UBC Theses and Dissertations

UBC Theses Logo

UBC Theses and Dissertations

Effects of sleep-deprivation on long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission in the ca1 region… Tadavarty, Ramakrishna 2012

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata


24-ubc_2012_spring_tadavarty_ramakrishna.pdf [ 2.87MB ]
JSON: 24-1.0072600.json
JSON-LD: 24-1.0072600-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 24-1.0072600-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 24-1.0072600-rdf.json
Turtle: 24-1.0072600-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 24-1.0072600-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 24-1.0072600-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

EFFECTS OF SLEEP-DEPRIVATION ON LONG-TERM DEPRESSION OF EXCITATORY SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION IN THE CA1 REGION OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS  by Ramakrishna Tadavarty  B.Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, 2001  A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF  DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Pharmacology and Therapeutics)  THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver)  February 2012  © Ramakrishna Tadavarty, 2012  Abstract  In the central nervous system (CNS), synapses are considered to be the loci for memories. Activity dependent strengthening or weakening of synaptic strength via long-term potentiation (LTP) or depression (LTD), respectively, is widely postulated to underlie memory formation. Sleep, which is universally present across most species in the animal kingdom, aids learning and formation of memories. On the contrary, sleep-deprivation (shortor long- term), disrupts memory formation and task re-performance. Exactly how this happens is unclear. In the present study, we hypothesized that sleep-deprivation affects LTD, which may in-turn be responsible for cognitive deficits observed at the behavioral level. Following a 12 h period of sleep-deprivation, LTD of the population excitatory postsynaptic potentials (pEPSPs) induced using a 20 Hz, 30s tetanus to Schaffer collaterals in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, is enhanced in sleep-deprived (SD) rats. We investigated the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptors (GABAA-Rs), GABAB-Rs and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors (NMDARs) in the LTD. The requirement of Ca2+ through L- and T- type voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and intracellular stores was also studied. Results indicate that mGluRs, a release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores and GABAB-Rs are required for LTD. Studies with mGluR antagonists suggest that while mGlu1Rs are involved in both short-term depression and LTD, mGlu5Rs participate mostly in LTD. CGP-55845, a GABAB-R antagonist, partially suppressed LTD in normally sleeping (NS) rats, while completely blocking in SD rats. Moreover, GS-39783, a positive allosteric modulator for GABAB-Rs, suppressed the pEPSP in SD, but not NS, rats. Since both mGluRs and GABAB-Rs seem to be involved in the LTD, especially in SD rats, ii  changes in receptor expression pattern and/or dimerization were examined using immunohistochemical, co-localization and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) techniques. Sleep-deprivation induced an increase in GABAB-R1 and mGlu1αR expression in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. In addition, co-localization and heterodimerization between mGlu1αR/GABAB-R1 and mGlu1αR/GABAB-R2 is enhanced in SD rats. Taken together, our findings present a novel form of LTD sensitive to the activation of mGluRs and GABABRs, and reveal, for the first time, that sleep-deprivation induces alterations in the expression and dimerization of these receptors.  iii  Preface  Publications that comprise the work in this thesis work.  1. Tadavarty, R., Rajput, P.S., Jennifer, M.W., Kumar, U & Sastry, B.R. Sleep-deprivation induces changes in GABAB and mGlu receptor expression and has consequences for synaptic long-term depression. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9): e24933. Epub 2011 Sep 27.  The data from chapters (3.2) are mainly included in this publication. I have contributed in the design, performance and analysis of all experiments (60%). Rajput P.S has helped me with immunohistochemical, co-localization and co-IP experiments (10%). Jennifer M. W helped with sleep-deprivation and in experiments using the agent GS-39783 (5%). Drs. Kumar and Sastry contributed significantly in the design of experiments and interpretation of results (25%).  2. Tadavarty, R., Kaan, T.K. & Sastry. B.R. Long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons following sleep-deprivation. Exp Neurol 216, 239-242 (2009).  The data from chapters (3.1) are included in this publication. I have contributed in the design, performance and analysis of all experiments (70%). Kaan T. K helped with sleepdeprivation and performing few experiments on LTD (10%). Dr. Sastry contributed significantly in the design of experiments and interpretation of results (20%). iv  3. Yang, B., Tadavarty, R., Xu, J.Y. & Sastry, B.R. Activity-mediated plasticity of GABA equilibrium potential in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons. Exp Neurol 221, 157-165 (2010).  In this publication, as a co-author I have contributed in the design of experiments and interpretation of results (10%). Apart from this I have been involved in writing the manuscript and assisted in preparing figures (10%). Data from this paper has not been used in this thesis.  4. R. Tadavarty, P. S. Rajput, J. M. Wong, U. Kumar, B. Sastry. Sleep-deprivation induced alterations in GABA-B and mGlu receptor expression, and LTD of the EPSP in rat hippocampus. Program No. 347.06. 2011 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Washington D.C, Society for Neuroscience, 2011.  5. R. Tadavarty, B. Sastry. Mechanisms involved in the induction of LTD in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons. Program No. 40.9/C59. 2009 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Chicago, IL: Society for Neuroscience, 2009. Online.  6. R. Tadavarty, T. K. Y. Kaan, D. N. Siew, B. Sastry. Sleep deprivation and synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampus. Program No. 383.15. 2005 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2005. Online.  The animal experiment protocols used in this thesis were approved by the UBC Animal Care Committee (approval #s: A07-0536 and A10-0381) v  Table of Contents  Abstract .................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ..................................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... xi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ xii List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... xiv Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. xvii Dedication ............................................................................................................................. xix Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1  Rat hippocampal formation....................................................................................... 1  1.1.1  Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1  1.1.2  Synapses ................................................................................................................ 3  1.1.3  Organization .......................................................................................................... 3  Strata ............................................................................................................. 3  Dentate gyrus ................................................................................................ 5  CA3 ............................................................................................................... 5  CA1 ............................................................................................................... 7  Subiculum ..................................................................................................... 8  Interneurons .................................................................................................. 8  1.1.4  Excitatory and inhibitory receptors ..................................................................... 10  AMPA receptors ......................................................................................... 10 vi  NMDA receptors ......................................................................................... 11  Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs).............................................. 12  GABAA receptors ........................................................................................ 12  GABAB receptors ........................................................................................ 13  1.2  Memory ................................................................................................................... 15  1.2.1  Hippocampus and memory ................................................................................. 17  Declarative memory .................................................................................... 17  Spatial memory ........................................................................................... 20  1.3  Memory consolidation and sleep ............................................................................ 22  1.3.1  Consolidation of memories ................................................................................. 22  1.3.2  Role of sleep ....................................................................................................... 25  1.4  LTP and LTD as cellular correlates for memory .................................................... 29  1.4.1  Synaptic plasticity and learning .......................................................................... 30  1.4.2  Synaptic plasticity and sleep ............................................................................... 31  Chapter 2: Materials and Methods .................................................................................... 33 2.1  Animals ................................................................................................................... 33  2.2  Sleep-deprivation .................................................................................................... 33  2.3  Brain-slice preparation ............................................................................................ 34  2.4  Recording chamber ................................................................................................. 36  2.5  Media and drugs ...................................................................................................... 37  2.6  Recording and stimulation equipment .................................................................... 40  2.6.1  Patch pipettes ...................................................................................................... 40  2.6.2  Data acquisition .................................................................................................. 40 vii  2.6.3  Stimulation and isolation units............................................................................ 41  2.6.4  Stimulating electrodes ......................................................................................... 41  2.7  Positioning of electrodes ......................................................................................... 42  2.8  Microscope and imaging ......................................................................................... 42  2.9  Patch-clamp and field recording setup .................................................................... 43  2.10  Electrophysiological recordings.............................................................................. 44  2.10.1  Field recordings (for pEPSPs) ........................................................................ 44  2.10.2  Whole-cell recordings (for EPSCs or IPSCs) ................................................. 46  2.11  Immunohistochemistry ........................................................................................... 47  2.12  Indirect immunofluorescence.................................................................................. 48  2.13  Western blot and co-IP............................................................................................ 49  2.14  Corticosterone radioimmunoassay .......................................................................... 51  2.14.1  Procedure ........................................................................................................ 51  2.14.2  Calculations..................................................................................................... 52  2.15  Data analysis ........................................................................................................... 52  2.15.1  Justification for analyzing slopes vs. amplitudes or area under the curve for  pEPSPs ......................................................................................................................... 53 2.15.2  Slope and amplitude analysis of PSPs/Cs ....................................................... 54  2.15.3  LTD ................................................................................................................. 55  2.15.4  Statistical analysis ........................................................................................... 55  Chapter 3: Experimental Protocols .................................................................................... 57 3.1  Induction of LTD .................................................................................................... 57  3.2  Effects of sleep-deprivation on LTD ...................................................................... 59 viii  3.3  Effect of stress induced by sleep-deprivation ......................................................... 60  3.4  Mechanisms involved in LTD ................................................................................ 61  3.5  Role of [Ca2+]i in LTD ............................................................................................ 63  3.6  GABAergic inhibition in LTD ................................................................................ 64  3.7  Expression of mGlu1Rs, GABAB-R1s and GABAB-R2s ....................................... 67  Chapter 4: Results................................................................................................................ 71 4.1  LTD and effects of sleep-deprivation ..................................................................... 71  4.1.1  LTD (1 Hz, 15 min LFS) .................................................................................... 71  4.1.2  LTD [20 Hz, 30 sec (1XSI)................................................................................. 73  4.1.3  LTD [20 Hz, 30 sec (2XSI)] ............................................................................... 74  4.1.4  Corticosterone radioimmunoassay ...................................................................... 75  4.2  Mechanisms involved in LTD ................................................................................ 76  4.2.1  Role of NMDARs in LTD .................................................................................. 76  4.2.2  Role of mGluRs in LTD ..................................................................................... 78  Group I mGluR subtypes and LTD ............................................................. 79 Role of mGlu1Rs................................................................................... 79 Role of mGlu5Rs................................................................................... 80 4.2.3  Role of Ca2+ in LTD ........................................................................................... 82  4.2.4  GABAergic inhibition and LTD ......................................................................... 84 Role of GABAA-Rs in LTD .................................................................. 84 Effects of 20 Hz LFS on GABAA-R mediated IPSCs ........................... 85 Masking of LTD by co-occurring LTP ................................................. 87 Role of GABAB-Rs in LTD .................................................................. 88 ix  4.2.5  Immunohistochemistry, co-localization, western blots and co-IP ...................... 92  Expression of mGlu1αR, GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 in the CA1  hippocampal region of normally sleeping and SD rats ............................................... 92  Western blot analysis of mGlu1αR, GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 expression  in the CA1 hippocampal region of normally sleeping and SD rats ............................ 95  Co-localization of mGlu1αR and GABAB-R1/R2 in normally sleeping and  SD rats  ..................................................................................................................... 97  GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 receptors are expressed in mGlu1α receptor  immunoprecipitate in normally sleeping and SD rats ............................................... 100 Chapter 5: Discussion ........................................................................................................ 103 5.1 5.1.1  LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus ........................................................ 103 Induction ........................................................................................................... 103  5.2  Enhancement of LTD in SD rats ........................................................................... 104  5.3  Mechanisms involved in LTD .............................................................................. 105  5.3.1  Involvement of mGluRs and GABAB-Rs ......................................................... 105  Chapter 6: Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 111 Chapter 7: Future Directions ............................................................................................ 113 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 116  x  List of Tables  Table 1. Theories on hippocampal function ........................................................................... 19 Table 2. Media and drugs........................................................................................................ 39 Table 3. Effect of various pharmacological agent used on LTD. ........................................... 91  xi  List of Figures  Figure 1. Hippocampal anatomy ............................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Brain regions and memory types ............................................................................. 16 Figure 3. Positioning of stimulating and recording electrodes ............................................... 44 Figure 4. Whole-cell recording procedure .............................................................................. 45 Figure 5. Calculation of slopes and amplitudes of PSP/Cs. .................................................... 54 Figure 6. LTD (1Hz, 15 min) .................................................................................................. 72 Figure 7. LTD (20 Hz, 30sec- 1XSI) ...................................................................................... 74 Figure 8. LTD (20 Hz, 30 sec- 2XSI) ..................................................................................... 75 Figure 9. Role of NMDARs in LTD ....................................................................................... 77 Figure 10. Role of mGluRs in LTD ........................................................................................ 78 Figure 11. Role of mGlu1Rs in LTD ...................................................................................... 80 Figure 12. Role of mGlu5Rs in LTD ...................................................................................... 81 Figure 13. Role of Ca2+ in LTD .............................................................................................. 83 Figure 14. Role of GABAA-Rs in LTD................................................................................... 85 Figure 15. Effect of a 20 Hz LFS on GABAergic IPSCs ....................................................... 86 Figure 16. Masking of LTD by LTP ....................................................................................... 88 Figure 17. Role of GABAB-Rs in LTD ................................................................................... 89 Figure 18. Effects of GS-39783 on pEPSPs ........................................................................... 90 Figure 19. Distribution of GABAB-R1/R2 and mGlu1αRs .................................................... 94 Figure 20. Western blot analysis of GABAB-R1, GABAB-R2 and mGlu1αRs ...................... 96  xii  Figure 21. Co-localization of GABAB-R1/GABAB-R2, GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR, andGABABR2/mGlu1αR ......................................................................................................................... 100 Figure 22. Heterodimerization between GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR, GABAB-R2/mGlu1αR and GABAB-R1/R2 ...................................................................................................................... 102  xiii  List of Abbreviations  EC  -  Entorhinal cortex  DG  -  Dentate gyrus  CA  -  Cornus ammonis  LM  -  Lacunosum moleculare  IS  -  Interneuron selective  AMPARs  -  α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-propionic acid receptors  NMDARs  -  N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors  mGluRs  -  Metabotropic glutamate receptors  GABAA-Rs  -  Γ-Aminobutyric acid- A receptors  GABAB-Rs  -  Γ-Aminobutyric acid- B receptors  VGCCs  -  Voltage gated Ca2+ channels  IP3  -  Inositol triphosphate  DAG  -  Diacylglycerol  cAMP  -  Cyclic adenosine monophosphate  NKCC1  -  Na+-K+-Cl- co-transporter type 1  EGABA-PSC  -  Equilibrium potential for GABAergic postsynaptic current  KCC2  -  K+-Cl-- co-transporter type 2  GIRK channels  -  G-protein dependent inward-rectifying K+ channels  CNS  -  Central nervous system  MTLS  -  Medial temporal lobe structures xiv  S-R  -  Stimulus response  S-C  -  Stimulus conditioning  SPWs  -  Sharp waves  NREMS  -  Non-rapid eye movement sleep  REMS  -  Rapid eye movement sleep  SWS  -  Slow wave sleep  EEG  -  Electroencephalogram  PSWs  -  Paradoxical sleep windows  PGO waves  -  Ponto-geniculo-occipital waves  LTP  -  Long-term potentiation  LTD  -  Long-term depression  APP  -  Amyloid precursor protein  UBC  -  University of British Columbia  ACSF  -  Artificial cerebrospinal fluid  APV  -  DL-2-Amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid  DNQX  -  6,7-Dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione  MCPG  -  RS-α-Methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine  LY-367385  -  (S)-(+)-α-Amino-4-carboxy-2-methylbenzeneacetic acid  MPEP  -  2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride  CGP-55845  -  (2S)-3-[[(1S)-1-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl) ethyl] amino-2hydroxypropyl] (phenyl methyl) phosphinic acid hydrochloride  GS-39783  -  N,N'-Dicyclopentyl-2-(methylthio)-5-nitro-4,6pyrimidinediamine xv  HEPES  -  4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid  BAPTA  -  1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid  pEPSPs  -  Population excitatory postsynaptic potentials  EPSCs  -  Excitatory postsynaptic currents  IPSCs  -  Inhibitory postsynaptic currents  SD  -  Sleep-deprived  TBS  -  Tris-buffered saline  NGS  -  Normal goat serum  ABC  -  Avidin-biotin complex  DAB  -  Diaminobenzidine tetrachloride  DTT  -  Dithiothretiol  SDS  -  Sodium dodecyl sulfate  RIPA  -  Radio-immunoprecipitation assay  BCM  -  Bienenstock, Cooper and Munro  HFS  -  High frequency stimulation  LFS  -  Low frequency stimulation  SI  -  Stimulus intensity  NS  -  Normally sleeping  PP  -  Protein phosphatase  GPCRs  -  G- protein coupled receptors  ER  -  Endoplasmic reticulum  xvi  Acknowledgements  I am very grateful to my supervisor Dr. B. R. Sastry for his guidance, constant support and encouragement throughout these studies. During my entire Ph.D. program we have had several productive discussions which not only stimulated learning but enabled me to understand and appreciate the workings of the central nervous system. I believe that the completion of this work was possible only because of Dr. Sastry’s unwavering confidence in me during failures at certain stages. Undoubtedly the research experience in Dr. Sastry’s laboratory has made me a better person and equipped me with all skills necessary to continue to pursue my interests in neuroscience. I thank Drs. Peter Soja and Michael. J. A. Walker for agreeing to be on my supervisory committee and guiding me at appropriate times. Their critical evaluation and timely support has significantly improved my thesis work. My special thanks to Dr. Ujendra Kumar, in whose laboratory I completed morphological and biochemical studies. He was always approachable and forthcoming whenever I needed his help. In fact, he has contributed greatly to my current understanding of how receptors interact through dimerization to elicit physiological effects. This knowledge, I believe will be a great asset in my future endeavors.  I would like to thank Dr. Jian-Yi Xu for teaching me how to prepare brain slices and record synaptic potentials using the patch-clamp technique. He helped me improve my technique and stood beside at all times during my most difficult initial stages. My special thanks to Padmesh. S. Rajput for helping me with the morphological and bio-chemical experiments. I sincerely thank other members of Dr. Kumar’s laboratory, Xiofan Qiu, Dr. xvii  Rishi Somvanshi, Geetanjali Kharmate and Sajad War for helping me on several occasions during my work. Many thanks to Dr. Prabhakara Nagareddy for help with the corticosterone radioassay experiments. It was a pleasure working with Bo Yang, my colleague who has been very helpful at all times.  I would like to thank Timothy Kaan and Jennifer. M. Wong for their help with my experiments. All my colleagues, including, Siew D. N, Jusung Hwang and Dr. Moazzem Hossain, helped me with sleep-depriving rats several times. I thank all members of the Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, for their encouragement and academic guidance during my graduate years in the department. They have been critical during the departmental presentations and their straight-forward comments have helped me at various stages. I would like to specially thank Christian Caritey who is a wonderful person. I have run in to his workshop at all times and have received great help in designing and making things for my electrophysiological setup to ensure smooth running of my experiments.  I am grateful to the University of British Columbia and the Faculty of Medicine for the University Graduate Fellowship and Faculty of Medicine Award. The partial tuition waiver for international students is much appreciated. I am thankful for the financial support from the Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, NIH and CIHR at various stages. Finally, I would like to thank my family members for their moral support throughout.  xviii  Dedication  I dedicate this thesis to my late grandfather.  xix  Chapter 1: Introduction  1.1  1.1.1  Rat hippocampal formation  Introduction  The hippocampal formation (hippocampus proper and other regions) extends as a part of the cerebral cortex as a long, C-shaped structure, along the curvature of the lateral ventricles. The hippocampus proper (Cornus Ammonis or CA) has three subdivisions: CA3CA2 (regio inferior) and CA1 (regio superior). The existence of the CA2 region is subject to much debate. Although it is comparatively less well-defined (for e.g. in rats), evidence indicates the presence of a narrow CA2 field, that can be distinguished clearly from other subfields (Amaral and Witter, 1989). Other regions include: dentate gyrus (fascia dentata), subiculum, presubiculum, parasubiculum (grouped as subicular complex) and entorhinal cortex (Blackstad, 1956; Lorente de No´, 1934; Ramón y Cajal, 1893).  1  Figure 1. Hippocampal anatomy Schematic illustrating the various cell types and interconnections between entorhinal cortex (EC), dentate gyrus (DG), Cornus Ammonis layers 3 (CA3), CA1 and subiculum. This picture was originally drawn by Santiago Ramon y Cajal. It was published prior to Jan 1st 1923, and is out of copyright.  The hippocampus is highly organized into parallel segments or lamellae, capable of functioning as independent units (Andersen, et al., 1969; Anderson, et al., 1971). The exact orientation of these lamellae, however, appear to be species dependent (Blackstad, et al., 1970). Stimulation of the entorhinal afferents, sequentially excite principal neurons in the dentate gyrus (granule cells), CA3 and CA1 (pyramidal cells), along the trisynaptic loop [Entorhinal cortex → Dentate Gyrus (synapse 1); Dentate Gyrus → CA3 (synapse 2); CA3 → CA1 (synapse 3)].  2  1.1.2  Synapses  Synapses fall into two structurally distinct categories, type I and type II (Gray, 1959). Type I synapses are expressed mainly on dendritic spines [pl. see (Megias, et al., 2001) for type I synapses on dendritic shafts), possess an asymmetrical synaptic specialization (heavily stained presynaptic, compared to postsynaptic, density), and contain excitatory synapses (Andersen, et al., 1966). Type II synapses, on the contrary, are mostly seen on the dendritic shafts and around the neuronal somata, possess a symmetrical synaptic specialization (presynaptic and postsynaptic densities stain uniformly), and contain inhibitory synapses (Blackstad and Flood, 1963; Gray, 1959).  1.1.3  Organization  Strata  The entorhinal cortex projects axons carrying sensory information from various sources via the perforant path to, subiculum (from layer III), dentate gyrus and the CA3 region (from layer II). The dentate gyrus is, therefore, considered to be the first stage in the intrahippocampal trisynaptic loop. It is divisible into three distinct layers, of which the molecular layer (stratum moleculare, ~ 250 µm thick in rats) is closest to the hippocampal fissure. Afferents from the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex terminate into the outer onethird and the middle one-third of the molecular layer respectively; the granule cell layer 3  (stratum granulosum), comprising granule cells (8-12 µm in diameter, layer thickness- 4-8 somata); the polymorphic layer, enclosed within the characteristic V- or U- shaped structure formed by the molecular and granule cell layers. This layer is the deepest of all and is populated by a variety of neuronal types.  In the hippocampus, pyramidal cell layer (stratum pyramidale) forms the principal cell layer. While it is tightly packed with pyramidal cells (excitatory) in the CA1 region, neurons are relatively sparse or loosely packed in the CA2 and CA3 fields. Some interneurons (inhibitory), basket cells, bistratified cells, and radial trilaminar cells may also be present. Deep to the stratum pyramidale, layers, stratum oriens and alveus can be distinguished. Stratum oriens (referred as the infrapyramidal region) mainly consists: axons originating from CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons; cell bodies of interneurons, basket cell and horizontal trilaminar type; basal dendrites of pyramidal cells; septal and commissural inputs from the contralateral hippocampus. In the CA3 field, superficial to the stratum pyramidale, stratum lucidum contains the mossy fibers from granule cells. Stratum radiatum (referred as the suprapyramidal region) extends superficial to stratum lucidum in the CA3 region and above stratum pyramidale in CA2 and CA1. This stratum contains: Schaffer collateral projections from the CA3 region; septal and commissural fibers; interneurons such as, basket cells, bistratified cells and radial trilaminar cells. Stratum lacunosum-moleculare is the most superficial layer of the hippocampus consisting of afferents from the entorhinal cortex, nucleus reuniens of the thalamus, and a variety of interneurons.  4  Dentate gyrus  The dentate gyrus is considered to be the first stage in the intrahippocampal trisynaptic loop. Granule cells are the principal cells of dentate gyrus. They have a small soma, with two radially oriented, densely spiny dendrites with a cone-shaped arbor, reaching up to the hippocampal fissure. The entire dendritic arbor is confined to the stratum moleculare. Axons called mossy fibers collateralize extensively in the polymorphic layer and enter the CA3 field, forming synapses with the proximal dendrites of the pyramidal neurons (Blackstad, et al., 1970; Claiborne, et al., 1986; Gaarskjaer, 1978; Gaarskjaer, 1986). Mossy cells, present in the polymorphic layer, have dense spiny dendrites with thorny excrescences, located mainly in the hilar region. They project axons to a third of molecular layer, in ipsiand contralateral hippocampus, with collaterals in the hilus (Amaral, 1978; Laurberg and Sorensen, 1981; Ribak, et al., 1985). Both granule and mossy cells excite interneurons through recurrent collaterals (Frotscher and Zimmer, 1983; Ribak, et al., 1986).  CA3  The CA3 field is the second stage of the trisynaptic loop. Pyramidal neurons (large somata) are the targets of granule cell axons, mossy fibers and projections from entorhinal cortex (Amaral and Witter, 1989). Loosely packed in a layer of ~ 60-120 µm thickness, they give rise to one or two spiny apical dendrites. These dendrites branch radially into the strata radiatum and lacunosum-moleculare, and extend into the hippocampal fissure, the border of 5  the hilus (Ishizuka, et al., 1995; Turner, et al., 1995). They form synapses with large mossy terminals in the stratum lucidum (Blackstad and Kjaerheim, 1961; Lorente de No´, 1934; Ramón y Cajal, 1893). Basal dendrites, in contrast, are numerous, bear large complex spines and traverse obliquely along the stratum oriens, and into the alveus. Basal and/or apical dendrites, in addition, possess spines of a special type, called “thorny excrescences” at ~ first 20- 120 µm from the soma, depending on their specific location of the neuron within CA3 (Amaral and Dent, 1981; Blackstad and Kjaerheim, 1961; Chicurel and Harris, 1992). The CA3 region can be further subdivided into: area CA3c, penetrating the dentate hilus; area CA3a, region adjacent to CA2; and CA3b, the area in between. Basal and apical dendritic tree of the CA3c neurons are rather uniform, and relatively short, innervated extensively by mossy fibers. Mossy synapses are generally rare in regions CA3a and CA3b. Dendritic length and branching pattern is, therefore, heterogeneous, depending on the location, as well as, on the diameter of the cell body [8-10 mm, 16-18 mm for 20, 30 µm soma, respectively (Amaral, et al., 1990; Ishizuka, et al., 1995)]. Axons of the CA3 pyramidal neurons collateralize extensively within CA3 (creating associational connections and a highly excitable network), and also project to the CA1 field, as Schaffer collaterals (Schaffer, 1892) spanning across some two-thirds of the hippocampus (Li, et al., 1994; Sik, et al., 1993). Axons from CA3a neurons innervate both strata (-radiatum and –oriens); CA3b neurons terminate in stratum radiatum and to a lesser extent in oriens; CA3c neurons, mainly innervate stratum radiatum. In addition, CA3 neurons also send commissural projections to contralateral hippocampus and to the lateral septal nucleus (Swanson, et al., 1980).  6  CA1  The CA1 field represents the last stage of the trisynaptic loop. Pyramidal neurons (small somata) are arranged in a layer ~ 50-100 µm thick, and receive inputs from the CA3 pyramidal cell axons, the Schaffer collaterals (Schaffer, 1892) and entorhinal afferents (Pare and Llinas, 1995). A single, radially oriented apical dendrite arborizes in the stratum radiatum (proximal apical) and stratum lacunosum-moleculare (distal apical). The density of the tree is gradually reduced into a tuft of thin branches in the stratum lacunosummoleculare, reaching up to the hippocampal fissure. Basal dendrites are numerous, branching extensively in the stratum oriens and reaching into the alveus (Ishizuka, et al., 1995). Both apical and basal dendrites are densely spiny, but unlike in the CA3 region, lack thorny excrescences. Axons emerge from the soma, close to the apical dendrites, and radiate deep into the alveus. They project mainly to the subiculum and entorhinal cortex (Meibach and Siegel, 1977) thereby completing the “cortex-hippocampus” feedback loop. Local collaterals and associational interactions between CA1 neurons are relatively sparse (Amaral and Witter, 1989; Ramón y Cajal, 1893), except in the developing hippocampus (Aniksztejn, et al., 2001). Extrinsic projections include those to the nucleus accumbens, lateral septum and the olfactory bulb (Swanson and Cowan, 1977).  7  Subiculum  Pyramidal cells in this region are categorized into regular-spiking or bursting types (Mason, 1993; Taube, 1993). They are diffusely packed, with a relatively less dense apical and basal dendritic arbor. Apical dendrites extend up to the molecular layer or in many instances into the hippocampal fissure (Greene and Totterdell, 1997; Staff, et al., 2000). As in other regions, dendrites are studded with spines, but their density or morphology is not well known. Inputs to subicular pyramidal neurons are mainly from the entorhinal cortex projections (Witter and Amaral, 1991), and axons of the CA1 neurons (Finch and Babb, 1980). In addition, they receive modulatory inputs from septal nucleus (cholinergic), locus coeruleus (noradrenergic), ventral tegmental area (dopaminergic), thalamus, and raphe nuclei (serotonergic). Axons collateralize extensively within the subicular region, and also project to presubiculum, parasubiculum, and several other cortical and sub-cortical areas (Paxinos, 1995).  Interneurons  At least six types of interneurons have been identified and they seem to spread across all layers of dentate gyrus and the hippocampus (Freund and Buzsaki, 1996). They target different domains on the soma and dendrites of the principal cells, and play a major role in shaping their output, synchronizing neuronal firing and generating behavior-related large scale network oscillations, such as, θ, γ and ripple activity (Klausberger, et al., 2004; Nimmrich, et al., 2005). Basket cell interneurons form a basket-like axonal plexus around the 8  soma and proximal dendrites of the pyramidal neurons. They are further divided based upon the expression of cholecystokinin or parvalbumin, axonal morphology and firing properties (Kawaguchi and Kondo, 2002). Their dendrites branch into strata oriens, radiatum and lacunosum-moleculare. They are excited by pyramidal neurons, in a feed-back and feedforward type inhibition (receive ~2000 excitatory inputs from a large number of neurons), and form ~ 2-10 synapses with as many as 1000 pyramidal neurons (Andersen, et al., 1963; Freund and Buzsaki, 1996; Freund and Katona, 2007). Axo-axonic cells reside close to the pyramidal cell layer, and spread across the entire hippocampal strata. Typically, 4-10 axoaxonic cells target axon-initial segments of pyramidal cells, with each of them individually connecting to ~ 1200 pyramidal neurons (Somogyi, et al., 1982). O-LM cells have their cell bodies and dendrites in the stratum oriens and project axons into stratum lacunosummoleculare, where they inhibit distal apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons, which in turn excite them through recurrent collaterals (Lacaille, et al., 1987). Bistratified cells are also located close to the pyramidal cells and extend their dendrites and axons into strata oriens and radiatum. However, unlike other interneurons, they do not reach the stratum lacunosummoleculare (Halasy, et al., 1996). Other types of interneurons include, LM neurons located mainly in stratum lacunosum-moleculare, superficially in stratum radiatum (Lacaille and Schwartzkroin, 1988), and IS (interneuron-selective) neurons which make synaptic contacts only with other interneurons (Gulyas, et al., 1996). Like the principal neurons, interneurons express α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA)-, N-methyl-Daspartate (NMDA)-, metabotropic glutamate (mGlu), Γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) A- and GABAB- receptors along with a repertoire of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VGCCs).  9  However, they differ considerably in their subunit composition, which confers uniqueness to their firing properties, permeability to ions, such as, Ca2+ (McBain and Fisahn, 2001).  1.1.4  Excitatory and inhibitory receptors  Like elsewhere in the CNS, glutamate is the main excitatory neurotransmitter in the hippocampus. It depolarizes target neurons by activating three major ionotropic receptors: AMPA, kainate, and NMDA and metabotropic mGlu receptors (mGluRs). GABA is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter. It hyperpolarizes target neurons by activating ionotropic GABA A and metabotropic GABAB receptors.  AMPA receptors  AMPA receptors (AMPARs) are tetramers of subunits, GluR1, GluR2, GluR3 and GluR4, in different combinations (Keinanen, et al., 1990; Ozawa, et al., 1998). Based upon the subunit composition, AMPARs vary in channel conductance (Bowie and Mayer, 1995; Donevan and Rogawski, 1995), Ca2+ permeability (Geiger, et al., 1995; Sommer, et al., 1991), and time course of desensitization (Mosbacher, et al., 1994). In pyramidal neurons, AMPARs are composed of GluR1-2 or GluR2-3 subunits (Wenthold, et al., 1996). A rapid pulse of glutamate (in excess of ~ 100 µM) elicits AMPAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic potentials/currents (EPSP/Cs), with a rapid rise time (100-600 µs), suggesting very fast binding kinetics and high open probability ~ 0.6 (Jonas, et al., 1993). They deactivate  10  following clearance of excess synaptic glutamate or by entering into a desensitized state (Colquhoun, et al., 1992).  NMDA receptors  NMDA receptors (NMDARs) are heterotetramers of two distinct subtypes, NR1 and NR2A-D (McBain and Mayer, 1994). NR1 hosts the binding site for amino acids, glycine, Dserine; NR2A-D subunits, on the other hand, contain the glutamate-binding site (Laube, et al., 1997). Unlike AMPARs, NMDARs present on pyramidal neurons exhibit very slow kinetics (activation time constant- 7 ms) and deactivate slowly (~ 200 ms to 1-3 s) with a lower open probability (0.05-0.3). NMDARs however, have higher affinity to glutamate than the AMPARs (1-10 µM vs. 100-500 µM in steady-state conditions), which may explain their slower kinetics (Dingledine, et al., 1999; Lester, et al., 1990). Affinity to glutamate further depends upon the subunit composition (Cull-Candy, et al., 2001). In addition, NMDARs, a) possess an obligatory glycine-binding site (Kleckner and Dingledine, 1988), b) are highly permeable to Ca2+ ions (Ascher and Nowak, 1988), and c) subjected to a voltage-dependent block by extracellular Mg2+ ions (Mayer, et al., 1984; Nowak, et al., 1984). Therefore, for NMDARs to be activated, a release of glutamate must be accompanied by postsynaptic depolarization (to < ~ -50 mV). This need for near simultaneous pre- and post- synaptic activity makes NMDARs function as coincidence detectors, a highly valuable property in Hebbian forms of long-term synaptic plasticity (Hebb, 1949; Wigstrom and Gustafsson, 1986).  11  Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs)  mGluRs are classified into three types: Group I, II and III (Schoepp, et al., 1999). Based upon their physiological activity and receptor structure, they are further subdivided into eight subtypes, Group I (mGlu1R and mGlu5R), Group II (mGlu2R and mGlu3R) and Group III (mGlu4R, mGlu6R, mGlu7R and mGlu8R). Group I receptors are positively coupled to phospholipase C via Gq, and stimulate an increase in inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) (Fagni, et al., 2000). They are mostly postsynaptic [perisynaptic (Lujan, et al., 1996)] and modulate neuronal excitability in the hippocampus by activating Ca2+, K+, other non-specific cationic conductances (Guerineau, et al., 1994; Heuss, et al., 1999; Swartz and Bean, 1992) or IP3-mediated release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (Miller, et al., 1996). Group II and III receptors are negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase via Gi/Go, and inhibit cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production (Schoepp and Johnson, 1993). They are located on presynaptic terminals, sometimes within the active zones (Shigemoto, et al., 1997), inhibit VGCCs and suppress neurotransmitter release (Cartmell and Schoepp, 2000).  GABAA receptors  GABAA receptors (GABAA-Rs) are heteropentameric consisting at least seven different subunits along with various splice variants, α1-6, β1-3, γ1-3, δ, ε, π, and θ (Mehta and Ticku, 1999). These subunits recombine to form GABAA-Rs with unique properties at different regions in the CNS. In the hippocampus, GABAA-Rs are a combination of two α 12  subunits, two β subunits, and either a γ or δ subunit (Chang, et al., 1996). The presence of distinct α, β, and γ or δ subunits determines the affinity for GABA, sensitivity to various pharmacological agents, anchoring to synapses (Barnard, et al., 1998), rate and extent of desensitization, and tonic or phasic inhibition (Nusser and Mody, 2002). GABA, acting via GABAA-Rs, can induce a depolarizing (excitatory)- [in neonatal neurons, (Ben-Ari, 2002; Cherubini, et al., 1991)] or a hyperpolarizing (inhibitory)- response [in adult neurons, (Zhang, et al., 1991)], depending upon the electrochemical gradient for Cl- ions. Claccumulation through Na+-K+-Cl- co-transporter type 1 (NKCC1), switches the equilibrium potential for GABAergic postsynaptic currents (PSCs) - EGABA-PSC in the positive (depolarizing) direction, making it excitatory (Plotkin, et al., 1997). On the contrary, Clextrusion through K+-Cl-- co-transporter type 2 (KCC2) (Deisz and Lux, 1982; Jarolimek, et al., 1999; Misgeld, et al., 1986; Thompson, et al., 1988) makes GABA-ergic PSCs hyperpolarizing (Owens, et al., 1996; Rivera, et al., 1999) and inhibitory. GABAA-Rs are also permeable to HCO3- ions, which may under certain conditions account for GABAA mediated depolarizing responses in pyramidal cell dendrites (Andersen, et al., 1980; Kaila, et al., 1997). Although GABAA-R kinetics vary depending upon the subunit composition (Benkwitz, et al., 2004), they have a generally faster onset and a slower decay compared to AMPAR- EPSCs.  GABAB receptors  Metabotropic GABAB receptors (GABAB-Rs) are obligate heterodimers of GBR1 and GBR2 subunits and structurally homologous to mGluRs (Jones, et al., 1998; Kaupmann, et 13  al., 1998; White, et al., 1998). They are expressed on pre-, post-, and extra- synaptic regions of synapses (Kulik, et al., 2003). When present presynaptically they are negatively coupled to Ca2+ channels, Cav2.2 (N-type) and Cav2.1 (P and Q type) via G-proteins and regulate neurotransmitter release (Anwyl, 1991; Mintz and Bean, 1993). When located postsynaptically, they mediate slow inhibition (lasting several hundred milliseconds) by activating G-protein dependent inward-rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels (Misgeld, et al., 1995) or in some cases, Ca2+ channels (Jones, et al., 1998; Mehta and Ticku, 1999).  14  1.2  Memory  Across the animal kingdom animals adapt to the ever changing environment through multiple forms of learning. Over time, knowledge gained through this process is stored as memories in the central nervous system (CNS). The ability to store, retain and recall past events ensures superior behavioral and/or biological responses at future events. Formation of memories, however, is a multi-step process involving distinct time-bound stages such as encoding, storage and retrieval (Squire, 1986). Following initial acquisition, a process termed “consolidation” is required to stabilize (Alberini, et al., 2006), enhance (Walker, 2005) and integrate the newly encoded information  into novel or pre-existing memories  (semanticization). Therefore, until memories become more permanent, they tend to remain in a fragile state, vulnerable to external amnesic influences (Walker, 2005). Post recall, memories may disintegrate, and require “reconsolidation” to take place (Stickgold and Walker, 2005). These basic processes seem to be true irrespective of the type of memory being processed or formed.  Memories are broadly classified into either declarative or non-declarative (Tulving, 1985). Declarative memory (also referred as, explicit or relational memory) is the memory for conscious recollection of fact- or event- based information. It is further subdivided into episodic memory (specific time-place events) and semantic memory (facts and events gathered through experience). Non-declarative memory (also referred as, implicit memory), on the other hand, is the memory for non-conscious information, which is perfected through repetition and practice (procedural memory for skills and habits). While hippocampus and 15  other closely connected medial temporal lobe structures (MTLS) seem to be critical for processing declarative memories (Squire, 1992), the neuroanatomical structures involved in the formation of non-declarative memories are diverse, comprising several cortical, subcortical and cerebellar networks (Daum and Ackermann, 1997; Nagao and Kitazawa, 2008). The evidence for the existence of specific brain regions (Fig. 2) to encode distinct memory subtypes comes mainly from neuropsychological or behavioral studies involving, amnesic or epileptic patients (Scoville and Milner, 1957), lesions (Zola-Morgan, et al., 1986), electroconvulsive therapy (Squire and Slater, 1983; Squire, et al., 1979; Squire and Zouzounis, 1988) and/or other pathological conditions, such as, the Korsakoff’s syndrome (Shimamura and Squire, 1986).  Figure 2. Brain regions and memory types Schematic illustrating the importance of various brain regions in processing distinct subtypes of memory (each region, and the respective form of memory processed is represented in separate colors)  16  1.2.1  Hippocampus and memory  Declarative memory  Hippocampus and associated MTLS are critical to the formation of “declarative” or “explicit” memories (Eichenbaum, 2001; Scoville and Milner, 1957; Squire, 1992; Tulving and Markowitsch, 1998; Walker and Stickgold, 2006). This perhaps was most convincingly demonstrated in patient H.M, who underwent a bilateral resection of medial portions of the temporal lobe in an effort to be relieved of pharmacologically intractable epilepsy (Scoville and Milner, 1957). A post-surgical neuropsychological assessment performed on H.M and nine other similar patients demonstrated anterograde amnesia, temporally graded retrograde amnesia and a profound inability to convert short-term memory to long lasting forms (Scoville and Milner, 1957). However, previously formed explicit memories remained intact with no noticeable impairment in, acquiring new motor/technical skills (Corkin, 1968; Shadmehr, et al., 1998), perceptual learning, repetition priming (Corkin, 2002) or perceptual aftereffects (Savoy and Gabrieli, 1991).  The above observations suggest the presence of distinct brain regions for processing memories and indicate a time-limited role for MTLS in the formation of declarative memories. A “systems-level” consolidation may, therefore, be required to make declarative memories independent of the hippocampus and MTLS (McClelland, et al., 1995). Whether the hippocampus remains engaged or disengaged post- formation during the lifetime of memories, is currently disputed. Nevertheless, in both cases, “hippocampal-neocortical” 17  interactions (Buzsaki, 1989; Lavenex and Amaral, 2000) seem to play a major role in memory formation. The independence of declarative memories from hippocampus can be achieved via bi-directional information transfer (cortex «--» hippocampus). Considering the sequential and unidirectional flow of information between the cortex and hippocampus, this seems to be an fairly efficient means to offload newly processed information back to neocortical areas, thereby making them permanent repositories for long-term memory (Buzsaki, 1996). Furthermore, this temporary outsourcing of memories to be processed in the hippocampus may prevent the otherwise “catastrophic interference”, as envisaged in parallel distributed processing networks (McClelland, et al., 1995). Several other theories, namely the multiple-trace theory (Nadel and Moscovitch, 1997), dual-process theory (Eichenbaum, et al., 2007; Norman and O'Reilly, 2003; Rugg and Yonelinas, 2003), relational theory (Cohen, et al., 1997) and cognitive-map theory (O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978), have also been proposed to speculate on the cognitive function of the hippocampus. While all theories support a role for hippocampus in processing declarative and/or spatial memories, they seem to differ mainly on the type and the temporal aspects of information processed (Table. 1).  18  Declarative theory  Declarative memories are initially processed in  the  hippocampus  and  MTLS,  but  consolidated to neo-cortical sites disengaging the hippocampus in the process. Multiple-trace theory  Hippocampus and MTLS remain engaged during the lifetime of episodic memories, but not semantic memories.  Dual-process theory  Hippocampus  and MTLS  independently  process aspects within episodic memories, such that contextual-based recollection of events requires the former while familiaritybased recollection requires the latter.  Cognitive-map theory  Hippocampus plays a vital role in creating representations of the environment, to aid in navigation. Thereby, it processes the spatiotemporal aspects of episodic memory  Table 1. Theories on hippocampal function The above table lists various current theories on hippocampal function. It summarizes their main ideas.  19  Spatial memory  In addition to declarative memories, the hippocampus plays a crucial role in the formation of spatial memories. This has been demonstrated in rodents. Rats navigate strategically through mazes, in short-cuts or round-about routes, depending upon the goal and/or reward (Tolman, 1948). This behavior could not be readily explained by the then dominant “stimulus-response” (S-R) or the “stimulus-conditioning” (S-C) theories (Restle, 1957). Tolman and colleagues (Tolman, 1948) contended that cognitive maps, if present, could serve as internal neural representations of physical space providing details of the animal’s position relative to various environmental cues (distal, proximal and extramaze). The animal can then consult these points-of-reference and navigate intelligently in the open field. The discovery of “place-cells” in the hippocampus strongly supported Tolman’s interpretation and laid the foundations for the “cognitive-map theory” (Moser, et al., 2008; O'Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971; O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978), which has been improved upon ever since (Eichenbaum, et al., 1999). Place-cells fire robustly (~ 20-100 Hz), in a locationspecific manner when the animal enters a particular grid, called a “place-field”. These cells are otherwise quiescent, firing at a rate of ~ 1 Hz. In rats, the field and the pyramidal cell’s firing rate within persist (Thompson and Best, 1990) as long as the environmental variables remain intact despite deafening, blind-folding or even after darkening the room (O'Keefe and Speakman, 1987; Quirk, et al., 1990). Altering the size, such as simply expanding the circular open-field in which the rat previously traversed, only results in a “scale-up” of some placefields, whereas changes in shape of the environment often leads to aberrant firing patterns and unpredictable behavior (Muller, et al., 1987). Similarly, modifications in cues, strategies, 20  head-direction or the speed of animal’s movement, result in a dramatic re-mapping or reorganization of place-fields (Breese, et al., 1989; Markus, et al., 1995; McNaughton, et al., 1983).  Although evidence from studies on “place-cells” clearly emphasize a role for the hippocampus in processing spatial memories, the concept of a cognitive map, is currently disputed. Opposing views have emerged mainly because adjacent cells have been found to have largely un-correlated firing patterns (Tanila, et al., 1997), and rats seem to rely overtly on relative distances from and between cues rather than respective positions of all the cues (O'Keefe and Burgess, 1996). Therefore, it appears that space in hippocampus is represented in a rather discontinuous manner, with place-fields of neighboring cells “overlapping or clustering” upon each other, instead of lining up in a continuous “Cartesian type” topographical representation, as originally proposed in the cognitive-map theory (Eichenbaum, et al., 1989; Hampson, et al., 1996). Clearly, more studies are required to understand exactly how time and space are represented in the hippocampus.  Evidence as to the role of hippocampus in spatial memories also emerges from studies assessing the structural changes in hippocampus across species in different situations. Hippocampal size is plastic, and varies according to species dependence on navigational skills. For instance, hippocampal volume relative to brain/-body size is higher in small mammals, birds and in humans, especially taxi-drivers, who rely extensively on spatial navigation (Lee, et al., 1998; Maguire, et al., 2000). These alterations in size can also be seasonal, and changes seem to occur according to impending demand (Smulders, et al., 21  1995). Not surprisingly, therefore, lesions to hippocampus or its extrinsic fiber connections selectively impair performance in spatial tasks while sparing non-spatial tasks (M'Harzi, et al., 1991; Mahut, 1972; O'Keefe, et al., 1975; White and McDonald, 1993).  Taken together, the data from a broad range of neuropsychological, anatomical, electrophysiological and behavioral studies, firmly establish the importance of hippocampus in the formation of declarative and spatial memories.  1.3  1.3.1  Memory consolidation and sleep  Consolidation of memories  Memories, as mentioned elsewhere, are formed in distinct stages: acquisition (learning), consolidation and recall (Squire, 1986). Consolidation is an active process during which newly encoded information is strengthened via a repertoire of cellular, sub-cellular and systems-level processes, and gradually incorporated into neocortex and other brain regions for long-term storage. Since consolidation is a time-bound and continuous process, it takes place during both wakefulness and sleep. Not surprisingly, therefore, distractions in periods immediately post-learning, or episodes of post-training sleep-deprivation, significantly interrupt memory formation and impair task re-performance (McGaugh, 2000; Müller and Pilzecker, 1900). Although it seems to be reasonably clear as to why the consolidation process itself is slow (Frankland and Bontempi, 2005; Kandel, 2001;  22  McClelland, et al., 1995), exactly how it takes place and the mechanisms involved are presently unclear.  In rats, theta oscillations can be recorded from dentate gyrus during exploratory activity (Bland, 1986). On the other hand, awake immobility is dominated by irregular sharp waves (SPWs- 0.02-3 Hz, 40-120 ms duration) and high-frequency ripples (140-200 Hz) (Buzsaki, 1986). Granule cells of the dentate gyrus are especially active during the theta, compared to non-theta states. In contrast, pyramidal cells of the CA3 and CA1 regions, fire synchronous population bursts during SPWs and are silent (except “place-cells”) during theta (Buzsaki, 1986; Buzsaki, et al., 1983). The locus for theta and SPWs therefore, appears to be the granule and pyramidal cells in the hippocampus, respectively (Buzsaki, et al., 1983; Olmstead, et al., 1973; Suzuki and Smith, 1985). Based upon these observations, Buzsaki et al., proposed a “two-stage model” for the consolidation of memories (Buzsaki, 1989).  According to this model, during exploration subcortical influences (via the entorhinal cortex) prime granule cells of the dentate gyrus. These neurons in-turn induce a mild heterosynaptic potentiation in certain “initiator cells” of the CA3 region. During SPWs, “initiator cells” may recruit additional cells and subsequently associate to alter the synaptic efficacy of their target CA1 and subicular neurons (Buzsaki, 1989; Buzsaki, 1996). The CA3 region, with its extensive associational interconnectivity, equips the neural network with an intrinsic capability to strengthen (via recurrent activation?) the otherwise labile memory traces. Sequential alteration in the synaptic excitability of selected neurons in this fashion may further ensure that the same set of neurons are activated during subsequent reactivations 23  or recall of the memory (Buzsaki, 1989). The non-reciprocal and unidirectional interconnections along the hippocampal trisynaptic loop, as opposed to the largely reciprocal connections between various regions in the neocortex (Bartesaghi, et al., 1988; Ramón y Cajal, 1893), also ensures the preservation of the fidelity of neuronal information before it is fed back into the cortical regions of origin. Overall, it therefore, seems that the hippocampus and the various sub-regions within it are self-sufficient enough to confer discrete computational capabilities to neural networks for processing multimodal information, and creating an integrated representation for newly acquired information, which can then be stored in higher brain centers as memories at a later stage (Nakazawa, et al., 2002). The twostage model, however, lacks experimental evidence for many of its assumptions. Despite shortcomings, emerging evidence in literature is supportive of the existence of “initiator cells”, and the need for “hippocampal-neocortical dialogue” (Buzsaki, 1996; Buzsaki and Czeh, 1992; Molle and Born, 2009) in forming memories. Since not all forms of memory are hippocampus dependent (Lehmann, et al., 2007), it appears that consolidation processes differ with respect to the type of memory. These aspects need to be further investigated.  Sleep is a physiological imperative that has been observed in most animals. Although it has important roles in a variety of functions (Siegel, 2005), its ability to somehow actively facilitate consolidation of newly acquired information is especially interesting and attractive. The discovery of the heterogenous nature of sleep (Aserinsky and Kleitman, 1953) led to speculations that sleep could indeed serve as a platform for “offline-reprocessing” of memories. In fact, stage specific oscillations during sleep have been shown to drive and synchronize network activity between thalamus, cortex and hippocampus, an arrangement 24  which is highly desirable for systems-level consolidation of memories (Born, 2010; Siegel, 2001).  1.3.2  Role of sleep  Sleep is sub-divided into distinct stages. It encompasses recurring cycles of non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS; stages I to IV) and rapid eye movement sleep (REMS), which in humans, alternate every 90-min across the night (Aserinsky and Kleitman, 1953). While the amount of time spent in slow wave sleep (SWS) or deep sleep (NREM stages 3 and 4) is higher early in the sleep cycle, the proportion of REM or dream sleep gradually increases until natural awakening. Electroencephalograms (EEGs) during NREM stages, I, II, III & IV comprise, alpha (8-13 Hz) to theta waves (4-7 Hz); sleep spindles (11-16 Hz) and Kcomplexes; and delta waves (1-4 Hz), respectively. Stages III and IV, are together referred to as the SWS. EEG during REMS mainly consists of fast desynchronized activity and theta waves [4-7 Hz] (Steriade, 2006).  The evidence for the role of sleep in consolidation of memories comes from disparate studies. Numerous studies have confirmed the positive effects of sleep on declarative and procedural memories (Marshall and Born, 2007; Robertson, et al., 2004; Smith, 2001). Compared to equal periods of post-learning wakefulness, episodes of sleep, significantly improve retention of declarative information, and procedural skills (Plihal and Born, 1999; Walker, et al., 2003). There is, however, no consensus either on the duration or the latency of the onset of specific sleep stages, for performance gains. Studies have reported benefits of 25  paradoxical sleep (or REMS) windows (PSWs) for place learning, fine motor procedural tasks, and implicit learning (Karni, et al., 1994; Plihal and Born, 1999; Smith, 1995). Selective paradoxical sleep-deprivation during, but not outside PSWs impairs re-performance (Smith and Butler, 1982). The characteristics of PSWs, however, seem to vary according to the strain of the animal, type of the learning task, and the learning protocol employed (Smith, 1985). Similarly, SWS has been implicated in the consolidation of mainly declarative and explicit memories (Barrett and Ekstrand, 1972; Fowler, et al., 1973; Plihal and Born, 1999; Yaroush, et al., 1971). However, other data indicate the need for a memory trace to be processed first in SWS and then in REMS, in a sequential, and dual-step manner (Giuditta, et al., 1995). The specific influence of REMS and NREMS in the formation of individual forms of memory, therefore, seems to depend mostly upon the type of learning. Hence, it is reasonable to conclude that our current understanding of the respective role of REMS and NREMS will be greatly enhanced by designing behavioral studies with stage-specific sleepdeprivation.  Despite clear indications of a role for sleep in memory, exactly how it mediates this process is unclear. It is thought that sleep creates a brain state distinct from wakefulness, which is highly conducive to the formation of memories. SWS oscillations (slow, delta waves, spindles), are correlated to rhythmic spike bursts in the thalamus and cortex during the up- and down- states (Amzica, et al., 1997; Steriade, 1999). The temporal relationship, which exists in this synchrony, could in fact facilitate the “cortical-hippocampal dialogue” (Isomura, et al., 2006; Siapas and Wilson, 1998; Sirota, et al., 2003; Wierzynski, et al., 2009) and provide adequate conditions for synaptic plasticity, the purported cellular mechanism for 26  learning and memory, to occur (Buzsaki, 1989). Ponto-geniculo-occipital (PGO) waves, which are prominent in the EEG during or slightly before the REMS, have also been implicated in brain development and synaptic plasticity (Datta, 1999). Furthermore, high or low levels of acetylcholine in the brain during REMS and NREMS, respectively, may directly modulate the efficacy of hippocampal synaptic transmission, by suppressing or potentiating (facilitate synaptic plasticity) them via subcortical afferents (Hasselmo, 1999). Indeed, fornix-fimbria lesions result in large amplitude sharp-waves [SPWs] (Buzsaki, et al., 1988; Buzsaki, et al., 1989). The various oscillations during sleep, therefore, aid synaptic plasticity and the formation of memories via reactivation.  In the hippocampus during sleep, reactivation of the original neural networks that were active during encoding in preceding wakefulness has been observed. Place-cells in the hippocampus fire uniquely when the animal navigates through individual place-fields during a spatial exploratory behavior (O'Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971; Pavlides and Winson, 1989; Skaggs and McNaughton, 1996; Wilson and McNaughton, 1994). Single and en masse network recordings from these cells reveal that the firing pattern as well as the temporal order is played back, although, on a faster time scale (Nadasdy, et al., 1999) during REMS and SWS (Poe, et al., 2000; Qin, et al., 1997). Reactivation of firing patterns have also been discovered in the thalamus, striatum and the neocortex (Ji and Wilson, 2007; Lansink, et al., 2008; Ribeiro, et al., 2004).  Consolidation of memories is likely to involve a cascade of molecular events. Several studies have probed for changes in brain protein synthesis, and gene transcription (Cirelli, 27  2002). There seems to be a positive correlation between learning, SWS duration and cerebral protein synthesis in monkeys (Nakanishi, et al., 1997). Blocking protein synthesis using anisomycin during REM sleep impairs learning (Smith, et al., 1991). The expression of Zif268, an immediate-early gene, is increased in sleep post-exposure, compared to wakefulness. Non-exposed rats, however, showed a decrease in Zif-268 levels both in REMS and NREMS, compared to wakefulness (Ribeiro, et al., 1999).  Taken together, the data on memory, sleep and hippocampal-dependent learning, reveal how these processes are interlinked in a manner that facilitates learning, storage of memories, and recall. However, a clear understanding of the consolidating of memories, and the role for sleep is complete only when a corresponding process is identified at a more local level, i.e., at the level of the synapse. It has been long held that activity dependent modification of synaptic strength (plasticity) may underlie various forms of learning and that synapse itself could be the locus for memory (Hebb, 1949). The discovery of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), was an important breakthrough, following which several laboratories projected them as candidate mechanisms for learning and memory at the cellular level (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993; Bliss and Lomo, 1973; Lynch and Baudry, 1984; Lynch, et al., 1977). If this were true, cognitive impairments evident at the behavioral level must manifest as changes to LTP and/or LTD at the cellular level. In fact, strong correlations have been found between synaptic plasticity and memory. Studies have consistently reported improvements in learning when LTP occurs and impairment in learning and disruption in memory consolidation when LTP is blocked, in a variety of learning paradigms (Martin, et al., 2000). LTD, however, has traditionally been viewed as a 28  counterpart for LTP, as a mechanism to undo its effects (Bear and Malenka, 1994). It is only recently that investigators have identified a much broader role for LTD in formation of certain types of memories (Manahan-Vaughan and Braunewell, 1999), in forgetting and amnesia (Tsumoto, 1993), and in preventing saturation of neural networks (Dayan and Willshaw, 1991). Therefore, it appears that both LTP and LTD are equally important in the context of learning and in the maintenance of the normal functioning and order in the CNS.  1.4  LTP and LTD as cellular correlates for memory  Certain properties of LTP and LTD make them excellent candidates for memory at the cellular level; a) LTP and LTD occur both in vitro as well as in vivo (Bliss and GardnerMedwin, 1973; Bliss and Lomo, 1973; Levy and Steward, 1979; Lynch, et al., 1977), and has been found almost universally in the CNS, b) LTP can be rapidly induced following tetanic stimulation of the inputs and persists for several hours or days, in other words, it outlasts the cause just like the formation of memory itself (Abraham, 2003), c) LTP is input-specific and co-operative (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993; McNaughton, et al., 1978; Sastry, et al., 1986). Stimulus protocols that mimic endogenous firing patterns successfully to induce LTP & LTD (Larson, et al., 1986; Staubli and Lynch, 1987), d) activation of the test input along with a concurrent tetanic stimulation of other excitatory afferents or a simultaneous depolarization of the postsynaptic neuron can associatively induce LTP (Barrionuevo and Brown, 1983; Sastry, et al., 1986; Wigstrom, et al., 1986), while hyperpolarizing the postsynaptic neuron elicits LTD (Debanne and Thompson, 1996; Stanton and Sejnowski, 1989). The associative induction of LTP and LTD is thought to play an important role in consolidation of 29  associative memory, e) sleep, which has been shown to promote synaptic plasticity (Benington and Frank, 2003), facilitates neural development, learning, as well as, memory. On the contrary, total/partial sleep-deprivation significantly impairs LTP in hippocampus and other areas of the brain (Campbell, et al., 2002; Davis, et al., 2006; Kopp, et al., 2006; McDermott, et al., 2003; Shaffery, et al., 2006; Tartar, et al., 2006).  1.4.1  Synaptic plasticity and learning  Retention deficits in spatial memory during senescence have been correlated to the degree/persistence of LTP (Barnes, 1979; Barnes and McNaughton, 1985). Similarly, over expression of amyloid precursor protein (APP) impairs performance in a spatial alteration task (Hsiao, et al., 1996). This decline in performance is correlated to a parallel decrease in LTP (Chapman, et al., 1999). Saturation of LTP or LTD by repeated stimulations or by pharmacologically blocking NMDARs or mGluRs, reversibly occlude spatial learning, certain types of olfactory learning, contextual fear conditioning, and other tasks (Danysz, et al., 1988; Danysz, et al., 1995; Moser, et al., 1998; Nielsen, et al., 1997). NMDAR1 or GluR1 mutants (O'Keefe, 1993; Tsien, et al., 1996) lack LTP, and exhibit decreased performance in a water maze owing to abnormal place fields and an overall reduction in correlated firing (McHugh, et al., 1996). On the contrary, agents that enhance hippocampal LTP improve learning (Lynch, 1998; Seabrook, et al., 1997; Staubli, et al., 1994). Although much less is known on how LTD influences learning, studies indicate that LTD is important in spatial learning (McNaughton, et al., 1986) and novelty acquisition of an object-place configuration (Manahan-Vaughan and Braunewell, 1999). 30  1.4.2  Synaptic plasticity and sleep  Learning paradigms that promote plasticity alter subsequent sleep (Smith and Lapp, 1991). Sleep enhances (Benington and Frank, 2003; Frank, et al., 2001), whereas, sleepdeprivation is detrimental to learning as well as LTP (Campbell, et al., 2002; Davis, et al., 2006; Kopp, et al., 2006; McDermott, et al., 2003; Tartar, et al., 2006). Sleep entails patterns of activity that may facilitate synaptic remodeling (Buzsaki, 1989; Buzsaki, 1996; Buzsaki, 1998). High percentage of REMS during development is critical for brain maturation and plasticity (Marks, et al., 1995). Selective sleep-deprivation during this critical period can adversely affect brain re-wiring (Fagiolini, et al., 1994; Frank, et al., 2001; Marks, et al., 1995). Although a majority of studies have focused on the adverse effects of sleepdeprivation on LTP, not much is known as to how it affects LTD. LTD is implicated in a variety of functional roles in the CNS. It protects neurons by dampening neuronal hyperexcitability, prevents a saturation of neuronal network activity (Dayan and Willshaw, 1991), and facilitates the formation of certain types of memories (Manahan-Vaughan and Braunewell, 1999). In adult/aged rats, however, an enhanced susceptibility to LTD has been found to not only interrupt the maintenance of LTP (Norris, et al., 1996), but also account for a slower pace of learning, poor retention and faster forgetting (Foster and Kumar, 2007). These observations support a vital role for LTD in the formation of memories, the modulation of LTP, and in normal functioning of the CNS.  In the present study, we therefore hypothesized that “a 12 h period of sleep-deprivation affects LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus”. This hypothesis was tested by 31  evaluating Schaffer collateral stimulation induced changes in the excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission. Specifically, the role of mGluRs, NMDARs, GABAA-Rs and GABABRs were tested pharmacologically. In additional experiments, changes to receptor expression, co-localization  and  dimerization  were  examined  using  immunohistochemistry,  immunofluorescence and co-IP techniques. All experiments were performed in normally sleeping and SD rats.  32  Chapter 2: Materials and Methods  This section provides a detailed description of the source of the animals, hippocampal slice preparation, incubating and recording chambers, superfusion media, intracellular pipette solutions, recording and stimulating equipment, field and patch-clamp recordings, LTD induction, data analysis and experimental protocols used.  2.1  Animals  Male Wistar rats (3-4 week old) were purchased from the Animal Care Centre at The University of British Columbia (UBC) or Charles River facility. Animals were delivered in groups, 2-4 rats, to the Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics in the mornings (between 9:00 and 10:00 AM). They were housed in the Department’s animal holding facility, and given about 2-3 days to acclimatize. Prior to experiments, animals were brought to the laboratory in clean, ventilated cages, with ample food, water and environmental enrichment. All experiments were performed in accordance to the approved guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the UBC animal care (Certificate no’s: A07-0536 and A10-0381)  2.2  Sleep-deprivation  Investigators routinely use “gentle-handling”, “forced locomotion” or the “inverted flowerpot” techniques to sleep-deprive animals (Campbell, et al., 2002; Davis, et al., 2003; 33  McDermott, et al., 2003). Among these well established procedures, the gentle-handling method is considered to be most humane. The other two procedures have been shown to simultaneously elevate stress (using serum corticosterone levels as an index) and physical exhaustion, which are unrelated to sleep-disruption per se. In our studies, animals were sleepdeprived (for 12 hours) using the gentle-handling technique. During this time, animals were under the constant observation of well-trained personnel (2 people were present at any time). Observer teams switched alternatively every 4-6 hours. If animals entered into sleep or recumbence, they were gently awoken with tactile or visual stimuli, which involved, for instance, prodding with a brush or placement of novel “safe” objects in their vicinity, to provoke behavioral and mental activity. Animals were housed in a clean cage, in the temperature-controlled laboratory, with ample food and water at any given time.  2.3  Brain-slice preparation  Brain slices were prepared as described in previous studies (Xie, et al., 1995). The dissection area was set up close to a large sink. The following surgical instruments and materials were used for brain removal: guillotine, folded paper towels, a #11 scalpel blade, surgical scissors, bone rongeurs, a modified spatula, synthetic artists brush (number 0 or 00), modified Pasteur pipette fitted with a rubber bulb, 110 mm diameter Whatman Filter paper, ice and Petri dishes. Sucrose-based artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) was used, to block synaptic transmission and minimize Ca2+, NMDAR dependent excitotoxicity during dissection (see Media and Drugs; Section #2.5). Solutions were kept ice-cold during the  34  entire procedure to slow down the metabolic rate and decrease the oxygen demand (Hagerdal, et al., 1975; Nishizaki, et al., 1988).  Animals were anesthetized with halothane and decapitated using a guillotine at the end of the 12 h light period. The head was immediately immersed in ice cold sucrose based ACSF, bubbled with carbogen (95% O2/5% CO2). Using the #11 scalpel, an incision was made in the middle of the scalp starting from near to the nasal bone and running caudally up to the occipital bone. This procedure exposed the sutures on the dorsal surface of the skull. With the rat’s head firmly held, the cutting edge of the surgical scissors were placed superior to the foramen magnum at the posterior portion of the skull. Keeping the lower sheer against the skull’s inner surface, the calvarium was then cut through the occipital plate first, then along the sagittal suture, and rostrally upwards to the frontal plates. Lateral cuts were made at the base and top of the saggital cut. The bone rongeurs was then slid under the left and right parietal plates, squeezed to hold the plates, and the wrist rotated upwards to retract the bones and expose the surface of the brain. After a quick inspection for the dura mater that may be still attached to the temporal plates, the modified spatula was moved side-to-side and forwards-backwards to sever any cranial nerves. The brain was then scooped out into ice cold ACSF, and allowed to chill. This procedure was completed in ~ 35-40 seconds.  The brain was then placed on a dampened (with ACSF) Whatman filter kept over the lid of an ice-cold Petri dish. The two hemispheres were separated, and the olfactory bulb and brainstem-cerebellum severed. One hemisphere was discarded and the other glued to an acrylic cutting block with cyanoacrylate (Lepage Accu-Flo No.8 or Crazy glue). The 35  mounted tissue was then placed in a bath chamber filled with ice-cold oxygenated sucroseACSF, and positioned carefully on a Vibroslice (World Precision Instruments Inc.). Transverse sections were cut to a thickness of 400 µm. A 350-400 µm thick hippocampal slice is a compromise between obtaining a useful core of the tissue, with the dendritic arbor intact, and the diffusion barriers posed by a thicker slice. CA3 region was cut off from the slice to diminish the influence of spontaneous activity from these neurons. Typically 4 slices could be obtained from a single hemisphere in this fashion/ animal.  The cut slices were immediately transferred to a holding chamber containing oxygenated normal-ACSF (flow rate ~ 1.5 ml/min; temperature ~ 25-26 ºC) (see Media and Drugs; Section #2.5), and gently placed over a submerged nylon mesh. Care was taken so as to not agitate slices while bubbling carbogen. Slices were allowed to equilibrate for at least 11.5 h before being placed in the recording chamber. This incubation period is imperative because slices immediately post-dissection are physiologically non-responsive. They display no spontaneous activity for various reasons (Teyler, 1980). Slices regain their electrophysiological and biochemical activity post-incubation, and continue to give responses to experimental manipulations for at least 6 hours thereafter.  2.4  Recording chamber  An interface-type chamber was constructed from Plexiglas, such that it fit snugly in to a circular adaptor plate. This was then affixed on to the Burleigh Gibraltar platform. Slices rested on the central flat rectangular area over a cover slip base. They were held in position 36  using a custom-made slice anchor (U-shaped flat stainless steel wire with nylon threads). The media entered the chamber via a gravity-fed system (at a rate of ~ 1.5-2 ml/min). 3-4 barrels (60 ml capacity) mounted high above the chamber onto an aluminum frame acted as reservoirs for holding different solutions. By raising or lowering the aluminum frame, the desired flow rate could be achieved. Aeration in each barrel was controlled using a single gas line with adjustable valves. Individual flow lines were switched on and off using butterfly clips, and passed through a manifold before entering the chamber’s inlet. This setup ensured rapid exchange of different media, when required. A vacuum line attached to the chamber’s outlet removed the superfusing medium as it flowed. Care was taken to minimize dead space and all feed lines were made free of large air bubbles before the start of the experiment. Temperature in the chamber was maintained at 25-26 ºC.  2.5  Media and drugs  Fresh solutions were prepared each day prior to the experiment. For slicing: sucrosebased ACSF (in mM): 234 sucrose, 2.5 KCl, 28 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 3 pyruvic acid, 1 ascorbic acid, 7 MgCl2, 0.5 CaCl2 and 10 dextrose (saturated with 95% O2/5% CO2); pH was adjusted to 7.35-7.4 (when bubbled with carbogen). For incubation and perfusion: normalACSF (in mM): 120 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.8 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2 and 10 dextrose (saturated with 95% O2/5% CO2); pH was adjusted to 7.35-7.4 (when bubbled with carbogen). Following incubation, individual slices were transferred into a recording chamber superfused with ACSF at a rate of 1.5-2 ml/min.  37  For intracellular recordings- patch-pipette solution (in mM): 135 K-gluconate, 10 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 10  KCl, 1 1,2-bis(o-  aminophenoxy) ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA), 5 Mg-ATP, 0.1 CaCl2, 10 Na2phosphocreatine, 0.4 Na3-GTP and creatine phosphokinase 50 U/ml; pH was adjusted to 7.27.3 with KOH). Mg-ATP and Na2-phosphocreatine ensured the required ATP regeneration, necessary to prevent run down of GABAA-R-mediated responses (Chen, et al., 1990; OhnoShosaku, et al., 1989). All patch-clamp recording solutions were filtered through a 0.22 µm pore size syringe filter (Nalgene #176-0020) prior to use.  38  Drugs  Concentration (µM) & solubility  Source (catalog no.)  Main pharmacological action  D, L-2-amino-5phosphonopentanoic acid (APV)  50 (in water to 100 mM)  Tocris Bioscience (0106)  NMDAR antagonist  6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3dione (DNQX)  Tocris Bioscience (0189) Ascent Scientific (Asc-252)  Non-NMDAR selective antagonist  (RS)-α-Methyl-4carboxyphenylglycine disodium salt (MCPG)  20 In DMSO to 100 mM) 500 (in water to 100 mM)  (S)-(+)-α-Amino-4-carboxy-2methylbenzeneacetic acid (LY-367385) 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl) pyridine hydrochloride (MPEP)  100 (in 1.1 eq. NaOH to 100 mM) 40 (in water to 5 mM)  Ascent Scientific (Asc-067) Ascent Scientific (Asc-008)  Selective mGlu1αR antagonist  Nitrendipine  5 (in DMSO to 50 mM) 50 (in water)  L-type Ca2+ channel blocker  1 (in DMSO to 100 mM) 10 (in water to 20 mM) 2 (in DMSO to 100 mM)  Tocris Bioscience (0601) Sigma Chemicals (339350) Ascent Scientific (Asc-286) Tocris Bioscience (2503) Tocris Bioscience (1248)  10 (in DMSO to 10 mM)  Tocris Bioscience (2001)  Ni2+  Thapsigargin  Bicuculline methiodide  (2S)-3-[[(1S)-1-(3,4Dichlorophenyl) ethyl] amino2-hydroxypropyl] (phenyl methyl) phosphinic acid hydrochloride (CGP-55845) N,N'-Dicyclopentyl-2(methylthio)-5-nitro-4,6pyrimidinediamine (GS39783)  Non-selective group I/group II mGluR antagonist  Non-competitive mGlu5R antagonist  T-type Ca2+ channel blocker Sarcoplasmic Ca2+ATPase inhibitor GABAA-R antagonist  Selective GABAB-R antagonist  Positive allosteric modulator of GABABR function  Table 2. Media and drugs  39  The above table is a list of various pharmacological agents, along with information on the concentrations, solubility, source and function, used in this project.    Drugs were stored in concentrated stock solutions (-20 or -80 ºC, as needed), and diluted directly using normal-ACSF to their final concentrations.    When dissolved in DMSO, the final concentration was at 0.1 % in the recording media.  2.6  2.6.1  Recording and stimulation equipment  Patch pipettes  Patch-clamp recording electrodes were made from thin-walled borosilicate glass capillaries (inner diameter- 1.17 mm; outer diameter 1.5 mm), purchased from World Precision Instruments, Inc. Electrodes were fabricated on a Flaming/Brown programmable micropipette puller (model P-87; Sutter Instruments) using preset parameters. When filled with patch-pipette solutions, the resistance varied between 7-10 MΩ.  2.6.2  Data acquisition  Synaptic potentials (intra- and extra- cellular) were recorded using the Axopatch 200A (Axon Instruments) amplifier. The Axopatch 200A had a very low open circuit noise of 0.16 pA rms (at 10 KHz bandwidth). The headstage (CV 201; Axon Instruments), had a 40  precision resistor (gain, β=1) that set the pre-amplifier gain to 10. Capacitance neutralization capacity was up to 100 pF. Evoked responses were monitored on a dual beam storage oscilloscope (Tektronix 5113), digitized and stored for offline analysis with a Digidata 1220 board (Axon Instruments) and MS-DOS based Fetchex software. Low pass filtering was set at 5 kHz. Data were analyzed offline using the Mini Analysis program (Synaptosoft).  2.6.3  Stimulation and isolation units  Current was generated using a Grass S88 dual output stimulator. The stimulator output was connected to photoelectric constant isolation unit (PSIU6, Grass Instruments) for pulsatile stimulation procedures or rectangular current pulses. Control stimulation frequency was set at 0.05 Hz with square pulses (0.1-0.2 ms duration), and a stimulus intensity high enough to evoke a half-maximal pEPSPs, EPSCs or inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs). This was done to allow enough room for potentiation or depression of responses following a conditioning stimulation.  2.6.4  Stimulating electrodes  Bipolar concentric platinum electrodes (SNEX-100, David Kopf Instruments) had a shaft length of 50 mm. The tip of the electrode had a contact length and diameter of 0.75 mm and 0.1 mm, respectively. The resistance of this electrode was constantly monitored (was ~ 1 MΩ), and replaced if it exceeded 7 MΩ.  41  2.7  Positioning of electrodes  The stimulating electrode was attached to a Narishige micromanipulator (model NMN-21), which permitted a movement range along the three axes, for coarse (X15mm, Y15mm, Z15mm; full knob rotation ~ 4mm) and for fine (X6mm, Y6mm, Z6mm; full knob rotation 250 µm with a minimum graduation of 1 µm) movement. Recording electrodes were attached to Narishige Water Hydraulic micromanipulator (model MHW-3), which permitted a movement range along the three axes for coarse (X30mm, Y30mm, Z30mm; full knob rotation ~ 4mm) and for fine (X2mm, Y2mm, Z2mm; full knob rotation ~ 50µm with a minimum graduation of 0.2µm) movement. Both NMN-21 and MHW-3 systems were mounted on a Burleigh Gibraltar platform. This setup ensured precision movement and stability.  2.8  Microscope and imaging  For electrophysiological experiments, the setup included a Zeiss Axioskop 2 FS plus upright microscope, which was mounted on the Burleigh Gibraltar platform, which provided the X-Y stage. The field of view was ~ 23 mm. The system was equipped with Nomarski interference optics, which provided excellent optical sections with an optimum resolution for thick slices. The condenser was setup for Kohler illumination. HAL 100 provided a 100 Watt halogen light source with variable intensity. The microscope was fitted with high numerical aperture objectives (Zeiss A-Plan 10x, 0.24 and Achroplan 40x, 0.80W). The system was equipped with an IR-1000 infrared CCD (1/2” interline) monochrome video camera (with a 42  separate control unit for gain and black levels) connected to a Hitachi B/W monitor (VM1720U). The IR-1000 offered excellent relative spectral sensitivity (> 80%) in the near IR and the entire visible spectrum (380 nm to 1200 nm), producing crystal clear images of the slice when illuminated using the IR light.  For immunohistochemical and co-localization studies, slides were visualized and photographed using a Leica DMLB motorized microscope equipped with a QImaging Retiga 2000R Peltier cooled CCD camera (quantum efficiency ~ 55% at 500 nm; 7.4µm x 7.4µm pixel size; 12 bit). The system was equipped with a, a) metal halide arc lamp source, which produced distinct peaks at wavelengths 365, 405, 436, 546 and 579 nm, b) filter block sets for Alexa 488 and Alexa 594, and c) Leica PL FLUOTAR 2.5x, 0.07; HC PL APO CS 10x, 0.40; HCX PL APO 40x, 1.25-0.75 oil and HCX PL APO 63x, 1.40 oil objectives. For colocalization, images were acquired on two channels (green and red) and merged. In merged images, yellow fluorescence indicates co-localization of red- and green- fluorescence tagged proteins. Images were acquired using the QCapture Pro software and analyzed.  2.9  Patch-clamp and field recording setup  The  Burleigh  Gibraltar  platform,  which  supported  the  microscope  and  micromanipulators, stood on a vibration-free isolation table (Nitrogen controlled). The entire setup was enclosed within a Faraday cage, which was grounded to a separate line in the building. This minimized electrical noise arising from other extraneous sources.  43  2.10 Electrophysiological recordings  Figure 3. Positioning of stimulating and recording electrodes The figure depicts a hippocampal slice preparation on the left. On the right, the enlarged area shows the respective areas where the stimulation (STIM) and recording electrodes (REC 1 & 2) are placed. In our experiments, REC 2 was the position for pEPSPs and REC 1 for EPSCs or IPSCs  2.10.1 Field recordings (for pEPSPs)  The stimulating electrode was positioned (using NMN-21) in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 region ~ 300-400 µm from the planned recording site, and ~ 200 µm from the stratum pyramidale (Fig. 3). The depth of the placement varied between 100-200 µm. The recording electrode (filled with normal-ACSF) was positioned in the dendritic region (apical) at a similar distance from the stratum pyramidale. pEPSPs were evoked at a rate of 0.05 Hz (square pulses 40-100 µs duration, 10-30 µA current). The recording electrode was then 44  gradually advanced into the planned site with MHW-3. Usually field responses increased to a certain depth and started to decrease. At this point, the lowering was stopped, and stable pretetanic controls (15-20 min) were obtained.  Figure 4. Whole-cell recording procedure The relative position of the patch electrode and the cell is illustrated schematically on the left. To the right are changes to the test-pulse at different stages, as the resistance across the patch electrode tip goes up or down. A reduction in test-pulse current indicates a closer distance between the electrode tip and the cell. In (A), the recording electrode is just above the cell, not in direct contact, so the  45  resistance is low (~ 1-10 MΩ) and the test-pulse current is large. In (B), as the electrode touches the cell surface, the resistance goes up slightly and the test-pulse current becomes smaller. In (C), a gigaseal is established, which pulls a small patch of membrane up into the electrode tip, increasing the resistance to about > 2 GΩ. The electrode capacitive transients are also visible. In (D), the electrode capacitance transients are nulled and finally, in (E), rupture of the cell membrane is achieved by a strong suction, entering the whole-cell mode. Note the drop in resistance and large capacitance transients.  2.10.2 Whole-cell recordings (for EPSCs or IPSCs)  Pyramidal neurons were visually identified by their shape and location using the Zeiss Axioskop 2 FS plus microscope. The stimulating electrode was placed in a similar fashion, as described in the field recordings (but closer to stratum pyramidale for IPSCs; Figure. 4). Before the recording electrode (connected to the headstage, which served as a preamplifier) was lowered into the recording chamber, slight positive pressure was applied via a 10 ml syringe connected to the electrode holder through a Teflon tubing (this procedure prevented the contamination of the tip of the electrode with cell debris). Once the recording electrode was lowered into the media, a 0.45 nA, 50 ms hyperpolarizing rectangular current pulse was delivered through the pipette every 2 s. The changes to the test-pulse were carefully monitored on an oscilloscope as the electrode approached the cell, as explained in Figure 4A, B, C, D, E) and whole-cell configuration achieved. If the cell could not be patched in first attempt, it was discarded and the same steps were repeated on a different cell. Fast capacitative transients were offset with a compensation circuit built into the amplifier. Series 46  resistance was calculated by measuring the peak amplitude of the capacitative transient and using the equation (Rs=Vstep/Icap). The values ranged between 10-30 MΩ. Series resistance compensation was at ~ 75 %.  PSCs were evoked by constant current pulses (0.1-0.2 ms duration, 0.05 Hz). Cells were voltage-clamped at ~ -60 mV and accepted for further study if PSCs were stable during the initial 15-20 min pre-tetanic control recording period. Recordings were considered stable if series resistance and capacitance could be compensated to 75% and if PSC’s holding current was stable. If series resistance changed by more than 15% during a recording, the cell was not used for analysis. In this configuration, the recording of whole-cell currents could last for more than ~ 1 h without any significant changes in the response associated with cell dialysis per se. While perforated patch-clamp recording was considered, the method was not used for the following reasons, a) it usually takes a long time for the antibiotics (nystatin or gramicidin) to punch holes on the attached cell membrane, b) increases the access resistance and noise in recordings significantly, c) prevents the usage of larger molecules in the intracellular solution (owing to smaller pore sizes) and d) over time, the patch of membrane tends to rupture, resulting in a whole-cell recording.  2.11 Immunohistochemistry  Immunohistochemical studies were performed on coronal sections of rat brains, as described previously (Rajput, et al., 2009). Briefly, normally sleeping or sleep-deprived (SD) rats were anaesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital, and the brains 47  fixed by transcardial perfusion with 0.9% cold heparinized saline and 4% paraformaldehyde. Post-fixation, the brains were taken out and cryoprotected in 20% sucrose and 40% sucrose solution. Following a wash in cold water, 40 m thick sections were prepared using the Leica 1200s vibratome. Free-floating hippocampal sections were incubated in 1% H2O2 (for 15 min) and 0.2% Triton X-100 (for 15 min), washed 3X in Tris-Buffered Saline (TBS, used at 20 mM; 1 L, 50 mM TBS contains, Tris-HCl 6.61g, Tris Base 0.97g, NaCl 8.77g, H2O 800ml, with pH adjusted to 7.4) post-incubation between each treatment. The sections were then blocked in 5% normal goat serum (NGS; for 1 h at RT), and incubated with primary antibodies, specific to mGlu1αR (mouse anti-mGlu1αR, BD Pharmingen #556389), GABABR1 (goat anti- GABAB-R1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-7338) or GABAB-R2 (goat antiGABAB-R2, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-31457) at 1:300 dilution in 1% NGS, overnight at 4C in a humid atmosphere. Following three subsequent washes in TBS, sections were incubated for 1 h with biotinylated secondary antibodies. The avidin-biotin complex method was used to detect the antigen (ABC kit, Vector laboratories, Burlingame, California) and 3, 3'-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (DAB, 0.2 mg/ml) containing 0.001% H2O2 was used to visualize the reaction. Sections were then mounted on slides, viewed and photographed using a Leica DMLB microscope equipped with a Retiga 2000R camera.  2.12 Indirect immunofluorescence  Co-localization of mGlu1αR with GABAB-R1/R2 and GABAB-R1 with GABAB-R2 was studied in normally sleeping and SD rats, as described previously (Rajput, et al., 2009). Briefly, brain sections passing through hippocampus were selected and incubated in 0.2% 48  Triton X-100 (for 15 min) and washed 3X with TBS for 10 min. The sections were then blocked in 5% NGS for 1 h at RT, and incubated overnight at 4C in a humid atmosphere with primary antibodies (at 1:300 dilution in 1% NGS) in the following combination: mGlu1αR and either GABAB-R1 or GABAB-R2 (mouse anti-mGlu1αR, BD Pharmingen #556389; goat anti- GABAB-R1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-7338; goat anti- GABAB-R2, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-31457); GABAB-R1 (guinea pig anti-GABAB-R1, Millipore #AB2256) and GABAB-R2 (goat anti- GABAB-R2, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-31457). This was followed by incubation with mixtures of Alexa 594 (red) and Alexa 488 (green)conjugated anti-mouse, anti-guinea pig or anti-goat secondary antibodies. Alexa Fluor dyes are exceptionally bright and photo-stable. The absorption spectra for Alexa 594 and Alexa 488 are well differentiated with no overlap. Finally, the sections were mounted on slides, viewed and photographed using the Leica DMLB microscope equipped with a Retiga 2000R camera.  2.13 Western blot and co-IP  Western blot and co-IP were performed on the tissue lysate prepared from the hippocampus of normally sleeping and SD rat brains, as described previously (Rajput, et al., 2009). Briefly, the hippocampal tissue lysate was solubilized in a homogenizing buffer containing (in mM): 62.5 Tris-HCl, 50 dithiothretiol (DTT), 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 10% glycerol. Protein concentration in the tissue was estimated using the Bradford protein assay. 20g of protein was then solubilized in Laemmli buffer with 5% 2mercaptoethanol and heated at 99C for 5 min. Samples were then fractionated by 49  electrophoresis on a 7% SDS polyacrylamide gel and then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently incubated overnight at 4C with primary antibodies (at 1:500 dilutions in 5% bovine serum albumin) specific to mGlu1αR (mouse anti-mGlu1αR, BD Pharmingen #556389), GABAB-R1 (goat anti- GABAB-R1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc7338) and GABAB-R2 (goat anti- GABAB-R2, Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-31457). Membranes were then incubated with goat anti-mouse or anti-goat secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Bands were detected with a chemiluminescence reagent and images were taken using the Alpha Innotech Fluorchem 800 (Alpha Innotech Co., San Leandro, CA) gel box imager. -actin was used as the house-keeping protein.  For co-IP experiments, tissue lysates prepared from normally sleeping and SD rats were centrifuged and the pellet was further solubilized in 1 ml of radio-immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA buffer; containing, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, pH 8.0), for 1 h at 4C. Tissue lysates were then incubated with monoclonal mGlu1αR or polyclonal GABAB-R1 antibodies (at 1:500 dilutions) overnight at 4C on a rocking shaker. 25 µl of protein A/G-agarose beads were added to each tube to immunoprecipitate antibody for 2 h at 4 °C. Beads were then washed three times in RIPA buffer and solubilized in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad) containing 5% β-mercaptoethanol. The samples were heated at 99°C for 5 min before being fractionated by electrophoresis on a 7% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The fractionated proteins were transferred to a 0.2 µM nitrocellulose membrane in transfer buffer. Membranes were blotted  50  with antibodies specific to GABAB-R1 (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA) and GABABR2, as described in the western blot analysis section.  2.14 Corticosterone radioimmunoassay  2.14.1 Procedure  Rats were decapitated at the end of the light period and trunk blood collected in culture tubes, serum separated and frozen. A radioimmunoassay (RIA) was performed in blood samples obtained from two groups (normally sleeping and SD rats) to estimate the serum corticosterone levels using standard procedures described in the protocol (125I RIA kit, MP Biomedicals #07120102). Briefly, rat serum was diluted (1:200) with the steroid diluent by taking 10 µl of the sample to 2.0 ml. 0.3 ml of steroid diluent was added to tubes 1 and 2 (non-specific binding, NSB tubes). Supplied corticosterone calibrators (0.1 ml; 25 to 1000 ng/ml) were added to tubes 5 to 16. Reconstituted controls (0.1 ml) and diluted (1:200) rat serum were added to tubes 17 to end of assay. Corticosterone-125I was added to all tubes, followed by anti-corticosterone (to tubes 3 to end of assay). All assay tubes were vortex mixed and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. After incubation, precipitant solution (0.5 ml) was added to all tubes and vortexed thoroughly. All assay tubes were then centrifuged at 2300-2500 rpm (1000 x g) for 15 min. The supernatant was aspirated and the precipitate was counted in a gamma counter.  51  2.14.2 Calculations  All duplicate tubes were averaged. The values of the NSB (blanks) were subtracted from the averages obtained, which yielded corrected values. The % bound was calculated by dividing the corrected values by the zero calibrator value,  %B/Bo = CPM (sample)  CPM ( NSB)  CPM (0calibrator )  CPM ( NSB) 100  CPM  = Average counts of duplicates  Sample  = Particular serum or calibrator being calculated  NSB  = Non-specific binding tube (blank)  0calibrator  = 0 tube (100% binding tube)  The values were plotted (% bound vs. concentration of corticosterone) for all calibrators (25-1000 ng/ml) to construct a calibrator curve. Sample values were then directly inferred from the curve. Corticosterone levels estimated by the RIA method are very similar and comparable to those obtained using other methods such as, high performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectroscopy or fluorimetric methods (Rattner, et al., 1979; Shimizu, et al., 1983). The baseline range varies from ~ 50 to 300 or 400 ng/ml in mice and rats, depending on the time of the day (Shimizu, et al., 1983).  2.15 Data analysis This section summarizes the methods used for the analysis of data. 52  2.15.1 Justification for analyzing slopes vs. amplitudes or area under the curve for pEPSPs  Changes to the synaptic excitation were quantitated by measuring the slopes of pEPSPs. Since inhibitory responses were not blocked in our studies (unless otherwise mentioned), evoked pEPSPs contained both excitatory and inhibitory events. The kinetics of AMPAR-mediated pEPSPs/EPSCs is, however, clearly distinct from both GABAA and GABAB -R mediated IPSCs, with the latter most likely affecting the peak of the response, while the former affecting the rising phase of the response. Therefore, slopes (10-90 % of the rising phase of the response) and not amplitudes of pEPSPs (a measure of distance from the baseline to the peak of the response) are truly representative of changes in synaptic excitation. Furthermore, although pEPSPs were evoked and recorded such that there was no contamination from population spikes (by placing the recording electrode far away from the cell body region, close to the dendrites), in some instances, spikes that were negligible in a pre-tetanic response, shifted in position relative to peak following tetanic stimulation (e.g. move closer to peak when the post-tetanic response is potentiated). Changes such as these, in the amplitude and/or position of the population spikes make it difficult or sometimes impossible to quantitate the amplitude of the pEPSP. Slopes, however, remain largely unaffected. For the same reasons, an area under the curve is also not a true estimate of changes in synaptic excitation. In addition, it is prone to potential errors and misinterpretation of results owing to inclusion of phases, such as the recovery. For responses which involve activation of any one receptor or receptor-mediated events such as, miniature EPSCs, quantitating area under the curves may be more accurate. Taking into account, our 53  experimental conditions, pEPSPs were always quantitated by measuring slopes. Since, EPSCs or IPSCs that were recorded intracellularly are not prone to the above mentioned errors; amplitudes were analyzed for data from whole-cell experiments.  2.15.2 Slope and amplitude analysis of PSPs/Cs  Figure 5. Calculation of slopes and amplitudes of PSP/Cs. A standard pEPSP record with (1) illustrating the analysis of slope and (2) illustrating the analysis of amplitude.  pEPSP slopes (mV/ms) were measured as the inclination between low % and high % (in our case, the 10 - 90%) of the peak amplitude. All waveform voltage points from slope beginning time point to end time point (sampling of 100 µs generated ~ 10 to 21 AD samples) were used to construct a linear regression line (using least squares fit). Slopes (1) were then ascertained automatically using the Mini Analysis program from Synaptosoft. Amplitudes for EPSCs or IPSCs, on the other hand, were measured as the distance of the vertical line (2) from the baseline of the recording to the peak of the response (Fig. 5).  54  In all cases, slope values of three consecutive records were averaged (one-min bin). Data were further normalized to their 10 min pre-tetanic controls and a time-course of pEPSP slopes constructed using the GraphPad Prism software.  2.15.3 LTD  A variety of stimulation paradigms (1 Hz, 15 min; 20 Hz, 30 s, 1XSI; 20 Hz, 30s, 2XSI, Section #4.1), were used to establish a reliable protocol for inducing LTD. LTD induction was considered successful when pEPSPs were depressed by 20-25 % at 20 min post-tetanus in normally-sleeping rats. While in all cases (in both normally sleeping and SD rats), post-tetanic pEPSPs depressed, only the 20 Hz, 30 s, 2XSI induced a depression which lasted for at-least 30 min post-tetanus. The depression induced in this fashion also exhibited a stable time-course, which plateaued at ~ 15-20 min post-tetanus, satisfying our criteria for LTD.  2.15.4 Statistical analysis  Two statistical tests were used to analyze the data in this study. In our experiments, LTD was quantitated at 20 min post-tetanus. The Student’s t-test was used to compare LTD when two different treatments were involved (normally-sleeping vs. SD rats; effects of different pharmacological agents on LTD, etc.). When experiments involved comparison of two factors, such as different treatments (post-tetanic depression at various time points) or conditions (normally-sleeping vs. SD rats), a two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used. 55  GraphPad Prism and SigmaStat softwares were used to perform Student’s t-test or ANOVA, respectively. In both statistical tests, the level of significance (P value) was arbitrarily chosen at 0.05. P<0.05 was considered significant. Corresponding graphs were constructed using GraphPad Prism software. Each point in the graph represents the mean ± SEM of responses at that particular time. n refers to number of slices studied; only one slice per animal was used. For immunohistochemical, co-localization and co-IP studies, the analysis was qualitative. Alteration in receptor expression was confirmed through Western Blot analysis. Respective bands were quantitated using densitometric analysis and changes in the protein expression were calculated as the ratio of band of interest with the density of - actin.  56  Chapter 3: Experimental Protocols  The introductory chapters provided an overview on the, a) anatomy and physiology of the hippocampal formation, b) memory formation and the role of hippocampus, c) effects of sleep on memory, d) LTP and LTD as models for cellular learning and memory and e) effects of sleep on plasticity. In this section, LTD is discussed in more detail with relevant background literature, which forms a basis for the design of individual studies. The experimental protocol followed for each of these studies is further discussed.  3.1  Induction of LTD  The likelihood of LTP or LTD at a particular synapse seems to depend upon the prior synaptic activity (Coan, et al., 1989; Huang, et al., 1992). According to the Bienenstock, Cooper and Munro (BCM) model, if afferents are active during low levels of postsynaptic activity, they are more likely to depress (LTD), whereas, the opposite is true in vice versa (Bienenstock, et al., 1982). The BCM model also predicts the existence of a certain modification threshold (θM), which serves as a “cross-over” point for LTP or LTD. For instance, high levels of postsynaptic activity swing θM towards the right, making LTP difficult and LTD easier to obtain (Abraham, 2008; Bienenstock, et al., 1982). This fine balance perhaps ensures that the neural networks are protected from excessive saturation and maintained within their dynamic functional range (Dayan and Willshaw, 1991). Not  57  surprisingly, therefore, high- or low- frequency stimulations (HFS or LFS), have been used to successfully induce LTP and LTD, respectively.  At naïve synapses, LTD in the CA1 region can be elicited using a variety of LFS paradigms. LFS [~ 1-20 Hz, (Bolshakov and Siegelbaum, 1994; Dudek and Bear, 1992; Sastry, et al., 1984; Tadavarty, et al., 2009)] readily elicits LTD in young/juvenile rats. In adult rats (~ 4-5 week old), however, certain LFS protocols, such as, 1 Hz, 600-900 pulses, seem to be ineffective (Dudek and Bear, 1993; Errington, et al., 1995). In these animals, LTD requires a stronger stimulation paradigm (Berretta and Cherubini, 1998; Kemp and Bashir, 1997; Tadavarty, et al., 2009). These age-related differences in LTD induction could be due to a parallel increase in GABA-ergic inhibitory strength (Kerr and Abraham, 1995; Wagner and Alger, 1995), changes in subunit composition of NMDARs, or some other modifications in the synaptic machinery (Kemp and Bashir, 2001).  A 20 Hz LFS to the Schaffer collateral afferents also reliably induces an LTD of EPSP in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, in both juvenile and adult rats, a protocol that has been routinely used in our laboratory (Sastry, et al., 1984). In the CNS, activity around 20 Hz seems to be crucial for synchronizing network activity (Boddeke, et al., 1997; Marshall, et al., 2002). The stimulation itself is powerful enough to unmask the otherwise latent excitatory connections in hippocampal neurons (Miles and Wong, 1987). Moreover, several neurons in the hippocampus and neocortex fire action-potentials (also as bursts) in this range during learning and behavior (O'Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971). The temporal synchrony that exists between the SWS associated sleep spindles (~ 12-14 Hz), para58  hippocampal spindles and slow oscillations, is important in initiating the “hippocampalneocortical” dialogue, a phenomenon considered crucial for offline re-processing of memories (Clemens, et al., 2007; Wolansky, et al., 2006).  The induction of LTD, therefore, seems to be affected by the age of the animal, receptor expression (inhibitory and excitatory) and the extent of prior postsynaptic activity in the synapse. Since our studies involved the use of adult rats (~ 3-4 weeks old), the first set of experiments were designed to establish a stimulation paradigm which ensures a reliable LTD, stable for at least 40 min post-tetanus. Since the early part, immediately post-stimulation is more likely to involve short-term depression, LTD was measured routinely at 10 min posttetanus. Short-term depression differs significantly from LTD, in properties, as well as, in mechanisms. We tested the reliability of 1 Hz, 15 min, 20 Hz, 30s 1X stimulus intensity (SI), and 20 Hz, 30s, 2XSI low frequency tetanic stimulation protocols in inducing LTD.  3.2  Effects of sleep-deprivation on LTD  A 20 Hz, 30s, 2XSI stimulation protocol induced a stable and reversible LTD. Using this protocol, in these set of experiments, LTD was induced in sleep-deprived rats. Sleepdeprivation was done using the gentle-handling technique for a period of 12 h, as described in Section #2.2. The extent of LTD was compared between normally-sleeping and sleepdeprived rats.  59  3.3  Effect of stress induced by sleep-deprivation  Procedures used for sleep-deprivation, mainly the inverted flower-pot- or forced locomotion- techniques, have been previously shown to impart behavioral stress in the animal (Campbell, et al., 2002; McDermott, et al., 2003). In literature, the extent of acute/ chronic behavioral stress is measured by quantitating the serum/ plasma corticosterone levels. An elevated corticosterone level in the hippocampus can affect synaptic plasticity (Diamond, et al., 1992). To minimize the effect of behavioral stress on LTD, we took a two pronged approach. Firstly, we chose sleep-deprivation by gentle-handling in all our studies. It is well established that this method is significantly less stressful compared to the above mentioned classic methods. Secondly, while other investigators in the field have sleep-deprived rats for extended periods (up to 4 days), we employed 12 h. We believe shorter durations of sleepdeprivation are more realistic and directly applicable to our society and today’s 24 X 7 culture. Furthermore, choosing shorter durations had an additional benefit of inducing significantly lower behavioral stress in rats. Evidence in literature shows a correlative increase in the serum corticosterone levels proportional to the duration of sleep-deprivation.  In our studies, we quantitated serum corticosterone levels at the end of the light period in normally sleeping rats and SD rats (in this case, after the 12 h period of sleepdeprivation). Corticosterone levels in both conditions were estimated by performing a radioimmunoassay (refer to Section #2.14 for methods).  60  3.4  Mechanisms involved in LTD  A 20 Hz, 30, 2XSI protocol reliably induced LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Experiments were further designed to ascertain the mechanisms involved in LTD. In the CA1 region, NMDAR- and mGluR- dependent forms of LTD are well established. Both forms can be induced pharmacologically using receptor-specific agonists (Lee, et al., 1998; Palmer, et al., 1997), or through varying conditioning protocols (Bolshakov and Siegelbaum, 1994; Dudek and Bear, 1992). NMDAR- and mGluR- LTDs can also co-exist in the same synapse, without occluding each other, mainly due to their mutually exclusive mechanistic pathways. These alternating forms can be induced either by changing the frequency of induction protocol or by altering the Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio (Kemp, et al., 2000; Oliet, et al., 1997). NMDARs are tetramers of various subunits (see Section # Genetic and pharmacological studies reveal that selective activation of specific NMDAR subtypes (NR2B type) may be necessary for NMDAR-LTD (Liu, et al., 2004), but only under special circumstances (Bartlett, et al., 2007; Brigman, et al., 2010; Duffy, et al., 2008). Other studies, however, have failed to reproduce this effect (Morishita, et al., 2007). For the mGluR-LTD, activation of group I mGluRs seem to be necessary. Application of MCPG, a group I mGluR selective antagonist, blocks both LFS and pharmacologically induced mGluR-LTD (Bolshakov and Siegelbaum, 1994; Stanton, et al., 1991). The involvement of other mGluR subtypes (see Section #, however, is less clear. Interestingly, both mGluR and NMDARs may interact synergistically to induce LTD. Such an interaction has been observed in the perirhinal cortex (Cho, et al., 2000).  61  LTD is also age-dependent. Several studies have shown that while mGluR-LTD is readily induced in adult rats, NMDAR-LTD is not (Dudek and Bear, 1993; Kemp and Bashir, 2001; Staubli and Ji, 1996). Although the reasons behind this discrepancy are unclear, a variety of factors, including, stronger inhibitory tone (Steele and Mauk, 1999; Wagner and Alger, 1995), alterations in glutamate transport mechanisms (Collingridge, et al., 2010; Yang, et al., 2005), in adult rats, seem to play a role. For instance, application of GABAA- or adenosine- receptor antagonists, or blocking the L-type VGCCs, facilitate induction of LTD in these animals (Kemp and Bashir, 1997; Kerr and Abraham, 1995; Norris, et al., 1998; Wagner and Alger, 1995).  The involvement of both glutamatergic and GABA-ergic mechanisms in LTD is not surprising. As mentioned in detail in the introductory chapters (Section #, interneurons (inhibitory) and pyramidal cells (excitatory) are arranged sequentially in a laminar format in the hippocampus. Conditioning stimulations, therefore, are likely to affect both these neuronal types, and thereby, induce and/or affect LTD. It is however, unclear as to what effect a 20 Hz, 30s, 2XSI stimulation, produces on these receptors. Therefore, in this set of experiments, we first investigated the role of NMDARs, mGluRs, specifically type I, mGlu1R and mGlu5Rs were tested using antagonists, APV (50 µM), MCPG (500 µM), LY367385 (100 µM) and MPEP (40 µM), respectively (see Table. 2 for more information on drugs and concentrations used). In all cases, drugs were applied prior to the tetanic stimulation after analyzing the effects of the drugs used on a pre-tetanic control pEPSP.  62  mGlu1Rs and mGlu5Rs were specifically chosen considering their expression pattern 3-4 week old rats, and data from published literature on their roles in LTP and LTD in the hippocampus. Although other mGluRs, 2, 3, 4, 7 & 8 subtypes are equally important, their functional significance in modulating synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus remains largely unknown. They seem to however, modulate neurotransmitter release at certain synapses, not surprising, owing to their mainly presynaptic origins (Shigemoto, et al., 1997).  3.5  Role of [Ca2+]i in LTD  For both NMDAR- and mGluR LTDs, a postsynaptic elevation in [Ca2+]i seems to be necessary. In the hippocampus, [Ca2+]i rise can occur through a variety of sources, some of which include, VGCCs (Christie, et al., 1996), NMDARs (Cummings, et al., 1996), Ca2+induced [Ca2+]i release (Alford, et al., 1993), or [Ca2+]i release from intracellular stores (Reyes and Stanton, 1996). All the above sources have been implicated in NMDAR and mGluR LTDs (Bear and Abraham, 1996). Since the induction of LTP also entails a similar rise in [Ca2+]i, through the same sources, the specific role of [Ca2+]i on LTD was widely investigated. Studies revealed that the direction of plasticity (LTP or LTD) is mainly governed by the magnitude, temporal and spatial characteristics of the Ca2+ signal (Yang, et al., 1999). Not surprisingly, therefore, LTD could be selectively induced by buffering postsynaptic [Ca2+]i, to levels (~ 500 nM), whereas, maintaining levels (at ~ XXX nM), resulted in LTP. Interestingly, the differences in [Ca2+]i levels, seem to modulate the calciumbinding protein calmodulin (CaM) distinctly. Large increases preferentially activate CaMdependent protein kinases, whereas, a modest rise activates phosphatases (Lisman, 1989). 63  Once activated, these enzymes seem to influence AMPAR function either by phosphorylating (Barria, et al., 1997; Mammen, et al., 1997) or dephosphorylating (Snyder, et al., 2003) specific sites on the receptor. While the former leads to LTP (Ca-CaM complex → CaMKII → AMPAR phosphorylation), the latter leads to LTD [Ca-CaM complex → protein phosphatase 2 B (PP2B or calcineurin) → inhibitor 1 → protein phosphatase 1 and/or 2 (PP1/2) → AMPAR dephosphorylation)]. In agreement with this thinking, drugs that block protein kinases or phosphatases have been shown to inhibit LTP or LTD, respectively (Morishita, et al., 2001; Mulkey, et al., 1994; Mulkey, et al., 1993).  To understand if [Ca2+]i played a similar role in the 20 Hz LTD, we studied the roles of L- type, T- type VGCCs and intracellular stores in LTD. L- and T- type VGCCs were blocked using nitrendipine (5 µM) or Ni2+ (50 µM), respectively. The requirement for Ca2+release from intracellular stores was tested using thapsigargin (1 µM). In all cases, drugs were applied prior to the tetanic stimulation after analyzing their effects on a pre-tetanic control pEPSP.  3.6  GABAergic inhibition in LTD  As mentioned previously, in addition to the influence of NMDARs and mGluRs on LTD, the strength of GABAergic inhibition is likely to influence LTD. GABA A- and GABAB-Rs are located strategically (see Chapter 1, Section # to regulate both “inputs-to” and “outputs-from” the pyramidal neurons, and impart a powerful regulatory influence on their net-excitability (Stelzer, 1992). Studies in literature have reported that, 64  while a decreased GABAA-R activity facilitates induction of LTP of the pEPSP (Stelzer, 1992; Wigstrom and Gustafsson, 1983) and heterosynaptic LTD (Tomasulo, et al., 1993; Zhang and Levy, 1993), stimulation paradigms that would have otherwise induced LTP favored induction of LTD, in the presence of GABAA-R agonists (Grover and Yan, 1999; Steele and Mauk, 1999). Moreover, an age-dependent increase in GABAergic inhibition has been shown to be responsible for the loss of NMDAR-LTD in adult rats (Wagner and Alger, 1995). Sleep-deprivation even for a few hours seems to alter the expression and function of several receptors in the brain (Longordo, et al., 2009). Alterations in the efficacy of the inhibitory transmission (through age- or sleep- dependent processes), can therefore, modulate LTP and/-or LTD of the pEPSP.  Tetanic stimulations used to induce plasticity at excitatory synapses can lead to either short-term (Davies, et al., 1991; McCarren and Alger, 1985; Thompson and Gahwiler, 1989) or long-term changes (Shew, et al., 2000; Xie, et al., 1995) of the GABA-ergic IPSCs. Afferent activity also produces a shift in EGABA-PSC (Ouardouz and Sastry, 2000; Ouardouz and Sastry, 2005; Xu and Sastry, 2007). Changes to EGABA-PSC, can shunt (depending on the direction of the shift) PSPs more effectively which can manifest as an enhanced LTD of the EPSP. Therefore, increases in the amplitude of IPSC via an tetanus-induced LTP or shift in EGABA-PSC, will significantly affect the induction of LTD.  GABAB-Rs, on the other hand, have been shown to modulate mainly NMDAR-LTD, via disinhibition. Application of CGP-35348, a GABAB-R antagonist, significantly attenuated NMDAR-LTD. Blocking both GABAA&B-Rs however failed to have any effect on 65  NMDAR-LTD, indicating that the effects of GABAB-Rs on LTD was via a presynaptic control of GABAA-R-mediated IPSCs on pyramidal neurons (Wagner and Alger, 1995).  Taking the above evidence into consideration, experiments were designed to understand the influence of GABAA-Rs and GABAB-Rs in LTD. The involvement of GABAA-Rs was tested by stimulating the inputs using the 20 Hz protocol in the presence of bicuculline (10 µM). In earlier studies, Stelzer (1992), Wigstrom and Gustafsson (1983), found that in a naïve state, the influence of a GABA-ergic IPSC is such that it can completely mask an underlying EPSC. In fact, they demonstrated that an EPSC is visible only on blocking the IPSC. Moreover, in additional experiments, it was demonstrated that the induction of LTP of the EPSC is facilitated when IPSCs are selectively blocked. One of the reasons being, the activation of NMDARs becomes easier when all the inhibition mediated by GABAA-Rs is blocked. We therefore reasoned that, if application of bicuculline blocked LTD, it could be due to a development of LTP, which may mask LTD. So, in additional experiments, this hypothesis was tested by co-applying bicuculline (10 µM) with APV (50 µM) and thereby, simultaneously blocking GABAB-Rs and NMDARs, respectively.  Since conditioning stimulations can affect or induce a short- or long- term plasticity of the IPSC, we designed experiments to observe changes to the amplitude of IPSCs following a 20 Hz, 30s, 2XSI stimulation. The rationale being, any changes to the strength of inhibition, will influence net excitability, and in fact, LTD of the pEPSP.  66  To elucidate the role of GABAB-Rs in LTD, LTD was induced in the presence of CGP-55845 (2 µM), a potent GABAB-R antagonist. In additional experiments, the effect of GS-38783 (10 µM), a positive allosteric modulator for GABAB-Rs, was tested on naïve pEPSPs. The use of a positive allosteric modulator has several advantages over conventional agonists, such as baclofen. Of these, reduced receptor desensitization is a significant advantage. Also, since the allosteric modulator does not activate the receptor but facilitates the effect of the endogenous ligand once the receptor is activated, the temporal and spatial efficacy of GABA is adequately maintained. We therefore hypothesized that, any change in the slopes of pEPSPs in the presence of GS-39783, is a clear indication of an alteration in either the function or the expression of GABAB-Rs.  3.7  Expression of mGlu1Rs, GABAB-R1s and GABAB-R2s  Results from electrophysiological studies indicated that LTD is enhanced in SD animals. GABAB- and mGlu- Rs, but not NMDARs were involved in 20 Hz-LTD. The antagonists to mGluRs and GABAB-Rs differentially affected the time-course of LTD in normally-sleeping vs. SD rats. Moreover, the presence of GS-39783 selectively suppressed evoked pEPSPs in SD rats. Taken together, these data indicated that sleep-deprivation induces changes in the function of mGluRs, GABAB-Rs or both. Alterations in receptor function can arise via modifications in the receptor number and/-or their sub-cellular localization. If sleep-deprivation induces an alteration in the expression of either mGlu- or GABAB-Rs, it may explain the enhancement of LTD in SD rats. Indeed, the role of these 67  receptors in maintaining a balance between inhibitory and excitatory networks, and synaptic plasticity in the CNS is well established.  In the hippocampus, GABAB-Rs and mGlu1Rs are both localized in the perisynaptic regions of the dendritic spines/shafts (Kulik, et al., 2003; Lujan, et al., 1996). Depending upon their location (pyramidal cells or interneurons), they modulate neuronal excitability via actions on pre- and/or post- synaptic targets. Activation of mGluRs (mainly, group II & II) & GABAB-Rs expressed on glutamatergic- and GABA-ergic- axon terminals regulate neurotransmitter release by inhibiting presynaptic VGCCs and/or by interfering directly with the transmitter release machinery (Blackmer, et al., 2005; Swartz and Bean, 1992). Stimulation of mGluRs (mainly, group I), localized on postsynaptic neurons, depolarize them through actions on various Ca2+, K+ and other non-specific cationic conductances (Guerineau, et al., 1994; Swartz and Bean, 1992). Conversely, postsynaptic GABAB-Rs, when activated, cause a G-protein-mediated alteration in K+/Ca2+ conductance, leading to either a shunting or hyperpolarizing inhibition of the target neuron (Solis and Nicoll, 1992).  Although GABAB and mGlu-Rs may independently affect LTD enhancement, recent studies indicate that these receptors may “cross-talk” at a functional level, and co-operate to elicit effects. In the cerebellar parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses, activation of GABAB-Rs seem to enhance mGlu1R-mediated responses, mainly due to an interaction at the level of second messenger systems (Hirono, et al., 2001). Since GABAB-Rs and mGluRs are structurally homologous G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and expressed in close proximity, a physical interaction between them is an interesting possibility (Kulik, et al., 68  2003; Lujan, et al., 1996). GPCRs were traditionally thought to exist and function in monomeric entities. However, accumulating biochemical and biophysical evidence indicates that most, if not all GPCRs assemble as homo- and/or heterodimers (Kumar and Grant, 2010; Milligan, 2009). For GABAB-Rs, heterodimerization seems to be obligatory. In a GABABR1-GABAB-R2 complex, the GABAB-R1 fraction imparts sensitivity to endogenous ligands, whereas the GABAB-R2 subtype enables coupling of the receptor to G-proteins. This association seems to be sufficient to overcome the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal for GABAB-R1 subtype, thereby allowing the receptor to traffic and express on the cell surface. The co-expression of both subtypes is therefore necessary for a functional GABAB-R (Jones, et al., 1998; Kaupmann, et al., 1998; White, et al., 1998). GABAB-Rs and mGlu1αRs, in addition, have been shown to independently form stable heteromeric complexes with other receptors, such as, calcium sensing receptors (Gama, et al., 2001), a variety of cytoskeletal, scaffolding and signaling proteins like MUPP1, Homer and Shank (Fagni, et al., 2004; Kornau, 2006). A physical interaction between them is, however, currently disputed and not known to occur in the hippocampus. Receptor dimerization may change the basic function of either receptor, such that the activation of one receptor produces a synergistic/antagonistic effect on the function of the other, mainly through effects on receptor surface expression (Marshall, et al., 2002), sensitivity of receptors to endogenous ligands (Gomes, et al., 2000; Rocheville, et al., 2000), signal transduction (Kumar and Grant, 2010) and receptor internalization (Jordan, et al., 2001; Rocheville, et al., 2000). Since all the above mechanisms have been shown to influence LTD (Malinow and Malenka, 2002), modification in any of these aspects following sleep-deprivation could explain the enhancement of LTD in SD rats. 69  We therefore hypothesized that sleep-deprivation alters, a) the expression of mGlu1αR, GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2, b) the degree of co-localization between mGlu1αR and GABAB-R1/-or GABAB-R2, and c) the extent of complex-formation between mGlu1αR and GABAB-R1/-or GABAB-R2. Accordingly, the expression pattern of mGlu1αR, GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 was studied by classical methods, immunohistochemical staining and western  blot  analysis.  The  interaction  between  receptors  was  studied  using  immunofluorescence and co-IP techniques (see Sections #2.12, #2.13 for methods).  70  Chapter 4: Results  4.1  LTD and effects of sleep-deprivation  In the current studies, pEPSPs or EPSCs were evoked by stimulating in the stratum radiatum at a rate of 0.05 Hz (see Fig. 3). At the start of each experiment, a full input-output curve was constructed. Stimulus intensity was set at a level sufficient to evoke a halfmaximal pEPSP/Cs. Responses were allowed to stabilize over an initial 10-15 min waiting period. A 10 min pre-tetanic control was then recorded, and LTD induced using the 1 Hz, 15 min or 20 Hz, 30 sec LFS protocols. For the latter, two stimulus intensities (SI) were used (1XSI and 2XSI). This was done to standardize an appropriate protocol for obtaining a stable, and lasting LTD (for at least 30-40 min). These experiments were performed in slices from normally sleeping and SD rats.  4.1.1  LTD (1 Hz, 15 min LFS)  When the 1 Hz, 15 min stimulation protocol was used to induce LTD of the pEPSPs, in normally-sleeping rats no LTD was observed at 20 min post-tetanus (pEPSP slope as a % of pre-tetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 114.9 ± 9.1, n=11; Fig. 6). Similarly, no LTD was observed in SD rats (pEPSP slope as a % of pre-tetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 97.73 ± 4.3, n=11; Fig. 6). However, the slopes of pEPSPs were significantly lower in SD rats when  71  compared to normally-sleeping rats (p<0.05). This protocol was not used in further studies because it did not meet our criteria for LTD induction (Section #2.15.3).  Figure 6. LTD (1Hz, 15 min) Arrow indicates the low frequency tetanic stimulation (1 Hz, 15 min). Graph depicts the time course of LTD in normally sleeping (open circles, n=11) and sleep-deprived rats (filled circles, n=11). Representative pEPSP traces were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. At 20 min post-tetanus, pEPSP slopes were significantly suppressed (p<0.05) when compared to normally sleeping rats.  72  4.1.2  LTD [20 Hz, 30 sec (1XSI)  The 20 Hz protocol (1XSI), induced a suppression of pEPSPs in normally sleeping rats, which recovered back to pre-tetanic control levels in about 10 min (pEPSP slope as a % of pre-tetanic control; 10 min post-tetanus: 94.2 ± 9.1, n=11; p>0.05; Fig. 7). However, similar to the results obtained using the 1 Hz, 15 min protocol, in SD rats, the suppression of pEPSPs was more pronounced and significant (pEPSP slope as a % of pre-tetanic control; 10 min post-tetanus: 78 ± 5.4, n=11; p<0.05; Fig. 7). Since the 20 Hz (1XSI) protocol did not induce LTD in normally sleeping rats, it was not used for further experiments.  73  Figure 7. LTD (20 Hz, 30sec- 1XSI) The 20 Hz, 30 s (1XSI) tetanic stimulation (indicated by an arrow) did not induce LTD in normally sleeping rats (open circles, n=11). The time course of pEPSPs in normally sleeping and sleep deprived conditions (filled circles, n=11) indicate a larger suppression of synaptic excitation in the latter case. This effect was significant (p<0.05). Representative pEPSP traces were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  4.1.3  LTD [20 Hz, 30 sec (2XSI)]  The 20 Hz LFS (2XSI) reliably induced an LTD, which lasted at-least 30 minutes. LTD of the pEPSP in SD rats (pEPSP slope as a % of pre-tetanic control; 20 min posttetanus: 53 ± 5.5, n=6; Fig. 8A) was significantly higher (p<0.05) when compared to normally sleeping rats (pEPSP slope as a % of pre-tetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 76.4 ± 10.7, n=6; Fig. 8A). Similarly, in whole cell recordings, SD rats showed a significantly elevated LTD (EPSC amplitude as a % of pre-tetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 64.8 ± 4.6, n=6; Fig. 8B), when compared to normally sleeping animals (EPSC amplitude as a % of pre-tetanic control; 10 min post-tetanus: 81.2 ± 3.2, n=6; Fig. 8B). A two-way RM-ANOVA showed a significant group [df(1,120); F = 6.42; P < 0.05] and time effect (P < 0.0001) in LTD of pEPSPs. This effect was also observed in whole-cell recordings, in factors, group [df(1,80); F = 7.50; P < 0.05] and time (P < 0.0001).  74  Figure 8. LTD (20 Hz, 30 sec- 2XSI) A 20 Hz, 30 s (2 X SI) low frequency tetanic stimulation (arrow) was used to induce LTD. Sleepdeprivation potentiates LTD of pEPSP/-or EPSCs in A and B, respectively. The graph in A and B depicts the time course of LTD in normally sleeping rats (open circles: n = 6) and sleep-deprived rats (filled circles: n = 6). In each case, representative pEPSP/EPSC traces were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes or EPSC amplitudes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  4.1.4  Corticosterone radioimmunoassay  A RIA was performed to test the corticosterone levels in normally sleeping and SD conditions (Section #2.14). The corticosterone levels (ng/ml) in SD rats (154.4 ± 15, n=6) were not significantly different from normally sleeping animals (125.7 ± 14.3, n=6). Corticosterone levels estimated by the RIA method are very similar and comparable to those 75  obtained using other methods such as, high performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectroscopy or fluorimetric methods (Rattner, et al., 1979; Shimizu, et al., 1983). The baseline range varies from ~ 50 to 300 or 400 ng/ml in mice and rats, depending on the time of the day (Shimizu, et al., 1983).  4.2  Mechanisms involved in LTD  Literature evidence cited in the Section #3.4 clearly indicates that two forms of LTD, NMDAR- and/or mGluR- type can be induced. The mechanisms involved are highly dependent upon the age of the animal and/or the stimulation parameters used in the induction of LTD. Since we used rats aged 3-4 weeks, and a 20 Hz, 15 min (2XSI) protocol to induce LTD, the role of NMDARs and mGluRs, was investigated in the following experiments. LTD was induced in the presence of antagonists specific to NMDARs or mGluRs, APV (50 µM) or MCPG (500 µM, a broad spectrum group I/II mGluR antagonist), respectively (Bolshakov and Siegelbaum, 1994). When used in these concentrations, neither APV nor MCPG had any significant effect on the control pEPSPs.  4.2.1  Role of NMDARs in LTD  LTD was not affected in APV (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control in normally sleeping rats- 20 min post-tetanus: 72.4 ± 2.9, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 9), indicating that the LTD does not require the activation of NMDARs. For this reason, experiments were not performed in SD rats in the presence of APV. However, sleep76  deprivation itself may alter NMDARs and perhaps bring in a change such that LTD in SD rats may be sensitive to APV. This aspect needs to be further investigated in future studies.  Figure 9. Role of NMDARs in LTD LTD was induced using a low-frequency tetanic stimulation (LFTS, 20 Hz for 30s, arrow). In slices from normally sleeping rats, the presence of APV (50 µM), a NMDA receptor antagonist did not block LTD. Graph depicts the time course of LTD in no-drug controls (open circles, n=6) and in APV (filled circles, n=6). Representative pEPSP traces in no-drug controls and treated conditions were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  77  4.2.2  Role of mGluRs in LTD  The application of MCPG attenuated LTD in normally sleeping (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control; in normally sleeping rats- 20 min post-tetanus: 102.8 ± 5.5, n=6; p>0.05; Fig. 10A) and SD rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pretetanic control; in SD rats- 20 min post-tetanus: 95.9 ± 11.1, n=5; p>0.05; Fig. 10B). Since MCPG blocks both group I/II mGluRs, it can be concluded that an activation of these receptors is required for the induction of LTD. In a separate set of experiments (Section #, the roles of mGlu1Rs and mGlu5Rs in LTD were examined (please refer to Section #3.4 for justification).  Figure 10. Role of mGluRs in LTD LTD was induced using a tetanic stimulation (20-Hz for 30s, arrow). In A and B, slices from normally-sleeping (NS) rats and sleep-deprived (SD) rats, respectively, LTD was significantly  78  attenuated in the presence of MCPG (500 µM), a group I/II mGluR antagonist. Graph depicts the time course of LTD in no-drug controls (A, B; open circles, n=6) and in MCPG (A, filled circles, n=6; B, filled triangles, n=6). Representative pEPSP traces in no-drug controls and treated conditions were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  Group I mGluR subtypes and LTD  To investigate the role of group I mGluRs, LTD was induced in the presence of either LY-367385 (100 µM) or MPEP (40 µM), mGlu1R and mGlu5R receptor specific antagonists, respectively. At the above concentrations, LY-367385 or MPEP neither affect the slopes of control pEPSPs nor display any cross-reactivity with other mGluR subtypes (Pin and Duvoisin, 1995).  Role of mGlu1Rs  Application of LY-367385 (100 µM) significantly suppressed LTD in normally sleeping rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control, in no-drug controls20 min post-tetanus: 75.76 ± 7.97, n=6; in LY-367385- 20 min post-tetanus: 105.0 ± 12.56, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 11A) and in SD rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control- in no-drug controls- 20 min post-tetanus: 54.54 ± 3.62, n=6, in LY-367385- 20 min post-tetanus: 80.69 ± 2.777, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 11B).  79  Figure 11. Role of mGlu1Rs in LTD LTD was induced using a tetanic stimulation (20 Hz for 30s, arrow). In A and B, slices from normally-sleeping (NS) rats and sleep-deprived (SD) rats, respectively, LTD was significantly attenuated in the presence of LY-367385 (100 µM), a mGlu1R antagonist. Graph depicts the time course of LTD in no-drug controls (A, B; open circles, n=6) and in LY-367385 (A, B; filled circles, n=6). Representative pEPSP traces in no-drug controls and treated conditions were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  Role of mGlu5Rs  While the application of MPEP (40 µM) did not affect LTD in normally sleeping rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control, in no-drug controls- 20 min posttetanus: 75.76 ± 7.97, n=6; in MPEP- 20 min post-tetanus: 86.57 ± 5.291, n=6; p>0.05; Fig. 12A), it was significantly suppressed in SD rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre80  tetanic control- in no-drug controls- 20 min post-tetanus: 54.54 ± 3.62, n=6, in MPEP- 89.06 ± 5.896, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 12B).  Figure 12. Role of mGlu5Rs in LTD LTD was induced using a tetanic stimulation (20 Hz for 30s, arrow). In A and B, slices from normally-sleeping (NS) rats and sleep-deprived (SD) rats, respectively, while LTD was unaffected in the presence of MPEP (40 µM), a mGlu5R antagonist in NS rats, it was significantly blocked in SD rats. Graph depicts the time course of LTD in no-drug controls (A, B; open circles, n=6) and in MPEP (A, B; filled circles, n=6). Representative pEPSP traces in no-drug controls and treated conditions were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  81  4.2.3  Role of Ca2+ in LTD  In the present study, the requirement of [Ca2+]i for 20 Hz LTD was tested. LTD was induced in the presence of nitrendipine (5 µM), Ni2+ (50 µM) or thapsigargin (1µM), drugs that block L- type, T- type VGCCs or Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, respectively. These drugs did not affect control pEPSPs.  Bath application of thapsigargin (1 µM), which blocks Ca2+-release from intracellular stores dampened LTD induction. This effect was significant at 20 min post-tetanus (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control in normally sleeping rats- 20 min posttetanus: 106.1 ± 13.7, n=6; p>0.05; Fig. 13). The presence of nitrendipine (5 µM; pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control in normally sleeping rats- 20 min posttetanus: 79.9 ± 8.8, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 13) or Ni2+ (50 µM; pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control in normally sleeping rats- 20 min post-tetanus: 79.9 ± 4.7, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 13) did not affect LTD. These results indicate that Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, but not L- or T- type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs), are required for LTD induction.  82  Figure 13. Role of Ca2+ in LTD LTD was induced using a low-frequency tetanic stimulation (LFTS, 20-Hz for 30s, arrow). In slices from normally sleeping rats, LTD was blocked in the presence of thapsigargin (1µM), which blocks Ca2+-release from intracellular stores. Nitrendipine (5 µM), an L-type voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) antagonist or Ni2+ (50 µM), a T-type VGCC antagonist, however, did not affect LTD. Graph depicts the time course of LTD in no-drug controls (open circles, n=6), in thapsigargin (filled inverted triangles, n=6), in nitrendipine (filled circles, n=6) and in Ni2+ (filled triangles, n=6). Representative pEPSP traces in no-drug controls and treated conditions were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  83  4.2.4  GABAergic inhibition and LTD  In the present study, the influence of GABAA-Rs and GABAB-Rs on LTD was tested. LTD was induced in the presence of bicuculline (10 µM) or CGP-55845 (2 µM), antagonists to GABAA-Rs and GABAB-Rs, respectively. In separate studies, the effects of the 20 Hz LFS on the amplitude of IPSCs were studied. This was done to examine if the alterations in LTD (enhancement in SD rats) occur at the level of GABAergic transmission. All experiments were performed on normally sleeping and SD rats (see Section #3.6 for justification).  Role of GABAA-Rs in LTD  In the presence of bicuculline (10 µM), LTD was blocked in normally sleeping rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control- 10 min post-tetanus: 116.6 ± 25.3, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 14A) and in SD rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pretetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 138.4 ± 22.1, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 14B). Interestingly, the blockade of GABAergic inhibition with bicuculline seemed to induce a potentiation of pEPSPs, following the 20 Hz protocol in both normally sleeping and SD rats. This potentiation was much higher in SD rats. Whether these effects were due to a stronger basal inhibition following sleep-deprivation was unclear. Therefore, in the next set of experiments, changes to GABAA-R mediated IPSCs were directly examined.  84  Figure 14. Role of GABAA-Rs in LTD LTD was induced using a tetanic stimulation (20 Hz for 30s, arrow). In A and B, slices from normally-sleeping (NS) rats and sleep-deprived (SD) rats, respectively, LTD was significantly blocked in the presence of bicuculline (10 µM), a GABAA-R antagonist. Graph depicts the time course of LTD in no-drug controls (A, B; open circles, n=6) and in bicuculline (A, B; filled circles, n=6). pEPSP slopes were averaged every min and normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  Effects of 20 Hz LFS on GABAA-R mediated IPSCs  IPSCs were evoked by stimulating in the stratum radiatum (see Fig. 3, 4), in the presence of APV (50 µM) and DNQX (20 µM), drugs that block excitatory synaptic transmission by antagonizing NMDARs and AMPARs, respectively. Following the 20 Hz LFS, no significant difference was seen in IPSC amplitudes between normally sleeping rats (IPSC amplitude represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 115 ± 85  12.4, n=6; p>0.05; Fig. 15) and SD rats (IPSC amplitude represented as a % of the pretetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 111 ± 11.9, n=6; p>0.05; Fig. 15), or compared to their respective pre-tetanic controls.  Figure 15. Effect of a 20 Hz LFS on GABAergic IPSCs Effects of 20 Hz LFS on GABAAR-mediated IPSCs. Control IPSCs were stimulated using the 20 Hz, 30 sec low frequency stimulation (LFS). Graph depicts the time course of post-tetanic IPSC amplitudes in normally sleeping (NS; open circles, n=6) and sleep-deprived (SD) rats (filled circles, n=6). As can be seen, the 20 Hz LFS protocol do not significantly affect IPSCs. IPSC amplitudes were averaged every min and normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls. Values were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  86  Masking of LTD by co-occurring LTP  The effect of bicuculline on LTD was not due to an altered GABAergic synaptic strength as predicted. Studies have shown that in the absence of GABAergic inhibition, stimulations that would otherwise induce LTD, elicit LTP. Therefore, the LTD could simply be masked by a co-occurring LTP in the absence of GABAA-R mediated inhibition. To test if this is the case, in separate experiments, LTD was induced in the presence of bicuculline and APV. The presence of APV in the medium ensured the blockade of NMDAR-LTP.  LTD in the presence of bicuculline and APV (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 68 ± 5.4, n=6; p>0.05; Fig. 16) was not significantly different compared to no drug controls (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control; 20 min post-tetanus: 75.8 ± 8, n=6; p>0.05; Fig. 16).  87  Figure 16. Masking of LTD by LTP LTD was induced using a low-frequency tetanic stimulation (LFTS, 20 Hz for 30s, arrow). In slices from normally sleeping rats, the presence of APV (50 µM) and bicuculline (10 µM), a NMDA- and GABAA-R antagonist, respectively, did not block LTD. Graph depicts the time course of LTD in nodrug controls (open circles, n=6) and in APV + bicuculline (filled circles, n=6). Representative pEPSP traces in no-drug controls and treated conditions were taken at the indicated time points. The pEPSP slopes were normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls in each case. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.  Role of GABAB-Rs in LTD  In these experiments, the role of GABABRs in LTD was investigated. Bath application of CGP-55845 (2 µM), a GABAB-R antagonist, did not block LTD in normally sleeping rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control- 20 min post-tetanus: 89.1 ± 4.3, n=6; p<0.05; Fig. 17A). In SD rats, however, LTD was completely blocked in the presence of the drug (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control- 20 min posttetanus: 121.8 ± 9.8, n=6; p>0.05; Fig. 17B).  88  Figure 17. Role of GABAB-Rs in LTD LTD was induced using a low-frequency tetanic stimulation (LFTS, 20 Hz for 30s, arrow). In A and B, slices from normally sleeping (NS) and sleep-deprived (SD) rats, respectively, while LTD was partially suppressed in the presence of CGP-55845 (2 µM), a GABABR antagonist, in NS rats, it was completely blocked in SD rats. Graph depicts the time course of LTD in no-drug controls (A, B; open circles, n=6) and in CGP-55845 (A, B; filled circles, n=6). Representative pEPSP traces in no-drug controls and treated conditions were taken at the indicated time points. pEPSP slopes were averaged every min and normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls.  The application of GS-39783, a positive allosteric modulator for GABAB-Rs (Urwyler, et al., 2003), significantly depressed evoked pEPSPs in SD rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control; 10 min post-application: 50.7 ± 4.3, n=5 p<0.05; Fig. 18). No change was, however, noted in normally sleeping rats (pEPSP slope represented as a % of the pre-tetanic control; 10 min post-application: 97.3 ± 8.5, n=5 p>0.05; Fig. 18). Since GS-39783 affects GABAB-R mediated responses only when 89  activated, it appears that in normally sleeping rats these receptors are not fully active under a 20 Hz stimulation but get recruited in SD rats.  Figure 18. Effects of GS-39783 on pEPSPs Bath application of GS-39783 (10 µM), selectively suppressed evoked pEPSPs in sleep-deprived (SD) rats, but not in normally sleeping (NS) rats. Graph depicts the time course of evoked pEPSPs in NS (open circles, n=5) and SD (filled circles, n=5) conditions. Representative pEPSP traces in NS and SD conditions were taken at the indicated time points. pEPSP slopes were averaged every min and normalized to respective pre-tetanic controls.  90  Pharmacological agents (action) APV (NMDAR) MCPG (group I/II mGluRs) LY-367685 (mGlu1Rs) MPEP (mGlu5Rs) Thapsigargin (Ca2+ release from intracellular stores) Nitrendipine (L-type VGCCs) Ni2+ (T-type VGCCs) Bicuculline (GABAA-Rs) Bicuculline + APV (GABAA-Rs and NMDARs) CGP-55845 (GABAB-Rs)  LTD in normally sleeping rats No  LTD in SD rats  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Yes  N/A  No  N/A  No  N/A  Yes  Yes  No  N/A  No  Yes  N/A  Table 3. Effect of various pharmacological agent used on LTD. “Yes” indicates a blockade of LTD and “No” indicates no significant effect on LTD.  91  4.2.5  Immunohistochemistry, co-localization, western blots and co-IP  In this section, results from studies on receptor expression, co-localization and dimerization are presented.  Expression of mGlu1αR, GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 in the CA1  hippocampal region of normally sleeping and SD rats  In normally sleeping rats, strong GABAB-R1- like immunoreactivity was observed in the stratum pyramidale. Pyramidal and non-pyramidal cells in the CA1 region displayed GABAB-R1- like immunoreactivity at the neuronal perikarya, as well as, in intracellular compartments. A weak immunoreactivity was observed in the stratum radiatum (Fig. 19a, b). These findings are largely consistent with previous studies (Kulik, et al., 2003). Following sleep-deprivation, however, the GABAB-R1- like immunoreactivity was observed in stratum pyramidale and in the apical dendritic regions of the stratum radiatum (Fig. 19g, h). When examined visually, our results suggest that the intensity of staining and the number of neurons immunopositive to GABAB-R1 may have been increased in SD rats when compared to that in normally sleeping rats. Similar results were obtained for GABAB-R2 expression between normally sleeping and SD rats. Following sleep-deprivation, upon visual examination, the immunoreactivity in stratum pyramidale and radiatum appeared more pronounced in SD rats (Fig. 19i, j) in comparison to normally sleeping rats (Fig. 19c, d).  92  The mGlu1αR like immunoreactivity, in both normally sleeping and SD groups, was observed in isolated pyramidal and non-pyramidal neurons in stratum pyramidale. The expression was uniform at the neuronal perikarya and in the cytoplasmic compartment. However, in axonal processes or dendrites, the immunoreactivity was mostly punctated (Fig. 19e, f). Importantly, when compared when compared visually, SD rats points toward an increased number of mGlu1αR positive neurons. In addition, the mGlu1αR- like immunoreactivity at the neuronal perikarya and intracellular compartments of both cell types appeared more intense in stratum pyramidale and radiatum in SD rats.  93  Figure 19. Distribution of GABAB-R1/R2 and mGlu1αRs Representative photomicrographs illustrating the expression of GABAB-R1/R2 and mGlu1αR in the CA1 region of the hippocampus of normally sleeping (A) and sleep-deprived (B) rats. GABAB-R1-  94  like immunoreactivity was well-expressed at the neuronal perikarya and cytoplasmic protein (a, b). Following sleep-deprivation, the intensity of staining and the number of neurons immunopositive to GABAB-R1 increased (g, h). An enhanced immunoreactivity was also evident in the stratum radiatum (sr; b, h). For the GABAB-R2 subtype, a moderate to weak immunoreactivity was observed in stratum pyramidale (sp) and sr of NS rats (c, d), with a modest increase in immunoreactivity in SD rats (i, j). mGlu1αR- like immunoreactivity was strong- to moderately- expressed in isolated pyramidal and non-pyramidal neurons in the sp, sr and stratum oriens (so; e) in NS rats. Following sleep-deprivation, the intensity of staining and the number of neurons immunopositive to mGlu1α increased (k, l compared to e, f). The immunoreactivity in dendrites and axons was also enhanced. While the staining in pyramidal/non-pyramidal neuron perikarya was uniform, it appeared punctated in dendrites and axons in both NS and SD rats. Scale Bar= 160 µm for panels on left in A & B; 20 µm for panels on right in A & B; and 5 µm for inset.  Western blot analysis of mGlu1αR, GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 expression in  the CA1 hippocampal region of normally sleeping and SD rats  Data from immunohistochemical studies therefore suggest an increase in GABAB-R1 and mGlu1αR immunoreactivity, with a modest change in GABAB-R2 expression. We quantified these results by studying protein levels of GABAB-R1, GABAB-R2 and mGlu1αR. The hippocampal tissue lysate prepared from normally sleeping and SD rats was processed for western blot analyses, as described in material and methods. As shown in Fig. 20, GABAB-R1 (A), GABAB-R2 (B) and mGlu1αR (C) immunoreactivity was expressed as a single band at the expected molecular mass of ~130 kDa, ~120 kDa & ~142 kDa, respectively. A significant increase in GABAB-R1 and mGlu1αR protein levels was detected 95  in SD rats with only a subtle change in GABAB-R2 immunoreactivity. Histograms in representative panels describe the quantitative analysis for the receptor- immunoreactivity. These  findings  corroborate  and  further  strengthen  our  observations  from  immunohistochemical studies.  Figure 20. Western blot analysis of GABAB-R1, GABAB-R2 and mGlu1αRs Hippocampal tissue lysate from normally sleeping (NS) and sleep-deprived (SD) rats were processed for western blot analysis as described in Materials and Methods section. GABAB-R1 (A), GABAB-R2  96  (B) and mGlu1αR (C) immunoreactivity was expressed as a single band at the expected molecular mass of ~130 kDa, ~120 kDa & ~142 kDa, respectively. Histograms in representative panels describe the quantitative analysis for the receptor- immunoreactivity. A significant increase in GABAB-R1 and mGlu1αR protein levels was detected in SD rats with only a mild change in GABA B-R2 immunoreactivity. β-actin was used as the control for loading protein. * p < 0.05, ** p<0.01.  Co-localization of mGlu1αR and GABAB-R1/R2 in normally sleeping and SD  rats  It has been previously reported that GABAB-R1 and mGlu1Rs co-localize in cerebellum (Tabata, et al., 2004). However, it is currently not known if these receptors colocalize in the CA1 hippocampal region and if sleep-deprivation causes a change in their coexpression. Therefore, in the current study, we examined if GABAB-R1, GABAB-R2 and mGlu1Rs co-localize in normally sleeping rats and visually compared the results with SD rats.  To investigate whether GABAB-R1/GABAB-R2 or GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR and GABAB-R2/mGlu1αR co-express in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, double-labeled immunofluorescence co-localization was performed. In agreement with previous studies (Kulik, et al., 2003), an overlap in distribution of GABAB-R1 & R2- like immunoreactivity was observed in the CA1 pyramidal neurons between normally sleeping (Fig. 21a-c) and SD rats (Fig. 21j-l). Much of the co-localization was confined to the neuronal perikarya. Importantly, as illustrated, GABAB-R1 expression seems to have changed in SD rats (Fig. 97  21k) in comparison to normally sleeping rats (Fig. 21b). Co-localization, however, seemed unaffected (Fig. 21l, c).  We further extended our study to determine the co-localization between GABABR1/mGlu1αR in normally sleeping- (Fig. 21d-f) and SD- (Fig. 21m-o) rats. In normally sleeping rats, co-localization between GABAB-R1 and mGlu1αR was mainly restricted to stratum pyramidale and confined at the pyramidal/non-pyramidal cell perikarya. In addition, discrete neuronal population displayed punctated co-localization in the dendrites. However, in SD rats, visual examination points toward an increase in the immunoreactivity and colocalization for both GABAB-R1 and mGlu1αRs in stratum pyramidale. Co-localization, as in the normally sleeping rats, was, however, mainly restricted to the neuronal perikarya, although some neurons displaying changes in co-localization in the dendrites.  As illustrated in Fig. 21, the GABAB-R2/mGlu1αR displayed a qualitatively stronger colocalization in hippocampal CA1 region in SD (Fig. 21p-r) rats when compared with normally sleeping (Fig. 21g-i) rats. In stratum pyramidale, the number of individual pyramidal/non-pyramidal neurons co-expressing GABAB-R2 and mGlu1αR altered in SDwhen compared to normally sleeping- rats. The increase was not only restricted to the neuronal perikarya, but also evident in the dendrites.  98  99  Figure 21. Co-localization of GABAB-R1/GABAB-R2, GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR, andGABABR2/mGlu1αR Representative immunofluorescence photomicrographs illustrating co-localization of GABABR1/GABAB-R2 (top panel), GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR (middle panel) and GABAB-R2/mGlu1Rα (bottom panel) in CA1 area of normally sleeping (NS) and sleep-deprived (SD) rats. Receptors co-localization was performed as described in Material and Methods. Brain sections passing through hippocampus were stained with specific antibodies for GABAB-R1, GABAB-R2 and mGlu1Rα. Red and green fluorescence indicate individual receptor types while yellow (merged) shows co-localization. Note the specific increase in receptor immunoreactivity and co-localization in SD rats in comparison to normally sleeping rats. Arrows in representative panels indicate co-localization, arrow-heads indicate neuronal population devoid of co-localization, whereas, asterisks indicate mild co-localization. Scale Bar= 10 µm  GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 receptors are expressed in mGlu1α receptor  immunoprecipitate in normally sleeping and SD rats  Our immunocytochemical, western blot and co-localization analysis of GABAB- and mGlu1α- Rs suggest that these receptors may function as heterodimers in hippocampus. Whether GABAB- and mGlu1α- Rs form a complex and functionally interact with each other in cerebellum is currently disputed (Rives, et al., 2009) and not known in the hippocampus. Therefore, we performed co-IP experiments to study the complex formation between GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR and GABAB-R2/mGlu1αR, as well as, between GABAB-R1/GABABR2. As shown in Fig. 22A, GABAB-R1 expression was detected at the expected size of ~272 kDa indicating a possible heteromeric complex in mGlu1αR immunoprecipitate. Similarly, a 100  complex formation was also observed between mGlu1αR and GABAB-R2 at the expected molecular weight of ~260 kDa (Fig. 22B). We further extended our study to determine whether GABAB-R1 forms heterodimers with GABAB-R2. As expected, in Fig. 22C, the immunoprecipitate of GABAB-R2, when probed with GABAB-R1 antibody, displayed a band at ~250 kDa. The GABAB-R1/R2 dimerization is consistent with several previous studies in different brain regions (Jones, et al., 1998; Kaupmann, et al., 1998; White, et al., 1998). In conclusion, these results indicate that GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR and GABAB-R2/mGlu1αR dimerize in hippocampus, the extent of which is clearly enhanced in SD rats (Fig. 22A, B). However, since there is a significant decrease in GABAB-R1/R2 heterodimerization in SD rats (Fig. 22C), our results also suggest that a dissociation of GABAB-R1/R2 heterodimerization may lead to the formation of a heteromeric complex between GABABR1/mGlu1αR and GABAB-R2/ mGlu1αR respectively.  101  Figure 22. Heterodimerization between GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR, GABAB-R2/mGlu1αR and GABAB-R1/R2 Co-IP analysis illustrating the heterodimerization between, GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR (A), GABABR2/mGlu1αR (B) and GABAB-R1/R2 (C) in hippocampal tissue lysate from normally sleeping (NS) and sleep-deprived (SD) rats. As described in the Materials and Methods section, the tissue lysate was immunoprecipitated with mGlu1αR or GABAB-R2 specific antibodies. The mGlu1αR- or GABABR2- immunoprecipitate was then fractionated on a 7% SDS gel and probed with anti-GABAB-R1/R2 or GABAB-R1 antibodies, respectively. Note the formation of GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR (A), GABABR2/mGlu1αR (B) and GABAB-R1/R2 heterodimers at the expected sizes of ~272, ~260 and ~250 kDa in NS and SD rats. While the complex-formation between GABAB-R1/mGlu1αR and GABABR2/mGlu1αR is clearly enhanced in SD rats, GABAB-R1/R2 heterodimerization is reduced.  102  Chapter 5: Discussion  5.1  5.1.1  LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus  Induction  The 20 Hz (2XSI) LFS reliably induced LTD in 3-4 week old rats. The LTD lasted for the 30-40 min post-tetanus when the experiment was terminated (see Section #4.1.3). Consistent with reports in literature, the 1 Hz LFS, however, did not induce LTD in these animals (Dudek and Bear, 1993; Kemp and Bashir, 2001; Wagner and Alger, 1995). The 20 Hz LTD requires activation of mGluRs and GABAB-Rs (see Section #4.2). Since these receptors are localized mainly around the synapse (Kulik, et al., 2003; Lujan, et al., 1996), it may be possible that strong stimulation (such as the 20 Hz), recruits these receptors via a spill-over of the neurotransmitter into the extra or perisynaptic space (Isaacson, 2000; Nicoll, 2004). In fact, GABAB-Rs and mGluRs possess a higher affinity for GABA or glutamate (Nicoll, 2004; Nishi, et al., 2000), respectively, making them well-suited for sensing low levels of the neurotransmitter in these conditions. While a paired-pulse (PP)-LFS (900 pulses at 1 Hz, 200 ms inter-stimulus interval) induces NMDAR-LTD, increasing the stimulationstrength using a PP-LFS (900 pulses at 1 Hz, 50 ms inter-stimulus interval), selectively induces mGluR-dependent LTD (Kemp, et al., 2000). A PP-LFS (25 ms inter-stimulus interval) designed to prime GABAergic feed-back inhibition, however, induces NMDARLTD (Thiels, et al., 2002). These findings indicate that depending on the type of receptors LFS recruits, LTD mechanisms may vary. 103  5.2  Enhancement of LTD in SD rats  Sleep-deprivation for 12-72 h has been previously shown to disrupt the induction and/-or maintenance of LTP in the hippocampus (Campbell, et al., 2002; Davis, et al., 2003; McDermott, et al., 2003). We report for the first time that LTD is enhanced following sleepdeprivation (Tadavarty, et al., 2009). An elevated LTD may indeed be an intrinsic adaptive mechanism to prevent the saturation of neural networks associated with prolonged wakefulness and reset excitability to within their functional range (Longordo, et al., 2009). This would ensure that the learning and memory functions of the CNS are unaffected. In this context, the development of LTD may in fact be responsible for the disruption of LTP in SD rats. Computational modeling of neuronal plasticity, as well as experimental evidence, supports the existence of a certain “sliding threshold” for LTP or LTD (Dayan and Willshaw, 1991; Huang, et al., 1992; Stanton, 1996). When neuronal activity is high, in circumstances generally leading to LTP, compensatory changes could occur at specific synapses, which suppress subsequent LTP and favor the induction of LTD. This requires LTP and LTD to functionally interact and counterbalance each other at the cellular level. In fact, this can be achieved through various means, including the convergence in mechanisms that underlie LTP or LTD. Both LTP and LTD have been shown to require the activation of NMDARs and/or mGluRs (Collingridge, et al., 2010; Malenka and Bear, 2004; Riedel, et al., 2003). The magnitude and spatial and temporal characteristics of the postsynaptic Ca2+ signal can, indeed, determine the direction of plasticity (Yang, et al., 1999). Moreover, variations in the inhibitory tone can tilt synaptic plasticity in favor of LTP or LTD (Steele and Mauk, 1999; Stelzer, et al., 1994). Taken together, it therefore seems plausible that the sleep-deprivation 104  induced enhancement of LTD underlies the impairment of LTP observed in other studies. These aspects need to be studied in further detail.  5.3  5.3.1  Mechanisms involved in LTD  Involvement of mGluRs and GABAB-Rs  The 20 Hz LTD is dependent on the activation of mGluRs and GABAB-Rs (see Chapter 3, Section #4.2). Activation of mGluRs may independently affect LTD via modulating the expression of synaptic AMPARs. While an increased expression of AMPARs is associated with LTP, a decrease in receptor number is suggested to be important for LTD (Malinow and Malenka, 2002). Lynch et al. originally proposed that LTP could entail an increase in the number of synaptic glutamate receptors (Lynch and Baudry, 1984). The discovery of “silent synapses” (Isaac, et al., 1995; Liao, et al., 1995) provided the first electrophysiological evidence for this hypothesis. Synapses are silent postsynaptically if they express only NMDARs but lack AMPARs. Since non-synaptic AMPARs outnumber synaptic AMPARs (Shi, et al., 1999), and given that the synaptic and non-synaptic regions are only a few microns apart, a rapid delivery/-internalization of AMPARs into the synapse is possible following conditioning stimulations (Nusser, et al., 1998; Petralia, et al., 1999; Takumi, et al., 1999). Interventions that disallow membrane fusion and/-or exocytosis machinery block LTP, providing additional evidence for receptor trafficking (Lledo, et al., 1998). On the contrary, a significant loss of synaptic AMPARs through a clathrin-dependent endocytotic process might underlie LTD (Man, et al., 2000). Also, prolonged increases in 105  network activity induced by blocking GABA-ergic IPSCs and giving brief applications of glutamate in spinal cord, cortical cultures or hippocampal cultures, can cause AMPAR internalization (Lissin, et al., 1998; O'Brien, et al., 1998; Turrigiano, et al., 1998). Conversely, application of AMPAR antagonists for hours to days increase the receptor surface expression (Liao, et al., 1999; O'Brien, et al., 1998). The delivery of AMPARs into the synapse can further be modulated by other receptors. Exactly how this happens is unclear, but both NMDARs and group I mGluRs have been shown to trigger an internalization of AMPARs (Luscher, et al., 1999; Snyder, et al., 2001), thereby causing LTD.  Activation of mGluRs may induce LTD by modulating AMPAR function. Altering the phosphorylation state at two sites, Ser-845 (Kameyama, et al., 1998; Lee, et al., 1998) and Ser-831 (Barria, et al., 1997; Lee, et al., 2000) on the AMPAR can influence its function by modulating the single channel conductance (Derkach, et al., 1999) and/or the channel open probability [Popen; (Banke, et al., 2000)]. While an increase in channel conductance is implicated in LTP, the opposite seems to be true in LTD. mGluR-LTD is associated with a decrease in the phosphorylation of AMPARs. Blocking protein tyrosine phosphatase activity inhibits mGluR-LTD (Moult, et al., 2006). Therefore, activation of mGluRs can induce LTD by modulating the expression and/-or the function of AMPARs.  The role of GABAB-Rs in LTD is, however, perplexing. GABAB-R influences NMDAR-LTD through disinhibition (Wagner and Alger, 1995). Our results from studies on IPSC amplitude and selective blockade of GABAA-Rs rules out disinhibition as a possible mechanism. One possibility is that the site of GABAB action is indirect, on interneurons; this 106  needs further investigation. In the presence of GS-39783, a positive allosteric modulator for GABAB-Rs, pEPSPs were selectively suppressed in SD rats. It is possible that sleepdeprivation induces certain alterations in the function and/-or expression of GABAB-Rs. In agreement with this thinking, we found changes in the expression of GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 following sleep-deprivation. Exactly how this translates into LTD is unclear. Since GABAB-Rs may functionally interact with mGluRs (Hirono, et al., 2001), we studied the expression pattern of these receptors using co-localization techniques, in normally sleeping and SD rats. Our data reveal an overlapping distribution for mGlu1αRs and GABAB-Rs in the CA1 region in pyramidal/non-pyramidal cells of hippocampus, a finding that is consistent with previous observations (Kulik, et al., 2003; Lujan, et al., 1996). Since the degree of co-localization is altered during sleep-deprivation, we further hypothesized that GABAB-Rs and mGluRs might physically interact with each other, and that the enhancement in LTD in SD rats could be related to an alteration in this interaction. In line with this thinking, co-IP results revealed a complex-formation between mGlu1Rs and GABABR1/R2s, which was enhanced in sleep-deprivation.  Exactly how GABAB-Rs and mGluRs co-operate to affect LTD and its enhancement is not clear. The 20-Hz repetitive stimulation employed in this study, is powerful enough to not only induce homo- and hetero- synaptic depression (Sastry, et al., 1984), but also unmask the otherwise latent excitatory synaptic connections in hippocampal neurons (Miles and Wong, 1987). Stimulating afferent fibers at this rate may, therefore, be strong enough to simultaneously activate both GABAB-Rs and mGlu1αRs and provoke an interaction in a manner that is sufficient to induce and modulate LTD. Alternatively, previous studies have 107  shown that, in a functionally active heteromeric complex, the activation of a single protomer is sufficient to modulate its counterpart to trigger a physiological response (Kumar and Grant, 2010). Hence, in a scenario where mGlu1αRs and GABAB-Rs form complexes, activation of one receptor may not only further stimulate the formation of a heteromeric complex, but also enhance/decrease the effect of the other. In fact, a functional crosstalk/dimerization between mGlu1αR and GABAB-R in cerebellar parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses seems to lead to a synergistic enhancement in the effect of mGlu1αR (Hirono, et al., 2001). Conversely, mGlu1R antagonists seem to enhance GABAergic neurotransmission, thereby significantly reducing post-ischemic neuronal damage and epileptiform activity (Cozzi, et al., 2002). Interestingly, recent studies have shown that GABAB-Rs and group I mGluRs modulate the expression of Ca2+-permeable (CP) AMPARs in the cerebellar stellate cell synapses. Blockade of either group I mGluRs or GABAB-Rs results in an increase of CPAMPARs, indicating that under normal physiological conditions, mGluRs and GABAB-Rs may co-operatively alter the expression of AMPARs (Kelly, et al., 2009). In fact, this finding strengthens our thinking that a physical interaction between mGluRs and GABAB-Rs occurs in normally sleeping and SD rats.  GPCRs exist as homo- and hetero- dimers and in higher order as oligomers with a variety of proteins. Interestingly, this assembly is not restricted to only closely related GPCRs such as, δ- & κ-opioid receptors (Jordan and Devi, 1999), but observed even in distantly related receptors like somatostatin-SSTR5 & dopamine-D2 receptors (Rocheville, et al., 2000; Rocheville, et al., 2000). GABAB and mGluRs have been shown to form stable heteromeric complexes with calcium sensing receptors (Gama, et al., 2001) and scaffolding 108  proteins, MUPP1, Homer, Shank (Fagni, et al., 2004; Kornau, 2006). Other studies in literature indicate that GPCRs also dimerize with ionotropic glutamate and GABA receptors (Serulle, et al., 2007). While in most cases, specific domains on the carboxyl-terminal tails of GPCRs seem to be important for an interaction to take place (Cvejic and Devi, 1997; Grant, et al., 2004; White, et al., 1998), the cross-talk between GABAB-R amplification of mGlu1 receptor responses is intact even when it is co-expressed with mGlu1β receptor, a short splice variant with a much smaller carboxyl-terminal tail (Rives, et al., 2009). These data indicate that GPCR dimerization is a complex process which is unique to each receptor pair. Therefore, further studies are necessary to elucidate the type of interaction between GABA B and mGlu1αRs, and any possible alterations following sleep-deprivation. Functionally, GPCR dimerization seems to influence receptor surface expression (Marshall, et al., 2002), sensitivity of receptors to endogenous ligands (Gomes, et al., 2000; Rocheville, et al., 2000), signal transduction (Grant, et al., 2008; Somvanshi, et al., 2009; Watt, et al., 2009) and receptor internalization (Jordan, et al., 2001; Rocheville, et al., 2000). Intriguingly, although each of these aspects is known to affect the induction of LTP and LTD, the role of receptor dimerization in synaptic plasticity remains largely unexplored. Therefore, our current findings underscore the need to re-examine the classical view that activation of individual receptors alone affects short- and long- term plasticity of EPSPs and IPSCs in the CNS.  Sleep-deprivation in one form or other has become increasingly common in today’s 24X7 lifestyle. Other factors, but not limited to, age, prolonged warfare and/-or pathological conditions such as, Alzheimer’s disease, sleep apnea, etc., also account for the loss of sleep. Despite this, our knowledge on how sleep-deprivation affects basal synaptic transmission and 109  plasticity in the CNS remains very limited. One of the major findings of the present study is that acute sleep-deprivation, for as little as 12 h can significantly enhance LTD. GABABRs and mGluRs seem to co-operate differentially to affect LTD in normally sleeping and SD rats. The expression, co-localization and dimerization of GABABRs and mGluRs is altered following sleep-deprivation. Modulation of LTD via GPCR dimerization is a novel concept. In our view, such alterations in the receptor function through homo- and heterodimerization may be a much more efficient means to regulate plasticity in the CNS. It may ensure that short-term alterations induced by changes in behavior (sleep or sleep-deprivation), are quickly reversed to physiological levels following periods of recovery. The participation of both inhibitory and excitatory systems in modulating LTD also emphasizes the need to study the contribution of both GABAergic and glutamatergic in synaptic plasticity, as opposed to current focus on mainly glutamatergic pathways as mechanisms for LTP and LTD of pEPSPs/EPSCs. Lastly, considering the fact that a majority of currently available drugs act on GPCRs, we believe that a careful examination of our current findings will aid in the identification of novel targets and design of better drugs to combat problems like sleepdeprivation induced amnesia.  110  Chapter 6: Conclusions  Based on the experiments conducted in the present study, the major findings are summarized as follows,  1.  LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus can be reliably induced using a 20 Hz, 30 sec LFS (2XSI).  2.  LTD induced in this fashion is significantly enhanced in rats following a 12 h sleep-deprivation by gentle-handling.  3.  Activation of group I mGluRs, mainly mGlu1Rs and mGlu5Rs are necessary for LTD. NMDARs are however, not involved.  4.  Release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, but not L- or T- type VGCCs is required for LTD.  5.  Activation of GABAB-Rs but not GABAA-Rs affects LTD in normally sleeping and SD rats. GABAA-R mediated- IPSCs are not affected following the 20 Hz LFS. Electrophysiological results also indicated a change in GABAB-R function in SD rats.  6.  The expression of GABAB-Rs and mGlu1Rs are altered following seep-deprivation.  111  7.  The co-localization between mGlu1R/GABAB-R1, mGluR/GABAB-R2 is enhanced in SD rats. There seems to a decrease in the co-localization between GABAB-R1/R2 in SD rats.  8.  While mGlu1R/GABAB-R1 and mGlu1R/GABAB-R2 complex formation is enhanced in SD rats, the dimerization of GABAB-R1/R2 is decreased in SD rats.  112  Chapter 7: Future Directions  Results of studies pursued in this thesis work have provided valuable information on the possible effects of sleep-deprivation on LTD and receptor expression. The findings offer several avenues for further research. Some of these directions are summarized below,  1.  Sleep-deprivation induced alterations in the expression and interaction of mGlu1αRs and GABAB-Rs is a novel finding. Results from immunohistochemical studies indicate that receptor expression is altered in both pyramidal cells and interneurons. Given the fact that these cell types interact to control the overall excitability  of  neuronal  networks,  it  is  important  to  further  establish  electrophysiologically, as to how changes in receptor expression affect the basic synaptic transmission in pyramidal cells and interneurons, and what influence these alterations have on the LTD of pyramidal cell EPSPs. This can be achieved by, for instance, combining field recordings from CA1 pyramidal neurons with whole-cell recordings from interneurons.  2.  Data from co-IP studies suggest that mGlu1αRs dimerize with GABAB-Rs. The interaction between the receptor subtypes must be additionally confirmed through fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments. Following this, the mechanism of interaction, and how it is altered during sleep-deprivation must be 113  studied. Knowledge from these studies will unravel potential targets for combating sleep-deprivation induced deficits.  3.  In our studies, the focus was on the roles of mGluRs and GABAB-Rs in LTD, mainly because LTD in normally-sleeping rats required the activation of these receptors. However, sleep-deprivation itself may bring in changes in the function and/or expression of NMDARs and GABAA-Rs, which did not influence LTD in normallysleeping rats per se. This possibility must to be further investigated.  4.  Studies in literature have well established the role of [Ca2+]i in LTD. The 20 Hz- LTD is sensitive to the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. This is not surprising because both mGluRs and GABAB-Rs are GPCRs and Ca2+ acts as an important second messenger to both. Exactly how a rise in [Ca2+]i leads to LTD remains unclear. In literature, evidence indicates a significant role for calcium-binding proteins, protein kinases and phosphatases in LTD. These mechanisms must be further investigated in both normally-sleeping and sleep-deprived rats.  5.  We studied the effects of a 12 h sleep-deprivation on LTD. This we thought was a realistic representation of today’s lifestyle. However, in certain pathological conditions, such as sleep apnea or in soldiers during war time, longer duration of sleep-deprivation is the most likely scenario. After carefully selecting an appropriate  114  protocol, sleep-deprivation must be extended and its effect on synaptic transmission and LTD tested.  6.  Our studies provide a remarkable overview of on how even acute sleep-deprivation can influence synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Whether these changes are reversible is currently unknown. This aspect can be tested by allowing a period of sleep recovery following sleep-deprivation, and subsequently examining its influence on LTD and receptor expression.  115  Bibliography  Abraham, W. C., 2003. How long will long-term potentiation last? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 358, 735-744. Abraham, W. C., 2008. Metaplasticity: tuning synapses and networks for plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 9, 387. Alberini, C. M., Milekic, M. H., Tronel, S., 2006. Mechanisms of memory stabilization and de-stabilization. Cell Mol Life Sci. 63, 999-1008. Alford, S., Frenguelli, B. G., Schofield, J. G., Collingridge, G. L., 1993. Characterization of Ca2+ signals induced in hippocampal CA1 neurones by the synaptic activation of NMDA receptors. J Physiol. 469, 693-716. Amaral, D. G., 1978. A Golgi study of cell types in the hilar region of the hippocampus in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 182, 851-914. Amaral, D. G., Dent, J. A., 1981. Development of the mossy fibers of the dentate gyrus: I. A light and electron microscopic study of the mossy fibers and their expansions. J Comp Neurol. 195, 51-86. Amaral, D. G., Ishizuka, N., Claiborne, B., 1990. Neurons, numbers and the hippocampal network. Prog Brain Res. 83, 1-11. Amaral, D. G., Witter, M. P., 1989. The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: a review of anatomical data. Neuroscience. 31, 571-591. Amzica, F., Neckelmann, D., Steriade, M., 1997. Instrumental conditioning of fast (20- to 50-Hz) oscillations in corticothalamic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 94, 19851989. Andersen, P., Blackstad, T. W., Lomo, T., 1966. Location and identification of excitatory synapses on hippocampal pyramidal cells. Exp Brain Res. 1, 236-248. 116  Andersen, P., Bliss, T. V., Lomo, T., Olsen, L. I., Skrede, K. K., 1969. Lamellar organization of hippocampal excitatory pathways. Acta Physiol Scand. 76, 4A-5A. Andersen, P., Dingledine, R., Gjerstad, L., Langmoen, I. A., Laursen, A. M., 1980. Two different responses of hippocampal pyramidal cells to application of gamma-amino butyric acid. J Physiol. 305, 279-296. Andersen, P., Eccles, J. C., Loyning, Y., 1963. Recurrent inhibition in the hippocampus with identification of the inhibitory cell and its synapses. Nature. 198, 540-542. Anderson, P., Bliss, T. V., Skrede, K. K., 1971. Lamellar organization of hippocampal pathways. Exp Brain Res. 13, 222-238. Aniksztejn, L., Demarque, M., Morozov, Y., Ben-Ari, Y., Represa, A., 2001. Recurrent CA1 collateral axons in developing rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 913, 195-200. Anwyl, R., 1991. Modulation of vertebrate neuronal calcium channels by transmitters. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 16, 265-281. Ascher, P., Nowak, L., 1988. The role of divalent cations in the N-methyl-D-aspartate responses of mouse central neurones in culture. J Physiol. 399, 247-266. Aserinsky, E., Kleitman, N., 1953. Regularly occurring periods of eye motility, and concomitant phenomena, during sleep. Science. 118, 273-274. Banke, T. G., Bowie, D., Lee, H., Huganir, R. L., Schousboe, A., Traynelis, S. F., 2000. Control of GluR1 AMPA receptor function by cAMP-dependent protein kinase. J Neurosci. 20, 89-102. Barnard, E. A., Skolnick, P., Olsen, R. W., Mohler, H., Sieghart, W., Biggio, G., Braestrup, C., Bateson, A. N., Langer, S. Z., 1998. International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev. 50, 291-313. Barnes, C. A., 1979. Memory deficits associated with senescence: a neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 93, 74-104.  117  Barnes, C. A., McNaughton, B. L., 1985. An age comparison of the rates of acquisition and forgetting of spatial information in relation to long-term enhancement of hippocampal synapses. Behav Neurosci. 99, 1040-1048. Barrett, T. R., Ekstrand, B. R., 1972. Effect of sleep on memory. 3. Controlling for time-ofday effects. J Exp Psychol. 96, 321-327. Barria, A., Muller, D., Derkach, V., Griffith, L. C., Soderling, T. R., 1997. Regulatory phosphorylation of AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaM-KII during long-term potentiation. Science. 276, 2042-2045. Barrionuevo, G., Brown, T. H., 1983. Associative long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 80, 7347-7351. Bartesaghi, R., Gessi, T., Sperti, L., 1988. Electrophysiological analysis of the dorsal hippocampal commissure projections to the entorhinal area. Neuroscience. 26, 55-67. Bartlett, T. E., Bannister, N. J., Collett, V. J., Dargan, S. L., Massey, P. V., Bortolotto, Z. A., Fitzjohn, S. M., Bashir, Z. I., Collingridge, G. L., Lodge, D., 2007. Differential roles of NR2A and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in LTP and LTD in the CA1 region of two-week old rat hippocampus. Neuropharmacology. 52, 60-70. Bear, M. F., Abraham, W. C., 1996. Long-term depression in hippocampus. Annu Rev Neurosci. 19, 437-462. Bear, M. F., Malenka, R. C., 1994. Synaptic plasticity: LTP and LTD. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 4, 389-399. Ben-Ari, Y., 2002. Excitatory actions of gaba during development: the nature of the nurture. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3, 728-739. Benington, J. H., Frank, M. G., 2003. Cellular and molecular connections between sleep and synaptic plasticity. Prog Neurobiol. 69, 71-101. Benkwitz, C., Banks, M. I., Pearce, R. A., 2004. Influence of GABAA receptor gamma2 splice variants on receptor kinetics and isoflurane modulation. Anesthesiology. 101, 924-936. 118  Berretta, N., Cherubini, E., 1998. A novel form of long-term depression in the CA1 area of the adult rat hippocampus independent of glutamate receptors activation. Eur J Neurosci. 10, 2957-2963. Bienenstock, E. L., Cooper, L. N., Munro, P. W., 1982. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2, 32-48. Blackmer, T., Larsen, E. C., Bartleson, C., Kowalchyk, J. A., Yoon, E. J., Preininger, A. M., Alford, S., Hamm, H. E., Martin, T. F., 2005. G protein betagamma directly regulates SNARE protein fusion machinery for secretory granule exocytosis. Nat Neurosci. 8, 421-425. Blackstad, T. W., 1956. Commissural connections of the hippocampal region in the rat, with special reference to their mode of termination. J Comp Neurol. 105, 417-537. Blackstad, T. W., Brink, K., Hem, J., Jeune, B., 1970. Distribution of hippocampal mossy fibers in the rat. An experimental study with silver impregnation methods. J Comp Neurol. 138, 433-449. Blackstad, T. W., Flood, P. R., 1963. Ultrastructure of hippocampal axo-somatic synapses. Nature. 198, 542-543. Blackstad, T. W., Kjaerheim, A., 1961. Special axo-dendritic synapses in the hippocampal cortex: electron and light microscopic studies on the layer of mossy fibers. J Comp Neurol. 117, 133-159. Bland, B. H., 1986. The physiology and pharmacology of hippocampal formation theta rhythms. Prog Neurobiol. 26, 1-54. Bliss, T. V., Collingridge, G. L., 1993. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 361, 31-39. Bliss, T. V., Gardner-Medwin, A. R., 1973. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the unanaestetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol. 232, 357-374.  119  Bliss, T. V., Lomo, T., 1973. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol. 232, 331-356. Boddeke, H. W., Best, R., Boeijinga, P. H., 1997. Synchronous 20 Hz rhythmic activity in hippocampal networks induced by activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors in vitro. Neuroscience. 76, 653-658. Bolshakov, V. Y., Siegelbaum, S. A., 1994. Postsynaptic induction and presynaptic expression of hippocampal long-term depression. Science. 264, 1148-1152. Born, J., 2010. Slow-wave sleep and the consolidation of long-term memory. World J Biol Psychiatry. 11 Suppl 1, 16-21. Bowie, D., Mayer, M. L., 1995. Inward rectification of both AMPA and kainate subtype glutamate receptors generated by polyamine-mediated ion channel block. Neuron. 15, 453-462. Breese, C. R., Hampson, R. E., Deadwyler, S. A., 1989. Hippocampal place cells: stereotypy and plasticity. J Neurosci. 9, 1097-1111. Brigman, J. L., Wright, T., Talani, G., Prasad-Mulcare, S., Jinde, S., Seabold, G. K., Mathur, P., Davis, M. I., Bock, R., Gustin, R. M., Colbran, R. J., Alvarez, V. A., Nakazawa, K., Delpire, E., Lovinger, D. M., Holmes, A., 2010. Loss of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors in CA1 hippocampus and cortex impairs long-term depression, reduces dendritic spine density, and disrupts learning. J Neurosci. 30, 4590-4600. Buzsaki, G., 1986. Hippocampal sharp waves: their origin and significance. Brain Res. 398, 242-252. Buzsaki, G., 1989. Two-stage model of memory trace formation: a role for "noisy" brain states. Neuroscience. 31, 551-570. Buzsaki, G., 1996. The hippocampo-neocortical dialogue. Cereb Cortex. 6, 81-92. Buzsaki, G., 1998. Memory consolidation during sleep: a neurophysiological perspective. J Sleep Res. 7 Suppl 1, 17-23. 120  Buzsaki, G., Czeh, G., 1992. Physiological function of granule cells: a hypothesis. Epilepsy Res Suppl. 7, 281-290. Buzsaki, G., Leung, L. W., Vanderwolf, C. H., 1983. Cellular bases of hippocampal EEG in the behaving rat. Brain Res. 287, 139-171. Buzsaki, G., Ponomareff, G., Bayardo, F., Shaw, T., Gage, F. H., 1988. Suppression and induction of epileptic activity by neuronal grafts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 85, 9327-9330. Buzsaki, G., Ponomareff, G. L., Bayardo, F., Ruiz, R., Gage, F. H., 1989. Neuronal activity in the subcortically denervated hippocampus: a chronic model for epilepsy. Neuroscience. 28, 527-538. Campbell, I. G., Guinan, M. J., Horowitz, J. M., 2002. Sleep deprivation impairs long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices. J Neurophysiol. 88, 1073-1076. Cartmell, J., Schoepp, D. D., 2000. Regulation of neurotransmitter release by metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Neurochem. 75, 889-907. Chang, Y., Wang, R., Barot, S., Weiss, D. S., 1996. Stoichiometry of a recombinant GABAA receptor. J Neurosci. 16, 5415-5424. Chapman, P. F., White, G. L., Jones, M. W., Cooper-Blacketer, D., Marshall, V. J., Irizarry, M., Younkin, L., Good, M. A., Bliss, T. V., Hyman, B. T., Younkin, S. G., Hsiao, K. K., 1999. Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Nat Neurosci. 2, 271-276. Chen, Q. X., Stelzer, A., Kay, A. R., Wong, R. K., 1990. GABAA receptor function is regulated by phosphorylation in acutely dissociated guinea-pig hippocampal neurones. J Physiol. 420, 207-221. Cherubini, E., Gaiarsa, J. L., Ben-Ari, Y., 1991. GABA: an excitatory transmitter in early postnatal life. Trends Neurosci. 14, 515-519. Chicurel, M. E., Harris, K. M., 1992. Three-dimensional analysis of the structure and composition of CA3 branched dendritic spines and their synaptic relationships with mossy fiber boutons in the rat hippocampus. J Comp Neurol. 325, 169-182. 121  Cho, K., Kemp, N., Noel, J., Aggleton, J. P., Brown, M. W., Bashir, Z. I., 2000. A new form of long-term depression in the perirhinal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 3, 150-156. Christie, B. R., Magee, J. C., Johnston, D., 1996. The role of dendritic action potentials and Ca2+ influx in the induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Learn Mem. 3, 160-169. Cirelli, C., 2002. How sleep deprivation affects gene expression in the brain: a review of recent findings. J Appl Physiol. 92, 394-400. Claiborne, B. J., Amaral, D. G., Cowan, W. M., 1986. A light and electron microscopic analysis of the mossy fibers of the rat dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol. 246, 435-458. Clemens, Z., Molle, M., Eross, L., Barsi, P., Halasz, P., Born, J., 2007. Temporal coupling of parahippocampal ripples, sleep spindles and slow oscillations in humans. Brain. 130, 2868-2878. Coan, E. J., Irving, A. J., Collingridge, G. L., 1989. Low-frequency activation of the NMDA receptor system can prevent the induction of LTP. Neurosci Lett. 105, 205-210. Cohen, N. J., Poldrack, R. A., Eichenbaum, H., 1997. Memory for items and memory for relations in the procedural/declarative memory framework. Memory. 5, 131-178. Collingridge, G. L., Peineau, S., Howland, J. G., Wang, Y. T., 2010. Long-term depression in the CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci. 11, 459-473. Colquhoun, D., Jonas, P., Sakmann, B., 1992. Action of brief pulses of glutamate on AMPA/kainate receptors in patches from different neurones of rat hippocampal slices. J Physiol. 458, 261-287. Corkin, S., 1968. Acquisition of motor skill after bilateral medial temporal-lobe excision. Neuropsychologia. 6, 255-265. Corkin, S., 2002. What's new with the amnesic patient H.M.? Nat Rev Neurosci. 3, 153-160. Cozzi, A., Meli, E., Carla, V., Pellicciari, R., Moroni, F., Pellegrini-Giampietro, D. E., 2002. Metabotropic glutamate 1 (mGlu1) receptor antagonists enhance GABAergic 122  neurotransmission: a mechanism for the attenuation of post-ischemic injury and epileptiform activity? Neuropharmacology. 43, 119-130. Cull-Candy, S., Brickley, S., Farrant, M., 2001. NMDA receptor subunits: diversity, development and disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 11, 327-335. Cummings, J. A., Mulkey, R. M., Nicoll, R. A., Malenka, R. C., 1996. Ca2+ signaling requirements for long-term depression in the hippocampus. Neuron. 16, 825-833. Cvejic, S., Devi, L. A., 1997. Dimerization of the delta opioid receptor: implication for a role in receptor internalization. J Biol Chem. 272, 26959-26964. Danysz, W., Wroblewski, J. T., Costa, E., 1988. Learning impairment in rats by N-methyl-Daspartate receptor antagonists. Neuropharmacology. 27, 653-656. Danysz, W., Zajaczkowski, W., Parsons, C. G., 1995. Modulation of learning processes by ionotropic glutamate receptor ligands. Behav Pharmacol. 6, 455-474. Datta, S., 1999. PGO wave generation: Mechanism and functional significance. In: B. N. Mallick and S. Inoue, Editors, Rapid Eye Movement Sleep, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi. pp. 91–106. Daum, I., Ackermann, H., 1997. [Nondeclarative memory--neuropsychological findings and neuroanatomic principles]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 65, 122-132. Davies, C. H., Starkey, S. J., Pozza, M. F., Collingridge, G. L., 1991. GABA autoreceptors regulate the induction of LTP. Nature. 349, 609-611. Davis, C. J., Harding, J. W., Wright, J. W., 2003. REM sleep deprivation-induced deficits in the latency-to-peak induction and maintenance of long-term potentiation within the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Brain Res. 973, 293-297. Davis, C. J., Meighan, P. C., Taishi, P., Krueger, J. M., Harding, J. W., Wright, J. W., 2006. REM sleep deprivation attenuates actin-binding protein cortactin: a link between sleep and hippocampal plasticity. Neurosci Lett. 400, 191-196.  123  Dayan, P., Willshaw, D. J., 1991. Optimising synaptic learning rules in linear associative memories. Biol Cybern. 65, 253-265. Debanne, D., Thompson, S. M., 1996. Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus in vitro. Hippocampus. 6, 9-16. Deisz, R. A., Lux, H. D., 1982. The role of intracellular chloride in hyperpolarizing postsynaptic inhibition of crayfish stretch receptor neurones. J Physiol. 326, 123-138. Derkach, V., Barria, A., Soderling, T. R., 1999. Ca2+/calmodulin-kinase II enhances channel conductance of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate type glutamate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96, 3269-3274. Diamond, D. M., Bennett, M. C., Fleshner, M., Rose, G. M., 1992. Inverted-U relationship between the level of peripheral corticosterone and the magnitude of hippocampal primed burst potentiation. Hippocampus. 2, 421-430. Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D., Traynelis, S. F., 1999. The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev. 51, 7-61. Donevan, S. D., Rogawski, M. A., 1995. Intracellular polyamines mediate inward rectification of Ca(2+)-permeable alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4isoxazolepropionic acid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 92, 9298-9302. Dudek, S. M., Bear, M. F., 1992. Homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of hippocampus and effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 89, 4363-4367. Dudek, S. M., Bear, M. F., 1993. Bidirectional long-term modification of synaptic effectiveness in the adult and immature hippocampus. J Neurosci. 13, 2910-2918. Duffy, S., Labrie, V., Roder, J. C., 2008. D-serine augments NMDA-NR2B receptordependent hippocampal long-term depression and spatial reversal learning. Neuropsychopharmacology. 33, 1004-1018. Eichenbaum, H., 2001. The hippocampus and declarative memory: cognitive mechanisms and neural codes. Behav Brain Res. 127, 199-207. 124  Eichenbaum, H., Dudchenko, P., Wood, E., Shapiro, M., Tanila, H., 1999. The hippocampus, memory, and place cells: is it spatial memory or a memory space? Neuron. 23, 209226. Eichenbaum, H., Wiener, S. I., Shapiro, M. L., Cohen, N. J., 1989. The organization of spatial coding in the hippocampus: a study of neural ensemble activity. J Neurosci. 9, 2764-2775. Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., Ranganath, C., 2007. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci. 30, 123-152. Errington, M. L., Bliss, T. V., Richter-Levin, G., Yenk, K., Doyere, V., Laroche, S., 1995. Stimulation at 1-5 Hz does not produce long-term depression or depotentiation in the hippocampus of the adult rat in vivo. J Neurophysiol. 74, 1793-1799. Fagiolini, M., Pizzorusso, T., Berardi, N., Domenici, L., Maffei, L., 1994. Functional postnatal development of the rat primary visual cortex and the role of visual experience: dark rearing and monocular deprivation. Vision Res. 34, 709-720. Fagni, L., Ango, F., Perroy, J., Bockaert, J., 2004. Identification and functional roles of metabotropic glutamate receptor-interacting proteins. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 15, 289298. Fagni, L., Chavis, P., Ango, F., Bockaert, J., 2000. Complex interactions between mGluRs, intracellular Ca2+ stores and ion channels in neurons. Trends Neurosci. 23, 80-88. Finch, D. M., Babb, T. L., 1980. Neurophysiology of the caudally directed hippocampal efferent system in the rat: projections to the subicular complex. Brain Res. 197, 1126. Foster, T. C., Kumar, A., 2007. Susceptibility to induction of long-term depression is associated with impaired memory in aged Fischer 344 rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 87, 522-535. Fowler, M. J., Sullivan, M. J., Ekstrand, B. R., 1973. Sleep and memory. Science. 179, 302304.  125  Frank, M. G., Issa, N. P., Stryker, M. P., 2001. Sleep enhances plasticity in the developing visual cortex. Neuron. 30, 275-287. Frankland, P. W., Bontempi, B., 2005. The organization of recent and remote memories. Nat Rev Neurosci. 6, 119-130. Freund, T. F., Buzsaki, G., 1996. Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 6, 347470. Freund, T. F., Katona, I., 2007. Perisomatic inhibition. Neuron. 56, 33-42. Frotscher, M., Zimmer, J., 1983. Commissural fibers terminate on non-pyramidal neurons in the guinea pig hippocampus -- a combined Golgi/EM degeneration study. Brain Res. 265, 289-293. Gaarskjaer, F. B., 1978. Organization of the mossy fiber system of the rat studied in extended hippocampi. I. Terminal area related to number of granule and pyramidal cells. J Comp Neurol. 178, 49-72. Gaarskjaer, F. B., 1986. The organization and development of the hippocampal mossy fiber system. Brain Res. 396, 335-357. Gama, L., Wilt, S. G., Breitwieser, G. E., 2001. Heterodimerization of calcium sensing receptors with metabotropic glutamate receptors in neurons. J Biol Chem. 276, 39053-39059. Geiger, J. R., Melcher, T., Koh, D. S., Sakmann, B., Seeburg, P. H., Jonas, P., Monyer, H., 1995. Relative abundance of subunit mRNAs determines gating and Ca2+ permeability of AMPA receptors in principal neurons and interneurons in rat CNS. Neuron. 15, 193-204. Giuditta, A., Ambrosini, M. V., Montagnese, P., Mandile, P., Cotugno, M., Grassi Zucconi, G., Vescia, S., 1995. The sequential hypothesis of the function of sleep. Behav Brain Res. 69, 157-166. Gomes, I., Jordan, B. A., Gupta, A., Trapaidze, N., Nagy, V., Devi, L. A., 2000. Heterodimerization of mu and delta opioid receptors: A role in opiate synergy. J Neurosci. 20, RC110. 126  Grant, M., Alturaihi, H., Jaquet, P., Collier, B., Kumar, U., 2008. Cell growth inhibition and functioning of human somatostatin receptor type 2 are modulated by receptor heterodimerization. Mol Endocrinol. 22, 2278-2292. Grant, M., Patel, R. C., Kumar, U., 2004. The role of subtype-specific ligand binding and the C-tail domain in dimer formation of human somatostatin receptors. J Biol Chem. 279, 38636-38643. Gray, E. G., 1959. Electron microscopy of synaptic contacts on dendrite spines of the cerebral cortex. Nature. 183, 1592-1593. Greene, J. R., Totterdell, S., 1997. Morphology and distribution of electrophysiologically defined classes of pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons in rat ventral subiculum in vitro. J Comp Neurol. 380, 395-408. Grover, L. M., Yan, C., 1999. Blockade of GABAA receptors facilitates induction of NMDA receptor-independent long-term potentiation. J Neurophysiol. 81, 2814-2822. Guerineau, N. C., Gahwiler, B. H., Gerber, U., 1994. Reduction of resting K+ current by metabotropic glutamate and muscarinic receptors in rat CA3 cells: mediation by Gproteins. J Physiol. 474, 27-33. Gulyas, A. I., Hajos, N., Freund, T. F., 1996. Interneurons containing calretinin are specialized to control other interneurons in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 16, 3397-3411. Hagerdal, M., Harp, J., Nilsson, L., Siesjo, B. K., 1975. The effect of induced hypothermia upon oxygen consumption in the rat brain. J Neurochem. 24, 311-316. Halasy, K., Buhl, E. H., Lorinczi, Z., Tamas, G., Somogyi, P., 1996. Synaptic target selectivity and input of GABAergic basket and bistratified interneurons in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus. Hippocampus. 6, 306-329. Hampson, R. E., Byrd, D. R., Konstantopoulos, J. K., Bunn, T., Deadwyler, S. A., 1996. Hippocampal place fields: relationship between degree of field overlap and crosscorrelations within ensembles of hippocampal neurons. Hippocampus. 6, 281-293.  127  Hasselmo, M. E., 1999. Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation. Trends Cogn Sci. 3, 351-359. Hebb, D., 1949. The Organization of Behavior a Neuropsychological Theory. Wiley, New York. Heuss, C., Scanziani, M., Gahwiler, B. H., Gerber, U., 1999. G-protein-independent signaling mediated by metabotropic glutamate receptors. Nat Neurosci. 2, 1070-1077. Hirono, M., Yoshioka, T., Konishi, S., 2001. GABA(B) receptor activation enhances mGluRmediated responses at cerebellar excitatory synapses. Nat Neurosci. 4, 1207-1216. Hsiao, K., Chapman, P., Nilsen, S., Eckman, C., Harigaya, Y., Younkin, S., Yang, F., Cole, G., 1996. Correlative memory deficits, Abeta elevation, and amyloid plaques in transgenic mice. Science. 274, 99-102. Huang, Y. Y., Colino, A., Selig, D. K., Malenka, R. C., 1992. The influence of prior synaptic activity on the induction of long-term potentiation. Science. 255, 730-733. Isaac, J. T., Nicoll, R. A., Malenka, R. C., 1995. Evidence for silent synapses: implications for the expression of LTP. Neuron. 15, 427-434. Isaacson, J. S., 2000. Spillover in the spotlight. Curr Biol. 10, R475-477. Ishizuka, N., Cowan, W. M., Amaral, D. G., 1995. A quantitative analysis of the dendritic organization of pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus. J Comp Neurol. 362, 17-45. Isomura, Y., Sirota, A., Ozen, S., Montgomery, S., Mizuseki, K., Henze, D. A., Buzsaki, G., 2006. Integration and segregation of activity in entorhinal-hippocampal subregions by neocortical slow oscillations. Neuron. 52, 871-882. Jarolimek, W., Lewen, A., Misgeld, U., 1999. A furosemide-sensitive K+-Cl- cotransporter counteracts intracellular Cl- accumulation and depletion in cultured rat midbrain neurons. J Neurosci. 19, 4695-4704. Ji, D., Wilson, M. A., 2007. Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nat Neurosci. 10, 100-107. 128  Jonas, P., Major, G., Sakmann, B., 1993. Quantal components of unitary EPSCs at the mossy fibre synapse on CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampus. J Physiol. 472, 615-663. Jones, K. A., Borowsky, B., Tamm, J. A., Craig, D. A., Durkin, M. M., Dai, M., Yao, W. J., Johnson, M., Gunwaldsen, C., Huang, L. Y., Tang, C., Shen, Q., Salon, J. A., Morse, K., Laz, T., Smith, K. E., Nagarathnam, D., Noble, S. A., Branchek, T. A., Gerald, C., 1998. GABA(B) receptors function as a heteromeric assembly of the subunits GABA(B)R1 and GABA(B)R2. Nature. 396, 674-679. Jordan, B. A., Devi, L. A., 1999. G-protein-coupled receptor heterodimerization modulates receptor function. Nature. 399, 697-700. Jordan, B. A., Trapaidze, N., Gomes, I., Nivarthi, R., Devi, L. A., 2001. Oligomerization of opioid receptors with beta 2-adrenergic receptors: a role in trafficking and mitogenactivated protein kinase activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98, 343-348. Kaila, K., Lamsa, K., Smirnov, S., Taira, T., Voipio, J., 1997. Long-lasting GABA-mediated depolarization evoked by high-frequency stimulation in pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampal slice is attributable to a network-driven, bicarbonate-dependent K+ transient. J Neurosci. 17, 7662-7672. Kameyama, K., Lee, H. K., Bear, M. F., Huganir, R. L., 1998. Involvement of a postsynaptic protein kinase A substrate in the expression of homosynaptic long-term depression. Neuron. 21, 1163-1175. Kandel, E. R., 2001. The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science. 294, 1030-1038. Karni, A., Tanne, D., Rubenstein, B. S., Askenasy, J. J., Sagi, D., 1994. Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill. Science. 265, 679-682. Kaupmann, K., Malitschek, B., Schuler, V., Heid, J., Froestl, W., Beck, P., Mosbacher, J., Bischoff, S., Kulik, A., Shigemoto, R., Karschin, A., Bettler, B., 1998. GABA(B)receptor subtypes assemble into functional heteromeric complexes. Nature. 396, 683687.  129  Kawaguchi, Y., Kondo, S., 2002. Parvalbumin, somatostatin and cholecystokinin as chemical markers for specific GABAergic interneuron types in the rat frontal cortex. J Neurocytol. 31, 277-287. Keinanen, K., Wisden, W., Sommer, B., Werner, P., Herb, A., Verdoorn, T. A., Sakmann, B., Seeburg, P. H., 1990. A family of AMPA-selective glutamate receptors. Science. 249, 556-560. Kelly, L., Farrant, M., Cull-Candy, S. G., 2009. Synaptic mGluR activation drives plasticity of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors. Nat Neurosci. 12, 593-601. Kemp, N., Bashir, Z. I., 1997. NMDA receptor-dependent and -independent long-term depression in the CA1 region of the adult rat hippocampus in vitro. Neuropharmacology. 36, 397-399. Kemp, N., Bashir, Z. I., 1997. A role for adenosine in the regulation of long-term depression in the adult rat hippocampus in vitro. Neurosci Lett. 225, 189-192. Kemp, N., Bashir, Z. I., 2001. Long-term depression: a cascade of induction and expression mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol. 65, 339-365. Kemp, N., McQueen, J., Faulkes, S., Bashir, Z. I., 2000. Different forms of LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus: role of age and stimulus protocol. Eur J Neurosci. 12, 360-366. Kerr, D. S., Abraham, W. C., 1995. Cooperative interactions among afferents govern the induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 92, 11637-11641. Klausberger, T., Marton, L. F., Baude, A., Roberts, J. D., Magill, P. J., Somogyi, P., 2004. Spike timing of dendrite-targeting bistratified cells during hippocampal network oscillations in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 7, 41-47. Kleckner, N. W., Dingledine, R., 1988. Requirement for glycine in activation of NMDAreceptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Science. 241, 835-837.  130  Kopp, C., Longordo, F., Nicholson, J. R., Luthi, A., 2006. Insufficient sleep reversibly alters bidirectional synaptic plasticity and NMDA receptor function. J Neurosci. 26, 1245612465. Kornau, H. C., 2006. GABA(B) receptors and synaptic modulation. Cell Tissue Res. 326, 517-533. Kulik, A., Vida, I., Lujan, R., Haas, C. A., Lopez-Bendito, G., Shigemoto, R., Frotscher, M., 2003. Subcellular localization of metabotropic GABA(B) receptor subunits GABA(B1a/b) and GABA(B2) in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 23, 11026-11035. Kumar, U., Grant, M., 2010. Somatostatin and somatostatin receptors. Results Probl Cell Differ. 50, 137-184. Lacaille, J. C., Mueller, A. L., Kunkel, D. D., Schwartzkroin, P. A., 1987. Local circuit interactions between oriens/alveus interneurons and CA1 pyramidal cells in hippocampal slices: electrophysiology and morphology. J Neurosci. 7, 1979-1993. Lacaille, J. C., Schwartzkroin, P. A., 1988. Stratum lacunosum-moleculare interneurons of hippocampal CA1 region. I. Intracellular response characteristics, synaptic responses, and morphology. J Neurosci. 8, 1400-1410. Lansink, C. S., Goltstein, P. M., Lankelma, J. V., Joosten, R. N., McNaughton, B. L., Pennartz, C. M., 2008. Preferential reactivation of motivationally relevant information in the ventral striatum. J Neurosci. 28, 6372-6382. Larson, J., Wong, D., Lynch, G., 1986. Patterned stimulation at the theta frequency is optimal for the induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Brain Res. 368, 347-350. Laube, B., Hirai, H., Sturgess, M., Betz, H., Kuhse, J., 1997. Molecular determinants of agonist discrimination by NMDA receptor subunits: analysis of the glutamate binding site on the NR2B subunit. Neuron. 18, 493-503. Laurberg, S., Sorensen, K. E., 1981. Associational and commissural collaterals of neurons in the hippocampal formation (hilus fasciae dentatae and subfield CA3). Brain Res. 212, 287-300.  131  Lavenex, P., Amaral, D. G., 2000. Hippocampal-neocortical interaction: a hierarchy of associativity. Hippocampus. 10, 420-430. Lee, D. W., Miyasato, L. E., Clayton, N. S., 1998. Neurobiological bases of spatial learning in the natural environment: neurogenesis and growth in the avian and mammalian hippocampus. Neuroreport. 9, R15-27. Lee, H. K., Barbarosie, M., Kameyama, K., Bear, M. F., Huganir, R. L., 2000. Regulation of distinct AMPA receptor phosphorylation sites during bidirectional synaptic plasticity. Nature. 405, 955-959. Lee, H. K., Kameyama, K., Huganir, R. L., Bear, M. F., 1998. NMDA induces long-term synaptic depression and dephosphorylation of the GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptors in hippocampus. Neuron. 21, 1151-1162. Lehmann, H., Glenn, M. J., Mumby, D. G., 2007. Consolidation of object-discrimination memory is independent of the hippocampus in rats. Exp Brain Res. 180, 755-764. Lester, R. A., Clements, J. D., Westbrook, G. L., Jahr, C. E., 1990. Channel kinetics determine the time course of NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents. Nature. 346, 565-567. Levy, W. B., Steward, O., 1979. Synapses as associative memory elements in the hippocampal formation. Brain Res. 175, 233-245. Li, X. G., Somogyi, P., Ylinen, A., Buzsaki, G., 1994. The hippocampal CA3 network: an in vivo intracellular labeling study. J Comp Neurol. 339, 181-208. Liao, D., Hessler, N. A., Malinow, R., 1995. Activation of postsynaptically silent synapses during pairing-induced LTP in CA1 region of hippocampal slice. Nature. 375, 400404. Liao, D., Zhang, X., O'Brien, R., Ehlers, M. D., Huganir, R. L., 1999. Regulation of morphological postsynaptic silent synapses in developing hippocampal neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2, 37-43. Lisman, J., 1989. A mechanism for the Hebb and the anti-Hebb processes underlying learning and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 86, 9574-9578. 132  Lissin, D. V., Gomperts, S. N., Carroll, R. C., Christine, C. W., Kalman, D., Kitamura, M., Hardy, S., Nicoll, R. A., Malenka, R. C., von Zastrow, M., 1998. Activity differentially regulates the surface expression of synaptic AMPA and NMDA glutamate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95, 7097-7102. Liu, L., Wong, T. P., Pozza, M. F., Lingenhoehl, K., Wang, Y., Sheng, M., Auberson, Y. P., Wang, Y. T., 2004. Role of NMDA receptor subtypes in governing the direction of hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Science. 304, 1021-1024. Lledo, P. M., Zhang, X., Sudhof, T. C., Malenka, R. C., Nicoll, R. A., 1998. Postsynaptic membrane fusion and long-term potentiation. Science. 279, 399-403. Longordo, F., Kopp, C., Luthi, A., 2009. Consequences of sleep deprivation on neurotransmitter receptor expression and function. Eur J Neurosci. 29, 1810-1819. Lorente de No´, R., 1934. Studies on the structure of the cerebral cortex. II. Continuation of the study of the ammonic system. J. Psychol. Neurol. (Lpz.). 46, 113–177. Lujan, R., Nusser, Z., Roberts, J. D., Shigemoto, R., Somogyi, P., 1996. Perisynaptic location of metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR1 and mGluR5 on dendrites and dendritic spines in the rat hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci. 8, 1488-1500. Luscher, C., Xia, H., Beattie, E. C., Carroll, R. C., von Zastrow, M., Malenka, R. C., Nicoll, R. A., 1999. Role of AMPA receptor cycling in synaptic transmission and plasticity. Neuron. 24, 649-658. Lynch, G., 1998. Memory and the brain: unexpected chemistries and a new pharmacology. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 70, 82-100. Lynch, G., Baudry, M., 1984. The biochemistry of memory: a new and specific hypothesis. Science. 224, 1057-1063. Lynch, G. S., Dunwiddie, T., Gribkoff, V., 1977. Heterosynaptic depression: a postsynaptic correlate of long-term potentiation. Nature. 266, 737-739. M'Harzi, M., Jarrard, L. E., Willig, F., Palacios, A., Delacour, J., 1991. Selective fimbria and thalamic lesions differentially impair forms of working memory in rats. Behav Neural Biol. 56, 221-239. 133  Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S., Frith, C. D., 2000. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 97, 4398-4403. Mahut, H., 1972. A selective spatial deficit in monkeys after transection of the fornix. Neuropsychologia. 10, 65-74. Malenka, R. C., Bear, M. F., 2004. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron. 44, 5-21. Malinow, R., Malenka, R. C., 2002. AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci. 25, 103-126. Mammen, A. L., Kameyama, K., Roche, K. W., Huganir, R. L., 1997. Phosphorylation of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole4-propionic acid receptor GluR1 subunit by calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II. J Biol Chem. 272, 32528-32533. Man, H. Y., Lin, J. W., Ju, W. H., Ahmadian, G., Liu, L., Becker, L. E., Sheng, M., Wang, Y. T., 2000. Regulation of AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission by clathrindependent receptor internalization. Neuron. 25, 649-662. Manahan-Vaughan, D., Braunewell, K. H., 1999. Novelty acquisition is associated with induction of hippocampal long-term depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96, 87398744. Marks, G. A., Shaffery, J. P., Oksenberg, A., Speciale, S. G., Roffwarg, H. P., 1995. A functional role for REM sleep in brain maturation. Behav Brain Res. 69, 1-11. Markus, E. J., Qin, Y. L., Leonard, B., Skaggs, W. E., McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A., 1995. Interactions between location and task affect the spatial and directional firing of hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 15, 7079-7094. Marshall, L., Born, J., 2007. The contribution of sleep to hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation. Trends Cogn Sci. 11, 442-450. Marshall, L., Henze, D. A., Hirase, H., Leinekugel, X., Dragoi, G., Buzsaki, G., 2002. Hippocampal pyramidal cell-interneuron spike transmission is frequency dependent 134  and responsible for place modulation of interneuron discharge. J Neurosci. 22, RC197. Martin, S. J., Grimwood, P. D., Morris, R. G., 2000. Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 23, 649-711. Mason, A., 1993. Electrophysiology and burst-firing of rat subicular pyramidal neurons in vitro: a comparison with area CA1. Brain Res. 600, 174-178. Mayer, M. L., Westbrook, G. L., Guthrie, P. B., 1984. Voltage-dependent block by Mg2+ of NMDA responses in spinal cord neurones. Nature. 309, 261-263. McBain, C. J., Fisahn, A., 2001. Interneurons unbound. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2, 11-23. McBain, C. J., Mayer, M. L., 1994. N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor structure and function. Physiol Rev. 74, 723-760. McCarren, M., Alger, B. E., 1985. Use-dependent depression of IPSPs in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells in vitro. J Neurophysiol. 53, 557-571. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., O'Reilly, R. C., 1995. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev. 102, 419-457. McDermott, C. M., LaHoste, G. J., Chen, C., Musto, A., Bazan, N. G., Magee, J. C., 2003. Sleep deprivation causes behavioral, synaptic, and membrane excitability alterations in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 23, 9687-9695. McGaugh, J. L., 2000. Memory--a century of consolidation. Science. 287, 248-251. McHugh, T. J., Blum, K. I., Tsien, J. Z., Tonegawa, S., Wilson, M. A., 1996. Impaired hippocampal representation of space in CA1-specific NMDAR1 knockout mice. Cell. 87, 1339-1349. McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A., O'Keefe, J., 1983. The contributions of position, direction, and velocity to single unit activity in the hippocampus of freely-moving rats. Exp Brain Res. 52, 41-49. 135  McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A., Rao, G., Baldwin, J., Rasmussen, M., 1986. Long-term enhancement of hippocampal synaptic transmission and the acquisition of spatial information. J Neurosci. 6, 563-571. McNaughton, B. L., Douglas, R. M., Goddard, G. V., 1978. Synaptic enhancement in fascia dentata: cooperativity among coactive afferents. Brain Res. 157, 277-293. Megias, M., Emri, Z., Freund, T. F., Gulyas, A. I., 2001. Total number and distribution of inhibitory and excitatory synapses on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Neuroscience. 102, 527-540. Mehta, A. K., Ticku, M. K., 1999. An update on GABAA receptors. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 29, 196-217. Meibach, R. C., Siegel, A., 1977. Efferent connections of the hippocampal formation in the rat. Brain Res. 124, 197-224. Miles, R., Wong, R. K., 1987. Latent synaptic pathways revealed after tetanic stimulation in the hippocampus. Nature. 329, 724-726. Miller, L. D., Petrozzino, J. J., Golarai, G., Connor, J. A., 1996. Ca2+ release from intracellular stores induced by afferent stimulation of CA3 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices. J Neurophysiol. 76, 554-562. Milligan, G., 2009. G protein-coupled receptor hetero-dimerization: contribution to pharmacology and function. Br J Pharmacol. 158, 5-14. Mintz, I. M., Bean, B. P., 1993. GABAB receptor inhibition of P-type Ca2+ channels in central neurons. Neuron. 10, 889-898. Misgeld, U., Bijak, M., Jarolimek, W., 1995. A physiological role for GABAB receptors and the effects of baclofen in the mammalian central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 46, 423-462. Misgeld, U., Deisz, R. A., Dodt, H. U., Lux, H. D., 1986. The role of chloride transport in postsynaptic inhibition of hippocampal neurons. Science. 232, 1413-1415.  136  Molle, M., Born, J., 2009. Hippocampus whispering in deep sleep to prefrontal cortex--for good memories? Neuron. 61, 496-498. Morishita, W., Connor, J. H., Xia, H., Quinlan, E. M., Shenolikar, S., Malenka, R. C., 2001. Regulation of synaptic strength by protein phosphatase 1. Neuron. 32, 1133-1148. Morishita, W., Lu, W., Smith, G. B., Nicoll, R. A., Bear, M. F., Malenka, R. C., 2007. Activation of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors is not required for NMDA receptordependent long-term depression. Neuropharmacology. 52, 71-76. Mosbacher, J., Schoepfer, R., Monyer, H., Burnashev, N., Seeburg, P. H., Ruppersberg, J. P., 1994. A molecular determinant for submillisecond desensitization in glutamate receptors. Science. 266, 1059-1062. Moser, E. I., Krobert, K. A., Moser, M. B., Morris, R. G., 1998. Impaired spatial learning after saturation of long-term potentiation. Science. 281, 2038-2042. Moser, E. I., Kropff, E., Moser, M. B., 2008. Place cells, grid cells, and the brain's spatial representation system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 31, 69-89. Moult, P. R., Gladding, C. M., Sanderson, T. M., Fitzjohn, S. M., Bashir, Z. I., Molnar, E., Collingridge, G. L., 2006. Tyrosine phosphatases regulate AMPA receptor trafficking during metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated long-term depression. J Neurosci. 26, 2544-2554. Mulkey, R. M., Endo, S., Shenolikar, S., Malenka, R. C., 1994. Involvement of a calcineurin/inhibitor-1 phosphatase cascade in hippocampal long-term depression. Nature. 369, 486-488. Mulkey, R. M., Herron, C. E., Malenka, R. C., 1993. An essential role for protein phosphatases in hippocampal long-term depression. Science. 261, 1051-1055. Müller, G. E., Pilzecker, A., 1900. Experimentelle Berträge zur Lehre vom Gedächtness. Z. Psychol. Ergbd. 1, 1–288. Muller, R. U., Kubie, J. L., Ranck, J. B., Jr., 1987. Spatial firing patterns of hippocampal complex-spike cells in a fixed environment. J Neurosci. 7, 1935-1950. 137  Nadasdy, Z., Hirase, H., Czurko, A., Csicsvari, J., Buzsaki, G., 1999. Replay and time compression of recurring spike sequences in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 19, 94979507. Nadel, L., Moscovitch, M., 1997. Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 7, 217-227. Nagao, S., Kitazawa, H., 2008. [Role of the cerebellum in the acquisition and consolidation of motor memory]. Brain Nerve. 60, 783-790. Nakanishi, H., Sun, Y., Nakamura, R. K., Mori, K., Ito, M., Suda, S., Namba, H., Storch, F. I., Dang, T. P., Mendelson, W., Mishkin, M., Kennedy, C., Gillin, J. C., Smith, C. B., Sokoloff, L., 1997. Positive correlations between cerebral protein synthesis rates and deep sleep in Macaca mulatta. Eur J Neurosci. 9, 271-279. Nakazawa, K., Quirk, M. C., Chitwood, R. A., Watanabe, M., Yeckel, M. F., Sun, L. D., Kato, A., Carr, C. A., Johnston, D., Wilson, M. A., Tonegawa, S., 2002. Requirement for hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors in associative memory recall. Science. 297, 211-218. Nicoll, R. A., 2004. My close encounter with GABA(B) receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 68, 1667-1674. Nielsen, K. S., Macphail, E. M., Riedel, G., 1997. Class I mGlu receptor antagonist 1aminoindan-1,5-dicarboxylic acid blocks contextual but not cue conditioning in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 326, 105-108. Nimmrich, V., Maier, N., Schmitz, D., Draguhn, A., 2005. Induced sharp wave-ripple complexes in the absence of synaptic inhibition in mouse hippocampal slices. J Physiol. 563, 663-670. Nishi, N., Odagaki, Y., Koyama, T., 2000. Pharmacological characterization of metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated high-affinity GTPase activity in rat cerebral cortical membranes. Br J Pharmacol. 130, 1664-1670. Nishizaki, T., Yamauchi, R., Tanimoto, M., Okada, Y., 1988. Effects of temperature on the oxygen consumption in thin slices from different brain regions. Neurosci Lett. 86, 301-305. 138  Norman, K. A., O'Reilly, R. C., 2003. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol Rev. 110, 611-646. Norris, C. M., Halpain, S., Foster, T. C., 1998. Reversal of age-related alterations in synaptic plasticity by blockade of L-type Ca2+ channels. J Neurosci. 18, 3171-3179. Norris, C. M., Korol, D. L., Foster, T. C., 1996. Increased susceptibility to induction of longterm depression and long-term potentiation reversal during aging. J Neurosci. 16, 5382-5392. Nowak, L., Bregestovski, P., Ascher, P., Herbet, A., Prochiantz, A., 1984. Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones. Nature. 307, 462-465. Nusser, Z., Lujan, R., Laube, G., Roberts, J. D., Molnar, E., Somogyi, P., 1998. Cell type and pathway dependence of synaptic AMPA receptor number and variability in the hippocampus. Neuron. 21, 545-559. Nusser, Z., Mody, I., 2002. Selective modulation of tonic and phasic inhibitions in dentate gyrus granule cells. J Neurophysiol. 87, 2624-2628. O'Brien, R. J., Kamboj, S., Ehlers, M. D., Rosen, K. R., Fischbach, G. D., Huganir, R. L., 1998. Activity-dependent modulation of synaptic AMPA receptor accumulation. Neuron. 21, 1067-1078. O'Keefe, J., 1993. Hippocampus, theta, and spatial memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 3, 917924. O'Keefe, J., Burgess, N., 1996. Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature. 381, 425-428. O'Keefe, J., Dostrovsky, J., 1971. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Res. 34, 171-175. O'Keefe, J., Nadel, L., 1978. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press, Oxford New York. 139  O'Keefe, J., Nadel, L., Keightley, S., Kill, D., 1975. Fornix lesions selectively abolish place learning in the rat. Exp Neurol. 48, 152-166. O'Keefe, J., Speakman, A., 1987. Single unit activity in the rat hippocampus during a spatial memory task. Exp Brain Res. 68, 1-27. Ohno-Shosaku, T., Kubota, T., Yamaguchi, J., Fukase, M., Fujita, T., Fujimoto, M., 1989. Reciprocal effects of Ca2+ and Mg-ATP on the 'run-down' of the K+ channels in opossum kidney cells. Pflugers Arch. 413, 562-564. Oliet, S. H., Malenka, R. C., Nicoll, R. A., 1997. Two distinct forms of long-term depression coexist in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells. Neuron. 18, 969-982. Olmstead, C. E., Best, P. J., Mays, L. E., 1973. Neural activity in the dorsal hippocampus during paradoxical sleep, slow wave sleep and waking. Brain Res. 60, 381-391. Ouardouz, M., Sastry, B. R., A tetanus-induced shift in reversal potential of IPSCS in neonatal deep cerebellar nuclei. Abstr- Soc. Neurosci. 26, 1865, 2000. Ouardouz, M., Sastry, B. R., 2005. Activity-mediated shift in reversal potential of GABAergic synaptic currents in immature neurons. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 160, 78-84. Owens, D. F., Boyce, L. H., Davis, M. B., Kriegstein, A. R., 1996. Excitatory GABA responses in embryonic and neonatal cortical slices demonstrated by gramicidin perforated-patch recordings and calcium imaging. J Neurosci. 16, 6414-6423. Ozawa, S., Kamiya, H., Tsuzuki, K., 1998. Glutamate receptors in the mammalian central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 54, 581-618. Palmer, M. J., Irving, A. J., Seabrook, G. R., Jane, D. E., Collingridge, G. L., 1997. The group I mGlu receptor agonist DHPG induces a novel form of LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Neuropharmacology. 36, 1517-1532. Pare, D., Llinas, R., 1995. Intracellular study of direct entorhinal inputs to field CA1 in the isolated guinea pig brain in vitro. Hippocampus. 5, 115-119.  140  Pavlides, C., Winson, J., 1989. Influences of hippocampal place cell firing in the awake state on the activity of these cells during subsequent sleep episodes. J Neurosci. 9, 29072918. Paxinos, G., 1995. Hippocampal formation. In: The rat nervous system. Academic Press, San Diego. Petralia, R. S., Esteban, J. A., Wang, Y. X., Partridge, J. G., Zhao, H. M., Wenthold, R. J., Malinow, R., 1999. Selective acquisition of AMPA receptors over postnatal development suggests a molecular basis for silent synapses. Nat Neurosci. 2, 31-36. Pin, J. P., Duvoisin, R., 1995. The metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure and functions. Neuropharmacology. 34, 1-26. Plihal, W., Born, J., 1999. Effects of early and late nocturnal sleep on priming and spatial memory. Psychophysiology. 36, 571-582. Plotkin, M. D., Snyder, E. Y., Hebert, S. C., Delpire, E., 1997. Expression of the Na-K-2Cl cotransporter is developmentally regulated in postnatal rat brains: a possible mechanism underlying GABA's excitatory role in immature brain. J Neurobiol. 33, 781-795. Poe, G. R., Nitz, D. A., McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A., 2000. Experience-dependent phase-reversal of hippocampal neuron firing during REM sleep. Brain Res. 855, 176180. Qin, Y. L., McNaughton, B. L., Skaggs, W. E., Barnes, C. A., 1997. Memory reprocessing in corticocortical and hippocampocortical neuronal ensembles. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 352, 1525-1533. Quirk, G. J., Muller, R. U., Kubie, J. L., 1990. The firing of hippocampal place cells in the dark depends on the rat's recent experience. J Neurosci. 10, 2008-2017. Rajput, P. S., Billova, S., Patel, S. C., Kharmate, G., Somvanshi, R. K., Kumar, U., 2009. Expression of somatostatin and somatostatin receptor subtypes in Apolipoprotein D (ApoD) knockout mouse brain: An immunohistochemical analysis. J Chem Neuroanat. 38, 20-33.  141  Rajput, P. S., Kharmate, G., Somvanshi, R. K., Kumar, U., 2009. Colocalization of dopamine receptor subtypes with dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein (DARPP-32) in rat brain. Neurosci Res. 65, 53-63. Ramón y Cajal, S., 1893. The structure of Ammon's horn. Transl. 1968 by Lisbeth M. Kraft, with a foreword by Paul D. MacLean. C.C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill. Rattner, B. A., Gruenau, S. P., Altland, P. D., 1979. Cross-adaptive effects of cold, hypoxia, or physical training on decompression sickness in mice. J Appl Physiol. 47, 412-417. Restle, F., 1957. Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place-vs.-response question. Psychol Rev. 64, 217-228. Reyes, M., Stanton, P. K., 1996. Induction of hippocampal long-term depression requires release of Ca2+ from separate presynaptic and postsynaptic intracellular stores. J Neurosci. 16, 5951-5960. Ribak, C. E., Seress, L., Amaral, D. G., 1985. The development, ultrastructure and synaptic connections of the mossy cells of the dentate gyrus. J Neurocytol. 14, 835-857. Ribak, C. E., Seress, L., Peterson, G. M., Seroogy, K. B., Fallon, J. H., Schmued, L. C., 1986. A GABAergic inhibitory component within the hippocampal commissural pathway. J Neurosci. 6, 3492-3498. Ribeiro, S., Gervasoni, D., Soares, E. S., Zhou, Y., Lin, S. C., Pantoja, J., Lavine, M., Nicolelis, M. A., 2004. Long-lasting novelty-induced neuronal reverberation during slow-wave sleep in multiple forebrain areas. PLoS Biol. 2, E24. Ribeiro, S., Goyal, V., Mello, C. V., Pavlides, C., 1999. Brain gene expression during REM sleep depends on prior waking experience. Learn Mem. 6, 500-508. Riedel, G., Platt, B., Micheau, J., 2003. Glutamate receptor function in learning and memory. Behav Brain Res. 140, 1-47. Rivera, C., Voipio, J., Payne, J. A., Ruusuvuori, E., Lahtinen, H., Lamsa, K., Pirvola, U., Saarma, M., Kaila, K., 1999. The K+/Cl- co-transporter KCC2 renders GABA hyperpolarizing during neuronal maturation. Nature. 397, 251-255. 142  Rives, M. L., Vol, C., Fukazawa, Y., Tinel, N., Trinquet, E., Ayoub, M. A., Shigemoto, R., Pin, J. P., Prezeau, L., 2009. Crosstalk between GABA(B) and mGlu1a receptors reveals new insight into GPCR signal integration. Embo J. 28, 2195-2208. Robertson, E. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Miall, R. C., 2004. Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 5, 576-582. Rocheville, M., Lange, D. C., Kumar, U., Patel, S. C., Patel, R. C., Patel, Y. C., 2000. Receptors for dopamine and somatostatin: formation of hetero-oligomers with enhanced functional activity. Science. 288, 154-157. Rocheville, M., Lange, D. C., Kumar, U., Sasi, R., Patel, R. C., Patel, Y. C., 2000. Subtypes of the somatostatin receptor assemble as functional homo- and heterodimers. J Biol Chem. 275, 7862-7869. Rugg, M. D., Yonelinas, A. P., 2003. Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 7, 313-319. Sastry, B. R., Chirwa, S. S., Goh, J. W., Maretic, H., Pandanaboina, M. M., 1984. Verapamil counteracts depression but not long-lasting potentiation of the hippocampal population spike. Life Sci. 34, 1075-1086. Sastry, B. R., Goh, J. W., Auyeung, A., 1986. Associative induction of posttetanic and longterm potentiation in CA1 neurons of rat hippocampus. Science. 232, 988-990. Savoy, R. L., Gabrieli, J. D., 1991. Normal McCollough effect in Alzheimer's disease and global amnesia. Percept Psychophys. 49, 448-455. Schaffer, K., 1892. Beitrag zur Histologie der Ammons Horn-formation. Arch Mikrosc Anat. 39, 611–632. Schoepp, D. D., Jane, D. E., Monn, J. A., 1999. Pharmacological agents acting at subtypes of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neuropharmacology. 38, 1431-1476. Schoepp, D. D., Johnson, B. G., 1993. Metabotropic glutamate receptor modulation of cAMP accumulation in the neonatal rat hippocampus. Neuropharmacology. 32, 1359-1365.  143  Scoville, W. B., Milner, B., 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 20, 11-21. Seabrook, G. R., Easter, A., Dawson, G. R., Bowery, B. J., 1997. Modulation of long-term potentiation in CA1 region of mouse hippocampal brain slices by GABAA receptor benzodiazepine site ligands. Neuropharmacology. 36, 823-830. Serulle, Y., Zhang, S., Ninan, I., Puzzo, D., McCarthy, M., Khatri, L., Arancio, O., Ziff, E. B., 2007. A GluR1-cGKII interaction regulates AMPA receptor trafficking. Neuron. 56, 670-688. Shadmehr, R., Brandt, J., Corkin, S., 1998. Time-dependent motor memory processes in amnesic subjects. J Neurophysiol. 80, 1590-1597. Shaffery, J. P., Lopez, J., Bissette, G., Roffwarg, H. P., 2006. Rapid eye movement sleep deprivation in post-critical period, adolescent rats alters the balance between inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms in visual cortex. Neurosci Lett. 393, 131-135. Shew, T., Yip, S., Sastry, B. R., 2000. Mechanisms involved in tetanus-induced potentiation of fast IPSCs in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons. J Neurophysiol. 83, 3388-3401. Shi, S. H., Hayashi, Y., Petralia, R. S., Zaman, S. H., Wenthold, R. J., Svoboda, K., Malinow, R., 1999. Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDA receptor activation. Science. 284, 1811-1816. Shigemoto, R., Kinoshita, A., Wada, E., Nomura, S., Ohishi, H., Takada, M., Flor, P. J., Neki, A., Abe, T., Nakanishi, S., Mizuno, N., 1997. Differential presynaptic localization of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 17, 7503-7522. Shimamura, A. P., Squire, L. R., 1986. Korsakoff's syndrome: a study of the relation between anterograde amnesia and remote memory impairment. Behav Neurosci. 100, 165-170. Shimizu, K., Amagaya, S., Ogihara, Y., 1983. Analysis of corticosterone in the serum of mice and rats using high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 272, 170-175.  144  Siapas, A. G., Wilson, M. A., 1998. Coordinated interactions between hippocampal ripples and cortical spindles during slow-wave sleep. Neuron. 21, 1123-1128. Siegel, J. M., 2001. The REM sleep-memory consolidation hypothesis. Science. 294, 10581063. Siegel, J. M., 2005. Clues to the functions of mammalian sleep. Nature. 437, 1264-1271. Sik, A., Tamamaki, N., Freund, T. F., 1993. Complete axon arborization of a single CA3 pyramidal cell in the rat hippocampus, and its relationship with postsynaptic parvalbumin-containing interneurons. Eur J Neurosci. 5, 1719-1728. Sirota, A., Csicsvari, J., Buhl, D., Buzsaki, G., 2003. Communication between neocortex and hippocampus during sleep in rodents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100, 2065-2069. Skaggs, W. E., McNaughton, B. L., 1996. Replay of neuronal firing sequences in rat hippocampus during sleep following spatial experience. Science. 271, 1870-1873. Smith, C., 1985. Sleep states and learning: a review of the animal literature. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 9, 157-168. Smith, C., 1995. Sleep states and memory processes. Behav Brain Res. 69, 137-145. Smith, C., 2001. Sleep states and memory processes in humans: procedural versus declarative memory systems. Sleep Med Rev. 5, 491-506. Smith, C., Butler, S., 1982. Paradoxical sleep at selective times following training is necessary for learning. Physiol Behav. 29, 469-473. Smith, C., Lapp, L., 1991. Increases in number of REMS and REM density in humans following an intensive learning period. Sleep. 14, 325-330. Smith, C., Tenn, C., Annett, R., 1991. Some biochemical and behavioural aspects of the paradoxical sleep window. Can J Psychol. 45, 115-124.  145  Smulders, T. V., Sasson, A. D., DeVoogd, T. J., 1995. Seasonal variation in hippocampal volume in a food-storing bird, the black-capped chickadee. J Neurobiol. 27, 15-25. Snyder, E. M., Philpot, B. D., Huber, K. M., Dong, X., Fallon, J. R., Bear, M. F., 2001. Internalization of ionotropic glutamate receptors in response to mGluR activation. Nat Neurosci. 4, 1079-1085. Snyder, G. L., Galdi, S., Fienberg, A. A., Allen, P., Nairn, A. C., Greengard, P., 2003. Regulation of AMPA receptor dephosphorylation by glutamate receptor agonists. Neuropharmacology. 45, 703-713. Solis, J. M., Nicoll, R. A., 1992. Pharmacological characterization of GABAB-mediated responses in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampal slice. J Neurosci. 12, 3466-3472. Sommer, B., Kohler, M., Sprengel, R., Seeburg, P. H., 1991. RNA editing in brain controls a determinant of ion flow in glutamate-gated channels. Cell. 67, 11-19. Somogyi, P., Freund, T. F., Cowey, A., 1982. The axo-axonic interneuron in the cerebral cortex of the rat, cat and monkey. Neuroscience. 7, 2577-2607. Somvanshi, R. K., Billova, S., Kharmate, G., Rajput, P. S., Kumar, U., 2009. C-tail mediated modulation of somatostatin receptor type-4 homo- and heterodimerizations and signaling. Cell Signal. 21, 1396-1414. Squire, L. R., 1986. Mechanisms of memory. Science. 232, 1612-1619. Squire, L. R., 1992. Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychol Rev. 99, 195-231. Squire, L. R., Slater, P. C., 1983. Electroconvulsive therapy and complaints of memory dysfunction: a prospective three-year follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry. 142, 1-8. Squire, L. R., Wetzel, C. D., Slater, P. C., 1979. Memory complaint after electroconvulsive therapy: assessment with a new self-rating instrument. Biol Psychiatry. 14, 791-801. Squire, L. R., Zouzounis, J. A., 1988. Self-ratings of memory dysfunction: different findings in depression and amnesia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 10, 727-738. 146  Staff, N. P., Jung, H. Y., Thiagarajan, T., Yao, M., Spruston, N., 2000. Resting and active properties of pyramidal neurons in subiculum and CA1 of rat hippocampus. J Neurophysiol. 84, 2398-2408. Stanton, P. K., 1996. LTD, LTP, and the sliding threshold for long-term synaptic plasticity. Hippocampus. 6, 35-42. Stanton, P. K., Chattarji, S., Sejnowski, T. J., 1991. 2-Amino-3-phosphonopropionic acid, an inhibitor of glutamate-stimulated phosphoinositide turnover, blocks induction of homosynaptic long-term depression, but not potentiation, in rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett. 127, 61-66. Stanton, P. K., Sejnowski, T. J., 1989. Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus induced by hebbian covariance. Nature. 339, 215-218. Staubli, U., Lynch, G., 1987. Stable hippocampal long-term potentiation elicited by 'theta' pattern stimulation. Brain Res. 435, 227-234. Staubli, U., Perez, Y., Xu, F. B., Rogers, G., Ingvar, M., Stone-Elander, S., Lynch, G., 1994. Centrally active modulators of glutamate receptors facilitate the induction of longterm potentiation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 91, 11158-11162. Staubli, U. V., Ji, Z. X., 1996. The induction of homo- vs. heterosynaptic LTD in area CA1 of hippocampal slices from adult rats. Brain Res. 714, 169-176. Steele, P. M., Mauk, M. D., 1999. Inhibitory control of LTP and LTD: stability of synapse strength. J Neurophysiol. 81, 1559-1566. Stelzer, A., 1992. GABAA receptors control the excitability of neuronal populations. Int Rev Neurobiol. 33, 195-287. Stelzer, A., Simon, G., Kovacs, G., Rai, R., 1994. Synaptic disinhibition during maintenance of long-term potentiation in the CA1 hippocampal subfield. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 91, 3058-3062. Steriade, M., 1999. Coherent oscillations and short-term plasticity in corticothalamic networks. Trends Neurosci. 22, 337-345. 147  Steriade, M., 2006. Grouping of brain rhythms in corticothalamic systems. Neuroscience. 137, 1087-1106. Stickgold, R., Walker, M. P., 2005. Memory consolidation and reconsolidation: what is the role of sleep? Trends Neurosci. 28, 408-415. Suzuki, S. S., Smith, G. K., 1985. Burst characteristics of hippocampal complex spike cells in the awake rat. Exp Neurol. 89, 90-95. Swanson, L. W., Cowan, W. M., 1977. An autoradiographic study of the organization of the efferent connections of the hippocampal formation in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 172, 49-84. Swanson, L. W., Sawchenko, P. E., Cowan, W. M., 1980. Evidence that the commissural, associational and septal projections of the regio inferior of the hippocampus arise from the same neurons. Brain Res. 197, 207-212. Swartz, K. J., Bean, B. P., 1992. Inhibition of calcium channels in rat CA3 pyramidal neurons by a metabotropic glutamate receptor. J Neurosci. 12, 4358-4371. Tabata, T., Araishi, K., Hashimoto, K., Hashimotodani, Y., van der Putten, H., Bettler, B., Kano, M., 2004. Ca2+ activity at GABAB receptors constitutively promotes metabotropic glutamate signaling in the absence of GABA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101, 16952-16957. Tadavarty, R., Kaan, T. K., Sastry, B. R., 2009. Long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons following sleep-deprivation. Exp Neurol. 216, 239-242. Takumi, Y., Ramirez-Leon, V., Laake, P., Rinvik, E., Ottersen, O. P., 1999. Different modes of expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors in hippocampal synapses. Nat Neurosci. 2, 618-624. Tanila, H., Shapiro, M. L., Eichenbaum, H., 1997. Discordance of spatial representation in ensembles of hippocampal place cells. Hippocampus. 7, 613-623. Tartar, J. L., Ward, C. P., McKenna, J. T., Thakkar, M., Arrigoni, E., McCarley, R. W., Brown, R. E., Strecker, R. E., 2006. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity and spatial 148  learning are impaired in a rat model of sleep fragmentation. Eur J Neurosci. 23, 27392748. Taube, J. S., 1993. Electrophysiological properties of neurons in the rat subiculum in vitro. Exp Brain Res. 96, 304-318. Teyler, T. J., 1980. Brain slice preparation: hippocampus. Brain Res Bull. 5, 391-403. Thiels, E., Kanterewicz, B. I., Norman, E. D., Trzaskos, J. M., Klann, E., 2002. Long-term depression in the adult hippocampus in vivo involves activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphorylation of Elk-1. J Neurosci. 22, 2054-2062. Thompson, L. T., Best, P. J., 1990. Long-term stability of the place-field activity of single units recorded from the dorsal hippocampus of freely behaving rats. Brain Res. 509, 299-308. Thompson, S. M., Deisz, R. A., Prince, D. A., 1988. Outward chloride/cation co-transport in mammalian cortical neurons. Neurosci Lett. 89, 49-54. Thompson, S. M., Gahwiler, B. H., 1989. Activity-dependent disinhibition. I. Repetitive stimulation reduces IPSP driving force and conductance in the hippocampus in vitro. J Neurophysiol. 61, 501-511. Tolman, E. C., 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev. 55, 189-208. Tomasulo, R. A., Ramirez, J. J., Steward, O., 1993. Synaptic inhibition regulates associative interactions between afferents during the induction of long-term potentiation and depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 90, 11578-11582. Tsien, J. Z., Huerta, P. T., Tonegawa, S., 1996. The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory. Cell. 87, 13271338. Tsumoto, T., 1993. Long-term depression in cerebral cortex: a possible substrate of "forgetting" that should not be forgotten. Neurosci Res. 16, 263-270.  149  Tulving, E., 1985. How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist. 40, 385398. Tulving, E., Markowitsch, H. J., 1998. Episodic and declarative memory: role of the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 8, 198-204. Turner, D. A., Li, X. G., Pyapali, G. K., Ylinen, A., Buzsaki, G., 1995. Morphometric and electrical properties of reconstructed hippocampal CA3 neurons recorded in vivo. J Comp Neurol. 356, 580-594. Turrigiano, G. G., Leslie, K. R., Desai, N. S., Rutherford, L. C., Nelson, S. B., 1998. Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons. Nature. 391, 892-896. Urwyler, S., Pozza, M. F., Lingenhoehl, K., Mosbacher, J., Lampert, C., Froestl, W., Koller, M., Kaupmann, K., 2003. N,N'-Dicyclopentyl-2-methylsulfanyl-5-nitro-pyrimidine4,6-diamine (GS39783) and structurally related compounds: novel allosteric enhancers of gamma-aminobutyric acidB receptor function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 307, 322-330. Wagner, J. J., Alger, B. E., 1995. GABAergic and developmental influences on homosynaptic LTD and depotentiation in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 15, 15771586. Walker, M. P., 2005. A refined model of sleep and the time course of memory formation. Behav Brain Sci. 28, 51-64; discussion 64-104. Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Seidman, J., Morgan, A., Hobson, J. A., Stickgold, R., 2003. Sleep and the time course of motor skill learning. Learn Mem. 10, 275-284. Walker, M. P., Stickgold, R., 2006. Sleep, memory, and plasticity. Annu Rev Psychol. 57, 139-166. Watt, H. L., Kharmate, G. D., Kumar, U., 2009. Somatostatin receptors 1 and 5 heterodimerize with epidermal growth factor receptor: agonist-dependent modulation of the downstream MAPK signalling pathway in breast cancer cells. Cell Signal. 21, 428-439.  150  Wenthold, R. J., Petralia, R. S., Blahos, J., II, Niedzielski, A. S., 1996. Evidence for multiple AMPA receptor complexes in hippocampal CA1/CA2 neurons. J Neurosci. 16, 19821989. White, J. H., Wise, A., Main, M. J., Green, A., Fraser, N. J., Disney, G. H., Barnes, A. A., Emson, P., Foord, S. M., Marshall, F. H., 1998. Heterodimerization is required for the formation of a functional GABA(B) receptor. Nature. 396, 679-682. White, N. M., McDonald, R. J., 1993. Acquisition of a spatial conditioned place preference is impaired by amygdala lesions and improved by fornix lesions. Behav Brain Res. 55, 269-281. Wierzynski, C. M., Lubenov, E. V., Gu, M., Siapas, A. G., 2009. State-dependent spiketiming relationships between hippocampal and prefrontal circuits during sleep. Neuron. 61, 587-596. Wigstrom, H., Gustafsson, B., 1983. Facilitated induction of hippocampal long-lasting potentiation during blockade of inhibition. Nature. 301, 603-604. Wigstrom, H., Gustafsson, B., 1986. Postsynaptic control of hippocampal long-term potentiation. J Physiol (Paris). 81, 228-236. Wigstrom, H., Gustafsson, B., Huang, Y. Y., Abraham, W. C., 1986. Hippocampal long-term potentiation is induced by pairing single afferent volleys with intracellularly injected depolarizing current pulses. Acta Physiol Scand. 126, 317-319. Wilson, M. A., McNaughton, B. L., 1994. Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep. Science. 265, 676-679. Witter, M. P., Amaral, D. G., 1991. Entorhinal cortex of the monkey: V. Projections to the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, and subicular complex. J Comp Neurol. 307, 437-459. Wolansky, T., Clement, E. A., Peters, S. R., Palczak, M. A., Dickson, C. T., 2006. Hippocampal slow oscillation: a novel EEG state and its coordination with ongoing neocortical activity. J Neurosci. 26, 6213-6229.  151  Xie, Z., Yip, S., Morishita, W., Sastry, B. R., 1995. Tetanus-induced potentiation of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in hippocampal CA1 neurons. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 73, 1706-1713. Xu, J. Y., Sastry, B. R., 2007. Theta-bursts induce a shift in reversal potentials for GABA-A receptor-mediated postsynaptic currents in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons. Exp Neurol. Yang, C. H., Huang, C. C., Hsu, K. S., 2005. Behavioral stress enhances hippocampal CA1 long-term depression through the blockade of the glutamate uptake. J Neurosci. 25, 4288-4293. Yang, S. N., Tang, Y. G., Zucker, R. S., 1999. Selective induction of LTP and LTD by postsynaptic [Ca2+]i elevation. J Neurophysiol. 81, 781-787. Yaroush, R., Sullivan, M. J., Ekstrand, B. R., 1971. Effect of sleep on memory. II. Differential effect of the first and second half of the night. J Exp Psychol. 88, 361366. Zhang, D. X., Levy, W. B., 1993. Bicuculline permits the induction of long-term depression by heterosynaptic, translaminar conditioning in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. Brain Res. 613, 309-312. Zhang, L., Spigelman, I., Carlen, P. L., 1991. Development of GABA-mediated, chloridedependent inhibition in CA1 pyramidal neurones of immature rat hippocampal slices. J Physiol. 444, 25-49. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Amaral, D. G., 1986. Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: enduring memory impairment following a bilateral lesion limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 6, 2950-2967.  152  


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items