://www.frommelt.ag/firmenportrait/magazin/19125083 [July 26, 2004]. Furrer, R. 2002. Grundlagen Wirtschaft und Recht: Wohlstand. [Introduction to economy and law: wealth]. Available: http://www.kszh.ch/unterricht/wirtschaft_und_rechtyWohlstand/bipzahlen.htm [Nov. 27, 2002]. Gfeller, ed. 2004.Website. Available:http://www.holzbau-gfeller.ch/Holz_und_Element.html [July 26, 2004]. Gliniorz, Kai-Uwe. 2001. Formbauteile aus Holzleichtbeton [Wood-lightweight-concrete modules]. Available: http://www.holz-bois.ch [August 26, 2002]. Gotsch, Nikolaus. 1999. Sustainable Primary Production in the Alpine Region in a Changing Environment. Available: http://www.primalp.ethz.ch/prim_ovr.htm [January 12, 2003]. Gschwend, Max. 1989. Bauernhauser der Schweiz [farm houses in Switzerland]. 2nd edititon. Solothurn: Union Druck + Verlag A G . Germerott, Uwe. 2002. Phone interview by author. February 15, 2002. G V A (Gebaudeversicherung Graubiinden), et al., ed. 1998. Holzbauland Graubunden [wood building country Grison]. Chur, Disentis: Condrau S A . Heusser, Sibylle. 2004. ISOS: Inventory of Swiss heritage sites. Available: http://www.isos.ch [August 21, 2004]  154  Holmberg, John, et.al. 1999. The ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability. International Jounal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 6:17-33. Available: http://www.naturalstep.ca/articles/TNSFootprint%5Bd%5D.pdf [April 3, 2003]. Holz 21, ed. 2001. Von der Idee zum Projekt [From the idea to the project]. Bern: Holz 21. Holzindustrie Schweiz, ed. 2002. Holzmarkt leidet unter Baumarktschwache [The timber market suffers from the weekness of the building market]. Available: http://www.holzbois.ch/frames/content.asp?langlD=1&lev1ID=42&lev2ID=30 [Nov. 28, 2002]. Hosp, Janine. 2002. Wohnungsnot weiter verscharft [housing shortage got worse]. Tages Anzeiger (TA). Available: http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/ta/taOnlineRubrik?rubrikid=183 [July 31, 2002]. IFS (Institut fur Stadtebau, Wohnungswirtschaft und Bausparwesen). 2000. Mehr Wohneigentum durch eine neue Eigentumsstruktur in Mehrfamilienhausern [More housing ownership through new ownership structures in multiple residential buildigns]. Press release 8/2000. Available: http://ifsstaedtebauinstitut.de/HI2000/hi2000.htm#hi00liste [Aug. 8, 2002]. Kamber, Donat. Minergie buildings: Work in progress. Available: http://www.dka.ch/Page/Work1.html [July 26, 2004]. Kalin, Beda, ed. 2004. Beda-house.  Available: http://www.beda-haus.ch [July 26, 2004].  Keller, Bruno, ed. 2004. Building physics: U-values and vapour diffusion. Availabe: http://www.bph.hbt.arch.ethz.ch/FilepAA/aermeA/Vaerme_Bauwerk/U-Wert_Berechnung.html [March 31, 2004]. Kolb, Josef. 1998. Systembau mit Holz. [Wood building systems]. Dietikon: Baufachverlag. Koll - Schretzenmayr, Martina. 2002. Law and Order. Available: http://disp.ethz.ch/issues/149.html [Feb. 4, 2003]. Kramel, H.E. 1998. Tradition und Kultur des Holzbaus in der Schweiz [Tradition and culture of wood constructions in Switzerland]. Zurich: Architekturabteilung E T H . Kummerle + Frey, et al., ed. 2001. Switzerland2001  /2002. Zollikofen-Bern: Kummerle + Frey.  Lignatur, ed. 2004. Lignatur webpage. Available: http://www.lignatur.ch [July 26, 2004]. Lignotrend, ed. 2004 [?]. Lignotrend webpage. Available: http://www.lignotrend.at/index01.asp [July 26, 2004]. Lignum (Swiss Association of Woodworking industry), ed. 1997. Holzprodukte fur den statischen Einsatz: Part 3 - Bausysteme fur Wand, Decke und Daach [Structural wood products: Part 1 - Building systems for walls, floors and roofs]. Lignatec, December 5/1997. Lignum (Swiss Association of Woodworking industry), ed. 1998. MerkblattBrandschutz protection]. Bern: Buri Druck A G .  [Leaflet fire  Lignum (Swiss Association of Woodworking industry), ed. 1999. Holzprodukte fur den statischen Einsatz: Part 1 - Plattenformige Produkte [Structural wood products: Part 1 - planar products]. Lignatec, December 9/1999. Lignum (Swiss Association of Woodworking industry), ed. 2000. 500 wood constructions. Compact Disc. Lignum (Swiss Association of Woodworking industry), ed. 2001. Zehn Argumente arguments for building in wood]. Zurich: Hochparterre.  Zurich: Lignum.  fur den Holzbau [Ten  155  Lignum (Swiss Association of Woodworking industry), ed. 2002 [?]. Lignum webpage. Available: http://www.lignum.ch/index.html [Aug. 8, 2002]. Maissen, Aluis. 1985. Baustoffkunde  [Basics of building materials]. Zurich: E T H , School of Architecture.  MeteoSchweiz, 2003 [?]. Climate normals and averages between 1961 and 1990. Available: http://www.meteoschweiz.ch/de/Klima/Engagement/lndexEngagement.shtml [March 19, 2003]. Minergie, ed. 2004 [?]. Minergie homepage. Available: http://www.minergie.ch [April 20, 2004]. Murakami, Takashi. 2002. Global and local themes the subject of UNU Global Seminar in Kanazwa. Available: http://www.ias.unu.edu/events/details.cfm/articlelD/349 [April 1, 2003]. Natterer, Julius, et al. 1994. Holzbau Atlas Zwei\\Nood Architektur-Dokumentation.  Building Atlas two]. Munchen: Institut fur  Netzwerk Holz, ed. 1999. Kandidaturdossier - Netzwerk Holz [candidature dossier - wood network]. Available: http://www.netzwerkholz.ch [February 16, 2002] Neufert, Ernst. 1996. Bauentwurfslehre [Design principles for buildings]. 34rd edition. Braunschweig / Wiesbaden: Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. Novatlantis, ed. 2004. Swiss 2,000 Watt society. Available: http://www.novatlantis.ch/frames_e.html [July 26, 2004] Novatlantis. 2004. Wohnkomfort inklusive -Wohnungsbau in der2000-Watt-Gesellschaft [living comfort included - residential construciton in the 2,000-watt-society]. Panel Discussion. Basel: Markthalle, August 31, 2004. O E C D , ed. 2002. OECD Statistics: Gross Domestic Product. Available: http://www.oecd.Org/EN/longabstract/0,,EN-longabstract-432-15-no-1-6784-0.FF.html [July 5, 2002] O F S (Federal statistical office), ed. 2001. Bildungsstatistik statistical office.  [Education statistics]. Neuchatel: Swiss Federal  PHI (Passive House Institute Darmstadt), ed. 2003 [?]. What is a Passive House? Available: http://www.passiv.de/English/Haupt.HTM [March 19, 2003]. Phleps, Hermann. 1983. The Craft of Log Building: A Book of Craftsmanship in Wood. Translated and adapted by Roger MacGregor [Holzbaukunst: der Blockbau]. Ottawa, Ontario: Lee Valley Tools Ltd. Pius Schuler A G . 2004. Hinweise zum Bauen mit Blockholz [DetaWs on building with block wood]. Available: http://www.pius-schuler.ch [August 29, 2004]. P R S (Presence Switzerland) ed. 1999. Switzerland in Sight. Available: http://www.schweiz-insicht.ch/en/uebersicht/uebersicht.html [June 27, 2002]. R P , Redefining Progress, ed. 2002. Ecological Footprint Accounts. Available: http://www.redefiningprogress.org/programs/sustainability/ef [April 3, 2003]. Reiners, Holger. 2002. Energie effektiv nutzen: Die besten Einfamilienhauser [Using energy effectively: the best single-family houses]. Stuttgart, Munchen: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt. Rempel, John I. 1980. Building with wood and other aspects of Nineteenth-century Canada. Rev. ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.  Building in Central  156  Renggli, Max. 2002. Interview by author. Nebikon: Renggli A G , March 26, 2002. Renggli A G . 2003. Construction of a single-family house in only one day. Available: http://www.sfdrs.ch/system/frames/news/schweiz-aktuell/index.php [April 20, 2004]. Renggli A G . 2004 [?] Technology and ecology: Building standards. Available: http://www.renggli-haus.ch [August 29, 2004]. Rothlisberger Kiesen, Hans. 1999. Gunstiger Bauen [Building cheaper]. Available: http://www.roeplaner.ch/buch/vorspann/index_buch.htm [August 15, 2002]. RAIC (Royal Architectural Institute of Canada). 2002. RAIC agrees to a plan to launch the Canada Green Building Council. Available: http://www.raic.org/greenbuildingcommittee.pdf [April 8, 2003]. S A E F L (Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape), ed. 1999. Wald und Holz/Holz und Wald in der Schweiz [Forest and wood / wood and forest in Switzerland]. Bern: Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape. S A E F L (Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape), ed. 2003. Wald und Holz in der Schweiz: Jahrbuch 2003 [Forest and wood in Switzerland: Yearbook 2003]. Neuchatel: Swiss Federal statistical office. Samvaz, ed. 1998. ISOX-lsolierbalken  [ Y S O X insulating beam]. [Catel-Saint-Denis]: Samvaz.  Schillig Partner. 2004 [?]. Homepage of the Schilling Partner. Available: http://www.schillingpartner.ch/deutsch/main.asp [July 26, 2004]. Schob, Walter. 2002. Interview by author. G a m s : Schob A G , February 26, 2002. Schuler, Pius. 2002. Interview by author. Bern: B e a Bern Expo, November 27, 2003 Schuler, Pius. 1997. Wandkonstruktionen aus Blockholz [\Na\\ construction with block boards]. 29th conference of the Swiss working committee for wood research, S A H . Weinfelden: S A H : 93-101. S F O E (Swiss Federal office of Energy), ed. 1991. Energy2000. Available: http://www.energie2000.ch/Default.htm [Nov. 19, 2002]. S F O E (Swiss Federal office of Energy), ed. 2000. Bauen [building]. Neuchatel: Swiss Federal statistical office. S F O E (Swiss Federal office of Energy), ed. 2001. Energie2000: Goals and achievements. Available: http://www.energie-schweiz.ch/internet/ueberuns/index.html?lang=de [Nov. 22, 2002]. S F O E (Swiss Federal office of Energy), ed. 2001. Schweizerische Elektrizitatsstatistik electricity statistics 2000]. Berne: Swiss Federal office of Energy.  2000 [Swiss  S F O E (Swiss Federal office of Energy), ed. 2003. Gesamtenergiestatistik Schweiz 2002 [Overall energy statistics Switzerland 2002]. Berne: Swiss Federal office of Energy. S F O E (Swiss Federal office of Energy), ed. 2004. Gesamtenergiestatistik Schweiz 2003 [Overall energy statistics Switzerland 2003]. Berne: Swiss Federal office of Energy. S F S O (Swiss Federal statistical office), ed. 1997. Umwelt in der Schweiz 1997 [Environment in Switzerland in 1997]. Bern: Eid. Drucksachen und Materialzentrale (EDMZ). S F S O (Swiss Federal statistical office), ed. 2001. The changing face of land use. Neuchatel: Swiss Federal statistical office.  157  S F S O (Swiss Federal statistical office), ed. 2002. Statistisches Jahrbuch Schweiz 2002 [Statistical yearbook Switzerland 2002]. Neuchatel: Swiss Federal statistical office. S F S O leaflet (Swiss Federal statistical office), ed. 2002. Taschenstatistik der Schweiz 2002 [Statistical summary of Switzerland 2002]. Neuchatel: Swiss Federal statistical office. S F S O online (Swiss Federal statistical office online), ed. 2002. Swiss Statistics: Specialised Available: http://www.statistik.admin.ch/stat_ch/eber_m.htm [June 25, 2002]. SIA (Swiss engineer and architect association), ed. 1999. Norm SIA 180/1: Warmeschutz [Thermal protection of Buildings]. Zurich: SIA. SIA (Swiss engineer and architect association), ed. 2000. Norm SIA 181 .Larmschutz insulation of Buildings]. Zurich: SIA. SIA (Swiss engineer and architect association), ed. 1988. Norm SIA 232:Geneigte Zurich: SIA.  fields.  im Hochbau  im Hochbau [Sound  Dacher [Sloping roofs].  SIA (Swiss engineer and architect association), ed. 2003. Norm SIA 265: Holzbau [Building in wood]. Zurich: SIA. Solar Agency ed. 2003. Renggli AG, Schotz. Available: http://www.solaragency.org/Solarpreis2002/50.htm [August 21, 2004] S O Z (Statistical office canton Zurich), ed. 2002. Canton Zurich in numbers: 2002. Available: http://www.statistik.zh.ch/publikationen/summaries/Berichte_ktzhiz01.pdf  [February 5, 2003].  Steko Holzbausysteme A G , ed. 2004 [?]. Steko. Available: http://www.steko.ch [July 26, 2004]. Suter, Keith. 1999. Fair warning? Available: http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/rome [[July 26, 2004]. Swiss Federal Council, ed. 2002 [?].Sustainable Development Strategy 2002. (March 27, 2002). Available: http://www.johannesburg2002.ch/en/pdfs/Strategie_BR_e_05_05.pdf [Mai 21, 2002] Tages Anzeiger. 2003. Zementindustrie February 11, 2003.  in die Pflicht genommen [cement industry taken into duty].  Thuler, Magrit, e t a l . 1997. FesteimAlpenraum: Schweiz, Oesterreich, [Celebrations in the alpine region]. Zurich: Migros-Presse.  Deutschland,  Italien,  Timbatec, ed. 2004 [?]. Optiholz. Available: http://www.timbatec.ch/projects.asp?pr=17  Frankreich  [July 26, 2004].  Tschentscher, A. 2002. Switzerland - Constitution. Available: http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/sz00t .html [Nov. 19, 2002]. Tschopp Holzbau, ed. 2004 [?]. Bresta. Available: http://tschoppholzbau.ch/w_bresta/site/w_bresta.asp?RID=41&AID=386 [July 26, 2004]. U B S , ed. 2000. Prices and earnings around the globe. Available: http://www.ubs.eom/e/index/about/research/publications.Referenz18.pdf [July 22, 2002] U B S , ed. 2003. UBS Hypotheken [UBS mortgages]. [Zurich], U B S . U N (United Nations), ed. 2003. Johannesburg summit 2002. Available: http://www.johannesburgsummit.org [April 1, 2003]. U N (United Nations), ed. 2003.[?]. Agenda21. Available: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/index.htm [April 1, 2003]. 158  U Q (University of Queensland). 2002. Life cycle assessment. Available: http://www.geosp.uq.edu.au/emc/CP/l_c_a_.htm [April 2, 2003]. U S G B C ( U . S . Green Building Council), ed. 2000. LEED: Green Building Rating System™. Version 2.0. [Washington, DC]: Green Building Council. Velasques, Jerry. 2002. Linking the global to the local. U N U global seminar series: 2 Kanazawa Swssion. Available: http://www.unu.edu/globseminar/kanazawa2002/02Kanazawa2report.html [April 3, 2003]. n d  V G Q (Schweizerischer Verband fur geprufte Qualitatshauser) ed. 2002. Auslandische Fertighausern [Foreign concurrence of factory-built houses]. Available: http://www.schweizerholzbau.ch [July 12, 2002]  Konkurrenz  mit  V G Q (Schweizerischer Verband fur geprufte Qualitatshauser) ed. 2002 [?]. Geprufte Qualitatssiegel VGQ [Tested quality houses: quality label V G Q ] . Available: http://www.vgq.ch/qualitat/siegel.htm [July 12, 2002]  Qualitatshauser:  Vial carpenters, ed. 2004 [?]. Caisson WKL. Available: http://www.vialcharpentes.ch/wellsteg/caissonwkl.php [July 26, 2004]. Wachter, Daniel. 1995. Schweiz: eine moderne Geographie [Switzerland: a modern geography]. Zurich: Verlag Neue Zurcher Zeitung. W H O , World Health Organisation, ed. 2004 [?]. WHO air quality guidelines: Regional Office for Europe, 2000. Available: http://www.euro.who.int/air/Activities/20020620_1 [August 15, 2004]. Winter, W . 1995. Anforderungen and die Werkstoffe des 21. Jahrhundert [Requirements for building materials in the 2 1 century]. Internationales Holzbauforum 2002, Proceedings. Available: http://www.holzbauforum.ch/parser/parser.php7fileWforum/03_03_e.htm [June 13, 2002]. st  Zehnder, A. 2004. Nachhaltigkeit als Innovationsmotor: Die Rolle von Forschung und Bildung [Sustainability as an innovation motor: the role of research and education]. Speech at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, E T H , Zurich, 16 June 2004.  159  


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items