UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

The gamma-rays of radium Ozeroff, Michael John 1948-12-31

You don't seem to have a PDF reader installed, try download the pdf

Item Metadata

Download

Media
831-UBC_1948_A8 O9 G2.pdf [ 1.98MB ]
Metadata
JSON: 831-1.0085419.json
JSON-LD: 831-1.0085419-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0085419-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 831-1.0085419-rdf.json
Turtle: 831-1.0085419-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 831-1.0085419-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 831-1.0085419-source.json
Full Text
831-1.0085419-fulltext.txt
Citation
831-1.0085419.ris

Full Text

THE GAMMA-RATS OF RADIUM by Michael John Ozeroff  A thesis submitted i n p a r t i a l f u l f i l m e n t of the requirements f o r the degree o f ' MASTER OF ARTS i n the Department of PHYSIOS  The University of B r i t i s h Columbia A p r i l , 1948  ACKNOWLEDGEMENT  The present study has been made possible by a Grant-in-Aid of Research to Professor K. C. Mann from the National Research Council of Canada.  The author wishes to  acknowledge a g i f t of 4060 pounds of lead from the Consolidated Mining and Smelting Company of T r a i l , B. C. f o r the construction of spectrometer b a f f l e s and protective screens. He i s indebted to the Cancer Research Group of Vancouver,  B.C.  f o r providing a Radium source, and to Mrs. E. Speers of the Chemistry Department f o r preparing a Thorium B source.  The  award to the author of a Studentship from the National Research Council has greatly f a c i l i t a t e d t h i s work.  Finally,  the author wishes to express his deep indebtedness to Professor K. C. Mann, whose u n f a i l i n g interest and helpfulness assisted greatly i n the successful completion of the study.  V  TABLE OP CONTENTS Page I.  INTRODUCTION  II.  EXPERIMENTAL METHOD 1. Spectrometer Types 2. The Thin-Lens Spectrometer 3. Source Arrangement 4. The Geiger Counter 5. Counter Power Supply -6. Magnet Current Supply 1. Earth's F i e l d Compensator 8. Alignment 9. Resolution 10. Calibration 11. Calculation of Gamma-Ray Energies  1  3 6 8 10 11 12 14 14 17 17 lo  I I I . EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 1 . Reduction of Primary Beta-Ray Radiation . . 19 2. The Radium Gamma-Ray Spectrum . 21 3. S t a t i s t i c a l Accuracy 21 4. Error i n Energy Determination 23 5. Comparative Results 24 IV.  CONCLUSION .  26  V.  BIBLIOGRAPHY  29  ILLUSTRATIONS  Figure  Page  1. -fT-Type Spectrometer  4  2.  E l e c t r o s t a t i c Spectrometer  5  J>,  Electron Lens Spectrometer . .  4.  Thin-Lens Spectrometer . . .  7  5.  Source Arrangement  8  6.  Geiger Counter  7.  Current Regulator  12  8.  Compensator C o i l E f f i c i e n c y  15  9.  E f f e c t of Compensator Current on Peak,Shape  J>  . . . . .  10.  Thorium B Source, and E-line  11.  Reduction of Primary Beta-Radiation  12.  Radium Gamma-Ray Spectrum  . 10  , . 16 . . . 18 20 .22  Table 1.  Comparative Results  Plate I.  24 Facing Page  Thin-Lens Spectrometer  7  ABSTRACT  Th© thin-lens beta-ray spectrometer i s described, together with i t s associated equipment.  The. energies of  gamma-rays, emitted by Radium i n equilibrium with i t s d i s i n tegration products have been determined  by measuring, i n such  a spectrometer, the energies of photoelectrons ejected from lead.  These energies agree reasonably w e l l with those re-  ported by E l l i s and Skinner, although several values reported by Alichanov and Latyshev have not been found.  The  energy  calculations were based on a c a l i b r a t i o n using the E l i n e of Thorium B; (H o = 1385.6 gauss-cm.).  An i n d i c a t i o n was  of a gamma energy not previously reported.  found  1  THE GAMMA-RAYS OF RADIUM  I.  INTRODUCTION  Previous measurements of Radium gamma-ray energies nave been made by several investigators.  E l l i s and-  Skinner^ ), measuring i n t e r n a l conversion and photoelectric 1  l i n e energies i n a "IT-type spectrometer reported twenty-one gamma-rays of Radium B, C and D.  Alichanov and Latyshev^)  measured the energies of positrons formed by pair-production i n lead with a f t - t y p e spectrometer, and from these measurements reported eleven gamma-rays of Radium C, of energies greater than 2 moc  2  ( i . e . 1.02 Mev).  T s i e n ^ ) , using  selective absorption and c r y s t a l d i f f r a c t i o n i n the range  25-50  Kev, and the cloud chamber i n the range  ported s i x gamma-rays of Radium D. (Dc.D. E l l i s and H.W.B. Skinner,  7-25 Kev  re-  While i n the high energy Proc.Roy.Soc, 105A, 165  (1924). (2) A. Alichanov and G. Latyshev, (3) s.T. Tsien,  C.R.Acad.Sci. (U.R.S.S.), 20, 429 (1938). Phys.Rev., 69, 38 (1946).  region at l e a s t , a comparison of results shows f a i r agreement, there are some discrepancies and i t seemed advisable to r e peat t h i s work with the thin-lens spectrometer at our d i s posal.  2.  II.  1.  EXPERIMENTAL METHOD  SPECTROMETER TYPES The negative beta-rays from radioactive n u c l e i con-  s i s t of electrons whose energy varies continuously from a c e r t a i n maximum value down to zero*  Gamma-rays may also be  emitted from such n u c l e i , and since they represent t r a n s i tions between excited nuclear energy states, they possess discrete energies.  To observe beta-ray d i s t r i b u t i o n s , beta  spectrometers of various designs have been developed.  Under  the proper conditions the beta spectrometer may be used equally well to Investigate gamma-ray energies, either by measuring the energies of photoelectrons expelled by these gamma-rays from t h i n high atomic number lamina, by measuring Compton r e c o i l electron d i s t r i b u t i o n s ejected from thick absorbers of low atomic number, or by measuring the energies of positrons or negatrons created by pair production i n high atomic number absorbers. Pour types of instruments are i n general use. (a)  The Magnetic Semicircular Focussing Spectrometer  (1^-type), shown i n Figure 1 , was devised by D a n y s z ^ i n 1912.  I t was l a t e r improved by Robinson and Rutherford^)  ( ) j . D a n y s z , L e Radium, 9 , 1 ( 1 9 1 2 ) ; 1 0 , 4 ( 1 9 1 3 ) . Robinson and E. Rutherford, Phil.Mag., 2 6 , 717 4  (1913).  4. and has since been very widely used.  A uniform magnetic  f i e l d i s applied perpendicular to the plane of the f i g u r e . Beta-rays i n a small momentum i n t e r v a l describe c i r c l e s of approximately equal r a d i i i n the f i e l d and are therefore focussed at the same point on the photographic plate.  A  Geiger tube may be used i n place of the photographic plate, i n conjunction with a magnetic f i e l d which can be varied.  -Figure 1. (b)  The E l e c t r o s t a t i c Focussing Spectrometer, shown in.  Figure 2, was suggested by Hughes and Rojanskyt6).  This  instrument uses a r a d i a l , inverse first-power, e l e c t r o s t a t i c f i e l d to focus a bundle of electrons of the same energy i n a manner similar to that of a magnetic f i e l d .  An angle of  deviation of 1 2 7 ° 1 7 ' i s found to give the correct focussing condition.  The instrument i s p a r t i c u l a r l y useful f o r low  (^A.L. Hughes and V. Rojansky,  Phys.Rev., 34, 284 (1925).  energy p a r t i c l e s , and lias been used successfully by Backus(7) to measure the low energy negatron d i s t r i b u t i o n of C u ^ .  Figure 2. (c)  The Electron Lens type of spectrometer i s shown i h  ^1  Figure 3.  Source  Figure 3. (7) J . Backus,  Phys.Rev., 68, 59  (WJ,  6..  This arrangement was f i r s t used by T r i c k e r ^ ) i n 1 9 2 4 .  The  evacuated cylinder i s surrounded f o r i t s entire length by a solenoidal wound conductor.  For a given current through the  solenoid, electrons of a certain energy w i l l be focussed on the detector. (d)  A v a r i a t i o n of t h i s type of instrument i s the t h i n -  lens spectrometer, as introduced by Deutsch, E l l i o t t and Evans ( 9 ) .  This i s the type of spectrometer used i n the pre-  sent study.  I t i s described i n d e t a i l i n the sections which  follow.  2.  THE THIN-LENS SPECTROMETER The thin-lens spectrometer i s shown i n section i n  Figure 4 and i n a photograph i n Plate I .  I t consists essen-  t i a l l y of an evacuated c y l i n d r i c a l brass tube 8 inches i n diameter and 4 0 inches long, surrounded at i t s centre by a short magnet c o i l of heavy wire.  The c o i l i s water cooled  i n order to reduce temperature f l u c t u a t i o n s .  The tube con-  tains f i v e lead baffles which perform several functions. Baffle A transmits a conical beam of electrons from the radiator into the focussing f i e l d of the magnet.  Baffle B  prevents high-energy radiation from passing d i r e c t l y from source to counter.  C i s a.masking b a f f l e and together with  D and E serves to absorb much of the scattered r a d i a t i o n which might otherwise reach the counter and thus increase the Tricker, Proc.Camb.Phil.Soc, 2 2 , 4 5 4 ( 1 9 2 4 ) . ( ? ) M . Deutsch, L. E l l i o t t and R. Evans, Rev.Sci.Instr., 1 5 ,  ( )R.A. 8  7  (1944).  8  normal background.  -  A Genco Megavac pump i s used to evacuate'  the system, with an o i l d i f f u s i o n pump included f o r lower pressures when necessary.  The vacuum indicator i s a thermo-  couple gauge. The cone of electrons passing through the defining baffle A i s focussed by the action of the magnetic f i e l d of the c o i l .  For a given c o i l current, electrons of the appro-  priate energy w i l l pass through b a f f l e C, and be focussed on the "window" of the Geiger counter.  Electrons of other  energies would, i n the absence of b a f f l e s , be focussed at other points along the axis of the spectrometer  tube.  Since  the c o i l contains no iron, the f i e l d and hence the momentum of the focussed electrons w i l l be l i n e a r with current.  3.  SPURGE ARRANGEMENT Figure 5 shows the source arrangement used i n t h i s  study.  Figure 5.  The Radium used was enclosed i n a s i l v e r capsule 1 inch long and 1/8 inch i n diameter.  This was placed i n a small hole R  d r i l l e d through a s o l i d brass cylinder as shown.  The c y l i n -  der was sealed to the end of the spectrometer tube.  On the  end of the cylinder facing into the spectrometer was cemented a c i r c u l a r lamina of lead, 3 millimetres i n diameter and 0.044 millimetres thick, of surface density 50 milligrams per square centimetre. radiator.  This w i l l be referred to as the lead  The thickness of brass, between the Radium and the  lead was made s u f f i c i e n t to absorb a l l the primary beta-rays from the source, c a l c u l a t i o n f o r t h i s minimum thickness being made on the basis of the well known Feather formula(10), R(gms/cm2) =  0.543 E (Mev) *- 0.16.  Gamma-rays emitted from the source pass through the brass and eject photoelectrons from the lead.  In addition,  Compton electrons i n a continuous d i s t r i b u t i o n are ejected from the brass absorber.  Both photoelectrons and Compton  electrons are detected and counted i n the spectrometer with the r e s u l t that a plot of electron i n t e n s i t y versus electron momentum i s a composite curve, showing a series of monoenergetic photoelectric peaks superimposed Compton d i s t r i b u t i o n . Compton background,  upon the continuous  In order to correct the curve f o r  the lead radiator i s removed and a back-  ground curve i s plotted over the same momentum range.  This  curve, sometimes normalized to f i t the composite curve, i s (•°)j".M. Cork, L  "Radioactivity and Nuclear Physics", (Van -Nostrand) P. 121.  10. subtracted from the l a t t e r , and the r e s u l t i n g plot gives the l i n e spectrum due to photoelectrons ejected by gamma-rays from the lead.  4.  THE GEIGER COUNTER  ^1  The counter, shown i n Figure 6, i s of the b e l l type,  Wind  > s~  Figure 6, having a diameter of 0.75  0.005  inch tungsten wire.  inches, and a central anode of I t i s f i l l e d with a mixture  of Argon and Ethyl Alcohol vapor, 9.3 cm. (Hg) of Argon with 0.7 cm. of Alcohol vapor having been found to give a good pulse shape and a usable.plateau.  A sample plateau  r i s e s from 750 counts per minute at 975 volts to 1000 counts per minute at 1070 v o l t s , a rate of increase of 0.3 percent i n counts per minute per v o l t .  With a lead  shield around the counter, normal background (with source i n place, no current through the magnet c o i l ) i s of the order of 60 counts per minute.  A mica window of surface  11. density 0.89 milligrams per square centimetre was used. window was found to absorb a l l energies below 50 Kev,  This  and  t h i s automatically sets a lower l i m i t to the energies which may  be measured.  Considerable care must be exercised i n  order to avoid subjecting such a t h i n window to d i f f e r e n t i a l pressures much greater than 10 centimeters of mercury, since i t s strength i s not great.  A brass mask with a central  c i r c u l a r hole i n i t i s f i t t e d over the counter window.  The  diameter of the hole i s made about 1 millimetre greater than the diameter of the source.  The mask i s intended to improve  the resolving power of the spectrometer by eliminating from the counter electrons not.properly focussed. flange on the counter permits replacement  A removable  of the window and  easy sealing of the counter to the spectrometer tube.  Pulses  are counted by a scale-of-64 s c a l i n g unit which actuates a mechanical  5.  register.  C01INTER POWER SUPPLY The counter power supply consists of a high voltage  battery pack with a switching arrangement which gives steps of 15 v o l t s over the range from 840 to 1400 v o l t s .  A stable  supply voltage i s a necessity since changes i n voltage w i l l cause changes i n counting rate and w i l l thus d i s t o r t the r e sults.  In the absence of an accurate voltmeter, reproduci-  b i l i t y of points on a curve i s the most r e l i a b l e test of the supply voltage.  12 6. MAGNET CURRENT SUPPLY A D.C. generator supplies current f o r the magnet This current i s regulated to within 1 part i n 1000 by  coil.  means of a photocell control c i r c u i t , shown i n Figure 7«  A B C D E F  D. C. Generator Generator F i e l d C i r c u i t Generator F i e l d Supply Load C i r c u i t F i l t e r Magnet C o i l Standard Resistance  G H J K L  Galvanometer Potentiometer Photocells Amplifier 8 P a r a l l e l 6L6 Tubes  Figure 7. The operation of the regulator i s as follows.  The potentio-  meter, used as a reference voltage, i s standardized by means of a Weston Standard c e l l .  The voltage across a standard  resistance i n the load c i r c u i t of the generator i s then balanced by the required potentiometer  voltage.  When the . . . .  system i s i n balance the galvanometer reads zero current, and the galvanometer l i g h t beam takes up a p o s i t i o n midway between the two photocells.  This i s the desired operating condition.  13-. In t h i s condition, the two photocell output voltages are balanced against each other and no signal voltage reaches the next stage of the amplifier.  I f now  the magnet current  begins to change, the voltage across the standard resistance also begins to change, and t h i s deflects the galvanometer light.  The r e s u l t i n g off-balance photocell s i g n a l i s ampli-  f i e d and applied to the grids of the 6L6 tubes i n such a way that the generator f i e l d current i s altered to compensate for the o r i g i n a l change i n magnet current. diagram, the generator  As shown i n the  f i e l d i s separately excited, from  batteries of large current capacity. adds to the s t a b i l i t y of the regulator.  Such an arrangement Because of the re-  l a t i v e l y slow response of the galvanometer and the long timeconstant of the generator f i e l d , t h i s system i s useful i n c o n t r o l l i n g only, slow variations of current (greater than 0.5  seconds).  Hence considerable extra f i l t e r i n g on the  generator output as well as on the magnet load was  found  necessary. The importance of a high degree of regulation f o r the magnet current cannot be too f i r m l y stre'ssed.  A varying  current has the e f f e c t of reducing peak height and increasing peak width, thereby reduc'ing both the resolving power and s e n s i t i v i t y of the spectrometer.  the  Since many of the gamma-  rays are only weakly converted, t h e i r resultant photoelectric peaks are very small, and an instrument with poor s e n s i t i v i t y w i l l not detect them. At the same time i t must be admitted that t h i s  14. control c i r c u i t which holds the current constant to 0.1 percent i s hotter than i s actually needed when we consider the r e l a t i v e l y low resolution of the spectrometer.  ?.  EARTH'S FIELD COMPENSATOR Two rectangular c o i l s connected as Helmholtz c o i l s -  were arranged i n horizontal planes, one above and one below the spectrometer tube and placed symmetrically with respect to i t s axis.  Their function i s to compensate f o r the effect  of the v e r t i c a l component of the earth's f i e l d , which could cause defocussing of beta p a r t i c l e s .over t h e i r long path. Current f o r the c o i l s i s supplied from .batteries and must be held as nearly constant as possible.  Further remarks r e -  garding the importance of the compensator w i l l be made i n the following s e c t i o n .  8.  ALIGNMENT .Four major factors must be considered i n the a l i g n -  ment of the thin-lens spectrometer. (a)  The spectrometer tube axis should l i e i n the plane  of the earth's magnetic meridian.  The earth's f i e l d strength  ( v e r t i c a l component} and d i r e c t i o n (horizontal component) are plotted over the area a v a i l a b l e . i n the laboratory.  An  optimum p o s i t i o n is, then chosen f o r the spectrometer, taking into account the rate of v a r i a t i o n of v e r t i c a l f i e l d strength with distance along the tube axis. (b)  The current through the compensator c o i l s must be  15. adjusted to counteract the e f f e c t of the v e r t i c a l component of the earth's f i e l d .  I f t h i s f i e l d strength i s not sensibly-  constant throughout the length of the spectrometer tube, then obviously some compromise must be made i n the current value chosen f o r the c o i l s .  A plot of the resultant f i e l d , with  compensating c o i l s i n operation at an optimum current i s shown i n Figure 8.  r  "1  VevV;«i\ F \ e U  ] <L«HI  art-  3*.  to  Figure 8. (c)  The spectrometer tube was placed  with respect to the f i e l d of the magnet.  symmetrically F i r s t the tube  was aligned v i s u a l l y so that i t s axis and centre point coincided as nearly as possible with those of the magnet coil.  Then as a f i n a l adjustment, sample counts were taken  with a source i n place and a constant current through the magnet, f o r d i f f e r e n t positions of the tube.  The p o s i t i o n  of each end of the tube was changed ( v e r t i c a l l y or h o r i zontally only) i n turn, and the f i n a l p o s i t i o n chosen was  16. that f o r which the counting rate was a maximum.  The tube  was then clamped i n t h i s p o s i t i o n . (d)  The chosen value of compensator c o i l current should  give good peak shape, which implies maximum peak height combined with minimum width and least d i s t o r t i o n .  As a f i n a l  c r i t e r i o n f o r t h i s current value, a strong photoelectron peak was located i n the spectrum of the Radium source, and this peak was plotted using several d i f f e r e n t values of compensator current.  A sample plot i s shown i n Figure 9, with  the jvarious compensator currents indicated thereon.  It is  seen from t h i s that l i t t l e doubt a r i s e s as to the required compensator current value.  Such a current value i s then  used i n the earth's f i e l d compensator c o i l s for a l l subsequent work.  Figure 9.  17.  9.  RESOLUTION The resolving power of the instrument, whioh i s  defined as the peak width (expressed as a percentage) at half-maximum intensity, was found to be approximately 4 percent.  10.  CALIBRATION As was mentioned previously, the f i e l d of the  magnet i s l i n e a r with current, because of the absence of iron.  Therefore only single-point c a l i b r a t i o n i s required.  The instrument was calibrated with the very strong (conversion) F l i n e of Thorium B (Hp  =  138j?.6  gauss-cm)^ K 11  Using a very t h i n source i n order to obtain as sharp a l i n e as possible, and mounted on a t h i n sheet of mica to reduce back-scattering* the Thorium F l i n e was plotted as shown i n Figure 1 0 .  The Thorium source arrangement i s also shown i n  the same figure.  The potentiometer reading which corres-  ponds to the H f> value of 1 3 8 5 . 6 gauss-cms f o r the F l i n e was found to be 0 . 2 2 8 v o l t s . Hp  From t h i s a l l the required  values are found.  C.D. E l l i s , Proc.Roy.Soc, 1 3 8 , 3 1 8 ( 1 9 3 2 ) , K.C. Wang, Zeits.f.Phys., 8 7 , 633 ( 1 9 3 4 ) .  and  18.  r W  ISO Counts | M V  "T"V>oriuwr>  Source f \ r range merit"  B  F \00  So  O.t  0.3  0.3L  Potentiometer  Setting Bw>«  mask  Figure 1 0 ,  11.  CALCULATION OF GAM.iIA.-RAY ENERGIES Using the well known equation  Hp where H^  i2l  | T(T + 1 . 0 2 )  represents the electron momentum i n gauss-cm, and  T the kinetic energy i n Mev, the l a t t e r can be determined. For a photoelectron peak, hV  (gamma-ray energy) = T + Efc  where Efc i s the electron binding energy, and hence the energy of the gamma-ray can be found. For lead, the value of E  D  f o r the K s h e l l i s  8 7 . 6 K e v ^ ) , and f o r the L s h e l l 1 5 . 8 Kev, t h e i r difference 12  being 7 1 . 8 Kev.  (  12J  J . M . Cork,  l o o . c i t . p. 3 0 1 .  19.  III.  1.  EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS  REDUCTION OP PRIMARY BETA BACKGROUND An attempt was made to improve the s e n s i t i v i t y of  the spectrometer i n the following way.  The brass absorber  over the source has one function only, and that i s to prevent the intense primary beta r a d i a t i o n from the souroe from arr i v i n g at the counter.  This i t does, but a Compton back-  ground i s introduced i n i t s place, though much less intense than the primary beta r a d i a t i o n i t replaces. this Compton background  Nevertheless  s t i l l imposes a l i m i t upon the photo-  electron l i n e intensity that can be observed because of the unavoidable s t a t i s t i c a l fluctuations of i n t e n s i t y of both background and photoelectric peaks. Therefore an attempt was made to remove the primary beta r a d i a t i o n by replacing the brass absorber with a strong magnetic f i e l d , which could not of course give r i s e to Compton secondaries.  The gamma-rays would be unaffected and  this beam would then eject photoelectrons from the lead with l i t t l e or no background. shown i n Figure 11.  The experimental arrangement i s  20*  Figure  11.  The d i f f i c u l t i e s proved to be as follows: (a) .With a primary beta energy of the order of 2.5 strength of f i e l d s available about  7000  Mev,  gauss, and the geo-  metry employed, minimum source-to-radiator distances of the order of 1.5  centimetres were required to d i v e r t the most  energetic beta-rays from the spectrometer beam. (b)  Such a source-to-radiator distance proved to be so  great that with the source a v a i l a b l e (10  m i l l i c u r i e s ) the  photoelectron peaks were too small to detect, even without any appreciable background. (c)  I t was necessary to have the d e f l e c t i n g magnetic  f i e l d cut o f f sharply short of the lead radiator i n order to avoid i n t e r f e r i n g with the focussing properties of the spectrometer magnet. Various arrangements of source, f i e l d and radiator were tested.  Because of the d i f f i c u l t i e s noted above, and  21.  the l i m i t a t i o n s imposed by'the geometry of the source, which were unavoidable as t h i s was the only source available, t h i s method was not found to be f e a s i b l e .  Indications are, how-  ever, that i t would be useful f o r a source of greater i n tensity, and perhaps even with a source of the strength used but with a more suitable shape.  As was noted before, the  source used was not a point source but a cylinder 1 inch long and 1/8  inch thick, and t h i s shape complicated the problem  considerably.  2.  THE RADIUM GAMMA-PvAY SPECTRUM A graph of the photoelectron peaks over the entire  momentum range covered i n t h i s study i s shown i n Figure  12.  The upper curve i s the composite curve referred to e a r l i e r . The dotted l i n e indicates the Compton background, and the lowest curve represents the difference between the other two. The horizontal scale i s such that the momentum i n t e r v a l at any point i s a constant percentage of the t o t a l momentum at that point.  (Electron momentum i s l i n e a r l y proportional to  the Potentiometer voltage shown.)  3.  STATISTICAL ACCURACY The average intensity per point (on peak outline)  i s approximately 640  counts per minute.  For the average  counting time of 12 minutes t h i s gives a t o t a l count per point of about 7700.  On the Compton background curve the  average intensity per point i s about 600  counts per minute,  \000|  Gramma - R o y s 8001  i  600  +c5  of  Radium.  I  4 0  O 00©  Cut-otff  o f o.osK  •I*  .n  3P  Potentiometer  .3?  Voltage Figure  .50  "~  .60  .7*.  .86  \J>  \.9L  \.S  23. which leads to a t o t a l count of of 6 minutes.  3&00,  f o r the counting time  The s t a t i s t i c a l accuracies of these two mea-  surements are 1.1 and 1.7 percent respectively.  The r e s u l -  tant s t a t i s t i c a l accuracy u of the points which give the peak outline i s given by the formula  where x and y are the errors i n each of the two independent measurements.  This leads to an average s t a t i s t i c a l accuracy  of ± 2 percent.  4.  ERROR IN ENERGY DETERMINATION The accuracy of the energy determination i s o f  course an important factor.  The error i n potentiometer  standardization i s small enough to be neglected.  The pro-  bable maximum error i n determining the " c a l i b r a t i o n point" i s estimated to be less than 1 percent.  S i m i l a r l y the maxi-  mum error i n reading the highest point of a given photoelectron l i n e i s estimated to be also less than 1 percent. These are considered to be the major sources of error.  They  lead to a probable maximum error i n calculated gamma-ray energy of ± 1.5 percent. the experiment  An i n d i c a t i o n of the accuracy o f  i s given by the binding energy difference  which was found between the K and L conversion l i n e s of the  0,598  Mev gamma-ray.  This difference was found to be  73  Kev,  a value which agrees reasonably well with the quoted value of 71.8 Kev, noted e a r l i e r .  24.  5.  COMPARATIVE RESULTS Table 1 snows a comparison between the values  found i n t h i s study and those of e a r l i e r investigators.  TABLE 1 E l l i s and Skinner Gamma-ray Energy s  Mann and Ozeroff  Alichanov and Latyshev Gamma-ray Energy  Relative Intensity  .0472 .0536 .0589  Gamma-ray Energy  .243  .237  .260 .275 .297 .332 .354  .289 .428 .448. .478  .471 .503 .612 .773  .59®  .768  .941  1.248 1*39 1.43  1.21 1.29 1.39 1.52 1.62  1.78  2.22  0.6 * s  11** 2 8  .429  1.13  Relative Intensity  1.69 1.75 1.82  2.09  2.20 2.42  2 1.2 i : i  18 49  2  1.40  3BE  6 2.2 11 53 11 78 33  22  29 22  17  100 17  15 41 21  1.7?  100  2.1?  22  (2.4)  Relative i n t e n s i t i e s not given. Not corrected f o r photoelectric cross-section.  25. Relative i n t e n s i t i e s of the gamma-rays are included a l s o . The i n t e n s i t i e s shown here have been corrected to take into account the decreasing cross-section f o r the photoelectric effect with increasing energy, using p u b l i s h e d ^ ^ cross1  section curves.  (^C.D. Coryell, M. Deutsch, R.D. Evans, W.J. Ozeroff et a l The Science and Engineering of Nuclear Power, (Addison-Wesley) p. 40.  26.  IV.  CONCLUSION  An examination of the graph i n Figure 12 shows that i n the lower energy portion of the spectrum the photoelectron peaks are very prominent, while i n the high energy section they become very weak.  This condition i s due i n part to the  fact that the photoelectric cross-section decreases very rapidly with increasing photon energy.  For gamma-rays i n  lead, the absorption c o e f f i c i e n t decreases from a value of 1.6 cm" at an energy of 0.4 Mev to 0.03 cm" at 2.5 Mev. 1  1  This means that we must expect the photoelectron peaks to become weaker.and weaker as we pass to higher gamma energies. From the Compton background end-point at the upper l i m i t we can f i n d an approximate value f o r the energy of the gamma-ray which i s responsible f o r the Compton background i n that region, but which i s apparently too weak to show as a photoelectron l i n e . Table 1.  This value i s l i s t e d i n brackets i n  I t was calculated from the equation  ',  .  -.51 T (Mev)  h V (Mev) = _ ^ 0  T  T  (  T  + 1  .o2) cos 0  which i s developed from the Compton Scattering Formula. h V  Q  represents the energy of the incident gamma-ray, 0 the  angle between the d i r e c t i o n of the incident gamma-ray and that of the r e c o i l electron and T the maximum r e c o i l electron  27. energy, i n t h i s case 2.14 Mev; In the experimental arrangement, because of the r e l a t i v e l y large size of the source as compared to that of the radiator, 0 may have values from 0° to about 60° upon which portion of the source i s considered. we get h V  0  = 2.4 Mev (approx.).  depending  For  0=0°  A d i f f e r e n t value of 0*,  say 15°, leads to a higher gamma energy which i n turn would give r i s e to a maximum r e c o i l electron energy greater than 2.14 Mev.  Since the-maximum r e c o i l electron energy detected '  was 2.14 Mev, i t was concluded that the gamma-ray responsible for i t was that at 2.4 Mev. As noted previously, cut-off at the lower end of the spectrum occurs at 50 Kev, because of window thickness. Therefore the spectrometer i s not e f f i c i e n t i n the detection of gamma-rays whose energies are below about 138 Kev (50 Kev plus the lead K-shell binding energy of 88 Kev).  L-shell  photoelectrons might s t i l l be ejected but the fact that the probability of t h e i r ejection i s f a r less than that f o r the K-shell e f f e c t i v e l y rules out the p o s s i b i l i t y of detecting them. The comparative chart i n Table 1 shows fourteen gamma-ray energies found i n t h i s study.  One of these, that  at 2.4 Mev i s quoted only approximately since i t i s calculated from the Compton end-point.  Of the fourteen, a l l but  one correspond reasonably well to values found by e a r l i e r investigators.  The remaining one, at 0.45 Mev i s a very  weak l i n e , as may be seen from Figure 12, and occurs between  28. two r e l a t i v e l y strong l i n e s .  Because of i t s low i n t e n s i t y ,  much time was spent i n making observations on i t and r a i s i n g i t s s t a t i s t i c a l accuracy to a figure comparable to that of the more intense l i n e s .  Should such a l i n e actually exist,  i t i s certain that i t s i n t e n s i t y i s near the l i m i t of detect i o n of the spectrometer  used.  Many gamma-ray energies, reported by other workers were not observed here.  This might be due to t h e i r low i n -  tensity or perhaps to the fact that they are highly converted and hence have l i t t l e intensity l e f t f o r photoelectron emission.  I t may be noted that i n the region of the spectrum  above 1.1 Mev, according to the present study the picture i s similar to that given by E l l i s and Skinner.  Of the several  other energies given by Alichanov and Latyshev i n t h i s region no trace could be found, i n spite of the f a c t that they are quoted as being of r e l a t i v e l y high i n t e n s i t i e s .  29.  V.  BIBLIOGRAPHY  A.. Alichanov and G. Latyshev  C.R.Acad.Sci. (U.R.S.S.), 20, 429  J.  Phys.Rev., 68, 5 9 (194-5).  Backus  J. M. Cork  (1938).  "Radioactivity and Nuclear Physics", (Van Nostrand).  C. D. C o r y e l l , M. Deutsch, R. D. Evans, W. J . Ozeroff et a l "The Science and Engineering of Nuclear Power", (Addison-Wesley). I. Danysz  Le Radium, 9 , 1 ( 1 9 1 2 ) ;  M. Deutsch, L. E l l i o t t and R. D. Evans  Rev.Sci.Instr., 1 5 , 7 (1944).  C. D. E l l i s  P r o c R o y . S o c , 138, 318 (1932).  C. D. E l l i s and H. W. B. Skinner  P r o c R o y . S o c , 1 0 5 A , 165 (1924).  A. L. Hughes and V. Rojansky  Phys.Rev., 3 4 , 284 ( 1 9 2 5 ) .  H. Robinson and E. Rutherford  Phil.Mag., 2 6 , 717  R. A. Tricker  Proc.Camb.Phil.Soc, 2 2 , 4 5 4 (1924).  S. T. Tsien  Phys.Rev., 6 9 , 38 ( 1 9 4 6 ) .  K. C. Wang  Z e i t s . f u r Phys., 8 7 , 633 ( 1 9 3 4 ) .  10, 4 (1913).  (1913).  

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.831.1-0085419/manifest

Comment

Related Items