UBC Faculty Research and Publications

Knowledge brokering : An innovative model for supporting evidence-informed practice in respiratory care Camp, Patricia G.; Hoens, Alison; Reid, Wendy Darlene 2013

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata

Download

Media
52383-Hoens_A_el_al_Knowledge_brokering.pdf [ 497.1kB ]
Metadata
JSON: 52383-1.0368692.json
JSON-LD: 52383-1.0368692-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 52383-1.0368692-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 52383-1.0368692-rdf.json
Turtle: 52383-1.0368692-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 52383-1.0368692-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 52383-1.0368692-source.json
Full Text
52383-1.0368692-fulltext.txt
Citation
52383-1.0368692.ris

Full Text

Can Respir J Vol 20 No 4 July/August 2013 271Knowledge brokering:  An innovative model for supporting  evidence-informed practice in respiratory careAlison M Hoens BSc(PT) MSc1,2, W Darlene Reid BMR(PT) PhD1,3,4, Pat G Camp BSc(PT) PhD1,2,4,51 Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia; 2Providence Health Care; 3Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; 4Institute for Heart and Lung Health; 5James Hogg Research Centre, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British ColumbiaCorrespondence: Dr Pat G Camp, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6.  Telephone 604-806-9144, e-mail pat.camp@hli.ubc.caThe gap between evidence and practice is real. Indeed, it is esti-mated that it takes an average of 17 years for only 14% of research findings to be adopted into clinical practice (1). The process of changing practice to include adoption of the research findings – vari-ably known as knowledge mobilization, knowledge exchange, know-ledge transfer or, more commonly, ‘knowledge translation’ (KT) – is a challenge regardless of area of practice. The field of study focused on the science of KT – implementation science – has identified a number of barriers that contribute to the challenges. These barriers exist at multiple levels: the individual clin-ician (eg, knowledge/experience, skills in accessing/appraising litera-ture, attitude toward change); the organization (eg, provision of resources, training, protected time, authority to implement change, financial incentives); the regulators (eg, mandates from regulatory agencies); the health care research funders (eg, funding, provision of support services); and the patient (eg, preferences, behaviour) (2,3). Many strategies to address the barriers have been trialed including the use of didactic sessions, academic detailing, educational resources, clinical pathways, audit and feedback, reminders, local opinion lead-ers, decision aids and computer decision support. A number of system-atic reviews and meta-analyses investigating the relative effectiveness of the strategies have revealed that these interventions typically result in approximately a 10% change in practice. It is increasingly evident that there is no single ‘magic bullet’ to dramatically impact uptake of evidence into practice and that there is greater likelihood of success using multiple interventions targeted at context-specific barriers (3,4). Another method to facilitate practice change that is gaining momentum in health care has been the creation of ‘knowledge broker’ (KB) positions. The KB’s role is to ‘bridge the gap’ between evidence and practice (5-6), functioning as a ‘change agent’, catalyst and pro-ject leader to link research producers and knowledge users. In a recent review of the literature on KBs, Conklin et al (5) identified seven types of activities that are typically undertaken by KBs and emphasized the ‘boundary spanning’ component of the role to link researchers, practitioners and decision makers by “fostering relationships and cre-ating operational groups capable of producing tangible results”. The KB’s ability to promote mutual understanding of the unique environ-ments and cultures of each stakeholder group is crucial to fostering understanding across groups, commitment to the objective(s) of the project and, ultimately, adoption of the desired change. A key com-ponent of success is the ability to adapt the knowledge to the local context. Ward et al (6) identified the five key elements to the process undertaken by KBs: identify and communicate the problem; analyze the context; develop and select the knowledge to be transferred; select the appropriate KT interventions; and consider how the knowledge will be used in practice. The steps outlined by Ward et al (6) provide evidence-based direction for teams seeking guidance for their own knowledge translation activities.PHYSICAL THERAPY KB IN BRITISH COLumBIAIn 2009, the University of British Columbia Department of Physical Therapy, the British Columbia (BC) Rehabilitation Science Research Network (BCRSRNet), and the Physiotherapy Association of BC jointly funded a KB position. The main purpose of the KB position was to seek, build and support knowledge linkage and exchange opportun-ities among physical therapy clinicians and researchers. Currently in its fourth year of funding (with the Providence Health Care Institute commentAry©2013 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reservedAm Hoens, WD Reid, PG Camp. Knowledge brokering: An innovative model for supporting evidence-informed practice in respiratory care. Can Respir J 2013;20(4):271-274.The process of adopting research findings in the clinical setting is challeng-ing, regardless of the area of practice. One strategy to facilitate this process is the use of knowledge brokering. Knowledge brokers (KBs) are individu-als who work to bridge the gap between researchers and knowledge users. In the health care setting, KBs work closely with clinicians to facilitate enhanced uptake of research findings into clinical practice. They also work with researchers to ensure research findings are translatable and meaning-ful to clinical practice. The present article discusses a KB’s role in a respira-tory care setting. Working closely with both researchers and clinicians, the KB has led teams in the process of  conceptualizing, developing, testing, disseminating and evaluating several projects related to respiratory care, including projects related to mobility in critical care settings and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; inspiratory muscle training; and the use of incentive spirometry in postsurgical populations. The KB role has provided an important communication link between researcher and knowledge user that has facilitated evidence-informed prac-tice to improve patient care.Key Words: Knowledge broker; Knowledge translation; Respiratory careLe courtage du savoir : un modèle novateur pour soutenir la pratique fondée sur des données probantes en soins respiratoiresLe processus d’adoption des résultats de la recherche en milieu clinique est complexe, quel que soit le secteur de pratique. Le courtage du savoir fait partie des stratégies pour faciliter ce processus. Les courtiers en savoir (CS) sont des personnes qui travaillent à combler les lacunes entre les chercheurs et les utilisateurs du savoir. Dans le milieu de la santé, les CS travaillent en étroite collaboration avec les cliniciens pour qu’ils intègrent les résultats des recherches à la pratique clinique. Ils travaillent également avec les chercheurs pour s’assurer que les résultats de la recherche soient traduisibles et significatifs en pratique clinique. Le présent article porte sur le rôle d’un CS en pneumologie. En étroite collaboration avec les chercheurs et les cliniciens, ce CS a dirigé des équipes dans le processus de conceptualisa-tion, d’élaboration, de mise à l’essai, de diffusion et d’évaluation de divers projets liés aux soins respiratoires, y compris des projets liés à la mobilité en soins intensifs et aux exacerbations aiguës des maladies pulmonaires, à l’entraînement des muscles inspiratoires et à l’utilisation de la spirométrie d’encouragement après une opération. Le CS s’est révélé un lien de com-munication important entre les chercheurs et les utilisateurs du savoir et a facilité la pratique fondée sur des données probantes pour améliorer les soins aux patients.Hoens et alCan Respir J Vol 20 No 4 July/August 2013272Table 1Details of the process led by the british Columbia physical therapy knowledge broker for six respiratory care knowledge translation projectsProjectFive essential elements of knowledge translationIdentify the  problem analyze the  contextSelect the  knowledgeSelect the  intervention Support use in practiceSAFEMOB (Safe mobiliza-tion of acutely ill patients)(http://physicaltherapy.med.ubc.ca/files/2012/05/SAFEMOB_Final18673.pdf)Clinicians identified this issue.Decision makers supported the need.Researchers acknowledged the scattered, diverse and limited guidance from the existing literatureUncertainty as to the ‘yellow and red flags’ for when one should consider not mobilizing an  acutely ill patient Stakeholders: PT and, to a lesser extent, nursingFocus: safe mobilization of acutely ill patientSynthesis of available evidence and expert opinion with multiple opportunities for feedback by >2000 stakeholdersIterative, two page clinical decision-making toolSupport for adoption provided by a live webinar (recorded for later or repeated viewing providing rationale, process, and experts working through typical case histories utilizing the tool.Presentations and practical sessions with case histories led by experts  at both regional and national meetingsSafe and effective mobilization of AECOPD  (see article in the current issue of the Journal by Camp et al, pages 281-284)Researchers and clinician identified a gap in the SAFEMOB tool that it did not address the unique needs of the AECOPD patient – an important need given the high cost of care, and readmission rates of AECOPD patientClinicians treating patients with AECOPD are uncer-tain as to the parameters for exercise prescription for  this populationStakeholders: Medicine, PT, Nursing, RT,  patient, and family Focus: safe and effective mobilization of AECOPD patientTwo components:1. Identify the current evidence from the liter-ature;2. Address the gaps in the existing literature. Three steps:1. Synthesis of systematic reviews of effective exercise in AECOPD and other co-morbidities;2. Delphi process to develop best practice recommendations;3. Using the information from steps 1 and  2, develop a clinical decision-making tool to guideDeveloped an implementation and evaluation plan to address potential barriers to adoption of the toolMobilizing intensive care unit patientsIdentified as an issue by the multidisciplinary ICU team at a local hospital.Inadequate mobilization of pts in the ICU setting can result in additional cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological and musculoskeletal complicationsTeam identified that they needed to create a process to enhance the earlier and more threshold targeted mobilization of their patientsStakeholders: Medicine, PT, Nursing, RTFocus: safe and effective mobilization of the criti-cally ill patient with an emphasis on the delinea-tion of the responsibilities of each disciplineModification of SAFEMOB tool together with discipline-specific roles for progressive stages of patient abilityDevelopment of a clinical decision making  tool that included: a process for identifying the current level of mobility for a patient, a plan for selecting the targeted level of mobility for the patient, specific roles for each discipline and  the required documentationEducation was provided, in the annual education forum, to all team members on the use of the tool and the steps in the process.Ongoing follow-up to address questions and ensure compliance is provided by the nurse educatorIncrease prescription     of IMTResearchers identified an underutilization of IMT in spite of well-established evidence of its effectiveness in the COPD populationResearchers identified that most COPD patients were not receiving effective treatment to manage dyspnea and inspiratory muscle weakness.Stakeholders: PT, RT, nursing in outpatient pulmonary rehabilitationFocus: increasing use of IMT for outpatient COPD patientsReview of evidence for effectiveness of IMT and of the behavioural theories to elicit practice change.Undertook an RCT (MSc project) that compared traditional didactic approach with a theory informed behavioural approach to promote change in practicePublication of findings (7)Presentation at the 2011 Canadian Physiotherapy Annual Congress.Development of implementation plan in processContinued on next pageKnowledge brokering in respiratory careCan Respir J Vol 20 No 4 July/August 2013 273Table 1 – CONTINUeDDetails of the process led by the british Columbia physical therapy (PT) knowledge broker for six respiratory care knowledge translation projectsProjectFive essential elements of knowledge translationIdentify the  problem analyze the  contextSelect the  knowledgeSelect the  intervention Support use in practiceIndication and contraindications to secretion removal techniquesClinicians identified a need to support appropriate referrals to PT for secretion removal techniques.PT in acute care hospitals frequently receive referrals requesting interventions using secretion removal techniques (eg, percussions, vibrations) for pts in which these techniques are either contraindicated or not indicatedStakeholders: Medicine, PT, nursingFocus: Increasing awareness of physicians re: the evidence for the contraindications and indications of secretion removal techniquesSynthesis of available evidence for contraindications and indicationsTwo-page clinical decision making toolPosted on hospital internet.Distributed to all new medical staff by ward PT in conjunction with a discussion to address further questions /concernsContraindications and indications for incentive spirometryClinician identified the need to support appropriate referrals to PT for incentive spirometryPT in acute care hospitals frequently receive referrals requesting incentive spirometry for pts in which it is either contraindicated or not indicatedStakeholders: Medicine, PT, nursingFocus: Increasing awareness of physicians re the evidence for the contraindications and indications of incentive spirometrySynthesis of available evidence for contraindications and indicationsTwo-page clinical decision making toolPosted on hospital internet.Distributed to all new medical staff by ward PT in conjunction with a discussion to address further questions /concernsNumber in parentheses refers to reference. AECOPD Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IMT Inspiratory muscle training; RCT Randomized controlled trial; RT Respiratory therapyand the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute replacing the BCRSRNet funding), this position has evolved to include multiple interdisciplinary KB projects related to acute and chronic disease, with several specifically focused on respiratory care.  The roles and activities of the physical therapy KB are diverse, but can be categorized as activities related to research; development of practice resources; and evidence-informed practice skill development. The KB facilitates research by identifying and facilitating partnerships among academic, education and clinical entities (decision makers and clinicians) in medicine, nursing and the allied health professions including physical therapy. The development of practice resources uses knowledge of the optimal methods to ‘translate’ the literature into practice-relevant tools and make it accessible and acceptable to stake-holders, including clinicians, researchers, students and decision mak-ers. These practice resources are housed on an array of stakeholder relevant websites enabling broad access. Assessment of web traffic to these KB resources has shown a total of 10,000 hits over four years, and a 230% increase in traffic between year 1 and year 4 of the KB pos-ition. To improve health care professionals’ critical appraisal skills, the KB developed a journal club series hosted through a webinar platform (and recorded for repeated viewing), enabling health care profession-als working throughout the province an ongoing opportunity to develop and refine their skills in reading, critiquing and then applying knowledge to their clinical practice setting. Attendance has increased by 302% between the first and most recent sessions (10 sessions in total) and pre/post evaluations demonstrate a 29% to 43% mean change in confidence in appraisal skills. This position undergoes an annual review of activities and outcomes before renewal of funding. Annual reports of the activities and outcomes of the position are avail-able at <http://physicaltherapy.med.ubc.ca/research/physical-therapy-knowledge-broker/>.SuPPORTING EVIDENCE-INFORmED PRACTICE IN RESPIRATORY CAREWith respect to supporting evidence-informed practice specifically in respiratory care, the KB has been instrumental in facilitating six important projects for British Columbian and Canadian health care providers. Using the five steps outlined by Ward et al (6), Table 1 provides the essential components of each of these KT projects.OTHER KT RESOuRCES The recent emphasis on KT is a reflection of the lack of uptake of research findings into clinical practice. The KB role is an increasingly popular method to enhance evidence-informed practice. Although knowledge brokering can be an effective means to link clinicians, decision makers, educators and researchers to improve clinical care, Hoens et alCan Respir J Vol 20 No 4 July/August 2013274the responsibility for effective KT does not fall solely on the role of the KB. The KB can help facilitate these important processes but there are numerous strategies to support evidence-informed practice in health care that any health care professional, researcher and decision maker can adopt. The Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto (Toronto, Ontario) have developed several leading KT plans as well as certificate programs (www.sickkids.ca/Learning/AbouttheInstitute/Programs/Knowledge-Translation/Knowledge-Translation-Professional-Certificate/Knowledge-Translation-Professional-Certificate.html) for professionals interested in KT and brokering responsibilities. Additional information regarding courses and resources are available on the KT Canada website (http://ktclearinghouse.ca/ktcanada). There is also detailed KT literature offering step-by-step approaches to KT practices (3). (See the KT plan in Camp et al (8) in the current issue of the Journal (pages 281-284), which summarizes a logistic plan for the dissemination, implementation and evaluation of the decision-making tool.)  CONCLuSIONFunding agencies, such as the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, government agencies, such as the Public Health Agency of Canada, nongovernmental organizations, such as the Canadian Lung Association and health care professional societies, such as the Canadian Thoracic Society and the Canadian Respiratory Health Professionals, are united in their support for best evidence-based KT activities. The need for KT in respiratory care is vast, from the require-ment of urgent and accurate communication with health care practi-tioners and patients (eg, in surveillance and identification of disease, such as during the SARS outbreak), to detailed management guide-lines for complex chronic diseases (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis). However, while most researchers are adept at producing end-of-grant KT items, such as peer-reviewed articles and presentations at conferences, there is less experience and expertise in designing, implementing and evaluating KT activities. Similarly, health care professionals often voice con-cerns about the time and proficiency required to efficiently access, synthesize, interpret and apply the findings of research articles. The inclusion of the KB role to our health care community provides a vital communication link that has enabled respiratory-related KT activities to expand beyond end-of-grant activities to include a wide variety of evidence-based strategies to improve patient care.REFERENCES1. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research – “Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403-6.2. Holmes B, Scarrow G, Schellenberg M. Translating evidence into practice: The role of health research funders. Implement Sci 2012;7:39.3. Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID. Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving From Evidence to Practice. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2009.  4. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.  Health Technol Assess 2004;6:iii-iv:1-72.  5. Conklin J, Lusk E, Harris M, Stolee P. Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: The case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers. Implement Sci 2013;8:7.  6. Ward V, Smith S, House A, Hamer S. Exploring knowledge exchange: A useful framework for practice and policy.  Soc Sci Med 2012;74:297-304.7. Simms AM, Li LC, Geddes EL, Brooks D, Hoens AM, Reid WD. Impact of a behavioral-based intervention on inspiratory muscle training prescription by a multidisciplinary team. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2012;32:116-25.8. Camp PG, Reid DW, Yamabayashi C, et al. Safe and effective prescription of exercise in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Rationale and methods for an integrated knowledge tranlation study. Can Respir J 2013;20:281-4.

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
https://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.52383.1-0368692/manifest

Comment

Related Items