UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

Structural and biochemical characterizations of the skeletal muscle and cardiac ryanodine receptor N-terminal… Kimlicka, Lynn 2014

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Notice for Google Chrome users:
If you are having trouble viewing or searching the PDF with Google Chrome, please download it here instead.

Item Metadata


24-ubc_2014_spring_kimlicka_lynn.pdf [ 24.96MB ]
JSON: 24-1.0166930.json
JSON-LD: 24-1.0166930-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 24-1.0166930-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 24-1.0166930-rdf.json
Turtle: 24-1.0166930-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 24-1.0166930-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 24-1.0166930-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

STRUCTURAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATIONS OF THE SKELETAL MUSCLE AND CARDIAC RYANODINE RECEPTOR N-TERMINAL DISEASE-ASSOCIATED MUTANTS  by Lynn Kimlicka  B.Sc. Hon., The University of British Columbia, 2009  A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF  DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Biochemistry and Molecular Biology)  THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver)  April 2014  © Lynn Kimlicka, 2014 ii  Abstract  Ryanodine receptors (RyRs) are calcium release channels located in the endo/sarcoplasmic reticulum that play a crucial role in the excitation-contraction coupling. Over 500 mutations have been found in the skeletal muscle (RyR1) and cardiac (RyR2) isoforms that cause severe muscle disorders or life-threatening arrhythmias. Mechanisms of these mutations have remained elusive largely due to the lack of high-resolution structures. Here, we compare pseudo-atomic models of the N-terminal region of RyR1 in the open and closed states together with crystal structures and thermal melts of multiple disease-associated mutants. We describe a model in which the intersubunit interface at the N-terminal region acts as a brake in channel opening. Next, we depict crystal structures of mutants at the intersubunit interface of RyR2 N-terminal region that perturb the structure of a loop targeted by multiple mutations. Furthermore, the crystal structure of the N-terminal domains of RyR2 reveals a unique, central anion-binding site. This anion binding is ablated in a disease-associated mutant that targets one of the anion-coordinating arginine residues, resulting in domain reorientations. Several other disease-causing mutations destabilize the protein. Taken together, the results illustrate a common theme across the RyR isoforms and their homologous IP3 receptors that conformational changes at the N-terminal region caused by the destabilization of the interfaces are allosterically coupled to channel opening. iii  Preface  The Introduction (Chapter 1) is adapted from two previous publications with several updates based on recent studies. The majority of Sections 1.1 and 1.2 come from portions of a chapter in a book, from the sections my supervisor and I have written: Yuchi, Z., Kimlicka, L., and Van Petegem, F. Structural Insights Into Disease Mutations of the Ryanodine Receptor. Genetic Disorders, InTech, 2013, Chapter 5:105-141. The rest of the Introduction is based on a review article I have written with my supervisor: Kimlicka, L. and Van Petegem, F. The structural biology of ryanodine receptors. Sci. China Life Sci., 2011, 54(8):712-724. Chapter 2 is based on the work published in Kimlicka, L., Lau, L., Tung, C.C., and Van Petegem, F. Disease mutations in the ryanodine receptor N-terminal region couple to a mobile intersubunit interface. Nature Commun., 2013, 4:1506, DOI:10.1038/ncomms2501. I cloned, expressed, and purified all the disease-associated mutants, collected the diffraction data, solved their structures, and performed the thermal melt, CD spectroscopic, cross-linking, pull-down, and dynamic light scattering experiments. Kelvin Lau purified FKBP12 and performed the corresponding ITC experiment. Ching-Chieh Tung crystallized RyR1BC and RyR1ABC at different pH levels, performed diffraction experiments and carried out the ITC experiments between domains A and BC. My supervisor designed and supervised the project, performed the docking experiments, solved RyR1BC structure, and wrote the manuscript. Chapter 3 is adapted from a portion of the work published in collaboration with the laboratory of Dr. Mitsuhiko Ikura (University of Toronto): Amador, F.J., Kimlicka, L., Stathopulos, P.B., Gasami-Seabrook, G.M.C., MacLennan, D.H., Van Petegem, F., and Ikura, M. Type 2 Ryanodine Receptor Domain A Contains a Unique and Dynamic α-Helix That iv  Transitions to a β-Strand in a Mutant Linked with a Heritable Cardiomyopathy. J. Mol. Biol., 2013, 425(21):4034-4046. My supervisor prepared the disease-associated mutants and obtained crystals. I collected the diffraction data and solved the crystal structures. Fernando J. Amador performed the NMR experiments.   The majority of Chapter 4 is based on the work published in Kimlicka, L., Tung, C.C., Carlsson, A.C.C., Lobo, P.A., Yuchi, Z., and Van Petegem, F. The Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor N-Terminal Region Contains an Anion Binding Site that Is Targeted by Disease Mutations. Structure, 2013, 21(8):1440-1449. I performed all mutagenesis, expressed, purified, and crystallized the R420Q mutant, collected its diffraction data and solved its structure, and performed thermal melt experiments. I was also responsible for the training and supervision of Dr. Anna-Carin C. Carlsson, a visiting postdoctoral fellow from the laboratory of Dr. Mate Erdelyi (University of Gothenburg). Ching-Chieh Tung cloned, expressed, purified, and crystallized the wild-type RyR2ABC, collected its diffraction data, and assisted with thermal melt analysis. My supervisor solved the wild-type RyR2ABC structure, designed experiments, and wrote the manuscript. Paolo A. Lobo purified the RyR2ABC exon3 deletion mutant. Anna-Carin C. Carlsson purified some of the point mutants (L62F, F329L, T415R, and L433P). Zhinguang Yuchi helped design the experiments. The portion of Chapter 4 on the G230C mutant is based on a part of the work published in collaboration with the laboratory of Dr. Wayne Chen (University of Calgary): Liu, Y., Kimlicka, L., Hiess, F., Tian, X., Wang, R., Zhang, L., Jones, P.P., Van Petegem, F., and Chen, S.R.W. The CPVT-associated RyR2 mutation G230C enhances store overload induced Ca2+ release and destabilizes the N-terminal domains. Biochem. J., 2013, 454(1):123-131. The homology model of the RyR2ABC structure in the original publication is now replaced with the actual crystal structure of RyR2ABC. I was responsible for the cloning, v  expression, purification, and thermal melt analysis of the G230C RyR2ABC mutant. My supervisor wrote part of the manuscript. The rest of Chapter 4 is based on unpublished data. I prepared the R414C RyR2ABC mutant, collected its diffraction data, solved its structure, and performed thermal melt experiment. Paolo A. Lobo solved the crystal structure of the RyR1ABCD construct. Ching-Chieh Tung and I performed the ITC experiment using HMT-RyR2ABC. I crystallized the wild-type RyR2ABC protein in low KCl concentrations (both dialysis and crystal soaking experiments), collected their diffraction data and solved their structures, including the new wild-type structure with an additional α-helix in the β22-β23 loop.  The three topics discussed in the Conclusion (Chapter 5) were graciously suggested by my supervisor.   vi  Table of Contents  Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ii	  Preface ........................................................................................................................................... iii	  Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... vi	  List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ xi	  List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. xii	  List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. xiv	  Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... xvi	  Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1	  1.1	   Ryanodine receptors and genetic disease ........................................................................... 5	  1.1.1	   Malignant hyperthermia .............................................................................................. 6	  1.1.2	   Core myopathies ......................................................................................................... 7	  1.1.3	   Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia ........................................... 8	  1.2	   Functional studies of RyRs ................................................................................................ 8	  1.2.1	   Model systems ............................................................................................................ 9	   Native expression systems ................................................................................... 9	   Recombinant expression systems ...................................................................... 10	   In vivo systems ................................................................................................... 10	  1.2.2	   Methods ..................................................................................................................... 10	   [45Ca2+]-uptake and release assays ..................................................................... 10	   Whole-cell Ca2+ fluorescence assays ................................................................. 11	   [3H]-ryanodine binding assays ........................................................................... 11	  vii	   Single-channel electrophysiology ...................................................................... 11	  1.2.3	   Highlights of the results ............................................................................................ 12	   Gain-of-function mutations ................................................................................ 13	   Loss-of-function mutations ................................................................................ 13	   Mutations with no discernible functional change .............................................. 14	   Remark on functional studies ............................................................................. 15	  1.3	   Structural studies of RyRs ............................................................................................... 15	  1.3.1	   Cryo-EM studies of closed RyRs .............................................................................. 16	  1.3.2	   Opening and closing ................................................................................................. 21	  1.3.3	   Insertion studies ........................................................................................................ 24	   N-terminal region ............................................................................................... 25	   Central region ..................................................................................................... 26	   Divergent regions ............................................................................................... 27	   Phosphorylation sites in the central region ........................................................ 28	   Remark on insertion studies ............................................................................... 28	  1.3.4	   Binding sites of protein binding partners .................................................................. 29	   FK506-binding proteins ..................................................................................... 29	   Calmodulin ......................................................................................................... 30	   Chloride intracellular channel 2 ......................................................................... 30	   Toxins ................................................................................................................ 31	  1.3.5	   X-ray crystallography and NMR .............................................................................. 31	   EF-hand proteins in complex with RyR peptides .............................................. 31	   CaM-peptide complex ................................................................................. 32	  viii	   S100A1 ....................................................................................................... 33	   N-terminal region ............................................................................................... 34	   Domain A of RyR1 and RyR2 .................................................................... 34	   Domains ABC of RyR1 .............................................................................. 36	   Exon-3 deletion in domain A of RyR2 ....................................................... 38	   Phosphorylation domain in the central region ................................................... 39	  1.3.6	   Pseudo-atomic models .............................................................................................. 41	   Remark on docking reliability ........................................................................... 41	   N-terminal region: domains ABC ...................................................................... 41	   N-terminal region: residues 850-1060 ............................................................... 43	   Phosphorylation domain .................................................................................... 44	  1.3.7	   Analogies with the inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptor ........................................... 44	  1.3.8	   Research question ..................................................................................................... 47	  Chapter 2: Disease mutations in the ryanodine receptor N-terminal region couple to a mobile intersubunit interface ..................................................................................................... 49	  2.1	   Methods ............................................................................................................................ 52	  2.1.1	   Cryo-EM docking ..................................................................................................... 52	  2.1.2	   Cloning and crystallization of disease mutants ......................................................... 53	  2.1.3	   Data collection and refinement ................................................................................. 54	  2.1.4	   Thermal melt analysis ............................................................................................... 56	  2.1.5	   CD spectra measurement .......................................................................................... 56	  2.2	   Results .............................................................................................................................. 57	  2.2.1	   Pseudo-atomic models of the N-terminal disease hot spot ....................................... 57	  ix  2.2.2	   Disease mutations can weaken the thermal stability ................................................. 62	  2.2.3	   Buried disease mutations affect the intersubunit interface ....................................... 65	  2.2.4	   Salt-bridge mutations cause relative domain-domain movements ........................... 67	  2.2.5	   Uncharged mutations at the A-B-C interfaces cause local changes ......................... 69	  2.2.6	   The relative orientation of domains B and C ............................................................ 72	  2.3	   Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 74	  Chapter 3: The cardiac ryanodine receptor N-terminal domain contains a hot spot loop that is perturbed by disease-causing mutations ....................................................................... 80	  3.1	   Methods ............................................................................................................................ 81	  3.1.1	   Cloning, expression, and purification ....................................................................... 81	  3.1.2	   Crystallization and data collection ............................................................................ 82	  3.2	   Results .............................................................................................................................. 83	  3.3	   Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 89	  Chapter 4: The cardiac ryanodine receptor N-terminal region contains an anion-binding site that is targeted by disease-associated mutations ............................................................... 93	  4.1	   Methods ............................................................................................................................ 94	  4.1.1	   Cloning, purification, and crystallization of RyR2 N-terminal region ..................... 94	  4.1.2	   Data collection, structure solution, and refinement .................................................. 95	  4.1.3	   Fluorescence-based thermal shift assays .................................................................. 97	  4.2	   Results .............................................................................................................................. 97	  4.2.1	   Overall structure of the RyR2 N-terminal region ..................................................... 97	  4.2.2	   Chloride can be exchanged ..................................................................................... 102	  4.2.3	   Chloride dissociation constant is below 4mM ........................................................ 103	  x  4.2.4	   The R420Q disease-associated mutation affects chloride binding ......................... 105	  4.2.5	   Additional RyR2 disease-associated mutations ...................................................... 108	  4.2.6	   Putative ligand binding sites ................................................................................... 116	  4.2.7	   Interface 1 contains an additional α helix ............................................................. 118	  4.3	   Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 121	  Chapter 5: Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 128	  5.1	   Pseudo-atomic structures ............................................................................................... 129	  5.2	   Models of disease mutation mechanisms ....................................................................... 132	  5.3	   Ligand-dependent modulation ....................................................................................... 135	  5.4	   Future directions ............................................................................................................ 137	  References .................................................................................................................................. 140	  Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 187	  Appendix A ............................................................................................................................. 187	   xi  List of Tables  Table 2.1: Crystallographic parameters. ....................................................................................... 55	  Table 3.1: Data collection and refinement statistics. .................................................................... 82	  Table 4.1: Crystallographic parameters. ....................................................................................... 96	  Table 4.2: Interdomain salt bridges. ............................................................................................. 99	  Table A.1: Summary from functional studies on RyR disease-associated mutations. ............... 187	   xii  List of Figures  Figure 1.1: A schematic diagram of the components in E-C coupling. .......................................... 2	  Figure 1.2: Disease hot spots. ......................................................................................................... 6	  Figure 1.3: An overall structure of RyR. ...................................................................................... 18	  Figure 1.4: The pore-forming region. ........................................................................................... 20	  Figure 1.5: Opening and closing. .................................................................................................. 23	  Figure 1.6: Overview of difference densities observed for insertion studies (left) and protein binding partners (right). ................................................................................................................ 25	  Figure 1.7: Binding partners containing EF hands. ...................................................................... 32	  Figure 1.8: Crystal structures of RyR1A and RyR2A. ................................................................. 35	  Figure 1.9: The structure and docking of RyR1ABC. .................................................................. 37	  Figure 1.10: Structures of the RyR2A wildtype and exon 3 deletion mutant. .............................. 38	  Figure 1.11: Structure of RyR1 phosphorylation domain. ............................................................ 40	  Figure 1.12: Structural conservation between RyR and IP3R. ...................................................... 46	  Figure 2.1: A linear view of RyR1 and RyR2 disease mutations. ................................................ 50	  Figure 2.2: Pseudo-atomic models of RyR1ABC in open and closed RyR1. ............................... 58	  Figure 2.3: Relative positions between and within N-terminal disease hot spots. ....................... 60	  Figure 2.4: RyR1ABC docking results for different cryo-EM maps. ........................................... 61	  Figure 2.5: Thermal melt analysis. ............................................................................................... 64	  Figure 2.6: Circular dichroic (CD) spectra of G216E. .................................................................. 65	  Figure 2.7: Buried disease mutations. ........................................................................................... 66	  Figure 2.8: Disease mutation affecting interdomain ionic pairs. .................................................. 68	  xiii  Figure 2.9: Other mutations at the intrasubunit interfaces between different domains. ............... 70	  Figure 2.10: Domain reorientations are not due to pH differences. .............................................. 72	  Figure 2.11: The clamping action of domain A. ........................................................................... 73	  Figure 2.12: Model for the effect of N-terminal disease-associated mutations in RyRs and ligand binding in IP3Rs. ........................................................................................................................... 76	  Figure 3.1: The RyR2A HS-loop mutant structures. .................................................................... 85	  Figure 3.2: The HS-loop of RyR2A wild type and A77V mutant. ............................................... 86	  Figure 3.3: Chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) on RyR2A caused by the HS-loop mutants. .... 88	  Figure 4.1: Overall structure of the RyR2 N-terminal region. ...................................................... 98	  Figure 4.2: Sequence alignment of RyR2 and RyR1 N-terminal regions. .................................... 99	  Figure 4.3: Details of the anion-binding site. ............................................................................. 101	  Figure 4.4: Structure of RyR2ABC crystallized in 4mM KCl. ................................................... 104	  Figure 4.5: Structure of the R420Q disease-associated mutant. ................................................. 106	  Figure 4.6: Sequence alignment of various mammalian RyR2 sequences. ................................ 107	  Figure 4.7: Additional RyR2 disease-associated mutants. .......................................................... 110	  Figure 4.8: The G230C mutation reduces the thermal stability of RyR2ABC. .......................... 112	  Figure 4.9: The structure and thermal stability of R414C. ......................................................... 114	  Figure 4.10: PEG binding sites. .................................................................................................. 117	  Figure 4.11: The structure of the β22-β23 loop at interface 1. ............................................... 119	   xiv  List of Abbreviations  4-CmC 4-chloro-m-cresol ARVD2 Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia type 2 Ca2+ Calcium (ion) CaM Calmodulin CaMBD Calmodulin-binding domain CaVs Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels CCD Central core disease CICR Ca2+-induced-Ca2+ release CLIC-2 Chloride intracellular channel 2 CPVT Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Cryo-EM Cryo-electron microscopy Da (kDa/MDa) Dalton (kilo-daltons/mega-daltons) DLS Dynamic light scattering DR Divergent region E-C coupling Excitation-contraction coupling ER/SR Endo/sarcoplasmic reticulum FKBP FK506-binding protein FSC Fourier shell correlation GST Glutathione-S-transferase ITC Isothermal titration calorimetry xv  IVF Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation IP3R Inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptor IpTxa Imperatoxin A K+ Potassium (ion) MH Malignant hyperthermia MmD Multi-mini core disease nm Nanometer PEG Polyethylene glycol PKA Protein kinase A PPS Porcine stress syndrome RDCs Residual dipolar couplings RMSD Root mean square deviation RyRs Ryanodine receptors SOICR Store-overload-induced Ca2+ release WT Wild type             xvi  Acknowledgements  I thank my supervisor, Dr. Filip Van Petegem, for his guidance and support in pursuing my doctoral thesis projects. I am grateful for the opportunities he has given me to develop my research skills. I also thank my committee members Dr. Edwin Moore and Dr. Franck Duong for their support. None of the projects described in this thesis could have been tackled single-handedly. The success was possible due to the highly collaborative effort of the members of the Van Petegem lab. I especially thank Ching Chieh (Jett) Tung for his continued support throughout my doctoral studies. It was his dedication and superhuman bench-work skills combined with my supervisor’s guidance that got many of our papers into prestigious journals. I also thank Paolo Lobo, the former Masters student, for helping me develop crucial techniques, including crystallography and thermofluor assays, as wells as obtaining the preliminary results that provided us with a lot of insights. I thank the rest of the lab members, particularly Dr. Zhinguang (Michael) Yuchi for his mentorship and Kelvin Lau for answering all my computer-related questions, fixing everything from printer to ITC, and sharing the PhD-student life with me. I also thank Dr. Wayne Chen (University of Calgary), Dr. Mitsu Ikura (University of Toronto), and their research teams for their collaboration in parts of the work presented in this thesis. In addition, my thanks go to Dr. Anna-Carin Carlsson (the Erdelyi Lab, University of Gothenburg) for her collaboration. I owe special thanks to my family and my newly extended family, who have provided me with both emotional and financial well-being throughout my years of education. 1  Chapter 1: Introduction  Calcium ions (Ca2+) are important intracellular messenger molecules in nearly every cell type of the human body. Under so-called “resting” states of the cell, the concentration of Ca2+ in the cytoplasm is extremely low (~10-7M), but this can rapidly rise ~2 orders of magnitude when an appropriate signal is generated. Ca2+ can enter the cytoplasm either from the extracellular space or from intracellular compartments through specialized membrane proteins. These “calcium channels” are complex proteins, often consisting of multiple subunits, and are targets for multiple regulatory events. The mobilization of Ca2+ from these organelles can trigger many Ca2+-dependent events, such as the contraction of muscle tissue.  A major intracellular Ca2+ store is the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), or its specialized form, the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) in muscle tissue. There reside ryanodine receptors (RyRs), high-conductance Ca2+-release channels responsible for releasing Ca2+ from the intracellular store into the cytoplasm (Figure 1.1). RyRs are involved in various physiological events such as learning and memory, secretion, fertilization, and apoptosis. Their most prominent role, however, is in the contraction of both cardiac and skeletal muscle. 2   Figure 1.1: A schematic diagram of the components in E-C coupling. Depolarization of the plasma membrane activates the voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV) channels, embedded in the T-tubule, which conduct Ca2+ influx into the cytoplasm. RyRs in the SR membrane sense this Ca2+ signal and amplify it by releasing more Ca2+ from the SR store (Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release, CICR). This provides enough Ca2+ for the muscle contraction to occur. RyRs can also be activated through an overload of the luminal Ca2+ in a process known as store-overload-induced Ca2+ release (SOICR). SERCA pump in the SR membrane and Na+/Ca2+-exchanger in the plasma membrane restore the resting [Ca2+]. The activity of RyR can be upregulated by the PKA phosphorylation upon the activation of β-adrenergic receptor in the plasma membrane. 3  The naming of RyRs originates from the ability of the channel to bind the plant alkaloid ryanodine, a toxic compound from the South American plant Ryania speciosa(1). Ryanodine binds RyR at nanomolar affinity, which locks the channel in subconductance states at low concentrations and blocks them entirely at higher concentrations(2). RyRs are the largest ion channels currently known and form homotetrameric assemblies measuring approximately 2.3MDa (565kDa/subunit). In mammalian organisms three isoforms have been identified, encoded on different chromosomes. RyR1 is the predominant isoform in the skeletal muscle(3), while RyR2 is enriched in the heart(4). The third subtype (RyR3) was originally identified in the brain(5), but all three isoforms are expressed in multiple cell types. They share about 70% sequence identity, and the sequence variations mainly stem from three divergent regions in the RYR genes, referred to as DR1, DR2, and DR3(6). RyRs are crucial in excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling (Figure 1.1). In myocytes, depolarization of the plasma membrane propagates through invaginations in the sarcolemma (transverse tubules, or T-tubules), where L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (CaVs) are located. The activation of these CaVs by membrane depolarization stimulates RyRs in the SR. Thus, CaVs act as the voltage sensors for RyRs(7-9). In the skeletal muscle, RyR1 and CaV1.1 interact directly(10,11), and this mechanical coupling is sufficient for the activation of RyR1. On the other hand, in the cardiac muscle, RyR2 is activated by the small influx of extracellular Ca2+ through CaVs in a process known as Ca2+-induced-Ca2+ release (CICR). In either case, the end result is a massive release of SR Ca2+ into the myoplasm through RyRs in response to membrane depolarization, leading to muscle contraction. RyRs, thus, act as the signal amplifiers, increasing the Ca2+ message originating from L-type CaVs. The T-tubules and the SR form very close contacts (~12nm) in junctional sites(12). In the skeletal muscle, junctional sites are known as 4  triads, while they form dyads in cardiac myocytes(13). The proximity between the two membranes allows a rapid and precise communication between the voltage sensor and the signal amplifier. Mutations in RyRs have been linked to severe disease phenotypes, reflecting their importance in the tight regulation of Ca2+ release during muscle contraction(14). More than 300 mutations have been identified in RyR1, and they are associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH)(15), central core disease (CCD), and several other conditions(16). In the cardiac isoform, more than 150 mutations have been linked to catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT)(17) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia type 2 (ARVD2)(18), two conditions that can lead to sudden cardiac death. The RyR provides a platform for an abundance of small molecules and protein binding partners, and this is the likely reason for the enormous size of this protein(19)(20-24). The primary regulatory molecule is cytoplasmic Ca2+, which triggers the channel to open. However, higher Ca2+ levels can trigger closing, indicating that there is more than one Ca2+ binding site: activation sites and inactivation sites. Under conditions whereby the SR is overloaded with Ca2+, RyRs can also open spontaneously in a process known as store-overload-induced Ca2+ release (SOICR)(25,26). Some of the auxiliary proteins include, but are not limited to, calmodulin (CaM), FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs), calsequestrin, kinases (PKA, PKG, and CaMKII), and phosphatases (PP1, PP2A, and PDE4D3)(27). The size of this modulatory complex can be up to 7 MDa(20). The presence of RyRs in the SR has been observed more than 40 years ago, long before their identification. In electron microscopic images, regularly spaced electron-dense protrusions were observed extending from the SR membrane and spanning the gap in the triads(28). Not 5  knowing the identity of these structures as the Ca2+ release channels at the time, these protrusions were later referred to as the “feet” structures(29). Since then, multiple studies have generated 3-dimensional structures of RyRs, which has provided a wealth of information on the molecular mechanisms underlying these complex channels. 1.1 Ryanodine receptors and genetic disease RyRs are target for plethora of disease-associated mutations, highlighting their importance in the cellular processes and the need for their tight regulation.  To date, more than 300 mutations have been identified in RyR1, and over 150 mutations have been found in RyR2. Although there may be a significant amount of sequencing bias(30), many mutations are found in three clusters or “hot spots” (Figure 1.2). 6   Figure 1.2: Disease hot spots. A linear view of the RyR1 and RyR2 amino-residue sequences, with each vertical line representing a disease mutation. The areas of solid colors correspond to domains A (blue), B (green), C (red), phosphorylation domain (purple), and pore-forming domain (orange). The available crystal structures are shown above the sequences: RyR1ABC (PDB accession code 2XOA) and RyR1 and RyR2 phosphorylation domains (PDB accession codes 4ERT and 4ETV, respectively). 1.1.1 Malignant hyperthermia Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a pharmacogenetic disorder, requiring both a genetic mutation and an external trigger to cause a disease phenotype. The condition is mostly linked to mutations in RyR1, but some mutations in the skeletal muscle L-type Ca2+ channel (CaV1.1) can also cause this disorder(31). It is typically triggered by the use of inhalational anesthetics or a 7  muscle relaxant, succinylcholine(32). The condition is considered rare, with an incidence of 1:60,000 for adults or 1:15,000 for children(33).  A MH episode is characterized by an abnormal rise in the core body temperature, skeletal muscle rigidity, acidosis, and tachycardia. Most modern surgery rooms monitor for these signs and will make use of dantrolene, which can rapidly reverse the symptoms. Dantrolene acts by decreasing the intracellular Ca2+ concentration(34). Several studies suggest a direct interaction between dantrolene and RyR1, and it is thought that dantrolene directly prevents Ca2+ release through RyR1(35,36), although some studies failed to observe any effect of dantrolene on purified RyR1, questioning the direct binding between the two(37). The first link between MH and RyR1 came through a related disorder in pigs, known as porcine stress syndrome (PSS). It was found that the pig RyR1 mutation R615C underlies PSS(38), and soon after, the corresponding mutation in humans was linked to MH(15). 1.1.2 Core myopathies Central core disease (CCD) is a congenital myopathy, characterized by progressive muscle weakness and the presence of metabolically inactive tissue (or cores) in the center of muscle fibers. These cores lack mitochondria, and the myofibrillar organization is disrupted. The common phenotype of CCD includes muscle atrophy, floppy infant syndrome, and skeletal muscle deformities(39,40). It was established early on that there is a connection between CCD and MH susceptibility(41), and some RyR1 mutations have been found to cause both(40). Multi-mini core disease (MmD) is another inherited congenital myopathy. Unlike CCD, whose inheritance is autosomal dominant, MmD is usually considered recessive(39). As its name suggests, MmD is characterized by the presence of multiple ill-defined cores in muscle fibers. MmD can cause axial muscle weakness that can lead to severe scoliosis(39). Although MmD is 8  mainly associated with mutations in RyR1(42), mutations in selenoprotein N1(43), a protein required for RyR1 Ca2+ release(44), and α-actin (ACTA1) have also been found to underlie MmD(45). 1.1.3 Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Also known as CPVT, this disorder manifests itself in young individuals, with either syncope or sudden cardiac death as the first symptom. Many affected individuals will develop cardiac arrhythmias that are triggered by physical exercise or emotional stress. CPVT is mostly detected through stress tests, which indicate bidirectional ventricular tachycardia. Typically no morphological abnormalities of the myocardium are detected. The disease is mostly due to mutations in the cardiac RyR2 isoform(17), but mutations in the associated proteins calsequestrin(46), triadin(47), and CaM(48) can also be the cause.  As CPVT is triggered by β-adrenergic stimulation, it can be treated by β-blockers(49). Flecainide, a sodium channel blocker, has also been found to be beneficial for CPVT patients(50). 1.2 Functional studies of RyRs Although increasing numbers of RyR mutations are identified in patients and their family members, only a handful of them have been validated as causative disease mutations(33). Functional studies are necessary to prove the molecular basis of the mutations as pathogenic, and without such characterizations, the possibility that some of the mutations are the result of polymorphism cannot be ruled out. Moreover, functional studies provide a number of clues on how the mutations affect the channel function. For example, do the mutations facilitate channel opening or do they inhibit the channels? Do the mutations affect the channel sensitivity towards 9  cytosolic modulators or luminal modulators? In this section, different methods of performing functional studies and their results are highlighted. 1.2.1 Model systems Variety of model systems for studying the functional effects of RyRs, in physiological and pathogenic states, have been developed over the years. These can be roughly divided into three groups: endogenous and recombinant expression systems and in vivo models. Native expression systems In the early days, before and shortly after the discovery of RyR1 mutations in MH-susceptible pigs and individuals, SR vesicles were prepared from muscle biopsies(51,52). SR vesicles from non-MH-susceptible animals or individuals were also obtained to serve as controls. These are endogenous expression systems since SR vesicles contain native RyRs. SR vesicles can be used as a whole or can be further purified to obtain individual RyR channels.  SR vesicles prepared from biopsies are invasive, since they involve acquisition of native RyRs expressed in patients or knock-in mice carrying mutations. For example, skeletal myotubes have been isolated from MH-susceptible and/or CCD patients(53-56). Both RyR1 and RyR2 can be studied by isolating skeletal myotubes and cardiomyocytes from knock-in mice, respectively(57-59). Flexor digitorum brevis fibers, present in the feet, have also been derived from knock-in mice for the study of RyR1 mutations(60-63). In some cases, measures have been taken to alleviate some of the affliction on obtaining native RyRs from patients by using less invasive approaches. In one study of a CCD-associated mutation, fibroblasts from a CCD patient were differentiated into muscle by myoD conversion with adenovirus(64). In other cases, immortalized lymphoblastoid cells were generated using B-lymphocytes isolated from blood samples(65,66). 10 Recombinant expression systems A more commonly used model is a recombinant expression system. By using cells that lack the native expression of RyRs, all results will arise only from the mutant RyRs. One of the most well-used systems are dyspedic myotubes, which are derived from mice that lack RyR1, or RyR1-null mice(67-70).  Also frequently used are human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells. HEK-293 cells not only lack native RyR expression but also lack other components involved in E-C coupling. Yet HEK cells have been demonstrated to express functional channels when they are transfected with RyR cDNA(71-76). Other cell lines used in functional studies include COS-7(77), myoblastic C2C12(78), HL-1 cardiomyocytes(79,80), and CHO cells(81). In vivo systems  Knock-in mice have served as valuable models for functional studies of mutations in RyR1 and RyR2(57-59,82,83). The comparison between mice that are homozygous or heterozygous for the mutation in question has provided clues about the gene dosage effects in different disorders. Studying the effect of mutations on the body as a whole provides insights that are more relevant to clinical phenotypes, such as mutational effects on multiple organs. 1.2.2 Methods Multiple techniques have been implemented to characterize mutant RyRs in different expression systems.  Four commonly used methods are briefly introduced here. [45Ca2+]-uptake and release assays One way to measure Ca2+ release through RyRs is via [45Ca2+]-uptake and release assays(84-86). Microsomal vesicles expressing recombinant RyR and SERCA1a are prepared. SERCA1a (sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase) is a Ca2+ ATPase that pumps back Ca2+ 11  from cytosol into the SR/ER lumen. The vesicles are then incubated with [45Ca2+], during which SERCA1a drives [45Ca2+] into the vesicles. By comparing the amount of [45Ca2+] accumulation in the presence or absence of the potent RyR inhibitor Ruthenium Red, the amount of Ca2+ release through RyR can be determined. Whole-cell Ca2+ fluorescence assays A more widely used technique is a Ca2+ fluorescence assay involving whole cell samples(71-73,75,77,78,87). Cells, usually HEK-293 with recombinant expression of RyR, are loaded with a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator, such as fura-2, which diffuses throughout the cytoplasm. By measuring florescence with confocal microscopy, the resting [Ca2+] levels in the cytoplasm, as well as the frequency, duration, and extent of Ca2+ release from RyR can be calculated. The addition of caffeine to the cell leads to the depletion of the Ca2+ store in the ER through RyR, and in this way, the [Ca2+] levels in the ER can also be measured. [3H]-ryanodine binding assays Also commonly used is a [3H]-ryanodine binding assay(72,73,75,76,88,89). SR vesicles containing endogenous or recombinant RyR are incubated with ryanodine containing the radioactive isotope of hydrogen: [3H]-ryanodine. Since ryanodine binds to RyR in the open state, binding of [3H]-ryanodine is indicative of the measure of open channels. The extent of RyR activation is then measured by radioactive counting on the [3H]-ryanodine bound to RyR at the end of the experiment. Single-channel electrophysiology As opposed to whole-cell measurements, activities of a single channel can be recorded using planar lipid bilayer electrophysiology(66,87,89,90). Recombinant or endogenous RyR from crude SR vesicle preparations or from purified material are fused into an artificial lipid 12  bilayer formed across two chambers. The current generated by ions passing through the channel is then recorded. This method allows various properties of the single channel to be determined, including the open probability, duration of the open and closed time, and conductance. The two chambers can resemble cytoplasmic and luminal sides of the channel, allowing the studies of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) from the cytoplasmic side or store-overload-induced Ca2+ release (SOICR) from the luminal side. The planar lipid bilayer technique also allows for additional control because purified auxiliary proteins or pharmacological modulators can be added to either side of the chambers. 1.2.3 Highlights of the results Functional studies of mutant RyR channels have generated numerous insights into the molecular basis of the RyR channelopathies. Accordingly, complex sets of results have been generated that require careful interpretation and have resulted in debates. For example, many mutations seem to make RyRs more active, but the exact nature of this change is still under scrutiny. In some cases, mutations seem to be more sensitive to cytosolic activators, while other evidence suggests they are more sensitive to luminal Ca2+ levels. Others suggest that altered phosphorylation states of the channel or affinity to auxiliary proteins are the causative mechanism. In this section, results of the functional studies are highlighted as mutations that cause RyRs to be either hypersensitive (more prone to opening upon stimulation) or hyposensitive (requiring more stimulus to open). RyR mutations can be pathogenic either through gain or loss of function since alteration in Ca2+ homeostasis in either direction can cause aberrant muscle functions. Yet other mutations have exhibited no apparent alterations in the functional studies performed so far. The results are summarized in Appendix A. 13 Gain-of-function mutations The majority of the mutations in both RyR1 and RyR2 have been shown to make the channels hyperactive. This includes the first disease-associated mutation found in porcine stress syndrome, RyR1 R615C. Functional studies have revealed that RyR1 channels with this mutation have significantly lowered threshold for activation by Ca2+, caffeine, and halothane compared to wild-type channels, while having markedly increased threshold for inactivation by Ca2+, Ruthenium Red, or Mg2+(51,52,77,78,84,85,88,91-93). These results are characteristic of gain-of-function mutations that alter RyRs into hypersensitive channels. RyRs that are hyperactive are often described as “leaky,” and in addition to their increased sensitivity towards activators or reduced sensitivity towards inhibitors, they often exhibit increased resting [Ca2+] levels in the cytoplasm, reduced SR Ca2+ store content, or altered maximal Ca2+ release. Loss-of-function mutations Although less common, some mutations in RyRs have been demonstrated to reduce channel activity. For example, I4898T mutation in the transmembrane region of RyR1, associated with an unusually severe and highly penetrant form of CCD, has been shown to cause complete uncoupling of sarcolemmal excitation from SR Ca2+ release, in which activating signals from L-type CaV channels to RyR1 are uncoupled(67). Mutations that disrupt signaling between CaV1.1 and RyR1 are known as “E-C uncoupling” mutations. It has also been shown that the I4898T mutation leads to a complete loss of Ca2+ release induced by caffeine stimulation(94). Many other CCD-associated mutations located at the predicted pore region of RyR1 (G4890R, R4892W, A4894P, I4897T, G4898R, G4898E, and R4913G) have also been shown to abolish E-C coupling and/or exhibit reduced sensitivity to activation by Ca2+, caffeine, or 4-CmC(70,86,95-98).  14  In RyR2, fewer mutations thus far have been associated with a reduction in activity, suggesting that a loss of function in RyR2 may be less tolerated than in RyR1. A4860G mutation in RyR2 is associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) and is located at the predicted inner pore helix. It has been shown to diminish response or increase the threshold for activation by SOICR(99,100). Furthermore, RyR2 A1107M mutation in mice (corresponding to T1107M mutation in humans, associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) has been shown to increase the threshold for Ca2+ release termination(101,102). Mutations with no discernible functional change Effects of some disease-associated mutations are less apparent. For instance, single channel measurements of RyR1 A1577T and G2060C mutants produced no discernible change in the activity of the channels compared to that of the wild type(103). Similarly, [3H]-ryanodine binding assays of RyR1 R2939K expressed in HEK-293 cells failed to show alteration in Ca2+-dependent and caffeine-induced activation compared with wild-type channel(104). RyR1 I404M expressed in dyspedic mice myotubes exhibited resting [Ca2+] levels and SR [Ca2+] content comparable to that of the wild type(68). Furthermore, expressions of RyR1 D3987A and G3939A rabbit cDNA (corresponding to MH-associated mutations D3986E and G3938D in humans, respectively) in HEK-293 cells only showed responses to activation by Ca2+, caffeine, and 4-CmC comparable to that of the wild type(72,75). For those mutations where no clear functional effect has been observed, it is possible that they are not causative of disease but, instead, simply represent polymorphisms. Alternatively, their effect may only become apparent in the native environment, where particular regulatory mechanisms exist that are not captured by the model systems. 15 Remark on functional studies Overall, there is an apparent theme between RyR activity and disease phenotype. MH and CPVT are associated with RyR mutations that give an overall gain-of-function phenotype. On the other hand, CCD can be due to either a gain or a loss of RyR1 activity. Loss of function results in impaired Ca2+ release and, hence, decreased contractility observed in CCD. The gain of RyR1 activity can lead to a general “leak” of Ca2+, resulting in an overall lowered concentration of Ca2+ in the SR. The result is then an insufficient amount of Ca2+ being available for an E-C coupling event, again resulting in decreased contractility. For those mutations with less clear effects, as well as those which have been shown to be causative for aberrant Ca2+ homeostasis, combining functional studies with structural investigations would provide further useful insights into the molecular basis of disease-associated mutations in RyRs. 1.3 Structural studies of RyRs Knowing the atomic details of a macromolecular assembly greatly enhances our insights into a particular protein. Unfortunately, RyRs present major challenges to techniques such as X-ray crystallography because of the enormous size, the integral membrane protein nature, and dynamic features that result in a heterogeneity of functional states. For this reason, electron microscopy of single particles and two-dimensional crystals has been the primary method of choice in the field for many years. In the recent years, however, NMR and crystal structures of several segments of RyRs have started to emerge. These atomic-resolution structures provide details that are key to understanding the molecular mechanisms of the channel function in normal and diseased states. 16  1.3.1 Cryo-EM studies of closed RyRs The presence of junctional “feet” structures has been observed almost half a century ago in thin-section or negative stain electron microscopic images. In these studies, images captured square-shaped, electron-dense protrusions from the SR membrane from both native muscle tissues and isolated SR vesicles. For a limited set of examples, see references(10,28,29,105,106). The feet were shown to be composed of four subunits(107), and their identity was confirmed when the electron microscopic images of purified RyRs were able to show the characteristic “feet” structures(108).  An intriguing property of RyRs is their ability to form two-dimensional arrays. It was observed in native tissue preparations that skeletal muscle RyRs form checkerboard-like lattices, touching the neighboring molecules near the corners(12,107,109). It was later found that this is an intrinsic property, as purified RyR1 was able to assemble into similar patterns and could form two-dimensional crystals(110,111). In the skeletal muscle preparations, tetrads of CaVs were found to coincide with the cytoplasmic region of RyR1 in an alternating fashion. This strongly suggested that the two membrane proteins, each being part of a different membrane, physically interact(10). The functional implications of the clustering and RyR-CaV interaction will not be discussed here but are reviewed elsewhere(7,14,22). Numerous efforts have been made to improve the structural details of RyRs in the electron micrographs. Due to its high abundance in the SR membrane and the relative ease of purification, the RyR1 structure has been the most intensively studied. One group obtained a 37Å-resolution structure of RyR1 by generating computer-averaged images from multiple negative stain images(109,112). The resolution was further improved to ~30Å by the use of frozen-hydrated sample preparations in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM)(102,113,114). By 17  this time, enough details were present to identify globular-shaped domains in the cytoplasmic region of the channel. Further description was given to the RyR structure: regions found at the corners were termed “clamps” as they resembled the shapes of laboratory clamps, whereas the regions that connected these corners were termed “handles”(114)(Figure 1.3). Comparison between the structures of the three isoforms showed that the overall features are universal among subtypes, which is not surprising given their high sequence homology(115-118). The most striking trait of the RyR is its mushroom shape, composed of two parts: a larger cytoplasmic region forming the cap (~80%) (previously known as the “foot” structure) and a smaller transmembrane region forming the stem (~20%). Both form square prisms that are rotated by ~40° relative to one another, and which are connected via four thick columns ~14Å long. The transmembrane region measures 120 x 120 x 60Å3, whereas the cytoplasmic foot measures approximately 270 x 270 x 100Å3. The latter portion contains numerous globular masses and a series of cavities in which more than 50% of its volume is occupied by solvent. Fifteen globular subregions have been identified so far and arbitrarily assigned numerical labels. Based on segmentation of the highest resolution map(119,120)(Figure 1.3), these subregions can be divided into four units: (i) clamps at each corner (subregions 5, 6, 7a, 7b, 8a, 8b, 9, and 10); (ii) handles connecting two clamp regions (subregions 3 and 4); (iii) a central rim on the cytoplasmic face around the fourfold symmetry axis (subregions 1, 2a, and 2b); and (iv) columns (subregions 11 and 12) that connect the cytoplasmic and transmembrane regions. Some of the subregions have received alternative labeling(121) (Figure 1.3, brackets). The subunit boundary between each monomer was proposed to center around the handle region, containing one whole handle, two halves of the clamp regions on either side, and a quarter of the central rim(120), although there are some discrepancies (see Section and Chapter 2). 18   Figure 1.3: An overall structure of RyR. The ~10Å cryo-EM reconstruction (EMDB accession code 1275) of RyR1 in the closed state. (a) Top view from the cytoplasm facing the SR and (b) side view from the plane of the SR membrane. Subregions are labeled according to Serysheva et al.(120), with respective alternate labeling according to Samso et al.(121) shown in brackets.    The major difference between RyR1 and RyR2 seems to be located in the clamp region, where some masses were found to be either larger or smaller in RyR2 than in RyR1(115). Similarly, comparison between RyR1 and RyR3 has revealed an extra mass in RyR1 that is 19  missing in RyR3(118). These structural differences likely contribute to distinct functional properties among the three isoforms. A key question surrounding RyR structure is the transmembrane region. How many helices are present, and what is the architecture of the pore-forming part? In order to analyze the transmembrane assembly, the quality and resolution of the maps are of key importance. Two groups have described the structures of closed RyR1 at resolutions near 1nm, with reported resolutions of 10.2-10.3Å(121,122) and 9.6Å(119). It is noteworthy that both studies used different criteria to report the resolution (Fourier shell correlation or FSC cutoff 0.15 versus 0.5, respectively), adding to the debate of which criterion should be used(123-125). A recent discussion on the validation estimates the highest resolution of RyR cryo-EM reconstructions to fall between ~10Å to ~12Å(126). The highest resolution currently available for any full-length RyR is at ~10Å for the closed state of RyR1(119,126). At this resolution, five putative membrane-spanning α helices in each subunit could be assigned inside rod-like densities. However, there are likely more secondary structure elements, and it has been suggested that each subunit contains 6 or 8 transmembrane helices(127). Two out of the five putative helices (simply named helices 1 and 2) are located near the 4-fold central axis and resemble the pore-lining and pore helix structures observed in K+ channels (Figure 1.4). Helix 1 is about 45Å long and is kinked, bending away from the 4-fold symmetry axis. At the SR luminal side, helices 1 from each subunit together form a large, funnel-like cavity with a diameter of approximately 30Å, which likely forms the channel entrance. The funnel tapers towards the SR membrane, and the narrowest part measures about 15Å in diameter. Helix 1 is the likely candidate for the inner, pore-lining helix. Helix 2 is shorter (~22Å) and is tilted about 50° with respect to the plane of the SR membrane. Helices 2 20  from each subunit point towards the 4-fold central axis to form an opening of ~7Å and are, therefore, prime candidates for the pore helices. Putative helices 3, 4, and 5 have lengths of about 18-22Å.  Figure 1.4: The pore-forming region. A close-up of the transmembrane region of the ~10Å closed RyR1 cryo-EM map from the side view. The putative helices are outlined. The surrounding densities are clipped for clarity. Because crystal structures are now available for the pore region of several K+ channels, the helical arrangement can be compared directly with the presumed pore-forming region in the cryo-EM reconstructions. Although the ~10Å cryo-EM reconstruction is thought to represent RyR1 in the closed state, helices 1 and 2 only poorly match the helices of the closed KcsA K+ channel structure(128). Instead, a higher correlation was found for MthK channel in the open conformation. Kinking of the inner helices in MthK channel is thought to open this channel(129). Since helix 1 appears to be bent already, kinking of the inner helices in RyRs is likely not sufficient for channel opening(119). A proposed model places a highly conserved glycine (Gly4934) at the hinge position of the inner helix and two rings of negative charges at the luminal and cytoplasmic opening of the pore. Such a charge distribution is commonly observed in cation-selective channels. For a limited set of examples, see references(128,130-134). 21  In contrast with this, different conclusions have been reported by Samso and colleagues. In two RyR1 structures in the closed state at reported resolutions 10.2-10.3Å (FSC 0.15 cutoff), manual docking showed a higher correlation between the closed RyR1 and closed KcsA or KirBac1.1 channels(121,122,128,135). Therefore, there are discrepancies in the shape of the transmembrane helices and in the interpretations of possible modes of channel gating. These may be due to overall differences in the conformational purity of the samples, or simply due to differences in resolution (~4Å of difference when the FSC 0.5 criterion is applied to all studies). As the structures originated from detergent-solubilized preparations, it cannot be excluded that there are differences depending on sample handling. More recently, a feature detection program was used to identify secondary structures in the cytoplasmic region using the ~10Å structure of RyR1(120,136). The authors identified 36 putative α helices and seven putative β sheets in the cytoplasmic foot. In particular, one putative β sheet is located at subregion 12, near the tapered section of the “column” region. This β sheet may play an important role in the gating of the channel since other channels, including Kir and HCN2, share β sheets at the same location(135,137-140). 1.3.2 Opening and closing Being such a large protein, it is conceivable that opening and closing of the channel is allosterically coupled to the large cytoplasmic foot region. The first open structure of RyR was obtained by Orlova and colleagues at 30Å resolution(141), followed by more structures in the subsequent years(118,122,142). In these studies, the open conformation of RyR was stabilized by the presence of Ca2+ and other modulators, such as ryanodine, PCB95, and ATP homologs. The studies all agree that the closed and open RyRs share similar overall structures. One obvious difference is a widening of the central pore upon opening. The authors also reported 22  global conformational changes between the two states, especially in the clamps and the transmembrane region. Since structural changes occur far away from the proposed pore region, RyRs are clearly allosteric proteins, and interference with any of the movements is likely to affect channel function. The highest resolution available for the open-state RyR thus far is at reported 10.2Å (FSC 0.143 cutoff) for RyR1(122). The authors used PCB95, a neuroactive compound, to stabilize the open state. The largest conformational changes were found in the cytoplasmic foot. In the open conformation, subregions 7, 8, 9, and 10 in the clamp move down towards the SR membrane by ~8Å, while subregion 6 moves outwards by ~5Å (Figure 1.5). In addition, subregion 2 in the central rim moves upward towards the T-tubule and outwards away from the 4-fold central axis. Thus, the main conformational change in the cytoplasmic portion upon opening of the channel is an outward movement away from the center. 23   Figure 1.5: Opening and closing. (a) Top and (b) side views of superpositions of the cryo-EM reconstructions of RyR1 in closed (gray, EMDB accession code 1606) and open (red mesh, EMDB accession code 1607) states. The extent of some conformational changes is indicated by arrows. Another large structural change was observed in the transmembrane region. The authors identified at least six membrane-spanning α helices per subunit, based on the number of high-density segments in the transmembrane region. Upon opening, the inner helices seem to kink, as the bottom halves shift 3Å upward towards the cytoplasmic side, and tilt ~5°, widening the pore. 24  This observation is consistent with other studies that reported rotating motions in the transmembrane region and compared the opening and closing of RyR to that of a camera aperture(118,141,142). The motions in the cytoplasmic and transmembrane regions seem to be coupled via the column region, in particular the inner branches, which tilt by ~8° upon opening, moving their midpoints ~6Å away from one another(122). Manual docking of K+ channel structures in the open-state map showed that the open RyR1 correlates better with open K+ channels(122). However, since there have been inconsistent results for correlation between closed RyR1 and K+ channel structures(119,121,122), care must be taken when interpreting these manual docking results. Although buffer conditions can favor an open or closed state in intact membranes, this does not necessarily extrapolate to conditions following detergent extraction. As differences in sample handling may also contribute to structural changes, the conformational state is best deduced by analyzing the final model rather than assuming a particular state. The discrepancies would be reconciled, for example, if the ~10Å RyR1 structure(119) represents an open or partially open (i.e. subconducting) channel, rather than a fully closed structure. Future experiments will undoubtedly shed more light on this matter. 1.3.3 Insertion studies Despite the continued improvements into the quality of full-length RyR structures, the cryo-EM reconstructions are of insufficient resolution to locate individual amino acids. In the absence of atomic models, one alternative is to determine the rough location of regions of interest via the use of antibodies or fusion proteins. In both cases, analysis of the difference densities found in cryo-EM reconstructions puts restraints on the position of the insertion site or the antibody epitope. The residual uncertainties of the locations depend on the resolution, the 25  size of the insert or antibody, and the lengths of flexible linkers and loops at the insertion site. The locations proposed in many of these studies are summarized in Figure 1.6.  Figure 1.6: Overview of difference densities observed for insertion studies (left) and protein binding partners (right). (a) Top and (b) side views of the cryo-EM reconstruction of RyR1, with observed difference densities indicated in spheres. Although the studies were performed on different RyR isoforms, all are shown here on the RyR1 cryo-EM map to allow a direct comparison. N-terminal region The three-dimensional localization of the amino terminus of RyR has been of great interest since the N-terminal region (residues 1-614 in RyR1) covers the first of the three hot spots for disease mutations. (See also Section The 34Å cryo-EM reconstruction of RyR3, N-terminally fused to GST (GST-RyR3), displays an extra mass at the clamp region in the middle of subregions 7-10 and a smaller extra mass between subregions 1, 3, and 4(143). A 33Å structure of RyR2 with GFP inserted after Ser437 presented additional density between subregions 5 and 9(144). These studies led the authors to conclude that the N-terminal disease 26  hot spot was most likely located in the clamp region. We will go over the location of the N-terminal region in greater detail in Section and Chapter 2, showing that the region is found in the central rim rather than in the clamp region. Another site of interest in the N-terminal region is residues 590-609 in RyR1 and residues 601-620 in RyR2 which constitute the proposed binding site for dantrolene(35,145). Dantrolene is the only effective treatment for malignant hyperthermia, thus knowing the exact location of its binding site is of considerable interest. Insertions of GFP in the binding site did not yield any well-behaved protein, but the 27Å structure of RyR2 with GFP inserted after Tyr846 showed a major extra mass on the T-tubule side of subregion 9. Along with FRET studies, it was concluded that dantrolene also binds close to subregion 9, near the binding site for FKBP12(146). Central region The central region (residues 2163-2458 in RyR1) harbors another disease-mutation hot spot. Insertion of GFP near RyR2 Ser2367 showed a significant extra mass in the bridging density between subregions 5 and 6(147). This experiment suggests that it is possible for the N-terminal and central disease hot spots to interact, supporting the zipper hypothesis, which states that the two regions interact and undergo relative conformational changes upon channel opening(148). A recent study showed that the clamp region of RyR2 under go conformational changes in ligand-dependent manner(149). The study utilized CFP insertion at Ser2367 and YFP insertion at Tyr2801, for which FRET signal was identified in subregion 6 of the clamp region. Conformational changes in the region were detected for activators caffeine, aminophylline, theophylline, ATP, and ryanodine. However, the presence of Ca2+ or 4-CmC, despite also being 27  an agonist, did not induce detectable conformational changes in the clamp region. The authors suggest that RyRs possess multiple ligand-dependent activation mechanisms, each accompanied by distinct conformational changes in the clamp region(149). Divergent regions The three RyR isoforms share about 70% identity, and the major sequence differences are located in three stretches known as divergent regions DR1, DR2, and DR3(6). These stretches likely underlie functional differences between the isoforms, and, therefore, their three-dimensional location is valuable for understanding the functional mechanisms in RyRs. DR1 is the largest of the three divergent regions and includes residues 4254-4631 in RyR1 and residues 4210-4562 in RyR2. This region is thought to be responsible for the varying sensitivities towards Ca2+ inactivation in different isoforms(150-152). One study took advantage of a monoclonal antibody raised against residues 4425-4621(153). The 34Å structure of RyR1 in complex with the antibody showed an extra mass in subregion 3. In agreement with this observation, an extra mass was observed in the same area after inserting GFP at Asp4365(154). The second divergent region, DR2, includes residues 1342-1403 in RyR1 and residues 1353-1397 in RyR2. This region is thought to be involved in E-C coupling(155,156). DR2 is absent in RyR3(6). Negative stain electron micrographs of RyR1 in presence of an antibody against DR2 revealed an extra density in the clamp, close to subregion 9(117). Consistent with the result, an extra mass appeared in the neighboring subregion 6 in a 34Å structure of RyR2 with GFP inserted after Thr1366(157).  DR3 includes residues 1872-1923 in RyR1 and residues 1852-1890 in RyR2. This region has been implicated in modulation by CaV1.1, Ca2+, and FKBP(158-160), and is the target for 28  some disease-associated mutations(161). Insertion of GFP after RyR2 Thr1874 leads to an extra density in subregion 9, close to the proposed FKBP12.6 binding site(162). Phosphorylation sites in the central region RyRs are the target for phosphorylation by protein kinase A (PKA), which is known to activate the channels(163,164). Both Ser2030 and Ser2808 are PKA phosphorylation sites(165-167). The 27Å structure of RyR2 with GFP inserted after Thr2023 showed an extra mass in the T-tubule face of subregion 4(168). Similarly, the 27Å structure of RyR2 fused to GFP after Tyr2801 displayed an extra mass in the bridging density connecting subregions 5 and 6(169). In agreement, an extra mass appeared in the periphery of subregion 6 in the 25Å structure of RyR1 in complex with a monoclonal antibody raised against residues 2756-2803 (RyR2 residues 2722-2769)(169). See Section for pseudo-atomic models of phosphorylation domains. One hypothesis concerning the effect of PKA phosphorylation on RyR2 is that it causes the dissociation of FKBP12.6, a protein thought to stabilize the closed state of the channel(170-172). PKA phosphorylation would thus lead to enhanced channel opening. However, given the large distance between the FKBP12.6 binding site (see Section and the presumed position of Ser2808, it was concluded that Ser2808 cannot be directly involved in FKBP12.6 binding(169). Remark on insertion studies In the absence of atomic-resolution structures for the majority of the RyR parts, the use of monoclonal antibodies and protein insertions in conjunction with three-dimensional reconstructions continue to provide approximate locations of RyR components. Care must be taken when interpreting the data, as a piece of difference density can also appear further away 29  from the insertion site either due to overall conformational changes or due to the use of long flexible linkers. 1.3.4 Binding sites of protein binding partners Using a similar approach to the insertion studies, the analysis of difference densities is very useful in locating the positions of RyR biding partners (Figure 1.6). The difference densities are either due to the binding partner itself or due to conformational changes that arise because of the binding. In contrast to fusion protein strategies, such results are not dependent on linker lengths, and the confidence about the exact location is, therefore, much higher. FK506-binding proteins FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs), also known as immunophilins, bind to RyR1 and RyR2 with high affinities and stabilize the closed state. FKBP12, a 12kDa protein as its name suggests, is found predominantly in the skeletal muscle, where it binds to each subunit of RyR1(173). In the cardiac muscle, FKBP12.6, a 12.6kDa protein, preferentially associates with RyR2(174). In early studies, the three-dimensional structures of RyR1-FKBP12 complexes at ~35Å resolution showed that FKBP12 binds between subregions 3, 5, and 9(175,176). In addition, less significant differences were observed in the bridging densities between subregions 5 and 6, which could indicate conformational changes due to the binding(176). The location was confirmed by a more recent study which showed the structure of the RyR1-FKBP12 complex at 16Å resolution, whereby a crystal structure of FKBP12(177) was docked into the difference density(178). In another recent study, a 33Å structure of the RyR2-FKBP12.6 complex highlighted a binding site similar to the one for FKBP12(179). The binding of FKBP12.6 seemed to cause conformational changes, as subregion 6 was more extended towards the T-tubule and the electron dense parts in the transmembrane region splayed apart. 30 Calmodulin Calmodulin (CaM), or calcium-modulated protein, regulates various cellular processes through binding and unbinding of Ca2+ in its two domains, N-lobe and C-lobe, each containing two EF-hand motifs. CaM binds to RyR1 in both the absence (apoCaM) and presence (Ca2+/CaM) of Ca2+. For further functional implication of CaM binding, see Section The binding site of Ca2+/CaM on RyR1 was first studied using gold-cluster labeled CaM(180) and later confirmed by a 37Å RyR1-CaM complex(176). Ca2+/CaM binds between subregions 3 and 8a, and its association did not seem to cause major alterations in the conformation of RyR1. The Ca2+/CaM binding site is approximately 90Å away from the FKBP12 binding site(176). Similarly, RyR1-apoCaM complex at 28Å resolution showed that the apoCaM binding site is located at the outer surface of subregion 3, just above the binding site for Ca2+/CaM and closer to the T-tubule(181). These studies suggest that binding of Ca2+ can cause one or both CaM lobes to hop from one binding site to another, which supports the different functional effects that Ca2+ binding and unbinding in CaM have on RyR1(182-184). Chloride intracellular channel 2 Chloride intracellular channel 2 (CLIC-2) is a protein that is widely expressed in the skeletal and cardiac muscle of vertebrates(185), and which exist in a soluble and membrane-bound form(186). This 247-residue protein is homologous to the glutathione-S-transferase (GST) superfamily and was found to inhibit both RyR1 and RyR2(185,187). A 25Å structure of the RyR1-CLIC2 complex showed that CLIC-2 binds between subregions 5 and 6(187). Moreover, CLIC-2 binding seemed to separate subregions 9 and 10, resembling the open conformation despite the fact that the pore appeared to be closed. 31 Toxins Being strictly required in E-C coupling and many other Ca2+-dependent events, it is not surprising that RyRs are the targets of various toxins. Among these is imperatoxin A (IpTxa), a 33-residue peptide derived from scorpion venom, that is known to bind to both RyR1 and RyR2 with high affinity, locking the channels in subconductance state(188,189). Because IpTxa is too small (3.7kDa) for cryo-EM studies, it was N-terminally fused to biotin and bound to avidin. A 29Å cryo-EM reconstruction of the resulting complex with RyR1 showed that IpTxa binds in the crevice between subregions 3, 7, and 8a(190). Another toxin known to associate with RyRs is natrin, a 221-residue protein derived from venom of the snake Naja naja atra. Natrin belongs to the cysteine-rich secretory protein (CRISP) family and inhibits RyR1(191). A 21Å resolution structure of the RyR1-natrin complex showed that the toxin binds between subregions 5 and 6 on the surface exposed to the cytoplasm(191). 1.3.5 X-ray crystallography and NMR Being giant eukaryotic proteins, RyRs present major challenges to high-resolution studies. The cryo-EM reconstructions have shown that RyR consists of individual globular regions, which opens up the avenue for a “divide and conquer” approach, or atomic-resolution studies of individual RyR domains. EF-hand proteins in complex with RyR peptides The first high-resolution structures came from a small region (RyR1 residues 3614-3643) in complex with CaM(192) and S100A1(193)(Figure 1.7).  32   Figure 1.7: Binding partners containing EF hands. (a) Crystal structure of Ca2+/CaM (yellow) bound to RyR1 peptide (blue, residues 3614-3643; PDB accession code 2BCX). (b) NMR structure of an S100A1 dimer (purple) bound to two RyR1 peptides (blue, residues 3616-3627; PDB accession code 2K2F). Aromatic anchors providing major contacts are indicated (W3620 and F3636). Red spheres represent Ca2+ ions. CaM-peptide complex As described in Section, CaM is an EF-hand containing protein that can fine-tune the Ca2+-dependent feedback to RyRs. For example, at low cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations, apoCaM potentiates opening of RyR1, whereas Ca2+/CaM inhibits the channel(182-184). In contrast, both apoCaM and Ca2+/CaM seem to inhibit RyR2(194,195). A 2.0Å crystal structure of Ca2+/CaM in complex with a peptide from RyR1 (residues 3614-3643) was solved by Mackenzie and coworkers(192). The RyR1 peptide forms an α helix, with both lobes of CaM binding in an anti-parallel arrangement, in which the N-lobe binds to the C-terminal half of the peptide, and the C-lobe binds the N-terminal half (Figure 1.7a). The main 33  hydrophobic anchors, Trp3620 and Phe3636, have an unusual “1-17” spacing, whereby the CaM lobes do not interact with one another. In the same study, solution NMR 1H-15N residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) suggest that the lobes experience independent domain motions in solution, such that the RDCs for the two lobes cannot be fitted simultaneously to the crystal structure. This is compatible with the notion that multiple CaM-binding domains (CaMBDs) are present within RyR, and that individual lobes may associate with distinct CaMBDs(196,197). Since the cryo-EM reconstructions showed only one CaM bound per RyR monomer(176,181), these stretches have to be close for CaM to bridge. Given the large number of possible RyR fragments that can bind CaM(3,198-200), understanding the binding and effects of apoCaM and Ca2+/CaM on RyRs involves solving a complex puzzle. S100A1 S100A1 is an EF-hand containing protein from the S100 protein family. It exists as homodimers, with each monomer containing a low- and high-affinity EF hand. It enhances the opening of both RyR1 and RyR2(201-204). An NMR structure has shown the interaction between Ca2+/S100A1 and RyR1 (residues 3616-3627)(193)(Figure 1.7b). Interestingly, some residues (including Trp3620) are involved in binding both CaM and S100A1, showing that both proteins compete for the same binding site. It is, therefore, possible that the effect of S100A1 is due to a competition with CaM: at high Ca2+ levels, S100A1 can compete with Ca2+/CaM and, thus, abolish its inhibitory effect on the channel. 34 N-terminal region The N-terminal region, covering the first ~600 amino acid residues, harbors many disease-associated mutations in both RyR1 and RyR2. Several crystallographic and NMR studies have focused on this region. Domain A of RyR1 and RyR2 The first atomic-resolution structure of a RyR domain was reported by Ikura and coworkers, covering the first domain of RyR1 (residues 1-205)(205). This was soon followed by another study, describing the same domain in both RyR1 and RyR2(206). In both studies, the N-terminal domain (referred to as “domain A” from here on) consists of a β-trefoil core, built by 12 β strands, and a single α helix (Figure 1.8). In line with the high degree of sequence conservation, only minor differences are present between domains A of RyR1 and RyR2. However, a recent NMR structure of RyR2 domain A revealed a second α helix that is unique to RyR2(207). This unique α helix is dynamic and is located in proximity to the column region in the intact RyR2, suggesting an important role in the communication between the N-terminal and transmembrane regions(207). 35   Figure 1.8: Crystal structures of RyR1A and RyR2A. Superposition of RyR1A (blue; PDB accession code 3ILA) and RyR2A (white; PDB accession code 3IM5) chains A. β8- β9 loop (HS loop) from RyR1A is highlighted in orange. Residues targeted by disease-associated mutations and for which the structural studies have been performed are shown in stick representations (RyR1 in black(205); RyR2 in gray(206)). Both isoforms contain several disease mutations, many of which are located in a loop connecting the strands β8 and β9 (or β8-β9 loop), also referred to as a HS (hot spot) loop(205). Neither NMR nor crystallographic studies of mutant forms of this domain showed any significant differences in the stability or structure(205,206). Because the mutations appeared to be at the surface of domain A, it was assumed that they were located at interfaces for other RyR domains or auxiliary proteins. In Chapter 3, we show that point mutations at β8-β9 loop in RyR2 domain A may cause structural instability of the loop.   36 Domains ABC of RyR1 A recent study has depicted the 2.5Å crystal structure of the first 559 residues of RyR1, a region that covers the bulk of the N-terminal region(208). The structure folds up as three independent domains (A, B, and C) that interact with one another in a compact form (Figure 1.9a). Domains A and B both fold up as β-trefoil cores, whereas domain C consists of a bundle of 5 α helices. The domain-domain interactions are mainly hydrophilic in nature and inherently weak.  In RyR1 and RyR2 combined, over 75 disease-associated mutations could be located on the structures. A significant portion of those are located at the interface between domains A, B, and C, likely destabilizing the domain-domain interactions. These include mutations that abolish ionic pairs across the domains(209) or abolish the anion binding(210). Detailed structural and biochemical studies of these mutants are covered in Chapters 2 and 4. 37   Figure 1.9: The structure and docking of RyR1ABC. (a) Overall structure of rabbit RyR1 for amino acid residues 1-559. This portion of RyR1 consists of domain A (blue; residues 1-205), domain B (green; residues 206-394), and domain C (red; residues 395-532). The remaining 27 residues are not visible in the electron density. (b,c) Docking of RyR1 ABC in the ~10Å RyR1 cryo-EM map (EMDB accession code 1275). A view from the cytoplasmic side towards the endoplasmic reticulum (b), and a side view showing a vertical cut through the cryo-EM map at the four-fold axis (c).    38 Exon-3 deletion in domain A of RyR2 A very severe form of CPVT is due to the deletion of a 35-residue segment (exon 3) in the N-terminal domain (domain A) of RyR2. The deletion ablates an α helix and a β strand that is part of the domain A β-trefoil core. However, the exon-3 deletion in RyR2 domain A unexpectedly did not cause misfolding of the protein, and even more surprisingly, the deletion enhanced the thermal stability of the domain(206). A recent crystal structure of RyR2A with exon 3 deleted highlights a very unusual “structural rescue,” in which a flexible loop (exon 4), unique to RyR2, takes over the deleted β strand(211) (Figure 1.10b). A recent NMR structure revealed that exon 4 forms a dynamic α helix unique to RyR2, located close to the column region of an intact channel(207)(Figure 1.10a). This switch from α helix to β strand suggests that alternative splicing, allowing either exon 3 or exon 4 to insert itself in the β-trefoil core, enables fine-tuning the activity of RyR2.  Figure 1.10: Structures of the RyR2A wildtype and exon 3 deletion mutant. (a) The X-ray crystallography-solution NMR hybrid structure of RyR2A wildtype (PDB accession code 2MC2). Exon 3 is colored in black, and exon 4 is colored in red. The β strand in exon 3 (β4) is labeled. (b) The crystal structure of the RyR2A exon-3 deletion mutant (PDB accession code 3QR5). The coloring is the same as in (a).  39 Phosphorylation domain in the central region RyRs are regulated by several kinases (PKA, PKG, CaMKII) and phosphatases (PP1, PP2A, PDE4D3)(27). In particular, phosphorylation of RyR2 by PKA provides a link between physiological stress and RyR function: stress activates β-adrenergic receptors, which then consequently activates PKA and ultimately RyR. For this reason, PKA phosphorylation of RyR2 has gained a large amount of interest.  Several phosphorylation sites have been identified in the cytoplasmic portion of RyRs: Ser2843 in RyR1 and Ser2030 and Ser2808 in RyR2. Some groups believe that the hyperphosphorylation of RyR2 is the leading cause of heart failure via dissociation of FKBP12.6(165,172,212). Nonetheless, this proposed mechanism is still under debate since other groups could neither detect PKA hyperphosphorylation in heart failure nor confirm FKBP12.6 dissociation by PKA phosphorylation(80,213,214). Two recent studies report the crystal structures of a phosphorylation domain in RyR1(215) and in all three isoforms(216): RyR1 residues 2734-2940 (rabbit numbering), RyR2 residues 2699-2904 (mouse numbering), and RyR3 residues 2597-2800 (human numbering). This single domain consists of two symmetric halves, each half containing two α helices, one or more short 310 helices, and a C-terminal β strand (Figure 1.11).  40   Figure 1.11: Structure of RyR1 phosphorylation domain. The crystal structure of RyR1 phosphorylation domain (rabbit residues 2734-2940; PDB accession code 4ERT). The symmetric two halves are colored in different shades of green for clarity. Multiple phosphorylation sites were identified in RyR2, and most of them cluster in a long, flexible loop(216). Although RyR2 has no reported mutation in this domain thus far, the corresponding domain in RyR1 contains up to 11 mutations. Several of these are located close to the phosphorylation sites, on the same face of the domain. This indicates that phosphorylation and disease mutations target the same interface and may have the same effect on the channel(216).  Several disease-associated mutations in the phosphorylation domain have been studied. L2867G mutation in RyR1 drastically reduced the thermal stability of the domain by more than 10°C, and the same mutation caused aggregation of the domain at room temperature(216). Crystal structures of several RyR1 mutants (E2764K, S2776M, and R2939S) showed that these mutations alter the surface properties and salt bridges within the domain(216), which may affect 41  interfaces between binding partners (such as PKA) or neighboring domains (such as the FKBP binding site). 1.3.6 Pseudo-atomic models The cryo-EM images of the entire receptor currently cannot locate the positions of individual amino acids. Concurrently, high-resolution structures of individual portions provide limited information when their locations in the full-length proteins are unknown. With both techniques combined, however, it is feasible to start constructing pseudo-atomic models by docking high-resolution fragments into the cryo-EM maps. Remark on docking reliability Several algorithms exist to dock fragments, making use of six-dimensional searches (three translational and three rotational parameters) along with a scoring function. Crucial parameters for a successful experiment include the quality and resolution of the cryo-EM reconstruction, as well as the relative size of the fragment compared to the intact protein. When only small fragments are used, a simple cross-correlation coefficient may not suffice to provide a reliable position(217,218). In those cases, it may be advantageous to make use of a Laplacian filter, which enhances the features of the surface. Although the latter may increase high-frequency noise, the ideal method for any particular case can be identified through a statistical analysis of the correlation coefficients, whereby a correct solution has a correlation coefficient that is significantly higher than the second best solution. In the absence of such a docking contrast, the reliability of the top solution may be questionable. N-terminal region: domains ABC Prior to the availability of high-resolution structures, some homology-based models were prepared for the N-terminal region, and these were docked in the clamp region(120,219). 42  However, using the crystal structure of the N-terminal domains, a high-contrast solution places the N-terminal region in the central rim, forming a vestibule around the fourfold symmetry axis(208)(Figure 1.9b,c). Using the segmentation described by Serysheva et al.(120), domain A occupies subregion 1, whereas domains B and C occupy subregions 2a and 2b, respectively. The different results with the prior docking studies are most likely due to discrepancies between the homology based models and the crystal structure, and due to the use of different docking algorithms. The docking is also at odds with the proposed subunit boundaries(120). The N-terminal domains, thus, seem to form interactions with the same region in a neighboring subunit, mostly involving contacts between domains A and B. This interface contains the largest concentration of disease mutations in the region. A side view shows that the area is located far away from the transmembrane region, but is connected to the pore-forming region via electron dense columns (Figure 1.9c). All mutations at the periphery of the N-terminal region were found to be located at one of six different interfaces with other RyR domains. No mutation was found to be located in the exposed surface area, consistent with the fact that no protein-binding partner has been found in this region.   The location of the N-terminal region shows apparent discrepancies with the cryo-EM analysis of fusion proteins containing GFP inserted near residue Ser437 in RyR2(144), or with GST fused to the N-terminal of RyR3(143). However, when the length of the linkers is taken into account, together with the inherent length of the loop region containing Ser437, these studies can be reconciled(208). In addition, the GST-RyR3 fusion construct displayed two main regions of difference density, suggesting that the fusion created conformational changes. One of these is located right next to the N-terminus of the docked RyR1ABC domains.  43  The cryo-EM studies comparing RyR1 in the open and closed states have shown significant movements in the central rim where the N-terminal region is located(122). Together with the distribution of the disease mutations, it is plausible to assume that most or all of the domain-domain interfaces involving the region are labile and subject to movement. This creates an energetic penalty to open the channel, therefore, assigning the role of a “brake” to the N-terminal region. When disease mutations perturb any of these interfaces, the energetic penalty is reduced, making it easier for the channel to open. This is consistent with the fact that most mutations characterized so far lead to a gain of function, including increased sensitivity to modulators and leakage of Ca2+(14). Combining the mutations with another event (increased temperature, binding of halogenated anesthetics, phosphorylation, etc.) is then sufficient to open the channels. The perturbation of domain-domain interfaces by the disease-associated mutations is described in greater detail in Chapter 2 and Chapter 4. N-terminal region: residues 850-1060 In a recent study, homology models of RyR1 residues 850-1056 and RyR2 residues 861-1067 were built based on sequence homology with the crystal structure of RyR1 2733-2940 phosphorylation domain(220). The homology models were docked into the cryo-EM reconstruction of RyR1, where they were found to be located in subregion 5, connecting the central vestibule (where domains ABC are located) and the clamp region (where phosphorylation domain is located)(220). Furthermore, subregion 5 is positioned adjacent to the proposed FKBP binding site. Thus, the end of the N-terminal region may hold a key role in bridging multiple regulatory mechanisms within the channel: phosphorylation, FKBP binding, and conformational changes accompanying channel opening. However, care must be taken when interpreting 44  homology models, as they may not always reflect the true structure. Also, pseudo-atomic models from a small fragment may not give a reliable docking result, as discussed in Section Phosphorylation domain Two recent studies have used the crystal structures of the phosphorylation domain to dock into the cryo-EM reconstruction of RyR1(215,216). Both docking studies resulted in the phosphorylation domain fitted in subregion 10 in the clamp region. Due to the two-fold-symmetry of the domain, two alternative orientations within subregion 10 are possible(216). In one of the orientations, the side of the domain containing the phosphorylation-site loop and disease-associated-mutation interface is facing an inner cavity within the channel. In the alternate orientation, the same side is now exposed on the outer surface of RyR1. Future docking experiments using a larger fragment or a cryo-EM map with much higher resolution would enable the identification of the correct orientation of the domain within the channel.  The clamp region of RyR1 has previously been shown to undergo large motions upon channel opening, with the corners bending down towards the ER membrane by ~8Å(122). A recent study has also shown that the same region of RyR2 is subject to conformational changes in ligand-dependent manner(149). Thus, phosphorylation and mutations in this area may affect allosteric motions in the region that normally accompany channel gating(216). The phosphorylation domain may also be involved in the formation of RyR lattices, as the neighboring subregion 6 has been shown to mediate intermolecular contact between adjacent RyRs(110,111,221,222). 1.3.7 Analogies with the inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptor Inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) are another family of Ca2+ release channels, predominantly present in the ER membrane. Sizing ~1MDa, IP3R is the “little brother” of the 45  RyRs, and a significant amount of homology (~30% sequence identity) is found between the two channels. Not surprisingly, a great deal of structural homology is present as well, and IP3R have been studied by both electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography.  Several cryo-EM reconstructions of IP3Rs have been performed, but since most seem at odds with one another, it has been difficult to directly compare these with RyR reconstructions(223-228). In a recent study, however, a ~14Å cryo-EM reconstruction of IP3R reveals an overall mushroom shape, sharing the same hallmark feature of RyR, while the cytosolic cap is considerably smaller than that of RyR(229,230).  Three IP3R domains have been investigated with X-ray crystallography. Crystal structures are available for the N-terminal suppressor domain (equivalent to domain A of RyR)(231,232), and for the following two domains known together as the IP3 binding core (equivalent to domains BC of RyR) in complex with IP3(233). A structure describing all three domains together had been elusive until recently. Since then, crystal structures of the IP3RABC domains, in absence of the ligand and in complex with IP3, have become available(234,235). IP3RABC domains were docked in the central rim of the cryo-EM reconstruction of IP3R, very much like the N-terminal domains of RyR(234)(Figure 1.12).  46   Figure 1.12: Structural conservation between RyR and IP3R. (Left) The structure of RyR1ABC (domain A in blue, domain B in green, and domain C in red; PDB accession code 2XOA) and the top and side views of the docking in the RyR1 cryo-EM reconstruction (EMDB accession code 1606). The density of the cryo-EM reconstruction is clipped for clarity. (Right) The structure of apo IP3R1ABC (PDB accession code 3UJ4) in the same coloring scheme as in RyR1ABC and similar views of the docking in the IP3R1 cryo-EM reconstruction (EMDB accession code 5278). 47  The RyR ABC domains have a surprisingly large amount of structural homology with the IP3R N-terminal domains, a feature that was predicted before the RyR1ABC crystal structure was determined(120). The secondary structure elements in the two β-trefoil domains and the α-helical bundle in domain C superpose very well (Figure 1.12). The structural conservation underlines the evolutionary relationship between the two channels, and the interactions between the suppressor domain and the IP3 binding core have been suspected to be similar as well(208,236). Indeed, the crystal structure of IP3RABC shows rearrangement of the three domains upon binding of IP3(234,235), much like the rearrangement seen in RyR1ABC mutants(209) (See Chapter 2 for detail). The movement in the N-terminal domains may be a common theme among the Ca2+ release channels, where channel opening is facilitated through targeting the ABC domain-domain interface via ligand binding or disease mutations(27,209). 1.3.8 Research question Despite the efforts of numerous functional studies in understanding the molecular mechanism behind RyR-linked diseases, such knowledge remains elusive largely due to the lack of high-resolution structures of the channel. High-resolution structures of RyR domains and biochemical studies provide great details on the mutations. For example, do disease-associated mutations cause complete unfolding of the protein, or do they cause distinct structural changes? Do the structural changes destabilize domain interfaces, or do they cause permanent reorientations of the domains? Which side chains are involved? Are there new contacts caused by the mutations?  One important step in uncovering the mechanisms of mutations is to locate their positions in the full-length channel. By combining crystal structures of individual domains and 48  cryo-EM reconstructions of the full-length RyR, pseudo-atomic models can be obtained. These models give important clues, such as interfaces affected by the disease-associated mutations. We combine X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM docking studies, and thermal melt assays to analyze the folding and stability of the N-terminal regions of RyR1 and RyR2.   49  Chapter 2: Disease mutations in the ryanodine receptor N-terminal region couple to a mobile intersubunit interface  Mutations in ryanodine receptors (RyRs) can result in severe disease phenotypes. More than 300 have been identified in RyR1, associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH)(15), central core disease, and related conditions(16). In the cardiac isoform, more than 150 mutations have been linked to catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia(17), arrythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia type 2, and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation(18). Many mutations cluster in three distinct “hot spots” within the sequence, but several others, especially for RyR1, are increasingly found outside of these clusters (Figure 2.1).  50   Figure 2.1: A linear view of RyR1 and RyR2 disease mutations. Amino acid residue numbers are shown below. Vertical lines indicate disease-associated mutations. There is still a clear clustering of mutations in RyR2, but several mutations are increasingly found outside of the initially proposed hot spots for RyR1. The RyR1 N-terminal ABC domains and the pore-forming region are highlighted. The crystal structure of wild-type RyR1ABC (PDB accession code 2XOA) is shown above. The primary trigger for RyR opening is Ca2+, the same ion it permeates. RyRs can be activated by either cytoplasmic or luminal Ca2+ ions(26,237), but higher cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations can inhibit RyRs(2). In the skeletal muscle, RyR1 can also be triggered to open through conformational changes in the L-type calcium channel CaV1.1, which is thought to interact directly with RyR1(11). In addition, a host of regulatory proteins and small molecule 51  ligands can alter the sensitivity to these primary triggers. The precise mechanisms by which Ca2+ or CaV1.1 alter channel gating are still unknown.  Several high- and low-resolution studies have shed light on the RyR structure(238). Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) studies depict a mushroom-shaped structure with the stem forming the transmembrane region, and the cap located in the cytoplasm(2,11). A study comparing the open and closed states suggests that channel opening is the result of inner transmembrane helices that bend, in agreement with high-resolution studies on other ion channels(122). However, helix bending in RyRs is still a contentious issue(119). Channel opening also coincides with many movements in the cytoplasmic area(122), showing that RyRs are bona fide allosteric proteins. As a result, RyR-interaction partners that bind far away from the pore region can influence channel opening. For example, any partner that preferentially stabilizes the open state can facilitate channel opening. The overall open probability is, thus, the result of the integrated effect of ligands with positive and negative input. Similarly, any mutation that selectively affects one of the states may facilitate or inhibit channel opening. Several crystallographic studies have shed light on RyR domains(205,206,208). The N-terminal region (RyR1 residues 1-532), containing the bulk of the proposed N-terminal disease hot spot, is built up by three domains (A, B, and C) (Figure 2.1) and forms a cytoplasmic vestibule(208). This position was recently confirmed via a cryo-EM reconstruction, whereby green fluorescent protein was inserted in RyR2 domain B(239). For simplicity, we refer to the three domains together as the N-terminal disease hot spot. In the related inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP3R), the corresponding region forms the binding site for IP3, which triggers channel opening(234,235). However, a direct functional role for the RyR N-terminal domains is unknown. 52  Most mutations studied so far seem to confer a gain-of-function phenotype, whereby channel opening is facilitated(27). However, some mutations associated with central core disease and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, mostly located in the transmembrane area, can confer a loss-of-function(70,99). How can N-terminal disease mutations, located >100Å away from the transmembrane inner helices, facilitate channel opening? Most of them are found at domain-domain interfaces, suggesting that perhaps some or all of these interfaces undergo changes during channel opening, and that disease mutations directly interfere with such events. Here we compare pseudo-atomic models of the N-terminal area in the open and closed states, and look at crystal structures of disease mutations that affect domain-domain interactions. We present a model whereby neighboring N-terminal hot spots interact through an interface that is disrupted upon channel opening. 2.1 Methods Throughout the section, all numbering corresponds to the amino-acid sequence of rabbit RyR1. 2.1.1 Cryo-EM docking The RyR1ABC crystal structure (PDB accession code 2XOA) was docked into open and closed RyR1 cryo-EM reconstructions described by Samso et al.(122) (EMDB accession codes 1607 and 1606, respectively). The full structure was placed four times in the four-fold symmetric map using extensive six-dimensional searches using the colores program in the Situs 2.6 package(240). Contrast plots, showing the correlation coefficients of the top solutions were prepared based on this docking. The positions of all twelve individual domains were further refined by rigid-body refinement, taking steric clashes into account as implemented in the collage program of Situs 2.6(240). A Laplacian filter was applied during all stages.  53  2.1.2 Cloning and crystallization of disease mutants RyR1ABC proteins (wild type and mutants) were expressed and purified as described previously(208), with the difference that most constructs encompassed residues 1-536 instead of 1-559, because the C-terminal 27 residues were found to be unstructured. The exception is the R45C mutant, where the 1-559 construct was used for crystallization. All thermal melts were performed on the 1-536 constructs. The RyR1BC construct (residues 217-536) was cloned in the same pET28HMT vector as described before(208) and purified using a similar strategy as for RyR1ABC, with the following differences. After cleavage with Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease and collecting the PorosMC flowthrough, the sample was run on a ResourceQ column (GE Healthcare) in 20mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, 14mM β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), with a gradient from 50 to 350mM KCl, and on a Phenyl Sepharose column (GE Healthcare) in 20mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, 14mM β-ME, with a gradient from 50 to 1500mM KCl. The sample was then run on a preparative Superdex 200 as for the RyR1ABC proteins. Before crystallization, the proteins were exchanged to 50mM KCl, 10mM Na-HEPES pH 7.4, 10mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and concentrated to 10mg ml-1 using a 10,000 MWCO concentrator (Amicon, Millipore). All crystals were obtained using the hanging drop method at 4°C. L14R and D61N were crystallized in 1.4-1.6M ammonium sulphate (AS) and 0.1M HEPES pH 8.0 or 0.1M Bicine pH 9.5, respectively. V219I was crystallized in 1.4M AS, 12% glycerol, and 0.1M Bicine pH 9.0. G249R and I404M were crystallized in 1.3-1.5M AS, 12% glycerol, and 0.1M Tris pH 8.0. To refute an impact of pH on the structures, we also crystallized wild-type RyR1ABC in AS at three different pH values (pH 8.0, 9.0, and 9.5). C36R was crystallized in 1.2M lithium sulphate and 0.1M Bicine pH 9.5. R45C and R402G were crystallized in 20-22% 54  PA5100 sodium salt (PA5100), 0.02M MgCl2, and 0.1M HEPES pH 7.0 or 0.1M Bis-Tris pH 6.5, respectively. RyR1BC crystals were obtained in 0.1M Tris-Cl pH 7-8, 100-250mM KCl, and 20-30% PEG 3350. All crystals were flash frozen in the corresponding mother liquor containing 25-30% glycerol. 2.1.3 Data collection and refinement Data were collected at beamline 9-2 of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (Menlo Park) and 08ID of the Canadian Light Source (Saskatoon). The data were processed using the HKL2000 package (HKL Research) and XDS(241). All structures were solved using molecular replacement implemented in Phaser(242), using individual domains of RyR1ABC(208) (PDB accession code 2XOA) as search models. Refinement consisted of successive rounds of manual modeling in COOT(243) and refinement in REFMAC5(244) with TLS restraints applied to individual domains. Data collection and refinement statistics are available in Table 2.1. Coordinates and structure factors for all described structures are available in the Protein Data Bank: L14R (PDB accession code 4I7I), C36R (4I0Y), R45C (4I6I), D61N (4I3N), V219I (4I8M), G249R (4I1E), R402G (4I37), I404M (4I2S), and RyR1BC (4I96). Superpositions and RMSD calculations were performed using ProFit (http://www.bioinf.org.uk/software/profit). The structures of wild-type RyR1ABC at pH 8, 9, and 9.5 were identical, indicating that the observed structural differences for the mutations were not due to differences in pH (Figure 2.10).   55  Table 2.1: Crystallographic parameters. Values in parentheses are for the highest-resolution shells. RMSD = root mean square deviation.  L14R C36R R45C D61N V219I G249R R402G I404M RyR1BC Data collection          Space group R32 R32 P6322 R32 R32 R32 P6322 R32 P3121 Cell dimensions          a=b, c (Å) 171.40, 300.48 170.38, 302.11 118.16, 246.95 168.63, 301.65 169.27, 305.60 167.49, 304.70 118.26, 243.93 171.37, 299.43  68.45, 131.89 Resolution (Å) 50-2.9 (3.1-2.9) 50-2.8 (3.0-2.8) 50-2.5 (2.6-2.5) 50-2.95 (3.1-2.95) 50-2.8 (3.0-2.8) 50-2.4 (2.5-2.4) 50-2.95 (3.1-2.95) 50-2.5 (2.6-2.5) 50-2.7 (2.8-2.7) Rsym or Rmerge 14.7 (212.7) 11.1 (152.9) 16.0 (151.2) 15.0 (151.5) 12.9 (130.9) 6.7 (100.0) 12.9 (64.5) 9.7 (101.9) 13.0 (81.4) Rpim 3.1 (45.3) 3.4 (47.1) 5.0 (46.4) 4.6 (46.6) 4.5 (45.9) 3.1 (46.5) 7.4 (37.2) 3.7 (39.3) 4.1 (25.5) I/σI 14.6 (1.8) 18.0 (1.9) 13.4 (1.9) 12.6 (1.8) 15.6 (2.0) 16.0 (1.8) 10.0 (2.1) 12.9 (1.9) 15.5 (3.4) Completeness (%) 100.0 (100.0) 100.0 (100.0) 100.0 (100.0) 100.0 (100.0) 100.0 (100.0) 100.0 (100.0) 99.8 (100.0) 100.0 (100.0) 100.0 (100.0) Redundancy 22.7 (22.8) 11.4 (11.5) 10.9 (11.1) 11.4 (11.5) 9.1 (9.1) 5.7 (5.7) 3.9 (4.0) 7.6 (7.6) 10.8 (11.1)           Refinement          Resolution (Å) 50-2.9 50-2.8 50-2.5 50-2.95 50-2.8 50-2.4 50-2.95 50-2.5 50-2.73 No. reflections 35972 39670 34297 33250 39637 61106 20871 55655 9595 Rwork/Rfree 22.8/24.9 24.3/24.6 26.0/27.7 22.7/25.7 23.5/25.3 23.9/25.8 25.1/28.9 23.2/24.9 22.4/24.1 No. atoms          Protein 3521 3495 3297 3546 3575 3603 3409 3598 1968 56   L14R C36R R45C D61N V219I G249R R402G I404M RyR1BC Ligand/ion 6 6 0 6 6 0 0 6 0 Water 16 17 56 14 36 99 27 70 16 B-factors (Å2)          Protein 61.7 24.1 22.3 39.2 31.3 31.5 18.9 21.4 26.4 Ligand/ion 132.7 104.2 n/a 91.1 107.8 n/a n/a 95.7 n/a Water 49.5 21.6 20.3 26.8 21.9 28.3 13.2 21.0 18.9 RMSD          Bond lengths (Å) 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.007 0.006 0.011 Bond angles (°) 1.013 0.975 0.902 0.992 0.902 0.892 1.004 0.942 1.314  2.1.4 Thermal melt analysis The protein melting curves were measured by means of thermofluor experiments(245). Samples for melting curves contained 50µl of 0.2mg ml-1 protein and 1× SYPRO Orange solution (Invitrogen) using the manufacturer’s instructions. The melts were obtained in a DNA engine opticon 2 real-time PCR machine (Bio-Rad), using the SYBR green filter option. The temperature was changed from 20 to 95°C in 0.5°C steps. At every step, the temperature was kept constant for 15s. The melting temperatures were obtained by taking the midpoint of each transition.  2.1.5 CD spectra measurement CD spectra of RyR1ABC WT and G216E were measured in buffer containing 50mM KCl and 10mM Na3PO4 pH 7.4. Concentrations were determined using the calculated extinction coefficient at 280nm in the presence of 6M guanidine. CD spectrum measurements were performed using a Jasco J810 CD spectropolarimeter on samples at a concentration of 2µM. CD 57  spectra of the samples and buffer alone were collected over a spectral window of 195-280nm at 22°C. 2.2 Results 2.2.1 Pseudo-atomic models of the N-terminal disease hot spot The opening of RyRs is allosterically coupled to the cytoplasmic cap, which undergoes large conformational changes(118,122,141,142). This includes movements in the central rim, a region surrounding the four-fold symmetry axis on the cytoplasmic face, where the N-terminal disease hot spot was found to be located(208,239). We, therefore, docked the crystal structure of the RyR1 N-terminal domains (RyR1ABC) in the open- and closed-state cryo-EM maps of RyR1, previously compared in a systematic study at reported 10.2Å(122). Consistent with previous results in three other RyR1 cryo-EM maps(208), RyR1ABC docks around the four-fold symmetry axis with a high docking contrast, whereby the top solution clearly stands out from the next solutions down the ranking (Figure 2.2a). As it is possible that the individual domains A, B, and C also undergo relative movements during channel opening, we further refined their positions in both maps by allowing a positional refinement of each individual domain. Figure 2.2b shows their final refined positions. A direct superposition of these pseudo-atomic models shows that there are substantial shifts up to 8Å (Figure 2.2c-f). The major rearrangement in the models can be described as “tilting,” whereby all domains move upward and outward, as if pivoting around a hinge outside the hot spot. 58   Figure 2.2: Pseudo-atomic models of RyR1ABC in open and closed RyR1. (a) Docking contrasts for RyR1ABC docking, before refinement of the individual domain positions, in the open (red) and closed states (blue), showing the Laplacian-filtered cross-correlation coefficients for the top 15 unique positions. The correlation coefficients are normalized to the highest score. (b) Positions of RyR1ABC (PDB accession code 2XOA) docked in the open (left, EMDB accession code 1607) and closed (right, EMDB accession code 1606) RyR1 cryo-EM maps. Different colors indicate the individual domains (A: blue, B: green, and C: red). (c,d) Top view (cytoplasmic face) of a superposition of the entire cryo-EM maps and the docked RyR1ABC domains after refinement of the individual domain positions in closed (blue) and open (red) RyR1. The arrow and black dotted line in c indicate a cross-section used for the side view in e. (e,f) Side view of the cryo-EM maps and the docked RyR1ABC domains. The portion of the maps shown is based on segmentation through Segger, as a plug-in for Chimera(246). 59  These overall shifts are also visible when comparing the corresponding density in the open- and closed-state cryo-EM maps(122) (Figure 2.2c,e). A key observation is that the changes are concerted: where density is systematically disappearing “below” the domains, extra density appears “above” (Figure 2.2e). Such concerted movements are highly improbable as a result of poor resolution or noise in the maps, as this would only cause random scatter in both directions. Although these pseudo-atomic models do not allow a detailed description of interactions across subunits, they imply that domains A and B of neighboring subunits are juxtaposed, likely forming interactions in the closed state (“interface 1”). However, in the open-state model, the intersubunit gap is extended by ~7Å, a distance that is undoubtedly large enough to break or alter many interactions (Figure 2.3a). Incidentally, the largest concentration of disease mutations in the N-terminal region is found facing the intersubunit boundary (20 for RyR1 and RyR2 combined). The bulk of the mutations are clustered in only three loops that are juxtaposed. One of these loops is located in domain A (connecting β strands 8 and 9), and was previously found to contain a dense cluster of mutations(205,206). The two other loops reside in domain B and are inherently flexible in the absence of their binding partner (Figure 2.3a, red dotted lines). How could these mutations affect channel opening? Mutations in the β8-β9 loop were previously found not to cause any major structural or stability differences(205,206). This implies that the only way they can have an impact is by being directly involved in a functional interface, and we propose that they form part of intersubunit interactions that are disrupted upon channel opening. Any mutation that weakens these interactions will lower the energetic barrier to open the channel, and thus facilitate channel opening. 60   Figure 2.3: Relative positions between and within N-terminal disease hot spots. (a) Superposition of domain A (blue) in the open- and closed-state models, showing the relative position of domain B in a neighboring subunit (closed: green; open: grey). Disease mutations are shown as black sticks. Select mutations in three juxtaposed loops are labeled. The β8-β9 loop in domain A is shown in red. Two flexible loops in domain B that contain multiple disease mutations are shown as red dotted lines, with disease mutations indicated by black asterisks. This interface is subject to a total of 20 disease mutations: P152S*, Q156K, R157Q*, E161G, R164C, R164L, R164Q*, G166R, D167N, D167G, H226R, M227K, D228V, E229K*, R317L, R317W*, P362M*, R368L, R368Q, and H383N, where asterisks indicate mutations found in RyR2 (all in rabbit RyR1 residue numbering). (b) Superposition of the closed (colors) and open (grey) RyR1ABC models, based on domain A (blue), indicating the relative positions of domains B (green) and C (red). These conformational changes are too small to be interpreted at the resolution of the cryo-EM maps, so that channel opening does not seem to induce major conformational rearrangements within each hot spot.   61  The study by Samso et al.(122) is the only one that systematically compared the open and closed states at a resolution ~10Å. Comparing the docking in two other cryo-EM maps near ~10Å(119,121) also supports the idea that channel opening coincides with a widening of the intersubunit gap (Figure 2.4).  Figure 2.4: RyR1ABC docking results for different cryo-EM maps. (a) Comparison of docking results for RyR1ABC into two different closed RyR1 maps(121,122) (EMDB accession code 1606 – dark blue; EMDB accession code 5014 – light blue) shows a near perfect superposition, indicating that the results for the closed maps are consistent, with near identical intersubunit arrangements. The result for docking into the ~10Å map(119) (EMDB accession code 1275 – red) shows increased intersubunit distances like in the open RyR1 map(122) (EMDB accession code 1607) (Figure 2.2). Initially presumed to represent a closed state, it was later suggested that EMDB1275 may rather represent an open RyR1, or a mixture of different states(122). The increased intersubunit distances for docking in EMDB1275 would support this assumption. (b) Close-up view with arrows indicating the shifts that the models undergo from EMDB1606 to EMDB1275. Many mutations were previously found at interfaces involving domains A, B, and C within a single subunit(208). Could these interfaces also be disrupted as part of channel opening, and could those disease mutations, therefore, also facilitate channel opening? A direct superposition of domain A of the open- and closed-state models shows that the intrasubunit 62  domain-domain movements would be subtler (Figure 2.3b), with shifts of domains B and C relative to domain A of ~2-3Å, which are too small to be interpreted at the given resolution of the cryo-EM maps. Because there do not seem to be major relative movements at the intrasubunit interfaces upon opening, we decided to further investigate disease-associated mutations at the various intrasubunit interfaces between domains A, B, and C. 2.2.2 Disease mutations can weaken the thermal stability MH is the result of increased sensitivity of RyR1 to halogenated anesthetics. In addition, many mutations in RyR1 have also been associated with increased temperature sensitivity and may underlie environmental heat stroke(57,247-253). We prepared nine different disease-associated mutants of RyR1ABC, all of which are associated with a gain-of-function phenotype (Table 2.2). They are located at interfaces between domains A, B, and C or are buried within individual domains (Figure 2.5a). Other RyR1 mutations located at the periphery of the hot spot were not included, as their effect would only become clear in the presence of neighboring domains. Thermal stability measurements show that wild-type RyR1ABC has a melting temperature of ~47°C, and several (but not all) mutations lowered the thermal stability, with a maximum effect of >9°C destabilization for the C36R mutant (Figure 2.5b,c). The lowered stability of some RyR1 mutations may directly underlie a temperature-sensitive phenotype. For example, the R402C mutation (rabbit RyR1 numbering), which is similar to the R402G mutation that destabilizes the hot spot by >5°C, has been associated with rhabdomyolysis triggered by exercise in hot weather(254).   63  Table 2.2: Summary of functional characterizations of the mutants studied. Summary of functional characterizations of the mutants studied in this report, along with references for identification and characterization. All mutants are associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH), which is known to cause gain-of-function phenotype in RyR1. Not all mutants have been functionally characterized (indicated by “n/a”). Residue numbering is for rabbit RyR1. CCD = central core disease. MmD = multi-minicore disease. Mutation Disease phenotype(s) Primary identification references Functional characterizations Functional studies references L14R MH (255) Abnormally enhanced Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release. (255) C36R MH (256) Increased sensitivity to activation by caffeine and halothane. (71,74,256) R45C MH (257) Increased sensitivity to activation by caffeine and 4-CmC. (257,258) D61N MH/CCD (40,259) Assumed increased sensitivity to activation by halothane, due to MH phenotype. n/a G216E MH/CCD/MmD (260,261) Assumed increased sensitivity to halothane, due to MH phenotype. n/a V219I MH (255) Enhanced Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release. (255) G249R MH (262) Increased sensitivity to activation by caffeine, halothane, 4-CmC, and Ca2+. Decreased sensitivity to inactivation by Mg2+. (71,74,97) R402G MH (40) Assumed increased sensitivity to halothane, due to MH phenotype. n/a I404M MH/CCD (263) Increased sensitivity to activation by caffeine, halothane, and depolarization. (68,71,74) 64    Figure 2.5: Thermal melt analysis. (a) Overview of the positions of the nine different mutations included in the thermal melt study. (b) Melting curves for the wild-type RyR1ABC and disease-associated mutants using thermofluor experiments. The curves are the average of four measurements. The melting temperatures are defined as the midpoints of each transition. (c) Average melting temperatures (n=4). The error bar indicates the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed, paired Student’s t-test. *p < 0.02 and **p <0.001. The actual p-values (for comparison with wild type) are: C36R (3.3 ✕ 10-5), R45C (0.0016), R402G (8.2 ✕ 10-4), L14R (0.0029), G216E (6.2 ✕ 10-4), I404M (0.0073), V219I (0.019), D61N (0.20), and G249R (0.17). 65  2.2.3 Buried disease mutations affect the intersubunit interface A small number of disease mutations are buried within individual domains. We analyzed the effect of three such mutations (L14R, G216E, and G249R) on the structure of the N-terminal disease hot spot. The G216E mutant expressed well with an intermediate destabilization (Figure 2.5b,c) but did not crystallize. The Gly216 Cα atom is buried within domain B, and a Glu216 side chain would clash with a neighboring β strand (β16). The inability to crystallize suggests that the structural changes are quite substantial. However, as circular dichroic (CD) spectra of wild type and mutant are clearly identical (Figure 2.6), the changes do not seem to involve secondary structure content but instead may include relative domain movements or increased flexibility.  Figure 2.6: Circular dichroic (CD) spectra of G216E. The CD spectra for wild type and G216E RyR1ABC are very similar, suggesting that the disease mutation does not lead to changes in the overall secondary structure content. This suggests that the inability of G216E to crystallize is likely due to relative domain movements or a generally increased flexibility of the domains relative to one another.  66  The G249R mutant introduces a bulky Arg side chain within a buried region of domain B (Figure 2.7a). Its thermal stability is not altered significantly (Figure 2.5b,c), but the mutant displaces the neighboring side chains of Glu229 and Leu372. In addition, the neighboring loop 226-229 (Figure 2.7a, red), which is partially disordered in the wild-type structure has an altered conformation and is now completely visible. This loop harbors the positions of four different disease mutations (including Glu229) in RyR1 and RyR2 combined and is located at the intersubunit interface 1 between two neighboring ABC structures.  Figure 2.7: Buried disease mutations. Superposition of the wild-type (white) and mutant (colors) structures for (a) G249R (PDB accession code 4I1E) and (b) L14R (PDB accession code 4I7I). Domain A (blue) and domain B, (green). The mutated residues are shown in black. Loops directly located at interface 1 are shown in red. L14R introduces a charged residue in a small hydrophobic core near the very amino terminus, including Val165, Met202, and Pro204 (Figure 2.7b). The mutation displaces the main chain and side chain of Val165, which is located on the β8-β9 loop of domain A, also located at interface 1. Although L14R and G249R represent buried mutations, they both seem to affect an interface that is altered upon channel opening. 67  2.2.4 Salt-bridge mutations cause relative domain-domain movements Three RyR1 mutants (R45C, D61N, and R402G) target ionic pairs between domains A and C. They cause the largest structural changes, evoking relative domain-domain movements. R45C breaks a salt bridge with Asp447 on domain C. This causes the Asp447 side chain to become unstructured, and domain C to pivot with displacements up to ~3Å near the cytoplasmic side of the helical bundle (Figure 2.8a,b). 68   Figure 2.8: Disease mutation affecting interdomain ionic pairs. (a,b) R45C (PDB accession code 4I6I). (c,d) D61N (PDB accession code 4I3N). (e,f) R402G (PDB accession code 4I37). Domain A (blue), domain B (green), and domain C (red). Superpositions with the wildtype structure (white). All superpositions are based on domain A. Arrows indicate changes relative to the wild-type structure. R45C and R402G are in comparison with the wild-type structure crystallized in PA5100. 69  Both Asp61 and Arg402 are involved in a salt bridge, together with Glu40. The D61N mutation is isosteric, neutralizing a negative charge (Figure 2.8c). This causes a complete disruption of the ionic pair network, with Arg402 swinging away, breaking the interactions with both Asn61 and Glu40, and causing a relative change in the orientation of domain C with displacement close to 1Å. In domain B, Arg283 is no longer attracted to the negatively charged Asp61, causing a relative reorientation of the domains with shifts ~2Å (Figure 2.8d). The R402G mutation disrupts the same ionic pair network. His113 and His405 close the gap created by taking away the long Arg side chain (Figure 2.8e), and the domain C backbone has shifted by up to ~2.5Å relative to domain A (Figure 2.8f). Although domains A, B, and C interact through multiple ionic pairs, disruption of even single ones is sufficient to cause relative domain reorientations. This shows how mutations located at the interfaces between domains A, B, and C can affect regions at the periphery of the hot spot. Keeping domain C fixed, for example, the mutations would affect the positions of domain A and B, and hence, again, the intersubunit interface 1.  2.2.5 Uncharged mutations at the A-B-C interfaces cause local changes We looked at the effect of three additional mutants at the intrasubunit interfaces between domains A, B, and C that do not disrupt ionic pairs (C36R, V219I, and I404M). The C36R mutant caused the largest effect on the melting temperature (Figure 2.5b,c). Cys36 is located at the surface of domain A and has only minor effects on the structure of domain A in isolation(205). However, it is buried at the interface between domains A and B, and a direct placement of an Arg residue would clash with domain B. The mutation has several profound effects on the structure. First, a neighboring loop in domain A (residues 52-60) moves ~2Å to allow the Arg36 side chain to fit in a folded, rather than an extended, conformation (Figure 2.9a). 70  This prevents a direct clash with domain B, but the moving loop contains several contact points with domain B in the wild-type structure, and thus affects the domains A-B interface. The Gln23 and Asn203 side chains move towards the Arg36. The altered Asn203 side-chain conformation, together with the longer Arg36 side chain, cause the neighboring domain B loop to be displaced by ~1Å. All together, these significantly affect the A-B interface, destabilizing the RyR1ABC protein by >9°C (Figure 2.5b,c).  Figure 2.9: Other mutations at the intrasubunit interfaces between different domains. (a) C36R (PDB accession code 4I0Y). (b) V219I (PDB accession code 4I8M). (c) I404M (PDB accession code 4I2S). Superposition with the wildtype and color scheme as in Figure 2.8. For I404M, dual conformations were observed in the electron density. Arrows indicate changes relative to the wild-type structure. (d) RMSD values for superposition of the mutants with the wild-type structure. The superposition is performed based on domain A, so the values for domains B and C are the sum of intrinsic structural differences within the domains and relative domain reorientations compared with the wild-type structure. R402G and R45C are in comparison with the wild-type structure crystallized in PA5100. 71  The V219I mutation is located at the B-C interface and is very subtle, as it only introduces a single methyl group. It is surrounded by mostly hydrophobic residues, but no appreciable effect is seen on the structure (Figure 2.9b). The only effect could be that the hydrophobic packing is less-than-ideal, but as expected, the effect on the thermal melting is also minimal (Figure 2.5b,c). The I404M mutation is near the B-C interface. This mutation causes a clash with Met483 in domain C. As a result, both Met404 and Met483 adopt dual conformations. (Figure 2.9c). The branched Cγ atom of Ile404 is in the van der Waals contact with Thr286 on domain B in the wild-type structure. These changes result in a relatively small drop (~2°C) in the melting temperature (Figure 2.5b,c). Figure 2.9d shows the root mean square deviation (RMSD) values for each domain, after superposing the modeled Cα atoms in domain A. The values for domains B and C thus also indicate their degree of movement relative to domain A. Overall, the V219I and I404M mutants are predicted to have the smallest functional impact, as these mutants do not cause large structural changes and have only modest effects on the melting temperatures. Most mutants crystallized in the same condition reported for wild-type RyR1ABC(208), but two of them, R45C and R402G, crystallized in different conditions involving a polyacrylic acid (PA5100). We also crystallized the wild-type protein in PA5100, which was at lower resolution (3.5Å) but allowed us to investigate the relative domain orientations. The RMSD values and figures for the R45C and R402G superpositions are based on comparison with the wild-type protein in PA5100, showing that the conformational changes are due to the mutations, and not the crystallization conditions. None of the observed conformational differences are due to pH changes (Figure 2.10). 72   Figure 2.10: Domain reorientations are not due to pH differences. RyR1ABC wild-type structures crystallized at pH 8.0 (white), pH 9.0 (cream), and pH 9.5 (orange) are superposed, based on domain A. The positions of domains B and C relative to domain A are unchanged, indicating that the changes observed for the disease-associated mutants are not due to pH differences in the crystallization conditions. 2.2.6 The relative orientation of domains B and C As breaking favorable interactions between domains A-B or A-C causes relative domain reorientations, we wondered whether the destabilization simply allows a preferred relative orientation between domains B and C. In this scheme, domain A would act as a “clamp” that prevents the most favorable interactions between domains B and C. This situation is then analogous to IP3 receptors, where domain A, also known as the suppressor domain, decreases the ligand-binding affinity by clamping domains B and C in a conformation that disfavors IP3 binding(231,234-236). We, therefore, solved the structure of domains B and C in the absence of 73  domain A. Superposition of domain B shows that the relative orientation of domain C differs appreciably between the RyR1ABC and RyR1BC crystal structures (Figure 2.11). In the absence of domain A, domain C swings towards the position of domain A, showing that domain A prevents a more favorable interaction between domains B and C through steric hindrance. The results suggest that weakening the A-C interaction through disease mutations allows more favorable B-C interactions to occur. However, the disease mutations cannot cause the exact same B-C reorientation because domain A still provides steric hindrance.  Figure 2.11: The clamping action of domain A. Superposition of domains B of the RyR1BC and RyR1ABC crystal structures, showing the relative conformational changes of domain C (arrow). Gray: RyR1BC (PDB accession code 4I96). Colors: RyR1ABC domains A (blue), B (green), and C (red). 74  2.3 Discussion RyRs are allosteric membrane proteins, whose major function is to release Ca2+ from the endoplasmic or sarcoplasmic reticulum. Primary triggers for channel opening include cytoplasmic and luminal Ca2+, as well as voltage-dependent conformational changes in the L-type calcium channel CaV1.1. These likely cause channel opening by stabilizing the open-state or destabilizing the closed-state conformations of the cytoplasmic portion. Disease-causing mutations in RyR1 and RyR2 interfere with channel gating. With some exceptions, most mutants have been associated with a gain-of-function, for example, by lowering the threshold for activating ligands. Several theories have been put forward to explain their effect. In the “zipper hypothesis,” it was postulated that the N-terminal and central disease hot spots interact, and that disease mutations are located at their interface(148). However, it is now clear that most disease mutations in the N-terminal region are already involved with other domain-domain interfaces, and only a small fraction could remain available for binding the central hot spot(208). It was also postulated that the mutations may affect the binding of FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs), and that the resultant dissociation facilitates channel opening(171,264-266). One group suggested that the N-terminal region might interact directly with FKBPs(120), but our isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments failed to detect any appreciable binding. This is in agreement with cryo-EM studies showing that FKBPs bind at the periphery of the cytoplasmic foot (for example, see Samso et al.(178), far away from the docked position of the N-terminal disease hot spot. Here we built pseudo-atomic models of the N-terminal region in the open and closed states of RyR1, which suggest that channel opening results in ~7Å widening of an intersubunit contact area at the central rim. A recent study also supports this result, where FRET experiments 75  between domains B and C of the full-length RyR2 validated the docked positions and revealed dynamic conformational changes within the N-terminal region(239). One likely interpretation of the widening of the intersubunit interface is that there are direct contacts between domains A and B of the neighboring subunits in the closed state, and that those contacts are disrupted or drastically altered as the channel opens. The interaction thus serves as a “brake” on channel opening, imposing an energetic barrier that needs to be overcome to allow channel opening (Figure 2.13). This energy would be delivered by binding of triggering agents, such as Ca2+, which likely cause long-range conformational changes that couple allosterically to the N-terminal region. This also implies that the contacts must be extremely weak: a high-affinity interaction would require an extremely high energetic penalty for the disruption, as the effective concentration of two juxtaposed segments within a macromolecule can be in the molar range(267). Indeed, using various approaches (pull-down experiments, cross-linking, gel filtration chromatography, dynamic light scattering, and ITC), we failed to observe any interactions between individual RyR1ABC monomers in solution, implying that they do not drive tetramerization. The latter was shown to be mediated by the C-terminal area, which contains coiled-coil region(268). The proposed intersubunit interactions in the N-terminal region can, therefore, only arise in the context of a high effective concentration. The same applies to interactions between domain A and domains BC within a subunit, as the two separately purified constructs also failed to show any interaction in solution, despite their unambiguous contacts in the crystal structures. 76   Figure 2.12: Model for the effect of N-terminal disease-associated mutations in RyRs and ligand binding in IP3Rs. In wild-type RyR1, channel opening requires breaking the interaction along interface 1 between two neighboring N-terminal disease hot spots. This involves an energetic penalty. Disease-associated mutations directly at interface 1 weaken the interaction, which reduces the energetic penalty and facilitates channel opening. Some disease-associated mutations within a hot spot can change the relative domain-domain orientations, thus affecting other interfaces at the periphery of the hot spot, such as interface 1. These long-range structural changes, therefore, also facilitate channel opening. In IP3R, binding of IP3 (hexagon) results in relative domain reorientations, which also affects interface 1 and facilitates channel opening. Incidentally, the intersubunit contact area between domains A and B contains the largest cluster of disease mutations within the N-terminal region (20 for RyR1 and RyR2 combined) (Figure 2.3a), all of which are associated with gain-of-function phenotypes (MH and CPVT)(208). How could these affect channel opening? Mutations in the domain A β8-β9 loop, 77  one of the loops located at the contact region, were previously found not to cause any structural or stability differences(205,206). This implies that their only possible involvement is to be located at a functional interface, and we propose that they form part of intersubunit interactions that are disrupted upon channel opening. When a random disease mutation is introduced, there is a much higher probability that the mutation will weaken, rather than strengthen intersubunit contacts. Such mutations will lower the energy barrier to open the channel, which in turn facilitates channel opening (Figure 2.13). Important to point out is that they do not cause channel opening on their own. They simply weaken the “brake” on channel opening, and some amount of energy, albeit less, is still needed through binding of triggering agents. This can, for example, explain the shift in Ca2+ dependence and voltage dependence of channel opening(269,270). Many mutations are not located at the intersubunit interface. However, we previously observed that most mutations in the N-terminal disease hot spot are located at the domain-domain interfaces, including the interfaces between domains A, B, and C within individual subunits(208). We found that several mutations that disrupt salt bridges between domains A and C can cause relative domain movements. Therefore, such mutations cause long-range structural changes, which automatically affect the interfaces at the periphery of these domains. One straightforward interpretation is that this domain “misalignment” also affects the intersubunit interface 1, and thus also lowers the energetic barrier to open the channel (Figure 2.13). In full-length RyRs, the relative domain orientation could be stabilized by the surrounding domains. However, even if the ABC domains have the wild-type orientation in full-length RyR mutants, there is now an additional strain on the other interfaces to keep the ABC domains in a wild-type orientation, away from their favored orientation in isolation, thus reducing the stability of the closed state. Upon channel opening, the mutant ABC domains can then relax back to their 78  favored orientation. The closed state is thus destabilized relative to the open state, resulting in facilitated channel opening. Mutations that are buried (G249R and L14R) also seem to affect the intersubunit interface through conformational changes that couple within the protein. These results highlight the overall importance of this interface in channel opening. Finally, some mutations did not seem to cause any large structural changes, but only had an effect on the thermal stability (V219I and I404M). The largest effect was observed for the C36R mutation, destabilizing the RyR1ABC protein by >9°C (Figure 2.5b,c). The altered melting temperatures imply that there may be temperature-dependent conformational changes, which could then also affect one or more individual domain interactions. The RyR N-terminal region shares ~21% sequence identity with the corresponding region in IP3Rs, suggesting that both channels may have adopted similar allosteric strategies(236). In IP3Rs, the N-terminal domain A is also known as the “suppressor” domain, which lowers the affinity for IP3 by clamping domains B and C in a conformation that is unfavorable for IP3 binding(231). Importantly, domain-domain reorientations have also been observed in IP3RABC through binding of IP3(234,235), suggesting a common theme in both types of calcium-release channels (Figure 2.13). In RyRs, the relative domain orientation can be altered permanently through a disease mutation, whereas in IP3Rs, the reorientation is reversible through binding and unbinding of IP3(234,235). The IP3RABC domains also dock near the four-fold symmetry axis of a reported 9.5Å IP3R cryo-EM map(229), making intersubunit contacts that are very similar to the RyR1ABC interactions(234). It has been suggested before that IP3 binding may also rearrange the intersubunit interface(234). Future cryo-EM studies comparing open and closed IP3Rs may show a similar widening of the intersubunit gaps. Whether an activator can bind the 79  RyR N-terminal region and cause domain rearrangements similar to IP3 in IP3Rs remains to be discovered.80  Chapter 3: The cardiac ryanodine receptor N-terminal domain contains a hot spot loop that is perturbed by disease-causing mutations  Dysfunction of ryanodine receptors (RyRs) through mutations has devastating consequences, leading to life-threatening diseases. RyR2 is the target for over 150 mutations, many of which are associated with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) that can result in sudden cardiac death(17). Other conditions linked to mutations in RyR2 include arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia type 2 (ARVD2) and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation(18). Most disease-associated mutations render gain of function, increasing the sensitivity of the channel towards stimuli, such as cytosolic or luminal Ca2+.  Several structural studies of RyRs have provided insights into how disease-associated mutations affect the channel function(238). In particular, the crystal structure of the N-terminal region of RyR1 (RyR1ABC), that comprises of three domains and forms a cytoplasmic vestibule in an intact channel, has shown that the mutations are either clustered at interfaces or are buried, rather than exposed to the surface of the full-length channel(208). Further investigation of RyR1ABC docked in the closed and open cryo-EM maps led to a model of channel gating whereby an intersubunit interface, normally serving as a brake, is broken upon channel opening(209). This interface between domains A and B across the subunit (“interface 1”) harbors the largest number of disease-associated mutations in the N-terminal region, further highlighting its key role in the channel gating. In particular, the β8-β9 loop found at interface 1, also called the “hot spot” loop (HS-loop), is the target for over half the mutations found within domain A. Crystal structures have been solved for domain A in both RyR1(205,206) and RyR2(206). The 81  structural effect of two mutants in the HS-loop of RyR1A (R164C and R178C, rabbit RyR1 numbering) have been probed through solution NMR, which showed no overall structural perturbation(205). Despite being the prime target for disease-associated mutations and its critical location at interface 1 that acts as a brake in channel opening, no structural insight has been available for the HS-loop mutants in RyR2. Here, we provide the crystal structures of three HS-loop mutants in RyR2A: P164S, R169Q, and R176Q (mouse RyR2 numbering). 3.1 Methods 3.1.1 Cloning, expression, and purification  Mouse RyR2 (residues 1–217) was cloned into a modified pET28 vector containing, in tandem, a His-tag, maltose binding protein (MBP), and a tobacco etch virus (TEV) cleavage site, followed by the construct of interest(271). The HS-loop mutants (P164S, R169Q, and R176Q) were made using the Quikchange protocol (Stratagene). Proteins were expressed at 37°C in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) pLacI strains (Novagen), induced at OD600 of ~0.6 with 0.2mM IPTG, and then harvested after 4 hours. Cells were lysed via sonication in buffer A (250mM KCl and 10mM HEPES pH7.4), supplemented with 25mg mL-1 DNaseI and 25mg mL-1 lysozyme. The resulting lysate was applied to a PorosMC column (Tosoh Biosep), washed with 5 column volumes (CV) of buffer A and 5CV of buffer A and 10mM imidazole, and eluted with buffer B (250mM KCl and 500mM imidazole pH7.4). The protein was dialyzed overnight against buffer A, while cleaved simultaneously with recombinant TEV protease. The sample was then run on another PorosMC column in buffer A, and the flowthrough was collected and dialyzed against buffer C (10mM KCl and 20mM Tris-Cl pH8.8), applied to a ResourceQ column (GE Healthcare), and eluted with a gradient from 0% to 40% buffer D (1M KCl and 20mM Tris-Cl pH8.8). Finally, the protein was run on a Superdex200 (GE Healthcare) gel filtration column in 82  buffer A. The protein sample was exchanged to 10mM KCl and 5mM HEPES pH7.4, concentrated to 10-20mg mL-1 using Amicon concentrators (10K MWCO; Millipore), and stored at -80°C. 3.1.2 Crystallization and data collection All crystals were obtained by hanging drop vapor diffusion using 0.1M malonate (pH 4.6–4.9) and 5%-20% saturated (NH4)2SO4. Crystals were transferred to paratone oil and flash-frozen in liquid N2 prior to data collection. The datasets were collected at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL) beamline 11-1 and the Canadian Light Source (CLS) beamline 08ID-1 and were processed using the HKL2000 package (HKL Research). Molecular replacement was performed using Phaser(242) with a modified structure of RyR2A A77V (PDB accession code 3IM7) as a starting model, in which the HS-loop was deleted to remove bias. The models were completed by successive rounds of manual model building in Coot(243,272) and refinement with PHENIX(273). The coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics database with PDB accession codes 4KEI (P164S), 4KEJ (R169Q), and 4KEK (R176Q). Data collection and final refinement statistics are available in Table 3.1.  Table 3.1: Data collection and refinement statistics. Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.  P164S R169Q R176Q Data collection    Space group I41 I41 I41 Cell dimensions    a=b, c (Å) 111.75, 37.82 112.86, 38.09 100.27, 37.99 α=β=γ (°) 90 90 90 Resolution (Å) 50-2.40 (2.49-2.49) 50-2.55 (2.64-2.55) 50-2.15 (2.19-2.15) 83   P164S R169Q R176Q Rsym or Rmerge 5.9 (44.9) 9.3 (49.3) 6.1 (43.1) I/σ 32.1 (2.5) 24.9 (2.3) 33.3 (2.1) Completeness (%) 99.8 (98.4) 98.8 (90.0) 98.1 (86.0) Redundancy 7.2 (5.5) 6.6 (3.3) 4.9 (2.4) Refinement    Resolution (Å) 50-2.40 50-2.55 50-2.15 No. reflections 8805 7484 9885 Rwork/Rfree 24.2/27.3 23.6/29.7 25.0/29.0 No. atoms    Protein 1256 1264 1233 Ligand/ion 0 0 5 Water 15 19 14 B-factors    Protein 61.6 47.3 51.1 Ligand/ion N/A N/A 61.8 Water 52.2 37.8 47.8 R.m.s. deviations    Bond lengths (Å) 0.002 0.003 0.002 Bond angles (°) 0.554 0.696 0.649 3.2 Results In order to investigate the structural impact of disease-associated mutations located within the hot spot (HS-)loop of RyR2, or the β8-β9 loop (residues 164-179 in mouse RyR2 numbering), we solved the crystal structures of RyR2A mutants (P164S, R169Q, and R176Q) to resolutions between 2.15 and 2.55Å (Table 3.1). Because the conformation of the loop might be affected by crystal contacts and the wild-type RyR2A structure was solved in a different space 84  group (C2), we compared these structures with the previously published A77V mutant(206), which crystallized in the same space group as the three HS-loop mutants in this study. The A77V mutation only affects the surface and is distantly located from the HS-loop, thus unlikely to impact the conformation of the loop. The P164S and R169Q mutations are linked to CPVT, while the R176Q mutation is associated with ARVD2. Pro164 is located at the beginning of the HS-loop and presumably provides a degree of conformational rigidity to this loop. Mutating this residue to serine likely results in partial flexibility, as a portion of the loop exhibits weak electron density (Figure 3.1a,b). The side chain of Arg169 also appears inherently flexible with poorly defined electron density and was not modeled in the A77V structure. In the R169Q mutant structure, several residues, including Gln169, were not visible in the electron density, consistent with the higher degree of flexibility (Figure 3.1c,d). The R176Q mutation facilitates the formation of a new hydrogen bond between Gln176 and Arg169. This interaction also positions Arg169 for a salt bridge with Asp179 (Figure 3.1e,f). However, several neighboring residues still showed missing electron density, suggesting that the R176Q mutation, despite the formation of new interactions, destabilizes the loop. 85   Figure 3.1: The RyR2A HS-loop mutant structures. Structures of mutants (colors) are superposed onto the RyR2A A77V structure (white). The HS-loop (residues 164-179) is highlighted in orange (respective mutant) and white (A77V). The site of mutation is shown in black. The dashed line indicates the portion of the loop that could not be modeled due to flexibility. (a,b) P164S (PDB accession code 4KEI). (c,d) R169Q (PDB accession code 4KEJ). (e,f) R176Q (PDB accession code 4KEK). Although the HS-loops in the mutant structures appear partially flexible, as indicated by the poor electron density, crystal contacts may have affected the resolution of the loops. For example, in the wild-type RyR2A structure, which was crystallized in a different space group, the loop position is different from that of the A77V mutant structures(206) (Figure 3.2). 86  Although crystal contacts usually do not impart huge structural changes, the conformations of loops that are inherently flexible can be particularly sensitive. Therefore, we performed more detailed solution NMR experiments, in collaboration with the laboratory of Dr. Mitsuhiko Ikura (University of Toronto), to circumvent any effects by crystal contacts on the HS-loop properties.   Figure 3.2: The HS-loop of RyR2A wild type and A77V mutant. The superposition of the RyR2A wild type chain B (white) (PDB accession code 3IM5) and RyR2A A77V (blue) (PDB accession code 3IM7) structures. The HS-loop of the A77V mutant is colored in orange for clarity. The structural difference in the loop is due to the different crystal contacts between the wild-type (space group C2; two molecules in the asymmetric unit) and A77V (space group I41; one molecule in the asymmetric unit) structures and not due to the mutation since the A77V mutation only alters the surface of the mutation site, and residue 77 is not involved in contact with the HS-loop. The spectra of the P164S, R169Q, and R176Q mutants were assigned by transference from wild-type RyR2A and using 15N-resolved nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) spectroscopy-TROSY data for peaks that did not coincide sufficiently between spectra. We examined the effect of the three HS-loop mutations on the structural fold of RyR2A by 87  monitoring the chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) (Figure 3.3a). Plotting the CSPs on the hybrid structure of RyR2A revealed distinct magnitudes of structural perturbations caused by each mutation (Figure 3.3b). The P164S mutation resulted in the largest CSPs for residues throughout the HS-loop and for residues immediately adjacent to the loop. The R169Q mutation had a moderate conformational effect on the HS-loop and the core structure, while the perturbation of R176Q was limited to the immediate vicinity of the substituted residue. Taken together, the data suggest that P164S, R169Q, and R176Q cause local structural perturbations within or near the HS-loop, overall consistent with the crystal structures. 88   Figure 3.3: Chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) on RyR2A caused by the HS-loop mutants. (a) CSPs of RyR2A TROSY-HSQC. CSP values in Hz are plotted for each mutant. Colored arrows indicate the site of mutations in the sequence. Secondary structural elements for RyR2A are shown above the plot. Regions outside the HS-loop showing significant CSPs are the N-terminal region and β12, colored in brown and pink, respectively. The boxed inset is a close-up view of the HS-loop region showing the site of mutations (in asterisks) and perturbed structural elements including Tyr115, which fits into a cleft of the HS-loop, as well as the aforementioned N-terminus and β12. (b) CSPs generated by each HS-loop mutant are mapped onto the hybrid model of RyR2A. The P164S, R169Q, and R176Q perturbations are shown in blue, red, and green, respectively. The HS-loop is outlined in yellow. An asterisk shows the site of each mutation. Image provided by the Ikura Lab.  89  3.3 Discussion RyRs are large tetrameric Ca2+ release channels located in the membranes of the SR or ER. Previous low-resolution structural studies of the channel revealed an overall mushroom shape, comprised of many globular domains(238). Some of the domains are involved in the binding of modulatory proteins or ligands, while others are coupled to conformational changes connecting the movements in the transmembrane area to the cytoplasmic region(27). Each subunit consists of many domains that have individual functions(27). RyRs are the target for over 500 disease-associated mutations. In particular, the N-terminal region of RyR1 and RyR2 has been described as a “hot spot” for mutations that cause MH, CCD, CPVT, and other conditions, although the number of mutations identified outside of the hot spots are increasing, especially for RyR1 (Figure 1.2). Understanding of the mechanisms of these disease-associated mutations, as well as the exact nature of the conformational changes that regulates the channel opening, has been hampered due to the lack of high-resolution structures of RyRs. The first crystal structures to be solved for RyRs were that of the very N-terminal domain of RyR1 and RyR2, or RyR1A and RyR2A(205,206). The domain consisted of a β-trefoil core and an α helix at one side of the domain. The structures of two disease-associated mutations in RyR2A (A77V and V186M) only altered the surface of the protein and, thus, the most likely role of these mutations was predicted to affect the binding interface with other parts of the channel(206). Similarly, solution NMR of RyR1A disease-associated mutations (C36R, R164C, and R178C) showed that mutations do not perturb the global structure, again indicating that they likely cause local structural changes that would affect the binding interface(205). Nonetheless, a single domain construct was insufficient for reliably docking onto the full-length cryo-EM map 90  of RyR, and, therefore, which interfaces are targeted by disease-associated mutations remained elusive. Since then, the crystal structure of a larger N-terminal region of RyR1, comprising of three domains (RyR1ABC), allowed for a definitive positioning of the N-terminal region within the full-length RyR1, where four subunits of RyR1ABC form a cytoplasmic vestibule around the four-fold symmetry(208). RyR is an allosteric channel, where its opening coincides with coordinated conformational changes throughout the channel(122). In particular, the N-terminal region goes through significant conformational change during the channel opening. Interface 1, formed between domains A and B across subunit, have been identified as the key interface for channel gating and is the target for a large proportion of disease-associated mutations found in the region(209). At this interface, the β8-β9 loop harbors the largest cluster of disease-associated mutations and was previously termed the hot spot loop, or the HS-loop(205,206). In the initial investigations of crystal structures of RyR1A and RyR2A, the HS-loop was fully visible, forming a rigid structure(205,206). Mutations in the HS-loop (R164C and R178C, rabbit RyR1 numbering) did not cause an overall structural perturbation, and the effect of mutations in the loop remained unclear. In RyR1ABC, the HS-loop was once again revealed as a rigid structure. The close proximity of domain B from the adjacent subunit in the full-length channel would further imply that the mobility of the loop is restricted. Furthermore, two buried disease-associated mutations adjacent to the intersubunit interface have been shown to alter the structures of loops located at the interface, including the HS-loop, suggesting that the conformation of the loops at the interface is important in channel regulation(209). Here, we show the crystal structures of three HS-loop mutants in RyR2A: P164S, R169Q, and R176Q. The mutations did not cause structural change in the overall domain, but the loop in 91  each mutant became partially flexible (Figure 3.1). This observation differed from the previous structures of the wild-type RyR1A, RyR1ABC, and RyR2A, in which the loop formed a rigid structure(205,206,208). The increased mobility of the loop in the HS-loop mutants was also confirmed through solution NMR, where chemical shift perturbations were significantly higher only at the loop and its vicinity in the mutants compared with the wild type (Figure 3.3).  Thus, mutations in the HS-loop perturb the structure of the loop and its vicinity. The loop is located at the interface involved in conformational changes upon channel opening. This interface (interface 1) likely works as a brake, whereby interactions formed at the interface stabilize the closed state. Incidentally, interface 1 is the prime target for disease-associated mutations in the N-terminal region, with the HS-loop harboring the largest number of mutations in domain A. Taken together, structural changes induced by disease-associated mutations in the HS-loop would likely disrupt the intersubunit interface and lead to increased channel opening.  Two of the mutations in this study, P164S and R169Q, are associated with CPVT, while R176Q is linked to ARVD2. Yet all three mutations are located on the same loop, and they all cause perturbation of the loop to a similar extent. In RyR1, many mutations cause gain of function and target the cytoplasmic portion, while others confer loss of function and are mainly located near the transmembrane region(27). This difference in the function and location of the mutations may explain why some are associated with MH and others with CCD. In some cases, nonetheless, the same mutations have been linked to both diseases, and the reason for different phenotypes are still unclear. Could R176Q mutation in RyR2 differ from the other two mutations in this study due to its formation of new hydrogen bond and salt bridge within the HS-loop? This question remains to be answered. 92   The previous structure of RyR2A wild type was crystallized in space group that differs from mutant structures, both in the earlier and current studies(206,207). The comparison of the wild type structure with that of the A77V mutant shows that the HS-loop conformation differs between the two, although A77V is located away from the loop and only alters the surface structure (Figure 3.2). Therefore, the loop conformation is affected by the crystal contact, and the exact conformation of the loop in the crystal structures, as well as the extent of increased mobility due to mutations, are uncertain. However, the solution NMR of the HS-loop mutants confirms that the mutations increase the flexibility of the loop. The existence of multiple conformations of the loop and the increased flexibility in the disease-associated mutants strongly suggest that the HS-loop plays a crucial role at the intersubunit interface in the physiological context, in which the motion of the loop contributes to the regulation of channel opening. Future experiments involving the HS-loop in the natural conformation formed by tetramerization of the N-terminal region would shed further light on the effect of the HS-loop mutants. 93  Chapter 4: The cardiac ryanodine receptor N-terminal region contains an anion-binding site that is targeted by disease-associated mutations  Several high- and low-resolution studies have shed light on the ryanodine receptor (RyR) structure(238). Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reconstructions show that the RyR has an overall mushroom shape(119,121,122), with the stalk crossing the membrane and the large cap located entirely in the cytosol. In addition, several crystal structures of cytoplasmic domains or domain clusters have been solved(205,206,208,209,211,215,216). In some cases, these can be docked reliably into the available cryo-EM maps. This includes the N-terminal region of RyR1, an area consisting of three domains (A, B, and C), which was found to be located near the four-fold symmetry axis, forming a cytoplasmic vestibule(208). Opening and closing of RyRs result in many allosteric motions within the cytoplasmic cap(122). This includes movements in the N-terminal region, and an attractive model suggests that intersubunit contacts, mediated by domains A and B from neighboring subunits, can be disrupted upon channel opening(209). As such, it appears that the N-terminal region acts as a “brake” on channel opening. RyRs are targets for hundreds of disease-associated mutations. Over 150 mutations have been found in RyR2 that are mostly associated with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), a condition that leads to triggered cardiac arrhythmias and can result in sudden cardiac death(17). In addition, some mutations are associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia type 2 (ARVD2) and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation(18). In RyR1, mutations can lead to several disorders, including malignant hyperthermia (MH)(274) and central core disease (CCD)(263,275). Based on the crystal structure of the RyR1 N-terminal region, it 94  was found that disease mutations are mostly found at interfaces between domains and are capable of altering relative domain orientations(209). Although many mutations have been mapped onto the RyR1 crystal structure, our high-resolution insights into the corresponding region of RyR2 have been limited to the very N-terminal domain(206). Here, we describe the crystal structure of the N-terminal region of RyR2 (residues 1-547), an area encompassing 29 distinct disease-associated mutations. The protein folds up in three individual domains (“RyR2ABC”), which are, unlike RyR1, held together via a central chloride anion that shields repulsive positive charges. This anion-binding site is the target for disease mutations that cause CPVT. The results suggest that anion binding affects relative domain orientations and may regulate RyR2. 4.1 Methods 4.1.1 Cloning, purification, and crystallization of RyR2 N-terminal region Mouse RyR2 residues 1-547 (RyR2ABC) was cloned and expressed as previously described for the RyR1 constructs(208). All point mutants were prepared using the QuikChange protocol (Stratagene). The delta exon 3 variant of RyR2ABC was cloned using a full-length construct as a template (gift from the laboratory of Dr. Wayne Chen, University of Calgary). The proteins were purified similarly to the corresponding RyR1 construct, except that following a ResourceQ column (GE Healthcare), they were run on a Phenyl Sepharose column (GE Healthcare) in 10mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0 and 14mM β-ME, with a gradient from 50 to 1500mM KCl. The samples were then run on a preparative Superdex 200 (GE Healthcare). Protein crystals were produced by exchanging the samples to 250mM KCl, 10mM Na-HEPES pH 7.4 and 5mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and concentrating them to 10mg ml-1 using 10,000 MW cutoff concentrators (Amicon, Millipore). All crystals were obtained at room temperature 95  using the hanging drop method. Wild-type proteins were crystallized in 0.1M Tris pH 8.15, 5-10% PEG3350, and 1% EtOH. Bromide-bound protein and the R420Q mutant crystallized in similar conditions, except that seeding using wild-type crystals was necessary. All crystals were flash-frozen in the corresponding mother liquor containing 40% PEG200 or 35% glycerol. Crystals in complex with bromide were obtained by exchanging KCl for KBr through dialysis. 4.1.2 Data collection, structure solution, and refinement Data were collected at beamlines 08ID of the Canadian Light Source (CLS, Saskatoon) and 9-2 of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL, Menlo Park). The data were processed using XDS(241). The RyR2ABC wild-type structure was solved using molecular replacement implemented in Phaser(242) with the individual domains of RyR1ABC structure as search models. An improved structure was then generated through autobuilding using Arp/wArp(276). Refinement consisted of successive rounds of manual modeling in COOT(243) and refinement in REFMAC5(244) with translation, libration, and screw-rotation (TLS) restraints applied to individual domains. The RyR2ABC R420Q and R414C mutant structures were solved using the individual domains of RyR2ABC as search models and refined as described for wild-type RyR2ABC. Data collection and refinement statistics are available in Table 4.1. Coordinates and structure factors for the RyR2ABC wild-type and R420Q mutant structures have been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank with the accession numbers 4L4H and 4L4I, respectively. Anomalous maps for the bromide-grown crystal were obtained using calculated phases from the RyR2ABC structure and using anomalous differences from a data set collected at the peak absorption of bromide. 96  Table 4.1: Crystallographic parameters. Values in parentheses are for the highest-resolution shell. RMSD = root mean square deviation.  WT R420Q R414C Data collection    Space group P42212 P42212 P42212 Cell dimensions    a, b, c (Å) 78.04, 78.04, 248.38 78.22, 78.22, 248.65 79.49, 79.49, 250.43 α, β, γ (°) 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90 Resolution (Å) 50-2.00 (2.05-2.00) 50-2.15 (2.27-2.15) 50-2.15 (2.19-2.15) Rsym or Rmerge 9.1 (173.2) 10.3 (188.8) 6.8 (84.7) I/σI 15.6 (2.0) 20.2 (2.4) 47.5 (2.2) Completeness (%) 99.6 (99.9) 99.7 (99.7) 99.7 (98.9) Redundancy 5.7 (5.8) 14.3 (14.7) 13.7 (9.9) Refinement    Resolution (Å) 50-2.00 50-2.15 50-2.15 No. reflections 50190 40856 44761 Rwork/Rfree 22.03/25.11 22.83/26.29 19.65/21.95 No. atoms    Protein 3564 3553 3580 Ligand/ion 18 6 7 Water 83 64 146 B-factors    Protein 45.4 21.6 63.8 Ligand/ion 51.9 58.5 91.7 Water 44.6 23.1 59.4 RMSD    Bond lengths (Å) 0.021 0.013 0.007 97   WT R420Q R414C Bond angles (°) 1.809 1.430 0.981  4.1.3 Fluorescence-based thermal shift assays Protein melting curves were measured using thermofluor assays(245). A total of 10µl of 1mg ml-1 protein was mixed into a 40µl solution containing 1× SYPRO orange dye (Invitrogen), 150mM KCl, 10mM HEPES pH 7.4, and 14mM β-ME. Melting curves were obtained using a DNA Engine Opticon 2 real-time PCR machine (Bio-Rad), using the SYBR filter option. The temperature was increased from 25°C to 95°C with 0.5°C steps, with the temperature held constant for 15s before data acquisition. Melting temperatures were obtained by taking the maxima of the first derivatives of the melting curves. 4.2 Results 4.2.1 Overall structure of the RyR2 N-terminal region We solved the structure of mouse RyR2 residues 1-547 (RyR2ABC) at 2.0Å resolution. The structure consists of three individual domains (A, B, and C) that form a compact arrangement (Figures 4.1a and 4.2). Domains A and B display β-trefoil folds, whereas domain C forms an α-helical bundle typical of armadillo repeats. Domain A contains an α-helix, previously observed for the structure of the individual domain(206) and RyR1ABC(208), but in this case the helix was disordered, suggesting there is some intrinsic flexibility to this secondary structure element. The domains are held together by a number of ionic interactions (Table 4.2). In the corresponding RyR1ABC structure, ionic interactions are also responsible for the compact domain arrangement, and the overall domain orientations between the two isoforms are similar (Figure 4.1b). We compared the thermal stabilities of RyR1ABC and RyR2ABC via thermofluor 98  assay. The RyR2ABC protein appeared less stable than RyR1ABC (rabbit residues 1-536), with an approximately 5°C difference in melting temperature, although the melting transition occurred later and was steeper (Figure 4.1c).  Figure 4.1: Overall structure of the RyR2 N-terminal region. (a) Cartoon representation of mouse RyR2 residues 1-547 (RyR2ABC). Blue, domain A; green, domain B; and red, domain C. Select secondary structure elements are labeled. (b) Superposition of RyR1ABC (gray) and RyR2ABC (colors). (c) Thermal melt curves indicating thermal stability. The melting temperatures, obtained by the maxima of the first derivatives, are 48.0°C ± 0°C (RyR1ABC), 43.1°C ± 0.4°C (RyR2ABC), and 42.3°C ± 1.4°C (RyR2ABC R420Q), where errors indicate standard deviation of the mean. The RyR2ABC wild-type (WT) and mutant melting curves show two transitions, but due to the shallow nature of the second transition, a melting temperature for this portion could not be obtained reliably.  99   Figure 4.2: Sequence alignment of RyR2 and RyR1 N-terminal regions. Sequence alignment of the N-terminal regions of mouse RyR2 and rabbit RyR1, showing the secondary structure obtained from each crystal structure above and below, respectively. Coils represent α helices, while arrows represent β strands. Portions present in the crystallized construct but not modeled due to flexibility are indicated by dashed lines. Gray boxes highlight residues conserved between the two isoforms, and residues shown in red are targets of disease-associated mutations.  Table 4.2: Interdomain salt bridges. Ionic pairs between domains in RyR1ABC and RyR2ABC structures. The “✕” marks ionic pairs that do not exist in RyR2ABC. Domains involved Rabbit RyR1 Mouse RyR2 B-C Arg242-Glu481 Arg257-Glu492 B-C Arg221-Glu397 Arg235-Glu412 B-A-C-A (network) Arg283-Asp61-Arg402-Glu40 Arg298-Asp61✕Arg417✕Glu40 A-C Arg45-Asp447 Arg45-Asp458 100  Despite the similarity in the overall domain arrangement, a closer inspection of the domain-domain interactions reveals a crucial difference. In RyR1, there is an ionic-pair network consisting of four residues that are located in all three domains (Table 4.2 and Figure 4.3a): Arg283 (domain B) forms a salt bridge with Asp61 (domain A), which also forms an ionic pair with Arg402 (domain C), which finally forms a further salt bridge with Glu40 (domain A). Such networks of interactions are more stable than individual pairs, and this is, therefore, a major stabilizing element for the RyR1ABC structure. The latter three residues in the network also form multiple hydrogen bonds with one another, further adding to the stability. In RyR2, however, this network is disrupted (Figure 4.3b). Although the four residues involved in the network are conserved, there is a substitution of RyR1 His405 (domain C) by Arg420 in RyR2. Instead of a four-residue network, only a single ionic pair remains, formed by Arg298 and Asp61, and all hydrogen bonds within the network are lost. 101   Figure 4.3: Details of the anion-binding site. (a) Inter-domain interaction area for RyR1ABC showing the salt-bridge network involving residues in all three domains. Black dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds between ionic pairs. Orange dashed lines indicate a salt bridge between Arg283 and Asp61 that is not formed by hydrogen bonds. (b) The corresponding region in RyR2ABC. Domains are colored as in Figure 4.1. Fo-Fc density, contoured at 3σ, is shown for the chloride site. Dashed lines indicate contacts with positively charged arginine atoms and a hydrogen bond between Tyr125 and Arg420. Two histidine residues in RyR1 are replaced by Arg420 and Tyr125 in RyR2. This results in a disruption of the ionic pair network and the creation of a chloride-binding site. Arg298 and Asp61 form a salt bridge that is not mediated by hydrogen bonds. (c) Surface representation of RyR2ABC, with the chloride ion shown as a black sphere. The chloride is inaccessible to solvent. (d) Anomalous difference maps for the bromide-bound structure, contoured at 7σ (outer mesh) and 20σ (inner mesh). The peak is visible up to 34σ.  102  Instead, the ionic pair network seems to be replaced by a chloride ion. It is coordinated by electrostatic interactions with residues from domains B and C: Arg420, Arg298, and Arg276. The hydroxyl group of Tyr125 is within 4.5Å, too far to create a hydrogen bond, but the Tyr125 side chain forms a “lid” that further shields the anion and its hydroxyl group hydrogen bonds with the Arg420 side chain. Arg417, involved in the network in RyR1, is near the chloride ion, but its positive guanidinium group is pointing away. The chloride site is almost completely buried (Figure 4.3c). 4.2.2 Chloride can be exchanged The RyR2ABC protein was purified in the presence of high KCl concentration. The chloride binding appeared essential for stability, as removal of chloride prevented the protein from remaining soluble at concentrations required for crystal growth. The absence of an anion would allow several positively charged arginines to be in proximity, which destabilizes the domain-domain interactions. Does the site also accommodate other anions? In order to answer this question, we exchanged KCl with KBr, and the concentrated protein remained stable in solution under these conditions. We then grew RyR2ABC crystals in bromide and obtained a 2.3Å structure. Data were collected at the absorption edge for bromide, allowing us to calculate anomalous difference maps. An anomalous peak was visible up to 34σ (Figure 4.3d), providing an unambiguous assignment for a bromide ion at the anion binding site. As the ionic radius for bromide (1.82Å) is only slightly larger than for chloride (1.67Å), it is not surprising that it can bind to the same site. Bromide ions are not physiologically relevant, but the bromide anomalous signal confirms the presence of a halide-ion binding site. Since the KCl was exchanged for KBr only at the end of the purification, this also means that anion binding to this site is a reversible process. Although 103  the anion is buried and protected from solvent within the structure, this shows that dynamic breathing motions allow ion exchange. 4.2.3 Chloride dissociation constant is below 4mM The chloride binding seems important for the structural stability of RyR2ABC since the protein is unstable without the presence of high KCl concentration. We wondered if the chloride ion also has a physiological function in RyR regulation. To answer this question, we probed the chloride affinity of RyR2ABC. If the affinity for the anion were at the physiological level, this would strongly suggest that the chloride binding has a functional role rather than simply being a structural part that is always bound to the protein. We attempted to measure the affinity of the chloride binding in RyR2ABC using ITC. For this experiment, we used the HMT-RyR2ABC fusion protein since RyR2ABC on its own becomes insoluble at the concentration required for ITC experiments when chloride ions are dialyzed out. The maltose binding protein in the HMT portion would help stabilize RyR2ABC. We titrated 800µM of NaCl into 43µM of HMT-RyR2ABC but could not detect any binding. Subsequent gel filtration chromatography showed that the protein was partially aggregated, indicating that the removal of chloride ions caused protein misfolding.  Next, we wondered if we could crystalize RyR2ABC at lower KCl concentrations and capture different levels of bound-chloride occupancies. We performed serial dilutions of RyR2ABC in lower KCl concentrations starting from 50mM in the presence of 150mM Na-HEPES pH7.4 to compensate for the ionic strength in the buffer. A protein concentration of 6.5mg ml-1 was used, which is high enough for the crystallization to occur but still lower than usual, which may prevent the insolubility in low salt. RyR2ABC was soluble up to 5mM KCl but was partially precipitated at 4.5mM and 4mM KCl. The protein was completely insoluble at KCl 104  concentrations of 0, 2, and 3mM. We collected diffraction data for crystals obtained at 10, 5, 4.5, and 4mM KCl and solved the respective structures. However, the chloride ion occupancy was 100% in every KCl concentration after performing an occupancy refinement, and lower KCl level did not cause structural changes in the protein (Figure 4.4). This suggests that the dissociation constant for the chloride binding is somewhere below 4mM.   Figure 4.4: Structure of RyR2ABC crystallized in 4mM KCl. The superposition of the structures of RyR2ABC crystalized in the presence of 4mM KCl (colors) and in 250mM KCl (white) shows no structural alterations. For better comparison, the 250mM KCl structure was solved from a crystal soaked in glycerol as the cryo-protectant prior to data collection (unpublished). The spheres represent chloride ion (orange, 4mM KCl; and white, 250mM KCl). The 4mM KCl structure contains an extra helix in domain B that is discussed in detail in Section 4.2.7. Since we could not obtain crystal structures of RyR2ABC at KCl concentrations lower than 4mM, we performed soaking experiments using crystals grown at 250mM KCl. The crystals 105  were transferred into drops containing KCl concentrations between 0mM and 4mM, washed by transferring into new drops, and equilibrated over several days. Crystals at all levels of KCl tested stayed intact after the soaking experiment and diffracted well. However, subsequent occupancy refinement of the structures showed that chloride was bound at 100% occupancy in every concentration tested. Moreover, chloride was bound even in crystals that were soaked in the absence of KCl. This suggests that although chloride can be exchanged in solution, it cannot be removed after the protein crystal formation. This is consistent with the observation that the chloride ion bound within RyR2ABC is inaccessible to the solvent (Figure 4.3c), where the crystal lattice tightly packs the ABC domains into rigid structure that no longer “breathes.” 4.2.4 The R420Q disease-associated mutation affects chloride binding One of the arginines that coordinate the chloride ion, Arg420, is the target for two disease-associated mutations (R420Q and R420W). We investigated the structure of the R420Q mutant, which has been linked to CPVT(277). In RyR1, the corresponding residue is a histidine instead and no chloride binding was detected. We therefore expected the R420Q mutation to abolish the binding site and to re-establish the central ionic pair network observed in RyR1. We solved the crystal structure of RyR2ABC R420Q at 2.15Å resolution (Figure 4.5). As expected, no density was observed for a chloride ion. However, the ionic pair network was not restored. In particular, the Arg417 side chain, which is involved in the network in RyR1 by pairing up with Asp61 and Glu40, still does not pair up with either residue in the R420Q mutant, despite the absence of the chloride ion. This seems to be due to the side chain of Tyr125, which would sterically clash with Arg417 in its configuration necessary for the salt bridges. Both Tyr125 and Arg420 appear to be strongly conserved among all mammalian RyR2 sequences as well as in some other species (Figure 4.6). The exception is RyR2 from Myotis davidii, which does contain 106  Arg420 but not Tyr125. Overall, this suggests that the anion binding is strongly conserved among mammalian RyR2s and may play a functional role.  Figure 4.5: Structure of the R420Q disease-associated mutant. (a) Crystal structure of the R420Q disease-associated mutant (gray) superposed on the RyR2ABC wild-type structure (colors). No chloride density was visible for the disease mutant. (b,c) Superposition of wild type (colors) and R420Q RyR2ABC (white) based on domain C, showing the relative positions of domains A (b) and B (c). Shifts in the domain arrangement are indicated by arrows. Domains A and B are shifted relative to domain C. (d) Superposition of wild type and R420Q based on domain A, showing a near-perfect superposition of domain B, indicating the relative orientation of domain A versus domain B is unchanged. 107   Figure 4.6: Sequence alignment of various mammalian RyR2 sequences. Sequence alignment of various mammalian RyR2 sequences, clustered around Tyr125 and Arg420 (mouse RyR2 numbering; highlighted in gray), along with select RyR sequences from non-mammalian vertebrates. With the exception of Myotis davidii, both Tyr125 and Arg420 are strongly conserved. The absence of chloride in the R420Q structure removes a link between domain C (Arg420) and domain B (Arg276 and Arg298). Although the local rearrangements around the chloride site are small, the mutation seems to affect relative domain reorientations. Superposition based on domain C alone shows that the positions of domains A and B relative to domain C are 108  changed; main-chain atoms in domain A and B shift by as much as 1.4Å (Figure 4.5b,c). These shifts seem to be the result of a tilting around an axis near the domain B-C interface. As a result, the shifts are almost invisible right next to the chloride-binding site and are largest further away. In contrast, the relative position of domains A and B is unchanged (Figure 4.5d). We have previously observed that interdomain salt bridge mutations in RyR1 can cause similar relative domain reorientations(209). Altering domain orientations, thus, seems to be a common theme with several disease-associated mutations in both RyR1 and RyR2. Although no chloride was detected for the R420Q mutant, we wondered whether there is still some residual affinity, resulting in a lower occupancy of the anion-binding site that could not be detected in conventional difference maps. We, therefore, also co-crystallized the R420Q mutant with KBr and kept a high concentration of KBr (500mM) during the soak into cryo-protectant. After creating an anomalous difference map, a peak was visible at the anion-binding site but only visible to 5.5σ compared with 34σ for the wild type, suggesting a much lower occupancy despite the increased KBr concentration. The mutant, therefore, has a reduced affinity for anions but can still bind them at much higher concentrations. 4.2.5 Additional RyR2 disease-associated mutations  Figure 4.7a shows the positions of the known disease-associated mutations that target the RyR2ABC domains. In total, 29 RyR2 mutations can be mapped on the RyR2ABC structure, dispersed over 27 distinct sites (as two sites are the target for multiple mutations).  The Δexon3 is an abnormal mutation that ablates residues 57-91, causing a severe form of CPVT(277-279). The deletion includes a β strand (β4) that is part of the β-trefoil fold of domain A, but a crystal structure of RyR2A Δexon3 showed that exon4, a flexible stretch in wild-type RyR2A, can rescue this by inserting itself into the β-trefoil core(211). In a recent NMR 109  study, the exon4 was shown to form a second α helix in domain A, which replaces the missing β strand in Δexon3 protein(207). We were unable to purify the RyR2ABC Δexon3 construct, as it was readily degraded and appeared unstable. Several residues in exon3 interact with domain B (Figure 4.7b). This includes Asp61, which forms a salt bridge with Arg298 on domain B (Figure 4.3b). As the identities of amino acid residues in exon4 are all different(211), the contacts between domains A and B mediated by the exon3 residues are very different. Our inability to obtain pure, non-degraded RyR2ABC Δexon3 suggests that the alternative contacts involving exon4 are significantly less stable. 110   Figure 4.7: Additional RyR2 disease-associated mutants. Domains are colored according to Figure 4.1. (a) Mapping of known disease-associated mutations on the RyR2ABC structure, with the target residues shown as black sticks. Exon3 is shown in black cartoon representation. (b) Detail of several exon3 residues (black) interacting with domain B. (c-f) Details of the environments for four disease-associated-mutation target sites for which purification was attempted. The mutated residue in each case is shown in a black stick representation. All four caused destabilization of the protein, resulting in heavily degraded material. Shown are positions of L62F (c), F329L (d), T415R (e), and L433P (f).  111  In addition, we created a number of point mutants in RyR2ABC that correspond to individual disease-associated mutations. These include the mutants L62F, G230C, F329L, R414C, T415R, R420Q, and L433P and are either located at intrasubunit domain interfaces or are buried within individual domains (Figure 4.7a). All have been linked to CPVT(277), except for L433P, which has been found to associate with ARVD2(280).  The G230C mutation was reported in a recent study and exhibited increased sensitivity towards activation by cytosolic Ca2+(266). Another study showed that the mutation also sensitizes RyR2 for activation by luminal Ca2+(281). The corresponding residue on RyR1 is also the target for disease-associated mutation(209). On the RyR2ABC structure, Gly230 is located in the loop that connects domains A and B (Figure 4.8). The residue is part of a conserved Gly-Gly motif (Gly230 and Gly231), forming a tight turn just before the fist β strand of domain B (β13). The Gly230 Cα atom is buried near the domains A-B interface, and the addition of the Cys side chain would clash with the adjacent β strand (β16). We were able to purify the G230C mutant in the RyR2ABC construct, but the majority of the protein readily degraded, and we could not obtain enough intact protein for crystallization experiments. Thermal melt analysis reveals that both the RyR2ABC wild type and G230C mutant unfold in a two-step process, and the G230C mutation causes a leftward shift in the first transition, indicating a decreased thermal stability (Figure 4.8b). Thus, G230C has a destabilizing effect on the N-terminal domains, and the location of the residue at the domains A-B interface suggests that the mutation likely alters the fold and stability of the interface, possibly affecting the relative orientations of domains A and B. 112   Figure 4.8: The G230C mutation reduces the thermal stability of RyR2ABC. Coloring scheme of the three domains is the same as in Figure 4.1. (a) Structure of RyR2ABC, with Gly230 represented by black spheres. (b) Representative thermal melting curves of the wild type and G230C mutant RyR2ABC (n=3). The melting temperatures, obtained by taking the maxima of the first derivatives, are 42.0°C ± 0.5°C (wild type) and 39.7°C ± 0.3°C (G230C). Errors indicate standard deviation of the mean. Both curves show two transitions, but due to the shallow nature of the second transition, a melting temperature for this portion could not be obtained reliably. (c,d) Close-up views showing the Gly230 residue (black) as part of the turn preceding the first β strand of domain B (β13). The loop connecting domains A and B that harbors Gly230 is shown in cream color. In d, Gly230 and the neighboring residues in the loop are shown as stick representations that clearly reveal a tight turn formed by the two Gly residues. The Cα atom of Gly230 is located in close proximity to β16, which would not easily accommodate a Cys side chain. 113  Arg414 is the target of two CPVT-associated mutations (R414C and R414L)(282-284). The residue is located at the A-C interface but is also exposed at the surface of RyR2ABC. The side chain of Arg414 is not involved in hydrogen bonds or salt bridge interactions, and there is plenty of space for Cys or Leu substitution. We wondered how R414C is able to cause the CPVT phenotype. To gain such insight, we solved the crystal structure of R414C. The overall structure of the R414C mutant does not differ from that of the wild type, but the mutation confers subtle changes at the A-C interface (Figure 4.9). The R414C mutant is able to bind a chloride ion, but two of the arginine residues that coordinate the anion adopt conformations that differ from the wild type, in which Arg417 acquires and Arg276 loses a dual conformation in the mutant (Figure 4.9a). Although this swap does not seem to affect the chloride binding, it may cause subtle changes to the affinity. The Arg414 side chain is not involved in hydrogen bonds or salt bridges, but it does interact with the Phe42 side chain through van der Waals interaction (Figure 4.9a,c). The removal of the arginine side chain in the R414C mutant disrupts this interaction, and the Phe42 side chain swings away from Cys414 (Figure 4.9a,d).  114   Figure 4.9: The structure and thermal stability of R414C. (a) The crystal structure of RyR2ABC R414C (colors) superposed onto the wild-type structure (white), showing the close-up view around the mutation site. Since the R414C structure was solved using crystals frozen in glycerol, the wild type structure was also solved using crystals frozen in the same cryo-protectant (unpublished) for a better comparison. Coloring scheme of the three domains is the same as in Figure 4.1. Arrows indicate shifts of select side chains in the mutant with respect to the wild type. The chloride ion is represented by a sphere (orange in the mutant and white in the wild type). (b) Representative thermal melting curves of the RyR2ABC wild type and the R414C mutant  (n=4). The melting temperatures, obtained by 115  taking the maxima of the first derivatives, are 42.6°C ± 0.25°C (wild type) and 39.5°C ± 0.0°C (R414C). Errors indicate standard deviation of the mean. Both curves show two transitions, but due to the shallow nature of the second transition, a melting temperature for this portion could not be obtained reliably. (c) The surface representation of Phe42 and Arg414 shows van der Waals interaction in the wild type, (d) but Cys414 in the R414C mutant is unable to retain this interaction, resulting in Phe42 to swing away. (e,f) Two different views of the electron densities around Cys414 in the R414C mutant. Black mesh represents weighted 2Fo-Fc contoured at 1.5σ. Green mesh represents positive Fo-Fc contoured at 3.0σ and is visible up to 5.0σ. Water molecules are shown as red spheres. All three domains are shown in white for clarity.  We observed extra electron densities associated with the Cys414 side chain that could not be modeled (Figure 4.9e,f). The positive Fo-Fc density was visible up to 5σ. This strongly suggests that Cys414 is reactive and is involved in cysteine modification, which is not surprising since Cys414 is exposed to the solvent, and swapping the bulky Arg for Cys makes the site more accessible to modifying agents. The likely combination of modifications by βME and DTT (present at ~1mM and ~5mM in the sample, respectively), as well as being in multiple conformations, could explain the ambiguity in the electron densities that prevented the modeling of the structure. The modification at Cys414 would work as a “wedge” at the A-C interface and destabilize the domain-domain interaction. In fact, the R414C mutation destabilizes the protein by ~3°C (Figure 4.9b). With the exception of R420Q, G230C, and R414C, all other mutant versions of RyR2ABC in this study behaved poorly and were heavily degraded upon extraction and during the first two chromatography steps. This is in sharp contrast with point mutations in RyR1ABC, where multiple mutations destabilized the protein, but could still be purified(209). L62F is located within exon3, at the interface between domains A and B (Figure 4.7c). There is no space for a bulkier Phe group, so domain rearrangements would be necessary. Phe329 is completely 116  buried within domain B, where it forms part of a hydrophobic core that consists of several Leu, Ile, and a Phe residues (Figure 4.7d). The F329L mutation thus introduces a smaller hydrophobic side chain, reducing the packing and destabilizing the folding of domain B. Thr415 is buried between two α helices within domain C (Figure 4.7e). There is no space for the much longer Arg side chain, so this residue would cause misfolding of domain C. The L433P mutation has previously been shown to reduce the luminal Ca2+ threshold at which Ca2+ release terminates(101). Leu433 is completely buried within domain C, where it is part of a hydrophobic core (Figure 4.7f). Mutation to a Pro residue has two effects: it affects the hydrophobic packing, and, being a helix breaker, it can also destabilize the α helix in domain C. 4.2.6 Putative ligand binding sites For the wild-type crystal structure, extra density was observed in two areas near the interfaces of domains A and C and between domains A, B, and C (Figure 4.10). These densities were attributed to low molecular weight polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecules, which were used as cryo-protectant. High molecular weight (MW) PEG was used as a crystallization agent, but small amounts of low MW PEG are often present as contaminant. Using glycerol as cryo-protectant instead, some uninterpretable density remained at these sites, likely corresponding to disordered glycerol or partially occupied low MW PEG that could not be modeled reliably. The cryo-protectants were only used to soak existing crystals and, as expected, did not cause any significant rearrangements. 117   Figure 4.10: PEG binding sites. (a) Surface representation of RyR2ABC, showing two binding pockets for short polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecules. Coloring is according to Figure 4.1. Weighted 2Fo-Fc density is shown in black mesh, contoured at 1σ. The view is from the “bottom” compared to Figure 4.1, as viewed from the ER/SR lumen toward the cytosol. (b) Details of the two binding pockets, showing all residues within 4Å. The chloride ion (sphere, not within 4Å) is shown for reference. Both PEG molecules bind in very deep pockets. Pocket 1 is located at the interface between domains A and C, whereas pocket 2 is located primarily between domains B and C. Although PEG molecules are not physiologically relevant, these pockets may form ideal sites for developing small molecules with higher affinity. Since many disease mutations seem to destabilize domain-domain interactions, targeting molecules to such pockets may stabilize the interactions and thus have therapeutic potential. 118  4.2.7 Interface 1 contains an additional α helix In the process of solving multiple structures of RyR2ABC in different KCl concentrations, we have unexpectedly come across several structures for which the previously missing β22-β23 loop of domain B is now visible (Figure 4.11a). When superposed to RyR1ABC docked into the closed cryo-EM map of RyR1, the loop is found at the intersubunit interface 1 and is juxtaposed to the β11-β12 loop across the subunit (Figure 4.11b). Two residues in the loop are the targets of disease-associated mutations in RyR1 and RyR2 combined: Val377 and Arg383 (mouse RyR2 numbering). The middle portion of the loop forms an α-helix that contains Arg383.  119   Figure 4.11: The structure of the β22-β23 loop at interface 1. (a) The structure of the β22-β23 loop within RyR2ABC is shown in orange. The two residues targeted by disease-associated mutations are colored in black. (b) Two subunits of RyR2ABC are shown after superposition with RyR1ABC (PDB accession code 2XOA) subunits according to their docked positions in the closed RyR1 cryo-EM reconstruction (EMDB accession code 1606). The interface 1 area is indicated with a box, whose enlarged views are shown in c and d. The two juxtaposing loops (the β11-β12 and β22-β23 loops) are labeled. (c) Close-up of the interface 1 that corresponds to the boxed area in b. Relevant side chains are represented in sticks. Disease targets (Val377 and Arg383) are shown in black. The 120  residues on the β22-β23 loop are shown in van der Waals surface representation, showing that the Val377 side chain is tightly packed inside the loop. The side chains of Gln208 and Arg383 are modeled from the most common rotamers. (d) Similar view as in c, but with the RyR1ABCD structure (white) superposed on top. The residue numbering in parentheses represent rabbit RyR1 numbering. (e) Two molecules of RyR1ABCD from the asymmetric unit of the crystal, where the Arg383 side chain is involved in contact with another molecule. One molecule is shown in lighter colors for clarity. The residue numbering in parentheses represents rabbit RyR1 numbering. The V377M mutation in RyR2 is associated with CPVT(277). The Val377 side chain faces the tightly packed inner side of the β22-β23 loop (Figure 4.11c). The V377M mutation would replace a compact Val side chain for a long Met side chain, which would not be compatible in the tight space and would likely result in the destabilization of the loop, altering the interface 1 contact. Since the β22-β23 loop is juxtaposed to the β11-β12 loop of domain A of a neighboring subunit, the two loops are the prime candidates for interacting partners at interface 1. Two charged residues reside in the α helix of the β22-β23 loop (Lys380 and Arg383), which could form salt bridges across the intersubunit. Lys380 faces away from domain A across the subunit and is unlikely to be involved in the interface 1 interaction. The observation that Lys380 is not found at any interface agrees with the fact that this residue is not a target for disease mutation even though the residue is conserved between the two isoforms. On the other hand, Arg383 is the target for two disease-causing mutations in RyR1: R383Q and R383L(285,286). Although the Arg383 side chain is flexible and could not be modeled in the crystal structure, when the most common rotamer is added to the residue, the side chain extends towards interface 1, close to Gln208. When the Gln208 side chain is replaced with the most common rotamer, the Arg383 and Gln208 side chains extend toward each other with 3.5Å distance in between, strongly suggesting 121  a formation of hydrogen bonds (Figure 4.11c). Gln208 is not a disease-mutation target and is not conserved across the isoforms. However, Arg383 is conserved, and the R383Q and R383L mutations would break the interaction across interface 1.  We compared the β22-β23 loop between RyR2 and RyR1 isoforms. The crystal structure of the longer construct RyR1ABCD (unpublished) also revealed the loop, but it contains a short 310 helix instead of an α helix (Figure 4.11d). Also, Arg383 (or Arg368 in rabbit RyR1 numbering) is placed further away from interface 1, out of reach with the β11-β12 loop. The loop in RyR1ABCD, however, is involved in a contact between two molecules from the asymmetric unit of the crystal, and the loop conformation in the crystal structure could deviate from the physiological form (Figure 4.11e). Nonetheless, the interaction partner Gln208 in RyR2 is replaced with a Met residue in RyR1, and it is also possible that the nature of interface 1 contacts between the isoforms is truly different, which may explain the functional differences between the two.   4.3 Discussion RyRs form large tetrameric assemblies that release Ca2+ from the SR or ER. Each subunit consists of many domains that have individual functions(27). Some form binding sites for auxiliary proteins or small molecule ligands, whereas others couple conformational changes in the transmembrane area to movements in the cytoplasmic head. The N-terminal area of RyR1 and RyR2 was previously described as a “hot spot” for disease-associated mutations that cause MH, CCD, CPVT, and other conditions. However, many more mutations are continuously found in between the originally defined hot spots, especially for RyR1 (Figure 1.2). Previous crystallographic studies of the RyR1 N-terminal region have shown that this area consists of three domains: two β-trefoil domains (domains A and B) and an armadillo repeat domain 122  (domain C). They are located in the cytoplasmic area, forming a continuous ring around the central four-fold symmetry axis(208). Comparison of this area in closed and open RyR1 cryo-EM maps shows that conformational changes in the pore are allosterically coupled to the N-terminal region(122). A plausible model suggests that channel opening results in the disruption of favorable intersubunit interactions, an event that requires an energetic penalty to be paid(209). As such, the N-terminal region would act as a brake on channel opening, and energy through binding of external ligands is required to open the channel. The N-terminal region of inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) shows a similar arrangement of three domains(234,235) and is also located within the cytoplasmic head near the four-fold symmetry axis(234). The three mammalian RyR isoforms share a large amount of sequence conservation (~65%), but they differ strongly in their functional properties, such as their sensitivity to various inhibitory and activating ligands(24). Some of these differences may be attributed to divergent regions, three stretches within the sequence where the sequence conservation is very low. However, it is likely that some of these differences lie in the remaining >4,500 amino acids, despite their higher sequence conservation. Although we were previously able to crystallize the RyR1 N-terminal three domains, we wondered whether there might be intrinsic differences in this region between RyR1 and RyR2.  Our insights into the RyR2 N-terminal region were limited to the structure of the very N-terminal domain (“RyR2A”)(206), which did not allow us to peer into the interdomain contacts. In order to get further insights into the cardiac RyR, we solved the crystal structure of mouse RyR2 (residues 1-547), covering three N-terminal domains (A, B, and C). The structures of the individual domains are very similar to those in the skeletal muscle isoform (RyR1), but the interactions between these domains are surprisingly very different. In RyR1, the three domains 123  are kept in a compact conformation through a series of salt bridge interactions. This includes a central ion pair network involving four charged residues that are distributed over the three domains. Networks of ionic pairs are more stabilizing than individual ionic pairs because of the reduced desolvation penalties(287). As such, this network is a great contributor to the overall stability of the domain interactions. In RyR2ABC, however, this salt bridge network is disrupted by the addition of a chloride ion that occupies the space where the three domains meet and shields electrostatic repulsion created by several arginine residues. Although all four residues involved in the salt bridge network in RyR1 are conserved in RyR2, it seems to be specifically disrupted because of two mutations: H420R and H125Y (RyR2 numbering) (Figure 4.3a,b). Arg420 provides an extra ligand for the chloride ion, whereas Tyr125 forms a lid, preventing Arg417 to form salt bridges with Asp61 and Glu40. In addition, Tyr125 hydrogen bonds with the Arg420 side chain. Both Arg420 and Tyr125 are strongly conserved in mammalian RyR2 sequences, suggesting that they are both required for chloride binding (Figure 4.6). RyRs are complex macromolecules that open and close in response to a range of stimuli. Previously, it has been reported that the activity of RyRs can be influenced by anions(288,289). For RyR2, titrated ryanodine binding was found to be higher in 250mM KCl versus 250mM KMes(290), suggesting that chloride can increase the activity of RyR2. However, in another study, chloride was found to have little or no effect on RyR2 Ca2+ release, and the effect likely depends on the extraction conditions(289). The ability of chloride to modulate RyR2 may be due to binding to the RyR2 N-terminal region. Removal of chloride has a large effect on the stability of the RyR2ABC protein, as it no longer shields repulsive interactions between arginines on different domains. Therefore, it is likely that removal or addition of chloride to this site has a functional consequence. The activity of RyR1 is also dependent on chloride, yet it does not 124  contain a chloride-binding site within the N-terminal region. Chloride dependence on activity may, therefore, be a complex event involving multiple sites, and the previously reported effect of chloride on RyR2 could be the result of multiple sites. Could chloride binding to the N-terminal region within a physiological setting be a dynamic event that is regulated and provide a functional role, or is the chloride binding simply “structural” (that is, always bound)? The cytosolic concentration of chloride is in the low mM range, so the answer to this question depends on the inherent affinity. A high affinity would mean the site is always occupied, whereas an affinity in the low mM range would imply that RyR2 may exist in both chloride-bound and unbound conformations in physiological settings. Although chloride could be removed from RyR2ABC through dialysis, the protein readily precipitated at concentrations required to detect binding through, for example, isothermal titration calorimetry. As a result, we were unable to directly determine the affinity. We also dialyzed the protein at different levels of KCl and determined that at relatively high protein concentration (6.5mg ml-1), RyR2ABC is insoluble below 4mM KCl. However, crystal structures of RyR2ABC in the presence of 4mM KCl showed that chloride is fully occupied at the binding site, and thus we were also unable to measure the affinity indirectly.   We previously analyzed the effect of disease-associated mutations on the structure of RyR1ABC(209). Disease-associated mutations that abolish inter-domain salt bridges (R402G, D61N, and R45C in rabbit RyR1) resulted in relative domain reorientations. As the RyR2ABC protein could not be concentrated in the absence of chloride or bromide, we were unable to assess the effect of chloride removal on the structure. Removal of the chloride would not only take away favorable interactions, but it would also remove the shielding effect around repulsive interactions between several arginine residues. These would likely result in altered domain 125  orientations. It is not clear at this point which of the states (chloride-bound or chloride-free) would correspond to an activated state of the N-terminal region. We expressed several disease-associated mutant forms of RyR2ABC. However, with the exception of R420Q, G230C, and R414C, all other mutants readily aggregated or showed signs of aggregation. It is possible that some of the RyR2ABC disease-associated mutations perturb the structures of the individual domains to a level that affects chloride binding, resulting again in repulsive interactions between the exposed arginine residues that further destabilize the protein. Gly230 is buried near the domains A-B interface, and CPVT-associated G230C mutation destabilizes the N-terminal domains, as indicated by the lowered melting temperature and a large portion of the protein sample being degraded during the purification process. The corresponding residue in RyR1 is also the target for a disease-associated mutation (G216E in rabbit RyR1). We showed in Chapter 2 that G216E expressed well but did not crystallize, and because its CD spectra did not differ from the wild type, the mutation likely affects relative domain movements or increases the flexibility of the domains. This indicates that the tight turn formed by the Gly-Gly motif right before β13 in domain B is critical for keeping the proper geometry at the domains A-B interface, and the same mutation in RyR2 may also alter domain-domain interfaces. Furthermore, a functional study revealed that the G230C mutation sensitizes RyR2 channel for activation by either cytosolic or luminal Ca2+, suggesting a long-range crosstalk between N-terminal region and the luminal side of the channel with the pore(281). Opening of RyR has been shown to coincide with the allosteric motions of the channel and the disruption of the domains A-B interface across intersubunits(209), and it is likely that the G230C mutation in RyR2 facilitates the channel opening by destabilizing the domains A-B interface, ultimately altering the intersubunit contacts. 126  Arg414 is located at the domains A-C interface and is the target for two CPVT-associated mutations. The structure of the R414C mutant revealed that the overall structure of the protein is unchanged, although the mutation confers subtle changes at the A-C interface. More strikingly, the mutation seems to add a reactive cysteine, as indicated by the extra electron densities connected to Cys414 side chain. In the present study, the likely candidates for the modifying agents are βME and DTT. Physiologically, known post-translational modifications on RyRs include glutathionylation and S-nitrosylation, both of which have been shown to regulate the channel(291). The mechanism of disease through the R414C mutation could be that it introduces a reactive cysteine that causes altered channel regulation through post-translational modification. The 3°C drop in the thermal stability of the R414C protein likely represents the combination of the subtle structural alteration at the A-C interface and the modification of Cys414 that introduces a “wedge” between the interface. The Cys414 modification would present a foreign moiety at the A-C interface and disrupt or alter the interface interaction, but the relative orientations of the three domains did not differ between the wild type and the mutant. Not seeing a domain-domain reorientation in the crystal structure could be that the crystal contact overcomes the tendency for the domains to rearrange. It is still possible that such movements occur in solution, where a reactive Cys414 facilitates the domain-domain shift. Future NMR studies may shed more light on this speculation, although it would be difficult given the size of the ABC construct.  Two RyR2 disease-associated mutations directly target the chloride binding site: R420Q and R420W. R420W has previously been shown to reduce the luminal Ca2+ threshold for Ca2+ release termination(101). We analyzed the structure of R420Q and found that chloride binding was abolished. Using the anomalous signal of bromide, we could detect some residual binding of 127  an anion at very high concentrations, but the occupancy was clearly much lower. In addition, the small perturbations around the chloride-binding site resulted in relative domain reorientations as a result of tilting around an axis near the domain-domain interfaces. Domains A and B maintain the same relative orientation, but both are displaced relative to domain C, with maximum shifts ~1.4Å furthest away from the tilting axis.  Disease-associated mutations at domain-domain interfaces are insightful on disease mechanisms, where they could weaken the interface interactions and facilitate domain-domain reorientations that lead to channel opening. However, mutations at interface 1 could provide direct evidence of this model since this interface is clearly broken when the channel opens(209). Through solving the structure of the β22-β23 loop at interface 1, we have identified the likely interaction partners at this interface, Gln208 and Arg383, which are within hydrogen-bond distance. Using this candidate interaction as a guide, future experiments may be able to establish more direct evidence of the involvement of interface 1 in the disease mechanism and channel gating.  The observations of domain reorientations are based on an isolated fragment, and the extent of conformational changes may be different in full-length RyR2. However, relative domain reorientations seem to become a common theme in the activation of calcium release channels. IP3Rs are activated by the ligand IP3, which binds to a pocket between domains B and C. The binding also causes a relative reorientation of the N-terminal domains(234,235). Thus, what is a regulatory event in IP3Rs is a permanent event in several disease-associated mutant forms of both RyR1(209) and RyR2. The altered domain reorientations likely destabilize the intersubunit interface, resulting in facilitated channel opening(209,234). 128  Chapter 5: Conclusion  Ca2+ is a potent secondary messenger involved in major cellular processes, such as neurotransmission and muscle contraction. RyR is a Ca2+ release channel that plays a major part in E-C coupling by unleashing large amounts of Ca2+ from the SR/ER store into the cytoplasm. Three isoforms of RyR have been identified in mammals (RyR1 – RyR3). RyR1 is predominantly found in skeletal muscle, RyR2 in heart, and RyR3 is more ubiquitously expressed. RyR1 and RyR2 are the targets for over 500 disease-associated mutations, underlying the importance of its strict regulation.  Several cryo-EM studies revealed that all three isoforms of RyR resemble a mushroom structure: a huge cap in the cytoplasm and a smaller stem forming the transmembrane region that extends to the SR/ER lumen. RyR is a tetrameric channel, with each subunit comprised of globular domains. Due to its enormous size and its transmembrane nature, high-resolution structures of RyR have been lacking, greatly hampering our knowledge of the detailed mechanisms of normal and diseased-state functions of RyR. The average molecular weight of the available crystal structures in RCSB to date is ~80kDa, far below the full-length size of ~2.3MDa in RyR. In addition to its enormity, the transmembrane nature of RyR imposes difficulty in crystallization, requiring detergent extraction, which increases the mobility and heterogeneity in the sample. A few years ago, the first crystal structure of the very N-terminal domain of RyR1 and RyR2 became available, along with structural analyses of several disease-associated mutations at the periphery of the domain. However, a single-domain construct was insufficient to unambiguously dock the structure into the cryo-EM reconstruction of the full-129  length RyR1. Thus the effect of the peripheral mutations remained elusive, although it was supposed that they affect the binding interface. 5.1 Pseudo-atomic structures In this thesis, we described the crystal structures of the largest portion of RyR1 and RyR2 available to date that encompass three domains in the N-terminal region (RyR1ABC and RyR2ABC), harboring over 80 disease-associated mutations. Docking of RyR1ABC into the RyR1 cryo-EM reconstruction unambiguously placed the N-terminal region at the four-fold symmetry axis, forming a cytoplasmic vestibule. This enabled us to pinpoint the locations of the disease-associated mutations within the full-length channel, which revealed that the mutations are either buried within a domain or found at interfaces between domains or other parts of the channel. Combined with the observed allosteric motion in the region upon channel opening, we proposed a model whereby the disease-associated mutations in the N-terminal region of RyR facilitates channel opening through weakening the interfaces that undergo domain-domain reorientation during channel opening. The RyR1ABC docking strategy proved the feasibility of the “divide and conquer” approach, in which high-resolution structures of small portions of RyR, in unit of domain, can be pieced together by creating a pseudo-atomic model inside the cryo-EM map. The four-fold symmetry inside the RyR tetramer greatly facilitates this process. Combined with phosphorylation domains, we have already uncovered ~11% of the entire RyR structure. However, there are limitations and difficulties with this approach. Algorithms used for docking experiments tend to give high scores for crystal structures placed within electron dense regions of the cryo-EM map, such as the clamp region and column region in RyR. This “noise” is especially significant in small crystal structures, such as RyR1A, where the docking contrast 130  tends to be low. To compensate for this bias towards unspecific placing of fragments to electron dense regions, we have implemented a Laplacian filter in our RyR1ABC docking experiment, which takes into account surface contours of the fragment and the cryo-EM map, thus avoiding the nonspecific placement of a fragment inside electron dense regions with no matching surface features. This approach is especially useful for docking experiments in RyR, since the channel is comprised of multiple globular domains filled with numerous vestibules, each with unique surface contours. In addition to the implementation of a Laplacian filter, there are several alternative techniques to validate the docking results. One approach is to compare the result from insertion studies, where extra density that arises from fusion protein, such as GFP or GST, is mapped onto the full-length RyR. However, limitations to this approach include the positioning of the insertion site, which may affect the fold of the protein and lead to artificial conformational changes. For example, difference density maps from two insertion studies prior to the availability of the RyR1ABC structure indicated the N-terminal region to be located at the clamp region, but the insertion sites were later found to be likely unfavorable for the proper fold of the protein, causing conformational changes outside the true location(143,144). Another important consideration is the length of the linker that tethers the fusion protein. If the linker were too short, it would hamper proper folding of RyR, but if it were too long, the extra density might appear far away from the true insertion site. These hurdles are easier to overcome using the crystal structure of the portions to be located in RyR. With the appropriate sites of insertion and linker length, fusion protein insertions within domains B and C of RyR2 indicated extra densities consistent with the RyR1ABC docking result, thus validating the docking study(239).  131  Another approach to validate the docking result is to perform a “superdocking” experiment, where structures of multiple domains of RyR are incorporated in one docking experiment. If one domain occupies a certain location of the full-length RyR, another domain should not overlap in the same location. Since ~11% of the cryo-EM reconstructions is already accounted for by the N-terminal and the phosphorylation domains, one only needs to locate other domains within the remaining ~89% of the area. This technique should prove useful as structures of more domains of RyR become available in the future.   Lastly, docking studies can be further validated through comparison with functional and binding studies. Does the docked position make sense in terms of previous reports of functional properties and protein interactions? The docked position of RyR1ABC, which is far away from the proposed FKBP binding site, was consistent with the failure to observe binding between RyR1ABC and FKBP. The locations of the disease-associated mutation sites in the N-terminal region, in which none of them pointed towards the outer surface of the channel, were also consistent with the failure to observe RyR1ABC binding to peripheral modulatory proteins and ligands. Instead, the sites of disease-associated mutations were distributed across six interfaces in the docked position, with some buried within a domain, indicating that the universal effect of the N-terminal mutations are to weaken the interdomain interfaces. These validation techniques would be important especially in more difficult docking experiments, such as small fragments or domains sharing similar structural properties. The successful docking of the N-terminal portion of RyR1 brings promise to producing pseudo-atomic structures for the remaining part of RyR. 132  5.2 Models of disease mutation mechanisms Two predominant models in the field describe the mechanism of disease-associated mutations in RyR: the zipper hypothesis and FKBP dissociation theory. We proposed an additional model in this thesis that describes the interfaces at the N-terminal region as a restraint in channel opening. Here, we compare our new model to the existing models. The zipper hypothesis model states that the N-terminal region (residues 1-600) and the central region (residues 2000-2500) form an interdomain interaction that is broken, or “unzipped,” during channel opening through allosteric coupling(292,293). The supporting evidence of the model comes from spectroscopic measurements using peptides of central region, which was reported to competitively inhibit the binding of the endogenous central region to the N-terminal region and led to increased channel activity. This theory originated from the observation that a number of disease-associated mutations cluster in two hot spots in the cytoplasmic portion of RyR, the N-terminal and central regions. The results presented in the current thesis contradict this model because the majority of the disease-associated mutations harbored in the N-terminal region are buried within a domain, found at domain-domain interfaces, or located at the interface between the N-terminal subunits. We investigated these mutations that are buried or found at domain-domain interfaces and showed that they perturb the relative domain orientations, likely weakening the interfaces around the N-terminal region. In fact, the majority of the disease-target residues (66%) are already accounted for at the N-terminal interfaces and are not available for a direct interaction with the central region. The N-terminal region on its own, thus, already has a significant impact on the channel opening, and the zipper hypothesis does not describe a major mechanism, accounting only for 33% of the mutations at most. Also, direct binding of the N-terminal region and the central region has not been observed. 133  Furthermore, more and more disease-associated mutations are being identified outside of the previously proposed hot spots, and many agree that the notion of hot spots in the RyR has been the result of sequencing bias. Altogether, the theory that proposes a direct interaction between hot spots that no longer exist is no longer valid. The difference between the two models likely arises from the techniques used. Peptides that are not properly folded can aggregate and cause unexpected, but nonspecific, interference in channel function and spectroscopic experiments. Our approach utilized soluble domains that are well behaved and properly folded. Continued effort of this approach would identify soluble domains of the central region, which then can be used to test direct binding to the N-terminal region. Also, by obtaining pseudo-atomic models of the central region, we could identify if the two regions are located close enough for interaction and whether disease mutations from the two regions share the same interface. Further functional experiments on the N-terminal region, such as cross-linking the intersubunit interface and seeing if the channel is locked in the closed state, may also show that the mutations in the N-terminal region alone can have an impact on channel function. There are still remaining disease-associated mutations in the N-terminal region that are located at interfaces with other parts of the channel, which could be the central region. Thus, zipper hypothesis cannot be excluded, but the model should be redefined to include interdomain interactions within the N-terminal region. In addition, the experimental tactic of using ill-defined peptides should be replaced with our “divide and conquer” approach, in which soluble domains are identified and studied and then pieced together in a pseudo-atomic model. Another model describes the disease-associated mutations in RyR as reductions in the affinity of FKBP, causing the dissociation of FKBP and, thus, destabilizing the closed state of 134  the channel(264). Again, the results in this thesis show otherwise. Our N-terminus construct failed to directly bind FKBP and is located far away from the proposed FKBP binding site in the clamp region of the channel. Furthermore, we have shown that the interfaces at the N-terminal region, the intersubunit interface in particular, are the prime targets of mutations and have proposed that they play an important role in regulating channel opening.  Although our results indicate that the mutations in the N-terminal region alone can already impact channel gating, it is possible that the FKBP dissociation model holds true in other parts of the channel. For instance, the study that supports this model used disease-associated mutations in the central region(264). In addition, we cannot exclude the possibility that the conformational changes at the N-terminal region indirectly alter the affinity for FKBP at the clamp region through allosteric coupling. In fact, we expect a reduced affinity for FKBP when RyRs open. The FKBP unbinding is, then, not the cause of channel opening but rather the effect. In this regard, the FKBP dissociation theory describes the epiphenomenon rather than the mechanism of channel opening. To further support this point, multitudes of functional studies, such as mutated RyRs expressed in HEK cells, demonstrated that the mutations alter the functions of RyR even in the absence of FKBP. Thus, it seems that the involvement of FKBP is not necessary for RyR mutations to cause perturbed channel activity. Future experiments using the domains that are located at the proposed FKBP binding site would clarify the exact effect of mutations around the FKBP binding interface. Despite the differences, the existing models in the field and our model share a common theme, in which an allosteric coupling holds a key to channel regulation. This theme is also shared across the homologous Ca2+ release channel, IP3R, where channel opening is triggered by ligand-dependent conformational changes at the N-terminal region. Thus, it has become 135  increasingly clear that allosteric movements throughout the entire channel are responsible for channel gating, and to understand this process, the detailed atomic structure of the entire channel, or a complete pseudo-atomic model, is necessary. 5.3 Ligand-dependent modulation RyR activation is triggered by various ligands, such as Ca2+, caffeine, and volatile anesthetics. Mutations in RyR rarely cause disease symptoms on their own, but usually require additional triggers, in the form of stress, heat, volatile anesthetics, etc. Ligand-dependent modulation of RyR, thus, seems to hold key for regulating the channel opening. We have shown that the N-terminal region of RyR2 contains an anion-binding site at the core of the three domains. Although the functional significance of this binding site is yet to be investigated, the chloride shields the repulsive charges at the center of the three domains that replaces the stable salt-bridge networks in RyR1. The removal of this chloride in the form of CPVT-associated R420Q mutation caused domain-domain reorientation. The functional study of this mutant is not available, but the similar mutation R420W has been reported to cause gain of function. Furthermore, we have proposed a model where the domain reorientations in the N-terminal region of RyR1 causes channel opening, in much like the way IP3R opens upon ligand-dependent domain reorientation in the N-terminal region. Therefore, it seems that destabilizing the N-terminal region of RyR leads to channel opening. For the majority of the mutations that cause a gain of function, it would be attractive to stabilize the N-terminal domains in order to compensate for the oversensitivity of the diseased-state channel towards activators.  The affinity of chloride toward RyR2ABC, based on our preliminary results, seems to be at the physiological level of chloride (0-4mM). In many cell types, including the skeletal muscle and neurons, whose intracellular chloride levels are ~3-4mM(294,295), we can expect the 136  chloride binding at an equilibrium. On the other hand, a chloride ion may bind to RyR2ABC at a mostly full occupancy in other cell types with much higher intracellular chloride concentrations, such as epithelial cells (~40mM)(296) and ventricular cells (~25mM)(297). The chloride binding at the RyR2 N-terminus, thus, could function as a regulatory mechanism in a cell-type dependent manner, in which the ion can bind and unbind according to the chloride flux in some cell types or stay permanently bound to provide a structural stability in other cell types. We have shown that chloride can also be replaced with bromide. It is possible that other anions that are physiologically relevant, such as phosphate, can bind at the same site. Anions that are either smaller or larger than chloride may be able to bind RyR2 at different affinities, and this could be a way to control the binding affinity. Future functional experiments of the wild type and R420Q mutant channels in varying levels of chloride and other anions would clarify the effect of the anion binding at the N-terminal region. We have also identified other ligands that could potentially modulate the N-terminal domain stability. The R414C mutation destabilized the N-terminal region likely through cysteine modification that puts a wedge between domains A and C. There is currently no functional data on this mutation. Future functional experiments of the R414C channel would clarify if this mutation causes gain of function through redox modification.  Furthermore, we have shown PEG binding sites at intradomain interfaces of RyR2ABC. PEG is not physiologically relevant and high levels were required for the binding, but the binding pockets between the domains could accommodate other molecules that could stabilize the interfaces.  Although the N-terminal constructs failed to bind currently known modulators of RyR, larger construct may reveal binding sites in the future. In addition, the N-terminal region in its 137  physiological tetramer form, for example through cross-linking, might reveal a ligand-binding site at the intersubunit interface. Taken together, we have shown that the N-terminal region of RyR harbor key interfaces that are broken upon channel opening and are targeted by disease-associated mutations that weaken such interfaces. Stabilizing these domain-domain interfaces through ligands would be of therapeutic value, where channels over-sensitized towards activators via mutations could be compensated.  5.4 Future directions We have combined structural and biochemical data to propose an attractive mechanism for mutations at the N-terminal region of RyRs. Here, we propose the next set of experiments that involves obtaining functional data for mutant channels to relate the structural data to the channel gating properties. Functional studies can be performed using the planar lipid bilayer electrophysiology on an intact channel, which enables the observation of single channel properties, including open probability, duration of open/closed time, and conductance.  The RyR1ABC mutants showed variations in the degree of structural changes. Are there correlations between the degree of structural changes or thermal destabilization and channel gating properties? In particular, salt bridge mutants, such as R45C, displayed long-range domain reorientations. Does the R45C mutant channel have properties different from other types of mutants that display only local structural changes, such as the C36R mutant? In addition, would the mutants with only modest structural changes also confer modest changes in functional studies? If the mutant channels display a similar degree of channel activation regardless of the different degrees of structural changes in the crystal structures, then it could suggest that modest 138  structural changes in the crystal structures are the reflection of rigid restraints due to the crystal packing and that all mutations destabilize the domain-domain interfaces to a similar extent.  Another crucial study is to test the functional consequence of the intersubunit interface between the four subunits of N-terminal regions. Is the motion in the N-terminal region directly coupled to the channel gating? This could be tested by locking the domain-domain interfaces in the region through disulfide bonds or cross-linking. One candidate is one of the salt bridges at the A-C interface that are targeted by disease mutations, such as Arg45 and Asp447 (rabbit RyR1 numbering). Another candidate is the proposed intersubunit interface contact, Gln208 and Arg383 (mouse RyR2 numbering). If locking the interfaces prevents the channel opening, it would serve as a direct evidence for the allosteric coupling of N-terminal motions and channel gating. If the intersubunit interface can be locked through disulfide bonds or crosslinking, it would also be of great interest to obtain the crystal structure of the RyRABC protein in tetramer form. By doing so, we can gain better understanding of the nature of the intersubunit contact area, since the current ABC structure in isolation contains several flexible loops, and the contact area in the absence of the neighboring subunits is unclear. The N-terminal region of RyR2 contains a unique chloride-binding site, and the preliminary data suggest that this anion-bindig site could have a functional role. The R420Q mutation abolishes the anion binding and results in a domain-domain reorientation. Could this mutant confer gain of function through removing chloride from the N-terminal region? We can perform functional studies comparing channel opening between the wildtype and R420Q channels in the presence of different chloride concentrations. Previous studies showed that the wildtype channels are activated by chloride. This could be due to other chloride-binding sites elsewhere on the channel. By directly comparing the wildtype with a mutant that no longer binds 139  chloride at the N-terminal region, the effect of the anion binding in this region can be determined. The effect of chloride can be calcium dependent, so that we would perform functional studies using varying levels of chloride and calcium. The structure of the R414C mutant suggested that the mutation may introduce a reactive Cys that can be modified at the A-C interface. Previous studies, using mass spectroscopy, have identified several Cys residues in RyR that are redox modified. The same experiment can be repeated for the R414C mutant channel. Also, functional studies of the R414C mutant channel can test if the mutant channels are sensitive to redox modification.  By continuing studies on the N-terminal region of RyRs using planar lipid bilayer experiments and combining the structural and functional data, we can get a better, fuller picture of the mutation mechanism at this region. By verifying the importance of the N-terminal domain-domain interfaces in the channel gating through functional studies, we can justify the pursuit of molecules that can stabilize the contacts, which would have therapeutic values in RyR channelopathies.   140  References  1. Rogers, E. F., and Koniuszy, F. R. (1948) Plant insecticides; ryanodine, a new alkaloid from Ryania speciosa Vahl. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 70, 3086-3088 2. Meissner, G. (1986) Ryanodine activation and inhibition of the Ca2+ release channel of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 6300-6306 3. Takeshima, H., Nishimura, S., Matsumoto, T., Ishida, H., Kangawa, K., Minamino, N., Matsuo, H., Ueda, M., Hanaoka, M., and Hirose, T. (1989) Primary structure and expression from complementary DNA of skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Nature 339, 439-445 4. Otsu, K., Willard, H. F., Khanna, V. K., Zorzato, F., Green, N. M., and MacLennan, D. H. (1990) Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of rabbit cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 13472-13483 5. Hakamata, Y., Nakai, J., Takeshima, H., and Imoto, K. (1992) Primary structure and distribution of a novel ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel from rabbit brain. FEBS Lett. 312, 229-235 6. Sorrentino, V., and Volpe, P. (1993) Ryanodine receptors: how many, where and why? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 14, 98-103 7. Endo, M. (2009) Calcium-induced calcium release in skeletal muscle. Physiol. Rev. 89, 1153-1176 8. Rios, E., and Brum, G. (1987) Involvement of dihydropyridine receptors in excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. Nature 325, 717-720 141  9. Tanabe, T., Beam, K. G., Powell, J. A., and Numa, S. (1988) Restoration of excitation-contraction coupling and slow calcium current in dysgenic muscle by dihydropyridine receptor complementary DNA. Nature 336, 134-139 10. Block, B. A., Imagawa, T., Campbell, K. P., and Franzini-Armstrong, C. (1988) Structural evidence for direct interaction between the molecular components of the transverse tubule/sarcoplasmic reticulum junction in skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 107, 2587-2600 11. Tanabe, T., Beam, K. G., Adams, B. A., Niidome, T., and Numa, S. (1990) Regions of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor critical for excitation-contraction coupling. Nature 346, 567-569 12. Saito, A., Seiler, S., Chu, A., and Fleischer, S. (1984) Preparation and morphology of sarcoplasmic reticulum terminal cisternae from rabbit skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 99, 875-885 13. Smith, D. S. (1966) The organization and function of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and T-system of muscle cells. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 16, 107-142 14. Betzenhauser, M. J., and Marks, A. R. (2010) Ryanodine receptor channelopathies. Pflugers Arch. 460, 467-480 15. Gillard, E. F., Otsu, K., Fujii, J., Khanna, V. K., de Leon, S., Derdemezi, J., Britt, B. A., Duff, C. L., Worton, R. G., and MacLennan, D. H. (1991) A substitution of cysteine for arginine 614 in the ryanodine receptor is potentially causative of human malignant hyperthermia. Genomics 11, 751-755 16. Jungbluth, H., Sewry, C. A., and Muntoni, F. (2003) What's new in neuromuscular disorders? The congenital myopathies. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 7, 23-30 142  17. Priori, S. G., Napolitano, C., Tiso, N., Memmi, M., Vignati, G., Bloise, R., Sorrentino, V., and Danieli, G. A. (2001) Mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene (hRyR2) underlie catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 103, 196-200 18. Priori, S. G., Napolitano, C., Memmi, M., Colombi, B., Drago, F., Gasparini, M., DeSimone, L., Coltorti, F., Bloise, R., and Keegan, R. (2002) Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 106, 69-74 19. Kushnir, A., and Marks, A. R. (2010) The ryanodine receptor in cardiac physiology and disease. Adv. Pharmacol. 59, 1-30 20. Bers, D. M. (2004) Macromolecular complexes regulating cardiac ryanodine receptor function. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 37, 417-429 21. Zalk, R., Lehnart, S. E., and Marks, A. R. (2007) Modulation of the ryanodine receptor and intracellular calcium. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 367-385 22. Lanner, J. T., Georgiou, D. K., Joshi, A. D., and Hamilton, S. L. (2010) Ryanodine receptors: structure, expression, molecular details, and function in calcium release. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a003996 23. Marx, S. (2003) Ion channel macromolecular complexes in the heart. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 35, 37-44 24. Fill, M., and Copello, J. A. (2002) Ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. Physiol. Rev. 82, 893-922 143  25. Palade, P., Mitchell, R. D., and Fleischer, S. (1983) Spontaneous calcium release from sarcoplasmic reticulum. General description and effects of calcium. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8098-8107 26. Jiang, D., Xiao, B., Yang, D., Wang, R., Choi, P., Zhang, L., Cheng, H., and Chen, S. R. W. (2004) RyR2 mutations linked to ventricular tachycardia and sudden death reduce the threshold for store-overload-induced Ca2+ release (SOICR). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 13062-13067 27. Van Petegem, F. (2012) Ryanodine receptors: structure and function. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 31624-31632 28. Revel, J. P. (1962) The sarcoplasmic reticulum of the bat cricothroid muscle. J. Cell Biol. 12, 571-588 29. Franzini-Armstrong, C. (1970) Studies of the Triad: I. Structure of the Junction in Frog Twitch Fibers. J. Cell Biol. 47, 488-499 30. McCarthy, T. V., Quane, K. A., and Lynch, P. J. (2000) Ryanodine receptor mutations in malignant hyperthermia and central core disease. Hum. Mutat. 15, 410-417 31. Monnier, N., Procaccio, V., Stieglitz, P., and Lunardi, J. (1997) Malignant-hyperthermia susceptibility is associated with a mutation of the alpha 1-subunit of the human dihydropyridine-sensitive L-type voltage-dependent calcium-channel receptor in skeletal muscle. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 1316-1325 32. Rosenberg, H., Davis, M., James, D., Pollock, N., and Stowell, K. (2007) Malignant hyperthermia. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2, 21 144  33. MacLennan, D. H., and Zvaritch, E. (2011) Mechanistic models for muscle diseases and disorders originating in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1813, 948-964 34. Krause, T., Gerbershagen, M. U., Fiege, M., Weisshorn, R., and Wappler, F. (2004) Dantrolene--a review of its pharmacology, therapeutic use and new developments. Anaesthesia 59, 364-373 35. Paul-Pletzer, K., Yamamoto, T., Bhat, M. B., Ma, J., Ikemoto, N., Jimenez, L. S., Morimoto, H., Williams, P. G., and Parness, J. (2002) Identification of a dantrolene-binding sequence on the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 34918-34923 36. Zhao, F., Li, P., Chen, S. R., Louis, C. F., and Fruen, B. R. (2001) Dantrolene inhibition of ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channels. Molecular mechanism and isoform selectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13810-13816 37. Szentesi, P., Collet, C., Sárközi, S., Szegedi, C., Jona, I., Jacquemond, V., Kovács, L., and Csernoch, L. (2001) Effects of dantrolene on steps of excitation-contraction coupling in mammalian skeletal muscle fibers. J. Gen. Physiol. 118, 355-375 38. Fujii, J., Otsu, K., Zorzato, F., de Leon, S., Khanna, V. K., Weiler, J. E., O'Brien, P. J., and MacLennan, D. H. (1991) Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253, 448-451 39. Klingler, W., Rueffert, H., Lehmann-Horn, F., Girard, T., and Hopkins, P. M. (2009) Core myopathies and risk of malignant hyperthermia. Anesth. Analg. 109, 1167-1173 40. Robinson, R., Carpenter, D., Shaw, M.-A., Halsall, J., and Hopkins, P. (2006) Mutations in RYR1 in malignant hyperthermia and central core disease. Hum. Mutat. 27, 977-989 145  41. Denborough, M. A., Dennett, X., and Anderson, R. M. (1973) Central-core disease and malignant hyperpyrexia. Br. Med. J. 1, 272-273 42. Jungbluth, H., Zhou, H., Hartley, L., Halliger-Keller, B., Messina, S., Longman, C., Brockington, M., Robb, S. A., Straub, V., Voit, T., Swash, M., Ferreiro, A., Bydder, G., Sewry, C. A., Müller, C., and Muntoni, F. (2005) Minicore myopathy with ophthalmoplegia caused by mutations in the ryanodine receptor type 1 gene. Neurology 65, 1930-1935 43. Ferreiro, A., Quijano-Roy, S., Pichereau, C., Moghadaszadeh, B., Goemans, N., Bönnemann, C., Jungbluth, H., Straub, V., Villanova, M., Leroy, J.-P., Romero, N. B., Martin, J.-J., Muntoni, F., Voit, T., Estournet, B., Richard, P., Fardeau, M., and Guicheney, P. (2002) Mutations of the selenoprotein N gene, which is implicated in rigid spine muscular dystrophy, cause the classical phenotype of multiminicore disease: reassessing the nosology of early-onset myopathies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 739-749 44. Jurynec, M. J., Xia, R., Mackrill, J. J., Gunther, D., Crawford, T., Flanigan, K. M., Abramson, J. J., Howard, M. T., and Grunwald, D. J. (2008) Selenoprotein N is required for ryanodine receptor calcium release channel activity in human and zebrafish muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 12485-12490 45. Kaindl, A. M., Rüschendorf, F., Krause, S., Goebel, H. H., Koehler, K., Becker, C., Pongratz, D., Müller-Höcker, J., Nürnberg, P., Stoltenburg-Didinger, G., Lochmüller, H., and Huebner, A. (2004) Missense mutations of ACTA1 cause dominant congenital myopathy with cores. J. Med. Genet. 41, 842-848 46. Lahat, H., Pras, E., Olender, T., Avidan, N., Ben-Asher, E., Man, O., Levy-Nissenbaum, E., Khoury, A., Lorber, A., Goldman, B., Lancet, D., and Eldar, M. (2001) A missense 146  mutation in a highly conserved region of CASQ2 is associated with autosomal recessive catecholamine-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in Bedouin families from Israel. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69, 1378-1384 47. Roux-Buisson, N., Cacheux, M., Fourest-Lieuvin, A., Fauconnier, J., Brocard, J., Denjoy, I., Durand, P., Guicheney, P., Kyndt, F., Leenhardt, A., Le Marec, H., Lucet, V., Mabo, P., Probst, V., Monnier, N., Ray, P. F., Santoni, E., Trémeaux, P., Lacampagne, A., Faure, J., Lunardi, J., and Marty, I. (2012) Absence of triadin, a protein of the calcium release complex, is responsible for cardiac arrhythmia with sudden death in human. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 2759-2767 48. Nyegaard, M., Overgaard, M. T., Søndergaard, M. T., Vranas, M., Behr, E. R., Hildebrandt, L. L., Lund, J., Hedley, P. L., Camm, A. J., Wettrell, G., Fosdal, I., Christiansen, M., and Børglum, A. D. (2012) Mutations in calmodulin cause ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 91, 703-712 49. Pflaumer, A., and Davis, A. M. (2012) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. Heart Lung Circ. 21, 96-100 50. Watanabe, H., Chopra, N., Laver, D., Hwang, H. S., Davies, S. S., Roach, D. E., Duff, H. J., Roden, D. M., Wilde, A. A. M., and Knollmann, B. C. (2009) Flecainide prevents catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in mice and humans. Nat. Med. 15, 380-383 51. Ohnishi, S. T., Taylor, S., and Gronert, G. A. (1983) Calcium-induced Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum of pigs susceptible to malignant hyperthermia. The effects of halothane and dantrolene. FEBS Lett. 161, 103-107 147  52. Nelson, T. E. (1983) Abnormality in calcium release from skeletal sarcoplasmic reticulum of pigs susceptible to malignant hyperthermia. J. Clin. Invest. 72, 862-870 53. Wehner, M., Rueffert, H., Koenig, F., Neuhaus, J., and Olthoff, D. (2002) Increased sensitivity to 4-chloro-m-cresol and caffeine in primary myotubes from malignant hyperthermia susceptible individuals carrying the ryanodine receptor 1 Thr2206Met (C6617T) mutation. Clin. Genet. 62, 135-146 54. Wehner, M., Rueffert, H., Koenig, F., Meinecke, C.-D., and Olthoff, D. (2003) The Ile2453Thr mutation in the ryanodine receptor gene 1 is associated with facilitated calcium release from sarcoplasmic reticulum by 4-chloro-m-cresol in human myotubes. Cell Calcium 34, 163-168 55. Wehner, M., Rueffert, H., Koenig, F., and Olthoff, D. (2004) Functional characterization of malignant hyperthermia-associated RyR1 mutations in exon 44, using the human myotube model. Neuromuscul. Disord. 14, 429-437 56. Kaufmann, A., Kraft, B., Michalek-Sauberer, A., Weindlmayr, M., Kress, H. G., Steinboeck, F., and Weigl, L. G. (2012) Novel double and single ryanodine receptor 1 variants in two Austrian malignant hyperthermia families. Anesth. Analg. 114, 1017-1025 57. Chelu, M. G., Goonasekera, S. A., Durham, W. J., Tang, W., Lueck, J. D., Riehl, J., Pessah, I. N., Zhang, P., Bhattacharjee, M. B., Dirksen, R. T., and Hamilton, S. L. (2006) Heat- and anesthesia-induced malignant hyperthermia in an RyR1 knock-in mouse. The FASEB J. 20, 329-330 58. Yang, T., Riehl, J., Esteve, E., Matthaei, K. I., Goth, S., Allen, P. D., Pessah, I. N., and Lopez, J. R. (2006) Pharmacologic and functional characterization of malignant hyperthermia in the R163C RyR1 knock-in mouse. Anesthesiology 105, 1164-1175 148  59. Liu, N., Colombi, B., Memmi, M., Zissimopoulos, S., Rizzi, N., Negri, S., Imbriani, M., Napolitano, C., Lai, F. A., and Priori, S. G. (2006) Arrhythmogenesis in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: insights from a RyR2 R4496C knock-in mouse model. Circ. Res. 99, 292-298 60. Feng, W., Barrientos, G. C., Cherednichenko, G., Yang, T., Padilla, I. T., Truong, K., Allen, P. D., Lopez, J. R., and Pessah, I. N. (2011) Functional and biochemical properties of ryanodine receptor type 1 channels from heterozygous R163C malignant hyperthermia-susceptible mice. Mol. Pharmacol. 79, 420-431 61. Boncompagni, S., Loy, R. E., Dirksen, R. T., and Franzini-Armstrong, C. (2010) The I4895T mutation in the type 1 ryanodine receptor induces fiber-type specific alterations in skeletal muscle that mimic premature aging. Aging Cell 9, 958-970 62. Loy, R. E., Orynbayev, M., Xu, L., Andronache, Z., Apostol, S., Zvaritch, E., MacLennan, D. H., Meissner, G., Melzer, W., and Dirksen, R. T. (2011) Muscle weakness in Ryr1I4895T/WT knock-in mice as a result of reduced ryanodine receptor Ca2+ ion permeation and release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Gen. Physiol. 137, 43-57 63. Barrientos, G. C., Feng, W., Truong, K., Matthaei, K. I., Yang, T., Allen, P. D., Lopez, J. R., and Pessah, I. N. (2012) Gene dose influences cellular and calcium channel dysregulation in heterozygous and homozygous T4826I-RYR1 malignant hyperthermia-susceptible muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 2863-2876 64. Ghassemi, F., Vukcevic, M., Xu, L., Zhou, H., Meissner, G., Muntoni, F., Jungbluth, H., Zorzato, F., and Treves, S. (2009) A recessive ryanodine receptor 1 mutation in a CCD patient increases channel activity. Cell Calcium 45, 192-197 149  65. Tilgen, N., Zorzato, F., Halliger-Keller, B., Muntoni, F., Sewry, C., Palmucci, L. M., Schneider, C., Hauser, E., Lehmann-Horn, F., Müller, C. R., and Treves, S. (2001) Identification of four novel mutations in the C-terminal membrane spanning domain of the ryanodine receptor 1: association with central core disease and alteration of calcium homeostasis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 2879-2887 66. Zorzato, F., Yamaguchi, N., Xu, L., Meissner, G., Müller, C. R., Pouliquin, P., Muntoni, F., Sewry, C., Girard, T., and Treves, S. (2003) Clinical and functional effects of a deletion in a COOH-terminal lumenal loop of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 379-388 67. Avila, G., O'Brien, J. J., and Dirksen, R. T. (2001) Excitation--contraction uncoupling by a human central core disease mutation in the ryanodine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4215-4220 68. Avila, G., and Dirksen, R. T. (2001) Functional effects of central core disease mutations in the cytoplasmic region of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. J. Gen. Physiol. 118, 277-290 69. Yang, T., Ta, T. A., Pessah, I. N., and Allen, P. D. (2003) Functional defects in six ryanodine receptor isoform-1 (RyR1) mutations associated with malignant hyperthermia and their impact on skeletal excitation-contraction coupling. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 25722-25730 70. Avila, G., O'Connell, K. M. S., and Dirksen, R. T. (2003) The pore region of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor is a primary locus for excitation-contraction uncoupling in central core disease. J. Gen. Physiol. 121, 277-286 150  71. Tong, J., Oyamada, H., Demaurex, N., Grinstein, S., McCarthy, T. V., and MacLennan, D. H. (1997) Caffeine and halothane sensitivity of intracellular Ca2+ release is altered by 15 calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor) mutations associated with malignant hyperthermia and/or central core disease. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26332-26339 72. Du, G. G., and MacLennan, D. H. (1998) Functional consequences of mutations of conserved, polar amino acids in transmembrane sequences of the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of rabbit skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31867-31872 73. Lynch, P. J., Tong, J., Lehane, M., Mallet, A., Giblin, L., Heffron, J. J., Vaughan, P., Zafra, G., MacLennan, D. H., and McCarthy, T. V. (1999) A mutation in the transmembrane/luminal domain of the ryanodine receptor is associated with abnormal Ca2+ release channel function and severe central core disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 4164-4169 74. Tong, J., McCarthy, T. V., and MacLennan, D. H. (1999) Measurement of resting cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations and Ca2+ store size in HEK-293 cells transfected with malignant hyperthermia or central core disease mutant Ca2+ release channels. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 693-702 75. Du, G. G., Oyamada, H., Khanna, V. K., and MacLennan, D. H. (2001) Mutations to Gly2370, Gly2373 or Gly2375 in malignant hyperthermia domain 2 decrease caffeine and cresol sensitivity of the rabbit skeletal-muscle Ca2+-release channel (ryanodine receptor isoform 1). Biochem. J. 360, 97-105 76. Sambuughin, N., Nelson, T. E., Jankovic, J., Xin, C., Meissner, G., Mullakandov, M., Ji, J., Rosenberg, H., Sivakumar, K., and Goldfarb, L. G. (2001) Identification and 151  functional characterization of a novel ryanodine receptor mutation causing malignant hyperthermia in North American and South American families. Neuromuscul. Disord. 11, 530-537 77. Treves, S., Larini, F., Menegazzi, P., Steinberg, T. H., Koval, M., Vilsen, B., Andersen, J. P., and Zorzato, F. (1994) Alteration of intracellular Ca2+ transients in COS-7 cells transfected with the cDNA encoding skeletal-muscle ryanodine receptor carrying a mutation associated with malignant hyperthermia. Biochem. J. 301, 661 78. Otsu, K., Nishida, K., Kimura, Y., Kuzuya, T., Hori, M., Kamada, T., and Tada, M. (1994) The point mutation Arg615-->Cys in the Ca2+ release channel of skeletal sarcoplasmic reticulum is responsible for hypersensitivity to caffeine and halothane in malignant hyperthermia. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9413-9415 79. Jiang, D., Wang, R., Xiao, B., Kong, H., Hunt, D. J., Choi, P., Zhang, L., and Chen, S. R. W. (2005) Enhanced store overload-induced Ca2+ release and channel sensitivity to luminal Ca2+ activation are common defects of RyR2 mutations linked to ventricular tachycardia and sudden death. Circ. Res. 97, 1173-1181 80. George, C. H., Higgs, G. V., and Lai, F. A. (2003) Ryanodine receptor mutations associated with stress-induced ventricular tachycardia mediate increased calcium release in stimulated cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 93, 531-540 81. George, C. H., Jundi, H., Walters, N., Thomas, N. L., West, R. R., and Lai, F. A. (2006) Arrhythmogenic mutation-linked defects in ryanodine receptor autoregulation reveal a novel mechanism of Ca2+ release channel dysfunction. Circ. Res. 98, 88-97 82. Cerrone, M., Colombi, B., Santoro, M., di Barletta, M. R., Scelsi, M., Villani, L., Napolitano, C., and Priori, S. G. (2005) Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia and 152  fibrillation elicited in a knock-in mouse model carrier of a mutation in the cardiac ryanodine receptor. Circ. Res. 96, e77-82 83. Kannankeril, P. J., Mitchell, B. M., Goonasekera, S. A., Chelu, M. G., Zhang, W., Sood, S., Kearney, D. L., Danila, C. I., De Biasi, M., Wehrens, X. H. T., Pautler, R. G., Roden, D. M., Taffet, G. E., Dirksen, R. T., Anderson, M. E., and Hamilton, S. L. (2006) Mice with the R176Q cardiac ryanodine receptor mutation exhibit catecholamine-induced ventricular tachycardia and cardiomyopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 12179-12184 84. Mickelson, J. R., Gallant, E. M., Litterer, L. A., Johnson, K. M., Rempel, W. E., and Louis, C. F. (1988) Abnormal sarcoplasmic reticulum ryanodine receptor in malignant hyperthermia. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 9310-9315 85. Fill, M., Coronado, R., Mickelson, J. R., Vilven, J., Ma, J. J., Jacobson, B. A., and Louis, C. F. (1990) Abnormal ryanodine receptor channels in malignant hyperthermia. Biophys. J. 57, 471-475 86. Du, G. G., Khanna, V. K., Guo, X., and MacLennan, D. H. (2004) Central core disease mutations R4892W, I4897T and G4898E in the ryanodine receptor isoform 1 reduce the Ca2+ sensitivity and amplitude of Ca2+-dependent Ca2+ release. Biochem. J. 382, 557-564 87. Jiang, D., Xiao, B., Zhang, L., and Chen, S. R. W. (2002) Enhanced basal activity of a cardiac Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) mutant associated with ventricular tachycardia and sudden death. Circ. Res. 91, 218-225 153  88. Mickelson, J. R., Litterer, L. A., Jacobson, B. A., and Louis, C. F. (1990) Stimulation and inhibition of [3H]ryanodine binding to sarcoplasmic reticulum from malignant hyperthermia susceptible pigs. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 278, 251-257 89. Shomer, N. H., Louis, C. F., Fill, M., Litterer, L. A., and Mickelson, J. R. (1993) Reconstitution of abnormalities in the malignant hyperthermia-susceptible pig ryanodine receptor. Am. J. Physiol. 264, C125-135 90. Nelson, T. E. (1992) Halothane effects on human malignant hyperthermia skeletal muscle single calcium-release channels in planar lipid bilayers. Anesthesiology 76, 588-595 91. Ohnishi, S. T. (1987) Effects of halothane, caffeine, dantrolene and tetracaine on the calcium permeability of skeletal sarcoplasmic reticulum of malignant hyperthermic pigs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 897, 261-268 92. Jiang, D., Chen, W., Xiao, J., Wang, R., Kong, H., Jones, P. P., Zhang, L., Fruen, B., and Chen, S. R. W. (2008) Reduced threshold for luminal Ca2+ activation of RyR1 underlies a causal mechanism of porcine malignant hyperthermia. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 20813-20820 93. Liang, X., Chen, K., Fruen, B., Hu, J., Ma, J., Hu, X., and Parness, J. (2009) Impaired interaction between skeletal ryanodine receptors in malignant hyperthermia. Integr. Biol. 1, 533 94. Brini, M., Manni, S., Pierobon, N., Du, G. G., Sharma, P., MacLennan, D. H., and Carafoli, E. (2005) Ca2+ signaling in HEK-293 and skeletal muscle cells expressing recombinant ryanodine receptors harboring malignant hyperthermia and central core disease mutations. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 15380-15389 95. Zvaritch, E., Depreux, F., Kraeva, N., Loy, R. E., Goonasekera, S. A., Boncompagni, S., Boncompagi, S., Kraev, A., Gramolini, A. O., Dirksen, R. T., Franzini-Armstrong, C., 154  Seidman, C. E., Seidman, J. G., and MacLennan, D. H. (2007) An Ryr1I4895T mutation abolishes Ca2+ release channel function and delays development in homozygous offspring of a mutant mouse line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18537-18542 96. Xu, L., Wang, Y., Yamaguchi, N., Pasek, D. A., and Meissner, G. (2008) Single channel properties of heterotetrameric mutant RyR1 ion channels linked to core myopathies. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 6321-6329 97. Sato, K., Pollock, N., and Stowell, K. M. (2010) Functional studies of RYR1 mutations in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor using human RYR1 complementary DNA. Anesthesiology 112, 1350-1354 98. Haraki, T., Yasuda, T., Mukaida, K., Migita, T., Hamada, H., and Kawamoto, M. (2011) Mutated p.4894 RyR1 function related to malignant hyperthermia and congenital neuromuscular disease with uniform type 1 fiber (CNMDU1). Anesth. Analg. 113, 1461-1467 99. Jiang, D., Chen, W., Wang, R., Zhang, L., and Chen, S. R. W. (2007) Loss of luminal Ca2+ activation in the cardiac ryanodine receptor is associated with ventricular fibrillation and sudden death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18309-18314 100. Jones, P. P., Jiang, D., Bolstad, J., Hunt, D. J., Zhang, L., Demaurex, N., and Chen, S. R. W. (2008) Endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ measurements reveal that the cardiac ryanodine receptor mutations linked to cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death alter the threshold for store-overload-induced Ca2+ release. Biochem. J. 412, 171-178 101. Tang, Y., Tian, X., Wang, R., Fill, M., and Chen, S. R. W. (2012) Abnormal termination of Ca2+ release is a common defect of RyR2 mutations associated with cardiomyopathies. Circ. Res. 110, 968-977 155  102. Radermacher, M., Rao, V., Grassucci, R., Frank, J., Timerman, A. P., Fleischer, S., and Wagenknecht, T. (1994) Cryo-electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction of the calcium release channel/ryanodine receptor from skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 127, 411-423 103. Zhou, H., Yamaguchi, N., Xu, L., Wang, Y., Sewry, C., Jungbluth, H., Zorzato, F., Bertini, E., Muntoni, F., Meissner, G., and Treves, S. (2006) Characterization of recessive RYR1 mutations in core myopathies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15, 2791-2803 104. Zhou, H., Lillis, S., Loy, R. E., Ghassemi, F., Rose, M. R., Norwood, F., Mills, K., Al-Sarraj, S., Lane, R. J. M., Feng, L., Matthews, E., Sewry, C. A., Abbs, S., Buk, S., Hanna, M., Treves, S., Dirksen, R. T., Meissner, G., Muntoni, F., and Jungbluth, H. (2010) Multi-minicore disease and atypical periodic paralysis associated with novel mutations in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene. Neuromuscul. Disord. 20, 166-173 105. Bonilla, E. (1977) Staining of transverse tubular system of skeletal muscle by tannic acid-glutaraldehyde fixation. J. Ultrastruct. Res., 162-165 106. Somlyo, A. V. (1979) Bridging structures spanning the junctioning gap at the triad of skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 80, 743-750 107. Ferguson, D. G., Schwartz, H. W., and Franzini-Armstrong, C. (1984) Subunit structure of junctional feet in triads of skeletal muscle: a freeze-drying, rotary-shadowing study. J. Cell Biol. 99, 1735-1742 108. Inui, M., Saito, A., and Fleischer, S. (1987) Purification of the ryanodine receptor and identity with feet structures of junctional terminal cisternae of sarcoplasmic reticulum from fast skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 1740-1747 156  109. Saito, A., Inui, M., Radermacher, M., Frank, J., and Fleischer, S. (1988) Ultrastructure of the calcium release channel of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 107, 211-219 110. Yin, C. C., and Lai, F. A. (2000) Intrinsic lattice formation by the ryanodine receptor calcium-release channel. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 669-671 111. Yin, C.-C., Han, H., Wei, R., and Lai, F. A. (2005) Two-dimensional crystallization of the ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channel on lipid membranes. J. Struct. Biol. 149, 219-224 112. Wagenknecht, T., Grassucci, R., Frank, J., Saito, A., Inui, M., and Fleischer, S. (1989) Three-dimensional architecture of the calcium channel/foot structure of sarcoplasmic reticulum. Nature 338, 167-170 113. Radermacher, M., Wagenknecht, T., Grassucci, R., Frank, J., Inui, M., Chadwick, C., and Fleischer, S. (1992) Cryo-EM of the native structure of the calcium release channel/ryanodine receptor from sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biophys. J. 61, 936-940 114. Serysheva, I. I., Orlova, E. V., Chiu, W., Sherman, M. B., Hamilton, S. L., and van Heel, M. (1995) Electron cryomicroscopy and angular reconstitution used to visualize the skeletal muscle calcium release channel. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 18-24 115. Sharma, M. R., Penczek, P., Grassucci, R., Xin, H. B., Fleischer, S., and Wagenknecht, T. (1998) Cryoelectron microscopy and image analysis of the cardiac ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18429-18434 116. Jeyakumar, L. H., Copello, J. A., O'Malley, A. M., Wu, G. M., Grassucci, R., Wagenknecht, T., and Fleischer, S. (1998) Purification and characterization of ryanodine receptor 3 from mammalian tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16011-16020 157  117. Murayama, T., Oba, T., Katayama, E., Oyamada, H., Oguchi, K., Kobayashi, M., Otsuka, K., and Ogawa, Y. (1999) Further characterization of the type 3 ryanodine receptor (RyR3) purified from rabbit diaphragm. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17297-17308 118. Sharma, M. R., Jeyakumar, L. H., Fleischer, S., and Wagenknecht, T. (2000) Three-dimensional structure of ryanodine receptor isoform three in two conformational states as visualized by cryo-electron microscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9485-9491 119. Ludtke, S. J., Serysheva, I. I., Hamilton, S. L., and Chiu, W. (2005) The pore structure of the closed RyR1 channel. Structure 13(8), 1203-1211 120. Serysheva, I. I., Ludtke, S. J., Baker, M. L., Cong, Y., Topf, M., Eramian, D., Sali, A., Hamilton, S. L., and Chiu, W. (2008) Subnanometer-resolution electron cryomicroscopy-based domain models for the cytoplasmic region of skeletal muscle RyR channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 9610-9615 121. Samsó, M., Wagenknecht, T., and Allen, P. D. (2005) Internal structure and visualization of transmembrane domains of the RyR1 calcium release channel by cryo-EM. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12(6), 539-544 122. Samsó, M., Feng, W., Pessah, I. N., and Allen, P. D. (2009) Coordinated movement of cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of RyR1 upon gating. PLoS Biol. 7, e85 123. Minor, D. L. (2005) Bend to open? Structure 13(8), 1094-1095 124. Frank, J. (2002) Single-particle imaging of macromolecules by cryo-electron microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31, 303-319 125. van Heel, M., and Schatz, M. (2005) Fourier shell correlation threshold criteria. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 250-262 158  126. Ludtke, S. J., and Serysheva, I. I. (2013) Single-particle cryo-EM of calcium release channels: structural validation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 755-762 127. Du, G. G., Avila, G., Sharma, P., Khanna, V. K., Dirksen, R. T., and MacLennan, D. H. (2004) Role of the sequence surrounding predicted transmembrane helix M4 in membrane association and function of the Ca(2+) release channel of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum (ryanodine receptor isoform 1). J. Biol. Chem. 279, 37566-37574 128. Doyle, D. A., Cabral, J. M., Pfuetzner, R. A., Kuo, A., Gulbis, J. M., Cohen, S. L., Chait, B. T., and MacKinnon, R. (1998) The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science 280, 69-77 129. Jiang, Y., Lee, A., Chen, J., Cadene, M., Chait, B. T., and MacKinnon, R. (2002) The open pore conformation of potassium channels. Nature 417, 523-526 130. D'Avanzo, N., Cho, H. C., Tolokh, I., Pekhletski, R., Tolokh, I., Gray, C., Goldman, S., and Backx, P. H. (2005) Conduction through the inward rectifier potassium channel, Kir2.1, is increased by negatively charged extracellular residues. J. Gen. Physiol. 125, 493-503 131. Imoto, K., Busch, C., Sakmann, B., Mishina, M., Konno, T., Nakai, J., Bujo, H., Mori, Y., Fukuda, K., and Numa, S. (1988) Rings of negatively charged amino acids determine the acetylcholine receptor channel conductance. Nature 335, 645-648 132. Andersen, C., Koronakis, E., Hughes, C., and Koronakis, V. (2002) An aspartate ring at the TolC tunnel entrance determines ion selectivity and presents a target for blocking by large cations. Mol. Microbiol. 44, 1131-1139 159  133. Terlau, H., Heinemann, S. H., Stühmer, W., Pusch, M., Conti, F., Imoto, K., and Numa, S. (1991) Mapping the site of block by tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin of sodium channel II. FEBS Lett. 293, 93-96 134. Long, S. B., Campbell, E. B., and MacKinnon, R. (2005) Voltage sensor of Kv1.2: structural basis of electromechanical coupling. Science 309, 903-908 135. Kuo, A., Gulbis, J. M., Antcliff, J. F., Rahman, T., Lowe, E. D., Zimmer, J., Cuthbertson, J., Ashcroft, F. M., Ezaki, T., and Doyle, D. A. (2003) Crystal structure of the potassium channel KirBac1.1 in the closed state. Science 300, 1922-1926 136. Baker, M. L., Ju, T., and Chiu, W. (2007) Identification of secondary structure elements in intermediate-resolution density maps. Structure 15, 7-19 137. Nishida, M., Cadene, M., Chait, B. T., and MacKinnon, R. (2007) Crystal structure of a Kir3.1-prokaryotic Kir channel chimera. EMBO J. 26, 4005-4015 138. Nishida, M., and MacKinnon, R. (2002) Structural basis of inward rectification: cytoplasmic pore of the G protein-gated inward rectifier GIRK1 at 1.8 A resolution. Cell 111, 957-965 139. Pegan, S., Arrabit, C., Zhou, W., Kwiatkowski, W., Collins, A., Slesinger, P. A., and Choe, S. (2005) Cytoplasmic domain structures of Kir2.1 and Kir3.1 show sites for modulating gating and rectification. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 279-287 140. Zagotta, W. N., Olivier, N. B., Black, K. D., Young, E. C., Olson, R., and Gouaux, E. (2003) Structural basis for modulation and agonist specificity of HCN pacemaker channels. Nature 425, 200-205 160  141. Orlova, E. V., Serysheva, I. I., van Heel, M., Hamilton, S. L., and Chiu, W. (1996) Two structural configurations of the skeletal muscle calcium release channel. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 547-552 142. Serysheva, I. I., Schatz, M., van Heel, M., Chiu, W., and Hamilton, S. L. (1999) Structure of the Skeletal Muscle Calcium Release Channel Activated with Ca(2+) and AMP-PCP. Biophys. J. 77, 1936-1944 143. Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Sharma, M. R., Li, P., Chen, S. R., and Wagenknecht, T. (2001) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the recombinant type 3 ryanodine receptor and localization of its amino terminus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 6104-6109 144. Wang, R., Chen, W., Cai, S., Zhang, J., Bolstad, J., Wagenknecht, T., Liu, Z., and Chen, S. R. W. (2007) Localization of an NH(2)-terminal disease-causing mutation hot spot to the "clamp" region in the three-dimensional structure of the cardiac ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 17785-17793 145. Paul-Pletzer, K., Yamamoto, T., Ikemoto, N., Jimenez, L. S., Morimoto, H., Williams, P. G., Ma, J., and Parness, J. (2005) Probing a putative dantrolene-binding site on the cardiac ryanodine receptor. Biochem. J. 387, 905-909 146. Wang, R., Zhong, X., Meng, X., Koop, A., Tian, X., Jones, P. P., Fruen, B. R., Wagenknecht, T., Liu, Z., and Chen, S. R. W. (2011) Localization of the dantrolene-binding sequence near the FK506-binding protein-binding site in the three-dimensional structure of the ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 12202-12212 147. Liu, Z., Wang, R., Zhang, J., Chen, S. R. W., and Wagenknecht, T. (2005) Localization of a disease-associated mutation site in the three-dimensional structure of the cardiac muscle ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 37941-37947 161  148. Ikemoto, N., and Yamamoto, T. (2002) Regulation of calcium release by interdomain interaction within ryanodine receptors. Front. Biosci. 7, d671-683 149. Tian, X., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, R., Wagenknecht, T., Liu, Z., and Chen, S. R. W. (2013) Ligand-dependent conformational changes in the clamp region of the cardiac ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 4066-4075 150. Du, G. G., Khanna, V. K., and MacLennan, D. H. (2000) Mutation of divergent region 1 alters caffeine and Ca(2+) sensitivity of the skeletal muscle Ca(2+) release channel (ryanodine receptor). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11778-11783 151. Du, G. G., and MacLennan, D. H. (1999) Ca(2+) inactivation sites are located in the COOH-terminal quarter of recombinant rabbit skeletal muscle Ca(2+) release channels (ryanodine receptors). J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26120-26126 152. Nakai, J., Gao, L., Xu, L., Xin, C., Pasek, D. A., and Meissner, G. (1999) Evidence for a role of C-terminus in Ca(2+) inactivation of skeletal muscle Ca(2+) release channel (ryanodine receptor). FEBS Lett. 459, 154-158 153. Benacquista, B. L., Sharma, M. R., Samsó, M., Zorzato, F., Treves, S., and Wagenknecht, T. (2000) Amino acid residues 4425–4621 localized on the three-dimensional structure of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Biophys. J. 78, 1349-1358 154. Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Li, P., Chen, S. R. W., and Wagenknecht, T. (2002) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the recombinant type 2 ryanodine receptor and localization of its divergent region 1. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 46712-46719 155. Yamazawa, T., Takeshima, H., Shimuta, M., and Iino, M. (1997) A region of the ryanodine receptor critical for excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8161-8164 162  156. Perez, C. F., Mukherjee, S., and Allen, P. D. (2003) Amino acids 1-1,680 of ryanodine receptor type 1 hold critical determinants of skeletal type for excitation-contraction coupling. Role of divergence domain D2. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 39644-39652 157. Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Wang, R., Wayne Chen, S. R., and Wagenknecht, T. (2004) Location of divergent region 2 on the three-dimensional structure of cardiac muscle ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel. J. Mol. Biol. 338, 533-545 158. Hayek, S. M., Zhao, J., Bhat, M., Xu, X., Nagaraj, R., Pan, Z., Takeshima, H., and Ma, J. (1999) A negatively charged region of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor is involved in Ca(2+)-dependent regulation of the Ca(2+) release channel. FEBS Lett. 461, 157-164 159. Hayek, S. M., Zhu, X., Bhat, M. B., Zhao, J., Takeshima, H., Valdivia, H. H., and Ma, J. (2000) Characterization of a calcium-regulation domain of the skeletal-muscle ryanodine receptor. Biochem. J. 351, 57-65 160. Proenza, C., O'Brien, J., Nakai, J., Mukherjee, S., Allen, P. D., and Beam, K. G. (2002) Identification of a region of RyR1 that participates in allosteric coupling with the alpha(1S) (Ca(V)1.1) II-III loop. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 6530-6535 161. Koop, A., Goldmann, P., Chen, S. R. W., Thieleczek, R., and Varsányi, M. (2008) ARVC-related mutations in divergent region 3 alter functional properties of the cardiac ryanodine receptor. Biophys. J. 94, 4668-4677 162. Zhang, J., Liu, Z., Masumiya, H., Wang, R., Jiang, D., Li, F., Wagenknecht, T., and Chen, S. R. W. (2003) Three-dimensional localization of divergent region 3 of the ryanodine receptor to the clamp-shaped structures adjacent to the FKBP binding sites. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 14211-14218 163  163. Danila, C. I., and Hamilton, S. L. (2004) Phosphorylation of ryanodine receptors. Biol. Res. 37, 521-525 164. Petrovic, M. M., Vales, K., Putnikovic, B., Djulejic, V., and Mitrovic, D. M. (2008) Ryanodine receptors, voltage-gated calcium channels and their relationship with protein kinase A in the myocardium. Physiol. Res. 57, 141-149 165. Wehrens, X. H. T., Lehnart, S. E., Reiken, S., Vest, J. A., Wronska, A., and Marks, A. R. (2006) Ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel PKA phosphorylation: a critical mediator of heart failure progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 511-518 166. Xiao, B., Jiang, M. T., Zhao, M., Yang, D., Sutherland, C., Lai, F. A., Walsh, M. P., Warltier, D. C., Cheng, H., and Chen, S. R. W. (2005) Characterization of a novel PKA phosphorylation site, serine-2030, reveals no PKA hyperphosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor in canine heart failure. Circ. Res. 96, 847-855 167. Xiao, B., Zhong, G., Obayashi, M., Yang, D., Chen, K., Walsh, M. P., Shimoni, Y., Cheng, H., ter Keurs, H., and Chen, S. R. W. (2006) Ser-2030, but not Ser-2808, is the major phosphorylation site in cardiac ryanodine receptors responding to protein kinase A activation upon beta-adrenergic stimulation in normal and failing hearts. Biochem. J. 396, 7-16 168. Jones, P. P., Meng, X., Xiao, B., Cai, S., Bolstad, J., Wagenknecht, T., Liu, Z., and Chen, S. R. W. (2008) Localization of PKA phosphorylation site, Ser(2030), in the three-dimensional structure of cardiac ryanodine receptor. Biochem. J. 410, 261-270 169. Meng, X., Xiao, B., Cai, S., Huang, X., Li, F., Bolstad, J., Trujillo, R., Airey, J., Chen, S. R. W., Wagenknecht, T., and Liu, Z. (2007) Three-dimensional localization of serine 164  2808, a phosphorylation site in cardiac ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 25929-25939 170. Ahern, G. P., Junankar, P. R., and Dulhunty, A. F. (1997) Subconductance states in single-channel activity of skeletal muscle ryanodine receptors after removal of FKBP12. Biophys. J. 72, 146-162 171. Chelu, M. G., Danila, C. I., Gilman, C. P., and Hamilton, S. L. (2004) Regulation of ryanodine receptors by FK506 binding proteins. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 14(6), 227-234 172. Marx, S. O., Reiken, S., Hisamatsu, Y., Jayaraman, T., Burkhoff, D., Rosemblit, N., and Marks, A. R. (2000) PKA phosphorylation dissociates FKBP12.6 from the calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor): defective regulation in failing hearts. Cell 101, 365-376 173. Jayaraman, T., Brillantes, A. M., Timerman, A. P., Fleischer, S., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., and Marks, A. R. (1992) FK506 binding protein associated with the calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor). J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9474-9477 174. Timerman, A. P., Onoue, H., Xin, H. B., Barg, S., Copello, J., Wiederrecht, G., and Fleischer, S. (1996) Selective binding of FKBP12.6 by the cardiac ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20385-20391 175. Wagenknecht, T., Grassucci, R., Berkowitz, J., Wiederrecht, G. J., Xin, H.-B., and Fleischer, S. (1996) Cryoelectron microscopy resolves FK506-binding protein sites on the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Biophys. J. 70, 1709-1715 176. Wagenknecht, T., Radermacher, M., Grassucci, R., Berkowitz, J., Xin, H. B., and Fleischer, S. (1997) Locations of calmodulin and FK506-binding protein on the three-165  dimensional architecture of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32463-32471 177. Burkhard, P., Taylor, P., and Walkinshaw, M. D. (2000) X-ray structures of small ligand-FKBP complexes provide an estimate for hydrophobic interaction energies. J. Mol. Biol. 295, 953-962 178. Samsó, M., Shen, X., and Allen, P. D. (2006) Structural characterization of the RyR1-FKBP12 interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 356, 917-927 179. Sharma, M. R., Jeyakumar, L. H., Fleischer, S., and Wagenknecht, T. (2006) Three-dimensional visualization of FKBP12.6 binding to an open conformation of cardiac ryanodine receptor. Biophys. J. 90, 164-172 180. Wagenknecht, T., Berkowitz, J., Grassucci, R., Timerman, A. P., and Fleischer, S. (1994) Localization of calmodulin binding sites on the ryanodine receptor from skeletal muscle by electron microscopy. Biophys. J. 67, 2286-2295 181. Samsó, M., and Wagenknecht, T. (2002) Apocalmodulin and Ca2+-calmodulin bind to neighboring locations on the ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 1349-1353 182. Ikemoto, T., Iino, M., and Endo, M. (1995) Enhancing effect of calmodulin on Ca(2+)-induced Ca2+ release in the sarcoplasmic reticulum of rabbit skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 487 (Pt 3), 573-582 183. Tripathy, A., Xu, L., Mann, G., and Meissner, G. (1995) Calmodulin activation and inhibition of skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor). Biophys. J. 69, 106-119 166  184. Buratti, R., Prestipino, G., Menegazzi, P., Treves, S., and Zorzato, F. (1995) Calcium dependent activation of skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) by calmodulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 213, 1082-1090 185. Board, P. G., Coggan, M., Watson, S., Gage, P. W., and Dulhunty, A. F. (2004) CLIC-2 modulates cardiac ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channels. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36, 1599-1612 186. Littler, D. R., Harrop, S. J., Goodchild, S. C., Phang, J. M., Mynott, A. V., Jiang, L., Valenzuela, S. M., Mazzanti, M., Brown, L. J., Breit, S. N., and Curmi, P. M. G. (2010) The enigma of the CLIC proteins: Ion channels, redox proteins, enzymes, scaffolding proteins? FEBS Lett. 584, 2093-2101 187. Meng, X., Wang, G., Viero, C., Wang, Q., Mi, W., Su, X.-D., Wagenknecht, T., Williams, A. J., Liu, Z., and Yin, C.-C. (2009) CLIC2-RyR1 interaction and structural characterization by cryo-electron microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 387, 320-334 188. Tripathy, A., Resch, W., Xu, L., Valdivia, H. H., and Meissner, G. (1998) Imperatoxin A induces subconductance states in Ca2+ release channels (ryanodine receptors) of cardiac and skeletal muscle. J. Gen. Physiol. 111, 679-690 189. Gurrola, G. B., Arévalo, C., Sreekumar, R., Lokuta, A. J., Walker, J. W., and Valdivia, H. H. (1999) Activation of ryanodine receptors by imperatoxin A and a peptide segment of the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7879-7886 190. Samso, M., Trujillo, R., Gurrola, G. B., Valdivia, H. H., and Wagenknecht, T. (1999) Three-dimensional location of the imperatoxin A binding site on the ryanodine receptor. J. Cell Biol. 146, 493-499 167  191. Zhou, Q., Wang, Q.-L., Meng, X., Shu, Y., Jiang, T., Wagenknecht, T., Yin, C.-C., Sui, S.-F., and Liu, Z. (2008) Structural and functional characterization of ryanodine receptor-natrin toxin interaction. Biophys. J. 95, 4289-4299 192. Maximciuc, A. A., Putkey, J. A., Shamoo, Y., and MacKenzie, K. R. (2006) Complex of calmodulin with a ryanodine receptor target reveals a novel, flexible binding mode. Structure 14, 1547-1556 193. Wright, N. T., Prosser, B. L., Varney, K. M., Zimmer, D. B., Schneider, M. F., and Weber, D. J. (2008) S100A1 and calmodulin compete for the same binding site on ryanodine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26676-26683 194. Balshaw, D. M., Xu, L., Yamaguchi, N., Pasek, D. A., and Meissner, G. (2001) Calmodulin binding and inhibition of cardiac muscle calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor). J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20144-20153 195. Yamaguchi, N., Xu, L., Pasek, D. A., Evans, K. E., and Meissner, G. (2003) Molecular basis of calmodulin binding to cardiac muscle Ca(2+) release channel (ryanodine receptor). J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23480-23486 196. Xiong, L.-W., Newman, R. A., Rodney, G. G., Thomas, O., Zhang, J.-Z., Persechini, A., Shea, M. A., and Hamilton, S. L. (2002) Lobe-dependent regulation of ryanodine receptor type 1 by calmodulin. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40862-40870 197. Zhang, H., Zhang, J.-Z., Danila, C. I., and Hamilton, S. L. (2003) A noncontiguous, intersubunit binding site for calmodulin on the skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8348-8355 168  198. Menegazzi, P., Larini, F., Treves, S., Guerrini, R., Quadroni, M., and Zorzato, F. (1994) Identification and characterization of three calmodulin binding sites of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Biochemistry 33, 9078-9084 199. Zorzato, F., Fujii, J., Otsu, K., Phillips, M., Green, N. M., Lai, F. A., Meissner, G., and MacLennan, D. H. (1990) Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding human and rabbit forms of the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2244-2256 200. Chen, S. R., and MacLennan, D. H. (1994) Identification of calmodulin-, Ca(2+)-, and ruthenium red-binding domains in the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of rabbit skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22698-22704 201. Most, P., Remppis, A., Weber, C., Bernotat, J., Ehlermann, P., Pleger, S. T., Kirsch, W., Weber, M., Uttenweiler, D., Smith, G. L., Katus, H. A., and Fink, R. H. A. (2003) The C terminus (amino acids 75-94) and the linker region (amino acids 42-54) of the Ca2+-binding protein S100A1 differentially enhance sarcoplasmic Ca2+ release in murine skinned skeletal muscle fibers. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26356-26364 202. Treves, S., Scutari, E., Robert, M., Groh, S., Ottolia, M., Prestipino, G., Ronjat, M., and Zorzato, F. (1997) Interaction of S100A1 with the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of skeletal muscle. Biochemistry 36, 11496-11503 203. Prosser, B. L., Wright, N. T., Hernández-Ochoa, E. O., Varney, K. M., Liu, Y., Olojo, R. O., Zimmer, D. B., Weber, D. J., and Schneider, M. F. (2008) S100A1 binds to the calmodulin-binding site of ryanodine receptor and modulates skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5046-5057 169  204. Du, X.-J., Cole, T. J., Tenis, N., Gao, X.-M., Köntgen, F., Kemp, B. E., and Heierhorst, J. (2002) Impaired cardiac contractility response to hemodynamic stress in S100A1-deficient mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2821-2829 205. Amador, F. J., Liu, S., Ishiyama, N., Plevin, M. J., Wilson, A., MacLennan, D. H., and Ikura, M. (2009) Crystal structure of type I ryanodine receptor amino-terminal beta-trefoil domain reveals a disease-associated mutation "hot spot" loop. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 11040-11044 206. Lobo, P. A., and Van Petegem, F. (2009) Crystal structures of the N-terminal domains of cardiac and skeletal muscle ryanodine receptors: insights into disease mutations. Structure 17, 1505-1514 207. Amador, F. J., Kimlicka, L., Stathopulos, P. B., Gasmi-Seabrook, G. M. C., MacLennan, D. H., Van Petegem, F., and Ikura, M. (2013) Type 2 ryanodine receptor domain A contains a unique and dynamic α-helix that transitions to a β-strand in a mutant linked with a heritable cardiomyopathy. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 4034-4046 208. Tung, C.-C., Lobo, P. A., Kimlicka, L., and Van Petegem, F. (2010) The amino-terminal disease hotspot of ryanodine receptors forms a cytoplasmic vestibule. Nature 468, 585-588 209. Kimlicka, L., Lau, K., Tung, C.-C., and Van Petegem, F. (2013) Disease mutations in the ryanodine receptor N-terminal region couple to a mobile intersubunit interface. Nat. Commun. 4, 1506 210. Kimlicka, L., Tung, C.-C., Carlsson, A.-C. C., Lobo, P. A., Yuchi, Z., and Van Petegem, F. (2013) The cardiac ryanodine receptor N-terminal region contains an anion binding site that is targeted by disease mutations. Structure 21, 1440-1449 170  211. Lobo, P. A., Kimlicka, L., Tung, C.-C., and Van Petegem, F. (2011) The deletion of exon 3 in the cardiac ryanodine receptor is rescued by β strand switching. Structure 19, 790-798 212. Wehrens, X. H. T., Lehnart, S. E., Reiken, S. R., and Marks, A. R. (2004) Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II phosphorylation regulates the cardiac ryanodine receptor. Circ. Res. 94, e61-70 213. Jiang, M. T., Lokuta, A. J., Farrell, E. F., Wolff, M. R., Haworth, R. A., and Valdivia, H. H. (2002) Abnormal Ca2+ release, but normal ryanodine receptors, in canine and human heart failure. Circ. Res. 91, 1015-1022 214. Zhang, H., Makarewich, C. A., Kubo, H., Wang, W., Duran, J. M., Li, Y., Berretta, R. M., Koch, W. J., Chen, X., Gao, E., Valdivia, H. H., and Houser, S. R. (2012) Hyperphosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor at serine 2808 is not involved in cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 110, 831-840 215. Sharma, P., Ishiyama, N., Nair, U., Li, W., Dong, A., Miyake, T., Wilson, A., Ryan, T., MacLennan, D. H., Kislinger, T., Ikura, M., Dhe-Paganon, S., and Gramolini, A. O. (2012) Structural determination of the phosphorylation domain of the ryanodine receptor. FEBS J. 279, 3952-3964 216. Yuchi, Z., Lau, K., and Van Petegem, F. (2012) Disease mutations in the ryanodine receptor central region: crystal structures of a phosphorylation hot spot domain. Structure 20, 1201-1211 217. Wriggers, W. and Chacón, P. (2001) Modeling tricks and fitting techniques for multiresolution structures. Structure 9, 779-788 171  218. Wriggers, W., and Birmanns, S. (2001) Using situs for flexible and rigid-body fitting of multiresolution single-molecule data. J. Struct. Biol. 133, 193-202 219. Baker, M. L., Serysheva, I. I., Sencer, S., Wu, Y., Ludtke, S. J., Jiang, W., Hamilton, S. L., and Chiu, W. (2002) The skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel has an oxidoreductase-like domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 12155-12160 220. Zhu, L., Zhong, X., Chen, S. R. W., Banavali, N., and Liu, Z. (2013) Modeling a ryanodine receptor N-terminal domain connecting the central vestibule and the corner clamp region. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 903-914 221. Yin, C.-C., Blayney, L. M., and Lai, F. A. (2005) Physical coupling between ryanodine receptor-calcium release channels. Journal of Molecular Biology 349, 538-546 222. Yin, C.-C., D’Cruz, L. G., and Lai, F. A. (2008) Ryanodine receptor arrays: not just a pretty pattern? Trends Cell Biol. 18, 149-156 223. Wolfram, F., Morris, E., and Taylor, C. W. (2010) Three-dimensional structure of recombinant type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. Biochem. J. 428, 483-489 224. Sato, C., Hamada, K., Ogura, T., Miyazawa, A., Iwasaki, K., Hiroaki, Y., Tani, K., Terauchi, A., Fujiyoshi, Y., and Mikoshiba, K. (2004) Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor contains multiple cavities and L-shaped ligand-binding domains. J. Mol. Biol. 336, 155-164 225. Serysheva, I. I., Bare, D. J., Ludtke, S. J., Kettlun, C. S., Chiu, W., and Mignery, G. A. (2003) Structure of the type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 21319-21322 172  226. da Fonseca, P. C. A., Morris, S. A., Nerou, E. P., Taylor, C. W., and Morris, E. P. (2003) Domain organization of the type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor as revealed by single-particle analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 3936-3941 227. Hamada, K., Terauchi, A., and Mikoshiba, K. (2003) Three-dimensional rearrangements within inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor by calcium. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 52881-52889 228. Jiang, Q.-X., Thrower, E. C., Chester, D. W., Ehrlich, B. E., and Sigworth, F. J. (2002) Three-dimensional structure of the type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor at 24 A resolution. EMBO J. 21, 3575-3581 229. Ludtke, S. J., Tran, T. P., Ngo, Q. T., Moiseenkova-Bell, V. Y., Chiu, W., and Serysheva, I. I. (2011) Flexible architecture of IP3R1 by Cryo-EM. Structure 19, 1192-1199 230. Murray, S. C., Flanagan, J., Popova, O. B., Chiu, W., Ludtke, S. J., and Serysheva, I. I. (2013) Validation of cryo-EM structure of IP₃R1 channel. Structure 21, 900-909 231. Bosanac, I., Yamazaki, H., Matsu-Ura, T., Michikawa, T., Mikoshiba, K., and Ikura, M. (2005) Crystal structure of the ligand binding suppressor domain of type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. Mol. Cell 17, 193-203 232. Chan, J., Yamazaki, H., Ishiyama, N., Seo, M.-D., Mal, T. K., Michikawa, T., Mikoshiba, K., and Ikura, M. (2010) Structural studies of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor: coupling ligand binding to channel gating. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 36092-36099 233. Bosanac, I., Alattia, J.-R., Mal, T. K., Chan, J., Talarico, S., Tong, F. K., Tong, K. I., Yoshikawa, F., Furuichi, T., Iwai, M., Michikawa, T., Mikoshiba, K., and Ikura, M. (2002) Structure of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor binding core in complex with its ligand. Nature 420, 696-700 173  234. Seo, M.-D., Velamakanni, S., Ishiyama, N., Stathopulos, P. B., Rossi, A. M., Khan, S. A., Dale, P., Li, C., Ames, J. B., Ikura, M., and Taylor, C. W. (2012) Structural and functional conservation of key domains in InsP3 and ryanodine receptors. Nature 483, 108-112 235. Lin, C.-C., Baek, K., and Lu, Z. (2011) Apo and InsP₃-bound crystal structures of the ligand-binding domain of an InsP₃ receptor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1172-1174 236. Yuchi, Z., and Van Petegem, F. (2011) Common allosteric mechanisms between ryanodine and inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. Channels (Austin) 5, 120-123 237. Endo, M., Tanaka, M., and Ogawa, Y. (1970) Calcium induced release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skinned skeletal muscle fibres. Nature 228, 34-36 238. Kimlicka, L., and Van Petegem, F. (2011) The structural biology of ryanodine receptors. Sci. China Life Sci. 54, 712-724 239. Zhong, X., Liu, Y., Zhu, L., Meng, X., Wang, R., Van Petegem, F., Wagenknecht, T., Chen, S. R. W., and Liu, Z. (2013) Conformational Dynamics inside Amino-Terminal Disease Hotspot of Ryanodine Receptor. Structure 21, 2051-2060 240. Birmanns, S., Rusu, M., and Wriggers, W. (2011) Using Sculptor and Situs for simultaneous assembly of atomic components into low-resolution shapes. J. Struct. Biol. 173, 428-435 241. Kabsch, W. (2010) XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125-132 242. McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., and Read, R. J. (2007) Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658-674 243. Emsley, P., and Cowtan, K. (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 174  244. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., and Dodson, E. J. (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240-255 245. Nettleship, J. E., Brown, J., Groves, M. R., and Geerlof, A. (2008) Methods for protein characterization by mass spectrometry, thermal shift (ThermoFluor) assay, and multiangle or static light scattering. Methods Mol. Biol. 426, 299-318 246. Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Couch, G. S., Greenblatt, D. M., Meng, E. C., and Ferrin, T. E. (2004) UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 247. Capacchione, J. F., and Muldoon, S. M. (2009) The relationship between exertional heat illness, exertional rhabdomyolysis, and malignant hyperthermia. Anesth. Analg. 109, 1065-1069 248. Durham, W. J., Aracena-Parks, P., Long, C., Rossi, A. E., Goonasekera, S. A., Boncompagni, S., Galvan, D. L., Gilman, C. P., Baker, M. R., Shirokova, N., Protasi, F., Dirksen, R., and Hamilton, S. L. (2008) RyR1 S-nitrosylation underlies environmental heat stroke and sudden death in Y522S RyR1 knockin mice. Cell 133, 53-65 249. Muldoon, S., Deuster, P., Brandom, B., and Bunger, R. (2004) Is there a link between malignant hyperthermia and exertional heat illness? Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 32, 174-179 250. Tobin, J. R., Jason, D. R., Challa, V. R., Nelson, T. E., and Sambuughin, N. (2001) Malignant hyperthermia and apparent heat stroke. JAMA 286, 168-169 251. Nishio, H., Sato, T., Fukunishi, S., Tamura, A., Iwata, M., Tsuboi, K., and Suzuki, K. (2009) Identification of malignant hyperthermia-susceptible ryanodine receptor type 1 175  gene (RYR1) mutations in a child who died in a car after exposure to a high environmental temperature. Leg. Med. (Tokyo) 11, 142-143 252. Bourdon, L., and Canini, F. (1995) On the nature of the link between malignant hyperthermia and exertional heatstroke. Med. Hypotheses 45, 268-270 253. Bendahan, D., Kozak-Ribbens, G., Confort-Gouny, S., Ghattas, B., Figarella-Branger, D., Aubert, M., and Cozzone, P. J. (2001) A noninvasive investigation of muscle energetics supports similarities between exertional heat stroke and malignant hyperthermia. Anesth. Analg. 93, 683-689 254. Davis, M., Brown, R., Dickson, A., Horton, H., James, D., Laing, N., Marston, R., Norgate, M., Perlman, D., and Pollock, N. (2002) Malignant hyperthermia associated with exercise‐induced rhabdomyolysis or congenital abnormalities and a novel RYR1 mutation in New Zealand and Australian pedigrees. Br. J. Anaesth. 88, 508-515 255. Ibarra M, C. A., Wu, S., Murayama, K., Minami, N., Ichihara, Y., Kikuchi, H., Noguchi, S., Hayashi, Y. K., Ochiai, R., and Nishino, I. (2006) Malignant hyperthermia in Japan: mutation screening of the entire ryanodine receptor type 1 gene coding region by direct sequencing. Anesthesiology 104, 1146-1154 256. Lynch, P. J., Krivosic-Horber, R., Reyford, H., Monnier, N., Quane, K., Adnet, P., Haudecoeur, G., Krivosic, I., McCarthy, T., and Lunardi, J. (1997) Identification of heterozygous and homozygous individuals with the novel RYR1 mutation Cys35Arg in a large kindred. Anesthesiology 86, 620-626 257. Tammaro, A., Bracco, A., Cozzolino, S., Esposito, M., Di Martino, A., Savoia, G., Zeuli, L., Piluso, G., Aurino, S., and Nigro, V. (2003) Scanning for mutations of the ryanodine 176  receptor (RYR1) gene by denaturing HPLC: detection of three novel malignant hyperthermia alleles. Clin. Chem. 49, 761-768 258. Sato, K., Roesl, C., Pollock, N., and Stowell, K. M. (2013) Skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor mutations associated with malignant hyperthermia showed enhanced intensity and sensitivity to triggering drugs when expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Anesthesiology 119, 111-118 259. Wu, S., Ibarra M, C. A., Malicdan, M. C. V., Murayama, K., Ichihara, Y., Kikuchi, H., Nonaka, I., Noguchi, S., Hayashi, Y. K., and Nishino, I. (2006) Central core disease is due to RYR1 mutations in more than 90% of patients. Brain 129, 1470-1480 260. Romero, N. B., Monnier, N., Viollet, L., Cortey, A., Chevallay, M., Leroy, J.-P., Lunardi, J., and Fardeau, M. (2003) Dominant and recessive central core disease associated with RYR1 mutations and fetal akinesia. Brain 126, 2341-2349 261. Zhou, H., Treves, S., Jungbluth, H., Sewry, C., and Muntoni, F. (2005) RYR1 gene genotype-phenotype and functional correlative studies in central core disease and multi-minicore disease. Neuromusc. Dis. 15, 676-743 262. Gillard, E. F., Otsu, K., Fujii, J., Duff, C., de Leon, S., Khanna, V. K., Britt, B. A., Worton, R. G., and MacLennan, D. H. (1992) Polymorphisms and deduced amino acid substitutions in the coding sequence of the ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene in individuals with malignant hyperthermia. Genomics 13, 1247-1254 263. Quane, K. A., Healy, J. M., Keating, K. E., Manning, B. M., Couch, F. J., Palmucci, L. M., Doriguzzi, C., Fagerlund, T. H., Berg, K., and Ording, H. (1993) Mutations in the ryanodine receptor gene in central core disease and malignant hyperthermia. Nat. Genet. 5, 51-55 177  264. Wehrens, X. H. T., Lehnart, S. E., Huang, F., Vest, J. A., Reiken, S. R., Mohler, P. J., Sun, J., Guatimosim, S., Song, L.-S., Rosemblit, N., D'Armiento, J. M., Napolitano, C., Memmi, M., Priori, S. G., Lederer, W. J., and Marks, A. R. (2003) FKBP12.6 deficiency and defective calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor) function linked to exercise-induced sudden cardiac death. Cell 113, 829-840 265. Lehnart, S. E., Mongillo, M., Bellinger, A., Lindegger, N., Chen, B.-X., Hsueh, W., Reiken, S., Wronska, A., Drew, L. J., and Ward, C. W. (2008) Leaky Ca2+ release channel/ryanodine receptor 2 causes seizures and sudden cardiac death in mice. The J. Clin. Invest. 118, 2230 266. Meli, A. C., Refaat, M. M., Dura, M., Reiken, S., Wronska, A., Wojciak, J., Carroll, J., Scheinman, M. M., and Marks, A. R. (2011) A novel ryanodine receptor mutation linked to sudden death increases sensitivity to cytosolic calcium. Circ. Res. 109, 281-290 267. Lin, T. Y., and Kim, P. S. (1991) Evaluating the effects of a single amino acid substitution on both the native and denatured states of a protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 10573-10577 268. Stewart, R., Zissimopoulos, S., and Lai, F. A. (2003) Oligomerization of the cardiac ryanodine receptor C-terminal tail. Biochem. J. 376, 795-799 269. Valdivia, H. H., Hogan, K., and Coronado, R. (1991) Altered binding site for Ca2+ in the ryanodine receptor of human malignant hyperthermia. Am. J. Physiol. 261, C237-245 270. Dietze, B., Henke, J., Eichinger, H. M., Lehmann-Horn, F., and Melzer, W. (2000) Malignant hyperthermia mutation Arg615Cys in the porcine ryanodine receptor alters voltage dependence of Ca2+ release. J. Physiol. 526(Pt 3), 507-514 178  271. Van Petegem, F., Clark, K. A., Chatelain, F. C., and Minor, D. L. (2004) Structure of a complex between a voltage-gated calcium channel beta-subunit and an alpha-subunit domain. Nature 429, 671-675 272. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., and Cowtan, K. (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486-501 273. Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Davis, I. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Hung, L.-W., Kapral, G. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., McCoy, A. J., Moriarty, N. W., Oeffner, R., Read, R. J., Richardson, D. C., Richardson, J. S., Terwilliger, T. C., and Zwart, P. H. (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 274. MacLennan, D. H., and Phillips, M. S. (1992) Malignant hyperthermia. Science 256, 789-794 275. Zhang, Y., Chen, H. S., Khanna, V. K., de Leon, S., Phillips, M. S., Schappert, K., Britt, B. A., Browell, A. K., and MacLennan, D. H. (1993) A mutation in the human ryanodine receptor gene associated with central core disease. Nat. Genet. 5, 46-50 276. Langer, G., Cohen, S. X., Lamzin, V. S., and Perrakis, A. (2008) Automated macromolecular model building for X-ray crystallography using ARP/wARP version 7. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1171-1179 277. Medeiros-Domingo, A., Bhuiyan, Z. A., Tester, D. J., Hofman, N., Bikker, H., van Tintelen, J. P., Mannens, M. M. A. M., Wilde, A. A. M., and Ackerman, M. J. (2009) The RYR2-encoded ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel in patients diagnosed previously with either catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or 179  genotype negative, exercise-induced long QT syndrome: a comprehensive open reading frame mutational analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 54, 2065-2074 278. Bhuiyan, Z. A., van den Berg, M. P., van Tintelen, J. P., Bink-Boelkens, M. T. E., Wiesfeld, A. C. P., Alders, M., Postma, A. V., van Langen, I., Mannens, M. M. A. M., and Wilde, A. A. M. (2007) Expanding spectrum of human RYR2-related disease: new electrocardiographic, structural, and genetic features. Circulation 116, 1569-1576 279. Marjamaa, A., Laitinen-Forsblom, P., Lahtinen, A. M., Viitasalo, M., Toivonen, L., Kontula, K., and Swan, H. (2009) Search for cardiac calcium cycling gene mutations in familial ventricular arrhythmias resembling catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. BMC Med. Genet. 10, 12 280. Tiso, N., Stephan, D. A., Nava, A., Bagattin, A., Devaney, J. M., Stanchi, F., Larderet, G., Brahmbhatt, B., Brown, K., Bauce, B., Muriago, M., Basso, C., Thiene, G., Danieli, G. A., and Rampazzo, A. (2001) Identification of mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene in families affected with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy type 2 (ARVD2). Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 189-194 281. Liu, Y., Kimlicka, L., Hiess, F., Tian, X., Wang, R., Zhang, L., Jones, P. P., Van Petegem, F., and Chen, S. R. W. (2013) The CPVT-associated RyR2 mutation G230C enhances store overload-induced Ca2+ release and destabilizes the N-terminal domains. Biochem. J. 454, 123-131 282. Tester, D. J., Kopplin, L. J., Creighton, W., Burke, A. P., and Ackerman, M. J. (2005) Pathogenesis of unexplained drowning: new insights from a molecular autopsy. Mayo Clin. Proc. 80, 596-600 180  283. Creighton, W., Virmani, R., Kutys, R., and Burke, A. (2006) Identification of novel missense mutations of cardiac ryanodine receptor gene in exercise-induced sudden death at autopsy. J. Mol. Diagn. 8, 62-67 284. Choi, G., Kopplin, L. J., Tester, D. J., Will, M. L., Haglund, C. M., and Ackerman, M. J. (2004) Spectrum and frequency of cardiac channel defects in swimming-triggered arrhythmia syndromes. Circulation 110, 2119-2124 285. Galli, L., Orrico, A., Lorenzini, S., Censini, S., Falciani, M., Covacci, A., Tegazzin, V., and Sorrentino, V. (2006) Frequency and localization of mutations in the 106 exons of the RYR1 gene in 50 individuals with malignant hyperthermia. Hum. Mutat. 27, 830 286. Levano, S., Vukcevic, M., Singer, M., Matter, A., Treves, S., Urwyler, A., and Girard, T. (2009) Increasing the number of diagnostic mutations in malignant hyperthermia. Hum. Mutat. 30, 590-598 287. Karshikoff, A., and Ladenstein, R. (2001) Ion pairs and the thermotolerance of proteins from hyperthermophiles: a "traffic rule" for hot roads. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 550-556 288. Fruen, B. R., Mickelson, J. R., Roghair, T. J., Cheng, H. L., and Louis, C. F. (1994) Anions that potentiate excitation-contraction coupling may mimic effect of phosphate on Ca2+ release channel. Am. J. Physiol. 266, C1729-1735 289. Fruen, B. R., Kane, P. K., Mickelson, J. R., and Louis, C. F. (1996) Chloride-dependent sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release correlates with increased Ca2+ activation of ryanodine receptors. Biophys. J. 71, 2522-2530 290. Liu, W., Pasek, D. A., and Meissner, G. (1998) Modulation of Ca2+-gated cardiac muscle Ca2+-release channel (ryanodine receptor) by mono-and divalent ions. Am. J. Physiol., Cell Physiol. 274, C120-C128 181  291. Niggli, E., Ullrich, N. D., Gutierrez, D., Kyrychenko, S., Poláková, E., and Shirokova, N. (2013) Posttranslational modifications of cardiac ryanodine receptors: Ca(2+) signaling and EC-coupling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1833, 866-875 292. Oda, T., Yano, M., Yamamoto, T., Tokuhisa, T., Okuda, S., Doi, M., Ohkusa, T., Ikeda, Y., Kobayashi, S., Ikemoto, N., and Matsuzaki, M. (2005) Defective regulation of interdomain interactions within the ryanodine receptor plays a key role in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Circulation 111, 3400-3410 293. Liu, Z., Wang, R., Tian, X., Zhong, X., Gangopadhyay, J., Cole, R., Ikemoto, N., Chen, S. R. W., and Wagenknecht, T. (2010) Dynamic, inter-subunit interactions between the N-terminal and central mutation regions of cardiac ryanodine receptor. J. Cell. Sci. 123, 1775-1784 294. Hironaka, T., and Morimoto, S. (1980) Intracellular chloride concentration and evidence for the existence of a chloride pump in frog skeletal muscle. Jpn. J. Physiol. 30, 357-363 295. Payne, J. A., Rivera, C., Voipio, J., and Kaila, K. (2003) Cation-chloride co-transporters in neuronal communication, development and trauma. Trends Neurosci. 26, 199-206 296. Treharne, K. J., Crawford, R. M., and Mehta, A. (2006) CFTR, chloride concentration and cell volume: could mammalian protein histidine phosphorylation play a latent role? Exp. Physiol. 91, 131-139 297. Desilets, M., Puceat, M., and Vassort, G. (1994) Chloride dependence of pH modulation by beta-adrenergic agonist in rat cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 75, 862-869 298. Bannister, R. A., Esteve, E., Eltit, J. M., Pessah, I. N., Allen, P. D., Lopez, J. R., and Beam, K. G. (2010) A malignant hyperthermia-inducing mutation in RYR1 (R163C): 182  consequent alterations in the functional properties of DHPR channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 135, 629-640 299. Esteve, E., Eltit, J. M., Bannister, R. A., Liu, K., Pessah, I. N., Beam, K. G., Allen, P. D., and Lopez, J. R. (2010) A malignant hyperthermia-inducing mutation in RYR1 (R163C): alterations in Ca2+ entry, release, and retrograde signaling to the DHPR. J. Gen. Physiol. 135, 619-628 300. Loke, J. C. P., Kraev, N., Sharma, P., Du, G., Patel, L., Kraev, A., and MacLennan, D. H. (2003) Detection of a novel ryanodine receptor subtype 1 mutation (R328W) in a malignant hyperthermia family by sequencing of a leukocyte transcript. Anesthesiology 99, 297-302 301. Vukcevic, M., Broman, M., Islander, G., Bodelsson, M., Ranklev-Twetman, E., Müller, C. R., and Treves, S. (2010) Functional properties of RYR1 mutations identified in Swedish patients with malignant hyperthermia and central core disease. Anesth. Analg. 111, 185-190 302. Andronache, Z., Hamilton, S. L., Dirksen, R. T., and Melzer, W. (2009) A retrograde signal from RyR1 alters DHP receptor inactivation and limits window Ca2+ release in muscle fibers of Y522S RyR1 knock-in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 4531-4536 303. Boncompagni, S., Rossi, A. E., Micaroni, M., Hamilton, S. L., Dirksen, R. T., Franzini-Armstrong, C., and Protasi, F. (2009) Characterization and temporal development of cores in a mouse model of malignant hyperthermia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 21996-22001 183  304. Zullo, A., Klingler, W., De Sarno, C., Ferrara, M., Fortunato, G., Perrotta, G., Gravino, E., Di Noto, R., Lehmann-Horn, F., Melzer, W., Salvatore, F., and Carsana, A. (2009) Functional characterization of ryanodine receptor (RYR1) sequence variants using a metabolic assay in immortalized B-lymphocytes. Hum. Mutat. 30, E575-590 305. Dirksen, R. T., and Avila, G. (2004) Distinct effects on Ca2+ handling caused by malignant hyperthermia and central core disease mutations in RyR1. Biophys. J. 87, 3193-3204 306. Richter, M., Schleithoff, L., Deufel, T., Lehmann-Horn, F., and Herrmann-Frank, A. (1997) Functional characterization of a distinct ryanodine receptor mutation in human malignant hyperthermia-susceptible muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5256-5260 307. Migita, T., Mukaida, K., Hamada, H., Yasuda, T., Haraki, T., Nishino, I., Murakami, N., and Kawamoto, M. (2009) Functional analysis of ryanodine receptor type 1 p.R2508C mutation in exon 47. J. Anesth. 23, 341-346 308. Lyfenko, A. D., Ducreux, S., Wang, Y., Xu, L., Zorzato, F., Ferreiro, A., Meissner, G., Treves, S., and Dirksen, R. T. (2007) Two central core disease (CCD) deletions in the C-terminal region of RYR1 alter muscle excitation-contraction (EC) coupling by distinct mechanisms. Hum. Mutat. 28, 61-68 309. Yuen, B., Boncompagni, S., Feng, W., Yang, T., Lopez, J. R., Matthaei, K. I., Goth, S. R., Protasi, F., Franzini-Armstrong, C., Allen, P. D., and Pessah, I. N. (2012) Mice expressing T4826I-RYR1 are viable but exhibit sex- and genotype-dependent susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia and muscle damage. FASEB J. 26, 1311-1322 184  310. Anderson, A. A., Brown, R. L., Polster, B., Pollock, N., and Stowell, K. M. (2008) Identification and biochemical characterization of a novel ryanodine receptor gene mutation associated with malignant hyperthermia. Anesthesiology 108, 208-215 311. Thomas, N. L., George, C. H., and Lai, F. A. (2004) Functional heterogeneity of ryanodine receptor mutations associated with sudden cardiac death. Cardiovas. Res. 64, 52-60 312. van Oort, R. J., Respress, J. L., Li, N., Reynolds, C., De Almeida, A. C., Skapura, D. G., De Windt, L. J., and Wehrens, X. H. T. (2010) Accelerated development of pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction in an RyR2-R176Q knockin mouse model. Hypertension 55, 932-938 313. Mathur, N., Sood, S., Wang, S., van Oort, R. J., Sarma, S., Li, N., Skapura, D. G., Bayle, J. H., Valderrábano, M., and Wehrens, X. H. T. (2009) Sudden infant death syndrome in mice with an inherited mutation in RyR2. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2, 677-685 314. Thomas, N. L., Lai, F. A., and George, C. H. (2005) Differential Ca2+ sensitivity of RyR2 mutations reveals distinct mechanisms of channel dysfunction in sudden cardiac death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 331, 231-238 315. Jiang, D., Jones, P. P., Davis, D., Gow, R., Green, M., Birnie, D., Chen, S. R. W., and Gollob, M. H. (2010) Characterization of a novel mutation in the cardiac ryanodine receptor that results in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Channels 4, 302-310 316. Suetomi, T., Yano, M., Uchinoumi, H., Fukuda, M., Hino, A., Ono, M., Xu, X., Tateishi, H., Okuda, S., Doi, M., Kobayashi, S., Ikeda, Y., Yamamoto, T., Ikemoto, N., and Matsuzaki, M. (2011) Mutation-linked defective interdomain interactions within 185  ryanodine receptor cause aberrant Ca²⁷release leading to catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 124, 682-694 317. Tester, D. J., Dura, M., Carturan, E., Reiken, S., Wronska, A., Marks, A. R., and Ackerman, M. J. (2007) A mechanism for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): stress-induced leak via ryanodine receptors. Heart Rhythm 4, 733-739 318. Goddard, C. A., Ghais, N. S., Zhang, Y., Williams, A. J., Colledge, W. H., Grace, A. A., and Huang, C. L. H. (2008) Physiological consequences of the P2328S mutation in the ryanodine receptor (RyR2) gene in genetically modified murine hearts. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 194, 123-140 319. Lehnart, S. E., Wehrens, X. H. T., Laitinen, P. J., Reiken, S. R., Deng, S.-X., Cheng, Z., Landry, D. W., Kontula, K., Swan, H., and Marks, A. R. (2004) Sudden death in familial polymorphic ventricular tachycardia associated with calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor) leak. Circulation 109, 3208-3214 320. Kobayashi, S., Yano, M., Uchinoumi, H., Suetomi, T., Susa, T., Ono, M., Xu, X., Tateishi, H., Oda, T., and Okuda, S. (2010) Dantrolene, a therapeutic agent for malignant hyperthermia, inhibits catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in a RyR2 (R2474S/+) knock-in mouse model. Circ. J. 74, 2579-2584 321. Cerrone, M., Noujaim, S. F., Tolkacheva, E. G., Talkachou, A., O'Connell, R., Berenfeld, O., Anumonwo, J., Pandit, S. V., Vikstrom, K., Napolitano, C., Priori, S. G., and Jalife, J. (2007) Arrhythmogenic mechanisms in a mouse model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ. Res. 101, 1039-1048 322. Fernández-Velasco, M., Rueda, A., Rizzi, N., Benitah, J.-P., Colombi, B., Napolitano, C., Priori, S. G., Richard, S., and Gómez, A. M. (2009) Increased Ca2+ sensitivity of the 186  ryanodine receptor mutant RyR2R4496C underlies catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ. Res. 104, 201-209 323. Kashimura, T., Briston, S. J., Trafford, A. W., Napolitano, C., Priori, S. G., Eisner, D. A., and Venetucci, L. A. (2010) In the RyR2(R4496C) mouse model of CPVT, β-adrenergic stimulation induces Ca waves by increasing SR Ca content and not by decreasing the threshold for Ca waves. Circ. Res. 107, 1483-1489 324. Du, G. G., Guo, X., Khanna, V. K., and MacLennan, D. H. (2001) Functional characterization of mutants in the predicted pore region of the rabbit cardiac muscle Ca(2+) release channel (ryanodine receptor isoform 2). J. Biol. Chem. 276, 31760-31771  187  Appendices  Appendix A   Table A.1: Summary from functional studies on RyR disease-associated mutations. Mutations that alter RyR functions are listed as gain or loss of function. Mutations with no discernible change compared with wild-type channels are listed as “uncertain.” References to the functional studies are listed beside the corresponding mutations. Amino residue numbering is for human RyRs. (Δ) = deletion mutation. (/) = double mutation. (MH) = Malignant hyperthermia, (CCD) = central core disease, ((MmD) = multi-minicore disease, (CNMDU1) = congenital neuromuscular disease with uniform type 1 fiber, (CPVT) = catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, (ARVD2) = arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia type 2, and (IVF) = idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Effect Isoform Mutation Disease References Gain of function RyR1 C35R MH (71,74) R44C MH (258) R163C MH/CCD/MmD (58,60,68,69,71,74,97,258,298,299) G248R MH (71,74,97) R328W MH (300) G341R MH (69,71,74) H382H MH (301) R401C MH (258) I403M MH/CCD (71,74) Y522S MH/CCD (57,68,70,71,74,94,248,302,303) R530H MH (304) R533C MH (258) R533H MH (258) R552W MH (71,74) A612P MH (56) 188  Effect Isoform Mutation Disease References Gain of function RyR1 R614C MH (51,52,69,71,74,77,78,84,85,88,89,91-94,305) R614L MH (71,74) E1058K MH (301) K1393R MH (301) R1679H MH (301) R2163C MH (69,71,74,305) R2163H MH (68,71,74,305) R2163 P MH (304) V2168M MH (69) T2206M MH (53) N2283H CCD/MmD (103) N2342S MH (304) ΔE2347 MH (305) A2350T MH (55,76) R2355W MH (55) E2371G MH (304) G2375A MH (55) G2434R MH (71,74,306) R2435H MH/CCD (68,71,74) R2435L MH/CCD (64,305) I2453T MH/CCD (54) R2454H MH/CCD (304) R2458C MH (71,74) R2458H MH (69,71,74) R2458H/R3348C MH (56) 189  Effect Isoform Mutation Disease References Gain of function RyR1 R2508C MH/CCD (307) R2508G MH (301) ΔR4214_F4216 CCD (308) T4637A CCD (305) Y4796C CCD (70,305) T4826I MH (63,69,97,309) H4833Y MH (97,258,310) R4861H CCD (65) ΔF4863_D4869 CCD (66) R4893W CCD (65) A4894T MH (98) I4898T CCD (65,73,94) G4899R CCD (65) RyR2 ΔExon 3 CPVT (101) A77V CPVT/ARVD2 (101) R176Q ARVD2 (83,311-313) R176Q/T2504M ARVD2 (79,100,101,314) E189D CPVT (315) G230C CPVT (266,281) R420W ARVD2 (101) L433P ARVD2 (79,101,314) S2246L CPVT (79-81,100,316)  R2267H CPVT (317) 190  Effect Isoform Mutation Disease References Gain of function RyR2 P2328S CPVT (266,318,319) N2386I ARVD2 (311,314) R2474S CPVT (79,265,320) T2504M ARVD2 (311) N4104K CPVT (26,80,81) Q4201R CPVT (79,100,319) R4497C CPVT (26,80,81,87)(59,82,321-323) S4565R CPVT (317) V4653F CPVT (100,319) I4867M CPVT (79) N4895D CPVT (26) Loss of function RyR1 S71Y/N2283H CCD/MmD (103) R109W/M485V CCD/MmD (96,103) C4664R MH (304) G4891R CCD (70) R4893W CCD (70,86) A4894P CNMDU1 (98) I4898T CCD (67,70,73,86,94,97)(61,62,95) G4899R CCD (70,96,97) G4899E CCD (86,96) A4906V CCD (70) R4914G CCD (70) ΔV4927_I4928 CCD (96,308) 191  Effect Isoform Mutation Disease References Loss of function RyR2 L433P ARVD2 (311) A1107M (T1107M) CPVT (101) A4860G IVF (99,100) Uncertain effects RyR1 I403M MH/CCD (68) A1577T/G2060C CCD (103) R2939K MmD (104) G3938A (G3938D) MH (324) D3986A (D3986E) MH (72) RyR2     


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items