- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- BIRS Workshop Lecture Videos /
- Non-adaptive Data Structure Lower Bounds for Predecessor...
Open Collections
BIRS Workshop Lecture Videos
BIRS Workshop Lecture Videos
Non-adaptive Data Structure Lower Bounds for Predecessor Search Brody, Joshua
Description
In this work, we continue the examination of the role non-adaptivity plays in maintaining dynamic data structures, initiated by Brody and Larsen [BL15]}. We consider non-adaptive data structures for predecessor search in the w-bit cell probe model. Predecessor search is one of the most well-studied data structure problems. For this problem, using non-adaptivity comes at a steep price. We provide exponential cell probe complexity separations between (i) adaptive and non-adaptive data structures and (ii) non-adaptive and memoryless data structures for predecessor search. A classic adaptive data structure of van Emde Boas solves dynamic predecessor search in $O(\log \log m)$ probes. For dynamic data structures which make non-adaptive updates, we show the cell probe complexity is $O(min{ (log m)/(log(w/log m)$, $(n log m)/w) })$. We also give a nearly-matching $\Omega( min {(log m)/(log w)$, $(nlog m)/(w log w) })$ lower bound. We also give an $\Omega(m)$ lower bound for memoryless data structures. Our lower bound technique is tailored to non-adaptive (as opposed to memoryless) updates and might be of independent interest. Joint work with Joe Boninger and Owen Kephart.
Item Metadata
Title |
Non-adaptive Data Structure Lower Bounds for Predecessor Search
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
Banff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and Discovery
|
Date Issued |
2017-03-21T11:21
|
Description |
In this work, we continue the examination of the role non-adaptivity plays in maintaining dynamic data structures, initiated by Brody and Larsen [BL15]}. We consider non-adaptive data structures for predecessor search in the w-bit cell probe model. Predecessor search is one of the most well-studied data structure problems. For this problem, using non-adaptivity comes at a steep price. We provide exponential cell probe complexity separations between (i) adaptive and non-adaptive data structures and (ii) non-adaptive and memoryless data structures for predecessor search.
A classic adaptive data structure of van Emde Boas solves dynamic predecessor search in $O(\log \log m)$ probes. For dynamic data structures which make non-adaptive updates, we show the cell probe complexity is $O(min{ (log m)/(log(w/log m)$, $(n log m)/w) })$. We also give a nearly-matching $\Omega( min {(log m)/(log w)$, $(nlog m)/(w log w) })$ lower bound. We also give an $\Omega(m)$ lower bound for memoryless data structures.
Our lower bound technique is tailored to non-adaptive (as opposed to memoryless) updates and might be of independent interest.
Joint work with Joe Boninger and Owen Kephart.
|
Extent |
24 minutes
|
Subject | |
Type | |
File Format |
video/mp4
|
Language |
eng
|
Notes |
Author affiliation: Swarthmore College
|
Series | |
Date Available |
2017-09-18
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0355679
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Peer Review Status |
Unreviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International