- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Phronesis, deconstruction, and democratic theory :...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Phronesis, deconstruction, and democratic theory : a hybrid interpretive approach to democratic systems Ouellette, Jordan Eric Pierre
Abstract
Although democratic theorists have been searching deeper into context and shared meaning, which shape and validate certain practices as more or less democratic answers to problems in democratic political systems, there has been little serious interest among them to consider more interpretive and practice-centered strategies for research. The main purpose of this paper is to combine two such strategies, Bent Flyvbjerg’s phronetic social research and Jacques Derrida’s deconstruction, into a hybrid interpretive approach to democratic systems. First, I trace how contemporary democratic theory up to Mark Warren’s problem-based approach has moved closer and closer to adopting four common and crucial features of both phronetic and deconstructive research. Next, and in light of this methodological overlapping, I argue that the latter two research strategies are indispensable to the study of democratic systems. Here I discuss two general areas in which such a hybrid interpretive approach would be most effective: in understanding how to do what Warren calls “functional sorting” for the sake of democratizing political systems; and in understanding how social movements “function” in democratic systems today. The last section deals with some bigger concerns regarding my serious engagement with Derrida. I argue against what has long been the conventional view that distances Derridean deconstruction from democratic theory by hinting at the democratic project (if not method or theory) that Derrida was developing, especially in his later years, and the growing recent scholarship around this overlooked development. Moreover, I reconsider Flyvbjerg’s own rejection of Derrida and demonstrate how phronetic and deconstructive ways of doing research can and should, in fact, complement each other. The conclusion reiterates the promise of this (or any other) hybrid interpretive approach for the democratic theorist today.
Item Metadata
Title |
Phronesis, deconstruction, and democratic theory : a hybrid interpretive approach to democratic systems
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2018
|
Description |
Although democratic theorists have been searching deeper into context and shared
meaning, which shape and validate certain practices as more or less democratic answers to
problems in democratic political systems, there has been little serious interest among them to
consider more interpretive and practice-centered strategies for research. The main purpose of this
paper is to combine two such strategies, Bent Flyvbjerg’s phronetic social research and Jacques
Derrida’s deconstruction, into a hybrid interpretive approach to democratic systems. First, I trace
how contemporary democratic theory up to Mark Warren’s problem-based approach has moved
closer and closer to adopting four common and crucial features of both phronetic and
deconstructive research. Next, and in light of this methodological overlapping, I argue that the
latter two research strategies are indispensable to the study of democratic systems. Here I discuss
two general areas in which such a hybrid interpretive approach would be most effective: in
understanding how to do what Warren calls “functional sorting” for the sake of democratizing
political systems; and in understanding how social movements “function” in democratic systems
today. The last section deals with some bigger concerns regarding my serious engagement with
Derrida. I argue against what has long been the conventional view that distances Derridean
deconstruction from democratic theory by hinting at the democratic project (if not method or
theory) that Derrida was developing, especially in his later years, and the growing recent
scholarship around this overlooked development. Moreover, I reconsider Flyvbjerg’s own
rejection of Derrida and demonstrate how phronetic and deconstructive ways of doing research
can and should, in fact, complement each other. The conclusion reiterates the promise of this (or
any other) hybrid interpretive approach for the democratic theorist today.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2018-08-14
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0370995
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2018-09
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International