UBC Faculty Research and Publications

Structural barriers to antiretroviral therapy among sex workers living with HIV : Findings of a longitudinal… Goldenberg, Shira M.; Montaner, Julio; Duff, Putu; Nguyen, Paul; Dobrer, Sabina; Guillemi, Silvia; Shannon, Kate May 1, 2016

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata


52383-Goldenberg_S_et_al_Structural_barriers_antiretroviral_therapy.pdf [ 146.62kB ]
JSON: 52383-1.0357448.json
JSON-LD: 52383-1.0357448-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 52383-1.0357448-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 52383-1.0357448-rdf.json
Turtle: 52383-1.0357448-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 52383-1.0357448-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 52383-1.0357448-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

Structural Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Among Sex Workers Living with HIV: Findings of a Longitudinal Study in Vancouver, CanadaShira M. Goldenberg1,2, Julio Montaner2,3, Putu Duff1,2, Paul Nguyen2,3, Sabina Dobrer2,3, Silvia Guillemi2,4, and Kate Shannon1,21Gender and Sexual Health Initiative, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, CANADA2Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CANADA3British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, CANADA4Clinical Education and Training Program, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, CANADAAbstractIn light of limited data on structural determinants of access and retention in antiretroviral therapy (ART) among sex workers, we examined structural correlates of ART use among sex workers living with HIV over time. Longitudinal data were drawn from a cohort of 646 female sex workers in Vancouver, Canada (2010–2012) and linked pharmacy records on ART dispensation. We used logistic regression with generalized estimating equations (GEE) to examine correlates of gaps in ART use (i.e., treatment interruptions or delayed ART initiation), among sex workers living with HIV (n=74). Over a 2.5-year period, 37.8% of participants experienced gaps in ART use (i.e., no ART dispensed in a six-month period). In a multivariable GEE model, younger age, migration/mobility, incarceration, and non-injection drug use independently correlated with gaps in ART use. In spite of successes scaling-up ART in British Columbia, younger, mobile, or incarcerated sex workers face persistent gaps in access and retention irrespective of drug use. Community-based, tailored interventions to scale-up entry and retention in ART for sex workers should be further explored in this setting.KeywordsAntiretroviral therapy; sex workers; structural factors; HIV/AIDS; migrationINTRODUCTIONUnequal access and retention in antiretroviral therapy (ART) for people living with HIV remains a public health and human rights issue of paramount concern. Global efforts to Corresponding Author: Kate Shannon, PhD, MPH, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Director, Gender and Sexual Health Initiative, B.C. Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul’s Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada, Tel: (604) 804-9459; Fax: (604) 806-9044, gshi@cfenet.ubc.ca. HHS Public AccessAuthor manuscriptAIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Published in final edited form as:AIDS Behav. 2016 May ; 20(5): 977–986. doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1102-2.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptThe final publication is available at link.springer.com via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1102-2.scale-up access as well as retention in the HIV care cascade have increased as a result of evidence suggesting significant health and community benefits of early ART initiation and enhanced adherence supports, including lower morbidity and mortality, as well as reduced sexual transmission of HIV(1–5). Despite substantial progress in scaling-up access and retention in the HIV care cascade, access and outcomes for key populations, including sex workers, often lag behind the general population(6–9).Female sex workers experience a greatly elevated HIV burden in both concentrated and generalized HIV epidemics(9, 10), as well as a multitude of structural barriers to HIV prevention and care, including high levels of violence(11–18), stigma(19–21), criminalization(22–26), and mobility(27–31). However, few epidemiological studies have assessed the impacts of structural determinants on ART uptake and retention among sex workers, and longitudinal data on ART use remain especially limited. Most prior research on this topic has been conducted in Sub-Saharan African settings, which has suggested that women in the sex industry often experience significant gaps in ART access. For example, in a study among 870 Zimbabwean sex workers, half of those with confirmed HIV infection were unaware of their status, with the majority not on ART(7). Research from Sub-Saharan Africa suggests that sex workers, like some other populations of highly marginalized women, may face challenges in accessing treatment due to fear of disclosing their HIV status (e.g., concerns of partner violence, stigma), food insecurity, a lack of social support, and economic concerns(6, 32, 33). Such barriers to ART access may be exacerbated for sex workers, who often face distinct vulnerabilities related to criminalization, physical and sexual violence, and unsafe working and living conditions. However, limited research has explicitly sought to examine structural determinants of ART use for women in sex work.In the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, ART is available free-of-charge to people living with HIV through governmental healthcare coverage. Access to ART has increased steadily in BC since 2003, and this has been accelerated in recent years as a result of the provincial government-sponsored ‘treatment as prevention’ efforts to scale-up access to HIV testing and treatment(34), coupled with harm reduction services, which aimed to curb HIV morbidity and mortality, while also reducing HIV transmission in the general population(1, 3) and people who inject drugs (PWID)(35). However, little is known regarding access to ART for women in the sex industry in BC, who face a disproportionate burden of HIV (>12%), which varies by work environment(27). As in many other settings, sex workers and their clients are criminalized in Canada, which often displaces sex work transactions to unsafe locations where sex workers’ capacity to negotiate condoms and access healthcare may be compromised(17, 25, 36, 37). Stemming from a legacy of colonial oppression, dispossession, and displacement, women of Indigenous (i.e., Aboriginal) ancestry are highly over-represented in Canada’s HIV epidemic, as well as in its sex industry, particularly in street-based sex work in urban centres(38, 39). Given gaps in epidemiological evidence regarding ART access and retention among sex workers outside of Sub-Saharan Africa and the notable absence of longitudinal studies examining structural determinants, our objective was to identify structural determinants of ART use in a prospective cohort of female sex workers living with HIV in Vancouver, BC, over time.Goldenberg et al. Page 2AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptMETHODSLongitudinal data were drawn from an open prospective cohort, An Evaluation of Sex Workers Health Access (AESHA), and confidential linkages to provincial health administrative databases on ART pharmacy dispensation.An Evaluation of Sex Workers Health Access (AESHA)Between January 2010 and August 2012, 646 female sex workers (both HIV seropositive and negative) were enrolled in an open prospective cohort and completed surveys and HIV/STI testing at baseline and on a semi-annual basis. AESHA is based on collaborations with sex work agencies which have existed since 2005(40) and is monitored by a Community Advisory Board of >15 organizations. All procedures are approved by the Providence Health Care/University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board.As previously described(37, 41), participants in the cohort complete interviewer-administered questionnaires at study offices in Metro Vancouver or at their work or home and received $40 CAD at each visit for their time, expertise and travel. For the purposes of this analysis on ART use, analyses were restricted to sex workers who were HIV-seropositive at baseline. Eligibility criteria include self-identifying as female (transgender male-to-female inclusive), being ≥14 years of age, having exchanged sex for money within the last month and providing informed consent. Exclusion criteria include being <14 years old, not having exchanged sex in the prior month, being unable to provide informed consent, and not residing in Metro Vancouver. Time-location sampling is used to recruit participants through weekly outreach to on- and off-street sex work venues across Metro Vancouver, which are identified through community mapping(40) and regularly updated. Following an open cohort design, sex workers continue to be actively recruited throughout the life of the cohort, through extensive and ongoing outreach to street and indoor venues. Between 10–15% of individuals screened are deemed ineligible for the cohort. The primary reason for ineligibility is not being actively engaged in sex work at baseline (e.g., did not work within the last 30 days); other reasons account for <5% of those screened as ineligible, and include living outside the Metro Vancouver area or being unable to give informed consent. Annual retention of participants under active follow-up is >90%, and primary reasons for attrition include mortality and migration outside Metro Vancouver. Extensive efforts are made to continue to follow sex workers who move outside Metro Vancouver during the study, including mobile outreach/interview teams and phone interviews, to support high retention rates.Independent Variables of Interest/Confounders—Participating sex workers complete interviewer-administered questionnaires in English, Cantonese, or Mandarin by trained interviewers and HIV/STI testing by a project nurse (AESHA research staff include both experiential and non-experiential). Time-fixed variables derived from the AESHA questionnaire include socio-demographic characteristics such as age, education, birthplace, ethnicity, and languages spoken. All other variables are considered as time-updated variables of occurrences within the past 6 months at each semi-annual study visit. Individual and partner-level risks included condom negotiation and use (e.g., inconsistent condom use with Goldenberg et al. Page 3AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscriptclients) and substance use (e.g., non-injection and injection drug use, alcohol use), which were assessed using standardized measures used in previous sex work and drug use research(42–45). Inconsistent condom use is defined as reporting that condoms were ‘usually’, ‘sometimes’, or ‘occasionally’ used for vaginal or anal sex with either or both of one-time and regular clients in the prior six months. Non-injection and injection drug use include drugs (other than marijuana and alcohol) used in the last six months, including non-injection (e.g., crack cocaine, cocaine, crystal meth, inhalants) and injection (e.g., heroin, cocaine, speedballs, street methadone) drugs. Mental health status is also assessed (e.g., lifetime and recent diagnoses with mental health problems); the project nurse provides active referral to health and social supports for those in need/not currently receiving care (e.g., mental health services).Questions on structural factors include migration and mobility, incarceration, homelessness, and work environment in the past six months. Internal migration/mobility includes migration (moved to Metro Vancouver from another province or city) and mobility (lived in another province, or city outside Metro Vancouver) in the last six months. Incarceration is assessed by asking, “In the last 6 months, have you been in detention, prison, or jail overnight or longer?” Work environment covers places of solicitation and servicing clients, interactions with third parties (e.g., managers), police, security, and city licensing, and workplace violence. Place of service is measured by asking, “In which of the following types of places have you ever serviced/taken clients in the last 6 months?” and coded as outdoor/public space (e.g., street, public washroom, vehicle), informal indoor venue (e.g., bar/nightclub, dance/strip club, hotel/hourly rental, crack/drug house, clients’ place, your place), or formal sex work establishment (“in-call venues, e.g., massage/beauty parlour, micro-brothel, managed indoor space). Workplace violence is assessed by asking about violence by clients in the preceding six months (e.g., abducted/kidnapped, forced unprotected sex, raped, strangled, physical assault, assaulted with a weapon), as well as violence by police, third parties and strangers.HIV/STI measures—Following pre-test counseling and informed consent, HIV seropositive participants receive CD4 and HIV-1 RNA viral load testing at the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS to assess HIV disease progression. Nursing staff provide referral and active connections to HIV service providers for all women living with HIV not currently connected to an HIV provider. All participants receive post-test counseling. Free STI and Papanicolaou testing are also offered, regardless of study enrolment.ART dispensation dataInformation on ART dispensation was accessed via confidential linkage to records from a provincial health administrative database managed by the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS’ Drug Treatment Program (DTP). As previously described(46–48), the DTP collects comprehensive information on province-wide ART dispensation. The DTP also collects HIV/AIDS monitoring information, including CD4 cell counts and plasma viral load for each participant. At the time of study, provincial eligibility for ART included all people living with HIV with a CD4 cell count ≤500 and other key health indicators and risks (e.g., AIDS-defining illnesses, HCV co-infection, pregnant women, serodiscordant couples), Goldenberg et al. Page 4AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscriptconsistent with current WHO guidelines. Early entry into ART regardless of CD4 cell count is continues to be encouraged in British Columbia by provincial guidelines, based on a Treatment as Prevention’ approach(49).Dependent Variable—The dependent variable, experiencing a gap in ART use, was a time-updated measure based on pharmacy dispensation records from the DTP. Experiencing a gap in ART use was considered as a time-updated measure at each semi-annual study visit defined as not having any ART dispensed in the 6-month period preceding the survey date of a participant who was previously diagnosed as HIV-seropositive. Gaps in ART use included cases of treatment interruptions as well as delayed ART initiation. In cases of missing data, we substituted participants’ questionnaire responses regarding their current ART use.Data analysisDescriptive statistics were calculated for independent variables of interest, stratified by ART use. The differences between those who experienced gaps in ART use and those who did not were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and Pearson’s Chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test for small cell counts) for categorical variables. Following this, we used generalized estimating equations (GEE) with an exchangeable correlation structure(50, 51) to longitudinally examine correlates of events of gaps in ART use (ART treatment interruptions or delayed initiation) among sex workers living with HIV over the 2.5-year study period. Bivariable and multivariable GEE analyses included data from baseline and follow-up visits, accounting for repeated measures among the same participants. Socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, Aboriginal ancestry) were treated as fixed covariates, and all other variables were treated as time-updated covariates of occurrences at each semi-annual visit. Variables hypothesized a priori to be related to ART access (i.e., known potential confounders and independent variables of interest) and which were significant at p < 0.10 in bivariate GEE analyses were considered for inclusion in the multivariable model. A maximum of five variables were considered for the multivariable model, in light of our sample size. Using the GENMOD procedure(52) in SAS version 9.3 (SAS, Cary, NC), a manual backward model selection process was used to identify the model with the best fit, as indicated by the lowest quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion value(53). All p-values are two sided.RESULTSA total of 74 sex workers living with HIV enrolled in the AESHA cohort between 2010 and 2012 were eligible and therefore included in the analysis. Participants completed a median of 3.5 study visits (Interquartile Range (IQR): 2.0–5.0), with a median follow-up duration of 18.40 months (IQR: 11.76–24.57). Among the 74 participants, there were 242 observations and 63 events of gaps in ART use (i.e., six-month periods in which no ART was dispensed to an eligible participant) over a 2.5-year period.The majority of participants were Canadian-born (97.3%) and of Aboriginal ancestry (63.5%), and over half had ever been diagnosed with a mental health issue. Over one in ten participants (10.8%) had recently moved to Vancouver from another province or city, or had lived in a province or city other than Vancouver in the past six months (i.e., internal Goldenberg et al. Page 5AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscriptmigration/mobility); similar proportions reported mobility within BC versus other provinces. Most sex workers serviced clients in outdoor/public spaces (e.g., street, vehicle) (47.3%) or informal indoor venues (e.g., bar/nightclub, crack/drug house, private home, hotel) (e.g., 44.6%). In comparison with women who used ART, those not using ART at baseline had a higher plasma viral load (median: 4.03 log10 copies/mL vs. 1.60 log10 copies/mL)(Table 1).In bivariable GEE analysis of factors correlated with gaps in ART use over the 2.5-year observation period, experiencing a gap in ART use was correlated with higher plasma viral load (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.03, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.62–2.53), younger age (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01–1.16), using non-injection drugs (e.g., crack, crystal methamphetamine) (OR: 4.86, 95% CI: 1.16–20.44), and injecting drugs (e.g., heroin, cocaine) (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.01–3.77). In terms of structural determinants, recent internal migration/mobility (OR: 5.65, 95% CI: 1.61–19.82) and recent incarceration episodes (OR: 2.80, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.27–6.18) were both correlated with gaps in ART use in bivariate GEE analysis. There were no significant bivariate differences in ART use over time by Aboriginal ancestry, mental health status, place of service, or inconsistent condom use with clients, which was very low across the sample. Among participants who had previously used ART and had stopped taking it, primary self-reported reasons for not using ART during the observation period included adherence challenges/ difficulties taking the medication every day (18.2%), followed by side effects/toxicities (6.06%), housing instability (6.06%), and distance/transportation issues (6.06%).In a multivariable GEE model, younger age (AOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01–1.17), non-injection drug use (AOR: 5.04, 95% CI: 1.31–19.34), internal migration/mobility (Adjusted OR (AOR): 5.19, 95% CI: 1.38–19.56), and incarceration (AOR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.04–6.20) remained independently correlated with experiencing gaps in ART use over a 2.5-year period.DISCUSSIONOur results showed that almost forty percent of female sex workers living with HIV experienced delays or interruptions in ART use over a 2.5-year observation period. In spite of major successes in scaling-up ART access and retention and reducing HIV-related morbidity and mortality in BC in the general population and in some key populations (e.g., PWID), this study demonstrates that sex workers continue to face serious gaps in access and retention in ART. These gaps appear to largely relate to structural factors (e.g., incarceration, mobility) as well as the unique challenges faced by marginalized young women living with HIV in accessing and staying on ART. Our results pertaining to the relationship between younger age and gaps in ART are supported by previous research in which youth have been found to be more likely to face barriers to ART use, have poorer adherence, and enter ART later than adults, due to concerns such as violence, unequal relationship power, limited access to social support, stigma, and barriers to healthcare access(54–58). Importantly, while sex workers who use drugs were more likely to experience treatment barriers, correlations with younger age, migration/mobility, and incarceration remained irrespective of drug use. Despite previous concerns that ART use among marginalized populations and people who use drugs may result in lower condom use, our study adds to a body of evidence suggesting Goldenberg et al. Page 6AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscriptthis to be unsubstantiated among sex workers(59, 60). Unsurprisingly, we also found that women who experienced gaps in ART use had a higher plasma viral load than those retained in treatment. Efforts to scale-up voluntary and supportive access to ART for sex workers remains critical to ensure equitable access to this life-saving and health-promoting treatment, which has significant implications for both individual and public health.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to explicitly examine structural determinants of ART access or retention among female sex workers. Our findings regarding the potential for migration/mobility and incarceration to interrupt ART access and retention are supported by prior epidemiological and qualitative studies with PWID(46, 47, 61–63), which have identified incarceration and mobility as barriers to ART use. For example, research in British Columbia has found a dose-response relationship between numbers of incarceration events and non-adherence to ART(47), as well as associations between exposure to incarceration, non-suppression of viral load, and syringe sharing(63) among PWID. Findings of our study are also supported by research with broader cohorts of people living with HIV, which have found that mobility and migration can adversely affect ART adherence(61). Though epidemiological studies pertaining to migration and health have infrequently examined issues of ART use, mobility patterns have been linked to HIV-related risks and barriers to health care access among sex workers, as well as some protective factors; for example, short-term migration/mobility are associated with barriers to health care, condom refusal, client violence, and higher income(27, 31, 64), whereas long-term international migration to some higher-income settings is associated with lower sexual and drug-related risks(29, 65). Further research is needed to unpack how migration/mobility patterns impact access to and engagement with the continuum of HIV care for women engaged in sex work.These findings likely reflect treatment barriers as a result of disconnections to care and limited social supports experienced within the context of migration/mobility as well as incarceration. Previous studies have indicated that both incarceration and migration/mobility can enhance health-related vulnerabilities and interrupt healthcare access as the result of the rupturing of social networks(30, 66, 67), insurance barriers (e.g., lack of immediate access to health insurance upon moving to a new province), unfamiliarity with new healthcare system, and the disruption of previously established relationships with healthcare providers and services(68, 69). These may be among the reasons that migrant/mobile women were more likely to experience gaps in ART use after moving to Vancouver. We did not document any recent migration/mobility events among women living with HIV during the follow-up period, which is likely related to challenges accessing HIV care outside the Metropolitan Vancouver area (e.g., lack of insurance coverage or knowledge of physicians/pharmacies in other provinces) and the concentration of HIV-related services (e.g., harm reduction, ART, subsidized housing) in the city’s most marginalized downtown core neighborhoods (e.g., the downtown eastside). Anecdotal reports indicate that although marginalized women living with HIV may wish to leave these neighborhoods for safety, housing, and family reasons, difficulties accessing services (e.g., housing, HIV care) or a community of people living with HIV outside this neighborhood may prevent them from doing so. Further research is required to examine this hypothesis, since research among PWID(70) suggests that out-Goldenberg et al. Page 7AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscriptmigration from inner-city communities where HIV and injection drug use are concentrated may relate to reduced health-related harms.Our findings regarding incarceration are supported by research with PWID, which has found strong linkages between incarceration and difficulties adhering to ART(47), plasma viral load(71), and ART discontinuation(46). In a recent study among PWID, both sex work involvement and recent incarceration predicted plasma viral load rebound(71). Although ART is technically available within criminal justice settings in Canada, concerns have been raised regarding barriers to ART for incarcerated populations. These include a lack of continuity of care between community and in-prison providers, disruptions in health care access (e.g., loss of rapport previously established with providers) upon entry and release, and a desire to conceal one’s HIV status due to stigma and discrimination within criminal justice settings(47, 72). Our study adds to a body of evidence underscoring the negative impacts of criminalization on marginalized populations’ health and safety, and is one of few to examine this issue in relation to ART use among sex workers(6). The criminalization of sex work has been previously shown to severely undermine health and safety, both in Canada and internationally(9, 15, 17, 23, 24, 37, 73, 74). In Canada, HIV non-disclosure (i.e., in cases where either a condom or detectable viral load are present, but not both) remains criminalized, even in cases where no transmission occurs. Furthermore, the Canadian government recently proposed new laws that further criminalize sex work (e.g., criminalization of the purchase of sex). These forms of criminalization can substantially impede the scale-up of HIV care for sex workers. In addition to concerns of further marginalization related to partner/client violence, stigma, housing insecurity, and lost income, women may fear HIV testing or picking up ART due to criminalization. Policy reforms remain needed to ensure that sex workers have access to the same health and human rights as other populations (i.e., the removal of criminal sanctions surrounding HIV and sex work; safer indoor workspaces).Implications for policy and practiceMulti-pronged, combination (i.e., biomedical, behavioural and structural) interventions are needed to scale-up access to and retention in ART for female sex workers and address structural barriers to ART, especially for younger women who may have less social support and therefore require special intervention strategies. Interventions to support entry into and continuity of HIV care within the context of migration/mobility patterns (e.g., linkage to HIV providers, community-based organizations, and social supports in common destination settings; addressing insurance barriers for women moving between provinces) and within the criminal justice system (e.g., programs supporting sensitive and effective linkages to care upon entry and release) are recommended. Additionally, broader efforts to provide social supports (e.g., housing, transportation, access to social support) are recommended, particularly for recent arrivals to Vancouver, women who regularly visit communities outside Vancouver, and younger women recently diagnosed with HIV.Evidence suggests that when appropriate supports are provided, sex workers can be effectively engaged in HIV care(75) and achieve high levels of ART adherence(8). This often depends on the provision of strong supports, including close follow-up with outreach Goldenberg et al. Page 8AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscriptteams and peer-educators(8). As models to promote ART access among sex workers have been infrequently studied(76), efforts to develop, test, and scale-up tailored, peer- and community-based ART access models for sex workers are recommended.Lessons from HIV prevention research suggest that community and peer-based interventions that incorporate sex worker-tailored services can be highly effective to support the health and human rights of sex workers(76–78), including access and retention in ART. One example is Ashraya, a community-based organization in India started by sex workers living with HIV. This program provides peer advocates to help navigate the health system, peer support groups, and advocacy to reduce stigma and discrimination, which have collectively improved ART access for sex workers living with HIV in the community(75). Although the ability for sex workers and other marginalized populations living with HIV to self-organize represents a key health promotion strategy that could successfully support ART programs in other settings(26,77), sex workers’ continued criminalization and social exclusion undermine the potential health advances that such approaches could achieve(73).Strengths and limitationsThis study has some limitations. Our measure of ART use was based on prescription refills as captured by provincial pharmacy records, rather than directly observed therapy, which could overestimate actual ART use. We selected this outcome since pharmacy records have been found to be more reliable than self-report(79), and previous work has demonstrated that ART prescription refill data is a reliable predictor of viral suppression(80, 81) and survival(1, 35, 82). As this could underrepresent ART use among sex workers who moved outside BC, we used the questionnaire responses of internally mobile/ migrant women (i.e., self-reported ART use) to verify consistency with our pharmacy dispensation-based outcome – that is, to ensure that migrant/mobile women were not missed by our outcome due to accessing ART outside of BC. While our study was based on a relatively small sample of women living with HIV enrolled in a larger cohort, this would have made it more difficult to detect the associations we noted between ART use, incarceration, and migration/ mobility. Larger prospective cohorts investigating structural determinants of HIV treatment and care (e.g., ART adherence, viral load) among sex workers living with HIV and other populations of marginalized women living with HIV remain needed to better understand treatment access and retention rates, and to map out the most effective strategies to reduce structural barriers and enhance engagement in care. As sex work remains largely hidden in Vancouver due to persistent criminalization, official estimates of the general population of sex workers are unavailable. Our cohort employs various strategies to ensure that the cohort is as representative as possible, including use of time-location sampling to facilitate recruitment across diverse venues and neighbourhoods, strong community partnerships, and regular outreach efforts, which have resulted in our ability to recruit a large and diverse cohort.ConclusionIn spite of success in scaling-up access and retention in the HIV cascade of care in BC, structural barriers, including migration/ mobility and incarceration, continue to impede engagement with ART for sex workers living with HIV. The fact that sex workers, a population heavily impacted by HIV and other health and social disparities, do not have Goldenberg et al. Page 9AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscriptequal access to the health-preserving and preventive benefits of ART represents a serious human rights and health concern. Sex worker-led, community-based interventions should be further explored as a means to scale-up access to the HIV care continuum and to promote sex workers’ equitable access to health and human rights.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe thank all those who contributed their time and expertise to this project, including participants, partner agencies, and the AESHA Community Advisory Board. We wish to acknowledge Sarah Allan, Ofer Amram, Eva Breternitz, Jill Chettiar, Kathleen Deering, Sabina Dobrer, Julia Homer, Rhiannon Hughes, Emily Leake, Jane Li, Vivian Liu, Sylvia Machat, Meenakshi Mannoe, Jen Morris, Paul Nguyen, Rachel Nicoletti, Tina Ok, Saba Tadesse-Lee, Chrissy Taylor, Brittney Udall, Peter Vann, Gina Willis, and Jingfei Zhang for their research and administrative support. This research was supported by operating grants from the US National Institutes of Health (R01DA028648), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (HHP-98835) and CIHR/Public Health Agency of Canada (HEB-330155), and MAC AIDS. SG is supported by fellowships from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research/Women’s Health Research Institute. KS is supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (R01DA028648), a Canada Research Chair in Global Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. JM is supported with grants paid to his institution by the British Columbia Ministry of Health and by the US National Institutes of Health (R01DA036307). He has also received limited unrestricted funding, through his institution, from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare.REFERENCES1. Montaner JS, Lima VD, Barrios R, Yip B, Wood E, Kerr T, et al. Association of highly active antiretroviral therapy coverage, population viral load, and yearly new HIV diagnoses in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. The Lancet. 2010; 376(9740):532–539.2. Das M, Chu PL, Santos G-M, Scheer S, Vittinghoff E, McFarland W, et al. Decreases in Community Viral Load Are Accompanied by Reductions in New HIV Infections in San Francisco. PLoS One. 2010; 5(6):e11068. [PubMed: 20548786] 3. Montaner JSG, Lima VD, Harrigan PR, Lourenço L, Yip B, Nosyk B, et al. Expansion of HAART Coverage Is Associated with Sustained Decreases in HIV/AIDS Morbidity, Mortality and HIV Transmission: The “HIV Treatment as Prevention” Experience in a Canadian Setting. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e87872. [PubMed: 24533061] 4. Wood E, Milloy MJ, Montaner JS. HIV treatment as prevention among injection drug users. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2012; 7(2):151–156. [PubMed: 22227587] 5. Wood E, Kerr T, Marshall BD, Li K, Zhang R, Hogg RS, et al. Longitudinal community plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations and incidence of HIV-1 among injecting drug users: prospective cohort study. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2009; 3386. Braunstein SL, Umulisa M-M, Veldhuijzen NJ, Kestelyn E, Ingabire CM, Nyinawabega J, et al. HIV Diagnosis, Linkage to HIV Care, and HIV Risk Behaviors Among Newly Diagnosed HIV-Positive Female Sex Workers in Kigali, Rwanda. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2011; 57(4):e70–e76. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182170fd3. [PubMed: 21407083] 7. Cowan FM, Mtetwa S, Davey C, Fearon E, Dirawo J, Wong-Gruenwald R, et al. Engagement with HIV Prevention Treatment and Care among Female Sex Workers in Zimbabwe: a Respondent Driven Sampling Survey. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e77080. Epub 2013/10/22. [PubMed: 24143203] 8. Huet C, Ouedraogo A, Konate I, Traore I, Rouet F, Kabore A, et al. Long term virological, immunological and mortality outcomes in a cohort of HIV-infected female sex workers treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy in Africa. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11(1):700. [PubMed: 21917177] 9. Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Goldenberg SM, Duff P, Mwangi P, Rusakova M, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV among female sex workers: influence of structural determinants. The Lancet. 2015; 385(9962):55–71.10. Baral S, Beyrer C, Muessig K, Poteat T, Wirtz AL, Decker MR, et al. Burden of HIV among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2012; 12(7):538–549. [PubMed: 22424777] Goldenberg et al. Page 10AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript11. Beattie TSH, Bhattacharjee P, Ramesh BM, Gurnani V, Anthony J, Isac S, et al. Violence against female sex workers in Karnataka state, south India: impact on health, and reductions in violence following an intervention program. Bmc Public Health. 2010; 1012. Deering KN, Amin A, Shoveller J, Nesbitt A, Garcia-Moreno C, Duff P, et al. A Systematic Review of the Correlates of Violence Against Sex Workers. American Journal of Public Health. 2014; 104(5):e42–e54. [PubMed: 24625169] 13. Deering KN, Bhattacharjee P, Mohan HL, Bradley J, Shannon K, Boily MC, et al. Violence and HIV Risk Among Female Sex Workers in Southern India. Sex Transm Dis. 2013; 42(2):168–174. Epub 2013/01/18. [PubMed: 23441335] 14. Okal J, Chersich MF, Tsui S, Sutherland E, Temmerman M, Luchters S. Sexual and physical violence against female sex workers in Kenya: a qualitative enquiry. AIDS Care. 2011; 23(5):612–618. [PubMed: 21390890] 15. Pando MA, Coloccini RS, Reynaga E, Rodriguez Fermepin M, Gallo Vaulet L, Kochel TJ, et al. Violence as a Barrier for HIV Prevention among Female Sex Workers in Argentina. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e54147. Epub 2013/01/24. [PubMed: 23342092] 16. Shannon K, Kerr T, Strathdee SA, Shoveller J, Montaner JS, Tyndall MW. Prevalence and structural correlates of gender based violence among a prospective cohort of female sex workers. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2939. [PubMed: 19671935] 17. Shannon K, Csete J. Violence, condom negotiation, and HIV/STI risk among sex workers. JAMA. 2010; 304(4):573–574. [PubMed: 20682941] 18. Platt L, Grenfell P, Bonell C, Creighton S, Wellings K, Parry J, et al. Risk of sexually transmitted infections and violence among indoor-working female sex workers in London: the effect of migration from Eastern Europe. Sex Transm Infect. 2011; 87(5):377–384. Epub 2011/05/17. [PubMed: 21572111] 19. Choi SYP. Heterogeneous and vulnerable: The health risks facing transnational female sex workers. Sociol Health Illn. 2011; 33(1):33–49. [PubMed: 20942821] 20. Lazarus L, Deering KN, Nabess R, Gibson K, Tyndall MW, Shannon K. Occupational stigma as a primary barrier to health care for street-based sex workers in Canada. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2012; 14(2):139–150.21. Scambler G, Paoli F. Health work, female sex workers and HIV/AIDS: Global and local dimensions of stigma and deviance as barriers to effective interventions. Social Science & Medicine. 2008; 66(8):1848–1862. [PubMed: 18295948] 22. Erausquin JT, Reed E, Blankenship KM. Police-related experiences and HIV risk among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India. J Infect Dis. 2011; 204(Suppl 5):S1223–S1228. Epub 2011/11/09. [PubMed: 22043036] 23. Rhodes T, Simić M, Baroš S, Platt L, Žikić B. Police violence and sexual risk among female and transvestite sex workers in Serbia: qualitative study. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2008; 337:a811. [PubMed: 18667468] 24. Shannon KCJ, Jia Xi J, Nguyen J, Strathdee SA, Deering K, Ogilvie G, Montaner JS. Poor workplace, violence and police arrest linked to high STI incidence among street and hidden off-street sex workers: A call for structural STI interventions. Under Review. 201325. Shannon K, Rusch M, Shoveller J, Alexson D, Gibson K, Tyndall MW. Mapping violence and policing as an environmental-structural barrier to health service and syringe availability among substance-using women in street-level sex work. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2008; 19(2):140–147. [PubMed: 18207725] 26. Shannon K, Goldenberg S, Deering K, Strathdee S. HIV Infection among Female Sex Workers in Concentrated and High Prevalence Epidemics: Why a Structural Determinants Framework is Needed. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2014; 9(2):174–182. [PubMed: 24464089] 27. Goldenberg S, Chettiar J, Nguyen P, Montaner J, Dobrer S, Shannon K. Complexities of Short-Term Mobility for Sex Work and Migration among Sex Workers: Violence and Sexual Risks, Barriers to Care, and Enhanced Social and Economic Opportunities. J Urban Health. 2014; 91(4):736–751. [PubMed: 25055750] Goldenberg et al. Page 11AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript28. Goldenberg S, Silverman J, Engstrom D, Bojorquez-Chapela I, Strathdee S. “Right here is the gateway”: Mobility, sex work entry and HIV risk along the Mexico-U.S. border. International Migration. 201329. Goldenberg S, Liu V, Nguyen P, Chettiar J, Shannon K. International migration from non-endemic settings as a protective factor for HIV/STI risk among female sex workers in Vancouver, Canada. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2015; 17(1):21–28. Epub Apr 4. [PubMed: 24700025] 30. Goldenberg S, Strathdee S, Perez-Rosales M, Sued O. Mobility and HIV in Central America and Mexico: A critical review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2012; 14(1):48–64. [PubMed: 21789558] 31. Ramesh S, Ganju D, Mahapatra B, Mishra RM, Saggurti N. Relationship between mobility, violence and HIV/STI among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:764. Epub 2012/09/13. [PubMed: 22967276] 32. Mtetwa S, Busza J, Chidiya S, Mungofa S, Cowan F. You are wasting our drugs: health service barriers to HIV treatment for sex workers in Zimbabwe. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13(1):698. [PubMed: 23898942] 33. Chakrapani V, Newman PA, Shunmugam M, Kurian AK, Dubrow R. Barriers to free antiretroviral treatment access for female sex workers in Chennai, India. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2009; 23(11):973–980. [PubMed: 19821725] 34. STOP HIV/AIDS: Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS. 2014 Jan 12.35. Wood E, Kerr T, Marshall BD, Li K, Zhang R, Hogg RS, Harrigan PR, Montaner JS. Longitudinal community plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations and incidence of HIV-1 among injecting drug users: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009; 338:b1649. [PubMed: 19406887] 36. Strathdee SA, Lozada R, Martinez G, Vera A, Rusch M, Lucie N, et al. Social and Structural Factors Associated with HIV Infection among Female Sex Workers Who Inject Drugs in the Mexico-US Border Region. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4):e19048. [PubMed: 21541349] 37. Goldenberg SM, Chettiar J, Simo A, Silverman JG, Strathdee SA, Montaner J, et al. Early sex work initiation independently elevates odds of HIV infection and police arrest among adult sex workers in a Canadian setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014; 65(1):122–128. [PubMed: 23982660] 38. Amnesty International. No More Stolen Sisters Report. 200939. Bingham B, Leo D, Zhang R, Montaner J, Shannon K. Generational sex work and HIV risk among Indigenous women in a street-based urban Canadian setting. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2014; 16(4):440–452.40. Shannon K, Bright V, Allinott S, Alexson D, Gibson K, Tyndall MW. Community-based HIV prevention among substance-using women in survival sex work: the Maka Project Partnership. Harm Reduction Journal [Internet]. 2008 Jan 15.4(20) Available from: http://harmreductionjournal.com/content/4/1/20. 41. Deering K, Montaner J, Chettiar J, Jia J, Ogilvie G, Buchner C, et al. Successes and gaps in uptake of regular, voluntary HIV testing for hidden street-and off-street sex workers in Vancouver, Canada. AIDS Care. 2014:1–8. ahead-of-print. 42. Deering KN, Lyons T, Feng CX, Nosyk B, Strathdee SA, Montaner JS, et al. Client demands for unsafe sex: the socioeconomic risk environment for HIV among street and off-street sex workers. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013; 63(4):522–531. Epub 2013/04/26. [PubMed: 23614990] 43. Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Shoveller J, Rusch M, Kerr T, Tyndall MW. Structural and environmental barriers to condom use negotiation with clients among female sex workers: implications for HIV-prevention strategies and policy. American Journal of Public Health. 2009; 99(4):659–665. [PubMed: 19197086] 44. Chettiar J, Shannon K, Wood E, Zhang R, Kerr T. Survival sex work involvement among street-involved youth who use drugs in a Canadian setting. Journal of Public Health. 2010; 32(3):322–327. [PubMed: 20061578] 45. Kerr T, Marshall B, Miller C, Shannon K, Zhang R, Montaner J, et al. Injection drug use among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9(1):171. [PubMed: 19493353] Goldenberg et al. Page 12AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript46. Kerr T, Marshall A, Walsh J, Palepu A, Tyndall M, Montaner J, et al. Determinants of HAART discontinuation among injection drug users. AIDS Care. 2005; 17(5):539–549. [PubMed: 16036240] 47. Milloy M, Kerr T, Buxton J, Rhodes T, Guillemi S, Hogg R, et al. Dose-response effect of incarceration events on nonadherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy among injection drug users. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2011; 203(9):1215–1221. [PubMed: 21459814] 48. Hogg RS, Bangsberg DR, Lima VD, Alexander C, Bonner S, Yip B, et al. Emergence of drug resistance is associated with an increased risk of death among patients first starting HAART. PLoS medicine. 2006; 3(9):e356. [PubMed: 16984218] 49. British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS. Therapeutic Guidelines: ANTIRETROVIRAL (ARV) TREATMENT OF ADULT HIV INFECTION. 201350. Hanley JA, Negassa A, Forrester JE. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157(4):364–375. [PubMed: 12578807] 51. Ballinger GA. Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational research methods. 2004; 7(2):127–150.52. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.2 Users Guide: The GENMOD Procedure Cary. NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2008. 53. Pan W. Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics. 2001; 57(1):120–125. [PubMed: 11252586] 54. Jewkes RK, Dunkle K, Nduna M, Shai N. Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: a cohort study. The Lancet. 2010; 376(9734):41–48.55. Andrinopoulos K, Clum G, Murphy DA, Harper G, Perez L, Xu J, et al. HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CORRELATES AMONG HIV-INFECTED ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT WOMEN IN THE US. Aids Educ Prev. 2011; 23(4):367–381. [PubMed: 21966746] 56. Moon T, Burlison J, Blevins M, Shepherd B, Baptista A, Sidat M, et al. Enrolment and programmatic trends and predictors of antiretroviral therapy initiation from president’s emergency plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-supported public HIV care and treatment sites in rural Mozambique. International Journal of STD &AIDS. 2011; 22(11):621–627. [PubMed: 22096045] 57. Charurat M, Oyegunle M, Benjamin R, Habib A, Eze E, Ele P, et al. Patient retention and adherence to antiretrovirals in a large antiretroviral therapy program in Nigeria: a longitudinal analysis for risk factors. PLoS One. 2010; 5(5):e10584. [PubMed: 20485670] 58. Fumaz CR, Munoz-Moreno JA, Molto J, Ferrer MJ, Lopez-Blazquez R, Negredo E, et al. Sustained antiretroviral treatment adherence in survivors of the pre-HAART era: attitudes and beliefs. AIDS Care. 2008; 20(7):796–805. Epub 2008/08/30. [PubMed: 18728987] 59. McClelland RS, Graham SM, Richardson BA, Peshu N, Masese LN, Wanje GH, et al. Treatment with antiretroviral therapy is not associated with increased sexual risk behaviour in Kenyan female sex workers. AIDS (London, England). 2010; 24(6):891.60. Diabate S, Chamberland A, Zannou DM, Geraldo N, Azon-Kouanou A, Massinga-Loembe M, et al. Sexual behaviour after antiretroviral therapy initiation in female sex workers and HIV-positive patients from the general population, Cotonou, Benin. AIDS Care. 2013; 25(11):1426–1432. Epub 2013/02/27. [PubMed: 23438011] 61. Lima V, Fernandes K, Rachlis B, Druyts E, Montaner J, Hogg R. Migration adversely affects antiretroviral adherence in a population-based cohort of HIV/AIDS patients. Social Science & Medicine. 2009; 68(6):1044–1049. [PubMed: 19157668] 62. Krüsi A, Wood E, Montaner J, Kerr T. Social and structural determinants of HAART access and adherence among injection drug users. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2010; 21(1):4–9. [PubMed: 19747811] 63. Milloy M-J, Kerr T, Salters K, Samji H, Guillemi S, Montaner J, et al. Incarceration is associated with used syringe lending among active injection drug users with detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA: a longitudinal analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2013; 13(1):565. [PubMed: 24289651] Goldenberg et al. Page 13AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript64. Reed E, Gupta J, Biradavolu M, Blankenship KM. Migration/mobility and risk factors for HIV among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India: implications for HIV prevention. Int J STD AIDS. 2012; 23(4):e7–e13. Epub 2012/05/15. [PubMed: 22581964] 65. Platt L, Grenfell P, Fletcher A, Sorhaindo A, Jolley E, Rhodes T, et al. Systematic review examining differences in HIV, sexually transmitted infections and health-related harms between migrant and non-migrant female sex workers. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2013; 89(4):311–319. [PubMed: 23112339] 66. Grzywacz JG, Quandt SA, Early J, Tapia J, Graham CN, Arcury TA. Leaving family for work: ambivalence and mental health among Mexican migrant farmworker men. J Immigr Minor Health. 2006; 8(1):85–97. Epub 2006/01/01. [PubMed: 19835002] 67. Weine S, Golobof A, Bahromov M, Kashuba A, Kalandarov T, Jonbekov J, et al. Female Migrant Sex Workers in Moscow: Gender and Power Factors and HIV Risk. Women & Health. 2012; 53(1):56–73. [PubMed: 23421339] 68. Guirgis M, Nusair F, Bu YM, Yan K, Zekry AT. Barriers faced by migrants in accessing healthcare for viral hepatitis infection. Internal Medicine Journal. 2012; 42(5):491–496. [PubMed: 22151101] 69. Zuniga ML, Brennan J, Scolari R, Strathdee SA. Barriers to HIV care in the context of cross-border health care utilization among HIV-positive persons living in the California/Baja California US-Mexico border region. J Immigr Minor Health. 2008; 10(3):219–227. Epub 2007/07/27. [PubMed: 17653865] 70. Rachlis BS, Wood E, Li K, Hogg RS, Kerr T. Drug and HIV-related risk behaviors after geographic migration among a cohort of injection drug users. AIDS and Behavior. 2010; 14(4):854–861. [PubMed: 18427970] 71. Milloy M, Kerr T, Buxton J, Rhodes T, Krusi A, Guillemi S, et al. Social and environmental predictors of plasma HIV RNA rebound among injection drug users treated with antiretroviral therapy. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2012; 59(4):393–399. [PubMed: 22134149] 72. Small W, Wood E, Betteridge G, Montaner J, Kerr T. The impact of incarceration upon adherence to HIV treatment among HIV-positive injection drug users: a qualitative study. AIDS Care. 2009; 21(6):708–714. [PubMed: 19806487] 73. Krüsi A, Pacey K, Bird L, Taylor C, Chettiar J, Allan S, et al. Criminalisation of clients: reproducing vulnerabilities for violence and poor health among street-based sex workers in Canada—a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(6)74. Strathdee SA, Lozada R, Martinez G, Vera A, Rusch M, Nguyen L, et al. Social and Structural Factors Associated with HIV Infection among Female Sex Workers Who Inject Drugs in the Mexico-US Border Region. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4):e19048. [PubMed: 21541349] 75. Lazarus L, Reza-Paul S, Pasha A, Jairam S, Hafeez Ur Rahman S, O’Neil J, et al. Exploring the Role of Community-Based Peer Support in Improving Access to Care and Antiretroviral Treatment for Sex Workers in Mysore, India. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services. 2012; 11(2):152–168.76. Chersich MF, Luchters S, Ntaganira I, Gerbase A, Lo YR, Scorgie F, et al. Priority interventions to reduce HIV transmission in sex work settings in sub-Saharan Africa and delivery of these services. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013; 16(1):17980. Epub 2013/03/07. [PubMed: 23462140] 77. Kerrigan D, Fonner V, Stromdahl S, Kennedy C. Community Empowerment Among Female Sex Workers is an Effective HIV Prevention Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. AIDS and Behavior. 2013; 17(6):1926–1940. [PubMed: 23539185] 78. Blanchard AK, Lakkappa Mohan H, Shahmanesh M, Prakash R, Isac S, Manjappa Ramesh B, et al. Community mobilization, empowerment and HIV prevention among female sex workers in south India. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13(1):1–13. [PubMed: 23280303] 79. World Health Organization. Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection: Recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2013Goldenberg et al. Page 14AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript80. Low-Beer S, Yip B, OShaughnessy MV, Hogg RS, Montaner JS. Adherence to triple therapy and viral load response. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2000; 23(4):360–361. [PubMed: 10836763] 81. Wood E, Montaner JS, Yip B, Tyndall MW, Schechter MT, OShaughnessy MV, et al. Adherence and plasma HIV RNA responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-1 infected injection drug users. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2003; 169(7):656–661. [PubMed: 14517122] 82. Wood E, Hogg RS, Lima VD, Kerr T, Yip B, Marshall BD, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and survival in HIV-infected injection drug users. JAMA. 2008; 300(5):550–554. [PubMed: 18677027] Goldenberg et al. Page 15AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptGoldenberg et al. Page 16Table 1Characteristics of female sex workers living with HIV (n=74) at baseline, stratified by whether experienced gaps in ART use, 2010Gap in ART use, past 6 monthsVariable Yes(N=27)n (%)No(N=47)n (%)Total(N=74)n (%)P-valueIndividual factorsDuration of known HIV positivity, years (median, IQR)* 2.88 (1.05–7.93) 10.60 (3.64–15.10) 7.91 (1.42–12.26) <0.001CD4 count, cells/mm3 (median, IQR)* 520 (315–620) 320 (170–550) 395 (260–580) 0.035Viral load, log10 copies/mL (median IQR)* 4.03 (3.34–4.55) 1.60 (1.54–3.24) 2.79 (1.54–4.28) <0.001Age, years (median, IQR) 31 (28–35) 38 (33–45) 35 (29–43) 0.006Canadian born 26 (96.30%) 46 (97.87%) 72 (97.30%) 1.000Aboriginal ancestry 19 (70.37%) 28 (59.57%) 47 (63.51%) 0.353Diagnosed with a mental health issue** 18 (66.67%) 21 (44.68%) 39 (52.70%) 0.068Interpersonal/behavioral factorsInconsistent condom use (clients)* 4 (14.81%) 8 (17.02%) 12 (16.22%) 1.000Non-injection drug use* 26 (96.30%) 43 (91.49%) 69 (93.24%) 0.647Injection drug use* 20 (74.07%) 31 (65.96%) 51 (68.92%) 0.468Structural exposuresPrimary place of service*   Outdoor/public space (ref) 13 (48.15%) 22 (46.81%) 35 (47.30%)   Informal indoor 12 (44.44%) 21 (44.68%) 33 (44.59%) 0.947   Brothel/quasi-brothel 2 (7.41%) 4 (8.51%) 6 (8.11%) 0.858Homelessness* 8 (29.63%) 16 (34.04%) 24 (32.43%) 0.696Client physical/sexual violence* 3 (11.11%) 7 (14.89%) 10 (13.51%) 0.738Internal migration or mobility* 5 (18.52%) 3 (6.38%) 8 (10.81%) 0.132Incarceration* 6 (22.22%) 5 (10.64%) 11 (14.86%) 0.194*In last 6 months**In lifetimeNOTE: All data refer to n (%) of participants, unless otherwise specified.AIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptGoldenberg et al. Page 17Table 2Factors longitudinally correlated with gaps in ART use among female sex workers living with HIV (n=74) over time, 2010–2012Variable UnadjustedOdds Ratio95%ConfidenceIntervalAdjustedOddsRatio95%ConfidenceIntervalViral load, log10 copies/mL* 2.03 1.62–2.53Age, per year younger 1.08 1.01–1.16 1.09 1.01–1.17Non-injection drug use 4.86 1.16–20.44 5.04 1.31–19.34Injection drug use 1.95 1.01–3.77Primary place of service   Informal indoor (vs. outdoor/public) 1.16 0.64–2.11   Brothel/quasi-brothel (vs. outdoor/public) 0.62 0.10–3.92Homelessness 1.22 0.60–2.49Client-perpetrated physical/sexual violence 1.13 0.57–2.26Internal migration/mobility 5.65 1.61–19.82 5.19 1.38–19.56Incarceration 2.80 1.27–6.18 2.54 1.04–6.20*All variables refer to the last 6 months, except for age, which was treated as a time-fixed covariateNote: Generalized estimating equations (GEE) with an exchangeable correlation structure were used to longitudinally examine correlates of gaps in ART use among sex workers living with HIV. Analyses included data from baseline and follow-up visits, accounting for repeated measures among the same participants. Variables hypothesized a priori to be related to gaps in ART use and which were significant at p < 0.10 in bivariate GEE analyses were considered for inclusion in the multivariate model. A backward model selection process was used to identify the model with the best fit, as indicated by the lowest quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion valueAIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 May 01.


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items