UBC Faculty Research and Publications

Ultra-wide-band coplanar waveguide based impedance transformer using slow-wave electrodes. Yao, Xia; Jaeger, Nicolas A. F. 2011

You don't seem to have a PDF reader installed, try download the pdf

Item Metadata


Jaeger_SPIE_8007_80070G.pdf [ 303.42kB ]
JSON: 1.0107562.json
JSON-LD: 1.0107562+ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 1.0107562.xml
RDF/JSON: 1.0107562+rdf.json
Turtle: 1.0107562+rdf-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 1.0107562+rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 1.0107562 +original-record.json
Full Text

Full Text

  Ultra Wideband Coplanar Waveguide Based Impedance Transformer using Slow-wave Electrodes    Xia Yao1 and Nicolas A. F. Jaeger  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia 2332 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4   ABSTRACT  This paper presents a new type of broadband impedance transformer loaded with capacitive fins (ITF) suitable for use in the frequency range 10 GHz to 70 GHz.  Compared with conventional, unloaded, tapered impedance transformers, these ITF structures extend the impedance matching range and the operating bandwidth for the same amount of on-chip real- estate.  We have designed ITFs capable of impedance matching resistive loads from ~ 10 Ω to ~ 229 Ω, on a 650 μm thick GaAs substrate over about a 60 GHz bandwidth.  Design examples are used to demonstrate the flexibility of these ITF structures.  Broadband impedance transformer, slow-wave electrode theory, capacitive loading fins, coplanar waveguide.    1. Introduction  The growing demand for channel transmission capacity in the telecommunications industry has lead to a perpetual interest in developing millimeter wave electronic devices.  Impedance transformers are important components at millimeter wave frequencies and are typically used to reduce reflections between mismatched loads.  This allows cleaner signal transfer and higher bit rates.  In recent years, attractive impedance transformers based on microstrip and coupled transmission lines have been demonstrated1-3.  These proposed impedance transformers would operate below 20 GHz and are several centimeters long.  Also, miniaturized impedance matching circuits utilizing meandered coplanar waveguide (CPW) were demonstrated4,5 for MMIC wireless RF front-end applications.  In these structures, the λ/4 CPW transmission lines are folded together to achieve size reduction.  However, the impedance matching range of these devices was not explored.  In this paper, a new type of impedance transformer loaded with capacitive fins (ITF) is proposed.  Our ITF is based on tapered CPW impedance transformers (IT).  Traditionally, there are many types of tapered microwave ITs, namely the triangularly tapered transformer, the exponentially tapered transformer, and the Klopfenstein tapered transformer6.  Of these, the exponentially tapered transformer (ETT) offers low reflection coefficient, wide operating bandwidth, and ease of design.  Though other substrate thicknesses are possible, our ITFs are designed on a 650 μm, conductor-backed GaAs substrate.  The impedance values along the length of the ITF structures are matched to those of ETT.  Capacitive loading fins are added to the center and ground electrodes to raise the effective microwave index which, in turn, increases the operating bandwidth and impedance matching range of the impedance transformer.  We have used the high frequency EM analysis program SONNET® V.12 to design and analyze the ITF structures.  In addition to the theory of operation, several design examples will be presented in this paper.                                                  1 X. Yao is currently at Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom SW7 2AZ; email: terry_jaxa@hotmail.com  Photonics North 2011, edited by Raman Kashyap, Michel Têtu, Rafael N. Kleiman, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8007, 80070G · © 2011 SPIE · CCC code: 0277-786X/11/$18 · doi: 10.1117/12.905674 Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8007  80070G-1 Downloaded from SPIE Digital Library on 22 Nov 2011 to Terms of Use:  http://spiedl.org/terms   2. Tapered CPW Impedance Transformer  The CPW must be carefully designed to eliminate any undesired propagation modes.  For the frequencies and dimensions considered here, there are, typically, four possible propagation modes for a CPW line, namely the slotline, the microstrip, the coplanar, and the surface wave parallel plate modes7.  In our designs/simulations, the slotline mode is not present.  Also, given that H is 650 μm, we chose values of W and G so as to suppress the surface wave parallel plate mode, see Figure 1.  Additionally, Wg is the same for both outer, ground electrodes and is chosen to be 200 μm.  This ensures that the potential on the ground conductor approaches zero when the center conductor is excited7.  As a result, our CPW guides only a single coplanar mode.  Once the dimensions W, G, and Wg are decided upon, impedance matching can be achieved by tapering the center electrode6.  ETTs exhibit high pass characteristics, where S21 first rises with respect to frequency, reaches a maximum at the cutoff frequency and then tapers off as the frequency further increases subject to microwave loss.  In impedance transformers the term “cutoff frequency” is used for the frequency at which the first null of the reflection coefficient occurs6 which is different from how the term “cut-off frequency” is often used to mean the 3 dB frequency.  Using this definition, the cutoff frequency, fcutoff, of ETT can be expressed as6  2cutoff eff c f Ln =  where c is the speed of light, L is the length of the IT, and neff is the effective microwave index.  In order to achieve a wider operating bandwidth, the designer can increase neff and/or L.  neff is fixed at ~ 2.6 for standard CPW on GaAs substrates so only L can be changed.  Given a minimum feature size of 1 μm, we have designed ETTs with impedance matching ranges from ~ 24 Ω to ~ 229 Ω.  In what follows, we show that we can use interdigitated capacitive loading fins in CPW to significantly increase neff and, thereby, reduce the length of the impedance transformer, lower the minimum impedance that can be matched, and significantly lower the cutoff frequency (in fact, cutoff frequencies below 10 GHz are possible in impedance transformers that are only 2 mm long).   3. Slow-wave Impedance Transformer  We have developed a new type of IT loaded with fins, ITF.  The concept of this new type of IT has its roots in slow- wave electrode theory8 where capacitive elements in the form of fins are added to coplanar strips.  The addition of the capacitive elements to the coplanar electrodes significantly increases the capacitance per-unit-length while having negligible effect on the inductance of the line.  As a result, increasing the capacitance of the CPW line not only lowers the characteristic impedance but also increases the effective microwave index, neff, i.e., adding extra capacitance decreases the propagation speed of the microwave.  Therefore, instead of gradually tapering the center electrode to change the line impedance, one can gradually increase or decrease the fin capacitance to achieve the tapering effect.               Figure 1. CPW layout cross-sectional view. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8007  80070G-2 Downloaded from SPIE Digital Library on 22 Nov 2011 to Terms of Use:  http://spiedl.org/terms                 Figure 2. Typical ITF structure layout.   Geometry-wise, the ITF has a uniform width center electrode, which translates to low electrode loss, with fins gradually growing longer on both the center and the ground conductors along the length of the ITF.  The low impedance end of the ITF has longer fins as compared to the high impedance end, see Figure 2.  The impedance value represented by a section of CPW loaded with interdigitated capacitive fins can be determined using SONNET® V.12 (this program can be used to compute the impedance of the line and neff 9).  Once a table of impedance values corresponding to different fin geometries is obtained, ITF can be designed by matching the impedance values along the length of the ETT to particular fin geometries.  As expected, the effective microwave indices are higher at the low impedance end of the ITFs, where the capacitive loading of the fins is greatest.  By employing the capacitive loading fins, neff rises above 2.6.  When ETT and ITF have the same cutoff frequency, the electrode length of the ITF is always shorter due to the increased values of neff that are used.  To demonstrate this, in Figure 3 the device characteristics of an ITF (ITF1) are compared with those of an exponentially tapered impedance transformer (ETT1).  Both devices match 24 Ω to 57 Ω and W+2G = 170 μm.  ITF1 employs 4 μm wide fins and is 2 mm long.  In contrast, ETT1 does not utilize any capacitive loading fins and is 2.75 mm long.  To simulate electrode loss for both devices, the metal layer is chosen to be 0.5 μm thick gold.  As shown in Figure 3, the cutoff frequencies of ITF1 and ETT1 are both 18.5 GHz.  The S21 level of ITF1 shows a similar level of performance as that of ETT1.  However, ETT1 is 37.5% longer than ITF1.  By using ITF, one can achieve the same device performance with shorter electrode length, saving on-chip real-estate.  When narrower fins are used, even greater real-estate savings can be achieved.  However, as the fins become longer and narrower, current crowding in the fins induces severe electrode loss above 40 GHz.  This limits the upper 3 dB frequency of the ITF.  In order to reduce electrode loss, one can use a combination of tapered center electrode and fin sections to design the impedance transformer, as explained in the following section.   4. Impedance Matching Range of ITF  Given the same minimum feature size of 1 μm for fabrication, ITF can match impedances to lower values than ETT can.  This is due to the excess amount of capacitance introduced by the interdigitated fins.  In our simulations, we analyze ITFs with two different values of W+2G, namely 170 μm and 260 μm and call these Type A and Type B devices, respectively (note: Wg = 200 μm for both types).  Table 1 summaries the impedance matching ranges of ITF and of tapered CPW without fins. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8007  80070G-3 Downloaded from SPIE Digital Library on 22 Nov 2011 to Terms of Use:  http://spiedl.org/terms                            Figure 3. Device characteristics of ITF1 and ETT1.   Electrode Type Fin Width Impedance Range (Ω) neff Type A: W+2G = 170 μm W = 60 μm G = 55 μm 1 μm 12.5 ~ 57.8 2.65 ~ 11.1 2 μm 17.2 ~ 57.8 2.65 ~ 8.42 4 μm 22.5 ~ 57.8 2.65 ~ 6.58 Tapered CPW (no fins) 23.9 ~ 193.8 2.65 Type B: W+2G = 260 μm W = 60 μm G = 100 μm 1 μm 10.1 ~ 68.5 2.65 ~ 15.3 2 μm 14.1 ~ 68.5 2.65 ~ 11.6 4 μm 19.0 ~ 68.5 2.65 ~ 8.91 Tapered CPW (no fins) 24.5 ~ 229.1 2.65  Table 1. Impedance matching ranges of the impedance transformers for various fins widths.   The dimensions of W and G for each type of structure are listed in the first column of Table 1.  In our ITF simulations, W for the fin sections is set to 60 μm to minimize center electrode loss at high frequencies.  G is chosen so that the fins have 54 μm and 99 μm space to grow in Type A and Type B devices, respectively.  The impedance matching ranges of various widths of fins are shown in the third column.  For example, in Type A devices, 1 μm wide fins cover the impedance matching range from 12.6 ~ 57.8 Ω when the length of the fins varies from 0 μm to 54 μm.  The Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8007  80070G-4 Downloaded from SPIE Digital Library on 22 Nov 2011 to Terms of Use:  http://spiedl.org/terms  corresponding values of neff are shown in the fourth column.  As shown in Table 1, the impedance matching range of various kinds of fin sections and regular CPW taper overlap, i.e., 30 Ω can be designed by using 1 μm wide fin sections, 2 μm wide fin sections, 4 μm wide fin sections, and tapered CPW without loading fins.  For a given center electrode width, adding capacitive loading fins to the CPW can only reduce the impedance of the line, but not increase it.  Therefore, the highest impedance of the line can only be reached by narrowing the center electrode.  In Type A structures, a conventional CPW taper is able to cover an impedance matching range from ~ 23.9 Ω to ~ 193.8 Ω.  By introducing tightly packed fins, the designer can extend the lower impedance matching range of the CPW taper.  As the fins become longer and narrower, the added capacitance per unit length increases dramatically.  Impedances as low as ~ 12.5 Ω can be reached with 1 μm wide, 54 μm long fins in Type A structures (with narrower and longer fins, lower impedance values can be reached).  This makes matching to low impedance devices possible given the same on- chip real-estate.  Correspondingly, neff reaches 11.1 for this fin geometry.  In Type B structures, a possible impedance matching range from  10.1 Ω to ~ 229.1 Ω can be achieved.  The overall attenuation of the impedance transformer is attributed to the cumulative loss of all ITF sections (here we use the term ITF to describe any impedance transformers employing capacitive fins).  In order to minimize electrode loss due to the fins above 40 GHz, the designer can employ capacitive fins when matching impedance values that are below the lower impedance matching range of the CPW taper, e,g., in the range from ~ 12.5 Ω to ~ 23.9 Ω for Type A structures.  Adopting this approach results in a combined capacitively-loaded/tapered structure such as that depicted in Figure 4.  A 2 mm long capacitively-loaded/tapered ITF structure matching 12.5 Ω to 100.5 Ω (ITF2), in which W+2G = 170 μm, was  studied.  In order to minimize electrode loss at high frequencies, fin sections are only used below 24 Ω.  In particular, 1 μm wide and 2 μm wide fins are used in combination to extend the lower impedance matching range.  The center electrode is tapered to reach 100.5 Ω at the high impedance end of the ITF.  The device characteristics of ITF2 are compared with those of ETT2  (ETT2 is a 2.25 mm long exponentially tapered impedance transformer, matching 24 Ω to 100.5 Ω).  As shown in Figure 5, the cutoff frequency of each device is 21.25 GHz.  The S21 level of ITF2 shows a similar level of performance as that of ETT2.  However, ITF2 is 0.25 mm shorter than ETT2 and is able to match down to 12.5 Ω.  Following this design approach, low-loss, ultra wideband impedance transformers capable of matching impedances from below 10 Ω to over 200 Ω should be realizable.   Low I mpedance                               Hi gh I mpedance          Figure 4. Schematic layout of ITF2. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8007  80070G-5 Downloaded from SPIE Digital Library on 22 Nov 2011 to Terms of Use:  http://spiedl.org/terms                            Figure 5. Device characteristics of ITF2 and ETT2.   5. Conclusions  Impedance transformers loaded with capacitive fins suitable for high frequency ultra wideband impedance matching are presented.  We have demonstrated that ITFs are capable of matching ~10 Ω to ~ 229 Ω on 650 μm thick GaAs substrates up to at least 70 GHz.  Impedance transformers matching even lower impedance values are possible.  The ITF design approach can be applied to other types of impedance transformer, such as triangularly tapered transformers and Klopfenstein tapered transformers, to extend their impedance matching ranges and to save on-chip real-estate.   6. Acknowledgements  The authors would like to thank Sonnet Software, Inc., for making SONNET® available to them at their educational rates.  Also, this work was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada which the authors gratefully acknowledge.   7. References   [1] Jensen, T., Zhurbenko, V., Krozer, V., and Meincke, P.,"Coupled Transmission Lines as Impedance Transformer", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 55(12), (2007). [2] Ang, K. S., Lee, C. H., and Leong, Y. C., "A Broad-Band Quarter-Wavelength Impedance Transformer With Three Reflection Zeros Within Passband", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 52(12), (2004). [3] Nesic, A.; Jovanovic, S., "A new small size wideband impedance transformer", Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, 7th International Conference, (2005) Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8007  80070G-6 Downloaded from SPIE Digital Library on 22 Nov 2011 to Terms of Use:  http://spiedl.org/terms  [4] Kanaya, H., Nakamura, T., Kawakami, K., and Yoshida, K., "Design of Coplanar Waveguide Matching Circuit for RF-CMOS Front-End", Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part 2, Vol. 88, No. 7, 2005. [5] Kanaya, H., Pokharel, R.K., Koga, F., Arima, Z., Kim, S., Yoshida, K., "Design of coplanar waveguide on-chip impedance-matching circuit for wireless receiver front-end", RFICS, (2006). [6] Misra, D. K., [Radio-Frequency and Microwave Communication Circuits: Analysis and Design, 2nd Edition], Chapter 7(2004). [7] Riaziat, M., Majidi-Ahy, R., and Feng, I-J., "Propagation Modes and Dispersion Characteristics of Coplanar Waveguides", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 38(3), (1990). [8] Jaeger, N. A. F., and Lee, Z. K. F., “Slow-wave electrode for use in compound semiconductor electrooptic modulators,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 28, 1778-1784 (1990). [9] Spickermann, R., and Dagli, N., "Experimental Analysis of Millimeter Wave Coplanar Waveguide Slow Wave Structures on GaAs", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 42(10), (1994).  Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8007  80070G-7 Downloaded from SPIE Digital Library on 22 Nov 2011 to Terms of Use:  http://spiedl.org/terms


Citation Scheme:


Usage Statistics

Country Views Downloads
Germany 19 1
United States 9 3
Canada 4 0
Poland 3 0
Sweden 3 0
France 3 0
Denmark 1 0
Algeria 1 0
China 1 20
City Views Downloads
Aachen 16 0
Unknown 13 1
Handen 3 0
Ashburn 3 0
Denver 2 0
Albertslund 1 0
Villa Park 1 0
Ottawa 1 0
Vancouver 1 0
Mountain View 1 3
Baton Rouge 1 0
Beijing 1 0

{[{ mDataHeader[type] }]} {[{ month[type] }]} {[{ tData[type] }]}
Download Stats



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items