HMMCONVERTER A tool-box for hidden Markov models with two novel, memory efficient parameter training algorithms by TIN YIN LAM B.Sc., The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Computer Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October, 2008 © TIN YIN LAM 2008 Abstract Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are powerful statistical tools for biological sequence analysis. Many recently developed Bioinformatics applications employ variants of HMMs to analyze di verse types of biological data. It is typically fairly easy to design the states and the topological structure of an HMM. However, it can be difficult to estimate parameter values which yield a good prediction performance. As many HMM-based applications employ similar algorithms for generating predictions, it is also time-consuming and error-prone to have to re-implement these algorithms whenever a new HMM-based application is to be designed. This thesis addresses these challenges by introducing a tool-box, called HMMC0NvERTER, which only requires an XML-input file to define an HMM and to use it for sequence decoding and parameter training. The package not only allows for rapid proto-typing of HMM-based applications, but also incorporates several algorithms for sequence decoding and parameter training, including two new, linear memory algorithms for parameter training. Using this software package, even users without programming knowledge can quickly set up sophisticated HMMs and pair-HMMs and use them with efficient algorithms for parameter training and sequence analyses. We use HMMCONVERTER to construct a new comparative gene prediction program, called ANNOTAID, which can predict pairs of orthologous genes by integrating prior information about each input sequence probabilistically into the gene prediction process and into parameter training. ANNOTAID can thus be readily adapted to predict orthologous gene pairs in newly sequenced genomes. 11 Table of Contents Abstract ii Table of Contents iii List of Figures vii Acknowledgements ix 1 HMMs in Bioinformatics applications 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Introduction to hidden Markov models 3 1.2.1 Theoretical background 3 1.2.2 Variants of HMMs for Bioinformatics applications 8 1.3 Challenges in designing and implementing HMMs 13 1.4 Discussion and conclusion 16 2 Decoding and parameter training algorithms for HMMs 18 2.1 Introduction and motivation 18 2.2 Decoding algorithms 19 2.2.1 The Viterbi algorithm 20 2.2.2 The Hirschberg algorithm 23 111 Table of Contents 2.3 2.4 3 27 2.3.1 The Baum-Welch algorithm 28 2.3.2 The Viterbi training algorithm 31 Discussion and conclusion HMMCONVERTER 32 34 3.1 Motivation 34 3.2 Main features 36 3.3 4 Parameter training 3.2.1 Input and output files 36 3.2.2 Special features 39 3.2.3 Sequence decoding algorithms 51 3.2.4 Training algorithms 53 Training using sampled state paths 58 3.3.1 Sampling a state path from posterior distribution 3.3.2 A new, linear memory algorithm for parameter training using sampled 58 state paths 61 3.3.3 A new linear memory algorithm for Viterbi training 68 3.3.4 Pseudo-counts and pseudo-probabilities 72 3.3.5 Training free parameters 73 3.4 Availability 76 3.5 Discussion and conclusion 77 Specifying an HMM or pair-HMM with HMMConverter 78 4.1 Introduction 78 4.2 The XML-input file 79 4.2.1 79 The <model> component of the XML file iv Table of Contents 4.2.2 4.3 The <sequence_analysis> component of the XML file Other text input files 99 4.3.1 The input sequence file 99 4.3.2 The free emission parameter file 101 4.3.3 The free transition parameter file 103 4.3.4 The tube file 104 4.3.5 The prior information file 105 4.4 The output files of HMMC0NvERTER 107 4.5 Examples 111 5 Implementation of HMMConverter 112 5.1 Introduction 112 5.2 Converting XML into C++ code 113 5.2.1 The model_parameters class 113 5.2.2 Other classes 115 5.3 6 91 Decoding and training algorithms 120 5.3.1 The Viterbi and Hirschberg algorithms 120 5.3.2 The parameter training algorithms 122 Annotaid 124 6.1 Introduction and Motivation 124 6.2 Main features of Annotaid 126 6.2.1 The pair-HMM of ANNOTAID 126 6.2.2 Banding and sequence decoding algorithms 127 6.2.3 Integrating prior information along the input sequences 127 6.2.4 Parameter training in ANNOTAID 130 v Table of Contents 6.3 Availability 133 6.4 Discussion and Future Work 134 Bibliography 136 vi List of Figures 1.1 A Markov model for the CpG-Island process 5 1.2 An HMM for the CpG-Island 5 1.3 A 5-state simple pair-HMM 9 1.4 A simple pair-HMM for predicting related protein coding regions in two input DNA sequences 2.1 10 A simple generalized pair-HMM for predicting related protein coding regions in two DNA sequences 19 2.2 Illustration of the Viterbi algorithm 23 2.3 Illustration of the Hirschberg algorithm (1) 25 2.4 Illustration of the Hirschberg algorithm (2) 26 3.1 The XML-input file for defining an HMM in HMMC0NvERTER 37 3.2 Using BLAST to generate a tube for HMMC0NvERTER 44 3.3 Defining a tube for HMMC0NvERTER explicitly 45 3.4 A state which carries labels from two different annotation label sets 47 3.5 Illustration of the special emission feature in HMMC0NvERTER 49 3.6 Using the Hirschberg algorithm inside a tube 53 3.7 Illustration of the forward algorithm 63 vi’ List of Figures 3.8 Sampling a state path from the posterior distribution 3.9 Illustration of the novel, linear memory algorithm for parameter training using 63 69 sampled state paths 3.10 A part of the pair-HMM of DOUBLESCAN 75 4.1 Defining a state of an HMM or pair-HMM in HMMCONvERTER 83 4.2 A part of the pair-HMM of DOUBLESCAN 98 4.3 Specifying a tube explicitly in a flat text file 105 4.4 A simple 5-state pair-HMM 108 6.1 Combing the Hirschberg algorithm with a tube 128 6.2 Special emissions in 129 6.3 Combining the parameter training with a tube PROJECTOR and ANNOTAID 132 vu’ Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, Prof. Irmtraud Meyer for her advice, support and encour agement during the course of this project. A special thank you goes to Prof. Anne Condon for agreeing to be the second reader of my thesis. I thank Nick Wiebe, Rodrigo Goya, Chris Thachuk and all other members of the BETA lab who have made my life on campus enjoyable as they are always being helpful and nice. ix Chapter 1 HMMs in Bioinformatics applications 1.1 Introduction Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are flexible and powerful statistical tools for many different kinds of sequence analysis. HMMs were first introduced in a series of papers by Leonard E. Baum in the 1960s, and an early application of HMMs is speech recognition in the mid 1970s. Today, HMM-based methods are widely used in many different fields such as speech recognition and speech synthesis [42, 45], natural language processing [32], hand-writing recog nition [27] and Bioinformatics [11]. Among the above applications, HMMs are especially popular for sequence analysis in Bioinformatics. In Bioinformatics, HMMs are used for sequence annotation such as gene prediction [8, 23], sequence analysis such as transcription binding site recognition [17] and peptide identification [22], sequence alignment such as protein alignment [21, 24] and other applications such as protein-protein interaction prediction [41]. Many variations of HMMs have been developed in the recent two decades for different Bioinformatics applications. In addition, new algorithms for sequence decoding and parameter training have been introduced. Although HMMs are a powerful and popular concept, several practical challenges often have 1 1.1. Introduction to be overcome in practice. It is not easy to design an HMM, especially to assign values to its parameters. The time and memory requirements for analyzing long input sequences can be prohibitive. Finally, it can be very time consuming and error-prone to implement an HMM and the corresponding prediction and parameter training algorithms. This thesis presents an HMM generation tool called HMMCONVERTER, which only re quires an XML-file and simple text input files for defining an HMM and for using the HMM for predictions and for training its parameters. Users of HMMC0NvERTER are not required to have programming skills. The tool provides the most commonly used Viterbi algorithm [47], and the more memory efficient Hirschberg algorithm [161 for sequence decoding. For param eter training, HMMC0NvERTER offers not only a new, linear memory algorithm for BaumWelch training, but also a novel linear memory variation of the Viterbi training algorithm as well as a new and efficient algorithm for training with sampled state paths. Furthermore, HMMC0NvERTER supports many special features for constructing various types of HMMs, such as higher order HMMs, pair-HMMs as well as HMMs which take external information on the input sequences into account for parameter training and generating predictions. In this chapter, we give some theoretical background on HMMs, and describe variants of HMM and their applications in Bioinformatics. We also further discuss the challenges of designing and implementing an HMM. Existing sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms for HMM are introduced in chapter 2. Chapter 3 describes the main features of HMMCONVERTER, and includes a detailed explanation of the novel parameter training algo rithms. The specifications of an HMM within HMMC0NvERTER and the input and output format for the tool are described in chapter 4, some implementation details of HMMC0NVERTER are also provided in chapter 5. Finally, we used this tool to implement a novel comparative gene prediction pair-HMM called ANNOTAID which can take various types of prior information on each of the two input sequences into account in order to give more accu 2 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models rate predictions. The features and applications of this new model are described in chapter 6. 1.2 1.2.1 Introduction to hidden Markov models Theoretical background A hidden Markov model (HMM) is a variation of a Markov model, where the state sequence of a Markov chain is hidden from the observation. We first explain what a Markov chain is and then use a simple biological example to introduce HMMs. Markov model A Markov chain is a random process with a Markov property. In brief, a random process is a process for which the next state is determined in a probabilistic way. The Markov property implies that given the current state in the random process, the future state is independent of the past states. Let X be a random variable for all positive integers i, representing the state of the process at time i. The sequence X ,X 1 ,... ,X,... is a Markov chain if: 2 P(X 1 ,X = = = Xl) = P(XZ = = A time-homogeneous Markov chain means that the next state of the process is independent of the time, but only depends on the current state: P(X, = xIX_i = y) = = 2 xIX = y) One can also define higher order Markov chains. A Markov chain of n-th order (Vn) is a Markov chain for which depends on the current state and the previous n — 1 states. Note 3 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models that when we say Markov chain, we refer to the simplest case, i.e. a 1st order Markov chain. A Markov chain can be represented by a finite state machine [11]. CpG-Island Now, we the use CpG-Island [4] example from the book Biological Sequence Analysis [11] to introduce hidden Markov models. In a genomic DNA sequence, the dinucleotide CG (i.e. a neighboring C and G on the same strand) appears more frequently around the transcription start sites of genes than in other regions of the genome. We call regions which have an increased frequency of CG pairs a CpG-Island. They are usually a few hundred to a few thousand bases long. Suppose we want to identify CpG-Islands in a long genomic sequence. We can do this by defining a Markov chain. Each state of the model in figure 1.2.1 represents a DNA nucleotide in a CpG-Island or not in a CpG-Island. The Markov property holds for this model as the probability of going from a given state to the next state only depends on the current state, but not the previous states. Figure 1.2.1 shows the Markov model of the CpG-Island “process”, but this model is lacking something as we cannot distinguish whether an observed nucleotide is from a CpG-Island(+) or not (-). We can modify this model a little, see figure 1.2.1. In this new model, each observed nucleotide can be read by two states, one state with label “-“ “+“ representing a nucleotide from a CpG-Island and one state with representing a nucleotide outside a CpG-Island. This is a hidden Markov model for a CpG-Island process, where the “hidden feature” is the underlying “+“ or “-“ state associated to nucleotides in the observed sequence. The transition probability from the C+ state to the G+ state should be larger than the transition probability from the C- state to the G- state. The start state and the end state in the two models are both silent states which do not read any character from the input sequence. The model always start with the start state 4 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models e Figure 1.1: A Markov model for the CpG-Island process This is a Markov model for the CpG-Island process, but it cannot solve the CpG-Island annotation problem. B Figure 1.2: An HMM for the CpG-Island This figure shows an HMM which can model CpG-Islands. The states of the model are all connected to each other, i.e. it is a complete graph(K ) where each state also has a transition 8 back to itself. 5 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models before reading any character from the input sequence. On the other hand, every state path ends at the end state. In the above example, the start state is connected to all the other states (except the end state), and all the states except the start state are connected to the end state. Now we are ready to give a more formal definition of HMM, an HMM is unambiguously defined by the following components: • A set of N states S = {0,... , N — 1}, where 0 is the start state and N — 1 is the end state. • An alphabet A which contains the symbols of observations of the HMM (i.e. {A,C,G,T} is the DNA alphabet for the CpG-Island 11MM in the above example). • A set of transition probabilities T = i, j e S}, where tj probability of going from state i in the model to state j and E [0, 1] is the transition JI tj,j’ = 1 for all states i inS. • A set of emission probabilities E = {ejQy)Ii emission probability of state i for symbol ‘y and 5,7 E 7’EA A}, where ej(7) e (Wy’) = e [0,11 is the 1 for all states i in S. An HMM as defined above corresponds to a probabilistic model. It can be used in a number of ways to generate predictions. In the following, • let M denote an 11MM, • X = (xi,... , XL) an input sequence of length L where x is the i-th letter of the sequence and • Tr = , lrj) a state path of length 1 + 1 in the model M where ir is the state at the k-th position in the state path, i.e. iro is always the start state and Trj is always the 6 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models end state. We can use M in a number of ways to generate predictions: • Sequence decoding: For a given input sequence X and model M, we can for example calculate the state path with the highest overall probability in the model, i.e. the state path ir which maximizes P(irIX, M). In that case, model M analyzes the sequence X and we will, in all of the following, say that the states of model M read the symbols of observations of input sequence X. • Parameter training: For a given set of training sequences X and a given model M, we can train the set of free parameters 0 of M, for example by using training algorithms which maximize P(XI0, M). • Generating sequences of observations: As any HMM defines a probability dis tribution over sequences of observations, we can use any given HMM M to generate sequences of observations. In that case, we say that the states of model M emit sym bols of observations. In this thesis, this way of using an HMM is not employed. We will, in all of the following, therefore refer to a state as reading one or more symbols from an input sequence. The CpG-Island finding problem can be solved with a decoding algorithm, which computes the most probable state path it for an input DNA sequence X and model M. Before we can use an HMM for decoding, we first have have to determine good values for its parameters which may require parameter training. Algorithms for decoding and parameter training will be discussed in more detail in this chapter and in chapter 2. In the following section, we first describe variants of HMMs that have been developed recently for Bioinformatics applications. 7 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models 1.2.2 Variants of HMMs for Bioinformatics applications Pair-HMMs and n-HMMs A pair-HMM is a simple extension of an HMM that reads two rather than only one sequence at a time. One of the main applications of pair-FIMMs is to generate sequence alignments, so pair-HMMs are particularly prevalent in Bioinformatics [39]. For example, a pair-HMM called WABA [21] can be used to identify pairs of protein coding exons in two orthologous input DNA sequences. This pair-HMM generates a global alignment between the two input sequences unlike TBLAsTX which generates local alignments [1]. Pair-HMMs are also used for comparative gene prediction [26, 34, 36]. These pair-HMMs take a pair of homologous DNA sequences as input and predict pairs of homologous gene structures. Comparative gene prediction methods using pair-HMMs have been shown [26, 36] to perform better than non-comparative approaches [8]. Figure 1.2.2 shows a simple 5-state pair-HMM. In an n HMM, each state can read letters from up to ri input sequences. n-HMMs can be used for multiple sequence alignment, but because of their high memory and time requirements, they are typically used only for short sequences, such as protein sequences. Generalized HMMs Generalized HMMs [8, 48] allow states to read more than one letter at a time from an input sequence. In Bioinformatics applications, a state of an HMM often corresponds to a biological entity, e.g. a codon consisting of 3 nucleotides, such a state would read 3 letters from the input sequence at a time. Figure 1.2.2 shows a simple generalized pair-HMM for finding related protein-coding exons in two input DNA sequences. In particular, any HMM used for gene prediction should be a generalized HMM. 8 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models Figure 1.3: A 5-state simple pair-HMM This is a 5-state simple pair-HMM, where the Match state reads one character from each of the two input sequences and aligns them according to the emission probability of the combination of the two characters read by the state. The Emit_X state reads one character from input sequence X and the Emit.Y state does the same thing as the Emit....X state, but it reads one character from the input sequence Y at a time. 9 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models Figure 1.4: A simple pair-HMM for predicting related protein coding regions in two input DNA sequences This simple pair-HMM can be used for predicting related protein coding regions in two input DNA sequences. There are 3 states to model the protein coding part and 3 states to model the non-coding part of the two input sequences. The states which model the protein coding part read one codon at a time, e.g. the Match_Codon state reads 3 nucleotides from each input sequence at a time. 10 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models Explicit state duration HMMs Explicit state duration HMMs extend the concept of HMMs by keeping track of the state’s duration, i.e. the “time” that the state path has stayed in the same state is also remembered in the decoding process. In this type of HMM, a set of parameters or functions for modeling the state duration is needed in addition to the set of transition and emission probabilities, and the probability of the next state is conditional on both the current state and the state duration. GENSCAN [8] and SNAP [25] are two ab initio gene prediction models which are based on an explicit state duration HMM. Evolutionary HMMs For many types of biological sequence analysis, it is important to know the evolutionary cor relations between the sequences. [24] describe a method that uses evolutionary information to derive the transition probabilities of the insertion and deletion states of sequence align ment pair-HMMs. EVOGENE [40] is an evolutionary HMM (EHMM), which incorporates the evolutionary relationship between the input sequences into the sequence decoding process. EVOGENE consists of an HMM and a set of evolutionary models. In the model, each state of the HMM consists of a set of alphabets over fixed alignment columns and a state-specific evolutionary model, and the emission probabilities of each state are calculated using the corresponding evolutionary model for each column in the input alignment. The Felsenstein algorithm [13] is used to calculate the likelihood of an alignment column given an evolutionary input tree and an evolutionary model. 11 1.2. Introduction to hidden Markov models HMMs which take external evidence into account Because of significant improvements in biological sequencing technology, large amounts of genome-wide data such as cDNAs, ESTs and protein sequences [3, 18, 37, 38] are currently being generated. It is desirable to incorporate these types of additional evidence into com putational sequence analysis methods to get a better performance. In recent years, many HMMs that can incorporate prior information on the input sequences into the prediction process have been developed. They are especially popular in gene prediction because of the highly available data. TWINSCAN [26] is one of the first HMMs that incorporates external information into the gene prediction process. It extends the classical gene prediction HMM GENSCAN [8] by incorporating matches to several homologous genomic sequences to the input DNA sequence into the predictions. TWINSCAN first generates a “conserved sequence” from the matches between homologous DNA sequences and the DNA sequence of interest. This conserved sequence is then used to bias the emission probabilities of the underlying GEN SCAN HMM. DOUBLESCAN [34] is a comparative gene prediction pair-HMM which performs ab initio gene prediction and sequence alignment simultaneously by taking two un-annotated and unaligned homologous genomic sequences as input. It incorporates splice site informa tion along each input sequence using the predictions of STRATASPLICE [29], which generates log-odd scores and posterior probabilities for potential splice site. These scores are then inte grated into the prediction process, and greatly improve the prediction accuracy of splice sites. PROJECTOR [36] extends DOUBLESCAN by using the known genes in one of the two input sequences to predict the gene structures in the other un-annotated DNA input sequence. It uses so-called special emissions, which integrate the information on the annotated sequence into the prediction process by biasing the emission probabilities. In its published version, PROJECTOR is only capable of incorporating prior probabilities with discrete values (i.e. ei 12 1.3. Challenges in designing and implementing HMMs ther 0 or 1). More recently, several gene prediction HMMs have been developed for integrating various types of prior information into the prediction process [7, 15, 19, 44]. These programs (they all employ HMMs but not pair-HMMs) all allow taking prior information with different levels of confidence in account. For example, in JIGSAW [19], a feature vector is used to store prior information on different features from various sources in probabilities. Simple multipli cation rules are then used to incorporate the vector into the nominal emission probabilities. EXONHUNTER [7] calls a piece of external evidence an “advisor”, different “advisors” are combined to form a “superadvisor” by quadratic programming (it is a problem of minimiz ing or maximizing a quadratic function of several variables subject to linear constraints on these variables), which is then incorporated into the prediction process. All of these HMMs are capable of integrating various prior information with different confidence scores into the prediction process, but they all have some limitations. For example, they cannot deal with contradicting pieces of information, and one state of the model can only incorporate one type of prior information. 1.3 Challenges in designing and implementing HMMs As discussed previously, HMMs are a widely used powerful concept in many applications. However, it is often not easy to design and implement an HMM. Various algorithms exist for generating predictions with the model and for training the model’s parameters. The main challenges are: • Long input sequences lead to large memory and time requirements for predictions and parameter training. • It is difficult to set up the transition and emission parameters of the model that yield a good performance. 13 1.3. Challenges in designing and implementing HMMs • It is time consuming and tricky to implement the model and to test several HMMs against each other (“Proto-typing”). Dealing with long input sequences In Bioinformatics, the length of input sequences for HMMs varies between applications. For example, the average gene size (before splicing) of eukaryotic genes varies from around 1kb (yeast) to 50kb (human) or longer. Before discussing the sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms in detail, we first specify the time and memory requirements of these algorithms to give readers a better impression of the challenges. For a pair-HMM with N states, the Viterbi algorithm [47], which is the most widely used algorithm for sequence decoding, requires O(N ) time and 2 L 2 O(NL memory for analyzing a pair of sequences ) of length L each. For a gene prediction pair-HMM consisting of 10 states, it would thus require between 108 and 1010 time units and between io and 9 many units of memory to i0 analyze typical input sequences which contain only a single gene. These constraints are even more serious for parameter training, as most training algorithms are iterative processes which have to consider many input sequences. These challenges for parameter estimation of HMMs are described below. New efficient algorithms are needed to make decoding and parameter training practical even for long input sequences. Parameter training The set of transition probabilities and emission probabilities constitutes the parameters of an HMM. There are additional parameters for explicit state duration HMMs and evolutionary HMMs. As the performance of an HMM critically depends on the choice of the parameter values, it is important to find good parameter values. As the states of an HMM closely reflect the biological problem that is being addressed, it is typically fairly easy to design the states of 14 1.3. Challenges in designing and implementing HMMs the model. However, it can be difficult to manually derive good parameter values. There are two common ways to define the parameters of an HMM: (1) Users can manually choose the parameters. This is time consuming and also requires a very good understanding of the data. Also, this strategy may not result in values that optimize the performance. (2) An other strategy is to use an automatic parameter training algorithm. This strategy works best if we have a large and diverse set of annotated training sequences. Being able to use automatic parameter training for a pair-HMM, for comparative gene prediction means that it can be readily trained to analyze different pairs of genornes. However, as we explain now, parameter training is not an easy task. There are two common types of parameter training strategies for HMMs, maximum like lihood methods (ML) and expectation maximization methods (EM) [10]. The corresponding training algorithms are usually iterative processes, whose convergence depends on the set of initial values and the amount of training data. Depending on the training algorithm, the out come of the training may depend on the initial parameter values and may also not necessarily maximize the resulting prediction performance. Pseudo-counts for the parameters may be needed to avoid over-fitting, especially if the training data is sparse or biased. We have discussed the importance of parameter training for setting up an HMM. Because of the difficulties of implementing training algorithms that can be used efficiently on realistic data sets, parameter training algorithms are not implemented in most HMM applications (i.e. the parameters are set up manually for one particular data set). An exception are some HMMs for gene prediction [25, 30, 46]. This is because (1) the set of parameters are very important for the gene prediction performance, (2) parameters need to be adapted to predict genes for different organisms, (3) due to the great improvement in biological sequencing techniques, there are large enough sets of known genes to allow parameter training. For gene prediction methods, the main challenge is to implement efficient parameter training algorithms. The 15 1.4. Discussion and conclusion existing parameter training algorithms are described in chapter 2. Proto-typing Designing an HMM for a new Bioinformatics application is fairly easy given a good under standings of the underlying biological problem, whereas the implementation of several possible HMMs can be a tedious task. Proto-typing several HMMs and implementing the sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms is time-consuming and error-prone. Although there are many variations of HMMs, they all use the same prediction and training algorithms. It is particularly inefficient if the same algorithms have to be implemented repeatedly when ever a new HMM application is created. If there was a software tool for generating an 11MM with the corresponding algorithms, then users would be able to focus on designing the 11MM, i.e. the states of the model, which is the only task that requires human expertise and insight into the biological problem. 1.4 Discussion and conclusion HMMs are a very powerful statistical concept which allows many different kinds of sequence analysis applications. In this chapter, we have introduced the theoretical background of HMMs and some popular variants of HMMs and also described the popularity of these models in Bioinformatics. As we explained, it is typically not easy to design and implement an HMM in practice. We have discussed several challenges, such as long input sequences which lead to large memory and time requirements, difficulties with setting up the parameters of the model, and the time consuming and error-prone task of implementing efficient algorithms. Even though marty different HMMs have been developed for different applications, they use similar prediction and parameter training algorithms. It is therefore not efficient if users 16 1.4. Discussion and conclusion spend most of their time implementing and re-implementing these algorithms for different HMMs, when they could be focusing on the design and parameterization of the HMM. We here propose an HMM-generating tool HMMC0NvERTER, which takes an XML input file for defining an HMM, its states and parameters and the algorithms to be used for gener ating predictions and training the parameters. Using this tool, a user is not required to have computer programming knowledge to set up an HMM and to use it for data analyses and parameter training. This tool provides several widely used sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms, including two novel parameter training algorithms. Furthermore, HMM CONVERTER supports many special features, such as incorporating external information on each input sequence with confidence scores, and several heuristic algorithms for reducing the run time and memory requirement greatly while keeping the performance essentially un changed. These features are especially useful for Bioinformatics applications. In the following chapter, we introduce several widely used existing sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms. The 11MM generating tOol-HMMCONVERTER is described in chapter 3, including details on all special features and novel algorithms. Chapter 4 explains how to specify an HMM using HMMCONVERTER and chapter 5 describes some implemen tation details of HMMCONVERTER. Chapter 6 describes a novel pair-HMM for comparative gene prediction called ANNOTAID, which is constructed using the HMMCONVERTER frame work. 17 Chapter 2 Decoding and parameter training algorithms for HMMs 2.1 Introduction and motivation In biological sequence analysis or biological sequence annotations, we are interested in finding good annotations for the raw biological sequences. This is the sequence decoding problem discussed in chapter 1. Every HMM assigns an overall probability to each state path which is equal to the product of the encountered transition and emission probabilities, and every state path corresponds to an annotation of the input sequence. For an HMM with well-chosen parameters, high-quality annotations should correspond to high-probability state paths, so the task for sequence decoding is to find a state path with high probability. The Viterbi algorithm [47] is one of the most widely used sequence decoding algorithms which calculates the most probable state path for a given input sequence and HMM. For many Bioinformatics applications, it is often the case that several state paths that yield the same annotation. For example, in a simple pair-HMM which generates global align ments of protein coding regions in two input DNA sequences (see figure 2.1), there are states Emit..Codonx and Match..Codon, which both assign the annotation label Codon to the letters they read from sequence X. In this pair-HMM, several different state paths that cor 18 2.2. Decoding algorithms respond to different global alignments between the two sequences could yield the same gene annotation for the two input sequences. From this example, we can see that it is always possible to translate a state path in the model into an annotation of the input sequence. Figure 2.1: A simple generalized pair-HMM for predicting related protein coding regions in two DNA sequences This simple generalized pair-HMM has been presented in chapter 1. In particular, the MatchCodon state, the EmitCodonX state and the EmitCodonY state all assign the annotation label Codon to the letters they read from the input sequences. The three other states (except the start and the end state) assign the annotation label non_coding. 2.2 Decoding algorithms In this section, we describe two existing sequence decoding algorithms for HMMs: The most commonly used Viterbi algorithm [47] and the Hirschberg algorithm [16]. The Hirschberg 19 2.2. Decoding algorithms algorithm can be regarded as a more memory efficient version of the Viterbi algorithm. For a given HMM and an input sequence, both algorithms derive the state path with the highest overall probability. 2.2.1 The Viterbi algorithm The Viterbi algorithm is one of the most widely used sequence decoding algorithm for HMMs. It first calculates the maximum probability that a state path in a given model M can have for a given input sequence, and then retrieves the corresponding optimal state path by a back-tracking process. In this section, we introduce the algorithm for an HMM, i.e. a single tape HMM where only the start and and end states are silent and all other states read one letter from the input sequence at a time. The algorithm consists of two parts: • Part 1: Calculate the optimum probability of any state path using dynamic program ming. • Part 2: Retrieve the corresponding optimal state path by a back-tracking process. We first introduce some notations before explaining the algorithm with pseudo-code, some of these notations have already been introduced in chapter 1. • X = (xi,. .. ,xL) denotes an input sequence of length L, where x is i-th letter of the sequence. • S = {O,.. and N • T = — . , N — 1} denotes the set of N states in the HMM, where 0 is the start state 1 is the end state. Ii, j e S}, where tçj is the transition probability from state i to state j 20 2.2. Decoding algorithms {eiQy)i e • 6 8, ‘y e A}, where ej(y) is the emission probability of state i to read symbol 7 from alphabet A 3 (i) is the probability of the most • v denotes the two-dimensional Viterbi matrix, where v probable path that ends in state s and that has read the input sequence up to and including position i. • ptr denotes the two-dimensional pointer matrix, where ptr (s) is the previous state from which the maximum probability at state s and sequence position i was derived. • ir ... , ir) represents a state path in the model for a given input sequence of (7r , 0 length L, where 2r is the i-th state of the state path. In particular, is the start state and lrL+1 is the end state. • .* denotes the optimal state path, it is the state path with the highest overall probability on sequence X, i.e. lr* = argmaxP(irX, M). We also call this state path the Viterbi path. In order to calculate the optimum probability among all state paths for a given HMM and a given input sequence, the Viterbi algorithm uses the following dynamic programming ap proach: Part 1: Initialization before reading the first letter from the input sequence v(O) 1, ifs=start 1 0, ifsstart = Recursion Fori=1,.. ,L 21 2.2. Decoding algorithms Fors’=1,• ,N—2 i(i) 5 v = eS’(i)maxSEs{vS(i ptr(s’) = {vs(i 38 argmax — — } , 8 1)t i} 3 , 5 1)t (2.1) (2.2) Termination at the end of the sequence and in the end state VN_1(L) = maxses{vs(L)ts,end} 1) = 8 ( 3 {v 85 argmax d 6 , L)t } PtTL(N From the definition of VN_1(L). v, — we know that the probability of the optimal state path P(x, ir*) = The corresponding optimal state path can be obtained by a back-tracking procedure. Part 2: Back tracking starts at the end of the sequence in the end state and finishes at the start of the sequence in the start state. It is defined by the recursion: (4) 2 71-:_i =ptr Figure 2.2.1 illustrates the first part of the Viterbi algorithm. The above algorithm can be easily generalized for pair-HMMs by using a three dimensional matrix and looping over both X and Y dimensions in the recursion. For a generalized HMMs where states can read more than one character at a time from the input sequence, the entries of the Viterbi matrix are calculated by: (i) 3 v = ’(i)max e ( 8 v(i — where (s’) is the number of characters read by state s’. 22 2.2. Decoding algorithms / / / / s, /-+ State I: S / / / / State / i-i I Figure 2.2: Illustration of the Viterbi algorithm The left part shows how the Viterbi algorithm calculates the Viterbi matrix from left to right in the recursion. The algorithm first ioops along the input sequence X and then loops over the states in the model. It terminates in the top right corner of the matrix at the end of the input sequence and in the end state. The right part demonstrates the calculation of entry (i), where the matrix element for state s’ and sequence position i is derived from state s 3 v i}. , 8 1)t i(i) 8 (i 8 v (i) = e 8 i(i) 3 at sequence position (i 1), i.e. v 3 =e 1)t, maxSEs{vS(i — . — . — Let Tmax be the maximum number of transitions into any state in the model. The Viterbi ) memory for an n-HMMs which reads 1 algorithm takes O(NTmaxL) operations and O(NL n input sequences at a time. These time and memory requirements impose serious constraints when employing this algorithm with n-HMM and long input sequences. 2.2.2 The Hirschberg algorithm From equation 2.1, we can see that the Viterbi algorithm can be continued if we keep the Viterbi elements for the previous sequence position in memory. This means that only O(NL’) memory is required for an n-HMM with N states and n input sequences of identi 23 2.2. Decoding algorithms cal length L if we only want to calculate the probability of the Viterbi path. However, in order to obtain the Viterbi path, O(NL) memory is required for storing the back-tracking pointers (see equation 2.2) for the back-tracking process. The memory needed for the back-tracking pointers thus dominates the memory requirements for the Viterbi algorithm. The Hirschberg algorithm is a more memory efficient version of the Viterbi algorithm. ) memory instead of O(NL) for an n-HMM. Furthermore, the time 1 It requires O(NL” requirement of the Hirschberg algorithm is of the same order as for the Viterbi algorithm. It uses the same recurrences as the Viterbi algorithm, but searches the Viterbi matrix in a smarter way. We now describe the Hirschberg algorithm for a pair-HMM. Instead of filling the Viterbi matrix in a single direction along one of the two input sequences, the Hirschberg algorithm traverses the matrix from both ends using two Hirschberg strips of O(NL) memory each (see figure 2.2.2). We call them the forward strip and the backward strip, respectively. In order to perform the backward traversal, a “mirror model” of the original HMM has to be set up by reversing the transitions and exchanging the end state and start state with respect to the original HMM. This mirror model does not necessarily define an HMM because the sum of the transition probabilities from a state may no longer be 1. The forward strip calculated the 3-dimensional matrix in the same direction as the Viterbi algorithm, while the backward strip uses the mirror model to move in the opposite direction, i.e. it starts at the end state and at the end of one sequence. The matrix element (i, j, s) in the backward strip stores the probability of the optimal state path that has read the input sequences from their ends up to and including position i of sequence X and position j of sequence Y and that finishes in state s. Figure 2.2.2 shows how the two Hirschberg strips move in opposite directions and meet at the middle position of one of two input sequences (i.e. sequence X in 24 2.2. Decoding algorithms this example). Y Y 7 / / / / / / / / / i 1+1 Figure 2.3: Illustration of the Hirschberg algorithm (1) This figure shows the projection of the 3-dimensional Viterbi matrix onto the X—Y plane. The two Hirschberg strips traverse the matrix from both ends of sequence X and meet at the middle of the sequence X. For a generalized HMM, the two strips have a width of max es(Z(s)) + 1, 3 so they will overlap instead of “touching” each other. The additional columns of the strip are used to store the values calculated for the previous sequence position which are needed in order to continue the calculation. Suppose the two strips meet at position i of sequence X, where the forward strip stores the Viterbi matrix elements for position i of sequence X and the backward strip stores the corresponding probabilities for position i + 1 of sequence X. At that sequence position in X, the probability of the optimal state path P(X, YIlr*) can be calculated by finding the transition probabilities from states in the forward strip to states in the backward strip, such that the product of this transition probability and the two entries in the strip is maximum. Using this criterion, we can identify the Viterbi matrix element (i, j, s) through which the optimal state path lr* goes. 25 2.2. Decoding algorithms In summary, when the two Hirschberg strips meet, the optimum probability and a coor dinate on the optimal state path can be determined. The process only continues on the left sub-matrix and the right sub-matrix which corresponds to only half of the search space of the previous iteration (see figure 2.2.2). From the above example, the position i of sequence X defines the right boundary of the ‘eft sub-matrix, and the coordinate (i, j, s) defines the end position, this coordinate also defines the start position of the right sub-matrix. Figiire / / / / / I_ / / - (i,j,s) / / * * / Y / / I Figure 2.4: Illustration of the Hirschberg algorithm (2) The coordinate (i,j,s) on the optimal state path was determined in the first iteration of the Hirschberg algorithm (see figure 2.2.2). The matrix is then split into left and right submatrices and the next round of iterations is started for each of the two sub-matrices. This recursive procedure continues, until the complete state path is determined. 2.2.2 shows that two smaller Hirschberg strips search in each of the two sub-matrices. The recursive process continues until the optimal state path is completely determined. The figure also shows that in each iteration, the total search space for the Hirschberg strips is reduced by a factor of two. So the number of operations performed by the Hirschberg algorithm is given by: t + + •. <2t, where t denotes the number of operations required for searching 26 2.3. Parameter training the entire matrix, i.e. the number of operations in the Viterbi algorithm. 2.3 Parameter training In order to calculate the most probable state path for a given input sequence or sequences, a set of parameters must be provided. The parameters are the set of transition probabilities and emission probabilities. HMMs of the same topology but different parameter values can be used for different applications. For example, the average length of an exonic stretch in human genes is different from that in mouse genes, so the transition probabilities from the exon state to intergenic state in the HMM should not be the same. The values of these parameters determine the prediction result and the performance of the HMM. In general, the set of parameters of the HMM should be adjusted according to applications, so the parameter estimation is very crucial. However, it is often a difficult task to obtain good parameter estimation, because the parameter training process is expensive to run and training data is usually inadequate. Parameter training is essential in order to set up HMMs for novel biological data sets and to optimize their prediction performance. First of all, a set of training sequences is required for the training process. If the state paths for all the training sequences are known, then the parameter estimation becomes a simple counting process where the performance is optimized via a maximum likelihood approach. Suppose there are M training sequences. Let: • X = {Xi,. .. , XM} denote the set of M training sequences. • 0 denote the set of parameters of the HMM. This set refers to the set of transition and emission probabilities, i.e. 0 = {T, }. 27 2.3. Parameter training ’ the pseudo-count for the number of times the transition s , 8 • r —f S is used. • r (-y) the pseudo-count for the number of times states s reads symbol 7. 8 We can then derive the parameters that maximize the likelihood, ’ 8 t., 8 , 3 T = = V.’ where -, P(XI), by setting: (2.3) Ls number of transitions from s to s’ in all the state paths including any pseudo-counts r ’ , 3 . Similarly, (7) 8 e ) 7 ( 8 E = (-y) 8 E ’ 7 Z , , (7) where (2.4) number of times state s reads letter 7 in all the state paths including any pseudo- counts r Qy) 8 Often, the state paths that correspond to a known annotation are not known or too numerous. In that case, parameter estimation becomes more difficult. In this situation, we can employ two frequently used parameter training algorithms: the Baum-Welch algorithm [2] and the Viterbi training [11]. 2.3.1 The Baum-Welch algorithm The Baum-Welch algorithm is a special case of an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm, which is a general method for probabilistic parameter estimation. The Baum-Welch algorithm iteratively calculates new estimates for all parameters and the overall log likelihood of the HMM can be shown to converge to a local maximum. We introduce a few more notations, 28 2.3. Parameter training and then describe the Baum-Welch algorithm: • denotes the letter of the j-th position of sequence X in the set of training sequences x. • f(i, Xk) denotes the forward probability for state s and sequence position i in iteration q of the Baum-Welch algorithm. It is equal to the sum of probabilities of all state paths that have read the input sequence Xk up to and including sequence position i and are in states, i.e. f (i,Xk) 8 := P(x,... = s). • b(i, Xk) denotes the backward probability for state s and sequence position i in iteration q of the Baum-Welch algorithm. It is equal to the sum of probabilities of all state paths that have read the input sequence from the end up to and including sequence position i+ 1, given that the state of sequence position i is s, i.e. b (i, Xk) 3 := P(x+i,... , X = s). • t is the transition probability of going from state s to state s’ in iteration q of the Baum-Welch algorithm. • e (-y) is the emission probability of reading symbol -y in state s in iteration q of the Baum-Welch algorithm. • 0 q is the estimated set of parameters. i.e. the set of transition and emission probabilities of the model in iteration q of the Baum-Welch algorithm. So, in each iteration, we derive a new value for every transition probability from the ex pected number of times that this transition is used in any state path: 29 2.3. Parameter training q+1 i(Xk) 8 Z T, — ‘-,-‘q ‘cv L.k=1 L.ES lsJkk) where q ZLJdik 881 T (Xk) := f(i,Xk)t + 1,Xk) e,(x+i)b,(i 31 P(X) (2.5) Similarly for the emission probabilities. ‘i’J — -‘M L.ik=1 L.d’y’EA ‘‘ ‘k where E(’y,Xk) ‘ xk) ‘‘ &f(i, Xk)b(i, Xk) := and ö is the delta function such that 5, S (2.6) P(X) = 1 if i = 3 j and ö = 0 if i j. P(X) is the probability of the sequence Xk in the 11MM of iteration q. From the definition of forward probability, we can see that P(X) = ffld(Lxk, Xk). This value can be calculated by the forward algorithm [11J. In equation 2.5, the value 1,X)/P(X) is the probability that a transition from state s to state s’ is used at sequence position i given the set of parameters q 8 So, I ,(Xk) is the expected number of times that a 5 transition from state s to state s’ is used in sequence Xk given the set of parameters q• 8 It can be calculated by summing over all sequence positions of sequence Xk. Similarly, the value f(i, Xk)b(i, Xk)/P(Xk) in equation 2.6 is the probability that state s reads symbol E( Xk) is the expected , at position i in sequence Xk given that the set of parameter 0”. So, 7 number of times that state s reads symbol 7 in the sequence Xk given the set of parameters q• 0 It can be calculated by summing over all sequence position of the sequence Xk. 30 2.3. Parameter training In Baum-Welch training, the iterations in 2.5 and 2.6 are continued until a stopping criterion is reached. There are typically two stopping criterion for the Baum-Welch training, (1) the differences between the estimated parameters in the q-th iteration and the estimated parameters in the (q — 1)-th iteration is smaller than a pre-defined threshold. This difference can be estimated by the log odd ratio (2) The number of iterations exceeds a maximum allowed number of iterations. Suppose that c is the number of parameters to train, each iteration of the Baum-Welch training algorithm requires O(NL’) memory and O(c. M NTmaxL’) operations for an n-HMM with N states and M training . sequences of identical length L. 2.3.2 The Viterbi training algorithm The Viterbi training algorithm is another popular training algorithm which uses the Viterbi state paths to derive parameter estimates in an iterative way. Given a set of initial parameters, the Viterbi algorithm is first used to obtain the optimal state paths for all the training sequences. Then the counting procedure (equation 2.3 and equation 2.4) described at the beginning of this section is performed to calculate new parameter values. This procedure is iterated until the Viterbi paths of all training sequences remain unchanged. The Viterbi training is popular because (1) the Viterbi algorithm is usually implemented for sequence decoding in many HMM applications, so only the simple counting procedures in equation 2.3 and 2.4 needs to implement in addition. (2) As the Viterbi algorithm is usually used for sequence decoding, it can be argued that Viterbi training results in a better set of parameters for decoding with the Viterbi algorithm. The Viterbi training consists of the following steps: (i) The optimal state paths for all the training sequences in the training set are obtained 31 2.4. Discussion and conclusion by using the Viterbi algorithm and the 11MM with its parameters q 0 of iteration q. (ii) Suppose T, and E(-y) have same meaning as after equation 2.3 and equation 2.4, with the Viterbi paths assigned to all the training sequences. The values of these pa rameters can be calculated using equation 2.3 and 2.4, i.e. — eq+1 (‘y) 3 — — — E(-y) 7’EA(7) The above two steps are repeated until the Viterbi state paths for all the training sequences remain unchanged. This can always be achieved as the state paths correspond to discrete values. The Viterbi training is not an EM algorithm and it cannot be shown to always maximize the likelihood of the model. However, it maximizes the likelihood for both parameters and the optimal state paths for all the training sequences, i.e. 1 P(X , ... , 1 X O , *(xi),... , For each iteration, the Viterbi training algorithm requires O(NL) memory and O(c. M. NTmaxL’) operations for an m-HMM with N states and M training sequences of identical length L, which are the same requirements as for the Baum-Welch algorithm. 2.4 Discussion and conclusion We have discussed the roles of sequence decoding and parameter estimation for HMM-based applications, and have introduced several commonly used algorithms. For sequence decod ing, the Viterbi algorithm calculates the optimal state path for each input sequence. One disadvantage is that it requires O(NL) memory for an n-HMM, and this imposes a serious constraint if the input sequences are long. The Hirschberg algorithm reduces the memory 32 2.4. Discussion and conclusion usage by a factor of L compared to the Viterbi algorithm, and while increasing the run time by at most a factor of two. For parameter estimation, both the Baum-Welch algorithm and the Viterbi training have the same memory and time requirements for each iteration. The implementation of the Baum-Welch algorithm is more complicated as both the forward and backward values have to be calculated. However, it is guaranteed to converge to a local performance maximum and produce better parameter estimates than Viterbi training as it considers all state paths and weighs them according to their probabilities in order to estimate new parameters, whereas Viterbi training only considers a single state path for every training sequence (the Viterbi path). 33 Chapter 3 HMM CONVERTER 3.1 Motivation We have already introduced the challenges of designing and implementing HMMs in chapter 1. It is both time-consuming and error-prone to implement these models and efficient algorithms. As HMMs are used for many Bioinformatics applications, it would be extremely useful to be able to use the same source code and efficient algorithms for quickly setting up different kinds of HMMs and data analyses. One early effort is the DYNAMITE software package [5J which is a dynamic-programming code generator which can be used to implement Viterbi-like sequence analysis algorithms. The tool is a compiler which produces highly efficient C code. As this is a tool for dynamic programming, it is not specially convenient for constructing HMMs for different applications. As users still have to implement the HMM, and it is also not flexible to incorporate special features into the provided dynamic programming framework. There are several powerful profile HMM tools such as HMMER [12] and SAM [20] which provides sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms. But these tools have limitations on the models that can be implemented as all the algorithms provided are for profile HMMs only, this type of HMM is mainly used for analyzing fixed multiple sequence alignments. MAMOT [43] and HMMoC [31] are two recently published HMM generating tools. MAMOT takes a simple text file as input for defining the HMM and provides the Viterbi and Baum-Welch training algorithm. But MAMOT can only implement HMMs of order 1. 34 3.1. Motivation With these limitations, it is not practical for most Bioinformatics sequence analyse. HMM0C is a more comprehensive HMM generating tool which supports n-HMMs, i.e. HMMs with any number of input sequences, and higher order HMMs. The tool also incor porates special features such as position-dependent emission and transition probabilities as well as banding which allows a user to define a smaller search space in the Viterbi matrix. However, it is not easy to define an HMM within HMM0C as it requires an XML description and user-supplied programming codes to define an HMM. For example, C code fragments are required for setting up the transition and emission probabilities, the position-dependent probabilities and the banding features. This requires users to have programming knowledge. We here present an HMM generator software tool called HMMCONVERTER, which takes an XML and simple text files as input files, and then translates them into C++ code. The converter supports generalized pair-HMMs with many special features such as banding which allows users to specify a sub-search space for sequence decoding. It is much more flexible and easier to use than HMM0C, the feature of special emissions allows integrating prior information along each input sequence into the prediction process, and the parameterization of transition and emission probabilities makes it possible to efficiently train a large number of transition and emission probabilities from a small set of free parameters. Four unique features of our software package are the memory-efficient Hirschberg algorithm [16] for decoding, a linear-memory version of the Baum-Welch algorithm [35], a novel linear-memory version of Viterbi training and a novel and computationally efficient algorithm for training with sampled state paths. All of these decoding and training algorithms can be combined with banding and special emissions, making HMMCONVERTER thereby an extremely powerful and useful software package that can be used to swiftly set up sophisticated HMMs for real-life data sets. In this chapter, we focus on introducing the features of HMMCONVERTER. Section 3.2 introduces the main features of HMMCONVERTER, including the special features mentioned 35 3.2. Main features above and the different algorithms. Section 3.3 introduces the two novel training algorithms, and other special features for parameter training with HMMCONVERTER. The specifications and formats of the input and output files are described in chapter 4 and some implementation details of HMMC0NvERTER are discussed in chapter 5. 3.2 3.2.1 Main features Input and output files In order to build an HMM with HMMC0NvERTER, users have to supply several input files for describing the HMM and setting up special features. The format of these input files are designed to be simple, easy to construct, and easy to read even by users who may not have any programming experience. Depending on the type of analysis requested, HMMC0NvERTER generates output files for storing the results of sequence decoding and parameter training. The format of the output files is also designed to be easily readable by users. In particular, the output files that store the sequence decoding results are designed to be straightforward and readable and can be easily to converted into other popular formats like GTF etc (GTF stands for Gene Transfer format, which is a file format used to store information about gene struc tures). In this section, we briefly describe the input and output files of HMMCONVERTER, the details of the format of these files are described in chapter 4. Input files Depending on the analysis to be performed, HMMCONVERTER takes up to 5 input files: • XML input file (compulsory): This file defines the different components and the topolog ical structure of the HMM, it specifies the algorithms to be used for sequence decoding or parameter training as well as any free parameters required by these algorithms. The 36 3.2. Main features parameters for setting up the set of free transition parameters and the set of free emis sion probabilities are also defined in this file, while the values of the free transition parameters and the free emission probabilities are specified in separated files. These parameters include the id and the size of the set of free transition parameters and the set of free emission probabilities, and the name of the file that stores the values of these free transition parameters and free emission probabilities. This is a pure XML-based file and users are not required to have knowledge in any computer programming language. The name of all the other compulsory or optional input files are also specified in this XML input file, see figure 3.2.1. free emission parameter file free transition parameter file XML-Ne prior information file tube file Figure 3.1: The XML-input file for defining an HMM in HMMCONVERTER The XML-input file references all other fiat text files which store parameters for the HMM or specify special features in HMMC0NVERTER. The dashed lines corresponds to optional input files which are required only if the corresponding feature is used. • free emission parameter file (compulsory): This is a fiat text file which specifies the set of free emission probabilities of the HMM. We call group of emission probabilities stored in this file a free emission parameter if it defines the emission probabilities of a state in the HMM. We use a separate text file to specify the free emission parameters in order to keep the XML input file short and readable. For example, for a higher-order pair-HMM with a state that reads 6 characters from the two input sequences, we would need to 37 3.2. Main features specify 46 emission probabilities for a DNA alphabet only for this state. The format of the file with the free emission parameters can be easily generated using a little script. • free transition parameter file (optional): This file stores the values of the free transition parameters. It is required only if the transition probabilities are parameterized. • tube file (optional): This file specifies the restricted search space along the sequence dimensions. It is required if banding is to be used. • prior-information file (optional): This file stores all prior information on input sequences. It is required if special emissions are to be used. The last three files are optional input files which are only required if the corresponding feature in HMMCONVERTER is to be used in the algorithm for decoding or parameter training. The concept and theoretical details of these features are explained in the next section. Output files HMMC0NvERTER generates up to 5 output files for storing the results of sequence decoding and parameter training: • Two output files for sequence decoding: — The first file contains the optimal state path for all the input sequences. In this file, each line specifies one state of the state path with the corresponding positions in the input sequence(s), as well as information on the state. — If annotation label sets are defined for the HMM, then a second file will be gen erated. This file shows the resulting annotation of the input sequence(s) which corresponds to the optimal state path. • Three output files for parameter training: 38 3.2. Main features — XML output file: This file has the same format as the XML input file, but contains the trained values of the transition probabilities. Given this file, it is easy for users to compare the 11MM before and after training. — output file with trained free emission parameters: This file stores the trained free emission parameters of the HMM. It has the same format as the input file with the free emission parameters. — output file with free transition parameters: This file stores the trained free tran sition parameters of the HMM. It has the same format as the input file with the free transition parameters. 3.2.2 Special features Three special features of HMMC0NvERTER are introduced in this section. They are: pa rameterization of transition and emission probabilities, banding and special emissions. These features are particularly useful for constructing complex pair-HMMs. Special emissions can be used to integrate prior information on each input sequence probabilistically into all pre diction and parameter training algorithms, which is a very desirable feature for many recent Bioinformatics applications. Parameterization of transition and emission probabilities Complex HMMs with a large number of states may consist of hundreds of transition and emission probabilities. For many applications, the transitions or emission probabilities of different states are correlated. In that case, specifying all the probabilities as independent parameters is not desired. Furthermore, the large number of parameters would entail serious constraints for parameter training, as enormous amounts of training data would be needed 39 3.2. Main features to avoid over-fitting. In a particular case, two states may share the same set of emission probabilities. If the training process views them as independent parameters during parameter training, this would not only double the time for training, but may also result in different parameter values. In order to solve the above problem, HMMC0NvERTER allows the parameterization of transition and emission probabilities. Besides specifying the free parameters, users also have to define the derivation rules which express the probabilities as function of the free param eters (required for decoding and training) as well as derivation rules which express the free parameters as function of the probabilities (required for training only). The rules for deriving transition probabilities and emission probabilities are different from each other and we will describe them separately in the following. Parameterization of transition probabilities We first present the power of parameter ization by looking at the complex generalized pair-HMM of DOUBLESCAN [33, 34] for com parative gene prediction. It consists of 153 transitions, but can be efficiently parameterized using only 19 free transition parameters. In HMMC0NvERTER, a transition probability can be defined by an arithmetic formula. The formula may use any of the basic arithmetic operators: ‘+‘,‘—‘, ‘*‘,‘/‘ and brackets, with the id of the free transition parameters and numerical values as operands. The free transition parameters need not correspond to probabilities, i.e. their values are not restricted to the range [0,11. However, users have to ensure that the parameterization of all transition probabilities implies that with three transitions, i parameters) t 1 = — 2 fi, tj = , 1 j = i 1 for all states i in the HMM. For example, for a state i — i2 and i 3 f2 and t,j — = 3, f, and the derivation formula (functions of free respectively, the sum of the three transition probabilities as function of the free parameters always has to be 1 (i.e. fi + f2 + f 1). 40 3.2. Main features HMMC0NvERTER applies consistency checks to ensure that = 1 and ej(7) = 1 for all states i in the HMM and reports error messages and terminates the program otherwise. Derivation of emission probabilities For the emission probabilities, we only allow free parameters that correspond to probabilities, i.e. values in [0, 1]. In HMMC0NvERTER, a group of emission probabilities that defines the set of emission probabilities for a state is regarded as one emission parameter. All the free emission parameters are specified in the free emission parameter file. HMMCONVERTER provides two functions, SumOver and Product, for deriving emis sion probabilities. Consistency checks on the correct dimensions of the parameters and the normalization are enforced by HMMC0NvERTER. There are four ways of defining the emission probabilities of a state: (i) Directly defining the emission probability An emission parameter can be used directly by several states. This means that the emission probabilities of a state can be defined by pointing directly to an emission parameter in the free emission parameter file. (ii) SumOver This function can be used to derive a lower dimensional emission probability from a higher dimensional emission probability. The dimension of an emission probability is the sequence dimension, i.e. the total number of letters read at by the corresponding state at a time. Consider as example three states: matchxy, emitx and emit.y of dimension 6, 3 and 3, respectively. The emission probabilities of emit..x and emit_y can be derived from 41 3.2. Main features those of matchxy by summing over several sequence dimensions: Pemitx(xi, X2, X3) Pmatchzy(X1, X2, X3, = Yi, 112, Ya) (yl,y2,y3) Pemit,(yi, Y2, Y3) Pmatchzu(X1, X2, X3, 111,112,113) = (x1 ,X2,X3) (iii) Product This function allows the user to express a high dimensional emission prob ability as product of several lower dimensional emission probabilities. Consider as example two states, triple and single, of dimension 3 and 1, respectively. The emission probabilities of triple can be expressed as function of those of single in the following way: Ptriple(X1,X2,X3) (iv) SumOver & Product = Psimgie(xi) * Psingle(x2) * Psingie(xa) The two functions can be combined to form more complex rules, for example for three states of dimension 3, 1 and 4, respectively: P3_tuple(X1,X2,X3) = ( P4_tuple(X1,X2,y1,y2) \(y1,y2) J The four above rules are easy to apply and flexible enough for many applications. It is easy to prove mathematically that these rules derive a normalized set of emission probabilities which fulfill > eQy) = 1 for all states i in the HMM. Banding As discussed previously, it takes O(N ) time and O(NL 1 L 2 ) memory to run the Viterbi 2 L 1 algorithm on a pair-HMM with N states and two input sequences of length L 1 and L . 2 These requirements are often too high for many Bioinformatics applications where the input sequences are very long. 42 3.2. Main features Banding is a feature in HMMCONVERTER for addressing this problem. This feature is particularly important for pair-HMMs and allows to run sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms on a restricted search space along the sequence dimensions. We call the restricted search space a “tube”. If the tube is well chosen, the memory and time require ments of the algorithms can be greatly improved while keeping the performance essentially unchanged. In HMMC0NvERTER, there are two ways to construct a tube: (i) derive a tube from local matches generated by TBLASTX or BLASTN [1]. (ii) specify the restricted search space explicitly in the tube file. (i) In order to derive a tube from BLAST matches, the user has to specify a parameter called radius which defines the width of the tube around the selected matches. As many local BLAST matches can be generated for the same pair of input sequences, HMMCONVERTER uses a dynamic programming routine to derive a highest-scoring subset of mutually compatible matches from the original set of BLAST matches. It is only this subset of matches which is used to construct the tube. Figure 3.2.2 illustrates a tube derived from two matches. (ii) We now consider specifying the tube explicitly in the tube file. HMMC0NvERTER defines a tube via a set of user defined 4-tuples, Yi y2 {(X1,yl,X2,y2)l1 <L}. Each 4-tuples defines two points (xi, Yl) and (x2, x X2 L,1 Y2) on the sequence plane. This two points can either define the end points of a match, or a rectangular block in the sequence plane of the Viterbi matrix. Users can explicitly define a tube either by specifying matches and a radius or by specifying blocks of restricted area. Figure 3.2.2 shows the two different ways of explicitly defining a tube using the same set of 4-tuples. It also shows how HMMC0NvERTER specifies the final tube which connects the specified blocks via maximum 43 3.2. Main features Yl Figure 3.2: Using BLAST to generate a tube for HMMCONVERTER The two thick lines in the middle correspond to the subset of matches that were selected by the dynamic programming as the highest scoring subset of mutually compatible BLAST matches (the discarded BLAST matches are not shown here). The radius is specified as 30 (by the user). The Viterbi algorithm will then only search inside the tube derived from these two matches. 44 3.2. Main features areas such that the final tube connects the start of the sequences to the end of the sequences. (80 .750) (450.55q) 77 (30 .400) (6O,650) 11 Y Figure 3.3: Defining a tube for HMMC0NvERTER explicitly The right part of the figure shows the matches defined by the tube file, with the radius set to 50. The tube around the matches is derived in the same way as for matches generated by BLAST. The left figure shows the same specified 4-tuples interpreted as blocks and how the final tube is derived from these blocks. Annotation label sets and special emissions The performance of many recent Bioinformatics applications could be vastly improved by integrating prior information on the input sequences into the prediction process. HMMC0NVERTER supports this by the feature of special emissions, where the basic idea is to bias the nominal values of the emission probabilities with position-specific prior probabilities along the input sequences. These concept of special emissions was first employed by TWINSCAN It is also used by can be regarded PROJECTOR [36]. The special emissions in PROJECTOR [26]. as restricting the state paths along the state dimension according to the discrete sequence 45 3.2. Main features position-specific prior information, i.e. the state path is only allowed to pass through states that reproduce the known annotation of input sequence X. HMMC0NvERTER extends this concept by allowing prior probabilities with any values in [0,1]. Furthermore, arbitrary anno tation label sets can be defined by the user to describe different types of prior information. We first describe the concept of multiple annotation label sets, and then explain special emissions. Multiple annotation label sets In order to integrate prior probabilities along the input sequences into the prediction process, a mapping has to be defined between the labels of the states in the HMM and the prior information. We call the prior information along the sequences “the annotation of the input sequences” and the labels of the states the “annotation labels of the states”. The mapping has to explain how an annotation label of the sequence is mapped to the annotation labels of the states. An annotation label set defines some annotation labels, for example, an HMM for gene prediction may have an annotation label set Feature = {Exon, Intron, Intergenic}, where the annotation labels represent the different parts of the gene structures. Users can define arbitrary annotation label sets for an HMM, any state in the HMM that is non-silent assigns to each letter that it reads from each input sequence exactly one annotation label from each annotation label set. Let us consider as an example a pair-I-IMM for comparative gene prediction with two arbitrary annotation label sets, Set_i and Set2 = = {Exon, Intron, Intergenic, Start_Condon, Stop_Codon} {Match, EmitJ(, EmitX} and we consider the Match_Exon state (see figure 3.2.2). This state reads three letters from each of the two input sequences at a time, and assigns the label Exon e Set_i and Match e Set_2 to each letter that it reads. Two types of prior information, Seti and Set_2, can be specified for every position in each input sequence. Note that the annotation labels for different letters of one state can differ. For example, we 46 3.2. Main features could define a third annotation label set Set_3 = {NoPhase, PhaseO, Phasel, Phase2} which represents the reading frame of a nucleotide in the input sequence. The Match_Exon state would assign annotation labels (PhaseD, Phasel, Phase2) to the sequence positions (x1, x2, x3), respectively, and also the same set of labels to the sequence positions (Yl, Y2, y3), respectively. Match_Exon 12 x 3 x 3 2 1 Y Set_i : Exon Set_2 : Match Figure 3.4: A state which carries labels from two different annotation label sets A state in a generalized pair-HMM which carries labels from two different annotation label sets: Exon e Set_i and Match e Set_2. This state reads six letters, three from input se quence X and three from input sequence Y, and assigns to all six letters the two labels Exon and Match. In order to use special emissions, users have to specify the prior information along the input sequences using the labels of the different annotation label sets. The labels of the states in the model have to be matched to the labels specified along the input sequences. The following paragraph explains the details of how the special emissions are used. Special emissions HMMC0NvERTER supports a very flexible way for integrating prior information. Users can defined any number of annotation label sets for an HMM. The labels 47 3.2. Main features of different annotation label sets have to correspond to different types of information, see the previous example. Consider the annotation label set Seti. Every Start Codon is also an Exon. So, if there are prior probabilities specified for the label Start_Codon for an interval of sequence positions, the same interval may also have a prior probability for the label Exon (in this particular case, the prior probability for Exon must be larger or equal to the one for Start ..Codon). Figure 3.2.2 illustrates assigning different prior probabilities for an input sequence. It also shows that the users has to take care of the normalization of the prior probabilities. This means that the sum of the prior probabilities for mutually exclusive annotation labels in one annotation label set assigned to the same interval of sequence positions has to be one. The requirement of normalization of prior probabilities becomes clearer once we explain the mechanism for biasing the emission probabilities with prior probabilities. We illustrate the mechanism by considering the state Match_Exon in figure 3.2.2 and the prior probabilities for an input sequence X as shown in figure 3.2.2. We consider four cases during the prediction or parameter training process for sequence X: (i) reading sequence position 89 (ii) reading sequence position 90 (iii) reading sequence position 220 (iv) reading sequence position 186, with an additional prior probability of 70% for the label Match in annotation label set SeL2 In case (i), there is no prior information assigned to sequence position 89 of sequence X. In this case, no bias of the nominal emission probabilities is introduced for the corresponding sequence position, i.e. for this sequence position, the Viterbi state path is calculated using 48 3.2. Main features 90 120 185 370 j_ Sequence X 215 1.0’ —Exon 0.8 — Intron 0.6 —-— 0.4 Intergenic 0.2 - -* 14 No Info. I( Incomplete Info. Complete Info. 1 Prior Information Figure 3.5: Illustration of the special emission feature in HMM CONVERTER Example of prior information for input sequence X of length L for one annotation label set S = {Exon, Intron, Intergenic}. For sequence interval [1,89], no prior information on the annotation of the sequence is available. This stretch of the sequence would thus be analyzed with an HMM whose nominal emission probabilities are not biased by any prior probabilities. For sequence interval [90, 184], there is prior information concerning the likelihood for being Exon, Intron and Intergenic. For the rest of the input sequence, i.e. sequence interval [185,370], we know with certainty that the sequence positions in [185,214] are exonic and that the remainder of the sequence is intergenic. Note that the prior probabilities add up to 1 for every sequence position for which any prior information is supplied, reflecting the fact that in this case the three labels Exon, Intron and Intergenic are mutually exclusive and that each sequence position has to fall into exactly one of these three categories. 49 3.2. Main features the nominal emission probabilities of the HMM. In case (ii), the sequence position 90 of the input sequence X has a 60% probability of being an Exon. The decoding or training algorithm then integrates this prior probability into the nominal emission probabilities. When the state path passes through this sequence position and a state which carries the annotation label Exon (in particular, the Match..Exon state), it multiplies the nominal value of the emission probabilities with an additional factor of 0.6. If the state path passes through a state with annotation label Intron, a factor of 0.3 will be multiplied with the nominal emission probability. The nominal emission probabilities for states which carry the label Intergenic will be biased similarly by multiplying with a 0.1 when the state path pass through this sequence position. Note that the three annotation labels Exon, Intron and Intergenic in the same annotation label set are mutually exclusive labels, so the sum of the prior probabilities assigned to these labels for any sequence position should be 1. This additional responsibility for the user gives a highly flexible way for integrating prior probabilities. In the same annotation label set, users can have annotation labels that are related to each other (i.e. Exon and StartCodon) as well as mutually exclusive labels (i.e. Exon and Intron). In case (iii), the sequence position 220 has 100% probability of being an Intergenic re gion. As this is the only prior probability specified for the sequence position 220, the prior probabilities of other annotation labels (i.e. Exon and Intron) in this annotation label set (i.e. Set_i) will be set to 0 for this sequence position by default. Then, the factor 0 will be multiplied to the nominal value of the emission probabilities of the Match_Exon state when the state path passes through this sequence position. In other words, this Match_Exon state is prohibited to pass through the sequence position 220. This case is different from case(i) 50 3.2. Main features where there is no prior probability assigned to any annotation labels in this annotation label set. In HMMCONVERTER, once it recognizes prior probabilities of an annotation label for a sequence position (in this case, Intergenic in SeL.1), all the other annotation labels in the same annotation label set without specifying prior probability for the same sequence position will be assigned with a prior probability 0 (in this case Exon and Intron) by default. So, it is very important for users to suppiy normalized prior probabilities for any sequence positions. Finally in case(iv), the sequence position 186 has 100% probability of being an Exon, so the factor 1 will be multiplied to the nominal value of the emission probabilities of the Match_Exon state when the state path passes through this sequence position (i.e. the nom inal value of the emission probability of this state is not biased for this sequence position). But now we also have another prior probability of 70% for the label Match in the annotation label set Set_2 for this sequence position, so another factor of 0.7 is multiplied to the nominal emission probabilities of this Match_Exon state for the sequence position 186. Precisely, let the symbols read by the Match_Exon state at sequence position 186 be -y, and the corre sponding emission probability for the state be e(7). Then when the state path pass through the sequence position 186, the emission probability for passing through the Match_Exon state will become e’Qy) = eQy) * 1 * 0.7. More factors are multiplied to the nominal emission probability of a state for a sequence position if there are more types prior probabilities as signed on that sequence position. Note that users are required to provide normalized prior probabilities for all the different annotation label sets defined in the HMM for any sequence positions. 3.2.3 Sequence decoding algorithms HMMCONVERTER incorporates several sequence decoding algorithms. They can all be re 51 3.2. Main features garded as different variations of the Viterbi algorithm [47], and all of them retrieve the state path with the highest overall probability given the specified search space. The Viterbi and Hirschberg algorithms The Viterbi algorithm is a widely used se quence decoding algorithm for HMMs which calculates the optimal state path for the input sequences. The Hirschberg algorithm [16] is a more memory efficient version of the Viterbi algorithm refer to earlier chapter. It is especially useful for pair-HMMs, as the memory requirement of the Viterbi algorithm usually impose a serious constraint for long input se quences. The details of these algorithms are described in chapter 2. In practice, the Hirschberg algorithm takes up to twice as long to run than the Viterbi algorithm, so HMMC0NvERTER uses a smart approach in order to determine which algorithm to use best. The user can specify the maximum amount of memory to be allocated and the Hirschberg iterations are stopped as soon as the sub-spaces fit into memory to be calculated with the Viterbi algorithm. The Viterbi and Hirschberg algorithms combined with a tube Both the Viterbi and Hirschberg algorithms can be combined with a tube: • Algorithm 1: Run the decoding algorithm inside the tube created from matches gener ated by the program BLASTN [1]. • Algorithm 2: Run the decoding algorithm inside the tube created from matches gener ated by the program TBLASTX [1]. • Algorithm 3: Run the decoding algorithm inside a user-specified tube. Algorithms 1 and 2 are introduced in DOUBLESCAN [33, 34], where they are called the stepping stone algorithm. Algorithm 3, combined with the Hirschberg algorithm (see figure 3.2.3), is a 52 3.2. Main features new feature which is not implemented in any existing HMM generating tool. An optimal or almost optimal state path can thus be calculated in an extremely time and memory efficient way. HMM0C also supports the banding feature, but does not combine it with the Hirschberg algorithm and also does not allow the tube to be automatically derived from BLAST matches using a separate dynamic programming routine. Y Ly x Lx Figure 3.6: Using the Hirschberg algorithm inside a tube Using the Hirschberg algorithm inside a tube, i.e. in every iteration the Hirschberg strips only searches inside the reduced tube-like search space. 3.2.4 Training algorithms HMMCONVERTER supports several algorithms for parameter training which can all be com bined with the tube and special emissions. Right now, HMMC0NvERTER is the only software package which not only provides the linear memory Baum-Welch algorithm [35j but also a new linear memory algorithm for training with sampled state paths, and a novel linear memory al 53 3.2. Main features gorithm for Viterbi training. These three training algorithms reduce the memory requirement by 0(L) with respect to the nominal requirement. This renders parameter training even for complex pair-HMM feasible for the first time. The special emissions and banding discussed previously can be combined with any training algorithms to improve the time requirements (banding) and the performance (special emissions). Furthermore, we can train only the free parameters by specifying corresponding derivation rules. In this section, we give a brief introduction of the linear-memory Baum-Welch algorithm which has already been published in [351. The novel linear-memory algorithm for training with sampled state paths and the new linear-memory algorithm for Viterbi training are explained in detail in the following. The linear-memory Baum-Welch algorithm We have already introduced the traditional Baum-Welch algorithm in chapter 2. This algo rithm takes O(NL’ ) memory for an n-HMM with N states and m input sequences of length L 2 each. Miklós and Meyer [35] introduced a clever way to perform the Baum-Welch training us ing linear memory, a small correction to this algorithm is made by Churbanov in [9]. The term “linear memory” implies that the algorithm only takes 0(N) memory for an HMM with N states, and 0(NL’) memory for an m-HMM with N states and n input sequences of length L each. A brief description of the algorithm and the pseudo-code is presented here. The reader should refer to the paper for more detailed explanations and a proof of the correctness of the algorithm. We use the same notations as in chapter 2 unless they are specifically defined here. Recall that we can derive a new estimate for the transition probability for going 54 3.2. Main features from state ito state j in the (q + 1)-th iteration, given the estimated counts pq V’ 4’_sXX — ZXEX — where 1(X) jl + 1) := P(X) Similarly, we can derive a new estimate for letter I ( 1 X)’ (-y), denotes the probability of reading from the input sequence at state i in the (q + 1)-th iteration, given the estimated counts EQy): ‘c’ q+1 e TIq( — , — where 7 E7( , X) , X)’ 7 E( := We now denote two new counts for transition and emission probabilities which can also be used to derive the corresponding probabilities: L i(X) := := f?(k)t,e(xk+l)b(k + 1) oxkyf1(k)b(k) (3.1) (3.2) So, the new estimates for the t 1 and the eQ-y) can be derived by the following formulae, 55 3.2. Main features respectively: — — e’( ) = Zxex j, i’j’ji (X)/P(X)’ ZXxE(7,X)/P(X) i E’, X)/P(X) ZXEX 7 The main idea of the algorithm is that the value 7(X) in equation 3.1 can be interpreted as a weighed sum of probabilities of state paths for sequence X that contain transition i —÷ j, where the weight is the number of times this transition is used in all possible state paths. The value E7(, X) in equation 3.2 can also be interpreted as a weighed sum of probabilities of state paths for sequence X, where the weight is the number of times the letter -y is read in state i at least once in all possible state paths. Using this observation, Miklós and Meyer show that the i’(X) and the E(, X) values can be calculated using only the forward probabilities and a “slice” of memory along one input sequence. We first present the algorithm, and then give further explanations. Let transition i m) —* j, denote the weighted sum of probabilities of all state paths that contain the and which finish in sequence position k and state m, and let E (y, xk, m) denote the weighed sum of probabilities of all state paths that finish at sequence position k (X) 3 and state m, and for which state i reads letter ‘y at least once. Then i, EZ(X) and = = end) &(xL,end). The algorithm uses a dynamic programming approach for calculating the values I,(X) and EQy, X), for an HMM with N states and one training sequence of length L: 56 3.2. Main features Initialization: Before reading the first letter from the input sequence 1, ifm=start fm(o) = 1 0, ifmstart i, ( 3 O,m) = 0 Vm{1,•.N—1} ,E,( 7 xo,m) = 0 VmE{1,..N—1} Recurrences: Fork=1,...L Form=1,••N—2 fm(k+1) = fn(k)tn,mem(xk+l) + 1,m) = ,j(k,n)tn,mem(xk+l) + m,j fi(k)ti,mem(xk+l) Ei (7, Xk, n)tn,mem (Xk+1) E (, Xk+1, m) + Sm,i7,xk+l fi (k)ti,mem (Xk+1) = Termination: at the end of sequence and the end state P(X) , X) 7 E( where = fend(L) = ,(L,end) = E(7,xL,end) is the delta function, with = fn(L)tn,end = = ,j(L,n)tfl,€fld + Sj,end fi(k)ti,€nd = Ei(7,XL,Th)tn,end 1 if i = j and Sj = 0 if i j. In the recurrence step, the value of i,(k+1, m) is increased by fi(k)ti,mem(xk+1) if m = j, 57 3.3. Training using sampled state paths i.e. by the probability of the sum of all state paths with a transition i —f j up to and including sequence position k +1. In the algorithm, only the values after the previous sequence position in the table and the for calculating the E (‘-y) f: table are needed in order to continue the calculation (similarly table, so the memory requirements of the algorithm is 0(N). On the other hand, the run time of this algorithm is 0 ( I NTmaxL) for training one parameter (X is the set of training sequences), so in total this linear-memory Baum-Welch algorithm requires O(p• . NTmaxL) time to train p parameters in one iteration. The procedure of training emission probabilities is very similar, reader may refer to the paper for more details. 3.3 Linear memory parameter training using sampled state paths This is a novel strategy for parameter training. Unlike Viterbi training which considers only a single state path and unlike Baum-Welch training which considers all possible state paths, this new training algorithm derives new parameter values from state paths that are sampled from the posterior distribution. Similar to Viterbi and Baum-Welch training, this new algorithm works in an iterative way. In each iteration, a new set of parameter values is derived from the observed transitions and emissions in the sampled state paths for all sequences in the training set. The iteration is stopped after a fixed number of iterations or as soon as the change in the log-likelihood is sufficiently small. 3.3.1 Sampling a state path from posterior distribution Sample state paths are high probability state paths which can be derived from the posterior distribution P(irIX). These state paths are especially popular for pair-HMMs that generate 58 3.3. Training using sampled state paths global sequence alignments. As different state paths can yield the same annotation on an input sequence, it is often more useful to get several sub-optimal alignments rather than just getting one optimal global alignment (the Viterbi state path). In order to better understand how the new algorithms work, we first explain how we can sample a state path from the posterior distribution using existing algorithms. According to [11], this can be done by first using the forward algorithm and then a back-tracking procedure. We give some notations before explaining the algorithm. Let • f(k) denote the forward probabilities which has been defined previously • pj (k, m) denote the probability of selecting state m as the previous state when being in state i at sequence position k (i.e. sequence position k has already been read by state i). For fixed k and i, p (k, m) defines a probability distribution over previous states as Zmpj(k,m) = 1. We consider sampling a state path with an HMM with N states and read only one input sequence of length L. The algorithm is as follows: Initialization: at the start of the input sequence 1, ifm=Start fm(o) = ( 0, ifmStart Recursion: loop over all positions k from 1 to L in the input sequence and, for each sequence position, over all states m from 1 to N fm(k + 1) = em(xk+1) — 2 (N — 1 is the end state) in the model f(k) tn,m (3.3) 59 3.3. ‘flaining using sampled state paths Termination: at the end of the input sequence P(X) = fend(L) = fn(L) tn,end Once we have calculated all forward probabilities f(k), i.e. for all states i in the model and all positions k in the input sequence, we can then use the following back-tracking procedure to sample a state path from the posterior distribution P(irIX). We start the back-tracking at the end of the input sequence, k i = = end, and select m as the state for the previous sequence position k pj( k ,m) — — e(xk) fm(k k . — 1) tm,i L, in the end state, — 1 with probability: (3.4) The back-tracking finishes once we have reached the start of the sequence and the start state. The resulting succession of chosen previous states corresponds to one sampled state path. As the back-tracking procedure requires the entire matrix of forward values for all states and all sequence positions, the above algorithm for sampling a state path requires O(NL) memory and O(NTmaxL) time in order to first calculate the matrix of forward values and then 0(L) memory and time to sample a single state path from the matrix. Note that more state paths can be sampled without having to recalculate the matrix of forward values. For sampling K state paths for the same input sequence, we thus need 0(NL + KL) memory and 0(NTmaxL + KL) time. 60 3.3. Training using sampled state paths 3.3.2 A new, linear memory algorithm for parameter training using sampled state paths We first describe a new algorithm for training the parameters of an HMM using state paths sampled from the posterior distribution. The algorithm corresponds to an iterative procedure. In each iteration, a new set of transition and emission probability values is derived from the number of times that these transition and emission were observed in state paths that were sampled from the posterior distribution using the HMM with parameter values from the previous iteration. The iterations are stopped once a maximum number of iterations have been reached or once the change in the log-likelihood is sufficiently small. In the following, let 7 E2( X, ir) denote the number of times that state i reads symbol , from input sequence X in state path r given the HMM with parameters from the q-th iteration. Likewise, let I (X, 7r) denote the number of times that a transition from state i to state j is used in state path ir given the HMM with parameters from the q-th iteration. In the following, the superscript q will indicate from which iteration the underlying parameters derive. If we consider all sequences of a training set X of M training sequences and sample K state paths for each sequence, the recursion which updates the values of the transition and emission probabilities can be written as: q+1 ii eq+1( — — — — —‘M -K L.dn=1 Ldk=1 L.dj’ i,j’. n E(7,Xfl,1rk) 1 ‘lZf —M .çK , n Ljn=1 Ldk=1 Ly’ j ‘7 x Equations 3.7 and 3.8 assume that we know the values of 7(X, irk) and E( , X, irk), 7 i.e. how often each transition and emission was used in each sampled state path Irk for every 61 3.3. ‘&aining using sampled state paths training sequence X. If our computer has enough memory to use the forward algorithm and the backtracking procedure described above, each iteration in the training algorithm takes 0 (N max 2 {L 2} + {L max } K2 ) memory and 0(NTmax 2+K ZL ) time, where 2 L L is the sum of the M sequence lengths in the training set X and } {L the length of the longest sequence 2 max in training set X. However, for many Bioinformatics applications where the number of states in the model N is large, the connectivity Tmax of the model high or the training sequences are long, these memory and time requirements are too large to allow automatic parameter training using this algorithm. We now introduce a novel, linear-memory algorithm for training the parameters of an HMM using sampled state paths. The idea for this algorithm comes from the following observations: (i) If we consider the description of the forward algorithm above, in particular the recursion in equation 3.3, we realize that the calculation of the forward values can be continued by keeping only the values for the previous sequence position in memory (see figure 3.3.2). (ii) If we have a close look at the description of the backtracking algorithm, in particular the sampling step in Equation 3.4, we observe that the sampling of the previous state only requires the forward values for the current and the previous sequence position (see figure 3.3.2). So, provided we are at a particular sequence position and state, we can sample the state at the previous sequence position if we know the forward values for the current and the previous sequence position. (iii) If we want to sample a state path ir from the posterior distribution P(irIX), we have to start the backtracking at the end of the sequence in the End state, see the description 62 3.3. Training using sampled state paths (1) (2) 7 / / / , -+ State State / / / / / Figure 3.7: Illustration of the forward algorithm demonstrates the calculation of a forward value (i.e. the forward value of figure this Part (1) (m, k)). This calculation only requires the forward values in the previous sequence position. So, only a “strip” of memory (of size 0(N)) is needed to continue the forward algorithm by filling the forward matrix from the left to the right as shown in part (2) of this figure. k-i k Figure 3.8: Sampling a state path from the posterior distribution This figure shows that sampling a previous state only requires the forward values for the current and the previous sequence position. i.e. this “sampling operation” can also be carried out with the memory “strip” which only stores the forward values for two sequence positions as shown in figure 3.3.2. 63 3.3. Training using sampled state paths above and equation 3.4 above. (The only alternative for sampling state paths from the same posterior distribution would be to use the backward algorithm [11] instead of the forward algorithm and to start the backtracking procedure at the beginning of the sequence in the start state.) Observations (i) and (ii) imply that local information suffices to continue the calculation of the forward values (i) and to sample a previous state (ii) if we already are in a particular state and sequence position, whereas observation (iii) reminds us that in order to sample from the correct probability distribution, we have to start the sampling at the end of the training sequence. Given these three observations, it is not obvious how we can come up with a computationally more efficient algorithm for training with sampled state paths. In order to realize that a more efficient algorithm exists, one also needs to note that: (iv) While calculating the forward values in the memory-efficient way outlined fri (i), we can simultaneously sample one (or more) potential previous states for each state and sequence position that we encounter in the calculating of the forward value. This is possible because of observation (2) above. (v) In every iteration q of the training procedure, we only need to know the values of 7(X, ir) and E(y, X, rr), i.e. how often each transition and emission was used in each sampled state path ir for every training sequence X, but we do not need to remember where along the training sequence each transition and emission was used. Given observations (i) to (v), we can now formally write down a new, linear-memory algorithm which calculates T’J (X, it) and E (y, X, -it). As the description of the following algorithm is for one training sequence X and one iteration q which both stay the same throughout the algorithm, we will use a simplified notation, where m) denotes the 64 3.3. Training using sampled state paths number of times the transition from state i to state j is used in a sampled state path that finishes at sequence position k in state m and where E( , k) denotes the number of times 7 state i read symbol y in a state path that finishes at sequence position k in state m. As introduced earlier, f(k) denotes the forward probability for sequence position k and state i and p(k, in) the probability of selecting state m as the previous state while being in state i at sequence position k. Initialization: at the start of training sequence X fm(o) = 1 = (Xl,. 1, ifm=start o ifm#start .. ,x) T,(O,m) = 0 VmE{l,... ,N—1} E(-y,O,m) = 0 VmE{1,... ,N—1} Recursion: loop over all positions k from 1 to L in the training sequence X and, for each sequence position k, loop over all states m from 1 to N — 2 (N — 1 is the end state) in the model fm(k+1) k + 1 ‘1 Pm1 = — em(xk+l).ffl(k).tn,m f(k) tn,m fm(k+1) em(xk+l) — T ( 3 , 2 k + 1, m) = ,E( 7 k+1,m) = 1) + m,j ,k,1)+S,,.6 E( ’ 7 , (3.7) (3.8) where 1 is the chosen previous state and ‘ the symbol at sequence position k 65 3.3. Training using sampled state paths Termination: at the end of the input sequence fend(L) = Pend(L,fl) = end) = , End) 7 E( = L, TZ, ( 3 fn(L) tn,end fn(L) tn,end £ fend 1) + +öi,i , k, 1) + 7 E( ,i 5 1 nd,j ‘ e 5 öy,y where 1 is the chosen previous state and -“ the symbol at sequence position k We now prove the correctness of the algorithm for training the transition tj. Theorem 1: The above algorithm calculates it) in 0(N) memory and 0(NTmaxL) 3 (X, it) is the number of times that a transition from state i to state time. T, state path j is used in it. Proof: (1) The recursion in the above algorithm requires only 0(N) memory, as the calculation of fm(k + 1) only requires the values of f(k) with n e {1..N 2}, similar for the calculation — k + 1, m). Therefore, only 0(N) memory is needed to store a column of the table to T, ( of 3 proceed the calculation. It is also clear that the run time requires 0(MTmaL). In order X, it), NL entries of the forward table and the table Tj, ( to calculate 3 are needed to be calculated. To calculate each entry, maximum Tmax previous entries would be searched, so this is in total 0(NTmaxL) operations. k, m) is the number of T, ( (2) We now prove by induction (on sequence position k) that 3 times that a transition from state i to state j is used in state path it that finishes at sequence position k in state m. Let this statement be s(k) 66 3.3. Training using sampled state paths For k = 0: In the initialization step, T,(Xo, m) = of times a transition from state i to state 0 for all m e {1 N— 1}. It is true as the number j is used in state path r that finishes at sequence position k in state m is 0 for all state m. Assume s(k) is true for some non-negative integer k, now we proof s(k) is true implies s(k + 1) is also true. In the recursion step, there are two cases: Case (i) I = i and m = j, where 1 is the chosen previous state at state m and sequence position k + 1: T,(k+ 1,m) =T,(k,l)+ 1 By the induction assumption, state 1) is the number of times the transition from state ito j is used in state path ir that finishes at sequence position k in state 1. 1 is the chosen previous state at state m and sequence position k + 1, so state I is chosen in ir on sequence position k if state m is chosen in sequence position k + 1. It is clear that if the condition 1 and m = = i j is satisfied, the transition from state i to state j is used in this step, so the number of times this transition is used in state path IT that finishes at sequence position k + 1 and state m(= j) is equal to the corresponding count at the previous sequence position k and the chosen state I plus 1. Case (ii) 1 i or m j, where 1 is the chosen previous state at state m and sequence position k + 1: T,(k + 1, m) = Tj,(k,l) Again by the induction assumption, 2 T ( 3 , k, 1) is the number of times the transition from state j is used in state path r that finishes at sequence position k in state 1. As either i or m j, the transition from state ito state j is not used in the transition of state path i to state I ir from sequence position k to sequence position k + 1. So the number of times a transition 67 3.3. Training using sampled state paths from state i to state j is used in state path ir that finishes at sequence position k +1 and state m is equal to the corresponding count at the previous sequence position k and the chosen state 1. In both cases, the value T,(k + 1, m) stores the number of times a transition from state i to state j is used in the state path so we have proved s(k) definition of —* ir that finishes at sequence position k + 1 and state m, s(k + 1). Finally, it is clear that end) and end) ir), by the ir), and we have proved theorem 1. By theorem 1 and equation 3.7, this new algorithm completes one iteration in training of a transition probability of an HMM with 0(N) memory and 0(NTmaxL) time. For training of emission probabilities, the proof is exact analogous to the above proof, so we just state the theorem. Theorem 2: The above algorithm calculates E( , X, ir) in 0(N) memory and O(MTmazL) 7 time. EQy, X, ir) is the number of times that state i reads symbol 7 from input sequence X in state path ir. Figure 3.3.2 gives a visual illustration of the algorithm. In summary, we have designed a memory efficient novel parameter training using sampled state paths, which requires 0(N) memory and O(NTmaxL) time for training one parameter with one sample state path for an HMM with N states and reads one input sequence of length L in each iteration. 3.3.3 A new linear memory algorithm for Viterbi training The traditional Viterbi training algorithm [11] has already been described in chapter 2, the algorithm requires 0(NL) memory and 0(NTmaxL) time for an HMM with N states and reads one input sequence of length L in each iteration. We employ similar ideas as discussed in the above section to develop the new linear memory algorithm for Viterbi training, and we call it the linear-memory Viterbi training. 68 3.3. Training using sampled state paths f-strip (1) (y)p (2) 1 strip / State State Figure 3.9: Illustration of the novel, linear memory algorithm for parameter training using sampled state paths Part (1) of this figure shows that three “strips” of memory (in 0(N)) are used for computing ir) and the counts E(y, X, Tr) for the input sequence X and the values of the counts the sampled state path ii-. These strips move in parallel starting from the left of the matrix and finished at the right end of the matrix. Part (2) of this figure shows how the value of the (X, ir) is calculated with the T, 3 3 strip and the f-strip (the forward strip). At each count T, recursion step of the algorithm, a forward value is calculated and a previous state is sampled by using the forward value just calculated and the forward values in the previous sequence position (the back-tracking arrows for a cell in the table). Then, the value of the cells (which is the number of times the transition from state i to state j is used in this sampled state path) in the T:, 3 table is calculated by accumulating the corresponding counts. In particular, at sequence position 1 and state j, the sampled previous state is i, which implies the transition i —* j is used at this position, so the value in this cell (the count) is increased by one from the value in the previous position. At sequence position k and state i, the transition i —+ j is not used according to the sampled previous state, so the value of the cell remains the same as the previous position. At the last sequence position, the cell of state j is sampled as the last (X, it) for this sampled state path is 4 (see state of the sample state path, and the counts the four dark back-tracking arrows). Note that the dark box at the right end of the matrix -strip. It means that at the termination step, this strip only stores the values 3 denotes the T, for the last two sequence positions, so the corresponding sample state path that derives the count (X, it) is not remembered. 69 3.3. Training using sampled state paths The linear-memory Viterbi training is very similar to the training algorithm for sampling state paths. To describe the new Viterbi training algorithm, we use similar notations, where T:,,(k, m) denotes the number of times transition from state ito state j is used in the Viterbi path that finishes at sequence position k and state m and where E(y, k) denotes the number of times state i read symbol y in a state path that finishes at sequence position k in state m. We further denote v(k) as the probability of the most probable path ending in state i and sequence position k. Initialization: at the start of training sequence X Vm(O) 1, ifm=start 0, ifmLstart = (xl,.. . , XL) = 1 (O,m) 3 T, = 0 Vmel,. ,N—1 E(’y,0,m) = 0 VmE1,••• ,N—1 Recursion: loop over all positions k from 1 to L in the training sequence X and, for each sequence position k, loop over all states in from 1 to N — 2 (N — 1 is the end state) in the model Vm(k + 1) = em(xk+1) max(v(k) tn,m) T,(k+1,m) = Ti,j(k,1)+6i,iSm,j , k + 1, m) 7 E( = E(y, k, 1) + . where 1 ‘ = . argmax(v(k) tn,m) . the symbol at sequence position k 70 3.3. Training using sampled state paths Termination: at the end of the input sequence Vnd(L) = max(v(L) end) = T, ( 3 L, 1) + S ,i e6 1 nd,j E(y,end) = 7 , 1 E(y,L,1)+ó .&,, where I ‘ = tn,end) argmax(v(k) tn,m) the symbol at sequence position k This algorithm can update a transition or emission probability with 0(N) memory and 0(NTmaxL) time, the proof for this algorithm is also exactly analogous to that for sampling state paths. In summary, the two new algorithms both require 0(N) memory and 0(MNTmaxL) time to train one parameter (with one sample state path for the linear memory parameter training using sampled state path) for an HMM with N states and reads one input sequence with length L. Suppose there are p parameters to be trained, the memory and time requirements for these two parameter training algorithms can be expressed in terms of c, which denotes the number of parameters estimated in parallel by the formula: • O(c. N) memory and 0((p/c) MN (Tmax + c)L) time. Suppose we train c parameters in parallel, c strips with size 0(N) for each are needed, so the memory requirement is increased by a factor of c. On the other hand, to calculate each cell of the corresponding matrix, O(Tmax) operations are needed for computing the forward values (sum over the forward values of the previous sequence position) or the viterbi value (select the maximum state from the previous sequence position), and 0(c) operations are needed to 71 3.3. 1}aining using sampled state paths compute the counts for the parameters to be trained in parallel. So O(MN. (Tmax + c)L) operations are needed at a time, and in order to train all the p parameters, we need p/c such parallel computations. HMMCONVERTER uses a smart way to perform these linear memory parameter training algorithms. Users are required to provide the amount of maximum memory allocated for the training algorithms, and the maximum number of parameters will be computed in parallel accordingly. 3.3.4 Pseudo-counts and pseudo-probabilities An over-fitting problem would be generated in parameter training if there are insufficient training data. In order to avoid this problem, it is preferable to add predetermined pseudocounts to the counts for deriving the transition and emission probabilities. Users can use pseudo-counts or pseudo-probabilities for training, there are two different “counts” in HMM CONVERTER. Typically, a pseudo-count for transition i —f j, say cj is added to the corre sponding weight of the transition in the training process [11], for example, in Baum-Welch training: (see chapter 2) • The weight for the transition i —* j in the q-th iteration: + cii I—k = • The corresponding probability in the n + 1-th iteration: tQ+l i,i — - z i,i 72 3.3. Training using sampled state paths Often, it is difficult to provide an appropriate pseudo-count, and more intuitive to prove a pseudo-probability. HMMC0NvERTER also allows “pseudo-probabilities” for training the transition and emission probabilities. Suppose we know a priori that the probability of tran sition i —* j is roughly Pij, then we may use this as the pseudo-probability for transition t,. These pseudo-probabilities are added to t 1 instead of the estimated number of counts and a normalization process is performed to yield a set of valid transition probabilities that fulfill >, t’, = 1 for all states i in the HMM. This same strategy can be applied for training emission probabilities. For the free transition parameters which need not correspond to probabilities, pseudocounts can be used and they are added to the free parameter after each training iteration. Note that the pseudo-count itself can be any value 0. For pseudo-counts for free parameters, no normalization process is needed as the normalization is implicitly imposed by the derivation rules. 3.3.5 Training free parameters HMMCONVERTER supports the parameterization of transition and emission probabilities in order to avoid over-fitting during parameter training. The training algorithms have to be capable of training the free parameters. Recall that HMMC0NvERTER allows different kinds of parameterizations for transition and emission probabilities. In the following, the training of free transition parameters and free emission parameters is therefore explained in separate subsections. Training of free transition parameters For the training of free transition parameters, users have to supply a reverse formula which expresses each free transition parameter as a function of transition probabilities. They corre 73 3.3. Training using sampled state paths spond to the inverse of the functions which express each transition probability as function of the free transition parameters. In each iteration, the normal training process is performed for the transitions involved in the inverse functions, and the values of the parameters are then derived using the corresponding inverse function with the updated transition probabilities. In complicated cases, a free transition parameter cannot be expressed by an arithmetic function. Figure 3.3.5 shows a part of the pair-HMM of DOUBLESCAN [34]. The states shown in figure 3.3.5 can model pairs of aligned codons (match_exon state) in a pair of orthologous exons which is either followed by a pair of orthologous introns in one of 3 possible phases (states 14 to 16) or followed by an intron in one of the two input sequence only (states 17 to 19 model an intron in X only, states 20 to 22 model an intron in Y only). Two particular parameters are involved in these transitions, namely PhaseO and Phasel, they represent the relative probability of starting an intron or intron pair after codon position 3 (Phase 0), 1 (Phase 1) and 2 (Phase 2). Phase2 can be expressed as 1 — PhaseO — Phasel. We now consider training the parameter Phase0. From figure 3.3.5, the value of PhaseO should correspond to the fraction of transitions 3 —f 14, 3 —* 17 and 3 —÷ 20 normalized by transitions from state 3 to any of the states 14 to 22. As state 3 also has other transitions, we cannot easily write PhaseO as arithmetic function of transition probabilities. For solving this problem, HMMCONVERTER supports so-called “group transitions”. This allows users to define a group of transitions which should be regarded as the same transition in the training. In this example, the parameter PhaseO would be trained by calculating the weight of the group transitions of 3 —‘ 14, 3 —* 17 and 3 —* 20 normalized by the weight of group transitions of state 3 to all the states 14 to 22. Chapter 4 explains how “group transitions” are specified in HMMCONVERTER. 74 3.3. &aining using sampled state paths match 5’ splice site Phase U Phase I Phase 2 () () () emit x 5’ splice site match exan Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 0 () () y 5’ splice site Phase0 Phase 1 Phase 2 () () Figure 3.10: A part of the pair-HMM of DOUBLESCAN In order to train the free transition parameter PhaseO , transitions from state 3 to all the states representing splice site phase 0 should be counted. They include 3 — 14, 3 —* 17 and 3 —* 20. 75 3.4. Availability Training of free emission parameters We now describe the training of free emission parameters. As previously discussed, every free emission parameter has to be a group of emission probabilities that define the emission probabilities for some states. Furthermore, an emission parameter specified in the emission probability file can be shared by several states, and also be used for expressing the emission probabilities of other states. In the most general case, it is therefore not trivial to define rules for deriving functions which would allow us to derive the free emission parameters from the emission probabilities of the states. Because of this, HMMCONVERTER supports one simple way for training free emission parameters. For each free parameter, the states which share emission probabilities directly with the parameter are determined in HMM CONVERTER, and the parameter is trained by taking contributions from all those states into account. This strategy allows the efficient and successful training even for complex models as long as their number of free emission parameters is still small. 3.4 Availability HMMCONVERTER is available under the Gnu Public License. The software comprising HMMCONVERTER will be available for download, free of charge, from http: //www. cs nbc. . ca/irmtraud/HMMConverter once paper submission is accepted. The package includes a de tailed manual, the software itself and the examples described in the last section of chapter 4. 76 3.5. Discussion and conclusion 3.5 Discussion and conclusion We have discussed the main features of HMMCONVERTER in this chapter, many of them are novel among existing HMM generating packages. Among the novel features, using banding together with the Hirschberg algorithm is both very memory and time efficient for sequence decoding. The special emission feature is desirable for many Bioinformatics applications where prior information on the input sequences has to be integrated into the decoding algorithms. The linear-memory Baum-Welch algorithm and the new linear-memory training algorithm for training with sampled state paths are both memory efficient, banding can also be applied to parameter training, which can greatly accelerate the process. Furthermore, special emissions can be used to integrate prior information about training sequences into the training process, with the capability of training free parameters, the overall performance of the parameter estimation process can be greatly improved. The specifications for constructing an 11MM with HMMC0NvERTER are described in detail in chapter 4. Some implementation details of important classes and the interactions between the classes are discussed in chapter 5. 77 Chapter 4 Specifying an HMM or pair-HMM with HMMConverter 4.1 Introduction HMMC0NvER’rER takes up to six input files if all special features are used. We first give a brief description of these files: • XML-input file: This is a compulsory XML file which describes the states and connec tions of an 11MM or pair-HMM. • Free emission parameter file: This is a compulsory fiat text file which specifies the emission probabilities of the 11MM. • Free transition parameter file: This file is only required if the transition probabilities are parameterized. • Tube file: This file is only required if banding is used with a user-defined tube. • Prior information file: This file is only required if special emissions are switched on. • Input sequence file: This compulsory file stores the input sequences. 78 4.2. The XML-input file In this chapter, the format of all the input files and the output files generated by HMM CONVERTER are described in detail. In the last section of this chapter, we describe several HMMCONVERTER applications included in the software package. Their main purpose is to demonstrate how to set different HMMs with HMMC0NvERTER. 4.2 The XML-input file HMMCONVERTER takes an XML-input file, and translates it into efficient C++ code. The XML-input file consists of two large components, defined by the <model> and the <sequence.analysis> tag. In this section, we explain the XML tags by first showing an example of how to specify the tag, and then describe its attributes. The term “boolean attribute” used in this section refers to an attribute that only accepts two discrete values “0” and “1” where “0” means “No” and “1” means “Yes”. 4.2.1 The <model> component of the XML file This component consists of five compulsory tags for specifying the HMM, and two optional tags for using special features. [i] <Model_Type> This tag defines some general parameters of the HMM. Example tag: <Model_Type name=” Gene Prediction” pair=” 1” SpecialEmission=” 0” /> Attributes of <ModeLType>: • name: This compulsory attribute defines the name of the model. • pair: This optional boolean attribute defines whether the model is a pair-HMM or an 11MM. The default value is “0” (HMM). 79 4.2. The XML-input file • SpecialEmission: This optional boolean attribute defines whether the model uses special emission or not. The default value of this attribute is “0” (no special emissions). [ii] <Alphabets> This tag defines the set of symbols, i.e. the alphabet, that the HMM can read from the input sequences Example tag: <Alphabets set=” ACGT” cases=” 0> Attributes of <Alphabets>: • set: This compulsory attribute defines the set of symbols, i.e. the alphabet, that the HMM can read. • cases: This optional boolean attribute defines whether the model is case sensitive (“ 1”) or not (“0”). The default value of this attribute is “0”. [iii] <Emission....Probs> This tag defines the attributes of the set of free emission param eters on which the emission probabilities of the HMM depend. The free emission parameters themselves are defined in a separate input file, we call it the free emission parameter file. Example tag: <EmissionYrobs id=” FEP” size=” 7” file=” emissionprobs.zmousehuman.txt” > Attributes of <EmissionProbs>: • id: This compulsory attribute defines the id of the set of free emission parameters. This id is used to find the corresponding emission parameters in the free emission parameter file. • file: The name of the free emission parameter file. 80 4.2. The XML-input file • size: Compulsory attribute which specifies the number of free emission parameters contained in the free emission parameter file. In this example, “FEP” is the id of the set of 7 free emission parameters (size=” 7”), and the ids of the free emission parameters specified in the free emission parameter file would be FEP.O” ,“ FEP. 1”,. [iv] <States> . ,“ FEP.6”. This tag defines the attributes of all states in the HMM. For an HMM with N states, the start state should be defined with id S.O and the end state should be defined with id S.(N — 1). Example tag: <State id=” S. 14” name=” sample..state” xdim=” 2” ydim=” 3” special=” 1” > <Setl> <label idref=” Set 1.2” /> </Setl> <Set 2> <label idref=” Set2.O” /> <label idref=” Set2.O”/> <label idref=”Set2.1”/> <label idref=”Set2.1”/> <label idref=” Set2.2” /> </Set2> <StateEmissionYrobs .. <StateEmission..Probs /> </State> 81 4.2. The XML-input file Attributes of <State>: • id: This compulsory attribute takes a string value. The format of the string starts with “S.”, followed by an integer number in the set {O, 1,... , N — 1}, where N is the number of states in the model. • name: This compulsory attribute defines the name of the state. • xdim: This optional attribute defines the number of characters that this state reads from input sequence x. The default value is “0”. • ydim: This optional attribute defines the number of characters that this state reads from sequence y, the default value is “0”. This attribute is only required for states in pair-HMMs. • special: This optional boolean attribute defines whether the special emission of this state is switched on (“1”) or not (“0”). The state (namely “sample_state”) described in the above example tag is shown in figure 4.2.1. This state reads five characters, two from input sequence X and three from input sequence Y, we call this a state of dimension five. For the annotation label set “Seti” i defined for the HMM, only one label “Setl.2” (this is the id of the annotation label defined in this annotation label set) is specified, which means that all the five sequence positions of the state have the same annotation label “Setl.2” from this set. For “Set2” (another annotation label set defined for the HMM), different labels are specified for each of the five sequence positions (xl,x2,yl,y2,y3), i.e. the annotation label in “Set2” for Y2 is “Set2.1”. The name of the <Seti> (and <Set2>.) tag has to match with the name of the correspond ing annotation label set specified in the <AnnotationLabel> tag. The annotation labels de fined in this <state> tag are only for specifying the annotation labels for this particular state, 82 4.2. The XML-input file Figure 4.1: Defining a state of an HMM or pair-HMM in HMMC0NvERTER The figure shows the state defined in the above example tag. This state reads five letters at a time, two from input sequence X and three from input sequence Y. Each of the sequence position are assigned with two annotation labels from the annotation label set “Seti” and “Set2”. In this example, all the five sequence positions are assigned with the same annotation label “Seti .2” from the annotation label set “Set 1”, while different annotation labels from annotation label set “Set2” are assigned to each sequence positions. For example, the sequence position Y2 is assigned with “Setl.2” from annotation label set “Seti” and “Set2.2” from annotation label set “Set2”. 83 4.2. The XML-input file the complete annotation label sets for the HMM and the annotation labels defined in each annotation label set are specified in the <AnnotationLabel> tag. The <Annotation.Iabel> tag is an optional tag inside the <model> component which will be explained after describing all the compulsory tags. The attribute of the <label> tag inside the <state> tag is: • idref: This attribute stores the id of an annotation label in a string. The string has to start with the name of the corresponding annotation label set, followed by a “.“ character and then a number between 0 to the total number of labels defined in this annotation label set. The <Stat&EmissionYrob> tag defines the emission probabilities of a state. There are two ways to define this tag, the simpler way is the following: <Stat&EmissionYrobs GetFrom=” S.2” > The attribute GetFrom specifies the id of a free emission parameter defined in the free emission parameter file or the id of a state in the HMM. If a state is specified, this means the two states share the same set of emission probabilities. The second way to define this tag is to specify how the emission probabilities are derived from free emission parameters. In that case, the <StateEmissionYrob> tag has to be defined in the following way: <StateEmission_Probs SumOver=” 1” Product=” 1”> <SumOver From=”S.3” FromPos=”O 1 3 4” ThisPos=”O 1 4 5”/> <Product From=”S.14” FromPos=”O 1 2 3” ThisPos=”2 3 6 7”/> </StateEmissionYrobs> The attributes of the <StateEmissionYrob> tag are: 84 4.2. The XML-input file • SumOver: This boolean attribute defines if the SumOver function is used (“ 1”) or not (“ 1”) or not (“0”). The default value is “O”. • Product: This boolean attribute defines if the Product function is used (“0”). The default value is “0”. The concept of these two functions has already been explained in detail in chapter 3, we now describe how to set up the functions. Consider an example where we use the SumOver function to derive the emission probabilities of state S.3 from those of state S.6: (xi,x 3 P. , 2 ) x Ps.6(xi,x2,x3,yi,y2,y3) = (?Ji ,Y2,Y3) This could be specified by: <StateEmissionYrobs SumOver=” 1”> <SumOver From=”S.6” FromPos=”O 1 2” ThisPos=”O 1 2”/> </Stat&EmissionYrobs> ThisPos=”O 1 2” and FromPos=”O 1 2” means that the 0-th, 1-th and 2-th character read by S.3 match with the 0-th, 1-th and 2-th character read by S.6 respectively, i.e. that we sum over the 3-rd, 4-th and 5-th character of state S.6 to obtain the emission probabilities of state S.3. The attributes of the <SumOver> tag are: • From: The id of a state or an emission parameter. • FromPos and ThisPos: FromPos is a vector of positions of the state or emission pa rameter specified in the From attribute. The FromPos vector and the ThisPos vector have to have the same length as they map the sequence positions in the From state to 85 4.2. The XML-input file the sequence position in this state. Here, “0” represents the first character read by the state,” 1” and “2” represents the second and third character respectively. For the Product function, consider an example with states S.3 and S.1 of dimension 3 and 1 respectively where the emission probabilities of state S.3 depend in the following way on those of state S.1: (xi,x 3 P. , 2 ) x = (x 1 P. ) Pi(xi) Psj(x) 3 (4.1) The corresponding specification is: <StateEmissionProbs Product=” 1”> <Product From=”S.l” FromPos=”O” ThisPos=”O”/> <Product From=” S.1” FromPos=” 0” ThisPos=” 1” /> <Product From=” S.1” FromPos=” 0” ThisPos=” 2” /> </StateEmissionYrobs> The attributes of the <Product> tag are the same and have the same meaning as those of <SumOver> tag. In the above example, the 0-th, 1-th and 2-th character read by state 5.3 are all mapped to the 0-th character read by state Si. The Product and SumOver functions can be combined, as the following example shows where we have three states 5.3, S.1 and S.4 with dimension 3, 1 and 4 respectively. (yi,y 3 P. , 2 ) y = ( (yi,y 4 (P. , 2 ) xi,x )) P.(y) . (x1,x2) The corresponding specification would be: <State.EmissionYrobs SumOver=” 1” Product=” 1”> 86 4.2. The XML-input file <SumOver From=”S.4” FromPos=”2 3” ThisPos=”O 1” /> <Product From=” S.1” FromPos=” 0” ThisPos=” 2” /> </StateEmissionProbs> Users can also use the combinations of Product and SumOver with one sequence position involved in more than one operation. The <Stat&EmissionYrob> tag is not required in two cases: (i) The state is a silent state which does not read any symbols from any input sequence. (ii) All the emission probabilities of the HMM are specified explicitly in the free emission parameter file, the numbering of emission probability sets start with “FEP.O” (“ FEP” is the id of the set of free emission parameter). Regarding case (ii), if this state (S.14) is not defined with the <State_EmissionYrob> tag, then the emission probabilities of this state will be assigned with free emission parameter “FEP.13” defined in the free emission parameter file (as S.0 is the start state which does not read any letter, and the emission probabilities of S.1 will be assigned with “FEP.O” ). This is implemented for convenient of setting up the model if the emission probabilities of the states in the HMM are not pararneterized. In this way, users oniy require to specifies the emission probabilities of the states in order in the free emission parameter files, and no <State.EmissionYrobs> tag is needed to define for any state. [vj <Transitions> This tag defines the topology of the HMM, i.e. the transitions between states in the HMM and the corresponding probabilities. Example tag: <Transitions train=” 1”> 87 4.2. The XML-input file <from idref=” S0’> <to idref=”All” exp=” 1/53”/> </from> <from idref=” S.3” > <to idref=” S .3” exp=” 0.6” pseudoprob=” 0.2” /> <to idref=” S .53” exp=0.01” /> <from idref=”S.4” train=” 1” > <to idref=” S.3” exp=” FTP. 15* (1 —FTP.2)” /> <to idref=” S.4” exp=” (1—FTP. 15) *(1 —FTP.2)” /> <to idref=”S.53” exp=”FTP.2”/> </from> </Transitions> The attributes of the <Transitions> tag are: • train: This optional attribute takes the value “0”, “1” or “All”. The default value of this attribute is “0” which means that none of the transition probabilities is trained. The value train =“ 1” means that some transitions are to be trained. These transitions have to be matched by setting the train value in the corresponding “from” state to “1”. A train=” All” values implies that all transitions of the HMM are to be trained. The attributes of the <from> tag are: • idref: This compulsory attribute defines the state from which this transition is. The value of idref has to match the id of the “from” state. 88 4.2. The XML-input file • train: This optional boolean attribute defines whether the transition probabilities of the “from state” need to be trained or not. The default value is “0”. The attributes of the <to> tag: • idref: This compulsory attribute specifies the “to” state of the transition. The value of idref has to either match the id of the “to” state, or is set to “All” which means that the “from” state is connected to all other states of the HMM except the start and the end state using the same transition probability. • exp: This compulsory attribute defines the transition probability. It takes a string with either of the following three formats: — — Decimal number Arithmetic formula with decimal numbers as operands. The formula accepts op erators: ‘‘, ‘— ‘, ‘*‘ and ‘/‘ representing addition, subtraction, multiplication and division respectively. Brackets are also allowed in the expression. — Arithmetic formula with decimal numbers and free transition parameters id as operands. • pseudoprob: This optional attribute defines a pseudo-probability to be used for this transition during parameter training. All the five tags described above, i.e. <ModeLType>, <Alphabets>, <EmissionYrobs>, <States> and <Transitions>, are compulsory for specifying an HMM. Two optional tags can be used for setting up special features with HMMCONVERTER. [vi] <Annotation.Labels> HMMCONVERTER can use special emissions to integrate prior information along the input sequences into the sequence decoding and the training 89 4.2. The XML-input file algorithms. Prior probabilities are specified with the name of the annotation labels along the input sequences, those names should match with the name of the annotation labels defined in the states of the HMM. The details of these annotation label sets for the HMM are defined in this <Annotation.iabels> tag. Example tag: <AnnotationLabels> <AnnotationLabel name=” Feature” score=” 1” > <label id” Feature.O” name=” Undefined” /> <label id=” Feature. 1” name=” Intergenic” /> <label id=”Feature.6” name=”StopCodon” /> </AnnotationLabel> </AnnotationLabels> The attributes of the <Annotationiabel> tag are: • name: This compulsory attribute defines the name of the annotation label. • score: This optional boolean attribute defines whether the annotation label set accepts a prior probability in [0, 1] (“ 1”) or only discrete values “on” or “off” (“0”). The default value is “0”. The attributes of the <label> tag are: • id: This compulsory attribute defines the id of the annotation label. The string has to start with “AnnotationLabeLname.”, followed by an integer in the set {0, L — where L is the size of the annotation label set. • name: This compulsory attribute defines the name for the label. 90 4.2. The XML-input file [vii] <Transition_Probs> This tag defines a set of free transition parameters, the values of the free transition parameters are defined in a separate input file, we call it the free transition parameter file. Example tag: <Transition_Probs id=” FTP” size=” 19” file=” transition_parametersmouse_human.txt” /> The attributes of the <Transition_Probs> tag are: • id: This compulsory attribute defines the id of this set of free transition parameters. This id is used to find the corresponding values in the free transition parameter file. • size: This compulsory attribute specifies the number of parameters in the free transition parameter file. • file: The file name of the free transition parameter file. 4.2.2 The <sequenceanalysis> component of the XML file The purpose of this tag is to specify the decoding and training algorithms that are to be used with the model and to specifr the algorithms parameters. This tag consists of two main tags, the <sequencedecoding> and the <parametertraining> tag. We explain these tags in order in this section. The <sequencedecoding> tag All parameters for sequence decoding algorithms are specified in the this tag. It consists of three sub-tags: • <inputfiles> 91 4.2. The XML-input file • <algorithm> • <outputfiles> <input_files> This tag specifies the names of different input files for the sequence decoding algorithm. Example tag: <inputilles SeqFile=” seqi .fasta” AnnFile=” priorinfol .txt” TubeFile=” tube.txt” /> The attributes of the <input_files> tag are: • SeqFile: This compulsory attribute specifies the name of the input sequence file. • AnnFile: This optional attribute specifies the name of the prior information file. This attribute is not required if special emissions are not used. • ThbeFile: This optional attribute specifies the name of the tube file that defines the restricted search space. This tag is only required if algorithm 3 is chosen. <algorithm> This tag specifies the sequence decoding algorithm to be used and its pa rameters. Example tag: <algorithm alg=” 1” MaxVolume=” 300000” radius=” 30” /> The attributes of the <algorithm> tag are: • aig: This compulsory attribute defines the decoding algorithm being used, it has four options: 92 4.2. The XML-input file — 0: A combination of normal Viterbi algorithm [47] and the Hirschberg algorithm [16] will be used depending on the maximum amount of memory specified by the user. — 1: Derives a tube from BLASTN [1] matches and run algorithm 0 inside the resulting tube. — 2: Derives a tube from TBLASTX[11 matches and run algorithm 0 inside the resulting tube. — 3: Runs algorithm 0 inside a user-defined tube-defined by an input file. • MaxVolume: This compulsory attribute defines the maximum amount of memory in bytes to be allocated for running any decoding algorithm. • radius: This attribute specifies the radius of the tube generated from matches given by the blast programs, see figure 3.2.2, i.e. this attribute is only required if algorithm 1 or algorithm 2 above are chosen. <outputJiles> This tag specifies the name of the output files which store the results generated by the sequence decoding algorithm. Example tag: <outputiiles OutFile=” viterbLresult.txt” /> The attribute of the <outpuLffles> tag is: • OutFile: This compulsory attribute specifies the name of the output file. The file will be created if it does not exist in the output directory, otherwise, the existing file will be overwritten. 93 4.2. The XML-input file HMMC0NvERTER generates at most two output files for storing the result of sequence de coding algorithm. The output files generated are both in simple text formats. The first output file shows the optimal state path explicitly, and the second one shows the resulting annotation of the sequences. If no annotation label set is defined, the second file is not gener ated. If both output files are generated, the output files name are viterbi_result_1.txt and viterbi_result_2.txt respectively in the above example. The <parametertraining> tag This tag specifies the parameters of the training algorithms. The general format is similar to that of the <sequencedecoding> tag, except this tag has an additional sub-tag while specifies the derivation rules for training free transition parameters. For this reason, only the tags and attributes that are different from the <sequence_decoding> tag are explained in detail. The <parametentraining> tag consists of four sub-tags: • <inputilles> • <algorithm> • <train_free_parameters> • <outputfiles> <input_files> This is the same tag as for the <sequence_decoding> tag, it specifies the names of the different input files for parameter training. The attribute ThbeFile in this <inputfiles> tag is different from that in the <sequencedecoding> tag. In addition to specifying the name of the user-defined tube file, it also accepts the value “Blastn” and TBlastX”, which means the tubes for the parameter training would be generated from the matches provided by the specified BLAST program. 94 4.2. The XML-input file <algorithm> The <algorithm> tag for parameter training is similar to that for sequence decoding. We only describe the attributes that are different from those for sequence decoding: Example tag: <algorithm alg=” 1” MaxVolume=” 100000” Maxiter=” 5” threshold=” 0.01” SamplePaths=” 10” /> The attributes for the <algorithm> tag are: • aig: This attribute specifies which training algorithm is to be used, it accepts two values: — — — 0: The linear memory Baum-Welch aigorithm[9, 35]. 1: The linear memory training using sampled state paths 2: The linear memory Viterbi training [11] • threshold: This attribute specifies a threshold score for terminating the Baum-Welch training algorithm. Its default value is 0, the algorithm will be terminated if the average log-odd ratio in the current iteration is less than this threshold value. Note that this attribute does not apply to training algorithm 1 and 2. • Maxiter: This attribute specifies the maximum number of iterations for running the training algorithm, the default value is 10. • SamplePaths: This attribute specifies the number of state paths that are to be sampled for every training sequence and every iteration in algorithm 1. The training algorithm stops as soon as the first of the two convergence criteria are met. parameter_training This tag is needed for training of the free transition parameters. As discussed in the previous section, the user has to specify rules for deriving free transition parameters from transition probabilities. We use the same example as in chapter 3 to illustrate 95 4.2. The XML-input file how we can set up “Group transition probabilities” with this tag. Take a look at figure 4.2.2 again, we want to to train the “PhaseO” parameter by counting the transitions 3 and 3 — —* 14, 3 —* 17 20, and then normalizing by all transitions from state 3 to any of the states 14— 22. The following example shows how to specify the above “Group transition probabilities”: <Parameters...training> <FreeTransitionParameters> <FTP idref=” FTP.0” exp=” GTP. 1” /> <FTP idref=” FTP. 2” exp=” GTP. 2+GTP.3” /> </FreeTransitionParameters> <GroupTransitions id=” GTP”> <GTP id=”GTP.l”> <from idref=” S.3”> <to idref=”S.14”> <to idref=” S.17”> <to idref=”S.20”> </from> <Overfrom idref=” S. 14”> <Overto idref=” All”> </Overfrom> <Overfrom idref=” S.17”> <Overto idref=” All”> </Overfrom> 96 4.2. The XML-input file <Overfrom idref=” S.20”> <Overto idref=” All”> </Overfrom> </GTP> </GroupTransitions> </Parameters_training> In the above example, GTP stands for “Group transition probabilities”. For example, the parameter GTP.1 specifies the group of transitions for training PhaseO. In the above ex ample, another free transition parameter FTP.2 is derived by adding two group transition probabilities. One important point to mention here is that in order to train a free transition parameter, the user has to specify this in the tag <FreeTransitionParameters>. Furthermore, an appropriate expression, which should be an arithmetic formula using group transition prob abilities and numerical values as operands should be given. In the above example, FTP.1 is not specified so the parameter is not being included in the parameter training. No rule is needed to specify the training of the free emission parameters, as discussed previously. The counts from appropriate states for an emission parameter can be determined within the parameter training process. For a more detailed explanation of this strategy, please refer to chapter 3. output_files This tag specifies the output file for storing the result of parameter training. At most three output files are generated. Example tag: <outputiiles XMLFi1e=” trainedHMM.xml” 97 4.2. The XML-input file match 5’ splice site Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 (•) () () ernitx 5’ splice site match exon PhaseD Phase 1 Phase 2 (E) () () y 5’ splice site Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 () () () Figure 4.2: A part of the pair-HMM of DOUBLESCAN In order to train the free transition parameter PhaseO with id FTP.O, all transitions from state 3 to any state presenting a splice site of phase 0 have to be counted, i.e. transitions 3 —* 14, 3 —* 17 and 3 —* 20. The group transition GTP.1 is set up correspondingly. 98 4.3. Other text input files TProbFile=” trained_transition.txt” EProbFile=” trained_emission.txt” /> The attributes for the <outpuLfiles> tag are: • XMLFi1e: This attribute specifies the name of the xml output file for describing the HMM after the training process. i.e. if transition probabilities are trained, the updated values will appear in this output XML file. This is convenient for users to compare the HMM before and after parameter training and to set up to new HMM for data analyses using one of the decoding algorithms. • TProbFile: This attribute specifies the name of output file that stores the trained free transition parameters. This file has the same format as that of the input free transition parameter file. • EProbFile: This attribute specifies the name of output file for storing the trained emis sion parameters. This file has the same format as that of the input free emission parameter file. 4.3 Other text input files HMMCONVERTER takes several fiat text files as input for setting up several features of an HMM. In this section, we describe the format of these text input files in detail. 4.3.1 The input sequence file This file stores the input sequences for decoding or training algorithms in a fasta-like format (Note that HMMCONVERTER is not limited to Bioinformatics applications). All sequences 99 4.3. Other text input files in this input sequence file are considered for the specified algorithm. The following is an example of an input sequence file: >Mm.X13235.5 1—637 gggaatgaagttttt ctgcaggatttaaatgtggtctttaagagacaccgcatgcaaaga atagctggggcttgctagc caatgaaaacatt cagatt ccaatgacgcatcctttttt Ct ccacccccttccaagacccggattcggaaaccccgcctaacgctctagttttcaaccagg t ccgcagaaggc ctatttaaagggacgattgctgtct ccctgctgtcataaccatgtctg gacgtggcaagggtggtaaaggccttgggaaaggcggcgctaagcgccaccgtaaggttc tccgcgataacatccagggcatcaccaagcctgccatccgccgcctggcccggcgcgggg gagtgaagcgcatct C cggc ctcat ctacgaggagacccgcggtgtgctgaaggtgtt cc tggagaacgtgatccgcgacgccgtcacctacacggagcacgccaagcgcaagaccgtca ccgccatggacgtggtctacgcgctcaagcgccagggccgcactctctacggattcggcg gttaatcgactaacaaacgattttccactgtcaacaaaaggcccttttcagggccaccca caaattcctagaaggagttgtt cacttac cgaagctt >Hs M16707 H4F2 .8 . . 85—1098 ccgtcctccttcggcgaagatccctggcgcgcgtccttgaggtcgccttcggtgttgacc t catcgtcggaacggcgctt c ctgaagctttatataagcacggct ctgaat ccgct cgt c ggattaaatcctgcgctggcgtcctgccagtctctcgctccatttgctcttcctgaggct ccctccagagacctttcccttagcctcagtgcgaatgcttccgggcgtcctcagaaccag agcacagccaaagccactacagaatccggaagcccggttgggatctgaattctcccgggg accgttgcgtaggcgttaaaaaaaaaaaagagtgagagggacctgagcagagtggaggag gagggagaggaaaacagaaaagaaatgacgaaatgt cgagagggcggggacaattgagaa cgcttcccgccggcgcgctttcggttttcaatctggtccgatactcttgtatatcagggg aagacggtgct cgc cttgacagaagctgt ctatcgggct ccagcggt catgt ccggcaga 100 4.3. Other text input files ggaaagggcggaaaaggcttaggcaaagggggcgctaagcgccaccgcaaggt cttgaga gacaacatt cagggcatcaccaagcctgc catt cggcgtctagct cggcgtggcggcgtt aagcggatctctggc ctcatttacgaggagacccgcggtgtgctgaaagtgtt cttggag aatgtgattcgggacgcagt cac ctacac cgagcacgccaagcgcaagaccgt cacagcc atggatgtggtgtacgcgctcaagcgccaggggagaaccct ctacggcttcggaggctag gcgccgctccagctttgcacgtttcgatcccaaaggccctttttgggccgaccacttgct cat cctgaggagttggacacttgactgcgtaaagtgcaacagtaacgatgttggaaggta actttggcagtggggcgacaat cggat ctgaagttaacggaaagacataac cgc If a pair-HMM is used for an analysis, the entries in the input sequence file will be interpreted and analyzed in pairs, i.e. the first two sequence are regarded as a pair, and then the third and the fourth, etc. The header line has to start with the character “>“, followed by the name of the sequence (a string without breaks) and the start and end position of the sequence below that header line, the start position always has to be smaller or equal to the end position and both numbers have to be integers. The name and the positions are separated by space or tab character. Other information about the sequence can be put on the header line after the range, which is for users reference only. 4.3.2 The free emission parameter file This fiat text format file is required for setting up the emission probabilities of an HMM. We will call a grouped set of emission probabilities which defines the emission probabilities for a state in the HMM a free emission parameter, these free emission parameters are all stored in this file. We specify a free emission parameter with a header line with the following format: 101 4.3. Other text input files FEP.1 Stopexon 6 train The first three columns contain the id, the name of the emission parameter and the dimension of the parameter, respectively, the forth column tells whether this parameter is to be included in the training process. The four columns are separated by a space or a tab character. The id has to be identical to the one that was defined in the XML-input file, the name of the emission parameter is optional and defaults to “Not defined”. Similarly, the dimension specified in the header line has to be consistent with the dimensions of the emission proba bilities follow the header line. If the parameter set does not needed to be trained, then the word “train” should be omitted from the header line. The program can correctly interpret a header line with 3 entries by recognizing the position of the key word “train” and the position of the dimension parameter, which is the only parameter with numerical value. Below the header line, the emission probabilities are defined using the following format: taataa 0.5082690 0.10 taatag 0.0632332 0.05 taatga 0.0943092 0.05 tagtaa 0.0632332 0.05 tagtag 0.0607797 0.05 tagtga 0.0160113 0.01 tgataa 0.0943092 0.05 tgatag 0.0160113 0.01 tgatga 0.0838441 0.05 The first column is the string of characters that corresponds to the emission probability in 102 4.3. Other text input files the second column. The third column is the value of an optional pseudo-probability to be used in training which defaults to 0 if it is not specified. The three columns are separated by a space or a tab character. Emission probabilities of unspecified character combinations are set to zero. We can use this feature to specify the emission probabilities of some states in a very compact way. For example, if a Match.Start_Codon state reads only “atgatg” with emission probability larger than zero, we can specify its emission probabilities by: FEP.1 atgatg MatchStartCodon 6 1 After specifying one free emission parameter, there needs to be an empty line before specifying another parameter. 4.3.3 The free transition parameter file This ifie defines the free transition parameters. This input file is not required if the transition probabilities are not parameterized. Each line in the file defines a free transition parameter using the following format: FTP.0 PhaseO 0.4387 0.3333 FTP.1 Phasel 0.3870 0.3333 FTP.16 Matchexonto.stopexon 0.003 0.01 FTP. 17 Matchexonto_emitexon.x 0.01 FTP. 18 Match_exon_to_emit_exon_y 0.01 103 4.3. Other text input files The four columns contain the id, the name, the value and the pseudo-probability of the transition parameter respectively. The id has to be identical to the one that was defined in the XML-input file. The name is an optional attribute where default value is “Not defined”. The default value for the pseudo-probabilities is 0. In this free transition parameter file, each line represents one free transition parameter, there is no need to have an empty line between two parameter entries. 4.3.4 The tube file This input file stores the user-defined restricted search space in the sequence dimension(s) to be used for sequence decoding or parameter training. Note that the banding feature only applies to pair-HMMs. The tubes for all input sequence pairs have to be specified in a single tube file. A header line is required for specifying a tube for each sequence pair, using the following format: >Mm.X13235.5&Hs.X60484.H4/e.6 Each header line starts with the character “>“ radius:50 followed by the name of the sequence pair to which the tube will be applied to. The name of the two sequences are connected with the char acter ‘&‘, i.e. in the above example, the names of the two input sequences are Mm.X13235.5 and Hs.X60484.H4/2.6. The radius is defined in the next field of the header line if the specified coordinates below represent matches. The coordinates for specifying the tube itself are given in the following format: 300 400 450 550 600 650 800 750 The four columns of each line are “xstart”, “ystart”, “xend” and “yend”, respectively, which together define two points in the X-Y plane: (xstart,ystart) and (xend,yend). Depending on 104 4.3. Other text input files the desired interpretation, each line thus either specifies a rectangular area (see left of figure 4.3.4) or a match (see right of figure 4.3.4). Figure 4.3.4 also shows two possible ways of defining a tube from the same set of coordinates. Note that if radius is not defined in the header line, the coordinates are interpreted as rectangles rather than matches. (80 .750) [-I (450,554) 7? a (30 .400) (60$,650) H Figure 4.3: Specifying a tube explicitly in a fiat text file This figure has already been introduced in chapter 3. The tube in the right part is constructed by interpreting the coordinates as matches (with radius around them 50), while the tube on the left is constructed by interpreting the coordinates as rectangles. 4.3.5 The prior information file This input file stores prior information along the input sequences to be used with the special emissions feature of HMMC0NvERTER. Each line of this input file corresponds to one piece of information for one sequence interval along one input sequence. It is specified using the following format: SeqX Sourcel 100 150 Feature:Exon:Intron 0.3:0.7 105 4.3. Other text input files Phase:NoPhase:PhaseO The above example actually corresponds to a single line in the prior information file, we only split it into two lines for better readability. Each line contains one piece of prior information for one sequence interval, it consists of several columns separated by a space or a tab character. The first four columns specify: • SeqX: The name of the sequence to which this piece of information applies. • Sourcel: The source of this piece of information, e.g. a database name or the name of a human annotation expert. • 100: The start of the sequence interval to which this information applies. • 150: The end of the sequence interval to which this information applies. The prior information itself is defined starting in the fifth column. The above example defines two types of prior information, information of type “Feature” and of type “Phase”: (i) Feature:Exon:Intron 0.3:0.7 (ii) Phase:NoPhase:Phase0 For each type of prior information, the first entry specifies the annotation label set and the annotation labels, e.g. “Feature:Exon:Intron”, and following entry specifies the corresponding prior probabilities, e.g. 0.3 for “Exon” and 0.7 for “Intron”. Users can define any number of types of prior information within a line as long as they concern the same sequence interval. We now consider prior information for annotation label set “Feature” in (i) above. It means that sequence interval [100, 150j has a prior probability of 0.3 for being “Exon” and a prior probability of 0.7 for being “Intron”. The prior information for annotation label set 106 4.4. The output files of HMMCONvERTER “Phase” in (ii) has the same format, but the prior probability is ‘.‘ instead of a numerical value, because the annotation label set “Phase” is an on/off label set. In this example it means that the sequence positions in the interval [100, 150] has value “NoPhase” or “PhaseO”. Finally, suppose there was a third annotation label set “Stat&Type” defined for the HMM. As no information for this label set is defined for sequence interval [100, 150], there the nominal emission will not be biased by this label set. The concept of special emissions in HMMC0NVERTER and how to specify valid prior probabilities are discussed in detail in chapter 3. The output files of HMMC0NvERTER 4.4 HMMCONVERTER provides two simple output files for storing the results of sequence decod ing. The first file shows the sequence of states in the optimal state path, and the second optional file shows the resulting annotation of the input sequences. Figure 4.4 shows a 5-states simple pair-HMM. This pair-HMM consists of two annotation label sets, “Set 1” = {“align” ,“gap”} and “Set2”= {“match” ,“emit...X” ,“emit_Y”}. Each state (except the start state and the end state) of the pair-HMM is assigned with one annotation label from each of the annotation label set as shown in the figure. In this example, two output files are generated after running the Viterbi algorithm on a pair of input sequences SeqX and SeqY of length 10 and 15 respectively, the first file looks like: SeqX&SegY: o o start xdim= 0 ydim= 0 1 3 EmitX xdim= 0 ydim= 1 SetLyO=gap Set2..yO=emitY 2 3 EmitX xdim= 0 ydim= 1 SetLyO=gap Set2jO=emitY 3 3 EmitX xdim= 0 ydim= 1 SetLyO=gap Set2jO=emitY 4 3 EmitX xdim= 0 ydim= 1 Setl..yO=gap Set2..yO=emitY 5 3 Emit..Y xdim= 0 ydim= 1 SetLyO=gap Set2yO=emitY 6 1 Match xdim= 1 ydim= 1 SetLxO=align SetLyO=align Set2xO=match Set2yO=match 107 4.4. The output files of HMMC0NvERTER 0 Figure 4.4: A simple 5-state pair-HMM A 5-state simple pair-HMM which contains two annotation label sets “Set 1” and “Set2”. Each sequence position of a state in the pair-HMM is assigned with one annotation label from each of the annotation label sets. For example, the sequence position of X and Y in the Match state is assigned with label “align” and “match” from annotation label set “Seti”, and annotation label “Set2” respectively. 108 4.4. The output files of HMMCONvERTER 7 2 Emit..X xdim= 1 ydim 0 SetLxO=gap Set2xO=emitX 8 1 Match xdim= 1 ydim= 1 SetLxO=align Setl_yO=align Set2..xO=match Set2_yO=match 9 1 Match xdim= 1 ydim= 1 SetLxO=align Setl.y0=align Set2xO=match Set2jO=match 10 2 Emit..X xdim= 1 ydim= 0 Set LxO=gap Set2.x0=emitX 11 2 Em1LX xdim= 1 ydim= 0 SetLxO=gap SetixO=emitX ydim= 1 SetLxO=align SetLyO=align Set2.jc0match Set2..yO=match 12 1 Match xdim= 1 13 1 Match xdim= 1 ydim= 1 SetLxO=align Setl..yO=align Set2xO=match Set2_yO=match 14 1 Match xdim= 1 ydim 1 SetLxO=align SetLyO=align Set2..xO=match Set2.y0=match 15 3 EmitX xdim= 0 ydim= 1 SetLy0=gap Set2jO=emitY 16 3 EmitX xdim= 0 ydim= 1 SetLyO=gap Set2..yO=emitY 17 3 EmitX xdim= 0 ydim= 1 SetLyO=gap Set2.yO=emitY SetLx0=a1ign Set1_y0=a1ign Set2..xO=match Set2yO=match 18 1 Match xdim= 1 ydim= 1 19 3 end xdim= 0 ydim= 0 Let the optimal state path S := (So, S ,• ,SN’), the first output file then contains N’+ 1 2 lines, one line for each state in the state path, the first line always represents the start state and the last line always represents the end state. The first column shows the line number, which is also the index in the state path. The second column and third column show the number and the name of the state in the HMM. The fourth and fifth column specifies the number of characters read from sequence x and the number of characters read from sequence y respectively. Starting from the fifth column, each column contains the annotation label for the corresponding sequence position read by the state. For example, the position 6 (the 7-th line in the output file) of the optimal state path is a Match state, which the sequence position X and sequence position Y of the state are both assigned with annotation label “align” from annotation label set “Set 1” and “match” from annotation label set “Set2”. The second format shows the annotation of the sequence. If no annotation label set is defined for the HMM, this output file will not be generated. The following is the second output file of the same state path for the same pair of input sequences: SeqX SimplePair-HMM 1 1 Setl=align Set2=match 109 4.4. The output files of HMMCONVERTER SeqX SimplePair-HMM 1 1 Set 1=align Set2=match SeqX SimplePair-HMM 2 2 Setl=gap Set2=emitX SeqX SimplePair-HMM 3 4 Setl=align Set2=:match SeqX SimplePair-HMM 5 6 Setl=gap Set2=emitX SeqX SimplePair-HMM 7 10 Setl=align Set2=match SeqY SimplePair-HMM 1 5 Set 1=gap Set2=emitY SeqY SimplePair-HMM 6 11 Setl=align Set2=zmatch SeqY SimplePair-HMM 12 14 Setl=gap Set2=emitY SeqY SimplePair-HMM 15 15 Setl=align Set2=match Each line presents a contiguous sequence interval that is assigned the same annotation, where all the annotation labels have the same values. Regarding the format, the first column is the sequence name, second column is the name of the HMM specified by users in the XML-input file. The third and forth columns indicate the interval of the sequence positions that have the same annotations, the corresponding annotation labels are showed after that. If the HMM is used with any of the parameter training algorithms, HMMC0NvERTER writes three output files to store the results of the parameter training, one XML-file and two fiat text files. The XML-output file is the same as the XML-input file that describes the HMM, but contains the trained transition probabilities. The two flat text files are the files with the trained free transition parameters and the files with the trained free emission parameters. They have the same format as the corresponding input files, but contain the trained parameter values. 110 4.5. Examples 4.5 Examples The HMMCONVERTER software package comprises several examples with all the input and output files. These examples illustrate the range of features supported by HMMC0NvERTER. CpG-Island prediction This simple HMM is introduced in [11] for predicting the CpG Islands in a potentially long genomic DNA sequence. This simple example shows how to specify a simple HMM with annotation labels. Dishonest Casino The example of a dishonest casino HMM is introduced in [11], a vari ation of this HMM using special emissions is also included. The special emissions version of the HMM can be interpreted as the expert knowledge of a casino-insider who provides additional information on when the loaded rather than the fair dice was used. This simple example illustrates how to use special emissions. p53-transcription site prediction This HMM can be used to predict p53 transcription factor binding sites given genomic DNA input sequences [17]. This example shows how parameter training with HMMCONVERTER works. We use the same training set and the test set as MAMOT [43j. Simple pair-HMM This is a simple pair-HMM as shown in 4.4. This simple example illus trates how to specify a pair-HMM, and how to train its parameters. This example comprises an artificially created training set. 111 Chapter 5 Implementation of HMMConverter 5.1 Introduction HMMCONVERTER is an executable file in C++ that is executed from the command line. Users can start it using the following conunand: HMMCONVERTER inputdirectory/ outputdirectory/ HMM .xml where HMMCONVERTER is the name of the executable file and HMM.xml is the XML-input file specifying the 11MM and the analyses to be performed. Note that the name of the XML file is not restricted to HMM.xml. All input files including this XML input file must be contained in the input_directory. Similarly, all output files will be written to the output_directory. In order to construct an 11MM with HMMCONVERTER, the user only has to supply the corresponding input files, no compilation is needed. We provide the source code files including a Makefile with the software package for users’ convenience. HMMCONVERTER is based on the original implementation of DOUBLEBUILD [33j which corresponds to a set of C++ classes for constructing pair-HMMs. These classes provide a good framework for constructing HMMC0NvERTER, but as the code has been designed for the gene prediction pair-HMMs underlying DOUBLESCAN and PROJECTOR, the original code had to be modified. In addition, new classes were added for special features, and some re dundancies were removed. 112 5.2. Converting XML into C++ code In this chapter, we first give a very brief introduction of the XML language and the connection between HMMCONVERTER and the XML input file. We then describe several important classes, and finally focus on discussing the implementations of the algorithms for sequence decoding and parameter training. The interplay between the classes is also described in detail and their structure explained. 5.2 Converting XML into C++ code We chose XML for describing the 11MM because it is a popular, easy to understand and powerful language. XML is very popular for structuring, storing and exchanging information, it is an HTML-like language which uses tags or markup language. There is no restriction on the XML tags as they can all be defined by users. This provides great flexibility for representing data structures. Because of these reasons, XML has been used widely in many Bioinformatics applications, including genomic annotations, protein specification, etc. HMMC0NvERTER uses the TINYXML [28] package to convert the XML-input file into C++ code. Most of the attributes of the 11MM described in the XML file are first read into the modeLparameter class. 5.2.1 The model_parameters class A model_parameters object stores almost all the attributes defined in the <model> tag of the XML file, On the first step of building the specified HMM with HMMCONVERTER, all the information about the HMM from the XML-input file, except its topological structure and parameters, is read and stored in this object. In other stages of constructing the HMM and for invoking the different algorithms, this object interacts with other classes by supplying 113 5.2. Converting XML into C++ code information about the HMM, such as the name of an annotation label or the name of a state. In the following, we list some private variables in the model_parameters class for storing information about the specified HMM: • char* Model_Name: The name of the HMM. • boolean pair: A boolean variable indicates whether it is an HMM or a pair-HMM. • mt Total_Number_of_AnnotationLabels: The number of annotation label sets. • Label* Annotation_Label: The array of annotation label sets and the corresponding labels in each annotation label set. Label is a structure variable with four attributes which describes one annotation label set: — mt size: The number of annotation labels in the annotation label set. — char* tname: The name of the annotation label set. — char** name: The array of names of each label in the set. — boolean score: This boolean variable indicates whether this annotation label set can be used with prior probabilities (TRUE) or only with on/off values (False). • Letter Alphabet: The alphabet set that can be read from the HMM. Letter is a structure variable with three attributes: — — mt size: The number of alphabets in the alphabet set. boolean cases: This boolean variable indicates whether the HMM is case sensitive or not when reading characters from the input sequences. — char* name: The alphabet in the alphabet set, e.g. if the alphabet set of the HMM is {A, C, G, T}, then the value of this variable name is “ACGT”. 114 5.2. Converting XML into C++ code • mt Number_of_States: The number of states in the 11MM, including the start and end state. • boolean SpecialEmit: The boolean variable indicates whether the special emissions are use (TRUE) or not (FALSE). 5.2.2 Other classes The Hmm class, the Hmm_State class and the Sequence class are three other key classes in HMMCONVERTER which were derived from the Pairhmm class, the Pairhmm...State class and the Sequence class in DOUBLEBUILD respectively. These classes contain most of the functional components of HMMC0NvERTER. We are going to describe each of them in more detail in the following. The Hmm class An Hmm object basically knows everything about a specified HMM. It contains an array of Hmm_State objects and the sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms are implemented as public functions. The Hmm class consists of the following private variables: • boolean mirrored: This boolean variable indicates whether this is a “mirror” HMM (TRUE) or not (FALSE). The “mirror model” is needed in the Hirschberg algorithm. • boolean pair: This boolean variable indicates whether this is a pair-HMM or not. • mt number_of_states: The number of states in the 11MM. • mt alphabet: The number of symbols in the alphabet. • Pairhmm_State* model: An array with pointers to each state of the HMM. 115 5.2. Converting XML into C++ code The Hmm object oniy knows the size of the alphabet but not the symbols that it con tains. When algorithms are used, this class gets the corresponding information from the model_parameters object used when necessary. The Sequence class The Sequence class stores all the information about one input sequence. If special emissions are used, it also stores the prior information for the different annotation label sets for all positions in this input sequence, they are read from the prior information file into this object. A mapping and scoring function is used to calculate the special emission probabilities for each state according to the position-specific prior probabilities, and these probabilities are finally stored in the corresponding Hmm_State object. The most important private variables in the Sequence class are: • int* sequence: The sequence is represented by an integer, the corresponding characters can be derived from the modelparameters class. • mt start_position: The start position of the sequence as indicated in the header line of the input file with sequences. • mt end_position: The end position of the sequence as indicated in the header line of the input file with sequences. • mt length_of_sequence: — The length of the sequence. This number is equal to end_position startposition +1. • char* ac: The name of the sequence as indicated in the header line of the input file with sequences. 116 5.2. Converting XML into C++ code The above variables are always used when creating a sequence object. If special emissions are switched on, three additional arrays are needed to store the corresponding information. The class “array” used to define some variables listed below is provided in DOUBLEBUILD for constructing multi-dimensional arrays. • boolean**** annotation_labels: This four-dimensional boolean array indicates which types of prior information exists for the sequence. The four indices of this array are [source, sequence position, annotation label set, annotation label] respectively. A value of “on” (TRUE) indicates that the corresponding label exists, for that particular posi tion and the particular source. The source could be a database name or the name of a human annotation expert. • double**** annotation_labeLscores: This four-dimensional array stores the prior information for the sequence. The four indices of this array are [source, sequence po sition, annotation label set, annotation label] respectively. The corresponding entry indicates the corresponding prior probabilities. • array<Score> scores_for_specia1_missions: This two-dimensional array stores the scores of the special emissions. The two indices are [the index of a state with special emissions, sequence position] respectively. The HmmState class The Hmm_State objects form the building blocks of any HMM. Every Hmm...State object contains all the implementation for a state in an HMM as well as limited information about the states to which this state is connected by transitions. Some of the private variables are only for special emissions. We first describe the most important private variables and then the variables for special emissions. 117 5.2. Converting XML into C++ code • boolean mirrored: The boolean variable indicates whether this is a state in a “mirror” model (TRUE) or not (FALSE). • boolean special_emission: This boolean variable indicates whether this state uses special emissions (TRUE) or not (FALSE). • mt number_of_state: Number of this state in the HMM. • mt number_of_states: Number of states of the HMM. • mt number_of_letters_to_read: Total number of characters read by this state. • mt number_of_letters_to_read_x: Number of characters read by this state from se quence x. • hit number_of_letters_to_read_y: Number of characters read by this state from se quence y. • mt number_of_previous_states: The number of states that have a transition to this state. • array<int> numbers_of_previous_states: Array of numbers of the states that have a transition to this state. • mt number_of_next_states: The number of states that this state has a transition to. • array<int> number_of_next_states: Array of numbers of the states that this state has a transition to. • array<char*> transition_probs_expressions: Array of strings to store the deriva tion rules for deriving the transition probabilities. The index of this array corresponds to the state number of the respective next state. 118 5.2. Converting XML into C++ code • array<Prob> transition_probs: Array of transition probabilities of this state. The index of this array corresponds to the state number of the respective next state. • array<Score>transition..scores: Array of transition scores of this state. The index of this array corresponds to the state number of the respective next state. • array<Prob> emission_probs: Array of emission probabilities of this state. The index of this array corresponds to the combination of letters that read by this state. For example if the the alphabet set consists of 4 letters, and this state reads 3 letters at a time, then this array will have length 43 = 64. The different combinations of the letters are converted to an index for this array. • array<Score>emission.scores: Array of emission scores of this state. The index of this array has the same meaning as that of the array emission_probs. The data types Prob and Score are used for variables representing probabilities and log arithms of probabilities, a further explanation of Score is given in the last section of this chapter. The following variables are only used to store information about special emissions: • mt number_of_annotation_labels: Number of annotation label sets defined for this state. • array<int>.* annotation_labels: Array of annotation labels of all the annotation label sets and for each letter read by the state. The first index indicates the annotation label set, and the second index indicates the position of the letter that this annota tion label is defined for. Each value in this two-dimensional array corresponds to an annotation label. 119 5.3. Decoding and training algorithms • char** annotation_labels_type: Array of the name of annotation label sets defined for this state. The index indicates the number of annotation label set, and the value is the name of the corresponding annotation label set. • mt number_of_child_state_x: The number of the state that stores the prior informa tion for input sequence x for this state. This variable is only used for states that read characters from input sequence x, otherwise it is set to 0. • mt number_of_child_state_y: The number of the state that stores the prior informa tion for input sequence y for this state. This variable is only used for states that read characters from input sequence y, otherwise it is set to 0. 5.3 Sequence decoding and parameter training algorithms HMMC0NvERTER supports several prediction and training algorithms, among them, the Hirschberg algorithm [16] and several linear memory algorithms for parameter training, two of them being novel. In this section, we give the implementation details for these algorithms. 5.3.1 The Viterbi and Hirschberg algorithms The Viterbi [47] and Hirschberg algorithm [16] are implemented based on the corresponding implementations in DOUBLEBUILD. There are several issues worth mentioning in this section. Banding The sequence decoding algorithms are implemented using a linearized dynamic programming table, where each entry corresponds to an object containing a score and a back tracking pointer. The index to this table is calculated in a very time-efficient way using bit-shifting and the table itself is stored in the most memory-efficient way. If any decoding or 120 5.3. Decoding and training algorithms training algorithms used with a tube, only matrix elements inside this tube will be allocated memory. Numerical difficulties In the Viterbi algorithm, the entries of the Viterbi matrix is filled according to the following recurrence relation: v(k) = ej(k)max{v(k — 1)t,} The (i, k) entry in the Viterbi matrix for sequence position k and state i stores the probability of the state path with the highest overall probability that ends in state i at that sequence position. For high values of k (i.e. long sequences) or low emission and transition probabilities, this number can get very small and cause underfiow errors. A simple way to deal with this numerical difficulty is to do the Viterbi algorithm in logarithm space. The recurrence relation of the Viterbi algorithm then becomes: v(k) = log(e(k)) + max{log(v(k — 1)) + log(t, )} 2 This strategy works perfectly for the Viterbi algorithm as it avoids the underfiow problem, and as the logarithm function is a strictly monotonous function so this preserves the choice of the maximum state. For this purpose, transition and emission scores are pre-computed from the corresponding probabilities and stored in the corresponding arrays of the Hmm_State object, so it is not necessary to compute the score repeatedly during the Viterbi algorithm. Special emissions In any decoding algorithm, the emission probability of a state is ob tained via the public function get_emission..score in the Hmm..State class. This function returns the appropriate emission score, i.e. it returns the nominal emission score if special emissions are not used or no prior information is supplied for the particular sequence position, or it returns the modified special emission score in the other cases. 121 5.3. Decoding and training algorithms 5.3.2 The parameter training algorithms All training algorithms can also be combined with banding and special emissions, and the corresponding implementation regarding these two features is similar to the one discussed above. But as these algorithms already correspond to linear-memory versions, there is no need to linearize the dynamic programming table. On the other hand, any training algorithm can potentially generate underfiow errors due to many probabilities being multiplied (and added). The situation for training is a bit more com plicated than for the Viterbi algorithm. For all parameter training algorithms, the calculation of the forward values involves the summation of probabilities. If we perform the algorithm in logarithm space, we have to compute values like 0 log(> p ). In HMMCONVERTER, we use the following identity to do this: log( p 0 ) = logpo + log(l + exp(log(p) — log(po))) This is convenient and efficient to implement because the scores of all transition and emission parameters are already stored in the corresponding state object. There also exist alternative strategies to address the underfiow problem such as rescaling or creating a specific data type. The TransitionProb and EmissionProb objects The TransitionProb class and Emis sionProb class are implemented for convenience for the parameter training algorithms. A TransitionProb object stores the values of free transition parameters with the corre sponding pseudo-counts as well as the group transitions defined for training the free transition parameters. It also stores the inverse derivation rules for deriving the free parameters from the exact transitions. If no free transition parameter is defined, this class serve as a temporary 122 5.3. Decoding and training algorithms storage for the transition probabilities in the training process. It also stores the pseudo— probabilities for the transitions. An EmissionProb object stores the free emission parameters and the corresponding pseudo—probabilities. Hmm_State objects get their emission probabilities either directly or derived from these parameters. A function that automatically determines the states for training a particular emission parameter is included as a public function in this class, so the user only needs to specify which emission parameters to train. 123 Chapter 6 Annotaid 6.1 Introduction and Motivation HMMs are widely used in Bioinformatics. One important area of research where HMMs are used is gene prediction. We have already discussed many variations of HMMs that have been developed for this particular application in chapter 1. These HMM-based methods gradually changed from alignment-based methods (e.g. GENEWISE [6] and PROCRUSTES [14]) and ab initio methods (e.g. GENSCAN [8]) to a combination of these two methods, which we called hybrid methods (e.g. TWINSCAN [26], DOUBLESCAN [34] and PROJECTOR [36]). In recent research, as more genomic data becomes available, many HMMs were developed to integrate prior information about the input sequences into the prediction process. JIG SAW [19], AUGUSTUS [44] and EXONHUNTER [7] are examples of gene prediction methods that can take various types of prior information into account. They are also capable of integrating information with different confidence scores into the gene prediction process, but they have a number of limitations. For example, they cannot deal with conflicting pieces of informa tion and one state in the underlying HMM can typically only capture prior information of one type. Also as even more genomic data becomes available, there are many low-sequence coverage genomes with erroneous or incomplete genome data. ENSEMBL [18] is an integrated analysis pipeline for gene prediction, the most current version tackles this particular problem. With HMMCONvERTER, we built a novel gene prediction pair-HMM called ANNOTAID, 124 6.1. Introduction and Motivation which is capable of integrating various types of prior information along two input sequences into the gene prediction and parameter training process. The pair-HMM underlying ANNO TAID is the same as DOUBLESCAN [34] and PROJECTOR [36], however the new model extends PROJECTOR in the following aspects: (i) It can incorporate prior information for both input sequences instead of just one of the two input sequence as in Projector. (ii) Every sequence position can be assigned with more than one type of prior information and the level of confidence for each type of information can be expressed in terms of a prior probability in [0, 1]. (iii) Several memory-efficient algorithms for parameter training can be used, two of them are novel. All features provided by HMMC0NvERTER such as the Hirschberg algorithm [16] and the parameter training algorithms can be used in ANNOTAID. ANNOTAID uses several annotation label sets, and the prior information is incorporated with the special emission feature in HMMC0NvERTER. Furthermore, ANNOTAID checks conflicting pieces of prior information. The capability of integrating prior information on both input sequences is very important for parameter training, as the known annotation of the training sequences can thus consid erably improve the outcome of the training. Using the efficient training algorithms provided by HMMC0NvERTER, ANNOTAID can be easily adapted to analyze any pair of genomes if corresponding training data of known orthologous gene pairs is available. In the following section, we are going to describe the features and advantages of ANNOTAID. 125 6.2. Main features of Annotaid 6.2 Main features of Annotaid ANNOTAID BLESCAN NOTAID is a novel comparative gene prediction method which significantly extends Dou and PROJECTOR. It was constructed using the HMMCONVERTER framework. AN can predict partial, complete and multiple pair of genes in the two genomic input DNA sequences. It can also align more diverged pair of genes which differ by exon-fusion or exon-splitting. The main feature that leads to a superior performance is that the method simultaneously align while it predicts genes. In this section, we describe the main features of ANNOTAID, some of those are provided by HMMCONVERTER, such as banding and special emissions. For more details of those features, the reader is referred to chapter 3. 6.2.1 The pair-HMM of ANNOTAID The states and topological structure of ANNOTAID are the same as for DOUBLESCAN and PROJECTOR. The states can be sub-divided into three groups. Each group models a specific structure of a gene: (1) protein-coding Exons, (2) introns, (3) intergenic regions. The HMM consists of 54 states and 153 transitions. The transition probabilities are parameterized by 19 free transition parameters and all emission probabilities are derived from the emission probabilities of 7 states, i.e. there are only 7 free emission parameters. In DOUBLESCAN and PROJECTOR, the splice site signal is captured by an external splice site prediction program STRATASPLICE [29] which predicts potential splice sites and assigns a confidence score to each such site. These scores are integrated into the prediction process using so-called special transitions, which is a special feature of DOUBLESCAN and PROJECTOR. Since ANNOTAID is built with HMMCONVERTER, this special transition concept is not used. Instead, we convert the prediction by STRATASPLICE into prior probabilities and integrate them using special emissions. On this way, the splice site signal can be integrated into the 126 6.2. Main features of Annotaid prediction process and we can perform a fair comparison between ANNOTAID and PROJECTOR. For more details of the topological structure of the HMM and the special transition concept, readers can refer to the DOUBLESCAN and PROJECTOR paper [34, 36]. 6.2.2 Banding and sequence decoding algorithms ANNOTAID employs a generalized pair-HMM in order to annotate two input sequences simul taneously. It thus has to deal with the constraints of memory and time requirements if the input sequences are long. As all parameter training algorithms provided in HMMC0NvERTER are implemented as linear memory algorithms, the memory requirement is not a problem for parameter training. For sequence decoding, the memory problem can also be solved by using the Hirschberg algorithm [16]. To address the time constraint, users can use the banding feature in HMMCONVERTER. This forces the prediction and parameter training algorithms to run inside a tube-like sub-space of the search space. If the tube is well designed, it can greatly improve the speed of the algorithms while keeping the performance unchanged. As the Hirschberg algorithm can be run inside a tube, this combination allows to generate pre dictions with minimal time and memory requirements, see figure 6.1. The concept of banding is described in detail in chapter 3 and chapter 4, a discussion of this feature for parameter training of ANNOTAID is given below. 6.2.3 Integrating prior information along the input sequences ANNOTAID extends the special emission feature of PROJECTOR for integrating prior infor mation on the input sequences into the prediction and parameter training. There are three main modifications: (1) ANNOTAID is capable of integrating prior information on both input sequences instead of only one input sequence. (2) ANNOTAID can incorporate prior infor mation in terms of probabilities instead of only discrete “on/off” values, see figure 6.2.3. In 127 6.2. Main features of Annotaid ‘1 Ly x L Figure 6.1: Combing the Hirschberg algorithm with a tube addition, ANNOTAID can use prior information from different sources and consistency check are applied to check for conflicting information. (3) In PROJECTOR, the splice site signal is integrated into the prediction process using special transitions, while in ANNOTAID, this signal is converted into prior probabilities which are integrated using special emission. With the first two improvements, ANNOTAID is much more amenable to parameter train ing, as the known annotation on both training sequences can be automatically integrated into the training. These improvements make ANNOTAID also better for predicting genes on low-sequence coverage genome, as partial information on an input sequence may be able to cover the missing part on the other sequence, which can improve the resulting performance. The third modification allows a fair comparison between the published version of PROJECTOR and ANNOTAID which has been implemented using HMMCONVERTER. In this section, we describe each of the above features of ANNOTAID in greater detail, the theoretical details of 128 6.2. Main features of Annotaid //X states states Figure 6.2: Special emissions in PROJECTOR and ANNOTAID The left part shows how the special emissions are used in PROJECTOR to incorporate com plete information about the known gene in one of the two input sequence. The right part shows ANNOTAID which can accept incomplete and uncertain prior information on each input sequence. The dashed lines refer to evidence for exons with a prior probability of less than 100%. the special emissions in HMMCONVERTER are discussed in chapter 3. The special transitions is introduced in the PROJECTOR paper [36]. In order to incorporate the prior probabilities into the gene prediction process, ANNOTAID uses two annotation label sets: (i) Feature: {Intergenic, Intron, Exon, CDS, StarLCodon, StopCodon} (ii) Phase : {., 0, 1, 2} where the four labels denote NoPhase, Phase 0, Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively. Different types of prior information are set with these annotation labels in terms of probabil ities in the prior probability file. In ANNOTAID, we only set the annotation label set Feature to be a “score” label set, and the other two are set as “on/off” label set. The concept of how the special emission bias the normal emission probabilities of a state are discussed in depth in chapter 3. In brief, we can see figure 6.2.3 which illustrates the differences of the special 129 6.2. Main features of Annotaid emission 6.2.4 concept between ANNOTAID and PROJECTOR. Parameter training in ANNOTAID As discussed in chapter 1, most HMM-based applications do not provide algorithms for pa rameter training except for a few gene prediction HMMs such as [25, 30, 46]. Generally, it is much more challenging to train a pair-HMM than an HMM for the following reasons. (1) Large amounts of training data are required to reliably train a larger number of transition and emission parameters. (2) Even if the annotation of each training sequence is known, the pair of sequences can still be aligned in many ways, i.e. many valid state-paths need to be considered. In other words, even with complete annotations, the training process is not just a simple counting process for pair-HMMs as many state paths can yield the same annotation of the input sequences. Due to these challenges, relatively large training sets would be required to train ANNOTAID, which would impose significant time and memory requirements. In order to alleviate these problems, three special features are used for parameter training in ANNOTAID: (i) Three linear memory parameter training algorithms are implemented, two of them are novel (see chapter 3 for details). (ii) The special emissions in HMMC0NvERTER can be used to integrate prior information about the annotation of the training sequences into the parameter training. (iii) Tubes can be used to restrict the search space along the two sequence dimensions to accelerate the parameter training. We describe each of these features in the following. 130 6.2. Main features of Annotaid Linear memory parameter training algorithms As discussed in chapter 3, HMM CONVERTER provides the linear memory Baum-Welch algorithm[35], a novel linear memory algorithm for training with sampled state paths and a new linear memory implementation for Viterbi training. Because ANNOTAID is built with HMMCONVERTER, users can select any of these training algorithms in the XML-input file. The three algorithms require only O(NL) memory to train one parameter for an HMM with N states and two input sequences of length L, which essentially removes the memory requirement problem. In addition, the user can specify the maximum amount of memory for parameter training, and HMMCONVERTER will then optimize the run time accordingly by training as many parameters as possible in parallel. Special emissions used for parameter training ANNOTAID integrates the information on annotations of the training sequences into the parameter training process using the spe cial emission feature in HMMC0NvERTER, and can even incorporate partial and incomplete annotations. This particular feature is very useful for adapting ANNOTAID to predict genes in low-sequence coverage genome. Banding used for parameter training The constraint of a large memory requirement is solved by using the linear memory training algorithms, but the time constraint still exists. In order to also solve this problem, a user can combine the banding feature in HMMC0NvERTER the training algorithm. A tube can either be derived from local TBLASTX or BLASTN [1] matches, see figure 6.2.4, or specified explicitly by the user. Please refer to chapter 4 for more details on how a tube can be specified. This can greatly accelerate the training efficiency while retaining the same performance. The parameterization of the transition and emission probabilities of ANNOTAID is the 131 6.2. Main features of Annotaid Y x Figure 6.3: Combining the parameter training with a tube This figure shows the projection of the three dimensional search space onto the X-Y plane. It shows the tube that has been derived from local TBLASTX or BLASTN matches between the two input sequences, in particular, this tube was derived from matches with gaps. The training algorithm will consider the space inside the tube, thereby greatly accelerating the training process. 132 6.3. Availability same as for DOUBLESCAN and PROJECTOR. With 53 states, it has only 19 free transition parameters and 7 free emission parameters (each free emission parameter corresponds to a set of emission probabilities). In ANNOTAID, only the free parameters are being trained, so the corresponding inverse formula have to be defined for each parameter. The default setting of ANNOTAID trains 18 free transition parameters (excluding the To_End parame-. ter) and 3 free emission parameters, the Match_Start_Codon, Match_5’_Splice_Site and Match_3’_Splice_Site parameters are not trained as they correspond to particular consen sus sequences. The Match_Exon parameter is also not trained as it reads 6 letters at a time corresponding to 4096 emission probabilities which cannot easily be reliably trained. In order to define the emission probabilities of the Match_Exon state, a user can specify a table of amino acid alignment frequencies as well as two tables of codon frequencies (one for each organism) from which these probabilities are then derived. Once these values have been set, its values can be further improved in training. The three emission parameters set to be trained by default are MatchJntergenic, Match.Jntron and MatchStopCodon, users can change the default setting by specifying which parameters to be trained in the free emission n parameter file. In summary, with the features discussed above, efficient parameter training can be per formed for ANNOTAID so that it can be adapted quickly to predict genes on new pairs of eukaryotic genomes. 6.3 Availability ANNOTAID is available under the Gnu Public License. The ANNOTAID software package includes the HMMC0NvERTER software, the XML file specifying ANNOTAID, and several parameter files. The software package can be downloaded readily free of charge from 133 6.4. Discussion and Future Work http : //www. cs ubc ca/irmtraud/HMMConverter/Annotaid. . TAID, . In order to use ANNO the user has to run HMMC0NvERTER with the ANNOTAID XML file. The execution of HMMCONVERTER is described in chapter 3. 6.4 Discussion and Future Work We have presented here ANNOTAID, a novel method for comparative gene prediction which significantly extends DOUBLESCAN [34] and PROJECTOR [36]. It has been built using the HMMCONVERTER framework. ANNOTAID takes a pair of homologous DNA sequences, per form the sequence alignment and gene prediction simultaneously on both input sequences. It can predict pairs of complete genes, partial genes and multiple genes on the input sequences. ANNOTAID integrates different kinds of prior information, together with their prior proba bilities into the prediction and parameter training using the concept of special emissions in HMMC0NvERTER. This feature is important for successful parameter training as it allows to integrate information on the known annotation of both input sequences in order to derive better parameter values. We can thus expect ANNOTAID to generate high-quality results even for low-sequence coverage genome data. This is especially relevant for annotating many genomes sequenced today. The HMMCONVERTER framework provides all the features and efficient algorithms such as combining Hirschberg algorithm [16] with a tube. The scores generated by STRATASPLICE for predicting potential splice sites are converted into prior probabilities and integrated into the prediction process using special emissions. A Pen script file is also included in the ANNO TAID package, which can be used to generate STRATASPLICE prediction for the input sequences and which converts the results into an ANNOTAID input file with the prior probabilities. With all the features discussed previously, ANNOTAID can be readily adapted to new pairs 134 6.4. Discussion and Future Work of eukaryotic genomes. At this stage, we have developed the model with all the required algo rithins and we have obtained an annotated training set for two recently sequenced pathogens. The pre-processing of the training set is now in progress, then an in-depth analysis of the with parameter training will follow, and the overall performances adaptation of ANNOTAID of will then be investigated. ANNOTAID 135 Bibliography [1] S.F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers, and D.J. Lipman. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215:403—410, 1990. [2] L.E. Baum. An equality and associated maximization technique in statistical estimation for probabilistic functions of Markov processes. Inequalities, 3:1—8, 1972. [3] D.A. Benson, I. Karsch-Mizrachi, D.J. Lipman, J. Ostell, and D.L. Wheeler. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research, 34:D16—D20, 2006. [4] A. Bird. CpG islands as gene markers in the vertebrate nucleus. I’rends in Genetics, 3:342—347, 1987. [5] E. Birney and R. Durbin. Dynamite: a flexible code generating language for dynamic programming methods used in sequence comparision. In In Fifth International Confer ence on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, pages 56—64, Menlo Park, 1997. IAAA Press. [6] E. Birney and R. Durbin. Using GeneWise in the Drosophila annotation experiment. Genome Research, 10(4):547—548, 2000. [7] B. Brejová, D.G. Brown, M. Li, and T. Vinai. ExonHunter: a comprehensive approach to gene finding. Bioinformatics, 21(Suppl 1):57—65, 2005. 136 Chapter 6. Bibliography [8] C. Burge and S. Karlin. Prediction of Complete Gene Structures in Human Genomic DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology, 268(1):78—94, 1997. [9] A. Churbanov and S. Winters-Hilt. Implementing EM and Viterbi algorithms for Hidden Markov Model in linear memory. BMC Bioinformatics, 9:224, 2008. [10] A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39:1—38, 1977. [11] R. Durbin, S.R. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. Mitchison. Biological sequence analysis: Prob abilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998. [12] S.R. Eddy. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics, 14(9):755—763, 1998. [13] J. Felsenstein. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal Molecular Evolution, 17:368—376, 1981. [14] S. Gelfand, A.A. Mironov, and P.A. Pevzner. Gene recognition via spliced sequence alignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 93:9061—9066, 1996. [15] B.J. Haas, S.L. Salzberg, W. Zhu, M. Pertea, J.E. Allen, J. Orvis, 0. White, C.R. Buell, and J.R. Wortman. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using Evidence Modeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biology, 9:R7, 2008. [16] D.S. Hirschberg. A linear space algorithm for computing maximal common subsequences. Communications of the ACM, 18:341—343, 1975. 137 Chapter 6. Bibliography [17] J. Hoh, S. jin, T. Parrado, J. Edington, A.J. Levine, and J. Ott. The p53MH algorithm and its application in detecting p53-responsive gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 99(13):8467—8472, 2002. [18] T. J. P. Hubbard, B. L. Aken, K. Beau, B. Ballesterl, M. Caccamo, Y. Chen, L. Clarke, G. Coates, F. Cunningham, T. Cutts, T. Down, S. C. Dyer, S. Fitzgerald, J. Fernandez Banet, S. Graf, S. Haider, M. Hammond, J. Herrero, R. Holland, K. Howe, K. Howe, N. Johnson, A. Kahari, D. Keefe, F. Kokocinski, E. Kulesha, D. Lawson, I. Longden, C. Melsopp, K. Megy, P. Meidi, B. Overduin, A. Parker, A. Prlic, S. Rice, D. Rios, M. Schuster, I. Sealy, J. Severin, G. Slater, D. Smedley, G. Spudich, S. Trevanion, A. Vilella, J. Vogel, S. White, M. Wood, T. Cox, V. Curwen, R. Durbin, X. M. Fernandez Suarez, P. Flicek, A. Kasprzyk, G. Proctor, S. Searle, J. Smith, A. Ureta-Vidal, and E. Birney. Ensembl 2007. Nucleic Acids Research, 35:D610—D617, 2007. [19] E. Allen J and S.L. Salzberg. Jigsaw: integration of multiple sources of evidence for gene prediction. Bioinformatics, 21(18) :3596—3603, 2005. [20] K. Karplus, C. Barrett, and R. Hughey. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics, 14(10):846—856, 1998. [21] W.J. Kent and A.M. Zahler. Conservation, Regulation, Synteny, and Introns in a Large scale C. Briggsae-C. elegans Genomic Alignment. Genome Research, 10(8):1115—1125, 2000. [22] J. Khatun, E. Hamlett, and M.C. Giddings. Incorporating sequence information into the scoring function:a hidden Markov model for improved peptide identification. Bioinfor matics, 24(5):674—681, 2008. 138 Chapter 6. Bibliography [23] K. Knapp and Y.P. Chen. SURVEY AND SUMMARY: An evaluation of contempo rary hidden Markov model genefinders with a predicted exon taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Research, 35(1):317—324, 2007. [24] B. Knudsen and M.M. Miyamoto. Sequence Alignments and Pair Hidden Markov Models Using Evolutionary History. Journal of Molecular Biology, 333(2):453—460, 2003. [25] I. Korf. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 5:59, 2004. [26] I. Korf, P. Flicek, D. Duan, and M.R. Brent. Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 17(Suppl 1):S140—S148, 2001. [27] A. Kundu, Y. He, and M.Y. Chen. Alternatives to Variable Duration HMM in Hand writing Recognition. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 20(11):1275—1280, 1998. [28] T. Lee, Y. Berquin, and A. Ellerton. TinyXml Documentation, 2006. http://www.grinninglizard.com/tinyxmldocs/index.html. [29] A. Levine. Bioinformatics approaches to RNA splicing. Master’s thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2001. [30] A. Lomsadze, V. Ter-Hovhannisyan, Y.O. Chernoff, and M. Borodovsky. Gene identifi cation in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(20) :6494—6506, 2005. [31] G. Lunter. HMMoC-a compiler for hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics, 23(18):2485— 2487, 2007. [32] B. Merialdo. Tagging English Text with a Probabilistic Model. Computational Linguis tics, 20(2):155—171, 1994. 139 Chapter 6. Bibliography [33] I.M. Meyer. Mathematical methods for comparative ab initio gene prediction. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2002. [34] I.M. Meyer and R. Durbin. Comparative ab initio prediction of gene structures using pair HMMs. Bioinformatics, 18(10):1309—1318, 2002. [35] I. Miklós and I.M. Meyer. A linear memory algorithm for Baum-Welch training. BMC Bioinformatics, 6:231, 2005. [36] I. M.Meyer and R. Durbin. Gene structure conservation aids similarity based gene pre diction. Nucleic Acids Research, 32(2):776—783, 2004. [37] N.J. Mulder, R. Apweiler, T.K. Attwood, A. Bairoch, A. Bateman, D. Binns, P. Bork, V. Buillard, L. Cerutti, R. Copley, E. Courcelle, U. Das, L. Daugherty, M. Dibley, R. Finn, W. Fleischmann, J. Gough, D. Haft, N. Hub, S. Hunter, D. Kahn, A. Kanapin, A. Kejariwal, A. Labarga, P.S. Langendijk-Genevaux, D. Lonsdale, R. Lopez, I. Letunic, M. Madera, J. Maslen C. McAnulla, J. McDowall, J. Mistry, A. Mitchell, A.D. Nikol skaya, S. Orchard, C. Orengo, R. Petryszak, J.D. Selengut, C.J.A. Sigrist, P.D. Thomas, F. Valentin, D. Wilson anf C.H. Wu, and C. Yeats. New developments in the InterPro database. Nucleic Acids Research, 35:224—228, 2007. [38] The EMBL Outstation, Protein Information Resource, and Swiss Institute of Bioinfor matics. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Research, 36:D 190— D195, 2008. [39] L. Pachter, M. Alexandersson, and S. Cawley. Applications of Generalized Pair Hidden Markov Models to Alignment and Gene Finding Problems. Journal of Computational Biology, 9(2):389—399, 2002. 140 Chapter 6. Bibliography [40] J.S. Pedersen and J. Hem. Gene finding with a hidden Markov model of genome structure and evolution. Bioinformatics, 19(2) :219—227, 2003. [41] Y. Qi, J. Klein-Seetharaman, and Z. Bar-Joseph. A mixture of feature experts approach for protein-protein interaction prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(Suppl 10):S6, 2007. [42] L.R. Rabiner. A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2):257—286, 1989. [43] F. Schutz and M. Delorenzi. MAMOT: hidden Markov modeling tool. Bioinformatics, 24(11):1399—1400, 2008. [44] M. Stanke, 0. Schoffmann, B. Morgenstern, and S. Waack. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinformatics, 7:62, 2006. [45] M. Tamura, T. Masuko, K. Tokuda, and T. Kobayashi. Adaptation of pitch and spectrum for HMM-based speech synthesis using MLLR. In 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing, volume 2, pages 805—808. IEEE Press, 2001. [46] V. Ter-Hovhannisyan, A. Lomsadze, Y.0. Chernoff, and M. Borodovsky. Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training. Genome Research, in press, 2008. [47] A. Viterbi. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optinmum de coding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, pages 260—269, 1967. [48] R.F. Yeh, L.P. Lin, and C.B. Burge. Computational Inference of Homologous Gene Structures in the Human Genome. Genome Reseach, 11(5):803—816, 2001. 141
- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- HMM converter a tool box for hidden Markov models...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Featured Collection
UBC Theses and Dissertations
HMM converter a tool box for hidden Markov models with two novel, memory efficient parameter training… Lam, Tin Yin 2008
pdf
Page Metadata
Item Metadata
Title | HMM converter a tool box for hidden Markov models with two novel, memory efficient parameter training algorithms |
Creator |
Lam, Tin Yin |
Publisher | University of British Columbia |
Date Issued | 2008 |
Description | Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are powerful statistical tools for biological sequence analysis. Many recently developed Bioinformatics applications employ variants of HMMs to analyze diverse types of biological data. It is typically fairly easy to design the states and the topological structure of an HMM. However, it can be difficult to estimate parameter values which yield a good prediction performance. As many HMM-based applications employ similar algorithms for generating predictions, it is also time-consuming and error-prone to have to re-implement these algorithms whenever a new HMM-based application is to be designed. This thesis addresses these challenges by introducing a tool-box, called HMMC0NvERTER, which only requires an XML-input file to define an HMM and to use it for sequence decoding and parameter training. The package not only allows for rapid proto-typing of HMM-based applications, but also incorporates several algorithms for sequence decoding and parameter training, including two new, linear memory algorithms for parameter training. Using this software package, even users without programming knowledge can quickly set up sophisticated HMMs and pair-HMMs and use them with efficient algorithms for parameter training and sequence analyses. We use HMMCONVERTER to construct a new comparative gene prediction program, called ANNOTAID, which can predict pairs of orthologous genes by integrating prior information about each input sequence probabilistically into the gene prediction process and into parameter training. ANNOTAID can thus be readily adapted to predict orthologous gene pairs in newly sequenced genomes. |
Extent | 2755022 bytes |
Genre |
Thesis/Dissertation |
Type |
Text |
FileFormat | application/pdf |
Language | eng |
Date Available | 2009-03-09 |
Provider | Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library |
Rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
IsShownAt | 10.14288/1.0051281 |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5786 |
Degree |
Master of Science - MSc |
Program |
Computer Science |
Affiliation |
Science, Faculty of Computer Science, Department of |
Degree Grantor | University of British Columbia |
GraduationDate | 2009-05 |
Campus |
UBCV |
Scholarly Level | Graduate |
Rights URI | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
AggregatedSourceRepository | DSpace |
Download
- Media
- 24-ubc_2009_spring_lam_tin_yin.pdf [ 2.63MB ]
- Metadata
- JSON: 24-1.0051281.json
- JSON-LD: 24-1.0051281-ld.json
- RDF/XML (Pretty): 24-1.0051281-rdf.xml
- RDF/JSON: 24-1.0051281-rdf.json
- Turtle: 24-1.0051281-turtle.txt
- N-Triples: 24-1.0051281-rdf-ntriples.txt
- Original Record: 24-1.0051281-source.json
- Full Text
- 24-1.0051281-fulltext.txt
- Citation
- 24-1.0051281.ris
Full Text
Cite
Citation Scheme:
Usage Statistics
Share
Embed
Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML
of your page to embed this item in your website.
<div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
<script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
src="{[{embed.src}]}"
data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
async >
</script>
</div>
Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard.
To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.24.1-0051281/manifest