UBC Library and Archives

Mendeley 2012

You don't seem to have a PDF reader installed, try download the pdf

Item Metadata


Barsky_Eugene_Mendeley_Review.pdf [ 120.9kB ]
JSON: 1.0077926.json
JSON-LD: 1.0077926+ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 1.0077926.xml
RDF/JSON: 1.0077926+rdf.json
Turtle: 1.0077926+rdf-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 1.0077926+rdf-ntriples.txt

Full Text

Mendeley  London, EC1R 5DF, United Kingdom, http://www.mendeley.com. Price: free basic service, premium packages available. Reviewed by Eugene Barsky, Science and Engineering Librarian, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia eugene.barsky@ubc.ca Imagine the all-familiar scenario. A graduate student comes to you and says that she has a load of articles in PDF format forwarded by her supervisor and lab-coworkers. She asks whether she can use RefWorks or EndNote to bunch-load these articles. If your institution subscribes to RefWorks or EndNote, your answer is usually: “No, I am sorry, you have to re-find each of these citations and upload them to the bibliographic software.” Well, not anymore. Meet Mendeley, a new web service that allows academics to organize their research free-of-charge online (for now, at least) and store documents in PDF format.  With a name sounding like the great Russian chemist - Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev who is credited as being the creator of the first version of the periodic table of elements (Gordin 2004) or maybe Mendele Mocher Sforim (Mendele the book peddler,), one of my favorite authors and one of the founders of modern Yiddish and Hebrew literature (Steinberg 1977), Mendeley can extract metadata, full-text and cited references from the actual papers in PDF format, so it is an ultimate answer for a student with a pack of electronic PDF articles handed to her by her supervisor.  Mendeley was born in 2008, with an idea of helping researchers organize their work locally on a freely-downloaded client that is easy to use (Mendeley 2010). Mendeley also intends to facilitate social networking, collaboration and sharing information within research networks (Giustini 2010; Reiswig 2010). The information can be synchronized with your account on Mendeley website, allowing access to your library from anywhere.  Documents that you choose to download could be tagged, and organized into collections; PDFs can be annotated in a very easy way, easier than any other citation products I am familiar with. Mendeley can also monitor a given folder on your computer and automatically import any new PDFs saved in that location. Plug-ins for MS Word and OpenOffice allow users to insert and format in a variety of citation styles. A plug in for Open Office is a unique feature, and is still a bit buggy as I couldn’t get it to work with my netbook. Collections can be shared in two ways: 1) Free shared collections can include citations as well as PDFs and can be shared with up to ten individuals (copyright issues alert!); 2) Public collections are reading lists and do not contain full-text files, resembling RefWorks shared folders. Documentation for the software is very good and includes a “getting started guide”, a frequently asked questions (FAQ) section, and a support forum where new features are proposed and discussed (Reiswig 2010).  Since most of us are familiar with the way bibliographic software functions, rather that describing how Mendeley works, I summarize the major differences between Mendeley, RefWorks, Zotero and EndNote in the table below:  Name RefWorks Mendeley Zotero EndNote * Who is behind it RefWorks is a business unit of ProQuest - http://www.proque st.com/ Private company - http://www.mende ley.com/ Center for History and New Media of George Mason University - http://www.zotero. org/ Thomson Reuters - http://www.endnot eweb.com/ Cost Negotiated with ProQuest, more than $20,000 for a large university Free for basic version. Free – with Firefox plug-in $249.95 for a private copy Word processing integration Write-n-Cite for MS Word MS Word and Open Office MS Word and Open Office MS Word Metadata extraction No Yes No No Citing from the Web Yes, with a plug-in – RefGrab-It Yes, with a plug-in - Web Importer Yes No Sharing Yes, no full text Yes, some full text No No Storage 3GB 500MB for basic account 100MB Storage on your computer Duplicates elimination Yes Yes No Yes Direct export from databases Yes, for most Yes, for most Yes, for most Yes Interoperability with other citation tools Yes Yes Yes Yes Ease of use Average Easy Easy Average  * Only the full stand alone version of EndNote was reviewed. The author is aware of the scaled-down version of EndNote Web.  In my personal opinion, Mendeley enters a very crowded marketplace of bibliographic citation tools, with new tools emerging constantly - 2Collab.com, ScrapBook, Cite-U-Like, WizFolio, Connotea and a few more.  Today, the major advantages of Mendeley are the ability to extract metadata from PDF files and integrate itself into OpenOffice software, something that other bibliographic tools haven’t achieved yet. The major disadvantage is that it is a private company and it may disappear from the marketplace tomorrow.  References: Giustini, D. 2010. Mendeley - Manage, Share & Discover Research - HLWIKI Canada. Available: http://hlwiki.slais.ubc.ca/index.php/Mendeley_-_Manage,_Share_%26_Discover_Research Accessed: July 28, 2010. Gordin, M.D. 2004. A well-ordered thing : Dmitrii Mendeleev and the shadow of the periodic table. New York: Basic Books. Mendeley. 2010. About us | Mendeley. Available: http://www.mendeley.com/about-us/ Accessed: July 22, 2010. Reiswig, J. 2010. Mendeley. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 98(2):193-194. Steinberg, T.L. 1977. Mendele Mocher Seforim. Boston: Twayne Publishers. 


Citation Scheme:


Usage Statistics

Country Views Downloads
United States 3 0
China 2 10
City Views Downloads
Unknown 2 0
Beijing 2 0
Sunnyvale 1 0

{[{ mDataHeader[type] }]} {[{ month[type] }]} {[{ tData[type] }]}


Share to:


Related Items