UBC Faculty Research and Publications

Boundary Layer Experiment 1996 (BLX96). Berg, Larry K.; Santoso, Edi; Stull, Roland B.; Hacker, Joshua P. Jun 30, 1997

Your browser doesn't seem to have a PDF viewer, please download the PDF to view this item.

Item Metadata


52383-Stull_AMS_1996_BAMS1149.pdf [ 195.64kB ]
JSON: 52383-1.0041838.json
JSON-LD: 52383-1.0041838-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 52383-1.0041838-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 52383-1.0041838-rdf.json
Turtle: 52383-1.0041838-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 52383-1.0041838-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 52383-1.0041838-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

Boundary Layer Experiment 1996 (BLX96) Roland Stull, Edi Santoso, Larry Berg, and Joshua Hacker Atmospheric Science Programme, Department of Geography, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada  ABSTRACT The University of Wyoming King Air aircraft was the primary instrument platform for turbulence measurements in the bottom half of the convective boundary layer during 15 July–13 August 1996. A total of 12 successful research flights were made, each of about 4.5-h duration. Crosswind (east–west) flight patterns were flown in Oklahoma and Kansas over three sites of different land use: forest, pasture, and crops. Measurements of mean values, turbulent deviations, and turbulent fluxes of temperature, moisture, and momentum were made to test theories of convective transport, the radix layer, and cumulus potential. Additional portions of each flight included slant soundings and near-surface horizontal flights in order to determine mixed layer (ML) scaling variables such as ML depth zi, Deardorff velocity w*, and buoyancy velocity wB. While the ML was shallower and the ground wetter than anticipated based on climatology, a high-quality dataset was obtained.  1. Introduction During 15 July–13 August 1996, The University of British Columbia (UBC) conducted a boundary layer field experiment (BLX96) in Oklahoma and Kansas. BLX96 consisted of three subexperiments within the daytime convective mixed layer (ML):  • Convective transport theory (CTT), • Radix layer (RxL), and • Boundary-layer cumulus (BLCu). The University of Wyoming (UW) King Air aircraft (N2UW) was the primary instrument platform for this experiment, based at Ponca City, Oklahoma (36°44.0′N, 97°06.0′W). BLX96 coincided with a routine U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program intensive operation Corresponding author address: Roland B. Stull, Atmospheric Science Programme, Dept. of Geography, UBC, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada. E-mail: rstull@geog.ubc.ca In final form 12 December 1996. ©1997 American Meteorological Society  Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society  period, conducted from 15 July to 4 August 1996 at the Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) region in the southern Great Plains (SGP). The central facility (36.605°N, 97.485°W, elevation 318 m) of CART is near Lamont, Oklahoma, although the full 143 000-km2 CART region spans parts of Kansas and Oklahoma. Collaborators from Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) brought ground-based remote sensors into the CART region, near the BLX96 flight tracks. a. Convective transport theory During free convective conditions of light winds and statically unstable air, vertical transport is caused primarily by thermals. The convective transport velocity (Stull 1994) wB = (β zi ∆θ v)1/2 is a measure of this transport rate, where β = g/T v is the buoyancy parameter, g is gravitational acceleration, Tv is virtual absolute temperature in the mid-ML, zi is the average ML depth, and ∆θ v is the virtual potential temperature difference between the surface skin and the mid-ML. Surface fluxes under these conditions are expected to be proportional to this buoyancy velocity times the difference in mean condition between the  surface skin and the mid-ML; for example, w′θ ′ s 1149  = bHwB∆θ , where empirical constant bH ≈ 0.0005, and ∆θ = θ skin − θ midML. Convective transport theory (CTT) predicts that surface fluxes should be independent of roughness length for free convection, where free convection occurs approximately when the mixed layer Richardson number, R* = (wB /MML)2, is greater than 3, where MML is mid-ML wind speed. It also suggests a diagnostic way to estimate ML depth from surface fluxes and skin–ML temperature differences. Extensions to this theory allow for nonzero mean wind. To test CTT and its empirical parameters, BLX96 included measurements of eddy-correlation fluxes over three sites with different aerodynamic roughness. A downward-looking infrared (IR) radiation thermometer on the aircraft remotely measured surface skin temperature. The aircraft also made in situ measurements of wind, temperature, and humidity in the mid-ML. b. Radix layer For free convection, the ML can be divided into layers identified by shapes of the mean profiles. Traditionally, the surface layer (SL) is defined as the region where 1) turbulent fluxes are roughly constant with height near the surface, 2) Monin– Obukhov similarity theory applies, 3) wind profiles are nearly logarithmic, and 4) mechanically generated turbulence is important. In the interior of the ML is a uniform layer (UL) where wind speed and potential temperature are approximately constant with height and where buoyantly generated turbulence dominates. However, there is often a large gap between the top of the SL and the bottom of the UL, which is also the region where only a limited amount of field data exists. Within this gap, free convection scaling can apply (Holtslag and Nieuwstadt 1986; Panofsky 1978). A radix layer (RxL) has been identified by Santoso (1993) and Santoso and Stull (1997a, manuscript submitted to J. Atmos. Sci.) as the whole region between the surface and the base of the UL (Fig. 1). The classic SL and classic free convection scaling layer are subsets of the RxL. At the top of the RxL, the wind speed becomes tangent to UL wind speed. Typical RxL depths are on the order of 100–300 m for wind speed and 20–70 m for potential temperature. The Latin name “radix,” meaning root or base, was suggested because the RxL is at the root of thermals. To investigate the RxL, a vertical zig-zag flight pattern was flown to provide vertical profiles of 1150  mean wind, temperature, and humidity between altitudes of about 5 and 700 m above ground level (AGL). This spans the SL, the RxL, and the bottom of the UL. In addition, higher sounding legs were flown to get zi, and near-surface level legs were flown to get eddy-correlation fluxes from which the  Deardorff {w* = [(g/Tv) zi w′θ v ′ s]1/3} and buoyancy  (wB) velocities could be found, where w′θ v ′ s is the vertical eddy flux of virtual potential temperature at the surface. To test dependency of the RxL to surface roughness and land use, three regions of differing land use were chosen for the flight tracks. c. Boundary layer cumulus Heterogeneous land surfaces cause small differences in near-surface air temperature and humidity, which modulate characteristics of rising thermals and control the formation of boundary layer cumulus (BLCu). Air parcels born over a variety of surfaces tend to rise to a range of heights, depending on their buoyancies. Buoyancy can be quantified by the virtual potential temperature ( θv) difference between the parcel and the ambient θv profile. The probability of a parcel to form a cumulus cloud also depends on its individual lifting condensation level (LCL) height (zLCL). The joint frequency distribution (JFD) of θ v versus z LCL can be used as a predictor of BLCu (Schrieber et al. 1996). Such a JFD consists of three sectors (Fig. 2). Parcels that have a θv less than the  FIG. 1. Layers within the convective ML, where M is wind speed and G is geostrophic wind speed.  Vol. 78, No. 6, June 1997  environment comprise sector one; they are not buoyant and will not form BLCu. Sector two includes parcels that have θv greater than the environment; they are buoyant but will stop rising at their height of neutral buoyancy before making BLCu. Buoyant parcels in sector three are moist enough to reach their LCLs before reaching their height of neutral buoyancy and thus will form clouds. By tracking each parcel, one can diagnose the range of cloud-base heights and cloud thickness. The portion of JFD within sector three gives fractional forced and active cloudiness (Stull 1985) associated with rising thermals. BLX96 investigated how the JFD changes with height and land use. To investigate land use effects we flew over three different locations that were predominantly pasture, forest, and cultivated farm fields, respectively. Fast response temperature, humidity, and altitude were measured to calculate the JFDs. These JFDs were measured at five altitudes within the RxL. 2. Site  Major cities include Wichita, Kansas, to the north; Tulsa, Oklahoma, to the east; and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to the south. These cities were distant enough to cause no major alteration of the weather over the field site. The terrain elevation was roughly 300 m above mean sea level (MSL) and generally sloped up toward the west–northwest with a mean gradient of 1/900. b. Land use under each flight track Figure 3 shows the locations of flight tracks in north-central Oklahoma and south-central Kansas. These east–west tracks are crosswind relative to the prevailing southerly winds. Ends of flight tracks are named after nearby villages, and the underlined name is used as a generic site identifier. 1) LAMONT The Lamont flight track is over an area that was predominantly agricultural with a few small towns. Each of the towns covers less than 3 km2. The agricultural land was mainly nonirrigated wheat and pasture. A few of the farm fields were planted with sorghum, alfalfa, and hay. Land use ranged from  a. Overview Relatively flat topography, large areas of uniform land use, frequent fair weather, numerous airports, and existing field instrumentation motivated the selection of the U.S. southern Great Plains for the field site.  FIG. 2. Cumulus cloud triggering as a function of the ambient sounding (heavy line) and the joint frequency distribution (oval indicates JFD envelope) of LCL vs virtual potential temperature.  Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society  FIG. 3. Locations of flight tracks (dark lines) in north-central Oklahoma and south-central Kansas. White box in insert shows site location within North America. Smoothed elevation (thin gray) is contoured every 50 m. 1151  60%–80% wheat fields to 40%–20% pasture–other crops. Roughly 40% of the cultivated fields were recently plowed at the time of the experiment, leaving the reddish-brown soil bare. There were a small number of trees, predominantly along fence rows and drainage areas. Most of the trees were less than 10 m tall. The terrain under the track was rather flat but gently rising to the west, with elevations ranging from 320 to 425 m. The eastern edge of this flight track was 3 km west of the ARM CART “Lamont” Central Facility site. 2) WINFIELD The Winfield flight track was over an area of rangeland and woods. The track passed by several small towns, each less than 3 km 2. There was a large quarry near the middle of the track. Tree coverage ranged from 50% to about 10%, with the east end being more wooded. Pasture coverage ranged from 60% to 30%. Other agricultural uses, such as hay meadows, sorghum, soy beans, alfalfa, and cotton fields covered 0%–30%. Most of the trees, even in the forested areas, were less than 10 m tall. Elevations at the west end of the track were near 400 m, while those at the east were 250 m. Small hills near the center of the flight track ranged from 70 to 100 m above local ground level. 3) MEEKER The Meeker flight track had more small rolling hills than the other tracks. The area was a mix of forest, rangeland, and pasture. This track had the densest forest and more lakes and ponds. Common trees are hackberry, cottonwood, elm, cedar, osage orange, and oak. The track passed close to several small towns, most under 3 km 2. Okemah Lake (about 5 km2) was under the eastern end of the track. Tree coverage was 40%–60%, cropland 10%–30%, and pasture 40%–50%. Trees in the area were generally under 10 m tall. The western end of the flight track had more cultivated fields than did the east end. Crops grown in the area included wheat, sorghum, alfalfa, cotton, and hay. The elevation at the 1152  west end of the Meeker track was about 280 m, while the east end was near 250 m. Hills along the flight track ranged from 40 to 60 m AGL. 3. Measurements and instrumentation a. Measurements and procedures Measured quantities include:  • vertical profiles of mean variables including horizontal wind components, temperature, and humidity from the surface to above the ML top; • ML depth, zi; • near-surface, eddy-correlation fluxes of heat, moisture, and momentum; • upward and downward short and longwave radiation;  FIG. 4. Sketch of typical east–west flight pattern. Solid lines indicate measurement of ML scaling variables, dashed lines indicate radix-layer measurements, long-short dashed lines were to measure boundary-layer cumulus formation factors, and the dotted lines were turns made outside the measurement domain. Letters index key points during the flight. Sketch (b) is a continuation from (a).  Vol. 78, No. 6, June 1997  • • • •  land use imagery; surface radiometric skin temperature statistics; cumulus cloud coverage; and joint frequency distributions of virtual potential temperature and lifting condensation level.  A single flight pattern was designed to satisfy all experimental goals. Each flight of roughly 4.5 h was flown back and forth in a crosswind direction over a single, straight, 72-km horizontal track of relatively uniform land use. Except for coursereversal turns outside the measurement domain, the flight was conducted within a vertical plane, with two exceptions as described below. Figure 4 sketches the standard vertical flight pattern. During the beginning, middle, and end of this pattern, a vertical sounding and a near-surface leg (solid lines) were flown to estimate the ML depth z i , Deardorff velocity w *, and buoyancy velocity wB. These are ML scaling variables used for all experiment goals. During the two intervals between each pair of scaling legs, a vertical zigzag pattern (dashed lines) was flown in the radix layer. The horizontal length of zig-zag needed for reliable RxL statistics was previously determined using a simulated flight pattern with a synthetic dataset, described by Santoso and Stull (1997b, manuscript submitted to Bound.-Layer Meteor.). Also during each of the the same two intervals, horizontal legs (long and short dashes) at two altitudes allowed observation of surface layer plumes merging into convective thermals, a process important to formation of BLCu. These legs were parallel to the near-surface ground track but displaced downwind such that the convective flux footprint for that altitude was centered on the near-surface ground track (Weil and Horst 1992). During the second interval, two more horizontal legs were interlaced between the previous two altitudes. Fair-weather MLs typically have a three-phase growth (Stull 1988): 1) slow growth through the nocturnal stable boundary layer in the early morning, 2) rapid rise through the residual layer in late morning or early afternoon, and 3) deep, nearly steady ML in the afternoon where synoptic-scale subsidence approximately counteracts entrainment. With take-off at noon, our flights occurred during the first half of phase 3, when both the ML depth and the solar heating were relatively constant. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society  b. Instrumentation on King Air The King Air was configured with the standard University of Wyoming turbulence instrumentation package. Table 1 lists the instruments and their characteristics. Known errors are summarized here. Preliminary data analysis indicates an erroneous maximum cutoff of 50°C for the radiometric skin temperature during flights 1 through 4 (see next section for an index of flights). The data tape from flight 2 was unreadable in the field, but data recovery might be possible. The LI-COR fast-response humidity instrument was inoperative for all of flight 3. Infrequent intermittent LI-COR outages occurred during flights 1 and 2. The downward-looking solar radiometer had short cutouts during flights 7 and 8, and was inoperative during all of flight 6. Thanks to the vigilance of the University of Wyoming program managers during their routine postflight data inspection, these problems were caught early and remedied. The bulk of the data looks reasonable in our preliminary analysis. c. Collaborators with surface-based sensors ANL brought a 915-MHz boundary layer wind profiler (detection altitudes of 100 m–4.5 km), radio acoustic sounding system (RASS: 100 m–2 km), and Doppler mini-sodar (10–200 m). It was located at 37.63°N, 96.54°W, 525-m altitude, north of the Winfield flight tracks near the village of Beaumont, Kansas. This site is the first of three remote sensing sites that will compose the permanent ANL boundary layer measurement facility. They plan to compile continuous boundary layer data 24 h every day during many years. Measurements at this Beaumont site began on 18 July 1996. NCAR brought their ARM Multiple Antenna Profiler (MAPR), which is part of their integrated sounding system, including a surface weather station, Cross-Chain Loran Atmospheric Sounding System (CLASS) rawinsonde balloon system, and Vaisala ceilometer. Their 915-MHz MAPR wind profiler with RASS was an experimental device that could use either spaced-antenna windfinding or Doppler beam swinging. The site was located at 37°12.1′N, 96°39.77′W, 405-m altitude, near Dexter, Kansas, very close to the Winfield flight track. Their measurements began at roughly 25 July 1996. As mentioned in the introduction, the ARM CART site was conducting an intensive operation 1153  TABLE 1. List of standard turbulence-package measurements on the University of Wyoming King Air aircraft. Parameter  Instrument  Range  Accuracy  Resolution  Sensor mounted  Air temperature  Rosemount 102  −50° to +50°C  0.5°C  0.006°C  Left wing tip, below  Air temperature  Reverse flow (Minco element)  −50° to +50°C  0.5°C  0.006°C  Right wing tip, below  Air temperature  Friehe  −50° to +50°C  0.5°C  0.006°C  Nose, below  Dewpoint temp.  Cambridge Sys Model 137C3  −50° to +50°C  1.0°C for T > 0°C 2.0°C for T < 0°C  0.006°C  Body near tail, right  Mag. heading  King KPI 553 Sperry C14-43  0°–360°  1°  0.02°  Static pressure  Rosemount 1501  0–108.0 kPa  0.05 kPa  0.0003 kPa  Body near tail, right and left  Static pressure  Rosemount 1201 FA181A  0–103.4 kPa  0.05 kPa  0.006 kPa  Body near tail, right and left  Geometric alt.  Stewart Warner APN159 Radar Alt  0–18 288 m  1%  0.073 m  Pitot-static diff.  Rosemount 1332  0–8.5 kPa  0.02 kPa  0.0005 kPa  Lat/long  Tremble 2000 GPS  ±90° Lat ±180° Long  100 m  (1.72 × 10−4)°  Cockpit, above  Lat/long  Honeywell Laseref SM  ±90° Lat ±180° Long  0.8 mm h−1 drift 1.65 mm h−1 drift  (1.72 × 10−4)°  In middle cabin (doesn’t need outside sensor)  period (IOP) from 15 July to 4 August 1996. In fact, this IOP was the reason for conducting our flights at this site and during these weeks. Their observations include an array of surface weather stations, Bowen ratio flux stations, rawinsonde stations with increased launching frequency, radiometric stations, and numerous remote sensors, including radars, wind profilers, RASS, lidars, atmospheric emitted-radiation interferometer spectrometers, and others (Peppler et al. 1996). 4. Case-study days a. Criteria Optimal conditions consisted of sunny afternoons, with little or no high and midlevel clouds, 1154  Nose  Underneath wing, near body, right and left Nose boom  and neither thunderstorms nor precipitation. Winds of 0–10 m s −1 were acceptable, although light to calm winds were most desired for the CTT goals. We hoped to fly half the flights with no fairweather cumulus clouds, and half with. To forecast BLCu formation and ML growth, a simple one-dimensional ML model based on the thermodynamic method (Stull 1988) was initialized with the early morning rawinsonde sounding from the CART site. With a total of 60 research flight hours allotted to BLX96, we planned for a total of about 13 flights. The goal was four flights at each location, with half of those flights during clear conditions and half during BLCu cloudy. Because the weather was unusually wet during this field campaign, BLCu were present during most of the flights. Vol. 78, No. 6, June 1997  TABLE 1. Continued. Parameter  Instrument  Range  Accuracy  Resolution  Ground velocity  Honeywell Laseref SM  0–2106 m s−1  1 m s−1 after correction  0.0002 m s−1  See above  Vertical velocity  Honeywell Laseref SM  ±166.5 m s−1  1 m s−1 after correction  0.00016 m s−1  See above  Pitch–roll angle  Honeywell Laseref SM  ±90° pitch ±180° roll  0.05°  (1.72 × 10−4)°  See above  True heading  Honeyweel Laseref SM  180°  0.2°  (1.72 × 10−4)°  See above  Differential pressure  Rosemount 858AJ/1332  ±1.5 kPa  0.02 kPa  0.000375 kPa  Nose boom  Pyranometer  Eppley PSP (0.285–2.8µm)  0–1400 W m−2  5 W m−2  0.08 W m−2  Middle body, top and bottom  Pyrgeometer  Eppley PIR (3.5–50µm)  0–700 W m−2  15 W m−2  0.04 W m−2  Middle body, top and bottom  Radiation Pyrometer  Heimann KT-19.85 (9.6–11.5 µm)  −50–400°C  0.5°C  0.10° for 10 s  Near tail, bottom  H 2O concentration  LI-COR LI 6262  0–7.5 kPa  1%  0.01 kPa  Surface and cloud visual  video camera  —  —  —  b. Flights Table 2 shows the research flights during BLX96. The 11th flight on 4 August included only the first half of the pattern (e.g., Fig. 4a, plus a last surface leg and sounding) but was otherwise successful. The 12th flight on 9 August and the 14th flight on 14 August were aborted after the first sounding and near-surface leg due to increasing cloud cover and are considered unsuccessful flights. This leaves 12 successful flights. 5. Weather a. Synoptic and climatic overview Table 3 shows climatological conditions in the region of northern Oklahoma, southern Kansas, and northeastern Texas. The region was hot during July and August, with high temperatures frequently near Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society  Sensor mounted  Pipe at top, middle body Cockpit (forward), below left engine (downward)  40°C. The lee trough on the east side of the Rocky Mountains manifested itself as a dryline from northern Texas through Kansas (Fig. 5a). Typical east–west diurnal oscillation of the dry line spanned the length of the Oklahoma panhandle. The diurnal oscillation was also apparent in the east–west pressure gradient, which strengthened daily and weakened nightly. Thunderstorms commonly occurred near the dryline, but most of the time they were far enough west to remain inconsequential to our study. Cirrus and altocumulus from thunderstorm outflow were often observed to drift over the study area at night. With the dryline separating air masses, low-level advection of warm, humid air from the gulf of Mexico was unimpeded. Upper-level geopotential fields were relatively flat this time of year, making upper-level winds weak. Winds above 70 kPa gen1155  TABLE 3. Climatological conditions for the BLX96 region.  TABLE 2. Record of flights during BLX96.  Location  Date 1996  Lamont  21 July  BLCu  Clear  Flight index  Condition  July  August  26.0–28.4  25.1–27.6  Fraction of possible sunshine (%)  73–79  72–79  Number of clear sky days month−1  12.0–14.4  13.0–14.9  Mean wind speeds (m s−1)  4.0–5.8  3.9–5.6  Prevailing wind direction  South  South  6.9–9.2  6.1–7.6  1–2  1–2  Hours Average temperature (°C)  X  3  4.5  23 July  X  5  4.4  27 July  X  7  4.4  4 Aug  X  11*  3.1  13 Aug  X  13  4.6  1  4.4  4  4.5  Precipitation (cm) Winfield  15 July  X  Tornadoes 22 July  Meeker  X  25 July  X  6  4.5  31 July  X  9  4.5  9 Aug  X  12**  0.8  16 July  X  2  4.7  28 July  X  8  4.8  10  4.9  14**  2.1  2 Aug 14 Aug  X X  *First half of flight pattern only. **Flight aborted early due to bad weather.  erally flowed from the west or northwest, and the jet stream remained at higher latitudes. b. Synoptic evolution Approximately biweekly, a frontal system disrupted the lee trough and the oscillation of the dry line. By the time the front reached south of the field site, much of its energy was spent, causing it to move slowly through the study area (Fig. 5b). Such was the case during the first week, when the front displayed a north–south diurnal variation, moving farther south during night hours. A weak temperature gradient coupled with a significant dewpoint gradient characterized this front, with dewpoints around 23°C south of the front and 19°C north. At the end of the third week and into the fourth, a front characterized by a stronger temperature gradient and weaker dewpoint gradient was present near 1156  the site that displayed similar behavior. High temperatures were near 38°C south and 29°C north of the front. Although wind shifts were apparent near the fronts, the low-level winds were generally from the south, both south of the front and farther than 100 km north of the front. This occurred because the fronts were weak. As the fronts slowly moved south, dewpoint temperatures in the study area normally dropped for 1 or 2 days. Subsidence contributed to a decrease in the depth of the boundary layer and lapse rates in the early morning lower troposphere were close to moist adiabatic. The stable, drier air and the thinner boundary layer combined to produce mostly clear conditions and virtually no chance of thunderstorms. Though slightly drier, occasionally the post-frontal air was cool enough to form radiation fog over night. Whenever the front was completely out of the region, the flow at lower levels strengthened from the south as the lee trough and dryline reestablished. This brought lapse rates closer to dry adiabatic. The moisture returned and the boundary layer was often deeper, increasing the occurrence of observed cumulus and the chance for thunderstorms. During the last 2 weeks of the experiment, a deep longwave trough over the eastern half of North America dominated the weather. As shortwaves propagated rapidly along the trough, thunderstorm conditions were optimal. Consequently, the weather was unseasonably poor, as a series of surface fronts passed through the study area with variable speeds and strengths. They displayed simiVol. 78, No. 6, June 1997  lar characteristics as those discussed, including stagnation periods near the study area. Conditions were favorable for flights on those days when a frontal system was not directly over the experiment site. To choose the particular flight location each day, we considered the chance of thunderstorms, morning cloudiness from thunderstorm outflow, fog, and the development of BLCu. We needed morning sunshine to promote boundarylayer development as early as possible in the day and no precipitation or thick mid- and high-level clouds. Since we did not fly close to passing fronts, winds were usually from the south. Table 4 summarizes the weather conditions for those days that the aircraft flew. 6. Discussion and conclusions A total of 53.3 of the 60 allotted research flight hours were flown during the 12 successful flights. Two other flights (numbers 12 and 14) were aborted, consuming a total of 2.9 flight hours. The last flight (number 14, not listed in some of the previous tables) was unsuccessful, because deteriorating weather prompted us to change locations and then terminate the flight early. Because of a stalled front that vacillated through the field site, the ML was generally shallower, and the ground moister and cooler, than would have been climatologically expected. The infrequency of anticyclones over the site also reduced the number of flight days experiencing light winds and clear skies. These conditions affect all three goals. The CTT analysis will be refocused on combined thermal and mechanical turbulence generation. The RxL analysis will be extended from pure free convection to cases of combined (free plus forced) convection. The BLCu study will add cloud shading–induced heterogeneity to factors that affect the JFD. Detailed data analysis is just beginning. Available now is a technical report (Berg et al. 1997) containing the airborne scientist flight logs. A table of key ML scales, mean meteorological values, and fluxes will be produced in about a year. The raw data is available to outside investigators now, and the calibrated and documented digital data will be made available as soon as it is produced. Acknowledgments. BLX96 was sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant ATM-9411467. We appreci-  Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society  ate the willingness of Greg Tripoli at the University of Wisconsin to serve as U.S. liaison and co-primary investigator for this project. The experiment would have been impossible without outstanding support from the University of Wyoming (UW) King Air facility, also sponsored by the NSF. We thank pilots Ernie Gasaway and Mark Hoshor, program managers Glenn Gordon and Larry Oolman, and the aircraft support crew Larry Irving and Ken Endsley. Preliminary research, funded by the Department of Energy (DOE) Grant DE-FG02-92ER61361, led to the definition of goals for the experiment. The continued close cooperation with the ARM Program, also sponsored by the DOE, was greatly appreciated. We give special thanks to ARM researchers and site managers, including Richard Cederwall, Doug Sisterson, and Jim Teske. Richard Coulter, Tim Martin, Donna Holdridge, and Jerry Klazura of Argonne National Laboratory contributed data from the wind profiler–RASS–sodar site near Beaumont, Kansas. Coulter also coordinated ARM CART 915-MHz wind profiler–RASS measurements near Lamont, Oklahoma. Steve Cohn and Dave Parsons of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, who collaborated with a 915-MHz multiple antenna wind profiler near Dexter, Kansas, were funded by DOE via ARM Grant DE-AI05-90ER61070. Lawrence Fleck of the Oklahoma State University Extension Center helped identify vegetation and crops from the aerial photographs. We also thank Rich Clark of Millersville University, Pennsylvania, who shared the aircraft to conduct his experiments on the  FIG. 5. Sketch of typical synoptic situation, showing idealized isobars (solid lines), fronts and drylines (thick lines), pressure centers, and experiment domain (shaded). (a) Climatologically expected and (b) typically observed during July 1996. 1157  TABLE 4. Daily weather (wx) conditions during flight days. Date  Wind (Speed, dir.)  Clouds  15 July  2.5–5 m s−1, 180°–210°  25% BLCu  Frontal passage 13 July, little pressure gradient  16 July  5 m s−1, 160°–180°  25% BLCu  High to SE blocking approaching low  21 July  Variable southerly  Clear  High to SE prevented widespread CB  22 July  2.5 m s−1, 180°–200°  Clear  MCC in Nebraska with approaching front  23 July  Variable southerly  25% BLCu  CB in north-central OK previous night with frontal passage  25 July  Variable northerly  25% BLCu  CB rained heavily on 24 July, small low-level ridge in region allowed fair wx  27 July  Variable northerly  15% BLCu  CB rained heavily on 26 July, small low-level ridge in region allowed fair wx  28 July  Variable southwesterly  20% BLCu  Midlevel ridge gave fair wx over much of the region  31 July  Variable southeasterly  5% BLCu; 10%–20% Ci  2 Aug  Variable southeasterly  Clear  Front to the south washed out. Mid- and upper-level ridging kept disturbances to the north  4 Aug  7.5–10 m s−1, 160°–180°  Clear  Strong low-level pressure gradient developed strong winds but kept it clear  9 Aug  Variable easterly  Patchy Cc  Flight aborted due to cloud cover  13 Aug  Variable  Cloudless and hazy  Ridging at all levels, subsidence kept skies clear; very moist BL contributed to haze  14 Aug  Variable southerly  > 25% BLCu  nocturnal jet. Our cordial interaction with him made administration of the experiment a pleasure.  References Berg, L. K., R. B. Stull, E. Santoso, and J. P. Hacker, 1997: Boundary Layer Experiment–1996 (BLX96) airborne scientist flight log. Boundary Layer Research Team Tech. Note BLRT-97-1, 116 pp. [Available from Roland B. Stull, Atmospheric Science Programme, Dept. of Geography, UBC, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada.] Holtslag, A. A. M., and F. T. M. Nieuwstadt, 1986: Scaling the atmospheric boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 36, 201–209. Panofsky, H. A., 1978: Matching in the convective planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 272–276. Peppler, R. A., P. J. Lamb, and D. L. Sisterson, 1996: Site scientific mission plan for the southern Great Plains CART site, January–June 1996. Tech. Memo. ARM-96-001, 86 pp. [Available 1158  Comments  Thunderstorms along approaching front kept to the north during the day  Flight aborted due to cloud cover  from Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831.] Santoso, E., 1993: A wind-profile relationship for the unstable surface-layer mixed-layer system. M. S. thesis, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences, University of Wisconsin, 59 pp. Schrieber, K., R. Stull, and Q. Zhang, 1996: Distributions of surface-layer buoyancy versus lifting condensation level over a heterogeneous land surface. J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1086–1107. Stull, R. B., 1985: A fairweather cumulus cloud classification scheme for mixed-layer studies. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 24, 49–56. ——, 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer, 666 pp. ——, 1994: A convective transport theory for surface fluxes. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 3–22. Weil, J. C., and T. W. Horst, 1992: Footprint estimates for atmospheric flux measurements in the convective boundary layer. Precipitation Scavenging and Atmosphere–Surface Exchange, Vol. 2, S. E. Schwartz and W. G. N. Slinn, Eds., Hemispheric Publishing, 717–728.  Vol. 78, No. 6, June 1997  


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items