UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

Caloric restriction in the context of reduced insulin Dionne, Derek Alcide 2015

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata

Download

Media
24-ubc_2015_may_dionne_derek.pdf [ 1.84MB ]
Metadata
JSON: 24-1.0166183.json
JSON-LD: 24-1.0166183-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 24-1.0166183-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 24-1.0166183-rdf.json
Turtle: 24-1.0166183-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 24-1.0166183-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 24-1.0166183-source.json
Full Text
24-1.0166183-fulltext.txt
Citation
24-1.0166183.ris

Full Text

CALORIC RESTRICTION IN THE CONTEXT OF REDUCED INSULIN  by   Derek Alcide Dionne   B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 2013   A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF   MASTER OF SCIENCE   in   The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies   (Cell and Developmental Biology)   THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver)   April 2015   © Derek Alcide Dionne, 2015    	   ii	  Abstract   Therapeutic benefits of caloric restriction (CR) on clinical outcomes in the treatment of neurodegenerative disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes have been found. Studies indicate the positive health outcomes produced by CR may involve cellular nutrient-sensing pathways including insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 signalling. CR has been reported to have significant effects on glucose metabolism and body composition: lowering fasting blood glucose and insulin, improving glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and decreasing energy expenditure and body fat. However, it is not clear which, if any, of the effects of CR are due to the lowering of circulating insulin. To determine which CR effects are a function of circulating insulin-dependent mechanisms we placed female Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice and Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- littermate controls on either a chow diet ad libitum (AL) or on a CR diet where they were fed 60% of what their genotype-matched littermate controls ate daily. All mice were singly housed and CR mice fed at night. With the onset of CR, body mass in both genotypes fell and reached a new equilibrium by 20 weeks of age. As expected, mice on CR had lower fasting, fed plasma glucose and improved glucose tolerance when compared to AL controls. We observed a more rapid return to baseline glucose post-insulin injection in mice on CR and no difference in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion compared to AL littermates. CR was able to prevent an age-dependent decline in fasting insulin of Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice. Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- on CR also exhibited increased plasma leptin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, subcutaneous white and intrascapular brown adipose tissue size compared to the AL controls. The 	   iii	  endocrine milieu created in these very low insulin mice appears to disrupt several well-established effects of CR on body composition, insulin and insulin sensitivity.                                            	   iv	  Preface  For the entirety of the studies reported in this thesis I performed the design, data acquisition and analysis, writing and submission. Nicole Templeman and Betty Hu provided technical training for in vivo studies. Dr. Majid Mojibian aided in training on Xponent software for analysis of metabolic hormone data. Farnaz Taghizadeh helped in gross tissue dissection. The metabolic cage experiment data were obtained with aid from the lab of Dr. Susanne Clee. The data presented in chapter 3 will be submitted to the journal Aging Cell.   Animal Care Certificates were obtained and approved for this research (A11-0390 and A14-0197) with yearly renewal from the University of British Columbia.             	   v	  Table of contents Abstract…………………………………………………………..…………ii Preface……………………………………………………………..……….iv Table of contents…………………………………………………..……...v List of tables…………………………………………………………..……x List of figures…………………………………………………………..….xi List of abbreviations…………………………………………………....xiii Acknowledgments…………………………………………………….....xv Dedication………………………………………………………………...xvi Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………..1 1.1 Insulin function and regulation……………………………....1 1.1.1 Diabetes and the discovery of insulin………………….1 1.1.2 Insulin across phylogeny…………………………..……2 1.1.3 Regulation of mammalian insulin expression and secretion…………………………………………….…....3 1.1.3.1 Murine Ins1 and Ins2 expression pattern……...6 1.1.4 Insulin signalling………………………..………………..8 1.1.5 Physiological effects of insulin on peripheral tissues..9 1.2 Physiological regulation of glucose levels…….........…….11  	   vi	  1.3 Regulation of body weight and energy homeostasis….....14 1.3.1 Regulation of body weight by insulin………………....14 1.3.2 Leptin regulates body weight and energy expenditure……………………………………………...16 1.3.3 Neuroendocrine axis: feeding behavior and energy expenditure…………………………………………..….17 1.3.4 Brown adipose tissue in energy balance………...…..18 1.4 Body composition and fat mass…………………………....20 1.4.1 Adipose tissue subtypes and function…………….....20 1.4.2 Fat storage plays a role in maintaining good health..21 1.4.3 Lipid metabolism is regulated by endocrine signals..22 1.4.3.1 Regulation of lipolysis by insulin and catecholamines………………………………….23 1.4.3.2 Regulation of de novo lipogenesis by insulin...24 1.5 Caloric restriction slows ageing and improves metabolic outcomes…………………………………………………..…25 1.5.1 Caloric restriction and lifespan extension…………....25 1.5.2 Improved glucose tolerance in caloric restriction…...26 1.5.3 Caloric restriction and age-related disease risk…..…27 	   vii	  1.5.4 Longevity-related signalling pathways induced by caloric restriction…………………………………..……28 1.5.5 Hormonal alterations under caloric restriction…..…..30 1.5.6 Effects of caloric restriction on body composition..…30 1.6 Aim of thesis investigation………………………………..…31 Chapter 2: Materials and methods…………………………………....34 2.1 Experimental animals………………………………………..34 2.2 Glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity and plasma analysis…………………………………………………….....35  2.3 Body composition and energy expenditure…………..…...36  2.4 Statistical analysis………………………………………..….36  2.5 Tables………………………………………………………....37 Chapter 3: Caloric restriction changes body composition, glucose homeostasis and decreases energy expenditure of Ins2-/- female mice…………………………………….....…38  3.1 Caloric restriction decreases body mass………..………...38  3.2 Caloric restriction lowers fed and fasting blood glucose and increases glucose tolerance………………………..………39  3.3 Effects of caloric restriction and Ins1 gene dosage on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion ……………..…...…..40 	   viii	   3.4 Caloric restriction increases rate of return to baseline glucose levels post insulin injection………………..………40  3.5 Age-dependent decrease in circulating insulin of Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice is abrogated by caloric restriction………..….41  3.6 Caloric restriction in mice with reduced insulin gene dosage alters metabolic hormone levels……………….....42  3.7 Caloric restriction increases fat mass in mice with reduced insulin gene dosage……………………………………..…..43  3.8 Caloric restriction decreases energy expenditure and alters circadian respiratory exchange ratio cycling…………...…45  3.9 Figures……………………………………………………..…46 Chapter 4: Discussion…………………………………………………..56  4.1 Caloric restriction has minimal effects on circulating insulin in reduced insulin gene dosage mice………………...……56  4.2 Effects of caloric restriction and reduced insulin gene dosage on glucose homeostasis …………………..…..….56  4.3 Paradoxical increase in both subcutaneous white and interscapular brown adipose tissue due to caloric restriction in Ins2-/- female mice ………………………...……….….…59  4.4 Summary………………………………………………..…....64 	   ix	   4.5 Limitations of studies and future directions……...…..……64 Bibiliography…………………………………………………………..….68                 	   x	  List of tables  Table 2.1 Teklad LM-485 chow diet macronutrient composition…...37                 	   xi	  List of figures  Figure 3.1 Body mass of ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice…………………………………………………………………......….46 Figure 3.2 Food intake of ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice……………………………………………………………..……….....47 Figure 3.3 Fed and fasted blood glucose of ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice...............................................................47 Figure 3.4 Glucose and insulin tolerance of ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice………….................................................48 Figure 3.5 Fasting and glucose stimulated insulin secretion of ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice………….……………………49 Figure 3.6 Fed and fasted metabolic hormone levels of ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice………………..………..………....50 Figure 3.7 Lean mass, fat mass and bone mass density of ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice………….…………………….…...51 Figure 3.8 Fasting plasma non-esterified fatty acids, cholesterol and triglycerides of ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice....…..52 Figure 3.9 Relative and wet tissue mass in adult and old ad lib. and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice……………….………………....…53 	   xii	  Figure 3.10 Mean light and dark phase energy expenditure and respiratory exchange ratio in ad lib. and 40% calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice……….………………………………………………….....…54 Figure 3.11 Circadian energy expenditure and respiratory exchange ratio in ad lib. and 40% calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice.......…...55                	   xiii	  List of abbreviations ADP Adenosine diphosphate AgRp Agouti-related protein  ANOVA Analysis of variance ATP Adenosine trisphosphate AUC Area under curve BAT Brown adipose tissue cAMP Cyclic adenosine monophosphate CR Caloric restriction DEXA Duel-energy X-ray absorptiometry ERK Extracellular regulated kinase Foxo Forkhead box O  Gck Glucokinase Gip Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide Glp1 Glucagon-like peptide 1 GLUT Glucose transporter Gpr40 Free fatty acid receptor 1 Grb2 Growth factor receptor-bound protein-2 Igf Insulin-like growth factor Ins Insulin Irs Insulin receptor substrate KATP ATP-sensitive potassium channels  Mc4 Melanocortin 4 	   xiv	  Mek MAPK kinase mRNA Messenger ribonucleic acid Npy Neuropeptide Y Pi3k Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase PIP3 Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5) trisphosphate Pka Protein kinase A Pomc Proopiomelanocortin C  Raf-1 RAF proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase-1 Ras Rat sarcoma RER Respiratory exchange ratio Shc SH2-containing protein  SREBP-1c Sterol regulatory binding element-1c T3 Triiodothyronine Tor Target of rapamycin Ucp1 Uncoupling protein 1 VLDL Very low density lipoprotein VMH Ventromedial hypothalamus WAT White adipose tissue α-MSH α-melanocyte stimulating hormone      	   xv	  Acknowledgements Of my seven years at UBC the last two have by far been the most exciting, challenging and rewarding. Throughout my undergraduate degree I wanted to be a part of the scientific community and make my own contribution to medical research. I am so thankful to my supervisor James D. Johnson for giving me the opportunity to fully embrace my intrigues and interests in the lab. His support and guidance throughout my research have been irreplaceable.   I would like to thank all the members of the Johnson lab for making science fun and always being so willing to help. Special thanks to Nicole Templeman, Melissa Page and Søs Skovsø who answered so many questions and helped keep me grounded. Doing research has taught me so much about truly understanding science and applying knowledge gained to my own experiments and goals. I know the skills I’ve developed during the last few years will make me a significantly better medical doctor. I will strongly consider a career as a clinician-scientist due to my great experiences in this graduate degree.  To my best friends Alisa, Mai, Christina and David, you’ve all helped keep me sane and maintain my motivation throughout my many years at UBC. To my family and partner Joey, your never-ending love and support have always been such a wondrous foundation. It has allowed me to succeed and progress in ways I could never have done without you.   	   xvi	  Dedication         This thesis is dedicated to my friends, family and partner.           	   1	  Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Insulin function and regulation 1.1.1 Diabetes and the discovery of insulin  Diabetes mellitus is a disease characterized by an inability to produce sufficient insulin hormone and it results in continual elevated levels of blood glucose. Two types of diabetes mellitus exist. Type 1 diabetes arises as a result of autoimmune destruction of the insulin producing cells (~5-10% of cases), requiring patients to undergo lifelong insulin therapy. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (>90% of cases) is designated once production of insulin is insufficient to meet physiological demand1.The risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases as a function of and obesity and age2. Insulin has been a lifesaving treatment for millions of people with diabetes worldwide since its discovery. The story of insulin discovery begins with Paul Langerhans in 1868 when he observed that pancreata from diabetic patients were damaged. Clusters of cells existed in the pancreas with unknown function, that would become known as the pancreatic islets of Langerhans3. Next, Oskar Minkowski and Joseph von Mering discovered that dogs became diabetic after removal of their pancreas but maintained euglycemia upon pancreatic duct ligation in 18894. Several years later in 1920 with the aid of his student Charles Best and funding from John Macleod, Frederick G. Banting injected pancreas extract into pancreatectomized dogs and found that they were able to reverse the dogs’ diabetic symptoms. After purifying the extracts with the aid of Bertram Collip, they began testing in humans. The first diabetic patient to be treated with 	   2	  a purified version of the extract, Leonard Thompson, showed remarkable recovery from his diabetic symptoms and near-death state5. The identification of insulin as the first critical hormone controlling glucose homeostasis is regarded as one of the most significant discoveries in medical history. Justifiably, Frederick G. Banting and John Macleod were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1923 for the discovery of insulin. Improvements and alterations on insulin therapy are still underway today and new roles of this hormone maintain an exciting research environment for those studying diabetes and related-diseases.   1.1.2 Insulin across phylogeny Insulin, insulin-like growth factors (Igf) and their downstream effectors involved in nutrient sensing are conserved from worms to humans. Evolutionary conservation of a gene or signalling pathway generally implies a significant role in and necessity for survival. In Caenorhabditis elegans there are 40 insulin-like genes, in Drosophila melanogaster there are 76-9. In worms and flies, insulin-related hormones are produced in specialized neuroendocrine cell types6,10-14. Specifically, in flies the insulin-like peptides are produced in neuroendocrine cells in the pars intercerebralis region of the protocerebrum as well as in the salivary gland and midgut10,11. In both organisms they serve in sensing and responding to nutrients and in lifespan regulation6-9. For instance, mutation of daf-2, encoding for the sole C. elegans ortholog of the insulin/Igf-1 receptor, lead to significantly increased lifespan12,15. In D. melanogaster, ablation of cells producing insulin-like 	   3	  peptides increased hemolymph glucose levels and lipid storage in the fat body, and maintained a higher resistance to oxidative stress, starvation and have increased lifespan11,16. Similarly, in mammals, including humans, insulin and Igfs are involved in energy storage, metabolism, growth and lifespan7,17,18. It is evident that insulin and related pathways have maintained common function and importance across phylogeny.  1.1.3 Regulation of mammalian insulin expression and secretion In mammals, insulin is produced by the β-cells in the islets of Langerhans of the pancreas. Mammalian insulin genes encode for preprohormones and require post-translational modification by two prohormone convertase enzymes (Pc1 and Pc2) and exopreptidase carboxypeptidase E19. Prohormone convertase 1 and 2 cleave at two sites located after pairs of basic residues (lysine-64 and arginine-65, and arginine-31 and arginine-32) releasing a peptide fragment, C-peptide20. Once the C-peptide has been cleaved, the two pairs of basic residues are removed via carboxypeptidase E20. Mature insulin consists then of two peptide chains (A and B), which are connected by two disulfide bonds and packaged in vesicles20. Insulin granules are packaged as hexamer crystals complexed with zinc ions in intracellular vesicles ready for secretion21-23.  The cellular production of insulin is regulated at multiple processing levels which are primarily affected by glucose metabolism24. Transcription of the human INS and the rodent Ins2 genes are regulated by a 340-660 bp promoter region upstream of the transcriptional start site24-26. This region is composed of binding 	   4	  sites for ubiquitous as well as β-cell-specific transcription factors25,27. It should be noted there are some differences in the promoter elements between the rodent Ins2 gene and the human INS gene, including binding sites and regulatory element spacing28. However, the main three regulatory elements (A3, E1 and C1) that are involved in the response to glucose are conserved28. There are three main transcription factors that function in coordination with each other and synergistically increase insulin gene expression as a result of increasing glucose levels29-31. These factors are Pdx1 (pancreatic and duodenal homeobox-1), NeuroD1 (neurogenic differentiation 1), and MafA (V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homologue A)32-43. Glucose affects the transcriptional regulatory activity of these factors by different mechanisms. Glucose alters Pdx1 localization, DNA-binding affinity and interaction with other proteins44-50. NeuroD1 translocates to the nucleus and MafA transcription increases dramatically upon β-cell exposure to increased glucose concentration51-56.  Insulin production can be regulated by hormones. Insulin may also function in an autocrine or paracrine fashion on β-cells in a positive feed-forward mechanism that has shown to increase insulin synthesis in dispersed human islet cells57. Leptin, an adipose tissue secreted hormone, also reduces insulin gene transcription58,59. Growth hormone can also affect insulin transcription. Rats with a growth hormone producing tumor had increased ratio of Ins1 to Ins2 expression, suggesting the two genes are regulated differently60.  Additionally, glucagon-like peptide, a gut secreted incretin hormone, promotes glucose 	   5	  regulation of insulin gene transcription via increasing Pdx1 levels and activity61-64.  Insulin expression is also regulated post-transcriptionally by rate of translation and mRNA degradation by interactions with RNA-binding proteins and microRNAs65. RNA-binding proteins that specifically enhance insulin mRNA stability include the Hu family of proteins and polypyrimidine tract-binding protein65. Insulin mRNA represent at least 30% of rat islet cell mRNA; insulin mRNA has a half-life ranging from 29 to 77 hours depending on glucose concentrations66,67.  Rapid increases in insulin production due to rising glucose levels are a result of increases in insulin mRNA translation, whereas transcriptional processes occur more slowly68-70. Insulin secretion is regulated by circulating blood glucose levels, but can also be induced by other circulating nutrients such as fatty or amino acids71,72. The mechanisms by which nutrients cause insulin secretion are well studied. Glucose passes into the β-cell from the blood via the high capacity transmembrane glucose transporters. GLUT1 is the primary transporter in humans, whereas Glut2 is the primary transporter in rodents73. Once inside the β-cell glucose is rapidly phosphorylated by glucokinase whereupon the phosphorylated glucose-6-phosphate enters glycolysis. This leads to increases in intracellular adenosine-triphosphate (ATP) and a shift in the ATP:ADP ratio causing closing of the ATP-sensitive potassium channels (KATP), cell depolarization and entry of Ca2+ through voltage-gated calcium channels leading to fusion of insulin-containing vesicles with the cell membrane and thus 	   6	  secretion73,74. Circulating fatty acids can bind the fatty acid receptor Gpr40, which ultimately leads to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and insulin secretion72. Fatty acids are also able to amplify glucose-stimulated insulin secretion via intracellular metabolism of fatty acids causing increased ATP production72. Insulin secretion is tightly regulated and is affected by other hormones, such as the incretins and potentially the novel decretins secreted by enteroendocrine cells of the gut75,76. The incretins, glucagon-like peptide 1 (Glp1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (Gip) produced by L and K cells, respectively, function to potentiate post-prandial insulin secretion. Both incretins act by binding to their respective G-protein coupled receptors on β-cells causing increases in intracellular cyclic-AMP levels and downstream effects that amplify insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner76. The novel decretin, Neuromedin U, has recently been shown to have the opposing effect and decreases insulin secretion in human islet β-cells75. However, more in vivo data is required to determine its physiological relevance. Leptin also acts to decrease insulin secretion via several mechanisms77-81. Insulin is a vital nutrient-sensing hormone and β-cells integrate many signalling pathways to supply appropriate insulin levels dependent on nutritional and endocrine environment.  1.1.3.1 Murine Ins1 and Ins2 expression pattern Unlike humans who have one INS gene, mice and rats have two, the Ins1 and Ins2 genes82-84. They are thought to be the result of a gene duplication event by retroposition of partially processed Ins2 mRNA82. The peptides that 	   7	  arise from these genes are not currently believed to have different biological activity or receptor affinity82. The murine Ins2 gene has greater homology to the human INS than Ins1 and is regarded as the more ancestral gene82. The Ins1 gene is thought to have near exclusive expression in the pancreas, whereas Ins2 is expressed in the pancreas, brain and thymus85. As the thymus is involved in eliminating auto-reactive T-cells, mice lacking Ins2 expression in this organ might be expected to be more susceptible to autoimmune destruction of β-cells. Indeed, non-autoimmune, early onset insulin-deficient diabetes has been observed in male Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice on the nonobese diabetes mouse background86. In female Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- or Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- on the same background also develop insulin-deficient diabetes accompanied by insulitis86-88. However on a 129/Sv background mice lacking either the Ins1 or Ins2 gene are able to compensate and maintain similar circulating insulin levels, euglycemia and do not become diabetic89. Mice completely lacking both Ins1 and Ins2 develop neonatal diabetes and cannot survive without insulin treatment90.  Hyperglycemia was not a common phenotype of Ins2-/- mice in a recent study in our lab with mice obtained from the Bucchini group and partially backcrossed with C57BL/6 mice85,90. In this study Ins1 and Ins2 expression profiles in the central nervous system of these mice was determined in detail85. The highest expression level of Ins2 in postnatal mice was in the hippocampus, minimal expression of Ins1 was observed only in spinal cord, medulla and olfactory bulb85. This suggests murine neural insulin production is almost exclusively from the Ins2 gene. Whole-body tissue Ins1 expression profile data was also summarized revealing expression is 	   8	  primarily in the pancreas with minimal expression in placenta, lung and urogenital sinus85. Thus although the peptides produced from Ins1 and Ins2 are nearly identical, the regulation of their expression likely differ due to differences in regulatory elements upstream of the transcription start site91.  1.1.4 Insulin signalling Insulin has functions in many cellular and physiological processes including cell growth and survival, energy homeostasis, glucose metabolism, feeding, learning and lifespan7,17,18. The insulin protein functions in an autocrine, paracrine and endocrine fashion by binding receptors expressed by peripheral and central tissues. The primary receptor for insulin is the insulin receptor, although insulin may also bind hybrid insulin/Igf1 receptors18. Upon binding to and activating the insulin receptor, its tyrosine kinase activity causes autophosphorylation at various tyrosine residues on the intracellular side of the receptor. The phosphorylated sites then attract and interact with signal amplifiers and effectors like the insulin receptor substrate proteins, including Irs1 and Irs2, as well as Shc (SH2-containing protein)18. The ultimate effects of insulin receptor activation depend on the cell type and which signalling effectors are expressed. One of the primary pathways involve activation of Grb2 (growth factor receptor-bound protein-2), Ras (rat sarcoma), Raf-1 (RAF proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase-1), Mek (MAPK kinase), and finally result in phosphorylation of Erk1 and Erk2 (extracellular regulated kinases) causing translocation to the nucleus where they can alter gene expression18. The second 	   9	  pathway requires activation of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (Pi3k), production of phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5) trisphosphate (PIP3), activating Akt which can cause translocation of Glut4, a glucose transporter, to the membrane increasing cell permeability to glucose, as well as phosphorylate the transcription factor forkhead box O (Foxo) leading to its translocation out of the nucleus thereby changing gene expression18. The signals briefly described here do not exhaustively describe all the pathways and effector proteins that insulin signalling interacts with and affects. The cellular outcomes as a result of insulin receptor binding depend strongly upon the presence of endocrine or other signals being received by the cell, the cell type and its expression profile18.   1.1.5 Physiological effects of insulin on peripheral tissues In most tissues insulin is primarily involved in increasing cell membrane permeability to glucose via translocation of Glut4 to the plasma membrane but it has many other anabolic effects that are tissue-dependent. In the liver, insulin promotes glycogen, protein and fatty acid production from glucose and inhibits gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis92. In white adipose tissue (WAT), insulin signalling causes increased fatty acid synthase activity, storage of triglycerides and inhibits lipolysis thereby increasing lipid energy stores92. In skeletal muscle, where the majority of acute insulin-dependent glucose uptake is thought to occur, there is also a mild increase in glycogen production and storage92.  The pathology of diabetes includes the development of insulin resistance, which results in dysregulation of glucose and lipid metabolism93. This occurs 	   10	  when tissues that are normally sensitive to insulin become unresponsive to physiological levels of insulin. This may be the cause or consequence of increased circulating insulin levels, hyperinsulinemia, that occurs in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and remains under debate85,93. Our lab recently reported that the genetic prevention of hyperinsulinemia in male Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice prevents development of insulin resistance despite being on a high fat diet for a year and having different body weights85.  The importance of insulin signalling for maintenance of healthy physiology are evinced by the phenotypes of tissue-specific insulin receptor knockout mice from key insulin responsive tissues. Muscle-specific insulin receptor knockout mice maintain normal glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and insulin levels with mild dyslipidemia94. The liver-specific deletion of insulin receptor causes insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance and hyperglycemia in mice95. Mice with β-cell specific knockout of the insulin receptor exhibit decreased insulin secretion in response to glucose challenge, develop impaired glucose tolerance and hyperinsulinemia96. The phenotype of fat specific insulin receptor knockout mice include increased lifespan, protection from age-related glucose intolerance, decreased fat mass and disruption of the leptin levels that are normally positively correlate with fat mass97,98. When the insulin receptor is knocked out of the mouse brain mice have increased body weight, WAT mass, increased food intake in females despite increased leptin99. These mice also developed insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia and increased circulating insulin in females99. The physiological effects of insulin are many and differ by tissue but it is evident 	   11	  glucose and lipid homeostasis as well as body weight are important functions of this anabolic hormone18,100.   1.2  Physiological regulation of glucose levels  Maintenance of physiological levels of blood glucose are extremely vital as our brains are only able to metabolize two carbon fuels: glucose and ketones101. Untreated hypoglycemia, the lack of sufficient blood glucose, can lead to coma and death. Hypoglycemia can occur during starvation or in people with diabetes as a result of incorrect insulin dosing102. On the other end of the spectrum, having consistent high blood glucose, or hyperglycemia, as is seen in diabetes patients not maintaining proper glycemic control, has several pathological effects. These include various micro and macrovascular complications such as neuropathies, retinopathies and ulcers. In order to prevent the detrimental effects of glycemic dysregulation and pathological levels of circulating glucose, mammals have evolved several biological systems that function to maintain euglycemia.  The main tissues involved in glycemic control are the islets of Langerhans of the pancreas, the liver, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, the brain, the kidneys and adrenal glands92,101. Each tissue plays a specific role in the system. The β-cells and α-cells found in the islets of Langerhans secrete insulin and glucagon, respectively, with opposing function in terms of effects on blood glucose. Insulin is an anabolic hormone and acts to decrease blood glucose by causing translocation of Glut4 from vesicles to the plasma membrane causing increased 	   12	  tissue uptake of glucose, whereas glucagon acts on the liver to increase circulating glucose levels. The liver responds to circulating hormones by increasing or decreasing blood glucose appropriately. In order to increase blood glucose hepatocytes begin to break down glycogen and fat stores and initiate gluconeogenesis. The opposite occurs when circulating glucose is sufficient, resulting in glycogen and fat storage and inhibition of gluconeogenesis92,101. Skeletal muscle is the tissue responsible for the most insulin-dependent glucose uptake and myocytes are also able to store minimal amounts of glycogen for fuel use during fasting or exercise101. The brain has hormone and nutrient integrating centers that are able to respond to endocrine stimuli and exert top-down neuroendocrine control on glucose and energy homeostasis (discussed further later). The kidneys are able to produce glucose via gluconeogenesis and are involved in glucose recycling or in cases of hyperglycemia excess glucose is secreted and eliminated through urination103. The adrenal glands function in glucose regulation by secreting cortisol (or corticosterone in rodents) by zona fasciculata-reticularis and adrenaline by chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla in response to stress-stimuli through the neuroendocrine axis104,105. The acute stress hormone adrenaline has many physiological effects. With regards to energy homeostasis, adrenaline causes lipolysis in adipose tissue, glycogenolysis in liver and gluconeogenesis in the kidneys in order to increase circulating glucose104.   	   13	  Adipose tissue affects glucose homeostasis through both endocrine and non-endocrine mechanisms106. Adipoctyes secrete many proteins with endocrine action, named adipokines, and with roles in glucose homeostasis. The first such protein discovered, leptin, has many actions. With regards to glycemia, leptin improves both muscle and liver insulin sensitivity, corrects hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in leptin deficient ob/ob mice58,107-109. Leptin plays a significant role in maintaining whole-body insulin sensitivity, insulin controlled liver glucose production and suppresses insulin secretion from β-cells110. These effects are independent of leptin’s effects on food intake81. Leptin has been shown to decrease levels of counterregulatory hormones, which may be part of the mechanism by which leptin ameliorates glucose homeostasis81,109,111-113. Another important adipokine that also increases insulin sensitivity is adiponectin114. Adiponectin’s effects on insulin sensitivity and improved glucose homeostasis may be a combination of β-cell protection from apoptosis, increased Glut4 translocation in muscle, suppression of hepatic glucose output and its anti-inflammatory properties114-117. Other adipokines with positive effects on glucose homeostasis include omentin and visfatin, while still others, tumor necrosis factor-α, resistin and retinol-binding protein 4 have negative effects on insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis106. Adipocytes secrete non-esterified fatty acids, especially during fasting, which decrease muscle glucose uptake and increase hepatic glucose production118,119. Acutely, non-esterified fatty acids induce insulin secretion in the post-prandial state and sensitize β-cells to glucose106,120. However, chronically high circulating fatty acids decrease insulin 	   14	  secretion and can cause β-cell death120-122. A final function of adipose tissue in glucose homeostasis involves it serving as a safe lipid storage site. Ectopic lipid accumulation in the liver or muscle increase insulin resistance in these tissues and exacerbate diabetes106,122,123. Dysregulation of adipose tissue and its endocrine functions have a significant impact on glucose homeostasis and provide a major link between obesity and the development of type 2 diabetes. Unsurprisingly, many tissues are involved in the proper maintenance of circulating glucose as it is so vital to maintain physiological glucose levels for health and survival. Many therapeutics are targeted to various components of glucose regulation for the treatment of diabetes.  1.3 Regulation of body weight and energy homeostasis  1.3.1 Regulation of body weight by insulin Another major function of insulin is in long-term body weight management and energy expenditure. The mechanisms regulating body weight are being extensively studied. The discovery of potential methods for the treatment and prevention of obesity, a growing epidemic, is of health and commercial interest. Despite significant variations in day-to-day food intake body weight is maintained within a small range, which may be a reason why treating obesity is so difficult124. This long-term stability is provided by mechanisms of energy balance that alter energy expenditure dependent on energy intake125,126. Research has established that changes in body weight are defended and that a set-point is a function of both environmental and genetic factors127. Body weight defense 	   15	  suggests integration of peripheral and central signals that act to alter metabolic activity to account for variations in energy intake124. One of these signals is insulin. This hormone is well known for its acute anabolic effects on body weight and fat mass. Indeed, post-prandial and fasting insulin correlate with fat stores128,129. Part of insulin’s body weight regulation role, involves effects on feeding behaviour. This is suggested by the decreased feeding after intracerebroventricular administration of insulin to streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats130. Insulin’s inhibitory effects on feeding are evinced by the hyperphagia seen in female neuron-specific insulin receptor knockout mice99. Even oral administration of an insulin mimetic, more permeable to central nervous system than insulin, decreased food intake, body weight and minimized weight gain in mice fed a high fat diet131. Circulating insulin is known to cross the blood brain barrier by a saturable mechanism132,133. The insulin receptor is expressed by neurons in the brain134. However, circulating insulin isn’t the only source of insulin in the brain. As mentioned earlier hippocampal and olfactory bulb neurons express insulin85,135-138. It is now well established that insulin exerts its effects on feeding and long-term body weight management via central effects on specialized neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus139,140. The mechanisms of which are discussed below. Perhaps the most convincing evidence is the neuron specific insulin receptor knockout mouse, which displays increased food intake and fat mass99. Similarly, mice exhibited the same phenotype when injected with insulin receptor antisense oligonucleotides near the hypothalamus141. Thus insulin plays a significant role in controlling body 	   16	  weight by both acute peripheral and chronic central mechanisms. Although insulin role is important it is not the only hormone with effects on body weight regulation.   1.3.2 Leptin regulates body weight and energy expenditure Another hormone with a significant role in energy store regulation and maintenance of energy expenditure at appropriate levels is a fat secreted hormone, leptin. One of the initial observations implicating fat in energy regulation was in rats, where food intake, indicative of an energy deficit, was affected by fat depot size142. Later, two spontaneous mutations of either the ob or db genes were discovered, where mice homozygous for either mutated gene were phenotypically identical143. These mice exhibited a three fold increase in body mass compared to normal mice on the same diet and five times the body fat content143. The gene products of these genes were eventually identified as the hormone leptin and its cognate receptor144,145. Leptin is now known to be a hormone secreted by adipose tissue, or adipokine, involved in food-intake, metabolism and fertility146,147. Circulating levels of this hormone are correlated with WAT mass, decrease as a function of weight loss and are increased in obese humans and rodent models of obesity148,149. Mutant ob/ob mice exhibit similar pathophysiology to starved animals such as decreased body temperature and energy expenditure, hyperphagia and infertility143. Treatment of these mice with leptin returns these parameters to physiological levels, suggesting a state of perceived starvation where the animal’s response is to store all ingested excess 	   17	  nutrients resulting in obesity107,147,150. Leptin functions to resist changes in weight in both directions and is a major regulator of long-term body weight151-153. Leptin and other hormones act centrally in the hypothalamus to regulate energy expenditure. Energy expenditure can be categorized into basal metabolism, physical activity and adaptive thermogenesis. The specific neuroendocrine mechanism whereby insulin and leptin affect feeding behaviour, body weight and energy expenditure involve binding to receptors expressed on neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus.  1.3.3 Neuroendocrine axis: feeding behavior and energy expenditure  One of the major organs integrating energy intake and modifying energy expenditure is the brain, the effector nuclei are the ventromedial and arcuate nuclei, which contain nutrient-sensing neurons and are located in the ventromedial hypothalamus 146,154. The primary function of these neural networks is controlling body weight, feeding and energy expenditure155,156. These neuronal populations are sensitive to insulin and leptin157-159. Insulin and leptin have similar effects on these neurons and act as satiety factors and lead to decreases in food intake157,158. Leptin binds to its receptor (Lepr) on two types of neurons expressing either neuropeptide Y (Npy) and Agouti-related protein (Agrp) or proopiomelanocortin C (Pomc) and cocaine and amphetamine regulated transcript (Cart) in the arcuate nucleus160. In the Pomc/Cart neurons leptin increases the production of Cart and α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-Msh), a melanocortin 4 (Mc4) agonist160. Contrastingly leptin inhibits production of Npy 	   18	  and Agrp, an antagonist of the Mc4 receptor160. These signals are integrated by Mc4 receptor expressing neurons, which are involved in regulating metabolic rate, feeding, energy expenditure, insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis160,161.  The mutation of the insulin receptor specifically in the brain causes hyperphagia, obesity, insulin resistance, increases in circulating triglycerides and leptin in female mice99. In addition these neurons are sensitive to changes in physiological levels of glucose, above that required by the brain162-166. They also control whole-body glucose homeostasis: demonstrated by the specific increase or decrease in ventromedial hypothalamus glucose metabolism preventing or inducing peripheral counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia, respectively167-169. In addition, leptin infusion into the ventromedial hypothalamus of rats results in increased peripheral glucose metabolism170. While ablation of leptin receptors in the Agrp/Npy neurons of the arcuate nucleus causes obesity in mice due to temporary hyperphagia and decreased energy expenditure171. A mechanism by which energy expenditure may be decreased is by altering thermogenesis. A process involving sympathetic nerve stimulation in the brown adipose tissue172,173.  1.3.4 Brown adipose tissue in energy balance  Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is important for proper glucose homeostasis, energy balance and thermogenesis. BAT was previously believed to only exist in humans in early infants, however more recent positron-emission tomography 	   19	  results found that there is metabolically active BAT in healthy adult humans174. BAT is characterized by dense vasculature, multilocular intracellular lipid droplets and a high density of mitochondria172. Brown unlike WAT is normally an energy burning tissue as opposed to an energy storing tissue 172,175. Mice lacking BAT become obese175. BAT is implicated in glucose homeostasis as mice lacking insulin receptor in BAT develop glucose intolerance likely due to an insulin secretion defect but remain insulin sensitive176. Additionally, mice with BAT transplants have increased insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance177.  However, the primary function of BAT in rodents is thought to be thermoregulation by its defining ability to uncouple the proton gradient created by the electron transport chain of the inner mitochondrial membrane during oxidative phosphorylation of energy fuels172. The protein responsible for this effect is the uncoupling protein 1 (Ucp1), which is uniquely highly expressed in BAT, but can be induced in WAT by sustained cold stress, β-adrenergic compounds or insulin85,176,178.  The expression of Ucp1 in BAT as well as BAT size can be increased by exposure to cold or a result of adrenergic stimulation of the β-adrenergic receptors172.   It has recently become clear that cells within WAT can also adopt some features of BAT, albeit in a very limited capacity. The induction of Ucp1 expression during the ‘browning’ of WAT may be inhibited by insulin85. Specifically, in male Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice, with decreased circulating insulin, exhibit increased Ucp1 expression in WAT on high-fat diet compared to Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- controls85. This suggests insulin negatively regulates Ucp1 expression in WAT, 	   20	  which agrees with the decreased Ucp1 expression observed in brown adipocyte specific insulin receptor null mice176. Knowing there is active BAT in adult humans makes this tissue and conversion of WAT to brown-like or “beige” an attractive therapeutic target for the treatment of obesity175,179.   1.4 Body composition and fat mass 1.4.1 Adipose tissue subtypes and function Adipose tissue is the largest mammalian endocrine organ and is involved in controlling several biological functions through adipokine secretion including food intake, glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, aging, fertility and body temperature180. There are different WAT depots including subcutaneous, inguinal, interscapular, perigonadal, retroperitoneal and mesenteric depots180. Adipose tissue found in the abdominal cavity (or visceral fat) has altered metabolic and functional roles from subcutaneous adipose tissue, having a more extensive capillary bed, sympathetic efferent innervation and has adipogenic, pro-atherogenic and pro-thrombotic properties181-183. There are also differences in the secretory profile between WAT depots, for example leptin and adiponectin are secreted at higher levels from subcutaneous adipocytes, whereas retinol binding protein 4 and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 are more selectively secreted by visceral adipose tissue184-187. There are sexual dimorphisms in fat depot size. Women tend to have increased total adipose size over lifespan as well as increased ratio of subcutaneous to visceral fat188. These sex depot-specific patterns may be a 	   21	  function of sex hormones; however, the exact mechanism for the dimorphisms have yet to be elucidated189-191. A recent genome-wide association study suggests there may be a genetic component to sexual dimorphic body fat distribution. Surgical excision of visceral fat improves glucose homeostasis in both male and female mice, whereas removal of subcutaneous fat offers no improvements in rodent or human metabolic syndrome181,192-194. Additional differences between the two types of WAT include their mechanisms for expansion during high-fat diet, where visceral fat primarily expands by hypertrophy, increase in adipocyte size, and subcutaneous fat through hyperplasia, recruitment of new adipocytes by replication and differentiation of adipocyte progenitor cells188,195. Unsurprisingly, there are also differences in lipid metabolism in subcutaneous compared to visceral fat depots. Their varying metabolic and secretory profiles substantiate the more negative outcomes associated with increased visceral fat182,192,196-198.  1.4.2 Fat storage plays a role in maintaining good health  Since the discovery of leptin, appreciation for the role of adipose tissue in maintaining healthy physiology has increased dramatically. The role of fat in maintaining health is made evident by the complications and comorbidities arising from either lipodystrophies, genetic or acquired disorders exhibiting selective loss of body fat, as well as those associated with excess body fat in obesity. Patients with partial or generalized lipodystrophy, where there is fat loss from many or all depots, are predisposed to hypertriglyceridemia, hepatic 	   22	  steatosis, polycystic ovaries, acanthosis nigricans, insulin resistance and thus type 2 diabetes mellitus199,200. Some of the same health risks arise in obese patients such as insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia and increased risk of development of type 2 diabetes mellitus201. Appropriate lipid homeostasis is thus vital for maintenance of health. Hormones involved in promoting lipid accumulation include insulin and cortisol, which act by inducing expression of enzymes and proteins involved in lipid storage202. On the other hand, growth hormone, testosterone and catecholamines induce lipolysis and cause lipid mobilization202,203. Estrogen may play a role in location of lipid deposition but results are inconclusive regard possible cellular mechanisms188,204. Progestin and estrogen were found to induce preadipocyte differentiation in vitro and another study revealed estrogen maintains this function in vivo205-207. Adiponectin may play a role in maintaining adipocytes ability to store lipids, exhibited by adiponectin overexpressing leptin deficient mice with increased subcutaneous fat but smaller adipocyte size208.  1.4.3 Lipid metabolism is regulated by endocrine signals A vital function of the WAT is serving as a safe storage site for lipids in the form of triglycerides, which can then be converted to fatty acids and used as energy for exercise, during fasting or starvation. The rates of storage and lipolysis are tightly regulated by endocrine signals.    	   23	  1.4.3.1 Regulation of lipolysis by insulin and catecholamines Lipolysis is the hydrolysis of triglycerides stored in intracellular lipid droplets. Access to the triglycerides within the droplet is regulated by perilipin, a lipoprotein that coats lipid droplets and is involved in regulating lipolysis209. In adipose tissue, the products of lipolysis are non-esterified fatty acids, which can then be exported from the adipocytes for translocation to another tissue where they can undergo β-oxidation for production of ATP or be used to produce other biologically necessary lipids. In adipocytes triglycerides are hydrolyzed primarily by two enzymes: adipose triglyceride lipase converting triglycerides to diacylglycerols, and hormone sensitive lipase,, hydrolyzing diacylglycerols to monoacylglycerols210,211. Adipose triglyceride lipase mRNA expression is increased by glucocorticoid action and during fasting, and is decreased by insulin and food intake209,212,213. However, as these lipases activities are highly regulated by post-translational modifications gene expression changes do not imply changes in lipase activity209. The physiological role of lipolysis is to provide fatty acids as an energy source during prolonged fasting when insulin and catecholamine levels are low or under acute stress initiated by catecholamines214. Intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) stimulates protein kinase A, which phosphorylates both hormone sensitive lipase and perilipin thereby activating lipolysis215. β-Adrenergic stimulation by catecholamines causes production of cAMP via stimulatory G-proteins, whereas insulin signalling activates phosphodiesterase 3B which decreases cAMP levels214. Thus the rate of lipolysis is balanced by endocrine signals. 	   24	  1.4.3.2 Regulation of de novo lipogenesis by insulin As lipids are a necessary component of all cellular life there are mechanisms by which organisms have evolved to produce lipids from other carbon sources like carbohydrates or protein metabolites. In humans under normal conditions, the majority of stored triglycerides are obtained from fatty acids in the diet, but a small amount (1-5%) is produced by the liver or (1-2%) in the adipose tissue214,216. After excess carbohydrate ingestion, the liver can synthesize esterified fatty acids and triglycerides that are then secreted as very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles217.  Once in the circulation, fatty acids can be released from VLDLs by hydrolysis of lipoprotein triglycerides by lipoprotein lipase found on the surface of epithelial cells in capillaries217. Cycling of fatty acids from adipose tissue to liver is accomplished by production and secretion of non-esterified fatty acids (bound to circulating proteins) and from the liver to adipose tissue via VLDLs217,218. The synthesis of fatty acids is also hormonally regulated. Insulin acts to increase fatty acid synthesis in the liver during carbohydrate excess by increasing cAMP and increasing sterol regulatory binding element-1c (SREBP-1c) expression, which is a transcription factor known to affect expression of genes involved in fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis217,219. This effect is decreased during fasting when glucagon levels increase, which decreases cAMP levels in hepatocytes219. Understanding the relationship between lipid metabolism and the endocrine system are vital for discoveries of novel therapeutic targets for diseases with defects in either system. Dietary interventions that affect hormones regulating lipid metabolism, 	   25	  like insulin, may provide further insight into how these biological systems interact.  1.5 Caloric restriction slows ageing and improves metabolic outcomes 1.5.1 Caloric restriction and lifespan extension In 1935, diet restriction in rats was identified as the first experimental method to extend lifespan220. Since this initial discovery of lifespan regulation by food intake, it has been replicated and demonstrated that from yeast to mammals restricting food or caloric intake has a positive effect on longevity221. Caloric restriction, defined generally as a reduction in caloric intake from 20-60% less than theoretical energy requirements (while avoiding malnutrition), has become an exciting diet intervention to study due to its consistent longevity inducing phenotype. However, there are cases where caloric restriction in certain strains of mutant yeast or mice of different genetic backgrounds have not led to increased lifespan and suggest the effect is genotype dependent222-224. Currently studies in non-human primates, one at Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre (WNPRC) in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and the other at the National Institute for Aging (NIA), are inconclusive whether caloric restriction has a positive effect on lifespan in primates225-228. Of the three primate studies reported, only one has found a statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality on its own. However, after a recent meta-analysis including data from all three studies only a decrease in age-related and not all-cause mortality is statistically significant225-228. It should be noted that the studies differed in terms 	   26	  of the origin of the animals included, age of diet initiation and the caloric restriction protocols themselves, which may contribute to the variation in results226,227,229. Consequently whether or not caloric restriction is likely to increase human lifespan or not remains under debate228,230. These studies are also grossly underpowered and in the NIA study the control diet is not truly characteristic of ad libitum 226-228. The cost and logistics of caloric restriction studies in humans and non-human primates make it extremely difficult to determine mechanism and physiological effects of long-term caloric restriction. Thus the use of a mouse model is more economically feasible and can provide more detailed information about how caloric restriction exerts its beneficial effects.   1.5.2 Improved glucose tolerance in caloric restriction Caloric restriction is extremely effective at improving glucose regulation from rodents to non-human primates and humans231-240. The effects on glucose homeostasis include increased tolerance to a given glucose load compared to ad libitum or free-fed controls as well as decreased fasting glucose and insulin and increased whole-body insulin sensitivity231-240. These effects are seen in obese, diabetic and healthy individuals239,241-243. Diets that exploit the caloric restriction paradigm provide a promising treatment option for improving glucose management without the need for drugs. 	    	   27	  1.5.3 Caloric restriction and age-related disease risk   Expected lifespan for humans has increased dramatically over the last hundred years from 45 to at least 77 years in many developed countries244. The effect on healthspan, lifespan without chronic disease, has not been as great exhibited by the growing burden of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s disease, respiratory diseases and cancers245. Thus, regardless of whether or not a positive indication is found for lifespan extension the study performed at the WNPRC found significant decreases in age-related diseases (defined as cancer, diabetes, arthritis, diverticulosis and cardiovascular disease)227; an economically important outcome that could greatly benefit quality of life for many people if this diet or a mimetic can be translated to human interventions. Some benefits to the caloric restriction diet have already been illustrated in healthy non-overweight humans. For example several surrogate risk factors associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of age-related death, were significantly reduced after only 6 months of 25% calorie restriction in both men and women in one study246,247.  Additionally, placing obese or diabetic patients on a calorie-restricted diet has many positive effects including greatly improved glycemic control and improved lipid profiles230,238,243,246,248,249. A 30% calorie restricted diet, compared to individual pretrial food intake, was found to improve memory in elderly adults (between age 50 and 80) after just 3 months, which the authors suggest may be due to decreased circulating insulin levels250. With the many beneficial outcomes as a result of even short-term caloric restriction on disease 	   28	  risk factors or even in healthy subjects it is not a surprise that there is so much research poised to discover the molecular mechanisms by which this diet exerts its physiological effects. The ideal scenario might be the discovery of caloric restriction mimetics that confers a similar delay and/or prevention of age-related diseases.  1.5.4 Longevity related signalling pathways induced by caloric restriction Several important pathways involved in the extension of lifespan by caloric restriction have been identified in C. elegans, D. melanogaster and mice, but the exact mechanisms by which restriction of food intake increases lifespan have yet to be elucidated. To date, caloric restriction studies implicate cellular nutrient-sensing pathways, including insulin/IGF-1-like signalling, kinase target of rapamycin (TOR), AMP kinase, and sirtuins as active regulators of the lifespan extension seen in caloric restriction251-260. Other important cellular mechanisms have also been implicated in caloric or glucose restriction in lifespan extension of C. elegans, including autophagy and mitochondrial respiration261-263. To corroborate, a large-scale study of gene expression changes as a result of ageing in multiple mouse tissues shows a decrease in genes involved in energy metabolism264.  Meta-analysis of 27 datasets of gene expression profiles obtained from mouse, rat and human tissues found a similar signature as a result of ageing265. This indicates the use of mouse models is well suited for aging research as discoveries are likely to be clinically significant. 	   29	  Genetically engineered mice provide a prime tool in order to determine mammalian mechanisms by which caloric restriction induces a longevity phenotype. Mice lacking Irs1, a gene encoding an intracellular insulin receptor substrate, have metabolomes with remarkable similarities to mice on caloric restriction266. These data suggest a potential role for insulin as a mediator of caloric restriction induced longevity. However, mice with mutations in the somatotropic axis (growth hormone/Igf1/insulin), such as the growth hormone releasing hormone knockout mice, which have genetically increased lifespans have a further extension of lifespan when placed on caloric restriction. This additivity of the response is taken to imply that other molecular mechanisms may be involved267. Similarly, there is evidence from C. elegans and D. melanogaster suggesting caloric restriction and insulin signalling mutants have additive effects on lifespan, suggesting the two manipulations function through independent molecular mechanisms268-272. However, these conclusions are not comprehensive and draw from mutants of only one of the many downstream targets of insulin signalling, the ortholog of the forkhead box transcription factor, foxo3a. Other studies, some in mammals, suggest they have common mechanisms240,251,268,273. The specific effects of circulating insulin levels on lifespan and caloric restriction have never been evaluated. Key genetic investigations are needed to determine undeniably whether caloric restriction extends life in mammals by reducing circulating insulin.   	   30	  1.5.5 Hormonal alterations under caloric restriction Many physiological changes occur as a result of caloric restriction including alterations in circulating hormone levels to mediate tissue responses under energy restriction. Some of the most consistent findings include decreases in insulin, triiodothyronine (T3), leptin, Igf1, growth hormone, pro-inflammatory cytokines and increases in cortisol (corticosterone in rodents) and adiponectin239,274. It is evident that the main effect for reduction in hormones like T3 and leptin would act to decrease energy expenditure in an energy deficient state by lowering resting body temperature275-277. Anabolic hormones like insulin, Igf1 and growth hormone act to increase cell proliferation and are associated with tumorigenesis; mice with defects in the somatotropic axis have decreased cancer incidence and longer lifespans267,278-285. Decreased inflammatory molecules and increases in cortisol levels result in lower systemic inflammation and age-related dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines286-291. Increases of adiponectin are likely involved in increasing insulin sensitivity under caloric restriction292,293. Determining which of these effects are required for the beneficial effects of caloric restriction is necessary for the potential development of calorie restriction mimetics.   1.5.6 Effect of caloric restriction on body composition  Calorie restricted diets have profound effects on body composition, as might be expected. Mice and humans on this diet exhibit decreases in lean and fat mass as well as decreased body fat relative to body weight233,248,294-296. The 	   31	  decrease in body fat is seen ubiquitously in caloric restriction literature. The exception is for a very mild (5%) and very short (4-week) caloric restriction diet given to female mice where fat mass was increased, lean mass decreased and overall body mass maintained297. Interestingly, it has been reported that the ratio of lean to fat mass lost depends on age of caloric restriction initiation, where fat mass is lost more in young mice and lean mass in aged mice233. The amount of lean or fat mass maintained during a 40% restricted diet in multiple inbred mouse strains were correlated with lifespan extension298. Liao et al. found that a reduction in fat stores was negatively correlated with lifespan extension in the CR mice, illustrating that strains with the smallest reduction in fat mass had significantly increased likelihood of having longer lifespans298. These findings suggest retaining a certain amount of fat storage is important for lifespan extension under caloric restriction and provides some insight into the genetic variation involved in the longevity phenotype298.   1.6 Aim of thesis investigation  Caloric restriction, involving a 20-60% reduction in food intake, has numerous beneficial biological effects including significant improvements to glucose metabolism, decreased incidence of age-related diseases like cancer, diabetes and various neurological diseases as well as increases in lifespan230,247,274,299. Insulin and insulin/Igf1-like signalling play significant roles in moderating invertebrate and mammalian energy, glucose and lipid homeostasis as well as food intake and lifespan251. The beneficial effects of caloric restriction 	   32	  on lifespan and healthy aging are primarily attributed to alterations in glucose and energy regulation, neuroendocrine and hormone level changes as well as decreases in body fat. Understanding the relationship between nutrient sensing hormones like insulin and the effects of restricted diet on aging and energy metabolism is key to identifying the interplay of diet and the endocrine system. Thus the thesis research performed was aimed at discovering the relationship between decreased circulating insulin levels and caloric restriction.  As long-term caloric restriction is accompanied by decreases in fasting insulin, it has yet to be explicitly determined whether a decrease in circulating insulin is required for improved glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and concurrent hormonal alterations. Hyperinsulinemia is prevented despite high-fat feeding in male Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice and hyperinsulinemia is not seen in female Ins2-/- mice regardless of Ins1 alleles85. The ability of female Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice to maintain low, unchanging insulin levels despite high-fat feeding suggests the insulin secretion profile of these mice do not respond conventionally to diet changes. Additionally the Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mouse has the fewest Ins alleles that permit sufficient, albeit very low, circulating insulin without the development of diabetes or hyperglycemia.  Caloric restriction is also hypothesized to promote healthy glucose homeostasis and lifespan extension by decreases in fat mass300. Insulin is known to increase body mass and fat storage. It is not known what role circulating insulin plays in decreased fat storage during long-term caloric restriction. No study has been able to separate caloric restriction and circulating 	   33	  insulin effects on fat and body composition. Male Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- mice exhibited hypertrophy of epididymal fat on high-fat diet and increased fat to lean mass ratio, which were abrogated in the Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice85. This difference was attributed to increased WAT Ucp1 expression, increased energy expenditure and prevention of hyperinsulinemia85. These data suggest decreased insulin production in this model lead to changes in body composition, energy expenditure and gene expression.  As female Ins2-/- mice have very low insulin but do not become hyperinsulinemic on a high-fat diet, they may serve as a model to distinguish the insulin-mediated effects of caloric restriction. Specifically this thesis aimed to determine the effects of caloric restriction and insulin gene dosage on glucose homeostasis, metabolic hormone levels, energy expenditure and body composition. Previous studies on female Ins2-/- mice in our lab were underpowered and used a different diet85. Therefore it is still prudent to perform all experiments on both Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/-:Ins2-/-  as the different diet used in this study may alter the insulin phenotype of these mice. The use of both genotypes increases the likelihood one of them will have unaltered circulating insulin on caloric restriction.      	   34	  Chapter 2: Materials and methods 2.1 Experimental animals  Animal procedures were approved by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee and in accordance with the guidelines set out by the Canadian Council for Animal Care. The Ins2-/- mouse model used was created at INSERM by J. Jami and colleagues as is described by Duvillie et al.90. Our study focused on female mice, since male Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice occasionally develop spontaneous, persistent hyperglycemia between 8-13 weeks of age. All mice in the study had a mixed background that was predominantly C57BL/6. Mice were fed a commercial chow, Teklad Diet LM485 manufactured in Madison, WI (chow details provided in Table 2.1). At 13 weeks of age the female Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- littermate mice were randomly placed into either an ad libitum-fed (AL) or a caloric restriction (CR) group fed 60% of food intake of the same genotype AL controls and housed individually to ensure equal feeding for CR mice. A fifth group was introduced of Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice being fed 60% of Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- AL group to separate genotype from food intake effects in certain measurements. Mice weights and food intake were measured weekly until 80 weeks thereafter they were weighed every other week. To measure food intake of AL group, the amount of food removed from the cage hopper was weighed weekly with any spillage subtracted. The CR mice were given 60% of food consumed by the genotype matched AL group using an automated feeder (Fish Mate F14 Aquarium Fish Feeder) refilled twice a week that would drop weighed food pellets into cage hopper in three quasi-equal “meals” during the dark phase. 	   35	  The meals were dispensed two, five and eight hours after initiation of dark phase of the 12-hour light/dark cycle (lights on at 7 AM). Feeders were checked every morning by experimenter or animal technician to verify all food pellets had dropped. If they hadn’t the mice would be given the remaining food. Mice were housed in specific pathogen free conditions on ventilated (50 air changes per hour), autowater Ehret mouse cage racks at ambient room temperature of 21ºC.   2.2 Glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity and plasma analysis  Mice were fasted for 4 hours during light phase initiated at 8 or 9 AM to provide a postprandial state for glucose homeostasis measurements and blood sampling. All CR mice meal times were shifted forward 4 or 5 hours so that their final meal was given 1 hour prior to fasting initiation. At 6, 12 an 18 months of age, fasting and intraperitoneal glucose-stimulated (2g/kg) insulin secretion were measured, as were the blood glucose response to intraperitoneal administrations of glucose (2g/kg) or an insulin analog (0.75U/kg of Humalog; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Blood glucose measurements were assessed with OneTouch Ultra2 glucose meters (LifeScan Canada Ltd, Burnaby, BC, Canada), plasma insulin levels were determined by mouse ultrasensitive insulin ELISA kit (Alpco Diagnostics, Salem, NH, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Area under the curve was calculated to determine statistical differences in the glucose and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion tests. The MAGPLEX mouse magnetic bead panel assay (Millipore, St. Charles, MO, USA) was used to measure leptin, ghrelin, resistin, interleukin 6, glucose-dependent insulinotropic 	   36	  polypeptide, peptide YY, and glucagon levels in fasting plasma samples collected from 48 week-old mice, in accordance with manufacturers’ instructions.  2.3 Body composition and energy expenditure In order to determine in vivo body composition, duel-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA; Lunar PIXImus densitometer; GE Medical Systems LUNAR, Madison, WI, USA) was used in 48-week old mice. Organ and fat depot contributions to lean and fat mass were assessed by gross dissection and measurement of wet-mass of 66-week old and 106-week old mice. Energy expenditure was examined in 48-week old mice using metabolic cages (PhenoMaster; TSE Systems, Bad Homburg, Germany). Mice were housed and acclimated in experimental room for 3 days. Cages were then placed in the environment-controlled chambers at 21ºC for oxygen and carbon dioxide gas exchange measurement, physical activity by beam breaks, and food intake for the AL group over 72h. Data from the first light phase were excluded. The remaining data from two full light cycles and three dark cycles were averaged. Total energy expenditure was calculated as previously described301.  2.4 Statistical analysis   Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with genotype and diet as the factors for a given measurement at a specific age.  If a significant interaction was found, one-way ANOVAs with multiple comparisons were used instead to compare AL Ins1+/+:Ins2-/-, CR Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- , AL Ins1+/-:Ins2-/-, and CR 	   37	  Ins1+/-:Ins2-/-, with Bonferroni corrections applied. Statistics were done using Prism (version 6.0a; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). The effect of age was not determined due to some mice having missing data points. Data presented are mean ± standard error of the mean. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.   2.5 Tables Table 2.1 Teklad LM-485 chow diet macronutrient composition Crude Protein 19.1% Fat (ether extract) 5.8% Carbohydrate (available) 44.3% Crude Fiber  4.6% Neutral Detergent Fiber 13.7% Ash  6.1% Energy Density 3.1kcal/g Calories from Protein  25% Calories from Fat  17% Calories from Carbohydrate  58%       	   38	  Chapter 3: Glucose homeostasis, body composition and metabolic hormone profile of ad libitum and calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice 3.1 Caloric restriction decreases body mass  Energy restricted mice, rats and humans are known to lose body mass when placed on a restricted diet after a period of energy excess234,235,239,240,248,294,302-304.  The body weight of female Ins1+/+Ins2-/- mice was indistinguishable from that of Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- before initiation of caloric restriction (Fig 3.1A). Mice fed ad lib. continued to increase their body weight until 30 weeks of age, after which their weight stabilized (Fig 3.1A). Unsurprisingly, mice on caloric restriction initially lost weight for 5 weeks when first placed on the diet at 13 weeks of age and stabilized between 15-20% less than their littermate ad lib. controls (Fig 3.1A). Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- mice weighed slightly less than Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice until about 50 weeks of age. (Fig 3.1A). A pair-fed study where calorie-restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- were fed 60% of the ad lib.  Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and thus fed the same as calorie-restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- abolished the difference in body weights of calorie-restricted mice(Figs 3.1B). This suggests that the body weight difference observed in calorie-restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- mice are a result of a very small increase in food intake of ad lib. Ins1+/:-Ins2-/- causing a very small, not statistically significant increase in food intake of calorie-restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/-  mice (Fig 3.2).   	   39	  3.2 Caloric restriction lowers fed and fasting blood glucose and increases glucose tolerance The effects of a calorie-restricted diet on blood glucose have been well documented. In non-human primates, humans, rats and mice fasting blood glucose is decreased and glucose tolerance increased under caloric restriction compared to control-fed animals231,232,234,235,239,305.  Similarly, Ins2-/- mice on caloric restriction had decreased fasting and fed blood glucose levels with no difference between ages (Fig 3.3A,B). The restricted mice also had increased glucose tolerance when challenged with an intraperitoneal glucose challenge (2g/kg) (Fig 3.4A). However, no differences in blood glucose levels or glucose tolerance were observed between mice with only one or both Ins1 alleles at all three ages tested (Fig 3.4A). It was previously noted that Ins1+/+Ins2-/- mice have no difference in glucose tolerance compared to wildtype mice89. These data taken in combination suggest that one Ins1 allele is sufficient to compensate for the lack of other Ins genes in maintaining euglycemia in mice89. In fact, in previous studies it was demonstrated that male or female Ins2-/- mice maintained euglycemia and glucose tolerance when challenged with a high fat diet85.  However, those results were obtained in a conventional mouse facility and may not apply to newer pathogen-free facilities due to potential microbiota effects on metabolism.    	   40	  3.3 Effects of caloric restriction and Ins1 gene dosage on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion In most studies where mice, rats, non-human primates or humans are placed on a CR diet there is either a decrease or no change in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion for a given glucose load232,236,295. In our study, no differences were seen in insulin secretion regardless of genotype or diet (Fig 3.5B). This is further evidence that a single Ins1 gene is sufficient to produce enough protein to maintain glucose homeostasis and that mouse islets are able to maintain minimum levels of insulin production regardless of Ins gene dosage.   3.4 Caloric restriction increases rate of return to baseline glucose levels post insulin injection One of the main beneficial effects of caloric restriction at least in terms of its effects in obese or type 2 diabetic patients, is its insulin sensitizing effect. In the large majority of studies caloric restriction is accompanied by a reduction in insulin resistance. In the Ins2-/- mice, caloric restriction did not appear to increase insulin sensitivity, as measured by the glucose response to an intraperitoneal injection of insulin (Fig 3.4B). Instead, a response that could be interpreted as increasing insulin resistance was found (Fig 3.4B). For the first 30 minutes after 0.75U/kg insulin injection, all groups followed similar trajectories and reached similar minimal blood glucose levels around 3 mM (Fig 3.4B). After this minimal point all groups began increasing their blood glucose, likely countering the insulin effect (Fig 3.4B). However, the rate of return to baseline glucose was 	   41	  much more rapid in the calorie-restricted mice as most of them reached fasting levels by 60 minutes compared to ad lib. mice that never returned to baseline glucose over the 120 minutes post injection measured (Fig 3.4B). More surprisingly, calorie-restricted mice often had higher glucose levels than their initial fasting levels by the 90-minute time-point (Fig 3.4B).  This appears to be a strong counterregulatory effect in response to dropping blood glucose as opposed to insulin resistance as these mice maintain an initial response to insulin (Fig 3.4B). It is conceivable that the calorie-restricted mice encounter lower blood glucose concentrations than ad lib. controls on a daily basis due to long fasting times in between meals. Consequently they may be more primed to respond to drops in blood glucose levels more efficiently.    3.5 Age-dependent decrease in circulating insulin of Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice is abrogated by caloric restriction Next, we assessed the effects of caloric restriction on circulating insulin levels in the context of partial insulin gene deletion. Unlike in most caloric restriction studies, this diet applied in our reduced insulin gene dosage mice did not decrease fasting circulating insulin levels and mice with only a single Ins1 allele were able to maintain similar insulin levels as those with two alleles (Fig 3.5A). As the mice aged, this compensation diminished as ad lib. fed Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- had lower circulating insulin at 53 than 27 weeks of age (Fig 3.5A). Additionally Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- had lower insulin compared to Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- mice at 53 weeks of age (Fig 3.5A). However, when placed on caloric restriction Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice 	   42	  maintained similar insulin levels as 53-week old ad lib Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- mice and 27-week old Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice (Fig 3.5A). This suggests caloric restriction is preventing a drop in circulating insulin over age in the Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice. In most aging studies, there is a trend for increasing fasting insulin as well as insulin resistance that are also not seen in these reduced insulin gene dosage mice306. It is possible that the lack of an effect of caloric restriction on lowering insulin is due to these mice having reached a physiological ‘insulin floor’ where any further reductions would be deleterious and result in a pathological diabetic-like state. Female mice with a similar C57Bl/6 or 129/Sv backgrounds have been reported to exhibit fasting insulin levels of 0.5-2ng/ml307,308.  3.6 Caloric restriction in mice with reduced insulin gene dosage alters metabolic hormone levels Next, we evaluated how caloric restriction may affect the levels of other metabolic hormones in mice with reduced insulin gene dosage. Similar to most studies, Igf1 levels were diminished during caloric restriction in both genotypes (Fig 3.6G). However, growth hormone levels no longer correlated with Igf1 levels in these mice as the calorie-restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- mice had increased growth hormone compared to ad lib. controls and calorie-restricted Ins1+/:-Ins2-/- mice had similar levels to their ad lib. controls (Fig 3.6H). The satiety hormone peptide YY was not affected by diet nor genotype, but was affected by fasting in most groups (Fig 3.6E). The orexigenic hormone ghrelin was not found to be altered by genotype, diet or fasting in these mice (Fig 3.6D). No statistically significant 	   43	  differences in interleukin-6 levels were seen, although fasting had a tendency to increase this hormone in all groups (Fig 3.6C).  Another adipokine, resistin, was not found to have any differences between groups or after fasting (Fig 3.6F). Interestingly, leptin levels in both the fed and fasted states were significantly increased by caloric restriction with no difference due to genotype. This is the first study to find this diet to induce an increase in circulating leptin (Fig 3.6A). Similarly, caloric restriction lead to an increase in fed circulating GIP and fasted only in Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- mice (Fig 3.6B). Fasting also significantly decreased GIP levels, at least in CR mice (Fig 3.6B). Caloric restriction related effects on endocrine signals appeared to be significantly altered in reduced insulin gene dosage mice.   3.7 Caloric restriction increases fat mass in mice with reduced insulin gene dosage  Caloric restriction is known to have a significant impact on body composition and leads to decreased body fat mass and often decreased lean mass. Paradoxically, in our study we found an increase in percent body fat and fat mass due to caloric restriction of Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice (Fig 3.7B,C). This may also be interpreted as a prevention of decrease in fat mass normally seen under caloric restriction. Lean mass was significantly reduced in Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- mice (Fig 3.7A). These in vivo data obtained by DEXA scan were corroborated by tissue collection. Significant increases in relative inguinal fat depot size in both Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- in 66 week-old calorie-restricted mice were 	   44	  observed (Fig 3.9A). The relative BAT size was also nominally increased (p=0.0515) in 66-week old calorie-restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice (Fig 3.9A). The effect on BAT size was more substantial in 106 week-old mice where both relative and actual inguinal and BAT size were significantly increased in calorie-restricted mice (Fig 3.9C,D). Relative gonadal fat depot size was also increased as a function of caloric restriction diet (Fig 3.9C). Other body composition changes included decreases in relative and actual liver and kidney sizes due to caloric restriction (Fig 3.9). Although unexpected and paradoxical, the increases in fat mass size are consistent with the increased leptin levels observed as it has been repeatedly shown that leptin levels are strongly correlated with WAT size. Subsequently determining whether lipid metabolism was being altered as a result of caloric restriction in these reduced insulin gene dosage mice became of interest. No difference in circulating fasting non-esterified fatty acids or cholesterol were observed (Fig 3.8A,B). However, there was a significant increase in plasma triglycerides (Fig 3.8C). These data are also surprising, given that almost every other caloric restriction study reports decreases in triglycerides and occasionally increases in circulating non-esterified fatty acids. Collectively, these data suggest that the normal effects of caloric restriction on fat mass and triglycerides are reversed when insulin levels are extremely low.    	   45	  3.8 Caloric restriction decreases energy expenditure and alters circadian respiratory exchange ratio cycling  In an effort to determine how mice fed 40% less food could have increased body fat these mice were placed in metabolic caging to determine total energy expenditure and respiratory exchange ratio. The caloric restriction diet led to a decrease in daytime energy expenditure, but not nighttime energy expenditure, normalized to lean mass (Fig 3.10A, 3.11A). No difference in mean respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was observed, however there were differences in RER cycling (Fig 3.10C, 3.11B). These data imply that calorie-restricted mice utilize different energy fuels than the ad lib mice depending on the time of day.               	   46	  3.9 Figures      Figure 3.1 A) Body mass over 80 weeks in ad lib and 40% calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice and B) body mass of mouse cohorts with pair fed-restricted animals over 1 year. Results are mean ± standard error of the mean with n= 20-25 per group for A and n=3-9 for B. Statistical significance indicated by ** for p<0.01, between mice of same genotype and § for p<0.05 between mice on caloric restriction.   10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Mass (g) Age (weeks) CR Start 	  	  § § § § 	  ** 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Mass (g) Age (weeks) CR Start A B Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Pair-restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- 	   47	                  Figure 3.2 Food intake of female ad lib. or 40% calorie-restricted Ins2-/- mice over 80 weeks. Results are mean ± standard error of the mean with n= 20-25 per group.                Figure 3.3 A) 4-hr fasted and B) fed blood glucose of female ad lib. or 40% calorie-restricted Ins2-/- mice. Results are mean ± standard error of the mean with n= 11-25 per group. Statistical significance indicated by ** for p<0.01; ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 between mice of same genotype. 0	  1	  2	  3	  4	  5	  6	  7	  8	  Age 26 weeks Age 52 weeks Age 78 weeks Fed	  Glucose	  (mM)	  **** **** **** **** *** **** 	  	  	  	  Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- 0 1 2 3 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Food intake (g/mouse/day) Age (weeks) CR Start 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 26 weeks 52 weeks 78 weeks Fasting Glucose (mM) **** ** ** *** ** A B 	   48	                                   Figure 3.4 A) Intraperitoneal glucose (2g/kg) tolerance test and B) insulin (0.75U/kg) tolerance test after a 4-hr fast in ad lib. or 40% calorie-restricted female Ins2-/- mice. Insets represent Area Under Curve (AUC). Results are mean ± SEM with n= 11-25 per group. Statistical significance indicated by * for p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 between mice of same genotype.         0 2 4 6 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Blood Glucose (mM) Time (mins) 0 2 4 6 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Blood Glucose (mM) 0 2 4 6 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Blood Glucose (mM) * * ** 26 weeks  52 weeks 78 weeks   * ** 0 5 10 15 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Blood Glucose (mM) * * 0 5 10 15 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Blood Glucose (mM) *** *** 050010001500AUC**** ****050010001500AUC**** ***0	  5	  10	  15	  20	  0	   20	   40	   60	   80	   100	   120	  Blood Glucose (mM) Time (mins) ** * 050010001500AUC**25 weeks 51 weeks 77 weeks A B Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- ** *  * 	   49	       Figure 3.5 A) 4-hr fasting plasma insulin and B) intraperitoneal glucose-stimulated (2g/kg) insulin secretion test following 4-hr fast in ad lib. and 40% calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice. Insets represent Area Under Curve (AUC). Results are mean ± SEM with n= 11-25 per group. Statistical significance indicated by * for p<0.05 and by # for p<0.05 between Ins1+/-Ins2-/- ad lib. mice and all other groups.     0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 10 20 30 Insulin (ng/ml) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 10 20 30 27 weeks old 53 weeks old 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 10 20 30 Time (mins) 78 weeks old AUC05101520AUC0510152005101520AUC0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 27 weeks 53 weeks 79 weeks  Plasma Insulin (ng/ml)  * * * ** A B Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/-    # 	   50	                                                Fed Fasted050010001500GIP (pg/ml)***********Fed Fasted050010001500Ghrelin (pg/ml)Fed Fasted050010001500IL-6 (pg/ml)Fed Fasted01000200030004000Leptin (pg/ml)**Fed Fasted050100150200PYY (pg/ml)******Fed Fasted05000100001500020000Resistin (pg/ml)0200400600800100053 WeeksPlasma IGF-1 (ng/ml)*****0.00.51.01.553 WeeksPlasma GH (ng/ml)***A B C E D F G H Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- 	   51	  Figure 3.6 Fed and 4-hr fasted A) leptin, B) glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) hormone, C) interleukin-6 (IL-6), D) ghrelin, E) peptide YY (PYY) and F) Resistin in 48 week-old, ad lib. or 40% calorie-restricted Ins2-/- female mice. G) 4-hr fasted IGF-1 and D) growth hormone at indicated age. Results are mean ± SEM with n=4-25  per group. Statistical significance indicated by * for p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.         Figure 3.7 A) Lean mass, B) fat mass, C) body fat, E) bone mass density (BMD) of 48-week old Ins2-/- female mice fed chow diet ad libitum or subjected to 40% calorie restriction starting at 13 weeks old. Each value represents mean ± SEM of data from 5-7 mice. Asterisks (*) denote level of statistical significance between mice of same genotype on different diets. * p<0.05, **p<0.01. § denotes statistical difference p<0.05 between groups on same diet with different genotypes.  0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 BMD (g/cm3 ) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Lean mass (g) ** * 0 1 2 3 4 5 Fat mass (g) § * 0 5 10 15 20 25 % Body Fat * Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Pair-restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- A B C D 	   52	    Figure 3.8 4-hr fasting plasma A) non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs), B) cholesterol and C) triglycerides in 48-week old Ins2-/- female mice fed chow diet ad libitum or subjected to 40% caloric restriction starting at 13 weeks old. Each value represents mean ± SEM of data from 3-6 mice. Asterisks (*) denote level of statistical significance between mice of same genotype on different diets. * p<0.05, **p<0.01.              0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 NEFA (mM) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Cholesterol (mg/dL) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 TGs (mg/dL) ** * A B C 	  	  	  	  Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- 	   53	              0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Liver  Kidneys  Heart  Inguinal Gonadal Mesenteric BAT  % Body Weight * ** * *** § 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 BAT  % Body Weight p=0.0515 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Liver  Kidneys  Heart  Inguinal Gonadal Mesenteric BAT  Tissue mass (g) *** *** * ** *** 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 BAT  Tissue Mass (g) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Liver  Kidneys  Heart  Inguinal Gonadal Mesenteric BAT  % Body Weight * * * ** ** ** *** ** 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 BAT  % Body Weight ** *** 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Liver  Kidneys  Heart  Inguinal Gonadal Mesenteric BAT  Tissue mass (g) ** ** * *** ** * * ** 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 BAT   Tissue Mass (g) * ** A B C D Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- 	   54	  Figure 3.9 A) and C) Relative organ, B) and D) wet tissue masses of 66 and 106-week old (respectively) female Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- littermates fed chow diet ad libitum or subjected to 40% calorie restriction. Each value represents mean ± SEM of data, n=4-9. Asterisks (*) denote level of statistical significance (2-way ANOVA multiple comparisons) between mice of same genotype on different diets. * p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. § denotes statistical difference p<0.05 between groups on same diet with different genotypes. BAT, brown adipose tissue.    	  	       Figure 3.10 Mean light and dark phase A) energy expenditure normalized to lean body mass, B) energy expenditure and C) respiratory exchange ratio (RER) in 58-week old Ins2-/- female mice fed chow diet ad libitum or subjected to 40% caloric restriction starting at 13 weeks old. Results are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) obtained over two light and three dark cycles with n=3-4  per group. Statistical significance indicated by * for p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.   Day Night0102030EE/lean mass (kcal/h/kg)**********Day Night0.70.80.91.01.1RER (VCO2/CO2)******Day Night0.00.10.20.30.40.5EE (kcal/h)*********** ****p = 0.08A B C Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- 	   55	  	    Figure 3.11 A) Energy expenditure normalized to lean body mass and B) respiratory exchange ratio (RER) in 58-week old Ins2-/- female mice fed chow diet ad libitum or subjected to 40% caloric restriction starting at 13 weeks old. Results are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) obtained over two light and three dark cycles with n=3-4  per group. Statistical significance indicated by * for p<0.05. Meal times indicated for calorie-restricted mice.  0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 EE/kg lean mass (kcal/h/kg) Time Dark Light meal meal meal 	   	  * * 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 RER (VCO2/VO2) Time Dark Light meal meal meal 	   * 	   	  * * 	   * A B Ad libitum Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Ad libitum Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- Calorie restricted Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- 	   56	  Chapter 4: Discussion 4.1 Caloric restriction has minimal effects on circulating insulin in reduced insulin gene dosage mice  The goal of the present study was evaluate the effects of caloric restriction in the context of reduced insulin gene dosage. The circulating insulin levels of Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/-Ins2-/- mice were very low, approximately 20-60% that of ad lib. fed wildtype mice of similar background. Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- and Ins1+/-Ins2-/- mice maintain similar fasting insulin levels whether fed ad lib. or a calorie-restricted diet. However, at one-year caloric restriction prevented an age-related decrease in fasting insulin in Ins1+/-Ins2-/- mice. Comparatively, female Ins2-/- mice fed a high-fat diet also did not elicit changes in fasting insulin85. These data suggest the islets of these mice are not significantly affected by diet and are able to maintain physiological levels of insulin whether stressed with energy restriction or energy excess.  4.2  Effects of caloric restriction and reduced insulin gene dosage on glucose homeostasis  One of the most prevalent and consistent findings in animal models or human studies of caloric restriction is a significant improvement in glucoregulation and insulin sensitivity. In the present study, decreases in fasting glucose and increases in glucose tolerance were consistent with previous findings. In contrast these same mice had no glucose tolerance difference when challenged with a high fat diet85. Blood glucose levels in response to insulin 	   57	  injection were significantly different between ad lib. and calorie-restricted animals. Under certain manipulations of the data, such as a calculation of area over the curve, it might appear as though caloric restriction decreased insulin sensitivity in these mice. Similar to the transient insulin resistance observed previously in young high fat fed Ins2-/- mice85. However, this conclusion would be misplaced, as all mice reach a similar minimal blood glucose concentration. The major difference in the calorie-restricted animals’ response was a rapid and substantial increase in blood glucose after this minimal glucose level. This minimal level begins to approach levels likely able to induce a hypoglycemic response. It is possible that due to long-term caloric restriction and regular exposure to long-term daily fasting where their blood glucose levels may approach glucopenic levels they have developed a more robust, effective counterregulatory response to decreasing blood glucose. It would be interesting to determine whether this effect is primarily due to catecholamines or glucagon.  Insulin secretion dynamics in response to glucose administration demonstrate β-cell glucose responsiveness. These data in conjunction with glucose tolerance measurement and an insulin sensitivity test provide a snapshot of whole-body glucose metabolism. Despite improved glucose tolerance under caloric restriction and no apparent differences in insulin sensitivity, no difference in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was observed. This begs the question, how are these energy deficient mice more rapidly dispensing circulating glucose with no increases in insulin sensitivity with a similar insulin response to glucose?  There are a few possible answers. The first 	   58	  being that the maximal insulin response of calorie-restricted mice is missed in the time intervals measured (as insulin has a short half-life ~4-6 minutes). The amount of glucose injected due to body weight differences could be the reason blood glucose concentration in the smaller, calorie-restricted mice is more rapidly decreased. However, the difference in body weight is minimal (~20%) and the difference in peak glucose concentration more significant (~40%). Another possibility is that insulin independent glucose uptake is higher in the calorie-restricted mice, such that the rate of glucose uptake is increased with no effect on insulin sensitivity.  It has been previously reported that Gip exerts effects other than glucose-dependent insulin secretion potentiation, including increasing murine skeletal muscle glucose uptake independent of insulin309,310. Similarly leptin is able to increase 2-deoxyglucose uptake into several tissues, including skeletal muscle and BAT, independent of insulin action108,170,311,312. As increased fasting and fed levels of leptin and Gip levels were observed as a result of caloric restriction in low insulin mice it may be possible that these hormones are promoting insulin-independent glucose uptake.  In most studies, the beneficial effects of caloric restriction on glucoregulation are attributed to decreases in circulating insulin and leptin. However, in our model, circulating insulin is affected only as a function of Ins1 gene dosage, where 1-year old Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice have decreased fasting insulin compared to Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- littermates. It is therefore possible that the Ins2-/- mice are operating at a physiological ‘insulin-floor’ where any decreases could result 	   59	  in a type 2 diabetes-like state where insufficient insulin is produced. This may be what occurs in ad lib.-fed male Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice that spontaneously develop persistent hyperglycemia (observation from breeding colony). Interestingly, caloric restriction instead prevented an age-related decrease in fasting insulin in Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice. These data suggest that other endocrine factors such as adipokines or enteroendocrine and sympathetic nervous system activity may have equally important functions in mediating beneficial glucoregulatory effects of caloric restriction in our model.   4.3 Paradoxical increase in both subcutaneous white and interscapular brown adipose tissue due to caloric restriction in Ins2-/- female mice  It was well established that moderate to severe caloric restriction had very strong, rapid and consistent effects on body composition including decreases in body fat mass and content as well as decreases in lean mass233,248,294-296. These effects were primarily attributed to decreases in energy intake, as it has been found that resting energy expenditure in calorie restricted animals is much higher than predicted by their decreased mass313. However in this study, despite a relatively constant reduction in body mass maintained at ~15-20% less than ad lib. controls, mice on long-term  caloric restriction sustained increases in total fat mass and content as well as decreases in lean mass. This could in part be attributed to the decreased energy expenditure per unit lean mass observed during the light phase in the calorie-restricted mice. Although paradoxical, especially in mice with genetically lowered anabolic insulin, where one might 	   60	  have expected a more drastic fat loss, the increased circulating triglycerides suggest increased de novo lipogenesis from the liver and associated lipid trafficking. Integrating the metabolic cage data suggests that the circulating lipid profiles of these mice likely change depending on the time of day as RER cycles according to feeding time. As the plasma samples examined were obtained during the middle of the light phase, when the calorie-restricted mice are primarily using carbohydrates as fuel and the ad lib. mice fatty acids, it may be slightly less surprising that their circulating triglycerides are significantly higher at this time. Additionally it is very interesting to note that these mice have increased fasting leptin levels despite being on a calorie-restricted diet, which has been repeatedly shown to decrease circulating leptin levels234,274,295,314. As fat mass and leptin increased in these mice on caloric restriction it is clear that calorie-restriction itself does not function directly to alter leptin levels. Instead caloric restriction likely acts indirectly by decreasing fat mass which would result in a decrease in leptin. This being the first study able to differentiate an energy restriction and fat mass effect on circulating leptin.  Mice on caloric restriction are known to have significant gene expression changes, especially genes encoding glucose, lipid and mitochondrial metabolism315. In WAT of calorie-restricted rats there is an increase in proteins involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, glucose and lipid metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis316,317. Okita et al. also noted that their calorie-restricted rats had smaller white adipocytes and smaller WAT size316. Thus it may be that these processes are also augmented in this model and the diet or lack of Ins2 	   61	  permits for more efficient storage such that even on calorie-restriction these mice store more fat than their ad lib. littermates. We are only aware of a single other publication wherein energy restriction was reported to lead to an increase in body fat and simultaneous decrease in lean mass297. It should be noted that the publication reported on female C57BL/6J mice (a similar background to the mice in our study) and that the ‘caloric restriction’ diet was short (3-4 weeks) and un-restrictive (5% caloric restriction)297. A potential mechanism in fat accumulation in our female Ins2-/- mice on caloric restriction may include a strong Gip component. It is likely if glucose was administered orally instead of injected into the peritoneal space the insulin secretion profile would differ between that ad lib. and calorie-restricted mice due to the significant difference observed in their fed Gip levels. Insulin has been found to inhibit Gip secretion in humans and rats318,319, suggesting that Ins2-/-  mice might be more primed for increased Gip production due to their low insulin levels318,319. Gip also plays a role in glucose uptake and incorporation into lipids, increasing lipoprotein lipase activity, stimulating fatty acid synthesis as well as lipolysis in adipose tissue310,320-328. Gip may also play an important role in maintaining circulating non-esterified fatty acids at appropriate levels during fasting327. Lipolysis induced by Gip is inhibited by insulin327. Several studies in Gip receptor knockout mice found that Gip has no effect on body weight, but Gip deficient mice had reduced adiposity on high fat diet329,330. Even when placed on a chow diet Gip receptor knockout mice exhibit decreased body, visceral and subcutaneous fat331.Thus, it is possible that the increased Gip found in calorie-	   62	  restricted Ins2-/- mice is acting on adipocytes to induce triglyceride storage and increasing WAT size. The Gip fat storage signal in conjunction with postprandial surges of insulin could strongly induce lipid storage mechanisms promoting efficient energy storage in WAT of our calorie-restricted mice.   Ins2-/- mice on caloric restriction maintain lower energy expenditure per unit lean mass during the end of the dark phase and beginning of light phase despite increased levels of leptin, known for its energy expenditure increasing effects. Unlike in the male Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- high-fat fed mice that exhibited increased energy expenditure compared to Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- littermates85, no difference in genotype dependent energy expenditure was observed in the female Ins2-/- mice. This discrepancy is likely due to significant diet or housing differences. A potential mechanism for the observed decrease in energy expenditure due to caloric restriction is the induction of torpor. Torpor is a daily hypometabolic state that can be incurred by low ambient temperatures or by energy restriction in heterotherms near the end of night where body temperature is lowered below 30°C temporarily to decrease resting metabolic rate and thus energy expenditure332. Torpor may also explain the increased BAT size observed in the calorie-restricted Ins2-/- mice.  The mechanisms by which torpor is controlled are not fully elucidated but a role for leptin and the arcuate nucleus have some merit333,334. Leptin has been shown to blunt the entrance of torpor in calorie-restricted mice, whereas NPY injected into the brains of Siberian hamster initiates a torpor-like state277,335. There are also leptin-independent mechanisms that induce torpor that likely involve glucose sensing in the brain304,336,337. The 	   63	  rapid return of body temperature to normal levels requires BAT stimulation, likely by activation of β-adrenergic receptor stimulation via the sympathetic nervous system334,338,339. BAT is known to undergo hyperplasia as a result of sympathetic nerve stimulation usually in circumstances of low ambient temperatures172,340,341. Although body temperature was not explicitly measured the energy expenditure profile exhibits the characteristics of daily torpor and when calorie-restricted mice were handled in the morning their body temperature was noticeably lower than ad lib. mice by touch. The calorie-restricted mice were also quite lethargic at this time. It is possible that the daily induction of torpor, and the resulting exit of torpor requiring BAT stimulation, may be responsible for the significant increase in BAT mass seen in calorie-restricted mice as torpor-like energy expenditure cycle is not evident in ad lib. mice. It would be interesting to verify body temperature cycling of these mice to determine if torpor is truly induced in these mice. Similarly whether leptin cycles according to daily energy expenditure in these mice to determine what likely mechanism is involved in torpor induction. Understanding BAT physiology is of clinical significance as it could provide methods for safely treating obesity by increasing energy expenditure.  4.4 Summary The significant differences in response to caloric restriction observed in these mice compared to previous studies provides exciting opportunities to learn more about the interactions of diet and physiology. Significantly, caloric restriction prevented age-related decrease in insulin of Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice 	   64	  compared to Ins1+/+:Ins2-/- littermates and the well established decrease in fasting insulin due to caloric restriction was not observed in this model. This suggests that the insulin reducing effect of caloric restriction is dependent on physiological need rather than a direct insulin reducing effect on the β-cell. The majority of effects observed were a result of caloric restriction and not Ins gene dosage. These include decreased fasting and fed glucose, increased glucose tolerance without changing whole-body insulin sensitivity or insulin secretion dynamics, decreased daytime but not nighttime energy expenditure normalized to fat-free/lean body mass with no alterations in daily fuel use type. Although perhaps the most interesting results were those that were truly unexpected, such as the increased total body fat, with a primary increase in subcutaneous white and interscapular BAT in long-term calorie-restricted female Ins2-/- mice. This was accompanied by increases in circulating triglycerides, Gip and leptin levels. These novel data suggest caloric restriction itself does not directly alter leptin levels but does so by altering fat mass and that the glucoregulatory and fat storage outcomes typical of caloric restriction depend on decreasing circulating insulin levels.  4.5 Limitations and future directions  Grasping the relationship between the endocrine system and long-term diet on aging and energy metabolism is necessary to discover ways to prevent or slow the progression of age-related diseases. The endocrine system and specifically insulin are known to play significant roles in regulating aging. 	   65	  Similarly caloric restriction is known to extend lifespan under most experimental conditions. Determining the physiological effect of caloric restriction on mice with reduced insulin gene dosage is poised to provide new insights on the interaction of this lifespan extending diet and endocrine regulation.  The data acquired in this study provide the first step in understand how a long-term calorie-restricted diet alters the physiology of Ins2 deficient mice. A caveat of the study is that it was not possible to distinguish whether the paradigm altering results were primarily an effect of the mice lacking the Ins2 gene as there was no fully wildtype littermate control. This control could have provided some answers regarding the effects of caloric restriction on circulating insulin as the effects of this diet differ depending on mouse strain and genotype. Additionally it would be very interesting to determine whether the fat phenotype observed in these mice is indeed a function of the Ins2 knockout by the addition of wildtype controls. However, the logistics of including this control would have required extensive breeding colonies as it would require breeding double het Ins1+/-:Ins2+/- mice in order to maintain the gold standard of littermate controls. This would imply some genotypes would only arise with a 1:16 frequency not including a further split by sex. Additionally the number of mice per group would have been unmanageable for one person. The majority of caloric restriction studies have been performed on male C57BL/6 mice. However in most longevity studies with genetically altered insulin-related proteins a more robust lifespan extension is observed in female mice. Additionally male Ins1+/-:Ins2-/- mice can on occasion spontaneously develop 	   66	  hyperglycemia by 15 weeks of age. This phenotype developed after a switch from a conventional to a pathogen free animal facility after these mice were used previously by Mehran et al. 85. Using female mice has the caveat of estrogen cycling, which can also be altered in caloric restriction342. However estrogen cycling is not expected to have a significant impact on this study. Another minor caveat that simply implies the results may not be as readily extrapolated to males is due to the sexual dimorphic effects on body weight management, fat storage and lipid profiles181,343-345. Interestingly, in one study female mice on caloric restriction preferentially maintained subcutaneous fat over visceral fat whereas male mice lost both equally344.  Some of the methods for measurements of glucose metabolism were limited, including the insulin tolerance test as measure of insulin sensitivity as it does not distinguish tissue-dependent differences. However, in order to assess insulin sensitivity the most accurately requires a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, which is usually a terminal procedure. As we endeavoured to follow our mice longitudinally, this option was not available.  There were also caveats with regards to measuring tissue expansion. For instance, wet tissue weight is an indirect indication of triglyceride content but does not distinguish functional changes in BAT.  There is no set method on how to best administer food under caloric restriction. In our study we aimed to best approach normal murine nocturnal feeding times. This is likely an improvement on other studies that normally feed their calorie-restricted animals one bolus food during light phase. However, no 	   67	  effect on the lifespan extension effect of caloric restriction is seen due to altered feeding time, however energy expenditure and body temperature coupling are changed depending on feeding time, which may have had an impact on the results obtained346.   Many further exciting questions have arisen from the results of the work in this thesis. It might be prudent to determine the histology of several tissues, including determining the size distribution and mitochondrial content of white and brown adipocytes as this may denote altered function as well as distinguish hypertrophy from hyperplasia of adipocytes in the calorie-restricted mice. Immunohistochemical staining for Gip receptor in adipose tissue as well as determining K cell number may help establish role and source of increased circulating Gip in calorie-restricted mice. Insulin and Gip secretion could be measured in response to either re-fed or glucose gavaged animals to establish the physiological relevance of these adiposity signals to fat mass control in our model. Validation of torpor by circadian body temperature measurements and adrenergic receptor staining would provide a stronger basis for potential method of increased BAT size. Finally it would be interesting to determine expression levels of lipogenic and lipolytic in WAT, BAT and liver of these mice to further establish hypothesized mechanisms for paradoxical fat increases.   Despite the caveats and need for future studies the present work advances our understanding of how caloric restriction affects mice in a new endocrine context of reduced insulin gene dosage.   	   68	  Bibliography 1. Nolan CJ, Damm P, Prentki M. Type 2 diabetes across generations: from pathophysiology to prevention and management. Lancet. 2011;378(9786):169-181. 2. Ashcroft FM, Rorsman P. Diabetes mellitus and the beta cell: the last ten years. Cell. 2012;148(6):1160-1171. 3. Langerhans P. Ueber die Nervender Menschlichen Haut. Virchows Arch [B]. 1868;44:325-337. 4. von Mering JV, Minkowski O. Diabetes mellitus nach Pankrcasexstirpation. Zbl Kiln Med. 1889;10:393. 5. Bliss M. The discovery of insulin: the inside story. Publ Am Inst Hist Pharm. 1997;16:93-99. 6. Pierce SB, Costa M, Wisotzkey R, et al. Regulation of DAF-2 receptor signaling by human insulin and ins-1, a member of the unusually large and diverse C. elegans insulin gene family. Genes & development. 2001;15(6):672-686. 7. Tatar M, Bartke A, Antebi A. The endocrine regulation of aging by insulin-like signals. Science. 2003;299(5611):1346-1351. 8. Geminard C, Arquier N, Layalle S, et al. Control of Metabolism and Growth Through Insulin-Like Peptides in Drosophila. Diabetes. 2006;55(Supplement 2):S5-S8. 	   69	  9. Tatar M, Kopelman A, Epstein D, Tu MP, Yin CM, Garofalo RS. A mutant Drosophila insulin receptor homolog that extends life-span and impairs neuroendocrine function. Science. 2001;292(5514):107-110. 10. Brogiolo W, Stocker H, Ikeya T, Rintelen F, Fernandez R, Hafen E. An evolutionarily conserved function of the Drosophila insulin receptor and insulin-like peptides in growth control. Current biology : CB. 2001;11(4):213-221. 11. Rulifson EJ, Kim SK, Nusse R. Ablation of insulin-producing neurons in flies: growth and diabetic phenotypes. Science. 2002;296(5570):1118-1120. 12. Li W, Kennedy SG, Ruvkun G. daf-28 encodes a C. elegans insulin superfamily member that is regulated by environmental cues and acts in the DAF-2 signaling pathway. Genes & development. 2003;17(7):844-858. 13. Cornils A, Gloeck M, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Alcedo J. Specific insulin-like peptides encode sensory information to regulate distinct developmental processes. Development. 2011;138(6):1183-1193. 14. Murphy CT, Lee SJ, Kenyon C. Tissue entrainment by feedback regulation of insulin gene expression in the endoderm of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(48):19046-19050. 	   70	  15. Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R. A C-Elegans Mutant That Lives Twice as Long as Wild-Type. Nature. 1993;366(6454):461-464. 16. Broughton SJ, Piper MD, Ikeya T, et al. Longer lifespan, altered metabolism, and stress resistance in Drosophila from ablation of cells making insulin-like ligands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(8):3105-3110. 17. Nakae J, Kido Y, Accili D. Distinct and overlapping functions of insulin and IGF-I receptors. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(6):818-835. 18. Siddle K. Signalling by insulin and IGF receptors: supporting acts and new players. Journal of molecular endocrinology. 2011;47(1):R1-10. 19. Steiner DF, Oyer PE. The biosynthesis of insulin and a probable precursor of insulin by a human islet cell adenoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1967;57(2):473-480. 20. Davidson HW. (Pro)Insulin processing: a historical perspective. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2004;40(3 Suppl):143-158. 21. Emdin SO, Dodson GG, Cutfield JM, Cutfield SM. Role of zinc in insulin biosynthesis. Some possible zinc-insulin interactions in the pancreatic B-cell. Diabetologia. 1980;19(3):174-182. 22. Gold G, Grodsky GM. Kinetic aspects of compartmental storage and secretion of insulin and zinc. Experientia. 1984;40(10):1105-1114. 	   71	  23. Wang M, Li J, Lim GE, Johnson JD. Is dynamic autocrine insulin signaling possible? A mathematical model predicts picomolar concentrations of extracellular monomeric insulin within human pancreatic islets. PloS one. 2013;8(6):e64860. 24. Andrali SS, Sampley ML, Vanderford NL, Ozcan S. Glucose regulation of insulin gene expression in pancreatic beta-cells. The Biochemical journal. 2008;415(1):1-10. 25. Melloul D, Marshak S, Cerasi E. Regulation of insulin gene transcription. Diabetologia. 2002;45(3):309-326. 26. Hanahan D. Heritable formation of pancreatic beta-cell tumours in transgenic mice expressing recombinant insulin/simian virus 40 oncogenes. Nature. 1985;315(6015):115-122. 27. Ohneda K, Ee H, German M. Regulation of insulin gene transcription. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2000;11(4):227-233. 28. Hay CW, Docherty K. Comparative analysis of insulin gene promoters: implications for diabetes research. Diabetes. 2006;55(12):3201-3213. 29. Song YD, Lee EJ, Yashar P, Pfaff LE, Kim SY, Jameson JL. Islet cell differentiation in liver by combinatorial expression of transcription factors neurogenin-3, BETA2, and RIPE3b1. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2007;354(2):334-339. 30. Ohneda K, Mirmira RG, Wang J, Johnson JD, German MS. The homeodomain of PDX-1 mediates multiple protein-protein interactions in 	   72	  the formation of a transcriptional activation complex on the insulin promoter. Molecular and cellular biology. 2000;20(3):900-911. 31. Matsuoka TA, Kaneto H, Stein R, et al. MafA regulates expression of genes important to islet beta-cell function. Molecular endocrinology. 2007;21(11):2764-2774. 32. Kataoka K. Multiple mechanisms and functions of maf transcription factors in the regulation of tissue-specific genes. Journal of biochemistry. 2007;141(6):775-781. 33. Aramata S, Han SI, Kataoka K. Roles and regulation of transcription factor MafA in islet beta-cells. Endocrine journal. 2007;54(5):659-666. 34. Chu K, Nemoz-Gaillard E, Tsai MJ. BETA2 and pancreatic islet development. Recent progress in hormone research. 2001;56:23-46. 35. Naya FJ, Stellrecht CM, Tsai MJ. Tissue-specific regulation of the insulin gene by a novel basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor. Genes & development. 1995;9(8):1009-1019. 36. Chae JH, Stein GH, Lee JE. NeuroD: the predicted and the surprising. Molecules and cells. 2004;18(3):271-288. 37. Kaneto H, Miyatsuka T, Shiraiwa T, et al. Crucial role of PDX-1 in pancreas development, beta-cell differentiation, and induction of surrogate beta-cells. Current medicinal chemistry. 2007;14(16):1745-1752. 	   73	  38. Kaneto H, Miyatsuka T, Fujitani Y, et al. Role of PDX-1 and MafA as a potential therapeutic target for diabetes. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2007;77 Suppl 1:S127-137. 39. Melloul D. Transcription factors in islet development and physiology: role of PDX-1 in beta-cell function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2004;1014:28-37. 40. Ashizawa S, Brunicardi FC, Wang XP. PDX-1 and the pancreas. Pancreas. 2004;28(2):109-120. 41. Hui H, Perfetti R. Pancreas duodenum homeobox-1 regulates pancreas development during embryogenesis and islet cell function in adulthood. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2002;146(2):129-141. 42. McKinnon CM, Docherty K. Pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1, PDX-1, a major regulator of beta cell identity and function. Diabetologia. 2001;44(10):1203-1214. 43. Sander M, German MS. The beta cell transcription factors and development of the pancreas. Journal of molecular medicine. 1997;75(5):327-340. 44. Barrow J, Hay CW, Ferguson LA, Docherty HM, Docherty K. Transcription factor cycling on the insulin promoter. FEBS letters. 2006;580(2):711-715. 45. Lebrun P, Montminy MR, Van Obberghen E. Regulation of the pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 protein by DNA-dependent protein kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2005;280(46):38203-38210. 	   74	  46. Mosley AL, Ozcan S. The pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 protein (Pdx-1) interacts with histone deacetylases Hdac-1 and Hdac-2 on low levels of glucose. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279(52):54241-54247. 47. Gao Y, Miyazaki J, Hart GW. The transcription factor PDX-1 is post-translationally modified by O-linked N-acetylglucosamine and this modification is correlated with its DNA binding activity and insulin secretion in min6 beta-cells. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 2003;415(2):155-163. 48. Elrick LJ, Docherty K. Phosphorylation-dependent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1. Diabetes. 2001;50(10):2244-2252. 49. Harmon JS, Gleason CE, Tanaka Y, Oseid EA, Hunter-Berger KK, Robertson RP. In vivo prevention of hyperglycemia also prevents glucotoxic effects on PDX-1 and insulin gene expression. Diabetes. 1999;48(10):1995-2000. 50. Petersen HV, Peshavaria M, Pedersen AA, et al. Glucose stimulates the activation domain potential of the PDX-1 homeodomain transcription factor. FEBS letters. 1998;431(3):362-366. 51. Matsuoka TA, Zhao L, Artner I, et al. Members of the large Maf transcription family regulate insulin gene transcription in islet beta cells. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003;23(17):6049-6062. 52. Olbrot M, Rud J, Moss LG, Sharma A. Identification of beta-cell-specific insulin gene transcription factor RIPE3b1 as mammalian MafA. 	   75	  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(10):6737-6742. 53. Kataoka K, Han SI, Shioda S, Hirai M, Nishizawa M, Handa H. MafA is a glucose-regulated and pancreatic beta-cell-specific transcriptional activator for the insulin gene. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277(51):49903-49910. 54. Petersen HV, Jensen JN, Stein R, Serup P. Glucose induced MAPK signalling influences NeuroD1-mediated activation and nuclear localization. FEBS letters. 2002;528(1-3):241-245. 55. Vanderford NL, Andrali SS, Ozcan S. Glucose induces MafA expression in pancreatic beta cell lines via the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(3):1577-1584. 56. Andrali SS, Qian Q, Ozcan S. Glucose mediates the translocation of NeuroD1 by O-linked glycosylation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(21):15589-15596. 57. Luciani DS, Johnson JD. Acute effects of insulin on beta-cells from transplantable human islets. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2005;241(1-2):88-98. 58. Seufert J, Kieffer TJ, Habener JF. Leptin inhibits insulin gene transcription and reverses hyperinsulinemia in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96(2):674-679. 	   76	  59. Laubner K, Kieffer TJ, Lam NT, Niu X, Jakob F, Seufert J. Inhibition of preproinsulin gene expression by leptin induction of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 in pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes. 2005;54(12):3410-3417. 60. Kakita K, Giddings S, Permutt MA. Biosynthesis of rat insulins I and II: evidence for differential expression of the two genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1982;79(9):2803-2807. 61. Buteau J, Roduit R, Susini S, Prentki M. Glucagon-like peptide-1 promotes DNA synthesis, activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and increases transcription factor pancreatic and duodenal homeobox gene 1 (PDX-1) DNA binding activity in beta (INS-1)-cells. Diabetologia. 1999;42(7):856-864. 62. Wang X, Zhou J, Doyle ME, Egan JM. Glucagon-like peptide-1 causes pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 protein translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of pancreatic beta-cells by a cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A-dependent mechanism. Endocrinology. 2001;142(5):1820-1827. 63. Stoffers DA, Kieffer TJ, Hussain MA, et al. Insulinotropic glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists stimulate expression of homeodomain protein IDX-1 and increase islet size in mouse pancreas. Diabetes. 2000;49(5):741-748. 64. Hussain MA, Habener JF. Glucagon-like peptide 1 increases glucose-dependent activity of the homeoprotein IDX-1 transactivating domain in 	   77	  pancreatic beta-cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2000;274(3):616-619. 65. Lee EK, Gorospe M. Minireview: posttranscriptional regulation of the insulin and insulin-like growth factor systems. Endocrinology. 2010;151(4):1403-1408. 66. Tillmar L, Welsh N. Hypoxia may increase rat insulin mRNA levels by promoting binding of the polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB) to the pyrimidine-rich insulin mRNA 3'-untranslated region. Molecular medicine. 2002;8(5):263-272. 67. Welsh M, Nielsen DA, MacKrell AJ, Steiner DF. Control of insulin gene expression in pancreatic beta-cells and in an insulin-producing cell line, RIN-5F cells. II. Regulation of insulin mRNA stability. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1985;260(25):13590-13594. 68. Wicksteed B, Herbert TP, Alarcon C, Lingohr MK, Moss LG, Rhodes CJ. Cooperativity between the preproinsulin mRNA untranslated regions is necessary for glucose-stimulated translation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276(25):22553-22558. 69. Wicksteed B, Uchizono Y, Alarcon C, McCuaig JF, Shalev A, Rhodes CJ. A cis-element in the 5' untranslated region of the preproinsulin mRNA (ppIGE) is required for glucose regulation of proinsulin translation. Cell metabolism. 2007;5(3):221-227. 	   78	  70. Jahr H, Schroder D, Ziegler B, Ziegler M, Zuhlke H. Transcriptional and translational control of glucose-stimulated (pro)insulin biosynthesis. Eur J Biochem. 1980;110:499-505. 71. Floyd Jr JC, Fajans SS, Conn JW, Knopf RF, Rull J. Stimulation of Insulin Secretion by Amino Acids. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1996;45(9):1487-1502. 72. Nolan CJ, Madiraju MSR, Delghingaro-Augusto V, Peyot ML, Prentki M. Fatty Acid Signaling in the  -Cell and Insulin Secretion. Diabetes. 2006;55(Supplement 2):S16-S23. 73. Rorsman P, Braun M. Regulation of insulin secretion in human pancreatic islets. Annual review of physiology. 2013;75:155-179. 74. De Vos A, Heimberg H, Quartier E, et al. Human and Rat Beta Cells Differ in Glucose Transporter but Not in Glucokinase Gene Expression. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1995;96:2489-2495. 75. Alfa RW, Park S, Skelly KR, et al. Suppression of insulin production and secretion by a decretin hormone. Cell metabolism. 2015;21(2):323-333. 76. Campbell JE, Drucker DJ. Pharmacology, physiology, and mechanisms of incretin hormone action. Cell metabolism. 2013;17(6):819-837. 77. Lam NT, Cheung AT, Riedel MJ, Light PE, Cheeseman CI, Kieffer TJ. Leptin reduces glucose transport and cellular ATP levels in INS-1 beta-cells. Journal of molecular endocrinology. 2004;32(2):415-424. 	   79	  78. Kieffer TJ, Heller RS, Leech CA, Holz GG, Habener JF. Leptin suppression of insulin secretion by the activation of ATP-sensitive K+ channels in pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes. 1997;46(6):1087-1093. 79. Emilsson V, Liu YL, Cawthorne MA, Morton NM, Davenport M. Expression of the functional leptin receptor mRNA in pancreatic islets and direct inhibitory action of leptin on insulin secretion. Diabetes. 1997;46(2):313-316. 80. Kulkarni RN, Wang ZL, Wang RM, et al. Leptin rapidly suppresses insulin release from insulinoma cells, rat and human islets and, in vivo, in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1997;100(11):2729-2736. 81. Denroche HC, Huynh FK, Kieffer TJ. The role of leptin in glucose homeostasis. Journal of diabetes investigation. 2012;3(2):115-129. 82. Shiao MS, Liao BY, Long M, Yu HT. Adaptive evolution of the insulin two-gene system in mouse. Genetics. 2008;178(3):1683-1691. 83. Soares MB, Schon E, Henderson A, et al. RNA-mediated gene duplication: the rat preproinsulin I gene is a functional retroposon. Molecular and cellular biology. 1985;5(8):2090-2103. 84. Wentworth BM, Schaefer IM, Villa-Komaroff L, Chirgwin JM. Characterization of the two nonallelic genes encoding mouse preproinsulin. Journal of molecular evolution. 1986;23(4):305-312. 85. Mehran AE, Templeman NM, Brigidi GS, et al. Hyperinsulinemia drives diet-induced obesity independently of brain insulin production. Cell metabolism. 2012;16(6):723-737. 	   80	  86. Babaya N, Nakayama M, Moriyama H, et al. A new model of insulin-deficient diabetes: male NOD mice with a single copy of Ins1 and no Ins2. Diabetologia. 2006;49(6):1222-1228. 87. Chentoufi AA, Polychronakos C. Insulin expression levels in the thymus modulate insulin-specific autoreactive T-cell tolerance: the mechanism by which the IDDM2 locus may predispose to diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(5):1383-1390. 88. Thebault-Baumont K, Dubois-Laforgue D, Krief P, et al. Acceleration of type 1 diabetes mellitus in proinsulin 2-deficient NOD mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2003;111(6):851-857. 89. Leroux L, Desbois P, Lamotte L, et al. Compensatory responses in mice carrying a null mutation for Ins1 or Ins2. Diabetes. 2001;50:S150-S153. 90. Duvillie B, Cordonnier N, Deltour L, et al. Phenotypic alterations in insulin-deficient mutant mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(10):5137-5140. 91. Madadi G, Dalvi PS, Belsham DD. Regulation of brain insulin mRNA by glucose and glucagon-like peptide 1. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2008;376(4):694-699. 92. Saltiel AR, Kahn CR. Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature. 2001;414(6865):799-806. 93. Shanik MH, Xu Y, Skrha J, Dankner R, Zick Y, Roth J. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia: is hyperinsulinemia the cart or the horse? Diabetes care. 2008;31 Suppl 2:S262-268. 	   81	  94. Bruning JC, Michael MD, Winnay JN, et al. A muscle-specific insulin receptor knockout exhibits features of the metabolic syndrome of NIDDM without altering glucose tolerance. Molecular cell. 1998;2(5):559-569. 95. Michael MD, Kulkarni RN, Postic C, et al. Loss of insulin signaling in hepatocytes leads to severe insulin resistance and progressive hepatic dysfunction. Molecular cell. 2000;6(1):87-97. 96. Kulkarni RN, Bruning JC, Winnay JN, Postic C, Magnuson MA, Kahn CR. Tissue-specific knockout of the insulin receptor in pancreatic beta cells creates an insulin secretory defect similar to that in type 2 diabetes. Cell. 1999;96(3):329-339. 97. Bluher M, Michael MD, Peroni OD, et al. Adipose tissue selective insulin receptor knockout protects against obesity and obesity-related glucose intolerance. Developmental cell. 2002;3(1):25-38. 98. Bluher M, Kahn BB, Kahn CR. Extended longevity in mice lacking the insulin receptor in adipose tissue. Science. 2003;299(5606):572-574. 99. Bruning JC, Gautam D, Burks DJ, et al. Role of brain insulin receptor in control of body weight and reproduction. Science. 2000;289(5487):2122-2125. 100. Bunner AE, Chandrasekera PC, Barnard ND. Knockout mouse models of insulin signaling: Relevance past and future. World journal of diabetes. 2014;5(2):146-159. 101. Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. Biochemistry, Fifth Edition: International Version. W. H. Freeman; 2002. 	   82	  102. Fowler MJ. The Diabetes Treatment Trap: Hypoglycemia. Clinical Diabetes. 2011;29(1):36-39. 103. Gerich JE. Role of the kidney in normal glucose homeostasis and in the hyperglycaemia of diabetes mellitus: therapeutic implications. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2010;27(2):136-142. 104. Gerich JE. Physiology of glucose homeostasis. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2000;2:345-350. 105. Cryer PE. Glucose counterregulation: prevention and correction of hypoglycemia in humans. The American journal of physiology. 1993;264(2 Pt 1):E149-155. 106. Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. Adipocytes as regulators of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Nature. 2006;444(7121):847-853. 107. Pelleymounter MA, Cullen MJ, Baker MB, et al. Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice. Science. 1995;269(5223):540-543. 108. Kamohara S, Burcelin R, Halaas JL, Friedman JM, Charron MJ. Acute stimulation of glucose metabolism in mice by leptin treatment. Nature. 1997;389(6649):374-377. 109. Denroche HC, Levi J, Wideman RD, et al. Leptin therapy reverses hyperglycemia in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes, independent of hepatic leptin signaling. Diabetes. 2011;60(5):1414-1423. 	   83	  110. Levi J, Gray SL, Speck M, et al. Acute disruption of leptin signaling in vivo leads to increased insulin levels and insulin resistance. Endocrinology. 2011;152(9):3385-3395. 111. Wang MY, Chen L, Clark GO, et al. Leptin therapy in insulin-deficient type I diabetes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(11):4813-4819. 112. German JP, Thaler JP, Wisse BE, et al. Leptin activates a novel CNS mechanism for insulin-independent normalization of severe diabetic hyperglycemia. Endocrinology. 2011;152(2):394-404. 113. Yu X, Park BH, Wang MY, Wang ZV, Unger RH. Making insulin-deficient type 1 diabetic rodents thrive without insulin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(37):14070-14075. 114. Turer AT, Scherer PE. Adiponectin: mechanistic insights and clinical implications. Diabetologia. 2012;55(9):2319-2326. 115. Berg AH, Combs TP, Du X, Brownlee M, Scherer PE. The adipocyte-secreted protein Acrp30 enhances hepatic insulin action. Nat Med. 2001;7(8):947-953. 116. Ceddia RB, Somwar R, Maida A, Fang X, Bikopoulos G, Sweeney G. Globular adiponectin increases GLUT4 translocation and glucose uptake but reduces glycogen synthesis in rat skeletal muscle cells. Diabetologia. 2005;48(1):132-139. 	   84	  117. Wijesekara N, Krishnamurthy M, Bhattacharjee A, Suhail A, Sweeney G, Wheeler MB. Adiponectin-induced ERK and Akt phosphorylation protects against pancreatic beta cell apoptosis and increases insulin gene expression and secretion. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2010;285(44):33623-33631. 118. Roden M, Stingl H, Chandramouli V, et al. Effects of free fatty acid elevation on postabsorptive endogenous glucose production and gluconeogenesis in humans. Diabetes. 2000;49(5):701-707. 119. Roden M, Price TB, Perseghin G, et al. Mechanism of free fatty acid-induced insulin resistance in humans. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1996;97(12):2859-2865. 120. Eldor R, Raz I. Lipotoxicity versus adipotoxicity — the deleterious effects of adipose tissue on beta cells in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2006;74(2):S3-8. 121. Lowell BB, Shulman GI. Mitochondrial dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Science. 2005;307(5708):384-387. 122. Girard J. [Contribution of free fatty acids to impairment of insulin secretion and action. mechanism of beta-cell lipotoxicity]. Medecine sciences : M/S. 2005;21 Spec No:19-25. 123. Simha V, Garg A. Lipodystrophy: lessons in lipid and energy metabolism. Current opinion in lipidology. 2006;17(2):162-169. 124. Bray GA. Weight homeostasis. Annual review of medicine. 1991;42:205-216. 	   85	  125. Cummings DE, Schwartz MW. Genetics and pathophysiology of human obesity. Annual review of medicine. 2003;54:453-471. 126. Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M, Hirsch J. Changes in energy expenditure resulting from altered body weight. The New England journal of medicine. 1995;332(10):621-628. 127. Keesey RE, Hirvonen MD. Body weight set-points: determination and adjustment. J Nutr. 1997;127(9):1875S-1883S. 128. Cancello R, Tounian A, Poitou C, Clément K. Adiposity signals, genetic and body weight regulation in humans. Diabetes & metabolism. 2004;30(3):215-227. 129. Porte D, Jr., Woods SC. Regulation of food intake and body weight in insulin. Diabetologia. 1981;20 Suppl:274-280. 130. Sipols AJ, Baskin DG, Schwartz MW. Effect of intracerebroventricular insulin infusion on diabetic hyperphagia and hypothalamic neuropeptide gene expression. Diabetes. 1995;44(2):147-151. 131. Air EL, Strowski MZ, Benoit SC, et al. Small molecule insulin mimetics reduce food intake and body weight and prevent development of obesity. Nat Med. 2002;8(2):179-183. 132. Banks WA, Jaspan JB, Kastin AJ. Selective, physiological transport of insulin across the blood-brain barrier: novel demonstration by species-specific radioimmunoassays. Peptides. 1997;18(8):1257-1262. 	   86	  133. Banks WA, Jaspan JB, Huang W, Kastin AJ. Transport of insulin across the blood-brain barrier: saturability at euglycemic doses of insulin. Peptides. 1997;18(9):1423-1429. 134. Abbott MA, Wells DG, Fallon JR. The insulin receptor tyrosine kinase substrate p58/53 and the insulin receptor are components of CNS synapses. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1999;19(17):7300-7308. 135. Orosco M, Gerozissis K, Rouch C, Nicolaidis S. Feeding-related immunoreactive insulin changes in the PVN-VMH revealed by microdialysis. Brain research. 1995;671(1):149-158. 136. Singh BS, Rajakumar PA, Eves EM, Rosner MR, Wainer BH, Devaskar SU. Insulin gene expression in immortalized rat hippocampal and pheochromocytoma-12 cell lines. Regulatory peptides. 1997;69(1):7-14. 137. Schechter R, Sadiq HF, Devaskar SU. Insulin and insulin mRNA are detected in neuronal cell cultures maintained in an insulin-free/serum-free medium. The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society. 1990;38(6):829-836. 138. Clarke DW, Mudd L, Boyd FT, Jr., Fields M, Raizada MK. Insulin is released from rat brain neuronal cells in culture. Journal of neurochemistry. 1986;47(3):831-836. 139. Rother E, Belgardt BF, Tsaousidou E, et al. Acute selective ablation of rat insulin promoter-expressing (RIPHER) neurons defines their orexigenic 	   87	  nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(44):18132-18137. 140. Mayer CM, Belsham DD. Insulin directly regulates NPY and AgRP gene expression via the MAPK MEK/ERK signal transduction pathway in mHypoE-46 hypothalamic neurons. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2009;307(1-2):99-108. 141. Obici S, Feng Z, Karkanias G, Baskin DG, Rossetti L. Decreasing hypothalamic insulin receptors causes hyperphagia and insulin resistance in rats. Nature neuroscience. 2002;5(6):566-572. 142. Kennedy GC. The role of depot fat in the hypothalamic control of food intake in the rat. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a Biological character. Royal Society. 1953;140(901):578-596. 143. Coleman DL. Obese and diabetes: two mutant genes causing diabetes-obesity syndromes in mice. Diabetologia. 1978;14(3):141-148. 144. Zhang Y, Proenca R, Maffei M, Barone M, Leopold L, Friedman JM. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature. 1994;372(6505):425-432. 145. Tartaglia LA, Dembski M, Weng X, et al. Identification and expression cloning of a leptin receptor, OB-R. Cell. 1995;83(7):1263-1271. 146. Ahima RS, Flier JS. Leptin. Annual review of physiology. 2000;62:413-437. 	   88	  147. Chehab FF, Lim ME, Lu R. Correction of the sterility defect in homozygous obese female mice by treatment with the human recombinant leptin. Nat Genet. 1996;12(3):318-320. 148. Maffei M, Halaas J, Ravussin E, et al. Leptin levels in human and rodent: measurement of plasma leptin and ob RNA in obese and weight-reduced subjects. Nat Med. 1995;1(11):1155-1161. 149. Stunkard AJ, Harris JR, Pedersen NL, McClearn GE. The body-mass index of twins who have been reared apart. The New England journal of medicine. 1990;322(21):1483-1487. 150. Halaas JL, Gajiwala KS, Maffei M, et al. Weight-reducing effects of the plasma protein encoded by the obese gene. Science. 1995;269(5223):543-546. 151. Friedman JM, Halaas JL. Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature. 1998;395(6704):763-770. 152. Halaas JL, Boozer C, Blair-West J, Fidahusein N, Denton DA, Friedman JM. Physiological response to long-term peripheral and central leptin infusion in lean and obese mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(16):8878-8883. 153. Spiegelman BM, Flier JS. Adipogenesis and obesity: rounding out the big picture. Cell. 1996;87(3):377-389. 154. Elmquist JK, Elias CF, Saper CB. From lesions to leptin: hypothalamic control of food intake and body weight. Neuron. 1999;22(2):221-232. 	   89	  155. Dacks PA, Moreno CL, Kim ES, Marcellino BK, Mobbs CV. Role of the hypothalamus in mediating protective effects of dietary restriction during aging. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology. 2013;34(2):95-106. 156. Mobbs CV, Moreno CL, Poplawski M. Metabolic mystery: aging, obesity, diabetes, and the ventromedial hypothalamus. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM. 2013;24(10):488-494. 157. Carvalheira JB, Torsoni MA, Ueno M, et al. Cross-talk between the insulin and leptin signaling systems in rat hypothalamus. Obes Res. 2005;13(1):48-57. 158. Wang J, Leibowitz KL. Central insulin inhibits hypothalamic galanin and neuropeptide Y gene expression and peptide release in intact rats. Brain research. 1997;777(1-2):231-236. 159. Woods SC, Chavez M, Park CR, et al. The evaluation of insulin as a metabolic signal influencing behavior via the brain. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 1996;20(1):139-144. 160. Leibel RL. The role of leptin in the control of body weight. Nutrition reviews. 2002;60(10 Pt 2):S15-19; discussion S68-84, 85-17. 161. Spiegelman BM, Flier JS. Obesity and the regulation of energy balance. Cell. 2001;104(4):531-543. 162. Dunn-Meynell AA, Routh VH, Kang L, Gaspers L, Levin BE. Glucokinase is the likely mediator of glucosensing in both glucose-excited and glucose-inhibited central neurons. Diabetes. 2002;51(7):2056-2065. 	   90	  163. Oomura Y, Ono T, Ooyama H, Wayner MJ. Glucose and osmosensitive neurones of the rat hypothalamus. Nature. 1969;222(5190):282-284. 164. Orzi F, Lucignani G, Dow-Edwards D, et al. Local cerebral glucose utilization in controlled graded levels of hyperglycemia in the conscious rat. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 1988;8(3):346-356. 165. Song Z, Levin BE, McArdle JJ, Bakhos N, Routh VH. Convergence of pre- and postsynaptic influences on glucosensing neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus. Diabetes. 2001;50(12):2673-2681. 166. Yang XJ, Kow LM, Funabashi T, Mobbs CV. Hypothalamic glucose sensor: similarities to and differences from pancreatic beta-cell mechanisms. Diabetes. 1999;48(9):1763-1772. 167. Borg WP, Sherwin RS, During MJ, Borg MA, Shulman GI. Local ventromedial hypothalamus glucopenia triggers counterregulatory hormone release. Diabetes. 1995;44(2):180-184. 168. Borg MA, Sherwin RS, Borg WP, Tamborlane WV, Shulman GI. Local ventromedial hypothalamus glucose perfusion blocks counterregulation during systemic hypoglycemia in awake rats. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1997;99(2):361-365. 169. Borg WP, During MJ, Sherwin RS, Borg MA, Brines ML, Shulman GI. Ventromedial hypothalamic lesions in rats suppress counterregulatory 	   91	  responses to hypoglycemia. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1994;93(4):1677-1682. 170. Minokoshi Y, Haque MS, Shimazu T. Microinjection of leptin into the ventromedial hypothalamus increases glucose uptake in peripheral tissues in rats. Diabetes. 1999;48(2):287-291. 171. van de Wall E, Leshan R, Xu AW, et al. Collective and individual functions of leptin receptor modulated neurons controlling metabolism and ingestion. Endocrinology. 2008;149(4):1773-1785. 172. Himms-Hagen J. Brown adipose tissue metabolism and thermogenesis. Annual review of nutrition. 1985;5:69-94. 173. Lowell BB, Spiegelman BM. Towards a molecular understanding of adaptive thermogenesis. Nature. 2000;404(6778):652-660. 174. Virtanen KA, Lidell ME, Orava J, et al. Functional brown adipose tissue in healthy adults. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360(15):1518-1525. 175. Lowell BB, V SS, Hamann A, et al. Development of obesity in transgenic mice after genetic ablation of brown adipose tissue. Nature. 1993;366(6457):740-742. 176. Guerra C, Navarro P, Valverde AM, et al. Brown adipose tissue-specific insulin receptor knockout shows diabetic phenotype without insulin resistance. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2001;108(8):1205-1213. 	   92	  177. Stanford KI, Middelbeek RJ, Townsend KL, et al. Brown adipose tissue regulates glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123(1):215-223. 178. Fisher FM, Kleiner S, Douris N, et al. FGF21 regulates PGC-1alpha and browning of white adipose tissues in adaptive thermogenesis. Genes & development. 2012;26(3):271-281. 179. Tseng YH, Cypess AM, Kahn CR. Cellular bioenergetics as a target for obesity therapy. Nature reviews. Drug discovery. 2010;9(6):465-482. 180. Berry DC, Stenesen D, Zeve D, Graff JM. The developmental origins of adipose tissue. Development. 2013;140(19):3939-3949. 181. Shi H, Clegg DJ. Sex differences in the regulation of body weight. Physiology & behavior. 2009;97(2):199-204. 182. Wajchenberg BL. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2000;21(6):697-738. 183. Trayhurn P. Adipose tissue in obesity--an inflammatory issue. Endocrinology. 2005;146(3):1003-1005. 184. Hube F, Lietz U, Igel M, et al. Difference in leptin mRNA levels between omental and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from obese humans. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 1996;28(12):690-693. 	   93	  185. Montague CT, Prins JB, Sanders L, et al. Depot-related gene expression in human subcutaneous and omental adipocytes. Diabetes. 1998;47(9):1384-1391. 186. Gavi S, Qurashi S, Stuart LM, et al. Influence of age on the association of retinol-binding protein 4 with metabolic syndrome. Obesity. 2008;16(4):893-895. 187. Kloting N, Wilke B, Kloting I. Alleles on rat chromosome 4 (D4Got41-Fabp1/Tacr1) regulate subphenotypes of obesity. Obes Res. 2005;13(3):589-595. 188. White UA, Tchoukalova YD. Sex dimorphism and depot differences in adipose tissue function. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2014;1842(3):377-392. 189. de Ridder CM, Bruning PF, Zonderland ML, et al. Body fat mass, body fat distribution, and plasma hormones in early puberty in females. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1990;70(4):888-893. 190. Ley CJ, Lees B, Stevenson JC. Sex- and menopause-associated changes in body-fat distribution. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1992;55(5):950-954. 191. Wells JC. Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism. 2007;21(3):415-430. 192. Gabriely I, Ma XH, Yang XM, et al. Removal of visceral fat prevents insulin resistance and glucose intolerance of aging: an adipokine-mediated process? Diabetes. 2002;51(10):2951-2958. 	   94	  193. Klein S, Fontana L, Young VL, et al. Absence of an effect of liposuction on insulin action and risk factors for coronary heart disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2004;350(25):2549-2557. 194. Shi H, Strader AD, Woods SC, Seeley RJ. The effect of fat removal on glucose tolerance is depot specific in male and female mice. American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2007;293(4):E1012-1020. 195. Joe AW, Yi L, Even Y, Vogl AW, Rossi FM. Depot-specific differences in adipogenic progenitor abundance and proliferative response to high-fat diet. Stem cells. 2009;27(10):2563-2570. 196. Muzumdar R, Allison DB, Huffman DM, et al. Visceral adipose tissue modulates mammalian longevity. Aging Cell. 2008;7(3):438-440. 197. Barzilai N, She L, Liu BQ, et al. Surgical removal of visceral fat reverses hepatic insulin resistance. Diabetes. 1999;48(1):94-98. 198. Trayhurn P, Wood IS. Adipokines: inflammation and the pleiotropic role of white adipose tissue. The British journal of nutrition. 2004;92(3):347-355. 199. Garg A, Misra A. Lipodystrophies: rare disorders causing metabolic syndrome. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. 2004;33(2):305-331. 200. Garg A. Clinical review: Lipodystrophies: genetic and acquired body fat disorders. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2011;96(11):3313-3325. 	   95	  201. Kopelman P. Health risks associated with overweight and obesity. Obes Rev. 2007;8 Suppl 1:13-17. 202. Bjorntorp P. Hormonal control of regional fat distribution. Hum Reprod. 1997;12 Suppl 1:21-25. 203. Carpene C, Bousquet-Melou A, Galitzky J, Berlan M, Lafontan M. Lipolytic effects of beta 1-, beta 2-, and beta 3-adrenergic agonists in white adipose tissue of mammals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1998;839:186-189. 204. Tchernof A, Poehlman ET, Despres JP. Body fat distribution, the menopause transition, and hormone replacement therapy. Diabetes & metabolism. 2000;26(1):12-20. 205. Anderson LA, McTernan PG, Barnett AH, Kumar S. The effects of androgens and estrogens on preadipocyte proliferation in human adipose tissue: influence of gender and site. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2001;86(10):5045-5051. 206. Roncari DA, Van RL. Promotion of human adipocyte precursor replication by 17beta-estradiol in culture. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1978;62(3):503-508. 207. Lacasa D, Le Liepvre X, Ferre P, Dugail I. Progesterone stimulates adipocyte determination and differentiation 1/sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c gene expression. potential mechanism for the lipogenic effect of progesterone in adipose tissue. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276(15):11512-11516. 	   96	  208. Kim JY, van de Wall E, Laplante M, et al. Obesity-associated improvements in metabolic profile through expansion of adipose tissue. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2007;117(9):2621-2637. 209. Zechner R, Zimmermann R, Eichmann TO, et al. FAT SIGNALS--lipases and lipolysis in lipid metabolism and signaling. Cell metabolism. 2012;15(3):279-291. 210. Schweiger M, Schreiber R, Haemmerle G, et al. Adipose triglyceride lipase and hormone-sensitive lipase are the major enzymes in adipose tissue triacylglycerol catabolism. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281(52):40236-40241. 211. Fredrikson G, Belfrage P. Positional specificity of hormone-sensitive lipase from rat adipose tissue. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1983;258(23):14253-14256. 212. Kralisch S, Klein J, Lossner U, et al. Isoproterenol, TNFalpha, and insulin downregulate adipose triglyceride lipase in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2005;240(1-2):43-49. 213. Kershaw EE, Hamm JK, Verhagen LA, Peroni O, Katic M, Flier JS. Adipose triglyceride lipase: function, regulation by insulin, and comparison with adiponutrin. Diabetes. 2006;55(1):148-157. 214. Wang S, Soni KG, Semache M, et al. Lipolysis and the integrated physiology of lipid energy metabolism. Molecular genetics and metabolism. 2008;95(3):117-126. 	   97	  215. Arner P. Human fat cell lipolysis: biochemistry, regulation and clinical role. Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism. 2005;19(4):471-482. 216. Large V, Peroni O, Letexier D, Ray H, Beylot M. Metabolism of lipids in human white adipocyte. Diabetes & metabolism. 2004;30(4):294-309. 217. Strable MS, Ntambi JM. Genetic control of de novo lipogenesis: role in diet-induced obesity. Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology. 2010;45(3):199-214. 218. Barrows BR, Parks EJ. Contributions of different fatty acid sources to very low-density lipoprotein-triacylglycerol in the fasted and fed states. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2006;91(4):1446-1452. 219. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2002;109(9):1125-1131. 220. McCay CM, Crowell MF, Maynard LA. The effect of retarded growth upon the length of life span and upon the ultimate body size. Journal of Nutrition. 1935;10(1):63-79. 221. Sinclair DA. Toward a unified theory of caloric restriction and longevity regulation. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 2005;126(9):987-1002. 222. Schleit J, Johnson SC, Bennett CF, et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying genotype-dependent responses to dietary restriction. Aging Cell. 2013;12(6):1050-1061. 	   98	  223. Liao CY, Rikke BA, Johnson TE, Diaz V, Nelson JF. Genetic variation in the murine lifespan response to dietary restriction: from life extension to life shortening. Aging Cell. 2010;9(1):92-95. 224. Mulvey L, Sinclair A, Selman C. Lifespan modulation in mice and the confounding effects of genetic background. Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao. 2014;41(9):497-503. 225. Bodkin NL, Alexander TM, Ortmeyer HK, Johnson E, Hansen BC. Mortality and morbidity in laboratory-maintained Rhesus monkeys and effects of long-term dietary restriction. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2003;58(3):212-219. 226. Mattison JA, Roth GS, Beasley TM, et al. Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study. Nature. 2012;489(7415):318-321. 227. Colman RJ, Beasley TM, Kemnitz JW, Johnson SC, Weindruch R, Anderson RM. Caloric restriction reduces age-related and all-cause mortality in rhesus monkeys. Nature communications. 2014;5:3557. 228. Hultstrom M. Caloric restriction reduces age-related but not all-cause mortality. Acta physiologica. 2015. 229. Kemnitz JW. Calorie restriction and aging in nonhuman primates. ILAR J. 2011;52:66-77. 230. Cava E, Fontana L. Will calorie restriction work in humans? Aging (Albany NY). 2013;5(7):507-514. 	   99	  231. Masoro EJ, Mccarter RJM, Katz MS, Mcmahan CA. Dietary Restriction Alters Characteristics of Glucose Fuel Use. Journals of Gerontology. 1992;47(6):B202-B208. 232. Lane MA. Diet restriction in rhesus monkeys lowers fasting and glucose-stimulated glucoregulatory end points. American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 1995;268:E941-948. 233. Colman RJ, Nam G, Huchthausen L, Mulligan JD, Saupe KW. Energy restriction-induced changes in body composition are age specific in mice. J Nutr. 2007;137(10):2247-2251. 234. McCarter R, Mejia W, Ikeno Y, et al. Plasma glucose and the action of calorie restriction on aging. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2007;62(10):1059-1070. 235. Harris SB, Gunion MW, Rosenthal MJ, Walford RL. Serum glucose, glucose tolerance, corticosterone and free fatty acids during aging in energy restricted mice. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 1994;73(3):209-221. 236. Kalant N, Stewart J, Kaplan R. Effect of diet restriction on glucose metabolism and insulin responsiveness in aging rats. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 1988;46(1-3):89-104. 237. Larson-Meyer DE, Heilbronn LK, Redman LM, et al. Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, fat cell size, and ectopic lipid in overweight subjects. Diabetes care. 2006;29(6):1337-1344. 	   100	  238. Heilbronn LK, de Jonge L, Frisard MI, et al. Effect of 6-month calorie restriction on biomarkers of longevity, metabolic adaptation, and oxidative stress in overweight individuals: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295(13):1539-1548. 239. Walford RL, Mock D, Verdery R, MacCallum T. Calorie restriction in biosphere 2: alterations in physiologic, hematologic, hormonal, and biochemical parameters in humans restricted for a 2-year period. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2002;57(6):B211-224. 240. Redman LM, Ravussin E. Caloric restriction in humans: impact on physiological, psychological, and behavioral outcomes. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2011;14(2):275-287. 241. Hughes TA, Gwynne JT, Switzer BR, Herbst C, White G. Effects of caloric restriction and weight loss on glycemic control, insulin release and resistance, and atherosclerotic risk in obese patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1984;77(1):7-17. 242. Bauman WA, Schwartz E, Rose HG, Eisenstein HN, Johnson DW. Early and long-term effects of acute caloric deprivation in obese diabetic patients. Am J Med. 1988;85(1):38-46. 243. Lips MA, de Groot GH, van Klinken JB, et al. Calorie restriction is a major determinant of the short-term metabolic effects of gastric bypass surgery in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Clinical endocrinology. 2014;80(6):834-842. 	   101	  244. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1196-1208. 245. Eyre H, Kahn R, Robertson RM, Committee AAACW. Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for theAmerican Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2004;54(4):190-207. 246. Lefevre M, Redman LM, Heilbronn LK, et al. Caloric restriction alone and with exercise improves CVD risk in healthy non-obese individuals. Atherosclerosis. 2009;203(1):206-213. 247. Fontana L, Meyer TE, Klein S, Holloszy JO. Long-term calorie restriction is highly effective in reducing the risk for atherosclerosis in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(17):6659-6663. 248. Redman LM, Heilbronn LK, Martin CK, et al. Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on body composition and fat distribution. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2007;92(3):865-872. 249. Martin CK, Heilbronn LK, de Jonge L, et al. Effect of calorie restriction on resting metabolic rate and spontaneous physical activity. Obesity. 2007;15(12):2964-2973. 250. Witte AV, Fobker M, Gellner R, Knecht S, Floel A. Caloric restriction improves memory in elderly humans. Proceedings of the National 	   102	  Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(4):1255-1260. 251. Kenyon CJ. The genetics of ageing. Nature. 2010;464(7288):504-512. 252. Hansen M, Taubert S, Crawford D, Libina N, Lee SJ, Kenyon C. Lifespan extension by conditions that inhibit translation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell. 2007;6(1):95-110. 253. Kaeberlein M, Powers RW, 3rd, Steffen KK, et al. Regulation of yeast replicative life span by TOR and Sch9 in response to nutrients. Science. 2005;310(5751):1193-1196. 254. Kapahi P, Zid BM, Harper T, Koslover D, Sapin V, Benzer S. Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway. Current biology : CB. 2004;14(10):885-890. 255. Greer EL. An AMPK-FOXO pathway mediates the extension of lifespan induced by a novel method of dietary restriction in C. elegans. Current biology : CB. 2007;17(19):1646-1656. 256. Rogina B, Helfand SL. Sir2 mediates longevity in the fly through a pathway related to calorie restriction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(45):15998-16003. 257. Li Y, Xu W, McBurney MW, Longo VD. SirT1 inhibition reduces IGF-I/IRS-2/Ras/ERK1/2 signaling and protects neurons. Cell metabolism. 2008;8(1):38-48. 	   103	  258. Arum O, Bonkowski MS, Rocha JS, Bartke A. The growth hormone receptor gene-disrupted mouse fails to respond to an intermittent fasting diet. Aging Cell. 2009;8(6):756-760. 259. Honjoh S, Yamamoto T, Uno M, Nishida E. Signalling through RHEB-1 mediates intermittent fasting-induced longevity in C. elegans. Nature. 2009;457(7230):726-730. 260. Boily G, Seifert EL, Bevilacqua L, et al. SirT1 regulates energy metabolism and response to caloric restriction in mice. PloS one. 2008;3(3):e1759. 261. Jia K, Levine B. Autophagy is required for dietary restriction-mediated life span extension in C. elegans. Autophagy. 2007;3(6):597-599. 262. Schulz TJ, Zarse K, Voigt A, Urban N, Birringer M, Ristow M. Glucose Restriction Extends Caenorhabditis elegans Life Span by Inducing Mitochondrial Respiration and Increasing Oxidative Stress. Cell metabolism. 2007;6(4):280-293. 263. Lin SJ, Kaeberlein M, Andalis AA, et al. Calorie restriction extends Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan by increasing respiration. Nature. 2002;418(6895):344-348. 264. Zahn JM, Poosala S, Owen AB, et al. AGEMAP: a gene expression database for aging in mice. PLoS genetics. 2007;3(11):e201. 265. de Magalhaes JP, Curado J, Church GM. Meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles identifies common signatures of aging. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(7):875-881. 	   104	  266. Wijeyesekera A, Selman C, Barton RH, Holmes E, Nicholson JK, Withers DJ. Metabotyping of long-lived mice using 1H NMR spectroscopy. Journal of proteome research. 2012;11(4):2224-2235. 267. Sun LY, Spong A, Swindell WR, et al. Growth hormone-releasing hormone disruption extends lifespan and regulates response to caloric restriction in mice. eLife. 2013;2:e01098. 268. Mair W, Dillin A. Aging and survival: the genetics of life span extension by dietary restriction. Annual review of biochemistry. 2008;77:727-754. 269. Hansen M, Hsu AL, Dillin A, Kenyon C. New genes tied to endocrine, metabolic, and dietary regulation of lifespan from a Caenorhabditis elegans genomic RNAi screen. PLoS genetics. 2005;1(1):119-128. 270. Houthoofd K, Braeckman BP, Johnson TE, Vanfleteren JR. Life extension via dietary restriction is independent of the Ins/IGF-1 signalling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Experimental gerontology. 2003;38(9):947-954. 271. Lakowski B, Hekimi S. The genetics of caloric restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95(22):13091-13096. 272. Iser WB, Wolkow CA. DAF-2/insulin-like signaling in C. elegans modifies effects of dietary restriction and nutrient stress on aging, stress and growth. PloS one. 2007;2(11):e1240. 273. Roth GS, Lane MA, Ingram DK, et al. Biomarkers of caloric restriction may predict longevity in humans. Science. 2002;297(5582):811. 	   105	  274. Fontana L, Klein S. Aging, adiposity, and calorie restriction. JAMA. 2007;297(9):986-994. 275. Lane MA, Baer DJ, Rumpler WV, et al. Calorie restriction lowers body temperature in rhesus monkeys, consistent with a postulated anti-aging mechanism in rodents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93(9):4159-4164. 276. Blanc S, Schoeller D, Kemnitz J, et al. Energy expenditure of rhesus monkeys subjected to 11 years of dietary restriction. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2003;88(1):16-23. 277. Doring H, Schwarzer K, Nuesslein-Hildesheim B, Schmidt I. Leptin selectively increases energy expenditure of food-restricted lean mice. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22(2):83-88. 278. Oster MH, Fielder PJ, Levin N, Cronin MJ. Adaptation of the growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I axis to chronic and severe calorie or protein malnutrition. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1995;95(5):2258-2265. 279. Straus DS. Nutritional regulation of hormones and growth factors that control mammalian growth. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 1994;8(1):6-12. 280. Breese CR, Ingram RL, Sonntag WE. Influence of age and long-term dietary restriction on plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IGF-1 	   106	  gene expression, and IGF-1 binding proteins. Journal of gerontology. 1991;46(5):B180-187. 281. Flurkey K, Papaconstantinou J, Miller RA, Harrison DE. Lifespan extension and delayed immune and collagen aging in mutant mice with defects in growth hormone production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(12):6736-6741. 282. Miller RA, Chang Y, Galecki AT, Al-Regaiey K, Kopchick JJ, Bartke A. Gene expression patterns in calorically restricted mice: partial overlap with long-lived mutant mice. Molecular endocrinology. 2002;16(11):2657-2666. 283. Ikeno Y, Bronson RT, Hubbard GB, Lee S, Bartke A. Delayed occurrence of fatal neoplastic diseases in ames dwarf mice: correlation to extended longevity. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2003;58(4):291-296. 284. Holzenberger M, Dupont J, Ducos B, et al. IGF-1 receptor regulates lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress in mice. Nature. 2003;421(6919):182-187. 285. Al-Regaiey KA, Masternak MM, Bonkowski M, Sun L, Bartke A. Long-lived growth hormone receptor knockout mice: interaction of reduced insulin-like growth factor i/insulin signaling and caloric restriction. Endocrinology. 2005;146(2):851-860. 	   107	  286. Matsuzaki J, Kuwamura M, Yamaji R, Inui H, Nakano Y. Inflammatory responses to lipopolysaccharide are suppressed in 40% energy-restricted mice. J Nutr. 2001;131(8):2139-2144. 287. Ershler WB, Sun WH, Binkley N, et al. Interleukin-6 and aging: blood levels and mononuclear cell production increase with advancing age and in vitro production is modifiable by dietary restriction. Lymphokine and cytokine research. 1993;12(4):225-230. 288. Han ES, Evans TR, Shu JH, Lee S, Nelson JF. Food restriction enhances endogenous and corticotropin-induced plasma elevations of free but not total corticosterone throughout life in rats. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2001;56(9):B391-397. 289. Sabatino F, Masoro EJ, McMahan CA, Kuhn RW. Assessment of the role of the glucocorticoid system in aging processes and in the action of food restriction. Journal of gerontology. 1991;46(5):B171-179. 290. Spaulding CC, Walford RL, Effros RB. Calorie restriction inhibits the age-related dysregulation of the cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-6 in C3B10RF1 mice. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 1997;93(1-3):87-94. 291. Jolly CA. Dietary restriction and immune function. J Nutr. 2004;134(8):1853-1856. 292. Zhu M, Miura J, Lu LX, et al. Circulating adiponectin levels increase in rats on caloric restriction: the potential for insulin sensitization. Experimental gerontology. 2004;39(7):1049-1059. 	   108	  293. Ding Q, Ash C, Mracek T, Merry B, Bing C. Caloric restriction increases adiponectin expression by adipose tissue and prevents the inhibitory effect of insulin on circulating adiponectin in rats. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2012;23(8):867-874. 294. Faulks SC, Turner N, Else PL, Hulbert AJ. Calorie restriction in mice: effects on body composition, daily activity, metabolic rate, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production, and membrane fatty acid composition. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2006;61(8):781-794. 295. Escriva F, Gavete ML, Fermin Y, et al. Effect of age and moderate food restriction on insulin sensitivity in Wistar rats: role of adiposity. The Journal of endocrinology. 2007;194(1):131-141. 296. Racette SB, Weiss EP, Villareal DT, et al. One year of caloric restriction in humans: feasibility and effects on body composition and abdominal adipose tissue. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2006;61(9):943-950. 297. Li X, Cope MB, Johnson MS, Smith DL, Jr., Nagy TR. Mild calorie restriction induces fat accumulation in female C57BL/6J mice. Obesity. 2010;18(3):456-462. 298. Liao CY, Rikke BA, Johnson TE, Gelfond JA, Diaz V, Nelson JF. Fat maintenance is a predictor of the murine lifespan response to dietary restriction. Aging Cell. 2011;10(4):629-639. 	   109	  299. Stein PK, Soare A, Meyer TE, Cangemi R, Holloszy JO, Fontana L. Caloric restriction may reverse age-related autonomic decline in humans. Aging Cell. 2012;11(4):644-650. 300. Anderson RM, Weindruch R. The caloric restriction paradigm: implications for healthy human aging. American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council. 2012;24(2):101-106. 301. Weir JB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. The Journal of physiology. 1949;109(1-2):1-9. 302. Hubbard GD, Lee S, Richardson A, Strong R, Diaz V, Nelson JF. Housing Density Does Not Influence the Longevity Effect of Calorie Restriction. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2005;60A(12):1510-1517. 303. Martin B, Pearson M, Kebejian L, et al. Sex-dependent metabolic, neuroendocrine, and cognitive responses to dietary energy restriction and excess. Endocrinology. 2007;148(9):4318-4333. 304. Overton JM, Williams TD. Behavioral and physiologic responses to caloric restriction in mice. Physiology & behavior. 2004;81(5):749-754. 305. Greene AE, Todorova MT, McGowan R, Seyfried TN. Caloric restriction inhibits seizure susceptibility in epileptic EL mice by reducing blood glucose. Epilepsia. 2001;42(11):1371-1378. 306. Chang AM, Halter JB. Aging and insulin secretion. American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2003;284(1):E7-12. 	   110	  307. Selman C, Lingard S, Choudhury AI, et al. Evidence for lifespan extension and delayed age-related biomarkers in insulin receptor substrate 1 null mice. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2008;22(3):807-818. 308. Pettersson US, Walden TB, Carlsson PO, Jansson L, Phillipson M. Female mice are protected against high-fat diet induced metabolic syndrome and increase the regulatory T cell population in adipose tissue. PloS one. 2012;7(9):e46057. 309. O'Harte FP, Gray AM, Flatt PR. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide and effects of glycation on glucose transport and metabolism in isolated mouse abdominal muscle. The Journal of endocrinology. 1998;156(2):237-243. 310. McIntosh CHS, Widenmaier S, Kim SJ. Chapter 15 Glucose‐Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; GIP). Vitamins and Hormones. 2009;80:409-471. 311. Ceddia RB, William WN, Jr., Curi R. Comparing effects of leptin and insulin on glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle: evidence for an effect of leptin on glucose uptake and decarboxylation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(1):75-82. 312. Fernandez-Formoso G, Perez S, Gonzalez-Touceda D, Dieguez C, Tovar S. Leptin, 20years of searching for glucose homeostasis. Life sciences. 2015. 313. Selman C, Phillips T, Staib JL, Duncan JS, Leeuwenburgh C, Speakman JR. Energy expenditure of calorically restricted rats is higher than 	   111	  predicted from their altered body composition. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 2005;126(6-7):783-793. 314. Kuhla A, Hahn S, Butschkau A, Lange S, Wree A, Vollmar B. Lifelong caloric restriction reprograms hepatic fat metabolism in mice. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2014;69(8):915-922. 315. Higami Y, Pugh TD, Page GP, Allison DB, Prolla TA, Weindruch R. Adipose tissue energy metabolism: altered gene expression profile of mice subjected to long-term caloric restriction. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2004;18(2):415-417. 316. Okita N, Hayashida Y, Kojima Y, et al. Differential responses of white adipose tissue and brown adipose tissue to caloric restriction in rats. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 2012;133(5):255-266. 317. Valle A, Sastre-Serra J, Roca P, Oliver J. Modulation of white adipose tissue proteome by aging and calorie restriction. Aging Cell. 2010;9(5):882-894. 318. Sirinek KR, Pace WG, Crockett SE, O'Dorisio TM, Mazzaferri EL, Cataland S. Insulin-induced attenuation of glucose-stimulated gastric inhibitory polypeptide secretion. American journal of surgery. 1978;135(2):151-155. 	   112	  319. Bryer-Ash M, Cheung A, Pederson RA. Feedback regulation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) secretion by insulin in conscious rats. Regulatory peptides. 1994;51(2):101-109. 320. Beck B, Max JP. Direct metabolic effects of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP): dissociation at physiological levels of effects on insulin-stimulated fatty acid and glucose incorporation in rat adipose tissue. Diabetologia. 1986;29(1):68. 321. Oben J, Morgan L, Fletcher J, Marks V. Effect of the entero-pancreatic hormones, gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon-like polypeptide-1(7-36) amide, on fatty acid synthesis in explants of rat adipose tissue. The Journal of endocrinology. 1991;130(2):267-272. 322. Hauner H, Glatting G, Kaminska D, Pfeiffer EF. Effects of gastric inhibitory polypeptide on glucose and lipid metabolism of isolated rat adipocytes. Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 1988;32(5-6):282-288. 323. Eckel RH, Fujimoto WY, Brunzell JD. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide enhanced lipoprotein lipase activity in cultured preadipocytes. Diabetes. 1979;28(12):1141-1142. 324. Kim SJ, Nian C, McIntosh CH. Activation of lipoprotein lipase by glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in adipocytes. A role for a protein kinase B, LKB1, and AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(12):8557-8567. 325. Kim SJ, Nian C, McIntosh CH. Resistin is a key mediator of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) stimulation of lipoprotein 	   113	  lipase (LPL) activity in adipocytes. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(47):34139-34147. 326. Knapper JM, Puddicombe SM, Morgan LM, Fletcher JM. Investigations into the actions of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide on lipoprotein lipase activity in explants of rat adipose tissue. J Nutr. 1995;125(2):183-188. 327. McIntosh CH, Bremsak I, Lynn FC, et al. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide stimulation of lipolysis in differentiated 3T3-L1 cells: wortmannin-sensitive inhibition by insulin. Endocrinology. 1999;140(1):398-404. 328. Yip RG, Boylan MO, Kieffer TJ, Wolfe MM. Functional GIP receptors are present on adipocytes. Endocrinology. 1998;139(9):4004-4007. 329. Miyawaki K, Yamada Y, Ban N, et al. Inhibition of gastric inhibitory polypeptide signaling prevents obesity. Nat Med. 2002;8(7):738-742. 330. Hansotia T, Maida A, Flock G, et al. Extrapancreatic incretin receptors modulate glucose homeostasis, body weight, and energy expenditure. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2007;117(1):143-152. 331. Yamada C, Yamada Y, Tsukiyama K, et al. Genetic inactivation of GIP signaling reverses aging-associated insulin resistance through body composition changes. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2007;364(1):175-180. 332. Hudson JW, Scott IM. Daily Torpor in the Laboratory Mouse, Mus musculus Var. Albino. Physiological Zoology. 1979;52(2):205-218. 	   114	  333. Swoap SJ. The pharmacology and molecular mechanisms underlying temperature regulation and torpor. Biochemical pharmacology. 2008;76(7):817-824. 334. Swoap SJ, Gutilla MJ, Liles LC, Smith RO, Weinshenker D. The full expression of fasting-induced torpor requires beta 3-adrenergic receptor signaling. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2006;26(1):241-245. 335. Paul MJ, Freeman DA, Park JH, Dark J. Neuropeptide Y induces torpor-like hypothermia in Siberian hamsters. Brain research. 2005;1055(1-2):83-92. 336. Gavrilova O, Leon LR, Marcus-Samuels B, et al. Torpor in mice is induced by both leptin-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96(25):14623-14628. 337. Freinkel N, Metzger BE, Harris E, Robinson S, Mager M. The hypothermia of hypoglycemia. Studies with 2-deoxy-D-glucose in normal human subjects and mice. The New England journal of medicine. 1972;287(17):841-845. 338. Himms-Hagen J. Nonshivering thermogenesis. Brain research bulletin. 1984;12(2):151-160. 339. Himms-Hagen J. Food restriction increases torpor and improves brown adipose tissue thermogenesis in ob/ob mice. The American journal of physiology. 1985;248(5 Pt 1):E531-539. 	   115	  340. Barnard T, More G, Nechad M. Biogenic amines and the trophic response of brown adipose tissue. In: Parvez S, Parvez H, eds. Biogenic Amines in Development. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1980:391-439. 341. Ricquier D, Mory G. Factors affecting brown adipose tissue activity in animals and man. Clinics in endocrinology and metabolism. 1984;13(3):501-520. 342. Nelson JF, Gosden RG, Felicio LS. Effect of dietary restriction on estrous cyclicity and follicular reserves in aging C57BL/6J mice. Biol Reprod. 1985;32(3):515-522. 343. Masharani U, Goldfine ID, Youngren JF. Influence of gender on the relationship between insulin sensitivity, adiposity, and plasma lipids in lean nondiabetic subjects. Metabolism: clinical and experimental. 2009;58(11):1602-1608. 344. Shi H, Strader AD, Woods SC, Seeley RJ. Sexually dimorphic responses to fat loss after caloric restriction or surgical lipectomy. American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2007;293(1):E316-326. 345. Khor VK, Dhir R, Yin X, Ahima RS, Song WC. Estrogen sulfotransferase regulates body fat and glucose homeostasis in female mice. American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2010;299(4):E657-664. 346. Nelson W, Halberg F. Meal time circadian rhythms and life span of mice. J Nutr. 1986.  

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.24.1-0166183/manifest

Comment

Related Items