UBC Community, Partners, and Alumni Publications

Articles of faith : Religion, Secularism, and the Indian Supreme Court : [book review] Sharma, Arvind Sep 1, 2013

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata


52387-86231.pdf [ 59.38kB ]
JSON: 52387-1.0045161.json
JSON-LD: 52387-1.0045161-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 52387-1.0045161-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 52387-1.0045161-rdf.json
Turtle: 52387-1.0045161-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 52387-1.0045161-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 52387-1.0045161-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

423Book Reviewsconfusing vein, the reader is left wondering how her final recommendations will address the very vulnerabilities and lack of choices that make girls and women prey to traffickers that she describes as the main cause of trafficking in the book.APNE AAP Women Worldwide, New Delhi, India Ruchira GuptaARTICLES OF FAITH: Religion, Secularism and the Indian Supreme Court. Law in India Series. By Ronojoy Sen. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2012. xli, 237 pp. Rs350.00, paper. ISBN 0-19-808535-4. This is an illuminating book on a difficult subject, which highlights the glowing points of intersection of religion and law through the judgments of the Supreme Court of India, and in doing so throws light on several issues associated with nationalism, secularism, multiculturalism and Hinduism.It explores in particular the Supreme Court?s attempts to (1) define Hinduism; (2) sift what is ?essential to Hinduism? from what is not; (3) regulate use of religion, specially Hindutva, in electioneering; (4) adjudicate the relationship of religion and educational institutions; (5) address issues of conversion; and (6) clarify minority rights. Don?t let this skeleton sketch of the template mislead you; each theme is examined in granular detail with an abundance of facts and concepts. Nor is it a book merely for specialists, for at stake is the role of religion in modern India from one point of view, or the nature of Indian secularism from another. The selection of the judgments of the Supreme Court to shed light on these issues is justified by the fact that, unlike the debates in intellectual and political circles on these issues which might be termed descriptive, the rulings of the Supreme Court are prescriptive in nature and therefore shape the very nature of what concepts like secularism, religious reform and religious freedom actually come to mean. The author is therefore to be complimented for producing such a good book on such contested issues from which the student, the scholar, and the interested citizen may equally benefit. The topics it discusses are however so contested that almost any reader will have some suggestions about what could have been additionally included in the discussion or carried to a more convincing conclusion. The author discusses how far-reaching the intervention of the court has been in the management of Hindu religious institutions (48, 194, 200). But the author doesn?t highlight its danger. If the government will manage Hindu temples on such a scale, then could not the Hindu community turn around and claim that the state should become a Hindu state, if it is going to do so, especially when the Court is apparently not intervening to the same extent in running the institutions of other religions. Now we can see why Donald Eugene Smith identified this feature of Indian secularism as potentially the most dangerous for it (see India as a Secular State, 1963, 497). Pacific Affairs: Volume 86, No. 2 ? June 2013424It seems to this reviewer that some of the problems regarding issues pertaining to defining Hinduism and to conversion stem from the Western background of these words and could be clarified if this was pointed out. The word religion has the connotation of exclusive identity in European languages, but the word has been applied blindly to the religions of Indian origin, which are more open to multiple religious identities. The Court is groping to find a way out of this bind by defining Hinduism as a way of life. If we realize that when a Hindu converts to Christianity he converts not just to another religion but to another concept of religion as well, then we may have a better appreciation of the Court?s predicament. What is true of religion is also true of conversion. The right to convert can mean two things: (1) my right to change my religion and (2) someone else?s right to ask me to change my religion. The courts are trying to uphold it in the first sense rather than in the second, but these two senses have not been distinguished in Western discourse because, as a missionary religion, Christianity has no need to. Hence the sense of confusion. Once conceptual clarity is reached on such points the Court?s efforts, while still clumsy, may appear less misguided.McGill University, Montreal, Canada  Arvind Sharma ECONOMY, CULTURE AND HUMAN RIGHTS: Turbulence in Punjab, India and Beyond. By Pritam Singh. Gurgaon: Three Essays Collective, 2010. xix, 249 pp. US$25.00, paper. ISBN 978-81-88789-69-6.The significance of the book under review lies in the fact that it aims at addressing two of the most relevant questions that often crop up while thinking about human rights in theory and in practice: Why do people get moved to protest against some violations of human rights and not others? How can the culture of human rights be made inclusive? The questions acquire significance given the widely held assumption about human rights being universal and intrinsic to human beings in their nature and application.Reading the book offers useful insights into these and other related questions. Singh underlines the dialectical link between the economic interests of nation states, the level of political culture in a country and the protection of human rights. His argument is that for achieving their political objectives and economic interests, states/political regimes (as well as social groups/organizations) tend to use human rights selectively as an instrument to promote their interests, and even do not hesitate in violating them if it serves their purpose. However, the author argues that the same state regimes /organizations would be constrained to observe the tenets of human rights if the ?ideas, movements and organizations defending the human rights acquire importance in ? society?s moral ethos? (1).The author comes around as a strong votary of ?the intrinsic worth approach? (as opposed to the ?instrumentalist approach?) to human rights, 


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items