International Conference on Gas Hydrates (ICGH) (6th : 2008)


You don't seem to have a PDF reader installed, try download the pdf

Item Metadata


59278-5394.pdf [ 458.09kB ]
JSON: 59278-1.0041051.json
JSON-LD: 59278-1.0041051-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): 59278-1.0041051-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: 59278-1.0041051-rdf.json
Turtle: 59278-1.0041051-turtle.txt
N-Triples: 59278-1.0041051-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: 59278-1.0041051-source.json
Full Text

Full Text

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Gas Hydrates (ICGH 2008), Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA, July 6-10, 2008.  AN ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE INVERSION APPROACH TO DETECT AND CHARACTERIZE GAS HYDRATE ACCUMULATIONS WITH SEISMIC METHODS: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE MALLIK GAS HYDRATE FIELD, NWT, CANADA Gilles Bellefleur Geological Survey of Canada 615 Booth, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0E9 CANADA Michael Riedel, Stephanie Mair Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University 3450 University St. Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2A7 CANADA Tom Brent Geological Survey of Canada 3303-33 Street North West, Calgary, AB, T2L 2A7 CANADA ABSTRACT Two internationally-partnered research well programs, in 1998 and 2002, studied the Mallik gas hydrate accumulation in the Mackenzie Delta, Canada. Gas hydrate bearing intervals were cored, logged and production tested thus establishing Mallik as an excellent site for testing geophysical imaging techniques. Here, we apply a model-based acoustic impedance inversion technique to 3D seismic reflection data acquired over the Mallik area to characterize gas hydrate occurrences and to help define their spatial extent away from well control. Sonic logs in Mallik research wells show that P-wave velocity of sediments increases with hydrate saturation, enough to produce detectable reflections for the lower two of three known gas hydrate zones. The inversion method converts these reflections into acoustic impedances from which velocity and hydrate saturation can be estimated. Acoustic impedance inversion results indicate that the deepest gas hydrate zone covers an area of approximately 900,000 m2. With some assumptions on the lateral continuity of gas hydrate saturation, porosity and thickness measured at the wells, we estimate that this zone contains approximately 771x106 m3 of gas at standard atmospheric pressure. At a regional scale, results allowed the detection of a high-velocity area near the A-06 well, about 6 km south-east of 5L-38. We infer that the high velocity area corresponds to a gas hydrate accumulation. Logging data in A-06 indicate the presence of gas hydrates in this area and support our interpretation. Keywords: gas hydrates, acoustic impedance inversion, seismic, Mallik INTRODUCTION Seismic methods play a significant role in assessing and characterizing in-situ marine and   permafrost-related gas hydrate deposits. Estimated volumes obtained from seismic characterization studies help to provide realistic assessment of the  Corresponding author: Phone: +1 613 996-2400 Fax +1 613 943-9285 E-mail:  potential impacts of gas hydrates on global climate change, as a geohazard or future energy resource. Gas hydrates have distinctive physical properties that allow their detection on seismic records. Poorly consolidated sediments with gas hydrates located in their pore space are stiffer and exhibit higher P-wave velocity that generally increases the acoustic impedance (product of density and velocity). The contrast of acoustic impedance between hydrate-bearing sediments and those without gas hydrates is often sufficient to produce a strong seismic reflection [1; 2]. Reflectivity is even stronger when gas hydrates are in contact with low-velocity sediments with free gas at the base of the stability field. The resulting Bottom Simulating Reflector (BSR) is commonly used to infer their presence in marine environment. Acoustic impedance inversion methods [3] are frequently used to convert seismic reflections occurring at layer boundaries into acoustic impedances associated with the sedimentary units straddling these boundaries. The results can be linked directly to rock-properties measured in well-logs thus providing distribution of acoustically-distinctive units. Previous acoustic impedances obtained from a band-limited inversion of seismic data have shown the applicability of this approach to gas hydrates [4]. A fundamental but yet realistic assumption is that high acoustic impedances are indicative of gas hydrates in poorly consolidated sediments. Here, we present acoustic impedances and velocity estimates obtained with a model-based inversion [3] of 3D seismic data from the Mallik area, Northwest Territories (Figure 1). The model-based inversion provides improved correlation at well locations and defines more accurately the resource in place. Inversion results are also used at a regional scale to help identify areas of high acoustic impedance that may indicate the presence of hydrate. We identified one of these probable hydrate areas near the A-06 well site. GEOLOGICAL SETTING The 3D seismic data used in this study is located in the western part of Richards Island in the Mackenzie River Delta on the coast of the Beaufort Sea (Figure 1). The area straddles two physiographic regions identified by Rampton [5], the Big Lake Delta Plain to the west which is influenced by active Mackenzie River deltaic  Figure 1. Location of the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik gas hydrate research wells in the Mackenzie Delta (modified from Dallimore and Collett, 2005). The red polygon outlines the area covered by the 3D seismic survey used in this study. Small circles indicate well locations and larger circles with ticks show wells that intersected gas hydrate. Contours represent the base of the gas hydrate stability field as determined by Majorowicz and Smith (1999). deposition and older upland terrain referred to as the Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands. Pleistocene sediments consisting mainly of glacial, marine and fluvio-deltaic sediments are exposed at shallow depth beneath the Big Lake Delta plain and outcrop at the surface in the Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands. These deposits are underlain by older deformed deltaic Tertiary strata [6]. Interpretations of geophysical well logs from exploration wells in the area suggest that ice bonded permafrost beneath terrestrial areas is 600 to 650 m deep and that gas hydrates can occur to depths of 1150 m [7]. Two major gas hydrate research well programs have been conducted at the Mallik site [8] which is located at the apex of a regional anticline structure. Core studies and geophysical interpretations document that gas hydrate occurs in coarse-grained sandy sediments of the Mackenzie Bay and Kugmalit Tertiary sequences from 870 to 1100 m depth. The gas hydrate-bearing sediments are interbedded with silty sediments with little or no gas hydrate. The gas hydrate intervals (zone A, B and C on Figure 2) are up to 40 m thick and have high gas hydrate saturation, sometimes exceeding 80% of pore  volume of unconsolidated clastic sediments with average porosities ranging from 25% to 40%. MALLIK SEISMIC DATA We use the upper two seconds of a 3D seismic reflection data set acquired and processed by Veritas DGC Land in 2002. This data set has been made available to the Mallik 5L-38 science program through partnership with the BPChevron/Texaco-Burlington joint venture parties. The area covered by the Mallik 3D includes four gas hydrate targeted wells (2L-38, 3L-38, 4L-38 and 5L-38) and four industry wells drilled by Imperial Oil Limited in the 1970s (L-38, P-59, J37 and A-06). The 3D acquisition geometry was designed to image conventional hydrocarbon accumulations located beneath the gas hydrate zones (deeper than 1100 m). The processing also focussed on the imaging of the conventional gasbearing structures rather than gas hydrates, and so the resulting 3D volumes provide poor images of the permafrost (<600 m) and low common-depthpoint fold in the gas hydrate depth range. Low fold results partly from strong mutes applied to remove surface waves that cover and dominate useful seismic signal. From the differently processed data sets available for the Mallik 3D, we selected one that preserved the relative trueamplitude character of the data. This is particularly critical to obtain meaningful acoustic impedances. Sonic and density logs acquired in 2L-38 and 5L38 were used to assess seismic ties at well locations. Strong correlation at the well is fundamental to the evaluation of the spatial extent of hydrate zones around the Mallik wells from seismic data. Synthetic seismic traces from 5L-38 logs were compared to traces from the 3D data set near the well (Figure 2). A time-to-depth conversion curve was obtained from direct arrival traveltimes measured on a zero-offset VSP acquired in 2L-38 [9]. Synthetic seismic traces for vertical incidence were calculated by convolving the reflection coefficients obtained from the sonic and density logs with a wavelet extracted from the 3D data using a frequency matching approach. The extracted wavelet is zero-phase and has frequencies ranging between 20 and 75 Hz. In general, synthetic traces from the 3D survey show positive amplitude peaks at the top and troughs at the base of gas hydrate zones A, B and  Figure 2. Synthetic modeling at 5L-38 using the 3D wavelet and the Mallik 5L-38 density and Pwave sonic logs. Obvious data spikes were removed manually from the logs. Traces were extracted from an EW-section of the 3D data set through 5L-38. Time/depth conversion curve was derived from first-arrival traveltimes from a zerooffset VSP at 2L-38 (Sakai, 1999). Reflection coefficients (RC) were calculated from the density and P-wave velocity (Vp) logs. C (Figure 2). The synthetic traces also predict a reflection in the middle of zone B corresponding to higher velocities in this interval. The seismic traces extracted from the 3D data set close to 5L38 reveal strong and continuous troughs at the base of horizons B and C (Figure 2). These two reflections represent excellent markers to determine the spatial extent of the gas hydrate zones. These traces also show a second peak within zone B that could correspond to the middle reflection on the synthetic traces; however, correlation with the synthetic traces for that reflection is less convincing. The 3D and synthetic traces do not correlate well in the time range corresponding to zone A, likely due to inadequate imaging of this zone on the real data. ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE INVERSION  Mallik area A model-based inversion [3] was used to extract acoustic impedances from the true-amplitude  seismic data around the Mallik wells. This inversion approach requires an initial model of the acoustic impedance defining low-frequency trends that cannot be recovered by seismic data alone, but that are critical to obtain realistic properties. We tested two starting models based on P-wave and density logging data. The models consist of a lowfrequency (1 Hz) and slightly higher frequency (10 Hz) filtered versions of the logging data in 2L-38 (Figure 3). The 10 Hz model has higher impedances within gas hydrate zones but they do not reach the maximum expected from the logs. The 1 Hz model is primarily a non gas-hydrate starting model with a steady increase of velocity with depth. The two low-frequency acoustic impedance trends were then extended laterally from the well following the seismic trough at the base of the gas hydrate zone C. The inversion is run with a constraint that maintains the final solution within ±25% of the initial model. Figure 3 shows inverted acoustic impedances for both starting models. Due to the inversion constraint, impedances are slightly underestimated within the hydrate interval, especially for the 1 Hz model.  to velocity. Figure 4 shows a comparison of Pwave velocity at the C gas hydrate horizon obtained with the 1 Hz and 10 Hz initial models. Both inversions did not recover exactly the high velocities measured on borehole logging data but they show increasing P-wave velocities over the gas hydrate zones. The constraints used in the inversion explain the overall lower P-wave velocities recovered with the 1 Hz model (Figure 4), as this model does not include effects from the individual gas hydrate layers. The inversion results obtained with the 10 Hz model suggests a laterally extensive gas hydrate distribution around the Mallik wells. An area of approximately 900,000 m2 comprises P-wave velocity higher than 2900 m/s (Figure 4). From this geographic distribution, we estimate a volume of 4.7x106 m3 of gas hydrate or 771x106 m3 of gas at atmospheric pressure conditions for zone C. This is based on a thickness of 25 m, a porosity of 0.35, a gas hydrate saturation of 0.6 (determined from an empirical relationship between Vp and gas hydrate saturation) and an occupancy ratio of 100%. This remains a crude volume estimate as saturation, thickness and porosity values are not uniform over the inverted area. The P-wave velocity obtained with the 1 Hz initial model show a rather patchy distribution (approximately 180,000 m2 with Vp higher than 2900 m/s) and suggest a lower gas hydrate volume. In our opinion, results from the 10 Hz model provide a more realistic volume estimate simply because inverted P-wave velocity near the wells are closer to sonic log values. It is important to note that both inversion results reveal in general similar structures but with different intensity (e.g. Vp scaled differently).  Figure 3. Acoustic impedance inversion results at 2L-38 for the 1Hz and 10 Hz starting models (black line). The blue lines show the measured acoustic impedances whereas the red lines show the inverted acoustic impedances. Numbers in parenthesis are the correlation coefficients between inverted and measured impedances for the 600-875 ms interval.  Looking outside the Mallik area  We extracted P-wave velocities from the impedances assuming no vertical and lateral variability in the density of the sediments. The density is relatively constant throughout the entire gas hydrate range and averages 2100 kg/m3. This value was used to convert the acoustic impedances  The 1 Hz model follows the natural increase of velocity with depth and is not biased by highimpedances corresponding to gas hydrate intervals in 2L-38. This unbiased characteristic makes it a suitable model to search for new hydrate bearing areas outside the Mallik well site. Thus, we have chosen to invert the entire 3D seismic data with the 1 Hz model. Because of the inversion constraints, we expect that the inverted results will underestimate velocity of gas hydrate and provide conservative saturation estimates. Similarly to the Mallik well area, we produced approximate Pwave velocity maps by dividing the inverted impedances with a constant density of 2100 kg/m3.  Figure 5. Time slice at 0.812 s showing the Pwave velocities obtained from acoustic impedance inversion. An area of high velocity is mapped approximately 1750 m NW of well A-06.  Figure 4. Comparison of P-wave velocity at the C gas hydrate horizon (e.g. following this horizon) obtained with the 1 Hz and 10 Hz initial models. Figure 5 shows one of the P-wave velocity maps near the A-06 well site, about 6 km south-east of Mallik. In the northwest part of Figure 5, a highvelocity zone covering an area of ~200,000 m2 with P-wave velocity higher than 2900 m/s is evident. Figure 5 is a time slice at 0.812s, which is close to the expected base of the gas hydrate stability zone. We infer that the high velocity area may indicate a gas hydrate accumulation. Sonic logs from A-06 located approximately 2 km ESE of the high-velocity zone indicate the presence of hydrates in this area and free gas below the base of the stability field (Figure 6). A thin layer of the Lower Richards Formation containing free gas was intersected at a depth of approximately 2.5 km in A-06. Part of this free gas may have been the source of the inferred gas hydrate accumulation near A-06, and migrated along faults to form hydrates in the shallower strata. CONCLUSIONS We applied a model-based acoustic impedance inversion technique to 3D true-amplitude seismic  Figure 6. Sonic logging data from well A-06 showing a potential interval of gas hydrate between 1030-1050 m and a thin free gas layer at 1137 m.  reflection data acquired over the Mallik area to characterize gas hydrate occurrences and to help define their spatial extent away from the wells. Of the two initial models tested, the 10 Hz model provides the most accurate velocity map and volume estimate of gas hydrates near the Mallik wells. The 1 Hz model is more appropriate to search for other gas hydrate accumulation outside the Mallik well area. Results obtained with both models underestimate P-wave velocities, especially the 1 Hz starting model. Acoustic impedance inversion results indicate that the deeper gas hydrate zone (zone C) near 5L-38 covers an area of approximately 900,000 m2. With some assumptions on the lateral continuity of saturation, porosity and thickness measured at the wells, we estimate that this zone contains approximately 771x106 m3 of gas at standard atmospheric pressure. At a regional scale, results allowed the detection of a high-velocity area near the A-06 well. We infer that the high velocity area corresponds to a gas hydrate accumulation. Logging data in A-06 indicate the presence of gas hydrates in this area and support our interpretation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We acknowledge the international partnership that undertook the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program: the Geological Survey of Canada, Japan National Oil Corporation, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, U.S. Geological Survey, India Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, BP / ChevronTexaco / Burlington joint venture parties, U.S. Department of Energy. The first 2 s of the Mallik 3D seismic data has been made available to the Mallik science program through partnership with the BP / ChevronTexaco / Burlington joint venture parties. REFERENCES [1] Cordon, I., J. Dvorkin, and G. Mavko (2006), Seismic reflections of gas hydrate from perturbational forward modeling, Geophysics, 71, F165-F171, doi:10.1190/1.2356909. [2] Jin, Y.K., M.W. Lee, and T.S. Collett (2002), Relationship of gas hydrate concentration to porosity and reflection amplitude in a research well, Mackenzie Delta, Canada, Marine and Petroleum Geology, 19, 407-415. [3] Russell, B., and Hampson, D., 1991, Comparison of poststack seismic inversion  methods, Ann. Mtg. Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 876-878. [4] Bellefleur, G., Riedel, M. and Brent, T., 2006. Seismic Characterization and Continuity Analysis of Gas Hydrate Horizons Near the Mallik Research Wells, Mackenzie Delta, Canada. The Leading Edge, 599-604. [5] Rampton, V.N. 1988. Quaternary geology of the Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands, northwest Territories. Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 423. [6] Dixon, J. 1995. Geological atlas of the Beaufort-Mackenzie area, Geological Survey of Canada. Miscellaneous Report 59, 173 p. [7] Judge, A. S., Pelletier, B. R. and Norquay, I. 1987. Permafrost base and distribution of gas hydrates; in: Marine Sciences Atlas of the Beaufort Sea-Geology and Geophysics (ed B.R. Pelletier), Geological Survey of Canada Miscellaneous Report 40, p. 39. [8] Dallimore, S.R. & Collett, T.S. 2005. Summary and implications of the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program. In Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada, (ed.) S.R. Dallimore and T.S. Collett; Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 585, 36 p. [9] Sakai, A., (1999), Velocity analysis of vertical seismic profile (VSP) survey at JAPEX/JNOC/GSC Mallik 2L-38 gas hydrate research well, and related problems for estimating gas hydrate concentration, in Scientific Results from JAPEX/JNOC/GSC Mallik 2L-38 Gas Hydrate Research Well, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada, edited by S.R. Dallimore, T. Uchida, and T.S. Collett, Bull. Geol. Surv. Can. 544, 323-340.  


Citation Scheme:


Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics



Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            async >
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:


Related Items