UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

N-fertilization effects on water- and nitrogen-use efficiency in Picea glauca families Pritchard, Emily S. 2000

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata


831-ubc_2000-0258.pdf [ 6.54MB ]
JSON: 831-1.0089461.json
JSON-LD: 831-1.0089461-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0089461-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 831-1.0089461-rdf.json
Turtle: 831-1.0089461-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 831-1.0089461-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 831-1.0089461-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

N - FERTILIZATION EFFECTS O N W A T E R - AND NITROGEN-USE EFFICIENCY IN Picea glauca FAMILIES  by E M I L Y S. PRITCHARD B.G.S., The University of Michigan, 1995  A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL F U L F I L M E N T OF T H E REQUIREMENTS FOR T H E D E G R E E OF M A S T E R OF SCIENCE in T H E F A C U L T Y OF G R A D U A T E STUDIES *  (Department of Forest Sciences)  We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard  T H E UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH C O L U M B I A April 2000 © Emily S. Pritchard, 2000  In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment  of the  requirements for an advanced  degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department  or  by his  or  her representatives.  It  is  understood  that  copying or  publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.  Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date  DE-6 (2/88)  Apr-  21? &Q (  ABSTRACT  Water-use efficiency (WUE) and nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) are typically negatively correlated across environmental variation in N fertilization or drought. The contribution of genotypic and species N H / preference in uptake to W U E and N U E was tested using ten fullsibling families of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss). The families were raised hydroponically in solutions containing 100 uM N as NFL; , NO3" or NH4NO3 and after eight +  weeks, growth parameters, gas exchange, C:N ratio and stable C and N isotope composition (5 C and 8 N , respectively) were analyzed. I3  I?  N H 4 treatment significantly increased biomass which correlated negatively with N U E +  (C:N ratio). Although the significant difference in treatment mean biomass indicated a preference for NHLi , there was no associated relationship with N U E or 8 C, and a negative +  13  correlation between N U E and W U E (as measured by gas exchange and 5 C ) did not occur I3  across treatments. Potential reasons for the lack of correlation are the significant variation between treatment replicates or an unknown effect of hydroponics on gas exchange in this species. In contrast to treatment effects, families were significantly different in biomass, C:N ratio and 5 C , and each family maintained its rank in the measured parameters. This indicated I3  that there are high uptake and low uptake families regardless of the form of nitrogen supplied. There was no evidence of a genotypic trade-off between W U E and N U E presumably because of the interaction of genetic control of N assimilation and allocation to growth versus non-growth related N compounds. Mean A 8 N was significantly different in each of the treatments and positively l3  correlated with biomass. A potential explanation for treatment differences relates to the efflux/influx ratio associated with each of the N forms. Slower uptake and assimilation of NO3" over N H  + 4  combined with a low storage capacity, could cause greater efflux of N yielding 1 5  more negative A 8 N values in the NO3" treatment than in the NH} and NH4NO3 treatments. |3  +  Stable N isotope composition was also shown to be genetically controlled and correlated positively with 8 C . This correlation may be a result of genetically determined uptake rates and 13  sink strength, such that if a family has a high uptake rate and allocates a greater proportion of assimilated N to Rubisco, this will yield less negative 8 C and A 8 N values. I3  15  A second experiment was designed to test the physiological control of N isotope fractionation. The experimental design was similar to the first experiments but the treatments imposed were steady-state and draw-down supply rates of 200 u M N H . There was no +  4  significant difference between treatments in total biomass, but the ratio of root dry matter to shoot dry matter was higher in the draw-down treatment indicating a higher level of nutrient stress. Treatments also significantly affected C:N ratio, 8 C and Cj/C , resulting in a positive 13  a  environmental correlation between N U E and 8 C. Treatment means for A 8 N were not significantly different possibly because the N I5  1 5  enrichment of the medium overcame enzymatic discrimination. Genotypic control of A 8 N was 15  significant and may reflect genetic control of the balance of N efflux/influx at the roots. This balance of efflux/influx may be related to genetic control of N uptake, assimilation, allocation and demand.  ii  TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract  ii  Table of Contents  iv  List of Figures  viii  List of Abbreviations  ix  Acknowledgements  xi  Introduction  1  Literature Review  5  I. Water-use Efficiency (WUE)  5  A. Physiology and Measurement of W U E  5  B. Genetic control of W U E  9  II. Nitrogen-use Efficiency (NUE)  11  A. Physiology and Measurement of N U E 1. Kinetics of nitrogen uptake  11 12  2. N-source effects on uptake, C assimilation, biomass and N assimilation 3. N-source effects on allocation  14 16  B. Genetic control of N U E  17  III. Relationship between W U E and N U E  19  IV. Stable Isotopes in Physiological Research  22  A. Using natural abundance levels of nitrogen stable isotopes in physiology Materials and Methods  23 28  I. Plant Material and Germination  28  II. Treatments in Hydroponics  29  A. N-source experiments (Exps. 1 and 2)  29  B. N-supply experiment  31  III. Measurements  31  A. Chlorophyll fluorescence  31  B. Gas exchange  32  C. Plant harvesting  ...32  IV.  I 5  D. Biomass measurements  32  E. C:N and stable isotope analyses  33  N Depletion Analysis for N-Supply Experiment  V. Statistical Analysis  33 34  Results  36 I. N-Source Experiments  36  A. Chlorophyll fluorescence  36  B. Total biomass and allocation  36  C. N U E (C:N ratio)  40  D. Gas exchange measurements  40  E. 5 C  42  F. A 5 N  44  13  I5  G. Biomass versus N U E and 5 C  46  H. R:S ratio versus N U E and 5 C  46  I. 8 C versus N U E  48  I3  13  I3  J. Biomass versus A 8 N  48  K. N U E versus A 8 N  51  L. 8 C versus A 8 N  51  15  15  13  I5  II. N-Supply Rate Experiment  54  A. Total biomass and allocation  54  B. N U E (C:N ratio)  54  C. Gas exchange measurements  56  D. 8 C  56  E. A 8 N  59  I3  15  F. Biomass versus N U E and 8 C  59  G. 8 C versus N U E  61  I3  13  H. Biomass versus A 8 N I5  61  I. N U E versus A 8 N  63  J. 8 C versus A8 N  63  15  13  15  III. ''N Depletion Experiment  66  v  Discussion  68  I. N-Source Experiments  68  A. Effects on individual traits  68  1. Environmental and genetic control of morphological traits  68  2. Environmental and genetic control of N U E  70  3. Environmental and genetic control of W U E  75  B. Effects on correlated traits  78  1. Biomass versus 8 C  78  2. Biomass versus N U E  79  3. N U E versus W U E  79  I3  C. Effects on A 8 N  81  I5  1. Environmental and genetic effects on A 8 N  81  2. Correlations with biomass, N U E and 8 C  82  I5  I3  II. N-Supply Rate Experiment  85  A. Effects on individual traits  85  1. Environmental and genetic control of morphological traits  85  2. Environmental and genetic control of N U E  86  3. Environmental and genetic control of W U E  87  B. Effects on correlated traits  89  1. Biomass versus 8 C  89  2. Biomass versus N U E  89  3. N U E versus 8 C  90  13  13  C. Effects o n 8 N  91  15  1. Environmental and genetic effects on A 8 N  91  2. Correlations with biomass, N U E and 8 C  91  15  I3  Conclusions  93  Recommendations for future research  96  Literature cited  97  Appendices  106  Appendix 1. 1/10 Modified Johnson's solution  106  Appendix 2. A N O V A tables  107  vi  Appendix 3. Tukey test results on family ranking  111  Appendix 4. A N O V A table for gas exchange data  113  Appendix 5. Genotypic correlations between treatments for each trait  114  vii  LIST O F F I G U R E S  1  Treatment effects on C:N ratio, biomass and R:S ratio in the N-source experiment  38  2  Relationship between total biomass and N U E in the N-source experiment  39  3  Treatment and family effects on measured gas exchange parameters in the N-source experiment  41  4  Family 8 C rank in the N-source experiment  43  5  Family A8 N rank in the N-source experiment.  45  6  Relationship between total biomass and 8 C in the N-source experiment  47  7  Correlations between N U E and 8 C on environmental and genotypic bases in the  I3  I:,  I3  13  N-source experiment  49  8  Relationship between total biomass and A 8 N in the N-source experiment  50  9  Relationship between N U E and A 8 N in the N-source experiment  52  15  I5  10 Relationship between 8 C and A 8 N in the N-source experiment  53  11 Relationship between total biomass and N U E in the N-supply rate experiment  55  13  15  12 Treatment and family effects on measured gas exchange parameters in the N-supply rate experiment  57  13 Relationship between total biomass and 8 C in the N-supply rate experiment  58  14 Relationship between total biomass and A8 N in the N-supply rate experiment  60  13  I:>  15 Correlations between N U E and 8 C on environmental and genotypic bases in the 13  N-supply rate experiment  62  16 Relationship between N U E and A 8 N in the N-supply rate experiment  64  17 Relationship between 8 C and A 8 N in the N-supply rate experiment  65  18  N depletion from hydroponics boxes  67  19 Schematic diagram of components of N U E  73  15  I3  Lv  I5  LIST O F A B B R E V I A T I O N S  Abbreviation  Definition  A  assimilation rate (umol C O 2 m" s")  2 1  2  1  Apiax  assimilation capacity (umol C O 2 m" s")  Arg  arginine  AS  asparagine synthetase  Asn  asparagine  Asp  aspartate  Ci/C  a  internal C O 2 concentration/ambient C O 2 concentration  CHATS  constitutive high affinity transport system  6 C  stable C isotopic composition (%o)  5 N  stable N isotopic composition (%o)  A  isotopic discrimination (%o)  I3  I5  A8 N  stable N isotopic composition of the plant minus the salt (%o)  E  transpiration rate (umol H 2 O m" s" )  GDH  glutamate dehydrogenase  Gin  glutamine  Glu  glutamate  GOGAT  glutamate synthase  GS  glutamine synthetase  GS2  chloroplastic glutamine synthetase  gs  stomatal conductance (umol H 2 O m" s")  gxe  genotype x environment interaction effect  HATS  high affinity transport system  Kin  external substrate concentration at V2 V ax (uM)  LATS  low affinity transport system  NiR  nitrite reductase  Nieaf  N concentration of the leaf  [NO3I0  external NO3" concentration  I5  2  1  2  1  m  NR  nitrate reductase  NUE  nitrogen-use efficiency  PEPcase  phosphoeno/pyruvate carboxylase  PNUE  photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency  PON  particulate organic nitrogen  R:S ratio  ratio of root dry mass to shoot dry mass  RuBP  ribulose bisphosphate  SLM  specific leaf mass (g m" )  Vniax  maximal transport when all carrier sites are loaded (umol g" h" )  vpd  vapor pressure deficit (mbar)  WUE  water-use efficiency  WUEi  instantaneous water-use efficiency  % 0  per mil, parts per thousand  2  1  1  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  My sincere thanks go to Rob Guy for his help in designing and implementing these experiments, as well as his valuable comments on the manuscript. As a graduate advisor, he set an example of rigorous scientific thought and attention to detail that is integral to the successful pursuit of plant physiology. I would also like to thank him for his patience, availability and willingness to discuss my thesis. My committee members, Sally Aitken and Tony Glass, made important contributions from their research fields and provided valuable suggestions and assistance in improving the manuscript. Tony Kozak and Val Lemay were helpful in choosing appropriate statistical analyses. Bente Nielsen analyzed samples and explained the intricacies of stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Salim Silim provided helpful suggestions on scientific writing. Special thanks go to Jodie Krakowski for tireless work as a research technician. Her reliability in all facets of sample preparation made her indispensable to this project.  INTRODUCTION  One of the determinants of competitive success in plant communities is how species and individuals utilize available resources to achieve maximal growth. Most important to competitive success is optimizing the use of the most limiting resource. The concept of plant strategies to increase the use efficiency of the most limiting resource was first introduced by Chapin (1980) who used the common definition of resource use efficiency as the amount of biomass produced per unit of resource. For example, water-use efficiency (WUE) is typically defined as the amount of dry matter yield for water transpired. This balance between transpiration and carbon gain depends on stomatal conductance (g ) and assimilation capacity s  (A  max  ) which can both be measured using gas exchange equipment to provide an instantaneous  measure of WUE (Farquhar and Sharkey, 1982). The ratio of stable isotopes of carbon has also been theoretically and empirically determined to be a valid indicator of W U E on a long-term scale (Farquhar et al., 1982; Evans et al., 1986; Meinzer et al., 1992; O'Leary, 1993). Nitrogenuse efficiency (NUE) is measured as gram of carbon per gram of nitrogen in the plant. Similarly, short-term N U E is defined as the assimilation capacity of C O 2 per gram of leaf nitrogen (A  m a x  /Niear)  (Reich and Walters, 1994).  Theoretically, the efficient use of water and nitrogen should trade-off on an environmental basis. Under irrigated conditions, plants can optimize N U E by increasing g and, s  consequently, photosynthesis and the uptake of mineral nutrients (Schulze and Ehleringer, 1984). During periods of drought, stomatal closure increases W U E and, as a result of decreased carbon assimilation, N U E decreases (Sheriff et al., 1986; Reich et al., 1989; Livingston et al., 1999). This trade-off is also evident on a species basis, such that plants which have adapted to droughty environments optimize the efficient use of water at the expense of nitrogen (N) (Field et al., 1983; DeLucia and Schlesinger, 1991; Patterson et al., 1997). Whether or not there is a similar trade-off at the genotypic level within species has yet to be determined. If so, then genetic differences in W U E may, at least in part, be driven by genetic differences in N acquisition. Ammonium ( N H / ) preference in uptake, as compared to nitrate (NO3"), increases the N content of conifers (Sheriff et al., 1986; Scheromm and Plassard, 1988; Marschner et al., 1991; Lavoie et al., 1992; Kronzucker et al., 1995; Kronzucker et al., 1996; Korol et al., 1999). Because approximately 75% of internal N can be allocated to photosynthetic machinery (Field  1  and Mooney, 1986), there is a tight correlation between the N-quantity of a leaf and CO2 assimilation (Sage and Pearcy, 1987; Evans, 1989; Reich et al., 1995). Therefore, treatments of N H 4 versus NO3" should expose the environmental trade-off between N U E and W U E through +  differences in N-quantity of the leaf. Although gross differences in species N-source preferences have been shown, more subtle genotypic preferences through differing quantities or affinities of uptake carriers or assimilatory enzymes have not. If there is genetic control of N-source preference, then relative performance of particular genotypes may be different on NO3" as compared to N H 4 . This could +  change the WUE and N U E rank of the genotypes between treatments. If the quantity and affinity of uptake carriers are somehow linked, either genetically or physiologically, then genotypes will maintain WUE and N U E rank in all treatments providing no additional information. If however, ranks change and WUE and N U E remain negatively correlated, this pattern would provide strong support for the notion that the ability to acquire N underlies genetic differences in WUE. Finally, WUE rank might change independently of N-source, suggesting that ability to acquire N is not a primary determinant of WUE. Unlike fractionation of carbon isotopes in terrestrial plants, the physiology behind the fractionation of N stable isotopes, N and N , is still unclear. For the most part, the ratio of l 5  1 4  stable isotopes has been used for labeling purposes in ecology to investigate N-partitioning within plants and soil (Buchmann et al., 1996; Stark and Hart, 1997; Nasholm et al., 1998; George et al., 1999) or competition between differing species (Staples et al., 1999). In terrestrial systems, natural abundance levels have most frequently been used to discern between fertilization effects (Johannisson and Hogberg, 1994; Hogberg et al., 1995; Neilson et al., 1998; Schulze et al., 1998; Schulze et al., 1999) or diazotrophy (Shearer and Kohl, 1989; Handley and Raven, 1992; Roggy et al., 1999). In oceanography, natural variation in N has been used l 5  extensively in food web studies and is under investigation in the context of the physiology of N uptake by phytoplankton. A major goal is to apply an understanding of N isotope fractionation to analyzing sediment layers for information about past productivity (Hoch et al., 1992; Waser et al., 1998; Waser et al., 1998; Waser et al., 1999). Correlations between C isotope fractionation in photosynthesis and N fractionation during uptake and assimilation were first proposed by Mariotti et al. (1981) using soil bacteria. They suggested that in an open system, where N can diffuse into and out of the cell,  2  discrimination should be high. When this exchange is terminated through exhaustion of external nitrogen or when N assimilation rate equals gross uptake, there will be no fractionation against Lv  N (Mariotti et al., 1981). Discrimination by isolated enzymes (Ledgard et al., 1985), and the  5 N values of isolated amino acids (Shearer et al., 1989) and plant parts (Handley et al., 1997a; |V  Handley et al., 1997b) have all been determined experimentally. Combined, these pieces of information contribute to our understanding of the mechanics of discrimination within the plant, but on their own do not account for total plant discrimination. Whole plant discrimination must incorporate some type of N-loss through efflux of inorganic N prior to assimilation, exudation of organic N , gaseous N H loss, or selective senescence of isotopically different organs. The 3  majority of research points to the first explanation as the most likely, although the controls of efflux are still unknown. Plant efflux of N enriched inorganic N can depend on multiple 1 5  factors related to both the form of N-fertilization and plant N-status. Differences in uptake, storage and assimilation capacities related to the form of N supplied may alter discrimination through inorganic N efflux. There may also be discrimination inherent in the assimilating enzymes or the equilibrium isotope effect associated with N H 3 - N H / reduction. As well, the form of N may affect internal N-status, thereby altering efflux and exudation of heavy N . Apart from these effects particularly related to N form, plant N-status could also affect the amount of inorganic N effluxed as well as organic N exudates. This study was designed to elucidate the effects of nitrogen source on the genetic control of water-use efficiency in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedlings. In addition, the use of 8 N in studies on nitrogen relations was investigated. The following hypotheses were 1:>  considered:  Hypotheses 1. Based on a preference in uptake, N H  + 4  fertilization will increase the W U E of white  spruce by providing more N for photosynthetic proteins. 2.  Within each treatment, there will be genetic control of W U E and N U E .  3. There will be genotypic variation in N H  + 4  and NO3" uptake capacity which will alter  family WUE and N U E ranking between treatments. 4. This alteration of rank will modify the environmental trade-off between W U E and NUE.  .  3  5. There will be an N-source treatment effect on plant 8 N reflecting differences in N I5  uptake and assimilation. 6. There will be an N-supply treatment effect on plant 8 N dependent on internal N I5  status. 7. Genetic control of plant 8 N will be shown by significant differences between I5  genotypes. 8. Genotypes will not change their 8 N rank across treatments, thereby indicating that I5  genetic control of discrimination is consistent in varying environments.  LITERATURE REVIEW I. Water-use Efficiency (WUE) A. Physiology and Measurement of WUE The water-use efficiency (WUE) of a plant or crop is generally defined as the amount of dry mass gained through carbon assimilation (A) for the amount of water lost in transpiration (E). This ratio varies between life forms (DeLucia et al., 1991; Brooks et a l , 1997) and habitats (Field et al., 1983; Meinzer et al., 1992); it is influenced by both environmental (Yoshie, 1986; Reich et al., 1989) and genetic factors (Virgona et al., 1990; Zhang and Marshall, 1994); and it can have varying effects on the competitive success of a species or a genotype (DeLucia and Heckathorn, 1989; Patterson et al., 1997). Research devoted to understanding this balance is plentiful and has provided insight on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, carbon allocation, drought tolerance and nutrient stress. WUE can be measured and expressed in different ways. Long term W U E is measured as the ratio of dry matter production to water taken up by the plant over a particular time period (Kramer, 1983). This is often done using a lysimeter or before and after weight measurements. Instantaneous W U E (WUEj) is often measured as the ratio AIE using gas exchange equipment. This ratio is dependent on the respective diffusion gradients for C O 2 and water: WUEi  = d= E  S ( c  C  a  ~  C  ')  = Pa  (1  g (ei-e ) w  (1)  -Cj/Ca)  1.6 v  a  where C and Q are the ambient and intercellular concentrations of carbon dioxide, g and g a  c  w  are the conductances to the diffusion of C O 2 and water vapor, e and ej are the atmospheric and a  intercellular vapor pressures and v is the vapor pressure difference between them. The difference between vapor pressures is multiplied by 1.6 to account for the greater conductance of water than C O 2 in air (Farquhar et al., 1989). Where v is held constant or is comparable between plants or across treatments, variation in WUEi is determined by variation in C j / C  a  .  The ratio of C O 2 concentrations is dependent on  both stomatal conductance (g ) and photosynthetic capacity ( A s  either g decreases and A s  m a x  remains unchanged or if A  m a x  max  ) . The ratio will increase if  increases while g remains constant. s  In either situation, low C , is caused by stomatal limitation of A which yields a high WUE. At high C j , A continues to be partially limited by g , but becomes more limited by the quantity of s  5  ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP). Regeneration of RuBP depends on electron transport rate which is in turn, dependent on illumination (Farquhar et al., 1982). Research has shown that stomata generally operate to maintain a photosynthetic rate that exists between being primarily limited by g or being limited by g and RuBP regeneration. It is at this point that the plant has optimized s  s  water-use efficiency (von Caemmerer and Farquhar, 1981). A second long-term measure of W U E that relates specifically to C j / C is the ratio of a  stable carbon isotopes in the plant. Atmospheric C O 2 is primarily comprised of two stable isotopes, C and C , in the ratio 98.9:1.1. As C O 2 diffuses through the plant cell and is 1 2  1 3  assimilated by carboxylating enzymes, this ratio within the plant tissue is altered slightly in favor of the lighter isotope  C. Both diffusion and assimilation discriminate against the heavier  isotope which may flow back out of the stomatal pore. The amount of discrimination varies with Cj/Ca and the inherent discrimination of the carboxylating enzyme. Net discrimination against C O 2 is maximal when diffusion through the stomata permits constant and full renewal of the C O 2 in the intercellular leaf spaces (i.e., when Cj is equal to C ) . Fractionation is minimal when a  diffusion is unidirectional and fully limiting to photosynthesis. Net discrimination is normally between these two extremes as a function of the balance between g and A s  m a x  . The ratio of the  two isotopes is most often written as the isotopic composition, 5 C , of air or the plant as compared to the standard, PDB.  PDB was a fossil belemnite from the Pee Dee formation. Other  standards, referenced to PDB by international convention ("Vienna PDB") are used in practice. The equation for expressing isotopic composition relative to a standard is: ,3  C  %  o  1/  =  ^sample-  1/  ^standard  x  m  (2)  Q  13r-</12^-i  w  ^standard  Because PDB is calcium carbonate of marine origin, most 8  1 3  C values referenced to it are  negative. The isotopic composition of the air is approximately -8%o and for C 3 plants is between -22%o and - 3 4 % o depending on species and environmental conditions. The more negative the value, the smaller the ratio of  CI C in the sample and the greater the discrimination. (Farquhar  etal., 1989b) Discrimination, relative to a source (e.g. air), is described in terms of A values, which are positive. It can be calculated from 8 A = 5a^8 1 +5  E  P  1 3  C values according to the following expression: (3)  where 8 is the 5 C of air and 8 is the 8 C of the plant. The benefit of using A is that it can be 13  13  a  P  directly related to the additive effects of diffusion and carboxylation weighted by Q . A  = a + (b - a)Cj C  In equation  (4),  (4)  a  a is the discrimination that occurs naturally in air by diffusion  (4.4%o)  and b is  the discrimination occurring through the combined carboxylations by both Rubisco and PEP carboxylase (PEPcase)  (27%o).  Rubisco and PEPcase independently have very different  A  values, whereby Rubisco discriminates more heavily than PEPcase ( A = 2 9 % o vs. 2 % o ) . As the percentage of carbon assimilation by PEPcase increases, plant discrimination decreases. (O'Leary, 1 9 9 3 ) Since the discovery of the relationship between Cj/C and 8 C , stable isotopes have been 13  a  used repeatedly to indicate differences between photosynthetic pathways, stress tolerance and species and genotype differences in WUE. When used appropriately, plant stable isotopic composition can provide a more integrated, long-term and precise index of W U E than gas exchange because the ratio is based on the entire plant and incorporates life-time WUE. For example, 8 C values have been used to show variations in W U E related to species and habitat I 3  associated differences in Cj. Brooks et al.  (1997)  surveyed different life forms (trees, shrubs,  forbs, and mosses; deciduous or evergreen) and found that life form described a significant portion of the variation in WUE. The correlations between life form and W U E were related to plant stature and leaf longevity. When comparing deciduous and evergreen forbs, shrubs and trees, shrub species were most alike one another. Brooks et al.  (1997)  attributed the difference in  forbs to variation in altitudinal gradient, and in trees to the closer coupling with the environment in evergreen species. They proposed that within the plant's native environment, each life form operates with the optimal WUE. Environmental control of WUE may be tested by manipulating the environment and describing the plastic response of a plant. Common environmental manipulations are water and nitrogen stress. Mild to moderate water stress primarily results in partial stomatal closure. This usually causes a proportionally greater decrease in E than A, such that Cj goes down and WUEi increases (Farquhar et al.,  1982).  Nitrogen fertilization primarily affects W U E by increasing the  quantity of photosynthetic proteins. If a chloroplast is composed of 2 5 - 3 3 % stromal protein, of which one half is in carboxylase, any increase in the N content of the leaf (N| f) significantly ea  7  affects A by increasing the quantities of Rubisco and RuBP (von Caemmerer and Farquhar, 1981). A correlation between photosynthetic rate and N| f has been substantiated in multiple ea  publications (Field et al., 1986; Evans, 1989; Reich et al., 1995). Although N fertilization may increase A A  m a x  m a x  , there can be two effects on W U E depending on g . If g is constant, an increase in s  s  will cause a decrease in Cj. On the other hand, if the increase in A  m a x  is accompanied by a  relatively smaller increase in g then Cj will remain constant, thereby maintaining WUE. Wong s  et al. (1979) did a series of experiments designed to perturb either A or g of three different s  species of plants. They found that when A changed, g was modified and a constant Cj was s  maintained. One of the treatments imposed was four levels of nitrogen nutrition (Wong et al., 1979). On a whole plant scale, water and nitrogen stress can affect W U E tltrough alterations in biomass allocation or relative growth rate. Nitrogen and water stress both increase the ratio of root dry mass to shoot dry mass (R:S ratio) (Hubick, 1990; Patterson et al., 1997). This can have varying effects on both long- and short-term W U E and their relationship with biomass dependent on the type of stress. Under water stress, generally there is a negative correlation between the two traits because of induced stomatal closure. Between N levels, there is typically a positive relationship, reflecting a decrease in A  max  (Virgona and Farquhar, 1996).  Although a high WUE may seem like a positive trait, it can also decrease the plants efficient use of N for photosynthesis and can allow available soil water to be lost to direct evaporation and competitors. When these two factors are considered, a high WUE may not always be the best strategy for survival. For example, black spruce may trade-off efficient use of water for more efficient use of N because in its indigenous habitat of nutrient poor muskegs, water is plentiful but N is not (Patterson et al., 1997). In desert soils, a plant may exhibit a high drought tolerance, but a low WUE in order to out-compete its neighbors for water (DeLucia et al., 1991). Conversely, WUE may increase during drought by a reversible change in metabolism from C3 to C A M photosynthesis (O'Leary, 1993). Studying available nitrogen levels in the soil and interactions with competitors is important in assessing the ecophysiological benefits of the inherent WUE of a species.  8  B. Genetic control of WUE Condon and Richards (1992) define broad sense heritability as "the proportion of total phenotypic variance that is attributable to genotypic differences". If genotypes maintain their relative W U E ranking through different environmental conditions, then there is little genotype x environment interaction (g x e interaction) and W U E is a more reliable criterion for selection. If the g x e interaction is high, there could still be a high heritablity within a given environment because the genotype response to that environment is consistent, but W U E may no longer be a reliable criterion for predicting performance across environments. If gas exchange or isotopic measures of W U E are to be used for selection, then the heritability of these two traits must parallel that of W U E . Most research on genotypic variation in W U E has used crop plants, with differing results for heritability (Farquhar and Richards, 1984; Hubick et al., 1988; Condon et al., 1990; Virgona et al., 1990; Condon et al., 1992). In wheat, Farquhar and Richards (1984) showed that isotopic and gas exchange measures of W U E correlated in well-watered plants. Variation in W U E was attributed approximately equally to variations in leaf conductance and A  m a x  when plants were  well fertilized but subjected to varying amounts of water stress (Condon et al., 1990). Broad sense heritability for isotope discrimination, A, was often greater than 90% and discrimination changed substantially as a result of both genetics and environment but the two factors did not interact (Condon et al., 1992). The authors concluded that the high heritability estimates and lack of a g x e interaction permit A to be used as an effective selection trait under well-watered conditions. Similarly, for peanut, there was no g x e interaction when plants were subjected to drought stress or well-watered environments (Hubick et al., 1988). Broad sense heritability was 81 % in this case. Fewer studies have been done on relationships between gas exchange parameters, isotope discrimination and W U E in gymnosperms. Zhang and Marshall (1994) demonstrated population differences in W U E of western larch (Larix occidentalis) seedlings using A values, but did not find significant differences in W U E j using gas exchange. The seedling W U E rank by A values was maintained in both well-watered and water-stressed soils, indicating no g x e interaction, and it correlated well with altitudinal differences in seed source. The lack of variation in W U E j was attributed to low variability in physiological characteristics in western larch families, environmental fluctuations which can affect the W U E j of the plant and a small number of  9  replications within populations (Zhang and Marshall, 1994). In a later paper (Zhang et al., 1994), the same parameters were measured on twelve-year old seedlings from different western larch families. In this case there were large fluctuations in A, E and g over the growing season s  which may have prevented a visible difference in WUEj between genotypes. Although there was no detectable difference between families in WUEj, there was a strong negative correlation with A values of the families. A also correlated with growth suggesting that genotypic differences in WUE were related to A  m a x  .  Holowachuk (1993) compared 8 C values of 11 lodgepole pine provenances (ten Pinus I3  contorta var. latifolia and one var. contorta) from various climates in British Columbia. The trees were growing in provenance trials at three sites varying in water supply. Across the sites, the trees maintained their WUE ranking which roughly correlated with precipitation levels from their site of origin. The only anomaly was a population (var. contorta) from the coastal region. This region is typically wetter than any of the other provenances, yet this population had a higher WUE both in the field trials and the greenhouse study. She suggested this was not because of higher A  m a x  , but perhaps due to heightened stomatal sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit (vpd)  (Holowachuk, 1993). In two studies using ten controlled crosses of white spruce (Picea glauca), genetic control of WUE and a correlation between gas exchange and stable isotope composition was shown (Sun et al., 1996; Livingston et al., 1999). In the first study, plants maintained their stable isotope ranking across water treatments and W U E (measured by biomass and time domain reflectometry of soil moisture) corresponded with WUEi and with stable isotope values. A l l three variables were correlated through gas exchange differences and not morphology. Both 8 C and biomass measures of WUE were positively correlated with dry matter production. This I3  result, combined with a lack of g x e interaction effect, provided evidence that genetic 13  differences in W U E were attributable to A  m a x  . A positive correlation between 8 C and growth  has also been shown in peanut (Hubick, 1990), sunflower (Virgona et al., 1990) and larch (Zhang etal., 1994). The second study (Livingston et al., 1999) included a N stress component intended to alter A  n i a x  . Again there was no significant g x e interaction, WUE indices correlated across all  treatments, there was a significant genetic effect on each index, and biomass was positively correlated with WUE and 8 C . One interesting point is that when A I3  m a x  increased with 10  fertilization, the genetic differences in W U E under droughted conditions tended to become more apparent. Although the genetic differences are determined by A enhance the effect of A  m a x  m a x  , water limitations on E may  on WUE. This is one of very few studies in the literature that has  looked at the genetic component of the interaction between W U E and N U E .  II. Nitrogen-use Efficiency (NUE) A . Physiology and Measurement of N U E Nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) can be measured on both short- and long-term bases. Instantaneous N U E or photosynthetic N U E (PNUE) is measured as A  m a x  per unit leaf N  (A ax/N| f) (Reich et al., 1989). This measure does not include N in the branches, stems or m  ea  roots, nor does it differentiate between leaf retention and retranslocation which can vary in both deciduous and evergreen trees. It is often used similarly to WUEj to indicate the potential N U E of a species under optimal conditions. A high N| f can be associated with lower C assimilation ea  per unit N , so PNUE decreases. Gas exchange measurements for PNUE are usually done over short intervals giving an instantaneous index of N U E (DeLucia and Schlesinger, 1995). Long-term N U E is generally measured as C/N ratio. When measured on a whole plant basis, N U E incorporates allocation of N to different plant parts. Allocation can refer to the proportion of N devoted to Rubisco, structural proteins, defense compounds, N stored in the vacuole or luxury consumption. Allocation can also refer to how C is distributed in the plant, for example N nutrition can affect the thickness of a leaf or specific leaf mass (SLM) and R:S ratio. A high N supply can increase the leaf surface area over the plant providing more C gain per unit N (Field and Mooney, 1986). Walters and Reich (1989) found this to be true with Ulmus americana; under high N supply the leaves produced a greater surface area with a higher N content and a greater leaf C gain (Walters and Reich, 1989). R.S ratio generally decreases under conditions of high N supply (Chapin, 1980; Birk and Vitousek, 1986) and is commensurate with a low C:N because of the proportionally higher quantities of N in the shoot than the root. Long-term N U E is also used in studies on forest production, where it again incorporates even more facets and as a result is often harder to measure. First is the logistical problem of analyzing the N U E of entire trees. It has been proposed to use the N content of litterfall as an index of N U E based on the presumption that trees which grow on low-N sites will be more efficient, have higher rates of retranslocation and will therefore have a low Ni f in the litterfall ea  11  (Vitousek, 1982). Later research has shown that this difference in N U E is not a plastic change in retranslocation related to site fertility, but rather a result of sink strength (i.e. shoot growth rate). Growth rate may be correlated with nutrient availability, but it can also be related to age, seasonality in growth patterns and longevity of leaves (Birk et al., 1986; Nambiar and Fife, 1991). A second problem associated with measuring N U E in the forest is the influence of mycorrhizae on uptake. Mycorrhizae present in the soil have been shown to affect uptake either by buffering the pH changes caused by ion uptake or by increasing the uptake of differing forms of mineral N (Rygiewicz et al., 1984; Rygiewicz et al., 1984). The associations between particular tree species and fungi then could influence the N content of specific trees in a community. Although understanding N U E both on an instantaneous and long-term basis is helpful, this literature review will continue by focusing only on the environmental and genetic components of whole plant N U E . The treatment effects of differing N sources on uptake, assimilation and allocation capacities are all incorporated in the use of C/N ratio. Uptake capacity for particular nitrogen forms could influence the N U E by providing more or less N to the plant. Furthermore, assimilation and allocation differences can determine whether the nitrogen that is taken up is used for carbon assimilation (helping to maintain NUE) or storage (decreasing NUE).  1. Kinetics of nitrogen uptake Environmentally induced changes in uptake rate at low concentrations are caused by both a preference for one N-form over another and pre-treatment N concentrations. In one of the first papers on N uptake, Clement et al. (1978) suggested that uptake was independent of external concentration by measuring the depletion of N0 " from the media by Lolium perenne plants at 3  twenty minute time intervals (Clement et al., 1978). As the N concentration fell from 10 uM to 1.43 uM, the rate of uptake was constant throughout the depletion cycle. The amount of N supplied in order to maintain a constant media N concentration was also plotted over time, indicating constant uptake rates. Not included in this study was the effect of pre-treatment concentration on induction of N uptake. If the plants that were used for this experiment were grown in low N conditions, it is possible that they were already maximizing the use of the high affinity-transport system (HATS) and at lower concentrations could not increase uptake. If the  12  plants were previously grown in high N concentrations, whereby placement in low N concentrations would induce HATS, constant uptake may not have occurred. Preferential uptake for N H  + 4  over NO3" has been shown for Douglas-fir (Kamminga-van  Wijk and Prins, 1993), Scots pine (Flaig and Mohr, 1992), maritime pine (Scheromm et al., 1988), jack pine (Lavoie et al., 1992), western hemlock (Knoepp et al, 1993) and white spruce (Kronzucker et al., 1997). These studies produced differing results on the magnitude of N H  + 4  preference because of pre-treatment and concentration effects (i.e. the utilization of the low affinity, LATS, and high affinity transport systems). Pre-treatment with either N-form can enhance uptake and N-concentration can determine whether uptake occurs through L A T S or Flux characteristics of NO3" and N H  HATS.  and their compartmentation in white spruce have  + 4  been studied by Kronzucker et al. (1995 a and b, 1996 and 1997) using radiolabeled N . Their results elucidate the effects of pretreatment and high doses of nitrogen. As with most higher plants, white spruce has two kinetically distinct transport systems; HATS which operates in a Michaelis-Menten fashion at low external nitrogen concentrations and LATS which operates in a linear unsaturable fashion at high external nitrogen concentrations (Kronzucker et al., 1996). Kronzucker et al. showed that the kinetics of N0 " HATS and N H 3  + 4  HATS differed when seedlings were induced with NO3" or with N H . Under NO3" induction +  4  (three days exposure to 100 u.M NO3"), seedlings exhibited two saturable phases, one at external N0 " concentrations ([N0 ~] )^ 75 uM and another at [N0 "] between 100-750 uM. When 3  3  0  3  o  uninduced, spruce exhibited one saturable phase between 200 and 500 u M [NO3] , termed 0  constitutive HATS (CHATS). The first phase in induced seedlings had a similar K to the m  CHATS of uninduced roots but the V  m a x  was almost three times higher. This indicated that  transport proteins for component I of induced seedlings and C H A T S may be similar. The V  m a x  and K for component II were significantly higher than for the CHATS and reflected a separate m  inducible transport system (IHATS) (Kronzucker et al., 1995). When spruce seedlings were given N H  + 4  without induction, they showed Michaelis-  Menten kinetics similar to when they were given NO3", but the V  (V ax = 1.86 umol g" h" for N H , 0.11 umol g" h" for N0 "). N H 1  m  1  +  4  1  was substantially higher  m a x  1  3  + 4  uptake was also enhanced  effectively by NO3" (influx increased by 20 to 40% in the low concentration range) but not with N H . Ammonium induction may lead to a negative feedback cycle reducing the ability for +  4  increased transport with previous exposure. The negative feedback could also cause the decrease  13  in N H  + 4  influx at higher concentrations that was observed in NO3" induced seedlings  (Kronzucker et al., 1996). The LATS is evident in both NO3" and N H / uptake, but the external N concentrations at which the saturable phase begins for both ions can vary. When spruce seedlings were grown on NO3", the L A T S was visible at 500 uM [NO3"] for uninduced seedlings versus 700 u M [NO3] 0  0  for induced seedlings. This change was accompanied by a slower rate of influx over the range of [NC»3"]  0  in uninduced seedlings. When spruce seedlings were given N H / , the linear saturation  phase began at 400 u M [ N H ] , but the slope of the influx of N H +  4  0  + 4  was depressed in the N0 " 3  induced seedlings as compared to N-deprived seedlings. The findings of Kronzucker et al. (1995a, b and 1996) are helpful in interpreting what seem to be conflicting results in the earlier literature. In Douglas-fir, the V  m a x  for N H  + 4  increased in a 100 uM N H N 0 solution and N0 " uptake became negligible (Kamminga-van 4  Wijk and Prins, 1993). N H  3  + 4  3  uptake may have been enhanced by the N0 " present in the 3  N H N 0 solution which increased the V 4  3  m a x  for N H  + 4  but did not change the K . Flaig and Mohr m  (1992) supplied N to Scots pine at concentrations where LATS would dominate and the 15 m M concentrations of N0 ", N H 3  + 4  and NH NC>3 given were well above levels where NO3" inhibition 4  would be seen. This illustrates the importance of studying uptake kinetics and the resulting effects on N U E at low external nitrogen concentrations. It is only under these more realistic conditions that differences between the two N-sources are likely to be obvious.  2. N-source effects on uptake, C assimilation, biomass and N assimilation N source can affect uptake indirectly through the efflux of hydrogen and hydroxyl ions. When N H  + 4  and NO3" are assimilated, there is a concomitant change in cytosolic pH; N H  assimilation produces at least one H per N H +  + 4  + 4  ion and N0 " assimilation produces almost one 3  OH" per N0 " ion (Raven and Smith, 1976). This can be mediated by efflux of excess ions or by 3  utilization of the biochemical pH stat. Maintenance of ionic balance by efflux is manifested by a change in media pH as the plants assimilate each form of nitrogen (Marschner et al., 1991; Kamminga-van Wijk et al., 1993). If the change in the pH of the external solution is extreme, it could affect the uptake of either N ion. The biochemical pH stat maintains cytosolic pH by the synthesis and removal of carboxylic acids, but its effectiveness is limited by the storage capacity of the vacuole. A cytosolic pH in the range of 6-8 activates PEPcase which increases the rate of  14  C O 2 fixation and the synthesis of oxaloacetate. Oxaloacetate is reduced to malate by malate dehydrogenase and malate is transported to the vacuole where it acts as a counter-ion for cations. Malate can also be incorporated into the cytoplasmic pool of organic acids of the Krebs cycle and traded for another organic acid to be stored in the vacuole. Malic enzyme is activated by a decrease in cytoplasmic pH, often due to an excess of anion uptake (Marschner, 1995). If the biochemical pH stat is utilized to maintain cytosolic pH, this could alter the proportion of C O 2 fixation by Rubisco and PEPcase. The division of C O 2 fixation by Rubisco and PEPcase can also be affected by N-source if differing uptake capacities change the availability of N for assimilation. When C isotope discrimination was investigated in N-limited control and N H / pulsed algae, control discrimination was very close to that of Rubisco (30-40 %o), while discrimination in N H . 4  +  pulsed algae was much less (4-11 %o), suggesting that the majority of carbon fixation was by PEPcase (Guy et al., 1989). As well, NH4 suppressed photosynthetic carbon fixation because N +  assimilation began to compete with RuBP regeneration for reductant. This caused less available RuBP and thus decreased photosynthesis. Relative to photosynthesis, rates of N-assimilation in these algae are very much higher than in conifers, but the same principles of division between the two carboxylating enzymes should apply. However, the effects on 5 C of gymnosperms should be negligible because the available HCO3" in roots is generated by normal dark respiration and is therefore of the same isotopic composition as the plant. N - source may more directly affect biomass through the bioenergetic cost of the extra assimilatory steps associated with NO3" assimilation. Unlike N H , NO3" must be reduced prior +  4  to assimilation. NO3" is reduced by nitrate reductase (NR) followed by nitrite reductase (NiR) and the resulting NH4 can then enter the G S / G O G A T cycle. The first step in the cycle is the +  reduction of glutamate to glutamine by the enzyme glutamine synthase (GS). Glutamine is then either shuttled out of the chloroplast or is used in the nitrification of oc-ketoglutarate (from the T C A cycle) by glutamate synthase (GOGAT) to replenish glutamate. This starts the GS/GOGAT cycle over again, so that for every N assimilated, one C molecule must be pulled from the T C A cycle. This carbon is replenished by HCO3" assimilated by PEPcase (Dennis and Turpin, 1990). Researchers have proposed that the high energetic cost of NO3" reduction may contribute to smaller plant biomass when grown on NO3" fertilization (Miflin and Lea, 1976; Raven et al.,  15  1992). The impact of this cost will depend on the quantity of available light and the site of NO3" reduction (shoots or roots). In gymnosperms, the majority of NO3" reduction occurs in the roots, and energy is derived from mitochondrial respiration, the pentose phosphate pathway and malate oxidation in the roots or leaves. When N0 ~ is reduced in the leaves, C and N can compete for 3  photochemical energy. Because root reduction is more energetically expensive, the balance between N0 " reduction in the leaves versus the roots can influence biomass accretion. If NO3" 3  reduction increases mitochondrial respiration and photosynthesis can not meet the demands of enhanced respiration, then N0 " fertilization may incur too much of an expense and cause a 3  decrease in biomass. However, in gymnosperms, it is unlikely that low photochemical energy would limit NO3" assimilation in the roots, but rather low uptake capacity of NO3" may be directly limiting the formation of photosynthetic proteins (Smirnoff and Stewart, 1985). N-source may also affect the relative quantity of the N assimilating enzymes. Assimilating enzymes for both N0 " and N H 3  + 4  are regulated by internal concentrations of both  ions differentially. N R activity increases with internal NO3 "concentrations (Martin et al., 1981) but is also limited by C availability at higher concentrations (Smirnoff et al., 1985). At low N concentrations, GS and G O G A T respond similarly to the two N-sources (Canovas et al., 1991; Knoepp et al., 1993) or a NO3" treatment yields the highest GS activity (Vezina et al., 1992; Bedell et al., 1999). Combined, these statements indicate that there may be a positive feedback mechanism between uptake and assimilation for both ions at low concentrations. At higher concentrations, this positive feedback could be interrupted to prevent toxic accumulation of one of the ions.  3. N-source effects on allocation Allocational differences with N-source may be more accurately related to internal N quantity than the ion. In conifer studies, the difference in allocation appears to be in the relative quantity of the amino acids asparagine (Asn), glutamine (Gin), aspartate (Asp), glutamate (Glu) and arginine (Arg), with varying results on the relationship with N-source. Asp and Asn are substrate and product in the asparagine synthase (AS) cycle which may be one entry point for NH3 into metabolism. Lavoie et al. (1992) found that NO3" fed jack pine had higher levels of N H , Asp and Gin in the needles than N H +  4  + 4  fed seedlings. In the stems, the stress related amino  acids Arg and y-aminobutyric acid increased, possibly due to a perceived N depletion when  16  grown on an exclusively NO3" solution. Decreased biomass accumulation in NO3" fed plants supports this idea (Lavoie et al., 1992). Flaig and Mohr (1992) fertilized Scots pine with almost four times the amount of both NO3" and N H  + 4  used by Lavoie et al. and found an increase in the  three amino acids which are normally associated with storage proteins (Asp, Gin and Arg). This pool of free amino acids comprised 41% of total nitrogen in seedlings grown in a mix of N sources. The most responsive of the three amino acids was Gin, which is the first product of NH  + 4  assimilation and the preferred transport compound in Pinus. Being able to sequester  excess nitrogen in these amino acids maintains the N balance of the plant and prevents potential N toxicity. They also found an increase in Asp and Glu in the leaves of NO3" fed seedlings. This balance reflects the effect of N-source (or N quantity) on the GS/GOGAT and the asparagine synthase (AS) cycles (Flaig and Mohr, 1992). N stress can also increase the amount of C allocated to starch or non-photosynthetic tissue when photosynthetic C is not limiting N assimilation. When algae were pulsed with N after a period of N-stress, a greater proportion of carbon skeletons came from starch (Turpin et al., 1991). As well, under N-stress, more carbon is allocated to roots in order to reach newNsources and increase the surface area for absorption (Birk et al., 1986; George et al., 1999). In most conifer studies, seedlings show faster growth when grown on N H  + 4  versus NO3"  (Lavoie et al., 1992 and ref. therein and Scheromm and Plassard, 1988 and ref. therein). As is seen above, at equal concentrations of N H  + 4  and NO3", NO3" fed plants perceive stress and  allocate nitrogen to proteins involved in growth. When treatments of N H at higher concentrations, more N is allocated to storage forms in N H  + 4  + 4  or NO3" are supplied  fed seedlings whereas in  NO3" fed seedlings more N is incorporated into immediately used amino acids. This storage capacity found with N H  + 4  may contribute to greater conifer biomass if available N is frequently  exhausted.  B. Genetic control of NUE Genetic control of N U E may reside in N uptake, assimilation or allocation capacities. The difficulty in determining the genetic control of N U E has been in separating the relative importance of the three components across environmental variation. This change in relative importance can frequently cause a g x e interaction. For example, under low N , the inherent ability of the plant to take up N may be more important than the rate of assimilation or how that  17  N is used and genetic control of uptake is likely to determine N U E . As N supply increases, uptake is not as important because the resource is not limited and maximizing assimilation or utilization takes precedence (Li et al., 1991). Heritable variation in N U E or associated traits has been found in corn and pumpkin. Eghball et al. (1993) did not find a g x e interaction in mean N - influx (measured as accumulated N over time) between five different corn hybrids in a greenhouse experiment but there was in the field (Eghball and Maranville, 1993). In the greenhouse, three of the hybrids were given four concentrations of N H N 0 : 0, 30, 60 and 90 mg N kg" soil. Although they showed no 1  4  3  significant g x e interaction in mean N-influx, genotypes were significantly different and there was an interaction between root dry weight, average root radius, R:S ratio and root N content measurements. In the field, four hybrids were given a wider range of concentrations of NH4NO3 (0, 60, 120, and 180 mg kg" soil) but a g x e interaction was only seen in the root length and 1  influx. This study did not show at which concentration the g x e interaction occurred, so it is not possible to ascribe the effect to the idea that at low N concentrations genetic control of uptake will be stronger and at high concentrations the genetic control of assimilation will play a bigger role. The authors also did not give an explanation for the significant effects seen in the field but not in the greenhouse. Swiader et al. (1991) studied thirteen inbred and hybrid pumpkin genotypes differing on the basis of harvest maturity. When the plants were three weeks old they were transferred to new nutrient solutions which were monitored daily for NO3" uptake by measuring loss from the solution. They found that the early maturing genotypes differed more in NO3" uptake than the later maturing genotypes, but there was no apparent relationship between parents and progeny. As a group, the later genotypes removed more N0 " from the solution and had greater biomass 3  than the early genotypes, but there was no significant difference between early and late genotypes in N U E (C:N ratio) (Swiader et al., 1991). Even though it looked as though there might be a genetic component because of the different responses of the early and late maturing genotypes, the lack of relationship between parents and progeny in NO3" uptake was discouraging. Alternatively, the results could indicate the complexity of genetic control of N U E . Sheppard and Cannell (1995) tested clonal differences in needle nutrient concentration, nutrient allocation to above-ground parts and needle retention in Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta trees grown in a lowland fertile site and an upland peaty-gley site. They found that all  18  three measured variables correlated well with the differences in N U E , and that there were clonal differences in needle nutrient concentration but no significant clone x site interactions. Since N uptake was not measured, and there was not a g x e interaction, it cannot be assumed that high and low levels of nutrient supply affected N U E differentially. Nonetheless, genetic control of separate facets of N U E (i.e. N allocation and needle retention) indicate the diversity of genetic control of total N U E (Sheppard and Cannell, 1985). Each of these studies shows that the genetic control of N U E at high and low N fertilization can be divided in multiple ways between variables related to uptake capacity and utilization capacity. Another approach to this may be to study genetic control of N U E when conifer seedlings are fed N H  + 4  or NO3". Potential genotypic differences in uptake, assimilation  and allocation capacities of the two ions could change the N U E ranking within a group of genotypes.  III. Relationship between W U E and N U E Theoretically, W U E and N U E should trade-off on both an environmental and a genetic basis. Fertilization should increase A  m a x  and WUE but also decrease the C:N ratio. In the  absence of allocational differences, genotypes which are adapted to a low nutrient supply may trade-off water use for the efficient use of nitrogen. This should hold true for both short and long-term measures of the two resource-use efficiencies. Unfortunately, the environmental and genetic trade-offs can be confounded by stomatal response to external variables, resource allocation patterns, and genotypic limitations of each resource-use efficiency. The first published research to substantiate the theory was a comparative study of five California evergreen angiosperms. Field et al. (1983) found a distinct species-level trade-off between the two resource-use efficiencies through the link of Cj levels. There was a positive correlation between Ni f and A ea  g did increase with A s  m a x  m a x  , but Cj did not vary consistently with this increase. However,  , inferring a constant proportional stomatal limitation that was specific  to each species. Because Cj levels remained relatively constant for each species in this study, the results imply that there is a positive relationship between g and N U E . This idea has not been s  investigated by many studies because of the strong correlation between A  m a x  and g . s  Ecologically, the trade-off implies that plants from drier habitats sacrifice efficient use of N for  19  more efficient use of water. Plants from wetter habitats maximize their N U E at the cost of transpiration in order to acquire carbon to meet enhanced rates of A (Field et al., 1983). One means to examine this trade-off, based on known physiological differences in A is to compare similar C3 and C 4 plants. C 4 plants tend to have a higher A  m a x  m a x  ,  per unit N than C 3  plants because they concentrate C O 2 at the site of Rubisco. This concentrating mechanism also allows them to maintain a higher N U E at similar WUE or a higher W U E at similar N U E . Sage and Pearcy (1987), examined two similar C 3 and C 4 annuals to more precisely understand the physiological differences in nitrogen use. As with the Field et al. (1983) study, Cj did not change perceptively with varying N| for the C3 plant. For both species, there was a positive eal  correlation between A and N| f, and g and A , where the C3 plant had consistently lower rates of ea  s  assimilation and higher conductance than the C 4 plant. What is interesting is that both plants had similar C, at low Ni f, but Cj was inversely related to N| f at higher N supply in the C4 plant. ea  ea  This is presumably because of less of an increase in g with A s  m a x  in the C4 plant. In a dry  environment, where maintaining a high W U E is advantageous, keeping g low may be more s  important than letting it vary with A  m a x  . These plants typically grow at C O 2 saturating levels,  which means that their stomata may not be as responsive to N levels within the plant and the strategy for an increased PNUE may be in the investment of proportionally more of the available N into new leaves. A C3 plant may alternatively invest N in proteins to increase the low A  m a x  (Sage et al., 1987). Patterson et al. (1997) examined this trade-off from an ecophysiological perspective, comparing two spruce species which occur in unique micro-geographic zones at the southern edge of the boreal forest. Black spruce (Picea mariana) typically grows in flooded nutrient-poor muskegs, while white spruce (Picea glauca) occupies drier upland sites. Rarely do the two species coexist. In a common garden experiment, Patterson grew both species on both high and 13  low water and N applications and measured biomass, photosynthesis, C/N and 8 C. Under N limitation, species did not differ significantly in their NUE. Black spruce, however, had lower N U E at high N and so exhibited greater plasticity in this trait, possibly due to luxury consumption. It also had lower rates of photosynthesis in all but the low N, low water treatment, but was less sensitive to N limitation, which may give it a slight advantage in nutrient limited environments. Under water stress, white spruce exhibited a greater W U E than black spruce only when fertilized. This may be an adaptation to the periodically dry conditions in environments  20  where white spruce occurs. When both N and water were limited, W U E and N U E for both species were compromised. The most important finding from these experiments was that there was no inherent trade-off in resource use efficiency, but there was a species difference in the plastic trade-off, such that species exhibited greater plasticity in use of the resource that was most limiting in their habitat. From this, Patterson et. al (1997) proposed that evolving a higher N U E or WUE does not necessarily preclude enhancement of the use efficiency of the other resource and that there is an optimization process "whereby each species maximizes the use efficiency of the resource which is most limiting in its normal habitat." The lack of an inherent species-level trade-off indicated by Patterson et al. (1997) is likely because of the subtle differences between genotypes or plants in their total physiology. Inherent W U E can differ because of stomatal response to the environment, A Inherent N U E can differ because of inherent A  m a x  m a x  and S L M .  , N uptake, assimilation and allocation  capabilities, and S L M . When these factors are included, an inherent trade-off between the two resource-use efficiencies becomes harder to find. One example of this is cited by Meinzer et al. (1992). They compared W U E and N U E in Hawaiian Metrosiderospolymorpha populations from habitats differing in moisture availability and temperature. Their results indicated that inherent W U E and PNUE did not trade-off because populations maintained constant inherent^ while g declined over the range of 8 C values. 13  s  Although they did not mention differences in site fertility, they noted that N| f was genetically ea  determined and did not correlate with either A or g . Thus W U E was determined by water s  availability in the site at which plants were grown and not N'availability. Meinzer et al. (1992) proposed that constant optimal utilization of N maintained PNUE as W U E varied due to g . s  In the summary of the progression of drought stress in a nitrogen deficient plant presented by Reich et al. (1989), the first consequence of a combination of both stresses is stomatal closure which decreases Q . Stomatal closure causes a proportionally greater decrease in E than A. A high N plant will exhibit a more drastic change in A because of the higher capacity for biochemical carbon dioxide fixation. Alternatively, as seen in Meinzer et al. (1992) and Livingston et al. (1999), fertilization or an inherently higher A  m a x  could ameliorate the  effects of stomatal closure (at the expense of NUE). Under low N| f, water stress effects on ea  photosynthesis will not be as obvious because carbon fixation is hampered by N stress. Under  21  severe water stress both g and A s  m a x  decrease because of an increasing influence of biochemical  limitations (Reich et al., 1989). An adaptation to temporal variations in nutrient supply (e.g. spring nutrient flushes) is luxury consumption. Plants may continue a constant absorption of nutrients without a concomitant increase in growth by storing nutrients either as mineral ions or as free amino acids or proteins. This may cause an apparent short-term decrease in PNUE, but over the long term N U E is high. Nutrient storage could also provide a quickly mobilized reserve for periods of nutrient stress (Vitousek, 1982; Elliott and White, 1994). Birk and Matson (1986) in studying loblolly pine {Pinus taeda L.) showed that carbon can also be stored during nutrient deficiency as starch when maintenance demands are less than carbon production. When resources are plentiful, the stored carbon and nitrogen can be readily mobilized and used for growth (Chapin, 1980; Birk and Matson, 1986). Modifications in allocational patterns induced by water or nutrient stress can also influence the trade-off on a long-term basis. Under these stresses, plants increase their R:S ratio as well as modify the shape and size of the leaves. Plants with greater root mass or high S L M may have less leaf area for transpiration and photosynthesis. If soil N content is low, producing thicker leaves may not only help in avoiding potential water loss, but may also make the plant less susceptible to herbivory and trampling. PNUE measured on an area basis then may be quite low, but long term N U E and WUE would be high if other dangers are avoided (Fichtner and Schulze, 1992). DeLucia and Schlesinger (1995) compared evergreen and deciduous swamp shrubs and found that the high S L M of evergreens correlated negatively with PNUE but positively with 5 C and therefore WUE. They attributed the correlations to devotion of the N to I3  non-photosynthetic functions such as defense, and to a high cell wall resistance to diffusion (DeLucia et al., 1989).  IV. Stable Isotopes in Physiological Research The use of stable isotopes at natural abundance levels has provided a tool to investigate plant physiology. The process of discrimination either through physical (e.g. diffusion or isotope equilibrium effects) or biochemical (e.g. enzymatic reactions) processes changes the isotopic composition of the plant component relative to the source. This change in isotopic composition can indicate the dominant reactions involved in metabolism of that element. Natural abundance  22  levels of the stable isotopes of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen have all been used in physiological research. Although the results are often very precise, the utility of the information is enhanced by coupling the data with other techniques. Thus, not only should one element be measured, but enzyme activity or quantity, elemental concentration or a second stable isotope should also be measured. By using multiple techniques the verity of the theories resulting from stable isotope composition can be supported.  A. Using natural abundance levels of nitrogen stable isotopes in physiology Application of stable nitrogen isotopes to physiological research is relatively novel, with the exception of studies on diazotrophy. In fact, few connections between 8 N and other I5  physiological traits have been recognized. Discrimination factors associated with particular enzymes involved in N assimilation have been determined and 8 N values have been used to 15  trace the N source from which the plants are feeding, but a conclusive theory on fractionation and how it relates to stress physiology has been hinted at only within the last few years. Notation to describe N isotope discrimination is similar to carbon, but the standard is air: 8 N %o = ,5  '  5  N  /  '  4  N  ^ p i e -  b  N/ N 1 4  s t a n d a r d  ( 5  )  The atom percent abundance of N in air is approximately 0.3663 %. Therefore, a l%o change 1 5  in the 8 N of a plant represents less than a 0.0004 change in the per cent abundance of N . The I5  1 5  Rayleigh distillation model has been used in various forms to calculate discrimination or enrichment factors dependent on whether the substrate or product is analyzed. For example, the model can describe the change in 8 N values of the substrate as it is assimilated, assuming I5  constant fractionation at all external substrate concentrations: s  =  In ( R / R n ) x 10'  3  (6)  In? where s is the enrichment factor of the product relative to the substrate, R/Ro is the ratio of the isotope abundances ( N/ N) of the substrate at any time relative to time 0 and/is the fraction of 15  14  unreacted substrate at any time during uptake (Mariotti et al., 1981). The notation is similar to A, but A is given as the isotopic composition of the substrate relative to the product, where s = R p / R - 1 and A = R / R -1. This generally causes s to be negative and A to be positive, s and A s  s  p  can be equated mathematically by using the discrimination factor, D (Guy et al., 1993).  23  s= -D  and  A=  -  ^  1-(Z)/1000)  Similar to C isotope discrimination in photosynthesis, N fractionation could occur at two steps, uptake and assimilation. At each step, fractionation may also be concentration dependent. For instance, if the two mechanisms of uptake, HATS and L A T S , were to have different discrimination values, the point at which uptake changes from HATS to L A T S would determine plant discrimination. Hoch et al. (1992) first presented this hypothesis to account for discrimination by a marine bacterium. They fed the bacterium < 0.1 mM M L * and >1 m M NH  + 4  and discovered a shift in isotopic composition that correlated with the shift from active  transport of N H  + 4  to diffusion of N H 3 . Despite this correlation they could not conclude that  fractionation was causally linked to uptake. In the concentration range where diffusion was the mode of uptake, isotopic equilibrium was reached intra- and extra- cellularly and the assimilating enzyme became the rate-limiting reaction responsible for fractionation. Under the concentration range of active transport, fractionation was greater than would be expected for the assimilating enzyme and it was proposed that uptake contributed to enhanced discrimination (Hoch et al., 1992). Yoneyama et al. (1991) also came to the conclusion that N uptake contributed to whole plant discrimination when fertilized with N H . They attributed fractionation in uptake to both +  4  the isotope equilibrium effect (which causes a 20 %o enrichment of N H difference between active transport of N H  + 4  + 4  nitrogen) and the  and diffusion of NH3. Using wild-type  cyanobacteria (Synechococcus PCC 7942) fed with NO3", and a mutant deficient in assimilating both NO3" and NO2" fed with N H , they found that discrimination was much higher in the N H +  4  + 4  fed bacteria. In addition, they compared the discrimination values to rice plants which were fed with 3.57 mM and 0.71 mM N H  + 4  at a pH between 4 to 6.5. Both the wild-type and mutant  cyanobacteria fed with 8.75 mM N H  + 4  and grown at pH 8 showed greater discrimination than the  rice plants. The authors proposed that at pH 8, 5% of the N is NH3 and the large depletion of b  N was a result of isotopic equilibrium and kinetic isotopic fractionation. At the lower pH and  lower concentration, discrimination was primarily determined by active transport of the protonated form of the ion. In a second publication by the same authors, on NO3" fertilization, there was no apparent discrimination in uptake or assimilation at 1.2, 3.0 or 12 mM NO3" (Yoneyama and Kaneko,  24  1989). Regardless of the rate or the concentration supplied, whole plant 8 N was not 15  significantly different from the salt 5 N . i5  However, when N concentration of the medium was  plotted over time, the lower concentrations reached almost 0 mM after one week and the upper concentration decreased only slightly from 12 mM to 10 mM. It is possible that at the lower concentrations, discrimination in net uptake was not evident because all of the NO3" was taken up and at the higher concentrations, slight discrimination was masked by a build-up of N . 15  Studies in fractionation associated with the assimilating enzymes in vitro are more conclusive.  In 1985, Ledgard et al. determined discrimination associated with NO3" reduction.  They described four places at which fractionation could occur: "(1) reduction of N O 3 " to N O 2 " by NR; (2) diffusion of N0 " into the chloroplasts; (3) reduction of N0 " to N H by NiR; and (4) 2  2  3  diffusion of NH3 out of the chloroplasts." By comparing the 8 N values of NH3 produced by I5  isolated chloroplasts and a reconstituted system containing cytosolic extracts and chloroplasts, they were able to discern where fractionation occurred. The first step (reduction of NO3") occurs in the cytosol and its activity is one fifth to one twentieth that of NiR. It was the only step of the four that was not included in the isolated chloroplasts. The isotope signature of the NH3 produced in the reconstituted system was not significantly different from the N H produced by 3  the isolated chloroplasts. This indicated that discrimination in NO3" assimilation occurs only at the reduction of NO3" by NR. Beyond this point, all substrate was used in the subsequent reactions and therefore no fractionation occurred. The A 5 N value I5  (8 N oduct 15  pr  -  8 N b trate) 15  su  s  of  NR in spinach leaves was -15 % o (Ledgard et al., 1985). Glutamine synthetase is the primary N H determine fractionation in N H  + 4  + 4  assimilating enzyme and would likely  assimilation. Yoneyama et al. (1993) isolated chloroplastic  glutamine synthetase (GS2) from spinach leaves and incubated the enzyme with 20 mM or 10 mM N H 3 and glutamate at differing combinations of time and temperature. They measured the final quantity and stable isotope composition of unreacted N H 3 , amide (glutamate) and glutamine and found that the glutamine produced was lighter than the N H 3 supplied. A 8 N for GS2 was I5  -16.5 % o ± 1.5 % o . Because the substrate supplied was N H 3 , this figure did not incorporate the equilibrium isotope effect (Yoneyama et al., 1993). From these two studies on N R and GS2 and references therein, it would seem that fractionation by the initial assimilating enzymes is similar for both NO3" and N H . In both +  4  cases, activity of the enzyme represents the rate-limiting step for N assimilation (Robinson et al.,  25  1998). The amount of fractionation in vivo seems to depend on substrate concentration. In the publication by Yoneyama et al. (1991), rice plants were fed high and l o w N H  + 4  concentrations  for 20 or 35 days. At 20 days, there were no significant treatment differences in 5 N , but all 15  plants were lighter than the source. At 35 days, high N H while the low N H  + 4  + 4  fed plants had become 3-5 %o lighter,  fed plants had become 3-5 %o heavier. This possibly reflects differences in  enzymatic discrimination due to external N concentrations. A second level of discrimination occurs within plants between plant parts or processes. For example, ability to assimilate NO3" in both the roots and the shoots could cause transport of relatively heavy residual N to the shoot. When tomato plants were fed very low (50 uM) concentrations of N H  + 4  and NO3" there was no difference in whole plant 8 N composition from 15  either source because all substrate was consumed (Evans et al., 1996). However, intraplant differences were significant in the NO3" fed plants. Leaves were heavier and roots were lighter than whole plant 5 N , but both leaf and root 5 N got closer to the whole plant value as the plant 15  I5  aged. The authors proposed that the convergence was due to increased partitioning of NO3" assimilation to the shoot as the plants aged. Similar results were found when rice plants were fed with the N0 " concentrations mentioned above (Yoneyama et al., 1989), in that roots were lighter 3  than leaves, petioles and midribs. There has been an emphasis in oceanography on understanding N isotope fractionation during uptake by marine bacteria and phytoplankton. Within this discipline, researchers have intended to use the natural abundance ratios in underlying sediment to trace past oceanic productivity. To this end, Waser et al. (1998, 1999) have experimented with differing N-sources and with N-deprivation to alter phytoplankton 8 N . In 1998, they presented their first results 15  on N-deprivation followed by N addition. As expected, discrimination decreased as substrate N concentration decreased, until 5 N O N (PON- particulate organic nitrogen) equaled that of the I5  P  combined substrates ( N 0 \ N H 3  + 4  and urea). When N was added after N-starvation, there was  very little fractionation and 8 NPON again equaled that of the combined substrates. Waser et al. I5  (1998) suggested that PON was enriched in N because isotopically light amino acids had been l 5  effluxed. In 1999, they published again on N-starvation in phytoplankton and produced similar results. In this experiment, phytoplankton were fed 30 uM N H  + 4  in three sequential pulses.  During the uptake of N in the first pulse, S'^NPON became lighter during the first 128 hours and then became more enriched as the N H  + 4  concentration dropped to 0 uM. During the second N -  26  pulse, all of the nitrogen was depleted within eight hours and fractionation initially increased, then decreased with external concentration. A six hour time period elapsed between total exhaustion of N H  + 4  in the second pulse and addition of N H  + 4  in the third pulse. Uptake rate was  fastest during the third pulse, and discrimination was non-existent. From these results, Waser et al. re-stated that N status of the phytoplankton can affect discrimination and efflux, but revised the theory of exotic light N efflux. In this publication, they suggested that under N-starvation there is less efflux and more complete utilization of the inorganic N taken up by the phytoplankton (Waser et al., 1999). Environmental stress experiments have also been done using genotypes of barley. When plants were salt stressed (Handley et al., 1997) or water stressed (Robinson et al., 2000) their 8 N was lighter than the control. N-stress appeared to have the same effect, but the |V  experimental designed was flawed in this respect. In the first publication, using salt stress, treatment related differences in 5 N were attributed to down-regulation of the assimilating I5  enzymes due to stress. In the second publication, using N and water stress, the authors proposed that the lighter 8 N values were due to the loss of amino acids. They hypothesized that when 15  plants are stressed, loss of N from the roots is restricted to one or two amino acids which have "exotic" 8 N values. That is to say, they are exceptionally light in isotopic composition. I5  Unfortunately, because such small changes in media N concentrations would be difficult to see using standard concentration measurement techniques, they presented little evidence for organic N efflux. More notably, in these two publications, the authors have demonstrated genotypic control o f 8 N . They are the first research group to publish such results and it introduces new l5  possibilities for screening genotypes on the basis of their 8 N value. Before screening can be 15  useful, the physiological basis for fractionation must be clarified. The literature indicates that 1) there is no apparent discrimination in N O 3 " uptake, 2).fractionation associated w i t h N H  + 4  uptake  may be a result of the isotope equilibrium effect, 3) discrimination by each of the primary N assimilating enzymes is similar, 4) fractionation can depend on external N concentration and 5) isotopic composition of plant parts can, differ depending on the location of the assimilating enzyme. By integrating these ideas researchers can create a theory on N / N fractionation in 1 5  1 4  plants that might be useful for genotype screening for NUE.  27  MATERIALS AND METHODS I. Plant Material and Germination Plant material was selected based on the ten full-sibling families used by Sun et al. (1996) and Livingston et al. (1999). Seeds were requested from the Ministry of Forests (Victoria, BC), but only nine of the original ten controlled crosses could be obtained. A tenth full-sib family, with similar lineage, served as a replacement. Table 1. List of  full-sib family crosses and their origin. Letters represent area of origin, where PG =Prince George selection unit, EK= East Kootenays selection unit and ENA = Eastern North America selection unit  #  Female x  Male  *0. 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.  PG 1 PG 161 PG 3 PG129 PG 145 PG 126 PG21 PG 171 EK30 E K 13  PG 79 PG21 E K 13 E N A 866 PG 5 EK57 PG 5 PG41 E N A 872 EK29 .  *Numbers listed correspond with the identification numbers used in Sun et al. (1996). Note the number 0 replaces number 4. These numbers are used throughout the thesis when identifying families.  Six of the eight females from the Prince George region were grafted scions from plus trees. The accessions of four of these plus trees are actively used as breeding trees because of outstanding physiological traits. The remaining families were deliberately chosen to have poor productivity in field tests. For further details refer to Sun et al. (1996). For all experiments, seeds were imbibed under running cool tap water for twenty-four hours and then stratified by storing in wet paper towel in plastic bags at 4° C for three weeks. After stratification, seeds were sown in 10 cm Cone-tainers (Stuewe and Sons, Corvallis, 3  Oregon) in sterile pre-made potting media (1 part peat: 0.5 parts perlite and 600 g dolomite) and covered with a thin layer of forestry gravel. Each of the Cone-tainers was filled with a similar amount of potting media to prevent soil density effects on germination, and labeled by genetic cross on the outside. Seventy-five Cone-tainers, each sown with two seeds, were used for each of the ten families. After sowing, each of the Cone-tainer racks was watered and covered tightly  28  with cellophane to reduce evaporation and placed in a growth chamber (Conviron CMP 3023, 3244, Winnipeg, Manitoba) at 16h/8h light/dark, 20° C/14° C day/night and ~ 35% relative 2  1  humidity. Light levels in the growth chamber were approximately 360 -400 umol m" s" PPFD. The seeds were sprayed twice daily with distilled water until germination. After germination, seedlings were watered with a fertilizer solution containing 100 u M N + 1/10 modified Johnson's solution (Appendix 1) for the first 6 weeks and 1.5 mM N + 1/10 modified Johnson's for the last two weeks before being transplanted into hydroponics. Originally, seedlings were given only 100 uM N solution + 1/10 modified Johnson's solution to maintain hydroponics treatment conditions in soil, but this concentration was too low for soil (as evidenced by slow growth and chlorosis) and was increased in the last two weeks. Nutrient concentrations were 1.4 ppm N , 6.2 ppm P, 23.5 ppm K, 2.4 ppm Mg, 16.04 ppm Ca, 22.5 ppm S and 0.19 ppm micro-nutrients (CI, B, Mn, Zn, Cu, Mo, and Fe). Seedlings were fertilized every second day to the drip point.  II. Treatments in Hydroponics A . N-source experiment (Exps. 1 and 2) The N-source experiment was performed twice, once in Fall 1998 (Exp.l) and a second time in Winter 1999 (Exp.2). The materials and methods were similar for both trials, but there were some unavoidable differences that affected the health of the seedlings. Outside of seasonal effects (e.g. changes in atmospheric C O 2 concentration), the two different growth chambers used noticeably affected the temperature of the nutrient solution and possibly other factors as well. After 8 weeks, eight seedlings from each family were transplanted into the treatmentrespective hydroponics boxes. The boxes were plastic tubs (16 L, 46 cm x 33 cm x 11.5 cm) with black Plexiglass lids from which the seedlings were suspended using styrofoam bungs. Each of the seedlings was first washed in cool, running tap water to remove all soil and then suspended in a treatment box containing 14 L of 100 uM N + 1/10 modified Johnson's solution for 60 days. The nitrogen treatments were ammonium sulfate, ( N H ^ S O ^ calcium nitrate, Ca(N03)2, and ammonium nitrate, N H 4 N O 3 , with two boxes for each treatment. The boxes were  aerated using ambient air from within the chamber to both increase circulation and maintain dissolved oxygen levels above 90% air saturation. Powdered CaC03 was added to each box as necessary to maintain pH near neutral (pH =5-7.8). Each of the boxes was placed in the growth  chamber with identical day/night conditions as for germination. The temperature of the solution in the boxes was maintained by the ventilation system in the floor of the growth chamber and by cooling coils underneath the boxes. Reflective tape was used to increase the albedo of the box lids. The solution temperature was 20-22°C for Experiment 1 and 24-25°C for Experiment 2. Nutrient concentrations were maintained by pumping in concentrated modified Johnson's solution and by daily manual additions. The intent was to compensate for nutrient uptake with the peristaltic pumps, but this proved more difficult than expected. As a result, on most days the nitrogen concentration was assessed it had decreased below target concentrations despite continuous additions through the pump system. Concentrations were amended by pipette and pump rates were again adjusted to try to compensate for uptake. The six peristaltic pumps (FPU 100 Series Omegaflex, Omega Engineering, Inc.) were interfaced to a 486 personal computer and controlled by Labtech software. Five times a week, medium N H / and NO3" concentrations were assayed using the phenolhypochlorite method (Solorzano, 1969) and perchloric acid method (Cawse, 1967), respectively. Color yield of the N H / assay varied by almost ten percent, whereas the NO3" assay proved more stable and reproducible. Ammonium concentrations also deviated more from the desired concentration because the N H / uptake rate was higher and increased more rapidly than NO3" uptake. After determining the N concentration of each of the treatment boxes, the molarity was adjusted as above. This method changed the ratio of macro- and micro-nutrients to N, but in all cases N remained limiting. The boxes were cleaned once a week to prevent microbial growth and nutrient solutions were replaced to raise all nutrient levels to their original concentrations. Again, powdered CaC03 was added to neutralize the solutions. Boxes were also rotated randomly within the growth chamber when the nutrient solution was refreshed to reduce positional effects within the chamber. For the first three weeks in hydroponics, dead seedlings were replaced with seedlings that were still growing and regularly fertilized in the cone-tainers. After three weeks, dead seedlings were removed from the treatment box but not replaced because at. this point size discrepancies could have affected treatment results. Fungal infection (Exp.2) was treated with the fungicide Benomyl. Aquatic fungus was first visible three weeks into the experiment and covered the roots of all treatment boxes approximately equally. Six grams of Benomyl was added daily for one week. At the end of one  30  week the dead fungus and fungicide were manually washed off the root surface. Large pieces of root material were lost but contamination did not re-occur.  B. N-supply experiment Treatment conditions and routine maintenance in the N-supply experiment were similar to the N-source experiment except for the hydroponics treatments imposed. In this experiment, the two treatments were a steady-state supply of 200 uM NFL; +1/10 modified Johnson's +  solution and a draw-down treatment where N H  + 4  was not re-supplied until there was a negligible  amount left in the box. Pre-treatment conditions in Cone-tainers were identical to the N-source experiment, but all seedlings were fertilized with NFL/. Growth chamber conditions, hydroponics aeration, pH maintenance and temperature (24-25°C) were as already described. Peristaltic pumps delivered N H V to the two steady-state boxes. The target concentration was also maintained by pipetting NH4 into the boxes on a daily basis. In the draw-down +  treatment, NH4 was either pipetted into the box when NFL; concentration reached zero, or if it +  +  was within 24 hours of a full nutrient solution replenishment then the N H  + 4  concentration was  amended when the box was replenished.  III. Measurements A . Chlorophyll fluorescence At the end of the 60-day treatment period, several measurements were taken before harvesting the plant tissue. Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured on five seedlings in each box in Exps. 1 and 2 with an OS-500 Modulated Fluorometer (PP systems, Haverhill, Massachusetts). A leaf clip was placed on a random branch of the seedling to block out light from the growth chamber. After five minutes of dark adaptation time, the probe was placed in the leaf clip and minimal fluorescence (Fo) was recorded for 20 sample points. Next, saturating light (peak wavelength = 670 nm) was emitted to test the maximum fluorescence (Fm) of the tissue. The ratio of the variable fluorescence, Fv, (where Fv =Fm-Fo) to the maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm) was recorded as an indicator of potential photoinhibition between treatments.  31  B. Gas exchange Periodically during the last week of treatment, random seedlings from each treatment box were selected for gas exchange measurements. For Exp. 1, seedlings were chosen from all families. Because this did not provide many replicates of both treatment and full-sib family, seedlings were selected from only three families in all treatments for Exp. 2 and the N-source experiment. Measurements were made at saturating PAR (750 umol m" s" ), ambient C O 2 2  1  concentration (360 ppm), 45% RH and a leaf chamber temperature of 23-25°C using an A D C LCA-4 open system (Hoddeson, England). Flow rate through the chamber was altered to maintain ACC>2< 40 ppm and ARH « 15%. Measurements were made in the evening before the night cycle had begun. After taking gas exchange measurements on 83 seedlings in the N-source experiments and 48 seedlings in the N-supply experiment, values were screened for factors that could confound plant performance in the leaf cuvette. These factors were C < 300 ppm, ARH < 5%, a  2  1  2  PAR < 700 umol n T s"', leaf area > 16 cm , and g = 0. The above values represent conditions s  that are beyond the normal environmental range or impair the accuracy of the equipment. In the case of leaf area, values above 16 cm resulted in too much self-shading.  Screening for these  factors reduced the database substantially to 42 data points for the N-source experiments and 34 for the N-supply experiment.  C. Plant harvesting At the end of the 60-day period, plants were harvested from each of the treatment boxes. Roots were rinsed in distilled water and the stem was severed just below the oldest needle with a razor blade. The root and shoot were packaged separately in foil packets, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80° C. Before grinding, seedlings were freeze-dried (Labconco Lyphlock 6 liter freeze dry system, Kansas City, MO) in the foil packets to remove all water.  D. Biomass measurements Three measures of growth were taken: seedling height, ratio of root dry weight to shoot dry weight (R:S ratio) and total dry weight. Seedling heights were measured from the first needle at the base of the seedling to the tip of the topmost needle. R:S ratio and dry weight were  32  measured after the seedlings had been freeze-dried. All seedlings were kept in a dessicator before measurement.  E. C : N and stable isotope analyses After weighing, roots and shoots were combined and reduced to sub-micron particle size by grinding with a Wiley Mill to pass through a 40 mesh screen, and then pulverizing in a planetary ball mill (Pulverisette, Fritch G M B H , Germany). Equal weight samples of the eight replicates from each cross within each box were pooled into one composite sample for analysis. Samples were combusted in a Europa A N C A - G S L preparation module. The liberated gas then passed through a Europa Hydra 20/20 ratio mass spectrometer (UC Davis Stable Isotope Facility) for analysis of both carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes. Duplicate samples of random seedlings were sent to U C Davis for reference analysis. In addition, samples of the reference material used by U C Davis were also analyzed at the U B C Dept. of Earth and Ocean Sciences. Isotopic composition of the salts used in the medium were analyzed at U C Davis. The salt 8 N 15  values used were the mean of four samples and were as follows: (NH4)2S04 = 0.365 %o, NH N0 = 2.3925 %o and Ca(N0 ) = 0.085 %o. All data were corrected for the 8 N 15  4  3  3  2  composition of the salt by subtracting 8 from 8 (where s and p refer to source and plant) and as S  P  such plant 8 N is represented by A8 N. I5  I5  IV. N Depletion Analysis for N-Supply Experiment , 5  Stable isotope composition of the nutrient solution in the N-supply experiment was analyzed periodically during two draw-down cycles and on two subsequent mornings in the steady-state treatment boxes. The draw-down treatment boxes were sampled four times in a 10 h period at estimated N H  + 4  concentrations of 200, 100, 50 and 10 uM. After samples were  collected, the N - N H 4 quantity in the water in the treatment boxes was determined by the N l 5  1 5  +  membrane diffusion method (Holmes et al., 1998). The method, as outlined by Holmes et al. (1998), relies on the volatilization of N H out of the solution and subsequent deposition on 3  suspended acidic glass fiber filters. The glass fiber filters are analyzed for 8 N . 15  Collected samples of hydroponics medium were preserved by adding H2SO4 to acidify the solution to pH = 2.0. Since the pK for ammonium disassociation is 9.25, the protonated form should be stable and not volatilize as N H (Shearer et al., 1989). At this point, samples were of 3  33  varying volumes dependent on the concentration. The membrane diffusion process requires that all samples are a consistent volume (40 ml) and contain similar quantities of nitrogen (112 u.g). In order to achieve this requirement larger samples of a lower concentration were concentrated under acidic conditions using a flash evaporator (Buchi Rotovapor Re III, Switzerland). This method proved to be the fastest and most reliable method for retaining the NH4 " in the sample 4  and preventing contamination. To ensure that nitrogen was not gained in the process a blank solution was also reduced. The blank was created by bubbling basic distilled water (pH= 10.711) with helium for five minutes to volatilize and release all NH/followed by reacidification.  In addition, a 40 ml blank was also used in the diffusion process.  Once the samples had been concentrated, the solution was made basic again by the addition of MgO. Acidified glass fiber filter (GF/F) discs enclosed in Teflon membrane traps were placed in plastic, re-sealable sample bottles to trap ammonia. After six days of incubation on a rotary shaker at 40° C, the discs were removed and dried in a desiccator with a 20 ml beaker of concentrated H2SO4 for 48 h. Once dry, the discs were wrapped in tin squares and combusted in a Carlo Erba model 1106 C H N analyzer. The resultant N2 gas passed into a Fisons Na 1500 ratio mass spectrometer (UBC, Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences) for 8 N analysis. 15  V. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed through a series of one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) (SAS Inc. Cary, NC) where each variable (biomass, R:S, C:N, 8 C and 8 N) was tested in a split-plot 13  I5  design. The main effects or factors were treatment, replicate and their interaction (Error I) and the subplot contained family, family x treatment interaction and the replicate effect on the family x treatment interaction (Error II). A completely randomized design was justified over a randomized complete block design because of biological interference (fungal infection in Exp. 2) and differences in experimental methods. Based on components of variance, all factors could not be tested against the total error term and were tested against the error terms indicated in Table 3. Among the factors, there was not a suitable error term for treatments and pseudo-F tests were created using the mean square of Error I, Error II and the treatment x family error. Degrees of freedom for treatment were calculated similarly (Appendix 2). The use of a pseudo-F prevented comparison of treatment means through normal multiple comparison tests. To replace this, data were plotted in a histogram with standard error bars to indicate differences between  34  means. Differences between family means were tested using a Tukey multiple comparison procedure. Prior to the analysis of variance, each variable was tested for normality and homogeneity of variances both through examination of histograms and stem and leaf plots and through various statistical tests of skewness and kurtosis. Those variables that did not meet these criteria were log transformed and statistical analysis was performed on the new values, but original values were used to produce figures. Pearson correlation coefficients between variables were estimated using transformed variables as appropriate. For the environmental correlations all data were combined within each experiment. For the family correlations, treatments were separated and families were blocked within treatment and replicate. The gas exchange data were treated somewhat differently. Data were blocked as resource and N-supply experiments, the N-source block containing all data from Exps. 1 and 2 in order to increase the sample size. The majority of this data was from Exp. 2 because of errors made during measurements taken on seedlings from Exp.l. The assimilation rate observations from the N-supply experiment, the E observations from both experiments and the g observations s  from both experiments were not normally distributed and were subsequently log transformed to produce a normal distribution. Because there were only three factors (treatment, family and treatment x family), no pseudo-F tests were created and all factors were tested against the error term. Where there was a significant difference in treatment or family means, a Scheffe multiple comparison test was used.  35  RESULTS  The intent in running all three experiments in a growth chamber using hydroponics was to try to control as many factors as possible. By controlling environmental factors, one can discern more clearly specific treatment effects without confounding interactions. Unfortunately, even in controlled experiments, there can be unforeseen environmental differences that can affect treatments. For instance, in the N-source experiment, replicates of the same treatment within Experiments 1 and 2 were significantly different in almost every measured phenotypic variable. Between those two experiments, most of the measured phenotypic variables were significantly different due to the fungal contamination. These uncontrollable environmental factors must be considered when analyzing the results both from the standpoint of the resiliency of the genotypic determination of particular traits and for the purpose of understanding the strength of a nitrogen treatment effect over other variables. The intended and unintended differences between experiments merit presentation of each of the results individually, despite having measured the same phenotypic traits. Treatment and family effects on traits are addressed first, followed by trait correlations. Although individual trait responses to treatment are interesting, invariably that treatment must have an interrelated effect on other traits as well.  I. N-Source Experiment A. Chlorophyll fluorescence If a seedling is photoinhibited, maximal fluorescence (Fm) decreases because more energy is lost as heat to prevent further damage to the photosynthetic apparatus. This provides a quick method for analyzing potential damage to photosynthesis from nutrient stress. A healthy plant typically has a Fv/Fm ratio of 0.83. In Experiment 1 mean Fv/Fm was 0.777 and all treatments were similar. In Experiment 2, mean Fv/Fm was 0.601 and the lowest value was 0.246 in one of the N H 4 N O 3 replicates.  B. Total biomass and allocation Biomass differences among treatments in the N-source experiments were significant (ct(2)= 0.05) (Appendix 2, Table 1). Total biomass data were log transformed to produce a  36  normal distribution of the variances and pseudo F-tests were created to remove both replicate and family variation. The highly significant Error I term in Exp. 1 indicates that replicates of the same treatment were more different than between treatments. Although the correlation coefficient between replicates of the same treatment in Exp.l was significant for all treatments (a= 0.05), the difference in replicate means in both the NH4NO3 and NFL; treatments may have +  caused the treatment x replicate effect (Error I). Nonetheless, when represented graphically (Fig. 1 a) the mean seedling biomass in the NH4NO3 and N H  + 4  treatments was greater than the  NO3" treatment. In Exp.2, Error I was not significant and a higher biomass in the NH4NO3 and NH  + 4  treatments was not as pronounced (Fig. lb). As a whole, the seedlings in the trial that  experienced a fungal infection were smaller than the healthy seedlings in Exp.l (pers. obs.). Based on this, the results presented will focus on Exp.l, with occasional mention of Exp.2 data. Family differences in total biomass were significant and larger families maintained their rank in all three treatments. There was some variation in the middle of the range of biomasses for each treatment, but the families which represented the highest (1, 3, 10) and lowest biomasses (0, 2, 6) were consistent for all treatments and both experiments. Significant Pearson correlation coefficients for biomass between each of the treatments in Exp. 1 and in two of the three treatment comparisons in Exp. 2, indicate strong genotypic control of this trait (Appendix 5, Table 1). In Exp. 1, it is clear that there is some clustering in the middle, but that the families on either end are significantly different (Fig. 2a and Appendix 3). Such clear grouping is not evident in data from Exp. 2 because there was a family x treatment x replicate interaction (Error II), preventing any distinction other than a significant difference between the means of families 10 and 5. In both experiments the range of biomasses covered by the families was wider for NH  + 4  and NH4NO3 than for N0 " alone. 3  Nitrogen treatments did not have a significant effect on R:S ratio in the N-source experiments (Appendix 2, Table 2). From Fig. la it appears that seedlings in the NO3" treatment had the highest R:S ratio, whereas the NFL} and NH4NO3 treatment R:S ratios were similar to +  one another, but the analysis of variance and T-tests did not support these differences. The R:S ratio of the families clustered in a low (1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 10) and a high (0, 2, 8 and 9) range in Exp. 1 (Appendix 3) but these distinctions were not as clear in Exp.2. Despite root damage from the fungus and perhaps the Benomyl, families displayed significant differences in their R:S ratios, but the order from high to low differed from Exp. 1 and there was not a significant  37  (a)  Fig. 1. Treatment effects on C:N ratio, biomass and R:S ratio in the N-source experiment. Each bar represents the mean of approximately 160 seedlings ± SEM. The S E M is based on the variance between the two replicates, (a) In Exp. 1, treatments were significantly different for biomass, ct(2) =0.05. (b) In Exp. 2, treatments were not significantly different in all variables.  38  (a) ii  V •  20.00  25.00  30.00 35.00 C:N (ng/ug)  40.00  45.00  20.00  25.00  30.00  40.00  45.00  (b)  35.00 C:N (ug/ug)  NH4N03 N03NH4+  Fig. 2. Relationship between total biomass and N U E in the N-source experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family, a). In Exp.l, the correlation coefficients are not significant within any of the treatments. In the NH4NO3 treatment, r= 0.30271 (P< 0.1945); in the N0 " treatment, r= 0.06412 (P< 0.7883), and in the N H treatment, r= 0.1513 (P< 0.5243). When all seedlings are combined, r= -0.58195 (PO.007). (b). In Exp.2 the correlation coefficients were not significant within any of the treatments. In the NH N03 treatment, r= 0.12818 (P< 0.5902); in the N0 " treatment, r= 0.04967 (P< 0.8352) and in the N H treatment, r= 0.02324 (P< 0.9225). When all seedlings are combined, r= -0.63648 (PO.0002). +  3  4  4  +  3  4  39  family correlation between any of the treatments for this trait (Appendix 5, Table 1).  C . N U E (C:N ratio) Mean treatment C:N values were not significantly different in both Exp. 1 and 2 (Appendix 2, Table 3). The graphical representation of treatment effects on C:N ratio shown in Figures 1 a and b and 2a and b, indicated that treatment differences were significant. Pseudo-F tests did not confirm this difference possibly because of the small number of replicates and the significant treatment x replicate interaction. Two sample t-tests were done on pairs of treatments and the only significantly different pair was NO3" and N H 4 in Exp. 1 (data not shown). +  Families displayed significantly different C:N ratios, but there was no interaction between family and treatment (Appendix 2, Table 3). The range of family mean C:N values for each treatment was somewhat narrower for Exp. 1 (Exp. 1,31.16- 35.79, Exp. 2, 29.77- 36.45). Multiple comparison tests showed that the ranking of families between the two experiments differed, but that each had only two clusters of family means. In Exp. 1, the higher N U E cluster contained families 1, 3, 7 and 10 and in Exp. 2 the higher N U E cluster contained families 0, 1,2, 6, 7, 9 and 10 (Appendix 3).  D. Gas exchange measurements Despite small sample sizes and large standard errors, there were significant treatment and family effects in certain gas exchange parameters (Fig. 3) (Appendix 4). Treatment and family differences were primarily expected in assimilation rate (A), yet this was the only factor to not show any significant differences. Treatment significantly affected stomatal conductance (g ), s  evapotranspiration (E) and the integrative factor Q / C , in relatively similar ways. g , E and Cj/C a  s  a  were highest in the NH4 treatment and lower in the NH4NO3 and NO3" treatments (Fig. 3b,c and +  d). Scheffe's multiple comparison test indicated a significant difference between the NFLt and +  NH N03 treatments for g , E and Cj/C . Of these three variables, a treatment x family interaction 4  s  a  only occurred in g . This was evident in Fig. 3b where family 3 had the highest g in the NFLt s  +  s  treatment, but dropped to almost equal to the others in the NO3" treatment. This trend was also seen in A and E, but was not nearly as pronounced.  40  (b)  (a)  0.14 ^  s o  • gt7  ~o B  • gtl  u  Hgt3  0.12 0.1  ^ ^o  0.08  w  0.04  S 6X1  0.06 0.02 0  NH4+  NH4N03  NH4+  N03-  (c)  NH4N03  N03-  NH4N03  N03-  (d)  d  NH4+  NH4N03  NH4+  N03-  Fig. 3. Treatment and family effects on measured gas exchange parameters in the N-source experiment. Numbers written above each bar in (a) represent the sample size and are the same for each parameter. Each of the bars represents the mean family value for (a) C O 2 assimilation rate, A, (b) stomatal conductance, g , (c) evapotranspiration rate, E, and (d) the ratio of internal C O 2 concentration to ambient C O 2 concentration, Cj/C . Treatments differ significantly for E (P< 0.0255), g (P< 0.0509) and Cj/C (P< 0.0501). Family differences are significant for E (P< 0.0231), g (P< 0.0101) and Q / C (P< 0.0284). The treatment x family interaction was significant for g (P< 0.0179). s  a  s  a  s  a  s  41  Family differences were significant in g , E and Cj/C presumably because of the above s  a  mentioned influence of family 3. This influence was most evident in g , as seen both in Fig. 3b s  and by Scheffe's multiple comparison test (Appendix 4), and became less pronounced in E, Ci/C and A. Between treatments, the difference in families was most clear in the N H a  + 4  treatment and became more diffuse in the NH4NO3 and NO3" treatments.  E. 5 C 13  The different sources of N did not affect the mean 8 C of the seedlings (Appendix 2, 13  Table 4). The spread of mean family 8 C values for all three treatments in the N-source 13  experiment very nearly overlapped one another in both Exp. 1 and 2 (Fig. 4). 8 C values of 13  seedlings in Exp. 1 ranged from -28.78 to -31.42 %o and each of the  and  NO3"  NH4NO3  boxes  was a true replicate of its twin (i.e. family 8 C values in the replicates of the NO3" and NH N03 13  4  boxes were significantly correlated). Families in the replicates of the NFLj treatment ranked +  differently in each of the boxes and therefore replicates were not correlated. This did not affect the significance of the Error I term. Treatment replicates of Exp. 2 were all highly correlated (a(2) =0.05), but the 8 C range of the two N H I3  + 4  tubs differed enough to cause a significant  treatment by replicate interaction. Families displayed significant variation in 8 C in both trials, but without a treatment 13  effect, there was no treatment x family interaction. Family correlations between treatments were significant in Exp. 1, but in Exp. 2 were only significant in the NO3" versus NH4NO3 treatments (Appendix 5, Table 1). Family 0 stood out as having the highest 8 C regardless of treatment or 13  fungal infection (Fig. 4). Removing this family from each of the treatments, reduced the range of 8 C values by almost half. The remaining families clustered, but continued to follow a I3  similar ranking between treatments in Exp. 1 whereby families 3, 9 and 10 dominated the lower 13  *  13  *  end of the spectrum. Endpoints of family 0 (least negative 8 C) and 3 (most negative 8 C in two of three treatments) held for Exp. 2 as well, but the order of the remaining families became less distinct (Fig. 4b). For instance, family 6 dropped down to a more negative value in all treatments and family 10 moved toward the middle of the range for all treatments in Exp. 2.  42  (a)  Fig. 4. Family 5 C rank in N-source experiment. Fig a and b represent Exp. 1 and Exp. 2, respectively. Each point represents the mean of 16 seedlings of a family within a treatment. Families are significantly different (P< 0.0002) for both experiments. 13  F. A8 N 15  Stable nitrogen isotope composition of the seedlings was the parameter least subject to measurement or method error. In Exp.l, all factors were significant and in Exp. 2 all factors except the treatment x family interaction were significant (Appendix 2, Table 5). The mean seedling A8 N was lighter than each of the respective salts and seedlings grown in the NO3" I5  treatment were more negative than both the N H / and NH4NO3 treatment seedlings. The differences between the 8 N salt and plant 5 N were: N H I5  I5  + 4  =2.2005, 1.033, NH4NO3 =3.6795,  3.0575 and NO3" =4.09, 3.49 in Exp. 1 and 2, respectively. Family A8 N values covered a 15  similar range in the N H  + 4  and NH NC>3 treatments in both Exp. 1 and 2 (Fig. 5). In considering 4  the NH4NO3 treatment data in Fig. 5b, it is important to note that the true 8 N value of the 15  source did not equal that of the NH4NO3 salt because of the additional N H  + 4  periodically added  to maintain the NH /N03" ratio. +  4  A significant Error I term indicates that replicates of the treatments were different from one another. In Exp. 1, mean family values in replicate boxes were highly correlated for both the NO3" and NH4NO3 treatments, but not between replicates in the N H  + 4  treatment. This could be  because the mean of one box was slightly more negative than the other (-1.236 %o vs. -1.705 %o) or because some families switched ranks between replicate tubs (families 1 and 3). A difference in replicate means did not occur in either of the other two treatments. In Exp. 2, almost the opposite is true and the correlation coefficient between replicate boxes is significant for the NH4 treatment (a=0.05), but not for either of the other two treatments. Differences +  between the means of the NO3" and NH N03 replicates were 0.4 %o and 0.5 %o, whereas 4  between N H  + 4  replicates it was only 0.2 %o. Changes in family rank were also more frequent in  the NO3" and NH4NO3 replicates than in the N H  + 4  replicates (data not shown).  Family rank by 8 N value was also quite different between trials and within Exp. 1. In I5  Exp. 1, there was a significant treatment x family interaction because of three substantial rank changes between treatments (families 2, 5 and 6) (Fig. 5a). In Exp. 2, there did not appear to be as many significant rank changes (treatment x family P< 0.5), but the overall family order differed from Exp. 1. As well, the family correlations between treatments were not significant in either experiment (Appendix 5, Table 1). Family 0 consistently had one of the least negative 8 N values, but all others changed between trials or treatments. Lv  44  (a)  -5.0  J  1  1  NH4  NH4N03 N treatment  1  —  N03  (b)  Exp. 2 0.0" -1.0 -  H £ -2.0"  < -3.0 " \  a  -4.0-  T  NH4  NH4N03 N treatment  N03  Fig. 5. Family A 8 N rank in the N-source experiment. Fig. a and b represent Exp. 1 and Exp. 2., respectively. Each point represents the mean of 16 seedlings of a family within a treatment. Families are significantly different (P< 0.005) for Exp. 1 and not significant (P< 0.0896) for Exp. 2. I5  45  G. Biomass versus N U E and 8 C I 3  Biomass and N U E were significantly negatively correlated between the three treatments in Exp. 1 and 2 (Fig. 2). Within treatments, there were no significant family correlations, but the correlation coefficient decreased from the NO3" treatment to the NFL; treatment. In addition, the +  distribution of biomasses covered a narrower range of C:N ratios. The families, however, were significantly different and maintained their relative rank or grouping through all three treatments. Only family 3 changed its rank from a relatively high biomass and high C:N ratio in the NO3" and NH4NO3 treatments to a relatively low biomass in the NFL^ treatment. Family correlations in Exp. 2 did not play out as clearly. There were no observable trends within the treatments. Family grouping was similar to Exp. 1, whereby families 1 and 10 represented the high end of the C:N range in both the NO3" and NH4NO3 treatments and family 8 represented the lower end. The expected positive correlation between biomass and 8 C on either an environmental 13  or family basis was not seen in this experiment (Fig. 6). In both Exp. 1 and 2 the correlations appeared to be heavily influenced by the presence of family 0, but when this family was removed from the equation, the correlation coefficient did not increase and the slope of the line did not change. When all data were combined, a positive environmental correlation between biomass and WUE was still not evident. There were, however, family patterns. Families 0 and 3 tended to dominate the extreme values in 8 C and controlled the correlation coefficient based on their biomasses relative to the I3  other families in the treatment. All other families clustered in the middle of the range of 8 C I3  values and served as the fulcrum for the balance created by the changing biomasses of families 3 and 0 in the N O 3 " and N H  + 4  treatments. Families 10 and 1 tended to have the highest biomasses  of the group, but were consistently in the middle to low end of the range of 8 C . I3  H . R:S ratio versus N U E and 8 C , 3  R:S ratio correlated more significantly with N U E than with WUE. For both experiments, there was a significant positive correlation between R:S ratio and N U E (Exp. 1 r = 0.6736 P< 0.001, Exp.2 r= 0.5227, P< 0.003) when all treatments were combined.  46  (a) 10  0.70  m  3  0.60  "  ,  9  •°  *3  0.30  10 6  3„  V  a  5* *  2  i  .  8  7 5  v%'  «  0.20  0  2 *c m 5  | 0.40  o  NH4N03 N03NH4+  7  m  0.50  B  V  •  * 7"'  8  Exp. 1  v  7  ' 7°  V  9  0.10 -31.00  -30.50  -30.00  -29.50  5 C (%o) 13  (b)  •  3  Exp. 2  -  10  0.35 " 0.30 "  •  19 «  0.25 -  0  •  $  10 B 6 7  0.20 "  8  V  •i  #  V  9  J  3  0.15 "  a  8  V  7  0  10  •5  12 Ea  5  V  76  2  f  0.10 -  V  7°  75  T  -30.00 -29.50 -29.00 -28.50 -28.00 -27.50 -27.00 -26.50 5 C (%o) I3  Fig. 6. Relationship between total biomass and 5 C in the N-source experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family, (a) In Exp. 1, the correlation coefficients are not significant within any of the treatments. In the NH4NO3 treatment, r= -0.16944 (P< 0.4751); in the NO3' treatment, r= -0.38651 (P< 0.0923) and in the N H treatment, r= -0.13682 (P< 0.5652). When all seedlings are combined, r= -0.16475 (P< 0.3843). (b). In Exp. 2, the correlation coefficients were not significant within any of the treatments. In the NH4NO3 treatment, r= 0.06821 (P< 0.7751); in the N0 " treatment, r= -0.06906 (P< 0.7723) and in the N H treatment, r=0.00887 (P< 0.9704). When all seedlings are combined, r= 0.33579 (P< 0.0697). 13  +  4  +  3  4  47  When treatments were separated, the R:S ratio and N U E were negatively correlated for N H / and NH4NO3 treatments in both experiments (Exp. 1 r= -0.4423 and -0.457, P< 0.0509 and 0.0428, Exp. 2 r= -0.7134 and -0.6777, P< 0.0004 and 0.003, N H  + 4  and NH4NO3 treatments  respectively). The distribution of the families along the regression line was very similar to what was obtained for biomass versus N U E (Fig. 2). Families with a high biomass and high N U E tended to have a low R:S ratio. There was no significant correlation between R:S ratio and 8 C 13  for either experiment when treatments were combined or treated separately (data not shown).  I. 8 C versus N U E , 3  A significant plastic trade-off between 8 C and N U E was not observed in either 13  experiment (Fig. 7a and b). The six points on each figure represented the mean for all families in that treatment and did not indicate any trade-off. What the points indicated was the variability between replicates of each treatment. Another way of visualizing a plastic trade-off would be to average the replicates within each treatment for each family and then to plot 8 C against N U E 13  for all 10 families in each treatment. The 10 regression lines should be parallel and have a negative slope when the independent variable is N U E . As N U E increases with the change in treatments (from NH4 to NO3"), 8 C would decrease. Instead, when these data were plotted, the +  I3  lines followed no particular pattern, some indicating a positive correlation, others indicating a negative correlation and still others presenting no correlation at all (data not shown). When the mean values for all treatments within a family were plotted to show a family trade-off between the two traits, again there was no significant correlation (Fig. 7c and d). 1 -1  Families which had a high 8 C did not necessarily have a low N U E when averaged across treatments. Although there was genetic control of both of these traits, there was no inherent trade-off. J . Biomass versus Correlations between biomass and A 8 N were inconsistent (Fig. 8). The environmental 15  correlations for both experiments were significant and positive, but the family correlations varied. In Exp. 1, the only significant family correlation with a positive slope was in the N H i  +  treatment. The family correlation in the NO3" treatment was significant as well, but had a  48  ON  •+ NH,  o p  i  o  CN  z  O  1 •  _  ' rY CN  B  ON  o U oo"(o  X  o p " oo  a  a  •=> *—  CN  OO  o  z +  a  •  a  f  1  O  CN  "~!  " oo CN  I  O  z „  O "  BrO NO  C N  m  (Srl/Srl) N:3  ON CN  i  O  m (Srl/Srl) M O  o  o  m  a  ON  CN  ON  i  CN O  p  ©  B  aa  •7 u  CN  B  OO  B  ir^ to  43 O  X  ON B  o " ~ B  o o o  C I  a >/-> CN  (3ri/3rl) N O  (^ri/gri]  r  crj rjj C/N  •  (a)  Fig. 8. Relationship between total biomass and A 8 N in the N-source experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family, (a) In Exp. 1, the correlation coefficients are significant only for the N H and NO3" treatments and are indicated by the inserted line. In the NH4NO3 treatment, r= -0.203 (P< 0.3907); in the N0 " treatment, r= -0.4478 (P< 0.0477) and in the N H treatment, r= 0.6468 (P< 0.0021). (b) In Exp. 2, the only significant correlation coefficient is for the N H treatment and is indicated by the inserted line. In the NH4NO3 treatment, r= 0.06274 (P< 0.7927); in the N0 " treatment, r= -0.03884 (P<0.8709) and in the N H treatment, r= 0.71299 (P< 0.0004). 15  +  4  +  3  4  +  4  +  3  4  50  negative slope. In Exp. 2, the family correlations in the N H / treatment was significant and the slope was positive. In both experiments, the range of family A 8 N values in the N H 15  + 4  and  N H 4 N O 3 treatments seemed less negative than the N O 3 " treatment. Within Exp. 1, the range of A 8 N values in the N H l5  NH  + 4  + 4  and N H 4 N O 3 treatments looked similar and families 2 and 6 in the  treatment and family 0 in the N H 4 N O 3 treatment appeared to determine the slope of the  line.  K. N U E versus A 8 N ,5  On an environmental basis, N U E and A 8 N were significantly negatively correlated for I5  both N-source experiments. The regression line was determined primarily by the three clusters of ten families in each treatment (Fig. 9). This negative correlation for both experiments was the only significant correlation between these two traits. On a family basis, correlations between the two traits within treatments were non-existent. Consistency in family ranking regarding the two traits was also difficult to determine.  L. 8 C versus A 8 N , 3  15  The environmental correlation between 8 C and A8 N was significant only in Exp. 2 13  15  (Fig. 1 Ob). Of six possible family correlations in the two experiments, only one was significant at the a(2)= 0.0124 level and a second was significant at the ct(2) = 0.0641 level (Exp. 1, N H N 0 and N03"treatments, respectively). Although the N H 4  3  + 4  treatment in Exp.l had a positive  slope, most data points occurred in a very narrow band on the x-axis. Without families 2 and 6 it would appear that there was almost no variation in A 8 N values in the N H I5  + 4  treatment, but there  was family variation in 8 C. The range of A8 N values also decreased in the NH N03 4  treatment, yet the correlation was still significant. As in other figures representing stable isotope data, family 0 again had the least negative value in both isotopes. This difference was most pronounced in Exp.l in the NO3" and NH4NO3 treatments, but continued in the N H  + 4  treatment as well. Beyond this distinction, there were not  any ranks that were common to all three treatments. Families tended to cluster in particular ranges for each of the traits, but this was confounded when the range narrowed as it did for A 8 N in the N H I5  + 4  treatment (Fig. 10a).  51  (a) 45  v  V *  0  40  V  8  1 ,0-  m  3  "o  2" 9^ ->  30  NH4N03 N03NH4+  1  •  an 35  z u  B  Exp. 1  10 _3  3 10 •  25  2  •  6*  20  -4.00  -3.00  •  8  • 9  -2.00 A8 N (%o)  -1.00  15  (b)  40  Exp. 2  10  45  V  5  V  m ^  00  l b 35  ivjo 1 1.*!  Z  i  30  «  1  25 20  ,8  -4.00  -3.00  -2.00 A5 N (%o)  3  6  1 0  -1.00  0.00  l5  Fig. 9. Relationship between N U E and A 8 N in the N-source experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family, (a) In Exp. 1, the correlation coefficients are not significant within any of the treatments. In the N H N 0 treatment, r= -0.2029 (P< 0.3908); in the N0 " treatment, r= 0.09499 (P< 0.6904) and in the N H treatment, r= -0.06683 (P< 0.7795). (b). In Exp. 2, the correlation coefficients are not significant within any of the treatments. In the N H N 0 treatment, r= 0.06189 (P< 0.7955); in the N0 " treatment, r= 0.09391 (P< 0.6937) and in the N H treatment, r= -0.0937 (P< 0.6939). I5  4  3  3  +  4  4  3  3  +  4  52  (a) •  V •  NH4N03 N03NH4+  0  Exp. 2 •  -27.00  •  0 V  -28.00  2* V  7  s  v  -29.00  S 7  if? • 6  1 ' -4.00  1  -3.00  -2.00 A5 N (%o)  -1.00  3 •  0.00  I5  Fig. 10. Relationship between 8 C and A 8 N in the N-source experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family, (a) In Exp. 1, the correlation coefficients are significant in the N H 4 N O 3 and N O 3 " treatments and are indicated by the inserted lines. In the N H 4 N O 3 treatment, r= 0.54766 (P< 0.0124); in the N0 " treatment, r= 0.42158 (P< 0.0641) and in the N H treatment, r= 0.09293 (P< 0.6968). When all seedlings are combined, r= 0.08481 (P< 0.6559). (b). In Exp. 2, the correlation coefficients are not significant within any of the treatments. In the N H 4 N O 3 treatment, r= 0.31691 (P< 0.1734); in the N0 " treatment, r= 0.28878 (P< 0.2169) and in the N H treatment, r= -0.09735 (P< 0.6830). When all seedlings are combined, r= 0.40958 (P< 0.0246). I3  I5  +  3  4  3  +  4  53  In Exp. 2, the family patterns were different still. Families 3 and 6 were very light in carbon, but not necessarily so in nitrogen. Family 0 still had the least negative 8 C value for each treatment, but the same did not hold true for A 8 N . The potential effects of the fungal I5  infection could have caused more alterations to the nitrogen stable isotope ratio than to the carbon stable isotope ratio.  II. N- Supply Rate Experiment A . Total biomass and allocation Supplying ammonium in either a steady-state or draw-down method did not affect the total biomass of the seedlings. However within each treatment the family biomass means were significantly different and ranked similarly to Exp. 1 in the N-source experiment (Appendix 3). Again there was not a treatment x family interaction, but there was a treatment x replicate x family interaction indicating that families responded differently to the separate boxes because of unaccounted for factors (Appendix 2, Table 6). After a log transformation of the R:S ratio in the N-supply rate experiment, observations met normality requirements and treatment, family and treatment x replicate x family effects were significant (Appendix 2, Table 7). Mean R:S ratio was higher in the draw-down treatment (draw-down = 0.436, steady-state = 0.261). A Tukey multiple comparison test showed that there were two clusters of R:S ratios, but family 3 was different from all other families and had the lowest R:S (Appendix 3).  B. N U E (C:N ratio) For C:N ratio, N - supply rate experiment data were log transformed to meet normality requirements and treatment, treatment x replicate and family factors were all significant (Appendix 2, Table 8).  Mean C:N ratio for the draw-down treatment (31.563) was higher than  the steady-state treatment (21.743) (Fig.l 1), although the significant treatment x replicate interaction indicates that boxes were not true replicates of one another. Whether or not the replicate difference interacted with the family response could not be tested as it was for biomass and R:S ratio because of a lack of a sampling error. Families ranked similarly to Exp. 1 of the N-source experiments, strengthening the hypothesis that N U E is under genetic control (Figs 2 and 11) (Appendix 3)  54  1.3 ~ 9  e 1.1 "  e8  3 »  1 0 e  9  / / 3  | 0.9 " o 15  lO  5  / 6 / 2«p • 5 7 9  0.7 "  9  X  / / o  6  °o 5  0.5 18.50  21.00  23.50  26.00  28.50  C:N (ng/^g)  31.00  33.50  36.00  Fig. 11. Relationship between total biomass and N U E in the N-supply rate experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. Open circles (o) denote the draw-down treatment and closed circles (•) denote the steady-state treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family. Lines are included where the family correlation was significant. In the steady-state treatment, r= 0.48010 (P< 0.0322); in the draw-down treatment, r= 0.67372 (P< 0.0016).  55  C . Gas exchange measurements Gas exchange measurements were more reliable and accurate for the N-supply rate experiment than for the N-source experiment. Sample size was slightly larger than it had been for the N-source experiment, yet there were fewer statistically significant measured variables. In fact, the only statistically significant variable was the treatment effect on the Cj/C ratio (data not a  shown). Bar graph representations of the data showed similarities between the N-source and N supply rate experiments in the family and treatment responses to treatments (Figs. 4a-d 12a-d).  D. 5 C I 3  Treatment was a significant predictor of 5 C when tested using a pseudo-F. The range of I3  5 C values for each treatment was statistically similar (steady state -29.89 % o to -28.19 % o , 13  draw-down -29.365 % o to -27.735 % o ) , but the mean for the drawdown treatment was less negative than the steady state treatment (dd = -28.778 % o and ss= -29.400%o) (Fig. 13). Error I was not significant and, unlike the N-source experiment^ replicate boxes were highly correlated (<x= 0.02) (Appendix 2, Table 9). Family was also a significant predictor of 5 C when the treatment effect was removed. As in the N-source experiments, family 0 had the least negative 8 C value and the others I3  clustered in the lighter half of the treatment range. A multiple comparison test revealed that this family was the only one that was significantly different from any of the others. The closest followers in the steady state treatment were families 1, 2, 9 and 10, but this order changed in the draw-down treatment where families 2 and 10 switched to the lower range of 8 C values. Families 3, 5 and 6 made up the more negative end of the range in the steady-state treatment, but only family 6 remained at that end in the draw-down treatment (Fig. 13). Although these families clustered in the lower half of the range, this variation in the ranks between treatments was represented in the significant treatment x family interaction.  56  draw-down  steady-state  (c)  draw-down  steady-state  (d)  draw-down  steady-state  draw-down  steady-state  Fig. 1 2 . Treatment and family effects on measured gas exchange parameters in the N-supply rate experiment. Numbers written above each bar in (a) represent the sample size and are the same for each parameter. Each of the bars represents the mean family value for (a) C O 2 assimilation rate, A, (b) stomatal conductance, g , (c) evapotranspiration rate, E, and (d) the ratio of internal C O 2 concentration to ambient C O 2 concentration, Cj/C . The only significant factor was the treatment effect on Cj/C . s  a  a  57  1.3  3 •  «  10 9 •  8  e  1.1  o  g 0.9 o  5  c  3  1®  6 *  10  8  7  o  o  «  6  0.7  o  2  7  o  °  °o  o  5  0  o  0.5 1  -30.00  1  •29.50  1  -29.00  -28.50  1  -28.00  6 C %o 1 3  Fig. 13. Relationship between total biomass and 8 C in the N-supply rate experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. Open circles (o) denote the draw-down treatment and closed circles (•) denote the steady-state treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family. In the steady-state treatment, r = 0.00616 (P< 0.9794); in the draw-down treatment, r = -0.28885 (P< 0.2304). When all seedlings are combined, r = -0.49403 (P< 0.0268). 13  58  E. A8 N 15  Varying the supply rate of NFLt did not affect the A 5 N of the seedlings, nor was there a +  15  treatment x replicate effect (Appendix 2, Table 10). Replicates within treatments were highly correlated (P< 0.01 for steady-state and P< 0.05 for draw-down), and therefore did not overshadow any potential treatment effects. Nine of the ten family A 8 N values in the drawI5  down treatment were within the steady-state treatment range (Fig. 14). The variances of the two treatments were significantly different (a(2) =0.05, F> 4.03), indicating smaller family diversity in the draw-down treatment. Most families became less negative in the draw-down treatment, but this variation could have been within the seedlings' natural range or it could have been treatment induced. Considering that treatments were not significantly different for this trait, it is likely that the variation is within the normal genotypic range. Family A 8 N values were significantly different I5  (Appendix 2. Table 10). Ranking was relatively stable between treatments except for a few families. The A 8 N value for family 0 varied little between treatments. The less negative end I5  of the A 8 N range also contained families 9 and 3 in the steady-state treatment and families 9 I5  and 5 in the draw-down treatment. Although not very dramatic, some of these switches in ranking were very similar to what was seen in the N-source experiment between N H  + 4  and NO3"  (Fig. 8a and 14) (Appendix 3).  F. Biomass versus N U E and 8 C I 3  The family correlation between biomass and N U E was significant and positive for both treatments (Fig.l 1). The spread of family mean C:N ratios in the steady-state treatment seemed to be primarily determined by four points (families 3, 8, 9, and 10), while all others clustered in one area. In the draw-down treatment, mean family values were more evenly dispersed. For the most part, family mean ranking was consistent between the two treatments, but because of the cluster in the steady-state treatment this was difficult to determine. One notable switch was family 9 which changed from having a relatively high biomass and moderate C:N ratio in the steady-state treatment to one of the lower biomasses and C:N ratios in the draw-down treatment. Similar to Exp. 1, families 3 and 10 had high biomasses and high C:N ratios in these treatments as well.  59  Fig. 14. Relationship between total biomass and A 8 N in the N-supply rate experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. Open circles (o) denote the draw-down treatment and closed circles (•) denote the steady-state treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family. Lines are included where the family correlation is significant. In the steady-state treatment, r = 0.44921 (P< 0.0469); in the draw-down treatment, r = 0.0354 (P< 0.8856). When all seedlings are combined, r = 0.03994 (P< 0.8672). I5  60  The correlation between biomass and 5 C was significant on an environmental basis (Fig. 13), but on a family basis, neither regression was significant. Most families were less water-use efficient in the steady-state treatment. Family 0, as in Exp. 1, seemed to heavily influence both correlations, but when this point was removed, neither coefficient was significant. Families maintained their rank for each trait within the treatments, except for family 2 which switched from a high W U E in the steady state treatment to a low W U E in the draw-down treatment.  G . 8 C versus N U E I 3  Unlike in the first two experiments, a significant plastic correlation between 8 C and 13  N U E occurred in these treatments (r= 0.44109, P< = 0.0516) (Fig. 15a). Replicates of the steady-state treatment were not as similar as those of the draw-down treatment in their C:N ratio, but this difference was not large enough to mask a positive correlation between the traits. Although a trade-off between the two traits was expected, instead the environmental differences yielded seedlings with both a high N U E and less negative 5 C (draw-down treatment) or a low 13  1 T  N U E and more negative 8 C (steady-state treatment). A genetic negative correlation did not occur (Fig. 15b). Within the draw-down treatment there was a slight indication of a possible trade-off, but it was not significant (r= -0.2986, P< 0.2143). In the steady-state treatment, the cluster of families in a narrow range of C:N values created a flat line between the two traits. The extreme 8 C values in family 0 were evident 13  again in this experiment. H. Biomass versus A 8 N ,5  Biomass and A8 N were not significantly correlated across the two treatments. Within 1:,  the steady-state treatment, the positive correlation was significant, but the correlation in the draw-down treatment was not (Fig. 14). Treatments appeared to have a substantial effect on the family rank for each trait. Fig. 14 indicated that the changes in families 3, 5, 9, and 10 between treatments were the greatest effectors for this switch from a positive to a negative correlation between treatments. Family 9 had a less negative A 8 N value, but was one of the largest I5  61  (a) o  32 "  ^28" rL  "SD 3.  2  CJ  24 ' • 20 " I  -29.60  -29.40  -29.20  -28.80  -29.00  5 C (%o) 13  (b)  10 o  35 6 o  3 o 5 °  2  _ 30" cn 3. "so  7  1 9 o  3_  Z  e  3 0  25-  "* e7 8 •  20 " -30.00  10  J • 9 -29.50  i>  e  •  2  -29.00  -28.50  -28.00  5 C (%o) 13  Fig. 15. Correlations between N U E and 8 C on (a) environmental and (b) family bases in the N-supply rate experiment. Symbols represent the average of (a) all seedlings in each treatment box and (b) all eight seedlings of that family in all treatment boxes. Open circles (o) denote the draw-down treatment and closed circles (•) denote the steady-state treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family. Lines are included where the correlation is significant, (a) The correlation coefficient using both treatments is r = 0.44109 (P< 0.0516). (b) In the steady-state treatment, r = 0.04576 (P< 0.8481) and in the draw-down treatment, r= -0.29858 (P< 0.2143). I3  62  families in the steady-state treatment and one of the smallest families in the draw-down treatment. Family 5 maintained its biomass ranking between treatments, but changed its isotope ranking from high to low. Families 10 and 3 also maintained their biomass rankings, but changed from being very heavy in the steady-state treatment to being very light in the draw13  down treatment. Family 0 which always stood out as being very heavy, both in  15  C and N ,  again was very heavy in this experiment, but also had a very low biomass in both treatments. I. N U E versus A 5 N I5  C:N ratio and A 8 N were significantly correlated on an environmental basis but not |5  within either of the treatments (Fig. 16).  The positive environmental correlation was significant  at the P< 0.0697 level, indicating that treatments which yield lower nitrogen contents are also isotopically heavier. The steady-state treatment showed absolutely no correlation because of the consistency of family C:N ratios within the treatment. Fig. 16 indicated that the correlation in the draw-down treatment was opposite that of the environmental correlation and families which had a high N U E had a relatively greater proportion of the lighter N isotope.  J. 8 C versus A 8 N I 3  ,5  There was a positive relationship between 8 C and A 8 N across and within treatments. 13  15  Between treatments the range of A 8 N values was broader for the steady-state treatment I5  (variances were significantly different). Fig. 17 indicated that families grown with a steady-state supply of N H / spread out more evenly in both 8 C and A 8 N values, whereas families 13  repeatedly starved of N H  + 4  15  tended to cluster in a more narrow range of A 8 N values. Only 15  families 0, 5, 6 and 9 were separate from the group. Most families became heavier in both C and N stable isotopes when grown under the draw-down conditions. Although the values became more positive, the magnitude of this change was different for each trait for each seedling. Families 0, 2, 3, and 10 did not follow this same pattern. Family 2 became lighter in its carbon isotope composition. Families 0, 3 and 10 became heavier in C but lighter in N. This backwards movement of the families reduced the A 8 N range in the draw-down treatment. I5  63  35  30 SO it 00  25  20  -3.00  -2.50  -2.00  -1.50 A5  1 5  -1.00 -0.50  0.00  N (%o)  Fig. 16. Relationship between C:N ratio and A 6 N in the N-supply rate experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. Open circles (o) denote the draw-down treatment and closed circles (•) denote the steady-state treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family. In the steady-state treatment, r = 0.1115 (P< 0.6399); in the draw-down treatment, r = -0.3849 (P< 0.1036). When all seedlings are combined, r = 0.4139 (P< 0.0697). I5  64  Fig. 17. Relationship between 8 C and A 5 N in the N-supply rate experiment. Symbols represent the average of 16 seedlings for each family within each treatment. Open circles (o) denote the draw-down treatment and closed circles (•) denote the steady-state treatment. The numbers beside each point represent the family. Lines are included where the family correlation is significant. In the steady-state treatment, r = 0.4429 (P< 0.0505); in the draw-down treatment, r = -0.4199 (P< 0.0735). When all seedlings are combined, r = 0.5673 (P< 0.0091). I3  I5  65  III. N Depletion Experiment I5  When the concentration of N H  + 4  was calculated from the measured ug of N found on  each of the discs it frequently differed by sometimes twice as much from the molarity calculated using the phenolhypochlorite assay. The differences were greatest at the extremes of the range, concentrations greater than 200 uM or less than 20 uM. Although the differences between expected molarity and actual molarity at the extremes may have been related to the concentration procedure using the flash evaporator, it is more likely that these concentrations were beyond limits of accurate detection using the assay. The concentrations used in Fig. 18 were calculated from the elemental analyzer values divided by the sample volume. Fig. 18 indicates that the media 8 N became more positive as N H 15  + 4  was removed from  the solution in the draw-down treatment. In Fig. 18b, D, as calculated in equation 7, is plotted over the range of concentrations between sampling periods. The regression through the means of each of the concentration ranges is linear and significant. In the steady-state treatment, the data was not as conclusive and it appeared that the media was becoming heavier although the concentration was staying the same. This would be expected for a certain amount of time, after which point the proportion of 8 N in the 15  hydroponics media should plateau to equal the discrimination against it. Because the steadystate treatment was only sampled on two subsequent days, it is unknown whether the 8 N of the 15  media ever reached this plateau (Box c 8 N= 23.19 % o and 19.71 % o , Box d 8 N = 6.11 % o and I5  15  14.44 % o , on Sept. 30 and Oct. 1, respectively).  66  (a) 14 12 10 -  "1 z  "co  8 6  m  4 2• 0 50  100  150  200  250  [NH ] (uM) +  4  (b)  50  100  150  200  250  [NH ] (uM) +  4  Fig. 18. N depletion from hydroponics boxes, (a) The 13 points represent 3-4 samples taken from the two replicate boxes in the draw-down treatment (c and d) on two subsequent days (Sept. 30 and Oct. 1). The regression line is significant at the ct(2) =0.05, R = 0.9628 (b) Relationship between discrimination (D) and [NH ] in the boxes. Each of the lines represents the discrimination that occurred between the two points of sampling. The regression is significant at the <x(2) =0.05, R = 0.497 I 5  2  +  4  2  67  DISCUSSION I. N - Source Experiments A. Effects on individual traits 1. Environmental and genetic control of morphological traits Typically in conifers, and frequently in plants growing on acidic soils, ammonium fertilization yields a higher biomass than nitrate fertilization (van den Driessche, 1971; Etter, 1972; Krajina et al., 1973; Bigg and Daniel, 1978; Scheromm et al., 1988; Marschner et al., 1991; Bedell et al., 1999), although this difference can often be quite small. Since the 1970's, researchers have tried to distinguish what causes this difference in yield. Studies on uptake have shown that N H  + 4  is taken up much more readily than NO3" (Kronzucker et al., 1997), but whether  or not greater biomass follows from uptake or if there are other physiological effects on whole plant metabolism associated with N-preference has not been clarified. Differentiating between uptake, assimilation and allocation and the effects of N-demand on each of these cannot be done by simply looking at biomass. Growth response in conjunction with measures of sink strength and allocation, such as photosynthetic rate, C:N ratio or R:S ratio, can help to elucidate the mechanism for greater biomass. The results of these experiments are similar to previous studies. Highest growth yield was achieved in the N H  treatments, followed closely by the NH4NO3 treatment and then the  + 4  NO3" treatment (Fig. 1). In the NH4NO3 treatments, N H  + 4  was depleted on a daily basis despite  increasing pump rates and manual addition of N H . Conversely, the N0 " concentration +  4  3  continued to increase as NH N03 was pumped into the hydroponics boxes. By the end of a one 4  week period, the NO3" concentration could reach over 100 uM (two times the intended 50 uM), yet N H  + 4  was still being depleted. This indicates either N H  uptake preference for N H  + 4  inhibition of NO3" uptake and/or an  + 4  (Gessler et al., 1998; Kronzucker et al., 1999). Distinguishing  between these two possibilities is difficult without knowing the uptake rates of each of the ions. Kamminga-van Wijk and Prins (1993) presented more concrete evidence of NO3" inhibition in Douglas-fir by calculating the change in V  m a x  and K for N0 " when supplied alone or in an m  NH NC>3 solution. Under NO3" nutrition, the K and the V 4  m  3  m a x  were 17 uM and 5 umol/g root dry  weight, respectively. In an NH N03 solution, uptake decreased so much that the K and the 4  V  m a x  m  could not be calculated (Kamminga-van Wijk et al., 1993). Gessler et al. (1998) found that  68  inhibition of NO3" uptake in spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees correlated with an enhancement of the concentration of primary amino compounds involved in N H assimilation (Glu, Asp and Gin). They did not measure the K and V m  m a x  + 4  of NO3" uptake of  seedlings fed both NO3" and NH4NO3 solutions and have presumed that decreased uptake (as compared to N H  + 4  uptake) is due to inhibition and N H  preference. These two cases present  + 4  evidence of NO3" uptake inhibition, but whether or not it occurred in my experiments is unknown. In Exp. 2, biomasses were again similar for the N H  + 4  and NH4NO3 treatments, but all  biomasses appeared smaller than in Exp. 1. Presumably this reflects the damage of either the fungus or the fungicide. Fungal effects could have been through the prevention of nutrient uptake by mucilage covering the roots, by utilization of carbohydrates produced by the plant or by simply damaging plant roots. Benomyl, the fungicide used, also could have inhibited growth through side effects on the plant. The chlorophyll fluorescence data indicate that these plants were stressed. Possibly because of these effects, there was no significant difference between the mean biomass in each of the treatments (Fig. lb). Biomass allocation to subterranean versus aerial parts of the plant has also been attributed to differing types of nutrient stress. When plants are nitrogen or water limited, a larger proportion of the net carbon production is apportioned to root growth (Chapin, 1980; Birk et al., 1986; Bailey, 1999; Traore and Maranville, 1999). This increases the root surface area for absorption and allows roots to tap into new nutrient sources. Unlike biomass, mean R:S ratio was not significantly different in each of the treatments. Although Fig.l indicates that R:S ratio was highest in the NO3" treatment and lowest in the N H  + 4  treatment, statistical limitations such as  low degrees of freedom and dissimilarity of the replicates may have prevented detection of significant differences. The implication of treatment differences in R:S ratio is that NO3" fertilization resulted in a certain level of N limitation. Because the seedlings were not able to take up as much nitrogen, proportionally more biomass was allocated to root growth and less to leaf area. Increased allocation to root growth can also cause an increase in respiration as compared to photosynthesis (Ibrahim et al., 1998). This increase in respiration combined with less leaf area for photosythate production could lead to a decreased biomass. Genotypic control of plant response to nutrition has been noted for various species since the 1930's: multiple species survey (Harvey, 1939), pine (Li et al., 1991), rice (Tirol-Padre et  69  al., 1996), sorghum (Traore et al., 1999) and peanut (Virgona et al., 1990). It is not surprising that the ten white spruce families used in these experiments showed genetic control of biomass and R:S ratio in each of the three N sources (Fig. 2). The consistency of family rank between treatments and the lack of a g x e interaction indicates that treatments did not affect the families differently. If the treatment effects on biomass were primarily through uptake capacity of N0 " 3  and N H / , consistency in family ranking suggests that genetic control is not independent for the two N-sources. The implication is that families with enhanced ability to acquire N H  + 4  are also  better at acquiring NO3" and genotypic control of uptake and utilization capacity (where utilization capacity includes N demand and allocation) would apply to both N-sources. Alternatively, the consistency of rank and lack of a g x e interaction could indicate that physiological processes independent of nutrition are more important in determining growth rate differences.  2. Environmental and genetic control of N U E Trends in plant N U E in response to treatment were as expected based on reported differences in N-uptake between N sources (Kronzucker et al., 1996). Although it appeared as though the mean C:N ratio was highest in the NO3" treatment and lowest in the N H  + 4  treatment,  there was no significant treatment effect (Fig. 1). This was likely due to statistical limitations caused by the low number of replicates. Treatment effects were calculated using a pseudo-F test which removes Error 1, the treatment x family interaction and Error 2, but reduces the degrees of freedom to 2/3. The low degrees of freedom decrease the likelihood of finding a significant difference between treatments. In addition, the significant replicate effect, although it was removed from the statistical test, produced differences that may have overshadowed treatment effects in this experiment. Statistical reasons may explain the lack of a significant treatment effect, but there could also be distinct physiological effects of each of the N-sources that may alter the NUE. Outside of the N H  + 4  preference indicated in these experiments, there may have been  differing physiological responses to the two N-sources. Evaluating whether or not N-source caused significant differences in assimilation or allocation may allow treatment effects to be simplified to high and low N. N U E can be altered by changing either C or N quantities in the plant. N-source could potentially affect either of these two parameters through 1) internal pH  70  changes, 2) the bioenergetic costs of the NO3" reduction steps or 3) the regulation of the associated assimilating enzymes. Internal pH is regulated by the biochemical pH stat and through efflux of ions. The biochemical pH stat, which is likely to be most active when plants are well fertilized with one N form, adjusts the pH by the addition and removal of carboxylic acids (Raven et al., 1976). These experiments were designed to create N-stress situations, so it is unlikely that the two N-sources caused internal pH differences great enough to change the balance of carboxylic acids. More likely is the possibility that ions were effluxed into the hydroponics media. Marschner et al. (1991) used the increasing pH of the medium that supplied NH4NO3 fertilizer to the roots of Norway spruce trees to indicate when seedlings switched from NH  + 4  uptake to NO3" uptake. They proposed that soil pH changes could affect the uptake of  other mineral ions, thereby causing a nutrient deficiency (Marschner et al., 1986; Marschner et al., 1991). The buffering capacity of the added C a C 0 should have mediated any N-uptake 3  inhibition caused by external pH in these experiments.  Thus, internal pH changes associated  with N-source should not have significantly affected either C or N levels in the seedlings. Energetic costs of NO3" reduction depend on the location of N assimilation, light availability, and NO3" uptake capacity. In conifers, where the majority of NO3" reduction occurs in the root, reductant and ATP for N assimilation are derived from mitochondrial respiration. Although this may decrease the net plant carbon gain per gram of nitrogen taken up (decreased NUE), it would only be a significant cost if seedlings were removing NO3" rapidly from the medium (Smirnoff et al., 1985). At the low N-concentrations used in this study the proportional energetic costs of NO3" assimilation would be balanced by N uptake limitations and total carbon cost would be no greater than for NhL^ assimilation. On a genotypic basis, however, families with a higher A lower A  m a x  .  m a x  may be able to provide more energy for NO3" reduction than families with a  In this way, genotypic differences in N U E within treatments may be influenced by  differences in A  m a x  .  The effects of the two N sources on N assimilating enzymes were not investigated in this experiment. Published data are variable and are affected by light quantity, N-source and the distribution of assimilating activity between NR, the two isoforms of GS, and G D H (Vezina et al., 1988; Knoepp et al., 1993; Truax et al., 1994). Without having analyzed the enzyme activity in either of my treatments, it is difficult to say how differences in enzyme activity may have contributed to the lack of treatment differences in C:N ratio.  71  A fourth possibility, potentially unrelated to N-source, would be an increase in C proportionally greater than the treatment induced N increase. This could occur if an increase in g increased A or if there was increased allocation of leaf N to photosynthesis away from s  structural or defense compounds (Fig. 19). In this scenario, a positive environmental correlation would be expected between N U E and biomass. This correlation was not found in the N-source experiments (Fig. 2). Regarding each of the four possibilities mentioned, it would seem that differences in N U E (and subsequently biomass and R:S ratio) were dominated by differences in uptake capacity of NO3" and N H / seen previously in white spruce. The lack of a significant treatment effect was most likely due to statistical limitations and the unaccounted for replicate effect. Once the nitrogen had entered the plant, it is assumed that assimilation of the two ions did not alter physiology other than by bringing about differences in tissue N concentration. The assumptions regarding genetic control of N U E rely on the fact that these treatments achieved their desired effect, creating low N environments where the limiting growth factor was nitrogen. In the study after which this one is modeled (Livingston et al., 1999), C:N ratios of seedlings in both low and high N fertilization treatments were above 45. Not one of the family mean C:N ratios in any of the treatments in this experiment was above 45, but these were 4 month old seedlings rather than 2 year old seedlings. At two years, proportionally more carbon is invested in non-photosynthesizing structures which increases the apparent N U E (Raven and Farquhar, 1990). Despite a seemingly low C:N ratio, these seedlings appeared nitrogen stressed; i.e., the seedlings were chlorotic or developed red pigmentation. Based on these visual cues and that N was the most limiting nutrient supplied by a factor of approximately 10, it appeared that the low N-concentrations in the media produced the desired N-stress. Genetic control of N U E , as seen with these seedlings, can be divided into four components: uptake capacity, assimilation capacity, allocation and growth-driven demand (Fig. 19). The effect of each of these components on measured parameters can be predicted if all other components are not limiting or do not vary (Table 2). For example, genotypes with a high uptake capacity should also have a high growth rate, low N U E , more positive 5 C and more 13  negative 8 N . In reality, such predictions may not hold because of the relative contribution of 15  the other three components and the changing prioritization of components of N U E with the environment. The table is presented as a framework to focus the discussion and summarize the  72  C/3  +->  o  cu  c  .2 c O C  OH  c -l-> o o d  C-M <D T3  CD  cu at  T3  c fi S « C  e i>  -  C3 cd g  o  o .5 fi  c3  CU  i  fio  o  o l  l  <*i  52  g & *  X  _  cj  .fi 2 <  d  > O  o  T3 fi CO  °3  fi  53 fi  fi c*-i cu  C o  o <u —  s ^c 4-*  —  S cs  §  «3  T3 fi <U fi  -O  O  Io  <U 03 s-i  o 00  00  o J3 00 o fi o 00  s  bi) J3 03 *•' O T3  „ g  S .2 to 4) -fi  X>  fa  a. S  M-H  t  —c  03  CU  -4—»  ob.s o—1 •—1 1  fa  OH  o  low uptake capacity high uptake capacity low growth rate high growth rate high N U E low N U E more -ve 8 C (low WUE) more +ve 5 C (high WUE) more +ve 8 N more -ve 8 N Differences in N assimilation low assimilation capacity high assimilation capacity high growth rate low growth rate high N U E low N U E 13 more -ve 8 C more +ve 8 C more -ve 8 N more +ve 8 N ;ncesin N" allocation' at leaf le;\ el low allocation to Ps high allocation to Ps low growth rate high growth rate low N U E high N U E more -ve 8 C more +ve 8 C more -ve 8 N more +ve 8 N 13  I5  13  I5  I3  15  I5  •  I3  I3  15  I5  ~~ 1  low growth rate low N U E more -ve 8 C 13  15>  more -ve 8 N  high growth rate high N U E more +ve 8 C more +ve 8 N 13  15  Table 2. Expected genotype response in measured variables due to differences in the various components of N U E (uptake, assimilation, allocation and demand/ growth rate).  74  expected isolated effects of each of the components on measured parameters. Most genotypes exist between the extremes of high and low and likely vary in more than one component. Rank maintenance of N U E indicates that control of NO3" and N H / uptake is correlated, in which case treatment effects are reduced to high and low nitrogen. Unfortunately, there are no other genetic studies on N U E in conifers which test genetic control by placing genotypes in differing N source treatments.  Most studies in conifers, and few in crop plants, that have  investigated N U E using genotypes as a factor have used high and low levels of fertilization; pumpkin (Tan and Hogan, 1995), pine (Li et al., 1991), spruce (Livingston et al., 1999), rice (Tirol-Padre et al., 1996). Only in sorghum were differing N sources tested, and a g x e interaction was evident in two of four genotypes tested (Traore et al., 1999). A g x e interaction was not evident in these experiments, supporting the conclusions regarding control of the uptake carriers drawn from rank maintenance.  3. Environmental and genetic control of WUE Neither of the two measures of water-use efficiency that were employed showed very clear effects of N-source. Treatments affected the instantaneous measure, Cj/C , but not the a  13  long-term measure, 8 C (Fig. 3d and 4). The absence of a treatment effect could be due to small degrees of freedom and the replicate effect, or it may be real. The results are surprising considering that in a previous study using both high and low N treatments and nine of the same families, these two measures of WUE were highly correlated and N fertilization significantly affected A and 8 C (Livingston et al., 1999). Other possible explanations for this discrepancy 13  between the two studies are that treatments were not extreme enough to cause an effect on W U E or that there were unexpected environmental effects of hydroponics. The N H  + 4  treatments were expected to affect gas exchange by increasing the rate of C O 2  fixation. The preference for NFL; would provide more N for Rubsico and other proteins, thereby +  increasing A (Evans, 1989; Brown et al., 1996). This was not evident in the study possibly because at such low N-concentrations the treatments were not different enough to significantly alters (Fig. 3). Patterson (1994) also did not find significant differences in A in white spruce when fertilized with high (5.6 mM) and low (0.6 mM) levels of N when seedlings were wellwatered. Under draughted conditions, A was significantly reduced in the low-N treatment.  75  Watering, and perhaps more so, hydroponics, could alter the N-source effect through g . s  If plants operate within a consistent range of Cj, then increases in the A should also increase the g (Wong et al., s  1979).  with N-fertilization  m a x  In a study on sunflowers, Virgona and Farquhar  (1996)  found that N-limitation had greater effects on genotypic variation in A than g . Toft et al.  (1989)  found the opposite in four species of cold desert shrubs and grasses. Fertilizing increased  s  the quantity of Rubisco, but g decreased and A was kept constant (Toft et al., s  1989).  In a third  study that used hydroponics, fertilization increased A but not as much as g (Ranjith and s  Meinzer,  1997).  The results from the N-source experiments are more like the third example, g  increased with N H  + 4  s  fertilization, but A was constant (Fig. 3). This supports the hypothesis that  hydroponics might create a situation different from the expected whereby g overcame treatment s  effects on A  m a x  .  The effect of the fungus on the majority of the gas exchange data can also not be ignored. If the fungus and subsequent loss of roots or root function caused a perceived drought even though the plants were in hydroponics, this could have had a more substantial effect than either N-source. The range of C j / C values was similar to that of the non-irrigated seedlings in a  Livingston et al. (1999) and the assimilation rates were similar to assimilation rates found in non-irrigated white spruce seedlings found in Patterson et al.  (1997).  in the NO3" treatment may indicate a fungal preference for NO3".  The significantly lower g  s  If the fungus grew better on a  NO3" substrate, then the seedlings in both the NH4NO3 and NO3" treatment boxes would be more droughted and have a lower g than the N H s  + 4  treatment (Fig. 3b). This would result in a  relatively larger decrease in E than A, but also a decrease in C j / C (Fig. 3c and d). a  Family differences may also be a reflection of fungal tolerance or resistance rather than family response to intended treatments. Family means were not significantly different in A, but family 3 was significantly different from the others in both g and E. This difference in g in the s  NH  + 4  s  treatment may have been the sole reason for the treatment differences in these two  parameters. Although it was not visually obvious, family 3 may not have been as infected as the others and because of an inherent N H  preference was healthier and suffered less damage from  + 4  the fungus in treatments containing N H . This interpretation is consistent with its exceptionally +  4  large biomass in the N H  + 4  treatment (Fig. 2b), and with the very negative 8 C values in all 1 3  treatments (Fig. 4b). Family 3 could have perceived less drought and had higher g because of a s  less limited water supply, which reduced both the instantaneous and long term WUE.  76  Similar to gas exchange, N-sources should not have differing effects on the C stable isotope composition of these plants other than by providing more or less N for photosynthetic machinery. The prediction was that the N H / preference in uptake would provide more nitrogen to the seedlings than the NO3" treatment, causing a higher WUE. The statistical and physiological explanations used for lack of significance in treatment effects on C:N ratio can also be applied here. Statistically, the low degrees of freedom available for the pseudo-F test may have limited the detection of significance between treatments. In addition, the significant difference between replicates compounded the statistical limitations of the low degrees of freedom. Physiologically, the N concentration fed to the plants may have been too low for both N-sources to cause a treatment effect on 8 C. 13  If the treatment N concentrations were higher,  possibly the disparity in uptake capabilities for the two N-forms would cause a greater difference inC:N ratio and 5 C . 13  There was, however, a significant genetic effect on 8 C . The graph of family ranks (Fig. I3  4) indicates that most families maintained their rank through most treatments in both experiments. Families that were most water-use efficient in the N H / treatment were also the most water-use efficient in the NO3" treatment. There were some rank changes between treatments, but these were not large enough to yield a significant interaction effect in the ANOVA.  Maintenance of rank implies either coordinated genetic control of N uptake between  N-sources, or that other processes not investigated in this study play a larger role in determining differences in WUE. Based on the previous data (Livingston et al., 1999) and established theory (Farquhar et al., 1982), it was expected that gas exchange data and stable carbon isotope composition would be concurrent indicators of WUE. After completing both Exp. 1 and 2, it was apparent that correlation between Cj/C and 5 C would be unlikely because of the small number of families I3  a  used in gas exchange and the substantial weight of the fungal infected experiment on the data set. The strong influence of family 3 may have been the sole basis for treatment differences in Cj/C . When the other seven families were included in 8 C analysis, this influence may have 13  a  been dampened and treatments appeared more similar. If the effect of the fungus interacted with treatment effects through a NO3" preference, then the NO3" treatment would yield the highest WUE (low Cj/C and less negative 8 C). But when the fungus was not present, the N H / I3  a  77  treatment should have yielded the highest WUE. These contradictory effects could have prevented agreement between C j / C and S C between the two experiments. 1 3  a  B. Effects of correlated traits 1. Biomass versus 8 C I3  Both positive and negative environmental correlations between biomass and 8 C can I 3  occur, depending on treatment effects. Typically, a positive correlation occurs when treatments cause greater variation in A  m a x  than g (e.g. N treatments) (Sun et al., 1996; Virgona et al., 1996; s  Patterson et al., 1997; Livingston et al., 1999). The negative correlation occurs when A  m a x  varies  less than g (e.g. irrigation or elevation treatments) (Holowachuk, 1993; Zhang et al., 1994; s  Aitken et al., 1995; Sun et al., 1996). The intent in using hydroponics was to minimize drought effects on g and vary A s  m a x  by changing the N treatment. The lack of environmental correlation  between biomass and 8 C (Fig. 6) indicates that either hydroponics did not achieve the goal of 1 3  keeping g relatively constant or that treatment differences were not as distinct as planned. s  13  Based on the fact that there were no significant treatment effects on N U E , A  m a x  or 8 C , it would  seem that the lack of correlation between biomass and 8 C was because of the similarity in 1 3  treatments or dissimilarity of replicates. Families were significantly different in both biomass and 8 C for both experiments, yet 1 3  the two variables were not correlated within any treatment (Fig. 6). As with the environmental correlation, a positive genetic correlation between the two traits relies on genetic variation in A  m a x  - This was not evident in the three families tested for gas exchange. Wong et al. (1979)  proposed that within limits, g is determined by A s  m a  x-  This connection between g and A s  m a x  has  appeared repeatedly when plants are grown in soil (Field et al., 1983; Sage et al., 1987; DeLucia et al., 1991; Meinzer et al., 1992), and in hydroponics (Ranjith et al., 1997). If fertilization 13  directly affects stomatal control, in addition to its effect on A  n  ,ax,  family differences in 8 C may  reflect stomatal responses. Genetic determination of stomatal sensitivity to N treatments could 13  cause variation from the predicted positive correlation between biomass and 8 C . Alternatively, there may be an unaccounted for reaction to hydroponics that has altered the normal family correlation.  78  2. Biomass versus NUE Correlations between biomass and N U E yielded predicted results on both environmental and family bases. The negative environmental correlation between biomass and N U E in both Exp. 1 and 2 (Fig. 2) shows that seedlings produced a higher biomass on treatments which provided higher internal N concentrations. If the two traits are negatively correlated, uptake preference has presumably determined N U E by increasing internal N more than C. If the correlation were positive, one N-source would have to result in greater C accumulation per unit N. This would only occur if the N-source caused allocation of proportionally more N to photosynthesis or other growth demand (Fig. 19). Family correlations in Exp. 1 were positive but in Exp. 2, where the fungal influence may have altered uptake capacity for the families, correlations were not as clear. A positive correlation may indicate family differences in A ax which cause a proportionally greater increase m  in C per unit N (Table 2). The strength of the correlation may be mediated by an N-source preference. Under the NO3" treatment, efficient allocation to C assimilating proteins may be a priority. When N is plentiful, as in N H / fertilization, more N can be stored (e.g. luxury consumption) or allocated elsewhere and the correlation between N U E and biomass is not as clear. Thus, unlike the environmental correlation where N-source uptake preference determines the relationship, the genotypic correlation may depend on both uptake and utilization (Table 2).  3. NUE versus WUE There are many studies that have shown an environmental trade-off between W U E and N U E (Field et al., 1983; Sage et al., 1987; Reich et al., 1989; DeLucia et al., 1991; van den Boogaard et al., 1995; Patterson et al., 1997; Livingston et al., 1999). The theory behind the trade-off is sound as long as certain correlative steps are satisfied. If one of those steps is not satisfied, then the trade-off is no longer apparent. The first required step is that fertilization will increase A of the plants. There was no evidence that this occurred when the 10 families of white spruce were fed with varying forms of nitrogen in hydroponics (Fig. 3a). Without this correlation, it is difficult to discuss the effects of increased A on the plastic W U E of the seedlings. A second possibility, which would obviate any potential environmental trade-off, could occur in situations where one of the resources is so plentiful that its effect is null. For example,  79  in hydroponics, the plentiful supply of water may change the typical response of stomata to the environment. Abundant water may allow greater g , permitting free exchange of carbon isotopes s  1 3 ' '  13  and 5 Cwould approach that of fractionation at Rubisco plus source 8 C, or about -37 %o. This did not occur, indicating that there were stomatal limitations to carbon fixation. After conducting multiple experiments which altered g independently of A s  m a x  , Wong et al. (1985)  concluded that g may respond not to Q , but to a metabolite of photosynthesis (Wong et al., s  1985). If this response was enhanced because of hydroponics, it may have contributed to the lack of correlation in Exp. 1 (Fig. 7a). In Exp. 2, although it is not significant, the slope of the regression line is negative (Fig. 7b). If less negative 8 C values reflect drought imposed by the fungus or the Benomyl, despite I3  being in hydroponics, then a decrease in g would contribute to the trade-off. The NH4" " 1  s  treatment would have provided more N for assimilation and therefore a higher WUE. The similar C:N ratios between the two experiments indicate that the seedlings were able to recover after the fungus had been killed, but the 8 C signature that had been developed was still present. I3  The indication of a trade-off in this experiment implies that resource use efficiency trade-offs will occur only when the variation in environment incorporates both stresses. In Livingston et al. (1999), if the treatments are separated into irrigated and dryland, the negative correlation seen in the dryland treatments no longer exists within the irrigated treatment between nitrogen stressed and fertilized treatments. A third factor to consider is the allocational differences that are incorporated when C:N ratio is used as the index of NUE. Under N H V fertilization, luxury consumption would not contribute to improving the plastic W U E response. If luxury consumption is responsible for the decreased slope between biomass and N U E in the N H / treatment (Fig. 2a), then a higher W U E would not be concomitant with this treatment. It may have been more informative to have used the instantaneous measure of N U E , A /Nieaf against the instantaneous measure of W U E , A/E. max  There was also not an inherent family trade-off between the two resource-use efficiencies. Although there is genotypic control of each of the traits, a genotypic trade-off between the two may not occur for various reasons. If families differ much in their allocational patterns both in biomass allocation and in allocation of N to particular processes other than photosynthesis, then a trade-off may not be visible (Table 2). Secondly, families may differ in their stomatal responses to environmental cues, and these differences may have greater influence 80  over WUE than does internal N quantity. Genetic differences in g were seen between family 3 s  and families 7 and 1 in the experiment infected by fungi but data is not available for healthy seedlings. This genetic difference may be a result of fungal resistance and not enhanced WUE, except that the low 5 C value for family 3 in all treatments supports high stomatal conductance I3  and high Cj/C . Nonetheless, A a  m a x  was not significantly different for the three families,  indicating that at the genetic level, multiple variables can confound the potential trade-off.  C. Effects on A 8 N 15  1. Environmental and genetic effects on A 8 N I5  The use of stable nitrogen isotopes at natural abundance levels as a tool to understand the uptake and metabolism of nitrogen is still a relatively new field. The data that has come from these experiments has shown that there is a possibility to use A 8 N , in conjunction with other I5  measures, to illustrate differences in N uptake and utilization as it relates to varying N sources and varying families. Of all traits or variables measured in these experiments, only A 8 N I5  showed significant treatment and family differences, as well as a significant g x e interaction. This indicates that it may be a reliable and sensitive variable to use when analyzing certain facets of N nutrition. By removing the 8 N value of the salts from each of the seedling values, the remaining I5  treatment effect is due only to differences in the physiological reaction to NO3" versus N H . +  4  One easy means to explain this difference would be to presume that the initial enzymes responsible for each type of N assimilation discriminate to a greater or lesser extent. Discrimination against  l 3  N in the nitrate reductase reaction is 15 %o (Ledgard et al., 1985) and  for glutamine synthetase (GS) the discrimination factor is 16.5 %o (Yoneyama et al., 1993). The 1 % o difference between these two enzymes may not be significant and is much less than the differences between the NO3" and N H  + 4  treatments seen in this study. Therefore, enzymatic  differences in discrimination can not account for the patterns observed. A second possibility relates to influx and efflux analysis. Kronzucker et al. (1997) discovered through using radioisotope tracers that the storage capacity for NO3" in white spruce in both the cell-wall free space and the cytoplasm of the roots is five to eight fold lower than for N H . A small storage capacity implies that NO3" which is not immediately assimilated by N R is +  4  quickly effluxed back out of the root (Fig. 19). Knoepp et al. (1993), in studying assimilating  81  enzymes in western hemlock, realized that N R activity under NO3" fertilization is less than 1/2000 of GS activity in either NO3" or N H . At such low rates of assimilation, it is possible +  4  that NR is limiting N acquisition for the plant. NO3" is taken into the root, but because NR is saturated, the internal NO3" pool is able to remain closer to isotopic equilibrium with the outside pool (i.e. the lighter isotope is preferred whereas the heavier isotope has a better chance of efflux). Although NO3" fertilization can be considered a stress treatment, it does not confer a heavier isotope signature because of the limitations of nitrate reductase activity and the inability to store large quantities of internal NO3" prevent The N H  + 4  1 5  N accumulation.  and NH4NO3 treatments are similar in Exp. 1 because of more rapid uptake  and assimilation of N H  + 4  versus NO3" in the NFL1NO3 treatment. Because N H  + 4  was consistently  resupplied in the NH4NO3 treatment, the proportion of N assimilation as NO3" was much smaller than it was in the NO3" treatment. In Exp. 2, A 8 N values from the NH4NO3 treatment are 15  confounded by the fact that a 50:50 ratio of N H the treatment boxes to raise the N H  + 4  + 4  to NO3" was maintained by pipetting N H  + 4  into  concentration without raising the NO3" concentration.  Because of the pipetting in of NH salt, with a different 8 N value than the NH4NO3, an exact +  15  4  value for the source 8 N could not be computed (Fig.5). 15  The demonstration of genotypic differences in stable N isotope signature is quite novel. Genotypic control was first shown in barley under salt stress treatments (Handley et al., 1997) and has subsequently been shown with N and water stress treatments (Robinson et al., 2000). In Exp. 1, most of the 10 families maintained their approximate A 8 N rank in the three different N 15  sources despite a few interactions with treatment (Fig. 5). The substantial rank change of families 2 and 9 may have contributed to the significant g x e interaction. Family differences were also apparent in Exp. 2, but the ranking was less clear. Again this could be a result of the fungal interaction with uptake capacity. Nonetheless, in both experiments it is presumed that the differences in A 8 N were a result of family differences in the ratio of efflux to influx. 15  2. Correlations with biomass, N U E and 8 C 13  Proposed theories for explaining treatment and family effects are more meaningful if they support correlations between traits. The simplest trait to use to understand A 8 N is biomass. 15  The plastic response to N-source treatments was that bigger, N H  + 4  or NH NC«3 grown seedlings 4  accumulated more of the heavy isotope (Fig. 8). Previously, the trade-off between biomass and  82  N U E was attributed to an N-source preference in uptake for N H , which in turn, provided more +  4  N for growth. N-source preference in uptake alone does not fully explain the correlation with A8 N. If the initial assimilating enzyme represents the sink for N , then NFL;"" was not only taken I:,  1  up more quickly but was also assimilated more rapidly at a rate approaching uptake (i.e. efflux/influx would be lower) (Fig. 19). These two factors yielded seedlings with greater biomass and more positive A 5 N values than seedlings in the NO3" treatment. I5  The genetic correlation between biomass and A 8 N was more variable than the 15  environmental correlation. In Exp. 1 the negative correlation in the NO3" treatment and the positive correlation in the N H  + 4  treatment were both significant (Fig. 8a). If differences in A 8 N 15  are determined more by N demand and assimilation than by uptake per se, then family correlations within treatments should all be positive. On the other hand, if uptake capacity is variably limiting, as it may be for NO3", the efflux/influx ratio will be low and A 8 N will 15  correlate negatively with biomass (Table 2). In both Exp. 1 and Exp. 2, the environmental correlation between the C:N ratio and A8 N was negative (Fig. 9). In the paper previously mentioned (see Literature Review IV.A) on Lv  the stress response of barley genotypes (Robinson et al., 2000), decreased 8 N from both 15  drought and N-starvation was attributed to a loss of N-enriched organic N . If the NO3" 15  treatment created a higher degree of N-stress, then these results agree with Robinson et al. Alternatively, if the lighter stable isotope composition in the NO3" treatment was a result of a lower uptake, storage and assimilation capacities, loss of organic N would not seem to be a major contributor to plant 8 N . Measuring the inorganic and organic stable isotope composition I5  of N released from the plant would help in understanding whether N U E and A 8 N are correlated I5  through the exudation of organic N or through the efflux of unassimilated N caused by an imbalance between the uptake and assimilation of inorganic N . A family correlation between N U E and A 8 N was variable to non-existent (Fig. 9). This 15  could be related to the four components of N U E and their effects on one another. If this is reduced to simply genetic control of uptake and assimilation capacity, genotypes could display four different phenotypes in response to fertilization. There could be genotypes that continue to competitively take up nitrogen at very low levels and assimilate all that is taken up. These plants would have a high N U E and low N / N ratio until N quantity of the nutrient solution becomes 1 5  1 4  83  scarce. At this point the enhanced uptake capacity will allow seedlings to continue taking up heavy N and the 8 N value will approach that of the media. Alternatively a genotype could 15  take up nitrogen well, but have a low demand for N. This would yield plants with 8 N values 15  more negative than the fertilizing solution because of the efflux of heavy inorganic N . The proportion of N that is effluxed and the demand for N will determine NUE.  If a genotype has a  low uptake capacity but a high assimilation capacity, then NUE would be high and 8 N would I5  always be near that of the media. Finally, if a genotype is relatively poor at both components, it will have a high NUE, but be very light because heavy N is still effluxed due to the low assimilation capacity. As N is removed from the medium, these genotypes will be slower to reach the 8 N of the media because of low uptake capacity. Families that potentially represent 15  each one of these scenarios were seen in the treatments.. Such varied results could have caused the lack of family correlation between the two traits. In all cases, however, A 8 N would be I5  expected to reflect efflux/influx ratio if this information were available. 13  15  Interestingly, there was a positive environmental correlation between 8 C and A8 N in Exp. 2 but not in Exp.  1 (Fig. 10). The plastic correlation may be a result of inadvertent drought  stress due to root damage. Because of the root damage, treatments may have caused differences in 8 C that would not normally have been apparent under hydroponics (Exp. 1). Root damage I3  would also increase N demand relative to N uptake, reducing the efflux/influx ratio. A positive 13  15  correlation between 8 C and AS  N would result.  Similar to both existing barley studies (Handley et al., 1997; Robinson et al., 2000), there was a positive family correlation between the two stable isotope measures, A 8 N and 8 C , in I5  I3  five of the six family regressions (Fig. 10). A physiological rationale for this is not clearly evident from the graphs. Of the five positive correlations, the two significant regressions are in Exp.  1 in the N O 3 " and N H 4 N O 3 treatments. If these two treatments represent higher  efflux/influx ratios than the N H  + 4  treatment, the positive correlation between the stable isotopes  could reflect sink strength or the capacity for N allocation to photosynthesis (Fig. 19). Families which had less negative A8 N values because of low uptake capacity and high N-demand may 15  have allocated proportionally more N to photosynthesis which would create a less negative 8 C 13  value. On the other hand, families which had relatively less of both C and N heavy isotopes in the NO3" and N H 4 N O 3 treatments may not be as efficient at allocating N to photosynthesis when  84  N quantities are low. When these same families are placed in the NH4 treatment, where uptake is higher because of the N-source preference, less efflux of N and an increase in A n  1  m a x  could  e  cause both 5 C and A8 N to become less negative. These scenarios are dependent on multiple physiological balances and, for the most part, are hypothetical. The underlying theory could be tested in different environments and with different species using 5 N in conjunction with other techniques (e.g. efflux analysis). In I5  addition, it is important to assess in what form the heavy N is being lost.  II. N- supply rate experiment After receiving results from the first and second experiments, a modification was made to the experimental design in order to acquire more information about environmentally and genetically controlled nitrogen isotope discrimination. Maintaining equal concentrations of NO3" and NHU in the NH4NO3 treatments and maintaining equal concentrations of each ion in their +  own treatments proved to be very difficult, so it was proposed to eliminate the NO3" and NH NC>3 treatments and use two treatments of NFL/. One treatment would maintain a steady 4  state of N H  + 4  supply at 200 uM and the other treatment would begin at 200 uM and decrease  down to approximately 0 uM, in order to test how different supply regimes would affect plastic and genetic control of N discrimination. I speculated, for example, that isotope enrichment during nutrient draw-down might separate families better able to acquire N at low concentrations. The same parameters were measured as before: biomass, R:S ratio, C:N ratio, 5 C and5 N. 13  l5  A. Effects on individual traits  1. Environmental and genetic control of morphological traits On the whole, mean biomass was greater in this experiment than in the NFL/ treatment of the N-source experiment because of the higher concentration of N F L / supplied. Significant effects of supply regime on biomass were not expected and did not occur. If the rate of uptake is fairly constant as the source N decreases (as reported by Clement, 1978), then biomass differences would only occur if the seedlings in the draw-down treatment were kept at 0 uM for extended periods of time. In this experiment, once the NH4 concentration reached zero, it was +  returned to 200 uM within twenty-four hours. This seemed sufficient to prevent supply regime  85  effects on total biomass, even though the draw-down treatment only supplied about half as much nitrogen as the steady state treatment. Nonetheless, significant differences in the R:S ratio between treatments indicate that the draw-down treatment may have imposed some stress on the seedlings. Similar to the NO3" treatment, more biomass was allocated to root production. Possibly, over a longer period, this allocation to roots would affect total biomass through a reduction in leaf area. Family differences in both biomass and R:S ratio were evident in these two environments and there was no g x e interaction. Families 10, 3 and 1 which tended to be the largest in the N source experiment, were the largest in this experiment. This similarity between the two experiments supports the idea that family differences in biomass are not determined by differences in uptake carriers, but rather are unrelated to N status or are determined by an inherent ability to take up more N regardless of form. The wider spread of biomass responses in the draw-down treatment also indicates that when seedlings were stressed, genetic differences in biomass accretion and N-uptake became more prominent. When seedlings received a steady supply of N, other factors responsible for differences in growth may have become more important. Family differences in R:S ratio also suggest that certain families may be more sensitive to stress because of lower uptake capacity. This stress causes generation of a higher root mass at the expense of shoot production. The negative correlation between biomass and R:S ratio in each of the treatments (data not shown) substantiates this relationship.  2. Environmental and genetic control of N U E Efficient use of a nutrient becomes more important when that nutrient is in limited supply. Although the rate of uptake may be fairly constant as the concentration of the external solution drops from 200 uM to 0 uM, the activity of uptake carriers contributing to uptake may increase. Similar to the negative-feedback control evidenced at high concentrations to prevent NH  + 4  toxicity, V  may also respond to decreasing N concentrations. Kronzucker et al. (1996)  m a x  showed induction of NFLt uptake in the HATS concentration range by pre-treating white spruce +  seedlings with 100 uM N H . They found that the highest rates of N H +  4  pretreated with N H  + 4  + 4  influx were in seedlings  for one day after three weeks of N-starvation. Pre-treatment periods lasting  longer than one day caused a decrease in the influx rate. If V  m a x  can increase in response to  decreasing external concentrations either through synthesis of new protein carriers or activation  86  of pre-existing carriers, then such an effect could have occurred in the draw-down treatment. In this treatment, N U E was higher but biomass was equal to the steady-state treatment, indicating that although V  m a x  may have increased it was not enough to compensate for decreasing N  concentrations. In addition, decreasing amounts of N caused a higher R:S ratio. When N was replenished, the higher R:S ratio and V  m a x  could have allowed for more N to be taken up than in  the steady-state treatment causing a momentarily lower N U E which then increased as N became limiting. The importance of genetic differences in uptake and/or allocation when N was limiting became more apparent in the draw-down treatment than in the steady-state treatment. Although families ranked similarly in both treatments, the cluster of six families in the steady-state treatment indicates that nutrients other than N might have become limiting for growth. Family shifts in N U E from high to low in the steady-state to draw-down treatments (family 9) may indicate an enhanced ability to competitively take up N at low concentrations.  Conversely, a  shift from low to high N U E may indicate an inability to take up low concentrations of N or simply lower uptake capacity.  3. Environmental and genetic control of WUE In this experiment, N-stressed seedlings (draw-down treatment) developed a higher W U E both by gas exchange parameters and by C stable isotope values. This is contrary to the original expectation that seedlings provided with a low but consistent supply of N would yield higher photosynthetic capacity. Gas exchange data would hopefully have clarified the differences between A and g in the two experiments, but the only significant difference was in the Cj/C s  a  ratio (Fig. 12). This is curious considering that Cj/C was calculated using A and g . The ratio a  s  did, however, correlate with the treatment effects on 5 C. 13  Large measurement errors inherent to  gas exchange measurements may account for this discrepancy. The significant treatment effect on 8 C might be explained by N-allocation. If uptake 13  rates in fact increased during repeated draw-down cycles, and when N was plentiful a greater proportion was allocated to a smaller shoot than in the steady-state treatment, then shoot N concentrations might have been higher than in the steady-state treatment. If the N was allocated to photosynthesis, 8 C would increase. This argument would be supported by equal biomasses 13  between treatments, higher R:S ratio and C:N ratio and lower Cj/C in the draw-down treatment. a  87  A second possibility is that hydroponics alter the relationship between A and internal N concentration through its effects on g . Elevated rates of photosynthesis and higher g at lower s  Nieat  s  have been reported in wheat cultivars (van den Boogaard et al., 1995). Ibrahim et al. (1998)  also found that when poplar was grown in mixed high and low water and N environments, the high water, low N environment yielded the highest g , but the high water, high N environment s  yielded the highest A  m a x  . Ranjith and Meinzer (1997) reported that in sugarcane grown at low  levels of N fertilization, a greater proportion of N was allocated to the photosynthetic apparatus. These three papers do not by any means counter the great mass of literature that cites positive correlations between A and N i f (Field et al., 1986), but they do indicate that experimental e a  conditions may influence expected treatment results. Family differences in WUE were evident in 8 C but not C j / C . The significant treatment 1 3  a  x family interaction indicates that unlike the N-source experiment, families changed their 5 C 1 3  rank between steady-state and draw-down N treatments. Under N-stress, C demand for root growth or respiration could increase A and this effect could vary with family. In a study on chicory (Ameziane et al., 1995), where N-deficiency did not change root mass, shoot growth dramatically diminished in N-depleted treatments. Through C02 pulse chase experiments, they 14  showed that this was due to an increase in the proportion of fixed carbon partitioned to the root. In a study on two peanut cultivars fertilized with high or low NH4NO3 (Hubick, 1990), there was no treatment effect on W U E either by stable isotope discrimination, or by the ratio of dry matter produced to water used. There was however, a g x e interaction in A and root/dry matter ratio, but no effect on g . Possibly the correlation between R:S ratio and A results from increasing the s  carbon sink strength and they are not simply two separate effects of N deprivation. There are four possible explanations for the lack of a significant difference between families in any of the gas exchange parameters: 1) the treatments were not severe enough to create measurable differences, 2) the three families selected were too similar to one another and do not represent the potential breadth of the population, 3) that g and A act in concert to maintain the C j / C ratio s  a  inherent to that seedling, or 4) the measurement error inherent in the technique cannot discern such fine differences in variables (Fig. 12).  88  B. Effects on correlated traits 1. Biomass versus 8 C I3  13  13  The negative environmental correlation between biomass and 8 C indicates that 8 C was mainly determined by g (Virgona et al., 1996). Treatments were designed to alter A more s  than g , but apparently this did not occur. Explanations for the correlation rely on hypotheses s  previously mentioned (i.e. higher shoot N concentration in draw-down treatment or unknown hydroponic effects on the A/N\ f correlation) (Fig. 13). ca  There was no genetic correlation between biomass and 8 C, although both traits varied significantly among families. Family differences in A  m a x  and stomatal responsiveness to the  environment may both play a part in determining the 8 C of the families and the magnitude of I3  change when placed in differing N environments. Genotypes with higher g but limited ability to s  maximize A with N fertilization may not change their biomass between treatments. Genotypes with greater flexibility in A and more precise stomatal responses to environmental change could increase their biomass within the steady-state treatment, at the expense of WUE.  2. Biomass versus NUE The negative environmental correlation between biomass and N U E that was seen in the N-source experiments was also observed in the N-supply experiment (Fig. 11). In both experiments, treatments that resulted in higher internal N concentrations produced greater biomass. Treatments did not yield significantly different biomasses, yet the negative correlation was significant because families clustered in a specific range in each treatment. Within the draw-down treatment, the significant positive correlation between biomass and N U E could be due to enhanced effects of competition when N is scarce. Those seedlings that had higher uptake capacity may have removed nitrogen from the system more quickly before it became limiting. Alternatively, the advantage of highly competitive seedlings could have been not the rate of uptake, but an ability to continue uptake at very low levels of external nitrogen. In the steady state treatment, competition for N was not a factor. Most families clustered in one area and the four that separated out presumably did so because of differing prioritization in N allocation. Certain genotypes may prioritize storage or other sinks over synthesis of photosynthetic proteins. This would alter the correlation between carbon acquisition and internal  89  N. Li et al. (1991) found that at low external N concentrations genetic control of N U E was equally divided between uptake, assimilation and allocation while at high external N concentrations, differences in allocation dominated genetic control. They also proposed that "families with similar levels of N U E showed large differences in the relative contribution of uptake and allocation efficiency" (Li et al., 1991).  3. N U E versus 5 C I 3  A plastic correlation between N U E and 8 C (not evident in the N-source experiment) is I3  clear in the N-supply rate experiment, yet it is the reverse of what would be expected (Fig. 15a). In experiments where both water and nitrogen limitations have been imposed in factorial designs, these two resource use efficiencies usually trade-off. It was expected that seedlings from the draw-down treatment would trade-off profligate water use with the efficient use of N and the opposite would be true for seedlings in the steady-state treatment. Fig. 15 shows that 1^  seedlings in the draw-down treatment had a higher N U E and 8 C. One possible explanation for the high N U E and less negative 8 C values follows the scenario used above to describe 13  treatment effects on 8 C . If N concentrations in the shoot in the draw-down treatment were I3  actually higher than in the steady-state treatment (due to induced uptake capacity at low external N concentrations), whole plant C:N ratio would be mediated by the higher R:S ratio resulting in high N U E . If the extra leaf N was allocated to photosynthesis and not structural or storage sinks, this could also yield less negative 8 C values. 13  The small number of points in the regression line limits the strength of the above argument. With only four points it is difficult to say whether the outcome was a result of chance or physiological reasons. Although the two resource use efficiencies may theoretically trade-off, hydroponics may also have interfered with this relationship in inexplicable ways. An inherent trade-off among families was also not evident (Fig. 14b). There was a possible indication of a negative trade-off when seedlings were N stressed, but a significant correlation was not detected within this range of 10 families. In the steady-state treatment, where family differences in C:N ratio were harder to discern, there was no trade-off. Again, it is possible that the range of families was too narrow to see a trade-off, or a family trade-off was not physiologically necessary when both resources were in plentiful supply.  90  C. Effects on A 5 N ,5  1. Environmental and genetic effects on A 8 N ,S  The supply regime treatments may not have resulted in significant differences in 8 N I5  because in both treatments, inherent enzymatic discrimination was masked by an increasing concentration of N in the media. The N diffusion assay revealed that the fractional l 5  1 5  abundance o f N in the solution increased as N content decreased in the draw-down treatment. 1 5  The significant linear regression between D and N H / concentration indicated that discrimination changed as the N H / concentration decreased (Fig. 18). Presumably, at very low concentrations the effluxed  l 3  N would be taken up again and the final plant 8 N would equal that of the salt I5  supplied. In the steady-state treatment a similar isotopic concentration gradient could have occurred, whereby 8 N of the solution should have initially increased and then stabilized when 1:,  the isotopic concentration gradient overcame net discrimination (Hoch et al., 1992). Because treatment solutions were refreshed only weekly to return the N / N ratio to its original balance, 1 5  1 4  the relative increase in the concentration of N as a result of efflux forced proportionally greater l 5  uptake of N . Ultimately, the plants in the steady-state treatment should have ended up only 1:,  marginally lighter than those in the draw-down treatment. Family differences in A 8 N in these treatments were more informative about the 15  physiological controls of uptake, assimilation and N-demand. The intent of the experiment was to test these three aspects of N U E by treating seedlings in a draw-down system and a steady-state system. The significant family effect indicates that there was genotypic control over net discrimination. The almost significant family x treatment interaction (P<0.1) indicates that the effect of sink strength on uptake and assimilation varies for some families when placed in a repeatedly exhausted as opposed to consistently fertilized system. In order to understand where the interaction occurs, it is useful to look at family correlations between traits.  2. Correlations with biomass, NUE and 8 C 13  Environmental correlations between A 8 N and biomass or N U E were non-significant I5  and relatively uninformative (Fig. 14 and 16). The same two correlations on a family basis, however, may have yielded evidence of genotypic differences in uptake and utilization capacity. In the steady-state treatment, there was a positive correlation between biomass and A 8 N (Fig 15  15). In this treatment, families that had higher growth-driven N demand may have had higher  91  rates of N assimilation and less efflux (Fig. 19). Biomass and N U E were positively correlated, supporting this idea, but when N U E and 5 N were plotted against one another there was not a 15  correlation (Fig. 16). If N uptake capacity became more important in the draw-down treatment, a negative correlation between biomass and A 8 N would occur (Fig. 14). Under these circumstance, N U E I5  should correlate positively with A 8 N and negatively with biomass. It is possible that during l3  draw-down cycles families that had a high uptake capacity were able to obtain a greater proportion of their N early in the cycle. If these families also had high assimilation capacity, this might have created bigger, more nitrogen use efficient seedlings (Figs. 14 and 16). Families that did not have a high uptake capacity, would have been left to assimilate lower quantities of relatively heavier N and, as a result, would be smaller. Waser et al. (1999) used a similar system to test the effect of N-starvation on the 8 N of diatoms. After N starvation, when N utilization 15  became preeminent, less N was effluxed out of the cells, reducing fractionation (Waser et al., 1999). There was a strong positive environmental correlation between the C and N stable isotopes. The steady-state treatment yielded seedlings light in both isotopes, whereas the drawdown treatment yielded seedlings heavy in both isotopes (Fig. 17). If proportionally more nitrogen was allocated to a smaller leaf area for the synthesis of Rubisco in the draw-down treatment, this would increase 8 C values. N isotope fractionation would decrease because of 13  the regularly exhausted N-supply. In the steady-state treatment, where the R:S ratio is lower, N concentration of leaves may have been lower because the N demand was divided between multiple sinks. This could have caused lower 8 C values while the build-up of N decreased N 13  1 5  discrimination. Within each treatment the family correlation between 8 C and A 8 N could also be a 13  15  combination of uptake and assimilation capacities and sink strength. The change of position along the regression lines between the two treatments may indicate that families respond differently in draw-down and steady-state treatments for the previously mentioned reasons.  92  CONCLUSIONS  The plastic negative correlation between W U E and N U E that was expected as a result of treatment-induced differences in internal N content did not occur. Explanations for this fall into two categories, statistical and physiological. Statistical power in an analysis of variance is dependent on the sample size, which was substantially reduced from the original experimental design. The original intent was to repeat the N-source experiment three times with one replicate of each treatment in each experiment, but the change in experimental design reduced the number of repetitions to two. The two repetitions, Experiments 1 and 2, could not be analyzed as a block design because of the significant effect of the fungal infection on the seedlings in one repetition. Within each experiment, there were only two replicates on which to conduct the analysis of variance. Such a low sample size was not sufficient to overcome the unexpected difference between replicates of the same treatment. On a physiological basis, the low N concentrations of the media may have limited photosynthesis in all treatments despite the apparent difference in mean C:N ratio in Fig.l. Although N concentrations were different in the N O 3 " and N H below a threshold to cause a change in A  m a x  + 4  treatments, both may have been  . N-limitations on photosynthesis should then be  supported by equal biomasses in the treatments. This did not occur indicating that a second physiological factor, potentially related to hydroponics, may have interfered with the A /Nieaf ma)  relationship. This factor may have caused the significant treatment differences in g which then s  affected Q / C . a  Genotypic control of all measured parameters associated with W U E , except^, was shown and a g x e interaction occurred only in g . Families responded similarly to each s  treatment indicating that either genotypic control of N-uptake carriers is linked or that W U E is unrelated to N-source. Family differentiation for N U E further supported the theory that N uptake capacity is under genetic control and maintenance of N U E rank across treatments indicates that the genetic control of differing N uptake carriers is linked. The potential dissociation between WUE and N-source could explain the lack of a trade-off between W U E and N U E seen at the family level. 8 N analysis revealed further information on N relations dependent on N-source and I5  family. On either level, environmental or genotypic, the suggested theory for N discrimination is  93  based on efflux/influx ratio. At the treatment level, plant A 8 N in the NO3" treatment may have 15  been lighter because of low storage and assimilation capacities. This caused greater efflux of heavy inorganic N. Under NFL; fertilization, when uptake and assimilation were both high, the +  efflux/influx ratio was lower and a greater proportion of N was assimilated. At the genotypic 1 5  level, this balance between uptake and assimilation capacity could also be applied to explain family A 8 N values. I5  The third experiment, which tested N-supply rates on seedling response, produced interesting effects of the interaction between hydroponics and N-fertilization on WUE. Opposite to what was predicted, seedlings repeatedly deprived of N had a higher W U E than those given a steady supply of N. One hypothesis would be that periods of N-stress induced higher N uptake capacity. When N was re-supplied, the higher N uptake capacity supplied N to a smaller leaf area than in the steady-state treatment yielding momentary high N| f. The higher Ni f caused ea  ea  either higher A or greater stomatal sensitivity to the environment, thereby increasing W U E and 8 C. 13  Family differences in most measured parameters were evident again in this experiment, but only in 8 C was there a g x e interaction. This interaction potentially reflects family I3  variability in water relations under these treatments. The lack of a significant family effect on gas exchange parameters was attributed to the small number of gs tested and the measurement error inherent in the technique. Analysis of A 8 N values revealed that N-supply treatments had no effect on I5  discrimination by the seedlings. In both treatments enzymatic discrimination was likely overcome by an isotope concentration gradient. The environmental correlation between C and N stable isotope ratios supports the explanation for the positive correlation between N U E and 8 C. Carbon isotope discrimination may have decreased in the draw-down treatment because of proportionally greater N allocation to photosynthesis during periods of high external N concentration. As the N was removed from the medium, N discrimination decreased and the seedlings became heavier. Under the steady-state treatment, proportionally less N may have been allocated to photosynthesis, possibly causing a lower N demand and less N discrimination. The build-up of N in the steady-state treatment could have also decreased discrimination. l 5  Family differences in A 8 N were again attributed to genotypic control of the balance 15  between uptake and assimilation capacity. It was hypothesized that competitive ability to take  94  up N quickly or at low concentrations combined with a high assimilation capacity, yielded large seedlings with less negative A 8 N values (Table 2). When competition was not included in the 15  treatment (steady-state), uptake ability may not have contributed as significantly to biomass, N U E and A 8 N . The family correlation between biomass and A 8 N may then be a result of N I5  15  demand on N assimilation capacity. Genotypic differences in photosynthetic capacity could have created high and low N demand causing the positive correlation between 8 C and A8 N. 13  15  95  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE R E S E A R C H  In research experiments there are always methods which if changed might provide more information. A few of these recommendations fall in this category. Other comments are ideas for experiments to help expand the understanding of the physiology and the genetic control of N isotope discrimination. The field is relatively new with ample room for investigation. I have chosen only to propose experiments that would contribute to questions related to my research that I could not answer. •  First, I would propose that if my experiments were to be run again, a greater number of replicates both in number of experiments and number of treatment replicates should be used. This may dampen unaccounted for occurrences even in the controlled environment of a growth chamber.  •  Second, if similar experiments were to be done again, I would suggest developing an on-line system for monitoring and ameliorating media N concentration. If this cannot be achieved, stabilization of N concentration could be attempted by either having low concentrations in large volume with fewer seedlings, or higher concentrations, so all N H t  +  is not removed  within a 24 hour period. •  The use of populations from varying environments in the same type of experiment would add ecological significance to genetic control of N-uptake carriers and the relation between N source and WUE.  •  In order to further the understanding of N relations, specific studies on genetic control of N uptake kinetics would be helpful.  •  Testing the organic/inorganic 8 N values of hydroponics media over time may indicate if, I 5  and in what form, heavy N is being lost from plants. Knowing if it is assimilated N or unassimilated N that is leaking back out of the plant, will clarify whether the efflux/influx ratio is controlling 8 N . l 3  •  Treatments which alter N-demand may also provide information on the contribution of efflux/influx to N discrimination. For example, phosphorus treatments, PPFD or D C M U would all affect photosynthetic demand for N without contributing to N uptake rates.  •  Removal of competition for N by providing consistent renewal of N / N at a constant ratio l 5  l 4  may help to test inherent genotypic discrimination.  96  LITERATURE CITED Aitken, S.N., K . L . Kavanagh and B.J. Yoder. 1995. Genetic variation in seedling water-use efficiency as estimated by carbon isotope ratios and its relationship to sapling growth in Douglas-fir. Forest Genetics 2: 199-206. Ameziane, R., M.A. Limami, G. Noctor and J.-F. Morot-Gaudry. 1995. Effect of nitrate concentration during growth on carbon partitioning and sink strength in chicory. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 1423-1428. Bailey, J.S. 1999. Varying the ratio of 1 ^N-labelled ammonium and nitrate-N supplied to creeping bent: effects on nitrogen absorption and assimilation, and plant growth. New Phytol. 143: 503-512. Bedell, J.P., M . Chalot, A. Gamier and B.Botton. 1999. Effects of nitrogen source on growth and activity of nitrogen-assimilating enzymes in Douglas-fir seedlings. Tree Physiol. 19: 205-210. Bigg, W.L. and T.W. Daniel. 1978. Effects of nitrate, ammonium and pH on the growth of conifer seedlings and their production of nitrate reductase. Plant and Soil 50: 371-385. Birk, E . M . and P.A. Matson. 1986. Site fertility affects seasonal carbon reserves in loblolly pine. Tree Physiol. 2: 17-27. Birk, E . M . and P.M. Vitousek. 1986. Nitrogen availability and nitrogen use efficiency in loblolly pine stands. Ecology 67: 69-79. Brooks, J.R., L.B. Flanangan, N . Buchmann and J.R. Ehleringer. 1997. Carbon isotope composition of boreal plants: functional grouping of life forms. Oecologia 110: 301311. Brown, K.R., W.A. Thompson, E.L. Camm, B.J. Hawkins and R.D. Guy. 1996. Effects of N addition rates on the productivity of Picea sitchensis, Thuja plicata, and Tsuga heterophylla seedlings. II. Photosynthesis, C discrimination and N partitioning in foliage. Trees 10: 198-205. l 3  Buchmann, N., G. Gebauer and E.-D. Schulze. 1996. Partitioning of ^N-labeled ammonium and nitrate among soil, litter, below- and above-ground biomass of trees and understory in a 15-year-old Picea abies plantation. Biogeochemistry 33: 1-23. Canovas, F.M., F.R. Canton, F. Gallardo, A. Garcia-Gutierrez and A.de Vicente. 1991. Accumulation of glutamine synthetase during early development of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) seedlings. Planta 185: 372-378. Cawse, P.A. 1967. The determination of nitrate in soil solutions by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Analyst 92: 311 -315. Chapin, F.S. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 233-260. Clement, C.R., M.J. Hopper and L.H.P. Jones. 1978. The uptake of nitrate by Lolium perenne from flowing nutrient solution. J. Exp. Bot. 29: 453-464.  97  Condon, A . G . , G.D. Farquhar and R.A. Richards. 1990. Genotypic variation in carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in wheat. Leaf gas exchange and whole plant studies. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 17: 9-22. Condon, A . G . and R.A. Richards. 1992. Broad sense heritability and genotype x environment interaction for carbon isotope discrimination in field-grown wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 43: 921-934. DeLucia, E.H. and S.A. Heckathorn. 1989. The effect of soil drought on water-use efficiency in a contrasting Great Basin desert and Sierran montane species. Plant, Cell and Environment 12: 935-940. DeLucia, E.H. and W.H. Schlesinger. 1991. Resource-use efficiency and drought tolerance in adjacent Great Basin and Sierran plants. Ecology 72: 51-58. DeLucia, E.H. and W.H. Schlesinger. 1995. Photosynthetic rates and nutrient-use efficiency among evergreen and deciduous shrubs in Okefenokee swamp. Int. J. Plant Sci. 156: 1928. Dennis, D.T. and D.H. Turpin. (1990). Plant Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Essex, England, Longman Scientific & Technical: p. 389-406. Eghball, B. and J.W. Maranville. 1993. Root development and nitrogen influx of corn genotypes grown under combined drought and nitrogen stresses. Agron. J. 85: 147-152. Elliott, K.J. and A.S. White. 1994. Effects of light, nitrogen and phosphorus on red pine seedling growth and nutrient use efficiency. Forest Science 40: 47-58. Etter, H.M. 1972. Effect of nitrogen nutrition upon sugar content and dry weight of juvenile lodgepole pine and white spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 2: 434-440. Evans, J.R. 1989. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in the leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78: 9-19. Evans, J.R., T.D. Sharkey, J.A. Berry and G.D. Farquhar. 1986. Carbon isotope discrimination measured concurrently with gas exchange to investigate C 0 diffusion in leaves of higher plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13: 281-292. 2  Evans, R.D., A.J. Bloom, S.S. Sukrapanna and J.R. Ehleringer. 1996. Nitrogen isotope composition of tomato {Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.cv.T-f) grown under ammonium or nitrate nutrition. Plant, Cell and Env. 19: 1317-1323. Farquhar, G.D., J.R. Ehleringer and K.T. Hubick. 1989a. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 40: 503-537. Farquhar, G.D., K.T. Hubick, A . G . Condon and R.A. Richards (1989b). Carbon isotope fractionation and plant water use efficiency. Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. P. W. Rundel, J. R. Ehleringer and K. A . Nagy. New York, Springer-Verlag. 68: 21-40. Farquhar, G.D., M . H . O'Leary and J.A. Berry. 1982. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9: 121-137.  98  Farquhar, G.D. and R.A. Richards. 1984. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11: 539-552. Farquhar, G.D. and T.D. Sharkey. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33: 317-345. Fichtner, K. and E.-D. Schulze. 1992. The effect of nitrogen nutrition on growth and biomass partitioning of annual plants originating from habitats of different nitrogen availability. Oecologia 92: 236-241. Field, C , J. Merino and H.A. Mooney. 1983. Compromises between water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency in five species of California evergreens. Oecologia 60: 384-389. Field, C. and H.A. Mooney. 1986. The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. On the economy of form and function. T. J. Givinsh. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press: p. 25-55. Flaig, H. and H. Mohr. 1992. Assimilation of nitrate and ammonium by the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedling under conditions of high nitrogen supply. Physiol. Plant. 84: 568576. George, E., C. Stober and B. Seith. 1999. The use of different soil nitrogen sources by young Norway spruce plants. Trees 13: 199-205. Gessler, A., S. Schneider, D.v. Sengbusch, P. Weber, U . Hanemann, C. Huber, A. Rothe, K. Kreutzer and H. Rennenberg. 1998. Field and laboratory experiments on net uptake of nitrate and ammonium by the roots of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees. New Phytol. 138: 275-285. Guy, R.D., M.L. Fogel and J.A. Berry. 1993. Photosynthetic fractionation of the stable isotopes of oxygen and carbon. Plant Physiol. 101: 37-47. Guy, R.D., G.C. Vanlerberghe and D.H. Turpin. 1989. Significance of phosphoe^o/pyruvate carboxylase during ammonium assimilation. Carbon isotope discrimination in photosynthesis and respiration by the TV-limited green alga Selenastrum minutum. Plant Physiol. 89: 1150-1157. Handley, L.L. and J.A. Raven. 1992. The use of natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes in plant physiology and ecology. Plant, Cell and Environment 15: 965-985. Handley, L.L., D. Robinson, B.P. Forster, R.P. Ellis, C M . Scrimgeour, D.C. Gordon, E. Nevo and J.A. Raven. 1997a. Shoot 8 N correlates with genotype and salt stress in barley. Planta201: 100-102. 15  Handley, L . L . , D. Robinson, C M . Scrimgeour, D. Gordon, B.P. Forster, R.P. Ellis and E. Nevo. 1997b. Correlating molecular markers with physiological expression in Hordeum, a developing appproach using stable isotopes. New Phytol. 135: 159-163. Harvey, P.H. 1939. Hereditary variation in plant nutrition. Genetics 24: 437-491. Hoch, M.P., M.L. Fogel and D.L. Kirchman. 1992. Isotope fractionation associated with ammonium uptake by a marine bacterium. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 1447-1459.  99  Hogberg, P., C. Johannisson, M . Hogberg, L. Hogbom, T. Nasholm and J.-E. Hallgren. 1995. Measurements of abundances of and as tools in retrospective studies of N balances and water stress in forests: A discussion of preliminary results. Plant and Soil 168-169: 125-133. Holmes, R.M., J.W. McClelland, D . M . Sigman, B. Fry and B.J. Peterson. 1998. Measuring 15N-NH4+ in marine, estuarine and fresh waters: An adaptation of the ammonia diffusion method for samples with low ammmonium concentrations. Marine Chemistry  60:235-243. Holowachuk, D.L. (1993). Population differences in water-use efficiency for Pinus contorta Dougl. as indicated by stable carbon isotopic compositition. Faculty of Forestry. Vancouver, University of British Columbia: 108 pp. Hubick, K.T. 1990. Effects of nitrogen source and water limitation on growth, transpiration efficiency and carbon-isotope discrimination in peanut cultivars. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 17: 413-430. Hubick, K.T., R. Shorter and G.D. Farquhar. 1988. Heritability and genotype x environment interactions of carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15: 799-813. Ibrahim, L., M.F. Proe and A.D. Cameron. 1998. Interactive effects of nitrogen and water availabilities on gas exchange and whole-plant carbon allocation in poplar. Tree Physiol. 18:481-487. Johannisson, C. and P. Hogberg. 1994. abundance of soils and plants along an experimentally induced forest nitrogen supply gradient. Oecologia 97: 322-325. Johnson, C M . , P.R. Stout, T.C. Broyer and A.B. Carlton. 1957. Comparative chlorine requirements of different plant species. Plant and Soil 8: 337-353. Kamminga-van Wijk, C. and H.B.A. Prins. 1993. The kinetics of N H and N0 " uptake by Douglas-fir from single N-solutions and from solutions containing both N H and NO3". Plant and Soil 151: 91-96. 4  3  +  4  Knoepp, J.D., D.P. Turner and D.T. Tingey. 1993. Effects of ammonium and nitrate on nutrient uptake and activity of nitrogen assimilating enzymes in western hemlock. Forest Ecol. and Mgmt. 59: 179-191. Korol, R.L., M.U.F. Kirschbaum, G.D. Farquhar and M . Jeffreys. 1999. Effects of water status and soil fertility on the C-isotope signature in Pinus radiata. Tree Physiol. 19: 551-562. Krajina, V.J., S. Madoc-Jones and G. Mellor. 1973. Ammonium and nitrate in the nitrogen economy of some conifers growing in Douglas-fir communities of the Pacific Northwest of America. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5: 143-147. Kramer, P.J. 1983. Water Relations of Plants. New York, N.Y., Academic Press: 489 pp. Kronzucker, H.J., A . D . M . Glass and M.Y. Siddiqi. 1999. Inhibition of nitrate uptake by ammonium in barley. Analysis of component fluxes. Plant Physiol. 120: 283-291.  100  Kronzucker, H.J., M.Y. Siddiqi and A . D . M . Glass. 1995a. Compartmentation and flux characteristics of nitrate in spruce. Planta 196: 674-682. Kronzucker, H.J., M.Y. Siddiqi and A . D . M . Glass. 1995b. Kinetics of NO3" influx in spruce. Plant Physiol. 109: 319-326. Kronzucker, H.J., M.Y. Siddiqi and A . D . M . Glass. 1996. Kinetics of NfLi " influx in spruce. 4  Plant Physiol. 110: 773-779. Kronzucker, H.J., M.Y. Siddiqi and A . D . M . Glass. 1997. Conifer root discrimination against soil nitrate and the ecology of forest succession. Nature 385: 59-61. Lavoie, N., L.-P. Vezina and H.A. Margolis. 1992. Absorption and assimilation of nitrate and ammonium ions by jack pine seedlings. Tree Physiology 11: 171-183. Ledgard, S.F., K . C . Woo and F.J. Bergersen. 1985. Isotopic fractionation during reduction of nitrate and nitrite by extracts of spinach leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 12: 631-640. Li, B., S.E. McKeand and H.L. alien. 1991. Genetic variation in nitrogen use efficiency of loblolly pine seedlings. Forest Science 37: 613-626. Livingston, N.J., R.D. Guy, Z.J. Sun and G.J. Ethier. 1999. The effects of nitrogen stress on the stable carbon isotope composition, productivity and water use efficiency of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) voss) seedlings. Plant, Cell and Environment 22: 281-289. Mariotti, A., J.C. Germon, P. Hubert, P. Kaiser, R. Letolle, A . Tardieux and P. Tardieux. 1981. Experimental determination of nitrogen kinetic isotope fractionation: some principles; illustration for the denitrification and nitrification processes. Plant and Soil 62: 413-430. Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. San Diego, C A , Academic Press Ltd.: p. 45-50. Marschner, H., M . Haussling and E. George. 1991. Ammonium and nitrate uptake rates and rhizosphere pH in non-mycorrhizal roots of Norway spruce [Picea abies(L.) Karst.]. Trees 5: 14-21. Marschner, H., V. Romheld, W.J. Horst and P. Martin. 1986. Root-induced changes in the rhizosphere: Importance for the mineral nutrition of plants. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenk. 149: 441-456. Martin, F., M . Chemardin and P. Gadal. 1981. Nitrate assimilation and nitrogen circulation in Austrian pine. Physiol. Plant. 53: 105-110. Meinzer, F.C., P.W. Rundel, G.Goldstein and M.R. Sahrifi. 1992. Carbon isotope composition in relation to leaf gas exchange and environmental conditions in Hawaiian Metrosideros polymorpha populations. Oecologia 91: 305-311. Miflin, B.J. and P.T. Lea. 1976. The pathway of nitrogen assimilation in plants. Phytochemistry 15: 873-885. Nambiar, E.K.S. and D.N. Fife. 1991. Nutrient retranslocation in temperate conifers. Tree Physiology 9: 185-207.  101  Nasholm, T., A. Ekblad, A. Nordin, R. Giesler, M . Hogberg and P. Hogberg. T 9 9 8 . Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen. Nature 392: 914-916. Neilson, R., D. Hamilton, J. Wishart, C A . Marriott, B. Boag, L . L . Handley, C M . Scrimgeour, J.W. McNicol and D. Robinson. 1998. Stable isotope natural abundances of soil, plants and soil invertebrates in an upland pasture. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 30: 1773- 1782. O'Leary, M . H . 1993. Biochemical basis of carbon isotope fractionation. Stable Isotopes and Plant Carbon-Water Relations. J. R. Ehleringer, A. E . Hall and G. D. Farquhar. New York, Academic Press, Inc.: 555. Patterson, T.B. 1994. Variation in nitrogen and water relations traits between two boreal spruce species from an interacting resource gradient in northern British Columbia. Dept. of Forest Sciences. Vancouver, Univ. of British Columbia: 90 pp. Patterson, T.B., R.D. Guy and Q.L. Dang. 1997. Whole-plant nitrogen- and water-relations traits, and their associated trade-offs, in adjacent muskeg and upland boreal spruce species. Oecologia 110: 160-168. Ranjith, S.A. and F . C Meinzer. 1997. Physiological correlates of variation in nitrogen-use efficiency in two contrasting sugarcane cultivars. Crop Sci. 37: 818-825. Raven, J.A. and G.D. Farquhar. 1990. The influence of N metabolism and organic acid sythesis on the natural abundance of isotopes of carbon in plants. New Phytol. 116: 505-529. Raven, J.A. and F.A. Smith. 1976. Nitrogen assimilation and transport in vascular land plants in relation to intracellular pH regulation. New Phytol. 76: 415-432. Raven, J.A., B. Wollenweber and L.L. Handley. 1992. A comparison of ammonium and nitrate as nitrogen sources for photolithotrophs. New Phytol. 12: 19-32. Reich, P.B., B.D. Kloeppel, D.S. Ellsworth and M.B. Walters. 1995. Different photosynthesisnitrogen relations in deciduous hardwood and evergreen coniferous tree species. Oecologia 104: 24-30. Reich, P.B. and M.B. Walters. 1994. Photosynthesis-nitrogen relations in Amazonian tree species II. Variation in nitrogen vis-a-vis specific leaf area influences mass- and areabased expressions. Oecologia 97: 73-81. Reich, P.B., M.B. Walters and T.J. Tabone. 1989. Response of Ulmus americana seedlings to varying nitrogen and water status. 2. Water and nitrogen use efficiency in photosynthesis. Tree Physiol. 5: 173-184. Robinson, D., L . L . Handley and C M . Scrimgeour. 1998. A theory for 15N/14;N fractionation in nitrate-grown vascular plants. Planta 205: 397-406. Robinson, D., L . L . Handley, C M . Scrimgeour, D . C Gordon, B.P. forster and R.P. Ellis. 2000. Using stable isotope natural abundances ( 8 ^ N and 8 ^ C ) to integrate the stress responses of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch.) genotypes. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 41-50.  102  Roggy, J.C., M.F. Prevost, F. Goubiere, H. Casabianca, J. Garbaye and A . M . Domenach. 1999. Leaf natural 1 5>j abundance and total N concentration as potential indicators of plant N nutrition in legumes and pioneer species in a rain forest of French Guiana. Oecologia  120:171-182. Rygiewicz, P.T., C.S. Bledsoe and R.J. Zasoski. 1984. Effects of ectomycorrhizae and solution pH on [ N] ammonium uptake by coniferous seedlings. Can. J. For. Res 14: 885-892. 15  Rygiewicz, P.T., C.S. Bledsoe and R.J. Zasoski. 1984. Effects of ectomycorrhizae and solution pH on [ N] nitrate uptake by coniferous seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 893-899. l5  Sage, R.F. and R.W. Pearcy. 1987. The nitrogen use efficiency of C3 and C4 plants 2. Leaf nitrogen effects on the gas exchange characteristics of Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). Plant Physiol. 84: 959-963. Scheromm, P. and C. Plassard. 1988. Nitrogen nutrition of non-mycorrhized maritime pine {Pinus pinaster) grown on nitrate or ammonium. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 26: 261-269. Schulze, E.-D. and J.R. Ehleringer. 1984. The effect of nitrogen supply on growth and wateruse efficiency of xylem-tapping mistletoes. Planta 162: 268-275. Schulze, E.-D., G.D. Farquhar, J.M. Miller, W. Schulze and B.H. Walker. 1999. Interpretation of increased foliar 8 N in woody species along a rainfall gradient in northern Australia. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 26: 296-298. I5  Schulze, E.-D., R.J. Williams, G.D. Farquhar, W. Schulze, J. Langridge, J.M. Miller and B.H. Walker. 1998. Carbon and nitrogen isotope discrimination and nitrogen nutrition of trees along a rainfall gradient in northern Australia. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 25: 413-425. Shearer, G. and D.H. Kohl. 1989. Natural N abundance of N H , amide N , and total N in various fractions of nodules of peas, soybeans and lupins. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 16: 305-313. l 5  +  4  Sheppard, L.J. and M.G.R. Cannell. 1985. Nutrient use efficiency of clones of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta. Silvae Genetica 34: 126-132. Sheriff, D.W., E.K.S. Nambiar and D.N. Fife. 1986. Relationships between nutrient status, carbon assimilation and water use efficiency in Pinus radiata (D. Don) needles. Tree Physiology 2: 73-88. Smirnoff, N . and G.R. Stewart. 1985. Nitrate assimilation and translocation by higher plants: Comparative physiology and ecological consequences. Physiol. Plant. 64: 133-140. Solorzano, L. 1969. Determination of ammonia in natrual waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14: 799-801. Staples, T.E., K.C.J.V. Rees and C.v. Kessel. 1999. Nitrogen competition using between early successional plants and planted white spruce seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 12821289. Stark, J.M. and S.C. Hart. 1997. High rates of nitrification and nitrate turnover in undisturbed coniferous forests. Nature 385: 61-64.  103  Sun, Z.J., N.J. Livingston, R.D. Guy and G.J. Ethier. 1996. Stable carbon isotopes as indicators of increased water use efficiency and productivity in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 19: 887-894. Swiader, J.M., Y.Chyan and W.E. Splittstoesser. 1991. Genotypic differences in nitrogen uptake, dry matter production, and nitrogen distribution in pumpkins (Cucurbita moschata Poir.). J. Plant Nutrition 14: 511-524. Tan, W. and G.D. Hogan. 1995. Limitations to net photosynthesis as affected by nitrogen status in jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 407-413. Tirol-Padre, A., J.K. Ladha, U. Singh, E. Laureles, G. Punzalan and S. Akita. 1996. Grain yield performance of rice genotypes at suboptimal levels of soil N as affected by N uptake and utilization efficiency. Field Crops Research 46: 127-143. Toft, N.L., J.E. Anderson and R.S. Nowak. 1989. Water use efficiency and carbon isotope composition of plants in a cold desert environment. Oecologia 80: 11-18. Traore, A. and J.W. Maranville. 1999. Effect of nitrate/ammonium ratio on biomass production, nitrogen accumulation, and use efficiency in sorghums of different origin. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22: 813-825. Truax, B., F. Lambert, D. Gagnon and N . Chevrier. 1994. Nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase activities in relation to growth and nitrogen assimilation in red oak and red ash seedlings: effects of N-forms, N concentration and light intensity. Trees 9: 12-18. Turpin, D.H., G.C. Vanlerberghe, A . M . Amory and R.D. Guy. 1991. The inorganic carbon requirements for nitrogen assimilation. Can. J. Bot 69: 1139-1145. van den Boogaard, R., S. Kostadinova, E. Veneklaas and H. Lambers. 1995. Association of water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency with photosynthetic characteristics of two wheat cultivars. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 1429-1438. Van den Driessche, R. 1971. Response of conifer seedlings to nitrate and ammonium sources of nitrogen. Plant and Soil 34: 421-439. Vezina, L.-P., N. Lavoie, K.W. Joy and H.A. Margolis. 1992. The fate of newly absorbed ammonium and nitrate ions in roots of jack pine seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 141: 61-67. Vezina, L.-P., H.A. Margolis and R. Ouimet. 1988. The activity, characterization and distribution of the nitrogen assimilation enzyme, glutamine synthetase, in jack pine seedlings. Tree Physiol. 4: 109-118. Virgona, J.M. and G.D. Farquhar. 1996. Genotypic variation in relative growth rate and carbon isotope discrimination in sunflower is related to photosynthetic capacity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23: 227-236. Virgona, J.M., K.T. Hubick, H.M. Rawson, G.D. Farquhar and R.W. Downes. 1990. Genotypic variation in transpiration efficiency, carbon-isotope discrimination and carbon allocation during early growth in sunflower. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 17: 207-214.  104  Vitousek, P. 1982. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. American Naturalist 119: 553572. von Caemmerer, S. and G.D. Farquhar. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376-387. Walters, M.B. and P.B. Reich. 1989. Response of Ulmus americana seedlings to varying nitrogen and water status. 1. Photosynthesis and growth. Tree Physiology 5: 159-172. Waser, N.A., K.Yin, Z. Yu, K. Tada, P.J. Waser, D.H. Turpin and S.E. Calvert. 1998. Nitrogen isotope fractionation during nitrate, ammonium and urea uptake by marine diatoms and coccolithophores under various conditions of N availability. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 169: 2941. Waser, N.A., Z. Yu, K. Yin, B. Nielsen, P.J. Harrison, D.H. Turpin and S.E. Calvert. 1999. Nitrogen isotopic fractionation during a simulated diatom spring bloom: importance of N-starvation in controlling fractionation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 179: 291-296. Waser, N.A.D., P.J. Harrison, B. Nielsen, S.E. Calvert and D.H. Turpin. 1998. Nitrogen isotope fractionation during the uptake and assimilation of nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, and urea by a marine diatom. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43: 215-224. Wong, S.C., I.R. Cowan and G.D. Farquhar. 1979. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282: 424-426. Wong, S.C., I.R. Cowan and G.D. Farquhar. 1985. Leaf conductance in relation to rate of CO2 assimilation. I. Influence of nitrogen nutrition, phosphorus nutrition, photon flux density, and ambient partial pressure of CO2 during ontogeny. Plant Physiol. 78: 821-825. Yoneyama, T., K. Kamachi, T. Yamaya and T. Mae. 1993. Fractionation of nitrogen isotopes by glutamine synthetase isolated from spinach leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 34: 489-491. Yoneyama, T. and A . Kaneko. 1989. Variations in the natural abundance of N in nitrogenous fractions of the komatsuna plants supplied with nitrate. Plant Cell Physiol. 30: 957-962. l 5  Yoneyama, T., T. Omata, S. Nakata and J. Yazaki. 1991. Fractionation of nitrogen isotopes during the uptake and assimilation of ammonia by plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 32: 12111217. Yoshie, F. 1986. Intercellular C O 2 concentration and water-use efficiency of temperate plants with different life-forms and from different microhabitats. Oecologia 68: 370-374. Zhang, J., L. Fins and J.D. Marshall. 1994. Stable carbon isotope discrimination, photosynthetic gas exchange, and growth differences among western larch families. Tree Physiol. 14: 531-539. Zhang, J. and J.D. Marshall. 1994. Population differences in water-use efficiency of wellwatered and water-stressed western larch seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 92-99.  105  t-  3 O  03 fi UH  1)  s  ON  OH OH  ^  r-H ©  CN CN NO  © ' © ' © '  fr, —I ©  n  © ©  NO  C  M  IT, © ©  o  T-H r-H  © ' © ' © '  ©  3  cr u  OO  r<-> O  CN CN  « —' ©  03  CN  i—i  hfN ©  ©  NO  *—i  ON ©  CN  C cu  o o  E Ji3  ©  ©  ©  ©  -H  "3"  o o o CN *0  o o  o  CU  <n to © m CN CN © © © in CN © © © © CN  O  _>  o  T3  CU  CH  «n  GO  CU  t~-  o"  in  NO  o  CD  >  00  fa ^  H-»  0u3  S  U  ffl  o  cu  S  CU OH l/l  0)  O  «  °  03  C  oo  ^^ s 10  e 3  e o CD  C O  o  O O CU IS 2 -5 '-r  O.  CN  o  „ C .2  o  ©  GO  ^  ©  ~ m~  O  r*1  O GO  <U 13 ^  -GO-  O  NO  .-H CN © ©  ON  ©  NO  in  r*0  '"I  m co m CN r-n oo ' — i oo  CN © CN C N l^ '—' CO  GO  1  W  OH OH  <  "3) e  CU  03  © © ©  O  © © © © © © © © © © ©  © ©  cu  rH  ©  © m <=>. <=>. "1 "3©• <u m CN CN CN © O CN rH  ©  c  O  CO  _CD  "o  -3  Ofl  IT) r-H NO  '5 co CN  ON  •—I CN CO  r-n  © ©  oo  ©  rCN  m ©  NO CO  CN  r-H  CN  IT) 00  CN  r-H NO  i—i  ©  z  fi cu >  CU  NO  in in  CN CN  00  ©  CN  r-H ON ON CN  ©  T3 3 3 O O,  S o V  fN CI  O  ©  o S  )4 U ^ ^ C H O S O T  C  •»  1  M  C/J  ^  HpH  W  OJJ  t PT;  o oo  c  00  c  *3 fi CU  03  NO  GO  c  OH  fi  CU  1 3 cS  03  CN  C cu  « « ° g .2 ta  rN  X X  <U  00  ©  o  5  c2  o  1  GO  T3  X  kH  VO NO m IT) co CN CN r-- C N © CN r- in m >— <— ON co o © © © 03 u 00  C  o  o  _yN»_  ;  o  ^4 o  in  '•3  o3  c2  O  CD  cS  X  !H  c  o  C  2  o  o  3 o  1—1 | >  o  H?  o .2  X  a  o  in  3  GO  o  o  —H  «N  03  H-H  >_  _  «  ti  o ^8  ^ § 1 §8 u  C  •  1  i  03 u :  APPENDIX 2. Analysis of variance tables for all measured variables for N-source and N-supply rate experiments. Each analysis was done using a split-plot design. Pseudo-F tests were created by M S i m n MSTXO + M S E I - MSE2- SS is not reported where a Pseudo-F was used because the value reported by SAS was invalid and unnecessary for creating the F-test. =  Table 1. Split-plot analysis of variance for biomass (log 10 transformed) in N-source experiments. N-treatment refers to the form of nitrogen supplied. Source  df  sum of squares mean square  F-test  P-value  Error term  0.896 5.677 0.926 1.15 17.412  0.307 0.299 0.631 0.051 0.043 0.042  17.68 7.01 14.80 1.21 1.03  0.05 0.0024 0.0002 0.6424 0.8564  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II Sampling error  0.036 1.884 0.903 1.343 12.27  0.012 0.012 0.209 0.050 0.05 0.031  163.79 0.24 4.21 1.01 1.58  0.05 0.5 0.0034 0.5 0.0676  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II Sampling error  Exp. 1 N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II Sampling Error  2/3.2 3 9 18 27 420  Exp. 2 N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II Sampling Error  2/0.5  j 9 18 27 420  Table 2. Split-plot analysis of variance for R:S ratio in N-source experiments. Source df sum of squares mean square F-test P-value Error term  Exp. 1 N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II Sampling error  2/3.1 3 9 18 27 419  2/3.2 3 9 18 27 420  0.893 3.843 0.573 0.675 4.188  0.301 0.298 0.427 0.032 0.025 0.010  12.829 11.91 17.09 1.27 2.5  0.10 0.0002 0.0002 0.5568 0.0002  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II Sampling error  1.41 4.041 1.295 1.51 25.422  0.486 0.4670 0.449 0.072 0.056 0.064  5.811 8.40 8.03 1.29 0.87  0.20 0.0008 0.0002 0.5406 0.5  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II Sampling error  Exp. 2 N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II Sampling error  107  Table 3. Split-plot analysis of variance for C:N ratio in N-source experiments. Source df sum of squares mean square F-test P-value Error term Exp.  1  N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II  2/3.0 3 9 18 27  390.28 128.872 32.672 51.840  129.988 130.093 14.319 1.815 1.920  9.2199 67.76 7.46 0.95  0.20 0.0002 0.0002 0.50  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II  2/3.2 3 9 18 27  264.395 186.733 142.440 152.189  90.408 88.132 20.748 7.913 5.637  10.969 15.64 3.68 1.40  0.10 0.0002 0.0082 0.4148  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II  Exp.2 N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II  fable 4. Split-plot analysis of variance for S> C in N-source experiments. 3  Source Exp. 1  df  sum of squares  N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II  2/2.5 0.841 3 9 8.898 18 1.459 2.807 27  F-test  P-value  Error term  0.257 0.280 0.988 0.081 0.104  0.839 2.69 9.51 0.78  0.50 0.1316 0.0002 0.5  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II  3.401 3.307 2.448 0.187 0.093  0.922 35.54 26.31 2.01  0.50 0.0002 0.0002 0.0982  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II  -  Exp.2 N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II  mean square  2/3.2 3 9 18 27  9.920 22.032 3.365 2.512  Table 5. Split-plot analysis of variance for <S"#inN -source experiments. Source Exp. 1  df  N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error 11  2/4.9 3 9 18 27  sum of squares mean square  F-test  P-value  Error term •  1.871 5.062 6.077 3.819  0.820 0.624 0.562 0.338 0.141  154.33 4.41 3.98 2.39  0.001 0.0240 0.005 0.0398  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II  1.383 6.037 3.183 2.997  0.523 0.461 0.671 0.177 0.115  238.82 4.00 5.82 1.53  0.001 0.2974 0.0896 0.5  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II  Exp. 2 N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II  2/3.7 3 9 18 27  Table 6. Split-plot analysis of variance for biomass in N-supply experiment. N-treatment refers to the method of N H delivery (steady-state or draw-down). Source df sum of squares mean square F-test P-value Error term +  4  N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II Sampling Error  1/0 2 9 9 18 274  0.102 8.734 1.017 3.104 20.474  -0.0083 0.0512 0.970 0.113 0.172 0.075  0 0.30 5.63 0.66 2.31  0 0.5 0.0018 0.50 0.0044  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II Sampling error  Table 7. Split-plot analysis of variance for R:S ratio (logJO transformed) in N-supply experiment. Source N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II Sampling Error  df sum of squares 1 /4.5 2 0.039 9 1.307 9 0.107 18 0.12 274 1.018  mean square 0.025 0.020 0.145 0.012 0.007 0.004  F-test 159.469 2.95 21.79 1.79 1.79  P-value 0.001 0.156 0.0002 0.2794 0.052  Error term Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II Sampling error  109  \ Table 8. Split-plot analysis of variance for C:N ratio (loglO transformed) in N-supply experiment. P-value Error term Source df sum of squares mean square F-test Pseudo-F 106.62 0.02 N-treatment 0.0023 1 /2.0 Error II Error I 0.002 8.15 0.0066 2 0.005 Error II 0.0002 Family 9 0.021 0.002 8.29 Error II 1.11 0.5 Trmt x fam 9 0.003 0.0003 0.0003 Error II 17 0.005 Table 9. Split-plot analysis of variance for d C in N-supply experiment. 43  Source N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II  df sum of squares 1 /4.5 2 0.368 9 7.639 9 1.712 17 1.095  mean square 0.3099 0.184 0.849 0.1902 0.0644  F-test 11.36 2.86 13.17 2.95  P-value 0.05 0.1702 0.0002 0.0524  Error term Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II  Table 10. Split-plot analysis of variance for d N'm N-supply experiment. 45  Source  df  N-treatment Error I Family Trmt x fam Error II  1/3.9 2 9 9 17  sum of squares mean square 1.264 16.345 4.93 3.75  0.959 0.632 1.816 0.548 0.221  F-test  P-value  Error term  5.294 2.86 8.23 2.48  0.20 0.1696 0.0002 0.1016  Pseudo-F Error II Error II Error II  APPENDIX 3. Tukey test results for family ranking across all treatments used in Exp. 1 and the N-source experiment. Variables are specified below "Family". Transformed variables used in the A N O V A tests are again used here. Families underlined by the same line are not significantly different. EXPERIMENT 1 Family Biomass  6 2 0 5 9 7 8 3 1 10 -0.661 -0.559 -0.528 -0.474 -0.419 -0.391 -0.391 -0.380 -0.305 -0.301  Family R:S ratio  3 0.403  7 5 10 1 6 0.415 0.428 0.430 0.452 0.513  Family C:N ratio  8 31.16  9 32.03  Family 5 C  3 10 6 9 8 2 5 1 7 0 -31.04 -30.7 -30.69 -30.60 -30.46 -30.4 -30.25 -30.25 -30.24 -29.51  Family A5 N.  2 6 3 10 8 9 5 1 7 0 -2.64 -2.63 -2.539 -2.518 -2.504 -2.503 -2.454 -2.256 -2.069 -1.659  I3  I 5  0 8 9 2 0.528 0.558 0.590 0.658  0 2 6 5 1 7 33.05 33.47 33.56 33.70 34.90 35.15  10 3 35.69 35.79  N-SUPPLY EXPERIMENT  Family Biomass  Family R:S ratio  Family C:N ratio  Family 5 C I3  Family A8 N I5  0 0.66  5 0.67  7 0.71  2 6 1 9 0.71 0.76 0.87  8 0.90  0.94  10 1.108  3 1.11  3 6 10 5 0 1 7 9 8 2 -0.644 -0.526 -0.508 -0.481 -0.470 -0.458 -0.450 -0.439 -0.438 -0.396  8 1.386  5 9 1.390 1.397  0 1.397  2 1 7 6 1.405 1.412 1.417  6 8 5 3 7 -29.63 -29.47 -29.43 -29.36 -29.26  5 -2.08  2 -1.55  7 6 1 -1.41 -1.32 -1.23  3 1.427  1.450  10 1.462  10 2 1 9 0 -29.18 -29.1 -28.89 -28.86 -27.96  10 8 3 9 -0.66 -0.57 -0.25 -0.18  0 0.36  a.  c3  3  •-  \3  CJ  c  A  00 CD sCD  — roo o m m < N \ o o o Z © o o l  . 03 -3  C  CD  NO </1  C N  o  fi n  £ -3  " 1  C N  ON  d  ON  CD CD O  GO  °  00| CD  a fi  03  o  3  CD  Z  «  -o  3  CD  -3  GO  l-c  H  CD  •—'  "7^  3 •£ CD 3  £ £ H -a 3  GO  S  3 03  O  CJ  5  03  -fi cj  CD ±J  X c  CD  CD  GO  "  H—i  5 GO  -3 03  CD  03  -4—»  £ o  OO NO  f i  LT)  M  z<  w CD -+—»  iri  r-H  O  io  c-> co  ©  ©  +  C N C N C — O O '—' zI  o a.  ©  O C N r—i C N F ~ " -  03  o z  Z mi  >  C 00 NO  »H  •c -c v  >s o -a C GO  lO  C N C N  -t—>  CD CJ <+-  03  z c d  C "S  C  ON  I  3  03  B  —  o o c-« (O r— oo o © © o  3  2  CD 00  ON  CJ  £ c  CD  X  z  S  x ^-  o z I  C/2  '3!  03 O 03 -o  A  3  O ON ^ O </-> ON C"> NO  co  ©  ©  ©  O  03  C N GO GO  <  NO  CD CD  O  C N O O ON  3  3  3  3  o o  C N C N ^ m  3  CD CJ CD 1 — 3 S r^ O S g IV3 U C8  .03 ^  X S  E  H  C  43  o 00  c s-l  Io  •5 © s  ON  A  '5  © oo o  Ifi ft M  N  © © o o  ^  -2  N©  <N  s »  'uT in w  o  CN  V  CJ  <u  c  en <D  4-;  o  03  °  a  x w  s  § s  | oo  V©  CN  ON O  oo CN  m oo o o ©  It  •+3 S3 _o3  Ofi  }»H  n cu  s  •t; s  I  O  CS  2  "«j  43  g  ca  o  ^ o 3? >^  03  > H  cu  CJ  CO  S3  a <u  IB  CN  o o o° ©  C  h  ON  h  -  © © © © o S3  CD  c  x  j^? 'S 03  N  a  «  v© v©  <u <u  I  o  =3  o  t  *Ti  IT)  © © © o  ©  O  o  W  cj  S3  00  X <D CD  .2  CO CO 03  f-i  CJ '+-> CJ  <  ©  =3  +-» S3  z OH  ^ © © ©  oo n m i n•  CO  O  OH  N  » • t • ifi•  OH .OH  01  5  . o »  OH  CD  X  ?  J-l  CD CJ  03  OS  w  13 * 1)  <^  06 "» © oo m rf s f i C N  X  crj CJ c  CO  I  OH  CJ  "33  CN  © © © © o  CD  U  "—'  v, oo o\  O  CJ  O  t  S3  03  r-»  oo  03  C/3  O n 42 co  "  <r. to U <  CD  1 E— 1  co co  S 03s  CN  03  £2;  


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items