- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- Enhanced Lung Cancer Survival Prediction Using Semi-Supervised...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
Enhanced Lung Cancer Survival Prediction Using Semi-Supervised Pseudo-Labeling and Learning from Diverse PET/CT Datasets Salmanpour, Mohammad R.; Gorji, Arman; Mousavi, Amin; Fathi Jouzdani, Ali; Sanati, Nima; Maghsudi, Mehdi; Leung, Bonnie; Ho, Cheryl; Yuan, Ren; Rahmim, Arman
Abstract
Objective: This study explores a semi-supervised learning (SSL), pseudo-labeled strategy using diverse datasets such as head and neck cancer (HNCa) to enhance lung cancer (LCa) survival outcome predictions, analyzing handcrafted and deep radiomic features (HRF/DRF) from PET/CT scans with hybrid machine learning systems (HMLSs). Methods: We collected 199 LCa patients with both PET and CT images, obtained from TCIA and our local database, alongside 408 HNCa PET/CT images from TCIA. We extracted 215 HRFs and 1024 DRFs by PySERA and a 3D autoencoder, respectively, within the ViSERA 1.0.0 software, from segmented primary tumors. The supervised strategy (SL) employed an HMLS–PCA connected with six classifiers on both HRFs and DRFs. The SSL strategy expanded the datasets by adding 408 pseudo-labeled HNCa cases (labeled by the Random Forest algorithm) to 199 LCa cases, using the same HMLS techniques. Furthermore, principal component analysis (PCA) linked with four survival prediction algorithms were utilized in the survival hazard ratio analysis. Results: The SSL strategy outperformed the SL method (p << 0.001), achieving an average accuracy of 0.85 ± 0.05 with DRFs from PET and PCA + Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), compared to 0.69 ± 0.06 for the SL strategy using DRFs from CT and PCA + Light Gradient Boosting (LGB). Additionally, PCA linked with Component-wise Gradient Boosting Survival Analysis on both HRFs and DRFs, as extracted from CT, had an average C-index of 0.80, with a log rank p-value << 0.001, confirmed by external testing. Conclusions: Shifting from HRFs and SL to DRFs and SSL strategies, particularly in contexts with limited data points, enabling CT or PET alone, can significantly achieve high predictive performance.
Item Metadata
Title |
Enhanced Lung Cancer Survival Prediction Using Semi-Supervised Pseudo-Labeling and Learning from Diverse PET/CT Datasets
|
Creator | |
Contributor | |
Publisher |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
|
Date Issued |
2025-01-17
|
Description |
Objective: This study explores a semi-supervised learning (SSL), pseudo-labeled
strategy using diverse datasets such as head and neck cancer (HNCa) to enhance lung
cancer (LCa) survival outcome predictions, analyzing handcrafted and deep radiomic
features (HRF/DRF) from PET/CT scans with hybrid machine learning systems (HMLSs).
Methods: We collected 199 LCa patients with both PET and CT images, obtained from TCIA
and our local database, alongside 408 HNCa PET/CT images from TCIA. We extracted
215 HRFs and 1024 DRFs by PySERA and a 3D autoencoder, respectively, within the
ViSERA 1.0.0 software, from segmented primary tumors. The supervised strategy (SL)
employed an HMLS–PCA connected with six classifiers on both HRFs and DRFs. The SSL
strategy expanded the datasets by adding 408 pseudo-labeled HNCa cases (labeled by the
Random Forest algorithm) to 199 LCa cases, using the same HMLS techniques. Furthermore,
principal component analysis (PCA) linked with four survival prediction algorithms were
utilized in the survival hazard ratio analysis. Results: The SSL strategy outperformed the
SL method (p << 0.001), achieving an average accuracy of 0.85 ± 0.05 with DRFs from PET
and PCA + Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), compared to 0.69 ± 0.06 for the SL strategy
using DRFs from CT and PCA + Light Gradient Boosting (LGB). Additionally, PCA linked
with Component-wise Gradient Boosting Survival Analysis on both HRFs and DRFs,
as extracted from CT, had an average C-index of 0.80, with a log rank p-value << 0.001,
confirmed by external testing. Conclusions: Shifting from HRFs and SL to DRFs and SSL strategies, particularly in contexts with limited data points, enabling CT or PET alone, can
significantly achieve high predictive performance.
|
Subject | |
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2025-02-14
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
CC BY 4.0
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0448076
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Citation |
Cancers 17 (2): 285 (2025)
|
Publisher DOI |
10.3390/cancers17020285
|
Peer Review Status |
Reviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty; Researcher; Other
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
CC BY 4.0