Open Collections

UBC Library and Archives

Using Wikipedia in the Classroom: an OA medium for research and student work Beasley-Murray, Jon 2008-11-03

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Notice for Google Chrome users:
If you are having trouble viewing or searching the PDF with Google Chrome, please download it here instead.

Item Metadata


67246-OA Day Presentation - Jon Beasley-Murray.pdf [ 287.69kB ]
67246-OA Day Presentation - Jon Beasley-Murray.mp3 [ 43.82MB ]
JSON: 67246-1.0077816.json
JSON-LD: 67246-1.0077816-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 67246-1.0077816-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 67246-1.0077816-rdf.json
Turtle: 67246-1.0077816-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 67246-1.0077816-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 67246-1.0077816-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

Wikipedia: The World’s largest and most successful open-access knowledge project New enclosures • costly – Rutgers: $300,000 per year? • closed • busy work blogs • updated response papers • mimicked by EduTech • a possible opening to the new public sphere Wikipedia • One of the top-ten Internet sites (No. 7) • 10% of global Internet users • 684 million visits per year • 2,582,065 articles • Web 2.0 classic Wikipedia and Education • Should students quote the site? – is it reliable? • Should professors contribute to it? – is it scholarly? “As educators, we are in the business of reducing the dissemination of misinformation [. . .] Even though Wikipedia may have some value [. . .] it is not itself an appropriate source for citation.” (Qtd. Scott Jaschik, “A Stand Against Wikipedia.”, Jan 26, 2007) “Teachers have little more to fear from students’ starting with Wikipedia than from their starting with most other basic reference sources. They have a lot to fear if students stop there.” (Roy Rosenzweig, “Can History be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past.” The Journal of American History, June, 2006) “I propose that all academics with research specialties, no matter how arcane [. . .] enroll as identifiable editors of Wikipedia.” (Mark A. Wilson, “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia.”, April 1, 2008) “Absurdity upon absurdity. Self appointed pundits who have no scientific competence whatsoever casting aspersions upon precise and pertinent remarks by experts in the field.” (Dr. John Harnard, qtd. on, April, 2008) Wikipedia and Education • Students do “stop” with Wikipedia – a problem that does not lie with Wikipedia, but with educators • Wikipedia is “semi-scholarly” – like any encyclopedia, it is a short-cut that relies on scholarship but does not contribute to it Wikipedia and Education • We have to deal with Wikipedia, like it or not • Wikipedia has to deal with us, whether it likes it or not • Rather than mutual disdain: positive engagement “The more universities engage with Wikipedia, and the more they realize that they can do so without necessarily dropping the high standards of research and academic rigour that it is also their duty to safeguard, the more they benefit not only their own students, but also the public good.” (Jon Beasley-Murray) Traditional technologies • students are losing basic research skills • but these are enhanced, not degraded by Wikipedia • at the same time that universities become neoliberal enterprises • open access offers a revitalization of knowledge production Conclusions • Wikipedia offers a challenge and an opportunity to educators • It is educational technology: just not as we know it • Educators should be leaders, not opponents


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items