- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Lectures, Seminars, and Symposia /
- The Times in Which We Live : Freud’s The Uncanny, World...
Open Collections
UBC Lectures, Seminars, and Symposia
The Times in Which We Live : Freud’s The Uncanny, World War One, and Trauma of Contagion Zilcosky, John
Description
The effect of World War One on Freud is well known, yet its relation to The Uncanny (1919) remains mysterious. Although scholars have mentioned the war’s atmospheric effect, I ask: What if the connection to The Uncanny is more essential, as exemplified by the essay’s implicit references to the war—including a 1917 story about trauma in colonial New Guinea and Napoleonic war shock resonating through Hoffmann’s “The Sandman”? The fact that Freud does not connect these traumas directly to “uncanniness” speaks to the problem they pose—to him and to psychoanalytic theory. This silence creates an uncanny effect within the essay itself: The Uncanny stages the same “return of the repressed” that it diagnoses. I aim to delineate this staging and, later, propose its conceptual relevance. The shadow of the war forces us to understand the uncanny differently: not just as a personal trauma but as a social symptom of the repression of this suffering. The real horror of the uncanny, Freud’s essay teaches us, is not our own but the other’s trauma—as embodied in wartime Europe by the “war neurotic” and his contagious afflictions. An article-length version of this research has been published in the journal Psychoanalysis and History, vol 20, issue 2, pp. 165-190, https://doi.org/10.3366/pah.2018.0257.
Item Metadata
Title |
The Times in Which We Live : Freud’s The Uncanny, World War One, and Trauma of Contagion
|
Creator | |
Contributor | |
Date Issued |
2017-11-30
|
Description |
The effect of World War One on Freud is well known, yet its relation to The Uncanny (1919) remains mysterious. Although scholars have mentioned the war’s atmospheric effect, I ask: What if the connection to The Uncanny is more essential, as exemplified by the essay’s implicit references to the war—including a 1917 story about trauma in colonial New Guinea and Napoleonic war shock resonating through Hoffmann’s “The Sandman”? The fact that Freud does not connect these traumas directly to “uncanniness” speaks to the problem they pose—to him and to psychoanalytic theory. This silence creates an uncanny effect within the essay itself: The Uncanny stages the same “return of the repressed” that it diagnoses. I aim to delineate this staging and, later, propose its conceptual relevance. The shadow of the war forces us to understand the uncanny differently: not just as a personal trauma but as a social symptom of the repression of this suffering. The real horror of the uncanny, Freud’s essay teaches us, is not our own but the other’s trauma—as embodied in wartime Europe by the “war neurotic” and his contagious afflictions. An article-length version of this research has been published in the journal Psychoanalysis and History, vol 20, issue 2, pp. 165-190, https://doi.org/10.3366/pah.2018.0257.
|
Subject | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Series | |
Date Available |
2018-08-02
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0369273
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Peer Review Status |
Unreviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International