Open Collections

Abstract

In high-density cities like Hong Kong, green spaces are often characterized by fragmentation and uneven spatial distribution, which negatively impacts their accessibility and equity. To address this issue, studies have proposed the use of informal green spaces (IGSs) as a supplementary component to formal urban green spaces (UGSs). However, the spatial delineation and quantitative analysis of IGSs remain challenging due to the lack of standardized identification and evaluation methods. Building upon the work of urban theorists Henry Lefebvre and Edward Soja, this study explores informal green spaces as third spaces. This study employed remote sensing and GIS technologies to systematically assess the spatial distribution and benefits of IGSs, categorizing them into four types: Urban Interstitial IGSs, Transitional IGSs, Fringe IGSs, and Riparian IGSs. Subsequently, an evaluation framework was constructed across ecological, social, and economic dimensions to quantify the overall value of IGSs. The results reveal that IGS significantly contributes to ecological regulation, social interaction, and economic potential, particularly in urban areas with limited green resources. This demonstrates that IGSs can serve as a vital complement to formal urban green spaces, playing a key role in alleviating green space inequity, enhancing urban livability, and promoting sustainability. Furthermore, this study provides a scientific foundation for precise identification, benefit assessment, and optimized management of IGSs, supporting effective integration and rational utilization in future urban planning.