Open Collections

UBC Library and Archives

Across Canada, across disciplines : Research data management practices and needs in the social sciences… Trimble, Leanne; Dearborn, Dylanne; Zaraiskaya, Tatiana; Burpee, Jane; Barsky, Eugene; Sahadath, Catie; Cheung, Melissa; Mitchell, Marjorie; Gertler, Matthew May 31, 2017

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata

Download

Media
494-Trimble_L_et_al_Across_Canada_humanities_2017.pdf [ 3.41MB ]
Metadata
JSON: 494-1.0348075.json
JSON-LD: 494-1.0348075-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 494-1.0348075-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 494-1.0348075-rdf.json
Turtle: 494-1.0348075-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 494-1.0348075-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 494-1.0348075-source.json
Full Text
494-1.0348075-fulltext.txt
Citation
494-1.0348075.ris

Full Text

Across Canada, across disciplines: Research data management practices and needs in the social sciences and humanitiesLeanne Trimble1, Dylanne Dearborn1,  Tatiana Zaraiskaya 2, Jane Burpee3, Eugene Barsky4 , Catie Sahadath5,  Melissa Cheung5,   Marjorie Mitchell4 , Matthew Gertler1    1University of Toronto,  2Queen's University, 3McGill University, 4University of British Columbia, 5University of OttawaIASSIST 2017ContextWho is involved?Methods - data collection and analysis  "Clipboard" icon by Annette Spithoven from Noun ProjectDemographicsRespondents by institutionn=437Breakdown by discipline n=437Respondents by rank n=437Working with Research DataStorage volume, by number of research projectsTypes of research data generatedStorage media usedDocumentation & description of datan=413 n=412Is there sufficient documentation and description (e.g., variable and field definitions, codebooks, data dictionaries, metadata, scripts to run) for another person outside your research team to: How long data is kept?Sharing Research DataCurrent sharing methods vs Future sharing methodsSharing restrictions● “Privacy or ethics restrictions” (37.8%) was the most identified restriction○ Highest in Education (82.4%) and the Social Sciences (SS) (45.1%)● “Needing to apply for a patent” was only selected by one researcher (SS)● Low number of responses identifying “commercial concerns”○ Only Business/Management (15.4%) and Law (6.7%) had higher response rates● Low across board for “public safety/sensitive data” (all <=6%)Perceived benefits & Reasons for not sharingFunding Mandates & RDM ServicesDrafting a data management plann=396Level of interest in services from libraries Digital Humanities/Digital ScholarshipDIGITAL HUMANITIES OR DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP (DS), can be defined as the collection and use of digital research data (either through digitization of print resources, or using born-digital resources) combined with methodologies from traditional Humanities and Social Science scholarship.Do you feel your research falls under this definition?Yes: 41% (n=176)No: 39% (n=165) Not Sure: 20% (n=85)Nature of Digital Scholars’ DataData topics taught in digital scholarshipSummary: Key findings● Data being produced: ○ Most commonly text; small storage sizes (i.e. requirements are not complex)● Knowledge gaps:○ Data storage: range of non-optimal storage options in use○ Over half were not confident about the quality of their documentation● Sharing:○ Plan to share more in the future than they do now○ Privacy/ethics most common reason for not sharing○ Strong awareness of the benefits of sharing● Interest in support from libraries:○ 87% would like/need some support in drafting DMPs○ Large proportion of respondents expressed interest in services from the library in general● Some variance in disciplinary responses - useful for targeting servicesLessons learned● Conducting a survey with both local and consortial goals can be a challenge○ Survey design must consider local and group needs○ Group data management planning○ Wrangling data from different institutions○ Communication with partners is key● Portage clearinghouse aims to improve this process for additional institutions joining the projectHumanities & Social SciencesEngineering & ScienceHealth & Medical SciencesFuture steps...Survey templates, data and reports will be made available on the Portage website How the data can be used● Informing institutional decisions, e.g. shaping services● Informing national initiatives, e.g Portage, funding agenciesData, templates and reports available: https://goo.gl/VD5hTYHosted by Portage, https://portagenetwork.ca/Acknowledgements - data contributors● Queen’s University○ Alexandra Cooper● University of British Columbia○ Sheryl Adam, Megan Meredith-Lobay● University of Ottawa○ Jessica McEwan, Patrick Labelle● University of Toronto○ Leslie Barnes, Nadia Muhe● University of Waterloo○ Kathy Szigeti, Sandra KeysQuestions?

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
https://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.494.1-0348075/manifest

Comment

Related Items