Open Collections

Abstract

Curved non-motorized treadmills (cNMTs) have been demonstrated to reduce impact accelerations in comparison with motorized treadmills (MTs). Most studies have analyzed impacts in the time domain, but analysis in the frequency domain can provide useful information associated with the increase in the running risk of injury. The purpose of this study was to analyze the frequency components (low- and high-frequency bands) of impact accelerations, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and perceived comfort during a prolonged run on different surfaces: MT, cNMT, and overground (OVG). Twenty-one recreational runners completed three randomized prolonged running tests on cNMT, MT, and OVG for 30 min (80% of the individual maximal aerobic speed). Impact accelerations were registered at minutes 5 and 30 of the test, the countermovement jump test (CMJ) was performed before (PreTest) and after (PostTest) the test, and perceived comfort was determined at the end of each test. A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (significance at p < 0.05) showed a reduction on cNMT in both low- and high-frequency bands of impact accelerations, such as head power (p < 0.001, ESd = 3.0) on the cNMT vs. the MT and tibia peak power (p = 0.001, ESd = 2.2) on the cNMT vs. OVG. However, cNMT was perceived as the least comfortable surface by runners. The prolonged running effect decreased impact accelerations during the treadmill running test (MT and cNMT) in the low-frequency band, while CMJ height decreased (p = 0.024, ESd = 1.4) during the PostTest vs. PreTest with the cNMT. Using a cNMT could be an interesting strategy for load reduction in long-distance runners or in return-to-play rehabilitation protocols.