- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- Crime and Punishment at 150 (2016) /
- Finding a Homeland : Omirbaev’s Student
Open Collections
Crime and Punishment at 150 (2016)
Finding a Homeland : Omirbaev’s Student Burry, Alexander
Description
In this paper, I discuss Kazakh director Darezhan Omirbaev’s interpretation of Crime and Punishment in his 2012 film Student. In setting Dostoevsky’s plot in present-day Kazakhstan, Omirbaev emphasizes his hero’s observations of a corrupt and barren nation. The film transforms Dostoevsky’s vision of the infection of Russian society by Western radicalism through a reversal of ideological poles. If Raskolnikov’s crime is motivated by the left-wing nihilism and rational egoism embodied by the “new men” of Nikolai Chernyshevsky’s What is To Be Done?, then Omirbaev’s unnamed student confronts a post-Soviet Kazakh society whose native identity has been engulfed by an equally pernicious right-wing, authoritarian, oligarchic, capitalist ideology. The eponymous student and the director each seek Eastern, native Kazakh values in opposition to the influx of both Russian and American ideas. I focus on Omirbaev’s emphasis on non-verbal language throughout the film, reflecting Dostoevsky’s own foregrounding of gestures and gazes at various key points. I also examine Dostoevsky’s and Omirbaev’s common focus on an Eastern alternative to encroaching Western values in their respective versions of Crime and Punishment.
Item Metadata
Title |
Finding a Homeland : Omirbaev’s Student
|
Creator | |
Contributor | |
Date Issued |
2016-10-22
|
Description |
In this paper, I discuss Kazakh director Darezhan Omirbaev’s interpretation of Crime and Punishment in his 2012 film Student. In setting Dostoevsky’s plot in present-day Kazakhstan, Omirbaev emphasizes his hero’s observations of a corrupt and barren nation. The film transforms Dostoevsky’s vision of the infection of Russian society by Western radicalism through a reversal of ideological poles. If Raskolnikov’s crime is motivated by the left-wing nihilism and rational egoism embodied by the “new men” of Nikolai Chernyshevsky’s What is To Be Done?, then Omirbaev’s unnamed student confronts a post-Soviet Kazakh society whose native identity has been engulfed by an equally pernicious right-wing, authoritarian, oligarchic, capitalist ideology. The eponymous student and the director each seek Eastern, native Kazakh values in opposition to the influx of both Russian and American ideas. I focus on Omirbaev’s emphasis on non-verbal language throughout the film, reflecting Dostoevsky’s own foregrounding of gestures and gazes at various key points. I also examine Dostoevsky’s and Omirbaev’s common focus on an Eastern alternative to encroaching Western values in their respective versions of Crime and Punishment.
|
Subject | |
Geographic Location | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2021-05-05
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0397241
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Peer Review Status |
Unreviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International