Open Collections

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Currently, treatments for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) consist of regular intravitreal injections that exert significant pressure on healthcare systems via their high labor costs and economic burden. To address this, our study’s goal is to propose new treatment protocols by comparing the efficacy of bimonthly fixed dosing aflibercept injections versus the treat-and-extend (T&E) approach for wet AMD. Secondary objectives included categorical best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes, anatomical outcomes, treatment intervals, and adverse events. Methods: This study is a 1-year randomized, open-label, prospective trial that included 44 eyes from 44 patients, 32 in the T&E arm and 12 in the bimonthly arm. Treatment-naïve AMD patients with neovascularization were randomized to a bimonthly fixed dosing group or a T&E group after receiving 3 consecutive monthly aflibercept injections. Following the induction doses, retreatment intervals for patients in the T&E arm were adjusted based on a predetermined algorithm. Results: Over 12 months, mean BCVA improvements were 5.0 letters in the bimonthly group and 4.1 in the T&E group (p = 0.096 for non-inferiority test). On average, T&E patients received 9.6 injections compared to 7.7 for those in the fixed dosing group (p < 0.001). Anatomical outcomes were comparable in both treatment arms. Conclusions: In our trial, the T&E approach provided significant visual improvements, but did not meet the threshold for non-inferiority when compared to fixed bimonthly dosing. It was also unable to minimize treatment burden over the course of the first year of injections. Further research is required to optimize the T&E algorithm with aflibercept.