1/19 For How Long is it Possible to Quantum Compute? Eduardo Mucciolo (University of Central Florida, USA) Eduardo Novais (University of ABC, Brazil) Harold Baranger (Duke University, USA) QAMF WORKSHOP Vancouver, UBC - July 23-25, 2010 Sunday, July 25, 2010 2/19 Overview ● Motivation and previous work ● Hamiltonian formulation of a fault-tolerant quantum processor ● Results Sunday, July 25, 2010 Motivation: 3/19 Protect Quantum Information from Decoherence Some standard strategies: 1) Decoherence free-subspaces 2) Topological systems 3) Dynamical decoupling likely the most versatile and universal approach 4) Quantum error correction - encode information - measure ancilla qubits - correct for errors Major result: The “threshold theorem” Provided Providedthat thatthe thenoise noiselevel levelisisbelow belowaacertain certaincritical critical value, can bebe protected value,quantum quantuminformation computation can proceedindefinitely “indefinitely” resilient QC (”low-T” regime) noisy QC (”high-T” regime) εc Sunday, July 25, 2010 ε (= single-qubit error probability) 4/19 Possible Pitfalls of the Standard Fault-Tolerant QEC Theory: 1) The theorem is derived using stochastic error models (not Hamiltonians). 2) It implicitly assumes that perturbation theory works and converges. 3) Correlated environments and memory effects are not considered. We avoided some of these problems in our previous work: - Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 040501 (2006); 98, 040501 (2007). - Phys. Rev. A 78, 012314 (2008). - Hamiltonian, microscopic error models. - Probabilistic calculations taking into account correlations. - Description of how correlated environments affect the threshold theorem. Sunday, July 25, 2010 Quick review: Correlated environments and the Threshold Theorem 5/19 Novais, EM, Baranger [PRL 98, 040501 (2007); PRA 78 012314 (2008)] Hamiltonian qubits H = Hcomputer + Hbath + V qubit-bath interaction: V = λα fα (x) σα (x) x,α environmentʼs “free” Hamiltonian (gapless) environmental degrees of freedom Three important parameters (critical environment) • spatial dimension D • bath mode velocity c • dynamical exponent z fα (x1 , t1 ) fα (x2 , t2 ) env ∼O 1 1 , 2δ α |x1 − x2 | |t1 − t2 |2δα /z Main hypothesis only one qubit per hypercube - defines a single-qubit error probability time ∆ space Sunday, July 25, 2010 - maps into an impurity problem for short times. ξ = (c∆)1/z ∆ = period of QEC cycle 6/19 Main result of previous work: Novais, EM, Baranger [PRL 98, 040501 (2007); PRA 78 012314 (2008)] D + z < 2δα the effect of long-range correlations are small; QEC and resilient quantum computing are ok. D + z > 2δα correlations grow unbounded; threshold theorem derivation breaks down. local error probability ( ε ) “temperature” qubits + environment strongly entangled; noisy quantum computer (efficiently simulated by a Turing machine) weak entanglement among qubits "upper critical dimension" "lower critical dimension" not possible to compute ✓ ✓ ? threshold theorem needs ( unkown ) new derivation ? ✓ traditional threshold theorem D+z 2 qubits + environment strongly entangled Sunday, July 25, 2010 qubits + environment weakly entangled; strong entanglement among qubits “correlations” strong δ weak Current Work: 7/19 Novais, EM, Baranger [arXiv: 1004.3247] 1) Change the question: Given a certain desired error tolerance, for long can we compute using QEC? 2) Avoid the hypercube assumption. - standard quantum error correction code (circuit model QC). “friendly” assumptions - state preparation, gates, measurements all done perfectly. - quantum evolution with only non-error syndromes. “unfriendly” assumptions - gapless bath: power-law correlations (non exponential) (phonons, EM fluctuations, etc.) Sunday, July 25, 2010 8/19 Time-Evolution under QEC: start end QEC 0 syndrome extraction QEC QEC QEC QEC Δ 2Δ 3Δ 4Δ s1 s2 s3 s4 (Ν−2)Δ (Ν−1)Δ sN-2 Syndrome history tree non-error syndrome path bosonic Sunday, July 25, 2010 QEC sN-1 t ΝΔ sN 9/19 Taking into account the QEC code structure: Example: 5-qubit code (corrects for one-qubit errors) 1 ¯ |0 = [|00000 + |10010 + |01001 + |10100 + |01010 − |11011 − |00110 − |11000 4 −|11101 − |00011 − |11110 − |01111 − |10001 − |01100 − |10111 + |00101 ] logical qubit 1 ¯ |1 = [|11111 + |01101 + |10110 + |01011 + |10101 − |00100 − |11001 − |00111 4 −|00010 − |11100 − |00001 − |10000 − |01110 − |10011 − |01000 + |11010 ] stabilizers and logical operations g1 = xzzx1 g2 = 1xzzx 45 = 1024 error operators 16 possible syndromes g3 = x1xzz g4 = zx1xz ¯ = xxxxx X Y¯ = yyyyy Z¯ = zzzzz Sunday, July 25, 2010 but only 64 error operators can lead to a non-error syndrome ¯ 1 g1 g2 g3 g4 h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7 h8 h9 h10 h11 ¯ 1 11111 xzzx1 1xzzx x1xzz zx1xz xy1yx 1zyyz yyz1z xxy1y z1zyy yxxy1 1yxxy zyyz1 y1yxx yz1zy zzx1x ¯ X xxxxx 1yy1x x1yy1 1x1yy y1x1y 1zxz1 xyzzy zzyxy 11zxz yxyzz z11zx xz11z yzzyx zxz11 zyxyz yy1x1 Y¯ yyyyy zxxzy yzxxz zyzxx xzyzx z1y1z yx11x 11xyx zz1y1 xyx11 1zz1y y1zz1 x11xy 1y1zz 1xyx1 xxzyz Z¯ zzzzz y11yz zy11y yzy11 1yzy1 yxzxy z1xx1 xx1z1 yyxzx 1z1xx xyyxz zxyyx 1xx1z xzxyy x1z1x 11yzy 10/19 Model for the critical environment: physical qubits HI = λα f α (x) σ α (x) qubit-bath interaction x α={x,z} ∗ e−ik·x aα,k gα,|k| eik·x a†α,k + gα,|k| f α (x) = bosonic bath k=0 ωα,|k| a†α,k aα,k HB = aα,k , a†β,k = δαβ δk,k α={x,z} k=0 form factor: dispersion relation: 2 2sα |gα,|k| | ∼ |k| zα ωα,|k| ∼ |k| spectral function Jα (ω) ∼ 2 λα J(ω) = k bosonic Sunday, July 25, 2010 ω (D+2sα −zα )/zα |gk |2 δ(ω − ωk ) 11/19 Time evolution: First QEC cycle system+bath evolution operator U (∆, 0) = Tt e−i R∆ 0 dt HI (t) =1−i ∆ 0 1 dt HI (t) − 2 ∆ t dt 0 dt HI (t) HI (t ) + . . . 0 lowest order perturbation theory (short times / small coupling) U (∆, 0) ≈ 1 − i λα ∆ f α (x, 0) σxα α=x,z x λα ∆ 1 expansion parameter syndrome extraction and error correction operation: U (∆, 0) −→ vs (∆, 0) evolution operator for logical qubits after a non-error syndrome v¯0 (∆, 0) ≈ ¯1 + i∆3 αβ ηijk λα λ2β f α (xi , 0) f β (xj , 0) f β (xk , 0) σ ¯xα + O(λ5 ) x α,β={x,z} i,j,k numerical coefficients O(λ2) renormalization dropped Sunday, July 25, 2010 12/19 Determining the expansion coefficients: operators leading to a non-error syndrome ¯ 1 g1 g2 g3 g4 h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7 h8 h9 h10 h11 ¯ 1 11111 xzzx1 1xzzx x1xzz zx1xz xy1yx 1zyyz yyz1z xxy1y z1zyy yxxy1 1yxxy zyyz1 y1yxx yz1zy zzx1x ¯ X xxxxx 1yy1x x1yy1 1x1yy y1x1y 1zxz1 xyzzy zzyxy 11zxz yxyzz z11zx xz11z yzzyx zxz11 zyxyz yy1x1 Y¯ yyyyy zxxzy yzxxz zyzxx xzyzx z1y1z yx11x 11xyx zz1y1 xyx11 1zz1y y1zz1 x11xy 1y1zz 1xyx1 xxzyz Z¯ zzzzz y11yz zy11y yzy11 1yzy1 yxzxy z1xx1 xx1z1 yyxzx 1z1xx xyyxz zxyyx 1xx1z xzxyy x1z1x 11yzy Notice: 3 or 5 insertions of the interaction only (one per physical qubit, at most) Sunday, July 25, 2010 xy xy xy xy xy η1524 = η1235 = η2314 = η3425 = η4513 xz xz xz xz xz η1423 = η2534 = η1345 = η2415 = η3512 yz yz yz yz yz η3425 = η1235 = η4513 = η2314 = η1524 (all other coefficients vanish) = 1 = 1 = 1 13/19 Time evolution (Cont.): rearrangement (separating intra versus inter logical qubit correlations) v¯0 (∆, 0) ≈ ¯1 + i∆ (λ∗α + Γα )f β (x, 0) σ ¯xα x α={x,z} αβ ηijk (λβ ∆)2 λ∗α = λα effective coupling constant x β={x,z} i,j,k k=0 |gα,|k| |2 e−ik·(xi −xj ) repeat for subsequent cycles ¯ (N ∆, 0) = v¯0 (N ∆, (N − 1)∆) v¯0 ((N − 1)∆, (N − 2)∆) . . . v¯0 (∆, 0) U quantum evolution of logical qubit after N QEC cycles: ¯ (T = N ∆, 0) ≈ Tt e U i RT 0 dt P P x ∗ α α λ f (x,t) σ ¯ α x α={x,z} Same functional form as for physical (unprotected) qubits! Main effect of QEC: renormalization of coupling constant Sunday, July 25, 2010 Δ 2Δ 3Δ 14/19 Upper bound to computation time - Trace distance as a measure of information degradation D ρR (T ) − ρideal 1 = Tr ρR (T ) − ρideal 2 A = √ A† A - Information lost by a single logical qubit D ρR (T ) − ρideal = |δσ + (T )|2 1 z + [δσ (T )]2 4 δσ α (T ) = σ α (T ) − σ α - Given a certain Dthresh, one can compute the available time Tmax by solving D ρR (Tmax ) − ρideal = Dthresh Sunday, July 25, 2010 15/19 Example: isolated logical qubit, no transversal coupling (λx =0) Long-time behavior controlled by the exponent D(t) 1 ζz ≡ 2(zz − sz ) − D Dthresh ζz> 0 ζz= 0 Dc ζz< 0 bath spatial dimension 0 Tmax ≈ ∆ ∞ exp C Dthresh ω0 λ∗ z 2 zz /ζz 2zz /ζz Dthresh ω 0 ∗ ω ∆ λ 0 z (ζz −2zz ) √ Dthresh 2π k0 L Sunday, July 25, 2010 ζz < 0 λ∗ z∆ ζz = 0 0 < ζz < 2zz ζz > 2zz Tmax “superohmic” “ohmic” “subohmic” t 16/19 Another example: logical qubit array (M qubits, array dimension Dq) ζα ≡ 2(zα − sα ) − D (sparse if intra-logical qubit correlations dominate array) ζα ≡ 2(zα − sα ) − D + Dq if inter-logical qubit correlations dominate (dense Tmax ≈ ∆ × ∞ exp B 1 ω0 ∆ 2π k0 L array) Dthresh M (λ∗ α /ω0 ) Dthresh M (λ∗ α /ω) ζα −zα zα /ζα Dthresh M (λ∗ α ∆) ζα < 0 best case ζα = 0 marginal case 0 < ζα < zα ζα > zα worst case compromise between array size, code effectiveness, and amplitude of coupling to environment M large λ* small Notice: Different layers of concatenation only alter λα* (higher power in the bare λα) Sunday, July 25, 2010 17/19 Case 1: 2D sparse logical qubit array; level-0 concatenation GaAs double-quantum dot charge physical qubits bath: piezoelectric acoustic phonons (3D) sz = 1/2 J(ω) ∼ ω 3 zz = 1 ζz = 0 D=3 marginal case Tmax Dthresh ≈ ∆ exp B M (λ∗z /ω0 ) Case 2: 1D dense logical qubit array; level-0 concatenation superconductor charge qubits bath: electromagnetic (gate voltage) fluctuations (effectively 1D) sz = 1/2 zz = 1 J(ω) ∼ ω D=1 Dq = 1 Sunday, July 25, 2010 ζz = 1 “bad” case Tmax ≈ ω0 Dthresh M (λ∗z /ω0 ) 18/19 Summary ● We developed a Hamiltonian formulation of QEC in the presence of critical environments. Details of error code and concatenation level are incorporated. The non-Markovian dynamics of the bath is taken into account. ● The effective, long-time evolution operator of the logical qubits has the same functional form of the original operator for physical qubits, but with a renormalized coupling constant. ● Given a certain final state tolerance, we developed an estimate of the maximum computational time for a non-error syndrome history; it is straightforward to estimate for other histories (will yield shorter computational times). Sunday, July 25, 2010 19/19 Funding: Resources: - Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 040501 (2006); 98, 040501 (2007). - Phys. Rev. A 78, 012314 (2008). - arXiv:1004.3247 - links to publications in http://www.physics.ucf.edu/~mucciolo/ THANKS! Sunday, July 25, 2010
- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- Workshop on Quantum Algorithms, Computational Models and Foundations of Quantum Mechanics /
- For How Long Is It Possible To Quantum Compute?
Open Collections
Workshop on Quantum Algorithms, Computational Models and Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
For How Long Is It Possible To Quantum Compute? Mucciolo, Eduardo 2010
Page Metadata
Item Metadata
Title | For How Long Is It Possible To Quantum Compute? |
Creator |
Mucciolo, Eduardo |
Date Issued | 2010-07-25 |
Description | One of the key problems in quantum information processing is to understand the physical limits to quantum computation. Several strategies have been proposed to attenuate errors caused by the interaction of the computer with its surrounding environment and quantum error correction (QEC) is likely the most versatile. A large effort has been devoted to proving that resilience can be achieved by concatenating QEC codes in logical structures. In our work we look into this question at a different angle: we provide an upper bound on the time available to computation given a certain computer, a QEC code, and a decohering environment. We consider a broad class of environments, including those where correlation effects can be induced by gapless modes. Our approach is based on a Hamiltonian formulation where we use coarse graining in time to derive an explicit quantum evolution operator for the logical qubits, taking into account the QEC code. We show that this evolution operator has the same form as that for the original physical qubits, except for a reduced coupling to the environment which can be evaluated systematically for a given geometry and QEC code structure. To quantify the effectiveness of QEC, we compute the trace distance between the real and ideal states of a logical qubit after an arbitrary number of QEC cycles. We derive expressions for the long-time trace distance for several for super-ohmic-, ohmic-, and sub-ohmic-like baths. Given a confidence threshold for the trace distance, we establish the maximum time available for computation in those three cases. This maximum time is controlled by an exponent related to the spatial dimensions and other characteristics of the computer and the environment. For the super-ohmic regime, we find that computation can continue indefinitely, while in the other regimes the maximum time depends strongly on the QEC code, on the number of logical qubits, and on the original environment-computer strength interaction. |
Subject |
quantum error correction fault-tolerant quantum computation critical environments |
Type |
Moving Image Other |
Language | eng |
Collection |
Workshop on Quantum Algorithms, Computational Models and Foundations of Quantum Mechanics |
Date Available | 2016-02-01 |
Provider | Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library |
DOI | 10.14288/1.0103169 |
Affiliation |
Non UBC |
Peer Review Status | Reviewed |
Scholarly Level | Faculty |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/30933 |
Aggregated Source Repository | DSpace |
Download
- Media
- [if-you-see-this-DO-NOT-CLICK]
- mucciolo_talk.pdf [ 3.41MB ]
- WS Jul 25 Mucciolo.mp4 [ 102.68MB ]
- [if-you-see-this-DO-NOT-CLICK]
- [if-you-see-this-DO-NOT-CLICK]
- Metadata
- JSON: 1.0103169.json
- JSON-LD: 1.0103169+ld.json
- RDF/XML (Pretty): 1.0103169.xml
- RDF/JSON: 1.0103169+rdf.json
- Turtle: 1.0103169+rdf-turtle.txt
- N-Triples: 1.0103169+rdf-ntriples.txt
- Original Record: 1.0103169 +original-record.json
- Full Text
- 1.0103169.txt
- Citation
- 1.0103169.ris
Full Text
Cite
Citation Scheme:
Usage Statistics
Country | Views | Downloads |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 0 |
Canada | 6 | 0 |
China | 2 | 4 |
France | 1 | 0 |
City | Views | Downloads |
---|---|---|
Ashburn | 4 | 0 |
Unknown | 4 | 0 |
Vancouver | 2 | 0 |
Beijing | 2 | 0 |
Wilmington | 1 | 0 |
Seattle | 1 | 0 |
Ottawa | 1 | 0 |
{[{ mDataHeader[type] }]} | {[{ month[type] }]} | {[{ tData[type] }]} |
Share
Embed
Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML
of your page to embed this item in your website.
<div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
<script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
src="{[{embed.src}]}"
data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
async >
</script>
</div>
Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard.
To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.29986.1-0103169/manifest