- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- Rofecoxib (Vioxx®) withdrawal generates uncertainty...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
Rofecoxib (Vioxx®) withdrawal generates uncertainty about “COX-2s” : Do product monographs adequately inform? Therapeutics Initiative (University of British Columbia)
Description
Therapeutics Letter 53 considers whether the Product Monographs for rofecoxib and the other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs marketed as COX-2 selective NSAID’s adequately inform clinicians about the benefits and harms of these drugs. Conclusions: Product monographs sometimes provide data about drug harms including serious adverse events that is not published elsewhere; represent a challenge in finding, extracting and interpreting the relevant information; do not adequately inform clinicians. Celecoxib, meloxicam and valdecoxib 2004 monographs do not claim to improve arthritis symptoms better than non-selective NSAIDs; do not warn against prescribing to patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease; do not claim to reduce complicated ulcers as compared with non-selective NSAIDs; provide insufficient information as to whether or not these drugs increase myocardial infarction or total cardiovascular thrombotic events.
Item Metadata
Title |
Rofecoxib (Vioxx®) withdrawal generates uncertainty about “COX-2s” : Do product monographs adequately inform?
|
Alternate Title |
Therapeutics Letter 53
|
Creator | |
Date Issued |
2004-10
|
Description |
Therapeutics Letter 53 considers whether the Product Monographs for rofecoxib and the other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs marketed as COX-2 selective NSAID’s adequately inform clinicians about the benefits and harms of these drugs. Conclusions: Product monographs sometimes provide data about drug harms including serious adverse events that is not published elsewhere; represent a challenge in finding, extracting and interpreting the relevant information; do not adequately inform clinicians. Celecoxib, meloxicam and valdecoxib 2004 monographs do not claim to improve arthritis symptoms better than non-selective NSAIDs; do not warn against prescribing to patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease; do not claim to reduce complicated ulcers as compared with non-selective NSAIDs; provide insufficient information as to whether or not these drugs increase myocardial infarction or total cardiovascular thrombotic events.
|
Subject | |
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Notes |
The UBC TI is funded by the BC Ministry of Health to provide evidence-based information about drug therapy. We neither formulate nor adjudicate provincial drug policies.
|
Date Available |
2023-06-20
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0433632
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Peer Review Status |
Reviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty; Researcher
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International